Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLower Yukon-Kuskokwim Regional Energy Plan Alaska Energy Authority April, 2011alas be Cet yy PANLowerYukon-Kuskokwim Regional Energy Plan Alaska Energy Plan Implementation- Region Plannning Lower Yukon -Kuskokwim Energy Plan Interior Region Plan Southeast Integrated Resource Plan Budget Support Letters (OLOZ/Z)Wu04 (Yq)Jsenbay yueWeINDOJg ,O Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim Regional Energy Plan -”Alaska Energy Authority April ,2011 ]Alaska Energy Plan Implementation-Region Plannning7feesoad.try Plann vy Fed fw ford cer 2,Lower Yukon -Kuskokwim Energy Plan es DI..,"Ther Fe,mde ban,>fervy thi b wh ov Cowtares jn Poe cd ode->Interior Region Plan rou L P fetanConlernr™s Lt ov bar the Sunt Yu ken Kuile(Cu rw!dete °4,: »Southeast Integrated Resource Plan 73,,,,tH.Fivst mage ort At4oOisergeneInASfrnSeftomesPlear.tr-trite,,The follows mw thal,Budget An 2007 Stole Ere)Plan ad te.2ayoPa}evrts Eri f/ny written bey bs ste 1)Pek Support Letters Si mele Soyve< ai Alaska Energy Plan implementation: Region Plannning Lower Yukon -Kuskokwirr Energy Plan Interior Region Plan 7 4 Southeast Integrated Resource Plan -_- Budget Si Support Letters ftso "Resources Single Seytes ests IRS Publications Delos,gett Regional Energy Planning Approach for Rural Areas Alaska Energy Authority DRAFT April 2011 Note:This is extracted from text prepared for the rural sub-cabinet report that was submitted to DCEED on 2/9/11. Background The Alaska Energy Authority (AEA)launched a statewide energy planning process in 2009 to identify alternatives for stabilizing sharply rising energy costs in rural,Railbelt and Southeast Alaska. (See Appendix for summary of recommendations.)This effort involved over 28 community meetings and resulted in two reports: 1.The Alaska Energy Guide',which presented an summary of energy policy in Alaska and detailed descriptions of potential resource and technology options for deployment in Alaska:diesel efficiency,heat recovery,end use efficiency,hydroelectric,wind,biomass, geothermal,heat pumps,solar,coal,natural gas,pipelines and interties,energy storage, river and ocean energy,nuclear,coal bed methane,fuel cells,and alternative fuels. 2.The Alaska Energy Pathway',which established a.Overall goals for renewable energy,energy efficiency development,energy security, economic development,innovation,and education and training. b.Detailed objectives and estimated capital costs for energy development in each of 227 non-Railbelt communities rolled up to 11 regions. Finally,the Alaska State Legislature has established policy'that addresses goals for renewable energy and energy efficiency,encourages statewide energy codes;establishes an energy efficiency revolving loan fund at Alaska Housing Finance Corporation to finance efficiency measures in state and municipal government buildings,public schools,and the University of Alaska;establishes an Emerging Energy Technology Fund at AEA to demonstrate energy efficiency and generation innovations that are likely to be commercially viable within five years; and requires the state to "lead by example”by increasing public building energy efficiency and testing alternative fuels in state fleets. *Alaska Energy,a First Step Toward Energy Independence:A Guide for Alaskan Communities to Utilize Local Energy Resources,AEA 2009,hitp://www.akenergyauthority.org/PDF%20files/AK%20Energy%20Final.pdf ?Alaska Energy Pathway,Toward Energy Independence,AEA 2010,http://www.akenergyauthority.org/alaska- energy-plan.html *Senate Bill 220 (the Alaska Sustainable Energy Act)and House Bill 306 (Omnibus Energy Bill)2010. DRAFT 2/9/11 AEA 1|Page State Programs that Address the High Cost of Rural Energy The State of Alaska administers a set of programs aimed at reducing the cost of energy and improving energy reliability for individuals,businesses,and communities.Generally they fall into three categories-direct aid,energy efficiency improvements,and energy supply infrastructure development. This section describes programs that address the rural portion of the state and that are administered by Alaska Department of Health and Social Service (DHSS)Division of Public Assistance,Alaska Housing Finance Corporation (AHFC),and AEA.Numerous other entities ranging from local governments to non- profits to utilities also have very active programs that address rural energy issues. Direct Aid Power Cost Equalization (AEA).The PCE program provides assistance to customers in rural areas of Alaska where the kilowatt-hour charge for electricity can be three to five times higher than the charge in more urban areas of the state.PCE pays approximately 30%of all kWh's sold by a typical utility.PCE provided $31.7 million to customers in fiscal year 2010. http://www.akenergyauthority.org/programspce.html Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program-LIHEAP (DHSS).LIHEAP provides payments to qualifying households to help defray heating costs and utility deposits when families are moving into certain rental housing,when heat is included in the rent.See www.hss.state.ak.us/dpa/programs/hap. Energy Efficiency Improvements Alaska Energy Efficiency Revolving Loan Fund Program (AHFC).This program provides financing for permanent energy efficient improvements to buildings owned by regional educational attendance areas, by the University of Alaska,by the state,or by municipalities in the state.Borrowers obtain an investment grade audit as the basis for making cost-effective energy improvements,selecting from the list of energy efficiency measures identified.See www.ahfc.state.ak.us/loans/akeerlf_loan.cfm. Commercial Energy Audit Program (AEA).AEA launched a new Alaska Commercial Energy Audit Program in January 2011 to help provide energy audits for nonprofit and commercial buildings state- wide.http://www.akenergyauthority.org/efficiencyaudits.html Energy Efficiency Block Grants (AEA).AEA administers 97 Alaska Small Cities Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grants across the state totaling approximately $5.2M.The funding provides for cost- effective energy efficiency and conservation upgrades to public buildings and facilities. http://www.akenergyauthority.org/eecbg.html Energy Efficiency Interest Rate Reduction Program (AHFC).AHFC offers interest rate reductions when financing new or existing energy efficient homes,or when borrowers purchase and make energy improvements to an existing home.Any property that can be energy rated and is otherwise eligible for AHFC financing may qualify for this program.http://www.ahfc.state.ak.us/loans/eeirr.cfm DRAFT 2/9/11 AEA 2|Page Alaska Home Energy Rebate Program (AHFC).This program provides a rebate covering some of the cost of energy-efficiency improvements,including materials and contracted labor,when homeowners increase their home's energy rating.To date AHFC has allocated $160 million toward the program. AHFC estimates that this program and the Weatherization program (below)are displacing the equivalent of 7 million gallons per year and decreasing the average homeowner's energy costs by 30%. http://www.ahfc.state.ak.us/energy/home_rebate.cfm Second Mortgage Program for Energy Conservation (AHFC).This program provides financing to make energy improvements on owner-occupied properties.Borrowers select from the list of energy upgrades included with the energy audit of their home,performed by a certified AKWarm Energy Rater. http://www.ahfc.state.ak.us/loans/second energy conserv.cfm Village Energy Efficiency Program (AEA).AEA currently administers $2.7 million of energy efficiency projects in 21 rural Alaska communities to improve the efficiency of public buildings and facilities.http://www.akenergyauthority.org/programsalternativeVEUM.html Weatherization Program (AHFC).Weatherization programs award grants to non-profit organizations for the purpose of improving the energy efficiency of low-income homes statewide.These programs also provide for training and technical assistance in the area of housing energy efficiency.Funds for these programs come from the U.S.Department of Energy as well as AHFC.AHFC has $200 million in state funds allocated to this program. http://www.ahfc.state.ak.us/energy/weatherization_program.cfm Infrastructure Development Alternative Energy and Energy Efficiency Development Programs (AEA).The AEEE program promotes the use of renewable resources as alternatives to fossil fuel-based power and heat,and measures to improve energy production.In rural areas the program may support developing local sources of coal and natural gas as diesel alternatives.In addition to EE programs (see above)the AEEE program includes seven separate program areas-biomass,combined heat and power,geothermal,hydroelectric, hydrokinetic,and wind.Approximately $38 million in state and federal funding are allocated to AEEE development.http://www.akenergyauthority.org/programsalternative(2).html Bulk Fuel Construction Program (AEA and Denali Commission).This program upgrades non-compliant bulk fuel facilities in communities that meet program criteria.Upgrading bulk fuel facilities reduces the cost of energy by reducing or eliminating fuel loss from leaks and spills.In addition,by providing enough capacity for current and planned needs,communities may purchase fuel in larger quantities at a lower cost per gallon.Since 2000,bulk fuel facilities have been upgraded in 68 communities. http://www.akenergyauthority.org/programsenergysystemupgrade.html Emerging Energy Technology Fund (AEA).Established in 2010,this program funds demonstrations of new infrastructure and EE technology that may be viable within five years.$4.8 million is currently available in funding for projects.http://www.akenergyauthority.org/EETFundGrantProgram.html Renewable Energy Fund (AEA).The RE Fund provides grants to local and tribal government,housing authorities,utilities,and independent power producers for community-scale renewable energy projects. To date $150 million has been allocated to projects and AEA has recommended an additional $37 DRAFT 2/9/11 AEA 3|Page million.The program is currently displacing 1.1 million gallons of diesel equivalent per year.Following completion of construction projects currently funded the program,displacement will increase to 6 million gallons per year.http://www.akenergyauthority.org/RE Fund Applications-IV.html Rural Power System Upgrades (AEA and Denali Commission).This program improves power production and delivery,including diesel powerhouses,hydroelectric,and electrical distribution in rural communities.Typical projects include powerhouse upgrades or replacements,distribution line assessments and upgrades,line extensions to new customers,demand-side improvements and repairs to generation and distribution systems.Since 2000,AEA has completed upgrades in 48 communities. http://www.akenergyauthority.org/programsenergysystemupgrade.html in addition to the above programs,AEA and AHFC manage programs that provide training to energy auditors,rural power plant operators and utility clerks,hydroelectric operators,and other energy-related occupations.AEA also provides emergency response and technical assistance to rural electric utilities. Approach for Regional Energy Planning in Rural Areas As noted above,the State,Denali Commission and others have substantial programs in place that are making a difference in reducing,or at least slowing the increase of,energy costs in rural communities. And the state has established overarching goals and objectives for increasing energy efficiency and the use of renewable and other local energy sources through legislation and energy plans. Following up on the Alaska Energy Pathway,and in a number cases leading the way,some regions in the state are taking the next logical step in defining their energy future-through more detailed plans at the regional and community level. Given the breadth and complexity of rural energy issues in the state,a coordinated,systematic approach toward energy project development in rural communities should be followed.AEA is working with its state,federal,regional,and local partners to identify and secure resources to support this approach. Elements of this approach should include the following: 1.Regional Groups Should Lead Regional Energy Planning.AEA has established eleven energy planning regions that,with the exception of the Railbelt,generally follow ANCSA region boundaries.A steering committee should be established to lead energy planning in each region'.The steering committee should represent the major entities in the region,including the regional Native corporation and non-profit,electric utilities that serve a significant number of customers in the region,boroughs and major city governments,housing authorities,and other regional stakeholders.Steering committees should have technical planning resources available under hire to compile information,perform analysis,organize meetings,and prepare reports. 2.Focus on Construction Projects.Efforts should be geared to developing construction projects and energy efficiency (EE)measures that are technically feasible,economically viable,and "AEA has prepared an integrated energy resource plan (IRP)for the Railbelt.Working with Southeast Conference, AEA is preparing an IRP for Southeast that is expected to be complete by the end of 2011. DRAFT 2/9/11 AEA 4|Page supported by the public.A staged approach should be used for project development with go/no-go decision points in each stage:a)project identification in regional and community plans,b)reconnaissance assessment,c)feasibility assessment and conceptual design,d)final design and permitting,and e)project construction and commissioning'.A parallel approach should be used for EE programs and projects.The goal of this approach is to define and reach public consensus on projects to be developed in an efficient and cost-effective manner. 3.State Funding and Technical Support.AEA,AHFC,Denali Commission,the University of Alaska, and the Department of Commerce,Community and Economic Development Division of Community and Regional Affairs should provide support to the regional planning and project development efforts in a coordinated manner.State representatives should not prepare regional plans,but instead fill a support role.Agencies should work together to streamline interaction with regional steering committees and standardize requirements of state programs as feasible.Funding provided to steering committees for energy planning should require completion of agreed-upon deliverables such as potential project lists and costs and summaries of public meetings. 4.Public Involvement.Energy planning and project development activities should be conducted in an open,transparent manner with appropriate public education,meetings and review.State funding support should require that all voices are heard and all significant interests are represented. 5.Use Common Assumptions and Data Sources.State agencies and the University should work together to provide energy resource information (e.g.wind,geothermal,biomass,natural gas, coal,and hydro potential and location),system cost and performance assumptions,energy supply and demand statistics,technology readiness information,and permitting information to feed into regional and community planning and reconnaissance level assessments.Sources of information include ISER's fuel price projections and Energy Statistics publication,AHFC's ARIS database,AEA's End Use Study results,and the G!S-based Alaska Energy Data Inventory managed by AEA and DNR.AEA,AHFC and ISER should work with regional planning technical staff to standardize data collection (e.g.energy audits)methods for regional plans. 6.Need to Measure Performance.AEA,AHFC,the University and partners should ensure that data is collected from completed EE and energy facility projects in a standardized manner so that the results of publicly-financed improvements can be assessed.This is consistent with the adage that "you can't manage what you don't measure”. *See the Renewable Energy Fund request for applications pp 13-18 for detailed description of project development phases. http://www.akenergyauthority.org/RenewableEnergyFund/Round IV_July 2010/Round_IV_RFA.doc DRAFT 2/9/11 AEA 5|Page Mike Harper From:Peter Crimp Sent:Friday,April 08,2011 4:55 PM To:Sean Skaling;Douglas Ott;Devany Plentovich Ce:Harper,Kevin;Rollins,Myron;James Strandberg;Mike Harper Subject:Sitka technical conference for SE IRP Attachments:Approach for rural regional planning crimp vO.doc Sean,Dev,and Doug- I think we've discussed how I'd like to see your programs interact with he regional plans.Attachedis a write-up that addresses the approach for rural regional displaced,etc for your area of expertise.We should regard the regional plans as the instrument for integrating AEA's and other agencies programs. Peter From:Sean Skaling Sent:Thursday,April 07,2011 4:49 PM To:James Strandberg;Rollins,Myron Cc:Harper,Kevin;Peter Crimp Subject:RE:technical conference Jim and/or Myron, in preparation for my lunch presentation on 4/22 in Sitka,I'd like to know your expectations regarding the content of the presentation.The first areas that come to mind are: 1.Describe current EE programs that SE may be able to tap during next rounds of funding (EECBG grants,Village Energy Efficiency Program (VEEP),Alaska Commercial Energy Audit Program,seafood processing plant energy audits,Emerging Energy Technologies Fund) 2.The typical cost effectiveness of energy efficiency improvements to public and commercial buildings (and how the payback compares to RE or transmission lines) 3.The other energy efficiency initiatives at AEA today:Statewide end use study,policy and program review,needs assessment,etc. 4.Show EnergyEfficiency.org web site and briefly describe the Energy Efficiency and Conservation Working Group 5.Concrete examples of energy savings opportunities Am |in the ballpark?Other topics to add?Some to skip? Thank you, Sean Mike Harper From:Mike HarperSent:Monday,April 04,2011 3:18 PM To:Peter Crimp Subject:RE:energy planning EA-RSAREQUESTi think you are right.But to be a gentleman about it,|should give Bruce Wright a ring up and let him know our intent is to pursue one region plan,and get bu ironed out first before coming back to Aleut and others. in the meantime,Chris R.is saying that IF Dep.Of Administration allows Single Source for YK Delta then we can move forward.But Chris R.thinks it might b ruff.|hate to play along Christine Klein and will let her know that it might be a problem. From:Peter Crimp Sent:Monday,April 04,2011 2:39 PM To:Mike Harper Subject:RE:energy planning Agreed.|didn't get the feeling that the Aleuts are desperate to get rolling on the regional plan.Did you? From:Mike Harper Sent:Monday,April 04,2011 2:37 PM To:Peter Crimp Subject:RE:energy planning gs\TemporaryInternetFiles\Content.Outlook\NFYMEPWLIAThatjis a decent plan.You will have to help me explain that to Aleutians and others that we have dealt with but are not funding.Perhaps the notion is that wesimalyneedtogetonestartedtoseehowitisgoingtoworkatleastforafewmonthsorevenoneyear.And then go statewide with implementation for mor® From:Peter Crimp Sent:Monday,April 04,2011 12:41 PM To:Mike HarperSuBject:RE:energy planning 2Yee I think we did discuss funding.But question is scope--Bruce's is too general.'Maybe we should proceed with Lower Y-K and get that nailed down betterbereproceedingdownapathwithAleutians?Yee [o) Fram:Mike HarperSet:Monday,April 04,2011 12:16 PM To:Peter Crimp Subject:FW:energy planning C:\DocumentsandSettings\mharper\Local-FORMTEMPLATE(2).doc Hmm:did |promise a grant to this fellow as well.After today's session with KrisN.Chris ,you,James and |looks like we are ready to charge out there and use our fund to do the deficiency list for about SSOOK-.That makes sense to me;here is what my score looks like: Those we have made solid contacts with: YKDelta.$100-most committed region;we are pursuing Sinlge Source Interior...maybe 0;Den.Comm.$300K Nome............justtalksofar --say $100,upcoming meeting Aleutians.....at least hint of some money say $100;already doing lots How about your take. From:Bruce Wright [mailto:brucew@apiai.ord] Sent:Monday,April 04,2011 11:22 AM To:Mike Harper Subject:energy planning Hi Mike, How are you doing on an energy planning statement of work?It may look something like this: The Alaska Energy Authority (AEA)is proposing to increase the effectiveness of partnerships and resources to promote energy efficiency,energy conservation and renewable energy in the Alaska communities.AEA will accomplish this and promote capacity building and effective planning through the development of a Regional Energy Strategic Implementation Plans.Upon completing the plans AEA proposes to coordinate and finance regional energy projects with participation from Tribal,non-profits,city,borough,state,and federal governments,and individuals from Alaskan communities. AFA expects the coordinated effort and plan outcomes will result in many energy conservation and renewable energy objectives being completed. AEA will fund an organization or organizations to manage and coordinate with all communities and associated entities to produce a strategic plan that comprehensively inventories existing utility infrastructure;evaluates the efficiency of each and study the potential of what renewable energy technology is most proficient in each community to replace or reduce current fossil fuel use.The plans will be reviewed and discussed in depth at a region wide summit.The plan will then be segmented into manageable time table and tasks to implement and ensure the plan becomesa reality of operational renewable resources utilities,energy conservation measures and results in less dependence upon fossil fuels. Letter to NC Machine Dear Sir: Edward George,President of Akiakchak Ltd.Called me today to talk about the generators NC sold the small community late in 2008 as part of the AEA /Denali Commission Bulk Fuel Construction program. Now it appears there are incessant mechanical breakdowns with 2 out of the 4 generators NC sold them. The purpose of this communication is to urge your consideration to help alleviate the consternation and frustration that the Utility operators are having with constant breakdowns. This 'or effort will incorporate a team approach and partnership ved region's governments and organizations culminating in Dra workshop.The partners can include Tribes,boroughs,regional non-profits and for-profits,regional housing authority,community development association and city governments.Buy-in from these organizations will insure economic and staff support for the implementation plans and energy efficiency,energy conservation and renewable energy projects.Additional support and coordination will be sought from the Alaska Housing Finance Corporation,University of Alaska Cold Climate Research Center,Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium,Alaska Energy Authority,Denali Commission,and others. Bruce Wright Senior Scientist Aleutian Pribilof Islands Association 1131 E.International Airport Rd. Anchorage,AK 99518-1408 (phone)907-222-4260 (fax)907-279-4351 (email)brucew@apiai.org Sfep 24,rw4/ Partnering to Improve Life Executive Summary Background The Alaska Rural Action Subcabinet was created by the Governor's Administrative Order 247 in December 2008.The purpose of the Subcabinet's,according to the Administrative Order 247,is to "advise the Office of the Governor on the preparation and implementation of a rural needs strategy that recognizes and works to preserve the culture and way of life,including reliance on subsistence resources,of rural Alaskans.In view of its purpose,the Subcabinet shall study (1)rural migration patterns;and (2)the cost of energy in rural Alaska.” The Governor and Subcabinet also asked the Attorney General to examine improper business practices in the sale of rural fuel,because prices in rural Alaska were skyrocketing.The Department of Law's rural fuel costs report,Rural Fuel Pricing in Alaska,a Supplement to the 2008 Attorney General's Gasoline Pricing Investigation,was released in February 2010.It found no price-fixing,but high wholesale prices driven by factors such as,but not limited to,high delivery,storage and logistical costs. Additionally,ISER issued an independent rural fuel pricing report specific to Western Alaska at the same time as the Department of Law with similar results. In a separate effort the Alaska Energy Authority (AEA)launched a statewide energy planning process in 2009 to identify alternatives for stabilizing sharply rising energy costs in rural,Railbelt and Southeast Alaska.(See Appendix for summary of recommendations.)This effort involved over fifty community meetings and resulted in two reports: 1.The Alaska Energy Guide',which presented an summary of energy policy in Alaska and detailed descriptions of potential resource and technology options for deployment in Alaska:diesel efficiency,heat recovery,end use efficiency,hydroelectric,wind,biomass, geothermal,heat pumps,solar,coal,natural gas,pipelines and interties,energy storage, river and ocean energy,nuclear,coal bed methane,fuel cells,and alternative fuels. 2.The Alaska Energy Pathway',which established a.Overall goals for renewable energy,energy efficiency development,energy security, economic development,innovation,and education and training. *Alaska Energy,a First Step Toward Energy Independence:A Guide for Alaskan Communities to Utilize Local! Energy Resources,AEA 2009,http://www.akenergyauthority.org/PDF%20files/AK%20Energy%20Final.pdf ?Alaska Energy Pathway,Toward Energy independence,AEA 2010,http://www.akenergyauthority.org/alaska- energy-plan.htm!} ENERGY EFFICIENCY Tap into the Powerful Potential of America's Greatest Resource U.S.DepartmentofEnergyEnergyEfficiencyandRenewable Energy -EERE information Center:1-877-EERE-INF www.eere.energy.gov as ne'ap* ra b.Detailed objectives and estimated capital costs for energy development in each of 227 non-Railbelt communities rolled up to 11 regions. Finally,the Alaska State Legislature has established policy'that addresses goals for renewable energy and energy efficiency,encourages statewide energy codes;establishes an energy efficiency revolving loan fund at Alaska Housing Finance Corporation to finance efficiency measures in state and municipal government buildings,public schools,and the University of Alaska;establishes an Emerging Energy Technology Fund at AEA to demonstrate energy efficiency and generation innovations that are likely to be commercially viable within five years; and requires the state to "lead by example”by increasing public building energy efficiency and testing alternative fuels in state fleets. Subcabinet Findings and Concerns of Rural Alaskans Although the Subcabinet heard diverse opinions from literally hundreds of citizens and statewide rural leaders,there were common recurring themes.The following highlight the major common issues. The Cost of Energy in Rural Alaska Without exception,every community visited by the Subcabinet and AEA pointed to high energy costs as the most daunting challenge facing them.The use of diesel to generate electricity,heat homes, transport the fuels,and run businesses are a substantially larger burden to rural residents compared to Alaskans that use natural gas and hydro for energy-especially when considered in relation to lower incomes in rural communities'.Rural vendors and transporters are experiencing these high costs for Operations and pass on costs to the consumer,thus,there is less expendable money for families for other necessities.High energy prices have a chilling impact on developing local economies.For the most part,fossil fuel usage is the main source of energy in rural Alaska,and will continue to be so until other systems are further developed. As a commodity traded on the world market,diesel is priced based on supply and demand factors beyond the control of Alaskans.Fuel for rural communities is purchased from a set of fuel vendors operating in Alaska,and the fuel is purchased at their cost.Usually this fuel is based on spot markets in Washington,California,or elsewhere.According to UAA Institute of Social and Economic Research (ISER),transportation costs to western Alaska add approximately $1.00/gal to the market price,while bulk fuel storage capital and operation and other local costs add an additional $1.60/gal to the delivered price®.Communities in Alaska try to purchase at a time and in volume most beneficial to >Senate Bill 220 (the Alaska Sustainable Energy Act)and House Bill 306 (Omnibus Energy Bill)2010. "Estimated Household Costs for Home Energy Use.Ben Saylor,Sharman Haley,Nick Szymoniak,May 2008,http://www.iser.uaa.alaska.edu/Publications/webnote/LLFuelcostupdatefinal.pdf 5 Components of Alaska Fuel Costs:An Analysis of the Market Factors and Characteristics that Influence Rural Fuel Prices,Nick Szymoniak,Ginny Fay,Alejandra Villalobos-Melendez,February 2010. http://www.iser.uaa.alaska.edu/Publications/componentsoffuel3.pdf them.It is recognized that bulk fuel purchase is one of the most feasible methods to reduce fuel costs. Several bulk fuel cooperatives,along with utilities,are operating successfully. y Ssneetay: Subsistence Issues and the High Cost of Fuel me Rural residents underscored the importance of subsistence to maintaining local culture and, indeed,the viability of their communities.Some residents are purchasing gasoline for up to $10.00 per gallon.The Alaska Federation of Natives 2010 Federal Priorities and resolutions summed up these concerns when it stated that with gasoline prices reaching above $7.50 per gallon,many families and individuals are having difficulty getting to fish camp in summer in order to harvest next winter's food, and this will be true of hunting in the fall and winter months. Develop Local Renewable Energy Resources yee 'a whoh:Fyuceds:Alaska has world-class energy resources-abundant hydrocarbons,hydropower,heeresources, large areas of forest,and geothermal resources.Rural residents pointedto many local innovations using energy alternatives specific to their available resources,such as biomass in Tanana,biomass or waveenergyinYakutat,natural gas in Barrow,hydrokinetic flow from the Yukon River in Ruby,and wind inUnalakleetandKotzebue.Residents recognize that this potential must be reconciled with challenges associated with remote,difficult terrain and low population density. Bulk Fuel Purchasing While diesel is still the fuel of choice,rural residents challenged the state and each other to help develop efficiencies by making more and better bulk fuel purchasing agreements.They pointed to Unalakleet's Norton Sound Economic Development Corporation as a model for achieving collaboration to purchase diesel fuel in bulk.Fuel storage is equally important,and rural residents encouraged private enterprise to develop new tank farms,where storage capacity volumes can be integrated and leased. Expand Energy Efficiency Improvements Rural residents recognized the need to increase energy efficiency with programs like weatherization,particularly in rural housing.Rural communities were uniformly enthusiastic about the Alaska Housing Finance Corporation's (AHFC's)weatherization and home energy rebate programs that focus on energy-efficient building envelopes and heating systems.This weatherization approach,along with those programs of the rural housing authorities,complement each other in achieving energy savings. *http://www.nativefederation.org/documents/2010afnFedPrior-final-lores.pdf Continue the Power Cost Equalization (PCE)and the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP) Rural residents recognized the importance of the state's rural energy assistance programs.They brought up possible ways to improve the PCE program.They also asked that the state consider expanding the PCE program to small businesses,and to consider fuel price stabilization and a change in the regulatory tariff calculation for communities that generate excess power.One idea that was brought up is to change the base eligibility from 550 to 750 kWh/month.- xss Make Sure that Fuel is Priced Fairly High energy costs are foremost on the minds of rural Alaskans.Public and private entities have all studied these costs extensively.The Subcabinet began looking into energy issues in rural Alaska with a formal investigation of why conventional fuel costs,like diesel,are so high.The Attorney General's February 2010 report Rural Fuel Pricing in Alaska,A Supplement to the 2008 Attorney General's GasolinePricingInvestigation'made the following key findings: e Wholesale fuel delivery costs to most parts of rural Alaska are high because of complicated scheduling,challenging geography,very small volumes over which to spread costs,and regulatory requirements for delivery. °High wholesale prices in rural Alaska appear to be driven by high delivery,storage,and logistical costs.Varying conditions affect retail margins in different communities. e Pricing differences among local retailers account for the wide disparity in fuel prices 4withincertainregionsacrossruralAlaska.M e Conservation,education,alternative energy development and infrastructure upgrades can all play a part in bringing down the high cost of fuel in rural Alaska. e The study did not categorically conclude there were no illegal wholesale and retail fuel pricing,but investigators found no evidence of illegal activity. Rural Communities Provide Critical Infrastructure for Resource Development Vibrant rural communities,with their ports and airports,housing,maintenance facilities and personnel,grocery stores and fuel distributors are essential to developing the state's resources.The existence of these existing communities helps support current resource development projects and makes future resource development in Alaska more likely.Existing communities will be the staging grounds for future resource development,because their pre-built infrastructure and ready access to on- site personnel make new projects more economically feasible.Examples include the following: Oil and Gas Development.Alaska's Outer Continental Shelf (OCS)is critical to our state's future oil and gas industry.The Minerals Management Service estimates that the OCS areas of the Beaufort Sea, Chukchi Sea,and the North Aleutian Basin have undiscovered technically recoverable resources ranging 7 http://www.law.state.ak.us/pdf/civil/021810RuralFuelPricinginAlaska.pdf from 2.8 to 65.8 billion barrels of oil and 11.4 to 305 trillion cubic feet (TCF)of natural gas.Studies indicate that OCS development could generate an annual average of 35,000 jobs over the next 50 years. Fishery Development.Alaska's fisheries and coastal communities support a large fish processing industry with over 500 licensed processors.As demand for seafood from Alaska's sustainably managed stocks increase,Alaska's rural communities are in a position to play an important role.r Mining.Alaska's rural communities are located near mineral resources and hold promise as staging areas for developing mines and associated transportation hubs such as the Red Dog Mine and the Skagway Ore Terminal. State Programs that Address the High Cost of Rural Energy The State of Alaska administers a set of programs aimed at reducing the cost of energy and improving energy reliability for individuals,businesses,and communities.Generally they fall into three categories-direct aid,energy efficiency improvements,and energy supply infrastructure development. This section describes programs that address the rural portion of the state and that are administered by Alaska Department of Health and Social Service (DHSS)Division of Public Assistance,Alaska Housing Finance Corporation (AHFC),and AEA.Numerous other entities ranging from local governments to non- profits to utilities also have very active programs that address rural energy issues. Direct Aid Power Cost Equalization (AEA). Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program-LIHEAP (DHSS).LIHEAP provides payments to qualifying households to help defray heating costs and utility deposits when families are moving into certain rental housing,when heat is included in the rent.See www.hss.state.ak.us/dpa/programs/hap. Energy Efficiency Improvements Alaska Energy Efficiency Revolving Loan Fund Program (AHFC).This program provides financing for permanent energy efficient improvements to buildings owned by regional educational attendance areas, by the University of Alaska,by the state,or by municipalities in the state.Borrowers obtain an Investment Grade Audit as the basis for making cost-effective energy improvements,selecting from the list of energy efficiency measures identified.See www.ahfc.state.ak.us/loans/akeerlf_loan.cfm. Commercial Energy Audit Program (AEA). Energy Efficiency Block Grants (AEA). Energy Efficiency Interest Rate Reduction Program (AHFC).AHFC offers interest rate reductions when financing new or existing energy efficient homes,or when borrowers purchase and make energy improvements to an existing home.Any property that can be energy rated and is otherwise eligible for AHFC financing may qualify for this program.http://www.ahfc.state.ak.us/loans/eeirr.cfm Second Mortgage Program for Energy Conservation (AHFC).This program provides financing to make energy improvements on owner-occupied properties.Borrowers select from the list of energy upgrades included with the energy audit of their home,performed by a certified AKWarm Energy Rater. http://www.ahfc.state.ak.us/loans/second_energy conserv.cfm Village Energy Efficiency Program (AEA) Weatherization Program (AHFC).Weatherization programs award grants to non-profit organizations for the purpose of improving the energy efficiency of low-income homes statewide.These programs also provide for training and technical assistance in the area of housing energy efficiency.Funds for these programs come from the U.S.Department of Energy as well as AHFC. http://www.ahfc.state.ak.us/energy/weatherization program.cfm Infrastructure Development Alternative Energy Development Programs (AEA) Emerging Energy Technology Fund (AEA) Renewable Energy Fund (AEA) Rural Power System and Bulk Fuel Construction Program (AEA and Denali Commission) In addition to the above programs,AEA and AHFC manage programs that provide training to energy auditors,rural power plant operators and utility clerks,hydroelectric operators,and other energy-related occupations.AEA also provides emergency response and technical assistance to rural electric utilities. Next Steps toward Affordable Rural Energy As noted above,the State,Denali Commission and others have substantial programs in place that are making a difference in reducing,or at least slowing the increase of,energy costs in rural communities. And the state has established overarching goals and objectives for increasing energy efficiency and the use of renewable and other local energy sources through legislation and energy plans. Following up on the Alaska Energy Pathway,and in a number cases leading the way,some regions in the state are taking the next logical step in defining their energy future-through more detailed plans at the regional and community level. Given the breadth and complexity of rural energy issues in the state,a coordinated,systematic approach toward energy project development in rural communities should be followed.AEA is working with its state,federal,regional,and local partners to identify and secure resources to support this approach. Elements of this approach should include the following: 1.Regionally Led.AEA has established eleven energy planning regions that,with the exception of the Railbelt,generally follow ANCSA region boundaries.A steering committee should be an ZpPE established to lead energy planning in each region®.The steering committee should represent the major entities in the region,including the regional Native corporation and non-profit, electric utilities that serve a significant number of customers in the region,boroughs and major city governments,housing authorities,and other regional stakeholders.Steering committees should have technical planning resources available under hire to compile information,perform analysis,organize meetings,and prepare reports.(2)2.Focus on Construction Projects.Efforts should be geared tf veloping construction projects and energy efficiency (FE)measures that are technically feasible,economically viable,and supported by the public.A staged approach should be used for project development with go/no-go decision points in each stage:a)project identification in regional and communityplans,b)reconnaissance assessment,c)feasiSmity assessment and conceptual design,d)finat-¢- design and permitting,and e)project construction and commissioning'.A parallel approach should be used for EE programs and projects.The goal of this approach is to define and reach public consensus on projects to be developed in an efficient and cost-effective manner. 3.State Funding and Technical Support.AEA,AHFC,Denali Commission,the University of Alaska, and the Department of Commerce,Community and Economic Development Division of Community and Regional!Affairs should provide support to the regional planning and project development efforts in a coordinated manner.State representatives should not prepare regional plans,but instead provide a support role.Agencies should work together to streamline interaction with regional steering committees and standardize requirements as feasible. Funding provided to steering committees for energy planning should require completion of agreed-upon deliverables such as potential project lists and costs and summaries of public meetings.4.Public Involvement.Energy planning and project development activities should 2 reres in an open,transparent manner with appropriate public education,meetings and review.State funding support should require that all voices are heard and all significant interests are represented. 5.Use Common Assumptions and Data Sources.State agencies and the University should work together to provide energy resource information (e.g.wind,geothermal,biomass,natural gas, coal,and hydro potential and location),system cost and performance assumptions,energy supply and demand statistics,technology readiness information,and permitting information to feed into regional and community planning and reconnaissance level assessments.Sources of 8 AEA has prepared an integrated energy resource plan (IRP)for the Railbelt.Working with Southeast Conference, AEA is preparing an IRP for Southeast that is expected to be complete by the end of 2011. *See the Renewable Energy Fund request for applications pp 13-18 for detailed description of project development phases. http://www.akenergyauthority.org/RenewableEnergyFund/Round IV July 2010/Round IV_RFA.doc information include Institute of Social and Economic Research's (ISER's)fuel price projections and Energy Statistics publication,AHFC's ARIS database,AEA's End Use Study results,and the GIS-based Alaska Energy Data Inventory managed by AEA and DNR.AEA,AHFC and ISER should work with regional planning technical staff to standardize data collection (e.g.energy audits) methods for regional plans. Need to Measure Performance.AEA,AHFC,the University and partners should ensure that data is collected from completed EE and energy facility projects in a standardized manner so that the results of publicly-financed improvements can be assessed.This is consistent with the adage that "you can't manage what you don't measure”. Which 24 Dérah”Corum.MZ CS.Pleopend,e KE a TB bon -yr syd LA -"Ste COsdah,"4 '2 fe Sok manéLao* A yKeirrongpatebaseaeTCEasMA,nee -frank Lo ur is had (rot sta,rhe gat)ey hogystees 9MrkFareS leojects pow (ae Toho s Cra,frég-ri reprr7y , ap tee wore twa roher iy Crt fre po ArbCwOEshouldgf46tyhihoPhipba AVI Aat "cond.gS”lt ale Ene Olt a ne. .ws Mb_Perr Pack fr Tec ns ob we .-&ptlhz,a fA SPtoy tller FekhCorki]iliWii260|eral Mike Harper From:Peter Crimp [pcrimp@aidea.org] Sent:Tuesday,March 01,2011 5:18 PM To:Audrey Alstrom Cc:Mike Harper;Bruce Tiedeman;Douglas Ott Subject:RE:Bethe!Energy Planning Code Hi Audrey, Mike is putting together a project budget for regional planning.We'll talk more tomorrow. Peter From:Audrey Alstrom [mailto:aalstrom@aidea.org] Sent:Tuesday,March 01,2011 11:36 AM To:Peter Crimp Subject:Bethel Energy Planning Code Peter, Doug and I were discussing the energy planning for the Bethel area and were wondering which project code to bill time for?Will a new project code have to be created? Thanks,Audrey COMMUNITY BUILDING Date Community Building {e.g.,city hall,washeteria} Year-round use? Daily hours in use Sq.footage Year built Type of construction (e.g.,log,frame) wall type (2x4,2x6,2x8]-> #rooms Hotes #rooms heated #floors ceiling insulated [yes-1] floor insulated [yes-1] exterior walls insulated [yes-1] energy audit [yes -1] year of audit Thermostat setting winter. Thermostat setting winter overnight Thermostat setting summer #windows #windows double pane #windows single pane condition of windows [good -1] #windows covered w/plastic wrap #entry ways (incl.the ones not used) #arctic entryways Primary heat Recovered heat (utilidor) Monitorstove -model 1 (Mo 441,Laser 76,Laser 53,etc.) Monitorstove -model 2 (Monitor,Laser,etc.) #of monitor stove model 1 #of monitor stoves model 2 boiler [yes-1] furnace [yes-1] fuel consumption (gallons) total heating fuel cost Toyo for space heat {yes-1] wood stove [in use -1,not in use -2,none exists -0] monthly wood consumption cost of wood (per cord) wood harvest location type of wood stove (e.g.,barrel,pellet) type of other portable heaters [p,e] #of portable heaters cooking stove [e,p,w,other SPECIFY!} hot water [yes-1] tank less there'is no hot water tank (true <1] separate from boiler like Toyo [yes-1 part of boiler ; hot water tank exists and capacity is ...[gallons] water tank'part of boiler [yes-1] water tank separate from boiler using [e,p,f,w] other -SPECIFY![heat pump,solar,etc.} Appliances washer dryer [e,p,no} #fridge (can incl.small freezer)[e,p] #addit.large size freezers #microwaves #TVs #video/DVD players #stereo system Internet access [yes -1] #computers #office equipment #of VHF #of coffee makers #of toaster ovens kWhs-winter "oe _ene = |month of bill kWhs -summer. month of bill cost/month=winter (estimate) cost/month-=-summer (estimate):_ Propane heat Propane in use?[0 -none,1 -cooking,2 -heating] Propane consumption (est.month or annual) Propane cost Capacity offuel.oil tank for heating [gallons]ae fuel oil tank also'serves hot water heater [yes-1]2 *- consume [gal /year]© consume =winter [gallons/month] cost winter [S /month] consume -summer {gallons/month] cost summer [5 /-month]Slee :seemed Capacity offuel oil tank for hot water heater [gallons] consume [gal /year] consume -winter [gallons/month] cost winter [S /month] fconsume summer [gallons/month} cost summer [$-/:month] Propane for cooking [#100ibs cylinder/year] Propane for heat [#100{bs cylinder/year] wood consume [cords/year] #of logs/week,month,year (SPECIFY!) wood -trips/yr wood -miles (one-way) wood -mode [snowmachine,4w,boat,truck] wood-gallons gasoline /trip wood -gallons gasoline /week wood -gallons gasoline /year building's ceiling height [ft]ee building length [ft] building width [ft] temperature.in room as measured by interviewer [degrees F] feel draft [yes-1]} RESIDENCE record -1D Date Community year-round fyes-1] elder adults and high school children daily hours nott occupiedyearbuilt«&Who built home?[HUD,BIA;owner,cE=jwall-type [2x4,2x6,2x8}oe HRV air exchanger [yes-1] #rooms (bed,kitchen/living,bath) #rooms heated #of stories ceiling insulated [yes-1] floor insulated [yes-1] exterior walls insulated [yes-1} energy audit [yes -1] year of audit Home weatherized? Year weatherized Weatherization performed by?(e.g.,IRHA,TCC) Thermostat setting winter =: Thermostat setting winter overnight =[Thermostat setting summer =: #windows #windows double pane #windows single pane condition of windows [poor -1,fair -2,good -3] #of windows covered with plastic wrap #-entry ways (incl.the:ones:not used)> #of arctic'entries (must have.2:doors}eaten Primary heat Monitorstove -model 1 (Mo 441,Laser 76,Laser 53,etc.) Monitorstove -model 2 (Monitor,Laser,etc.) #of monitor stove model 1 #of monitor stoves model 2 boiler {[yes-1] furnace [yes-1] Toyo used for space heat [yes-1} wood stove [in use -1,not in use -2,none exists -0} type of other portable heaters [p,e] #of portable heaters cooking stove [e,p,w,other SPEChotwater[yes-1]tankless =there.is:'no hot water tank iwrue.Ay. "separate from boiler like Toye lyes-t}=part-of boiler hot-water tank exists and capacity is."(gallons}ne water tank part of boiler [yes-1]} water tank separate from boilerusing [e,p,f,w] other SPECIFY![heat pump,solar,etc.} Appliances washer dryer [e,p,no] #fridge (can incl.small freezer){e,p]} #addit.large size freezers #microwaves #TVs #video/DVD players #stereo system Internet access [yes -1] #computers #office equipment #of VHF #of coffee makers #of toaster ovens kWhs winter :|month ofbill ae er kWhs -summer month of bill «es cost/month -winter (estimate) -}cost/month=summer (estimate) Pre-paid meters or Smartmeters in-use? Propane heat Propane in use?