Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
CDR And Construction Cost Est Of Fuel Storage- LIME VILLAGE November 19, 2001
AEK Cor CONCEPT DESIGN REPORT AND CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE FOR CONSOLIDATION AND RENOVATION OF FUEL STORAGE AND HANDLING FACILITIES IN THE COMMUNITY OF: LIME VILLAGE PREPARED FOR: STATE OF ALASKA ALASKA ENERGY AUTHORITY/ _RURAL ENERGY GROUP PREPARED BY: Alaska Energy and Engineering,Inc.Mailing Address -P.O.Box 11140Anchorage,AK 99511-1405(907)349-0100349-8001 FAX 5 enete=BPERSnePOsr=AaraSS_oeSNOePeeeeeeeeeoaeeaeas=aeeeeeertgoa"2reeeroI5Seeeanceene=.eeeaReaSeegpeeraesearager=PeoaPSSreeereespensoe”SeereasonentereeFsrbdnSaroP=q=RaeSereemSri=2SFeeahePOSteeeSSePaae=oone,ae_eoeeaSegaPraeeseeigoea=moeeioyeealoneDeereaeSohaeeSeCinx=ettaeveaageSsae:eees=exRehaesaeputameeSySateteosyasaaa=ss<2aaareeeeSe:?Iieaaaa=FapeatraesewSere=eee Alaska Energy and Engineering.Inc.Mailing Address -P.O.Box 111405 1217 East Klatt Road,Suite A Anchorage,AK 99511-1405 (907)349-0100 349-8001 fax November 19,2001 Mr.John Ingold Project Manager Rural Energy Group Alaska Energy Authority 813 West Northern Lights Blvd. Anchorage,AK 99503 Subject:Lime Village Tank Farm Project -Concept Design Report Dear Mr.Ingold: Enclosed please find ten bound copies and one un-bound reproducible copy of theabovereferencedreport.The report represents a plan to upgrade the Lime VillageTraditionalCouncilandIditarodAreaSchoolDistrictbulkfuelstorageandhandlingfacilities.A draft copy of the study was submitted on August 24,2001.Reviewcommentsfromyoure-mail of November 13,2001 have been incorporated into the final report. AutoCAD Release 14 drawing files have been sent to you via e-mail. Upon completion of your review,copies of the report should be forwarded to the Lime Village Traditional Council,the Iditarod Area School District,and other affected partiesforreviewandcomment.Relevant review comments should then be incorporated intothefinaldesign. If you have any questions please call us at 349-0100. Sincerely, Alaska Energy an \bn/nc.-Stever'S P.ES | President Enclosures:as noted Lime Village Bulk Fuel Consolidation &Upgrade November 19,2001 Concept Design Report Alaska Energy and Engineering EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report has been prepared by Alaska Energy and Engineering,Inc.(AE&E)for theAlaskaEnergyAuthority/Rural Energy Group (AEA/REG).The purpose of this study istoprovideaconceptdesignandconstructioncostestimateforconsolidationand upgrade of the diesel fuel storage facilities in the community of Lime Village.For thepurposeofthisstudy,the term "diesel fuel”refers to all fuel oil products used for space heating,electrical generation,and heavy equipment operation.The participants in the project include the Lime Village Traditional Council (Council),Lime Village Electric Utility (Utility),and the Iditarod Area School District (ASD). A site investigation was performed on October 12"and 13"2000.Existing tanks wereexaminedtodeterminesuitabilityforreuse.Potential sites and options were examined and discussed with local officials who attended a public meeting held on the afternoon of October 13th. All fuel is flown into Lime Village in small planes,resulting in an extremely highdeliveredfuelcost.As a result,most homes are heated with wood.Historically,onlydieselfuelhasbeenstoredinbulkforheatingpublicbuildingsandpowergeneration.Small quantities of gasoline are stored by residents for private use.During the meeting,the consensus of local officials was to only include diesel fuel storage for powergeneration,community buildings,and IASD facilities in the scope of the project,and notincluderetailgasolineordieseldispensing. The largest plane that can currently land at Lime Village is a Skyvan,which has amaximumpayloadofabout4,000 pounds.Since Lime Village does not receive bargeservice,all materials and equipment required for the tank farm project must be capableofbeingtransportedinaSkyvanorsmallerplane.For this reason,several existing fueltankswillberefurbishedforreuse. Consolidation of all bulk diesel storage tanks in one location was not deemed practicalduetotheneedtoreceiveandstorefueldeliveredbyplanetotheairport,and due tolimitedavailablespaceatthepowerplant.Two double wall tanks will be located adjacent to the airport apron to receive fuel by plane.Two double wall "intermediate” tanks will be located at the school to provide on-site storage for space heating andemergencypowergeneration.Two single wall tanks in an earthen berm dike will be located at the existing power plant tank farm.Separate welded steel pipelines will beroutedfromtheairporttankstothepowerplantandschool.A bulk transfer/drum loading area will also be constructed at the power plant to allow fueling of heavyequipmentandtransferoffueltocommunitybuildings.A total of three existing Counciltanksandoneexisting[ASD tank were determined to be suitable for reuse.Two new tanks will need to be flown in to meet the fuel storage needs of the community. The airport storage facility will have a gross storage (tank shell)capacity of 3,000gallonsofdieselfuel.The IASD tank farm will have a gross storage capacity of 3,000gallonsofdieselfuel,and the power plant tank farm will have a gross storage capacityof8,000 gallons of diesel fuel.The project provides a combined gross storage capacityof14,000 gallons.The combined net useable storage capacity is 12,600 gallons based on 90%of the gross capacity. The total project cost,including all design,supervision,construction,inspection,permitting,insurance and a 20%contingency is estimated to be $516,758 whichequatestoaunitcostof$41.01 per gallon based on a net storage capacity of 12,600gallons.The breakdown of tank farm costs by entity is as follows: e Council $246,978 9,000 net gallons at $27.44 per gallon e IASD $269,780 _3,600 net gallons at $74.94 per gallon ES-1 Lime Village Bulk Fuel Consolidation &Upgrade November 19,2001 Concept Design Report Alaska Energy and Engineering INDEX Executive SUMMALY ........cccsccccestecctesesecneeeseeeeaceeeseueceeeeaseesetseeeeeesessaeaaeeeeeenaes Page ES-1 TGOX oe eeeeccccceseesensssseeeeececcssseeeeececeessssusnuauaueeecesecsuneeeeeeesscesaeeseeeeeseteessessseseueauaeesenes Page i Acronyms and Abbreviations ............::cccessscceesseseeseseeeeeeeesnceseeessnanseeeseesennneeseenanes Page ii STON [a txere0(61 (0):ee Page1 1.1 Code ANnallySis .........ccccecesesseeeeeessssccecccceeceseeeeeeeseseeseseeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeseeeeneetenes Page 2 2.0 Existing Fuel Storage Facilities -Function and Capacity .............ccccceccessses Page 3 2.1 Existing Equipment Suitable for REUSE .........eee cccecceeeeeeeeetesesssenseneeeeeees Page 4 3.0 Current Fuel Consumption.................:.06 seseeeeseaeseeeeaeaenseaesenacseeaseecaetenseseeaeans Page 4 3.1 Planned Infrastructure Improvement ...........ccccscessssseeeessseessssseseeserseens Page 5 3.2 Tank Capacity Requirement ...............cccesssceeecstsseeeesneeensseseeseesteeeeseronens Page 5 4.0 Proposed Facility DESCIriIption.........ee eseeeneeesssssceecececeesesenseeseseensaneeeeeseetes Page 7 41 Site oo...ececescceessnnaceeeeeeceeeeeeeseaaeecesneeessneaseesssaeeeessscenaeseeeeeesnenaeestensaners Page 8 4.2 Pad Construction...ceeeccsessssenseeeessseeeeeescscceceneeeeeeseeeesereeseetensnssaseeens Page 8 4.3 Secondary ContainMent............ecceeseeceesssencssaneeeesesseceeeeeeeessenaneeeeessseees Page 8 4.4 Tank ......cccccccsssssssssnenenneseeeseeeceaeaaaaseceeeesensesessessesscsuscesseeceeeeeseaeeeaaeaaaaaanes Page 9 4.5 Piping/Valves/PUMPS/ACCESSOTIES .........ccccccessesseceececeeereeeceeseeseessensennneess Page 9 4.6 SOCUIILY oo ee ceceseeeteceeeseeesensseeceeeetessceeserensenaeneeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeesepensnseneaeeass Page 10 5.0 Proposed Operating Scenario and Spill RESponse...............:cccccsssssrcceeeeeees Page 10 6.0 Permitting ........eee eeeeeeeseseeeeeceneeeeceessaceeterseseceeeseseseneteagaaooaeaanaceceesesesenss Page 11 7.0 Construction Plann..........ccccccecccecceececeesesseeeesssseeseeeeesssennescceeeaeeeseeseeeeneseeeseeens Page 12 7.1 Local JOD SKINS...ceccceccesesesseseeeeeseteneeeseeserenecsennnacenenesaneseeeeseneeees Page 12 7.2 LOCal EQuipMent.............cccececesessseceeeesessnsceeceessssusaacacaseceseaseeeeeseesensees Page 12 7.3 Material SOUPCES .........cccccccccccceceeeceeesesssensauaaeeeceececaseasaaaeseeseeeeseeeeseeeeees Page 13 8.0 SCHECUIC ooo...cccccccccsssssseescecceceesesesssaeececsessaceceeeseseausuenesuaesassueeeeseceeeesesens Page 13 9.0 Cost Estimate...cccccccecceeeecenecceeeetesersssssnsensssccnenacauaasseseceeeeeeeeseeeeees Page 14 Preliminary Design DrawingS..............:.:cccccesseneessseessessseeeesesnseeeeseseesessnneeseeseees Appendix A Construction Cost Estimate ............eee csceceseeeseeeseesneceeseeeeeereseecersensneatesseeeees Appendix B Site Control DOCUMENIS..........::csccccecesesssnceeeseeeecesseaeeteeeetersesseeaeeeeetereesenanaaeees Appendix C Lime Village Bulk Fuel Consolidation &Upgrade November 19,2001 Concept Design Report Alaska Energy and Engineering ADCED ADEC AEA/REG AIDEA API ANTHC ASCG AVCP CDR COE Council DOT F FRP EPA HUD IASD IFC ML&P NEC NFPA NFS NIHA SHPO SPCC USCG USS Utility UUI VSW WTP ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS Alaska Department of Community and Economic Development Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation Alaska Energy Authority/Rural Energy Group Alaska Industrial Development and Export Authority American Petroleum Institute Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium Arctic Slope Consulting Group Association of Village Council Presidents Conceptual Design Report U.S.Army Corps of Engineers Lime Village Traditional Council Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities degrees Fahrenheit - Facility Response Plan U.S.Environmental Protection Agency Housing and Urban Development Iditarod Area Schoo!District International Fire Code McGrath Light and Power National Electric Code National Fire Prevention Association non-frost susceptible Northwest Inupiat Housing Authority State Housing Preservation office Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasures United States Coast Guard United States Survey Lime Village Electric Utility United Utilities,Inc. Village Safe Water Water Treatment Plant Lime Village Bulk Fuel Consolidation &Upgrade November 19,2001 Concept Design Report Alaska Energy and Engineering 1.0 INTRODUCTION This report has been prepared by Alaska Energy and Engineering,Inc.