Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Prelim Design Report And Construction Cost Est Of Fuel Storage And Handling Facilities - NAPASKIAK March 22, 2000
Gerrk cary cme, PRELIMINARY DESIGN REPORT AND CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE FOR CONSOLIDATION AND RENOVATION OF FUEL STORAGE AND HANDLING FACILITIES IN THE COMMUNITY OF: NAPASKIAK PREPARED FOR: STATE OF ALASKA RURAL ENERGY PROGRAMS /AEA PREPARED BY: Alaska Energy and Engineering,Inc. Mailing Address -P.O.Box 111405 Anchorage,AK 99511-1405 (907)349-0100 349-8001 FAX MARCH 22,2000 Napaskiak Bulk Fuel Consolidation &Upgrade March 22,2000 Preliminary Design Report Alaska Energy and Engineering EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report has been prepared by Alaska Energy and Engineering,Inc.(AE&E)for theRuralEnergyPrograms/AEA.The purpose of this study is to provide a concept designandconstructioncostestimateforconsolidationandupgradeofalldieselfuelandgasolinestorageinthecommunityofNapaskiak.The recommendations made hereinaresubjecttoapprovalofthecommunity,project participants,funding agencies,andtheRuralEnergyProjects/AEA.The participants in the project include the NapaskiakTribalCouncil,Napaskiak Electric Utility,and the Lower Kuskokwim School District. A site investigation was performed on July 23 and 24,1999.A previously constructedsandpad,with barge landing access road,was selected for the new consolidated tankfarmsite.The proposed tank farm site is located about 50 feet south of the electric utility power plant and tank farm. The new consolidated tank farm will combine virtually all of the fuel used for publicbuildingheating,electrical power generation,and retail sales into a common dike.Packaged daytanks will be located at the laundromat and power plant,and double walltankswillbelocatedattheschool,store and water plants.A dual product dispenser will be installed at the new tank farm site and will be equipped with remote control capabilities. A total of two existing tanks were determined to be suitable for reuse.Ten new tankswillberequiredtomeettheprojectedfuelstoragerequirementsforthecommunity,including one new 12,000 gallon double wall "intermediate"tank for the school,one3,000 gallon double wall tank for the store,and two 600 gallon double wall tanks for the water plants. The consolidated tank farm will have a gross storage (tank shell)capacity of 170,700gallonsofdieselfuel,including the school "intermediate”tank,and 12,000 gallons ofgasoline.The project provides a combined net storage capacity of 153,600 gallons based on 90%of the gross capacity. Local silty-sandy soil,high potential flood stage,and lack of locally available fill materialmakesanearthenpadanddikeimpractical.A heavy timber dike on an elevated pad ofimportedsandwillbeusedtoprovidesupportandsecondarycontainmentforthetanks. The proposed project schedule calls for design,permitting and construction duringspring/summer 2000.Initial site preparation will begin in the spring,delivery ofheavy/bulky materials in June,and completion of construction with the facility fullyfunctionalbyOctoberof2000. The total combined project cost for both including all design,supervision,inspection,permitting,and a 20%contingency is estimated to be $1,441,445 which equates to aunitcostof$9.38 per gallon based on a total net storage capacity of 153,630 gallons.The breakdown of costs for the Utility and Council are allocated on the tank capacity intheCommunitydikecellandaunitcostof$8.85 per gallon.The School tank farm costis$11.18 per gallon.The breakdown of costs is as follows:PUYcl.3°Council $355,245 40,140 gallons net capacity @$8.85/gal reUtility$693,764 78,390 gallons net capacity @$8.85/gal 9 "**% Subtotal $1,049,009 118,530 gallons net capacity e LKSD School$392,436 35,100 gallons net capacity@$11.18/gal Total $1,441,445 153,630 gallons net capacity @$9.38/gal Napaskiak Bulk Fuel Consolidation &Upgrade March 22,2000 Preliminary Design Report Alaska Energy and Engineering INDEX Executive SUMIMAL).............cccccssccecceeeccsssessececcccceessesnsseceeeesseeseuseeeseecesesseaeeesananaes Page i IGOX oo eeeeeesseesssscccceceeeeceeesseesenacaeeeeeeceeesseeeeeeeeeccessesseeueneeesecsessacaauseeeeeeeeeseesseseeene Page ii 1.0 INtPOGUCTION ..........eee cccccctteeecececeecseeseaeeeeeeesecsssaaseeeeeesesesssaaaacaeeesesersesensncenensaaes Page 1 1.1 Code AnallySis ..........ccceccsceeeecessnceeeesseneeeesssaeeeseesseeeesesenseaescensaaaeoeseeneaaes Page 1 2.0 Existing Fuel Storage Facilities -Function and Capacity .............eeeeeeeeee Page 2 3.0 Current Fuel CONSUMPTION...eee ee ceeseceeeeneteeeeeeeenuaeeeeeteneeeeeseesaaeeesoeeees Page 4 3.1 Planned Infrastructure Improvements ................cccssssecceceeesesssessnessaenenees Page 5 3.2 Tank Capacity Requirements .............sc ceceeeeeeeesessssceeeeeereeeeeeeessseaaeeeeeeees Page 7 4.0 Proposed Facility DESCIIPtiON ......ec ccseeeeeeseaeeeeeessaeeesesesssensesreeseseaes Page 8 BaD Site cc ecccesssssnecseeceeeseessseeeeeenersceessaeueeeeeeeesesecsaaneneceseeeteeseteseenes Page 8 4.2 Foundation Construction.............ccccccccccssssssseneceeeeeessesssnsneeeeseeseneeeeseeeenes Page 9 4.3 Secondary ContainMent...............:ceceesccceceeesceeeceeesseececeecnsnseeeseessnneeeeees Page 10 4A TAS ooo cccccccccccececesssssceecceceesesescssecereesecseeensnsaceeeseceesesesecsanaeaeeeseeseeeeens Page 11 4.5 Piping/Valves/PUMPS/ACCESSOTIES ...........ccceeseeceeeseeeeeseeeesesneeessenteeeesans Page 11 4.6 SOCUTrLY .........es cececesssececesssssceccesssnecessssnsecesessesecessssaseesenes setesceeeseeeeeaeeees Page 12 5.0 Proposed Operating Scenario and Spill RESponse................ccccccesesssnreeeees Page 13 6.0 Permitting............ccccessscccecessssceccessseneeeesssseesecsseaeeessssneececsessaeeseesesenaeeeerensseees Page 14 7.0 Construction Plan ..........ccccceeeeceeeeeeees besessecsseensecesecatecssecseeesseesssenseeesaeenes Page 14 7.1 Local Job SKIS 0...ec ccessssttecsscnececesesseecessesssacerssteaseeecessseaeeeeeeeees Page 14 7.2 Local EQuipMent ................csssssssssssssncccecenecccccecccceceeceeceeececececcesssensneeanes Page 15 7.3 Material SOUPCES .00...........cccccsssssececeesssssseseceeseesesessneeeeceeeeeseesesecenensenenes Page 15 B.0 Schedule...cccccccccsssssssnsnececcceeesssnsnececeeeesssensanaeeeeeesesessuanaeneeeeeeeeeeesees Page 15 9.0 Cost Estimate .........i cccccccssssseceeeceeesssseeeeceecesesesseaseceeeeeescsenseeaeeeeeeneeeeees Page 16 Preliminary Design DrawingS..............::::ccccsssceeeeeessneeesesseneeeseesnneeeseensenaeeeeeseens Appendix A Construction Cost Estimate ...........c.ccccccccssssseeceeeeeesssssseseecesesessssseeeeseeeeeneneeees Appendix B Certificate to Plat ..........cc cccccscsssssecccceecessssaaeeeeeecceessnsessnaceeseeerseeesessaaaaeeeeees Appendix C Napaskiak Bulk Fuel Consolidation &Upgrade March 22,2000 Preliminary Design Report Alaska Eneray and Engineering 1.0 INTRODUCTION This report has been prepared by Alaska Energy and Engineering,Inc.(AE&E) for the Rural Energy Programs/AEA.The purpose of this study is to provide a concept design and construction cost estimate for consolidation and upgrade of all diesel fuel and gasoline storage in the community of Napaskiak.The recommendations made herein are subject to approval of the community,project participants,funding agencies,and the Rural Energy Projects/AEA.For thepurposeofthisstudy,the term "diesel fuel"refers to all fuel oil products used forspaceheating,electrical generation,and heavy equipment operation.TheparticipantsintheprojectincludetheNapaskiakTribalCouncil,NapaskiakElectricUtility,and the Lower Kuskokwim School District (LKSD). A site investigation was performed by Steve Stassel and Trevor Krupa of AE&EonJuly23and24,1999.Existing tanks were examined to determine suitabilityforreuse.A meeting was held with Phillip Nicholai,Tribal Administrator andSteveMaxie,Utility Manager,on July 23°.The scope of the project wasdiscussedanditwasconfirmedthattheexistingsandpadsoutheastofthe power plant was the optimal location for the tank farm project.A preliminarytopographicsurveywasperformedattheselectedsiteandlocationsfor"intermediate"tanks and routes for pipelines were explored.Additional information was obtained from the following individuals: e Steve Maxie,Napaskiak Electric Utility 737-7432 e Jim Kohl,Lower Kuskokwim School District 543-4891 e Paul Maxie,Napaskiak School Maintenance 737-7212 e John Owens,Department of Transportation 269-0656 e Phillip Nicholai,Tribal Administrator 737-7364 e John Davis,AVCP Regional Housing Authority 543-3121 e Jim Patterson,Village Safe Water 269-7611 e Peter Saunders,WAVE Fuels 279-5516 e Mike O'Shea,Crowley Marine (800)248-8632 e Wiley Wilhelm,LCMF 562-1830 e Harlan Legare,U.S.Army Corps of Engineers 753-2610 Prior to the field investigation available information was obtained and analyzedincludingcommunityprofile,survey plats,engineering studies,flood information and other relevant data. 1.1 Code Analysis Prior work performed by the State of Alaska Division of Energy included a codeevaluationofexistingfacilitiesandpreparationofadatabasesummarizingresults.The existing facilities were reviewed and information in the databaseverifiedandrevisedasrequired.The following is a summary of the existing facility deficiencies that were observed: e tmproper Secondary Containment (Diking)-The tanks are not within a properliquidtightsecondarycontainmentsystemasrequiredbytheFireCodeand EPA regulations. e Improper Tank Foundations -Many of the tanks are installed on light wood & timber cribbing foundations in violation of the Fire Code. Napaskiak Bulk Fuel Consolidation &Upgrade March 22,2000 Preliminary Design Report Alaska Energy and Engineering e No Flood Protection -The facilities are located within the 100-year flood plain.The tanks are not adequately restrained from floating nor are they elevatedabovetheanticipated100-year flood level.A major flood event could causethetankstotoppleandcauseafuelspill. e Improper Piping and Valves -Existing piping systems are steel pipe withthreadedandgrooved-end joints.These joints have a tendency to leak andfailovertime.Many of the valves are made of bronze,in violation of the Fire Code,and appear to be worn out. The combinations of deficiencies pose a significant threat to public safety and the environment.In addition,the community has received violation notifications from the Coast Guard.The community may be denied delivery of fuel in thenearfuturebyfuelcarriersifthefacilitiesarenotrenovatedwhichwouldcreateasignificanthardshipforlocalresidents.A major upgrade is required to bring theexistingfacilityintocompliancewithcurrentcodesandregulationsandtomeet the long-term fuel storage and dispensing needs of Napaskiak.Consolidating theexistingtankfarmsintoonefacilityisthemostcost-effective solution because it will reduce not only construction costs but should also reduce long-termoperationandmaintenanceexpenses. The concept design for the new facility has been prepared to meet current code and regulatory requirements that include: e The 1997 Edition of the Uniform Fire Code,including State of AlaskaAmendments e The 1999 Edition of the National Electrical Code e 40 CFR,Part 112.1-12,U.S.Environmental Protection Agency SpillPreventionRequirementsincludingpendingrevisions e 33 CFR,Part 154.30 &154.1030,U.S.Coast Guard Spill Prevention Requirements The design also incorporates appropriate industry standards such as NFPA and API as well as proven methods and materials that have been used successfully on other rural bulk fuel facilities in similar locations and climates. 