{0 -no,1 -cooking,2 -heating] Propane for cooking [#100 Ibs cylinder /year] Propane for heating [#100 lbs cylinder /year] Propane cost Capacity offuel-oil tank for home heating [gallons]: fuel oil tank for home heating 'alsoserves 'hot water heater {yes-L] eifuel'consumption igal /year)”cost='[S/month]: <hcost'={S/week]Capacity offuel oil tank for hot water-heater[gatons . fuel consumption [gal /year] 4cost-=[S/month]wees cost=[5/week] wood consume [cords/year] #of logs/week,month,year (SPECIFY!) wood-trips/yr wood -miles (one-way) wood -mode [snowmachine,4w,boat,truck} wood -gallons gasoline /trip wodd -gallons gasoline /week wood-gallons gasoline /year home's ceiling height [ft] house length [ft] house width [ft] sq footage Equipment #-of snowmachines : :Se snowmachine 1 brand-2 'year built gas'tank capacity [gal] 2-stroke fyes-1}2 #fill-ups/week 'l snowmachine 2-brand year built gas tank-capacity [gal] 2-stroke [yes-1] #fill-ups/week:« #of boats river boat length [ft] hull year built outboard HP/jet HP engine year built 4 str (yes-1] gas tank capacity [gal] #fill ups/week #of ATVs ATV 'brand year built gas tank capacity {gal} 4 str [yes-1] #of fill-ups/week -winter #of fill-ups/week -summer used in winter [yes-1] truck tank capacity [gal] #of fill-ups/week temperature in room as measured by interviewer [degrees F] feel draft [yes-1] fry Award Conditions to the Financial Assistance Award Between the Denali Commission and Tanana Chiefs Conference (TCC) For Interior Regional Energy Plan Award No.01298 August 2010 1.Scope of Work This proposal provides $299,810 for the development of an Interior Regional Energy Plan, which is collaboration between Tanana Chiefs Conference,the Alaska Center for Energy and Power (ACEP)at the University of Alaska Fairbanks (UAF)and the Interior Regional _ Housing Authority (RHA).As the grantee,TCC shall receive $22,087 for both direct and indirect activities and shall enter into sub-agreements with ACEP ($61,821)and the IRHA ($185,902)to carry out the activities stated in this agreement.Additional conceptual design activities in the amount of $30,000 are authorized and detailed below. The Interior Regional Energy Plan will take a village-by-village approach to assess current power generation facilities,current and proposed conservation measures and options for alternative and renewable energy development for both electrification and space heating. The components of the project implementation are as follows: e TCC/IRHA to compile,assess and review existing data sources for accuracy,relevancy and completeness;identify gaps. e ACEP to create a template for data/information needed in each community.The draft template will be provided to Commission staff for review prior to traveling to communities.Upon completion of first 3 communities,template shall be revised,as necessary,in cooperation with Commission staff and other partners. e Using newly created template,insert already existing data/information into each community template. e TCC to contact all village tribal councils,city councils and other local entities to discuss this project and potential schedules for village visits. e IRHA technicians and TCC and/or IRHA personnel will travel to each village and conduct site inspections of current power generation facilities,assess conservation measures and alternative energy strategies and to hold meetings with the community. Relevant transmission facilities shall be documented. e ACEP will analyze data and write the Interior Regional Energy Plan to include data and analysis of appropriate near and long term actions and objectives. e After analysis of data for similarities between communities,a Conceptual Design Report (CDR)for energy savings,renewable or alternative energy will be completed for select communities and/or group of communities. Award Conditions,Award No.01298 Page 2 of 8 Tanana Chiefs Conference (TCC) e Disseminate Interior Regional Energy Plan to tribal councils in each village,state,federal and local governments and other funding agencies and policy makers. Approach The villages served by IRHA and TCC experience some of the highest energy costs in the nation while earning incomes significantly below the national and state median household incomes. With the lowest per capita incomes in the United States residents of the targeted communities continue to pay a disproportionately large share of their income for energy.Oil prices have increased over 50%since the year 2000;power for electricity in the villages is largely generated using diesel.Space heating is generally provided by using fuel oil.The communities served by this project are isolated and generally accessible year-round only by air.Not only are villages impacted by the increased cost of diesel for power generation and space heat,the increased cost of transportation is exacerbating a difficult situation.Overall energy consumption per household in rural Alaska is already significantly lower than in urban Alaska;the remaining strategies are to increase energy efficiencies and seek cost effective sources of alternative and renewable energy. Before these strategies can be enacted,assessments of existing conditions need to be conducted in order to make the most of limited resources. This proposal provides for the development of an Interior Regional Energy Plan,which covers the 42 villages of the TCC region.This energy plan will take a village-by-village approach using a "three-legged stool”concept.All three legs are of equal importance and must be addressed in a comprehensive,integrated way: e Current power generation facilities including electrification and space heat; e¢Current and proposed conservation measures;and e Options for alternative and renewable energy development. Current power generation facilities: Under this proposal,technicians from IRHA will make site inspections of the power plants and related energy infrastructure in all 42 villages in the TCC region.The inspections will result in assessments and data in the following areas: e Make,model,and capacity of existing diesel generators; e Analysis of community power usage (average and maximum load)compared with capacity of current generators; e Calculation of fuel usage and system efficiency (i.e.,number of Kilowatt-hours of power per gallon of fuel consumed); e Evaluation of transmission capacity; e Status of waste heat capture systems (which exist in some Interior villages,but not all)and potential re-plumbing upgrades;and e Potential power plant upgrades (i.e.,automatic switchgear). Award Conditions,Award No.01298 Page 3 of 8 Tanana Chiefs Conference (TCC) e Other space heat measures Conservation measures: Both TCC and IRHA currently have weatherization programs to make homes and other buildings -more energy efficient.Under this proposal,project staff will perform a comprehensive review of weatherization upgrades that have taken place or are scheduled,and develop a work plan for completing weatherization throughout the region.In addition,project staff will evaluate end-use electrical efficiency on a village-by-village basis in cooperation with AEA's Efficiency Program and Village End Use Efficiency Measures Program.Options worth considering include a coordination of programs in the Interior to take advantage of bulk purchasing and workforce development opportunities to train certified weatherization inspectors throughout the region. Alternative and renewable energy: As the State of Alaska has set a goal of deriving 50%of its energy from renewable sources by the year 2025,a comprehensive statewide inventory of such sources is essential.The focus will be on availability of timber,land ownership,geothermal potential in some communities, biomass,wind and hydro-kinetic.In addition,the Interior Regional Energy Plan will evaluate resource potential on a village and sub-regional basis. A final component of the Interior Regional Energy Plan will be an action plan with near-and long-term objectives and final report.Generally speaking,the near-term strategy will focus on the first two "legs”of the stool-improving the efficiency of existing power generation systems and conservation-while developing alternative and renewable sources of power will be a long- term objective.The action plan will incorporate efforts by village,tribal,and state entities,non- profit groups,and others. A draft table of contents for the Interior Regional Energy Plan might look like this: 1)Executive Summary 2)Introduction a.Village profiles b.Statement of need c.Energy costs 3)Current power generation including space heat a.Village inventory b.Potential upgrades c.Cost analysis d.Priority list of projects 4)Conservation a.Ongoing efforts and potential for expansion 5)Alternative and renewable energy Award Conditions,Award No.01298 Tanana Chiefs Conference (TCC) a.Sub-regional inventory 6)Action plan a.Near-term b.Long-term Conceptual Design Reports (CDR) Page 4 of 8 At the request of the Commission,up to $30,000 (pass-thru)shall be dedicated to developingCDRsthatwillprovide35%design for specific projects in multiple communities. Development of a template for this CDR will also be part of the work.The concept that "themes”across interior communities will emerge as this process unfolds should be further developed.Follow up discussions with the AEA on how to leverage the state energy inventory data into project development should occur.If there are known themes we canidentifyinthescopeofworkweshoulddoso. This may not include site assessment however will include specific scope and budget for a fundable capital/construction project.The goal shall be to complete this work with a potential funding entity as the target.No Commission funding may be committed to future construction until which time appropriations may become available,therefore other funding sources shall be explored as a factor in developing the CDR.Prior to completion of the CDR,Commission staff shall approve a refined scope of work. Budget by organization: Direct Indirect Rate |Indirect Total |Total TCC $16,860 31%$5,227 $22,087 IRHA $154,918 20%$30,984 $185,902 UAF/ACEP $42,606 45.1%$19,215 $61,821 $214,384 $55,426 $269,810 CDR $30,000 Pass-thru $0.00 $30,000 Total $299,810 Total Project Cost $299,810 All Commission funding is intended for use for the scope of work identified in the Award document only.Any balance of funds remaining after the full scope of work has been completed will be returned to the Denali Commission. ;3Jey /eor Partnering to Improve Life DRAFT 2/9/11 AEA Executive Summary [To be filled in after document is finalized.] Background The Alaska Rural Action Subcabinet was created by the Governor's Administrative Order 247 in December 2008.The purpose of the Subcabinet,according to the Administrative Order 247,is to "advise the Office of the Governor on the preparation and implementation of a rural needs strategy that recognizes and works to preserve the culture and way of life,including reliance on subsistence resources,of rural Alaskans.In view of its purpose,the Subcabinet shall study (1)rural migration patterns;and (2)the cost of energy in rural Alaska.” The Governor and Subcabinet also asked the Attorney General to examine improper business practices in the sale of rural fuel,because prices in rural Alaska were skyrocketing.The Department of Law's rural fuel costs report,Rural Fuel Pricing in Alaska,a Supplement to the 2008 Attorney General's Gasoline Pricing Investigation,was released in February 2010.It found no price-fixing,but high wholesale prices driven by factors such as,but not limited to,high delivery,storage and logistical costs. Additionally,Institute of Social and Economic Research (ISER)issued an independent rural fuel pricing report specific to Western Alaska at the same time as the Department of Law with similar results. In a separate effort the Alaska Energy Authority (AEA)launched a statewide energy planning process in 2009 to identify alternatives for stabilizing sharply rising energy costs in rural,Railbelt and Southeast Alaska.(See Appendix for summary of recommendations.)This effort involved over 28 community meetings and resulted in two reports: 1.The Alaska Energy Guide',which presented an summary of energy policy in Alaska and detailed descriptions of potential resource and technology options for deployment in Alaska:diesel efficiency,heat recovery,end use efficiency,hydroelectric,wind,biomass, geothermal,heat pumps,solar,coal,natural gas,pipelines and interties,energy storage, river and ocean energy,nuclear,coal bed methane,fuel cells,and alternative fuels. 2.The Alaska Energy Pathway',which established *Alaska Energy,a First Step Toward Energy Independence:A Guide for Alaskan Communities to Utilize Local Energy Resources,AEA 2009,http://www.akenergyauthority.org/PDF%20files/AK%20Energy%20Final.pdf ?Alaska Energy Pathway,Toward Energy Independence,AEA 2010,http://www.akenergyauthority.org/alaska- energy-plan.html DRAFT 2/9/11 AEA 1|Page a.Overall goals for renewable energy,energy efficiency development,energy security, economic development,innovation,and education and training. b.Detailed objectives and estimated capital costs for energy development in each of 227 non-Railbelt communities rolled up to 11 regions. Finally,the Alaska State Legislature has established policy'that addresses goals for renewable energy and energy efficiency,encourages statewide energy codes;establishes an energy efficiency revolving loan fund at Alaska Housing Finance Corporation to finance efficiency measures in state and municipal government buildings,public schools,and the University of Alaska;establishes an Emerging Energy Technology Fund at AEA to demonstrate energy efficiency and generation innovations that are likely to be commercially viable within five years; and requires the state to "lead by example”by increasing public building energy efficiency and testing alternative fuels in state fleets. Subcabinet Findings and Concerns of Rural Alaskans Although the Subcabinet heard diverse opinions from literally hundreds of citizens and statewide rural leaders,there were common,recurring themes.The following highlight the major issues raised. The Cost of Energy in Rural Alaska Without exception,every community visited by the Subcabinet and AEA pointed to high energy costs as the most daunting challenge facing them.The use of diesel to generate electricity,heat homes, transport the fuels,and run businesses are a substantially larger burden to rural residents compared to Alaskans that use natural gas and hydro for energy-especially when considered in relation to lower incomes in rural communities'.Rural vendors and transporters are experiencing these high costs for operations and pass on costs to the consumer,thus,there is less expendable money for families for other necessities.High energy prices have a chilling impact on developing local economies.For the most part,fossil fuel usage is the main source of energy in rural Alaska,and will continue to be so until other systems are further developed. As a commodity traded on the world market,diesel is priced based on supply and demand factors beyond the control of Alaskans.Fuel for rural communities is purchased froma set of fuel vendors operating in Alaska,and the fuel is purchased at their cost.Usually this fuel is based on spot markets in Washington,California,or elsewhere.According to ISER,transportation costs to western >Senate Bill 220 (the Alaska Sustainable Energy Act)and House Bill 306 (Omnibus Energy Bill)2010. *Estimated Household Costs for Home Energy Use.Ben Saylor,Sharman Haley,Nick Szymoniak,May 2008.http://www.iser,uaa.alaska.edu/Publications/webnote/LLFuelcostupdatefinal.pdf DRAFT 2/9/11 AEA 2|Page Alaska add approximately $1.00/gal to the market price,while bulk fuel storage capital and operation and other local costs add an additional $1.60/gal to the delivered price'. Subsistence Issues and the High Cost of Fuel Rural residents underscored the importance of subsistence to maintaining local culture and, indeed,the viability of their communities.Some residents reported purchasing gasoline for up to $10.00 per gallon.The Alaska Federation of Natives 2010 Federal Priorities®and resolutions summed up these concerns when it stated that with gasoline prices reaching above $7.50 per gallon,many families and individuals are having difficulty getting to fish camp in summer in order to harvest next winter's food,and this will be true of hunting in the fall and winter months. Develop Local Renewable Energy Resources Alaska has world-class energy resources-abundant hydrocarbons,hydropower,wind resources, large areas of forest,and geothermal resources.Rural residents pointed to many local innovations using energy alternatives specific to their available resources,such as biomass in Tanana and Tok,hydro in the lliamna area,wind in Unalakleet and Kotzebue,and heat recovery in many locations throughout the state.Residents recognize that this potential must be reconciled with challenges associated with remote,difficult terrain and low population density. Bulk Fuel Purchasing Communities in Alaska try to purchase at a time and in volume most beneficial to them.It is recognized that bulk fuel purchase can be a feasible method to reduce fuel costs.While diesel is still the fuel of choice,rural residents challenged the state and each other to help develop efficiencies by making more and better bulk fuel purchasing agreements.They pointed to Unalakleet's Norton Sound Economic Development Corporation as a model for achieving collaboration to purchase diese!fuel in bulk.Fuel storage is equally important,and rural residents encouraged private enterprise to develop new tank farms,where storage capacity volumes can be integrated and leased. 5 Components of Alaska Fuel Costs:An Analysis of the Market Factors and Characteristics that Influence Rural Fuel Prices,Nick Szymoniak,Ginny Fay,Alejandra Villalobos-Melendez,February 2010. http://www.iser.uaa.alaska.edu/Publications/componentsoffuel3.pdf ®http://www.nativefederation.org/documents/2010afnFedPrior-final-lores.pdf DRAFT 2/9/11 AEA 3|Page Expand Energy Efficiency Improvements Rural residents recognized the need to increase energy efficiency,particularly in rural housing. Rural communities were uniformly enthusiastic about the Alaska Housing Finance Corporation's (AHFC's)weatherization and home energy rebate programs that focus on energy-efficient building envelopes and heating systems. Continue the Power Cost Equalization (PCE)and the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP) Rural residents recognized the importance of the state's rural energy assistance programs.They brought up possible ways to improve the PCE program.They also asked that the state consider expanding the PCE program to small businesses,and to consider fuel price stabilization and a change in the regulatory tariff calculation for communities that generate excess power.One idea that was brought up is to change the base eligibility from 550 to 750 kWh/month. -Make Sure that Fuel is Priced Fairly High energy costs are foremost on the minds of rural Alaskans.Public and private entities have all studied these costs extensively.The Subcabinet began looking into energy issues in rural Alaska with a formal investigation of why conventional fuel costs,like diesel,are so high.The Attorney General's February 2010 report Rural Fuel Pricing in Alaska,A Supplement to the 2008 Attorney General's GasolinePricingInvestigation'made the following key findings: e Wholesale fuel delivery costs to most parts of rural Alaska are high because of complicated scheduling,challenging geography,very small volumes over which to spread costs,and regulatory requirements for delivery. e High wholesale prices in rural Alaska appear to be driven by high delivery,storage,and logistical costs.Varying conditions affect retail margins in different communities. e Pricing differences among local retailers account for the wide disparity in fuel prices within certain regions across rural Alaska. e Conservation,education,alternative energy development and infrastructure upgrades can all play a part in bringing down the high cost of fuel in rural Alaska. °The study did not categorically conclude there were no illegal wholesale and retail fuel pricing,but investigators found no evidence of illegal activity. Rural Communities Provide Critical Infrastructure for Resource Development Vibrant rural communities,with their ports and airports,housing,maintenance facilities and personnel,grocery stores and fuel distributors are essential to developing the state's resources.Existing 7 http://www.law.state.ak.us/pdf/civil/021810RuralFuelPricinginAlaska.pdf DRAFT 2/9/11 AEA 4|Page communities help support current resource development projects and make future resource development in Alaska more likely.Rural communities will be the staging grounds for future resource development,because their pre-built infrastructure and ready access to on-site personnel make new projects more economically feasible.Examples include the following: Oil and Gas Development.Alaska's Outer Continental Shelf (OCS)is critical to the state's future oil and gas industry.The federal government estimates that the OCS areas of the Beaufort Sea,Chukchi Sea, and the North Aleutian Basin have undiscovered,technically recoverable resources ranging from 2.8 to 65.8 billion barrels of oil and 11 to 305 trillion cubic feet of natural gas.Studies indicate that OCS development could generate an annual average of 35,000 jobs over the next 50 years. Fishery Development.Alaska's fisheries and coastal communities support a large fish processing industry with over 500 licensed processors.As demand for seafood from Alaska's sustainably managed stocks increase,Alaska's rural communities are in a position to play an important role. Mining.Alaska's rural communities are located near mineral resources and hold promise as staging areas for developing mines and associated transportation hubs such as the Red Dog Mine and the Skagway Ore Terminal. State Programs that Address the High Cost of Rural Energy The State of Alaska administers a set of programs aimed at reducing the cost of energy and improving energy reliability for individuals,businesses,and communities.Generally they fall into three categories-direct aid,energy efficiency improvements,and energy supply infrastructure development. This section describes programs that address the rural portion of the state and that are administered by Alaska Department of Health and Social Service (DHSS)Division of Public Assistance,Alaska Housing Finance Corporation (AHFC),and AEA.Numerous other entities ranging from local governments to non- profits to utilities also have very active programs that address rural energy issues. Direct Aid Power Cost Equalization (AEA).The PCE program provides assistance to customers in rural areas of Alaska where the kilowatt-hour charge for electricity can be three to five times higher than the charge in more urban areas of the state.PCE pays approximately 30%of all kWh's sold by a typical utility.PCE provided $31.7 million to customers in fiscal year 2010. http://www.akenergyauthority.org/programspce.html Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program-LIHEAP (DHSS).LIHEAP provides payments to qualifying households to help defray heating costs and utility deposits when families are moving into certain rental housing,when heat is included in the rent.See www.hss.state.ak.us/dpa/programs/hap. Energy Efficiency Improvements Alaska Energy Efficiency Revolving Loan Fund Program (AHFC).This program provides financing for permanent energy efficient improvements to buildings owned by regional educational attendance areas, DRAFT 2/9/11 AEA ;5|Page by the University of Alaska,by the state,or by municipalities in the state.Borrowers obtain an investment grade audit as the basis for making cost-effective energy improvements,selecting from the list of energy efficiency measures identified.See www.ahfc.state.ak.us/loans/akeerlf_loan.cfm. Commercial Energy Audit Program (AEA).AEA launched a new Alaska Commercial Energy Audit Program in January 2011 to help provide energy audits for nonprofit and commercial buildings state- wide.http://www.akenergyauthority.org/efficiencyaudits.html Energy Efficiency Block Grants (AEA).AEA administers 97 Alaska Small Cities Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grants across the state totaling approximately $5.2M.The funding provides for cost- effective energy efficiency and conservation upgrades to public buildings and facilities. http://www.akenergyauthority.org/eecbg.html Energy Efficiency Interest Rate Reduction Program (AHFC).AHFC offers interest rate reductions when financing new or existing energy efficient homes,or when borrowers purchase and make energy improvements to an existing home.Any property that can be energy rated and is otherwise eligible for AHFC financing may qualify for this program.http://www.ahfc.state.ak.us/loans/eeirr.cfm Alaska Home Energy Rebate Program (AHFC).This program provides a rebate covering some of the cost of energy-efficiency improvements,including materials and contracted labor,when homeowners increase their home's energy rating.To date AHFC has allocated $160 million toward the program. AHFC estimates that this program and the Weatherization program (below)are displacing the equivalent of 7 million gallons per year and decreasing the average homeowner's energy costs by 30%. http://www.ahfc.state.ak.us/energy/home_rebate.cfm Second Mortgage Program for Energy Conservation (AHFC).This program provides financing to make energy improvements on owner-occupied properties.Borrowers select from the list of energy upgrades included with the energy audit of their home,performed by a certified AKWarm Energy Rater. http://www.ahfc.state.ak.us/loans/second_energy conserv.cfm Village Energy Efficiency Program (AEA).AEA currently administers $2.7 million of energy efficiency projects in 21 rural Alaska communities to improve the efficiency of public buildings and facilities.http://www.akenergyauthority.org/programsalternativeVEUM.html Weatherization Program (AHFC).Weatherization programs award grants to non-profit organizations for the purpose of improving the energy efficiency of low-income homes statewide.These programs also provide for training and technical assistance in the area of housing energy efficiency.Funds for these programs come from the U.S.Department of Energy as well as AHFC.AHFC has $200 million in state funds allocated to this program. http://www.ahfc.state.ak.us/energy/weatherization_program.cfm Infrastructure Development Alternative Energy and Energy Efficiency Development Programs (AEA).The AEEE program promotes the use of renewable resources as alternatives to fossil fuel-based power and heat,and measures to improve energy production.In rural areas the program may support developing local sources of coal and natural gas as diesel alternatives.In addition to EE programs (see above)the AEEE program includes DRAFT 2/9/11 AEA 6|Page seven separate program areas-biomass,combined heat and power,geothermal,hydroelectric, hydrokinetic,and wind.Approximately $38 million in state and federal funding are allocated to AEEE development.http://www.akenergyauthority.org/programsalternative(2).html Bulk Fuel Construction Program (AEA and Denali Commission).This program upgrades non-compliant bulk fuel facilities in communities that meet program criteria.Upgrading bulk fuel facilities reduces the cost of energy by reducing or eliminating fuel loss from leaks and spills.In addition,by providing enough capacity for current and planned needs,communities may purchase fuel in larger quantities at a lower cost per gallon.Since 2000,bulk fuel facilities have been upgraded in 68 communities. http://www.akenergyauthority.org/programsenergysystemupgrade.html Emerging Energy Technology Fund (AEA).Established in 2010,this program funds demonstrations of new infrastructure and EE technology that may be viable within five years.$4.8 million is currently available in funding for projects.http://www.akenergyauthority.org/EETFundGrantProgram.html Renewable Energy Fund (AEA).The RE Fund provides grants to local and tribal government,housing authorities,utilities,and independent power producers for community-scale renewable energy projects. To date $150 million has been allocated to projects and AEA has recommended an additional $37 million.The program is currently displacing 1.1 million gallons of diesel equivalent per year.Following completion of construction projects currently funded the program,displacement will increase to 6 million gallons per year.http://www.akenergyauthority.org/RE_Fund Applications-IV.htm! Rural Power System Upgrades (AEA and Denali Commission).This program improves power production and delivery,including diesel powerhouses,hydroelectric,and electrical distribution in rural communities.Typical projects include powerhouse upgrades or replacements,distribution line assessments and upgrades,line extensions to new customers,demand-side improvements and repairs to generation and distribution systems.Since 2000,AEA has completed upgrades in 48 communities. http://www.akenergyauthority.org/programsenergysystemupgrade.html In addition to the above programs,AEA and AHFC manage programs that provide training to energy auditors,rural power plant operators and utility clerks,hydroelectric operators,and other energy-related occupations.AEA also provides emergency response and technical assistance to rural electric utilities. Next Steps toward Affordable Rural Energy As noted above,the State,Denali Commission and others have substantial programs in place that are making a difference in reducing,or at least slowing the increase of,energy costs in rural communities. And the state has established overarching goals and objectives for increasing energy efficiency and the use of renewable and other local energy sources through legislation and energy plans. Following up on the Alaska Energy Pathway,and in a number cases leading the way,some regions in the state are taking the next logical step in defining their energy future-through more detailed plans at the regional and community level. DRAFT 2/9/11 AEA 7|Page Given the breadth and complexity of rural energy issues in the state,a coordinated,systematic approach toward energy project development in rural communities should be followed.AEA is working with its state,federal,regional,and local partners to identify and secure resources to support this approach. Elements of this approach should include the following: 1.Regional Groups Should Lead Regional Energy Planning.AEA has established eleven energy planning regions that,with the exception of the Railbelt,generally follow ANCSA region boundaries.A steering committee should be established to lead energy planning in each region®.The steering committee should represent the major entities in the region,including the regional Native corporation and non-profit,electric utilities that serve a significant number of customers in the region,boroughs and major city governments,housing authorities,and other regional stakeholders.Steering committees should have technical planning resources available under hire to compile information,perform analysis,organize meetings,and prepare reports. Focus on Construction Projects.Efforts should be geared to developing construction projects and energy efficiency (EE)measures that are technically feasible,economically viable,and supported by the public.A staged approach should be used for project development with go/no-go decision points in each stage:a)project identification in regional and community plans,b)reconnaissance assessment,c)feasibility assessment and conceptual design,d)final design and permitting,and e)project construction and commissioning'.A parallel approach should be used for EE programs and projects.The goal of this approach is to define and reach public consensus on projects to be developed in an efficient and cost-effective manner. State Funding and Technical Support.AEA,AHFC,Denali Commission,the University of Alaska, and the Department of Commerce,Community and Economic Development Division of Community and Regional Affairs should provide support to the regional planning and project development efforts in a coordinated manner.State representatives should not prepare regional plans,but instead fill a support role.Agencies should work together to streamline interaction with regional steering committees and standardize requirements of state programs as feasible.Funding provided to steering committees for energy planning should require completion of agreed-upon deliverables such as potential project lists and costs and summaries of public meetings. Public Involvement.Energy planning and project development activities should be conducted in an open,transparent manner with appropriate public education,meetings and review.State funding support should require that all voices are heard and all significant interests are represented. *AEA has prepared an integrated energy resource plan (IRP)for the Railbelt.Working with Southeast Conference, AEA is preparing an IRP for Southeast that is expected to be complete by the end of 2011. *See the Renewable Energy Fund request for applications pp 13-18 for detailed description of project development phases. http://www.akenergyauthority.org/RenewableEnergyFund/Round_IV_July 2010/Round_IV_RFA.doc DRAFT 2/9/11 AEA 8|Page 5.Use Common Assumptions and Data Sources.State agencies and the University should work together to provide energy resource information (e.g.wind,geothermal,biomass,natural gas, coal,and hydro potential and location),system cost and performance assumptions,energy supply and demand statistics,technology readiness information,and permitting information to feed into regional and community planning and reconnaissance level assessments.Sources of information include ISER's fuel price projections and Energy Statistics publication,AHFC's ARIS database,AEA's End Use Study results,and the GIS-based Alaska Energy Data Inventory managed by AEA and DNR.AEA,AHFC and ISER should work with regional planning technical staff to standardize data collection (e.g.energy audits)methods for regional plans. Need to Measure Performance.AEA,AHFC,the University and partners should ensure that data is collected from completed EE and energy facility projects in a standardized manner so that the results of publicly-financed improvements can be assessed.This is consistent with the adage that "you can't manage what you don't measure”. Scope of Work for Regional Energy Planning 1. 2. 3.%Form Steering Committee of major stakeholders >wirrhw &(264,Ont Define subregions and clusters of communities that may be linked by interties - Compile existing information a.Pathway public meeting notes organized by geographic area and topic b.Energy supply and demand c.Energy resource data d.Energy system cost and performance (generic) Hold public meetings/workshops that explain goals,resource and EE potential (energy 101), government programs,planning process,expected outcome \ Prepare alternative document >c/o fnl a.communities _- b.community clusters c.region Review alternatives a.Public meetings b.Brochures Prepare draft plan Review draft and make changes Final plan DRAFT 2/9/11 AEA 9|Page Energy Notes from Dr.Bruce Wright of Aleutian Pribiof Island Association Monday March 21,2011 e Aleut has 11 communities that need really isolated plans due to Island nature of each place e Aleut has about 10-12,000 people with half in Unalaska e Major players :Aleut Pribolof,APICDA,Aleut Corp.,Aleutina Housing,TDX, Military;Aleutians East Borough,Other borough e Not included to date is City of Unalaska e Bruce is willing to work with AEA with MOA;sure the A team would sign e Information share;the group tends to lay off much of work to Bruce,Everette Anderson,Charles____ -s @Borough e They have every major energy resource:geo thermal,hydro,wind,tidal (ocean current) e Would be pleased to sign on with AEA to do energy grant for planning purposes to support e Plenty of economic development opportunities;such as Adak,where might be able to develop energy to do aluminum,or refine Zinc of Red Dog e Need more bodies to do this energy planning; Mike Harper "om:Peter Crimp ent:Thursday,November 04,2010 11:18 AM 10:Mike Harper Subject:Quick recap on Bethel planning suggestion Hi Mike, For what it's worth,the following might be a good approach for us to take: 1.Designate a staff person (possibly a consultant who could help Bruce?)to work with the Bethel (Calista Region?) planning group.Figure a minimum of 4 months over the next couple years-this is going to take some time. Have the staffer prepare a scope of work for a grant for planning assistance ($100.0?) 2.Planning group establishes formal MOU among appropriate organizations (AVCP,Calista,City,AVEC,Housing Authority,etc.)for coordinating the planning effort. 3.Planning group hires a planning/engineering consultant acceptable to members and AEA 4.AEAstaff (AEEE,others}provide tech assistance as needed to the planning group as requested. 5.Output of plan should include results of public meetings,reconnaissance-level assessment of potential projects, and list of preferred projects that reflect local consensus.We have language in the RE Fund RFA that can describe output. Peter |WeBetheleG,-0 MAre PM Heat Pump COP=2.50 Resistive Heat Diesel Equiv Heat Pump Diesel Equiv Generation Capacity kw Yearly Energy MWh Selected Capital Cost Annual Capital O&M Cost Cost:$/MWh S/mmBTU S/gal $/mmBTU S/gal NYAK 1,800 4,700,000 1,800 $10,805,195 $870,752 $246,416 $238 $69.71 $8.37 $27.89 $3.35 Chikuminuk Lake 16,000 68,170,358 16,000 $98,977,271 $7,976,222 $577,423 $125 $36.61 $4.39 $14.65 $1.76 Kisaralik River 30,000 131,400,000 30,000 $167,893,729 $13,529,952 $433,575 $106 $31.05 $3.73 $12.42 $1.49 47,800 204,270,358 $277,676,195 $22,376,926 $1,257,414 $116 Gross Energy 102,657,967 kWh Chikuminuk Lake /NYAK Generation Energy 72,870,358 kWh Wind Energy 29,787,609 kWh Capacity Factor 0.35 Wind 9,715 kw Heat PumpiplCOP=2.50 Resistive Heat Diesel Equiv Heat Pump |Diesel Equiv Cost:$S/MWh S/mmBTU S/gal S/mmBTU S/gal Kisaralik River 0%Grant $363 $106.29 $12.75 $42.51 $5.10 Kisaralik River 50%Grant $202 $59.23 $7.11 $23.69 $2.84 Kisaralik River 75%Grant $122 $35.71 $4.29 $14.28 $1.71 Kisaralik River 100%Grant $42 $12.18 $1.46 $4.87 $0.58 Chikuminuk Lake 0%Grant $496 $145.18 $17.42 $58.07 $6.97 Chikuminuk Lake 50%Grant $279 $81.78 $9.81 $32.71 $3.93 Chikuminuk Lake 75%Grant $171 $50.09 $6.01 $20.03 $2.40 Chikuminuk Lake 100%Grant $63 $18.39 $2.21 $7.36 $0.88 Generali Electrical Heat Combined Electric and Heat Intertie to Transmission Line |Peak Load (kW){Annual Energy (kWh)|Current $/kWh Annual Heat (mmBTU)|Annual Heat (kWh)|Current $/mmBTU (kWh)[Annual Savings |Max Capital Cost | 1 Akiachak 366 1,681,194 $0.41 24,467 7,168,766 $50.41 8,849,960 2 Akiak 214 1,046,884 $0.35 12,532 3,671,843 $47.97 4,718,727 3 Atmautluak 114 546,475 $0.40 9,996 2,928,802 $48.24 3,475,277 4 Bethel 9,994 42,269,649 $0.33 244,819 71,731,321 $50.05 114,000,970 5 Kasigluk 315 1,092,485 $0.30 17,455 5,114,269 $45.70 6,206,754 6 Kwethluk 298 1,414,798 $0.37 25,660 7,518,312 $52.94 8,933,110 7 Napakiak 124 489,249 $0.33 15,068 4,414,884 $48.96 4,904,133 8 Napaskiak 203 975,290 $0.38 11,488 3,365,954 $48.96 4,341,244 9 Nunapitchuk 293 1,287,142 $0.30 19,245 5,638,734 $45.70 6,925,876 10 Oscarville 141 598,191 $0.33 11,500 3,369,470 $50.05 3,967,661 11 Tuluksak 171 811,430 $0.37 12,681 3,715,500 $50.86 4,526,930 52,212,787 Resistive 118,637,855 170,850,642 52,212,787 Heat Pump 47,455,142 99,667,929 Jan 12,956,831 0.13 0.130 Feb 10,963,472 0.11 0.110 Mar 9,966,793 0.10 0.100 Apr 6,976,755 0.07 0.070 May 5,980,076 0.06 0.060 Jun 2,990,038 0.03 0.030 Jul 2,990,038 0.03 0.030 Aug 5,980,076 0.06 0.060 Sep 6,976,755 0.07 0.070 Oct 9,966,793 0.10 0.100 Nov 10,963,472 0.11 0.110 Dec 12,956,831 0.13 0.130 LoAdDs Bethel Region 1-Oct-10 Electric and Heat Service to Greater Bethel Area Pathway Estimated Monthly Avg. Generation:onfoff Generation $/kW Month kWh Energy Demand (kW) NYAK 1!ooo.1,800;kw $10,805,195 $6,003 January 12,956,831 17,749 Chikuminuk Lake 1i 16,000:kW $98,977,271 $6,186 February 10,963,472 15,018 Kisaralik River 0:30,000:kw si0)So March 9,966,793 13,653 Large Wind farm i 10,0003 kW $66,666,667 $6,667 April 6,976,755 9,557 Substation:New Dooce3 $18,000,000 $6,000,000 May 5,980,076 8,192 Modifications Pot0:$0 June 2,990,038 4,096 July 2,990,038 4,096 August 5,980,076 8,192 Transmission:Tranmission $/mi September 6,976,755 9,557 138 kV ee.345.00!mi $345,000,000 $1,000,000 October 9,966,793 13,653 34.5 kV :Oooo eee2 7.00:mi $16,200,000 $600,000 November 10,963,472 15,018 ooo eee ceeeeceeeecceeeeee December 12,956,831 17,749 HeatPumps i 2 ,000 :S 40,000,000 $20,000 Yearly Load Factor 64.10% Average kWh 8,305,661 Total 99,667,929 Total Capital Cost $595,649,133 Annual Capital Costs $44,437,115 yrs |30! int 6.25%! Annual OperatingCost!PH kWh Yearly Energy 102,657,967:kWh Line losses %3.0% kW Peak Monthly Demand Fuel Costs Operations and Maintenance Transmission line:O&M Bw eens $0.00 O&M price per kWh $0.01 $1,026,579.67 O&M as %of capex 1.5%$5,418,000.00 Bradley Model Grant Portion Grant Portion Grant Portion SO $297,824,566 $446,736,850 $595,649,133 Full Debt 50%Grant 75%Grant 100%Grant Total Annual Capital Cost $44,437,115.10 $0.433 $0.22 $0.11 $0.00 Total Annual O&M and FuelCosts $6,444,579.67 $0.063 $0.063 $0.063 $0.063 Total Annual Costs $50,881,694.77 $0.496 $0.28 $0.17 $0.06 FECon-ckh Bethel Region 1-Oct-10 Electric and Heat Service to Greater Bethel Area Pathway Estimated Monthly Avg. Generation:onfoff Generation $/kW Month kWh Energy Demand (kW) NYAE C..1,800;kW $0 $0 January 12,956,831 17,749 Chikuminuk Lake O:16,000:kw $0 $0 February 10,963,472 15,018 Kisaralik River 1 oe 30,000!kW $167,893,729 $5,596 March 9,966,793 13,653 Large Wind farm Oo:10,000!Kw $0 $6,667 April 6,976,755 9,557 Substation:New 3:$18,000,000 $6,000,000 May 5,980,076 8,192 Modifications Pot0:$0 June 2,990,038 4,096 July 2,990,038 4,096 August 5,980,076 8,192 Transmission: fe Tranmission $/mi September 6,976,755 9,557 138 kV Co 200.00:mi $200,000,000 $1,000,000 October 9,966,793 13,653 34.5 kV Po27.00:mi $16,200,000 $600,000 November 10,963,472 15,018 cececcucececcececcercececce December 12,956,831 17,749 HeatPumps 2 000 $40,000,000 $20,000 Yearly Load Factor 64.10% Average kWh 8,305,661 Total 99,667,929 Total Capital Cost $442,093,729 Annual Capital Costs $32,981,446 yrs |30: int }6.25%! Annual OperatingCost)eR kWhYearlyEnergy =ff ¢|102,657,967:kWh Line losses %3.0% kW Peak Monthly Demand Po 17,7493 KW Fuel Costs $0.00 Operations and Maintenance O&M price per kWh $0.01 $1,026,579.67 Transmission line:O&M O&M as %of capex 1.5%$3,243,000.00 Bradley Model Grant Portion Grant Portion Grant Portion so $221,046,865 $331,570,297 $442,093,729 Full Debt 75%Grant 100%Grant Total Annual Capital Cost $32,981,446.36 $0.321 $0.08 $0.00 Total Annual O&M and FuelCosts $4,269,579.67 $0.042 $0.042 $0.042 Total Annual Costs $37,251,026.03 $0.363 $0.12 $0.04 ECoN -HLl &Q Le Alaska Energy Plan Implementation Next Step Regional Planning:Calista First Background.The objective is to develop ultimately a statewide Alaska Energy plan.Various degrees of Regional planning have occurred over the past two years.Local stakeholders were engaged to identify their resources and needs of their region.Generally the stakeholders include,but not limited to,the following: housing authority,school district,regional non-profit,regional profit,health corporation,village corporation,and utility. Statewide: AEA is committed to follow through with the earlier efforts of the 2009 Report "Alaska Energy -A first step toward energy indepence "which provided information to review available resources to help communities determne least cost energy options.T he publication of 2010 report attempts to provide more detailed information on an energy path for each community and region. Through its work with several different regions of the state who are attempting to do their own planning for their individual regions,AEA is pleased to see progress. The agency feels the need to provide additional statewide support to the regions who are advancing to the next stage. Implementation Plan I.AEA will establish a position ,on a temporary basis that will assist in the development of regional plans .This position will work with regional organizations to further refine regional resource assessments and project development plans.It will be necessary to bring together widely diverse groups within a particular region where there may be disagreement as to most appropriate renewable energy mix of programs that can agreed upon,by concensus.This will take a high powered planner at Range 20-22 flex. Personnel Services..........80,000 + Benefits 25,000 Contractual Travel 10,000 Il.AEA will partner with Denali Commission so that they jointly might support regional planning efforts such as has been occurring in several different areas such as Tanana Chiefs Conference.Such efforts will necessitate use of well experienced Professional Planning firms such as (Nana Planning group);Mark Foster group,to do the regional plan. Preliminary discussion with Denali Commission suggest that they are willing to team up with AEA for this purpose. Contractual AEA:$250,000 Denali Commission $250,000 In recent weeks and months,at least 3 different regions of the state have asked for assistance in their planning efforts and this is a first step towards fulfilling wishes of those groups in the Calista/AVCP region,Interior or Tanana Chiefs Conference region,and in Northwest or Bering Staits Region. Regional Example:As an example,Calista,under their new management,has brought their stakeholders together to forward their regional energy plan just recently.In their case,their intent was to complete a regional energy plan,along with sub-regional approaches,and to find someone to help write it. Members of the planning efforts : AVCP Inc AVCP Housing Authority Yukon Kuskokwim Health Corp. Calista Alaska Village Electric Coop. This group will act as advisory group to AEA and Denali Commission ,who are providing the funds ,for selection of the contractor to write the plan.It will be up to the contractor to pull consensus out of these diverse parties so that energy projects will be actually be chosen for further funding opportunity. Key issues /Assumptions. *The stakeholders of the Calista region recognize that this is not a Calista Corporation plan only. *The stakeholders need to be in agreement on how to approach and vocalize this plan. *Priorities on energy development need to be agreed upon by the stakeholders. *How to fund and coordinate the final product of a plan is needed. *Ownership of the regional plan is a necessity.For example,Calista Corporation has offered to house and provide office services to support someone to put their plan together in rational manner.In the past,AVCE-HA had also provided some funding in the development of a regional plan.Up until this date, they were the driving entity to get such a plan done. *In early meetings the group seeks AEA assistance plan by providing technical assistance,and possible funding of a facilitator/planner.While Everyone agrees that there needs to be someone designated to write the plan,up to now there was not concensus on who that should be. *The plan should address and identify the stakeholders'concerns on energy needs,costs,projects,and funding. *The stakeholders of the Calista region would like to have a completed energy plan so that they can take their priorities to the Legislature and other funding agencies. Their follow-up would be to forward their plan to the Legislature for further funding. Draft Draft =mch Draft 3/3 Alaska Energy Plan Implementation Next Step Regional Planning Goal/Background.The objective of Alaska Energy Authority's efforts to assist Alaskans with energy challenges is for much of the state the development of regional energy plans..The ultimate goal is developing energy projects that will serve the purpose of providing sustainable, less expensive,reliable energy While earlier AEA planning efforts in the 2010 Alaska Energy Pathway were built largely around individual community plans for 228 communities,in several cases,energy projects might be more beneficial are regional in nature.Various degrees of Regional planning have occurred over the past two years.The purpose of this paper is to describe briefly,Alaska Energy Authority's (AEA)plan to pursue regional energy planning on a statewide basis. At this time,AEA is involved separately with regional Planning in Southeast Alaska,Interior Alaska,and Calista/Bethel region in slightly different fashions. In each case,the agency has endeavored to include Local stakeholders engaged to identify their resources and needs of their region.Generally the stakeholders include,but not limited to,the following:housing authority,school district,regional non-profit,regional profit,Health Corporation,Village Corporation,and the major utility(s). In southeast Alaska,AEA is working with an advisory group that is guiding our development of an Integrated Resource Plan.AEA has hired a nationally recognized consulting firm to do the primary writing of the plan .On the ground and day to day project management is being handled by the Southeast Conference.(A budget of Legislative Appropriation of $500,000 has been bolstered by another increment of $250,000 from Agency planning funds. In Interior Alaska,the Tanana Chiefs /Doyon,region has been assisted by Alaska Center for Energy &Power in development of the plan utilizing AEA funds through a Reimbursable Services Agreement in conjunction with planning grants from the Denali Commission. At least one or two of the Regional Planning areas have not only taken the next step in doing community wide discussion and culminating in action plans but have gone further.It is AEA understanding that the Northwest Region ,centered in the Northwest Arctic Borough/Nana region have moved forward with actions to fund energy Efficiency project with a grant from the Nana Corporation of approximately $800,000.For this region it does not make sense to provide further planning monies but rather an in-depth Planning Coordination meeting between AEA and the Region wide Planning group Other regional activity is occurring at different levels with Northwest Arctic and the Aleut region being more active.NANA "s engineering and planning subsidiary-WH Pacific has been involved in regional planning efforts in the 10 villages of the NANA region,having completed a preliminary plan on behalf of NANA in 2009 (?).However there have been no projects or infrastructure projects are in the offing. The Aleut region,following the lead of Aleutian Pribolof Island Association and APIDCA has been at the forefront of this planning effort. Kodiak Island Borough has produced a preliminary energy plan of the 7 village of the Kodiak Borough. Statewide:Through its work with several different regions of the state who are attempting to do their own planning for their individual regions,AEA is pleased to see progress.The agency feels the need to provide additional statewide support to the regions that are advancing to the next stage. Next Steps toward Affordable Rural Energy As noted above,the State,Denali Commission and others have substantial programs in place that are making a difference in reducing,or at least slowing the increase of,energy costs in rural communities.And the state has established overarching goals and objectives for increasing energy efficiency and the use of renewable and other local energy sources through legislation and energy plans. Following up on the Alaska Energy Pathway,and in a number cases leading the way,some regions in the state are taking the next logical step in defining their energy future-through more detailed plans at the regional and community level. Given the breadth and complexity of rural energy issues in the state,a coordinated,systematic approach toward energy project development in rural communities should be followed.AEA is working with its state,federal,regional,and local partners to identify and secure resources to support this approach.Elements of this approach should include the following: 1.Regional Groups Should Lead Regional Energy Planning.AEA has established eleven energy planning regions that,with the exception of the Railbelt,generally follow ANCSA region boundaries.A steering committee should be established to lead energy planning in each region'.The steering committee should represent the major entities in the region,including the regional Native corporation and non-profit,electric utilities that serve a significant number of customers in the region,boroughs and major city governments,housing authorities,and other regional stakeholders.Steering committees should have technical planning resources available under hire to compile information,perform analysis,organize meetings,and prepare reports. *AEA has prepared an integrated energy resource plan (IRP)for the Railbelt.Working with Southeast Conference, AEA is preparing an IRP for Southeast that is expected to be complete by the end of 2011. 2.Focus on Construction Projects.Efforts should be geared to developing construction projects and energy efficiency (EE)measures that are technically feasible,economically viable,and supported by the public.A staged approach should be used for project development with go/no-go decision points in each stage:a)project identification in regional and community plans,b)reconnaissance assessment,c)feasibility assessment and conceptual design,d)final design and permitting,and e)project construction and commissioning .A parallel approach should be used for EE programs and projects.The goal of this approach is to define and reach public consensus on projects to be developed in an efficient and cost-effective manner. 3.State Funding and Technical Support.AEA,AHFC,Denali Commission,the University of Alaska,and the Department of Commerce,Community and Economic Development Division of Community and Regional Affairs should provide support to the regional planning and project development efforts in a coordinated manner.State representatives should not prepare regional plans,but instead fill a support role. Agencies should work together to streamline interaction with regional steering committees and standardize requirements of state programs as feasible.Funding provided to steering committees for energy planning should require completion of agreed-upon deliverables such as potential project lists and costs and summaries of public meetings. 4.Public Involvement.Energy planning and project development activities should be conducted in an open,transparent manner with appropriate public education,meetings and review.State funding support should require that all voices are heard and all significant interests are represented. 