(AE&E)for the Alaska Energy Authority/Rural Energy Group (AEA/REG).The purposeofthisstudyistoprovideaconceptdesignandconstructioncostestimatefor consolidation and upgrade of the diesel fuel storage facilities in the community ofLimeVillage.For the purpose of this study,the term "diesel fuel"refers to all fuel oil products used for space heating,electrical generation,and heavy equipmentoperation.The participants in the project include the Lime Village TraditionalCouncil(Council),Lime Village Electric Utility (Utility),and the Iditarod AreaSchoolDistrict(IASD). Steven Stassel and John Dickerson of AEE performed a site investigation onOctober12"and 13”2000.Existing tanks were examined to determine suitability for reuse.Potential facility sites and options were examined anddiscussedwithFredBobby(Lime Village Corporation Vice President),AnnaBobby(Village Administrator),Joe Bobby (Power Plant Operator/Council),PhilGraham(Council),and Dave Shelborne ([ASD)who attended the public meetingheldontheafternoonofOctober13th. A preliminary survey of the school site was performed to locate existingimprovementsrelativetoplattedsurveyinformation.Site improvements weretiedtoknownpropertycornersfortheConstantine(HUD)Subdivision,USS 9975(Vonga Bobby Native Allotment),United Utilities (UUI)earth station lease,andtheAlaskaDepartmentofTransportation(DOT),Airport Lease site.Siteimprovementsincluded:IASD_school buildings,fuel tanks and_otherimprovements;UUI earth station;Lime Village power plant,shop,andwasheteria;DOT maintenance building;fuel tanks located at the airport;and thepipelineroutefromtheairporttotheschooltankfarm. An additional site visit is planned in December 2001 to review the CDR with community officials and obtain additional data for final design. Additional information was obtained from the following individuals: e Anna Bobby,Village Administrator 526-5236 e Evan Bobby,Jr.,Council 526-5236 e Joe Bobby,Lime Village Elect.Util./Council 526-5004 e Fred Bobby,Lime Village Corporation 526-5236 e Phil Graham,Council (McGrath)524-3112 e Dave Shelborne,Iditarod Area School District (McGrath)524-3033eHenryHill,Hill Enterprises (Sleetmute Fuel Provider)449-4227 e Ernie Baumgartner,ML&P (McGrath)527-3009 e Doug Graether,ASCG (Airport Master Plan)349-5148 e Dennis Meiners,AEA/REG 269-3000 e John Nichols,ANTHC 729-3568 Prior to the field investigation,available information was obtained and analyzed, including community profile,survey plats,engineering studies,Corps of Engineers Wetlands and flood information,erosion studies,and other relevant data. Lime Village Bulk Fuel Consolidation &Upgrade November 19,2001 Concept Design Report Alaska Energy and Engineering 1.1.Code Analysis The existing community fuel facilities were reviewed and a code evaluation performed.The information was summarized and submitted to AEA/REG forscoringandinputintotheREGtankfarmdatabase.The following is a summaryofsignificantfacilitydeficienciesthatwereobserved: e Improper Secondary Containment (Diking)-Single wall tanks are not within proper liquid tight secondary containment systems of adequate capacity,anddoublewalltanksarenotequippedwithredundantoverfillprotectiondevices,as required by the Fire Code and EPA regulations. e Improper Site Location -The airport tank farm is located in the 100-yearfloodplaininviolationoftheFireCode. e No Security Fence -The airport,UUI,and school tank farms are located in areas of vehicle and pedestrian traffic without any security fencing.Thispresentsanextremehazardtothecommunitywithchildrencommonlywalkingandplayingaroundthetanks.It also greatly increases the chance ofaspillorfireduetovandalismandtheftwhenunattended. e Improper Tank Foundations -Several of the tanks are installed on impropertimbercribbingfoundationsinviolationoftheFireCode. e Improper Tank Venting -Many of the tanks are not equipped with eithernormaloremergencyventinginviolationoftheFireCode. e Improper Piping and Valves -Existing school piping systems are steel pipewiththreadedendjoints.These joints have a tendency to leak and fail overtime.Many of the valves are made of bronze,in violation of the Fire Code, and appear to be worn out.Existing power plant tank farm fill and distributionpipingisHDPEplastic,a combustible material. The combination of deficiencies poses a significant threat to public safety andtheenvironment.A retrofit and upgrade project is required to replace andrelocatetheexistingtankfarmswithcodeandregulationcompliantfacilitiestomeetthelong-term needs of Lime Village. The concept design for the new facility has been prepared to meet current codeandregulatoryrequirements,which include: e The 2000 Edition of the International Fire Code,including proposed State of Alaska Amendments e The 1999 Edition of the National Electrical Code e 40 CFR,Part 112.1-12,U.S.Environmental Protection Agency Spill Prevention Requirements including pending Revisions e 33 CFR,Part 154.30 &154.1030,U.S.Coast Guard Spill Prevention Requirements The design also incorporates appropriate industry standards such as NFPA and API as well as proven methods and materials that have been used successfully on other rural bulk fuel facilities in similar locations and climates. Lime Village Bulk Fuel Consolidation &Upgrade November 19,2001 Concept Design Report Alaska Energy and Engineering 2.0 EXISTING FUEL STORAGE FACILITIES -FUNCTION AND CAPACITY There are five existing fuel storage facilities in Lime Village.Tank farm numbers below correspond to the numbers assigned in the REG database.The net fuel storage capacity,based on 90%of the gross tank shell capacity,is provided forthevariousproductsusedforeachentityinthefollowingtable: EXISTING NET*FUEL STORAGE CAPACITY Facility Unleaded Gas**Diesel Fuel IASD High School (1)None 6,300 gallons IASD Elementary School (2)None 900 gallons Trad.Council/IASD (airport)(3)None 6,480 gallons Lime Village Electric Utility (4)None 2,700 gallons United Utilities Inc.(5)None 900 gallons Total 0 gallons 17,280 gallons *Net capacity is based on 90%of tank shell volume to account for actual useable fuel in the tank. "There are no retail diesel fuel or gasoline sales in Lime Village. Each individual facility was evaluated to determine specific needs anddeficiencies.Tanks were visually examined to determine suitability for re-use.The following paragraphs summarize findings for each tank farm: e JIASD High School.This facility consists of five horizontal,welded steeltanksinalinedearthendikelocatedadjacenttothehighschoolandschoolemergencygenerator.There is one 5,000-gallon and four 500-gallon tanks.The liner is torn and does not appear to be liquid tight.A 1-1/2-inch diameterthreadedsteelpipelinerunsapproximately500feetdownasteephilltothesloughadjacenttotheairport.The 5,000-gallon tank will be retrofit for use atthepowerplant.The 500-gallon tanks are not cost effective to refurbish.Thisfacilityisusedforstoringdieselfuelforheatingthehighschoolandforemergencypowergeneration. e JIASD Elementary School.This facility consists of a single 1,000-gallonhorizontal,welded steel tank in a lined earthen dike.The liner is torn and does not appear to be liquid tight.The tank is not cost effective to refurbish. This facility is used exclusively for storing diesel fuel for heating theelementaryschool. e Traditional Council/ASD (airport).This facility consists of five tanks with atotalgrossshellcapacityof7,200 gallons.Four of the tanks are reportedlyownedbytheCouncilandoneisownedbytheIditarodAreaSchoolDistrict. Two of the Council tanks are 1,000-gallon,horizontal,welded steel,double wall skid mounted tanks that are in like-new condition and will be refurbished for use.The Council's two single wall,welded steel horizontal tanks of 1,000- gallon and 300-gallon capacity are not cost effective to refurbish.The IASD tank is a 3,900-gallon horizontal,welded steel,skid-mounted tank.This tank will be retrofit for use as contingency storage.This facility is used for storageofdieselfuelreceivedbyair-delivery. e Lime Village Electric Utility.This facility was constructed in 1998 with thevillagepowerplant.It consists of one horizontal welded steel tank in like-new condition.The gross shell capacity of the tank is 3,000 gallons.The tank is suitable for re-use with modifications.A mostly above ground two-inch 3 Lime Village Bulk Fuel Consolidation &Upgrade November 19,2001 Concept Design Report Alaska Energy and Engineering diameter HDPE pipeline runs adjacent to the school fill pipeline approximately250feetfromthepowerplanttothesloughadjacenttotheairport.The tank is installed in a lined dike;however,the containment volume of the dike is inadequate.The tank is supported on multiple layers of small dimension wood cribbing,resulting in improper tank foundations.This facility is usedexclusivelyforstoringdieselfuelforvillageelectricalpowergeneration. e United Utilities,Inc.The tank is a double wall horizontal welded steel tank with a gross shell capacity of 1,000 gallons.The tank was installed duringthelate1990's and appears to be in good condition.This facility is usedexclusivelyforstoringdieselfuelelectricalpowergenerationandheatfortheUUIearthstation. e No Retail Gasoline and Heating Sales.There is no retail dispensingfacility,or sales of gasoline and heating fuel in the community of Lime Village.Almost all residential home heating is done with wood.Gasoline for personaluseispurchasedfromsourcesoutsidethecommunityandstoredprivatelyinsmallquantities. 