HomeMy WebLinkAboutBiomass Feas. Studies Public Fac. Interior Allakaket Village 2014 REF Grant 7060933
Allakaket Village
Biomass Heat Pre -Feasibility Study
Prepared for Interior Regional Housing Authority
April 25, 2014
Prepared by:
Energy Action
Wynne Auld
With Support from:
Alaska Energy Authority
1231 W. Northern Lights #578
Anchorage, AK 99503
www.energyaction.info
Contents
Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................................... 3
Community Contact Information .................................................................................................................. 3
Summary of Findings..................................................................................................................................... 3
Statement of Purpose ................................................................................................................................... 3
Community & Facility Information................................................................................................................ 4
Site Control ................................................................................................................................................... 5
Permitting ..................................................................................................................................................... 5
Alternatives Considered ............................................................................................................................ 6
Heat Load & Biomass Requirements ............................................................................................................ 7
Capital & Operating Costs ............................................................................................................................. 8
Estimate of Probable Cost ......................................................................................................................... 8
Financial Analysis ........................................................................................................................................ 10
Financial Summary .................................................................................................................................. 10
Benefit / Cost Model ............................................................................................................................... 11
Recommended Next Steps .......................................................................................................................... 12
Appendices .................................................................................................................................................. 12
Appendix A – Biomass Technology
Appendix B -- Utility Receipts
Appendix C -- Site Photos
Acknowledgements
Energy Action thanks the following representatives for their assistance with this assessment:
Melanie Wholecheese, Interim Tribal Administrator, Allakaket Village
Gale Bourne, Director of Facilities & Maintenance, Yukon-Koyukuk School District
Dave Bishop, Principal, Allakaket School
Russell Snyder, Grants Coordinator, Interior Regional Housing Authority
Steven J. Stassel, P.E., Gray Stassel Engineering
Community Contact Information
Allakaket Village
PO Box 50, Allakaket, AK 99720
p. (907) 968 2237
f. (907) 968 2233
email: n/a
Yukon-Koyukuk School District
Gale Bourne, Director of Facilities & Maintenance
email: gbourne@yksd.com
Summary of Findings
Community findings
Facility findings
Economic findings
Recommendations
Statement of Purpose
Since 2008, the Alaskan Legislature has supported renewable electric and thermal energy projects
through the Renewable Energy Grant Recommendation Program, administered by the Alaska Energy
Authority. In Round 6 of the Program, the Interior Regional Housing Authority, which seeks
opportunities to promote community self-sufficiency through energy projects, received money to
complete pre-feasibility studies of biomass heat in community buildings in seven villages. The following
pre-feasibility study has been funded through that grant.
Page 3 of 12
Community & Facility Information
Allakaket Village (population 105) is an Alaska Native Village located on the south bank of the Koyukuk
River, southwest of its junction with the Alatna River, approximately 190 air miles northwest of
Fairbanks. Allakaket Village also provides the airport, electric utility, postal services, and school services
to Alatna Village (population 26), which is located directly across the River.
The Yukon-Koyukuk School District (“YKSD”) will construct a new school in Allakaket in 5 – 10 years. This
new school is the project building, as explained below. YKSD is managed by a Superintendent and Board
of Education. The current Director of Facilities & Maintenance is Gale Bourne.
YKSD purchases fuel oil in Allakaket for $5.69 per gallon. Delivery is by plane only.
The current going rate for cordwood is $400 per cord (Allakaket Village Council meeting, personal
conversation, February 5, 2013). The Allakaket Village Council and City of Allakaket offices both contain
wood stoves, which are actively used for heating.
Electricity averages 92 cents per KWH (email correspondence, Gale Bourne, February 11, 2014).
Much of the town, including the existing Allakaket School, is below the 100 year flood mark of 497’, but
new houses are generally constructed on high ground in the New Allakaket Subdivision.
YKSD Facilities & Maintenance Director Gale Bourne indicated that the Allakaket School building is
scheduled to be replaced in 5 – 10 years. Additionally, Mr. Bourne expressed that he is interested in a
biomass energy project that meets the following standards:
• Lower cost per btu than oil
• No increased maintenance costs
• No inherent risk that is out of YKSD’s ability to control
It appears that a heat sales project, owned and operated by a third party, which is separate from the
School’s energy system, may satisfy Mr. Bourne’s interest. However, the interest of a 3rd party to own
and operate such a system remains to be determined, as discussed in the Conclusions section of this
report.