5.Use Common Assumptions and Data Sources.State agencies and the University should work together to provide energy resource information (e.g.wind,geothermal,biomass, natural gas,coal,and hydro potential and location),system cost and performance assumptions,energy supply and demand statistics,technology readiness information, and permitting information to feed into regional and community planning and reconnaissance level assessments.Sources of information include ISER's fuel price projections and Energy Statistics publication,AHFC's ARIS database,AEA's End Use Study results,and the GIS-based Alaska Energy Data Inventory managed by AEA and DNR.AEA,AHFC and ISER should work with regional planning technical staff to standardize data collection (e.g.energy audits)methods for regional plans. *See the Renewable Energy Fund request for applications pp 13-18 for detailed description of project development phases. http://www.akenergyauthority.org/RenewableEnergyFund/Round IV July 2010/Round {V_RFA.doc 6.Need to Measure Performance.AEA,AHFC,the University and partners should ensure that data is collected from completed EE and energy facility projects in a standardized manner so that the results of publicly-financed improvements can be assessed.This is consistent with the adage that "you can't manage what you don't measure”. Draft Budget for discussion: I.AEA will not be writing these plans,rather the agency will be granting planning funds to Regional entities.Chosen by the region-wide planning groups. For the purpose of having the regional entity comply with minimum AEA requirements for good planning standards,we will look to adherence to the 6 elements described above. AEA will partner with Denali Commission so that they jointly might support regional planning efforts such as has been occurring in several different areas such as Tanana Chiefs Conference.Such efforts will necessitate use of well experienced Professional planning firms such as WH Pacific,or H D R or;Mark Foster group,to do the regional plan. Preliminary discussion with Denali Commission suggests that they are willing to team up with AEA for this purpose with funding a portion of this effort. Contractual AEA:$1,500,000 Denali Commission $250,000 Total 1,750,000 Phase | AEA will set aside funds for preliminary planning for regional use:at this time,AEA is contemplating approximately 50%for this purpose or $875,000.A simple arithmetic exercise could allow $100,000 approximately as a set aside,should the region find that of benefit. Aleutians AVCP/Calista Ahtna Bering Straits Bristol Bay Chugach Doyon/TCC Koniag Nana/NW Arctic Phase Il Additional funds might be made available to a region depending on the need,progress of existing planning efforts,and local involvement.Approximately $800,000-900,000 could be available for further planning efforts and once these meetings are held with regional planning groups,an allocation plan for the phase I!will be decided. As noted above at least one or two of the planning regions have already progressed to the point of implementation of energy solutions and it would not be appropriate for providing planning funds for preliminary planning.What makes more sense today is for AEA to convene a high level meeting with leaders of the regional planning groups to simply ascertain where the region is in their energy plan development.Only after a good serious discussion of this nature,will AEA find the best path forward,whether that might be deemed more planning,or design funds or perhaps project coordination with other state or federal agency. Il.AEA Sr.Staff,primarily the Deputy Director,REG,will lead this effort for AEA.This lead position will call upon other staff,such as Engineers and Specialists in particular area,and the Coordinator for Rural Outreach to assist in the development of regional plans.This position will work with regional organizations to further refining of regional resource assessments and project development plans.It will be necessary to bring together widely diverse groups within a particular region where there may be disagreement as to most appropriate renewable energy mix of programs that can agreed upon,by consensus. In recent weeks and months,at least 3 different regions of the state have asked for assistance in their planning efforts and this is a first step towards fulfilling wishes of those groups in the Calista/AVCP region,Interior or Tanana Chiefs Conference region,and in Northwest or Bering Straits Region. Regional Example:As an example,Calista,under their new management,has brought their stakeholders together to forward their regional energy plan just recently.In their case,their intent was to complete a regional energy plan,along with sub-regional approaches,and to find someone to help write it. Members of the planning efforts: AVCP Inc AVCP Housing Authority Yukon Kuskokwim Health Corp. Calista Alaska Village Electric Coop. This group will act as advisory group to AEA and Denali Commission,who are providing the funds,for selection of the contractor to write the plan.It will be up to the contractor to pull consensus out of these diverse parties so that energy projects will be actually be chosen for further funding opportunity. Draft Draft Draft 2/25 Alaska Energy Plan Implementation Next Step Regional Planning Goal/Background.The objective is to develop regional energy plans as part of statewide Alaska Energy plan.While earlier AEA planning efforts in the 2010 Alaska Energy Pathway were built largely around individual community plans for 228 communities,in several cases,energy projects that might be more beneficial are regional in nature.Various degrees of Regional planning have occurred over the past two years.The purpose of this paper is to describe briefly,Alaska Energy Authority's (AEA)plan to pursue regional energy planning on a statewide basis . At this time,AEA is involved separately with regional Planning in Southeast Alaska ,Interior Alaska,and Calista/Bethel region in slightly different fashions. In each case ,the agency has endeavored to include Local stakeholders engaged to identify their resources and needs of their region.Generally the stakeholders include,but not limited to,the following:housing authority,school district,regional non-profit,regional profit,Health Corporation,Village Corporation,and the major utility. Statewide: Through its work with several different regions of the state who are attempting to do their own planning for their individual regions,AEA is pleased to see progress.The agency feels the need to provide additional statewide support to the regions that are advancing to the next stage. Next Steps toward Affordable Rural Energy As noted above,the State,Denali Commission and others have substantial programs in place that are making a difference in reducing,or at least slowing the increase of,energy costs in rural communities.And the state has established overarching goals and objectives for increasing energy efficiency and the use of renewable and other local energy sources through legislation and energy plans. Following up on the Alaska Energy Pathway,and in a number cases leading the way,some regions in the state are taking the next logical step in defining their energy future-through more detailed plans at the regional and community level. Given the breadth and complexity of rural energy issues in the state,a coordinated,systematic approach toward energy project development in rural communities should be followed.AEA is working with its state,federal,regional,and local partners to identify and secure resources to support this approach.Elements of this approach should include the following: 1.Regional Groups Should Lead Regional Energy Planning.AEA has established eleven energy planning regions that,with the exception of the Railbelt,generally follow ANCSA region boundaries.A steering committee should be established to lead energy planning in each region'.The steering committee should represent the major entities in the region,including the regional Native corporation and non-profit,electric utilities that serve a significant number of customers in the region,boroughs and major city governments,housing authorities,and other regional stakeholders.Steering committees should have technical planning resources available under hire to compile information,perform analysis,organize meetings,and prepare reports. 2.Focus on Construction Projects.Efforts should be geared to developing construction projects and energy efficiency (EE)measures that are technically feasible,economically viable,and supported by the public.A staged approach should be used for project development with go/no-go decision points in each stage:a)project identification in regional and community plans,b)reconnaissance assessment,c)feasibility assessment and conceptual design,d)final design and permitting,and e)project construction and commissioning'.A parallel approach should be used for EE programs and projects.The goal of this approach is to define and reach public consensus on projects to be developed in an efficient and cost-effective manner. 3.State Funding and Technical Support.AEA,AHFC,Denali Commission,the University of Alaska,and the Department of Commerce,Community and Economic Development Division of Community and Regional Affairs should provide support to the regional planning and project development efforts in a coordinated manner.State representatives should not prepare regional plans,but instead fill a support role. Agencies should work together to streamline interaction with regional steering committees and standardize requirements of state programs as feasible.Funding provided to steering committees for energy planning should require completion of agreed-upon deliverables such as potential project lists and costs and summaries of public meetings. 4.Public Involvement.Energy planning and project development activities should be conducted in an open,transparent manner with appropriate public education,meetings and review.State funding support should require that all voices are heard and all significant interests are represented. *AEA has prepared an integrated energy resource plan (IRP)for the Railbelt.Working with Southeast Conference, AEA is preparing an IRP for Southeast that is expected to be complete by the end of 2011. ?See the Renewable Energy Fund request for applications pp 13-18 for detailed description of project development phases. http://www.akenergyauthority.org/RenewableEnergyFund/Round (V_July 2010/Round IV_RFA.doc 5.Use Common Assumptions and Data Sources.State agencies and the University should work together to provide energy resource information (e.g.wind,geothermal,biomass, natural gas,coal,and hydro potential and location),system cost and performance assumptions,energy supply and demand statistics,technology readiness information, and permitting information to feed into regional and community planning and reconnaissance level assessments.Sources of information include ISER's fuel price projections and Energy Statistics publication,AHFC's ARIS database,AEA's End Use Study results,and the GIS-based Alaska Energy Data Inventory managed by AEA and DNR.AEA,AHFC and ISER should work with regional planning technical staff to standardize data collection (e.g.energy audits)methods for regional plans. 6.Need to Measure Performance.AEA,AHFC,the University and partners should ensure that data is collected from completed EE and energy facility projects in a standardized manner so that the results of publicly-financed improvements can be assessed.This is consistent with the adage that "you can't manage what you don't measure”. Draft Budget for discussion: I.AEA will not be doing these plans ,rather the agency will be granting planning funds to Regional entities.It may be necessary to draft an MOU For the purpose of having the regional entity comply with minimum AEA requirements for good planning. AEA will partner with Denali Commission so that they jointly might support regional planning efforts such as has been occurring in several different areas such as Tanana Chiefs Conference.Such efforts will necessitate use of well experienced Professional planning firms such as WH Pacific,or H D R or;Mark Foster group,to do the regional plan. Preliminary discussion with Denali Commission suggests that they are willing to team up with AEA for this purpose. Contractual AEA:$1,500,000 Denali Commission $250,000 |$250,000_Teil -7 RP ry It.AEA Sr.Staff,primarily the Deputy Director ,REG,will lead this effort for AEA.This lead position may call upon other staff,such as the Coordinator for Rural Outreach to assist in the development of regional plans.This position will work with regional organizations to further refining of regional resource assessments and project development plans.It will be necessary to bring together widely diverse groups within a particular region where there may be disagreement as to most appropriate renewable energy mix of programs that can agreed upon ,by consensus. In recent weeks and months,at least 3 different regions of the state have asked for assistance in their planning efforts and this is a first step towards fulfilling wishes of those groups in the Calista/AVCP region,Interior or Tanana Chiefs Conference region,and in Northwest or Bering Straits Region. Regional Example:As an example,Calista,under their new management,has brought their stakeholders together to forward their regional energy plan just recently.In their case,their intent was to complete a regional energy plan,along with sub-regional approaches,and to find someone to help write it. Members of the planning efforts: AVCP Inc AVCP Housing Authority Yukon Kuskokwim Health Corp. Calista Alaska Village Electric Coop. This group will act as advisory group to AEA and Denali Commission,who are providing the funds ,for selection of the contractor to write the plan.It will be up to the contractor to pull consensus out of these diverse parties so that energy projects will be actually be chosen for further funding opportunity. otf Other regional activity is occurring at different levels with Northwest Arctive and the Aleut regioin being more active.NANA "'s engineering and planning subsidiary-WH Pacific has been involved in regional planning efforts in the 10 villages of the NANA region ,having compledted a preliminary plan on behalf of NANA in 2009 (?).Howeverr there have been no projects or infrastructure projects are in the offing. The Aleut region,following the lead of Aleutian Pribolof Island Association and APIDCA have been at the forfront of this planning effort. Kodiak Island Borough has produced a preliminary energy plan fo the 7 village of the Kodiak Borough. in clucka DLAVP _iVajot py The JEtev(EL/tp«oe FereaPipieuA on_a-Fe Belk /iP Sts DPI 9s wt Caeh(leghm7 wo ph Aes Plan fthaybevayklas(125 12V. en _sntwkK Lack Susy (gn[ra pleco AY £Ath ce.yA Pn.sm JS KC e- (|LE Ae sede 2b by,apr.Z TAA on **WWE WY)cb PoP Lm :Be.Cl as be &ag'&CALISTA CORPORATION /« * * * » * * + *$¥REGae?™,January 5,2011 Honorable Sean Parnell P.O.Box 110001 Juneau,Alaska 99811-0001 Dear Governor Parnell: This legislative session Calista will be focusing on capital and operating priorities in the areas of:Energy, Transportation,and Education/Safety.While there are many needs in our Yukon-Kuskokwim area;we have chosen only the very highest priorities which we feel may help the most.I would like to request your serious consideration and support for the projects and items listed below. Energy:The Yukon Kuskokwim area has some of the highest costs of energy in America.Calista, AIDEA,AEA,YKHC,AVCP RHA and AVCP have collaborated on numerous technical energy alternatives,demand,and potential capacity reports over the past 40 years.The latest effort indicates several hydroelectric options as feasible for the Bethel area that would address electrical demand in a 12- 14 village radius.Next steps to finish Phase I are underway and include Public Meetings of Preferred Alternatives this spring.Requests for 2012 include: 1.PhaseI Alternative Energy Studies,Feasibility,and Option a.Alternative Energy Studies Completed b.Nuvista Light &Power,and Project Consortium Established Funding to oversee progress of selected energy alternative,design, transmission easements,and project management for 2 years Total Capital Request $4.0 Million c.Public Meetings on Feasibility &Alternatives _Underway 2.PhaseIl Right of Way Surveys,Initial Design,and Permitting This will finalize field surveys of the transmission line corridors, Hydroelectric facility initial design,and the permitting process Total Capital Cost Request $8.50 Million 3.Phase TI Kisaralik Hydroelectric Plant Construction *Future Request Total Estimated Cost =$89.0 Million*(no request at this time) Transportation:The Yukon Kuskokwim area must rely on aircraft transportation access to the 50+ villages and 20,000+citizens of our region.Currently,there is ONE certificated airport depended on to serve the region;it supports the largest airport numbers and communitics in the entire state;and does not have full service or a dedicated airport manager.Most regions are served by a minimum of two certificated airports to ensure safety and provide diversion options.A complete state transportation improvement plan which includes this region is needed (nearest coverage is Alaska Peninsula and Kotzebue Nome).The state must do a better job providing road transportation access in this region. Public documents show requests for road improvements back to 1910 from the Donlin creek mining arca for the historical wagon trail corridors used for supplics and mail across the valley to mine camps and the Yukon River communities in the old roads commission files. 1.Increased Bethel Airport Services,Capabilities,and Management Staffing Cost TBD 2.Marshall Village Yukon River Port and Access Road from Port to Quarry Rock aggregate is needed for airport and road projects in the Yukon-Kuskokwim region by ADOT&PF,and materials is of construction quality based on their '10 coring reports.There is no existing port in Marshall and a stable port site is needed at the rock bluff for material transfers out of the area that will both support the regions transportation system,be safer for the community, and help improve the local economy of the village with quarry jobs and cash. Total Capital Cost Request $11.3 Million 3.State Funded Transportation Trust Program for Airports,Ports,and Roads Cost TBD Education &Safety:Calista region continues to need support from the state in the areas of providing basic education services and working towards putting a village public safety officer positions (VPSO's)in each large hub village.We fecl this area can be assisted in continued support to AVCP through its services in the region,and in providing housing for VPSO's in the villages through state housing funds to the region housing authority. 1.Design for Administration Building for AVCP Services (includes VPSO support)and Region Museum This request is to enable detailed designs for a facility in Bethel sized appropriate to the needs of the region-wide support services which the Alaska Village Council Presidents (AVCP)provides to the region which includes VPSO support and housing the region museum, Total Design Cost Request $3.5 Million 2.Village Public Safety Officer Housing (10 village homes at $350,000.each) Total Capital Cost Request $3.5 Million Thank you for your attention and consideration to the requests outlined in this letter,Please do not hesitate to contact my office regarding this or any other matter that Calista may be of assistance to you. Sincerely, CALISTA CORPORATION Andrew Guy President &CEO Alaska Energy Plan Implementation Next Step Regional Planning:Calista First Background.The objective is to develop ultimately a statewide Alaska Energy plan.Various degrees of Regional planning have occurred over the past two years.Local stakeholders were engaged to identify their resources and needs of their region.Generally the stakeholders include,but not limited to,the following: housing authority,school district,regional non-profit,regional profit,health corporation,village corporation,and utility. Statewide: AEA is committed to follow through with the earlier efforts of the 2009 Report "Alaska Energy -A first step toward energy indepence "which provided information to review available resources to help communities determne least cost energy options.T he publication of 2010 report attempts to provide more detailed information on an energy path for each community and region. Through its work with several different regions of the state who are attempting to do their own planning for their individual regions,AEA is pleased to see progress. The agency feels the need to provide additional statewide support to the regions who are advancing to the next stage. Implementation Plan I.AEA will establish a position ,on a temporary basis that will assist in the development of regional plans .This position will work with regional organizations to further refine regional resource assessments and project development plans.It will be necessary to bring together widely diverse groups within a particular region where there may be disagreement as to most appropriate renewable energy mix of programs that can agreed upon,by concensus.This will take a high powered planner at Range 20-22 flex. Personnel Services..........80,000 + Benefits 25,000 Contractual Travel 10,000 -}1)Talicd Pefe-/Biot Wy2)Eval |y s)mode chsh [bs I.AEA will partner with Denali Commission so that they jointly might support regional planning efforts such as has been occurring in several different areas such as Tanana Chiefs Conference.Such efforts will necessitate use of well experienced Professional Planning firms such as (Nana Planning group);Mark Foster group,to do the regional plan. Preliminary discussion with Denali Commission suggest that they are willing to team up with AEA for this purpose. Contractual AEA:$250,000 Denali Commission $250,000 In recent weeks and months,at least 3 different regions of the state have asked for assistance in their planning efforts and this is a first step towards fulfilling wishes of those groups in the Calista/AVCP region,Interior or Tanana Chiefs Conference region,and in Northwest or Bering Staits Region. Regional Example:As an example,Calista,under their new management,has brought their stakeholders together to forward their regional energy plan just recently.In their case,their intent was to complete a regional energy plan,along with sub-regional approaches,and to find someone to help write it. Members of the planning efforts : AVCP Inc AVCP Housing Authority Yukon Kuskokwim Health Corp. Calista Alaska Village Electric Coop. This group will act as advisory group to AEA and Denali Commission ,who are providing the funds ,for selection of the contractor to write the plan.It will be up to the contractor to pull consensus out of these diverse parties so that energy projects will be actually be chosen for further funding opportunity. Key issues /Assumptions. *The stakeholders of the Calista region recognize that this is not a Calista Corporation plan only. *The stakeholders need to be in agreement on how to approach and vocalize this plan. Cmpty tor fav tyed=ries Bruce. *Mt (et Hes,DIV 2 7) *Priorities on energy development need to be agreed upon by the stakeholders. *How to fund and coordinate the final product of a plan is needed. *Ownership of the regional!plan is a necessity.For example,Calista Corporation has offered to house and provide office services to support someone to put their plan together in rational manner.In the past,AVCE-HA had also provided some funding in the development of a regional plan.Up until this date, they were the driving entity to get such a plan done. *In early meetings the group seeks AEA assistance plan by providing technical assistance,and possible funding of a facilitator/planner.While Everyone agrees that there needs to be someone designated to write the plan,up to now there was not concensus on who that should be. *The plan should address and identify the stakeholders'concerns on energy needs,costs,projects,and funding. *The stakeholders of the Calista region would like to have a completed energy plan so that they can take their priorities to the Legislature and other funding agencies. Their follow-up would be to forward their plan to the Legislature for further funding. Ls Mike Harper From:Christine Klein [cklein@calistacorp.com] Sent:Tuesday,March 29,2011 5:22 PM To:Peter Crimp;Mike Harper Ce:Bruce Tiedeman Subject:checking in Fellows, Did you receive my email last week on the:1.Energy person job description,and 2.General scope of work,tasks,hours,timeline?It covered coordination for both the:a)region wide energy planning efforts,and the b)Sub-region Chikuminuk lake feasibility efforts. Our board approved moving forward last week out in Bethel so are anxiously pressing me for actions. Can |answer any questions or should we connect up on it? Christine Christine E.Klein,A.A.E. Executive Vice President Chief Operating Officer Calista Corporation 301 Calista Court,Ste.A Anchorage,Alaska 99518 (907)644-6309 direct (907)351-9585 cell (907)279-5516 oyKisaralik River and Chikuminuk Lake Reconnaissance and Preliminary Hydropower Feasibility Study EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of the study described in this report is to develop,consolidate,and present a body of information on candidate hydropower projects for serving the electrical demand in Bethel,and surrounding communities.If the Client (the Association of Village Council *residents RegionalHousingAuthority,or AVCP RHA)or the grant funding agency (the Alaska Energy Authority, or AEA)deems one or more of the projects worthy of further study,the next step would be to conduct a detailed feasibility study,which would include site investigations and formulation ofpreliminarydesigns. f Candidate Sites for Hydropower Development”The study focused on the hydropower development.potential using 'the Kisaralik River and theAllenRiverdrainingChikuminukLake.These candidates have'been studied in the past,and appear to represent the best opportunities for providing hydropower generation to meet the electrical demand in Bethel and the surrounding communities... The hydropower generation potential could be developed ii Your discrete projects:three on theVisaralikRiver(Golden Gate Falls,Lower Falls and Upper Falls)and on:»the Chikuminukaxeoutlet.Itis possible that the three candidate Kisaralil,projects couid ve optimized andconsolidatedintotwoprojects,or even a single project,'in further study.However,the intent wastodevelopreasonableprojectswiththebudgetavailableforthework,estimate the costs,assessenvironmentalconstraints,and provide decision:'making information.The physical development arrangement of any of the fo.r candidate sites would involveconstructionofadam,spillway,diversion tunnel,fish handling facilities and a powerhouse.Eachofthefoursitescouldbedeveloped,with a concrete faced rockfill dam and a spillway channelcutthroughoneof.the dam abutments.It°is anticipated that the spillway channel excavationcouldprovideasource,of materials for the dam.Itis not known if fine grained materials existwithinareasonablehauldistance,so the concrete faced rockfill type dam was adopted for thisevaluation.Diversion of the river flow during construction of the dam would be accomplished by_constructing a diversion tunnel around the dam site.The conceptual diversion tunnelneaccommodatesusing|the diversion features as part of the power waterway,avoiding a separate"tunnel,to minimize 'cost.A powerhouse would contain two Francis type turbines directlyconnectedtoagenerator.Each project would need facilities to handle migratory fish species.Salient characteristics for each candidate project are listed below: 'me Aa Average Reservoir "Dam | oF Site Flow Storage Height (cfs)(AF)(fe Chikuminuk Lake 1,353 1,691,903 128 Golden Gate Falls 1,757 23,584 118 Lower Falls 1,603 84,527 173 Upper Falls 833 64,629 204 @)MWH ES-1 January 2011 PRELIMINARY REVIEW DRAFT COMPILED JANUARY 285,2011 Kisaralik River and Chikuminuk Lake Reconnaissance and Preliminary Hydropower Feasibility Study Energy Generation The anticipated hydropower generation characteristics of each site,as developed for this study, are defined below.The Kisaralik River projects have limited storage,and therefore have a limited ability to regulate flows for delivering energy in a pattern that can be used by the regionaldemand.Much of the Kisaralik energy is available during the summer when the demandis low. Rated |Generating |Average Annual |2022 Demand Usable energySiteHeadCapacity|Energy Potential 3 (GWh)2022 condition(ft)(MW)(GWh)joe 7 (GWh) Chikuminuk Lake 91 13.4 89.3.)-"foe 64.9 Upper Falls 149 27.7 89.5 |64.9 -39.7 Lower Falls 122 34.1 128.3 :"oo 46.9 Golden Gate Falls 78 27.0 95.3 38.8Note:Demandis as measured at the local area busbar;excludes distibution losses. 'Transmission Interconnection A major transmission line would be required for interconnecting the candidate projects with theBethelareasystems.The lineis envisioned as>138 kV single circuit line supported on woodenX-braced H-style poles.The distances from the:rerconnection in the Bethel area to each site areasgiveninthefollowingtable:E Site Ny wee!Distance (miles) 'Chikuminuk Lake *118 Upper Falls ee 70 Lower Falls Nes 62 Golden Gate Falls"= 57 ae The sites are remote"without "existing permanent access.Transporting heavy materials and*;equipment to the sites would be done during the winter months via ice road from Bethel.During;summer months,small equipment,supplies and personnel would be ferriedin by aircraft.One ormore.Construction period labor camps would be required.Se aLong-term operation is assumed to rely on support by air.A permanentroad is not planned. Regulatory and Environmental Constraints Development of any of the projects would require a FERC license. The Kisaralik River projects would be located within the Yukon Delta National Wildlife Refuge (YDNWR).Although not typically found in National Wildlife Refuges,hydroelectric projects -ES-2 January 2011)MWH a ° ¥i:PRELIMINARY REVIEW DRAFT ;COMPILED JANUARY 285,2011 Kisaralik River and Chikuminuk Lake Reconnaissance and Preliminary Hydropower Feasibility Study may be permissible in the YDNWR,as there are no explicit prohibitions in the National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act of 1966 or in the National Wildlife System Improvement Act of 1997.The permissibility of hydroelectric development construction and operation would be determined by the Secretary of the Interior on a case-by-case basis under existing law.It should be noted that development and operation of the Terror Lake Hydroelectric Project wasdeterminedtobepermissiblewithinAlaska's Kodiak National Wildlife Refuge,despite public opposition;a 50-year FERC license for this project was issuedin 1981.The Terror Lake Projectwentintoservicein1985,and provides much of the electricity to the Community of Kodiak.The Chikuminuk Lake project would be located within a wilderniess-designated area of Wood-Tikchik State Park.The park authorization legislation would need to be amended to specificallyallowhydroelectricdevelopmentatChikuminukLake.This iis viewed as a significant constraint.The Kisaralik River supports anadromous fish species.'This jis viewed as a significant licensingconstraint.Thereis also significant recreational and commercial recreational use of the KisaralikRiver."gate! Project Development Schedule ... The absolute minimum time to implement any of the four candidate hydropower projects is 10years.The projects would require a FERC license before construction could begin;the estimatedminimumdurationtoacquireaFERClicenseforthe."candidate projects is five years.A two yearperiodfollowingissuance.-of..a license'is."expected for final design and bidding beforeconstructioncanbegin..The construction duration iis estimated at three years.The above stateddurationsassumefavorableconditionsintermsofagencyreview,approvalsin the licensingphase,and minimalissues during the construction phase.The actual development duration couldbelonger.é , %s Opinion.of ProbableCostThe."estintiated cost of each project if developed on a stand-alone basis,is as indicatedin thefollowingtable.* .Construction Total ao Cost Project Cost Specific Cost Site ae (2010$million)|(2010$million)|(2010 $/kW)»..|Chikuminuk Lake 391.7 483 36,045 we Upper Falls 386.4 479 17,292 '|Lower Falls 329.5 408 11,965 Golden Gate Falls 305.5 378 14,000 The stated costs are at the December 2010 price level without escalation or charges for interest during construction.The construction cost is the estimated amount for project and transmission line construction,plus procurement of the permanent turbine and generating equipment,but '3 ES-3 January 2011MWHes ao PRELIMINARY REVIEW DRAFT COMPILED JANUARY 285,2011 Kisaralik River and Chikuminuk Lake Reconnaissance and Preliminary Hydropower Feasibility Study without an allowance for escalation of costs beyond 2010 during the course of the future construction period.The "total project cost”is the construction cost plus the estimated development costs,such as engineering,management,legal services and reserves,but it does notincludeescalationorinterestcharges.The specific cost is the total project cost divided by thegeneratingcapacityofthefacility. Economic Evaluation The net present value (PV)of a diesel only future and alternatives with each of the candidatehydropowerprojectsispresentedinthefollowingtable: ae %Grant Power Supply Option 20-Year PV |.Funding fo!-|Required Diesel Only '$444.446,648 NA Kisaralik -Golden Gate Falls $597,710,978 40 Kisaralik -Lower Falls $579,922,017 33 Kisaralik -Upper Falls . =..|$694,679,344 52 Chikuminuk Lake =pe $554,869,086 |.22 an ability of the hydropowér_candidates to offset'diesel generation.Of the four candidates,Chikuminuk Lake and.Kisaralik River Lower Fells are the lowest cost alternatives to a diesel-only future.However,both of these exhibit anNEV thatis substantially greater than the dieselonlyfuture.;on\ ConclusionTheChikuminuk Lake project has been favoredin previous studies.However,the distance fromBethel(of the candidates considered,it is farthest from Bethel),its location within a State park,,"and the significant-alteration to an existing natural lake that would be required are significant".,.impediments.The Chikuminuk Lake project has the advantage over the Kisaralik projects in that"it can provide a relatively stable month-to-month energy delivery under a wide variety ofhydrologicalconditions,and does not appear to have anadromous fish use.In addition,it appearsthattheChikuminukLakeprojectexhibitsthelowestNPVofthepossiblehydropoweroptions. Therefore;if studies are to continue,it may be prudent to consider the Chikuminuk Lake project.Additional study could be carried out to optimize the storage and generating capacity to best meet the Bethel area needs.Optimization of the project layout could identify a lower cost arrangement meeting the power and energy demands of the Bethel area. If the Chikuminuk Lake project is developed as an initial project,this would contribute to a potential significant reduction in the cost of a Kisaralik project as a future development.The @ MIWH ES-4 January 2011 oo,PRELIMINARY REVIEW DRAFT COMPILED JANUARY 25,2011 Kisaralik River and Chikuminuk Lake Reconnaissance and Preliminary Hydropower Feasibility Study substantial cost reduction would result from the investment made in the transmission line which could serve the Kisaralik projects. If the AVCP wishes to proceed with further studies to refine the development concepts of any of the candidate projects,we recommend that future studies continue on a Chikuminuk project.Thestudiesshouldbecarriedoutinanincrementalfashiontopermitrefinedevaluationofeconomic feasibility.The activities suggested below are intended to provide the next level of initialinformationforevaluatingprojectfeasibility:: e Market study,combined with a reservoir and power operation study,to determine theoptimumsizeofaChikuminukproject.e Pending a favorable outcome of the market and operation study,then:o Surface geological reconnaissance and mapping;o LIDAR survey and topographic map preparation;o.Installation of a hydrometeorological recording station;|o Prepare an environmental review of the.site for the purposes of supporting aFERCPreliminaryApplicationDocument};"°Preparation of preliminary engineering concept drawings and an AACE Class 4costestimate.: The above information would proide!'a 'definitive basis for determining if it is justified toproceedwithsignificantinvestmentsinFERCClicensing. ES-5 January 2011 PRELIMINARY REVIEW DRAFT COMPILED JANUARY 25,2011 -% Kisaralik River and Chikuminuk Lake YRTIOL173890a,EGS"4Reconnaissance and Preliminary Hydropower Feasibility Study MAEKA UNITED BIATER : \ @ mwu OF JAN 2011 NOTES:are *'Fs i SPATIALREFERENCE!UTM ZONE 4,NADU FEET.Fo"2.WERTICALGATUMIRNGVO.eeeiTOO-FEET INTERVAL CONTOURS CREATED FROM uses STOG DEMS FOr THE BETHEL 89 Ba,c3,04A RYAN TAYLOR MOUNTAMNS AT,AS,87,08.Cts Cb (AR)1oaenaUTE MAP,& LEGEND; @ «=CANCIOATE PROJECT LOCATION A {GAGING BTATION =PLACES EXHIBIT ES-4 aaa ' A.USGS 15301500 ALLEN"NR ALEKNAGIK AX NOTE: TMS IS A PREL@NARY CONCEPT SKETCH FOR FEASIUEITY STUDYPURPOSESONLY.ALL DIMENSIONSANO ELEVATIONSAREAPPROXIMATE,AND WILL BE UPDATED AS PROJECT DESIGN STUDES:CONTINUE ALL CONCEPTS ANO DETAILS,SUCH AS DIMENSIONSANGELEVATIONS,DEFINED ON ORAWINGS WOULD REQUIRE FURFHERRESINEMENTOURINGASUBSEQUENTDLEIGHPHASE. Kisarahk and Chituminuk Sites Hydropower Development Astestmert Study: LOCATION MAP ES-6 January 2011 PRELIMINARY REVIEW DRAFT COMPILED JANUARY 25,2011 Procurement Request (PR)PR Number (see below for multiple .PR Numbers)Alaska Energy Authority Alaska Industrial Development &Export Authority K ip)bo 3 O)Shaded areas to be completed by Accounting (3 -_ Project Number:Project Name or Purpose: Lower Yukon -Kuskokwim Region Energy Plan Est.Not to Exceed $Date of PR Date Required Project Manager Requestor $100,000 April 4,2011 December Michael C.Harper,Deputy 30,2011 Director,REG Description of Goods or Services:(E-mail details to procurement) Engineering/Prof Services _x_Construction ___Equipment/Materials__-s Transportation___Other___ Professional Services Contract for the purpose of writing an Energy Plan for the area encompassed by the Lower Yukon -Kuskokwim Delta.See attached for further explanation.May request single source withregionalEnergyCooperativeNuvistaInc. Grant Existing Contract #Multiple Award Single Award___x__ Please provide SUGGESTED CONTRACTORS -(INCLUDE PHONE NUMBER &E-MAIL IF KNOWN) Nuvista Inc.%Calista,Kristine Klein,Chief Operating Officer,279-5516,Anchorage,Ak. Coding (Insert known coding )to be verified by accounting -- Amount Fund |GL Account|Appropriation |Contract{Stage|Award Dept |PR Number 1.FZ1/5 [100,000 yeild 1580001 LLL13 G02§|90000 _|00 Vr |V eX2.Ayo 3. 4. 5. 6. FUNDING SOURCE(s):Term date of funding source: Federal: State:Statewide Energy Plan Local: Requestor Approval -Deputy Director or Designee: Name:Michael C.Harper wi.(.Uf,---"le,olfDeputyDirector,REG Signature DateCERTIFICATION:I certify that the facts herein and on supporting documents are correct and that a request constitutes a legal charge againstfundsandappropriationscited.|am aware that certifying false,inaccurate or misleading documents constitutes an unsworn falsification under AS 11.56.210.Also reference AS 36.30.260 and AS 36.30.470.PO#Line # Accounting Approvalvome:Ky wh:Moc iA Ba Wie-t AS)|Title:§Arcoustant-(signature DateCERTIFICATION:|certify that sufficient funds are encumbered to pay this obligation,or that thereis a sufficient unencumbered balancein theappropriationcitedtocoverthisobligation.!am aware that certifying false,inaccurate or misleading documents constitutes an unswornfalsificationunderAS11.56.210.Aliso reference AS 36.30.260 AS 36.30.470. Forward Document to Procurement with Back-up When Approved Date Received Assigned to:Contract Numbers 1 2 3 4 5 6. The purpose of this document is to provide Procurement the authority to take action on your behalf and assist managers and accounting in tracking financial commitments such as NTPs,Grants,Contracts,and other commitments over $5K prior to award of any contract or agreement. Procurement Request (PR)Form (7/2010) 4S ree PR.RQ -3680 has been Sy foutted FO OCS Ge $004 Sty feo GL -SHG |ptr Lone Te by -FasKbigrn Rei mre bw {[an Pe Cuvened” Paene> STATEWIDE ENERGY PLAN Project Code §80001 Award Range * Date 01/01/01..06/30/14 FUND CONTRACT AWARD CONTRACT TITLE AR Code DESCRIPTION GL Account Budget Actual Encumbrance Commitment Remaining FEDERAL FUNDING Project Management Total Federat Project Management Funding 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Advances Total Federal Advances 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Subrecipient Grants Total Federal Subrecipient Grants 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTAL FEDERAL FUNDING 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 STATE FUNDING Project Management E2830 00000 NA 05140002 |S-AEEE State/Federal Energy Projects-32699-10 71000..76999 §,000.00 §,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 E2830 00000 NA 08130001 {S-State portion Energy Projects-06351-12 71000..76999 1,160,316.08 1,155,786.09 4,529.99 0.00 0.00 E2830 00000 NA 10130001 |S-ENERGY PJS-STATE GF-30503-14 71000..76999 1,040,000.00 994,133.30 31,901.71 0.00 13,964.99 E2830 00000 NA 11130025 _|S-AEA Statewide Energy Plan Dev_AR52024-15 71000..76999 1,750,000.00 55,499.74 1.180.90 2.358 B85 41.690,960.54 E2850 00000 NA 08225001 |AEA FYos RURAL ENERGY OPS-29607-08 71000..76999 49,510.78 49,510.78 0.00 |0.00 0.00 Total State Project Management Funding 4,004 826.86 2,259,929.91 37,612.60 2,358.85 1,704,925.50 Advances Total State Advances 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Subrecipient Grant Total State Subrecipient Grant Funding 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTAL STATE FUNDING 4,004,826.86 2,259,929.91 37,612.60 2,358.85 1,704,925.50 COMMUNITY CONTRIBUTIONS &OTHER FUNDING SOURCES TOTAL COMMUNITY CONTRIBUTIONS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING 4,004,826.86 2,259,929.91 37,612.60 2,358.85 1,704,925.50 Bal Ck 4,004,826.86 2,259,929.94 37,612.60 2,358.85 1,704 ,925.50 Difference 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Project Management 72000..76999 4,004,826.86 2,259,929.91 37,612.60 2,358.85 1,704,925.50 AEA Subrecipient Grant 77000..77999 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total AEA Funding 4,004,826.86 2,259,929.91 37,612.60 2,358.85 1,704,925.50 Community Contributions 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Project 4,004,826.86 2,259,929.91 37,612.60 2,358.85 1,704,925.50 H:\Accounting\BUDGET TO ACTUAL REPORTS\PJBdgtToActual by Funding Source-REV03011 1-JET.xlsx Expenditure Category Rept 4/5/2011 Lower YuleKuLelpnei -Caliste-Region-- Alternative Energy Update Nuvista Light &Electric Cooperative 2011 Andrew Guy,Calista President/CEO Christine Klein,COO i mi CALISTACORP.COM yeh | Outline Who We are Energy:Where We've Been &Found Potential Alternative Energy Solutions Forward to the Next Steps Pe zy t G ;°a - s I.Nuvista Formation Non-profit established 1995:e Association of Village Council ©Common Goal:to reduce electrical Presidents (AVCP) costs to residents e Yukon Kuskokwim Health e Assess high cost of power,demands Corporation (YKHC) and find alternatives e AVCP Regional Housing Authority e Organized as a cooperative to (AVCP-RHA) function as a future regional e Calista Corporation Generation &Transmission utility ©Chaninik Wind Group e Middle Kuskokwim Electric e Alaska Village Electric Coop e Lower Yukon Representative ,%Pe,e Alaska Energy Authority(pe Vy ms s*"ss 7 ta ailCALISTACORP.COM we ae jp 'Pitkas Point,Pitot Sti ta see wee "ene Refornaks'4 Upper Kaiskag.Lower Kaltes Taniak -Southwest Alaska:4 eK wethlukNapashiak,; areas Fairbanks * nchoragete au l.Region Energy Situation Diesel __NamalDieselseforHeat e Region primary home heating fuel, sapoaeeo TT -a ranges $6.14 to $9.50/gallon soomane pf Pe BP ee e Fuel deliveries by barged 1-2X year >woe EP i Se e 50%of family incomes go to home7|heating,now grown to 75%income 3 |¢Families having to choose between menee |food vs.heating |orn 2 oeapo:|ElectricityLohFd|,,,,EL an 4 e Region small independent village diesel tt generators e Household use is 50%Natl Average ¢Cost $0.60 to $1.00 per kilowatt hour e Escalating cost of energy e PCE cannot keep up vA ANS CALISTACORP.COM ll.Where We've Been a 'fo =LPSS *8stetanneen*eseeoesoa,2 "s on!sAREGIONALelectric"POWER Systemiforthese+,ener Me ' |j LOWER KUSKOKWIM |VICINITY (t ta Poesteme of |io io mond:le.A.WPrelt miner]'Foslvunay-!wee weddaeoo==eSparen Yor -eT tee i pamateng b+ nt a ett denen,==YMITED,'STATES.Department OF THE INTERIOR"a |=|or at be ©eel oeaetnwa|" oyIetree-_|aiadee@ POWER_ADMINISTRATION J----iTt "race monet|noes d AV itate Coe . -be b 2 -S Se ete a 1 er = <ee :weer'wee oe Taig erey Oe {ore cena aca i .:2 Ree te PE anew >awe Jae ali2gfootite !one!- a oie ane bd a 1 te me mae .ve bewee i.exercatnIpeeentree,a "2tte-ves-poe wntagee aes thera|-{.a re :ee aroma nt iene ; i wy ee won,ee,cone!wtfp.adh Seema ote soba|agennoeentWw.RETHERFORD AgsOCikTES ae \wear.br ce tne ee ANCHORAAGE,ALASKA.ww be ea eee ULY.1878 ----_- Over 21 Energy Studies,Data, and Reports since '75! >41 largely independent aged diesel power generator plants Village generators use >20 million gallons of diesel year Transmission lines needed 65Kw electrical demand for Bethel +14 villages by 2020 Coal &Hydropower listed repeatedly as feasible options Energy costs escalating CALISTACORP.COM ll.Electric Cost Projections (2002) Actual Cost $0.60 to $1.00 . per kwh for °08 to'10 a Village Power Costs e $0.80 -of 6 $0.70 ° e $0.60 Pa .°Projected illage Power Costsx$0.50 *ty ml=$0.40 a *K--*$0.30 $0.20 $0.10 ---UO *--- $0.00 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Year -g-15 MW Coal Plant at Bethel+Wind+SWGR,5%Interest =Continued Diesel Gen.+W.H.+Wind Mine Power Costs,Bethel+Mine+Wind,5%Interest *-Bethel+Mine Gen.+Wind at 5%Interest,SWGR System,5%Interest *-Bethel+Mine Gen.+Wind and SWGR System,0%Interest i 3 co VES . CALISTACORP.COM ll.Found Energy Needs Varied Region Villages Vary: e Diverse Village options,some Aproceedw/wind generation but \ limited application in region e Some villages have small needs ¢One size doesn't fit all! e Comprehensive Region-Wide Energy Plan still Needed e Sub-region Bethel +13 villages 65Kw electrical needs by 2020 2 ,;=*-..": CANINE 0 CALISTACORP.COM ll.Transmission System Needed Figure 2.1 YukonRiverCalista Region Boundary Millage SWGR Transmission Line Routing with Approximate Line Miles SWGR Buiid Out Sequence .by Village Grouping Calista Region is located in southwestern Alaska in the Yukon-Kuskokwim area,and encompasses 56,000 square miles. VWGR Build Out Sequence Absent Donlin Mine Development with 4.5 -10.5 MW Wind Turbine Generation Energy Alternatives Considered Alt.Energy Type Cost to Cost to Use Cost Capacity to Public Likelihood or Construct Operate per Kw Demand 65kw Perception Feasibility Diesel (do Existing High High Same -Existing nothing) Geothermal High Low -None Positive Small Wind Power Medium Low Low Low Positive Limited Hydropower High Medium Medium High Neutral High to Medium Coal Power High Medium Low High Negative |Medium to Plant Low Nuclear Low Low Low High Very Poor to Power ¢Negative None 2 os I "CALISTACORP.COM lil.Future -Remaining Candidates e Wind Turbines Variable -region precedent,low power production capacity, augments needs,does not work for all areas of region. e Coal Power Plant Bethel 15-60 MW Plant -negative public perception,would provide the cheapest and greatest energy capacity. e Hydroelectric PowerKisaralikRiver-3 sites Yukon Delta National Wildlife Refuge Chikuminuk Lake-in Wood Tikchik State Wilderness park,could provide clean,mid cost,proven alternative energy. ¢4 itesIc§HydroelectriiningRema apogee agpa cee oa the * Sse ald fae soc. i* 1 so * ta)A+ > eat 4%'mmoh « xk, oe, ASes ee » ao eTa wePagwetO }eae ope, ee ” pe eTeTeae he Me _ ; ants a he her Saar eta ab wee=-Twie og wee*"otwee iad re ™ eg OEaye - oT , +t f4¥ = ' Be : °< : ¥ &. oeze . : 22&a a 3 Ee=.: ee 1a t Byae. : i” ' % -* , od7 wo Z .irok soe Zt< . ety »,oe ; , SB -_ -ae * } 4 ' _Tuebgullak hurl egh k Lowe CALISTACORP.COM Ill.Hydroelectric Feasibility Findings Site Distance |Head |Generating Year Average Projected |Useable Energy miles ft Capacity Around Annual 2022 2022 (MW)Seasonal Energy Demand KWh(GWh)KW Chikuminuk Lake -Allen 118 91 13.4 Y 89.3 65+ River Outfall : Kisaralik -70 149 27.7 S 89.5 39.7. Upper Falls 64.9 Kisaralik -62 1122]341 S 128.3 : 46.9 Lower Falls Kisaralik -57 78 27.0 S 95.3 38.8 © Golden Gate a a hy fs f ra big : IV.Moving Forward &Ahead Selection of Option(s):A.Bethel Area Sub-Region Complete plan and project(s) underway to educe energy cost, and integrate those with the larger Region-Wide plan e Nuvista Team &Stakeholders Reviewed latest Findings e Board Decision made to move ahead with Hydropower Design Feasibility for Bethel Area. Both sub-region and region B.Region-Wide Alternative wide efforts viewed as critical |Energy PlaneHydrooptionofChikuminuk Lake has year around capability Begin a comprehensive region to supply %region's population,wide alternative energy plan 13 villages,and displace diesel that integrates the work already done and underway to guidee,\re,future development SEL Se i «| %®fd col LONG } o CALISTACORP.COM Bo ww IV.Preferred Alternative Site Construction Cost Design Total Project Estimated Meets Bethel in 2010 dollars Cost Cost 20 year Sub-Region Cost/Kw 2020+Demand? Chikuminuk $391.7 M $91.3 M $483 M 36,045 Yes Lake Outfall Kisaralik $386.4 M $92.6 M $479 M 17,292 No Upper Falls Kisaralik $329.5 M $78.5 M $408 M 11,965 No Lower Falls Kisaralik $305.5 M $72.5 M $378 M 14,000 No Golden Gate iv g aSaapol[FS gry . it a ae .as ' wl! ee yma %@ b *COGN IV.Current Complete HydroelectricFeasibilityStudy-1/2011 Nuvista Board Decision to Proceed Ahead -1/2011 Hiring Project Manager todevelopscopes,lead publicprocess,oversee work-4/2011¢"asCompletePublicHearingsandPreferredAlternativedesignsSpring-Fall 2011StartaComprehensive Region =eewideAlternativeEnergyPlan Initiate Federal FERC and ROW Processes and Next Tasks parafa>Et.82orBOERVR|ceBeebaae.CALISTACOR?.COM IV.Plan for Action and Process Major Tasks Next 10 Years: 1.Detailed Sub-Region (Bethel Area)Preferred Alternative Feasibility:engineering plans,surveys,site reconnaissance, permitting,and initial designs:3 -5 years (2011-2016) 2.Initiate State legislation:amendment authorizing Wood Tikchik park designated 'wilderness'specifically allowing hydro at Chikuminuk Lake:1+year (2012) 3.FERC licensing process:5 years (2011-2016) 4.Land status,surveys,ownership,and Dept.of Interior access easements for transmission lines:3+years (2012-2015) 5.Final Design:2 years (2016-2018) 6.Cqnstruction:3 years (2018 -2020)I.Syss(a\ eT?aL),z }:4 ue "2 " IV.Action:Energy Capital Request Hydroelectric Energy Lead Schedule |Funding Cost Tasks Agency (millions) 1a Detailed Feasibility Assessment,|Nuvista,|2011 State Permitting,Develop Engineering |FERC 2014 $5.88M Plans,and Licensing 1b Preliminary Design,Site Field Nuvista |2011 State $11.75M Investigations,Specifications AEA 2016 $17.6M. 2.Transmission rights-of-ways,and |Nuvista |2012-DOI land easements DOI/BLM |2015 $7.83M: 3.Final Designs,Permits,Mods,and |Nuvista |2016 AEA Construction Oversight AEA 2018+|Bonds |$35.25mM 4.Construction TBD 2018 AEA =:%?y 2021 +'|Bonds |$391.7M IV.FY2012 Capital Request Region:Calista/AVCP Southwest Alaska Project:Chikuminuk Hydroelectric Alternative Energy Scope:Complete Detailed Feasibility Report,Site Field Investigations,Reconnaissance,Hydrologic Monitoring,Surveys,Permitting,Engineering Plans,FERC Licensing,and Specifications Cost:$17,630,000. Quyanaqvaall! Thank you very much %CALISTACORP.COM RIS R GaAsNativeOwnedPetroleumRetailer "Created to serve the people of Rural Alaska.” NorthStar Gas,LLC was formed in July of 1998 to grant Native ownership of a fuel company,primarily to deliver bulk fuel to RuralAlaskanVillages.As a Native Owned Petroleum Retailer,NSG manages a gas station in Bethel,deliver Heating Fuel and UnleadedGasoline*in the Yukon Kuskokwim Delta Region and retails petroleum products in bulk,i.e.snowmachine oil,outboard motor oil. The owners consist of 2 Regional Corporations and 16 Village Corporations Regional Corporations Calista Corporation NANA Development Village Corporations Akiachak Enterprises -Akiachak Askinuk Corporation -Scammon Bay Atmautluak LTD.-Atmautluak Azachorok,Inc.-Mountain Village Chinuruk,Inc.-Nightmute Choggiung Ltd.-Dillingham Iqfijouaq,Inc.-Eek Kasigluk,Inc.-Kasighuk Kokarmiut Corp.-Akiak Kwethluk,Inc.-Kwethluk KWIK,Inc.-Kwigillingok Napaskiak,Inc.-Napaskiak Nunapitchuk,LTD.-Nunapitchuk Qanirtuuq,Inc.-Quinhagak Qemirtalek Coast Corp.Kongiganak The Kuskokwim Corporation VISION STATEMENT NorthStar Gas LLC,a premier distributor of competitive petroleum products and transportation services in the communities we operate. MISSION STATEMENT NorthStar Gas,LLC working in unison with our investors to increase value by providing competitive products and services to benefit our customers. Native Owned Petroleum Retailer Fuel Costs to Rural Alaska Fuel prices in every community are made up from 3 components 1-Market pricing (OPIS &Platt's &Anchorage Jet)on the day the fuel is lifted from the refinery 2 -Transportation Costs -Transportation cost vary by location (Lower,Middle,Upper Kuskokwim). 3-OH&M &Community Profit Margin -Landed cost of fuel plus overhead &maintance plus a %profit margin.Each community's OH&M plus the %of profit margin varies and this is why you see the varied prices in neighboring communities. -Product Applicable Index:Price -Diesel Fuel#1 Platt's LA Jet 1.4009 -Diesel Fuel#2 OPIS SEADF 2 ULS 1.5891 -UnleadedGas OPIS SEA UNL Gross 1.6678 - AV100LL Chevron ANC Rack 2.5999 -Village Differential 1.172 -All Prices shown include Fed,State Taxes -QTY(GAL)50,000-99,999 DF#1-2.8678 HF#1--2.6248 #2-2.6248 UNLGas-3.0747 AV 100--4.0168 100,000 DF#1--2.8178 HF#1--2.5748 #2-3.0060 UNLGas-3.0247 AV 100--3.9668 Rene -,INU MHSIAR tANativeOwnedPetroleumRetailer ¢Statewide heating fuel price parity capped at $3.00 per gallon (Sept.1 -March 31) ¢The reimbursement would take place at the Rural Community fuel distributor level. ¢Formula (#of households *XXX gallons allowed per household *cost above the $3.00).Example 500 households *500 gallons allowed per household =250,000 total gallons allowed for reimbursement *.35 (3.35 delivered cost -3.00 capp)= $87,500.00 to be reimbursed to the fuel distributor.Any fuel sold to households above the 500 gallons would be priced at fair market value. ipoS Native Owned Petroleum Retailer HF Spring HF Fall _HF Spring HF Fall HFSpring HF Fall HF Spring HFFall HF Spring HF Fall 2004 2.0076 1.9455 _2.0076 1.9455 2.0876 2.0255 -2.1476 2.0855 2.0076 1.9455 _. 2005 =2.4000 2.6700 2.4000 2.6700 2.4800 2.7500 2.5400 2.8100 2.4000 =2.6700 2006 3.1150 3.2930 3.1150 3.2930 3.1950 3.3730 3.2550 3.4330 .3.1150 3.2930. 2007 2.9070 2.9210 2.9070 =2.9210 2.9890 3.0030 =3.0510 =3.0650 =2.9080 2.9220 _ 2008 4.8920 3.8960 4.8920 3.9860 .4.9740 4.0680 5.0350 4.1290 4.8920 3.9860 | 2009)$2.7122 3.1984 $2.6997 3.1859 =$2.6722 3.0792 =3.4226 =3.9088 =3.0726 =2.9992 . Coast L Kusko . M Kusko . U Kusko Yukon . ULSpring ULFall ULSpring ULFall _ULSpring ULFall ULSpring ULFall ULSpring UL Fall . 2004 =-«-2.4260 «2.2090 2.4260 2.2090 «2.5060 2.2890 2.5660 2.3490 2.4260 --2.2090 2005 2.5770 2.8670 2.5770 2.8670 2.6570 2.9470 2.7170 =3.0070 2.5770 2.8670 2006 «3.3650 «3.1430 «3.3650 3.1430 3.4450 3.2230 3.6320 3.4100 «3.3650 3.1430 2007 3.4600 =2.9460 3.4600 =2.9460 ©3.5420 ©3.0280 3.6040 =3.0900 3.4600 =2.9460 2008 4.2400 4.1200»«4.2400 4.1200 4.3220 4.2020»4.3830 4.2640 4.2400 4.1200 2009 =--3.2636 «=3.3069 «=3.2513.3.2944 «3.2738 «=3.4943 3.7242 4.0173 3.6242 3.45114 SS Native Owned Petroleum Retailer mY e Per Barrel _...