2.1.Existing Equipment Suitable for Reuse The 5,000-gallon high school tank,the 3,000-gallon power plant tank,and thetwo1,000-gallon double wall Council tanks are suitable for modification and re- use.The 3,900-gallon IASD tank located at the airport will be modified for useascontingencystorage. 3.0 CURRENT FUEL CONSUMPTION Annual fuel consumption information was obtained for each facility.Thefollowingtableshowsthebreakdownofestimatedconsumptionofeachproductbyfacility: CURRENT ANNUAL FUEL CONSUMPTION Facility Unleaded Gas Diesel Fuel IASD High School None 1,900 gallons IASD Elementary School None 1,200 gallons Traditional Council/IASD (airport)None (Note 1) Lime Village Electric Utility None 10,000 gallons United Utilities Inc.None 4,000 gallons Traditional Council None 2,500 gallons Personal Imports (Note 2)5,000 250 gallons Total 5,000 gallons 19,850 gallons Note 1:The Airport facility is for receiving diesel fuel by air delivery,prior to transferring the fuel to the school and power plant tank farms by pipeline and to community facilities by drum. Note 2:Gasoline and diesel fuel delivered for personal/residential use as reported by Henry Hill of Hill Enterprises in Sleetmute (fuel provider). Lime Village Bulk Fuel Consolidation &Upgrade November 19,2001 Concept Design Report Alaska Energy and Engineering 3.1.Planned Infrastructure lmprovements It is important to evaluate the impact of planned near-term infrastructure improvement projects on existing utility systems.School additions,water and sewer expansions,new homes,as well as other community improvements all can adversely impact the adequacy of existing utilities.The followinginfrastructureprojectshavebeenidentifiedforthecommunityofLimeVillage. DOT has awarded a contract for the development of an Airport Master Plan study for Lime Village.The existing 1,475-foot airstrip is located in a low area adjacent to the Stony River.It is anticipated that eventually a new airstrip will beconstructedinalocationthatwillallowfora4,000-foot runway that can handlelargecargoplanes.DOT staff estimates construction of a new airport to be atleastfiveyearsout. ANTHC has recently completed renovations to the community pump house andwasheteria.A Sanitation Master Plan study is also planned for the community.ANTEC staff indicates that significant upgrades to water and sewer facilities are unlikely to occur until after a new airport is constructed.AVCP Regional HousingAuthoritystaffdoesnotanticipateanynewHUDhomeswillbeconstructedwithin the next two to three years,but that future new homes will likely include woodstovesforheating.The IASD has requested funding for a school addition forseveralyears,but funding availability is uncertain. The Lime Village power plant is a diesel,battery and solar hybrid facility built inthelate1990's.An upgrade project underway at the power plant includes theinstallationofadditionalphotovoltaic(solar)cells and other improvements.Oncecompleted,fuel consumption is expected to decrease by as much as 40%(from10,000 gallons to about 6,000 gallons per year). 3.2.Tank Capacity Requirements Lime Village is located on Stony River,approximately fifty miles southeast of theKuskokwimRiver.Due to its remote location and low river water conditions,the community does not receive barge deliveries.Virtually all goods and fuel areflownintoLimeVillagebysmallaircraftorbroughtinbypersonalboatsandsnowmachinesfromnearbyvillages.Almost all home heating is done with wood. The Lime Village airstrip is large enough to accommodate a Skyvan.GreatlandAviationhasalsoindicatedthatitsCaribouaircraftcouldlandifalltreesand brush are cleared to seventy feet each side of the runway centerline.However, the community does not support clearing the trees and brush due to concerns with erosion from the Stony River.Due to economic reasons most fuel is flown- in from Sleetmute in a Cessna 206 with a belly fuel tank,which takes as many as125deliveriesperyear.The average fuel delivery is about 200 gallons.Fuel isdeliveredoverafourtofivemonthperiodfromMaythroughOctober,dependingontheavailabilityoftheaircraftandfuel.Diesel fuel is pumped from the plane totheairportfueltankslocatedabout150feetsouthoftheairportapron. Currently,fuel is transferred from the airport tanks using a long hose to connecttotheschoo!and power plant tank farm pipelines.Fuel is transferred from the airport to community buildings by drum. Prior to 1998 the school self-generated its own electricity.Since 1998 the new community power plant has provided prime power to the school and community.The annual school fuel consumption prior to 1998 was about 9,000 to 10,000 5 Lime Village Bulk Fuel Consolidation &Upgrade November 19,2001 Concept Design Report Alaska Eneray and Engineering gallons of #1 diesel fuel per year.Now that fuel is only used for space heating and emergency backup power,the annual fuel consumption of the high school and elementary school has decreased to about 3,000 gallons per year.The Voc- Ed shop is currently heated only intermittently and uses less than 200 gallons of heating fuel per year.It is estimated that net tank capacity in excess of 3,200gallonsisrequiredtoprovideafull-years storage capacity for the school. The power plant currently uses about 10,000 gallons of #1 diesel fuel per year,which is almost four-times the power plant tank farm net capacity.The need for additional fuel capacity at the power plant was addressed during the communitymeeting.The power plant is a diesel,battery and solar hybrid facility.Anupgradeprojectunderwayatthepowerplantincludestheinstallationof additional photovoltaic (solar)cells and other improvements.Once completed, fuel consumption is expected to decrease from 10,000 gallons to about 6,000gallons.It is estimated that net tank capacity in excess of 7,000 gallons isrequiredtoprovideafull-years storage capacity for the power plant. During the community meeting options for receiving and transferring fuel from the airport to the power plant and school were discussed.The first optionconsideredusingapickuptruckwithasmallfueltanktoreceiveeachplaneloadoffuelattheairportanddeliverittothepowerplantandschool.This option wasrejectedbecauseitwouldrequireexcessivefuelhandling(as many as 125 trips),and all fuel deliveries would be dependent upon a single vehicle for receivingandmovingfuel.It was agreed that fuel storage capacity is required at theairport,due to the large number of fuel deliveries,combined with the small quantity of fuel received per fuel delivery.Additionally,since the current airportfueltanksiteislocatedwithinthe100-year flood plain,the facility must berelocatedtohigherground. Two sites were considered for the airport tank farm location.The first site waslocatedabout175feetsouthoftheexistingairportfueltanks,across the sloughandpartwayupthehilltothepowerplant.This site was rejected for tworeasons.First,the hill is fairly steep and would require extensive excavation,andpossiblyconstructionofaretainingwall,to provide a level area large enough forthefacility.Secondly,the facility would be located more than 400 feet from the airplane,which would require two people to safely receive fuel:one at theairplaneandoneatthetanks. Upon discussion,a consensus was reached that the airport storage facilityshouldbelocatedascloseaspossibletowheretheplaneoffloadsfuel.This willsimplifythefueldeliveryprocessandfacilitateonepersonsafelyoffloadingfuel.The optimum location for the airport storage facility is immediately adjacent to,and on the south side of,the airport apron. Lime Village Bulk Fuel Consolidation &Upgrade Concept Design Report November 19,2001 Alaska Energy and Engineering CURRENT ANNUAL CONSUMPTION,PROJECTED ANNUAL CONSUMPTION,PROPOSED NET CAPACITY &PROPOSED GROSS CAPACITY Facility Current Projected Proposed Net ProposedAnnualAnnualCapacityinGross Consumption Consumption (Gallons)Capacity (Gallons)(Gallons)(Gallons) Gas |Diesel}Gas |Diesel}Gas |Diesel |Gas |Diesel High Schoo!|N/A |1,900 |NA |4,900 |NA |1,800 |N/A |2,000 Elementary |NA |1,200 |N/A |4,200}NWA |900 |N/A |1,000School Airport N/A ---N/A ---N/A |2,700 |N/A |3,000 Lime Village N/A |10,000}N/A |10,000}N/A |7,200 |N/A |8,000ElectricUtility Traditional N/A}2,500 N/A |3,000 |N/A N/A N/A N/ACouncil Personal 5,000 |250 |5,000 |250 N/A N/A N/A N/AImports (Note 2) Subtotal 5,000 |19,850 |5,000 |19,850]N/A |12,600 0 14,000 Project Total Gross Capacity 14,000 1.Estimated future use based on planned development. 2.Net capacity of proposed tank farm based on 90%of tank shell volume. 