2.0 EXISTING FUEL STORAGE FACILITIES -FUNCTION AND CAPACITY The existing fuel storage facilities are scattered throughout Napaskiak,typicallylocatedatornearthepointofconsumption.Tank farm numbers belowcorrespondtothenumbersassignedintheRuralEnergyPrograms/AEAdatabase.The net fuel storage capacity,based on 90%of the gross tank shellcapacity,is provided for the various products used for each entity in the table on the following page: Napaskiak Bulk Fuel Consolidation &Upgrade March 22,2000 Preliminary Design Report Alaska Energy and Engineering EXISTING NET 'FUEL STORAGE CAPACITY Facility Unleaded Gas Diesel Fuel LKSD School (#1)37,100 gal BIA School Mech Bldg (#2)1,125 gal Napaskiak Electric Utility (#3)38,900 gal Napaskiak Inc.Store (#4)2,250 gal Army National Guard (#5)1,350 gal Total None 80,725 gal 1)Net capacity is based on 90%of tank shell dimensions to account for actual useable fuel in the tank. Each facility,except the store and D.O.T tanks,was evaluated to determinespecificneedsanddeficiencies.Tanks were visually examined to determinesuitabilityforre-use.Most of the tanks in Napaskiak appear to be in fair to good condition with minimal visible corrosion.While most of the tanks could be renovated for use in the new facility,it may not be cost effective.Prior studies . and cost comparisons have found that tanks of less than 10,000 gallons capacityaregenerallynotworthrepairingbecauseofthehighcostofmodificationsand new appurtenances versus the relatively low storage capacity.In addition,numerous small tanks in a consolidated tank farm require a larger dike footprintandsomanyvalves,gauges,etc.that the cost of construction,operation andmaintenanceishigherandtheprobabilityofspillsissignificantlyincreased.Thefollowingparagraphssummarizefindingsforeachtankfarm: e LKSD School (#1).This facility consists of four single wall,horizontal, welded steel tanks resting on steel saddles supported on heavy timbers.Thisfacilitystoresdieselfuelfortheschool's power plant and for building heat.The tanks are located in a diked and fenced facility about 120 feet south oftheschool.The top of the dike is below flood level and the dike does not appear to be lined or liquid tight.The combined gross shell capacity of thetanksis41,200 gallons.The tanks are in fair to good condition and could be renovated;however,because of the high cost of renovation and the largerdikefootprintrequiredformultipletanks,the school's tanks will not be used in the new tank farm.One of the school's horizontal tanks will be cleaned and saved for spill contingency storage.The remainder of the existing tanks will be backhauled to Bethel and turned over to the school district. e BIA School Mechanical Bldg (#2).This facility consists of three single wall,horizontal,welded steel tanks supported on a wooden platform approximately 7 feet above grade.The tanks are located adjacent to the BIA school mechanical building.There is no dike,liner or fence.The tanks were used for diesel fuel for the BIA School mechanical building,but are reported to beoutofservice.The gross shell capacity of the tanks is 1,250 gallons.Thetanksareinfaircondition,but are not considered for renovation due to their small capacity. e Napaskiak Electric Utility (#3).This facility consists of one horizontal andoneverticalweldedsteeltanklocatedadjacenttothepowerplant.The vertical tank is supported on a platform of heavy timbers and light wooddecking.The horizontal tank is supported on timber and dunnage.Guy wiresareattachedtothetopoftheverticaltankandanchoredtopreventthetank 3 Napaskiak Bulk Fuel Consolidation &Upgrade March 22,2000 Preliminary Design Report Alaska Energy and Engineering from overturning from seismic and wind loading.Both tanks are locatedwithinalinedsandbagandearthendike,and surrounded by a chain linkfence.The top of the berm is below flood level and the liner has failed and is not liquid tight.These tanks are used for storage of diesel!fuel for the utility for electric generation.The combined gross shell capacity of the tanks is43,200 gallons.The vertical tank is in fair condition,but is not considered acandidateforrenovationduetotheheightofthetankandseismic/windinstability.The vertical tank will be demolished and disposed of.Thehorizontaltankisinfairtogoodconditionandwillberenovated.Required modifications are described tn Section 4.4. e Napaskiak Inc.Store (#4):This facility consists of three single wall,horizontal,welded steel tanks located in a wooden dike with liner.The tanks are used for diese!fuel for the store.The tanks are in poor to fair condition, and are not considered for renovation due to their small capacity. e Army National Guard (#5):This facility consists of a double wall,skidmounted,horizontal,welded steel tank set on wood planking adjacent to theArmory.There is no fence.The Guard is in the process this summer ofconstructinganewarmorywithcodecompliantfuelstorage. e BIA School (inactive).This facility consists of nine BIA style,single wall, vertical welded steel tanks.The tank farm is located approximately 200 feet west of the school building.The tanks are supported on timber and plank foundations about 3 feet above grade.There is no dike,liner or fence surrounding this site.At the time of the site visit,the tanks were not connected to the school piping network.According to Jim Kohl (LKSD Maintenance Director)the tanks are not used and are scheduled to beremoved.This facility is not included in the DOE database because of its inactive status. The existing piping systems,including valves,are relatively old and in marginaltopoorcondition.The new consolidated tank farm will require a completely newpipingconfiguration,rendering the existing piping system virtually unusable.With the exception of the school's new 2”welded distribution piping,all existingabovegradepipingandvalvingshouldbedemolishedanddisposedofaspartof this project. 3.0 CURRENT FUEL CONSUMPTION Annual fuel consumption information was obtained for the community waterplants,Laundromat,electric utility,school,Napaskiak,Inc.Store and DOT heavyequipment.Although retail gasoline and diesel fuel is currently not available inNapaskiak,estimated annual retail fuel consumption is included for comparisontoproposedretailfueltankcapacity.For planning purposes,the diesel fuelconsumptionforthetwowaterplants,Laundromat,Napaskiak Inc.Store,andDOTheavyequipmentisincludedintheretailfueltankcapacity.The table onthefollowingpageshowsthebreakdownofestimatedconsumptionofeach product by facility owner: Napaskiak Bulk Fuel Consolidation &Upgrade March 22,2000 Preliminary Design Report Alaska Energy and Engineering CURRENT ANNUAL FUEL CONSUMPTION Facility Unleaded Gas Diesel Fuel Retail Sales | 8,470 gallons (1)24,240 gallons (2) Napaskiak Electric Utility 61,100 gallons (3) LKSD School 25,000 gallons (4) Total 8,470 gallons 110,340 gallons 1.Estimated at 77 households @ 110 gallons/year from ICDBG application 2.Estimated at 77 households @ 220 gallons/year from ICDBG application, plus water plants @ 1,500 gallons,Laundromat @ 2,500 gallons,store @2,300 gallons,and DOT heavy equipment @ 1,000 gallons.3.Based on FY98 PCE Data. 4.Based on information from LKSD (dependent on school electric generation). 3.1.Planned Infrastructure Improvements It is important to evaluate the impact of planned near-term infrastructure improvement projects on existing utility systems.School additions,water and sewer expansions,new homes,as well as other community improvements allcanadverselyimpacttheadequacyofexistingutilities.The followinginfrastructureprojectshavebeenidentifiedforthecommunityofNapaskiakandtheireffectsarepresentedbelow: RETAIL SALES -There is no retail fuel sales available in Napaskiak.AllgasolineanddieselfuelforprivateuseishauledfromBethelbyresidentsusuallybysmallboatinthesummerandbysnowmachineinthewinter.Withouthistoricalfuelusedataavailable,it is difficult to estimate current retail fuel use. As part of the HUD ICDBG grant process,a survey was conducted to determineestimatedretailfueluseinNapaskiak.Estimated annual fuel use per householdisfour55gallondrumsofdieselfuelandtwo55gallonsdrumsofgasolineperyear.With a total of 77 households,this equates to 16,940 gallons of diesel fueland8,470 gallons of gasoline per year.There are some factors that could cause an increase in consumption in the near-term.Five new HUD homes are plannedforconstructionin2000/2001.Based on the average diesel fuel use above,it is estimated that the new HUD homes will increase diesel fuel annual demand by1,100 gallons.In addition,a community center is planned.Estimated fuel use for the community center is unknown. Diesel fuel for the two water plants and Laundromat is delivered by barge in the summer and hauled by barrel to the respective facility fuel tanks.During the winter,fuel is hauled by snowmachine or fuel truck from Bethel via ice road andisdeliveredtothecommunity,Napaskiak Store and DOT heavy equipmentbuilding.The two water plants are reported to have a combined total diesel fueluseof1,500 gallons per year.The Laundromat diesel fuel use is reported to be2,500 gallons per year.It was reported that the Napaskiak Store uses 2,300gallonsperyearforheatingpurposesonly,and provides no retail sales.DOT reported that the heavy equipment at the Airport uses 1,000 gallons per year.Upgrades to both water plants are in the preliminary design phase and arediscussedbelow.It is too early to determine the impact on diesel fuel use due to future upgrades to the water plants.For planning purposes,the diesel fuel for 5 Napaskiak Bulk Fuel Consolidation &Upgrade March 22,2000 Preliminary Design Report Alaska Energy and Engineering the two water plants,Laundromat,store and DOT heavy equipment is included in the retail diesel fuel tank capacity requirements. Estimated future annual demand for retail fuel is projected to be 10,000 gallons of gasoline and 25,340 gallons of diesel fuel,which equates to a minimum grossstoragecapacityrequirementof11,100 gallons of gasoline and 28,150 gallons ofdieselfuel. NAPASKIAK ELECTRIC UTILITY -Currently,the Utility uses about 61,000gallonsofdieselfuelannuallyfortheproductionofelectricity.There are twowaterplants,one located at each end of the community.Both water plants haveawateringpointfordispensingpotablewater.Napaskiak also has a Laundromatequippedwithelectricwashersanddryers.There is presently no residentialpipedwaterorsewersysteminNapaskiak.According to Jim Patterson with Village Safe Water,a closed haul water/sewer system is planned for Napaskiak.A trial demonstration of 4 homes is scheduled this summer.Tentatively,15 additional homes will be included in each of the following years.The project is in the early planning stages and an engineering firm is expected to be selected bymid-summer.Improvements to the water plants may include an improvedpotablewatersupplywithwaterstoragecapacity.Mr.Patterson also indicatedthattheinstallationofapipedwater/sewer system in Napaskiak is a remote possibility due to potential flood damage to above grade piping and poor soilconditionsforbelowgradepiping.It is assumed the residential water and sewertankswillincludeheattracethatwillincreasedemandontheUtility's electricload.However,there is insufficient information available to estimate the impact to the Utility's fuel needs. John Owens with the Department of Transportation (DOT)has reported there arenoplansforimprovementstotheairportwithinthenext5years.A major airport upgrade was completed in 1993 and included lengthening the airstrip to 3,000feet,enlarging the apron,erecting an equipment building,and installing airportlighting.Fuel for heavy equipment is stored on-site in an above grade,500 gallon double wall tank that is filled twice a year. Based on historical trends and information provided by the Utility,future annualdieselfuelconsumptiontoproduceelectricityisestimatedtoincreasebyatleast10%for a total annual consumption of 67,200 gallons which equates to aminimumgrossstoragecapacityrequirementof74,700 gallons of diesel fuel. SCHOOL -LKSD district maintenance reported that the school consumesbetween13,000 and 25,000 gallons of diesel fuel a year for heat and standby power generation.In the past,the school reportedly generated its own powerduringschoolhours.Paul Maxie (school maintenance)reported that this schoolyearthestandbygeneratorshaveoperatedonlyabout4hourspermonthformaintenancepurposes,and fuel consumption for this year is currently about10,000 gallons.A portion of the school's reported historical fuel consumption isprobablyattributabletopastselfelectricpowergeneration.To be conservative,the school's annual diesel fuel consumption was assumed to be a maximum of 25,000 gallons.Jim Kohl with the Lower Kuskokwim School District reported nomajorimprovementstotheschoolareplannedinthenearfuturethatwillsignificantlyeffectdieselfuelconsumption.The