-Delivered Cost._..._.._PricePer Gallon...Transportation__] 114.53 437 :a -3.12.Be ee 4.25 M0087 oe ee we A ee ROC ee et D8 oe 9397 39600 DT OS a S119 ed S785 BR ge ee ess 6077 194 S077 9K TO 1S 4696 BR NSB 1S 7 a Yr 36.22 2.62 1.37 1.25 Operating Expenses Wages Operator Rate/Hour $ Hours per Week Annual Wages (50 weeks)$ Clerical Rate/Hour $ Hours per Week Annual Wages (50 weeks)$ Administrator Rate/Hour $ Hours per Week Annual Wages (50 weeks)$ Total Wages $ Taxes &Workers Comp $ Equipment Rental $ Phone $ Electric $ Interest (6.0%)$ Office Rent $ Prop &Liab Ins $ RAFS Services $ Maintenance $ Facility Payments $ Reserves $ Miscellaneous $ Total Operating Expenses $ Example on Pricing Your Fuel Fuel Purchases Gas Gallons 20,000 10.00 Price Per Gallon 3.85 20 Dollars 77,000 10,000 HF#1 Gallons 30,000 10.00 Price Per Gallon 3.80 10 Dollars 114,000 5,000 Total Fuel Costs: 15.00 Gallons 50,000 10 Dollars 191,000 7,500 22,500 Operating Expenses per Gallon 1.30 2,250 (Total Operating Expenses /Total Gallons)=64,786 /50,000 2,000 500 3,000 Sales: 7,736 Gas 4,800 Gallons 20,000 5,000 Price**5.15 =(3.85 +1.30) 5,000 Dollars $103,000 2,300 HF#1 2,000 Gallons 30,000 5,000 Price **5.10 2,500 Dollars $153,000 64,786 Total Sales: Gallons 50,000 Dollars $256,000 **Fuel Purchase Expense Plus Operating Expense per Gallon Sales -Fuel Costs =$256,000 -$191,000 =$65,000 SRIHSIAR Gas Native Owned Petroleum Retailer Revision of AEA Loan Application: Make the AEA Loan Application valid for 5 years.This eliminates Rural Alaska Communities from having to fill out an 11 page application on an annual basis.This would also allow the letter of intent,promissory note,waiver of sovereign immunity resolution,borrowing resolution,bulk fuel facilities questionnaire,fuel tank farm information sheet to be valid for the life of the application (Syrs).Due to seasonal activities,participation in community meetings to get approval and signatures have been proven to be difficult and holds up the whole loan process. On an annual basis,the Rural Alaska Communities would be responsible for filling out a 2 page Bulk Fuel Loan Agreement. Allow approval of the AEA Loan Application from a faxed copy rather than waiting for the original Application to arrive in the US Mail.This would expedite the application process.Funds would only be released upon receipt of the Original Signed Application. The loan approval process would be based on prior years payment history.If a community is late in payment or has a questionable history,their 5 year loan approval would be revoked and an annual application would need to be filled out until the communities history improves. If a loan is approved based on payment history but the community still has one or two months of payments due,the approved funds would not be released until the final prior years loan payment is received.The written approval letter would allow the community to become a credit worthycustomerratherthanarisk. FISCAL YEAR 2010 PCE DISBURSEMENTS 2347 Last Batch Estimate Date AR #REF!Number YTD Of Months Average Code Community Grant Paid Paid Mo.Amount 331020 Akiachak PCE 245,831.52 12 20,485.96 331030 Akiak PCE 72,164.20 12 6,013.68 331290 Eek PCE 150,887.92 12 12,573.99 331390 Kasigluk PCE 197,333.27 12 16,444.44 331530 Nunapitchuk PCE 203,759.47 12 16,979.96 331780 Atmautluak PCE 98,601.56 12 8,216.80 331800 Bethel/Oscarville PCE 2,244,082.23 12 187,006.85 : 332150 Kwethluk PCE 137,249.33 12 11,437.44 332160 Kwigillingok PCE 110,681.87 12 9,223.49 332290 Napakiak PCE 210,294.72 12 17,524.56 332300 Napaskiak PCE 154,794.08 12 12,899.51 332510 Kongiganak PCE 128,656.12 12 10,721.34 332710 Tuluksak PCE 92,448.42 12 7,704.04 332720 Tuntutuliak PCE 92,770.56 12 7,730.88 4,139,555.27 344,962.94 C:\Documents and Settings\jwilliams\Desktop\Bethel Region PCE Disbursemnts for FY10.xlsReport )|0)|_...._NO OF CUSTOMERS __WH GENERATED e 5 MERS KWH GENE!BY TYPE NERA TS kWh SOLD"eo MOST Reside Comm Com,Govt.Unbille Hydro Other 1 Other 2 Total Recent ntial ercial Facil.Facil.d Other Total kWh kWh Other1 kWh ==Other kWh Fuel Powerhouse Peak Com.Govt. Popula Custom Custo Custo Custo Custo Custo Custom Diesel kWh Genera Generate «kWh Genera 2kWh TotalkWh Purchas TotalkWh =Fuel Used Non-Fuel Purch.ptio Ci i R ial C 1 Facil.Facit. Unbilled Total kWh PJ Posting Description Mo.FY tion ers mers mers mers mers mers ers Generated ted d Type ted Type Generated ed Purchased From Available (Gallons)Fuel Cost Expenses Price n kWh kw sold To Sold To SoldTo Sold To Sold To Sold 331020 09225003 Akiachak PCE -JUL 08 Jul 09225003 628 155 24 13 25 3 0 220 0 [4]0 0 0 0 te)8,688 26,099.89 0.00 3.18 50,765 195 41,455 15,658 18,359 28,358 614 101,444 Akiachak PCE -AUG 08 Aug 09225003 628 156 24 13 25 3 0 221 0 0 0 0 0 0 te)9,775 29,365.45 11,020.98 3.18 $1,762 238 41,440 14,558 16,515 31,122 415 104,050 Akiachak PCE -SEPT 08 Sept 09225003 628 156 24 13 25 3 0 221 44,805 0 0 0 44,805 0 44,805 10,237 48,765.04 0.00 3.86 2,298 368 46,109 18,213 17,789 52,837 746 135,694AkiachakPCE-OCT 08 Oct 09225003 628 158 24 13 25 3 0 223 168,209 0 0 0 168,209 0 168,209 11,989 §7,112.00 16,783.29 3.86 5,366 369 48,312 18,601 16,543 71,583 439 165,478AkiachakPCE-NOV 08 Nov 09225003 628 156 24 13 25 3 i]221 185,050 0 0 0 185,050 0 185,050 12,167 57,959.94 13,399.52 3.86 8,222 361 55,361 20,500 18,685 59,362 1,357 155,265AkiachakPCE-DEC 08 Dec 09225003 628 157 24 13 25 3 0 222 169,951 0 0 0 169,951 0 169,951 11,638 55,439.94 20,785.78 3.86 10,749 381 56,404 21,126 17,524 52,412 3,458 160,924AkiachakPCE-JAN 09 dan 09225003 628 161 24 13 25 3 0 226 193,411 0 0 0 193,411 0 193,441 12,892 61,413.62 18,678.37 3.86 13,281 388 59,551 19,532 19,174 63,025 1,624 162,906 Akiachak PCE -FEB 09 Feb 09225003 628 160 25 13 25 3 0 226 184,153 (¢)0 0 184,153 0 184,153 11,625 55,378.01 14,093.48 3.86 15,592 263 54,469 17,054 18,765 66,964 1,260 168,542AkiachakPCE-MAR 09 Mar 09225003 628 161 25 13 25 3 0 227 166,352 0 0 0 166,352 0 166,352 11,913 56,749.96 17,556.01 3.86 17,601 295 54,015 22,169 17,066 62,961 572 153,783AkiachakPCE-APR 09 :Apr 09225003 628 161 25 13 25 3 0 227 167,993 0 0 0 167,993 0 167,993 11,333 53,987.10 22,638.61 3.86 19,871 352 48,598 19,087 16,921 60,173 1,341 146,120 Akiachak PCE -MAY 09 May 09225003 628 161 24 13 25 4 i')227 139,653 0 0 0 139,653 0 139,653 2,368 11,280.44 17,635.19 3.86 22,943 251 43,012 11,680 15,372 10,024 6,573 86,661 Akiachak PCE -JUNE 09 Jun 09225003 628 164 24 13 25 4 0 230 133,619 0 0 0 133,619 0 133,619 9,930 47,303.54 4,891.54 3.86 26,420 308 44,138 11,602 13,532 44,691 6,227 117,190 3 1,553,196 0 0 0 4,553,196 0 1,553,196 124,555 560,854.93 157,482.77 244,870 586,864 209,780 203.245 603,512 24,626 1,628,02731030 09225003 Akiak PCE -JULY 08 Jui 09225003 350 82 22 9 4 0 0 WT 70,558 0 0 0 70,558 0 70,558 6,490 19,497.26 7,319.42 3.00 2,065 171 19,750 32,829 6,753 696 5,553 65,581 Akiak PCE -AUG 08 Aug 09225003 350 82 22 9 4 0 0 117 79,651 0 0 te)79,651 0 79,651 6,814 20,709.19 19,795.71 3.00 3,362 174 20,720 35,185 13,262 753 11,868 81,788 Akiak PCE -SEPT 08 Sept 09225003 350 81 23 9 4 i)0 117 79,593 0 0 0 79,593 0 79,593 7,516 22,579.57 13,348.53 443 2,372 171 17,648 46,788 4,813 676 3,989 73,914 Akiak PCE -OCT 08 Oct 09225003 350 82 23 9 4 0 0 118 96,182 0 0 0 96,182 0 96,182 8,493 25,514.67 24,059.66 4.39 2,372 171 21,662 47,959 11,428 1,154 7,834 90,037AkiakPCE-NOV 08 Nov 69225003 350 82 23 9 4 i)0 118 92,857 te)0 Qo 92,857 0 92,857 7,066 21,227.68 8,293.41 4.39 1,842 174 22,078 32,169 18,189 1,035 11,073 81,544AkiakPCE-DEC 08 Dec 09225003 350 82 23 9 4 0 0 118 81,459 0 0 i)81,459 0 81,459 7,073 21,248.71 6,694.13 4.39 1,719 171 24,006 21,634 13,387 817 10,089 69,833 Akiak PCE -JAN 09 Jan 09225003 350 82 23 9 4 0 0 118 84,258 0 0 0 84,258 0 84,258 7,919 23,790.26 8,743.30 4.39 1,648 171 23,638 19,019 16,973 920 12,451 73,001 Akiak PCE -FEB 09 Feb 09225003 350 82 23 9 4 0 0 118 69,947 0 0 0 69,947 0 69,947 6,297 18,917.45 13,595.84 4.39 859 171 18,989 13,574 10,148 1,222 1,388 45,321 Akiak PCE -MAR 09 Mar 09225003 350 82 23 9 4 0 0 118 92,145 0 0 0 92,145 0 92,145 7,350 22,080.87 16,800.42 4.39 859 171 19,743 33,061 11,223 1,154 1,435 66,616 Akiak PCE -APR 09 Apr 03225003 350 82 23 9 4 0 0 118 94,195 0 0 0 94,195 0 94,195 7.37 22,071.86 10,053.00 4.39 3,107 174 18,196 44,429 11,256 1,067 1,274 76,222 Akiak PCE -MAY 09 May 09225003 350 83 22 9 4 0 0 118 80,787 0 0 0 80,787 0 80,787 5,518 16,577.18 12,884.92 4.39 2,019 174 17,041 38,852 4,096 773 1,039 61,771 Akiak PCE -JUNE 09 Jun 09225003 350 84 21 9 4 0 0 118 75,179 0 te)0 75,179 0 75,179 5,854 17,586.59 6,932.17 4.39 1,911 171 18,679 34,733 21,577 1,031 1,320 74,340 3 996,811 Q [?]9 996.811 ft)$96,811 83,737 251,801.29 148,520.21 24,135 242,120 397,132 140,105 41,298 69,313 859,968312390 09225003 Eek PCE Jul 09225003 284 92 1 9 8 0 0 120 49,612 0 0 0 49,612 ie)49,612 4,082 18,136.33 0.00 2.62 1,094 115 24,309 9,368 6,521 6,841 0 47,039 Eek PCE Aug 09225003 284 93 10 10 8 0 0 121 58,187 0 0 i)58,187 0 58,187 4,756 21,130.91 0.00 2.62 1,466 130 25,816 9,433 6,632 12,937 it)54,818 Eek PCE Sept 09225003 284 95 11 8 8 0 0 122 57,897 0 0 0 57,897 i)57,897 4,714 21,378.46 0.00 2.62 1,444 134 25,727 9,248 6,453 12,566 0 53,994 Eek PCE Oct 09225003 284 95 10 9 9 ie]0 123 64,880 0 0 0 64,880 Q 64,880 5,266 23,881.84 0.00 4.45 961 146 29,790 9,752 7,892 15,236 0 62,670 Eek PCE -NOV 08 Nov 09225003 284 94 9 10 9 0 0 122 68,326 0 0 0 68,326 Q 68,326 6,331 28,711.72 0.00 4.45 996 153 26,551 11,806 9,508 16,465 0 64,330 Eek PCE -DEC 08 Dec 09225003 284 96 10 9 3 9 0 124 75,754 ie)0 0 75,754 iy 75,754 6,459 29,292.21 0.00 4.45 1,245 i?)28,914 11,639 11,408 16,669 0 68,630 Eek PCE -JAN 09 Jan 09225003 284 96 9 9 9 0 0 123 77,817 0 0 0 77,817 0 77,817 6,508 29,514.43 0.00 4.45 4,295 161 27,696 16,831 12,563 19,109 0 76,199 Eek PCE -FEB 09 Feb 09225003 284 94 8 10 9 0 0 121 67,578 0 0 ie)67,578 0 67,578 6,049 27,432.82 0,00 4.45 1,173 158 24,022 13,226 10,463 16,223 0 63,934 Eek PCE -MAR 09 Mar 09225003 284 94 8 10 9 0 0 121 70,989 0 0 0 70,989 0 70,989 5,905 26,780.00 0,00 4.45 1,269 146 25,247 13,004 11,447 17,436 0 67,134 Eek PCE -APR 09 Apr 08225003 284 94 8 10 9 0 0 121 67,455 0 0 0 67,455 0 67,455 5,605 25,419.24 0,00 4.45 1,887 165 23,284 13,625 10,267 16,490 0 63,666 Eek PCE May 09225003 284 96 8 10 9 0 0 123 59,435 0 0 0 59,435 0 59,435 4,960 22,494.10 0.00 4.45 1,199 133 24,372 10,066 8,055 14,565 0 57,058 Eek PCE Jun 09225003 284 94 9 9 9 0 0 121 51,187 0 0 0 $1,187 0 51,187 4,346 11,344.00 171,635.84 4,45 1,403 116 23,062 9,372 7,157 8,639 0 48,220 769,117 0 Q (¢]769,117 0 769,447 64,981 285,516.06 171,635.84 15,432 308,780 137,370 108.366 _--173,176 ()727,692*331390 09225003 Kasighuk PCE Jul 09225003 545 116 13 1 9 0 0 149 131,325 0 50,196 WIND Q 181,521 Q 181,521 9,671 37,623.09 0.00 2.62 6,939 332 48,975 18,401 7,990 13,131 0 88,497 Kasighuk PCE Aug 09225003 545 115 12 an 10 0 0 148 179,757 QO 14,584 WIND 0 194,344 0 194,341 12,793 49,768.61 0.00 2.62 7,125 405 46,363 11,310 8,235 17,972 0 82,880 Kasigiuk PCE Sept 09225003 545 116 12 1 10 0 iy 149 189,051 OQ 23,184 WIND 9 212,235 0 212,235 13,545 52,694.11 0.00 2.62 6,170 472 48,224 22,585 8,631 24,807 0 104,247 Kasigiuk PCE Oct 09225003 545 115 12 1 10 0 0 148 196,960 0 43,453 WIND ie)240,413 0 240,413 14,368 55,895.83 0.00 447 6,125 468 49,488 14,146 10,727 27,484 0 101,845 Kasigiuk PCE -NOV 08 Nov 09225003 545 117 13 11 10 0 0 151 231,248 0 40,009 WIND 0 271,257 0 271,257 20,966 65,777.19 0.00 4.47 9,723 518 52,843 36,847 11,159 44177 ie)141,026KasiglukPCE-DEC 08 Dec 09225003 545 117 14 11 10 0 0 182 177,136 0 89,214 WIND 0 266,350 0 266,350 13,383 52,063.88 0.00 4.47 9,730 Q 54,718 12,086 11,158 40,231 ie)118,193KasiglukPCE-JAN 09 Jan 09225003 545 115 14 11 10 0 0 150 212,664 0 51,164 WIND 0 263,825 0 263,825 15,826 61,567.89 0,00 4.47 6,682 519 54,821 11,440 11,825 38,924 0 117,040 Kasigluk PCE -FEB 09 Feb 09225003 545 17 15 10 10 0 0 152 184,103 0 64,024 WIND 9 248,127 0 248,127 13,645 §3,083.14 0,00 4.47 9,608 519 46,858 17,673 10,242 41,231 0 116,004 Kasigluk PCE -MAR 09 Mar 09225003 545 115 14 10 10 t)0 149 157,444 0 88,947 WIND it)246,391 0 246,391 11,630 45,244.00 0.00 4.47 9,752 475 52,145 17,376 10,939 42,724 0 123,184 Kasigluk PCE -APR 09 Apr 09225003 545 114 15 9 10 0 0 148 172,666 0 75,874 WIND 0 248,540 0 248,540 12,959 50,414.40 0.00 4.47 8,534 461 49,625 17,232 10,562 38,851 8)116,270KasiglukPCEMay092250035451151491000148166,130 0 47,184 WIND Q 213,314 0 213,314 12,110 47,111.63 0.00 447 8,138 418 48,680 15,824 7,612 35,447 0 107,563 Kasigluk PCE dun 09225003 545 417 14 9 10 9 0 150 137,673 0 38,111 WIND 0 175,784 0 175,784 10,143 39,469.00 309,585.20 447 7,769 370 49,657 13,045 7,906 25,235 0 95,843 2,136,157 Q_625,941 (e]2,762,098 ()2,762,098 161,039 610,702.67 309,585.20 96,295 601,397 206,965 116.986 387,214 0 1,312,562331530 09225003 Nunapitchuk PCE Jul 09225003 545 124 21 11 1 0 0 157 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 2.62 0 0 42,666 16,961 4,854 13,383,0 77,864 Nunapitchuk PCE Aug 09225003 545 123 21 11 1 i)0 156 0 0 0 0 te)0 0 it)0.00 0.00 2.62 0 0 45,717 15,980 5,666 16,761 0 84,124 Nunapitchuk PCE Sept 09225003 545 126 22 10 1 0 0 159 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.00 0.00 2.62 0 0 46,038 16,487 5,468 21,760 0 89,753 Nunapitchuk PCE Oct 09225003 545 127 20 10 2 0 0 159 t)0 0 0 ie)0 0 Q 0.00 0.00 4.47 0 0 51,979 17,838 6,096 26,957 0 102,870 Nunapitchuk PCE -NOV 08 Nov 09225003 545 126 20 10 2 (4)0 158 0 0 0 0 )0 0 0 0.00 0.00 4.47 0 0 56,690 19,594 13,441 24,364 0 114,089 Nunapitchuk PCE -DEC 08 Dec 09225003 545 125 7 3 2 0 0 157 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 AAT 0 0 61,450 20,021 296 26,513 0 108,280 Nunapitchuk PCE -JAN 09 Jan 09225003 545 125 4 26 2 0 0 157 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 4.47 it)0 58,727 19,879 8,728 27,705 0 116,039 Nunapitchuk PCE -FEB 09 Feb 09225003 545 126 19 11 2 0 0 158 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 447 0 0 53,494 16,630 7,140 23,478 0 100,712 Nunapitchuk PCE -MAR 09 Mar 09225003 545 126 20 10 2 0 0 158 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 447 0 0 65,605 17,884 9,603 25,557 0 108,649 Nunapitchuk PCE -APR 09 Apr 09225003 545 128 18 12 2 i]0 160 0 0 0 Qo 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 447 0 0 50,440 17,251 7,745 23,202 0 98,638 Nunapitchuk PCE May 09225003 5A5 129 18 "1 2 0 0 160 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 447 0 0 46,097 15,817 §,124 19,634 0 86,672 Nunapitchuk PCE Jun 09225003 545 129 18 "1 2 0 0 160 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 272,922.61 447 0 0 39,545 13,915 4,687 12,285 0 70,432 0 0 0 0 it}0 9 ()0.00 272,922.61 Q 608.448 208,257 78,818 261,599 0 1,157,122331780 09225003 Atmautiuak PCE -JUL 08 dul 09225003 305 67 6 5 5 3 0 86 49,901 0 te)0 49,901 0 49,901 4,399 15,029.87 4,275.36 4.68 2,737 0 21,605 42,887 1,719 973 3,273 40,457 Atmautiuak PCE -AUG 08 Aug 09225003 305 67 6 §5 3 0 86 53,940 0 0 0 53,940 0 53,940 4,690 16,022.02 10,426.97 4.68 3,856 0 22,404 13,428 1,677 947 3,785 42,241 Atmautiuak PCE -SEPT 08 Sept 09225003 305 67 6 5 5 3 0 86 57,750 0 0 0 57,750 0 57,750 4,594 15,696.77 9,876.46 4.68 4,084 0 21,505 415,886 2,133 1,045 4,779 45,348 Atmautiuak PCE -OCT 08 Oct 09225003 305 67 6 5 5 3 0 86 55,457 0 0 0 55,457 0 55,457 4,222 14,423.44 10,013.66 4.30 2,093 0 24,500 4,935 3,086 1,626 8,193 42,340 Atmautiuak PCE -NOV 08 Nov 09225003 305 67 6 5 5 3 0 86 58,538 i)9 0 58,538 0 58,538 4,222 14,423.44 6,439.69 4.30 1,772 0 25,295 2,580 3,148 1,900 9,755 42,678 Atmautiuak PCE -DEC 08 Dec 09225003 305 67 6 5 5 3 0 86 65,189 0 0 0 65,189 0 65,189 5,198 22,810.55 7,953.52 431 1,895 [e)26,450 4,314 3,257 2,317 20,299 56,637 Atmautiuak PCE -JAN 09 Jan 09225003 305 67 6 5 5 3 0 86 63,896 t)ty)0 63,896 0 63,896 5,012 21,993.85 8,687.09 4.30 1,857 0 25,823 3,413 3,772 2,824 13,057 48,889 Atmautiuak PCE -FEB 09 Feb 09225003 305 67 6 5 5 3 0 86 51,276 0 0 0 51,276 0 51,276 4,104 18,008.65 6,435.43 430 1,397 0 22,983 2,632 3,303 3,554 6,755 39,227 Atmautuak PCE -MAR 09 Mar 09225003 305 67 6 5 5 3 0 86 55,891 0 ie)0 55,891 ie)55,891 4,579 20,094.94 7,173.32 430 1,564 0 22,994 2,950 3,414 4,052 7,981 41,391 Atmautiuak PCE -APR 09 Apr 09225003 305 67 6 5 5 3 0 86 47,799 0 0 0 47,799 te)47,799 4,007 17,583.40 7,819.23 4.30 1,370 0 20,936 2,906 2,364 2,484 6,347 35,037AtmautiuakPCE-MAY 09 May 09225003 305 67 6 5 5 3 0 86 47,146 0 0 0 47,146 te)47,146 4,094 17,967.40 5,485.63 4.30 1,438 0 21,714 §,149 2,141 1,597 4,462 35,063 Atmautiuak PCE -JUNE 09 dun 09225003 305 67 6 5 5 3 0 86 52,168 6 0 0 52,168 0 52,168 4,288 18,818.33 5,485.63 2.76 1,669 0 20,023 14,780 1,801 987 3,264 40,855 658,95+0 9 Q 658,951 0 658,95t 53,409 212,872.66 90,071.99 25,732 276,232 85,860 31,815 24,306 91,950 510,163331800 -09225003 Bethel/Oscarville PCE -JULY 08 Jul 09225003 5,730 1684 1152 17 42 0 0 2,795 3,116.800 0 0 0 3,116,800 0 3,116,800 225,805 1,357,381.60 0.00 6.01 48,400 5,250 708,122 1,909,418 51,498 251,003 0 2,920,041-Bethel/Oscarville PCE -AUG 08 Aug 09225003 5,730 1595 1141 7 42 0 0 2,795 2,998,400 0 0 0 2,998,400 0 2,998,400 218,508 1,313,517.14 350,000.00 6.01 55,200 5,325 664,072 1,855,472 54,532 227,573 0 2,801,649 Bethel/Oscarville PCE -SEPT 08 Sept 09225003 5,730 1866 1387 17 43 0 0 3,313 3,312,000 0 0 0 3,312,000 0 3,312,000 237,819 =1,429,601.35 0.00 6.01 51,600 5,350 693,301 4,970,252 59,362 259,267 0 2,982,182 Bethel/Oscarville PCE -OCT 08 Oct 09225003 5,730 1606 1108 15 42 i)QO 2,774 3,603,200 0 0 0 3,603,200 0 3,603,200 255,811 1,478,101.54 325,000.00 5.78 54,400 6,075 780,918 2,115,659 78,041 302,686 0 3,277,304 Bethel/Oscarville PCE -NOV 08 Nov 09225003 5,730 1616 1098 17 42 it)0 2,773 3,910,400 0 0 0 3,910,400 0 3,910,400 277,310 =4,602,322.02 0.00 5.78 58,000 6,675 855,603 2,181,880 92,776 322,735 0 3,452,994Bethel/Oscarville PCE -DEC 08 Dec 09225003 5,730 1632 1072 17 42 0 0 2.763 3,782,400 0 0 0 3,782,400 0 3,782,400 273,341 1,579,391.63 0.00 5.78 48,000 6,500 1,030,402 2,213,135 96,738 324,659 QO 3,664,934 Bethel/Oscarville PCE -JAN 09 Jan 09225003 5,730 1634 1043 17 42 Q 0 2,736 =3,971,200 0 0 0 3,971,200 0 3,971,200 287,696 =1,662,336.26 0.00 5.78 49,600 7,100 1,111,036 2,222,236 98,610 333,692 Q 3,765,574 CADocuments and Settings\jwilliams\Desktop\Bethel Region UtilityStatisticsQuery ded-Jet.xlsDetail ________NO.OF CUSTOMERS KWHGENERATED BY TYPE GENERATION COSTS kWh SOLD«-MOSTResideCommCom.Govt.Unbille Hydro Other 1 Other 2 Total Recent ntial ercial Facil.Facil.d Other Total kWh kWh (Other1 kWh =Other kWh Fuel Powerhouse Peak Com.Govt.Popula Custom Custo Custo Custo Custo Custo Custom Diesel kWh Genera Generate kWh Genera 2kWh Total kWh Purchas Total kWh Fuel Used Non-Fuel Purch.C t t=Facit.Facil.Unbilled Total kWhPJPostingDescriptionMo.FY tion ers mers mers mers mers mers ers Generated ted da Type ted Type Generated ed Purchased From Available (Gallons)-_Fuel Cost Expenses Price nkWh kw sold To Sold To SoldTo SoldTo SoldTo Sold Bethel/Oscarville PCE -FEB 09 Feb 09225003 5,730 1639 1051 7 42 0 0 2,749 3,562,000 0 0 0 3,552,000 0 3,552,000 260,004 1,502,329.11 0.00 5.78 46,000 6,700 916,842 2,071,349 80,865 315,866 0 3,384,922Bethel/Oscarville PCE -MAR 09 Mar 09225003 5,730 1637-1045 7 42 0 0 2,741 3,897,600 0 0 0 3,897,600 0 3,897,600 286,367 1,654,657.16 0.00 §.78 53,600 6,400 893,152 2,214,449 86,833 349,864 0 3,644,298 Bethel/Oscarville PCE -APR 09 Aor 09225003 5,730 1638 1042 17 42 0 0 2,739 3,424,000 0 0 0 3,424,000 0 3,424,000 251,063 1,450,667.12 0.00 5.78 49,200 §,875 853,261 2,055,299 76,820 314,223 0 3,299,603 Bethel/Oscarville PCE -MAY 09 May 09225003 5,730 1637 1058 17 42 0 0 2,754 3,017,600 0 0 0 3,017,600 0 3,017,600 219,878 =1,270,477.07 0.00 5.78 56,800 5,375 677,396 1,815,659 58,154 251,417 0 2,802,626Bethel/Oscarville PCE -JUNE 09 dun 09225003 5,730 1641 1064 7 42 0 0 2,764 =3,171,200 0 iy 0 3,171,200 0 3,171,200 232,648 =1,254,740.46 0.00 5.39 50,000 §,125 725,597 1,915,819 $3,446 248,448 0 2,943,310 332150 41,756,800 9 0 (0)41,756,800 [*)41,756,800 _3,026,250 17,555,522.46_675,000.00 620,800 9,909,702 24,540,627 887.675 3,501,433 0 38,839,437 09225003 Kwethluk PCE -JUL 08 Jul 09225003 721 172 6 12 5 16 0 210 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8,713 0.00 31,679.76 3.15 2,016 194 44,835 15,895 6,117 1,323 8,725 76,895 Kwethiuk PCE -AUG 08 Aug 09225003 721 172 6 12 5 16 0 210 103,066 (a)0 0 103,066 0 103,066 9,063 28,508.57 65,013.10 3.15 1,975 218 48,020 19,287 6,965 1,408 8,952 84,632 Kwethiuk PCE -SEPT 08 Sept 09225003 721 172 6 12 5 15 0 210 114,968 "oO 0 0 114,968 QO 114,968 9,839 30,949.56 19,766.29 3.15 1,953 266 50,012 22,997 6,883 1,708 8,784 90,3864 Kwethluk PCE -OCT 08 Oct 09225003 721 172 6 12 5 15 0 210 128,802 9 0 LY)128,802 Oo 128,802 11,356 35,721.43 6,278.44 3.15 2,591 262 57,181 24,892 9,439 2,900 10,361 104,773 Kwethluk PCE -NOV 08 Nov 09225003 721 172 6 12 5 15 0 210 132,302 0 0 0 132,302 Q 132,302 11,390 35,828.38 6,496.41 3.15 3,016 270 59,577 23,847 7,437 2,743 14,043 107,647KwethlukPCE-DEC 08 Dec 09225003 721 172 6 12 5 15 0 210 133,821 0 0 0 133,821 Oo 133,821 11,444 35,998.25 10,824.13 3.16 2,799 275 68,712 23,371 7,364 3,825 14,071 107,343, Kwethiuk PCE -JAN 09 Jan 09225003 724 172 6 12 5 15 (0)210 133,821 0 0 0 133,821 ij 133,821 11,444 35,998.25 11,395.05 3.15 2,799 275 59,593 20,411 7,609 4,461 16,303 108,377KwethlukPCE-FEB 09 Feb 09225003 721 172 6 12 5 15 Q 210 125,802 i}0 it}125,802 0 125,802 10,052 31,619.57 12,026.85 3.15 5,808 256 50,010 21,564 15,987 3,614 7,716 98,891 Kwethiuk PCE -MAR 09 Mar 09225003 721 172 6 12 5 15 0 210 129,898 0 0 0 129,898 0 129,898 10,322 32,468.88 44,530.59 3.15 6,193 250 50,010 21,280 7,939 2,976 17,217 99,422 Kwethluk PCE -APR 09 Apr 09225003 721 172 6 12 5 15 0 210 118,860 0 0 0 118,860 0 118,860 9,963 3,139.61 10,270.73 3.16 §,205 243 49,414 20,485 6,660 1,809 15,131 93,499 Kwethluk PCE -MAY 09 May 09225003 721 172 6 12 5 15 0 210 105,936 0 0 iy 105,936 0 105,936 9,374 29,486.85 10,404.93 3.15 2,019 227 48,615 19,750 5,863 1,717 11,408 87,353 Kwethluk PCE -JUNE 09 Jun 09225003 721 172 6 12 5 15 0 210 86,610 0 0 iy 86,610 0 86,610 8,525 26,816.24 28,437.28 3.15 1,768 187 40,834 13,353 5,441 1,516 7,976 69,120 332160 1,313,886 it]0 0 1,313,886 0 1,313,886 121,485 326,535.59 257,123.56 38,142 616,813 247,132 93,704 30,000 140,687 1,128,336. 09225003 Kwigillingok PCE -JULY 08 Jul 09225003 361 86 16 2 3 3 0 109 63,900 0 ie]0 63,900 0 63,900 4,887 18,865.71 21,739.39 3.86 3,023 251 32,050 17,654 2,622 161 2,006 54,493 Kwigillingok PCE -AUG 08 Aug 09225003 361 86 16 2 3 3 0 109 68,001 0 0 0 68,001 0 68,001 5,264 20,318.15 12,903.39 3.86 2,983 340 32,746 22,022 2,475 142 1,769 59,153 Kwigillingok PCE -SEPT 08 Sept 09225003 361 86 15 2 3 3 9 109 69,457 te]0 0 69,457 0 69,457 §,343 20,625.87 9,185.07 3.86 3,171 343 31,889 22,818 2,697 182 1,733 59,319 Kwigillingok PCE -OCT 08 Oct 09225003 361 86 16 2 3 3 0 109 69,457 0 0 0 69,457 i)69,457 5,991 23,644.37 13,366.28 3.93 3,129 343 36,282 3,284 28,051 221 1,528 69,366 Kwigillingok PCE -NOV 08 Nov 09225003 361 86 15 2 3 3 0 109 84,000 0 it]0 84,000 i!)84,000 6,026 23,678.49 13,675.61 3.93 3,411 205 38,022 47,724 4,282 554 1,432 62,014 Kwigillingok PCE -DEC 08 Dec 09225003 361 86 16 2 3 3 0 109 82,443 0 0 0 82,443 0 82,443 6,392 25,117.15 13,945.23 3.93 2,930 287 38,211 30,212 3,565 909 1,476 74,362 Kwigillingok PCE -JAN 09 Jan 09225003 361 86 15 2 3 3 0 109 90,348 Q 0 0 90,348 0 90,348 6,911 27,159.22 13,350.50 3.93 2,857 219 40,289 25,500 3,918 968 1,541 72,216 Kwigillingok PCE -FEB 09 Feb 09225003 361 86 16 2 3 3 is)109 74,682 0 0 0 74,682 0 74,682 §,370 21,100.56 11,874.41 3.93 2,625 294 36,948 40,364 3,367 890 1,319 52,888 Kwigillingok PCE -MAR 09 Mar 09225003 361 86 15 2 3 3 0 109 79,494 0 0 0 79,494 i)79,494 6,318 24,827.96 11,265.68 3.93 2,491 246 37,589 34,772 3,896 810 1,413 78,480 Kwigillingok PCE -APR 09 Aor 09225003 361 83 17 2 3 3 0 108 89,654 0 0 0 89,654 0 89,654 6,380 25,071.53 9,521.90 3.93 2,839 271 40,443 32,724 3,077 656 1,563 78,463 Kwigillingok PCE -MAY 09 May 09225003 361 83 17 2 3 3 0 108 75,750 0 0 0 75,750 i)75,750 5,839 22,945.09 9,182.18 3.93 2,725 260 35,939 21,447 3,340 0 1,723 62,449 Kwigillingok PCE -JUN 09 Jun 09225003 361 83 17 2 3 3 0 108 63,477 0 0 0 63,477 i)63,477 5,173 20,329.28 13,503.23 3.93 2,725 175 35,614 16,653 2,648 0 1,716 56,631 332290 910,663 9 0 0 910,663 0 910,663 69,894 273,583.38 153,512.87 34,209 436,021 255,174 63,928 5.493 19,218 779,834 09225003 ° Napakiak PCE -JUL 08 Jut 09225003 378 98 9 6 8 2 0 123 0 0 0 9 Q 57,900 BETHEL UTILITIES CORPOR,57,900 0 0.00 3,680.61 0.00 0 0 25,290 21,580 2,575 1,574 346 51,365NapakiakPCE-AUG 08 Aug 09225003 378 98 9 6 8 2 0 123 0 0 0 0 O 51,600 BethelUtilitiesCorporation 51,600 0 0.00 3,195.03 0.00 0 0 26,997 17,699 2,802 1,832 337 49,667 Napakiak PCE -SEPT 08 Sept 09225003 378 98 9 6 8 2 0 123 0 0 0 0 Q 41,400 BethelUtiitiesCorporation 41,400 0 0.00 3,962.87 0.00 0 0 23,967 4,516 2,554 1,717 219 32,973 Napakiak PCE -OCT 08 Oct 09225003 378 98 8 7 8 2 0 123 0 0 0 0 OQ 41,400 BethelUtiitiesCorporation 41,400 0 3,962.87 0.00 0.00 0 0 30,202 6,307 4,719 2,647 821 44,696 Napakiak PCE -NOV 08 Nov 09225003 378 100 13 4 8 2 0 127 0 0 0 9 0 55,200 BethelUtilitiesCorporation 55,200 0 0.00 5,910.13 0.00 0 0 34,319 7,952 2,360 2,639 962 45,232NapakiakPCE-DEC 08 Dec 09225003 378 96 13 4 8 2 0 123 0 0 0 0 0 55,200 BethelUtilitiesCorporation 55,200 0 0.00 5,120.00 0.00 0 0 37,484 9,603 2,756 3,347 1,068 54,258 Napakiak PCE -JAN 09 Jan 09225003 378 96 13 4 8 2 0 123 0 0 i?)0 0 52,500 BethelUtilitiesCorporation 52,500 0 0.00 5,566.98 0.00 0 0 36,691 8,610 2,933 3,056 988 52,278NapakiakPCE-FEB 09 Feb 09225003 378 98 12 4 8 2 0 124 0 0 0 0 0 53,460 BethelUtilitiesCorporation 53,460 0 0.00 5,000.00 0.00 0 Q 33,451 7,726 2,660 2,785 945 47,567 Napakiak PCE -MAR 09 Mar 09225003 378 97 13 4 8 2 0 124 te]0 0 iy 0 64,250 BethelUtilitiesCorporation 54,250 0 0.00 8,155.09 0.00 0 0 35,675 8,769 2,685 3,368 753 §1,250 Napakiak PCE -APR 09 Apr 09225003 378 98 13 4 8 2 0 125 9,768 0 0 iy 9,768 41,880 BethelUtilitiesCorporation 51,648 844 0.00 4,931.20 0.00 0 0 30,883 7,495 2,616 2,916 894 44,804 Napakiak PCE -MAY 09 May 09225003 378 98 17 4 8 2 0 129 9,480 0 0 0 9,480 31,200 BethelUtilitiesCorporation 40,680 750 3,577.57 6,184.45 0.00 0 0 27,297 6,991 2,570 2,088 216 39,162 Napakiak PCE -JUNE 09 Jun 09225003 378 101 17 4 8 2 0 132 7,420 0 0 0 7,420 44,640 BetheiUtilitiesCorporation 62,060 750 3,577.57 7,304.21 0.00 0 0 27,029 7,228 2,611 2,329 236 39,433 332300 26,668 (0)0 0 26,668 580,630 607,298 2.344 14,118.01 59,010.57 it)366,285 114,476 33,841 30,298 7,785 552,685 09225003 Napaskiak PCE-JUL 08 Jul 09225003 434 77 13 7 4 9 i)110 63,764 0 0 0 63,764 0 63,764 4,969 48,832.51 50,080.37 3.79 2,499 141 32,462 13,174 2,148 247 2,580 50,611 Napaskiak PCE -AUG 08 Aug 09225003 434 77 13 7 4 9 0 110 65,512 0 0 0 65,512 0 65,512 5,026 49,048.54 15,918.06 3.79 2,252 163 31,113 44,609 1,949 217 2,972 50,860 Napaskiak PCE -SEPT 08 Sept 09225003 434 77 13 7 4 9 0 4110 76,187 0 0 0 76,187 0 76,187 5,636 21,360.44 23,494.78 3.79 2,557 190 37,965 16.413 2,527 313 3,099 60,317NapaskiakPCE-OCT 09 Oct 09225003 434 7 43 7 4 9 Qo 110 72,143 [t)0 0 72,143 [9]72,143 5,222 49,791.38 13,633.94 3.79 3,291 144 40,366 41,847 4,446 581 4,670 61,810 Napaskiak PCE -NOV 08 Nov 09225003 434 7 13 7 4 9 Q 110 80,889 0 0 0 80,889 0 80,889 5,836 22,118.44 13,812.41 3.79 3,319 181 46,055 11,199 5,190 1,098 4,395 67,937 Napaskiak PCE -DEC 08 Dec 09225003 434 77 13 7 4 9 0 110 88,124 0 0 0 88,124 0 88,124 6,386 24,202.94 20,714.83 3.79 3,338 197 44,830 13,952 4,554 1,515 5.425 70,276 Napaskiak PCE -JAN 09 Jan 09225003 434 7 13 7 4 9 [¢)110 100,788 0 0 0 100,788 0 100,788 7,395 29,454.29 16,733.41 3.98 3,884 205 46,577 19,630 4,741 1,475 5,295 77,718 Napaskiak PCE -FEB 09 Feb 09225003 434 7 13 7 4 9 0 110 101,650 0 L)0 101,650 0 101,650 7,798 29,554.42 16,832.13 3.79 3,615 205 42,480 23,229 4,819 1,357 4,731 76,616 Napaskiak PCE -MAR 09 Mar 09225003 434 7 13 7 4 9 0 110 93,047 0 0 it)93,047 0 93,047 6,943 27,653.97 36,818.66 3.98 3,306 190 38,310 24,099 4,554 1,386 7,056 75,405, Napaskiak PCE -APR 09 Apr 09225003 434 77 13 7 4 9 0 110 91,044 i)0 0 91,044 0 91,044 6,763 26,937.03 15,137.00 3.98 2,920 189 36,609 22,137 3,786 1,280 6,239 70,051 Napaskiak PCE -MAY 09 May 09225003 434 77 13 7 4 9 0 110 69,270 0 0 0 69,270 0 69,270 5,853 23,312.50 18,403.76 3.98 2,771 190 35,519 18,364 4,177 366 3,600 62,026 Napaskiak PCE -JUNE 09 Jun 09225003 434 77 13 7 4 9 ie]110 72,163 0 0 0 72,163 0 72,163 5,196 20,695.67 22,318.77 3.98 2,536 127 30,010 13,553 2,764 305 2,306 48,938 332510 974,581 9 (¢)it}974,581 G 974,581 73,023 282,962.13 257,898.12 36,288 462,296 202,206 45,555 410,140 52.368 772,565 09225003 Kongiganak PCE -JULY 08 Jul 09225003 436 95 12 4 3 7 0 121 76,537 0 0 0 76,537 ie}76,537 6,857 31,953.62 11,142.49 4.66 0 211 38,714 18,793 7,988 237 537 66,269 Kongiganak PCE -AUG 09 Aug 09225003 436 95 12 4 3 7 0 121 83,381 0 0 0 83,381 0 83,381 6,857 31,953.62 11,142.49 4.66 0 211 40,016 25,000 8,822 163 564 74,555KongiganakPCE-SEP 09 Sept 09225003 436 95 13 4 3 6 ie)121 77,108 0 0 0 77,108 iY)77,108 6,147 26,432.10 11,324.89 4.30 0 189 36,527 23,058 7411 8t 500 67,577KongiganakPCE-OCT 09 Oct 09225003 436 95 15 4 3 6 0 123 92,873 0 0 0 92,873 0 92,873 7,387 31,764.10 18,712.88 4.30 ie}208 43,136 29,899 8,292 100 785 82,212 Kongiganak PCE -NOV 08 Nov 09225003 436 95 15 4 3 6 it)123 96,032 9 0 0 96,032 QO 96,032 7,446 32,017.80 9,015.54 4.30 0 193 44,066 31,294 9,039 401 865 85,665 Kongiganak PCE -DEC 08 Dec 09225003 436 96 15 4 3 6 it)124 101,971 Q 0 0 101,971 0 101,971 7,890 33,927.00 12,909.80 4.30 0 282 47,961 32,290 6,603 763 718 88,335 Kongiganak PCE -JAN 09 Jan 09225003 436 96 15 4 3 6 0 124 107,869 te)0 0 107,869 ie]107,869 8,294 35,664.20 9,186.12 4,30 0 317 52,149 34,639 7,287 711 1,000 95,686 Kongiganak PCE -FEB 09 Feb 09225003 436 96 15 4 3 6 0 124 100,913 Q 0 0 100,913 0 100,913 7,840 33,712.00 9,186.42 4.30 0 317 44,817 18,218 6,774 583 861 71,253 Kongiganak PCE -MAR 09 Mar 09225003 436 96 15 4 3 6 Q 124 103,346 0 0 0 103,346 Q 103,346 7,951 34,189.30 9,186.12 4.30 i)246 45,315 34,486 6,964 420 843 88,028 Kongiganak PCE -APR 09 Aor 09225003 436 96 15 4 3 6 i)124 92,246 0 0 0 92,245 0 92,245 8,543 36,734.90 9,186.12 4.30 0 215 44,9 30,355 6,432 241 782 82,159 Kongiqanak PCE -MAY 09 May 09225003 436 96 14 4 3 6 0 123 92,643 0 0 0 92,643 0 92,643 7,840 33,712.00 8,296.22 4.30 0 215 43,459 27,136 6,298 50 623 77,565 Kongiganak PCE -JUN 09 Jun 09225003 436 96 14 4 3 6 it}123 80,637 0 0 0 80,637 0 80,637 7,048 30,306.40 8,296.22 4.30 0 244 36,366 24,970 6,339 66 495 68,236 332710 1,105,555 i¢]0 0 14,105,555 9 4,105,555 90,100 392,367.04 127,585.01 Q 516,875 330,037 88,249 3,806 8,573 947,540 09225003 Tuluksak PCE -JUL 08 Jul 09225003 487 85 9 5 2 4 Qo 105 49,465 0 0 0 49,465 0 49,465 4,004 21,021.00 7,838.84 5.25 5,013 95 20,006 6,776 3,242 232 274 30,530 Tuluksak PCE -AUG 08 Aug 09225003 487 85 9 5 2 4 Q 105 43,471 0 0 0 43,471 0 43,471 3,897 20,459.25 7,703.15 5.25 2,359 88 20,969 10,924 3,443 230 944 36,510TuluksakPCE-SEPT 08 Sept 09225003 487 85 9 5 2 4 Q 105 42,745 0 Qo Q 42,745 0 42,745 3,913 20,543.25 7,703.15 5.25 1,834 84 17,283 7,215 3,025 160 1,072 28,755 Tuluksak PCE -OCT 08 Oct 09225003 487 85 9 5 2 4 Q 105 47,003 i?)it)0 47,003 0 47,003 3,977 20,879.25 7,703.15 5.25 2,062 87 16,082 12,034 1,677 183 1,094 31,070 Tuluksak PCE -NOV 08 Nov 09225003 487 85 9 5 2 4 0 105 50,346 0 0 0 50,346 0 50,346 3,980 20,895.00 6,069.98 5.25 2,149 106 24,159 13,124 8,131 255 1,440 47,109 Tuluksak PCE -DEC 08 Dec 09225003 487 85 9 5 2 4 te)105 52,253 0 i][i]52,253 0 52,253 4,211 20,339.13 7,703.15 4.83 2,513 110 28,839 14,523 2,282 251 1,805 47,700 Tuluksak PCE -JAN 09 Jan 09225003 487 85 9 §2 4 0 105 56,323 0 0 0 56,323 0 56,323 4,506 21,763.98 4,529.99 483 2,479 100 17,888 10,898 1,147 144 1,307 31,384 Tuluksak PCE -FEB 09 Feb 09225003 487 85 9 5 2 4 0 105 48,582 0 0]0 48,582 0 48,582 3,913 18,899.79 8,157.64 483 2,344 102 20,682 12,401 4,633 105 1,492 39,313 Tuluksak PCE -MAR 09 Mar 09225003 487 85 9 5 2 4 0 105 56,489 0 0 0 56,489 0 56,489 4,424 21,367.92 8,157.64 483 2,568 115 20,682 12,401 4,633 157 2,488 40,361 Tuluksak PCE -APR 09 Apr 09225003 487 85 9 5 2 4 0 105 65,947 0 0 0 65,947 0 65,947 6,123 29,574.09 8,157.64 4.83 2,881 192 19,118 13,694 4,426 130 1,160 38,528 Tuluksak PCE -MAY 09 May 09225003 487 85 9 5 1 4 0 104 56,291 0 0 i 56,291 0 56,291 4,559 22,019.97 8,157.64 4.83 2,254 192 19,882 12,254 4,152 163 1,263 37,704 Tuluksak PCE -JUNE 09 Jun 09225003 487 85 9 5 1 4 0 104 42,149 0 0 0 42,149 0 42,149 3,994 19,291.02 §,551.20 483 2,169 86 16,445 10,526 3,725 84 1,219 31,999 332720 611,064 Q a (*)611,064 0 614,064 51,501 257,053.65 87,433.17 30,625 242,035 136,770 44,516 2.084 15,558 440,963 09225003 C:\Documents and Settings\jwilliams\Desktop\Bethel Region Utili isticsQueryE ded-let.xlsDetail NO.OF CUSTOMERS KWHGENERATED BY TYPE GENERATION COSTS "kWh SOLDMOSTwv Reside Comm Com.Govt.Unbille Hydro Other 1 Other 2 Total Recent ntiat =ercial Facil.Facil.da Other Total kWh kWh Other1 kWh ==Other kWh Fuel Powerhouse Peak Com.Govt. Popula Custom Custo Custo Custo Custo Custo Custom Diesel kWh Genera Generate kWh Genera 2kWh Total kWh Purchas TotalkWh Fuel Used Non-Fuel Purch.C:c Resid:y C cial Facil.Facit.Unbilled Total kWhPJPostingDescriptionMo.FY tlon ers mers mers mers mers mers ers Generated ted d Type ted Type Generated ed Purchased From Available (Galtons)Fuel Cost Expenses Price nkWh kw sold To Sold To Sold To SoldTo Sold To Sold Tuntutuliak PCE -JULY 08 Jul 09225003 422 86 27 7 4 6 0 130 58,663 te)0 9 58,663 0 58,663 6,730 21,053.41 0.00 497 0 109 29,121 45,847 2,271 262 478 47,979 Tuntutuliak PCE -AUG 08 Aug 09225003 422 86 27 7 4 6 0 130 70,129 0 0 tt)70,129 0 70,129 7,432 23,248.78 0.00 497 0 161 30,805 17,481 2,481 275 471 §1,513 Tuntutuliak PCE -SEPT 08 Sept 09225003 422 86 27 7 4 6 0 130 80,770 ie)0 0 80,770 0 80,770 6,044 18,905.59 0,00 497 0 167 31,726 28,806 3,296 357 578 64,762 Tuntutuliak PCE -OCT 08 Oct 09225003 422 86 27 7 4 6 0 130 88,677 0 it)it),88,677 i}88,677 7,141 22,337.85 0.00 497 i)174 30,192 34,1148 2,622 1,414 866 66,212TuntutuliakPCE-NOV 08 Nov 09225003 422 86 27 7 4 6 0 130 88,544 0 ie)0 88,544 0 88,544 5,887 18,416.96 0.00 4.97 Q 0 32,990 32,114 3,850 1,244 910 71,108 Tuntutuliak PCE -DEC 08 Dec 09225003 422 86 27 7 4 6 0 130 94,358 0 [9]0 94,358 iy 94,358 7,501 37,314.73 0.00 4.97 0 188 35,379 30,334 3,805 1,715 1,087 72,320 Tuntutuliak PCE -JAN 09 Jan 09225003 422 86 27 7 4 6 0 130 94,385 0 0 0 94,385,iy 94,385 6,489 32,281.13 0.00 4.97 0 199 35,419 30,639 3,748 1,364 1,776 72,946 Tuntutuliak PCE -FEB 09 Feb 09225003 422 86 27 7 4 6 0 130 100,278 0 0 0 100,278 0 100,278 5,161 25,674.96 0.00 497 0 193 34,622 35,954 4,198 1,394 1,642 77,810 Tuntutuliak PCE -MAR 09 Mar 09225003 422 86 27 7 4 6 it)130 80,736 0 0 0 80,735 0 80,735 6,236 31,020.99 0.00 4.97 0 190 27,250 31,122 3,274 1,055 1,275 63,976 Tuntutuliak PCE -APR 09 Apr 09225003 422 86 27 7 4 6 0 130 89,595 0 0 0 89,595,0 89,595,7,065 35,145.19 0.00 497 0 183 29,659 32,778 3,404 1,047 1,407 68,295 Tuntutuliak PCE -MAY 09 May 09225003 422 86 a7 7 4 6 0 130 79,581 0 0 [e)79,581 0 79,581 5,456 27,140.57 0.00 497 0 168 29,259 29,172 3,117 710 649 62,907 Tuntututiak PCE -JUNE 09 Jun 09225003 422 86 27 7 4 6 0 130 72,479 0 0 0 72,479 0 72,479 5,044 25,094.89 0.00 2.62 0 155 31,635 19,564 2,896 461 603 $6,159 998,194 (¢]0 i]998,194 0 998,194 76,186 317,635.05 0.00 Q 378,057 334,929 38,961 14,298 11,742 774,987 C:\Documents and Settings\jwilliams\Desktop\Bethel Region Utility isti vE:ded-Jet.xlsDetail . *4 e =N \Q NO_OF CUSTOMERS KWHGENERATED BY TYPE GENERATION COSTS kWh SOLO Cont Reside merci Com.Govt.Unbille Hydro Other1 Other ntiat al Facil.Facil.d Other Diesel kWh kWh =Other 2 kWh Most Recent Powerhouse Peak Com.Govt. Populat Custo Custo Custo Custo Custo Custom kWh =Generat Generat 1kWh Gener Other 2 kWh Total kWh Total kWh Fuel Used Non-Fuel =Fuel Purch.C Ci C Facil.Faclt.-UnbilledPJPostingDescriptionMo.FY ion mers mers mers mers mers ers Total Custom Generated ed ed Type ated Type Generated Purchased Purchased From Total kWh A (Gallons)Fuel Cost Expenses Price kWh tion kW sold To alSold To SoldTo SoidTo SoldTo Total kWh Sold 331020 10225003 Akiachak PCE -JULY 09 Jub 102250 163025 13 25 4 0 121,863 ti)°0 121,863 0 10,019.00 31,104.98 3,788.94 4 30,063 39,588 10,445 13,759 36,967 5,850 =106618AkiachakPCE-AUG 09 Aug 102250 160-25 13 25 4 0 144,357 0 C)0 144,357 0 10,923.00 33,911.54 18,196.77 4 33,664 43,741 13,051 15,376 47,244 6,227 125639 Akiachak PCE-SEPT09 Sept 102250 161 24 13 25 4 0 157,979 0 t)0 157,979 0 .11,119.00 34,520.04 49,841.47 4 3,158 45,095 13,142 18,837 58,990 5,832 138896 Akiachak PCE -OCT 09 Oct 102250 161 24 13 25 4 0 168,264 0 0 0 168,264 0 14,844.00 40,472.13 0.00 3 )46,961 13,710 16,398 62,421 6,756 145246 Akiachak PCE -NOV 09 Nov 102250 149018 13,21 4 0 188,585 ()()0 188,585 0 12,754.00 42,927.41 18,633.44 3 42,755 59,302 18,195 22,271 67,665 5,410 169843 Akiachak PCE -DEC 09 Dec 102250 14918 13 21 4 0 176,448 0 0 t)176,448 ()12,326.00 40,472.13 18,816.83 3 45,654 $1,382 14,665 15,499 74,566 §,751 161863 Akiachak PCE-JAN 10 Jan 102250 148022 13 21 3 0 193,456 0 0 0 193,456 ()12,570.00 42,308.11 17,120.50 3 48,608 54,007 16,821 18,498 66,160 §,689 161175 Akiachak PCE -FEB 10 Feb 102250 150-22 13 21 3 0 178,745 0 [)°178,745 0 11,363.00 38,245.59 15,399.84 3 2,915 48,552 28,684 26,636 63,500 5.489 172861 Akiachak PCE-MARCH 10 Mar 102250 149°°«19-13 21 3 0 168,066 0 t)ti)168,066 0 12,191.00 41,032.47 27,418.28 3 3,334 44,652 49,126 14,850 70,534 6,273 184432 Akiachak PCE-APRIL 10 Apr 102250 149 °«19 13 21 3 0 168,554 [)t)t)168,554 °11,152.00 37,536.40 30,374.70 4 3,513 46,104 16,410 15,334.62,123 5,671 145642 Akiachak PCE -MAY 10 May 102250 15019 13 21 3%0 146,146 [))()146,146 0 10,864.00 36,566.05 47,388.22 4 5,346 42,730 43,428 13,742,81,347 6,268 126515 Akiachak PCE -JUNE 10 Jun 102250 18019 13 21 3 0 123,600 0 °0 123,600 o 9,058.00 30,487.42 14,975.51 4 3,880 41,746 12,387 13,211 40,901 5,383 113628 334030 4,936,063 0 ()()1,936,063 ()136,183.00 449,583.27 231,954.50 222,891 563,860 187,064 201,411 702,415 67,608 1722358 3403 as 10225003 Akiak PCE -JULY 09 Jul 102250 (7 ra 9 4 0 0 76,893 0 0 0 76,893 ()§,816.00 24,212.43 16,729.00 5 1,017 19,647 35,184 10,564 807 2,648 68850 Akiak PCE -AUG 09 Aug 102250 8421 9 4 0 0 78,294 0 0 ()78,204 0 6,561.00 28,751.16 7,148.00 5 1,648 16,407 40,505 3,863 926 983 62684AkiakPCE-SEPT 09 Sept 102250 841 9 4 0 0 86,690 0 ()()86,690 0 7,091.00 31,074.18 12,880.00 5 1,972 19,849 44,300 5,450 1,043 723 71365 Akiak PCE -OCT 09 Oct 102250 (7 a 9 4 0 [)97,463 0 0 0 97,463 ()8,163.00 36,771.90 11,664.59 5 2,025 20,513 48,963 15,515 1,370 1,244 87605 Akiak PCE -NOV 09 Nov 102250 a 9 4 ()[)109,930 0 0 0 109,930 [)8,540.00 37,423.99 12,027.15 5 1,611 20,621 51,917 10,476 1,301 943 85258AkiakPCE-DEC 09 Bec 102250 7 ra 9 4 0 0 115,742 0 t)()415,742 ()8,793.00 38,532.68 27,348.64 5 2,868 24,100 57,507 12,013 1,419 1,303 96342AkiakPCE-JAN 10 Jan 102250 a 9 4 0 (118,558 0 0 0 418,558 0 9,344.00 40,947.28 10,391.26 5 795 21,692 50,115 12,514 4,171 1,184 86676 Akiak PCE -FEB 10 Feb 102250 a4 9 4 0 0 99,569 0 0 0 99,569 0 8,223.00 38,404.70 11,514.17 5 1,659 19,272 46,864 9,793 1,312 1,049 78290 Akiak PCE MAR 10 Mar 02250 et 9 4 0 ()113,112 0 0 0 113,112 0 8,796.00 41,080.84 11,025.48 5 1,933 21,442 59,292 11,919 1,784 1,222 95659 Akiak PCE -APRIL 10 Apr 102250 B42 9 4 [)0 78,646 ()0 ()78,646 0 6,423.00 29,997.98 11,148.12 5 2,155 18,911 33,513 6,290 1,013 1,139 60866 Akiak PCE -MAY 10 May 102250 a4 9 4 ()[)73,874 0 0 0 73,874 0 6,315.00 29,493.58 16,161.55 5 2,044 17,691 30,282 4,879 1,067 687 54606AkiakPCE-JUNE 10 Jun 102250 84 ot 9 4 ([')69,589 0 0 0 69,589 0 5,882.00 27,352.48 8,141.00 5 1,838 17,980 30,957 3,760 1,122 264 54083 ° 1,118,360 0 0 0 4,118,360 0 89,947.00 403,043.20 156,178.96 21,565 238,125 529,399 107,036 14,335 13,389 902284 10225003 Eek PCE Jul 102250 94 9 9 9 [)0 52,704 0 0 0 52,704 0 4,356.00 11,355.00 0.00 4 4,152 24,519 10,542 7,284 8,029 0 50374 Eek PCE Aug 102250 95 9 9 9 0 0 66,492 0 0 0 56,492 0 4,557.00 14,879.18 0.00 4 1,089 25,342 9,833 7,389 10,920 0 $3484 Eek PCE -SEP 09 Sept 102250 96 8 10 9 0 ()59,980 0 0 0 59,980 0 4,818.00 12,569.56 0.00 3 1,038 26,289 9,340 8,307 12,927 0 56863 Eek PCE Oct 102250 98 9 (2)9 0 0 65,523 0 0 0 65,523 0 5,256.00 13,701.34 0.00 3 1,122 28,309 9,514 8,686 15,446 ()61955 Eek PCE Nov 102250 96 8 10 9 0 0 68,695 0 0 0 68,695 0 5,830.00 15,197.64 0.00 3 949 26,406 10,749 9,155 17,260 0 63570 Eek PCE Dec 102250 9 8610 10 8 ()ty)74,438 0 0 0 74,438 0 6,002.00 15,646.01 0.00 3 1,214 29,200 13,078 12,780 16,483 °71550 Eek PCE Jan 102250 vr 1 9 8 °0 78,449 0 9 0 78,449 0 6,278.00 16,365.49 0.00 3 1,510 29,272 12,380 11,863 20,140 0 73655 Eek PCE Feb 102250 9 =10 10 8 ()0 68,108 0 [')0 68,108 0 5,502.00 14,342.61 0.00 3 935 25,418 40,909 =11,321 17,147 [)64885 Eek PCE -MAR 10 Mar 102250 8 611 9 8 ()0 75,589 0 °0 75,589 0 6,093.00 15,883.23 0.00 3 1,008 26,729 12,990 12,488 19,795 0 72002 Eek PCE -APRIL 10 Apr 102250 102041 9 8 ()()65,290 0 0 0 65,290 0 5,179.00 13,500.62 0.00 3 854 26,208 11,024 10,010 15,428 0 62670 Eek PCE -MAY 2010 May 102250 101 8 10 8 ()0 58,267 0 [)0 58,267 0 4,790.00 12,486.57 0.00 3 1,069 26,492 9,102 7,229 13,030 0 55943 Eek PCE -JUNE 10 Jun 102260 101 9 10 8 0 0 51,815 0 fi)0 51,815 0 4,268.00 14,673.00 0,00 3 1,103 24,740 8,983 6,455 9,058 0 49236 334380 °775,350 0 fi)0 775,350 0 62,929.00 167,590.26 0.00 13,043 318,933 128,624--112,967 175,663 0 736187 10225003 Kasigluk PCE Jul 102250 1146016 8 10 0 0 162,826 0 49,260 WIND [)202,086 0 41,240.00 37,529.00 0.00 4 8,489 67,783 14,087 7,739 8,153 0 97762 Kasigluk PCE Aug 102250 11616 9 9 0 ()163,285 0 44,039 WIND 0 207,324 0 12,318.00 41,128.57 0.00 4 7,932 54,134 14,683 7,879 20,898 °97504 Kasigluk PCE -SEP 09 Sept 102250 17 «16 9 9 0 0 490,815 ©18,294 WIND 0 200,109 o 14,122.00 47,151.95 0.00 3 11,877 49,307 14,139 6.610 49,810 0 119866 Kasiqiuk PCE Oct 102250 12016 9 9 ()()183,192 0 §§,759 WIND (238,951 °13,236.00 44,193.68 0.00 3 5,327 53,024 16,120 7,076 42,809 0 119029 Kasigluk PCE Nov 102250 11916 9 9 0 0 201,962 ©49,962 WIND 0 251,024 0 14,890.00 49,716.22 0.00 3 7,367 52,004 18,356 8218 46,246 0 124824 Kasigiuk PCE Dec 102250 120.15 10 9 0 0 199,315 0 64,411 WIND 0 263,726 [)14,742.00 49,222.06 0.00 3 8,903 55,506 20,316 9,053 46,157 Oo 131032 Kasigluk PCE van 102250 18018 40 9 0 0 176,343 @ 95,300 WIND 0 271,643 to)13,505.00 45,001.84 0.00 3 9,271 57,186 21,184 9,374 44,498 0 132242 Kasigiuk PCE Feb 102250 120,«15 10 9 0 0 48,365 0 191,621 WIND ()230,986 o 13,510.00 45,108.54 0.00 3 8,858 47,862 18,914 7,202 45,026 Oo 119004 Kasigluk PCE -MAR 10 Mar 102250 1915 10 9 0 0 264,401 0 °0 264,401 0 15,263.00 50,961.63 0.00 3 9,404 49,731 21,014 7,576 48,545 0 126866 Kasigluk PCE -APRIL 10 Apr 102250 19012 12 9 0 0 201,105 0 35,402 WIND 0 236,507 °14,086.00 47,031.75 0.00 3 7,243 48,808 17,772 $376 45,187 Oo 117143 Kasigiuk PCE -MAY 2010 May 102250 W718 9 9 0 0 193,927 0 29,410 WIND 0 223,337 °8,159.00 25,265.98 0.00 3 2,082 49,113 18,229 5,38 41,121 oO 114004 Kasigluk PCE -JUNE 10 Jun 102250 422,18 10 9 ()0 143,163 ©30,240 WIND 0 173,403 o 10,340.00 34,246.00 0.00 3 7,861 45,863 20,105 5,720 24,241 0 95929 30 2,118,699 0 663,698 0 2,782,397 [*)155,411.00 516,647.22 0.00 94,614 630,321 214,919 87,361 462,691 QO 1395292 10225003 Nunapitchuk PCE Ju 102250 126-20 9 2 0 0 [)0 0 0 0 [)0.00 0.00 0.00 4 0 43,291 44,319 4871 12,422 {i}74903 Nunapitchuk PCE Aug 102250 1260 «17 1 2 0 0 0 ()0 0 ()0 0.00 0.00 0.00 4 0 45,533 14,318 4913 16,215 0 80979 Nunapitchuk PCE -SEP 09 Sept 102250 12818 10 2 ()0 [)(0 ()0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 3 0 46,406 16,583 4,900 17,979 0 85868 Nunapitchuk PCE Oct 102250 13018 "1 2 0 0 [)0 [)0 o 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 3 0 53,652 18,007 6448 20,529 0 98636 Nunapitchuk PCE Nov 102250 131 7 "1 2 0 0 [)0 0 0 o 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 3 0 55,677 19,006 9,063 23,313 0 107059 Nunapitchuk PCE Dec 102250 134017 11 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 3 0 59,119 19,793 9,535 23,609 Oo 112146 Nunapitchuk PCE Jan 102250 144 46 12 6 ()()0 0 0 t)[)0 0.00 0.00 0.00 3 0 62,633 19,437.11,281 -28,027 0 121378 Nunapitchuk PCE Feb 102250 1320017 11 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 ()0 0.00 0.00 0.00 3 0 52,291 20,352 8,853 24,367 0 105863 Nunapitchuk PCE -MAR 10 Mar 102250 131 7 1 6 0 ()0 0 0 0 °0 0.00 0.00 0.00 3 0 55,659 22,031 10,015 26,004 0 113709 Nunapitchuk PCE -APRIL 10 Apr 102250 133017 "1 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 3 0 50,782 17,931 8,182 24,403 Oo §=101298 Nunapitchuk PCE -MAY 2010 May 102250 12917 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 [')0 0.00 0,00 0.00 3 0 43,667 15,831 6,108 20,641 0 86247 Nunapitchuk PCE -JUNE 10 Jun 102250 12918 10 6 ()0 0 0 0 t)0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 3 0 39,684 13,104 §,796 14,907 {i}73681 0 0 ()0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0,00 [')608,304 210,802 89,965 252,506 Q 1161667 331780 10225003 Atmautluak PCE -JULY 09 Jul 102250 67 6 5 5 3 0 §3,503 0 0 [)53,503 0 4,469.00 19,612.24 §,867.27 3 2,512 21,542 14,948 4,892 909 3,192 42483 Atmautluak PCE -AUG 09 Aug 102250 67 6 5 8 0 ()34,805 0 0 )34,805 [)3,819.00 12,310.69 6,516.97 3 176 22,274 3,446 4,960 911 4,115 32708 Atmautluak PCE-SEPT 09 Sept 102250 67 6 5 5 3 0 59,461 0 0 (59,461 °3,811.00 12,282.33 9,363.14 3 2,730 21,594 2,529 2,318 866 §,486 32793AtmautiuakPCE-OCT 09 Oct 102250 67 6 5 5 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,341.00 13,991.92 12,797.52 3 3,508 23,842 2,643 2,598 4,274 8,025 38382 Atmautluak PCE-NOV 09 Nev 102250 67 6 5 5 3 0 0 0 )0 0 [)4,604.00 15,305.54 9,263.14 3 4,821 24,061 2,636 3,200 4,732 9,769 41308 Atmautluak PCE-DEC 09 Dec 102250 67 6 5 5 3 0 72,965 0 °0 72,965 0 6,126.00 20,361.95 9,412.27 3 1,867 25,884 10,653 3,070 1,609 18,587 59803 Atmautluak PCE-JAN 10 Jan 102250 67 6 5 5 3 ()67,527 0 °0 67,527 0 §,304.00 147,932.48 9,525.78 3 1,666 25,595 7,663 3,442 3,092 18,612 58404 Atmautluak PCE -FEB 10 Feb 102250 67 6 5 5 3 0 73,084 o °0 73,084 0 5,835.00 19,397.87 6,782.95 3 4,731 20,997 22,704 2,652 4,134 15,871 66358 Atmautiuak PCE MAR 10 Mar 102250 67 6 5 5 3 0 86,014 0 [)0 86,014 0 5,806.00 19,302.46 11,129,06 3 4,731 22,787 33,680 3,429 5,239 16,360 81495 Atmautluak PCE -APRIL 2010 Apr 102250 67 6 5 5 3 0 79,330 [)i)()79,330 0 5,232.00 17,302.26 10,255.61 3 1,740 21,452 29,573 2,486 2,710 15,286 71507 Atmautluak PCE -MAY 2010 May 102250 67 6 5 5 3 ()73,840 [)[')0 73,840 0 5,023.00 16,697.46 5,133.57 3 1,745 21,822 25,525 1,817 4,859 13,890 67913 Atmautluak PCE -JUNE 10 Jun 102250 67 6 5 5 3 0 60,682 [)[)0 60,682 ()4,362.00 14,502.36 8,907.76 3 1,553 20,991 15,785 1,808 952 12,431 51967 as1a00 661,211 0 [*)0 661,211 0 58,821.00 199,089.53 104,945.04 22,780 272,841 171,785 30,672 _28287 141,624 645209 10225003 Bethel/Oscarvitle PCE -JULY 09 Jul 102250 1636 1049 19 42 (0 3,084,800 ()0 0 3,084,800 0 223,790.00 -1,067,007.96 325,000.00 5 60,400 707,342 1,883,826 53,888 229,738 0 2874794 Bethel/Oscarville PCE -AUG 09 Aug 102250 1644 1047 19 42 0 0 3,212,800 [')0 0 3,212,800 ()230,132.00 1,012,351.55 0.00 4 55,200 681,676 1,886,830 57,027 237,974 0 2863507 Bethel/Oscarville PCE-SEPT09 Sept 102250 1650 1044 17 4t (0 3,142,400 0 )0 3,142,400 0 228,470.00 992,929.75 350,000.00 4 54,000 723,046 1,004,117 64,792 252,108 O 2944963 Bethel/Oscarville PCE -OCT 09 Oct 102250 1657 1045 7 a [))3,417,600 fi)0 0 3,417,600 0 248,180.00 1,031,237.12 0.00 4 54,000 798,153 2,008,348 77,824 284,964 0 3169289 Bethel/Oscarville PCE -NOV 09 Nov 102250 1659 1051 7 a1 0 0 3,913,600 [)0 [)3,913,600 )280,407.00 1,165,148.00 337,500.00 4 48,400 823,498 2,131,540 91,116 338,135 0 3364289 Bethel/Oscarvilte PCE -DEC 09 Dec 102250 1655 1037 7 41 0 0 3,913,600 tC)0 0 3,913,600 0 282,325.00 1,226,984.45 0.00 4 56,400 1,047,463 2,269,410 99,300 363,628 QO 3769801 :Bethel/Oscarville PCE -JAN 10 Jan 102250 1659 1041 7 a 0 0 4,336,000 0 0 [)4,336,000 0 311,810.00 -1,295,634.99 325,000.00 4 51,200 1,127,366 2,399,686 105,706 387,858 0 4020616 Bethei/Oscarville PCE -FEB 10 Feb 102250 1657 1028 7 a1 o 0 3,536,000 [)0 0 3,536,000 0 255,628.00 1,062,185.47 360,000.00 4 47,600 863,325 2,006,872 82,725 333,522 0 3286444 Bethel/Oscarville PCE MAR 10 Mar 102250 1650 1033 17 41 0 0 3,824,000 tC)0 0 3,824,000 [)277,125.00 1,151,509,80 337,500.00 4 50,400 1,013,490 2,218,850 87,015 346,619 0 3665974 Bethel/Oscarville PCE-APRIL10 Apr 102250 1656 1034 7 a 0 [)3,456,000 0 0 (3,456,000 0 252,589.00 1,049,558.23 325,000.00 4 52,400 843,606 2,059,436 71.482 300,881 0 3275405Bethel/Oscarville PCE -MAY 2010 May =102250 1655 1022 47 41 0 0 3,350,400 ()0 0 3,350,400 [)246,343.00 1,023,606.10 325,000.00 4 58,000 722,063 1,965,756 59,942 269,237 0 3016998 Bethel/Oscarville PCE -JUNE 10 Jun 102250 1653 1041 Ww 41 Li)0 2,928,000 0 0 0 2,928,000 0 213,422.00 886,809.43 0.00 §50,400 697,256 1,786,889 54,083 235,843 0 2774071 42,115,200 0 0 0 42,115,200 0 3,050,221.00 12,964,962.75 2,675,000.00 638,400 10,049,184 24,521,560 904,900 _3,570,507 0 39046151 CADocuments and Settings\jwilliams\Desktop\Bethel Region Utili istic E:ded-Jet FY10.xisDetail a com NO_OF CUSTOMERS_KWHGENERATED BY TYPE GENERATION COSTS kWh SOLD Reside merci Com.Govt.Unbille Hydro Other1 Other ntial al Facil.Factl.da Other Diesel kWh kWh (Other 2 kWh Most Recent Powerhouse Peak Com.Govt. Populat Custo Custo Custo Custo Custo Custom kWh Generat Generat 1kWh Gener Other2 kWh Total kWh Total kWh Fuel Used Non-Fuel =Fuel Purch.C i c Resi Cc.i Facil.Facil.