4.0 PROPOSED FACILITY DESCRIPTION Two double wall tanks will be used to receive diesel fuel at the airport.One oftheexistingCouncil1,000-gallon double wall tanks will be refurbished and used for storing fuel for the school.A new 2,000-gallon double wall tank will be usedforstoringfuelfortheCouncil.Since electric service has recently been extendedtotheairportapron,the facility will be equipped with electric pumps for receivingfuelfromtheairplaneandtransferringthefueltotheschoolandpowerplant. The school fuel system will consist of two double wall "intermediate”tanks.A new 2,000-gallon double wall tank will be located adjacent to the high school andpipedtotheexistingschoolfurnaceandstandbygenerator.One of therefurbishedCouncil1,000-gallon double wall tanks will be located adjacent to theelementaryschoolandpipedtotheexistingschoolfurnace. The existing power plant tank farm earthen dike will be renovated to allow spaceforadditionaltankcapacity.Both the existing 5,000-gallon high school and3,000-gallon power plant tanks will be refurbished with welded steel saddles, painted,equipped with new tank appurtenances,and installed in the new dike. 7 Lime Village Bulk Fuel Consolidation &Upgrade November 19,2001 Concept Design Report Alaska Energy and Engineering 4.1 Site Site control is a significant issue in Lime Village.The school buildings andimprovementsarelocatedonpropertyownedbytheLimeVillageCorporation.Aquitclaimdeedfromtheearly1970's between the State of Alaska and the "City”of Lime Village for the school property is not valid -as there is no municipalgovernmentinLimeVillage[Based on the preliminary topographic survey,noschoolsiteimprovementsappeartoencroachonU.S.Survey 9975 (VongaBobbyNativeAllotment)].A lease for the power plant exists,but it does not appear that all power plant improvements are within the leasehold boundary. Site control is required for the school site and the fuel transfer pipelines from theairporttothepowerplantandschool.Adequate property should be defined fortheschoolandpowerplantandeitherdeededfromtheCorporation,or long termleasesexecuted.Site control for the pipeline route from the airport to theschool/power plant may be in the form of an easement,leasehold,or quitclaimdeed. IASD has an existing permit with DOT&PF (ADA-07875)for the existing airporttankfarm.The permit needs to be revised to reflect the relocation of the tanks adjacent to the apron and to permit the fuel transfer pipelines across airportpropertytotheschoolandpowerplant. A Certificate to Plat is being prepared.Based on currently available data itappearstheLimeVillageCorporationistheownerofthepipelineroute,andpowerplantandschoolsites. 4.2.Pad Construction The airport apron will be extended using locally available fill to create a pad thatwillelevatetheairportfacilityabovethe100-year floodplain.The pad side-slopes will be protected from erosion using either a four-inch deep cellularconfinementgridorlocallyavailablerip-rap.The existing power plant dike will bedemolished,the area leveled,and a new dike constructed.Pads for the school "intermediate”tanks will be constructed to provide a level area to place the tanks.Surface organic material at the airport pad,school "intermediate”tanks,and power plant dike will be removed and clean fill will be placed in eight-inch liftsandcompactedto90%minimum density. 4.3.Secondary Containment The Uniform Fire Code and E.P.A.regulations require that fuel tanks havesecondarycontainment.To comply with the regulations tanks may be eitherdoublewall,or single wall installed within a secondary containment structure thatiscapableofholdingthecontentsofthelargesttankplussufficientfreeboard (usually six to twelve inches)to hold accumulated precipitation. The airport tanks and the school "intermediate”tanks will not be installed within dikes,but will be double wall construction and equipped with redundant overfill protection devices as required by the EPA to meet the intent of alternative secondary containment requirements. The power plant tanks will be installed in a dike made of locally available fill material with an earthen berm and membrane liner.The dike is sized to contain the entire contents of the largest tank (5,000 gallons)plus nine-inches of 8 Lime Village Bulk Fuel Consolidation &Upgrade November 19,2001 Concept Design Report Alaska Eneray and Engineering freeboard for precipitation.The dike will most likely be constructed in stages with one wall left down until tanks have been placed.The dike will be lined with a membrane liner compatible with diesel fuel.A non-woven geotextile fabric will be installed above and below the liner to prevent puncture and damage and a four-inch deep layer of gravel cover will be placed over the liner.A four-inch deep cellular confinement grid will be installed over the liner on the interior dike walls to hold the gravel cover in place on the side slopes. 4.4 Tanks A total of seven existing tanks will be drained,purged,and taken out of service as part of this project.One tank will be retained to serve as spill contingencystorage.A total of four existing refurbished and two new tanks will be installed attheschool,power plant,and airport.Tank capacities are summarized in the Tank Schedule on Sheet M1.Upon cleaning and vapor freeing,all existing tanks being reused will be inspected internally and externally.Should any significant corrosion be encountered,repairs will be made. The existing 1,000-gallon double wall tanks will be refurbished with new water draw connections,emergency vents,normal vents,gauge hatches,level gauges,and fill limiters.The existing 5,000-gallon school and 3,000-gallon power planttankswillberefurbishedwithweldedsteelsaddlesandappurtenancesasindicatedforthedoublewalltanks.All existing tanks will be cleaned,primed and painted. Two new 2,000-gallon double wall tanks will be designed specifically to fit into aSkyvan.The new tanks will be shop built double wall horizontal welded steel tanks built and labeled in accordance with UL 142.The tanks will be equippedwithsteelsaddleandskidfoundations.The new tanks will also be equipped withlevelgaugesandotherappurtenancesasindicatedfortheexistingtanks.Alltankswillbeplacedon4x12treatedtimbermudsillsatgrade.The timbers willbesizedtolimitsoil-bearing pressure to 1,500 pounds per square foot. 4.5 Piping/Valves/Pumps/Accessories The airport tanks will be filled from the airplane with tank-mounted centrifugalpumps.Each pump will be equipped with a fuel rated hose and dry-connect camlock fitting to connect to the airplane tank.The airport tanks will be top-filled and equipped with mechanical fill limiters,pressure/vacuum whistle vents,and clock gauges to help prevent overfilling the tanks.Submersible pumps will be installed in the tanks and connected to transfer pipelines with antisiphon valves, stainless steel flex connectors,and pipeline fuel filters.Fuel will be transferred periodically from the airport to the school and power plant,as required. Separate above and below grade pipelines will be routed from the airport apron up the hill to the power plant and school.The pipelines will be routed below grade from the airport to the hill.Where the pipelines cross the slough they willbeburiedfourtofivefeetbelowgradetoprotectthemfrompotentialfloodwater scouring.Once across the slough and above the 100-year floodplain,the pipelines will be routed above grade along the existing pipeline routes.The pipelines will be two-inch extra-heavy welded steel piping and will be coated andcathodicallyprotectedwherebelowgrade. An emergency fill-point connection will be provided in the school fill pipelineadjacenttothepowerplanttankfarmandequippedwithatwo-inch diameter ball 9 Lime Village Bulk Fuel Consolidation &Upgrade November 19,2001 Concept Design Report Alaska Energy and Engineering valve,check valve and camlock fitting.This will allow fuel to be transferred from the power plant tank farm to the school tanks in the event the village power plant is offline and the school needs additional fuel to generate electricity. A bulk transfer area will be provided at the power plant tank farm to allow fillingdrumsandfuelingheavyequipment.The bulk transfer equipment will include a submersible pump,meter,hose,nozzle,and static grounding line. The existing packaged day tank in the power plant will be retrofit with automatic controls,level gauges,and redundant overfill protection devices and alarms. All above-grade piping will be Schedule 80 black steel.All below-grade pipingwillbeSchedule80steelwithahighdensitypolyethylenecoatingandcathodic protection.Above-grade piping will be installed on treated timber sleepers orsupportedfromtanksandsecuredwithsteelpipestrapsorstrutandpipeclamps.All piping joints will be welded or flanged except for connections to pumps,which may be threaded.Sufficient flanged joints will be provided to allow service of pumps and other devices.All connections to pumps and tanks will be made with stainless steel flexible connectors.Each isolated section of piping willbeprovidedwithpressurerelievingdevicestoaccountforthermalexpansionofproductcausedbytemperaturefluctuations.Provisions for movement of the piping caused by thermal expansion and contraction will also be included.All valves will be steel body industrial grade valves intended for use with diesel fuel. 4.6 Security A six-foot tall chain link fence with barbed wire top and access gates will beinstalledateachfacility.All valves will be provided with lockable handles topreventtheftandvandalism.Each owner will have a unique set of keyed-alikelocksforalloftheirvalvesandfencegates.Pump controls-will be installedwithinfencedsecurityareas.Area lighting controlled by photocell will beprovidedforsecurityandspilldetectionandtoenhancewinteroperation. 