School's future diesel fuelannualconsumptionisestimatedtoremainatamaximumof25,000 gallons which equates to a minimum gross storage capacity requirement of 27,800 gallons of diesel fuel. 6 Napaskiak Bulk Fuel Consolidation &Upgrade March 22,2000 Preliminary Design Report Alaska Energy and Engineering 3.2.Tank Capacity Requirements The current lack of sufficient tank capacity requires the Utility to purchase fuelmostwintersandtransportitbyriverice-road to meet the Utility's fuel needs.Inaddition,since there is no retail fuel sales facility within Napaskiak,historically,allretailgasolineanddieselfuelusedbyresidentshasbeentransportedindependentlyintothecommunity.Since the consolidated tank farm will provideallbulkstorageanddispensingfuelforthecommunityofNapaskiak,the facilityneedstobedesignedtomeetthefutureneedsofeachuserwithsufficienttankcapacitytoaccommodategrowth.Expansion of the tank farm dike in the future would not be a cost-effective option.Although the diesel fuel use for the community center was not established in this report,the proposed retail dieselfuelnetcapacityshouldbesufficienttomeetcommunitydieselfueldemand.The following table compares the current annual consumption,projected annualconsumption,proposed net capacity and proposed gross capacity by facility: CURRENT ANNUAL CONSUMPTION,PROJECTED ANNUAL CONSUMPTION,PROPOSED NET CAPACITY &PROPOSED GROSS CAPACITY Facility and |Current Projected Proposed ProposedProductAnnualAnnualNetCapacityGrossConsumption|Consumption |in Gallons Capacity ininGallonsinGallonsGallons Retail Sales-8,470 (4)10,000 10,800 12,000Gasoline Gasoline 8,470 10,000 10,800 12,000 Subtotal Retail Sales-24,240 (5)25,340 (6)29,340 32,600 Diesel Fuel Napaskiak 61,100 67,200 78,390 87,100 Electric Utility LKSD School 25,000 25,000 35,100 39,000 Diesel Fuel 110,340 117,540 142,830 158,700 Subtotal Project Total 153,630 170,700 Estimated future use based on planned development. Net capacity (90%of gross shell capacity)of proposed tank farm as configured in the current design. Fuel use for the water plants,Laundromat,store and DOT heavy equipmentareincludedwithretailsales. Estimated at 77 households @ 110 gallons/year from ICDBG application.Estimated at 77 households @ 220 gallons/year from ICDBG application,plus water plants @ 1,500 gallons,Laundromat @ 2,500 gallons,store @2,300 gallons,and DOT heavy equipment @ 1,000 gallons.6.Current consumption plus 5 new HUD home @ 220 gallons/year from ICDBGapplication.ak©Nm7 Napaskiak Bulk Fuel Consolidation &Upgrade March 22,2000 Preliminary Design Report Alaska Energy and Engineering 4.0 PROPOSED FACILITY DESCRIPTION The consolidated tank farm will provide storage for all of the gasoline and dieselfuelrequiredforretailsales,public building heating,heavy equipment operationandelectricpowergeneration.The design provides for a single dike to containallofthebulkstoragetanks.The dike will be separated into two compartments by an 18”high intermediate dike wall,in accordance with Uniform Fire Code requirements.The north dike cell will contain one new 27,000 gallon diesel fuelbulkstoragetankfortheschoolfuel.The south dike cell will contain four new22,300 gallon diesel fuel bulk storage tanks and one new 22,300 gallondispensingtankdividedintotwocompartments.The gasoline compartment willbe12,000 gallons and the diesel compartment will be 10,300 gallons.The southdikecellwillalsocontaintheUtility's renovated 20,200 gallon horizontal dieselbulktank.Because the cost of the pad/dike construction is relatively high and new bulk storage tanks are required,it was determined to be more cost effectivetobuildthetankfarmnowtomeetfutureestimatedgrowthrequirements,as wellastoprovidespaceinthedikeforafuturetank. The proposed configuration provides adequate storage capacity to meet thecommunity's entire projected annual needs with reserve for increased diesel fuel demand.In addition,there is space in the south dike cell reserved for the future installation of a 13,500 gallon bulk storage tank.The tank can be dedicated toeithergasolineordieselfuel,as fuel demand requires.Additionally,due to thecloseproximityofNapaskiaktoBethel,multiple fuel deliveries are common,which will allow annual fuel throughput to exceed the facility tank capacity.Typically,early June and a late August/September fuel deliveries are made. A dual product dispenser will be installed at the site of the new tank farm and will be equipped with remote control capabilities.A 12,000 gallon double wall"intermediate”tank will be installed adjacent to the existing school power plant onasandpad.An access road is proposed to be constructed from the slough totheschooltoprovideaccesstoremovetheschool's existing fuel tanks as well asinstallthenewdoublewall"intermediate”tank.600 gallon double wall tanks willbeinstalledadjacenttothetwowaterplants.A 3,000 gallon double wall tank is proposed to be installed adjacent to the store.All double wall tanks will beinstalledwithburiedanchorsforfloodrestraint 4.1 Site In the late 1980's/early 1990's an access road was built from the barge landingtotheelectricutilitypowerplantandasandpadwasconstructedforaproposedtankfarm.Due to the existing access road and pad,location adjacent to thepowerplant,ease of access by the public,and preference indicated by the TribalCouncilandUtility,the existing sand pad was the only location givenconsiderationforthenewtankfarm.This location is dry compared to much ofNapaskiakandwillresultinthelowestconstructioncostforthefacilityduetothealreadydevelopedaccessroadandtankfarmpad.In addition,the pad hasgonethroughmanyfreeze/thaw cycles over the past 6+years without apparentmovementordifferentialsettlement. The site is well situated for development of the dispensing station and meets theHUDminimumAcceptableSeparationDistancerequirementsfromresidencesandareasofpubliccongregation. Napaskiak Bulk Fuel Consolidation &Upgrade March 22,2000 Preliminary Design Report Alaska Eneray and Engineering The proposed consolidated tank farm site is located approximately 50'southeastofthepowerplant,1650'east of the barge landing,850'south of the school,andiswithinTownship7North,Range 71 West,Sections 8-9.The land is presentlyundevelopedexceptfortheplacementofthesandpadandaccessroadandwasreportedasbelongingtoNapaskiakIncorporated,the community Nativecorporation.A Certificate to Plat was prepared by Pacific Northwest Title ofAlaskaonMarch2,2000,and is included in Appendix C.According to theCertificate,Napaskiak,Inc.owns the property.The Napaskiak Electric Utility hasrequestedthepropertybeleasedtotheUtilityfortheuseofatankfarm.Napaskiak,Inc.owns the majority of all land within and around Napaskiak,withtheexceptionoftheAirportproperty,Laundromat property,National Guard Armory,School sites and the HUD subdivision at the northeast end of town.Site control for the tank farm site and fill and distribution pipeline routes will need tobeaddressedduringthedesignphase. The tank farm site is basically level with a slight southerly slope.The naturalvegetationconsistsprimarilyofsparselowbrushandalders.Flooding iscommoninNapaskiak.According to the Corps of Engineers,AlaskaCommunitiesFloodHazardData,June 1993,the flood hazard for Napaskiak is considered very high,with floods occurring in 1964,1971,1979,1985,1989,and 1991.The estimated 100 year flood was the 1989 flood.The Corps ofEngineershasplaced"high water”marks in the vicinity of the school at the 100yearfloodlevel.The recommended building elevation is 0.7 feet above the 100yearfloodelevation. A preliminary topographic survey was conducted during the site visit to locatepropertyboundariesanddeterminetheproposedtankfarmpadelevation.Anarbitraryelevationof100.0'was assigned to the 100 year flood elevation.Theelevationoftheexistingsandpadisapproximately96.75',3.25'below the 100-year floodplain.The existing pad will be elevated approximately 2.6'so the floorofthetankfarmwillbeat99.4'.The top of the dike wall will be set at 101.0'(above the recommended building elevation)to meet federal flood mitigationrequirements,and the perimeter dike wall will be backfilled to 100.0'.In accordance with the January 29,1999 Memorandum of Agreement between theDivisionofEnergyandtheDivisionofFirePrevention(State Fire Marshal),Paragraph 3,the proposed tank farm design complies with the requirement thatthetankfarmbe"a minimum of 1'higher than the flood of record”. The tank farm is located about 1000 feet south of the Napaskiak Slough andmorethan2,500 feet east of the Kuskokwim River.Erosion of the riverbank does not appear to be a significant threat to the proposed tank farm facility. The proposed site is an undeveloped parcel and contamination should not be anissue;therefore,sampling for hydrocarbons should not be necessary. 4.2 Foundation Construction A geotechnical investigation was not performed as part of this study.Theexistingsandpadthatwasconstructedcirca1994iswellcompactedandstable.Additionally,the existing power plant and tank farm adjacent to the proposedtankfarmpadwereconstructedin1989.Neither the existing tank farm norpowerplantexhibitsignificantmovementordifferentialsettlement. Napaskiak Bulk Fuel Consolidation &Upgrade March 22,2000 Preliminary Design Report Alaska Energy and Engineering The proposed heavy timber diking system is sized to remain entirely within thelimitsoftheexistingsandpad,eliminating potential differential movementbetweentheexistingpadandapadextensionbuiltonvirginground. The existing grade at the proposed tank farm is basically level.Using importedfillofsandand/or gravel,the pad will be elevated approximately 2.6 feet.Additional fill will be needed to widen the existing access road at the proposeddispenserlocation.The road will be wide enough to allow for vehicles to turnaroundatthedispenserwithouthavingtobackup. The school "intermediate”tank will be set on a sand pad approximately 2 feetthick.The smaller double wall tanks will be placed on heavy timber foundations and sand pads,as required.All double wall tanks will be anchored to withstand anticipated flooding. 4.3.Secondary Containment The Uniform Fire Code and E.P.A.regulations require fuel tanks to be installed within a secondary containment structure that is capable of holding the contentsofthelargesttankplussufficientfreeboard(usually 6”to 12")to hold accumulated precipitation.This is commonly accomplished by constructing a gravel dike around the tanks and installing an impervious membrane liner..Since the tanks are installed within the secondary containment structure,the dike is an integral part of the foundation.This requires the dike and foundation to be designed as a unit.Construction of a dike and foundation system that meetscode,provides a 20 to 30 year useful life,and can withstand a 100 year floodeventisparticularlychallenginginNapaskiak.Three possible scenarios for secondary containment were considered:a lined gravel/sand dike constructed atgrade;a lined gravel/sand dike constructed upon an elevated pad;and a linedheavytimberdikeconstructeduponanelevatedsandpad. Construction of a lined earthen dike at grade would not provide protection fromfloods.The tanks could be anchored to prevent floating,but this usually requiresthepenetrationofthemembranelinerwithcablesandanchors,or the construction of large concrete pads for tank elevation and ballast.Due to theselimitations,this option was not considered feasible.Construction of a lined gravel-berm dike on an elevated pad was also investigated,but would requiresignificantamountsoffillandacorrespondinglylargefootprint.This also wasnotconsideredfeasibleduetothecostofimportedgravelfill,and the concernwithpotentialdifferentialmovementbetweentheexistingsandpadandnewfill placed around the perimeter of the sand pad. Based on analysis of the options and past experience,a heavy timber dike installed on a partially elevated earthen pad was determined to be the most cost- effective option that will provide a permanent solution for the Community'sneeds.A heavy timber dike is proposed to be constructed on a raised sand padsuchthatthetopofthedikeiselevatedabovethe100-year flood level.