-UnbilledPJPostingDescriptionMo.FY ton mers mers mers mers mers ers Total Custom:Generated ed ed Type ated Type Generated Purch.Purch d From Total kWh A (Gallons)Fuel Cost Expenses Price kWh tion kW sold To atSold To Sold To SoldTo Sold To Total kWh Sold 332150 10225003 Kwethiuk PCE -JUL 09 Jul 102250 172 6 12 5 15 Qo 92,553 0 Qo 0 92,553 iv 9,709.00 31,669.79 15,223.75 5 1,719 44,268 16,625 5,897 1,535 8,840 77165 Kwethiuk PCE -AUG 09 Aug 102250 172 6 12 5 18 0 104,569 Le)0 Q 104,569 0 234.00 762.63 10,902.99 5 1,863 48,120 18,610 6,683 1,773 10,110 85296 Kwethiuk PCE -SEPT 09 Sept 102250 172 6 12 5 18 Qo 108,576 0 ie)is)108,576 is}9,523.00 42,446.87 39,984.98 5 1,891 -45,579 21,614 6,697 2,731 10,480 87101KwethlukPCE-OCT 09 Oct 102250 172 6 12 5 16 0 124,171 ie)t)Ly 424,171 i)10,601.00 47,251.84 8,215.29 §2,183 52,548 26,724 7,870 2,521 14,953 101616KwethiukPCE-NOV 09 Nov 102250 172 6 12 5 18 tt)133,115 0 0 0 133,115 tt)11,042.00 34,733.72 11,182.62 3 2,908 55,173 22,175 10,560 2,864 13,661 104433KwethlukPCE-DEC 10 Dec 102250 172 6 12 5 15 0 134,771 ti)Q 0 134,771 0 11,615.00 36,536.14 20,374.07 3 2,746 58,462 24,406 8,185 3,111 17,412 111576 Kwethiuk PCE-JAN 10 Jan =102250 172 6 12 5 15 Ly)135,757 0 i)0 135,757 i}111,138.00 349,595.69 7,076.38 3 3,275 57,021 24,282 8,990 1,830 9,661 101784KwethlukPCE-FEB 10 Feb 102250 172 6 12 5 15 0 124,169 0 Q 0 124,169 0 10,002.00 34,718.94 16,620.94 3 2,403 §2,434 23,796 8,994 2,010 18,683 105917KwethlukPCEMAR10Mar1022501726125180i)fe)0 0 0 0 8,640.00 29,991.17 5,486.65 3 2,077 54,697 23,123 3,673 8,589 17,066 107148KwethlukPCE-APRIL 10 Apr 102250 172 6 12 5 18 0 119,497 °0 0 119,497 iV)8,558.00 29,706.53 22,530.63 3 2,176 49,059 18,843 7,166 3,317 10,444 88829KwethlukPCE-MAY 2010 May 102250 174 8 "1 5 18 0 103,822 0 Q 0 103,822 0 7,770.00 26,971.22 8,454.25 3 2,279 47,525 19,461 6,236 3,228 10,349 5 86799 Kwethluk PCE -JUNE 10 Jun =102250 174 8 11 5 18 0 91,550 i)te)iy 91,550 0 6,921.00 23,907.21 §,399.13 3 2,831 43,040 12,944 5,673 3,250 10,789 75696 332160 1,272,550 oO 0 0 1,272,550 0 205,753.00 688,291.75 171,451.68 28,451 607,926 252,603 86,624 36,759 149,448 1133360 10225003 Kwigillingok PCE -JULY 09 Jut 102250 83 17 2 3 3 0 65,555 0 Q 0 65,555 0 §,231.00 20,276.91 4,596.40 4 2,957 36,820 17,560 2,994 °o 1,760 §9134 Kwigillingok PCE -AUG 09 Aug 102250 83 7 2 3 3 0 78,253 0 0 iy 75,253 0 5,946.00 23,166.61 4,596.40 4 3,246 36,358 25,906 2,892 Qo 1,733 66889 Kwigillingok PCE -SEPT 09 Sept 102250 83 WW 2 3 3 0 75,443 QO te)0 75,443 0 5,696.00 18,409.63 12,494.45 4 3.246 36,315 25,707 3,172 0 1,736 65929 Kwigillingok PCE -OCT 09 Oct 102250 83 7 2 3 3 i+)83,005 ty Q 0 83,095 Oo 6,073.00 23,661.90 8,073.99 4 3.246 37,645 29,115 3,035 °1,630 71425 Kwi Nov 102250 83 17 2 3 3 QO 86,144 0 0 ti)86,144 0 6,207.00 20,061.28 18,754.33 4 3,246 39,124 32,532 2,928 0 1,531 76115 Dec 102250 8&3 7 2 3 3 i+)90,770 0 Q 90 90,770 0 6,639.00 21,455.79 9,990.78 4 3,246 36,052 30,086 3,762 tH)1,834 71434 Jan 102250 83 17 2 3 3 Q 95,794 Oo 0 0 95,794 i)6,808.00 26,527.08 11,757.26 4 1,490 40,063 36,253 4,036 1,932 1,537 83821 Feb 102250 83 7 2 3 3 i}82,614 0 Qo i)82,614 it)6,183.00 19,983.71 17,457.11 4 2,283 34,836 34,826 3,229 701 1,394 74986 Mar 102250 83 17 2 3 3 0 92,633 i)te)Le)92,633 i 6,726.00 21,739.85 10,037.13 4 4,645 39,946 38,328 3,368 779 1,359 83780 Apr 102250 83 17 2 3 3 i)83,935 0 oO 0 83,935 i)6,207.00 20,061.31 21,107.00 4 3,140 37,084 32.641 2,916 496 1,425 74562 Kwigiltingok PCE -MAY 10 May 102250 83 17 2 3 3 i)80,790 0 0 0 80,790 i)6,134.00 19,824.51 11,208.88 4 3,140 36,976 29,714 2,806 0 1,604 71100KwigillingokPCE-JUNE 10 Jun =102250 83 7 2 3 3 0 72,565 QO 0 0 72,565 0 5,593.00 18,077.19 17,782.37 4 3,774 34,146 21,835 2,261 i)1,735 §9977 33229 984,591 i')i)0 984,591 is)73,443.00 253,245.77 147,856.10 37,659 444,365 364,503 37,399 3,908 18,977 859152 10225003 Napakiak PCE -JULY 09 Jul 102250 100 17 4 3 2 t)i+)0 i)9 i)42,240 BethelUtilitiesCorporation 9.00 0.00 4,450.70 0 0 20,849 7,805 2,577 1,413 1 32645 Napakiak PCE -AUG 09 Aug 102250 100 17 4 8 2 i)0 i')0 [4]0 42,240 BethelUtilitiesCorporation 7,487.00 0.00 0.00 [4]0 27,181 7,597 2,137 1,803 1 38719 Napakiak PCE -SEPT 09 Sept 102250 401 18 4 8 2 0 0 0 i)90 it)43,680 BethelUtilitiesCorporation 9.00 0.00 16,581.32 Le)Q 26,974 7,425 2,590 2,384 0 39370 Napakiak PCE -OCT 09 Oct 102250 100 18 4 9 2 )0 [e)te)[)it)48,000 BethelUtilitiesCorporation 9.00 0.00 13,230.03 tt)is)31,061 8,716 2,522 2,674 91 45064 Napakiak PCE -NOV 09.Nov 102250 100 18 4 9 2 i)800 Qo 0 0 800 54,240 BethelUtilitiesCorporation 303.00 0.00 7,176.75 0 0 32,443 9,126 2,770 2,762 91 47192 Napakiak PCE -DEC 09 Dec 102250 100 19 4 9 2 is}80 0 i)i)80 58,080 BethelUtilitiesCorp 110.00 4.95 9,512.08 0 0 35,431 11,698 2,634 3,302 1,482 54547 Napakiak PCE-JAN 10 Jan 102250 1400 20 4 9 3 0 0 Q 0 0 Oo 65,280 BETHELUTILITIESCORP 0.00 0.00 18,863.81 0 ty 36,257 12,454 2,562 3,083 697 55053 Napakiak PCE -FEB 10 Feb 102250 100 18 4 9 2 0 0 [)0 0 i)54,720 BethelUtilitiesCorporation 0.00 0.00 8,251.68 0 Lt)35,107 12,420 2,647 2,610 58 52842 Napakiak PCE MAR 10 Mar 102250 101 18 4 9 2 i)iy i)0 9 0 62,400 BETHELUTILITIESCORPORATION 0.00 0.00 13,305.39 0 0 33,469 17,084 2,806 4,052 188 57599 Napakiak PCE-APRIL 10 Apr =102250 103 18 4 9 2 0 0 0 t')0 it)52,800 BETHELUTILITIESCORPORATION 0.00 0.00 114,222.69 0 0 30,823 12,315 2,526 3,628 188 49480 Napakiak PCE -MAY 10 May 102250 104 18 4 9 2 i)0 i')i}0 i}48,480 BETHELUTILITIESCORPORATION 0.00 0.00 8,592.99 is)0 26,325 9,004 2,272 3,116 132 40848 Napakiak PCE -JUNE 10 Jun =102250 104 18 4 i]2 0 9 0 LV)0 Oo 90 0.00 9.00 14,107.48 0 i')29,737 8,991 2,550 3,204 120 44602 332300 880 0 0 0 880 572,160 7,900.00 4.95 124,294.89 0 365,654 124,635 30,593 34,030 3,049 557961 10225003 Napaskiak PCE -JULY 09 Jul 102250 7 3 T 4 9 0 63,620 0 0 Qo 63,620 Lt)5,246.00 20,894.82 22,448.68 4 2,636 32,720 14,146 2,766 278 2,442 52352 Napaskiak PCE -AUG 09 Aug 102250 77 13 7 4 9 0 67,067 QO i')0 67,067 0 5,894.00 28,276.47 16,253.20 4 3,581 34,824 16,046 2,915 712 2,831 §7328 Napaskiak PCE -SEPT 09 Sept 102250 107 5 10 3 "L)0 Qo 0 it)0 0 5,369.00 21,384.73 16,825.35 3 is)34,664 15,909 4,014 888 2,981 58456 Napaskiak PCE -OCT 09 Oct 102250 107 §10 3 "it)0 o 0 i)°o 6,702.00 23,127.93 11,462.43 3 1,481 39,165,18,305 5,606 1,228 4,063 68367NapaskiakPCE-NOV 09 Nov 102250 107 5 10 3 "1 0 0 Qo QO 0 i)0 7,422.00 25,612.58 15,535.35 3 4,842 43,074 18,603 8,596 2,002 4,599 76874 Napaskiak PCE -DEC 09 Dec 102250 107 §10 3 "1 0 0 0 t)0 0 0 7,477.00 25,802.38 22,859.29 3 4,840 46,033 48,918 8,764 1,803 5,666 80184 Napaskiak PCE-JAN 10 Jan 102250 107 5 10 3 "1 0 i)Y)QO 0 Q 0 7,713.00 26,616.79 11,391.89 3 6,425 46,732 19,286 8,521 1,613 7,691 83843, Napaskiak PCE FEB 10 Feb 102250 107 5 10 3 "0 0 iV 90 0 0 o 6,826.00 23,555.84 11,331.14 3 5,425 40,529 17,867 7,494 1,582 423,988 491457NapaskiakPCE-MAR 10 Feb 102250 107 5 10 3 "G 97,451 0 i')0 97,451 0 6,826.00 23,555.84 11,331.14 3 5,425 40,222 19,873 8,253 1,824 6,689 76561 Napaskiak PCE-APRIL 10 Apr =102250 107 5 10 3 "0 83,899 ty i)i)83,899 0 6,429.00 22,185.84 23,008.51 3 3,401 31,212 17,072 7,153 1,309 2,571 59317 Napaskiak PCE -MAY 10 May 102250 107 5 10 3 WV oO 73,799 Qo 0 i')73,799 0 5,592.00 22,978.65 14,156.97 3 2,050 32,255 16,279 4,932 1,237 3,482 58185NapaskiakPCE-JUNE 10 Jun =102250 107 5 10 3 11 0 62,208 i}Qo [¢)62,208 0 4,546.00 18,680.42 21,609.56 3 1,877 29,054 12,870 3,573 1,229 2,487 49213 322510 448,044 0 ()()448,044 °76,042.00 282,672.29 198,213.51 40,983 449,484 205,174 72,584 15,405 «469,490 «1212137 10225003 Kongiganak PCE -JULY 09 Jul 102250 95 16 4 2 6 Qo 86,006 iy 0 te)86,006 oO 7,690.00 33,067.00 0.00 4 0 36,305 24,690 6,299 38 $11 67843 Kongiganak PCE -AUG 09 Aug 102250 96 16 4 2 6 0 96,503 [+]id i')95,503 0 7,690.00 33,067.00 0.00 4 i)39,800 27,187 6,475 §2 496 73980 Kongiganak PCE -SEPT 09 Sept 102250 96 16 4 2 6 ty 99,765 oO 0 90 99,765 0 7,690.00 33,067.00 0.00 4 0 40,481 29,086 7,297 136 571 77571 Kongiqanak PCE -OCT 09 Oct 102250 96 7 4 2 6 Qa 102,858 i)9 0 102,858 0 7,690.00 10,380.73 0.00 3 0 44,216 38,361 7,507 149 597 90830 Kongiqanak PCE -NOV 09 Nov 102250 96 18 5 8 7 QO 115,767 0 Qo is)118,767 Q 7,690.00 24,384.99 0.00 3 9 46,451 36,906 8,127 106 1,821 93411 Kongiqanak PCE-DEC 09 Bec 102250 96 17 5 8 7 0 113,505 0 0 Le)113,505 i)7,690.00 33,067.00 0.00 3 0 46,462 36,167 8,407 315 1,049 92400 Kongiganak PCE-JAN 10 Jan 102250 96 7 5 8 7 Oo 128,862 i]it]0 128,862 0 7,690.00 33,067.00 0.00 3 tv)49,803 41,337 10,734 875 1,209 103958KongiqanakPCE-FEB 10 Feb 102250 97 18 5 8 7 o 108,298 0 0 Lt)108,298 0 7,690.00 33,067.00 0.00 3 °42,056 34,995 8,003 744 979 86777 Kongiganak PCE MAR 10 Mar 102250 99 16 5 8 7 i)121,092 o 0 0 121,092 i}7,690.00 24,384.99 0.00 4 0 45,163 37,947 8,525 900 1,084 93619KongiganakPCE-APRIL 10 Apr =102250 99 16 5 8 7 Qo 110,633 0 L)0 110,633 i)7,690.00 24,384.99 0.00 4 tt)41,736 3,288 7,342 656 1,008 85030KongiganakPCE-MAY 10 May 102250 99 16 5 8 7 Qa 103,133 0 i)i)103,133 0 7,948.00 25,203.11 0.00 3 0 42,372 28,343 7,248 51 916 78930 Kongiganak PCE -JUNE 10 Jun 102250 101 16 §8 7 90 87,945 i)Q 0 87,945 °6,985.00 22,149.44 0.00 3 3,185 39,971 21,701 7,495 107 581 69825 392710 1,273,367 it)9 i)1,273,367 Qo 91,833.00 329,290.25 0.00 3,185 514,816 390,978 93,459 4,129 40,792 1014174 10225003 Tuluksak PCE -JULY 09 Jul 102250 8s 9 5 1 4 t]43,281 0 0 i)43,281 Lt)3,729.00 18,010.70 6,011.88 5 2,231 24,777 11,402 4,960 75 1,721 42935 Tuiuksak PCE -AUG 09 Aug =102250 85 9 5 1 4 Q 44,357 QO ty o 44,357 0 4,228.00 20,421.24 5,749.77 §2,046 16,167 12,507 3,233 58 1,047 33012 Tultuksak PCE -SEPT 09 Sept 102250 85 9 5 1 4 te)46,962 0 Qo 0 46,962 0 3,887.00 18,774.21 9,347.69 5 1,921 16,341 11,383 3,288 45 1,072 32129 Tultuksak PCE -OCT 09 Oct 102250 85 9 §2 4 (3)62,212 Qo Q iy §2,212 0 3,754.00 18,131.44 5,848.96 3 2,352 24,951 16,973 4,660 105 2,174 48863 Tuluksak PCE -NOV 09 Nov 102250 85 9 §2 4 i)93,092 ty 0 0 93,092 i}5,712.00 27,588.39 2,749.58 3 2,480 25,174 14,816 4,576 115 1,894 46575 Tuluksak PCE -DEC 09 Dec 102250 85 9 5 2 4 0 56,044 Qo 0 90 56,044 0 1,310.00 6,327.17 5,145.14 3 1,897 26,597 11,732 4,657 120 1,937 45043 Tuluksak PCE -JAN 10 Jan 102250 84 9 §2 4 0 73,557 0 i)ti)73,557 0 6,042.00 29,182.26 10,973.53 3 3,145 26,220 14,108 4,638 117 1,923 47006 Tuluksak PCE -FEB 10 Feb 102250 84 9 5 2 4 0 $1,229 ty 0 0 $1,229 [e)4,847.00 23,410.53 2,713.44 3 2,012 22,182 15,129 4,355 50 1,782 43498 Tuluksak PCE -MAR 10 Mar 102250 84 9 §2 4 Ly 55,187 °0 Qo 55,187 Q 2,153.00 10,398.77 7,200.85 3 1,484 21,005 10,260 4,353 57 1,781 37546 Tuluksak PCE -APRIL 10 Apr =102250 84 9 5 2 4 Ly)53,630 0 it}i)53,630 )8,645.00 41,754.49 7,619.87 3 3,115 22,588 11,941 4,400 64 1,781 40774 Tuluksak PCE -MAY 10 May 102250 a4 9 5 2 4 QO 49,386 Lt)0 [¢)49,386 Q 4,523.00 21,845.64 7,055.08 3 2,106 27,493 14,573 4,571 62 1,314 48013 Tuluksak PCE -JUNE 10 Jun =102250 84 9 5 2 4 iy 48,134 0 0 0 48,134 9 4,077.00 19,691.50 5,414.40 3 2,033 22,228 11,989 3,986 61 2,295 40559 332720 667,071 i)i)0 667,071 0 52,907.00 255,536.34 75,830.19 26,821 275,813 156,813 51,677 929 20,721 505953 10225003 Tuntutuliak PCE -JULY 09 Jul 102250 86 27 7 4 6 VY)65,825 0 [e)te)65,825 iy 6,114.00 16,030.21 0.00 3 2,903 28,811 17,778 2,644 328 459 50020TuntutuliakPCE-AUG 09 Aug 102250 92 26 7 §6 Q 76,605 i)Qo 0 76,605 0 5,067.00 13,286.97 0.00 3 6,835 30,095 24,237 3,543 443 1,445 59763TuntutuliakPCE-SEPT 09 Sept 102250 92 26 7 5 6 0 85,162 LY)Q iy 85,162 0 7,435.00 19,495.58 0.00 3 3,146 31,871 28,580 3,909 408 584 65352TuntutuliakPCE-OCT 09 Oct 102250 92 26 7 5 6 Q 72,490 QO 0 0 72,490 0 5,969.00 15,652.37 0.00 3 2,754 34,748 12,120 4,474 528 848 49718TuntutuliakPCE-NOV 09 Nev 102250 92 26 7 5 6 ()0 Qo 0 0 Ls)i 6,224.00 16,320.74 0.00 3 0 32,987 34,369 4,732 1,352 848 74288TuntutuliakPCE-DEC 09 Dec 102250 92 26 7 5 6 it)i)0 Qo ti)[)0 7,735.00 20,281.68 0.00 3 1,860 35,220 35,619 5,031 2,301 848 79019TuntutuliakPCE-JAN 10 dan =102250 92 26 7 5 6 ()0 Oo 0 ti)0 0 6,719.00 17,616.58 0.00 3 35,032 38,350 §,447 2,392 848 82069TuntutuliakPCE-FEB 10 Feb 102250 92 26 7 5 6 0 i)is)0 0 0 0 6,475.00 19,871.81 20,041.28 3 0 32,671 41,784 5,258 2,161 3848 82722 . Tuntutuliak PCE MAR 10 Mar 102250 92 26 7 5 6 te)66,224 0 9 0 66,224 0 7,690.00 23,601.99 23,618.23 3 2,086 27,856 38,498 1,446 2,866 848 71814TuntutuliakPCE-APRIL 10 Apr =102250 92 26 7 5 6 i)88,172 0 0 0 88,172 te)6,219.00 19,085.81 13,023.44 3 2,349 30,125 39,257 4,944 1,354 848 76528TuntutuliakPCE-MAY 10 May 102250 92 26 7 §6 i)78,093 Q ty it)78,093 [e)5,797.00 17,790.96 23,600.18 3 2,652 29,368 37,458 4,840 1,641 848 74155TuntutuliakPCE-JUNE 10 Jun =102250 92 26 7 §6 te)65,020 Q 0 oO 65,020 0 6,277.00 19,263.82 15,692.99 3 2,994 31,356 18,033 4,591 853 848 55681 597,591 [')0 i)597,591 a 77,721.00 218,298.52 95,976.12 27,579 377,140 366,083 50,859 16,627 10.120 820829 CADocuments and Settings\jwilliams\Desktop\Bethel Region UtilityStatisti E;ded-Jet FY10.x!sDetail . eae ” .Mike Harperty From:Audrey Alstrom Sent:Tuesday,February 15,2011 3:13 PM To:Peter Crimp;Mike Harper Ce:Bruce Tiedeman Subject:FW:Kisaralik/Chikuminuk hydro report And here are the comments that were submitted to MWH,which has our comments and AVCP RHA's.Let me know if you have any questions. Audrey From:Allen Joseph [mailto:ajoseph@avcphousing.org] Sent:Tuesday,February 15,2011 1:16 PM To:Heather Williams Cc:Audrey Alstrom;Douglas Ott Subject:Kisaralik/Chikuminuk hydro report Hi Heather, Our comments and AEA's (after mine,below): 1.In references to AVCP throughout,the client for which the draft was done,it should be listed as AVCP RHA,as there is another organization in Bethel that goes by the name "AVCP.” 2.Executive Summary -agree with MWH that Lake Chikuminuk project should be pursued. 3.Introduction section,pg.1-3 and Chapter 15 -Regional Wholesale Utility Planning and Development section missing.A couple of the most asked questions when discussing this project with others are,"What is the estimated cost per Kwh to the consumer when this is complete?” and "Why are we are pursuing this project.”People understand they might be paying lower electricity when this project is ever built,so they would like to see a comparison of what they pay now (with diesel)and what they could pay for in the future (with hydropower).So we do need to understand the worth or value of continuing to pursue the project. 4.Chapter 3,Land Use and Environmental Constraints pg.3-1.:when mentioning salmon species,include pink salmon. 5.Chapter 6,Site Specific Geological assessments,#6.1.3,page 6-2.There is some concern that the rising of the water level of Lake Chikuminuk will cause permafrost to melt.How do we prevent this? 6.Chapter 7,Power Concepts,#7.2,page 7-3.Another creator of debris to watch out for is the beaver.In Bethel around the city,they are always clearing beaver dams in front of culverts intended to help drain streams and sloughs.Beavers develop some of the toughest debris to clean. 7.Jter 8,Transmission Line Planning.When we talk about string...up lines we create killer zones for migrating birds,such as p......igan. While it probably can't be helped,its good to note that the Napakiak and Oscarville power lines kills hundreds of birds mostly ptarmigan during their fall and spring migrations.|wonder how we could try to prevent so much birds from being killed?The Kuskokwim and Kilbuck Mts.are noted for being excellent habitat for birds of prey. 8.Chapter 8 again,#8.12,Budgetary Cost Estimates.It is noted that rights of way acquisitions and costs are not included.Is it because the costs are anticipated to be nominal?Then we should probably say so. 9.Chapter 9,Fish Passage Considerations.AVCP Housing is concerned for what seems to be an overly dependence on man and machine to solve the fish passage issues.Machines break and man fails.Fish move in streams 24-hours a day,not just in summer but even in deep winter (#9.5).Resident fish migrate seasonally,for feeding and spawning or wintering.Since the dam(s)are permanent structures, equipment at the end of their working lives or during break downs over the years may take weeks or months to replace.Workers may not -be able to reach the dam sites especially during long term weather situations.Therefore,passageways or something more natural or with little to no equipment that allows fish passage without much maintenance or without man's help should be thoroughly examined. 10.Chapter 10,Environmental and Permitting,#10.3.2,page 10-5.The list of stakeholders should include all the 13 villages/cities as well as Orutsaramiut Native Council in Bethel and Cenaulilriit (local Coastal Zone Management Council).The communities in the Bristol Bay region are closer to Lake Chikuminuk and use the area more so than Bethel or its surrounding villages so they may want a say in what goes on in their backyard. 11.Chapter 10,#10.3.5,pg 10-7.Cenaulilriit,if they have jurisdiction in this project,and AVCP (not AVCP RHA)should be included in the naming of agencies that discuss concerns and address problems in the region. 12.Chapter 10,#10.3.5,pg 10-8.We agree with conclusion that special legislation is needed to allow development of a hydropower project in the Chikuminuk Lake area. 13.Chapter 10,#10.3.5,pg 10-9.We may need to determine how much sockeye utilize the lower reaches of Allen Creek,and how they will be affected by the dewatering of the creek. 14.Chapter 14,#14.1 Service Area,pg 14-1.Oscarville and Napakiak are the two villages to which powerlines from Bethel go. 15.Exhibit 10 needs to be titled "Exhibit 10.”It is listed as "Page 1.” -Allen J. Allen Joseph Grants Coordinator AVCP Regional Housing Authority P.O.Box 767 Bethel,AK 99559 543-0079 ajoseph@avcphousing.org From:Audrey Alstrom [mailto:aalstrom@aidea.org] Sent:Monday,February 14,2011 10:01 AM _To:Alle eph Cc:Douglas Ott Subject:Kisaralik/Chikuminuk hydro report Allen, Doug and |have completed our review of the "Kisaralik River and Chikuminuk Lake Reconnaissance and Preliminary Hydropower Feasibility Study”,dated January 2011.Following are our comments.Please share with your consultant for incorporation/discussion into the final report.We may have additional comments after receiving a draft containing the Regional Wholesale Utility Planning and Development section,which was missing from the draft we reviewed. Please contact me with any questions. Thank you,Audrey 1.Page ES-1:Describe all surrounding Bethel communities considered in this study in a footnote to last sentence in second paragraph. Page ES-4 and page 14-9:Consider extending the NPV calculations to the 50 year life of the hydro plants instead of the 20 years currently provided. 3.Page ES-4 and Page 14-8:Economic Evaluation:Adding electric heating sales to the hydro projects would increase their value and offset heating oil costs. 4.ES-4 and Section 14:Table on page ES-4 shows %Grant Funding Required.Unclear how this was established for each site after reading the Economic Evaluation sections.Please provide more thorough explanation.Consider computing economic evaluation with varying %of grant funding for each project. 5.Page ES-4 and ES-5:Conclusion.|agree Chikuminuk Lake hydro project appears to have the highest potential economic returns of the four hydro projects considered in this study.|also concur with MWH that Chikuminuk Lake is the best candidate for further study in the future. Pages iii and iv:Update the titles to Exhibits 1-4 to read:Kisaralik River and Chikuminuk Lake Regional Map,(Also Location Map,Drainage Basin Boundaries and Regional Geological Map). 7.Page 1-3:Missing 1.1.9 Regional Wholesale Utility Planning and Development section 8.Page 3-1:Add Preliminary Permit to discussion of milestones in a FERC license process. 9.Page 4-4:Provide consistent horizontal (y-axis)grid lines on this figure for Flow. 10.Page 4-7:Top paragraph refers to Table H-8,could not locate table. 11.Page 7-1:If the three Kisaralik sites were considered as high volume,low head,diversion structure type projects,the fish passage issues might be able to be accommodated without dams,using the natural streambeds and bypass environmental flows.This option was ruled out in the second paragraph on this page.It would be helpful to know what available energy and associated construction costs might be provided for these types of development at the three Kisaralik sites. 12.Page 7-3:Not sure how the dam intake screens will be kept clear from frazil ice,ice floes,and log jams.Applies to all four sites. 13.Page 8-7:Section 8.12 refers to Table 17 but Table 18 seems more appropriate. 14.Page 8-8:Section E-F has error in first sentence.Na 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 9-1:The fish passage facilities are very expensive and unprecede in Alaska hydro history.Particularly for Chikuminuk,where therc ._..9 anadromous population to accommodate,need to have a more detailed narrative provided to describe the resident fish species,their timing and populations that would need to use such a facility.It would be ideal if some simpler alternative approach was available to address this issue. Page 9-1:Cold weather operations for these fish passage facilities appear to be very problematic,including the accommodation of frazil ice,ice floes, glaciation,etc. Page 9-2:Unclear how the attractant flows for the floating surface (fish)collectors are routed.Do they discharge down the flume (outside of the turbine conduit)or do they merely re-circulate water back into the dam reservoir? Page 9-4:In your experience,for downstream fish passage,would 90%capture efficiency be good enough to meet the resource agency standards? Page 11-1:All four projects are proposed to have fish passage facilities,yet it appears the energy generation estimates have excluded any environmental flows.Some evaluation of the impacts to annual energy production for these facilities should be provided. Page 11-1:Would like to see actual energy demand by month data provided in Figure 12 (not just the pattern of use)for a given year (say mid-range estimates for 2022),consistent with those generation model results displayed in Figures 13 -16. Chapter 11:Would like to see a discussion and display of Useable Energy by month in this chapter for each project site.(Note this data has been summarized for year 2022 in the Executive summary).It could be added to Figures 13 -16.This would help display the mis-alignment of load and generation potential for the Kisaralik sites and confirm the benefits of reservoir regulation to match seasonal loads at Chikuminuk. Chapter 12 and Exhibit 9:A 5000 foot long runway and a multi thousand foot long cut-off wall has been indicated as significant project features in Chapter 6 for Lake Chikuminuk and airport runways have also been recommended for access to the three Kisaralik sites.Have these costs been factoredintotheconstructioncostestimatesfortheseprojects? Page 14-8:Please explain the following statement from the bottom of this page:"In most cases,the energy available for generation more than meets the electric energy requirements of the villages.”This statement is only true if some way to store annual energy produced could be provided to re- distribute energy to satisfy the demand.Since that luxury does not exist for any of these projects,we know that some diesel generation will be required to meet the balance of the loads when the hydro plant output is low. Tables 24 and 25:Please verify the economic analyses provided in Tables 24 and 25 include the ancillary costs of diesel generation needed to meet load for the various hydropower projects. Chapter 15:Missing this chapter:Regional Wholesale Utility Planning and Development Exhibit 1:Add names of villages to be served on this regional map of the Bethel area. Hhudrey Motion,ETT Assistant Project Manager -Hydro Alaska Energy Authority 813 West Northern Lights Blvd. Anchorage AK 99503 Phone:907-771-3045 Fax:907-771-3044 Email:aalstrom@aidea.org '«€sisSfasFAstaft<< ®The plan will =consider energy issues o For other communities;withelectricpowerAO o For communities with only biom generation of heat =Develop new load forecasts for electric systems assee ®The plan will «Identify energy technologies that: employed in Interior Alaska =Develop financing approaches for énergy e vo./9 coinfrastructure., »Emerging technologies,useful inshighway connectd.areas as welli:as remote communities.»Be a public process,to be-developed afterlistening*to residents of the Interior FUNDING SOURCE ®funding by AEA $100,000 ®Funding by Denali Commission©Cooperative effort between Tanana:Chiefs Alaska&Center for Energy and PROJ ECT TAS KS Upper Tanana,et al) o Community specific issuesoDetailedloadforecasts:that Consider inespected loadgrowthsforheating,'new technologiesspecific to eachcommunity”and.utility.X°Subregional:Technical Conferences and publictown/village meetings ©.,fo)Technical engineers and project staff from AEA,ASEP,AVEC,AP &T to speak and teachoProvide.Energy.101 to understand power generation,heating,Interior AlaskacoeoHearfrompubliconenergy issues (example:high cost ofheatingwithdieselinremotecommunities) é sefeS o Consider the risk of. inaccessible,terrain. and:'energy infrastructure.projects°Maximize use ofrenewable energy sources°Considernew technologies to control growth ofconsumptionaoConsider'bothheating and electric projects,as well asenergyefficiencyofdistributionandbuildingsystems. SCHEDULE ®First teaching and public meeting »Two day conference -April ,2011 =1 %days of presentations conference ©Take-away for Planning team:What issues must be dealt nthe plan that affect SCHEDULE ®By October of 2011 address energy costs and reliability forall ofInteriorAlaska. |: oO Oo CHEDULE -DRAFT RE ©By December 2011 ©A draft regional plan wotinfrastructure,e(pores generation, public comment. 11 oO Oo SCHEDULE -FINAL REPOR ®By January 2011 ©A final report, ©Availab ecosecurereeoRemic energy future for Interior Alaska. 12 ©Actively seek input on energy i From Interior Alaskans business people Utilities Advisory.Wo ent'this economy.Se 13 Native Regional Corp. Native Non-Profit Tanana Chiefs Conference Major Utility Alaska VillageaElectricCoop- Major Utility University - Koyukuk,Ft.Yukon Anterior RegionalHousingAuthority Smaller Utility Housing Authority Fuel Supplier Ruby Marine The Southeast Alaska Integrated Resource Plan (SEIRP)project Alaska Energy Authority Jim Strandberg 2/28/11 Purpose and Goals ¢The SEIRP is a 50 year plan for energy projects and transmission lines in Southeast Alaska. ¢The plan will: -Identify energy issues that affect SE Alaskans -Project growth in electricity demand dentify which power projects and transmission ines need to be built Develop an action plan for all stakeholders Funding Source Legislative Appropriation for SE IRP and IRP for Southeast Alaska Power Agency (SEAPA) system -$500,000 Additional funding by AEA -$250,000 Project combines detailed work with SEAPA integrated plan with Southeast regional plan Cooperative effort between SEAPA and AEA. Purpose and Goals ¢The plan will -consider energy issues ¢for remote SE communities,that must generate power and heat with diesel oil. ¢For SE communities with available hydro electric power -Consider impact of electric resistance heating, possibility of electric cars,and biomass heating for SE communities (both remote and urban). -Develop new load forecasts for electric systems Purpose and Goals ¢The plan will -Identify energy technologies that can be employed in SE. -Develop financing approaches for energy infrastructure. -Tally emerging technologies useful in urban areas as well as remote communities. -Be a public process,to be developed after listening to residents of SE Alaska. Project Tasks ¢The project has three major areas of endeavor -Load Forecasting and energy issues ¢Regional issues ¢Community specific issues ¢Detailed load forecasts that consider unexpected load growths for heating,new technologies,and possibility of electric cars,specific to each community and utility. -Technical Conference and public town meeting e Experts from SE Alaska to speak and teach ¢Provide Energy 101 to understand power generation, heating,and transportation in SE Alaska ¢Hear from SE public on energy issues (example:high cost of heating with diesel in remote communities) Project Tasks ¢The project has three major areas of endeavor -Transmission line planning ¢Rational,economic approach to connecting communities ¢Consider the risk of relying on submarine cables and Interties through rough,inaccessible terrain -Economically ordered list of power generation and energy infrastructure projects ¢Maximize use of renewable energy sources ¢Consider new technologies to control growth of consumption ¢Consider both heating and electric projects,as well as energy efficiency of distribution and building systems. Project Tasks The project includes development of an specific integrated resource plan for the Southeast Alaska Power Agency (SEAPA)system -Includes existing SEAPA system and its current three members,Petersburg,Wrangell and Ketchikan -Economically ordered list of power generation and energy infrastructure projects ¢For the SEAPA system ¢Integrated into the overall ordered list for SE Alaska Work to be fully integrated into the SE regional plan. Cooperative effort with SEAPA Schedule ¢First teaching and public meeting conference -Two day conference -April 215t and 22",2011 -1 %days of presentations -¥%day of public town meeting format ¢Take-away for Planning team:What issues must be dealt with in the plan that affect the energy future of SE Alaskans.(A list to be the foundation of the regional plan) Schedule ¢By October of 2011 ¢A list of energy infrastructure projects that can be undertaken in the next three years to address energy costs and reliability for all of SE Alaska. ¢A list of actions that can be taken by SE Alaskans that require coordinated action between utilities,SE Alaskans,and the Alaskan business community. Schedule -Draft Report ¢By December 2011 ¢A draft regional plan -complete with action plan,to mobilize SE stakeholders for coordinated action -list of capital projects to develop SE energy infrastructure (power generation,transmission and heating,and transportation) -Specific Integrated Plan for the SEAPA network ¢Presented to SE Alaska at the second public meeting,for public comment. Schedule -Final Report By January 2011 A final report, Available for consideration by legislators and funders A finalized list of capital projects to develop SE energy infrastructure (power generation, transmission and heating,and transportation) Take Away:A coordinated capital and action plan for SE Alaska residents,their Bankers,Municipal Gov'ts,Utilities,and SE investors to develop a secure and economic energy future for SE Alaska. AEA approach to this work Actively seek input from SE Alaskans on energy issues From SE Alaskans Utilities From the participants in the SE economy that depend on energy.(Likely all participants) Advisory Work Group to represent this SE economy., Advisory Work Group Roster AEA SE IRP Advisory Work Group Roster -2/3/11 Category ARDOR/trade group Robert Venables Energy Coordinator SEC Elected Officials Merrill Sanford Assembly member,Juneau Juneau City and Borough Henrich Kadake City Mayor City of Kake Jeremy Maxand Mayor Wrangell Borough Utilities Mike Kline Electric utility superintendent Ketchikan Public Utilities Paul Bryant General Manager Metlakatla Power &Light Steve Henson Superintendent Wrangell Light and Power Joe Nelson Superintendent Petersburg Municipal Power &Light Chris Brewton Superintendent Sitka Electric Utility Tim McLeod President Alaska Electric Light and Power Jodi Mitchell ceo Inside Passage Electric Cooperative Bob Grimm CEO Alaska Power &Telephone Company Dave Carlson CEO Southeast Alaska Power Agency Scott Newlun Electric utility superintendent Yakatat Power Federal Government Barbara Stanley Energy Coordinator USDA Forest Service Beth Pendleton (invited)Regional Forester USDA Forest Service Environmental Community Dan Lesh Energy Coordinator SEACC Chair of Huna Totem Corporation,Hoonah, Village Corporations Russell Dick Board Chair Alaska Regional Corporation Rick Harris Executive Vice President Sealaska Corporation Private Sector Power Producers Paul Southland Special Project Director ACE Coalition Business Sector Bill Corbus Chairman of the Board and Owner Alaska Electric Light and Power Fy wg Flann nfALASKA-ENERGY lee Contract for Southeast Alaska Regional Integrated Resources Plan (RIRP) Between Black &Veatch Corporation And The Alaska Energy Authority RFP 2011-0800-9846 Contract #AEA 11-032 AEA 813 West Northern Lights Blvd. Anchorage,AK 99503 (907 771-3000 Project Manager:James Strandberg Phone:907-771-3069 E-mail:jstrandberg@aidea.org Contracting Officer:Christopher Rutz Phone:907-771-3015 E-mail:crutz@aidea.org SEAPA Project Manager Eric Wolfe Southeast Conference Project Manager Robert Venables Black &Veatch Corporation 11401 Lamar Ave Overland Park,Kansas 66211 Project Contact Information Black &Veatch Corporation24513SE37"Street Issaquah,WA 98029 Project Director:Kevin Harper Tel:425-247-1652, Cell:425-941-6061 E-mail:HarperKM@bv.com Project Manager:Myron RollinsTel:913-458-7432 E-mail:rollinsmr@bv.com HDR Project Director Bob Butera HDR Project Manager Paul Berkshire,P.E. STANDARD AGREEMENT FORM FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES........sccssssssssssssssseecsssneseseneesssseseserensneneneee 4 APPENDIX A GENERAL PROVISIONS ..u....ccccsssccsssssssresnsccsenessesensneasensnsassecssacsesessaaaeesssasssansasasnsessocesnsesseaesseses 5 ARTICLE 1.DEFINITIONS........::ccccssescsssecccsneceensocsccsececsseeenteesssseensnsesssseseauensesensessneceaesnaaedusuaeenseaneesenenensaeerssensseeeeaseas 5 ARTICLE 2.INSPECTION AND REPORTS.......::sccccssssssscsssccessssneeeeeessnanensecaesscceueseasanesessaueecesessdeaaeaeeassseeseneseeesessanenees 5 ARTICLE 3.DISPUTES..........cseccccesesesessncecessccesstecsseaecsssensaceesestecessaeenesaaneasaneeesessaeeeaessseeeassueesesacacasaeeesausesnecesaneesenes 5 ARTICLE 4,EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY.......cssscsscessscssscesstessesessseessnesesseesususessenessasecensessaeesseesneetsnaecenseneseaness 5 ARTICLE 5.TERMINATION,......ccsccccsssccessssecessececsssceusstsessnecessneessaneuseseessenssuaesassaaeecescaaaeecsaaaaasecsaenssueaeeaaecsssasensansanseeess 6 ARTICLE 6.NO ASSIGNMENT OR DELEGATION.........ssssssscccsssscessonesssesecessesecensanacessssaneesensuacersnssenesasenenacesssneepacerersecers 6 ARTICLE 7.NO ADDITIONAL WORK OR MATERIAL.......cccsscssssccesssceceneneessnescesssecensersacerecenseseseracesevsnaeenaereceaessenersnenened 6 ARTICLE 8.INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR......sccccssscceessecssescssesesssceesssnecesenenceesranseeessnenseeasenseesenaneenenedseasesasenssosersecteres 6 ARTICLE 9.PAYMENT OF TAXES.......cccccccssssssscccecsssseecessssesscsecesceescssneneesenescsscesnseesasenensanseseesasoasaasessaseaceeensneeseassneeeeaes 6 ARTICLE 10.OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS........sccccssssecsseessscesssecesssneeeesseecasssusensanaasecensnaceceseneaensnsseseessansaeeeaaseasaueesas 6 ARTICLE 11.GOVERNING LAW.......::cccscsccscsssecssstecssseeesesensnecessassensuneensnscesenssaaaessesaeaaassaeecesaaeesssacansnuaesenaeessaeeessaaeenes 7 ARTICLE 12.CONFLICTING PROVISIONS.......:ccsssssssscssssssccseessesesarecsscesscesenseesseeensnsessuasesnsesensesensueseeesenseuacerteesenseaneae 7 ARTICLE 13.OFFICIALS NOT TO BENEFIT............csccceccesseccessseeceeessaenececenenaaeeeeceesesssanenanesensasenceerenseuaeneeesseaeeeeenenenenes 7 ARTICLE 14.COVENANT AGAINST CONTINGENT FEES.........:.ccssccccsssssccsscceecesssacecessaceeesesnaceeesaeeaacseescsasesaceeseeseneeeeses 7 APPENDIX A-SUPPLEMENTAL GENERAL PROVISIONG...........:ccsssssssssssccssesssesssseccessnscesseseessenerscarsessseseneseses 8 ARTICLE 15 CONFLICTS BETWEEN THE CONTRACT,RFP,OR CONTRACTORS PROPOSAL (3.6).......::seeceesseseeteeeeeeees 8 ARTICLE 16 PAYMENT PROCEDURES (3.7)......cccsssssssessscensesscscenscnscessnnsecaceenaesecaeesseseessceseeseasaeeseceesoeeeasecsseseeseeeeees 8 ARTICLE 17 CONTRACT PERSONNEL (3.8).......sscccssccesrecessccevsecconcnsceessseneasessseareseacaensessasacasseesasseceseaeesseeeseoneseseeeenee 8 ARTICLE 18 SUBCONTRACTORS (3.9)......ssscccssscscssrccssececsnsecsrencencessesenaneetessceeaseasseecesesseasacsssoasssseeseesseessoonsonseeesees 8 ARTICLE 19 CONTRACT INVALIDATION (3.12)......s:ccssssscesssesssscessecceecessseesseescncessanecesageseessacsesensaesscessoeeseaneseaeseeneees 8 ARTICLE 20 TERMINATION FOR DEFAULT (3.13)......ccccsccsssseccssccensscccceessecessssacesesssaneesssaneaerenseseseneesseeneseseasecsaasasseesss 8 ARTICLE 21.CONFLICT OF INTEREST (3.14).....ccesccsscsessescesseseeeenssesessesesscesescensseeeessesesaeseessseacessanesereereresenisessaae 9 ARTICLE 22 CONTRACT CHANGES (3.16).........::csesesecescsesseeeseeesoeeseeeeesnerscesensseesecsasesueusauasesseescesseesseeseseseseeeneceneoes 9. ARTICLE 23.RIGHT TO INSPECT PLACE OF BUSINESS (3.17)........ccssssccssserecsessecencrssnecesessatenessacesoearerenasessesaseesasaeenees 9 ARTICLE 24 CONFIDENTIALITY AND OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS (3.18)......cssccccsssecsseessseeeneceetsceesnensceeseaesesenaneseree 9 ARTICLE 25 REIMBURSEMENT TO THE AUTHORITY FOR UNACCEPTABLE DELIVERABLES (3.19).........::ccsecceseeseteeeeeteees 9 ARTICLE 26 =WARRANTY ......:cccccssscccesssenssnccesenscsenscccnanensaneceaceesnensecsanecesscuoasesessasnesessaaasascasasssceesscessenseeseeesonneoees 9ARTICLE27-_LIMITATIONS ........cccscccssseessseceseesssessacesssesssesessesesessnessceecenssessseesoanteqsqasessanecogsnsensasesassaseecaneaeseceseetioes 10 APPENDIX B'INDEMNITY AND INSURANCE .u....ccsscscssssscsssssssssssssssssssssssscsssersessusessassesascessvesesussanenseasenesnseaseases 11 ARTICLE 1.INDEMNIFICATION .........ssscccessscesssctecssscessnatcsnccsssneecenrseaassesesnnacesessnsecesesnsenacasacenenseeesenseoessaeecssasessasonsanecs 11 ARTICLE 2.INSURANCE ......cccsscccscsssccensececssenenencanecsasenesscenanercesaseveneecessneaseassessoeasacessasseaeeseaseedeacssessseeesacseeessssenosesenes 1 APPENDIX C -SCOPE OF WORK ............cssecccssserssseesssessesscssssrseossnnescananesassanesecesaeueranseusenseuessessecesenesasansscssoessauers 12 C.1 'CONTRACT PURPOSE AND GOALS ......ccccsssscssssccssecesteeeonsneesesanecessnecersseaaaaecsenaenasesdaseseseeeaaeaeeasensessssessneesonsoneees 12 C.2 PROJECT APPROACH.......ccsscesssecssscesssecsssceesscsaeescecsnessnaeseusensesessneesaueeseasesnessequeaessecsacsaeesacesseeeseeeseatensesseceraeees 12 C.2.1 PUbIIC PrOCOSSES.........cssccccscesrsecenensenncesesauensnenacnenacsesaansneceasasansacecnactensnansectessasscareeeresssssesessneasesseaeasees 13 C.2.2 AdVISOTY COMMIUECE .......cccsssccsssescsssneenssecsserensrecsnececeneneesssseneesessneesessnseesesnessoosasssucaeessscssssusseraeseneeseas 13 C.2.3 Components Of WOFK......cccsssccssesccsssssecenasensecsenesssncescsenecsenseetecsssaaesessdsessessceceossneseenenssusersunesssnsssoeeeeas 13 C.2.4 Schedule and Deliverables.........cccccccccsssssssnccccescssscessensccnnnacsonsneaceasessaaaaaaeaanaaasanesenecescusesasneesecersseesseuees 13 C.2.5 Planning HOsIZON..tssssscssesseccensncssancncnscccnnensecsersessenseseucesseoessesssececesienecessecascevsssssecsnenessssssesatoareoreneess 14 -C.2.6 Energy Policy Guideline .......ccccsscssesssssssssssssssssessnsescsssecesenessnensenscassssessanesssessssssesseasasucescseassnesenseeees 14 C.3 PROJECT TASKS .......ccscccessscccsssresessecccsscceessnesesssesasesesaueassaeeecenanenecensaeneeseasanenseeseaaascsessceseeaenersesnesssseesoonaeeens 14 C.3.1 Task 1 -Understand the Southeast Energy Model:Past,Present and Future .......::cccscccccsssesesesreeees 14 C.3.1.2 Contractor's Methodology Task 1 .......essscccsscsssnenscesseseseceeseseeseeessonseeessnseeesesceossoneasessssssassecsanenses 14 C.3.2 Task 2-Assess Existing and Future Energy TeChnologieS .........ssccsscccsscsssessssnersersonescsersscrsessssseseees 15 C.3.2.1 Contractor's Methodology Task 2............scccsssscssssccesssrscssssseesensacesensneessssnasecssdceanssseessesessseneeneesenees 16 C.3.3 Task 3 -Develop an Energy Conservation and Demand Side Management Program for SE Alaska 17 C.3.3.1 Contractor's Methodology Task 3.........cscccssssssscccsssscrscsseneesssenseeesscseesssecsecesessscasseeessssscoscascesssenseas 1 C.3.4 Task 4 -Financing the Southeast Energy Future...............duvsessestecsesscsscscesssaeceesscssesssaeacscesseseeaeasessasess 1 C.3.4.1 Contractor's Methodology Task 4..........ccsscesessssccenecesssseseeereeasencessssosenssesssneneesessecesecessnsesssansess 19 Table of Contents AE11-032 SE IRP Final Contract 2of 35 2/9/2011 C.3.5 Task 5--Technical Conference and Preliminary ACtion Plan ..........:ccccccccccsenccceceetonecereneneetreseeneeeraeess 19 C.3.5.1 Task 5.1 Participate in Technical Conference 1 ............cssscssssececeneceressecerseceenssseesesnesessesonsaneeeenes 19 C.3.5.2 Task 5.2 Develop a Preliminary Action Plan.............ccccccccsssscccececeesecceceeecesnoeceesersereeenssenseersseneeesnes 20 C.3.6 Task 6 -Develop a Region-wide Transmission Plan.uu....cccccssscccccsecssenceecetensenneecersrennesenseesevsseanseeesenes 21 C.3.6.1 Contractor's Methodology Task 6......ccccccscscsessscsssssnsesscsssonccesesensonaceecesenanenseeeseseneeseresseeseesssseseosneesees 22 C.3.7 Task 7 -Develop a Preferred Resource Lists for Interconnected Electrical Grid .............:csccceeees 24 C.3.8 Task 8 -Integrated Resource Planning (IRP)for the Southeast Alaska Power Agency (SEAPA).....25 €.3.8.1 IRP Requirement ............cccsssscsccecsssnsceesesecersssacesessesaacecevensaaesersessaecaeerersnensaeerecsecsesaseseaeesssausseneanees 25 C.3.8.1.1 Integration with Other Tasks .........eeccsessssscseeseesssenssceeesssseessesssscsseueesnsenseecessensessssesesseseaseeenes 25 C.3.8.1.2 Development of Load Forecasts for the SEAPA ReGioN ...............seecceeseeeeecesssseseevesseeesessnesenesseas 25 C.3.8.1.3 Modeling Requirements ..............ccsesccccesesesesccesceeeeeeeeeceecsesesseresseecsccecaneueeasereeessasesesenseets aueseeetene 25 C.3.8.1.4 Treatment of Kake and Metlakatla in SEAPA IRP ..........eeeececeeenesssecceesessenecessssneneraseneseeeeoes 26 C.3.8.1.5 Develop the Integrated Resource PI€n...........eceecesessscccceeseeesnecerererensvesanesesseseeesesseeessonsnanessnenens 26 C.3.8.1.6 Requirements for reporting IRP reSults .........ese secesesesseeesssncrensceneueneseesesesessssrscesereetsenseeees 26 C.3.8.2 Contractor Methodology Task 8...........:cccccssecccecesssecceessesseeesesesesseceeeseeeseneeseserscedsessoateenssenaseeasans 26 C.3.9 Task 9 -Planning for Insular COMMUNES .00......ccccccceseececccesenncceececenseneeneetecnanneescecserssesesaaceceeuseensenens 27 C.3.9.1 Contractor Methodology Task 9............csscccssseeceessceeeceeessceseceeeeeesaeseaeeeescusenerenensensentesserersrseeasoess 28 C.3.10 Task 10 -Provide Preliminary Capital Budgets for REGion-Wide IRP.......csssccccccseresesesensssernsesenseeees 28 C.3.11 Task 11 -Assemble Task Groups 1,2,and 3 Components into a Regional Plan.......ssscssccessecenes 28 C.3.12 Task 12 -PreSent the PION i iiccccccccccccessennetccecceccssseccecceeeneeersessesesesesscssecaconensesecesesssersneeeneceressnseenes 29 C.3.13 Task 13 -Complete the Plan.......cccccsssccccssscsesssenecesessnecceenssceneesecesaceestecscnnensesersrearesesesecasevesastsesseaes 29 C.3.14 Optional TaskS.........ccccsssesssssssssnsccccecsscevsnsnsecceesevensuvenssaeeeseessneesasesersetseseseseseasensenaceessosseanegneasensseneneees 29 C.4 MEETINGS.........cccecssssseccecesessseenecensesssaaseesasssaeeesecnsaeessnesensesssaeceeesssensenesessanaceeeseseseaeseneressecersesesdsasessereeeesssaas 29 C.4.1 KICKOFF M@CtING 20........cccssescsceeceesencceceesnsonsececconscsesnsececenneesereenscasererscananeesecererednacdesesssaesesseenseesevensssenunness 29 C.4.2 Southeast Stakeholder Me@etingS..........:.csccccseccssssssseccssnsssssssecesesenscaneeeseseeaccessaessenesseusessunssecousacsoneneness 29 C.4.3 Advisory Work Group Meeting .....cccsssscssssssessccssscenscneetsnnecssenessnsesenenseeessenenersnaseeveneesesetesssessseeosseesosess 30 C.4.5 Technical CONPCrONCES oe ccccccccccscssceversenseevessscssucnsascneensaasessannaceesesscaoesecsesanenaeesesenoesseceveneecensarertrnases 30 C.4.6 IN-OFICE SUPPOST.......sccccsseccsssssccscsnsceesonscesacecssacseransuconenesncsevsceseesnsaneoscsesssenececasssessenesersassessasesecooenenessass 30 C.5 DELIVERABLES............csssscccessescesssnececsnnsesssnseesssueesneessneensensesssnesusssneesesuaracseacecessseecesaueseuaceeseaaesensetsesenenecseenent®30 C.6 SCHEDULE ........cccccsssececssseceesssesecsnseaecsnseeacsseaesesacesscascanceesaesecsesceesneedeaasesepanecsscaseeneraneassoseencneaasssesssenesssansessaes 32 C.7 OTHER TERMS OR CONDITIONS..........sscccsseceessereosscesoeenesceesssecenseceeasesssaseseesesnsceeesecenecesausesenateseeessueusaeneusaaess 33 C.7.1 Requirements for Data COl@ction .......ccccccccssccsesssscscscsssceccsssensccssccesansacecessessocaececsuonsaesrssanaetssnonseseesonses 33 C.7.2 Additional SCrviCeS..........cccccsssccccsscccessnccesnessesnsessecevecneeernesecsaecesnsnseeuseceesnsccencersnsssssensesasesscasoseoneseneseones 33 C.7.3 Payment TOrims ......cccccssssscccscnsesscceveusnacevessnssecenuanecceusansevsceuaussecersuacansnecenenanasaeeesseonaeeetsenaeetseseaeerensens 33 C.8 EXPECTATIONS FOR THE ALASKA ENERGY AUTHORITY .......cccccsscccceccsssneceeteessscocaceesesseonoeeesrecsonersessensterenasenersseges 33 APPENDIX D CONSIDERATION ......ssscccssssecssssrsessnessssecscssssssossssnecessanesssvassessencsesensnessssnasensccsensausensetessarsrsusesessedene 34 AE11-032 SE IRP Final Contract 3 of 35 2/9/2011 |Standard Agreement Form for Professional Services 1.Agency Contract Number 2.ASPS Number 3.Financial Coding 4,Encumbrance Number | AEA 11-032 2011-0800-9846 RQ 3615 §.Vendor Number 6.Project/Case Number 7.Alaska Business License Number ABL 262940 This contract is between 8. THE ALASKA ENERGY AUTHORITY (AEA)Hereafter the State,and 9.Contractor Black &Veatch Corporation.Hereafter the contractor Mailing Address Street or P.O.Box City State ZIP+4 11401 Lamar Avenue.Overland Park,Kansas 66211-1508 Phone:913-458-2000 10. ARTICLE 1.Appendices:Appendices referred to in this contract and attached to it are considered part of it. ARTICLE 2.Performance of Service: 2.1 Appendix A (General Provisions),Articles 1 through 27,governs the performance of services under this contract. 2.2 Appendix B sets forth the liability and insurance provisions of this contract. 2.3 Appendix C sets forth the services to be performed by the contractor. ARTICLE 3.Period of Performance:The period of performance for this contract begins February 7,2011 ,and Ends June 30,2012 ARTICLE 4.Considerations: 4.1 in full consideration of the contractor 's performance under this contract,the State shall pay the Contractor a sum not to exceed $446,700.00 ___in accordance with the provisions of Appendix D. 4.2 When billing the State,the contractor shail refer to the Agency Contract Number and send the billing to: 11.ALASKA ENERGY AUTHORITY Mailing Address 813 West Northern Lights,Anchorage,Alaska 99503 Attention: Jim Strandberg,Project Manager 12.CONTRACTOR 14.CERTIFICATION:1 certify that the facts herein and on Name of Firm Black &Veatch Corporation. supporting documents are correct,that this voucher constitutes a legal charge against funds and appropriations cited,that sufficient funds are encumbered to pay this Signature of Authorized Representative Date RY peer 02/10/2011 obligation,or that there is a sufficient balance in the appropriation cited to cover this obligation.|am aware that to knowingly make or allow false entries or alternations on a Typed or Printed Name of Authorized Representative Richard J.Heenan public record,or knowingly destroy,mutilate,suppress, conceal,remove or otherwise impair the verity,legibility or availability of a public record constitutes tampering with Title Senior Vice President 4,Approved by Legal (Raltz/Grimaldl)02/10/2011 me Approved by PMiRollins}02/10/2601 t. public records punishable under AS 11.56.815-.820.Other disciplinary action may be taken up to and including dismissal. 13.CONTACTING AGENCY Signature of Head of Contracting Agency or Date Destanee ALASKA ENERGY AUTHORITY Date -2/tofroy aie 2-\O-}{ Signature of A DirectorYu¢[Yeap Typed or Printed Name Christophiér Ru Typed or Printed Name ofProject Director &Title {|Sara Fisher-Goad,Executive Director Title ie)aN Procurement Officer NOTICE:This contract has no effect until signed by the head of contracting agency or designee. AE11-032 SE IRP Final Contract 4of 35 2/9/2011 |APPENDIX A GENERAL PROVISIONS Article 1.Definitions. 1.1 In this contract and appendices,"Project Director"or "Agency Head"or "Procurement Officer"means the person who signs this contract on behalf of the Requesting Agency and includes a successor or authorized representative. 1.2 "State Contracting Agency"means the Alaska Energy Authority for which this contract is to be performed and for which the Executive Director or Authorized Designee acted in signing this contract. Article 2.Inspection and Reports. 2.1 The Authority may inspect,in the manner and at reasonable times it considers appropriate,all the contractor 's facilities and activities under this contract. 2.2 the contractor shall make progress and other reports in the manner and at the times the department reasonably requires. Article 3.Disputes. Any dispute concerning a question of fact arising under this contract,which is not disposed of by mutual agreement,shall be decided in accordance with AS 36.30.620-632. Article 4.Equal Employment Opportunity. 4.1 the contractor may not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race,religion,color,national origin,or because of age,disability,sex,marital status,changes in marital status,pregnancy or parenthood when the reasonable demands of the position(s)do not require distinction on the basis of age,disability,sex, marital status,changes in marital status,pregnancy,or parenthood.The contractor shall take affirmative action to insure that the applicants are considered for employment and that employees are treated during employment without unlawful regard to their race, color,religion,national origin,ancestry,disability,age,sex,marital status,changes in marital status,changes in marital status,pregnancy or parenthood.This action must include,but need not be limited to,the following:employment,upgrading,demotion, transfer,recruitment or recruitment advertising,layoff or termination,rates of pay or other forms of compensation,and selection for training including apprenticeship.The contractor shall post in conspicuous places,available to employees and applicants for employment,notices setting out the provisions of this paragraph. 4.2 the contractor shall state,in all solicitations or advertisements for employees to work on State of Alaska contract jobs,that it is an equal opportunity employer and that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, religion,color,national origin,age,disability,sex,marital status,changes in marital status,pregnancy or parenthood. 4.3 the contractor shall send to each labor union or representative of workers with which the contractor has a collective bargaining agreement or other contract or understanding a notice advising the labor union or workers'compensation representative of the contractor 's commitments under this article and post copies of the notice in conspicuous places available to all employees and applicants for employment. 4.4 the contractor shall include the provisions of this article in every contract,and shall require the inclusion of these provisions in every contract entered into by any of its subcontractors,so that those provisions will be binding upon each subcontractor.For the purpose of including those provisions in any contract or subcontract,as required by AE11-032 SE IRP Final Contract 5 of 35 2/9/2011 |APPENDIX C -Scope of Work C.1 Contract Purpose and Goals The Contractor will prepare a 50-year plan for energy projects and transmission lines in Southeast Alaska.This Regional Integrated Resource Plan (RIRP)will identify energy issues,establish new utility load forecasts,and identify which power projects and transmission lines need to be built and will enable communities to seek state or other available funding for these projects. The overall goal of this plan is to determine the best long-term plan for the provision of electricity,space heating and transportation for the region.In identifying the best plan,a list of capital projects will be developed which will include near term options requiring funding in the next three years as well as the longer-term options. The purpose of the plan is to create a document that identifies actions Southeast Alaskans can take so that all southeast residents can enjoy access to affordable,reliable energy for electricity,heating and transportation.This plan is envisioned to be a tool that Southeast Alaskans can use to facilitate future economic development and energy independence. AEA seeks through this plan, ¢To reduce reliance on fossil fuel energy in Southeast Alaska, *To develop strategies for long run energy security within the region *To develop strategies for wisely and effectively making use of the region's renewable energy resources *To develop least cost options for the provision of electricity,space heating and transportation for the long run,to enhance regional economic development. C.2.Project Approach The plan will include an assessment of regional energy concerns and issues,a regional transmission and inter-connection plan,and will address individual community energy needs for electricity,heating, and transportation. The long-range plan will identify a phased plan of generation and transmission (G&T)capital improvement projects in the Southeast Region of Alaska. The contractor is expected to develop this plan based on;public,stakeholder,and advisory committee input;review and analysis of existing data and systems;development of new utility load forecasts; contractor created financing models;and the technical knowledge and experience the contractor may have in developing resource plans. The project is not an economic development plan.Rather it is an assessment of future energy needs, and a definition of energy projects that will need to be pursued to respond to these needs,recognizing that different potential economic development paths will impose unique demands on energy systems. Different economic development paths are not to be defined in detail in this project;rather,assumptions must be made for the range of future energy needs that could result from different economic development paths. This is not a business restructuring study.The project is focused on developing an ordered list of power generation and transmission projects that can be pursued by Southeast Alaska utilities to meet future demands for energy.The public processes in early tasks are intended to allow Southeast utilities and their stakeholders to provide input to the processes,and to provide clarity to the Contractor for development of load forecasts,which are to be done collaboratively with the Southeast Alaska Utilities. AE11-032 SE IRP Final Contract 12 of 35 2/9/2011 C.2.1 Public Processes The proposed public process for developing the plan is intended to educate both the contractor and the stakeholders regarding Southeast Alaska Energy Resource issues,economic development issues,and the purpose of the plan.In addition,various public outreach processes will be used to gather data and comments on interim work products. Contractor will: ¢Participate in local meetings with southeast electric utilities and local stakeholders to develop load growth projections and understand their energy supply issues. ¢Participate in and assist as defined in this RFP with two regional technical energy conferences to understand and educate the Southeast's local and regional stakeholders and to present the draft regional plan. ¢Meet and report on project status to an Advisory working group. C.2.2 Advisory Committee The Contractor will report and provide support for an AEA created Advisory Work Group.Work will include providing presentations of planning methodologies,interim work products,and other input at monthly work group meetings. The Advisory Work Group will function as an advisor to the AEA Project Manager.The AEA project manager will direct the Contractor on which recommendations and input to consider in the assembly of the plan. C.2.3.Components of Work The work is divided into four task groups,to be completed and integrated into a final integrated plan. Task Group 1 -Data Collection,Load Forecasts,Technology Review,and Regional Action Plan - (Tasks 1 through 5)Accomplish public outreach and data collection,to include in-depth consultation with Southeast public utilities on their load forecasts.Develop load forecasts by working in close collaboration with SEAPA and the utilities within the SEAPA region.Participate in Technical Conference 1.From these initial tasks,develop a "Regional Action Plan”that addresses and identifies Southeast region energy issues and provides criteria for more detailed planning in Task Groups 2 and 3 and reporting in Task Group 4. Task Group 2 -Region wide Transmission Planning -(Task 6)Review existing Southeast Intertie Plan,develop new planning methodologies and develop a new plan for transmission interconnections in Southeast Alaska. Task Group 3 -Integrated Resource planning -(Tasks 7 through 9)Using data collection and analysis work from Task Groups 1 and 2,provide detailed integrated resource planning for interconnected networks,and for insular communities where it is impractical to interconnect with an existing network. Task Group 4 -Reporting -(Tasks 10 through 13)Assemble work from Task Groups 1 through 3 into a regional plan,present the plan,consider and incorporate review comments,and produce final report. C.2.4 Schedule and Deliverables A proposed project schedule and anticipated deliverables are identified in section C.4 Deliverables and Schedules.A project schedule shall be presented at the initial meeting.The Contractor will work with the Southeast Conference representative and AEA project manager to confirm this initial schedule. Additional input will be sought from stakeholders,and the advisory work group at its first meeting. AEA must have at a minimum preliminary Capital Budget Recommendations by early October 2011 for the possible development of a FY 2013 capital budget request.Some of the work identified in the task AE11-032 SE IRP Final Contract 13 of 35 2/9/2011 groups will be done concurrently,and that analysis in one task group will require coordination with ongoing work under a different task group. C.2.5 Planning Horizon This regional plan shall have a 50-year planning horizon that begins on January 1",2012. C.2.6 Energy Policy Guidelines The Contractor shall consider Alaska Energy Policy recently enacted into law in 2010 under House Bill 306 and Senate Bill 220. C.3.