5.0 PROPOSED OPERATING SCENARIO AND SPILL RESPONSE The Council power plant tank farm and IASD school tanks are located on separate parcels of land and have separate fuel pipelines from the airport,soeachentityshouldberesponsibleformaintenanceandoperationoftheirown tanks,pumps,piping systems,dikes,and fencing.The Council will beresponsibleforremovingstormwaterfromthepowerplantdike. At the airport facility,the Council and IASD will share specific items,such aselectricityforsecuritylightingandpumpoperation,and site improvementsincludingthepadandfencing. Additional items that could be shared include but are not limited to -pressure testing of the transfer pipelines,maintenance and replacement of spill response equipment and supplies,and operations and spill response training.These shared costs should be apportioned on an agreed upon flat rate or on a per gallon of throughput basis. Because Lime Village does not receive fuel delivery by marine vessel,the new facilities will not be subject to U.S.Coast Guard regulations.However,since all facilities have oil storage tanks in excess of 660 gallons,they will be subject toU.S.Environmental Protection Agency regulations and will require preparation of 10 Lime Village Bulk Fuel Consolidation &Upgrade November 19,2001 Concept Design Report Alaska Eneray and Engineering a Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasures (SPCC)plan.Separate SPCC Plans could be prepared for each owner;however,it may also be possible to utilize a combined SPCC Plan for all facilities. The gross storage capacity of the tank farms are well below the State of AlaskaDepartmentofEnvironmentalConservation(DEC)regulatory threshold of420,000 gallons so a DEC Oil Spill Contingency Plan will not be required. Spill response gear,including sorbent material,protective safety gear,and sorbent boom will need to be purchased and stored on-site.One of the existing school tanks currently located at the airport will be dedicated to contingency storage. 6.0 PERMITTING An Environmental Assessment (EA)will need to be completed prior toconstructionoftheproject.An EA is required for all projects that require afederalpermit(such as a Corps of Engineers Wetlands Permit)or are federallyfunded.The EA confirms there is no significant impact to the environment caused by the project.Although Lime Village is not located in a Coastal Management area,as part of the EA,a Coastal Zone Management ProjectQuestionnairewillbepreparedtohelpidentifystateorfederalpermitsthatmayberequired. A Corps of Engineers Wetlands permit should not be required for construction of the consolidated tank farm;however,the need for a permit will be investigatedfurtherwiththeCorpsofEngineersearlyinthefinaldesignphase.If required,this project should qualify for review under the Department of the Army GeneralPermit96-07 for village bulk fuel facilities.The general permit streamlines theapprovalprocess.Similar projects have been permitted in less than two months under the general permit. An FAA Form 7460-1 Notice is required to be submitted for review by the FAAfortheairportfacilityandfuelpipelinesonairportproperty.The existing IASDairportleasewillneedtoberevisedtoreflectthenewfacilityimprovements. A State Department of Natural Resources Letter of Intent/Annual Reclamation Statement or Material Sale Contract may be required for gravel material mined adjacent to Stony River. The community is not located in an organized borough so the facilities are not subject to planning and zoning requirements. The school and power plant property should be surveyed and either long termleasesorquitclaimdeedsrecordedwiththeStateRecordersOfficeinthe Kuskokwim Recording District. A Plan Review permit from the State Fire Marshal is required.Final stamped design drawings will need to be submitted for review and approval prior to construction.Site preparation work may be initiated prior to receiving approval from the Fire Marshal. The power plant and school pipelines will be routed on Lime Village Corporationproperty.An easement,lease,or quitclaim deed is required for the pipeline route. 11 Lime Village Bulk Fuel Consolidation &Upgrade November 19,2001 Concept Design Report Alaska Eneray and Engineering The EPA SPCC plans will be prepared upon completion of facility construction. 7.0 CONSTRUCTION PLAN The Alaska Energy Authority/Rural Energy Group has a history of administeringsimilarprojectsona"modified"force-account basis.Force-account construction involves the owner or grantee acting as the general contractor and utilizingprimarilylocallabor.This method tends to achieve a higher percentage of localhireandisstronglysupportedbymanycommunitiesandfundingagencies.Thehighlytechnicalnatureofatankfarmprojectrequiresalimitednumberof workers with specific experience and expertise to be brought in for the projectwhennotavailablelocally. All work must be supervised and managed by a superintendent with extensiveexperienceintheconstructionofruralfuelfacilities.All specialty work,such aspipewelding,electrical,and tank cleaning must be performed by skilledcraftsmenwithappropriatecertifications.An experienced construction managerwillberequiredtocoordinatetheconstructionteamandtooverseeprocurementandprojectlogistics.The design engineer will provide quality control throughcommunicationwiththeconstructionmanagerandperiodicon-site inspections. 7.1 Local Job Skills The following table summarizes availability of specialty skilled labor in LimeVillage: Skilled Trades Number Available Heavy Equipment Operator Heavy Equipment Mechanic Certified Welder Welder's Helper Journeyman Electrician Apprentice Electrician SO]OC]CO]GO]>)doThe labor force in Lime Village is minimal;however,due to the small scale of the project it appears that a project superintendent,two certified tank cleaners,onecertifiedwelder,and a journeyman electrician will need to be brought into LimeVillageforthisproject.All other labor should be available locally. 7.2.Local Equipment An inventory was performed on local heavy equipment and is listed in the following table: Owner Equipment Model #|Serial #Comments Council John Deere Dozer 450 n/a Has backhoe attachment Council Bobcat Loader 753 n/a Council 5 Ton Dump Trailer n/a n/a Needs reinforcement There is minimal heavy equipment available in Lime Village.The Council has a 450 John Deere dozer with backhoe attachment and loader bucket,753 Bobcat, and a dump trailer.The dozer was in working order during the site visit.The Bobcat reportedly required a bracket for mounting the alternator in order to beoperable.The dump trailer is rated at 5 tons,but the box appears to require 12 November 19,2001LimeVillageBulkFuelConsolidation&Upgrade Alaska Energy and EngineeringConceptDesignReport additional bracing and reinforcement prior to use.The equipment available in the community appears to be adequate to construct the tank farm facility,although it should be thoroughly inspected by a certified mechanic andnecessaryrepairsperformedpriortotheproject. The option of bringing additional equipment into the community for the project isextremelylimitedduetotheairstriplength(1,475 feet).Currently,the maximumloadthatcanbeflownintoLimeVillagemustfitinaSkyvan,and weigh less than4,000 pounds.This effectively eliminates additional heavy equipment from beingbroughtintothecommunityfortheproject. 7.3 Material Sources Fill material should be available from the existing borrow area adjacent to theairstripwherematerialwasminedfortheairportconstruction.Gravel is alsoavailablefromtheadjacentriverbankshoreline. Due to the minimal quantities of fill material required,all fill should be locallyavailable.As indicated above,potential material sources include the existingairportborrowsiteandtheStonyRiverbank.Additional borrow sources shouldbeinvestigatedduringfinaldesign. 8.0 SCHEDULE Due to Lime Village's location in interior Alaska,it is expected that site workcannotbeginuntillateMayorearlyJune.The following project schedule hasbeendevelopedonthisbasis:SEPOCTNOVDECJANFEBMARAPRMAYJUNJULAUGPH.Il TASKS (2001/2) 65%DESIGN REVIEW FINAL DESIGN XanneX PH.Ill TASKS (2001/2) PERMITTING/SITE CONTROL ORDER TANKS ORDER REST OF MAT'LS PIPELINES SITE WORK XX MODIFY EXIST TANKS PLACE TANKS PIPING,DAY TANKS,ETC.. FENCE,ELECTRICAL,ETC. PUNCH LIST COMPLETION SPILL PLANS &CLOSE OUT on 13 Lime Village Bulk Fuel Consolidation &Upgrade November 19,2001 Concept Design Report Alaska Energy and Engineering 9.0 COST ESTIMATE Separate construction cost estimates were developed for the Council portion and the IASD portion of project.The construction cost estimates have been developed based on a "modified"force-account approach utilizing a combination of local labor,certified craftsmen,and specialty sub-contractors under the direction of an experienced superintendent.Labor rates are based on Title 36 equivalent wages for certified specialty labor and prevailing local force-account wage rates for general labor and equipment operation. 