-Thedikeissizedtocontaintheentirecontentsofthelargesttankwithinit(27,000gallons)plus 10”of freeboard for precipitation.The dike will be constructed in stages with one wall left down until tanks have been placed,thus allowing thetankstobeplacedintothedikewithoutliftingoverthedikewall.The entire dikewillbelinedwithamembranelinercompatiblewithboth#1 diesel fuel andgasoline.A non-woven geotextile fabric will be installed above and below thelinertoprevent.puncture and damage and a 4”deep sand/gravel cover will be 10 Napaskiak Bulk Fuel Consolidation &Upgrade March 22,2000 Preliminary Design Report Alaska Energy and Engineering placed over the liner.A sheet metal covering will be placed over the liner on theinsideoftheverticaldikewallstoprotectthelinerfromdamage.A 4”deep cellular confinement grid will be placed around the exterior of the dike walls toprovideerosioncontrolfromrunoffandintheeventofaflood. 4.4 Tanks A total of 12 existing tanks will be emptied,taken out of service,and turned overtoLKSDinBethel.The Utility vertical tank will be cleaned,emptied,demolishedanddisposedof.The Utility horizontal tank will be refurbished,sandblasted,painted and reused.Six new tanks,including the dual product dispensing tank,will also be installed in the new facility -see the Tank Schedule on Drawing M3. One of the LKSD horizontal tanks will be retained to serve as spill contingency storage.Upon cleaning and vapor freeing,the reused tanks will be inspectedinternallyandexternally.Should any significant corrosion be encountered,repairs will be made.A new manhole,valve connections,water draw valve,normal vent,emergency vent,and level gauge will be installed on the Utility horizontal tank. The new bulk storage tanks will be shop built single wall,horizontal,welded steeltanks.The school "intermediate”,water plant and village store tanks will be shop built double wall,horizontal,welded steel tanks.All new tanks will be labeled in accordance with UL 142.All new tanks will also be equipped with level gauges and other appurtenances as indicated for the existing tank.The tank skids will beplacedon4x12treatedtimbers.Per U.B.C.,the timbers will be sized to limit soil-bearing pressure for sand and silty-sandy soils to 1,500 pounds per square foot. 4.5 Piping/Valves/Pumps/Accessories All 3”piping within the dike will be schedule 40 black steel.All other above-grade piping will be schedule 80 black steel.Any below-grade piping will beschedule80steelwithahigh-density polyethylene coating and cathodicprotection.Above-grade piping will be installed on treated timber sleepers or supported from tanks and secured with steel pipe straps or strut and pipe clamps.All piping joints will be welded or flanged except for connections topumps,which may be threaded.Sufficient flanged joints will be provided to allowserviceofpumpsandotherdevices.All connections to pumps and tanks will bemadewithstainlesssteelflexibleconnectors.Each isolated section of piping will be provided with pressure relieving devices to account for thermal expansion ofproductcausedbytemperaturefluctuations.Provisions for movement of thepipingcausedbythermalexpansionandcontractionwillbeincluded.All valveswillbesteelbodyindustrialgradevalvesintendedforusewithfuels. Separate gasoline and diesel fuel fill pipelines will be routed from a new marineheaderatthebargelandingtothetankfarm.The gasoline fill pipeline will be 2”diameter and the diesel fuel will be 3”diameter.The fill lines will remain mostlyabovegradewiththeexceptionofroadcrossings,which will be buried andprotectedfromtraffic.A drip pan will be provided at the termination of the fillpipelines(marine header.)Separate 3”manifold piping will be provided for each owner and will be connected to the common fill pipeline with individual isolation and check valves. To comply with State Fire Marshall requirements for dispensing from abovegroundtanks,the piping must be configured to limit the capacity of tanks directly 11 Napaskiak Bulk Fuel Consolidation &Upgrade March 22,2000 Preliminary Design Report Alaska Enerqy and Engineering connected to dispensers to 12,000 gallons each.Transfer pumps,overfill protection devices,and controls are required to provide appropriateinterconnectionbetweenbulktanksanddispensingtanks.An above grade 2”diameter transfer pipeline will be routed from the retail sales diesel bulk storage tank to the dispensing tank.A submersible pump with a backpressure valve willbeusedtotransferfuelfromthebulktanktothedispensingtank.The systemwillrequiretheoperatortostartthedieselfueldispensingtankfillprocessby pressing the transfer pump start button on the control panel.When the tank is85%full,a high level switch will shut off the pump.The backpressure valve willpreventgravityflowoffuelwhenthepumpisoff.A mechanical float-type filllimiterwillalsobeinstalledinthedieselfueldispensingtanktohelppreventthe tank from overfilling in the event that the high level switch does not operateproperly.Critical high and low level switches will be installed to provideadditionalprotectionagainstoverfillsandtoprotectthepumpfromrunningdry.The gasoline dispensing tank will be filled directly from the 2”barge fill pipeline.The tank will be equipped with a mechanical fill limiter to prevent overfilling the tank,as well as a low level switch to protect against running the dispensing pumpdry. Submersible pumps with backpressure valves will be provided in the dispensingtanksforsupplyingfueltothedispensers.Two 2"distribution lines will be routed above grade from the dispensing tanks to a dual product dispenser located in asecurityenclosurewestofthetankfarm.The above-grade piping will be installed on treated timber sleepers and secured with steel pipe straps.The dispenser willbecapableofbeingcontrolledremotelyfromtheTribalCounciloffice approximately 600 feet north of the tank farm. A 2”diameter transfer pipeline will be routed from the tank farm to the School"intermediate”tank.Existing welded steel distribution piping from the"intermediate”tank will serve the school's existing fuel tanks at the power plant,school,teachers quarters,and other out buildings.Separate 2”diametertransferpipelineswillalsoberoutedfromthetankfarmtotheexistingpowerplantdaytankandtoanewdaytankinstalledintheLaundromat.Both daytankswillbeequippedwithanewcontrolpackagecompletewithcontrolpanel,levelgauges,and redundant overfill protection devices and alarms.Normally closedisolationvalveswillbeinstalledinthetransferpipelinesinsidethedikeandwillbeinterlockedwiththedaytankcontrolstopreventaccidentaldischarge.Thedaytankswillfillautomaticallyasrequiredtomeetdemand.The school bulk tankwillbeequippedwithasubmersiblepumpandbackpressurevalvefortransferringfuelfromthetankfarmtothe"intermediate”tank.Control for fillingthe"intermediate"tank will be the same as that for filling the dispensing tank,with controls located at the "intermediate”tank.A signal conduit will be routedadjacenttothetransferpipelinebacktothetankfarmtooperatethesubmersiblepump.Float-type fill limiters will also be installed in the "intermediate”tank to prevent overfilling. 4.6 Security A 6'tall chain link fence with a barbed wire top will be installed around the entireperimeterofthedike.Two access gates will be provided into the fencedenclosure.The dispenser will be installed within a post structure with a concretefloor,metal roof and full-height chain link fence walls.All valves will be providedwithlockablehandlestopreventtheftandvandalism.Each owner will have a unique set of keyed-alike locks for all of their valves.Pump controls will be 12 Napaskiak Bulk Fuel Consolidation &Upgrade March 22,2000 Preliminary Design Report Alaska Eneray and Engineering installed within fenced security areas.Area lighting controlled by photocell willbeprovidedatthedispensers,pump controls,and dike for security and spilldetectionandtoenhancewinteroperation. 5.0 PROPOSED OPERATING SCENARIO AND SPILL RESPONSE The consolidated tank farm will provide storage for three separate entities -theTribalCouncil,Electric Utility and the Lower Kuskokwim School District.Thefacilitywillconsistofacommondikethatwillcontainallofthebulkstorageand dispensing tanks.The north dike cell will contain the school tank,which providesbulkstorageofdieselfuelforperiodictransfertothe"intermediate”tank locatedadjacenttotheschoolpowerplant.The south dike cell will contain the Utility'stanks,which provide bulk storage of diesel fuel for electric generation,as well astheTribalCouncil's tanks for gasoline and diesel fuel retail dispensing.Thetankswillhaveseparatepipingmanifoldsbutwillsharecommonfillpipelinestothebargelanding.Isolation and check valves will be included to separate eachentity's tanks during the filling process. Since the Tribal Council is the HUD ICDBG grant recipient,it will own the tank farm site and should enter into a long-term lease or other agreement with the Napaskiak Electric Utility and Lower Kuskokwim School District.The agreementshouldstipulaterequirementsforproperoperationandmaintenanceofthe facility,insurance,and spill prevention/response compliance. Each owner will be responsible for maintenance and operation of their own tanks,pumps,and piping system;maintenance and replacement of spillresponseequipmentandsupplies;and staff training.Some items will need to be addressed for the whole facility and should be the responsibility of the TribalCouncil.These items include but are not limited to -removal of stormwater from the dike;maintenance of area lighting;site grading and erosion control;cost ofelectricalservice;and snow removal.These overall operating costs should be apportioned among participants on a per gallon of throughput basis. Because the new facility will have oil storage tanks in excess of 660 gallons andwillreceivedeliverybymarinevessel,it will be subject to U.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgencyandU.S.Coast Guard regulations.An Operations ManualandaLetterofIntentwillneedtobepreparedandsubmittedtotheCoastGuard. An Oil Spill Response Plan will need to be prepared and submitted to both the Coast Guard and the EPA.The facility will also require preparation of a SpillPreventionControlandCountermeasures(SPCC)plan.Since the tank farm is aconsolidationofthreeentitieswithsimilarfunction,one set of documents should be prepared that addresses all storage tanks and piping,and includesagreementsforsharedresponsibilityandmutualassistancebetweentheparties.Each operator will be responsible for spill prevention functions that relate to their individual portion of the facility and for training of personnel.The combined staffoftrainedoperatorsfromallpartieswillprovideastrongerspillresponseteam. The tank farm has a gross storage capacity of 170,700 gallons,including theschool"intermediate”tank.The capacity of the tank farm is below the State of Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC)regulatory threshold of420,000 gallons so a DEC Oil Spill Contingency Plan (C Plan)should not berequired. 13 Napaskiak Bulk Fuel Consolidation &Upgrade March 22,2000 Preliminary Design Report Alaska Energy and Engineering Spill response gear,including sorbent material,protective safety gear,and possibly a containment boom will need to be purchased.One of the School's existing 10,300 gallon horizontal tanks that is being taken out of service will beplacednearthenewtankfarmanddedicatedtocontingencystorage. 6.0 PERMITTING A Corps of Engineers Department of the Army General Permit 96-07 has been issued and the project has complied with all state and federal permitting requirements for Wetlands,Coastal Zone Management,and HUD EnvironmentalPermitting.A Plan Review permit from the State Fire Marshal is required.Finalstampeddesigndrawingswillneedtobesubmittedforreviewandapprovalpriortoconstruction.Site preparation work may be initiated prior to receiving approvalfromtheFireMarshal. The distribution pipelines from the tank farm to the power plant and school will be on Napaskiak,Inc.or school property.Existing power line easements will beusedtotheextentpracticableforroutingdistributionpipelines,but easements will be required for the distribution pipeline to the school and Laundromat.The barge landing is on DOT airport property.An easement for the fill pipelines on DOT and Napaskiak,Inc.property are required. The Coast Guard and EPA required plans mentioned previously will be prepareduponcompletionoffacilityconstruction. 