The project building is a future school. This building will have the largest heat load in the community,
and new construction will offer the potential to minimize project costs by through simultaneous
construction of the new school and biomass project.
This biomass pre-feasibility assessment will include integration into a hydronic heat system designed to
use warm water (120° F -- 155° F). The existing Allakaket School uses about 14,500 gallons of fuel oil per
year (email correspondence, Gale Bourne, February 11, 2014).The biomass project will be modeled to
partially offset the fuel oil consumption of a building with a similar heat demand.
Several buildings were considered not suitable for biomass energy assessment, including the Tribal
office, City office, and Washateria. The Tribal office and City office have relatively low fuel oil
consumption (<1,200 gal/ yr), and already have cordwood stoves operating. The Washateria fuel oil
consumption (1,160 gal/ yr) is too low to justify evaluation for biomass heat. The Washateria benefits
from recovered heat from the nearby AP&T power plant.
Page 4 of 12
Site Control
The proposed biomass project is hypothetical, and no project location has been determined. Site control
has not been evaluated for this project.
Permitting
Applicable project permitting is considered below:
• The Alaska Department of Public Safety Division of Fire and Life Safety Firemarshall must
approve the project plans before construction is started. Mechanical and electrical review is
limited to that which is necessary to confirm compliance with fire and life safety requirements.
• Commercial harvests associated with the project may or may not be required to comply with the
Alaska Forest Practices and Resources Act. While most commercial operations are required to
comply, commercial operations of minor or small scale are sometimes exempted. The Act
addresses forest management along water bodies, erosion mitigation, and reforestation.
• The 40CFR63 NESHAP Rule may apply to the project. The Rule does not apply to a hot water
heater, which is defined in Subpart 6J as a boiler with a heat input capacity is less than 1.6
million Btu/hr and that does not generate steam. However, boilers using a combination of water
and glycol should consult the EPA for case by case review of the project.
• If State or Federal money is used to construct the project, the Alaska Department of Natural
Resources Office of History and Archaeology, State Historic Preservation Office should review
project plans to determine whether historic, prehistoric, or archaeological resources are likely to
be affected. The Office also offers suggestions for to mitigate potential effects on resources.
Page 5 of 12
Proposed Biomass System
The new building is likely to have a peak load in excess of 600,000 btu/hr. However, the wood resource
and the expressed concern about maintenance of a biomass system suggest that a relatively small boiler
may be better suited to a biomass project at the Allakaket School. The proposed system is one (1)
180,000 btu cordwood boiler.
The project boiler must be suitable for delivery by plane. Contact was made with several air carriers to
identify suitable aircraft for the project and ensure compatibility with the Allakaket airport runway.
The project was modeled with the following assumptions:
• Current annual consumption of 14,500 gallons of fuel oil per year, 95% of which serves space
heat load, 5% of which serves domestic hot water
• One (1) 180,000 btu cordwood boilers with 980 gallons of storage total, delta T = 80°F
• Maximum 4 firings per day, with additional heat demand served by oil. Each firing requires 20
minutes labor
• Annual inflation
o Biomass O&M and scheduled repairs – 1.5%
o Cordwood – 1%
o Oil O&M and scheduled repairs – 1.5%
o Oil – 1.7%, according to average rate for project in ISER Round 7 model
• Input prices, year 1
o Cordwood -- $400/ cord
o Oil -- $5.69/ gal
o Labor -- $24.25/ hr
Alternatives Considered
There were no alternatives considered for this project.
Page 6 of 12
Heat Load & Biomass Requirements
FUEL ENERGY VALUES
Gross
btu/unit
Net
btu/unit
Net boiler
efficiency $/unit $/mmbtu
(net)
Oil (gal)134,000 111,220 83% $ 5.69 51.16$
Biomass, 20% MC* (cord) 20,000,000 15,400,000 77% $ 400 25.97$
*MC is Moisture Content. Moisture in biomass fuel evaporates and absorbs energy in combustion, thereby
decreasing the net energy value of the fuel.