9.1.Traditional Council Facility The scope of the Council portion of this project includes the power plant tankfarm,airport to power plant transfer pipeline,and the Council tank,pumps and appurtenances at the airport.The Council cost estimate also includes a proportionate cost of all common overhead items such as freight,design,administration,and permitting and construction management.The total Council project estimated cost,including a 20%contingency is as follows: e Council $246,978 9,000 net gallons at $27.44 per gallon 9.2.IASD School Facilities The scope of the IASD School portion of this project includes the cost of theelementaryandhighschooltanksandassociatedsitework,airport to schooltransferpipeline,and the IASD tank,pumps and appurtenances at the airport.'The IASD cost estimate also includes a proportionate cost of all commonoverheaditemssuchasfreight,design,administration,and permitting andconstructionmanagement.The total IASD School project estimated cost,including a 20%contingency is as follows e IASD $269,780 3,600 net gallons at $74.94 per gallon 9.3 Total 'The total project cost,including all design,supervision,construction,inspection,permitting,insurance and a 20%contingency is estimated to be $516,758 whichequatestoaunitcostof$41.01 per gallon based on a net storage capacity of12,600 gallons.The unit cost is extremely high due to the high cost of air freight,relatively long pipelines,and small capacity of the facilities. 14 APPENDIX A CONCEPT DESIGN DRAWINGS EXISTING UNRECORDED SCHOOL PROPERTYUSSURVEY997: LEASE -ENCROACHES INTO USS 9975 UME VILLAGE ARPORTADA11248 LEASE 8/24/78PROPOSEDNEWSCHOOL PROPERTY BOUNDARY SCHOOL TANK S3 7NEXNEW2,000 GALLON DOUBLE WALL "BLDG,TANK FOR HIGH SCHOOL AND EXISTING SCHOOL TANK FARM- SALVAGE 1 TANK,AND DEMOLISH <s AIRPORT BORROW SITE SCHOOL EMERGENCY GENERATOR aSCHOOLTANK$2 Ge a1,000 GALLON DOUBLE a\\ Vy a WALL TANK AT ELEMENTARY __. :SCHOOL -RELOCATE VILLAGE TANK FARM TANKS V2 &V3 -\SA FROM AIRPORT =”3,000 &5,000 GALLON RENOVATED .Pa fNAEXISTINGSINGLEWALLTANKSINBURIED2"VILLAGE &\S a,NEW LINED EARTHEN BERM DIKE |2”SCHOOL FUEL PIPELINES <A ,oN PROPOSED VILLAGE POWER PLANT EXISTING AIRPORT FUEL&TANK FARM PROPERTY BOUNDARY i GENERATOR AND BULK'.FUEL STE -1996 LEASE AREA'SALVAGE 3 TANKS ra CONSTANTINE SUBDMSION LoT 1 PIPELINES TRANSITION FROM BELOW GRADE 10 ABOVE GRADE @ 2HOP: va 7EXIST1,000 GALLON DOUBLE WALL TANK -NO WORK THIS PROJECT aaeeae.-_a"-a, 7 " a . a ” we GRAVEL ROADS&MAJOR TRAILS,TYP PROPERTY LIN®,TYP MISHKA WASKEY RUSSIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH VONGA &MADRAN BOBBY APPROXIMATE MEANDER LINEKATHERINEBOBBY PETE BOBBY REDUCED PLOT -1/2 SCALE TANK SCHEDULE (CAPACITY IN GALLONS) TANK #|NEW |PREVIOUS|TANK SIZE |CATEGORY|TYPE |DIESELOWNER|OWNER GROSS Vi VILLAGE 2,000 NEW |Dw.[2,000 v2 VILLAGE [VILLAGE |3,000__|REFURB [S.w.|3,000v3VILLAGE[SCHOOL [5,000 [REFURB]S.w.|5,000VILLAGESTORAGETOTAL10,000 Si SCHOOL VILLAGE {000 TREFURB.[D.w.[ 1,000$2 SCHOOL |VILLAGE 000 [REFURB.|0.W.[1,000 $3 SCHOOL.2,000 NEW |D.W.[2,000 SCHOOL STORAGE TOTAL 4,000 PROJECT TOTAL GROSS STORAGE CAPACITY 14,000 PROJECT TOTAL NET STORAGE CAPACITY (90%OF GROSS)12,600 GENERAL NOTES: 1)ALL PIPING SHOWN IS NEW UNLESS SPECIFICALLY INDICATED AS EXISTING. 2)BURY ALL FUEL PIPELINES EXCEPT WHERE SPECIFICALLY INDICATED AS ABOVE GRADE. 3)LOCATE ALL EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES IN THE VICINITY PRIOR TO BEGINNING EXCAVATION, 4)INSTALL ABOVE GRADE PIPING ON TREATED TIMBER SLEEPERS AT 10°ON CENTER MAX,SEE DETAL 3/M2. 5)TBM -3”ALUMINUM CAP MONUMENT SET ON 3”ALUMINUM PIPE APPROXIMATELY 10°ABOVE GRADE.MONUMENT LOCATEDATWESTCORNEROFLOTS5&6 OF CONSTANTINESUBDMSION.TOP OF MONUMENT SET TO ELEVATION 100.0° State of AlaskaDeportofCommunityandEconomic Development**'in,Rule DEAVA Ee**Anchorage,Alaska 99503813WestNorthernLightsBlvd.=ALASKA PROWECT:LIME VILLAGE BULK FUEL STORAGE CONSOLIDATION &UPGRADE TITLE: OVERALL VILLAGE SITE PLAN PRELIMINARY -NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ALASKA ENERGY AND ENGINEERING,INC P.O.BOX 111405 ANCHORAGE,ALASKA 99511-1405 PHONE (907)349-0100 DRAWN BY:=JTO SCALE: 1°=60"FILE NAME:¢IMF-BFM141 SHEET: DESIGNED BY:SJS DATE:11/19/01 PROJECT NUMBER:Q 4 -1 41-9627 M 1 OF Concept Design Report And Construction Cost Estimate For Consolidation And Renovation Of Fuel Storage And Handling Facilities In The Community Of NANWALEK November 17,2003 PUMP SCHEDULE DESIGNATION FUNCTION STYLE MOTOR TP-1 AND 2 RECEIVING CENTRIFUGAL |1/2HP,230VTP-3 THRU 5 }BULK TRANSFER |SUBMERSIBLE |3/4HP,230V '\YNONNONNONNONNONNONNONNON\NNNN 2"BURIED FUEL PIPELINE \SN TO VILLAGE TANK FARM N \NONNYIN "XNNN 2”BURIED FUEL PIPELINE SS JO SCHOOL TANK FARM N\\NONNOSNONNONNON\IN\) I | i] t I T I :a i L-;}.Ff ian6'HIGH CHAIN -->-_-__-_-__-_UNK FENCE ee |ae]- |40° 4 TANK V4Oo<q 2,000 GAL >-_-_-__-_-_ DIESEL TANK S1 1,000 GAL .42>oe -={be 2.0"MIN i KF f 24.0° 26.0" (1 AIRPORT SHORTERM STORAGE AND TRANSFER a AIRPORT APRON M2/tT =5 A,WA AYRMNRASNA (2.AIRPORT SHORTERM STORAGE AND TRANSFER CROSS SECTION WJ tas NOTE:PROVIDE SUPPORTS AT 10°ON CENTER MAX. TWO-HOLE PIPE . GRINNELL FIGURE 262,TYP ,©1/4°x3" ]@, vi 4°x12°x2'LONGTREATEDTIMBER S (3.ABOVE GRADE PIPING SUPPORTMZ/NTS REDUCED PLOT -1/2 SCALE PRELIMINARY -NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION EXISTING GRADE a oe.te edili."|7 7tsfHyIill:CADWELDLEADwre 24 -I|TO ALL FUEL PIPES (4 BURIED PIPE INSTALLATION M2Z/Nts State of Alaska .ke Pepa of Community and Economic Development*s eM pma,ural Ener rouifNy813WestNorthenLights Blvd.=ALASKAwe*Anchorage,Alaska 99503 PRONEe LIME VILLAGE BULK FUEL STORAGE CONSOLIDATION &UPGRADE TITLE: AIRPORT SHORTERM STORAGE AND TRANSFER ALASKA ENERGY AND ENGINEERING,INC P.O.BOX 111405 ANCHORAGE,ALASKA 99511-1405 PHONE (907)349-0100 SCALE:AS NOTED FILE NAME:LIMEBFM2 SHEET:ORAWN BY:USA PROJECT NUMBER:(4 --11-9627 M 2DESIGNEDBY:SUS DATE:11/19/01 OF 207 2°FUEL PIPELINE FROM AIRPORT SHORT TERM STORAGE TO SCHOOL TANK FARM --- SCHOOL EMERGENCY FUEL TRANSFER CONNECTION HEAVY EQUIPMENT/DRUMFULHOSEANDHOZZLE \-<<>--- <GENERAL NOTES: 1.THE NET DIKE CAPACITY OF THE POWER PLANT DIKE IS 9,690 GALLONS - THE VOLUME OF THE LARGEST TANK PLUS 9°FREEBOARD FOR PRECIPITATION. 2.ALL HORIZONTAL TANKS WILL BE EQUIPPED WITH STEEL SADDLE AND SKID FOUNDATIONS AND WILL BE INSTALLED ON 4x12 TREATED TIMBER MUDSILLS. 3,DIKE DRAINAGE IS BY PORTABLE PUMP LOCATED OUTSIDE OF DIKE WITH SUCTION AND DISCHARGE HOSES. 4.PROVIDE PRODUCT IDENTIFICATION LABELS AND TANK NUMBERS ON ALL TANKS.PROVIDE KEYED-ALIKE BRASS PADLOCKS ON ALL VALVES AND FENCE GATES. (2.POWER PLANT TANK FARM ELEVATION TOP OF DIKE =59.3 HOOK LINER &GEOTEXTILE INTO TRENCH AT TOP OF DIKE ALL AROUND 4°DEEP CELLULAR CONFINEMENT SYSTEM OVER LINER & GEOTEXTLE ON INSIDE SLOPE OF DIKE &OVER TOP,2STRETCHDOWNSLOPETOTOEOFDIKE&FILL WITH GRAVEL tT (1 POWER PLANT TANK FARM PLAN |(G2°FUEL PIPELINE TO EXIST.DAYTANK M37 has 4°GRAVEL COVER OVER LINER FINISH GRADE =57.3 MEMBRANE LINER WITH GEOTEXTILEFABRICABOVE&BELOW eee rae w ep Es Wty BS AINA,oo :.2 of ita :°AREAGRAVELFILLCOMPACTEDTO90%SANSANG X ANY AOE WEarRAKRKiKADSRRAKRAM EXISTING GROUND ELEVATION VARIES,REMOVE SURFACE ORGANICS AND LEVEL EXISTING MATERIAL PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTING DIKE.PUSH EXCESS CLEAN MATERIAL INTO LOWER AREAS AND COMPACT TO 90%MIN DENSITY. (3 TYPICAL DIKE SECTIONM3_/NO SCAE Department of Community and Economic Development**AIDEA/AEA REDUCED PLOT -1/2 SCALE PRELIMINARY -NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION **Rural GSATBRustEne'Soe PER ALASKAwk*Anchorage,Alaska 99503 PROMECT:LIME VILLAGE BULK FUEL STORAGE CONSOLIDATION &UPGRADE TITLE: POWER PLANT TANK FARM ALASKA ENERGY AND ENGINEERING,INC P.O.BOX 111405 ANCHORAGE,ALASKA 99511-1405 PHONE (907)349-0100 DRAWN BY:USA SCALE:AS NOTED FILE NAME:|IME BFM3 SHEET: DESIGNED BY:SJS DATE:§=-11/19/01 PROJECT NUMBER:Q 4 -44-9627 M 5 OF |PLAN VIEW of\o ee P=Les]xX 4x12x6'L TREATED TIMBER MUDSILL,TYP(3) FINISH GRADE /1.\S-1 DOUBLE WALL 1,000 GALLON TANK INSTALLATION (V-1 SIMILAR EXCEPT NEW 2,000 GALLON TANK) GENERAL NOTES: 1.TANK S-1:EXISTING 5°-4"6x7'-6°L NOMINAL 1,000 GALLON CAPACITY DOUBLE WALL WELDED SSTEELTANKMANUFACTURED&LABELED IN ACCORDANCE WITH U.L 142. 2.TANK V--1:NEW 4'-10"6x16'L NOMINAL 2,000 GALLON CAPACITY DOUBLE WALL WELDED STEEL TANK MANUFACTURED &LABELED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ULL.142. SPECIFIC_NOTES: PLAN VIEW (>TANK S-1:INSTALL NEW SHOP FABRICATED LADDER WITH GRIP STRUT PLATFORM -SEAL WELD 6°6REINFORCINGPLATESATALLCONNECTIONPOINTS.TANK V-1;INSTALL SHOP FABRICATED BOLT-ON LADNER. [>2"SECONDARY TANK MONITOR PORT WITH PLUG. [>2"GAUGE HATCH WITH CAP é&GASKET,MORRISON FIGURE 307 OR EQUAL,INSTALL ON 2°x4°L NIPPLE. (4>2"SCHEDULE 80 FILL PIPE FROM TP-1. (CS FILL LIMITER,MORRISON FIGURE 9095A OR EQUAL.REMOVE FACTORY COLLAR &NIPPLE AND INSTALLIN4"x2"x2"DOUBLE TAP BUSHING WITH 2"x8"NIPPLE.EXTEND DROP TUBE TO WITHIN 6”OF BOTTOM. [E>3/4"THREADED GALL VALVE WATER DRAW WITH PLUG.INSTALL NEW 2”BUNG WITH 2°x3/4"x3/4"DOUBLE TAPPED BUSHING &3/4°x4°NIPPLE.EXTEND 3/4°DROP TUBE TO WITHIN 1”OF TANK BOTTOM.INSTALL IN NEW 2"BUNG. [>4°THREADED PRIMARY EMERGENCY VENT,MORRISON FIGURE 244 OR EQUAL 16 OZ/SQUARE INCHOPENINGPRESSURE.INSTALL IN NEW 4”BUNG. [>2”CLOCK GAUGE INSTALLED ON 2”BUNG WITH 18"NIPPLE &2”COUPLING,MORRISON FIGURE 818OREQUAL.SET GREEN ARROW AT 2' 0"AND RED ARROW AT ” COVER PLATE {S PROPERLY SEALED AFTER REASSEMBLY (ANY LOOSENESS OR RATILING WHEN TAPPEDINDICATESAPOORSEAL). ([3>PRESSURE VACUUM VENT WITH WHISTLE ALARM,MORRISON FIGURE 922 OR EQUAL.INSTALL ON 2°NIPPLE MIN 60”LONG.ENSURE VENT OUTLET iS 12°MIN ABOVE GRADE.SET WHISTLE TO ALARM AT (85%)ABOVE TANK BOTTOM.THREAD WHISTLE VENT WIRE THROUGH NIPPLE &ATTACH TOfotPRIORTOINSTALLINGONTANK. [10>4”THREADED SECONDARY EMERGENCY VENT,MORRISON FIGURE 244 OR EQUAL CLD 5'L STRUT WELDED TO TANK,TYP(4). [>2”ANTESYPHON VALVE, [TD2”FLEX,MPT x FLOATING FLANGE,12”OVERALL LENGTH. **(90%).ENSURE THAT THE BACK SS ifBY.2 ,Hl efi ie o& I | \o ofts]Les]NX FINISH GRADE [72>2”PIPE DOWN WITH 1-1/2"PIPELINE FILTER AND 2°FLANGED BALL VALVE,SECURE TO STRUT ATMIDPOINTOFTANKWITHPIPECLAMP.PROVIDE 3/4°THREAD-O-LET WITH 3/4°THREADED BALL VALVE &PLUG FOR PRESSURE TEST. 4x12x6'L TREATED TIMBER MUDSILL,TYP(3) GENERAL NOTES: 1,TANK S-2:EXISTING 5'-4"sx7'"-6°L NOMINAL 1,00 GALLON CAPACITY DOUBLE WALL WELDED STEEL TANK MANUFACTURED &LABELED IN ACCORDANCE WITH U.L.142. 