7.0 CONSTRUCTION PLAN The Rural Energy Programs/AEA has a history of administering similar projectsona"modified"force-account basis.Force-account construction involves the owner or grantee acting as the general contractor and utilizing primarily locallabor.This method tends to achieve a higher percentage of local hire and isstronglysupportedbymanycommunitiesandfundingagencies.The highlytechnicalnatureofatankfarmprojectrequiresalimitednumberofworkerswithspecificexperienceandexpertisetobebroughtinfortheprojectwhennotavailablelocally.All work must be supervised and managed by a superintendent with extensive experience in the construction of rural fuel facilities.All specialtywork,such as pipe welding,electrical and tank cleaning must be performed byskilledcraftsmenwithappropriatecertifications.An experienced construction manager will be required to coordinate the construction team and to oversee procurement and project logistics.The design engineer will provide qualitycontrolthroughcommunicationwiththeconstructionmanagerandperiodicon- site inspections. 7.1.Local Job Skills A request was sent to the community for information regarding the availability ofspecialtyskilledlaborinNapaskiak.The table on the following page summarizestheresults: 14 Napaskiak Bulk Fuel Consolidation &Upgrade March 22,2000 Preliminary Design Report Alaska Eneray and Engineering LOCAL LABOR FORCE Skilled Trades Number Available Laborer 15 Truck Driver Heavy Equipment Operator Heavy Equipment Mechanic Certified Welder Welder's Helper Journeyman Electrician Apprentice Electrician ek]aed}-d/=}AD)NO]ODIt appears that a project superintendent,two certified tank cleaners,and possiblyacertifiedpipewelder,heavy equipment mechanic and journeyman electrician,will need to be brought into Napaskiak for this project.All other labor should be available locally. 7.2.Local Equipment There is no heavy equipment locally available in Napaskiak for use on the tankfarmproject,with the possible exception of the DOT grader at the airport.AlllheavyequipmentrequiredfortheprojectwillneedtobebroughtinbybargeeitherfromBetheloraneighboringcommunity. 7.3.Material Sources The current tank farm design calls for an estimated 2,000 cubic yards of fill.FillwillbeimportedbybargefromBethelorotheravailablesource. 8.0 SCHEDULE A contract award for tanks needs to be issued no later than mid-April to make a mid-June sailing from either Seattle or Anchorage for Bethel.The fill needs to beadvertisedbyearlyApriltoallowacontractortobereadytodeliverfillinlateMay.The dike materials and all pipe should be ordered by early May in order tomakethelateMaybargesailing's for Bethel.Historically,barges arrive inNapaskiakinlateMay/early June.The initial earthwork can begin in May or earlyJunepriortothearrivalofdikingmaterials,piping,or tanks. While it would be possible to ship all of the dike materials to the site by plane,afarbetterrateshouldbeobtainedbybarging.Preliminary estimates indicate thebestpricefordeliveryoftanks,dense materials,and other large items can beobtainedbyocean-going barge from Seattle.The schedule on the followingpagehasbeendevelopedonthisbasis: 15 Napaskiak Bulk Fuel Consolidation &Upgrade March 22,2000 Preliminary Design Report Alaska Energy and Engineering PROPOSED PROJECT SCHEDULE JANFEBMARAPRMAYJUNJULAUGSEPOcTNOV90%DESIGN ;Kann REVIEW =X FINAL DESIGN X-X FIRE MARSHAL REVIEW X-X ADVERTISE FILL ORDER TANKS ORDER REST OF MAT'LS XX BARGE TANKS &MAT'LS Xo---=-X SITE WORK Arm---X INSTALL PIPELINES KanaanX CONSTRUCT DIKE Xnm=-X MODIFY EXISTING TANKS xX PLACE TANKS ;X-X PIPING,DAY TANKS,ETC.Xanenmn-X FENCE,ELECTRICAL,ETC.XananenmeX PUNCH LIST COMPLETION Aomn=X SPILL PLAN &CLOSE OUT Xo--=X 9.0 COST ESTIMATE The construction cost estimate has been developed based on a "modified"force- account approach utilizing a combination of local labor,certified craftsmen,andspecialtysub-contractors under the direction of an experienced superintendent.Labor rates are based on Title 36 equivalent wages for certified specialty labor and prevailing local force-account wage rates for general labor and equipment operation. Separate detailed construction cost estimates for the Community and School are included in Appendix B.The total combined project cost for both including alldesign,supervision,inspection,permitting,and a 20%contingency is estimatedtobe$1,441,445 which equates to a unit cost of $9.38 per gallon based on a total net storage capacity of 153,630 gallons.The breakdown of costs for the Utility and Council are allocated on the tank capacity in the Community dike cellandaunitcostof$8.85 per gallon.The School tank farm cost is $11.18 per gallon.The breakdown of costs are as follows: e Council $355,245 40,140 gallons net capacity @$8.85/gal e Utility $693,764 78,390 gallons net capacity @$8.85/gal Subtotal $1,049,009 118,530 gallons net capacity e LKSD School $392,436 35,100 gallons net capacity @$11.18/gal Total $1,441,445 153,630 gallons net capacity @$9.38/gal 16 Napaskiak Bulk Fuel Consolidation &Upgrade March 22,2000PreliminaryDesignReportAlaskaEnergyandEngineering APPENDIX A PRELIMINARY DESIGN DRAWINGS N \ ' AIRPORT PROPERTY - INSTALL NEW 600 GALLON--o- DOUBLE WALL TANK ATWATERPLANT42APPROX.Oo INSTALL NEW 600 GALLON Bed - 850"EAST - DOUBLE WALL TANK AT WATER PLANT ft SCHOOL 2°SAND/GRAVEL PAU FILL UNES EXISTING(\CI ee ot -al GENERATORBUNDINGS oar OPER \ee ARNORY cart EXISTING TANK FARM #1 [|Ae 1 TANK FOR CONTINGENCY EXISTING $00 GALLON DOUBLE WALL LAUNDRONAT 7 --HORIZONTAL TANK IN EQUIPNENT BUILDING O wew 100 _-/DAY TAN ,ABOVE GRADE 2°DESEL LINE TO°INTERMEDIATE TANK AT SCHOOLNRPORTPROPERTY_f 7 ¢EXISTING TANK FARM POWER PLANT . O SALVAGE 1 TANK a/ABOVE GRADE rip SEWAGE LAGOON O°DISTRIBUTION U REDUCED PLOT -1/2 SCALE PRELIMINARY -NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION State of Alaska .Deport of Community and Economic Development*,AIDEA/AEAIBSRuralEnergyGroup =333 W.4th Avenue,Suite 313 SR ENERGY SKAAnchorage,Aasko 99501-2341 PROJECT:NAPASKIAK BULK FUEL STORAGE CONSOLIDATION &UPGRADE TITLE: OVERALL COMMUNITY SITE PLAN ALASKA ENERGY AND ENGINEERING,INC P.O,BOX 111405 ANCHORAGE,ALASKA 99511-1405 PHONE (907)349-0100 ORAWN BY:=TOK 'SCALE:1"=100°FILE NAME NAPABFM1 |SHEET GESIGNED BY:TOK OATE:3/22/00 PROKCT NNER 99-02-9559 M 1 of 3 1°HIGH BARBED WIRE we 24 NOTE:100 YEAR FLOOD ELEVATION =100.0"TOP RAL C.0.E.RECOMMENDED QUILDING ELEVATION =100.7" 6'HIGH CHAN UNK FENCE FABRIC --EXISTING TANK TO BEBeDEMOUSHED|SALVAGED FOR RENOVATION ATTACH FENCE POST TO DIKE TOP OF DIKE ELEV,=101.0 WALL WITH 2 EACH 1/2°x6°GALYLAGSWITHFLATWASHERS WRAP LINER &GEOTEXTILE OVER &AROUND TREATED 2°x6". 1/2°xS"GALV LAG,TYP(4)[ATTACH SHEET METAL COVER &2°x6°TO DIKE WALL WITH20dGALVNAILSAT1°ON CENTER. SHEET NETAL COVER OVER LINERSTEELANGLE,TYP(2) Lg Gx6xt6'TREATED TIMGER,TYP(5) 4 PROVIDE 3”NIN SLACK IN UNER -FINSH GRADETOALLOWFORNOVENENT=99.4" DIKE MEMBRANEUNERWITHNON-WOVEN GEOTEXTILE ABOVE &BELOW \ ayy Tee art an PIPELINE TO EXISTING DAY TANK AT POWER PLANT"NS pene Une 2°ESE.FUEL @ Tei a aswentrataFertPoeteetarectirlil«uae OVER2NitelWessIED=I est lelaIEA Tl ill iTSSTRUCTURALSTEELCHANNELFOOTING STEEL ANGLE MIN 1"CONPACTED FILL UNDER MOMENT FRANE Gx6x12'TREATED TINGER (2 \TYPICAL DIKE SECTIONWwsa NOTE:PROVIDE SUPPORTS AT 10°ON CENTER NAX, TWO-HOLE PIPE STRAP, GRINNELL FIGURE 262,TYP 1/4703"LAG,"@, vi | 4°x12°x2"LONGTREATEDTIMBER J TANK §S1 k S_\ABOVE GRADE PIPING SUPPORTGane at 3°FLANGED GATE VALVEMALEQUICKCONNECT >TANK fs COUPUNG 1TH CaP k SECURE DRI PAN 0 aNFLANGE BoiuINBOLTWHHEAWSTEELCHANEL Z3'12'H (84 GAL)WELDEDSTEEL,ORI PAN NADE FRON3/16"PLATE,PROMDE 3/4"3°TO TANK FARM TANK US ae ot i i!=MW TAT TT TT TTSSei: a1".TREATED TNBER LOx2x1/4 "AY FRAME BRACE,LAG TO TINBER &BOLT TO FLANGECc=ig4I||!4ar----Lee{4 .\MARINE HEADER THK Ae \W2/NO SCALE TANK RIA BORROW EXISTING FILL THIS AREA FOR SITE GRADING TANK ful K REDUCED PLOT -1/2 SCALE TK 8 4 PRELIMINARY -NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION TANK #R2 State of Aloska .TOP OF OIKE Pepartgent of Community and Economic Development101.0!*Suan pee rr we 0 rs a,ein ORAZ AEA=9675's OOR FINSH a ural Energy Group -_GRADE AT 99.4 ----s Bw 333 W.4th Avenue,Suite 313 =ALASKA*Ancheroge,Aloska 99501-2341 TOE OF EXISTINGFILL,TYP y,PROVECT:NAPASKIAK BULK FUEL STORAGE CONSOLIDATION &UPGRADE ENLARGED SITE /GRADING PLAN &DETAILS ALASKA ENERGY AND ENGINEERING,INC (TY ENURGED SITE/GRADING PLAN P.O,BOX 111405 ANCHORAGE,ALASKA 99511-1405 PHONE (907)349-0100 aT . -Nua |NAPABFM2=t0 DESIGNED BY:TOK DATE:3/22/00 PROJECT NUNBER 99-02-9559 M 2 f 2°DESL FUEL TO ee .N\(CO)2"DIESEL FUEL TO INTERNEDIATE GENERAL_NOTES: TANK AT POWER PLANT NUZ/TANK AT SCHOOL 1.THE NET OKE CAPACITY IS 66,000 GALLONS -THE VOLUME OF THEaNLARGESTTANKPLUS10”FREEBOARD FOR PRECIPITATION. .TO OMY,TANK DE LAINDRONAT CUZ>2.DIKE DRANAGE IS BY PORTABLE PUMP LOCATED OUTSIDE OF DKE WITH >2 *v2 7 %x SUCTION AND DISCHARGE HOSES. 3.ALL NEW TANKS WILL BE SINGLE WALL WELDED STEEL CONSTRUCTIONMANUFACTUREDANOLABELEDINACCORDANCEWITHUL142. 2 4.ALL EXISTING TANKS BEING RE-USED ARE SINGLE WALL WELDED STEEL'\a CONSTRUCTION AND WL BE MODIFIED TO NEET THE REQURENENTS OF ae :THE 1997 UFC. nd 5.ALL TANKS WILL BE EQUIPPED WITH STEEL SADDLE AND SKID TANK St . FOUNDATIONS AND WILL BE INSTALLED ON 4x12 TREATED TIMBER WUDSILLS.7 Ie O OQ mesure of ||V]DIESEL FUEL Pot 8.PROVDE PRODUCT IDENTIFICATION LABELS AND TANK NUMBERS ON ALL 7.PROVIDE UNGQUE KEYED-ALIKE BRASS PADLOCKS ON ALL VALVES FOR EACH OWNER. Ry ; PUMP SCHEDULE 7 DESIGNATION |FUNCTION SME NOTOR i DK OP-1 &2 |DISPENSING SUBMERSIBLE |3/44P,230¥ .\ir P-1 &2 BULK TRANSFER |SUBMERSILE |3/4HP,230V4> ne 7 |_| x *x A ee!noi dysHoafleaoOg=11"8s35L O jo TANK SCHEDULE (CAPACITY IN GALLONS)|I DESEL FUEL TANKf [NEW |PREVIOUS|TANK SIZE |CATEGORY]TYPE |DIESEL |GASOUNEx!y i OWNER |OWNER GROSS |GROSSlya0CHOOLTOTRewTK7000 FUTURE TANK FLANGE SCHOOL SUBTOTAL 27,000 x 1 43500 GauoNs «(FOR FUTURE DIESEL lt LOOT]NEW TOSPENSING TZOOXQ1a-ornas-o |UL og a 0.300 |NEW[DISPENSING]"TO IO 2°GASOLINE TO DUAL PRODUCT DISPENSER |GASOLINE OR \tf ¢R iu 2.300 NEW [BULK 22,300ca)aL FUEL RETAK,SUBTOTAL 52,600 12,0002°DIESEL FUEL TO DUAL PROOUCT DISPENSER SFT NEW TSK oe 1 l ua ony Un 20.7200 [REFURS,[BuLK |20.200\1 JUTIUTY SUBTOTAL 87,100 1 :ik TANK FARN TOTAL 146,700!12,000x |TANK U3 3Z BCHOOLT-TET mE]12,000 22,300 GALLONS PROJECT GROSS STORAGE CAPACITY BY PRODUCT 158,700|_12,000poyoeoOoOloessor PROJECT TOTAL GROSS STORAGE CAPACITY 170,700 1 l PROJECT TOTAL NET STORAGE CAPACITY (Q0%OF GROSS)153,630 I \ Looe I J'DIESEL FUEL FILL PRELNE S)2°BUND FLANGE |Vai GASOUNE FILL PIPELINE L |FOR FUTURE GAS TANK : Zz - r K Thief [bei} oO 22,or CDNres}fe ao O 10-038.orf DIESEL FUEL a *O m4 a TANK #RIA 12,000 GALLONS 10'-0°6x20°-5°L GASOUNE a ?0 TANK #U1AeeOT©i ed an DIESEL FUEL "7 -weO et REDUCED PLOT -1/2 SCALE ?!PRELIMINARY -NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 810900CLLENS z State of Aloska . 10'-0"9x17"=7'L |Mi te Deporent of Community v7 Economic DeveloprnentDESELFUEL*AIDEA/AEA*.a Rural Energy Group =x oe f "iby 333 W.4th Avenue,Suite 313 SALASKAhd:x"*Anchorage,Alaska 99501-2341 TANK #82 ; 7lee]Je Ow-2 L Oo O 72.300 GALONS °PRONEET:NAPASKIAK BULK FUEL STORAGE O DIESEL FUEL pene CONSOLIDATION &UPGRADE Q TLE: -a 7 PIPING PLAN &TANK SCHEDULE r +ALASKA ENERGY AND ENGINEERING,INC SZ =r SZ”SZ.P.Q,BOX 111405 ANCHORAGE,ALASKA 99511-1405 PHONE (907)349-0100 "oo "'"ORAWN BY:TOK SAE "ss"FILE NANE NAPABFMS |SHEET DESKNED GY:TOK DATE:3/22/00 PRONECT NUMBER 99-02-9559 M 3 of 3 Napaskiak Bulk Fuel Consolidation &Upgrade March 22,2000 Preliminary Design Report Alaska Eneray and Engineering APPENDIX B CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE ALASKA ENERGY AND NAPASKIAK CONSOLIDATED TANK FARM MARCH 22,2000 ENGINEERING FORCE ACCOUNT CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY PRELIMINARY DESIGN REPORT COMMUNITY 1.FOUNDATION,DIKE,&SITE $121,120 2.TANKS $158,690 3.PIPING SYSTEM $86 334 4.PUMPS,DISPENSER,POWER,CONTROLS,ETC.$65,480 5.MISCELLANEOUS $31,715 6.OVERHEAD $117,374 7.FREIGHT $125,462 8.CONSTRUCTION SUB-TOTAL $706,174 9.DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION ADMIN.