+Project Tasks C.3.1 Task 1 -Understand the Southeast Energy Model:Past,Present and Future The Contractor shall work with the AEA and the Advisory Work Group to understand the unique energy needs and issues of Southeast Alaska and explain the vision and goals of the Planning Study,through community meetings,meetings with Utility boards and staff,business and trade associations. The Southeast Conference,under contract with AEA,will coordinate the schedule and location of these meetings with the Contractor. Subtasks at a minimum will include: Public Meetings -The Contractor will participate in up to10 meetings in Southeast Alaska Communities, to develop an understanding of community energy needs,and the potential for development of renewable energy resources,and identification of emerging regional energy issues. Existing IRPs -The Contractor will research and obtain copies of existing Integrated Resource Plans (IRP)'s and other energy planning efforts from operating Southeast public utilities.This will include Prince of Wales Island (AP&T),Greater Juneau area (AEL&P),and Greater Sitka area (Sitka Power Utilities),Upper Lynn Canal (AP&T)and from SEAPA and the utilities within the SEAPA region. Load Forecasts -The Contractor will contact all Southeast Utilities and seek available capacity and energy load forecasts that are the foundations for the above-mentioned integrated resource plans.The Contractor will discuss with utilities how their load forecasts consider emerging energy issues,such as cross over electric heating,smart grid technologies,and electric vehicles as well as available development plans of major commercial users such the plans of Alaska Ship and Dry-dock at the Ketchikan Shipyard.The Contractor,in close collaboration with the SEAPA region and utilities,will develop energy and capacity load forecasts. Research Existing Energy Infrastructure -The Contractor shall research and become familiar with southeast communities existing infrastructure and energy economics. Review Existing Reports -Contractor shall review existing reports and documents,and consult with stakeholders that include southeast electric utilities and local governments. C.3.1.2 Contractor's Methodology Task 1 Task 1 will be initiated with a kick off meeting with the AEA Project Manager,SEAPA project manager, and the SE Conference Project Manager in Ketchikan,at a location provided for by AEA.This meeting will be up to one day long.During this meeting,major external drivers will be discussed and the approach to dealing with each driver will be identified.The Contractor will take input from the SEAPA and SE Conference project managers,as well as the AEA project manager.While these approaches will be fully vetted and may possibly change during the Advisory Work Group meetings,this meeting will provide initial direction and increased efficiency to the study.The following are among the issues and drivers that will be addressed. AE11-032 SE IRP Final Contract 14 of 35 2/9/2011 *How HB 306's requirement of 50 percent of the state's electric generation from renewable and alternative energy sources by 2025 will be applied in the Southeast IRP.For instance,the Southeast as a region greatly exceeds the 50 percent target due to abundant hydro generation while some insular communities may have no renewable generation.Will a higher criterion be considered for the region since it has abundant renewable resources available or will the only criteria be least cost?Will insular communities have to meet the criteria? ¢How the 20 percent energy efficiency and conservation improvements by 2020 in the Alaska Energy Pathway will be applied in the Southeast IRP e¢Which electric utility systems will be included in the Southeast IRP *How will potential environmental regulations such as CO2 regulation be included in the Southeast IRP ¢What assumptions will be used for economic parameters such as inflation and escalation rates - e What fuel price projections will be used ¢How conversion to electric heat,electric cars,and Smart Grid activities will be considered relative to efficiency and conservation improvements *Approach for developing penetration levels for electric heat and vehicles An agenda with proposed positions on each issue will be provided prior to the meeting. The Contractor will work with the AEA Project Manager to clearly articulate the vision and goals of the Planning Study to be presented at the various stakeholder meetings. The Contractor will familiarize themselves with the unique aspects of the Southeast.As part of the familiarization process,the Contractor will obtain and review available reports and documentation on the utility systems including IRP's for Prince of Wales Island (AP&T),Greater Juneau area (AEL&P), Greater Sitka area (Sitka Power Utilities),and Upper Lynn Canal (AP&T). The Contractor will also review the transmission planning reports delineated in Task 6 as well as any other relevant transmission studies that are available.In addition,the Black &Veatch team will review .other relevant reports,documents,and data and consult stakeholders as appropriate.Upon completion of the review by the Black &Veatch team,the Black &Veatch team will prepare a data request to be sent to the utilities included in the Southeast IRP to provide information that wasn't obtained in the review and to confirm information that was obtained.This data request will explicitly include a request for existing load forecasts and will seek information from the utilities as to how each utility addresses emerging issues such as cross over electric heating,smart grid technologies,and electric vehicles. As part of this task,the Black &Veatch team will extrapolate the existing load forecasts to encompass the 50-year planning period.Two scenarios will be developed.One for naturally occurring penetration of electric heat and vehicles and the second will be a scenario developed during the kickoff meeting which provides accelerated penetration.This scenario will be discussed during meetings with the Southeast Alaska Communities and with the Advisory Work Group. The contractor will meet at least 10 Southeast Alaska Communities to obtain additional input from stakeholders and to obtain consensus on the scenarios and other input data.It is understood that the schedule for meetings as proposed in C.4 of the contract will be finalized with the input of the Stakeholders and Advisory Committee and a contract amendment will be negotiated to account for any changes in cost that may result from modifications to the contract meeting schedule. C.3.2 Task 2 -Assess Existing and Future Energy Technologies The Contractor shall research new and emerging energy technologies that could be applicable to Southeast Alaska,to include *Technologies to efficiently and economically provide for space heating AE11-032 SE IRP Final Contract 15 of 35 2/9/2011 *Technologies and methodologies to enable demand side management to maximize use of hydro power ¢New efficient lighting technologies *Smart grid technologies *Electrically powered vehicle transportation The Contractor will analyze and recommend how and where to deploy these new technologies.The Contractor shall distinguish between emerging and mature technologies,and identify deployment risks, timing for potential future deployment,and specific recommendations on how the technologies can be made a part of the existing energy systems.The Contractor will consider these potential deployments into load forecasting. The Contractor will develop a matrix of regional energy issues for both energy production and demand side management,and a list of available technologies and actions to be taken,to respond to each issue.This matrix shall be developed prior to the 1st technical conference,and distributed at the conference for consideration by attendees. C.3.2.1 Contractor's Methodology Task 2 The Contractor will research new and emerging technologies that could be applicable to Southeast Alaska as identified above.In addition the Contractor will investigate water heating. The majority of the effort associated with this task will be in evaluating the application of the technologies to the unique environment in Southeast Alaska. Some of the areas where evaluation efforts will be focused are the temperature profiles of the Southeast Alaska communities.These profiles will determine the effectiveness of conventional heat pumps for space heating and the profile of operation of the electric strip heating necessary if the temperatures drop below the temperature that heat pumps can operate in the DX mode. Depending upon the temperature profile,the electric strip heating can result in very large electric loads, which potentially could be met with pondage hydro.This direct linkage between hydro and space heating will require accurate characterization and understanding of existing and potential hydro projects. The use of heat pump water heating will be evaluated in an analogous manner.Ground and potentially water source heat pumps will be investigated as a method to mitigate the electric strip heating required from air to air heat pumps.The significant additional costs of the ground source heat pumps as well as their technical feasibility to be installed in the Southeast will be areas of investigation. Another potential source of space heating is the installation of a district heating system utilizing waste heat recovery from diesel generation. Efficient lighting technologies will be investigated as a method to reduce electric consumption.Efficient lighting technologies will reduce diesel consumption as well as have the potential to reduce hydro generation and depending on the hydro project may make more water available through pondage to meet periods of high loads due to resistance heating.Care will be taken to properly account for the loss of heat from replacement of incandescent lighting with efficient lighting during periods of space heating. The use of smart grid technologies and electric vehicles will be considered simultaneously to ensure that the charging of the electric vehicles is optimized with the electric generation especially considering coordination with hydro generation.The Contractor will also consider the use of the energy stored in the batteries of electric vehicles via smart grid technology to meet periods of high demand such as caused by strip heating. AE11-032 SE IRP Final Contract 16 of 35 2/9/2011 The Contractor shall investigate benefits from the technologies,the synergy from combined deployment,and operation of different technologies. The results of this task will be used in Task 1 in developing the penetration levels for the increased load forecasts.In addition,a matrix will be developed containing regional energy issues,technologies available to address the issues,and actions to be taken to address the issues.The matrix will be presented to the Advisory Work Group and at the first Technical Conference. C.3.3 Task 3 -Develop an Energy Conservation and Demand Side Management Program for SE Alaska The Contractor shall consider the potential for reducing energy consumption and lowering electrical demands in a demand side management analysis.The benefits and costs for demand side management shall be assessed.The contractor will: *Consider existing state energy conservation programs being managed by AHFC and AEA. *Identify actions that can be taken by utilities,consumers,and local governments to promote energy conservation and demand side management measures. ¢Recommend any potential new programs that could be implemented at the local or regional level. *Assess the costs and benefits of these programs within the IRP analysis. *Include the capital requirements in the region-wide integrated resource plan. C.3.3.1 Contractor's Methodology Task 3 The Contractor will characterize existing conservation programs managed by AHFC and AEA.The resultant energy and demand savings from these programs will be projected based on the existing saturation of the programs,the expected demand and energy savings,and the projected budget for the programs,which will be translated into saturation.Any existing utility programs will also be characterized in like manner. The Contractor will identify potential conservation measures that can be taken in addition to the existing programs.The Contractor will utilize specific Alaska DSM templates that were developed for the Railbelt RIRP and adopt them to the Southeast to reduce the level of effort required.The potential conservation measures will be evaluated using the conventional three conservation and demand-side management cost effectiveness tests. ¢Rate Impact (RIM)Test ¢Total Resource Cost (TRC)Test ¢Participant Test The potential conservation measures will be prioritized relative to their cost effectiveness test scores. All potential conservation measures that pass all three tests will be developed into programs.The projected demand and energy savings from these programs will be projected and compared to the manner in which the 20 percent increase in efficiency was determined to be implemented for the Southeast in Task 1.If additional,conservation and demand-side management reductions are necessary to meet the 20 percent increase in efficiency target by 2020 as applied to the Southeast, additional programs will be developed from measures that fail to pass one or more of the cost effectiveness tests. The Contractor will recommend an implementation plan for the programs in conjunction with input from the Advisory Work Group input as well as input from stakeholder meetings with the Southeast Communities.The Contractor will develop the additional demand and energy savings and the cost of implementation for the programs.Costs for all programs that pass the RIM test will be included in the utility costs in the IRP analysis.Costs for programs that do not pass the RIM test will be compiled separately and the Contractor will provide recommendations relative to their funding and implementation based on the input from the Advisory Work Group and the other stakeholders.The AE11-032 SE IRP Final Contract 17 of 35 2/9/2011 additional reductions in energy and demand will be incorporated into the load forecasts developed in Task 1. The Contractor does not propose to model conservation and demand-side management as a separate IRP option during the IRP modeling since the conservation and demand-side management is being evaluated through the use of the cost effectiveness tests and since conservation and demand-side management are being used to meet the 20 percent efficiency improvement target. C.3.4 Task 4 -Financing the Southeast Energy Future Contractor will develop a financial model that can be used to demonstrate the effects of different funding/capitalization approaches that can be taken with Southeast Alaska energy projects to yield affordable and stabilized cost of power and rates over the long run. The Contractor shall consider as a minimum the following sources of funds: ¢Private capital from equity investors and lending institutions *Public sale of privately placed and public bonds ¢Loans from the AEA Power Projects Loan Fund ¢Private loans from AIDEA and commercial banks,under AIDEA programs ¢Legislative Appropriations ¢Private loans with Department of Energy Loan Guarantees The financial model shall consider all aspects of financing of energy projects.This shall include assembly of equity and debt necessary to develop Southeast energy projects that will yield affordable and stabilized cost of power and rates over the long run. The financial model will consider funding of hydropower projects and transmission lines that have a lifetime of between 50 and 100 years,to provide levelized debt responsibility throughout the life of the project.The Contractor shall develop scenarios where a portion of the debt is supported by a bond or loan,that would be repaid over the initial 25 to 40%of the life of the asset,and the remaining portion of the debt to be a government supported loan to be repaid during the remaining life of the asset,with interest payments beginning at the time the early loan debt is fully repaid. The Contractor will consider *The financing approach expressed in the Bond Covenants and Agreements for the Bradley Lake Hydro Power project,which is owned by the Alaska Energy Authority,and operated by the Alaska Railbelt Utilities,collectively the Bradley Model.(Financing approach which combines State funding with utility debt) *Similar information for the Snettisham Hydro Power project,which is owned by the Alaska Industrial Development and Export Authority,and operated by AEL&P.(Financing approach which combines State funding with utility debt) ¢The financial analysis work accomplished in the Railbelt Integrated Resources Plan. The Contractor will use this financial analysis to develop at least 3 approaches for financing Southeast energy projects to reflect wide variations in community financial conditions.As a part of the first technical conference,the Contractor will present these approaches,and explain how they capitalize projects,and result in affordable and stable rates over the long run. Separate approaches will be developed ¢For smaller projects in insular communities with limited numbers of rate payers *For larger,discrete hydro-power projects to be interconnected with existing electrical grids _ *For projects to develop a robust transmission system of interconnected electrical grids under Task 6. This model shall be spreadsheet based,fully annotated and explained,suitable for use by the public, and be provided at the first Technical Conference and as a part of the final report. AE11-032 SE IRP Final Contract 18 of 35 2/9/2011 C.3.4.1 Contractor's Methodology Task4 The Contractor will review in detail the financing arrangements for Bradley Lake,Snettisham Hydro Project,and the RIRP.In addition to these models,the Contractor will consider the sources of funds as identified above. The Contractor will develop a series of financial models that will accommodate financing electric system projects including hydro projects and transmission projects which have lifetimes of 50 to 100 years.The financial models will be workable Excel models with written descriptions of model inputs,calculations, and outputs and will include at least the following three approaches: ¢For smaller projects in insular communities with limited numbers of rate payers ¢For larger,discrete hydro-power projects to be interconnected with existing electrical grids ¢For projects to develop a robust transmission system of interconnected electrical grids under Task 6. The Contractor will be careful to develop assumed financing rates for each model that are realistic and relevant reflecting appropriate relative differences due to risk,coverage,and guarantees or support. The financial models will be developed to present to the Advisory Work Group and at the first Technical Conference.The Contractor has extensive financial experience and as such does not anticipate a need to involve an independent financial advisor. C.3.5 Task 5 -Technical Conference and Preliminary Action Plan The Contractor will participate in a technical conference to inform and educate the public on Southeast energy issues and the planning process,collect information from stakeholders,and develop a consensus for a preliminary regional action plan. C.3.5.1 Task 5.1 Participate in Technical Conference 1 The Contractor shall assist AEA in conducting a regional technical conference for the purpose of informing and educating the public and stakeholders on Southeast energy issues.This conference will be sponsored by AEA in coordination with Southeast Conference and other Southeast organizations. AEA staff and Southeast Conference will organize and run the conference.The public forum,to be held as a part of the conference,will be professionally facilitated by others. The conference will include presentations by the Contractor,southeast electric utilities, southeast energy economists and energy project finance experts,Southeast Conference energy and economic development representatives,experts in new and emerging energy technologies, and a public forum in town meeting format. The Contractors involvement is anticipated to include: ¢Development of materials and a brief presentation of the southeast regional planning process to include suggested financial approaches developed in Task 4. *Development of a preliminary list of region wide energy issues and a range of strategies the region can employ. ¢Participate in a public forum in town meeting format for public comment on the Contractor's issues list and possible strategies. *The following Contractor and subcontractor staff are expected to participate in the conference.The Black &Veatch and HDR Project Director,and Black &Veatch and HDR Project Managers.If during the Advisory Work Group meetings specific issues develop that necessitate a Contractor subject manner expert to make a presentation,the contractor will provide a proposal for those additional services and AEA will negotiate an amendment to the contract. This list of issues is anticipated to include but not be limited to: AE11-032 SE IRP Final Contract 19 of 35 2/9/2011 *Opportunities that energy development can make available for job creation and economic development. ¢Consideration of the highest and best use of all feasible sources of energy available to SE Alaska,to include the needs of the residential customer,resident industrial customer, and the potential for exporting energy from SE Alaska into the Canadian Grid and a possible connection of a Southeast interconnected network to South central Alaska. *Actions by public utilities to manage and control the use of retail electricity for resistive space heating through rate structures,education or other means. *Regional initiatives to promote energy conservation and deployment of smart grid technologies and use of heat pump technologies. *The need to organize and coordinate economic development initiatives through governmental units,public utilities,municipal governments and the private sector ¢Potentials for public-private intervention to save economically distressed communities through combined energy infrastructure -economic development projects. ¢Actions by local governments to protect consumers,such as local government control and regulation on the use of resistance electrical heating for space heating in new construction. ¢«Energy conservation and demand side management. ¢The impact of "on the fly"fuel switching by customers on the system and rate structures. ¢Greenhouse gas regulation ¢Reduction in No.2 oil consumption *Coordination of renewable generation (hydro,tidal,and wind)for use as space and water heating through the use of smart grid technologies or other means *Coordination of renewable generation (hydro,tidal,and wind),and electric vehicles including grid use of energy stored in the batteries,and space and water heating through the use of smart grid technologies or other means *Transmission system interconnection *Opportunities that energy development can make available for job creation and economic development. The Contractor shall incorporate the consideration of these region wide issues into its regional work plans. AEA will arrange for recording each presentation,and will later place the videos on the AEA webpage as educational tools. C.3.5.2 Task 5.2 Develop a Preliminary Action Plan Following the first technical conference,the Contractor will develop a Preliminary Action Plan by first creating a list of the actions that stakeholders can take to move towards the goals of the Southeast Region.The Preliminary Action Plan will organize the identified actions into logical and meaningful subparts of the plan.The plan will be a summary document that identifies the following. e Specific actions *Who should take the action ¢Interaction with other stakeholders *Benefit of the action e Preliminary costs The Preliminary Action Plan will address the following issues identified in the RFP. *Coordination between utilities,local governments,the State of Alaska energy agencies, the federal government,and individual residents AE11-032 SE IRP Final Contract 20 of 35 2/9/2011 *Cooperative approaches for financing energy projects *The potential for technology deployment in combination with agreements by and between utilities and local governments on energy use,energy rates,and incentive programs ¢Acombined community approach to energy supply and cost,and identification of where significant benefit can arise when different stakeholders act together for the common purpose C.3.6 Task 6 -Develop a Region-wide Transmission Plan The Contractor will develop a new region-wide transmission plan for interconnecting Southeast communities.This plan will be based on the concept of interconnecting community electrical systems to a backbone transmission grid,where it can be shown such connection will provide public benefits, which exceed the costs of ownership and operations.This task shall produce a new,phased interconnection plan that integrates with task groups 1 and 3. The feasibility of constructing an export intertie shall be considered as part of this planning. The Contractor will recommend which communities should be interconnected,and which ones, because of distance or other economic considerations should remain insular.Planning for these insular communities is covered under Task 9. In developing the plan the Contractor shall analyze and consider the following: ¢The extent of existing transmission systems and previous planning efforts for interconnection including the Southeast Intertie Plan and existing transmission plans that were completed for Southeast electric utilities.They can be found at www.akenergyauthority.org/southeastIRP.html. These systems include: Upper Lynn Canal Transmission System (Owner:AP&T) Juneau area Transmission System (Owner:AEL&P) SEAPA Transmission System (Owner:SEAPA) Prince of Wales Transmission System (Owner:AP&T) e The direct costs of operation and benefits from the interconnection including community wide benefits,such as reductions in carbon emissions,and the added economic security of gaining access through the interconnection to hydro power based sources,with expectations of long term price stability. ¢Community size,long-term power requirements,both in demand and consumption,distance to interconnecting point,prevailing price of power in the community,and expectations of growth in the community. ¢The fact that Southeast Alaska is mountainous and made up of several large islands and many proposed community-to-community interconnections will require underwater cables. ¢The consideration of power quality as well as ancillary services such as regional voltage control and stability,regulation services for non-dispatchable renewable energy sources such as wind and tidal energy for the specific Southeast Alaska situation. *The presence of viable local energy resources that could be developed in lieu of the expense of a transmission line interconnection that could provide power at a similar cost and reliability of the interconnected source. ¢The unique risks of ownership,and reliability of transmission lines in the terrain and climate of Southeast Alaska. AE11-032 SE IRP Final Contract 21 of 35 2/9/2011 e Any larger scale renewable energy resources that are available to communities,which could be developed to provide power for the interconnected communities on the transmission backbone. ¢The capital cost,Operations and Maintenance Cost,Repair and Renovation costs,and inherent risks of operation,reliability and ownership for transmission lines. ¢The AK/BC Export Intertie feasibility study conclusions and assumptions. The plan will include: ¢A rational approach to where and when Southeast communities can be economically connected into the Regional transmission backbone. *Adecision methodology for determining which communities should be interconnected with transmission lines. ¢Arange of ownership,operation and maintenance and regulation approaches that would support a phased capital plan to develop this backbone transmission grid. *A technical analysis that includes possible points of interconnection with each existing system, analysis of system voltages for each system,determination of a possible Transmission Backbone system voltage,provision of ancillary services within each network,and necessary upgrades and system modifications to achieve reasonable system wide operation and control, and measures to be taken to assure system wide reliability. ¢An evaluation of risks to secure power supply for Southeast Communities that will rely on 'powerdeliveredbytransmissionline. *Specific recommendations on whether to,to what extent,and on what schedule to develop the Southeast Transmission Backbone. *Time phased capital budgets for these interconnections,and an estimated regional savings for each segment of the network. The Contractor shall link this plan with a preferred resource plan for power generation from tasks 7,8, and 9 that schedules the development of power generation projects,to assure that economic levels of renewable energy will continue to be available for all interconnected communities. C.3.6.1 Contractor's Methodology Task 6 The Contractor will utilize a multi-step screening approach along with work conducted in other tasks to develop a region-wide transmission plan that considers all alternatives while minimizing the cost of evaluation. The first step in developing the region-wide transmission plan is to review the previous transmission studies and obtain data on existing transmission systems.These studies include the following as well as any additional studies or information gathered while meeting with the Southeast communities or during other stakeholder meetings. ¢SE Alaska Intertie Study -Phases 1 and 2 ¢Alaska-BC Intertie Study Planning Report *Kake Petersburg Intertie Planning Study and Appendices ¢SE Alaska Electrical Intertie System Plan e Alaska-Canada Electrical Intertie Study and Additional Resource Documents AE11-032 SE IRP Final Contract 22 of 35 2/9/2011 In addition to these studies,information will be gathered and requested for the following systems. ¢Upper Lynn Canal Transmission System (Owner AP&T) ¢Juneau Area Transmission System (Owner AEL&P) ¢SEAPA Transmission System (Owner SEAPA) ¢Prince of Wales Transmission System (Owner AP&T) The Contractor will take the information gathered along with in-house estimates and detailed cost information from the RIRP and develop generic transmission system capital costs for the following. ¢Per mile cost for transmission line by voltage level! ¢Per mile cost for underwater cable ¢Termination and substation cost The varied topography of the Southeast decreases the accuracy of these types of estimates.The Contractor will potentially make some refinements as appropriate such as developing transmission line costs for two types of terrain.The screening accuracy will be further refined by updating specific interconnections from previous studies that are expected to encompass most of viable alternatives. The next step in the screening process is the identification of location of potential hydro,wind,and tidal projects.These will represent the first screening of the generating alternatives and the information provided is just the first cut at location,capacity,and annual energy.The Contractor will use its extensive hydro experience in the Southeast to identify potential projects along with previous studies and AEA inventories of potential projects to identify potential hydro projects.The Contractor will use the same process to identify potential wind and tidal projects as well. The next step in the screening process is to take the load forecasts for each system,apply reserve margin requirements to get total capacity requirements for each system,apply existing generation that will be in operation at the end of the 50 year planning period which will only be existing hydro generation,and determine the capacity requirements by the end of the 50 year planning period for each system.These capacity requirements can be compared individually for each system or together in various interconnection configurations and compared to the generating unit alternatives identified above. The generic transmission costs or the updated transmission costs as the case may be,will be used to determine first screening level costs for interconnection.An estimate of the annual capital carrying costs for the transmission interconnections will be developed from the financial analysis in Task 4. These annual transmission carrying costs along with the first screening level annual generation from the identified potential hydro,wind,and tidal projects will be used to determine the transmission costs on a $/MWh basis. The next step in the screening process will be to develop generic costs for diesel generation.The Contractor will use its experience in developing cost estimates for diesel generation in conjunction with discussions with and data obtained from the Southeast utilities and stakeholders to develop the diesel costs.In addition to capital costs,O&M costs and performance including heat rate will also be developed.The cost and performance information will be used in conjunction with the financing plan from Task 4 and fuel cost projections determined from Task 1 to develop busbar costs for diesel generation at the end of the planning period. . The transmission costs on a $/MWh basis will be compared with annual generation costs at the end of the planning period for diesel generation.A cutoff level will be determined,for instance the transmission costs alone cannot be more than 70 percent of the diesel generation cost,on a $/MWh basis.All the hydro,wind,and tidal generation projects that fail the screening test will be eliminated from further consideration along with their associated interconnections. The potentially viable hydro,wind,and tidal projects and associated interconnections will be refined into more definitive transmission interconnection and generation plans which will be modeled with Strategist AE11-032 SE IRP Final Contract 23 of 35 2/9/2011 in Task 8.More defined capital and O&M costs will be developed for the transmission alternatives for the Strategist modeling.Insular communities that fail the screening test will remain insular communities and will not be modeled with Strategist. C.3.7 Task 7 -Develop a Preferred Resource Lists for Interconnected Electrical Grids The Contractor will conduct the modeling to develop the Southeast Regional Plan.The modeling will include SEAPA.With this approach,AEA will have the plan and associated costs for the entire region and can compare those costs with an IRP for SEAPA and the non-SEAPA communities many if not all of which will be insular. One of the elements of this task is to refine the renewable potentially viable generation projects identified in Task 6.The Contractor will utilize their experience with Southeast hydro projects as well as their general expertise in hydro,wind,and tidal projects to refine the cost and performance of these projects.Where appropriate,hydro project generation will be determined in two parts.The first would be the run of river component that reflects capacity and energy on a monthly basis and to reflect needs to maintain flows for fisheries and any spillage from storage operation.The second part would reflect storage and its associated capacity and energy on a monthly basis.These approaches combined with the hourly modeling methodology of Strategist allow for explicit consideration of issues such as penetration of electric space heating and electric vehicles. Another element of this task is the development of hourly load profiles.The Contractor will develop these profiles for the 50-year planning period from the load forecast from Task 1 and hourly loads obtained from the utilities.The hourly loads will contain the impact of the conservation and demand- side management programs developed in Task 3.The hourly loads will be developed for two scenarios. One is the base case and the other is a case with accelerated penetration of electric space and water heating and electric vehicles. Both scenarios will contain the savings associated with conservation and demand-side management programs which include cost effective programs as well as any additional programs developed to meet the 20 percent increased efficiency goal by 2020.If separate modeling is desired to quantify the increased cost from the additional non cost-effective conservation programs,it can be conducted as an addition to the Scope of Services.With hourly loads developed for each of the utilities,they can be aggregated to reflect any of the interconnection plans. The region as a whole excluding the insular systems will be modeled using Strategist with the various refined interconnections from Task 6 as alternatives and any associated potential renewable energy projects (hydro,wind,and tidal).Modeling the region as a whole with these alternatives will result in the least cost integrated plan including consideration of interconnections.The costs for insular systems will be developed separately based on diesel additions unless potential renewable projects are located within the insular system in which case Strategist will be used to find the least cost expansion plan for the insular system.The costs for the insular system will be added to regional system to obtain the cost for the entire Southeast region.Depending upon the results of the least cost modeling,AEA may desire to quantify the additional cost of interconnections that were not selected. The Scope of Services includes one Strategist model run including the specified additional interconnection(s). Strategist will be constrained to provide the specified amount of renewable energy necessary to meet the 50 percent requirement by 2025 as determined to be applied in Task 1 and with the Advisory Work Group input.Results from Strategist will be exported to the financial model developed in Task 4 for final results. A capital plan will be developed from the results of the modeling showing the schedule of generation and transmission projects and their associated estimated capital cost. AE11-032 SE IRP Final Contract 24 of 35 2/9/2011 C.3.8 Task 8 -Integrated Resource Planning (IRP)for the Southeast Alaska Power Agency (SEAPA) The Contractor shall develop an integrated resource plan (IRP)for the communities presently being served by SEAPA,working closely with the utilities in the SEAPA region,to include Metlakatla and Kake (the SEAPA region).For the purposes of this IRP the SEAPA system will consist of the present SEAPA transmission system,to include interconnections with Kake and Metlakatla;and all distribution utilities,including IPEC (serving Kake)and Metlakatla Light and Power (serving Metlakatla),Petersburg Power and Light (serving Petersburg),City of Wrangell Municipal Light and Power (serving Wrangell). and Ketchikan Public Utilities (serving Ketchikan). The integrated resource plan shall include an assessment of cost,risk,and environmental impact,for supply side and demand side improvements that address identified energy or capacity and energy deficits for power generation and transmission. C.3.8.1 IRP Requirements The contractor will be responsible for collecting data,assembling data sets,and using appropriate modeling tools to develop the IRP considering the following requirements: C.3.8.1.1 Integration with Other Tasks Integrate the SEAPA IRP work with the work identified under other tasks in this contract,so the work process and product is appropriately integrated into consideration of regional energy issues, consideration of a region-wide transmission system,and approaches for financing projects. C.3.8.1.2 Development of Load Forecasts for the SEAPA Region in close collaboration with the SEAPA utilities,develop load forecasts that include analysis of emerging technologies,projections for the possible increase in electric space heating loads and electric cars as well as available development plans of major commercial users such the plans of Alaska Ship and Drydock at the Ketchikan Shipyard. Consider a base case load forecast,and two different load forecast scenarios of accelerated load growth to reflect the possible cross over use of electrical energy,or deployment of other technologies that increase electrical demand and consumption.Carry this analysis through to specific preferred resource lists and recommendations that respond to possible high growth futures. C.3.8.1.3 Modeling Requirements ¢Prior to making IRP modeling computer runs,the contractor will need to benchmark the SEAPA system as it is presently configured,and demonstrate to the satisfaction of SEAPA,that "current status”model run accurately predicts system performance. *Analyze the SEAPA system to understand its present operation,to include power sales agreements and other system operations agreements.Work with SEAPA staff to understand evolving programs for system reliability and power dispatch. ¢Model the present SEAPA operation,and identify ownership and control of all SEAPA system generation and transmission components. e¢Working closely with SEPA and its member utilities consider if control area(s)need to be established for reliability of a larger system and if needed consider the cost of balancing authority infrastructure,both capital and operating cost. ¢Develop a prediction of cost and availability for fossil fuels,over the planning horizon. ¢Use analysis tools that will model the operation of storage hydropower projects including system wide water management,run of the river-hydros,wind and tidal energy projects. ¢Consult with AEA project manager,SEAPA,and SEAPA system stakeholders on the findings of this analysis. AE11-032 SE IRP Final Contract 25 of 35 2/9/2011 Develop possible approaches for pooling of G&T resources in a way that recognizes the current power sales contracts,and business structures that exist between SEAPA and its customers and stakeholders,stakeholder's expectations and best approaches for evolution of the system. Participate in consultations between the AEA project manager,SEAPA and its customers and stakeholders on these approaches. Each prospective power generation project should include the basic transmission interconnection,including substation and transmission line from the backbone to the generation facility. C.3.8.1.4 Treatment of Kake and Metlakatia in SEAPA IRP Assume that the Communities of Kake and Metlakatla will be interconnected to the SEAPA system with transmission lines via the KPU 34.5 kV backbone.The capacity and voltage for the Kake transmission line will be based on expected growth for electrical load for Kake,and incrementally as an additional option,for the possibility of an interconnection to Takatz Lake via an undersea cable.This incremental interconnection is to be considered under Task Group 6 - Regional Transmission System. The Contractor will work with SEAPA to understand its abilities to serve new non-municipal power utilities and cooperative power utilities. Assume that the Petersburg to Kake Intertie and the Metlakatla Intertie will be 100 percent state funded. C.3.8.1.5 Develop the Integrated Resource Plan Working closely with the SEAPA-region utilities and taking into account and consideration SEAPA's and its member utilities resource plans,schedule and develop specific generation and transmission projects to reflect the results of the system analysis and modeling above. Develop the preferred resource list,which will consist of a time phased development plan for projects,together with brief project descriptions,duration for construction and project cost. Develop a database of project location,available conceptual design and project costs and prediction of power output. Develop a diversified power portfolio with emphasis on renewable energy resources,both dispatchable and non-dispatchable.Consider known hydropower developments being considered by Ketchikan Public Utilities,Metlakatla Power and Light,Southeast Alaska Power Agency,Inside Passage Electric Cooperative,Petersburg Power and Light,and Wrangell Power and Light. Develop a transmission upgrade plan to support a phased development of hydropower projects for the SEAPA region.Include in the transmission plan,all necessary substation improvements, Static VAR compensator equipment,and SCADA control components. C.3.8.1.6 Requirements for reporting IRP results The plan shall be presented as a separate document,to be presented to the SEAPA board,and SEAPA system stakeholders for comment.AEA will ask for written comments from SEAPA and its stakeholders,and will consult with them on comments.The AEA project manager,after close consultation with SEAPA,will direct the Contractor on any changes as a result of the SEAPA/stakeholder comments. The Plan will be incorporated in the overall Regional Plan document. C.3.8.2 Contractor Methodology Task 8 Much of the modeling work for Task 8 will be conducted in Task 7 and the much of the effort for Task 8 will be directed to reporting the results as a specific IRP for SEAPA.SEAPA will be modeled as specified under C.3.8.1.The SEAPA IRP will be comprised of Petersburg Power and Light,City of Wrangell Municipal Light and Power,Ketchikan Public Utilities as well as IPEC and Metlakatla. Interconnection type,size,and cost to IPEC and Metlakatla will be agreed to with AEA and the Advisory Work Group as well as other stakeholders. AE11-032 SE IRP Final Contract 26 of 35 2/9/2011 Strategist will be used to benchmark the SEAPA system to actual operation.This will be done prior to the regional modeling in Task 7.SEAPA will be responsible for providing actual operation information to benchmark against. Much of the effort requested in Task 8 will have been conducted in other tasks as follows. ¢Costs of interconnections to IPEC and Metlakatla -Task 6 ¢Collecting data,assembling data sets,and using appropriate modeling tools to develop the IRP -Tasks 1,6,and 7 ¢Load projections for SEAPA communities -Tasks 1 and 3 ¢Develop cost of fossil fuels over the planning horizon Task 1 e Use analysis tools that will model the operation of storage hydropower projects including system wide water management,run of the river-hydros,wind and tidal projects -Task 7 ¢Project financing -Task 4 ¢Option of interconnection to Takatz Lake -Tasks 6 and 7 The Contractor will work with AEA,the Advisory Work Group,and other stakeholders,to determine the method of modeling power sales agreements.The region wide model in Task 7 does not consider power sales agreements.For this task,that approach can be taken or the existing power sales agreements can be specifically modeled.From a regional IRP standpoint,modeling explicit power sales agreements is unnecessary since they only serve to redistribute costs within the region.For instance, profit from selling power to one system reduces the cost of the selling system.The Contractor will work with AEA and SEAPA to discuss existing power sales contracts and business structures between SEAPA and their customers.This will include protecting SEAPA's tax-exempt status while selling power to cooperatives or other non-municipal entities. Two separate financial approaches will be presented as requested in the RFP.One will be the SEAPA specific finance plan and the other will be the Bradley Lake Model. Interconnection with Takatz Lake will be modeled as an option in the Strategist modeling.If interconnection to Takatz Lake is not selected as the least cost option,the additional cost of interconnection can be quantified by forcing the interconnection in the Strategist modeling and comparing the cost.This additional Strategist modeling if desired by AEA would be an addition to the Scope of Services. The Contractor will utilize the results of the analyses in this task to develop an IRP for SEAPA as defined.The IRP will include identification,schedule,and cost of the selected generation and transmission projects.The Contractor will present the results of the IRP to the SEAPA board and SEAPA system stakeholders.The SEAPA IRP will be configured as a separate document that will be included as part of the Regional Plan document. C.3.9 Task 9 -Planning for Insular Communities Contractor will identify Communities,which cannot be interconnected with electrical grids and access to lower cost renewable energy.For each identified community the contractor will: ¢Update "Current Energy Status”data from the Alaska Energy Guide and Alaska Energy Pathway through consultation with serving utilities,and with data collected from Task 2 -- Assess Existing and Future Energy Needs ¢Consider the identified region-wide energy issues and action plan from Task 5,and identify specific demand side efficiency and conservation measures,potential for existing power plant upgrades,and alternative energy projects that could supplement or replace present power generation and heating energy sources for each community. ¢Develop community specific action measures and identify capital projects that would o Reduce volatility of energy prices o Reduce energy prices o Provide reliable capacity and energy supply at acceptable energy supply risk. AE11-032 SE IRP Final Contract 27 of 35 2/9/2011 *Recommend financial approaches developed in Task 4 for identified capital projects that can materially lower the price of energy in the community. ¢Provide a specific,prioritized list of capital projects,including project name and description, estimated capital cost,resultant cost of power or heat from the project,and a benefit to cost analysis for each project. e Address the effect of the projects on the system wide cost of power,as each project is included in the community power portfolio.) C.3.9.1 Contractor Methodology Task 9 Most of the effort for this task will be conducted under Task 7.Task 9 will be largely a reporting effort. The Contractor will utilize the results of previous analyses to update "Current Energy Status”data from the Alaska Energy Guide and Alaska Energy Pathway.Plans for integrated generation additions with conservation and demand-side management will be developed and presented for each insular system evaluated.In addition,efficiency improvements primarily though the addition of heat recovery systems will be evaluated and included in the plans along with credit for improved efficiency towards meeting the 20 percent efficiency improvement goal by 2020.The plans for each insular system will be included in capital additions for new generation or upgrade,estimated costs,financing plan,and estimated impact on the cost of power for each community. C.3.10 Task 10 -Provide Preliminary Capital Budgets for Region-wide IRP The Contractor will develop a preliminary capital budget for the generation,transmission,and conservation and demand-side management projects identified in the Region-wide IRP developed inTask7forthefirstthreeyearsoftheplan.In addition,if accelerated penetration of electric space and water heating and electric vehicles is found to be desirable,any funding approaches developed to accelerate the penetration during the first three years of the plan will be provided. This will be a single list for Southeast Alaska.The Contractor will provide a draft list to AEA at least 30 days before delivery date,for review by Southeast Utilities and the Advisory Work Group.The Contractor will incorporate recommended changes and deliver a final list on the delivery date. C.3.11 Task 11 -Assemble Task Groups 1,2,and 3 Components into a Regional Plan The Contractor shall use the results from each task to develop a cohesive regional plan.The plan shall establish an integrated approach that expresses recommended regional and community level strategies and a phased development of transmission line and power generation projects to achieve the goals of the regional plan. At a minimum the Contractor will: *Incorporate the Integrated Resource Planning task results from Tasks 7,8,and 9 to create an approach for developing power generation and transmission projects for Southeast Alaska. *Integrate the establishment of the southeast energy regime with energy technology review, regional transmission planning,and resource planning. *Produce an explanatory document that presents this three-phase approach,complete with an executive summary of findings and results,methodologies and conclusions and recommendations. The Contractor will document the work by developing a Regional Plan.The Plan will be structured such that it includes the SEAPA IRP and community plans as well as an overarching plan for the entire Southeast region.The Plan will include generation,transmission,conservation and demand-side management,and load growth through accelerated penetration of electric space and water heating and electric cars if found to be beneficial.The plan will meet the goals of efficiency improvement and renewable generation as applied to the Southeast region.Specifically,the plan will include the following: AE11-032 SE IRP Final Contract 28 of 35 2/9/2014 *Executive summary of findings and results ¢Methodologies ¢Conclusions e Recommendations C.3.12 Task 12 -Present the Plan The Contractor will present the Regional Plan to the Advisory Work Group and a second Technical Conference.The Scope of Services includes participation of the Black &Veatch Project Director,the HDR Project Director,and