2.TANK S-3:NEW 4'-10"sx16'L NOMINAL 2,000 GALLON CAPACITY DOUBLE WALL WELDED STEELTANKMANUFACTURED&LABELED iN ACCORDANCE WITH ULL.142. SPECIFIC NOTES: (CD TANK S-2:INSTALL NEW SHOP FABRICATED LADDER WITH GRIP STRUT PLATFORM -SEAL WELD 6°6RENORCINGPLATESATALLCONNECTIONPOWIS.TANK S-3:INSTALL SHOP FABRICATED BOLT-ONDER. [>2”SECONDARY TANK MONITOR PORT WITH PLUG. (i>2°GAUGE HATCH WITH CAP &GASKET,MORRISON FIGURE 307 OR EQUAL,INSTALL ON 2°x4°L NIPPLE. [4>2”SCHEDULE 80 FILL PIPE FROM TANK S-1. [E>FILL LIMITER,MORRISON FIGURE 9095A OR EQUAL.REMOVE FACTORY COLLAR &NIPPLE AND {NSTALLIN4°x2"x2"DOUBLE TAP BUSHING WITH 2°x8”NIPPLE.EXTEND DROP TUBE TO WITHIN 6”OF BOTTOM. ([6>3/4"THREADED BALL VALVE WATER DRAW WITH PLUG.INSTALL NEW 2”BUNG WITH 2°x3/4"x3/4"DOUBLE TAPPED BUSHING &3/4°x4"NIPPLE.EXTEND 3/4”DROP TUBE TO WITHIN 1°OF TANK BOTTOM,INSTALL IN NEW 2°BUNG. (7>1"FOS DROP TUBE.EXTEND DROP TUBE TO 'WITHIN 6”OF TANK BOTTOM.INSTALL IN NEW 2”BUNG. [>2”CLOCK GAUGE INSTALLED ON 2°BUNG WITH 18°NIPPLE &2°COUPLING,MORRISON FIGURE 818OREQUAL.SET GREEN ARROW AT 2'-0"AND RED ARROW AT .90%).ENSURE THAT THE BACK COVER PLATE IS PROPERLY SEALED AFTER REASSEMBLY (ANY LOOSENESS OR RATTUNG WHEN TAPPEDINDICATESAPOORSEAL). (S>PRESSURE VACUUM VENT WITH WHISTLE ALARM,MORRISON FIGURE 922 OR EQUAL INSTALL ON 2°NIPPLE MIN 60”LONG.ENSURE VENT OUTLET IS 12'MIN ABOVE GRADE.SET WHISTLE TO ALARM AT ._(85%)ABOVE TANK BOTTOM.THREAD WHISTLE VENT WIRE THROUGH NIPPLE &ATTACH TOFLOArPRIORTOINSTALLINGONTANK. [T>4°THREADED PRIMARY EMERGENCY VENT,MORRISON FIGURE 244 OR EQUAL 16 0Z/SQUARE INCHOPENINGPRESSURE.INSTALL IN NEW 4°BUNG. (I>4”THREADED SECONDARY EMERGENCY VENT,MORRISON FIGURE 244 OR EQUAL [12>5'L STRUT WELDED TO TANK,TYP(4). (11"Fos PIPE TO SCHOOL.1”FLEX,FLG x FLIIATING FLANGE,12”OVERALL LENGTH AND 1”FLANGEDBALLVALVENOTSHOWN. [>2”PIPE DOWN WITH 2°FLANGED BALL VALVE,SECURE TO STRUT AT MIDPOINT OF TANK WITH PIPECLAMP. (2 S-2 DOUBLE WALL 1,000 GALLON TANK INSTALLATION (S-3 SIMILAR EXCEPT NEW 2,000 GALLON TANK) NO SCALE(M47 No SCALE PLAN VIEW] [TANK ¥-2 3,000 GALLONS DIESEL FUEL gf eo o NOTES: 1)TANKS V-2 &V-3 ARE EXISTING.DRAIN,CLEAN,&PURGE : PRIOR TO MODIFYING.SEE SPECIFICATIONS.j2)SANDBLAST &PAINT AFTER MODIFICATION,SEE SPECS,__3)PLUG UNUSED EXISTING BUNGS. F-<azlcut out &INSTALL NEW 2°BOTTOM FLANGE CUT OUT EXISTING BOTTOM PCO) AND FLANGED BALL VALVE CONNECTION &INSTALL NEW 1”WATER DRAW DS\o ofTSIr=]=I T=K™FINISH GRADE INSIDE DIKE NN pet's TREATED TIMBER MUDSILL,TYP(5) M4. GENERAL NOTES: 1,TANK V-2:EXISTING 5'-3"#x18'-4°L NOMINAL 3,000 GALLON CAPACITY SINGLE WALL WELDEDSTEELTANKMANUFACTURED&LABELED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ULL.142. 2.TANK V-3:EXISTING 6' 3"6x17'L NOMINAL 5,000 GALLON CAPACITY SINGLE WALL WELDED STEEL TANK MANUFACTURED IN ACCORDANCE WITH UL 142. SPECIFIC_NOTES: (>TANK V-1 &V-2:INSTALL NEW SHOP FADRICATED LADDER WITH GRIP STRUT PLATFORM -SEALWELD6°REINFORCING PLATES AT ALL CONNECTION POINTS [2>2°GAUGE HATCH WITH CAP &GASKET,MORRISON FIGURE 307 OR EQUAL,INSTALL ON 2”x4"L NIPPLE. (>2”SCHEDULE 80 FILL PIPE FROM TANK V-1. [42>FIL UMITER,MORRISON FIGURE 9095A OR EQUAL REMOVE FACTORY COLLAR &NIPPLE AND INSTALLIN.4°x2"x2"DOUBLE TAP BUSHING WITH 2x8"NIPPLE.EXTEND DROP TUBE TO WITHIN 6°OF BOTTOM. [E>INSTALL NEW 24”MANHOLE. (E>PLUG EXISTING BUNG. [>CLOCK GAUGE INSTALLED ON 2”BUNG WITH 18”NIPPLE &2”COUPLING,MORRISON FIGURE 818 OREQUAL,SET GREEN ARROW AT 2'-0"AND RED ARROW AT -"(90%).ENSURE THAT THE BACK COVER PLATE IS PROPERLY SEALED AFTER REASSEMBLY (ANY LOOSENESS OR RATTLING WHEN TAPPEDINDICATESAPOORSEAL). [>PRESSURE VACUUM VENT WITH WHISTLE ALARM,MORRISON FIGURE 922 OR EQUAL.INSTALL ON 2”NIPPLE MIN 60°LONG.ENSURE VENT OUTLET IS 12°MIN ABOVE GRADE.SET WHISTLE TO ALARM AT (85%)ABOVE TANK BOTTOM.THREAD WHISTLE VENT WIRE THROUGH NIPPLE &ATTACH TO FLOAT PRIOR TO INSTALLING ON TANK, [93>8”FLANGED EMERGENCY VENT,MORRISON FIGURE 244-F OR EQUALPRESSURE.16 OZ/SQUARE INCH OPENING [>4'L STRUT WELDED TO TANK,TYP(2). [TD>1”FLANGED BALL VALVE WATER DRAW WITH PLUG. (12>2”FLANGED BALL VALVE AND 2”SCH BO PIPE TO POWER PLANT DAY TANK. (3\V-2 SINGLE WALL 3,000 GALLON TANK INSTALLATION (V-3 SIMILAR EXCEPT 5,000 GALLON TANK &TP-5 SUBMERSIBLE PUMP) REDUCED PLOT 1/2 SCALE PRELIMINARY -NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION M47 No SCALE 2°TO POWER PLANT TANKS TYP.INSTALLATION 2°FLANGED CHECK VALVE 7 CONSTRUCT FRAME BY BOLTING VERTICAL STRUTS TO 2 HORIZONTAL STRUTS WELDED TO TANK 7TNa\ rea) |TANK S=11,000 GALLONSL-]DIESEL FUEL Q GROUNDING REEL, BOLT BASE TO 2x2Q- RIGHT ANGLE STRUT BRACKET, TP (3) GRADE 50°ARCTIC GRADE TRANSFER HOSE W/DRY-BREAK COUPLING, 1-1/2"THREADED 90°£L TO 1-1/2"BREAKAWAY HOSE AND SAFETY BREAK NOTE:TANK V-1 IS MIRROR IMAGE OF S-1 (4 TANKS V1 AND S1_END VIEWM4/NOT TO SCE State of Alaska .Depargent of Community and Economic Development*AIDEA/AEAprtbenRuralEnergyGroup *Anchorage,Alaska 99503 td l=ALASKAuwENERGYAUTHORITY813WestNorthernLightsBlvd. PROSECT:LIME VILLAGE BULK FUEL STORAGE CONSOLIDATION &UPGRADE TANK &PIPING DETAILS ALASKA ENERGY AND ENGINEERING,INC P.O.BOX 111405 ANCHORAGE,ALASKA 99511-1405 PHONE (907)349-0100 SCALE:AS INDICATED FILE NAME:LIMEBFM4 SHEET: vifia/ar_|PROEET WONEER:4 -41-9627 [M4 DRAWN BY:SUS DESIGNED BY:SJS DATE: OF APPENDIX B CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE ALASKA ENERGY AND LIME VILLAGE TRADITIONAL COUNCIL TANK FARM NOVEMBER 19,2001 ENGINEERING FORCE ACCOUNT COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY CONCEPT DESIGN REPORT 1.FOUNDATION,DIKE,&SITE WORK $5,930 2.TANKS $48,690 3.PIPING SYSTEM $26,696 4.PUMPS,DISPENSER,POWER,CONTROLS,ETC.$10,270 5.MISCELLANEOUS $9,080 6.OVERHEAD $41,700 7.FREIGHT $13,449 8.CONSTRUCTION SUB-TOTAL $155,815 9.DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION ADMIN.$25,000 10.CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT $25,000 11.PROJECT SUB-TOTAL $205,815 12.CONTINGENCY $41,163 20 % 13.TOTAL PROJECT COST -TRADITIONAL COUNCIL $246,978 14.TOTAL STORAGE CAPACITY 10,000 GAL.GROSS CAPACITY 9,000 GAL.NET CAPAC.(90%OF GROSS) 15.COST PER GALLON OF NET CAPACITY $27.44 B-1 ALASKA ENERGY AND LIME VILLAGE TRADITIONAL COUNCIL TANK FARM NOVEMBER 19,2001 ENGINEERING FORCE ACCOUNT CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE CONCEPT DESIGN REPORT ITEM QUAN |UNIT]UNIT MATL |UNIT};LAB |LAB|LABOR |CONTR }FREIGHT|TOTAL |UNIT]TOTAL COST COST HRS |HRS |RATE|COST COST COST COST WT |WT(#) FOUNDATION,DIKE,&SITE Clear &Prep Site 1{lump $0 $0 25 25|$60}$1,500 $1,500 0 Gravel 5O|cu.yd}$2.50 $125 |0.500 25|$60 $1,500 $1,625 0 Dike Membrane Liner 1,100}sq.ft.$1.25 $1,375 |0.005 6}$60 $330 $1,705}0.17 187 Non-Woven Geotextile (Dike)2,500]sq.ft.|$0.05 $125 |0.004 3|$60 $150 $275 |0.04 100 4"Cellular Confinement 500|sq.ft.|$1.05 $525 |0.01 5|$60 $300 $825 |0.35 175 6'Chain-Link Fence O}lin.ft.|$10.50 $0 {0.50 0}$60 $0 $0 }15.00 0 TANKS Drain/Clean/Purge Exist Tanks 5|ea.$100 $500 15 75|$80 $6,000 $6,500 0 Inspect Exist Tanks for Reuse 2}_ea.$0 $0 5 10}$80 $800 $800 0 Wirebrush &Wash Exist Tanks 900]sq.ft.$0.50 $200 }0.03 21}$60 $1,260 $1,460 |0.20 180 Paint Exist Tanks 1,000]sq.ft.$0.60 $600 |0.05 50|$60 $3,000 $3,600 |0.20 200 New 2,000 Double Wall Tank 1}ea |$10,000 |$10,000 0 0}$60 $0 $10,000 |4000 4000 New Saddles on Exist Tanks 6]ea $300 $1,800 40 240]$60}$14,400 $16,200 |200 1200 Weld Connect on Exist Tanks 10]ea $50 $500 2 20]$60 $1,200 $1,700 20 200 Manholes/ways on Exist Tanks 2|ea $100 $200 2 4|$60 $240 $440 50 100 Emergency Vents 4|ea $150 $600 2 8}$60 $480 $1,080 25 100 Pressure/Vacuum/Whistle Vents 3]ea $250 $750 -2 6}$60 $360 $1,110 20 60 Clock Type Gauges 3}ea $280 $840 2 6|$60 $360 $1,200 20 60 4x12 Treated Timber Mudsills 100}lin.ft.$4.00 $400 |0.10 10}$60 $600 $1,000 13 1300 Place Tanks in Dike 2|ea $0 $0 20 40|$60 $2,400 $2,400 0 Place Double Wall Tanks 1}ea $0 $0 20 20|$60 $1,200 $1,200 0 PIPING SYSTEM . Demolish Old Piping 1}lump $0 $0 20 20|$60 $1,200 $1,200 0 2"Sch 80 Welded Buried 400}lin.ft.$4.50 $1,800 |0.10 40|$60 $2,400 $4,200 5 2000 2"Sch 80 Welded Above Grade 250}lin.ft.$5.00 $1,250 }0.05 13|$60 $750 $2,000 5 1250 Paint Piping 200]sq.ft.$0.60 $120 |0.10 20]$60 $1,200 $1,320 |0.20 40 4x12 Treated Timber Sleepers 40]lin.ft.$4.00 $40 |0.10 1|_$60 $60 $100 13 130 2"Pipe Straps 4|ea $1.75 $7 |0.10 0}$60 $24 $31 |0.60 2 Misc Strut &Pipe Clamps 1{lump |$750 $750 20 20}$60 $1,200 $1,950 }100 400 Flexible Connectors 8|ea $125 $1,000 1 8]$60 $480 $1,480 10 80 Manifold &Pump Fittings 1}lum $750 $750 50 50}$60 $3,000 $3,750 |1200 1200 2"Flanged Check Valves 3}ea $175 $525 1 3}$60 $180 $705 30 90 2"Flanged Ball Valves 8|ea $175 $1,400 1 8|$60 $480 $1,880 30 240 1"Flanged Baill Valves 2|ea $100 $200 1 2|$60 $120 $320 15 30 Misc Threaded Valves 1}lump $250 $250 10 10}$60 $600 $850 50 50 2°Actuator Valves 1{|ea |$1,700 $1,700 2 2|_$60 $120 $1,820 35 35 2"Strainers ij ea $250 $250 1 1{$60 $60 $310 50 50 2"Threaded PRV i}ea $225 $225 2 2|$60 $120 $345 20 20 1"Flanged PRV 1|ea $475 $475 1 4|$60 $60 $535 10 10 2”Anti-Syphon Valves 2|ea $150 $300 2 4|$60 $240 $540 10 20 2"Fill Limiters 3]ea $700 $2,100 4 12|$60 $720 $2,820 20 60 4-1/2"Pipeline Filter 1|ea $300 $300 4 4|_$60 $240 $540 20 20 B-2 ALASKA ENERGY AND LIME VILLAGE TRADITIONAL COUNCIL TANK FARM NOVEMBER 19,2001 ENGINEERING FORCE ACCOUNT CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE CONCEPT DESIGN REPORT ITEM QUAN |UNIT}UNIT MATL |UNIT);LAB |LAB|LABOR |CONTR |FREIGHT)TOTAL |UNIT!TOTALCOSTCOST|HRS|HRS |RATE}]COST COST COST COST WT |WT(#) PUMPS,POWER,CONTROLS,ETC. 3/4 HP Submersible Pumps 2|ea $1,000 $2,000 6 12|$60 $720 $2,720 100 200 1/2 HP NV/Expl Prf Cent.Pump 1|_ea $1,000 $1,000 4 4|$60 $240 $1,240 75 75 1-1/4"Bulk Transfer Hose 50]lin.ft.