$88,000 10.CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT $80,000 11.PROJECT SUB-TOTAL $874,174 12.CONTINGENCY $174,835 20 % 13.TOTAL PROJECT COST $1,049,009 14.TOTAL STORAGE CAPACITY 131,700 GAL.GROSS CAPACITY 118,530 GAL.NET CAPAC.(90%OF GROSS) 15.COST PER GALLON OF NET CAPACITY $8.85 16.PROJECT COST PER PARTICIPANT - NAPASKIAK TRIBAL COUNCIL $355,245]33.9%40,140 GAL.NET CAPACITY NAPASKIAK ELECTRIC UTILITY $693,764]66.1%78,390 GAL.NET CAPACITY B-1(Community) ALASKA ENERGY AND NAPASKIAK CONSOLIDATED TANK FARM MARCH 22,2000 ENGINEERING FORCE ACCOUNT CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE PRELIMINARY DESIGN REPORT ITEM QUAN |UNIT]UNIT MATL |UNIT{]LAB |LAB/LABOR |CONTR |FREIGHT|TOTAL [UNIT]TOTALCOSTCOSTHRS|HRS |RATE!]COST COST COST COST WT |WT(#) FOUNDATION,DIKE,&SITE Clear &Prep Site 1|lump $0 $0 40 40]$45 $1,800 $1,800 0 Sand Fill (Pad)720}cu.yd}$0.00 $0 |0.150 108}$45 $4,860 |$36,000 $40,860 0 Gravel (Dike Floor,Disp,Road)400}cu.yd.|$0.00 $0 |0.150 60}$45 $2,700 |$28,000 $30,700 0 Dike Membrane Liner 5,500]sq.ft.$1.25 $6,875 |0.005 28|$45 $1,238 $8,113 |0.17 935 Non-Woven Geotextile (Dike)12,650}sq.ft.$0.07 $886 |0.002 25}$45 $1,139 $2,024 |0.08 1012 4"Cellular Confinement 2,400]sq.ft.$0.80 $1,920 |0.01 24}$45 $1,080 $3,000 |0.35 840 Dike Wall Sheet Metal Cover 540|sq.ft.|$10.00 $5,400 |0.04 22|$45 $972 $6,372 }1.70 918 Moment Frames 22|ea.$250 $5,500 |2.00 44|$45 $1,980 $7,480 200 4400 Timbers,6"x6",Dike walls 1340]lin.ft $3.60 $4,824 |0.120 161]$45 $7,236 $12,060 10 13400 Timbers,2"x6",Dike walls 268}lin.ft $1.15 $308 |0.050 13]$45 $603 $911]3.60 965 Lags,Bolts,Angle,Strut,etc.1]lump |$1,500 $1,500 0 0]$45 $0 $1,500 0 6'Chain-Link Fence 350 lin.ft.$9 $3,150}0.20 70|$45 $3,150 $6,300 |15.00 5250 TANKS Drain/Clean/Purge Exist Tanks 1|ea.$100 $100 20 20}$60 $1,200 $1,300 0 Inspect Exist Tanks for Reuse 2}ea.$0 $0 5 10]$60 $600 $600 0 Demolish/Dispose Olid Tanks 1|_ea.$0 $0 20 20]$45 $900 $900 0 Sandblast Exist Tanks 1,300}sq.ft.$0.50 $650 |0.03 39|$45 $1,755 $2,405 5 6500 Paint Exist Tanks 1,300|sq.ft.$0.60 $780 |0.05 65]$45 $2,925 $3,705 |0.20 260 New 22,300 Gal Bulk Tanks 4|ea |$20,000 $80,000 0 0}$45 $0 $80,000 0 New 22,300 Dispensing Tank 4}ea |$26,700 |$26,700 0 0}$45 $0 $26,700 0 New 3,000 Double Wall Tank 1}ea $6,000 $6,000 20 20|$45 $900 $6,900 |6000 6000 New 600 Double Wall Tank 2|ea $1,200 $2,400 20 40]$45 $1,800 $4,200 |1200 2400 New Day Tanks 1{ea $3,000 $3,000 20 20|$45 $900 $3,900 200 200 New Saddles on Exist Tanks 1]ea $300 $300 40 40|$45 $1,800 $2,100 600 600 Weld Connect on Exist Tanks 3]ea $50 $150 2 6]$45 $270 $420 20 60 Emergency Vents 8|ea $300 $2,400 2 16]$45 $720 $3,120 75 600 Pressure/Vacuum/Whistle Vents 8}ea $300 $2,400 1 8}$45 $360 $2,760 20 160 Clock Type Gauges 8]ea $300 $2,400 1 8]$45 $360 $2,760 20 160 4x12 Treated Timber Mudsills 720]tin.ft.$4.00 $2,880 |0.10 721)$45 $3,240 $6,120 13 9360 Place Tanks in Dike 6]ea $0 $0 20 120}$45 $5,400 $5,400 0 Place Double Wall Tanks 3]ea $0 $0 40 120}$45 $5,400 $5,400 0 PIPING SYSTEM Demolish Old Piping 1|lump $0 $0 50 50|$45 $2,250 $2,250 0 3"Sch 80 Welded Above Grade 1,800]lin.ft.$7.50 $13,500 |0.15 270|$45 |$12,150 $25,650 10 18000 3"Sch 40 Welded Above Grade 90]lin.ft.$4.60 $414 |0.10 91 $45 $405 $819 8 720 2"Sch 80 Welded Above Grade 2,000}lin.ft.$3.50 $7,000 |0.10 200]$45 $9,000 $16,000 5 10000 B-2(Community) ALASKA ENERGY AND NAPASKIAK CONSOLIDATED TANK FARM MARCH 22,2000 ENGINEERING FORCE ACCOUNT CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE PRELIMINARY DESIGN REPORT ITEM QUAN |UNIT;UNIT |.MATL |UNIT]LAB |LAB |LABOR |CONTR |FREIGHT TOTAL [UNIT]TOTAL COST COST HRS|HRS |/RATE}COST COST COST COST WT |WT(#) Sandblast Piping 260|sq.ft.$0.50 $130 |0.03 8]$45 $351 $481 5 1300 Paint Piping 260]sq.ft.$0.60 $156 {|0.05 13}$45 $585 $741 |0.20 52 4x12 Treated Timber Sleepers 600}lin.ft.$4.00 $2,400 |0.10 60|$45 $2,700 $5,100 13 7800 3"Pipe Straps 200]ea $3.00 $600 |0.10 20}$45 $900 $1,500 |1.60 320 2"Pipe Straps 250|ea $1.75 $438 |0.10 25|$45 $1,125 $1,563 |0.60 150 Misc Strut &Pipe Clamps 1}lump {|$2,000 $2,000 60 60}$45 $2,700 $4,700 |400 400 Flexible Connectors 15]ea $75 $1,125 1 15}$45 $675 $1,800 10 150 Manifold &Dispensing Fittings 1{lump {$2,500 $2,500 150 150}$45 $6,750 $9,250 {2000 2000 3"Flanged Gate Valves 2|ea $350 $700 2 4]$45 $180 $880 50 100 3"Flanged Check Valves 4]ea $250 $1,000 2 8|$45 $360 $1,360 50 200 3"Flanged Ball Valves 7|ea $300 $2,100 2 14]$45 $630 $2,730 50 350 2"Flanged Check Valves 2|ea $175 $350 2 4|$45 $180 $530 30 60 2"Flanged Ball Valves 1}ea $200 $200 4 1|$45 $45 $245 30 30 1-1/2"Flanged Ball Vaives 2|ea $150 $300 4 2|$45 $90 $390 20 40 1"Flanged Baill Valves 7|ea $100 $700 1 71 $45 $315 $1,015 15 105 Misc Threaded Ball Valves 1{lump $250 $250 10 10}$45 $450 $700 100 100 1"Actuator Valves 2|ea $1,500 $3,000 2 4|$45 $180 $3,180 35 70 2"Pressure Relief Valves 1]ea $200 $200 2 2|$45 $90 $290 20 20 1"Pressure Relief Valves 2|ea $150 $300 2 4|$45 $180 $480 10 20 2"Backpressure Valves 3]ea $100 $300 2 6}$45 $270 $570 10 30 1-1/2"Shear/Fusible Valves 3|ea $80 $240 2 6]$45 $270 $510 10 30 2"Fill Limiters 3|ea $700 $2,100 4 12|$45 $540 $2,640 20 60 1-1/2"Pipeline Filter 2|ea $300 $600 4 8]$45 $360 $960 20 40 PUMPS,DISPENSER,POWER,CONTROLS,ETC. 3/4 HP Submersible Pumps 3]ea $900 $2,700 6 18}$60 $1,080 $3,780 |100 300 Dual Prod Electronic Disonsr 1}ea $7,000 $7,000 40 40}$60 $2,400 $9,400 400 400 Dispenser Control Console 1}ea $2,000 $2,000 20 20}$60 $1,200 $3,200 50 50 Intercom 1}ea $500 $500 20 20|$60 $1,200 $1,700 |100 100 Pump Control Panel 4]ea |$10,000 $10,000 100 100}$60 $6,000 $16,000 100 100 High/Low Level Switches 2|ea $900 $1,800 5 10}$60 $600 $2,400 50 100 Remote Control Wire 600}lin.ft.$2.00 $1,200 |0.05 30}$60 $1,800 $3,000 2.0 1200 Meter Base &Panel Board 1]lump |$1,000 $1,000 60 60}$60 $3,600 $4,600 |200 200 Area Lighting 1]lump;$1,000 $1,000 40 40|$60 $2,400 $3,400 300 300 Conduit,Conductors,&Devices 1{lump}$6,000 $6,000 200 200}$60;$12,000 $18,000 |2000 2000 MISCELLANEOUS Concrete 8]cu.yd.$80 $640 5 40}$45 $1,800 $2,440 600 4800 Misc.Steel (Shelters,Stairs..)1}lump |$4,000 $4,000 |200 200}$45 $9,000 $13,000 |5000 5000 B-3(Community) ALASKA ENERGY AND NAPASKIAK CONSOLIDATED TANK FARM MARCH 22,2000 ENGINEERING FORCE ACCOUNT CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE PRELIMINARY DESIGN REPORT ITEM QUAN |UNIT}UNIT MATL |UNIT/LAB |LAB|LABOR |CONTR |FREIGHT|TOTAL |UNIT;TOTALCOSTCOST{HRS|HRS |RATE|COST COST COST COST WT |WT(#) Form Lumber,Lags,Nails,Etc 1]lump |$1,000 $1,000 40 40}$45 $1,800 $2,800 |1000 1000 Portable Dike Drainage Pump 1]ea $500 $500 0 0O|$45 $0 $500 j 100 100 Warning and Identification Signs 1}lump |$1,200 $1,200 15 15}$45 $675 $1,875 |100 100 Spill Response Supplies 1}lump |$1,600 $1,600 0 O|$45 $0 $1,600 }600 600 Misc Hardware 1}tump |$2,000 $2,000 0 O|$45 $0 $2,000 }500 500 Misc Tools &Safety Gear 1}lump |$4,000 $4,000 0 O|$45 $0 $4,000 |500 500 Welding Rod,Gases,Etc.1}lump |$3,500 $3,500 0 O}$45 $0 $3,500 |2000 2000 OVERHEAD Audit Grants 4]lump $3,000 $3,000 0 ROW Legal Work 1|lump $10,000 $10,000 0 Insurance 1|lump $15,000 $15,000 0 Rent/Mobilize Heavy Equip 1{lump $40,000 $40,000 0 Welder/Compr/Misc Tool Rent 1|lump $20,000 $20,000 0 Commission System &Training 30]hr 1 30}$60 $1,800 $1,800 0 Superintendent Overhd Off-Site 80|hr 1 80}$60 $4,800 $4,800 0 Superintendent Overhd On-Site 80}hr 1 80!$60 $4,800 $4,800 0 Crew Travel Time 60}hr 1 60}$60 $3,600 $3,600 0 Crew Airfares 6}trips $3,000 $3,000 0 Crew Per Diem 164 |mn.dy.$6,874 $6,874 0 Housing Rent 3]mo.$4,500 $4,500 0 FREIGHT 115,517 Barge Freight Seattle-Napaskiak|115517 |Ib.$0.41 $47,362 Barge Tanks Seattle-Napaskiak |90000 |{b.$0.59 $53,100 Backhaul Heavy Equipement 1 |lump |$5,000 $5,000 Tool Mob &Demob (charter)2{|ea.$5,000 $10,000 Misc Small Freight &Gold Streak 1 |lump |$10,000 $10,000 CONSTRUCTION SUB-TOTAL $254,765 3,273 $159,573 |$166,374 |$125,462 |$706,174 Engineering (Design &CCA)1,{lump $88,000 Construction Management 1|lump $80,000 PROJECT SUB-TOTAL $254,765 $159,573 |$334,374 |$125,462 |$874,174|Contingency 20(%$174,835 TTOTAL PROJECT COST $1,049,009 B-4(Community) ALASKA ENERGY AND NAPASKIAK CONSOLIDATED TANK FARM MARCH 22,2000 ENGINEERING FORCE ACCOUNT CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY PRELIMINARY DESIGN REPORT SCHOOL 1.FOUNDATION,DIKE,&SITE $68,770 2.TANKS $76,700 3.PIPING SYSTEM $27,537 4.PUMPS,DISPENSER,POWER,CONTROLS,ETC.$21,360 5.MISCELLANEOUS $8,425 6.OVERHEAD $40,971 7.FREIGHT $41,267 8.CONSTRUCTION SUB-TOTAL $285,030 9.DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION ADMIN.$22,000 10.CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT $20,000 11.PROJECT SUB-TOTAL $327,030 12.CONTINGENCY $65,406 20 % 13.TOTAL PROJECT COST $392,436 14.TOTAL STORAGE CAPACITY 39,000 GAL.GROSS CAPACITY 35,100 GAL.NET CAPAC.(90%OF GROSS) 15.COST PER GALLON OF NET CAPACITY $11.18 16.PROJECT COST PER PARTICIPANT SCHOOL $392,436]100.0%35,100 GAL.NET CAPACITY B-5 (School) ALASKA ENERGY AND NAPASKIAK CONSOLIDATED TANK FARM MARCH 22,2000 ENGINEERING FORCE ACCOUNT CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE PRELIMINARY DESIGN REPORT ITEM QUAN [UNIT]UNIT |.MATL |UNIT|LAB |LAB/LABOR |CONTR |FREIGHT|TOTAL |UNIT|TOTALCOSTCOST|HRS}HRS |RATE|COST COST COST COST WT |WT(#) FOUNDATION,DIKE,&SITE Sand Fill (Pad)120|cu.yd.$0 |0.150 18}$45 $810 $6,000 $6,810 0 Sand Fill (Access Rd)600|cu.yd.$0 |0.150 120]$45 $5,400 |$30,000 $35,400 0 Gravel 100|cu.yd.$0 |0.150 15|$45 $675 $8,000 $8,675 0 Dike Membrane Liner 4,700]sq.ft $1.25 $2,125 |0.005 9|$45 $383 $2,508 |0.17 289 Non-Woven Geotextile (Dike)2,000}sq.ft $0.07 $140 |0.002 4)$45 $180 $320 |0.08 160 Woven Geotextile (Road)4,000]sq.ft.|$0.05 $200 |0.001 4|$45 $180 $380 |0.04 160 4"Cellular Confinement 500]sq.ft.$0.80 $400 |0.01 5)$45 $225 $625 |0.35 175 Dike Wall Sheet Metal Cover 68|sq.ft.|$10.00 $680 |0.04 3|$45 $122 $802 |1.70 116 Moment Frames 10]ea.$250 $2,500 |2.00 20|$45 $900 $3,400 |200 2000 Timbers,6"x6",Dike walls 780}lin.ft $3.60 $2,808 |0.120 94)$45 $4,212 $7,020 10 7800 Timbers,2"x6",Dike wails 156]lin.ft $1.15 $179 |0.050 8]$45 $351 $530 |3.60 562 Lags,Bolts,Angle,Strut,etc.1|lump $500 $500 0 O|$45 $0 $500 0 6'Chain-Link Fence 100}lin.ft.$9 $900 {0.20 20|$45 $900 $1,800 |15.00 1500 TANKS Drain Existing Tanks 13]ea.$100 $1,300 10 130]$60 $7,800 $9,100 0 Demolish/Dispose Old Tanks 12|ea.$0 $0 20 240}$45 |$10,800 $10,800 0 New 27,000 Gal Bulk Tank 14]ea |$24,000 |$24,000 0 O}]$45 $0 $24,000 0 New 12,000 Double Wall Tank 1|ea }$25,000 |$25,000 0 O|$45 $0 $25,000 0 Emergency Vents 3]ea $300 $900 2 6]$45 $270 $1,170 75 225 Pressure/Vacuum/Whistle Vents 2|ea $300 $600 1 2]$45 $90 $690 20 40 Clock Type Gauges 2|ea $300 $600 1 2|$45 $90 $690 20 40 4x12 Treated Timber Mudsills 300]lin.ft.$4.00 $1,200 |0.10 30}$45 $1,350 $2,550 13 3900 Place Tanks in Dike 1|ea $0 $0 20 20}$45 $900 $900 0 Place Intermediate Tanks 1{ea $0 $0 40 40}$45 $1,800 $1,800 0 PIPING SYSTEM 3"Sch 40 Welded Above Grade 20}lin.ft.$4.60 $92 |0.10 2|$45 $90 $182 8 160 2"Sch 80 Welded Above Grade 1,500}lin.ft.|$3.50 $5,250 |0.10 150]$45 $6,750 $12,000 5 7500 Sandblast Piping 60}sq.ft.$0.50 $30 |0.03 2|$45 $81 $111 5 300 Paint Piping 60}sq.ft.$0.60 $36 |0.05 3]$45 $135 $171 |0.20 12 4x12 Treated Timber Sleepers 300}lin.ft.$4.00 $1,200 |0.10 30]$45 $1,350 $2,550 13 3900 3"Pipe Straps 2|ea $3.00 $6 |0.10 O|$45 $9 $15}1.60 3 2"Pipe Straps 150]ea $1.75 $263 |0.10 15}$45 $675 $938 |0.60 90 Misc Strut &Pipe Clamps 1}tump |$1,000 $1,000 60 60}$45 $2,700 $3,700 |400 400 Flexible Connectors 3]ea $75 $225 1 3]$45 $135 $360 10 30 Manifold Fittings 1|lump $500 $500 60 60}$45 $2,700 $3,200 |2000 2000 3"Flanged Check Valves 1]ea $250 $250 2 2]$45 $90 $340 50 50 B-6 (School) ALASKA ENERGY AND NAPASKIAK CONSOLIDATED TANK FARM MARCH 22,2000 ENGINEERING FORCE ACCOUNT CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE PRELIMINARY DESIGN REPORT ITEM QUAN |UNIT}UNIT MATL |UNIT}LAB |LAB}LABOR |CONTR |FREIGHT|TOTAL |UNIT]TOTAL COST COST HRS|HRS {RATE}COST COST COST COST WT |WT(#) 3"Flanged Ball Valves 1{ea $300 $300 2 2|$45 $90 $390 50 50 2"Flanged Check Valves 1{ea $175 $175 2 2|$45 $90 $265 30 30 2"Flanged Ball Valves 1|ea $200 $200 1 1}$45 $45 $245 30 30 1"Flanged Ball Valves 2|ea $100 $200 1 2|$45 $90 $290 15 30 Misc Threaded Ball Valves 1}lump $250 $250 10 10}$45 $450 $700 100 100 2"Pressure Relief Valves 1}ea $200 $200 2 2|$45 $90 $290 20 20 1"Pressure Relief Valves 1]ea $150 $150 2 2}$45 $90 $240 10 10 2"Backpressure Valves 1]ea $100 $100 2 2|$45 $90 $190 10 10 2"Fill Limiters 1]ea $700 $700 4 4)$45 $180 $880 20 20 1-1/2"Pipeline Filter 1}ea $300 $300 4 4)$45 $180 $480 20 20 PUMPS,DISPENSER,POWER,CONTROLS,ETC. 3/4 HP Submersible Pumps i|ea $900 $900 6 6}$60 $360 $1,260 100 100 High/Low Level Switches 1]ea $900 $900 5 5|$60 $300 $1,200 50 50 Remote Control Conduit/Wire 1,500}lin.ft.