the Black &Veatch and HDR Project Managers.If specific issues result in the need for other subject matter experts to participate in the presentations,they will be provided as an addition to the Scope of Services. AEA will publish the plan on its web page and make CD copies available.AEA will solicit public comment,and the Contractor will receive the written comments,summarize and present to AEA and the Advisory Work Group with recommendations on how to edit and finalize the plan. C.3.13 Task 13-Complete the Plan As directed by the AEA project manager the contractor shall incorporate comments to create andpublishacomprehensivefinaldocument. C.3.14 Optional Tasks The contractor may be requested to perform additional tasks subject to available funding,receipt of an acceptable proposal from the contractor,execution of a written amendment to this contract.The following is a list of some of the additional tasks that could be negotiated and added to this contract. ¢Additional Strategist modeling runs for different scenerios beyond those specified inc.3 ¢An independent review of the proposed financial models used in the developing project funding options. e Additional meetings,presentations,reports,or more in depth analysis as may be requested for the purposes of developing the plan. C.4 Meetings The Scope of Services identifies meetings subject to the qualifications in this section.The scope and schedule of the meetings may be adjusted by the mutual agreement of the contractor and the project manager provided there is no change in the cost of the contract or a significant change in the scope of work.It is anticipated that at the initial kick-off meeting or the first advisory committee meeting an alternative meeting schedule may be negotiated between the Stakeholders,AEA,and the Contractor. AEA will amend the contract as needed to reflect any revision to the schedule or costs for locating a project manager in SEAPA offices. C.4.1 Kickoff MeetingThemeetingwillbeheldin Ketchikan and attended by the following members of the Contractor:Black &Veatch Project Director,HDR Project Director and the Black &Veatch and HDR Project Managers. C.4.2 Southeast Stakeholder Meetings The Scope of Services includes up to 10 stakeholder meetings to be held in the Southeast communities.These meetings will be attended by the Contractor's Project Manager.The Scope of Services is based on scheduling these meetings in six consecutive business days.Extension of that schedule will be considered an addition to the Scope of Services.The Contractor's offer to place the Black &Veatch Project Manager for extended periods in AEA,SEAPA,or Southeast Conference offices will mitigate any scheduling difficulties with the stakeholders. AE11-032 SE IRP Final Contract 29 of 35 2/9/2011 C.4.3 Advisory Work Group Meetings A total of nine Advisory Work Group meetings will be held in AEA's offices or the Southeast.This includes two of the meetings being held the day before each Technical Conference. Only three of the Advisory Work Group meetings will be conducted by teleconference. The Contractor members attending will be the Black &Veatch Project Director and Project Manager, and the HDR Project Manager for the Advisory Work Group meetings held in conjunction with the Technical Conferences. The remaining Advisory Work Group meetings will be attended by the Black &Veatch Project Manager. Any extension of that schedule will be considered an addition to the Scope of Services. C.4.5 Technical Conferences The Technical Conferences will be held in Southeast.The following Contractor members will be attending:Black &Veatch Project Director,and the Black &Veatch and HDR Project Managers.Any additional Contractor members required will be considered an addition to the Scope of Services. C.4.6 In-Office Support In order to better facilitate the project and accommodate potential deviations from the proposed meeting schedules,the Contractor may locate the Black &Veatch Project Manager in the SEAPA offices,or Southeast Conference offices for extended periods during the project. If AEA and SEAPA or the Southeast Conference representatives agree to this option,an Amendment to the Contract will be negotiated that will specify the terms of the arrangement including any costs for living expenses,support staff or office space. C.5 The contractor will provided the following minimum deliverables in accordance with the Schedule in 5.6. Deliverables Task #Task Deliverable Understand the Southeast Energy Model:Past,Present Participation in up to 10 public meetings and list of 1 and Future documents and load analysis Assess Energy Technologies Power Point Presentation and necessary work papers to 2 useful to Southeast Alaska Advisory Work Group Develop an Energy Conservation and Demand Side Management Program for |Include with Task 3 Presentation to Advisory Work 3 SE Alaska Group Financing the Southeast Power Point Presentation and necessary work papers to 4 Energy Future Advisory Work Group Address Region-wide Energy Presentation of plan methodology,and summary draft Issues and develop Regional document of issues list and narrative description of 5 Action Plan issues and participation in technical Conference Develop a Regional Power Point Presentation and necessary work papers to 6 Transmission Plan Advisory Work Group AE11-032 SE IRP Final Contract 30 of 35 2/9/2011 Task #Task Deliverable Preferred Resource Lists for existing Interconnected Power Point Presentation and necessary work papers to 7 Networks,excluding SEAPA Advisory Work Group Presentation of SEAPA IRP to Advisory Work Group, and presentation to SEAPA board for consideration and 8 Develop SEAPA Network IRP acceptance IRP Planning for Insular Power Point Presentation and necessary work papers to 9 Communities Advisory Work Group Interim report,with phased capital improvement Provide Preliminary Capita!schedule,focus on capital project for calendar year 10 Budgets for Region wide IRP 2012,2013,and 2014. Assemble Task Groups 1,2 and 3 Components into a Draft Report,delivered to AEA ftp site and by email to 11 Regional Plan AEA project manager,25 paper copies and 100 CDs Participate in technical conference 2,with responsibility 12 |Present the Plan to present the plan,provide power point presentation. Provide a CD of the final report in print ready PDF format for posting as an electronic download and printing hardcopies.Also provide a final editable copy in MS13|Complete the Plan Word or other format acceptable to the Authority. AE11-032 SE IRP Final Contract 31 of 35 2/9/2011 C.6 Schedule 7 4th Quarter,(Ast QuarteriNov.Dec)Jan a Feb_ Mon 1/16/12 ID a Task Name Duration Start Finish 1 fy |Task 1-Understand the Southeast Energy Model:Past,Present,and Future 21 days Tue 27/44 Tue HT 2 od Kickoff meeting 0 days Tue 2/8/11 Tue 2/8/11 3 Eq Stakeholder Meetings 7 days Mon 2/14/11 Tue 2/22/11 4 et |Task 2 -Assess Existing and Future Energy Technologies 39 days Tue 2/8/11 Fri 4/4/11 5 fx Advisory Work Group Meeting 0 days Thu 3/31/11 Thu 3/31/11 6 far]Task 3 -Develop an Energy Conservation and Demand Side Management Program for SE Alaska 39 days Tue 2/8/11 Fri 4/1/11 v iz |Advisory Work Group Meeting O days Thu 334/11 Thu ¥31/11 8 fog Task 4-Financing the Southeast Energy Future 67 days Tue 2/1/11 Wed 5/4/11 9 at |Advisory Work Group Meeting 0 days Wed 5/4/11 Wed 5/4/11 10 eq Task5-Technical Conf and Preliminary Action Plan 14 days Mon 5/2/11 Thu 6/19/14 ih eae Advisory Work Group Meeting O days Tue 5/17/11 Tue 5/17/11 120 Fg Technical Conference 2days|Wed 5/18/11 Thu 5/19/11 13 Bi Task 6 -Develop a Region-wide Transmission Plan 82 days Tue 2/8/11 Wed 6/1/11 140 Advisory Work Group Meeting 82 days Tue 2/8/11 Wed 6/1/11 15 rg Task 7 -Develop a Preferred Resource List for Existing Interconnected Electrical Grids Excluding SEAPA 68 days Thu 3/31/11 Mon 7/4/14 16 fod Advisory Work Group Meeting 0 days Thu 6/30/11 Thu 6/30/11 7 FW Task 8 -Integrated Resource P {IRP)for the Southeast Alaska Power Agency (SEAPA)111 days Thu ¥31/14 Thu 9/1/11 18 Be Advisory Work Group Meeting 0 days Wed 8/31/11 Wed 8/31/11 i 190%SEAPA Board Meeting 0 days Thu 9/1/11 Thu 9/1/11 20 fet |Task 9 -Planning for Insular Communities 111 days Thu ¥31/11 Thu 9/1/11 21 rg Advisory Work Group Meeting Odays|Wed 8/31/11 Wed 8/31/11 22 Ee |Task 10 -Provide Preliminary Capital Budgets for Region-wide IRP 69 days Fri 7/1741 Wed 10/5/11 23 er Preliminary Capital Budgets 0 days Wed 10/5/11 Wed 10/8/11 240d Task 11 -Assemble Task Groups 1,2,and 3 C into a Regional Plan 45 days Thu 9/1/11 Wed 11/2/11 2 ed Draft Report Qdays|Wed 11/2/11 Wed 11/2/11 26 |Task 12 -Present the Plan 6 days Wed 11/2/11 Wed 11/9/11 2 Advisory Work Group Meeting 0 days Mon 11/7/11 Mon 11/7/11 28 ral Technical Conference 2 days Tue 11/8/11 Wed 11/9/11 2 Fy Task 13 -Complete the Plan 48 days;Thu 11/10/11 Mon 1/16/12 ker|Final Report O days Mon 1/16/12 >#30 Ca 416 C.7 Other Terms or Conditions C.7.1 Requirements for Data Collection The Contractor shall be responsible for all data collection that include possible timing impacts as a result of existing federal and state regulatory requirements,utility power supply system characteristics, obtaining and reviewing existing reports and studies completed by others. C.7.2 Additional Services AEA may request the Consultant provide additional services which could include:economic analysis, cost benefits analysis,legal/regulatory analysis,additional research and analysis,additional conferences,and other services as determined by AEA.Any additional services would be subject to AEA and the Contractor negotiating an amendment to the contract. C.7.3.Payment Terms AEA intends to negotiate a firm fixed-priced contract by Task as defined by this RFP and the subsequent contract. Payment for services rendered will be made based upon submission of invoices and satisfactory progress reports which show work is being completed in accordance with the contract schedule. Unless the Contractor provides written notice to the Project Manager,all work being performed will be considered within the scope of the contract.The Contractor will not be reimbursed for work that is not approved in advance of an approved amendment. C.8 Expectations for the Alaska Energy Authority The contractor 's expectations of AEA include: ¢Prompt response to data/information requests. ¢Review and comment on major deliverables. ¢Project management team that can generally be reached on a timely basis and is assigned to this project for the duration AE11-032 SE IRP Final Contract 33 of 35 2/9/2011 |Appendix D Consideration 1.Contract Price.The total cost for the work identified in Appendix C including labor,overhead, profit,and expenses will not to exceed $446,700.00 for the tasks as defined in this contract and outlined in 2 below.It is anticipated that additional services will be negotiated and included in this contract over the course of the contract. 2.Cost Per Task.The contractor will be paid a fixed price per task for all work in accordance with price and tasks noted below: Task Total Cost Per Task Task1 -__Understand the Southeast Energy Model:Past,Present and Future $53,536 Task2 -_Assess Energy Technologies usefulto Southeast Alaska . $19,160 Task 3 Develop an Energy Conservation and Demand Side Management Program for SE Alaska $24,980 _ Task4 __Financing the Southeast Energy Future a oe _$39,580 Task5 -_-Address Region-wide Energy Issues and develop Regional Action Plan *$46,166 Task 6 Develop a Regional Transmission Plan *$71,959 Task 7 Preferred Resource Lists for existing Interconnected Networks,excluding = .SEAPA *$66,241_ Task 8 Develop SEAPA Network IRP ee $60,540 Task 9 IRP Planning for Insular Communities ee Co $9,440 Task 10 _Provide Preliminary Capital Budgets for Region wide IRP $5,840 Task 11 Assemble Task Groups 1,2 and 3 Components into a Regional Plan $15,760 | Task 12 Present the Plan *$23,578 Task 13.Complete the Plan $9,920 Total Cost $446,700 *Price reflects portion of 5%discount per proposal. 3.Payment Schedule:Payment will be made monthly based on percentage of completion of Tasks 1 through 13,and submission of a monthly report and invoice.The schedule of specific milestones and criteria for completion of each task are stated in APPENDIX C. Additional Work Not Authorized.Unless the Contractor provides written notice to the project manager,all work being performed will be considered within the scope of the Contract.The Contractor will not be reimbursed for any additional work unless it is approved in advance by a written Amendment to this contract. Changes and Adjustments to Price.If the Contractor proposes or the Authority requests additional work that results in an increase in cost or a change in the scope of work the Contractor and the Authority will negotiate an amendment to the contract. Rates for amendments.Rates that will be used for amendment adjustments will be per the labor and expense rates listed below: Labor Rates Labor rates listed here are considered to be loaded and include all direct and indirect labor costs, profit,and overhead,general and administrative expenses. AE11-032 SE IRP Final Contract 34 of 35 |2/9/2011 Kevin Harper Project Director $340 Myron Rollins Project Manager $280 Bob Butera HDR Project Director $174 "Paul Berkshire HDR Project Manager $197 Bob Brady Financial Consultant $280 Robert Miller Transmission Consultant $220MarkMichaels-_Smart Grid Consultant $240 Joe Trainor DSM Consultant $220 Analyst Analyst $170 _Wind Consultant Wind Consultant $109 Estimator Estimator $109 Expenses &Sub-consultants Expenses and sub-consultant rates will be billed at cost. 7.Changes or Additions to Personnel.Subject to AEA's approval,substitutes of assigned personnel will be paid at the same rate or less depending on the level of experience of the substitute.Rates for additional workers that may be required for different classes of work will be paid at a reasonable market rate negotiated as an amendment to the contract. 8.Follow-up Work Costs and Rates.Upon completion of the initial work required in the contract,the Authority may request the contractor provide additional services and will negotiate the price for the additional work.Amendments for follow-up work will be priced by either a fixed-price (FP)per task or time and expenses (T&E)price per task with a guaranteed fixed not-to-exceed price. 9.Rate Increases.The above rate schedule may be adjusted annually based on either the CPI/W for the Seattle area or some other mutually agreed upon standard.The percentage of the adjustment for any position will not exceed the best adjusted percentage Black and Veatch would offer to any other Government contract.Adjusted rate schedules will be good for one year.Rates may be adjusted on an annual basis for the life of the contract. AE11-032 SE IRP Final Contract 35 of 35 2/9/2011 Mike Harper From:May Clark Sent:Tuesday,April 05,2011 8:29 AM To:Shauna Howell;Mike Harper Subject:FW:upcoming technical conference,SE Integrated Resource Plan project Attachments:IRP_Technical_Conference_Sitka_draft_agenda.doc Here is a draft agenda for this month's SE IRP 1"Technical Conference in Sitka from Jim,for your information. There's both pdf and word version in the SE IRP folder. From:James Strandberg Sent:Tuesday,April 05,2011 7:39 AM To:Robert Venables (energy@seconference.orq);May ClarkSubject:FW:upcoming techncial conference,SE Integrated Resource Plan project May attached is the draft agenda for the technical conference.Could you please email this draft agenda to all participants on this email i sent out earlier this morning.We will be in Kake later today.R.Jim From:James Strandberg Sent:Tuesday,April 05,2011 7:29 AMTo:Mike Kline;tim.mcleod@aelp.com;Christoper Brewton (chrisb@cityofsitka.com);Bill Corbus (bill.corbus@aelp.com) Subject:upcoming techncial conference,SE Integrated Resource Plan project As you may know,we are planning for a technical conference in Sitka,AK for the SE Integrated Resource Planning project.This conference is meant to be an informative gathering of stakeholders from SE Alaska and SE Alaska public to both raise awareness and to identify the key energy issues facing SE Alaskans. This is in fact a regional energy planning process,but more it is a gathering of SE people to address their energy future,and to take actions that will ensure energy security,affordability and reliability for heating,electricity and transportation. This upcoming technical conference,and draft agenda attached is designed to include energy experts from Southeast Alaska,in a two day interactive session in Sitka on April 21st and 22nd.We are expecting up to 75 people to attend. On behalf of the Alaska Energy Authority and Southeast Conference,I would like to invite you to speak at this important conference.We suggest the attached agenda for this,and include you as topic experts.If you agree to participate as a speaker,AEA will reimburse you for your travel and perdiem. We would like to publish this agenda as draft,later this week,and hope you would be able to join us for this session.Later as we get confirmations on your attendance,we will update the agenda on line. This is p tily a teaching and informative program,so we seek an approximat minute presentation from you,with 10 minutes for questions and fers. We will be video recording each presentation,and putting it on the AEA web page.Power points are encouraged,and will also be placed on the web page. Please advise me of your willingness to participate in this important meeting and regional action plan. You can respond to me at jstrandberqg@aidea.org,(cell (907)632-3522)or with our project coordinator,Mr.Robert Venables at (enerqy@seconference.org)(cell (907)723-0177) I look forward to hearing from your willingness and ability to participate. Best Regards,Jim Southeast Integrated Resource Plan (SEIRP) 1*Technical Conference Harrigan Centennial Hall 330 Harbor Drive Sitka,Alaska April 21-22,2011 oliha Flight #62 from Juneau 10:25 am -11:06 am 11:30--4pm Registration Lunch on your own 1pm Welcome 1:30-1:45 Opening remarks Jim Strandberg,AEA SE IRP Project Manager 1:45-2:30 The Architecture of Integrated Resource Planning Kevin Harper,Black &Veatch 2:30-3:00 The Art and Science of Financing Power Projects -Dave Carlson,SEAPA 3:00-3:30 Break 3:30-4:00 Energizing through Roadless Areas,Forrest Cole,Tongass Forest Supervisor,USFS 4:00-4:30 Coast Guard Biomass projects -TBD 4:30-5:00 Biomass solutions and creating market demand _-Nathan Sobelof,Sealaska 5:00 Day 1 Wrap up and OverviewJim Strandberg,AEA Dinner on your own 6:30 7:00 Public Meeting Open House format SE IRP Presentation Jim Strandberg and Kevin Harper Community Discussion continues -what's important to Sitka? Day Two 7:30 -9:30 10:00 10:15 -10:40 10:40 -11:00 11:00 --11:25 11:25 -11:45 Noon 12:30 1:30-1:50 1:50-2:15 2:15-2:40 2:40-3:00 3:00-3:45 3:45-4:15 4:30 5:00 Southeast Integrated Resource Plan (SEIRP) 1*Technical Conference Harrigan Centennial Hall 330 Harbor Drive Sitka,Alaska April 21-22,2011 Southeast IRP Working Group Session Opening Remarks Jim Strandberg,AEA SE IRP Project Manager Load Forecasting in the local market |=Mike Kline,Ketchikan Public Utilities Dynamics of an Integrated System Eric Wolfe,SEAPA Permitting 101 for Power Projects Chris Brewton,Sitka Electric Utility Tariffs to respond to electric heat conversions _Bill Corbus Lunch Luncheon Speaker Alaska's Energy Programs &Progress Scott Waterman,AHFC and Sean Skaling,AEA How contracting community can shape the energy scene -Ralph Kibby,Chatham Electric Dorothy Lake,the cost of generation Tim McLeod,AEL&P The Thomas Bay business case Paul Southland,ACE Coalition Break Emerging Technology "Speed-dating”Various Presenters Roundtable Wrap up Black &Veatch Closing Remarks Jim Strandberg,AEA SE IRP Project Manager Leave for Airport Alaska Air #67 Sitka to Juneau 6:20 pm -6:57 pm wa, March 3,2011 Ms.Rachel Klein The Kuskokwim Corporation 4300 B Street,Ste 207 Anchorage,Alaska 99503 Re:Kuskokwim Strategic Energy Planning Dear Ms.Klein: Alaska Energy Authority is pleased to hear of The Kuskokwim Corporation's interest to develop a Kuskokwim Strategic Energy Plan for your area.As you may know AEA has been involved in energy planning for years and in particular the past two years.In 2009 AEA produceda report titled "Alaska Energy -A first Step toward energy independence”.This guide is now being used by communities to review available resources and help determine least const energy options.This report is available on our website:www.akenergyauthority.org. In 2010,AEA produced "Alaska Energy Pathway-Toward Energy Independence”.The first part addresses the big picture and talks about overall energy policy direction.It also identifies targets for energy efficiency and conservation and well as renewable energy development.The Pathway also identifies 228 communities and their energy related needs for power,heating and transportation.Finally the report shows different alternatives for satisfying these needs.This report is also on or website... On behalf of Alaska Energy Authority we are pleased to present you with this letter of support for the Kuskokwim Corporation's priority of forming a Strategic Energy Plan for the Kuskokwim region.We understand that The Kuksokwim Corporation is applying for funds from the U.S.Department of Energy to develop this strategic plan. AEA has been discussion energy planning with a major planning group headed up by one of your Shareholders Mr.Ron Hoffman in his capacity as President of AVCP,Housing Authority.This group includes AVCP.Inc.Calista,Yukon Kuskokwim Health Corp., AVEC,North Star Gas,and ourselves.I am quite sure the group would be happy to have you join the region wide planning efforts.I will send a copy of this to Mr.Hoffman. We know that the Kuskokwim Corporation will consider the opinions of the people and partners in the Kuskokwim region when making decisions regarding strategies for energy efficiency and conservation,as well as resource development. We look forward to cooperating and partnering with The Kuskokwim Corporation in this endeavor to improve and sustain life in the Kuskokwim Region. Sincerely, Michael C.Harper, REG ,Deputy Director CC :Ron Hoffman,President AVCP Housing Authority CC:Christine E.Klein,COO,Calista _Mike Harper From:James Strandberg Sent:Saturday,March 19,2011 10:24 AM To:Mike Harper Ce:Peter Crimp;Sara Fisher-Goad Subject:FW:Bethel Utility Study interview follow-up Attachments:Heather Stewart;Shanna Zuspan Here is a follow up email from the Agnew::Beck person who came in to discuss potential business structures and regulatory approach for the Bethel Utilities. Attached are the business cards for the two planners.Shanna Zuspan has some good experience in lower 48 utility regulatory affairs,and is on the ball and seems to have some good grit.They are teaming with EES to put together a Comp plan for the City of Bethel.|gave her your contact information Mike,since you are ramrodding the lower kuskol regional plan.|believe they will be contacting you directly.The City of Bethel apparently recommended they consult with me.I did spend some time explaining the concept of a G&T entity,and suggested they understand the utility business structures that exist in Alaska,and particularly those that exist for communities with demographics similar to the City of Bethel. 1 explained that you were engaged in considering a region wide generation and transmission project,and that it would be good,as the comp planners for Bethel, for them to understand and possibly participate in the regional energy planning effort you are engaged in with Ms.Kline and her group. So here is the hand off.|am available to talk business structure and regulatory strategies as you see fit. R.Jim From:Heather Stewart [mailto:HStewart@agnewbeck.com] Sent:Friday,March 18,2011 1:40 PM To:James Strandberg Cc:Shanna Zuspan Subject:Bethel Utility Study interview follow-up Hello Jim, Thank you so much for taking the time to meet with Shanna and me earlier this week.The conversation gave us some excellent food for thought. |wanted to follow up with you on some of the contacts and models you suggested: People to talk to (For these individuals,do you have recommendations for contacting them?E.g.,email,call the main phone number,call a direct fine): James Jensen,AEA,about wind projects in Bethel Brad Reeve,City of Kotzebue utility Mike Harper,AEA Rural Deputy Director,in charge of regional planning (leaving April 30) :1 istine Klein,Calista VP Is there anyone else you would recommend that we missed? Alaska utilities to look at as models (Are there any individuals you would recommend we talk to from each of these utilities?): City of Kotzebue electric utility Nome electric utility Barrow utility (+relationship with North Slope Borough utility for villages) Juneau AEL&P Finally,looking back at my notes,|am unsure about these two models that you referenced: Bonneville model (Bonneville Power Administration?) (sounds like,and maybe the SE is for southeast?)GretSE model Thanks again, HEATHER STEWART associate 441 West Fifth Avenue,Suite 202 Anchorage,Alaska 99501 t 907.222.5424 f 907.222.5426 Ww www.agnewbeck.com Mike Harper Full Name: Last Name: First Name: Job Title: Company: Business Address: Business: Business Fax: E-mail: E-mail Display As: Web Page: Heather Stewart Stewart Heather Associate Planning Agnew::Beck 441 W5th Avenue,Suite 202 Anchorage,AK 99501 (907)222-5424 (907)222-5426 heather@agnewbeck.com Heather Stewart (heather@agnewbeck.com) www.agnewbeck.com Mike Harper Full Name: Last Name: First Name: Job Title: Company: Business Address: Business: Business Fax: E-mail: E-mail Display As: Web Page: Shanna Zuspan Zuspan Shanna senior planner Aggnew::Beck 441 W5th Avenue,Suite 202 Anchorage,AK 99501 (907)222-5424 (907)222-5426 shanna@agnewbeck.com Shanna Zuspan (shanna@agnewbeck.com) www.agnewbeck.com wa, STATEWIDE ENERGY PLAN }Project Code 580001 |Award Range * 7 Date 01/01/01..06/30/14 FUND CONTRACT AWARD CONTRACT TITLE AR Code DESCRIPTION GL Account Budget Actual Encumbrance Commitment Remaining FEDERAL FUNDING Project Management Total Federal Project Management Funding 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Advances Total Federal Advances 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Subrecipient Grants Total Federal Subrecipient Grants 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTAL FEDERAL FUNDING 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 STATE FUNDING Project Management E2830 00000 NA 05140002 /|S-AEEE State/Federal Energy Projects-32699-10 71000..76999 5,000.00 5,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 E2830 00000 NA 08130001 |S-State portion Energy Projects-06351-12 71000..76999 1,160,316.08 1,155,786.09 4,529.99 0.00 0.00 E2830 00000 NA 08130002 |S-GF Electrical Emergencies-06377-12 CLOSED 71000..76999 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (0.00) E2830 00000 NA 09130001 |S-ENERGY PJS-STATE GF-04684-13 71000..76999 0.00 (0.00)0.00 0.00 0.00 E2830 00000 NA 10130001 |S-ENERGY PJS-STATE GF-30503-14 71000..76999 1,040,000.00 994,133.30 45,866.70 0.00 0.00 £2830 00000 NA 11130025 |S-AEA Statewide Energy Plan Dev AR52024-15 71000..76999 1,750,000.00 55,183.24 1,180.90 693.00 1,692,942.86 "E2850 00000 NA 08225001 |AEA FY08 RURAL ENERGY OPS-29607-08 71000..76999 49,510.78 49,510.78 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total State Project Management Funding 4,004,826.86 2,259,613.41 51,577.59 693.00 1,692,942.86 Advances Total State Advances 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Subrecipient Grant ma Total State Subrecipient Grant Funding 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 \TOTAL STATE FUNDING 4,004,826.86 2,259,613.44 §1,577.59 693.00 1,692,942.86 | COMMUNITY CONTRIBUTIONS &OTHER FUNDING SOURCES TOTAL COMMUNITY CONTRIBUTIONS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING 4,004 826.86 2,259,613.41 51,577.59 693.00 1,692,942.86 Bal Ck 4,004,826.86 2,259,613.41 51,577.59 693.00 1,692,942.86 Difference 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Project Management 72000..76999 4,004,826.86 2,259,613.41 51,577.59 693.00 1,692,942.86 I AEA Subrecipient Grant 77000..77999 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total AEA Funding 4,004,826.86 2,259,613.41 51,577.59 693.00 1,692,942.86 | I Community Contributions 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Project 4,004 826.86 2,259,613.414 51,577.59 693.00 | 1,692,942.86 \\fileserverishare\Rural Energy Group (REG)\Accounting\REGJetMgmtReports'P JBdgtToActual by Funding Source-REV030111-JET.xisxExpenditure Category Rept 3/2/2011 yy, Mike Harper From:Mayer,Thomas J (DOA)[tom.mayer@alaska.gov] Sent:Wednesday,April 13,2011 10:29 AM To:Christopher Rutz Ce:Mike Harper;Soza,Jason A (DOA);Althea S.Clapp;Peter Crimp Subject:RE: Chris, I have assigned it to Ted Fosket. Tom 465-5677 -----Original Message----- From:Christopher Rutz [mailto:CRutz@aidea.org] Sent:Wednesday,April 13,2011 10:22 AM To:Mayer,Thomas J (DOA) Cc:Harper,Michael C (AIDEA);Soza,Jason A (DOA);Clapp,Althea S (AIDEA);Crimp,Peter M (AIDEA) Subject: Tom, Attached is the RAP I called you about this AM. Let me know who you've assigned it to and call me if you need anything else.We are asking for $25@ under the RAP as however the initial contract will likely be for $100K for the first year.There are some negotiations that need to take place regarding scope schedule and deliverables. Thanks Christopher Rutz,C.P.M. Procurement Manager AIDEA and AEA 813 West Northern Lights Anchorage,AK 99503-2495 907-771-3015 Mike Harper From:Christopher Rutz Sent:Wednesday,April 13,2011 10:22 AM To:tom.mayer@alaska.gov Ce:Mike Harper;jason.soza@alaska.gov;Althea S.Clapp;Peter Crimp Attachments:AEARAPNuvistaAEA#1 1-042.pdf Tom, Attached is the RAP I called you about this AM. Let me know who you've assigned it to and call me if you need anything else.We are asking for $250 under the RAP as however the initial contract will likely be for $100K for the first year.There are some negotiations that need to take place regarding scope schedule and deliverables. Thanks Christopher Rutz,C.P.M. Procurement Manager AIDEA and AEA 813 West Northern Lights Anchorage,AK 99503-2495 907-771-3015 ,REQUEST FOR ALTERNATE PROCUREMENT 1.Total Estimated Cost 2.PR/DO or other Number (Attach document)3.RAP Number 250,000 AEA 11-042 4.If Single Source,Contractor's Name and Address 5,Date Required Requesting Department Nuvista Light &Electric Cooperative,Inc.;(NLEC)4/15/2011 Alaska Energy Authority 301 Calista Court,Suite A Anchorage,AK 99518 6.Preparer's Name Phone Mike Harper,Deputy Dir.REG |907-771-3025 7.Type of request for exemption from competitive solicitation requirements. A.X__Single Source:AS 36.30.300/2 AAC 12.410 B.Limited competition:AS 36.30.305 /2 AAC 12.430 C.Emergency:AS 36.30.310 /2 AAC 12.440 D.Exception to unanticipated amendment limitation.2AAC 12.485 E.Innovative Procurement.AS 36.30.308 /2AAC 12.575-577 8.Explanation:Explanations of exemptions under A,B,or C must contain findings of fact.Evidence must be included,consisting of material facts,sufficient to independently determine that the findings of fact listed are true and accurate,Factual evidence may consist of written documents,records,supporting data,affidavits,or other information proving that the findings of fact are true and accurate.Itemized listings of findings of fact and material factual evidence should be included or attached. The Alaska Energy Authority is requesting authority to enter into a single source contract with Nuvista Light &Electric Cooperative,Inc.(NLEC)a non-profit utility cooperative,to develop a comprehensive energy plan for the 56 communities of the Lower Yukon and Kuskokwim river Delta. --See attached for background information ,justification,and additional documentation. (For continuation,attach additional page) 9.Department Head or Authorized |certify to the best of my knowledge and belief,that all the Representative Name and Title (typed or printed)information on this request,including any attachment,is true and accurate. Christopher Rutz C.P.M. Procurement Officer,AEA u-|3-2D Vv |\Signature \\DateDEPARTMENTOFADMINISTRATION-CDIVISION OBGENERAE SERVICES 10.Approved Disapproved Returned Greuther Justification Date (See back) Chief Procurement Officer Date 02-100 (Rev.9/16/10) Background The Alaska Energy Authority has published two documents,one in 2009 and one in 2010 that provided a starting point for Alaskans across the state to begin the process of developing a long term 2nergy strategy for the State.The first document contains information on all critical energy echnologies,as well as a database of community energy resources compiled from a variety of sources.The second report,Alaska Energy Pathway,starts with overall policy direction in energy efficiency and conservation as well as renewable energy development.It also identifies critical priority areas like economic development,climate change,energy security,and education and work force development.Finally it includes much more detailed information on each community and region. Additionally AEA has worked with local utilities to develop more detailed IRP's (Integrated Resource Plans)for the Railbelt and Southeast Alaska.Because of the size and complexity of these regions AEA,in cooperation with the local utilities,solicited and awarded contracts for a consultant to coordinate this work in cooperation with the various utilities and other stakeholders in each of the regions.The cost of the Railbelt contract was approximately $770K and we expect the cost of the SE IRP contracts to exceed $600k. The next stage of energy planning is the development of Region-wide energy plans for the more remote and less populated regions of Alaska.AEA has identified nine rural regions of the state that would benefit from this planning process.AEA's intent is to work with stakeholders in the region to develop a standard methodology to provide consistency for evaluate funding alternatives and determining priorities for projects throughout these regions that may be requesting State participation in project development or funding. The Scope of work will be similar in all regional energy plans: "Identify energy issues that affect that particular region *Project growthin electricity demand*Identify which power projects and potential transmission lines needed to be built *Develop an action plan for all major stakeholders The fact that these regions are less populated,and have multiple stakeholders with differing local agendas,as well as limited resources,will require local involvement,commitment,and ownership of the plans to be successful. To this end AEA has been a participant on a steering committee in Interior Alaska that is focusing on the Tanana Chiefs Conference (TCC)geographic region's 42 communities.This project is being funded by the Denali Commission.They anticipate funding this project through by a federal grant with TCC and the Alaska Center for Energy and Power completing most of the work. While we are still in the early stages of developing planning standards AEA believes it is in the best interest of the Authority and the stakeholders in the Y-K region to contract with NLEC as they are the only entity in the region that has the support of a majority of local stakeholders,(see attached letters from AVCP Regional Housing Authority and the YK Health Corporation)a mandate to address energy issues in the Y-K region (Ref Article III under Articles of incorporation),and a willingness to contribute $50,000 of their own funds to complete the plan.(Ref E-mail dated 4/1/2011) About NLEC. *NLEC was formed over 15 years ago as a nonprofit cooperative utility to address energy issues in the YK Delta,there is no similar entity in the region that has the same level of stakeholder commitment. *NLEC members consist of and are represented by a12 member board of directors consisting of the below individuals representing other larger organizations: 1.Alaska Village Council President's -Myron Naneng (3 seats) 2.Yukon Kuskokwim Health Corporation -Gene Peltola (1) 3.Alaska Village Electric Cooperative -Brent Petrie (1) Channinik Wind Group -William Igurak (1) Lower Kuskokwim Electric -Martin Moore (1) Calista Corporation -Art Heckman,Willie Kasayulie (2) Kwethluk Electric -George Guy (1) Middle Kuskokwim Electric -Ernie Baumgartner (1) AVCP Regional Housing Authority -Ron Hoffman (1) ¢NLEC has the resources to do the work and knowledge of the energy landscape in the region that no other single entity in the region possesses which includes access to utility information and an understanding of socioeconomic factors of the entire region. e«NLEC has energy data available from previous reports it has completed. e NLEC's sole purpose is energy whereas all its member stakeholders have different mission statements as their primary focus. *tis not practicable to assume that any outside for-profit contractor could compete financially; with Nuvista 's willingness to commit their own funds and resources to the completing the plan.(See attached E-mail)OONAAPIf this request is approved AEA intends to further refine the tasks,deliverables,and schedule it expects to negotiate a professional services contract with NLEC to develop an energy plan for the YK Delta. Wednesday,April 13,2011 10:10:56 AM AKT Subject:FW:Nuvista Grant/Contract Date:Tuesday,April 12,2011 4:41:56 PM AKT From:Christine Klein To:Christopher Rutz,Mike Harper cc:Andrew Guy Chris, Please see the below email where I've highlighted in red,that the Nuvista Board two weeks ago in their quarterly meeting in Bethel did commit up to $50,000.towards this energy planning effort. Our own Calista board also re-confirmed this information and the monetary support last week in their own resolution (Calista has two seats on the Nuvista board).My president Andrew Guy is copied here as well should you have any questions. We feel this is a huge showing of commitment,since most federal grants require less than a 10%match.Let me know if there's anything else needed. Thanks very much for your help.I'll be out of the office in the region tomorrow but back thursday. Christine Christine E.Klein,A.A.E. Executive Vice President Chief Operating Officer Calista Corporation 301 Calista Court,Ste.A Anchorage,Alaska 99518 (907)644-6309 direct (907)351-9585 cell (907)279-5516 From:Christine Klein [mailto:cklein@calistacorp.com] Sent:Friday,April 01,2011 5:16 PM To:Mike Harper;Peter Crimp Ce:Andrew Guy;g.guy_kwtinc@yahoo.com;Christine Klein Subject:Nuvista Grant/Contract Importance:High Mike This is to follow up on our conversation today about a contract or grant with Nuvista.The $100,000.in funding requested for the year and subsequent effort (scope provided last week)is to provide a position that would help coordinate and oversee a:1)region-wide alternative energy plan,and a 2)Bethel sub-region alternative energy effort for the Y-K area.The actual plans and any project themselves would have to be funded separately by AEA or the legislature of course.|understand you or AEA may need the following Page 1 of 3 information before AEA can provide any funds,a grant,or contract to Nuvista:a)_ justification of why or how Nuvista is the best one prepared to do this,and b)two letters of support from other major stakeholders in the region (ie)AVEC and or another Here are some bullets to help provide support for Nuvista receiving a grant: e The sole purpose for Nuvista is as a non-profit utility cooperative set up years ago to address energy issues of the Yukon-Kuskokwim region e Nuvista is an organization focused on energy issues and a non-profit unlike other organizations in the region that may have another mission,focus,profits,and politics e Nuvista members consist of and are represented by a12 member board of directors consisting of the below individuals representing other larger organizations: Alaska Village Council President's -Myron Naneng (3 seats) Yukon Kuskokwim Health Corporation -Gene Peltola (1) Alaska Village Electric Cooperative -Brent Petrie (1) Channinik Wind Group -William Igurak (1) Lower Kuskokwim Electric -Martin Moore (1) Calista Corporation -Art Heckman,Willie Kasayulie (2) Kwethluk Electric -George Guy (1) Middle Kuskokwim Electric-Ernie Baumgartner (1)AVCP Regional Housing Authority--Ron Hoffman (1)e Nuvista does not focus on or address any one member's interests'or area,is an established non-profit,andis the one existing group or entity whichis most representative of the large diverse Y-K region e This is the first time all of these many diverse groups have all come together to collaborate,and its very important their efforts be supported,assisted,and continued while people remain interested and excitedOONAARWN>The group agreed that we can commit to putting up to $50,000.towards help support and/or match any grant assistance.In addition,Calista has also commilted to providing office, logistics,and support space for an individual,as well as,a significant amount of my own time,resource,and direction in leading,overseeing and moving this effort forward (as clearly proven and exhibited over the past 4 months).My knowledge of our region along with background of engineering,master planning,and permitting of many large past projects was specifically requested to ensure this effort proceeded.These have all been major commitments from these organizations and their combined leadership and | respectfully request AEA's funding help to proceed expeditiously. Hope this helps. Christine Page 2 of3 SIQHC "Working Together to Achieve Excellent Health” _april 4,2011 Michael Harper DEC!We |Deputy Director,Rural Energy Group Alaska Energy Authority Ni QPR™&2011813W.Northern Lights = Anchorage,Alaska 99503-2495 "oe Dear Mr.Harper: YK is writing to encourage the Alaska Energy Authority (AEA)to provide a contract or grant to Nuvista Light &Electric Cooperative,Inc.(NLEC)for a dedicated planning and coordination position on energy alternatives.Nuvista with our approval and support submitted to AEA a scope,timeline,and estimated an annual $100,000.to $150,000.for two years' support to complete a comprehensive Y-K region wide alternative energy plan,and,continuing Bethel sub-region feasibility work. Nuvista (NLEC)has a mission to improve the energy situation in our region and future management of electrical generation and transmission,Our groups along with TDX Power collaborated successfully in completing a recent sub- region hydropower feasibility study funded by AEA.Twelve members make up the Nuvista board,including:Alaska Village Council Presidents (AVCP),AVCP Rural Housing Authority,Alaska Village Electric Cooperative,Calista, Chaninik Wind Group,Lower Yukon Representative,Kwethluk Electric Inc.,Middle Kuskokwim Electric Cooperative, and Yukon Kuskokwim Health Corporation,These groups and their members make up the majority of Y-K electrical ers.While any of our organizations could individually and in some cases have undertaken energy tasks-that's not eir primary mission.It makes most sense for energy planning efforts to be headed up by Nuvista due to the following facts: e Nuvista is a non-profit utility cooperative with an energy mission and focus. Past Y-K energy contracts and contractor efforts failed or were marginally successful in our region,and forward progress would cease for several years after.We do not want to see this repeated after so much positive momentum and feel that one of our own region entities (NLEC)is best suited to "own”and undertake this important work. ®NLEC as an organization has the greatest number of members'who are representative of our region and the entities which are utilizing energy. e NLEC can help ensure work is professional,objective,and unbiased for the good of the entire region,based on its very broad membership. e Nuvista is in the best position to represent us and our region in the role of coordinating the complex issues and public process involved in next steps of the energy planning. Now is the time to move ahead at full speed while everyone continues to be actively engaged and excited about moving forward in our region.All of our organizations'have made commitments of substantial time,money,expertise,space orotherresourcestowardsthiseffort.AEA committed to assist Nuvista at its January 26"board meeting attended by a record number of supportive people from our region.We need help to find solutions for the Y-K energy situation and urge AEA's support of Nuvista for a contract or grant to ensure success.If you have any questions,please feel free to call.Thank you. epee ne Peltola President &CEO -P.O.Box 528 ¢Bethel,Alaska 99559 ©907-543-6000 ©1-800-478-3321 The Association of Village Council Presidents P.O,Box 767 Regional Housing Authority 405 Ptarmigan Road Bethel,AK 99559 Main (907)-543-3121 Toll Free (800)-478-4687 Fax-Tribal Operations 543-4020 WEP|iDEC April 4,2011 ',.aN A OAPR™F201 Michael Harper Deputy Director,Rural Energy Group "DEAAlaskaEnergyAuthorityEA 813 W.Northern Lights Anchorage,Alaska 99503-2495 Dear Mr.Harper: We are writing to encourage the Alaska Energy Authority (AEA)to provide a contract or grant to Nuvista Light & Electric Cooperative,Inc.(NLEC)for a dedicated planning and coordination position on energy alternatives. Nuvista with our approval and support submitted to AFA a scope,timeline,and estimated an annual $100,000.to $150,000.for two years'support to complete a comprehensive Y-K region wide alternative energy plan,and, continuing Bethel sub-region feasibility work. Nuvista's (NLEC)mission is to improve the energy situation and future management of electrical generation and transmission in our region,Our groups in collaboration with TDX Power successfully completed a sub-region hydropower feasibility study funded by AEA.Twelve members of the Nuvista board,include:Alaska Village Council Presidents (AVCP),AVCP Regional Housing Authority,Alaska Village Electric Cooperative,Calista, Chaninik Wind Group,Lower Yukon Representative,Kwethluk Electric Inc.,Middle Kuskokwim Electric Cooperative,and Yukon Kuskokwim Health Corporation.These groups and their members make up the majority of Y-K electrical users.While any of our organizations could individually and in some cases have undertaken energy task.It makes most sense for energy planning efforts to be headed up by Nuvista due to the following facts: Nuvista is a non-profit utility cooperative with an energy mission and focus. e Past Y-K energy contracts and contractor efforts failed or were marginally successful in our region, and forward progress would cease for several years after.We do not want to see this repeated after so much positive momentum and feel one of our own regional entity (NLEC)is best suited to "own” and undertake this important work. e NLEC as an organization has the greatest number of members'who are representative of our region and the entities which are utilizing energy. ®NLEC can help ensure work is professional,objective,and unbiased for the good of the entire region,based on its very broad membership. ®Nuvista is in the best position to represent us and our region in the role of coordinating the complex issues and public process involved in next steps of the energy planning. Now is the time to move ahead at full speed while everyone continues to be actively engaged and excited about moving forward in our region and there is an emphasis on the federal and state level to explore alternative energy resources and use.All of our organizations'have committed substantial time,money,expertise,space or otherresourcestowardsthiseffort.AEA committed to assist Nuvista at its January 26"board meeting which was attended by a record number of supportive people from our region.We need help to find solutions for the Y-K energy situation and urge AEA's support of Nuvista for a contract or grant to ensure success.If you have any questions,please contact my office.Thank you. Respectfully, pmoren ag L Tale Roycn ie SC a al liane -Ron Hoffinan President and CEO .em,o em .%<<._A.Wiss OS ROI Alaska Entity #:111394 enState of Alaska Department of Commerce,Community,and a Economic Development - Corporations,Business and Professional Licensing y.CERTIFICATE | (INCORPORATION ) é COOP Electric &Telephone ) 'onLaresSacBENSTHE UNDERSIGNED,as Commissioner of Commerce,Community,and Economic Development of the State of Alaska,hereby certifies that Articles of Incorporation duly ) 'signed and verified pursuant to the provisions of Alaska Statutes has been received in this office and have been found to conform to law.) be ACCORDINGLY,the undersigned,as Commissioner of Commerce,Community and Economic Development,and by virtue of the authority vested in me by law,hereby issues this certificate to "wy$Nuvista Light &Electric Cooperative,Inc.+eand attaches hereto the original copy of the Articles of Incorporation for such certificate.) IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF,I execute this certificate and 4 affix the Great Seal of the State of Alaska on September 28, 2007. 7 p-.yh the ' Emil Notti ) )'eidCommissioner {i Domestic Cooperative Formation 5 Page(s)| AK Entity #:111394 wc weiiStateofAlaskaHK|Mh i Department of Commerce 10727144033 ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION NUVISTA LIGHT &ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE,INC. We,the undersigned natural persons of the age of nineteen years or more acting as incorporators of an electric cooperative under the Electric and Telephone Cooperative Act, AS 10.25.010 et seq.,adopt the following Articles of Incorporation for such cooperative. ARTICLE I NAME The name of the cooperative is Nuvista Light &Electric Cooperative,Inc. ARTICLE II PERIOD OF DURATION The period of duration of this cooperative shall be perpetual. ARTICLE HI PURPOSES FOR WHICH ORGANIZED The purposes for which this cooperative is organized and the business or objects to be carried on and promoted by it are as follows: (a)To provide for all aspects of electric energy generation and transmission for its members; (b)In addition to the foregoing,the cooperative shall have and exercise all of the general powers enumerated in AS 10.25.010 and AS 10.25.020,as well as any other powers enumerated in AS 10.25,as heretofore or hereafter amended. ARTICLE IV MEMBERSHIP Section 1,|The cooperative is not organized for profit and shall not have authority toissuecapitalstock. Section 2.|Any person,entity,or body politic that desires to purchase wholesale electric energy,including but not limited to a village,municipality,village corporation,regional corporation,or retail electric utility,shall become a member of the cooperative by: (a)Filing a written application for membership; (bo)Agreeing to purchase from the cooperative electric energy as hereinafter specified; Articles of Incorporation Page 1 of 5 Nuvista Light &Electric Cooperative,Inc. (c)Agreeing to comply with and be bound by the Articles of Incorporation of the cooperative and the bylaws and such rules and regulations as may be from time to time adopted by the Board of Directors;and, (4)Paying the membership fee hereinafter specified;provided,however,that no person,entity,body politic,or subdivision thereof shall become a member unless or until it has been accepted for membership by the Board of Directors or the members; provided further that the bylaws may make additional provisions pertaining to the qualifications and methods of acquiring and terminating membership in the cooperative, not inconsistent with these Articles of Incorporation. The bylaws may provide for appeal by an applicant to a meeting of the members. No person,entity,body politic,or subdivision thereof,may own more than one (1) membership in the cooperative. Section3.|The membership fee,if any,shall be in an amount established in thebylawsorbyappropriateresolutionoftheBoardofDirectors.The bylaws may provide for additional fees and assessments to be paid by members requesting more than one service connection. Section 4.Each member may,as soon as electric energy shall be available,purchase from the cooperative all electric energy used on the premises referred to in the membership application of such member,and shall pay therefore monthly rates which shall from time to time be fixed by resolution of the Board of Directors;provided,however,that the electric energy which the cooperative shall furnish to any member may be limited to such an amount as the Board of Directors shall from time to time determine.In addition,each member shall pay to the cooperative such minimum amount per month as shall be fixed by the Board of Directors from time to time,regardless of the amount of electric energy consumed.Each member shall also pay all obligations which may from time to time become due and payable by such member to the cooperative as and when the same shall become due and payable.Production or use of electric energy on such premises,regardless of the source thereof,by means of facilities which shall be interconnected with the cooperative's facilities,shall be subject to regulations as shall be set from time to time by the Board ofDirectors of the cooperative. Section 5.