CURRENT ANNUAL FUEL USE & COST
Facility Fuel Type Ave. Use $ / gal Annual Fuel Cost
School (new)Fuel oil (gal)14,500 5.69$ 82,505$
Total 14,500 82,505$
PROJECTED ANNUAL FUEL USE & COST, BIOMASS PROJECT
Facility Fuel Type Ave. Use
Cost
$ / unit Annual Fuel Cost
School (new)Biomass (cords, 20% MC)51 400$ 20,400$
School (new)Fuel oil supplement (gal)*8,639 5.69$ 49,155$
Total $ 69,555
* Fuel oil offset =40%
OPERATING REQUIREMENTS
Facility Labor / hr
Annual Biomass
O&M Cost
School (new)24.25$ 9,678$ 1,197
Biomass Firings / yr
Page 7 of 12
Capital & Operating Costs
Estimate of Probable Cost
Forced Account Summary
Site & Foundation Work $12,171
Biomass boiler building $50,432
Biomass heat system $62,020
End-user building integration $12,918
Miscellaneous $6,000
Overhead $17,802
Freight $42,807
CONSTRUCTION SUB-TOTAL $204,150
Design & Construction Admin $16,000
Construction Management $18,000
PROJECT SUB-TOTAL $238,150
Contingency @ 20%$47,630
Admin @ 4%$9,526
TOTAL PROJECT COST $295,306
Page 8 of 12
Forced Account Detail
ITEM QUAN UNIT UNIT MATL UNIT LAB LAB LABOR CONTR FREIGHT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL
COST COST HRS HRS RATE COST COST COST COST WT WT(#)
SITE & FOUNDATION WORK
Site prep (layout, excavation, backfill,
compaction, grading)1 lump $5,000 $5,000 0.00 0
Rigid Insulation (2"x24"x96")19 ea.$15.00 $285 0.25 4.75 $95 $451 $736 1.00 19
Concrete footing (8" deep x 12" spread)3.5 cu.yd.$525.00 $1,838 2 7.0 $95 $665 $2,503 125 438
Concrete foundation 5.5 cu.yd.$525.00 $2,888 2 11.0 $95 $1,045 $3,933 125 688
BIOMASS BOILER BUILDING
Sill plate - 2" x 6" x 20" PT 5 ea.$20 $100 0.75 2 $95 $190 $290 51 255
SIP exterior walls -- 4' x 10' pkg R-value
6.5 18 ea.$500 $9,000 8.8 158 $95 $15,048 $24,048 4 72
SIP roof -- 4' x 10' pkg R-value 6.5 11 ea.$500 $5,500 1.2 11 $95 $1,045 $6,545 4 44
SIP fasteners / hardware / framing
anchors 1 lump $400 $400 0 0 $95 $0 $400 500 500
SIP caulk, sealant, expanding foam 1 lump $250 $250 20 20 $95 $1,900 $2,150 150 150
Roof, Metal -- 3' x 10' Delta rib roofing 15 ea.$37 $555 1.0 15 $95 $1,425 $1,980 96 1440
Siding, Metal, plus trim -- 3' x 10' Delta
rib roofing 24 ea.$37 $888 1.0 24 $95 $2,280 $3,168 96 2304
Fasteners 1 lump $250 $250 0 0 $95 $0 $250 100 100
Windows 1 ea.$250 $250 1.5 2 $95 $143 $393 75 75
Man-door w/ hardware 1 lump $275 $275 3.0 3 $95 $285 $560 75 75
Overhead garage door 1 lump $1,000 $1,000 6 6 $95 $570 $1,570 250 250
Drywall -- 4' x 10' 25 ea.$20 $500 0.33 8 $95 $784 $1,284 50 1250
Interior paint -- 5 gal 1 ea.$40 $40 4 4 $95 $380 $420 42 42
Fire protection 1 lump $200 $200 0 0 $100 $25 $225 150 150
Wood storage shed 200 sq ft $12 $2,400 0.25 50 $95 $4,750 $7,150 12 2400
BIOMASS HEAT SYSTEM
Boiler -- GARN 1000 1 ea.$11,000 $11,000 16 16 $95 $1,520 $12,520 2200 2200
Pipe/Valves/Ftgs/Gauges 1 lump $5,000 $5,000 54 54 $100 $5,400 $10,400 800 800