$2.00 $3,000 |0.05 75]$60 $4,500 $7,500 2.0 3000 Area Lighting 1]lump $500 $500 20 20}$60 $1,200 $1,700 |300 300 Conduit,Conductors,&Devices 1{lump |$2,500 $2,500 120 120}$60 $7,200 $9,700 |2000 2000 MISCELLANEOUS Misc.Steel (Shelters,Stairs..)1{lump $50 $50 40 40}$45 $1,800 $1,850 |500 500 Portable Dike Drainage Pump 1|ea $500 $500 0 O}$45 $0 $500 100 100 Warning and Identification Signs 1|lump $600 $600 15 15}$45 $675 $1,275 |100 100 Spill Response Supplies 1}lump $800 $800 0 O}|$45 $0 $800 |600 600 Misc Hardware 1}lump |$1,000 $1,000 0 O}$45 $0 $1,000 |500 500 Misc Tools &Safety Gear 1}lump |$2,000 $2,000 0 O}$45 $0 $2,000 |500 500 Welding Rod,Gases,Etc.4}lump |$1,000 $1,000 0 O}$45 $0 $1,000 #2000 2000 OVERHEAD Audit Grants 1|tump $1,000 $1,000 0 ROW Legal Work 1]lump $5,000 $5,000 0 Insurance 1]jump $5,000 $5,000 0 Rent/Mobilize Heavy Equip 1]lump $10,000 $10,000 0 Welder/Compr/Misc Tool Rent 1}lump $5,000 $5,000 0 Commission System &Training 20}hr 1 20}$60 $1,200 $1,200 0 Superintendent Overhd Off-Site 40]hr 1 40;$60 $2,400 $2,400 0 Superintendent Overhd On-Site 40)hr 1 40}$60 $2,400 $2,400 0 Crew Travel Time 30}hr 1 30|$60 $1,800 $1,800 0 Crew Airfares 3]trips $2,400 $2,400 0 Crew Per Diem 78|mn.dy.$3,271 $3,271 0 Housing Rent 1}mo.$1,500 $1,500 0 B-7 (School) B-8 (School) ALASKA ENERGY AND NAPASKIAK CONSOLIDATED TANK FARM MARCH 22,2000 ENGINEERING FORCE ACCOUNT CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE PRELIMINARY DESIGN REPORT ITEM QUAN |UNIT}UNIT MATL |UNIT|LAB |}LAB}LABOR |CONTR |FREIGHT]TOTAL |UNIT;TOTALCOSTCOST|HRS|HRS |RATE|COST COST COST COST WT |WT(#) FREIGHT 41,481 Barge Freight Seattle-Napaskiak|41481}Ib $0.41 $17,007 Barge Tanks Seattle-Napaskiak |42000 |__Ib.$0.53 $22,260 Misc Small Freight &Gold Streak 1 |lump |$2,000 $2,000 CONSTRUCTION SUB-TOTAL $89,209 1,558 $77,383 |$77,171 |$41,267 |$285,030 Engineering (Design &CCA)1jlump $22,000 Construction Management 1jlump $20,000 PROJECT SUB-TOTAL $89,209 $77,383 |$119,1/1|$41,267 |$327,030Contingency20/%|$65,406 [TOTAL PROJECT COST $392,436 Napaskiak Bulk Fuel Consolidation &Upgrade March 22,2000 Preliminary Design Report Alaska Energy and Engineering APPENDIX C CERTIFICATE TO PLAT Alaska Energy and Engineering,Inc.|Mailing Address -P.O.Box 111405 1217 East Klatt Road,Suite AAnchorage,AK 99511-1405(907)349-0100349-8001 fax February 25,2000 ! Mr.Howard Hancoc'! Pacific Northwest Title of Alaska 3201 C Street,#110 Anchorage,AK 99503 | Subject:Napaskiak Certificate to Plat Information £27 TO jUDear Mr.Hancock:|ARLEL #|----Please find enclosed the following regarding the Napaskiak BFU project land status:2---1.Current property status of the Napaskiak Airport as shown on the attached StateofAlaskaDepartmentofTransportationandPublicFacilitiesairportmap,page 4 of 4. '2,---s 2.The parcels identified as B.I.A.School Lot and the Napaskiak Schoo!Site on theattachedplat83-23 filed June 2,1983,in the Bethel Recording District. 3.The parcels identified as the Proposed Tank Farm Site,Existing Tank Farm andPowerGeneratorsontheattachedcommunitymap.|--(4.That land identified as the Proposed Pipeline Routes on the attached community map. Piease include in the Certificate to Plat properties included in items 1,2,3 and 4 ofabove.We require ithe Certificate to Plat prior to March 3,2000.You are authorizedtobillupto$250 for this effort.If you anticipate exceeding this amount,pleasecallmepriortoproceeding. If you have any questions,please call me at (907)349-0100,or fax your comments to(907)349-8001. Sincerely, Alaska Energy and Engineering,Inc. Aree (eyOr_ revor Krupa /Mechanical Engineer | ComduIr ]MAF 7 _@pAIRPORTBOUNDARY PARCEL AS vA ROUTE 7 |B.LA.SCHOOL PROPERTY FARCEL Hennn)SE BROPOQSED PIPELINES I MC Ey : ao ROUTE J |O |(jC jenueel TitsttitititetoN TTara <- Ae F z Lh vonEXISTINGTANKFARMwall AND POWER GENERATORS 1 SCHOOL PROPERTY PROPOSED TANK PARELHZ FARM SITE SEWAGE LAGOON ---- NIGHE AD AI4naoa*° 4 'SRSKEKPROTRACTED-OW-CORNER Weyer gitTIN,ATIW,SECTION @ NIGHEAD eumSEWARDMERIOIAN|\inas te,JS .to PROTRACTEO SECTIONS 8 O 'ty IT,TUN,APEW,Om.ALASKA>"LyNive v,evpOn oeXi¢Sead°,\ :\ _-Ap -_Apaclt 20%43"32°€4240.00" °rr hi y'X whe é2re)Xe°o o°°\. °\e |co ---- -S,-|-a ae -e _,. '- *°\}ase°iezp"e<S$-}400.00 . e °\o '\7a= ::4--_-1 oe "Ts 'S may$30°45'32)w 3,290.00 Loe \;\830°48'32"w ¥1060.00NES%14 207 Woot _Ee _°we NY150.00"a --;--389¢14'20"@ ' \$30°45'32°Ww 1,048.24'-190.00 ;ry 83e*35'03"w N38°35'03"E )Ne,34737 352.72 4 *8\pr 'aJLEGEND@\2-31%24 67 €£'eee ">$0.00pis -_-a AIRPORT BOUNDARY own,At ALL __OD fey 1"«400"LEASE BOUNDARY WOTATE OF ALASKA ee FUTURE RUNWAY PROTRACTED SE CORNER |DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPOATATIONTIN,ATIW,SECTION @ AND PUBLIC FACILITIESSRSRMSSEBTAZsEXISTINGROADSEWARDMERIDIANWAPgHOmIKg 4&SLM TAI STATION NAPASKIAK AIRPORT e PROTRACTED SECTION CORNER .me LD)Sees en@®,00.7%@ RK ALUMINUM CAP '$93.2 aores UD 4239 IN-2d LS ¥70e, CONTROL OLAQRAM core oe ageceas @ -foums DIse”Grows Cop VOL © O - Peres BI”ALM Brews O702 BO”reeer cof Gowran reser Baaeel en{TRUe weew hk OCARtROS EMOTE LEGAL DESCRIPTION BM peren!of lord wtusted In he vittege of Mapeshion,AlsshsofWOsepre-t- mate gengrapricg peuiien of 80°CF PY mm tates od I SE SO Leregtistsandbeingaerepartticuierty auecrtiedosfettnrs: Bugiewing ot 8 W/E incn ele pin witty 6 16 tech chara cp meted Carne fe.1 free wricn 0 Fa inch @ i @ Breese cop meresnettawrtingUS1 fe.0 eae I Wr Ow 58S fet tee OST ER EH fut goo WE ch atest pin wie 9 SN inch otic Cop mereeng Use miter - eetlen with Us sueterty fine of the BI A octumd ereperty Ownripites: Waren§08"35 Fd Ww,910 OF Fant steng colt B 1 A.conterty lee to 6 VE tre ots pin ett o 15 eer chen cop.renee te GF IP we MT fat,SO Ce paint of Daglnring Contaming 0 019 ex ree mere ar tove sl witneneRweetpremertyoncomted scnoow SITE 6000 ewes ®butntny enetep2Scorws©amttutag @orup 5\ s7-106 a me - ewesemweee Ce 0)mew west .mOoTEeS Trt GASsowTwetst AND OETU mnieYreasor. 83-23 . 'nee FILED 207 OWNE . one re teu - =e TOCE THER WITos:: Cammarvciong mt @ S/E inch stant mn wemh 8 th ech shania cop eorted Career me.1 fem wun os FL ich 8 08 trees cop erent aerhing wots5.0...See,4739 beers ONT?OP OT ww,Se FR feet,rence NGS"AE ET €,18.8F tent te 8 SVB inch stent pin wt @ TY inch shen cap morta i:Tre sntarverUen ©:h the assterty lone of Ge 8 A.chest property amecrip- Cen ate le the rus POINT Of BECIMEING Ber Wee deacriplien;,O-wr we cmntivamg©65°S14 8 47.61 tent te oe O/8 bn ote ps em oo Th bun aumean Cap merhed Corn Me.2;thence i 6°OF IF £SF Mf font tm © L/D acm stem gin etn 1)Inch sheen Cop morte Cover me 3)DeereB30eae27hWwOakTPfatee08/0 ch ote gin stn 0 Th inch ahamenee {ap merted Carnes tp 4:thence ©18°OF TF ww)47 0D fers te oo 1/8 bo aed pare eth 8 TN Inch chemo Cap eh meres Ee Intereertionn tt aah @.1 A.eesterty ie,ere ©OR FT Ft 8 FO C8 feet ate seed eooterty eve UD Eee BEEnt of Beyewiieng cariaring 3 M01 ecres mare ow wes Tre Deets of bearings fer Tite Gencriptim te wu -ueofUSB. BeerweyOe)I een oe 8 RY OR 8 om we wee ee aes se ml OT _-a 7 PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE\\,OF ALASKA,INC. CERTIFICATE TO PLAT ORDER NO.:00048435 Date:March 2,2000 ALASKA ENERGY AND ENGINEERING,INC. 1217 KLATT ROAD #A ANCHORAGE,AK 99511 Attn:TREVOR KRUPA Reference:NAPASKIAK This is a Certificate as of February 25,2000 at 8:00 am on the following described property: See Exhibit A Attached hereto and made a part hereof A search of the records of the Bethel Recording Office by this Company reveals that title to the property described herein is vested on the date shown above in: See Exhibit A Attached hereto and made a part hereof SUBJECT only to the exceptions shown herein:wwGENERAL EXCEPTIONS: Encroachments or questions of location,boundary and area,which an accurate survey may disclose;public or private easements, claims of easements or encumbrances which are not disclosed by the public records including but not limited to rights of the state and/or public in and to any portion of the land for right of way as established by federal statute RS 2477;rights or claims of persons in possession,or claiming to be in possession,not disclosed by the public records;material or labor liens or statutory liens under State Acts not disclosed by the public records;water rights or matters relating thereto;any service,installation or construction charges for sewer,water or electricity. Right of use,control or regulation by the United States of America in the exercise of powers over navigation;defects,liens, encumbrances,or other matters created or suffered by the insured;rights,claims based upon instruments or upon facts not disclosed by the public records but of which rights,claims,instruments or facts the insured has knowledge. General taxes not now payable;matters relating to special assessments and special levies,if any,preceding the same becominga lien. Mining claims,reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof. Any law,ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not limited to building and zoning laws,ordinances,or regulations) restricting,regulating,prohibiting or relating to (i)the occupancy,use or enjoyment of the land;(ii)the character,dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land;(iii)a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions or area of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a part;or (iv)environmental protection,or the effect of any violation of these laws,ordinances or governmental regulations,except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect,lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Certificate. "Consumer Credit Protection,”"Truth in Lending"or similar law,or failure to comply with said law(s). Any claim by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy,state insolvency,or similar creditors'rights laws. 3201 C Street,Suite 110,Anchorage,AK 99503, PHONE (907)561-5122 @ Fax:(907)261-2201 CERTIFICATE TO PLAT Printed on Recycled Paper Page 2 Exhibit A VESTING: PARCEL TI: NAPASKIAK INCORPORATED,an estate in fee simple. PARCEL 2: STATE OF ALASKA,DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION,an estate in fee simple. PARCEL 3: STATE OF ALASKA,DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC FACILITIES,an estate in fee simple. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PARCEL 1: T.7N.,R.71W.,Seward Meridian,Alaska,(Unsurveyed) Section 8,lying Southerly of the Napaskiak Slough of the Kuskokwim River; Section 9,lying Southerly of the Napaskiak Slough of the Kuskokwim River,Excluding Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act Sec.3(e)application AA-16144 and Public Land Order 2020; EXCLUDED from the above described lands are the submerged lands,up to the ordinary high water mark,beneath all water bodies determined by the Bureau of Land Management to be navigable because they have been or could be used in connection with travel,trade and commerce. EXCEPTING THEREFROM the subsurface estate and all rights,privileges,immunities and appurtenances of whatsoever nature,accruing unto said estate pursuant to the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act of December 18, 1971 (85 Stat.688,704;43 U.S.C.1601,1613 (f)(1976),as reserved by the United States of America. FURTHER EXCEPTING THEREFROM that portion delineated and described as the "Napaskiak School Site”on the Napaskiak School Boundary Survey,according to Plat No.83-23BS. FURTHER EXCEPTING THEREFROM that portion conveyed to the State of Alaska,Department of Transportation and Public Facilities by Quitclaim Deed (Napaskiak Airport)recorded May 23,1991 in Book 55 at Page 582. FURTHER EXCEPTING THEREFROM that portion delineated on the plat of Napaskiak Subdivision as Lots 1 through 7,inclusive,Block 1;Lots 1 through 9,inclusive,Block 2,and Lots 1 through 4,inclusive,Block 3,according to Plat No.88-5. FURTHER EXCEPTING THEREFROM that portion delineated on the Record of Survey of a tract of land,near Kuskokwim River,according to Plat No.97-20. FURTHER EXCEPTING THEREFROM that portion delineated on the Record of Survey of a portion of the B.I.A. School Lot in Napaskiak,Alaska,according to Plat No.99-7. FURTHER EXCEPTING THEREFROM that portion delineated on the plat of Tracts A &B,B.I.A.School Lot, according to Plat No.99-23. All being within the Bethel Recording District,Fourth Judicial District,State of Alaska. EXHIBIT "A"CON'T, PARCEL 2: Tracts "A”and "B”,of B.1.A.SCHOOL LOT,according to Plat No.99-23,records of the Bethel Recording District, Fourth Judicial District,State of Alaska. PARCEL 3: That portion of the following description lying with Section 8,Township 7 North,Range 71 West,Seward Meridian, Bethel Recording District,Fourth Judicial District,State of Alaska,as follows: A portion of protracted Sections 8 and 17,Township 7 North,Range 71 West,Seward Meridian,Bethel Recording District,Fourth Judicial District,State of Alaska,more particularly described as follows: Commencing at U.S.C.&G.S.triangulation station "Nighead 1949”(from which "Nighead AZ 1949”bears N1°55'44”E,which is the Basis of Bearing of this description),thence S75°44°11”E a distance of 25,249.69 feet (computed)to Station No.10+00,a point located on the runway centerline of the Napaskiak Airport; Thence S59°14°28”E a distance of 400.00 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence continuing $59°14'28”E a distance of 150.00 feet; Thence $30°45'32”W on a line parallel to and 550 feet distant from the airport runway centerline,a distance of 1,050.00 feet; Thence N59°14°28”Wa distance of 150.00 feet to a point on a line parallel to and 400.00 feet distant from the airport runway centerline; Thence S30°45'32”W on a line parallel to and 400.00 feet distant from the airport runway centerline,a distance of approximately 3,135 feet to a point on the ordinary high water line on the left bank of an unnamed slough located in Section 17; Thence northwesterly along the left bank of said unnamed slough a distance of approximately 900 feet to a point on a line parallel to and 400.00 feet distant from the airport runway centerline extended; Thence N30°45°32”E on a line parallel to and 400.00 feet distant from the airport runway centerline,a distance of approximately 3,695 to a point on the ordinary high water line on the left bank of the Napaskiak Slough; Thence northeasterly along the left bank of the Napaskiak Slough a distance of approximately 630 feet to a point located on the Napaskiak Airport runway centerline extended; Thence continuing northeasterly along the left bank of the Napaskiak Slough a distance of approximately 550 feet to apointonalineparalleltoand400.00 feet distant from the airport runway centerline extended; Thence $30°45'32”W on a line parallel to and 400.00 feet distant from the airport runway centerline extended,a distance of approximately 740 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Said Property is depicted as Parcel I on the Napaskiak Airport Parcel Plat attached to Quitclaim Deed recorded May 23,1991 in Book 55 at Page 582. Order No.:00048435 SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS: 1.EXCEPTIONS,RESERVATIONS,AGREEMENTS,EASEMENTS AND USE RIGHTS as set forth in interim conveyance: Dated:April 11,1983 Recorded:June 9,1983 Book/Page:35/51 Affects:Parcels |and 3 2.TERMS,COVENANTS,CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS,including rights of way and easements,as contained in the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act,dated December 18,1971,U.S.Public Law 92-203,(85 Stat.688,704;43 U.S.C.1601,et seq.). NOTE:No assurance is given as to the vertical delineation of the surface and subsurface estates in said land as provided in said Act. Affects:Parcels 1 and 3 3.ANY DEFECT OR INVALIDITYof the title to said land based on the fact that no patent has been issued by the United States of America.Upon the issuance of said patent and recordation thereof in the herein named recording district,said land will be subject to all the provisions and reservations contained therein Recording District:Bethel 4.DISCREPANCIES,CONFLICTS IN BOUNDARY LINES,SHORTAGE IN AREA,ENCROACHMENTS OR OTHER FACTS which a correct survey would disclose,and which are not shown by the public records. 5.ACLAIM,if any,of any person of a right,title,interest or possession to the property,or any portion thereof,under the Alaska Native Allotment Act of May 17,1906,34 Stat.197,as amended. 6.RIGHTS of the public and/or governmental agencies in and to that portion of said premises lying below the mean high water mark of Kuskokwim River,Napaskiak Slough. 7.ANY PROHIBITION OR LIMITATION on the use,occupancy or improvement of the land resulting from the rights of the public or riparian owners to use any waters which may cover the land,or to use any portion of the land which is now or may formerly have been covered by water. 8.ANY ADVERSE CLAIM based upon the assertion that some portion of said land is tide or submerged lands,or has been created by artificial means or has accreted to such portion so created. 9.ANY PREFERENCE RIGHTS which may exist under the Alaska Land Act,terms,provisions and reservations under the Submerged Lands Act (43 U.S.C.1301,67 Stat.29),and the Enabling Act (Public Law 85-508,72 Stat.339). 10.RIGHTS AND EASEMENTS of the United States over and across lands lying beneath navigable waters and tide lands necessary to its jurisdiction over commerce,navigation and fisheries. 11.COVENANTS,CONDITIONS,RESTRICTIONS,RESERVATIONS AND REVERSIONARY RIGHTS including the terms and provisions thereof,as set forth or referred to in Quitclaim Deed (Napaskiak School Site) Executed By:Bureau of Indian Affairs,Department of the Interior In Favor Of:State of Alaska,Department of Education Recorded:January 18,1989 Book/Page:49/751 Affects:Parcel 2 CERTIFICATE TO PLAT Printed on Recycled Paper Page 3 Order No.:00048435 SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS (Continued) 12.LEASE OF BIA SCHOOL SITE AT NAPASKIAK,including the terms and conditions thereof Lessor:United States of America by and through the Secretary of the Interior Lessee:State of Alaska Term:55 years Dated:August 5,1982 Recorded:September 28,1982 Book/Page:32/842 Affects:A portion of Parcel 1 Note:Said lease has merged with the fee simple title now held by the State of Alaska as to Parcel 2,however we find no termination of said lease as to that portion affecting a portion of Parcel 1. 13.LEASE,including the terms and conditions thereof Lessor:Napaskiak,Inc. Lessee:United Utilities,Inc. Term:20 years commencing August !,1982 Dated:August 1,1982 Recorded:November 19,1982 Book/Page:33/341 Affects:A portion of Parcel 1 AND Re-recorded:September 21,1993 Book/Page:61/691 SAID LEASE,among other things,provides for an option to renew for a period of an additional 15 year term. Corporate Resolution of Napaskiak Corporation Recorded:February 16,1983 Book/Page:34/306 14.EASEMENT,including the terms and conditions thereof In Favor Of:City of Napaskiak Recorded:April 27,1988 Book/Page:47/906 For:Public Use Easement Affects:A portion of Parcel 1 15.EASEMENT,including the terms and conditions thereof In Favor Of:Alaska Power Authority Recorded:April 10,1989 Book/Page:50/347 For:Electrical transmission line -Distribution line Affects:Blanket Easement over the South %of Section 8 and Section 9 (Parcels 1,2 &3) PARTIAL RELEASE OF EASEMENT over Napaskiak Airport Grantor:Alaska Power Authority Grantee:State of Alaska,Department of Transportation and Public Facilities Recorded:May 23,1991 Book/Page:55/600 CERTIFICATE TO PLAT Printed on Recycled Paper Page 4 Order No.:00048435 SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS (Continued) 16.LEASE,including the terms and conditions thereof 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. CERTIFICATE TO PLAT Printed on Recycled Paper Lessor: Lessee: Term: Dated: Recorded: Book/Page: Affects: Napaskiak,Incorporated Napaskiak Traditional Village30yearstocommenceonthe28"day of March 1991 March 28,1991 May 20,1991 55/541 A portion of Parcel 1 EASEMENT,including the terms and conditions thereof In Favor Of: Recorded: Book/Page: For: Affects: State of Alaska,Department of Transportation and Public Facilities May 23,1991 55/592 Avigation and Hazard Easement A portion of Parcel 1 EASEMENT,including the terms and conditions thereof In Favor Of: Recorded: Book/Page: For: Affects: United Utilities,Inc. April 15,1993 60/266 Telephone lines or system Blanket Easement (Parcels 1,2 &3) AMENDMENT OF RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT Recorded: Book/Page: March 21,1996 71/329 LEASE,including the terms and conditions thereof Lessor: Lessee: Term: Dated: Recorded: 'Book/Page: Affects: Napaskiak Incorporated Rural Alaska Community Action Program,Inc. 20 years,commencing on January 1,1996,and ending on December 31,2015. January 1,1996 March 15,1996 71/256 A portion of Parcel 1 LEASE,including the terms and conditions thereof Lessor: Lessee: Term: Dated: Recorded: Book/Page: Affects: Napaskiak,Incorporated Napaskiak Tribal Council 20 years,commencing on the effective date and terminating 20 years later,provided that such Lease term may be earlier terminated if and when the Premises may be conveyed to Lessee pursuant to Section 14(c)of ANSCA. February 5,1996 March 15,1996 71/265 A portion of Parcel 1 AGREEMENT FOR JOINT USE OF POLES,including the terms and conditions thereof By and Between: Dated: Recorded: Book/Page: Napaskiak,Inc.and United Utilities,Inc. August 1,1982 September 2,1997 77/24 Page 5 Order No.:00048435 SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS (Continued) ASSIGNMENT OF AGREEMENT FOR JOINT USE OF POLES,including the terms and conditions thereof Assignor: Assignee: Dated: Recorded: Book/Page: Napaskiak,Inc. The City of Napaskiak March 18,1996 June 2,1997 75/807 22,DEED OF TRUST,including the terms and conditions thereof Trustor: Trustee: Beneficiary: Amount: Dated: Recorded: Book/Page: Affects: Napaskiak,Incorporated First American Title of Alaska KeyBank National Association $122,044.75 November 15,1999 November 22,1999 85/767 A portion of Parcel 1 -The legal description recites "That certain parcel identified as Site 24 on maps attached hereto as Exhibits 'A'and 'B'....”.No such maps were attached to the recorded document. 23.OVERLAP AND CONFLICT OF BOUNDARY LINES between the Plats of 99-23 and 83-23BS 24.EASEMENT dedicated or delineated on the face of the plat Plat No.: For: Affects: Affects: 99-23 Ingress and Egress across Tract A for the benefit of Tract B With the filing of this plat Tract A Grants to Tract B a 15 foot wide ingress and egress easement across Tract A from the meander line of the Kuskokwim River to Tract B.This is a 15 foot wide ingress and egress easement covering the whole of Tract A.In the future if Tract A should be subdivided and provide Tract B with legal access,then this 15 foot wide ingress and egress easement will be void.Until such time this 15 foot wide right of way easement will run with the land. With the filing of this plat Tract B has the right to construct and maintain a 15 foot ingress and egress easement across Tract A.Upon the completion of this construction this ingress and egress easement will become a defined 15 foot wide easement where it has been constructed. Parcel 2 25.EFFECT of the notes as shown on Plat 99-23. Affects:Parcel 2 This report is restricted to the use of the addressee and is not to be used as a basis for closing any transaction affecting title tosaidproperty.Liability of the Company is limited to the compensation received therefor. CHARGE:$350.00 hh/March 2,2000 CERTIFICATE TO PLAT Printed on Recycled Paper PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE OF ALASKA,INC. »IM Authorized Signature Howard Hancock,Phone:261-2230 Page 6