$14 $550 |0.10 5|$60 $300 $850 1.5 75 Bulk Transfer Nozzle &Acces.1{ea $300 $300 1 1|_$60 $60 $360 75 75 Pump Control Panel 1]ea $500 $500 20 20]$80{$1,600 $2,100 |100 100 Area Lighting 1}lump $500 $500 5 5|$80 $400 $900 100 100 Conduit,Conductors,&Devices 1]lump $500 $500 20 20}$80 $1,600 $2,100 250 250 MISCELLANEOUS Concrete 1]cu.yd.$80 $80 10 10}$60 $600 $680 |600 600 Portable Fuel Transfer Pump 1{ea $750 $750 0 0}$60 $0 $750}100 100 Portable Dike Drainage Pump 1|ea $250 $250 0 0|$60 $0 $250 |100 100 Misc.Stee!1|lump $500 $500 20 20]$60 $1,200 $1,700 250 250 Signs &Valve Tags 1]lump $500 $500 10 10|$60 $600 $1,100]100 100 Spill Response Supplies 1}lump |$2,500 $2,500 0 o|$60 $0 $2,500 600 600 Misc Hardware 4|lump $500 $500 0 0}$60 $0 $500 |500 500 Misc Tools &Safety Gear 1]lump |$1,000 $1,000 0 O|$60 $0 $1,000 500 500 Welding Rod,Gases,Etc.1|lump $600 $600 0 0}$60 $0 $600 |500 500 OVERHEAD Audit Grants 1]lump $2,000 $2,000 0 ROW Legal Work 1}lump $7,500 $7,500 0 Construction Insurance 1]lump $2,500 $2,500 0 First Year Operation Insurance 1}lump $4,500 $4,500 0 Repair Local Heavy Equip 1|lump |$3,000 $3,000 40 40|$60{$2,400}$1,500 $6,900 0 Rent/Mobilize Heavy Equip 1}lump $5,000 $5,000 0 Welder/Compr/Misc Tool Rent 4|lump $2,500 $2,500 0 Commission System &Training 10}hr 4 10}$80 $800 $800 0 Superintendent Overhd Off-Site 20|hr 1 20|$80 $1,600 $1,600 0 Superintendent Overhd On-Site 20)hr {20}$80 $1,600 $1,600 0 Crew Travel Time 20|hr 4 20}$80 $1,600 $1,600 0 Crew Airfares 2|trips $1,600 $1,600 0 Crew Per Diem 50}mn.dy $2,100 $2,100 0 Housing Rent 4]mo.$1,500 $1,500 0 FREIGHT 17,414 Air Freight Sterling-Lime Village |17414 |Ib.$0.60 $10,449 Tool Mob &Demob (SkyVan)1|ea.$2,000 $2,000 Misc Small Freight &Gold Streak 1}lump |$1,000 $1,000 CONSTRUCTION SUB-TOTAL $47,012 1,011 $64,654 |$30,700 |$13,449 $155,815 Engineering (Design &CCA)1}lump $25,000 Construction Management 1}lump $25,000 PROJECT SUB-TOTAL $47,012 $64,654 |$80,700}$13,449 $205,815Contingency20)%|$41,163 {TOTAL PROJECT COST $246,978 B-3 ALASKA ENERGY AND LIME VILLAGE IASD SCHOOL TANK FARM NOVEMBER 19,2001 ENGINEERING FORCE ACCOUNT COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY CONCEPT DESIGN REPORT 1.FOUNDATION,DIKE,&SITE WORK $19,948 2.TANKS $28,960 3.PIPING SYSTEM $34,554 4.PUMPS,DISPENSER,POWER,CONTROLS,ETC.$13,510 5.MISCELLANEOUS $8,580 6.OVERHEAD $43,700 7.FREIGHT $15,565 8.CONSTRUCTION SUB-TOTAL $164,817 9.DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION ADMIN.$35,000 10.CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT $25,000 11.PROJECT SUB-TOTAL $224,817 12.CONTINGENCY $44,963 20 % 13.TOTAL PROJECT COST -SCHOOL $269,780 14.TOTAL STORAGE CAPACITY 4,000 GAL.GROSS CAPACITY 3,600 GAL.NET CAPAC.(90%OF GROSS) 15.COST PER GALLON OF NET CAPACITY $74.94 B-4 ALASKA ENERGY AND LIME VILLAGE IASD SCHOOL TANK FARM NOVEMBER 19,2001 ENGINEERING FORCE ACCOUNT CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE CONCEPT DESIGN REPORT ITEM QUAN |UNIT]UNIT MATL |UNIT|LAB |LAB |LABOR |CONTR |FREIGHT|TOTAL UNIT;TOTAL COST COST HRS |HRS |RATE}COST COST COST COST WT |WT(#) FOUNDATION,DIKE,&SITE Clear &Prep Site 1|jump $0 $0 25 25}$60 $1,500 $1,500 0 Gravel 250|cu.yd{$2.50 $625 |0.500 125|$60 $7,500 $8,125 0 Woven Geotextile (Pad)1,800}sq.ft.$0.05 $90 |0.001 2|$60 $108 $198 |0.04 72 6'Chain-Link Fence 250}lin.ft.|$10.50 $2,625 |0.50 125|$60 $7,500 $10,125 |15.00 3750 TANKS Drain/Clean/Purge Exist Tanks 7|ea.$100 $700 10 70}$80 $5,600 $6,300 0 inspect Exist Tanks for Reuse 2|ea.$0 $0 5 10]$80 $800 $800 0 Wirebrush &Wash Exist Tanks 400}sq.ft.$0.50 $200 }0.03 21}$60 $1,260 $1,460 1 400 Paint Exist Tanks 400|sq.ft.$0.60 $240 |0.05 20}$60 $1,200 $1,440 |0.20 80 New 2,000 Double Wall Tank 1{ea |$10,000 $10,000 0 0]$60 $0 $10,000 |4000 4000 Weld Connect on Exist Tanks 4]ea $50 $200 2 8|$60 $480 $680 20 80 Emergency Vents 6]ea $150 $900 2 12]$60 $720 $1,620 25 150 Pressure/Vacuum/Whistle Vents 3]ea $250 $750 2 6]$60 $360 $1,110 20 60 Clock Type Gauges 3]ea $280 $840 2 6|$60 $360 $1,200 20 60 4x12 Treated Timber Mudsills 75}lin.ft.$4.00 $300 |0.10 8]$60 $450 $750 13 975 Place Double Wall Tanks 3]ea $0 $0 20 60|$60 $3,600 $3,600 0 PIPING SYSTEM Demolish Old Piping 4|lump $0 $0 20 20|$60 $1,200 $1,200 0 2"Sch 80 Welded Buried 400|lin.ft.$4.50 $1,800 |0.20 80}$60 $4,800 $6,600 5 2000 2"Sch 80 Welded Above Grade 425}lin.ft.$5.00 $2,125 |0.10 43|$60 $2,550 $4,675 5 2125 1"Sch 160 Welded Buried 80]lin.ft.$5.50 $440 |0.20 16}$60 $960 $1,400 3 240 1"Sch 160 Welded Above Grade 40]lin.ft.$5.00 $200 |0.10 4)$60 $240 $440 3 120 Paint Piping 300]sq.ft.$0.60 $180 |0.10 30]$60 $1,800 $1,980 |0.20 60 4x12 Treated Timber Sleepers 50}lin.ft.$4.00 $200 |0.10 5]$60 $300 $500 13 650 2"Pipe Straps 25|ea $1.75 $44 |0.10 3}$60 $150 $194 |0.60 15 Misc Strut &Pipe Clamps 1|lump $750 $750 20 20|$60 $1,200 $1,950]100 100 Flexible Connectors 8|ea $125 $1,000 1 8|$60 $480 $1,480 10 80 Manifold &Pump Fittings 1}lump $750 $750 50 50]$60 $3,000 $3,750 |1200 4200 2"Flanged Check Valves 5|ea $175 $875 1 5|_$60 $300 $1,175 30 150 2"Flanged Ball Valves 7|ea $175 $1,225 1 7|$60 $420 $1,645 30 210 1"Flanged Ball Valves 2|ea $100 $200 1 2}$60 $120 $320 15 30 Misc Threaded Valves 1]lump $250 $250 40 10}$60 $600 $850 50 50 2”Threaded PRV 1{ea $225 $225 2 2}$60 $120 $345 20 20 1"Flanged PRV 2|ea $475 $950 1 2|$60 $120 $1,070 10 20 2"Anti-Syphon Valves 2|ea $150 $300 2 4|$60 $240 $540 10 20 2"Fill Limiters 3}ea $700 $2,100 4 12|$60 $720 $2,820 20 60 1"Oil Safety Valve 2|ea $300 $600 4 8|$60 $480 $1,080 10 20 4-1/2"Pipeline Filter 1|ea $300 $300 4 4|$60 $240 $540 20 20 ALASKA ENERGY AND LIME VILLAGE IASD SCHOOL TANK FARM NOVEMBER 19,2001 ENGINEERING FORCE ACCOUNT CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE CONCEPT DESIGN REPORT ITEM QUAN |UNIT]UNIT MATL |UNIT]LAB |LAB|LABOR |CONTR |FREIGHT|TOTAL [UNIT|TOTALCOSTCOST{HRS}HRS |RATE|COST COST COST COST WT |WT(#) PUMPS,POWER,CONTROLS,ETC. 3/4 HP Submersible Pumps 1|ea $1,000 $1,000 6 6|$60 $360 $1,360 |100 100 1/2 HP NV/Expl Prf Cent.Pump 1}ea $1,000 $1,000 4 4|$60 $240 $1,240 75 75 1-1/4"Bulk Transfer Hose 50}iin.ft.$11 $550 |0.10 5|$60 $300 $850 1.5 75 Bulk Transfer Nozzle &Acces.1}ea $300 $300 1 1]$60 $60 $360 75)75 Pump Control Panel i}ea $500 $500 20 20}$80 $1,600 $2,100 100 100 Meter Base &Panel Board 1|lump $500 $500 20 20}$80 $1,600 $2,100 100 100 Area Lighting 1]lump $500 $500 10 10|$80 $800 $1,300 |100 100 Conduit,Conductors,&Devices 4}lump |$1,000 $1,000 40 40|$80 $3,200 $4,200 |500 500 MISCELLANEOUS Concrete 1|cu.yd.$80 $80 10 10]$60 $600 $680}600 600 Misc.Steel 1|tlump |$1,000 $1,000 20 20|$60 $1,200 $2,200 |500 500 Signs &Valve Tags 1|lump $500 $500 10 10|$60 $600 $1,100}100 100 Spill Response Supplies 1|lump |$2,500 $2,500 0 0}$60 $0 $2,500 |300 300 Misc Hardware 4|Jump $500 $500 0 O|$60 $0 $500 {500 500 Misc Tools &Safety Gear 1}lump |$1,000 $1,000 0 0|$60 $0 $1,000 500 500 Welding Rod,Gases,Etc.4]lump $600 $600 0 O|$60 $0 $600 |500 500 OVERHEAD Audit Grants 1|jump $4,000 $4,000 0 ROW Lega!Work 1|lump $7,500 $7,500 0 Construction Insurance 1)lump $2,500 $2,500 0 First Year Operation Insurance 1}lump $4,500 $4,500 0 Repair Local Heavy Equip 1|jump }$3,000 $3,000 40 40|$60 $2,400 $1,500 $6,900 0 Rent/Mobilize Heavy Equip 1]lump $5,000 $5,000 0 Welder/Compr/Misc Tool Rent 1]lump $2,500 $2,500 0 Commission System &Training 10]hr 4 10]$80 $800 $800 0 Superintendent Overhd Off-Site 20|hr 1 20;$80|$1,600 $1,600 0 Superintendent Overhd On-Site 20]hr 1 20)$80 $1,600 $1,600 0 Crew Travel Time 20]hr 1 20]$80 $1,600 $1,600 0 Crew Airfares 2|trips $1,600 $1,600 0 Crew Per Diem 50}mn.dy $2,100 $2,100 0 Housing Rent 1]mo.$1,500 $1,500 0 FREIGHT 20,942 Air Freight Sterling-Lime Village |20942 ||b.$0.60 $12,565 Tool Mob &Demob (SkyVan)1 |ea.$2,000 $2,000 Misc Smail Freight &Gold Streak 1 |lump}$1,000 $1,000 CONSTRUCTION SUB-TOTAL $46,514 1,087 $70,038 |$32,700 |$15,565 $164,817 Engineering (Design &CCA)1}lump $35,000 Construction Management 1|lump $25,000 PROJECT SUB-TOTAL $46,514 $70,038 |$92,700 |$15,565 $224,817 Contingency 20|%fk $44,963 {TOTAL PROJECT COST $269,780 B-6 APPENDIX C SITE CONTROL DOCUMENTS Lime Village Site Control Issues Based on information obtained from the Bureau of Land Management and from the Department of Commerce and Economic Development,Municipal Land Trust Program,it appears the Lime Village Corporation owns the school site,powerplant,and fill pipeline property as part of Interim Conveyance 709. A request for a Certificate to Plat was issued on August 20,2001.-Three title companies declined to prepare the Certificate to Plat.A fourth title companyindicatedtheCertificatetoPlatwouldbeprepared,but has been unable toprovidethecompleteddocument. A land management consultant familiar with Lime Village,and specializing in landacquisitionunderthestateMunicipalLandTrustProgram,has been retained toassistinobtainingsitecontrolfortheproject.The consultant is tasked to confirm property ownership and prepare draft site control documentation with propertydescriptionsanddrawingsforreview,comment and approval by the Lime VillageCorporationandthecommunity.The Department of Transportation airport siteleaseissueswillalsobeaddressedwithDepartmentofTransportation,AirportLeasing. The land management consultant will also be tasked with providing informationandworkingwiththetitlecompanysoaCertificatetoPlatmaybeissuedfortheproject.