Circ pump 2 ea.$2,000 $4,000 3 6 $100 $600 $4,600 60 120
Plate HXR, ( 300 MBh @ 20F)1 ea.$2,500 $2,500 8 8 $100 $800 $3,300 250 250
Toyostove 1 ea.$2,500 $2,500 4 4 $95 $380 $2,880 250 250
Misc Strut & Pipe Hangers 1 lump $1,000 $1,000 18 18 $95 $1,710 $2,710 500 500
Tank Insulation 1 lump $1,200 $1,200 3 3 $95 $285 $1,485 50 50
Stack -- 6" dia double wall UL listed +
supporting infrastructure 1 lump $2,770 $2,770 4.00 4 $95 $380 $3,150 3.8 4
Ventilation 1 lump $500 $500 5 5 $95 $475 $975 50 50
BTU meter 0 ea.$2,500 $0 18 0 $95 $0 $0 0 0
Electrical 1 lump $10,000 $10,000 100 100 $100 $10,000 $20,000 750 750
INTEGRATION
Insulpex -- 1 1/2" pre insulated PEX 100 lf $55 $5,500 0.08 8 $95 $713 $6,213 35 3500
PEX accessories -- 1 lump $500 $500 4.00 4 $95 $380 $880 200 200
Pipe penetration exclosure 1 lump $1,250 $1,250 5 5 $95 $475 $1,725 200 200
Temp controls 1 lump $750 $750 8 8 $100 $800 $1,550 200 200
Electrical work 1 lump $1,250 $1,250 13 13 $100 $1,300 $2,550 200 200
MISCELLANEOUS
Misc Hardware 1 lump $2,500 $2,500 0 0 $95 $0 $2,500 500 500
Misc Tools & Safety Gear 1 lump $1,500 $1,500 0 0 $95 $0 $1,500 1446 1446
Consumables, Gases, Etc.1 lump $2,000 $2,000 0 0 $95 $0 $2,000 1500 1500
OVERHEAD
ROW Legal Work 0 lump $0 $0 0
Rent Heavy Equip 1 lump $1,500 $1,500 0
Misc Tool Rent 1 lump $1,250 $1,250 0
Commission System & Training 20 hr 1 20 $90 $1,800 $1,800 0
Superintendent Overhd Off-Site 40 hr 1 40 $90 $3,600 $3,600 0
Superintendent Overhd On-Site 40 hr 1 40 $90 $3,600 $3,600 0
Crew Travel Time 10 hr 1 10 $90 $900 $900 0
Crew Airfares 2 trips $350 $700 $700 0
Crew Per Diem 35 mn.dy.$42 $1,452 $1,452 0
Housing Rent 2 mo.$1,500 $3,000 $3,000 0
FREIGHT 22,970
Ground Freight 2,200 lb.$1.24 $2,733
Air Freight 22,970 lb.$1.40 $32,074
Air Freight Tool Mob & Demob 2 lump $2,500 $5,000
Misc Small Freight & Gold Streaks 1 lump $3,000 $3,000
CONSTRUCTION SUB-TOTAL $82,338 692 $66,103 $12,902 $42,807 $204,150
Engineering (Design & CCA)1 lump $16,000
Construction Management 1 lump $18,000
PROJECT SUB-TOTAL $82,338 $66,103 46,902$ $42,807 $238,150
Contingency 20 %$47,630
Admin Fee 4 %$9,526
CONSTRUCTION TOTAL $295,306
Page 9 of 12
Financial Analysis
Financial Summary
The project is considered financially //// at this time, with a Benefit / Cost ratio of ////
• B/C: ///
• Simple Payback Period: ///
• Net present value: ///
Page 10 of 12
Benefit / Cost Model
The following model was designed by University of Alaska Anchorage Institute of Social and Economic
Research, for use by the Alaska Energy Authority. The model has been completed by the consultant,
according to the aforementioned assumptions.
//////
Page 11 of 12
Recommended Next Steps
//////
Appendices
Appendix A – Biomass Technology
Appendix B -- Utility Receipts
Appendix C -- Site Photos
Page 12 of 12