|The private property of the members of the cooperative shall be exempt from execution for the debts of the cooperative and no member shall be individually liable or responsible for any debts or liabilities of the cooperative. ARTICLE V PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS The principal place of business of the cooperative shall be Anchorage,Alaska,or such other place within the State of Alaska as may be established by the bylaws or appropriate resolution of the board of directors. Articles of Incorporation .Page 2 of 5 Nuvista Light &Electric Cooperative,Inc. ARTICLE VI BYLAWS The internal affairs of the cooperative shall be regulated in accordance with the bylaws adopted as provided by law. ARTICLE VII AMENDMENTS OF ARTICLES The Articles of Incorporation may be amended as provided by law. ARTICLE VII REGISTERED OFFICE AND REGISTERED AGENT The address of the initial registered office of the cooperative shall be 301 Calista Court, Suite A,Anchorage,Alaska 99518,and the initial registered agent shall be Calista Corporation. ARTICLE IX DIRECTORS The number of directors of the cooperative shall be not less than six (6)directors,and shall be established in the bylaws,Each director must also be a member. The initial directors of the cooperative shall be: Arthur 8.Heckman 47 Hill Street Pilot Station,Alaska 99650 Willie Kasayulie 201 William and Tom Street Akiachak,Alaska 99551 Paul George Guy 301 Blueberry Street Kwethluk,Alaska 99621 Sven Paukan 100 Ketunraq Road St.Mary's,Alaska 99658 Daniel Waska 101 Village Road Atmautluak,Alaska 99559 Moses Owen 300 Riverfront Akiak,Alaska 99552 Articles of Incorporation Page 3 of 5 Nuvista Light &Electric Cooperative,Inc. ARTICLE X INCORPORATORS The names and addresses of the incorporators are: Arthur S.Heckman 47 Hill Street Pilot Station,Alaska 99650 Sven Paukan 101 Ketunraq road St.Mary's,Alaska 99658 Willie Kasayulie 201 William and Tom Street Akiachak,Alaska 99551 Daniel Waska 101 Village Road Atmautluak,Alaska 99559 Paul George Guy 301 Blueberry Street Kwethluk,Alaska 99621 Moses Owen 300 Riverfront Akiak,Alaska 99552 DATED at Anchorage,Alaska this 3 [day of July,2007. Arthur 8.Heckman Sven Paukan Willie ssayalte Daniel Waska Saat GoGeorge Guy Moses Owen Articles of Incorporation Page 4 of 5 Nuvista Light &Electric Cooperative,Inc. State of Alaska ) )ss. Third Judicial District ) The foregoing Articles of Incorporation were acknowledged before me this _.3/"aay of July,2007 by Arthur S.Heckman,Sven Paukan,Willie Kasayulie,Daniel Waska,Paul George Guy,and Moses Owen. Notary Public fore State of Alaska Ae My commission expires:_//-/@ -O07 iSArticles of Incorporation Page 5 of § Nuvista Light &Electric Cooperative,Inc. NUVISTA LIGHT ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE INC, AVCP Pouch 219 Bethel,Alaska 99559 RESOLUTION 08-01 WHEREAS,the AVCP/Calista region is faced with an energy crisis due to high costs of fuel and electricity beyond the capacity of the regional economy to contain;and WHEREAS,this crisis has the potential to cause a region-wide socio-economic failure unless the regional organizations and other stakeholders come together to address the energy crisis;and WHEREAS,there is a need to increase the number of members on the board of directors for Nuvista Light Electric Cooperative Inc.to address the regions energy needs and the bylaws of the cooperative authorizes the board of directors to increase the number. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED,as follows: 1,That Nuvista Light Electric Cooperative Inc.board of directors increases its members from six to twelve seats. 2.That the additional seats shall be appointed as follows: AVCPRHA _Ron Hoffman YKHC Gene Peltola AVEC Brent Petrie MKEC Ernie Baumgartner Chaninik Wind Group__William Igkurak Lower Yukon Representative _Martin Moore PASSED AND DATED this 20th day of March,2008. Nuvista Light Electric Cooperative Inc. FY ad "Gore Dp 4 :SEA [**a Arthur §.Heckman,Sr.,Secretary %,te,.tw NUVISTA LIGHT &ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE INC. AVCP P.O.Box 219 Bethel,Alaska 99559 RESOLUTION 08-02 WHEREAS,the Board of Directors of Nuvista Light &Electric Cooperative,Inc. (formerly Nuvista Light and Power)find it necessary to open checking,savings and investment accounts to carry out day-to-day business operations;and WHEREAS,the financial institutions with which Nuvista Light &'Electric Cooperative,Inc.accounts require a resolution from the Board of Directors listing those , officers authorized to open,close,and sign on such accounts on behalf of Nuvista Light &Electric Cooperative,Inc.whose address is P.O.Box 219,Bethel,Alaska 99559, NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED.that the following individuals of Nuvista Light &Electric Cooperative,Inc.,together or separately,are hereby authorized to open,close,and sign on checking,savings and investment accounts at any banks on behalf of the company: Myron P.Naneng,Sr. Zack Brink Andrew Stemp . Nicholas R.Charles Jr. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this resolution supersedes all previousNuvistaLight&Electric Cooperative,Inc.banking resolutions, DATED this 20"day of March,2008. Nuvista Light &Electric Cooperative,Inc. Arthur S.Heckman,Sr.,Secretaryny,vtean,seSRC4"CyBeshyiosorate:Secl44%é om s : ' . .. A '0 Alte8 ° ha }oN"e se",8th aysaq Yrz wiTra Mile 's fbf;REQUEST FOR ALTERNATE PROCUREMENT |1.Total Estimated Cost 2.PR/DO or other Number (Attach document)3.RAP Number 100,000 AEA 11-XXX 4.If Single Source,Contractor's Name and Address 5.Date Required Requesting Department Nuvista Light &Electric Cooperative,Inc.(NLEC);4/15/2011 Alaska Energy Authority 6.Preparers Name Phone Mike Harper,Deputy Dir.REG |907-771-3025 7.Type of request for exemption from competitive solicitation requirements. A.X __Single Source:AS 36.30.300/2 AAC 12.410 B.(1 Limited competition:AS 36.30.305 /2 AAC 12.430 c.0)Emergency:AS 36.30.310/2 AAC 12.440 D.CJ _Exception to unanticipated amendment limitation.2AAC 12.485 E.[C1 Innovative Procurement.AS 36.30.308 /2AAC 12.575-577 8.Explanation:Explanations of exemptions under A,B,or C must contain findings of fact.Evidence must be included,consisting of material facts,sufficient to independently determine that the findings of fact listed are true and accurate.Factual evidence may consist of written documents,records,supporting data,affidavits,or other information proving that the findings of fact are true and accurate.Itemized listings of findings of fact and material factual evidence should be included or attached. The Alaska Energy Authority is requesting authority to enter into a single source contract with Nuvista Light &Electric Cooperative,Inc.(NLEC)a non-profit utility cooperative,to develop a comprehensive energy plan for the 56 communities of the Lower Yukon and Kuskokwim river Delta. --See attached for background information,justification,and additional documentation. (For continuation,attach additional page) 9.Department Head or Authorized |certify to the best of my knowledge and belief,that all the Representative Name and Title (typed or printed)information on this request,including any attachment,is true and accurate. Christopher Rutz C.P.M. Procurement Manager,AEA Signature Date DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION /DIVISION OF GENERAL SERVICES 10.O Approved 0 Disapproved C Returned for Further Justification Date (See back) Chief Procurement Officer Date | 02-100 (Rev.9/16/10) Background The Alaska Energy Authority has published two documents ,one in 2009 and one in 2010 that intended to provide a starting point for Alaskans across the state to begin the process of developing a ong term energy strategy for the State.The first document contains information on all critical energy -echnologies,as well as a database of community energy resources compiled from a variety of sources.The second report,Alaska Energy Pathway,starts with overall policy direction in energy efficiency and conservation as well as renewable energy development.It also identifies critical priority areas like economic development,climate change,energy security,and education and work force development.Finally it includes much more detailed information on each community and region. Additionally AEA has worked with local utilities to develop to more detailed IRP's (Integrated Resource Plans)for the Railbelt and Southeast Alaska.Because of the size and complexity of these regions AEA,in cooperation with the local utilities,solicited and awarded contracts for a consultant to coordinate this work in cooperation with the various utilities and other stakeholders in the region.The combined cost of this planning effort for just these areas is expected to be over $1,000,000 before it is completed. The next stage of energy planning involves the development of Region-wide energy plans for the more remote and less populated regions of Alaska.The fact that these regions are less populated, and each region has multiple stakeholders with differing local agendas,as well as limited resources, will require local involvement,commitment,and ownership to be successful. After sending out a Request for Proposal,AEA finalized a contract with a professional planning firm,well known to AEA for an amount of $750,000 for the same type of planning effort for communities from Yakutat to Ketchikan. We are working with a like Steering Committee for Energy in Interior Alaska,that is focusing on The Tanana Chiefs Conference geographic region's 42 communities,largely funded by the Nenali Commission.It is going to be done by a partnership of TCC and Alaska Center for nergy and Power and is funded by a grant of $300,000. The Scope of work will be similar in all regional energy plans: *Identify energy issues that affect that particular region *Project growth in electricity demand *Identify which power projects and potential transmission lines needed to be built *Develop an action plan for all major stakeholders AEA has explored several options for accomplishing this work and believes it is in the best interest of the Authority and the stakeholders in the Y-K region to contract with NLEC as they are the only entity in the region that has the support of a majority of local stakeholders,(see attached letters from AVCP and AVEC)a mandate to address energy issues in the Y-K region (See corporate articles),and a willingness to contribute $50,000 of their own funds to complete the plan. About NLEC. e Nuvista was formed over 15 years ago as a nonprofit cooperative utility expressly to address energy issues in the YK Delta,there is no similar entity in the region that has the same level of stakeholder commitment. e Nuvista members consist of and are represented by a12 member board of directors consisting of the below individuals representing other larger organizations: Alaska Village Council President's -Myron Naneng (3 seats) Yukon Kuskokwim Health Corporation -Gene Peltola (1) Alaska Village Electric Cooperative -Brent Petrie (1) Channinik Wind Group -William Igurak (1) Lower Kuskokwim Electric -Martin Moore (1) Calista Corporation -Art Heckman,Willie Kasayulie (2) Kwethluk Electric -George Guy (1)NOORWN> 8.Middle Kuskokwim Electric -Ernie Baumgartner (1) 9.AVCP Regional Housing Authority -Ron Hoffman (1) Nuvista has the resources and knowledge of the energy landscape in the region that no other single entitly in the region posseses i.e.,office space;good community relations;access to utility information;cultural buy in;an understanding of socioeconomic factors;and weather impacts;to name a few.Niuvista's sole purpose is energy whereas all its member stakeholders have different mission statements as their primary focus. It is not practicable to assume that any outside for-profit contractor could compete financially 'with Nuvista 's willingness to commit their own funds and resources to the completing the plan. REQUEST FOR ALTERNATE PROCUREMENT |1.Total Estimated Cost 100,000 AEA 11-XXX 2.PR/DO or other Number (Attach document)3.RAP Number 4.If Single Source,Contractor's Name and Address Nuvista Light &Electric Cooperative,Inc.(NLEC) 5.Date Required Requesting Department 4/15/2011 Alaska Energy Authority 6.Preparers Name Phone Mike Harper,Deputy Dir.REG |907-771-3025 B.O c O db.6 O -E O A.X__Single Source:AS 36.30.300/2 AAC 12.410 Emergency:AS 36.30.310 /2 AAC 12.440 7.Type of request for exemption from competitive solicitation requirements. Limited competition:AS 36.30.305 /2 AAC 12.430 Exception to unanticipated amendment limitation.2AAC 12.485 Innovative Procurement.AS 36.30.308 /2AAC 12.575-577 8.Explanation:Explanations of exemptions under A,B,or C must contain findings of fact.Evidence must be included,consisting of material facts,sufficient to independently determine that the findings of fact listed are true and accurate.Factual evidence may consist of written documents,records,supporting data,affidavits,or other information proving that the findings of fact are true and accurate.Itemized listings of findings of fact and material factual evidence should be included or attached. The Alaska Energy Authority is requesting authority to enter into a single source contract with Nuvista Light & Electric Cooperative,Inc.(NLEC)a non-profit utility cooperative,to develop a comprehensive energy plan for the 56 communities of the Lower Yukon and Kuskokwim river Delta. --See attached for background information ,justification,and additional documentation. (For continuation,attach additional page) 9.Department Head or Authorized Representative Name and Title (typed or printed) Christopher Rutz C.P.M. Procurement Manager,AEA |certify to the best of my knowledge and belief,that all the information on this request,including any attachment,is true and accurate. Signature Date DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION /DIVISION OF GENERAL SERVICES 10.CO Approved C)Disapproved [J]Returned for Further Justification Date (See back) Chief Procurement Officer Date 02-100 (Rev.9/16/10) Background The Alaska Energy Authority has published two documents ,one in 2009 and one in 2010 that intended to provide a starting point for Alaskans across the state to begin the process of developing a long term energy strategy for the State.The first document contains information on all critical energy technologies,as well as a database of community energy resources compiled from a variety of sources.The second report,Alaska Energy Pathway,starts with overall policy direction in energy efficiency and conservation as well as renewable energy development.It also identifies critical priority areas like economic development,climate change,energy security,and education and work force development.Finally it includes much more detailed information on each community and region. Additionally AEA has worked with local utilities to develop to more detailed IRP's (Integrated Resource Plans)for the Railbelt and Southeast Alaska.Because of the size and complexity of these regions AEA,in cooperation with the local utilities,solicited and awarded contracts for a consultant to coordinate this work in cooperation with the various utilities and other stakeholders in the region.The combined cost of this planning effort for just these areas is expected to be over $1,000,000 before it is completed. he next stage of energy planning involves the development of Region-wide energy plans for the more remote and less populated regions of Alaska.The fact that these regions are less populated, and each region has multiple stakeholders with differing local agendas,as well as limited resources,fwillrequirelocalinvolvement,commitment,and ownership to be successful.df-_-- AEA has explored several options for accomplishing this work and believes it is in the best interest of the Authority and the stakeholders in the Y-K region to contract with NLEC as they are the only entity in the region that has the support of a majority of local stakeholders,(see attached letters from AVCP and AVEC)a mandate to address energy issues in the Y-K region (See corporate articles),and a willingness to contribute $50,000 of their own funds to complete the plan. \bout NLEC. e Nuvista was formed over 15 years ago as a nonprofit cooperative utility expressly to address energy issues in the YK Delta,there is no similar entity in the region that has the same level of stakeholder commitment. e Nuvista members consist of and are represented by a12 member board of directors consisting of the below individuals representing other larger organizations: Alaska Village Council President's -Myron Naneng (3 seats) Yukon Kuskokwim Health Corporation -Gene Peltola (1) Alaska Village Electric Cooperative -Brent Petrie (1) Channinik Wind Group -William Igurak (1) Lower Kuskokwim Electric -Martin Moore (1) Calista Corporation -Art Heckman,Willie Kasayulie (2) Kwethluk Electric -George Guy (1) Middle Kuskokwim Electric-Ernie Baumgartner (1)AVCP Regional Housing Authority-Ron Hoffman (1)e Nuvista has the resources and knowledge of the energy landscapein the region that no other single entitlyin the region posseses i.e.,office space;good community relations;access toutilityinformation;cultural buy in;an understanding of socioeconomic factors;and weather impacts;to name a few. e Niuvista's sole purpose is energy whereas all its member stakeholders have different mission statements as their primary focus. e tis not practicable to assume that any outside for-profit contractor could compete financially ;with Nuvista 's willingness to commit their own funds and resources to the completing the plan.ONONOARWN> ae x aS TANS SK ='3 x TWA <a ws Ry Alaska Entity #:111394 State of Alaska Department of Commerce,Community,and Economic Development Corporations,Business and Professional Licensing CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION COOP Electric &Telephone eeSi”)ipairaaymea”THE UNDERSIGNED,as Commissioner of Commerce,Community,and Economic Development of the State of Alaska,hereby certifies that Articles of Incorporation duly signed and verified pursuant to the provisions of Alaska Statutes has been received in this office and have been found to conform to law.EoACCORDINGLY,the undersigned,as Commissioner of Commerce,Community and Economic Development,and by virtue of the authority vested in me by law,hereby issues this certificate to Nuvista Light &Electric Cooperative,Inc. and attaches hereto the original copy of the Articles of Incorporation for such certificate.) IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF,I execute this certificate and . affix the Great Seal of the State of Alaska on September 28, 2007. fort [ees Emil Notti Commissioner EY Domestic Cooperative Formation §Page(s)| AK Entity #:111394 (0 oe ii State of Alaska|Il ||Hh i Department of Commerce 70727144033 ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION NUVISTA LIGHT &ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE,INC. We,the undersigned natural persons of the age of nineteen years or more acting as incorporators of an electric cooperative under the Electric and Telephone Cooperative Act, AS 10.25.010 et seq.,adopt the following Articles of Incorporation for such cooperative. ARTICLE I NAME The name of the cooperative is Nuvista Light &Electric Cooperative,Inc. ARTICLE Il PERIOD OF DURATION The period of duration of this cooperative shall be perpetual. ARTICLE Ik PURPOSES FOR WHICH ORGANIZED The purposes for which this cooperative is organized and the business or objects to be carried on and promoted by it are as follows: (a)To provide for all aspects of electric energy generation and transmission for its members; (b)In addition to the foregoing,the cooperative shall have and exercise all of the general powers enumerated in AS 10.25.010 and AS 10.25.020,as well as any other powers enumerated in AS 10.25,as heretofore or hereafter amended. ARTICLE IV MEMBERSHIP Section 1.|The cooperative is not organized for profit and shall not have authority to issue capital stock. Section 2.Any person,entity,or body politic that desires to purchase wholesale electric energy,including but not limited to a village,municipality,village corporation,regional corporation,or retail electric utility,shall become a member of the cooperative by: (a)Filing a written application for membership; (bo)Agreeing to purchase from the cooperative electric energy as hereinafter specified; Articles of Incorporation Page |of 5 Nuvista Light &Electric Cooperative,Inc. '(c)Agreeing to comply with and be bound by the Articles of Incorporation of the cooperative and the bylaws and such rules and regulations as may be from time to time adopted by the Board of Directors;and, (d)Paying the membership fee hereinafter specified;provided,however,that no person,entity,body politic,or subdivision thereof shall become a member unless or until it has been accepted for membership by the Board of Directors or the members; provided further that the bylaws may make additional provisions pertaining to the qualifications and methods of acquiring and terminating membership in the cooperative, not inconsistent with these Articles of Incorporation. The bylaws may provide for appeal by an applicant to a meeting of the members. No person,entity,body politic,or subdivision thereof,may own more than one (1) membership in the cooperative. Section3.©The membership fee,if any,shall be in an amount established in the bylaws or by appropriate resolution of the Board of Directors.The bylaws may provide for additional fees and assessments to be paid by members requesting more than one service connection. Section 4.Each member may,as soon as electric energy shall be available,purchase from the cooperative all electric energy used on the premises referred to in the membership application of such member,and shall pay therefore monthly rates which shall from time to time be fixed by resolution of the Board of Directors;provided,however,that the electric energy which the cooperative shall furnish to any member may be limited to such an amount as the Board of Directors shall from time to time determine.In addition,each member shall pay to the cooperative such minimum amount per month as shall be fixed by the Board of Directors from time to time,regardless of the amount of electric energy consumed.Each member shall also pay all obligations which may from time to time become due and payable by such member to the cooperative as and when the same shall become due and payable,Production or use of electric energy on such premises,regardless of the source thereof,by means of facilities which shall be interconnected with the cooperative's facilities,shall be subject to regulations as shall be set from time to time by the Board of Directors of the cooperative, Section 5.|The private property of the members of the cooperative shall be exempt from execution for the debts of the cooperative and no member shall be individually liable or responsible for any debts or liabilities of the cooperative. ARTICLE V PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS The principal place of business of the cooperative shall be Anchorage,Alaska,or such other place within the State of Alaska as may be established by the bylaws or appropriate resolution of the board of directors. Articles of Incorporation Page 2 of 5 Nuvista Light &Electric Cooperative,Inc.. ARTICLE VI BYLAWS The internal affairs of the cooperative shall be regulated in accordance with the bylaws adopted as provided by law. ARTICLE VII AMENDMENTS OF ARTICLES The Articles of Incorporation may be amended as provided by law. ARTICLE VIII REGISTERED OFFICE AND REGISTERED AGENT The address of the initial registered office of the cooperative shall be 301 Calista Court, Suite A,Anchorage,Alaska 99518,and the initial registered agent shal]be Calista Corporation. ARTICLE IX DIRECTORS The number of directors of the cooperative shall be not less than six (6)directors,andshallbeestablishedinthebylaws,Each director must also be a member. The initial directors of the cooperative shall be: Arthur S.Heckman 47 Hill Street Pilot Station,Alaska 99650 Willie Kasayulie 201 William and Tom Street Akiachak,Alaska 99551 Paul George Guy 301 Blueberry Street Kwethluk,Alaska 99621 Sven Paukan 100 Ketunraq Road St.Mary's,Alaska 99658 Daniel Waska 101 Village Road Atmautluak,Alaska 99559 Moses Owen 300 Riverfront Akiak,Alaska 99552 Articles of Incorporation Page 3 of 5 Nuvista Light &Electric Cooperative,Inc. ARTICLE X INCORPORATORS The names and addresses of the incorporators are: Arthur S.Heckman 47 Hill Street Pilot Station,Alaska 99650 Sven Paukan 101 Ketunraq road St.Mary's,Alaska 99658 Willie Kasayulie 201 William and Tom Street Akiachak,Alaska 99551 Daniel Waska 101 Village Road Atmautluak,Alaska 99559 Paul George Guy 301 Blueberry Street Kwethluk,Alaska 99621 Moses Owen.300 Riverfront Akiak,Alaska 99552 ; DATED at Anchorage,Alaska this _2/”_day of July,2007. Arthur S,Heckman -Sven Paukan Willie Kesey Daniel Waska Pal GaGeorge Guy |Moses Owen Articles of Incorporation Page 4 of 5 Nuvista Light &Electric Cooperative,Inc. State of Alaska ) )ss. Third Judicial District ) The foregoing Articles of Incorporation were acknowledged before me this _.3/"aay of July,2007 by Arthur 8.Heckman,Sven Paukan,Willie Kasayulie,Daniel Waska,Paul George Guy,and Moses Owen. PMaagies Mickag- Ww Me a,Notary Public fore State of Alaska 7 \g3 aei My commission expires:_//-/6 -O7aor1peaiRS Articles of Incorporation Page 5 of 5 Nuvista Light &Electric Cooperative,Inc. NUVISTA LIGHT ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE INC, AVCP Pouch 219 Bethel,Alaska 99559 RESOLUTION 08-01 WHEREAS,the AVCP/Calista region is faced with an energy crisis due to high costs of fuel and electricity beyond the capacity of the regional economy to contain;and WHEREAS,this crisis has the potential to cause a region-wide socio-economic failure unless the regional organizations and other stakeholders come together to address the energy crisis;and WHEREAS,there is a need to increase the number of members on the board of directors for Nuvista Light Electric Cooperative Inc.to address the regions energy needs and the bylaws of the cooperative authorizes the board of directors to increase the number. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED,as follows: 1,That Nuvista Light Electric Cooperative Inc.board of directors increases its members from six to twelve seats. 2.That the additional seats shall be appointed as follows: AVCPRHA _Ron Hoffman YKHC Gene Peltola AVEC Brent Petrie MKEC Ernie Baumgartner Chaninik Wind Group__William Igkurak Lower Yukon Representative__Martin Moore PASSED AND DATED this 20th day of March,2008. Nuvista Light Electric Cooperative Inc. gettttee éoCssCOGD thh.he -Arthur S.Heckman,Sr.,SecretaryRy3Fai4(Co rate SealCOREE't'4'Sy.hy *hd"eounee” Moa Te NUVISTA LIGHT &ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE INC. AVCP P.O.Box 219 Bethel,Alaska 99559 RESOLUTION 08-02 WHEREAS,the Board of Directors of Nuvista Light &Electric Cooperative,Inc. (formerly Nuvista Light and Power)find it necessary to open checking,savings and investment accounts to carry out day-to-day business operations;and WHEREAS,the financial institutions with which Nuvista Light &Electric Cooperative,Inc.accounts require a resolution from the Board of Directors listing those ; officers authorized to open,close,and sign on such accounts on behalf of Nuvista Light &Electric Cooperative,Inc.whose address is P.O.Box 219,Bethel,Alaska 99539, NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED.that the following individuals of Nuvista Light &Electric Cooperative,Inc.,together or separately,are hereby authorized to open,close,and sign on checking,savings and investment accounts at any banks on behalf of the company: Myron P.Naneng,Sr. Zack Brink Andrew Stemp Nicholas R.Charles Jr, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this resolution supersedes all previous Nuvista Light &Electric Cooperative,Inc.banking resolutions. DATED this 20"day of March,2008. Nuvista Light &Electric Cooperative,Inc. "Arthur S.Heckman,Sr.,Secretary "ue,awae” Mike Harper From:Althea S.Clapp Sent:Wednesday,April 06,2011 12:38 PM To:Christopher Rutz Ce:Mike Harper;Peter Crimp Subject:Draft #1 Single Source Waiver Y-K REP Attachments:WR Lower Yukon-Kus REP Ver1.doc HI Chris -Here is my first rough draft of the waiver.|thought that we would attach the letter that we received from Christina yesterday. |hope this gives you a good starting point -please comment and let me know the changes or how you want me to move forward. I've cc'd Mike and Peter so they have an opportunity to weigh in on the draft. Hope that you are having fun!ac Alaska Energy Authority Energy Efficiency and Conservation WAIVER REQUEST FOR ALTERNATE PROCUREMENT METHODS Requesting Department/Division:Date:Bid Waiver Number (FOR HQ USE ONLY) Alaska Energy Authority,raeConservation (AEEE)4/6/2011 , Ru Ve (By erg 4 YS Project Number(s)AKSAS/Federal:Estimated Price:Signature of Requesting Project Manager: AEA-11-042 $100,000 Project Name:Person to Contact (Project Manager &Telephone Number): Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim Region Energy Pian }Petererimp,Deputy Director 907)771-3039 Part 1 -Type of Procurement Method:Mee He A aimCompetitiveSealedBid(1 Competitive Sealed Proposal []*Limited Competition C)*Emergency [X)*Single Source C1 Small Procurement Part 2 -Specific description of procurement requirements to be waived:For example time of advertisement,public notice,selection process,record keeping,etc.:AEEE is requesting to enter into a Professional Service Single Source contract with Nuvista Light & Electric Cooperative,Inc.(NLEC)a non-profit utility cooperative that is located in the Yukon-Kuskokwim (Y-K)Region to assist -AEEE ty developing an energy plan for the Y-K region. Part 3 -Project Description:Provide the following information:1)The contract requirements with attached schematics,planning documents,or narratives as appropriate.2)A cost estimate that is linked to the contract requirements.Identify funding source:(General Fund,Bond,Federal,etc.)and if Federally funded attach copy of Federal approval.3)A time line depicting the project schedule from inception to completion.4)List all agency officials with oversight or supervisory responsibility for the project.Attach separate page(s)if necessary.R (2G'1-Fuel costs are extremely highin the lower Yukon-Kuskokwim region;AEEE-would like to enter into a contract with (NLEC)tojointlydevelopanenergyplanfortheY-K region.Both 'and NLEC have a vested interest and common goalsin reducing energy costs andincreasing energy efficiencyin the Y-K region.AEEE requires their assistance to develop a plan thatispracticalandthatcanbeimplementedtoreachthesegoals.PEG 2-The plan is estimated to cost $100,000 -$150,000;AEEE will fund $100,000 and NLEC Cooperative will fund $50,000. 3-The project timeline is twenty four months (2-years). 4-Contract Manager,POC,TA.Contracting Officer,Chris Rutz.MU Hans Part 4 -Justification:Provide the following information:1)Need for construction or services.2)Reason(s)for agency's inability to conform with standard procurement methods.3)Statutory or Regulatory authorization (if other than budgetary process)for construction or services.4)Impact on project if waiver is not approved --explain in detail.5)Any other documentation/justification the agency feels would be helpful in evaluating the request.Attach separate page(s)if necessary. REG AEEE considered writing a grant for this work;and then determined that this would not be in our best interest because we' would like to "own”the Y-K Energy Plan and have access to update it as things change.NLEC was going to develop its own plan; but they had insufficient funding and we discouraged them from doing so since we believe that this would be a duplication of effort and resources. NLEC cooperative has unique resources and expertise in the Y-K regional that are essential for this project.Because of their, presence in the region;we believe that there are economies to be realized in both time and funding that will impact the overall project in a positive manner.NLEC participation is an integra!part of the overall energy plan in this Particular area.By workincooperativelytogetherwebelievethatwewillcomeupwiththebestenergyplanfortheY-K region.:('La [Gn Is Ka ieleisy |Healt.Cyv °Kstc)See attached letter of recommendation from T it Presidents Regi Authority dated April 4,2011. Form 25D-026 (rev 8/00)Page 1 of 2 + PART 5 -Procurement Manager's comments and recommendations: REGSincetheYukon-Kuskokwim region has some of the highest energy cost in the State,AEEE Believes that going forward with an energy plan for this area is both timely and practical.It is AEEE mission to develop ways and means to help Alaskans lower their energy costs and increase their energy efficiency. Why NLEC? 1)Qur cooperative desire to develop an energy plan.< 2)Resources and knowledge that another company would not havei.e poftive Space;community relations;access to utility information;cultural buyin;socioeconomic consideration;and weather impacts;to name afew. e 3)Costs saving to the overall project,since we can jump start the effort due to their expertise. 4)They are already in the region and the cooperative is part of the regional community. 5)NLEC has already collected data. 6)The have a vested interest in the overall success of the plan. Ain YK AC We have the endorsement of the Association of Village Council President Regional Housing Authority;and a desire to get started with the plan.g AEEE is requesting approval of this waiver to enter into a single source professional service contract with NLEC so that we can begin the hard work of developing an energy plan for this region. Recommended:(Approval C)Disapproval [1 Other (]Return for other/further action as noted above. Reviewed by:Signature:Date: Christopher Rutz,Procurement Manager Date: []Approved by: CJ Approved with conditions C1 _sDisapproved Part 6-N/A Nuvista WA $frvmedk /$ YeArS AaGo As &NON --Profit cogpwart afi "rg2Xpvessl+noldress tNNAY [$8 4eg jn ua bn eas Fa Fern pele CA)nN»Tt >Sole purpuse fe energy Whereas Ta merger |poeopnenmissesbrakeulandyCNEIGcfaKeholes "A Mavs boys ferns Nupbhe of vill.thtiv Janiea A Aas target wn / nN Largest |Bons ret(Ts Vp EAVYES 20,900 pevan''S)ond Prfoul ata 7 Form 25D-026 (rev 8/00);Page 2 of 2 Regional Energy Planning for Yukon Kuskolwim Delta Single Source Justification Considerations: What:This is information intends to provide support for procurement of Grant Administration of Alaska Energy Authority Grant funds for the purpose of writing a Region-wide Energy Plan for the 56 communities with the area bordered by the Lower Yukon and Kuskokwim river Delta. Background:Alaska Energy Authority has published two documents ,one in 2009 and one in 2010 that intended to provide a starting point for Alaskans across the state to begin the process of developing a long term energy strategy for the State.The first - document contains information on all critical energy technologies ,as well as a database of community energy resources compiled from a variety of sources.The second report,Alaska Energy Pathway,starts with overall policy direction in energy efficgitny and conservation as well as renewable energy development.It also identifies critical priority areas like economic development,climate change,enery security,and eduation and work force development.Finally it includes much more detailed information on each community and region . Next Step:The 3”stage of energy planning now involves Region-wide energy plans that need to be locally founded and produced.The first region that AEA proposes to work with is the largest rural region in terms of population and number of communities and that is Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta . The reason that AEA chooses to start the strategy to get to all regions within the state is because this area has long had a formal planning process with the Navista group.(Vitt4; The reasons that AEA chooses to go sole source with a contract to the ReginalNonprofitCoop,Navista>i$Because it was formed over a decade ago for the reason of seeking ways to provide less costly energy to the 56 communities and approximately 25,000 people in its region. Single Source Justificaiton for Yukon Delta Regional Energy Plan Nuvista is the best one prepared to do this,and b)two letters of support from other major stakeholders in the region (ie)AVEC and or another Here are some bullets to help provide support for Nuvista receiving a grant: e The sole purpose for Nuvista is as a non-profit utility cooperative set up years ago to address energy issues of the Yukon-Kuskokwim region php w/e)Ce.Jrbod Ly e Nuvista is an organization focused on energy issues and a non-profit unlike other organizations in the region that may have another mission,focus,profits,and politics e Nuvista members consist of and are represented by a12 member board of directors consisting of the below individuals representing other larger organizations: Alaska Village Council President's -Myron Naneng (3 seats) Yukon Kuskokwim Health Corporation -Gene Peltola (1) Alaska Village Electric Cooperative -Brent Petrie (1) Channinik Wind Group -William Igurak (1) Lower Kuskokwim Electric -Martin Moore (1) Calista Corporation -Art Heckman,Willie Kasayulie (2) Kwethluk Electric -George Guy (1) Middle Kuskokwim Electric-Ernie Baumgartner (1)AVCP Regional Housing Authority-Ron Hoffman (1)e Nuvista does not focus on or address any one member's interests'or area,is an established non-profit,andis the one existing group or entity whichis most representative of the large diverse Y-K region e This is the first time all of these many diverse groups have all come together to collaborate,and its very important their efforts be supported,assisted,and continued while people remain interested and excitedOCONAARWN>Local Support/Matching Funds The group agreed to commit to putting up to $50,000.towards a match to any grant assistance.In addition,Calista has also committed to providing office,logistics,and support space for an individual;as well as,a significant amount of Sr.Management time time,resource,and direction in leading,overseeing and moving this effort forward (as clearly proven and exhibited over the past 4 months).This knowledge of YK region along with background of staff engineering,master planning,and permitting of many large past projects was specifically requested to ensure this effort proceeded.These have all been major commitments from these organizations and their combined leadership. Budget and preliminary Scope The $100,000.in funding requested for the year and subsequent effort (scope provided last week)is to provide a position that would help coordinate and oversee a:1)region- wide alternative energy plan,and a 2)Bethel sub-region alternative energy effort for the Y-K area.The actual plans and any project themselves would have to be funded separately by AEA or the legislature of course under.|stand you or AEA may need the include supporting letters from AVCP and AVEC ) wl dy 4 A re yer;eg.yn Bef Alaska Energy Authority Energy Efficiency and Conservation .WAIVER REQUEST FOR ALTERNATE PROCUREMENT METHODS Requesting Department/Division:Date:Bid Waiver Number (FOR HQ USE ONLY) Alaska Energy Authority,Energy Efficiency and Conservation (AEEE)4/6/2011 Project Number(s)AKSAS/Federal:Estimated Price:Signature of Requesting Project Manager: AEA-11-042 $100,000 Project Name:Person to Contact (Project Manager &Telephone Number): Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim Region Energy Plan Mike HarperPeter-Crimp.Deputy Director Rural Energy Group ABE (907)771-302539 Part 1 -Type of Procurement Method: (1 Competitive Sealed Bid (1 Competitive Sealed Proposal C)*Limited Competition CO *Emergency XX *Single Source (1 Small Procurement Part 2 -Specific description of procurement requirements to be waived:For example time of advertisement,public notice,selection process,record keeping,etc.:REGAEEE is requesting to enter into a Professional Service Single Source contract with Nuvista Light &Electric Cooperative,Inc.(NLEC)a non-profit utility cooperative that is located in the Yukon-Kuskokwim (Y-K)Region to assist REGAEEE in developing an energy plan for the Y-K region.The primary deliverable is that the plan will produce viable Part 3 -Project Description:Provide the following information:1)The contract requirements with attached schematics,planning documents,or narratives as appropriate.2)A cost estimate that is linked to the contract requirements.Identify funding source:(General Fund,Bond,Federal,etc.)and if Federally funded attach copy of Federal approval.3)A time line depicting the project schedule from inception to completion.4)List all agency officials with oversight or supervisory responsibility for the project.Attach separate page(s)if necessary. 1-Fuel costs are extremely high in the lower Yukon-Kuskokwim region;REGAEEE would like to enter into a contract with (NLEC) to jointly develop an energy plan for the Y-K region.Both AEEEREG and NLEC have a vested interest and common goals in reducing energy costs and increasing energy efficiency in the Y-K region.REGAEEE requires their assistance to develop a plan that is practical and that can be implemented to reach these goals. 2-The plan is estimated to cost $100,000 -$150,000;REGAEEE will fund $100,000 and Participants making up NLEC Cooperative will fund $50,000. 3-The project timeline is twenty four months (2-years). 4-Contract Manager,Mike Harper,Peter-Crimp -Contracting Officer,Chris Rutz. Part 4 -Justification:Provide the following information:1)Need for construction or services.2)Reason(s)for agency's inability to conform with standard procurement methods.3)Statutory or Regulatory authorization (if other than budgetary process)for construction or services.4)Impact on project if waiver is not approved --explain in detail.5)Any other documentation/justification the agency feels would be helpful in evaluating the request.Attach separate page(s)if necessary. REGAEEE considered writing a grant for this work;and then determined that this would not be in our best interest because we| would like to "own”the Y-K Energy Plan and have access to update it as things change.NLEC was going to develop its own plan; but they had insufficient funding and we discouraged them from doing so since we believe that this would be a duplication of effort and resources. NLEC cooperative has unique resources and expertise in the Y-K regional that are essential for this project.Because of their presence in the region;we believe that there are economies to be realized in both time and funding that will impact the overall project in a positive manner.NLEC participation is an integral part of the overall energy plan in this particular area.By working} cooperatively together we believe that we will come up with the best energy plan for the Y-K region. See attached letter of recommendation from The Association of Village Council Presidents Regional Housing Authority dated April 4,2011. Form 25D-026 (rev 8/00)Page 1 of 2 PART 5 -Procurement Manager's comments and recommendations: Since the Yukon-Kuskokwim region has some of the highest energy cost in the State,REGAEEE believes that going forward with lan energy plan for this area is both timely and practical.It is REG AEEE mission to develop ways and means to help Alaskans lower their energy costs and increase their energy efficiency. Why NLEC? 1)Our cooperative desire to develop an energy plan.Nuvista was formed over 15 years ago as a nonprofit cooperative utility expressly to address energy issues in the YK Delta . 2)Resources and knowledge that another company would not have i.e.,office space;community relations; access to utility information;cultural buy in;socioeconomic consideration;and weather impacts;to name a few.|t 's sole purpose is energy whereas all its member stakeholders have different mission statements as their primary focus. 3)Costs saving to the overall project,since we can jump start the effort due to their expertise.Nuvista brings together all major stakeholders as part of their organization. 4)They are already in the region and the cooperative is part of the regional community. 5)NLEC has already collected data. 6)The have a vested interest in the overall success of the plan. 7)__The YK region is the largest rural region in terms of number of villages (56)nd population (inexcess of 20,000) We have letters of recommendation from the Association of Village Council President Regional Housing Authority;and Yukon- Kuskokwim Health Corporation.(Attached Herein.) AEEE is requesting approval of this waiver to enter into a single source professional service contract with NLEC so that we can le s 68 '.'eo.''e oy Recommended:[J Approval (1 Disapproval C1 Other (4 Return for other/further action as noted above. Reviewed by:Signature:Date: Christopher Rutz,Procurement Manager Date: (1 _Approved by: (Cs Approved with conditions (0 _sDisapproved Part 6-N/A Form 25D-026 (rev 8/00)Page 2 of 2 Subje luvista Grant/Contract Importance:High Mike This is to follow up on our conversation today about a contract or grant with Nuvista.The $100,000.in funding requested for the year and subsequent effort (scope provided last week)is to provide a position that would help coordinate and oversee a:1)region-wide alternative energy plan,and a 2)Bethel sub-region alternative energy effort for the Y-K area.The actual plans and any project themselves would have to be funded separately by AEA or the legislature of course.|understand you or AEA may need the following information before AEA can provide any funds,a grant,or contract to Nuvista:a)justification of why or how Nuvista is the best one prepared to do this,and b)two letters of support from other major stakeholders in the region (ie)AVEC and or another Here are some bullets to help provide support for Nuvista receiving a grant: e The sole purpose for Nuvista is as a non-profit utility cooperative set up years ago to address energy issues of the Yukon- Kuskokwim region e Nuvista is an organization focused on energy issues and a non-profit unlike other organizations in the region that may have another mission,focus,profits,and politics e Nuvista members consist of and are represented by a12 member board of directors consisting of the below individuals representing other larger organizations: Alaska Village Council President's -Myron Naneng (3 seats) Yukon Kuskokwim Health Corporation -Gene Peltola (1) Alaska Village Electric Cooperative -Brent Petrie (1) Channinik Wind Group -William Igurak (1) Lower Kuskokwim Electric -Martin Moore (1) Calista Corporation -Art Heckman,Willie Kasayulie (2) Kwethluk Electric -George Guy (1) Middle Kuskokwim Electric-Ernie Baumgartner (1)AVCP Regional Housing Authority-Ron Hoffman (1)e Nuvista does not focus on or address any one member's interests'or area,is an established non-profit,andis the one existing group or entity whichis most representative of the large diverse Y-K region e This is the first time all of these many diverse groups have all come together to collaborate,and its very important their efforts be supported,assisted,and continued while people remain interested and excitedOONDAARWON>The group agreed that we can commit to putting up to $50,000.towards help support and/or match any grant assistance.In addition, Calista has also committed to providing office,logistics,and support space for an individual;as well as,a significant amount of my own time,resource,and direction in leading,overseeing and moving this effort forward (as clearly proven and exhibited over the past 4 . months).My knowledge of our region along with background of engineering,master planning,and permitting of many large past 2 proje vas specifically requested to ensure this effort proceedeu.rhese have all been major commitments from these organizationsandtheircombinedleadershipand|respectfully request AEA's funding help to proceed expeditiously. Hope this helps. Christine Christine E.Klein,A.A.E. Executive Vice President Chief Operating Officer Calista Corporation 301 Calista Court,Ste.A Anchorage,Alaska 99518 (907)644-6309 direct (907)351-9585 cell (907)279-5516 Mike Harper From:Christine Klein [cklein@calistacorp.com]Sent:Friday,April 01,2011 5:36 PM To:Mike Harper;Peter Crimp Cc:Andrew Guy;g.guy_kwtinc@yahoo.com Subject:RE:Nuvista Grant/Contract Quyana and Goolhda -gheesh! Thank you Christine E.Klein,A.A.E. Executive Vice President Chief Operating Officer Calista Corporation 301 Calista Court,Ste.A Anchorage,Alaska 99518 (907)644-6309 direct (907)351-9585 cell (907)279-5516 From:Mike Harper [mailto:mharper@aidea.orq] Sent:Friday,April 01,2011 5:30 PM To:Christine Klein;Peter Crimp Cc:Andrew Guy;g.guy_kwtinc@yahoo.com Subject:RE:Nuvista Grant/Contract Chris:Thanks for doing this;Now |will have to get busy and get to my guys .we will get back to you.Have nice weekend.Mike h From:Christine Klein [mailto:cklein@calistacorp.com] Sent:Friday,April 01,2011 5:16 PM To:Mike Harper;Peter Crimp Cc:Andrew Guy;g.guy_kwtinc@yahoo.com;Christine Klein AEA-AEEE 2007 Funded Wind Energy Feasibility Sturdy Design $150,000 $150,000 Grant Lapses on 6/30/11 Direct Grant: City of Bethel AEA-AEEE 2009 Funded Bethel Wind Power Project Times 4 OTHER FUNDING: Federal Contract $2,599,320 $3,198,986 Grant Term Date 12/31/13 Subrecipient Grant:City of Bethel AEA-AEEE 2009 Funded Bethel Wind Turbine OTHER FUNDING: ol Contract $11,250 $810,804 Grant Term Date 9/30/09 Subrecipient Grant:City of Bethel DCRA 2011 funded Electrical Utility Acquisition Study Legislative - Preliminary $175,000 $175,000 4/19/2011- 6/30/2015 City of Bethel AEA-AEEE 2003 Funded Bethel/Donlin Creek Mining District Power Line Study OTHER FUNDING: Denali Commission $27,721. Original project was to study a tie line from Bethel to Donlin Creek for development. Nova Gold Corp later determined to provide their own power source for their Donlin Creek mine Completed $0 $27,721 N/A Calista Corp AEA.1994 Funded Magnetic Survey OTHER FUNDING: RSA w/DNR $158,000. Airborne magnetic survey of Bethel basin. Funds granted to Calista.DNR to contract for services to Completed $17,000 $175,000 N/A NIA AEA 1994 Funded Bethel/NYAC Electric Intertie Completed $84,030 $84,030 N/A N/A AEA 1993 Funded 5 Bethel/Napaki ak Electric Line Maintenance Maintenance on line to grant to Completed $50,000 $50,000 N/A N/A AEA 1993 Funded Bethel/Napaki ak Line Suinsway.&Man Completed $21,328 $21,328 N/A N/A AEA-OTHER 2003 Funded Donlin Creek Mine Site Power Supply Legislative mena Preliminary $180,000 $180,000 N/A Direct Grant: Nuvista Light &Power DOT&PF 2000 Funded Donlin Creek Access Road + Planning Construct a road from Crooked Creek to the mine site at Snow Gulch. Completed $0 $500,000 Jun-02 N/A AEA-AEEE 2010 Funded Hooper Bay Wind Farm Construction OTHER FUNDING: Preliminary $80,000 $80,000 Grant Term Date 4/30/10 Subrecipient Grant:City of Hooper Bay Denali 2008 Funded Hooper Bay Wind Turbine Access Road Construction OTHER FUNDING: AVEC $20,000. Upgrade approximately 1,100-foot of an existing all- terrain vehicle trail that provides access to the community's cemetery and access to the site of three Completed $199,531 $219,531 Project Close- Out 3/15/09 AVEC Denali 2004 Funded Wind Generation OTHER FUNDING = AVEC $162,000; SOA Dept.of Fish and Game $37,464; USDA-RUS high cost energy--direct grant $1,156,811; AVEC match Construction $1,405,058 $0 N/A AVEC AEA-OTHER 2008 Funded Construct Docking Facility Other funding sources are Construction $21,733 $262,419 N/A Force Account & Contract for Construction Management: AEA-OTHER 2008 Funded Kwethluk Barge Landing and Jay Hammond Way Road Extension Design OTHER FUNDING: Denali Commission $180,000. Develop Preliminary Design for a new Barge Landing Facility and extension of Jay Hammond Completed $0 $180,000 NIA Force Account & Contract for Construction Management: AEA AEA-OTHER 2008 Funded Barge Landing Other funding sources are rou 1 rm Construction $28,604 $171,624 N/A Force RPSU 2006 Funded Electric - Rural Power System Upgrade OTHER FUNDING: Denali Commission $3,000,000. Replacement of the existing non code compliant powerhouse with a new 30° x 48'building, four new diesel generator sets with a total capacity of 1400 kW, engines with fuel saving electronically controlled governors and fuel injection, control panels with automatic load sensing and engine paralleling capability,and power data recording and remote. Construction $0 $3,299,694 N/A Engineering Design ServicesAcco unt AEA-BF 2005 Funded Bulk Fuel Facility OTHER FUNDING: Denali Commission $4,360,036. New co- located tank farm with a gross storage capacity of 439,500 Completed $107,234 $4,467,270 Project Close- out:09/30/08 Force Account & Contract for Construction Management \UKRWIITI Viqua n Doyon Li 'und Grants -Mountain Village _-Scammon Bay-itkas Point:*Saint MarysPaimiutPilotStatio : °°/Mooper Bay Marshal gona*Chevak Russian Mission « 1 Rounds 0 -3 a | -uction Ohogamiut: 'on Upper Ka Qn Construction Lower Kal ction Calista Corp ; ction °NndDiesel»oMok » +Tuluksak |Transmission Kasigluk,,Atmautluak Aki ach akTunnakNunapitchuk122.°*Akiak 72 7,Aloksook Ba BETHEL wethlukMekoryuAysoryulye\Umkumiut+»Nightmute Napakiak -Napaskiak 273 ZXuntutuliak *Chefornak -Eek 'able Energy Grant ity solicits competitive if recommending Kwigillingoks/Kongiganak |finehaul|bargestonecenabarges!and then.ranstersfthe fuel onto shall'f lighterage barges[s y +:"come m sor illages doaProthavesueszndtdmakethedelivery' I from refineries ir,Cook Inlet or othersources to Western A Panstelle'Po:-rerGiNormeremteoe-SPOfuel|barges must.beGrounded ©on the: Heating oil costs are determined by many factors such as the cost of the we :raw material (crude),how much it costs to refine,taxes,and transportation .just to name a few.Costs are broken down by percentage below: Overhead Costs -9% Overhead and marketing costs include indirect costs such as utilities,payroll, employee health benefits,etc.,as well as a margin of profit.Fees include sales, dock and throughput fees.These additional costs generate income for the communities that are serviced.Each community has a different fee structure that impacts the price of heating oil.Other costs that fit into this category are taxes and regulatory compliance costs associated with the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (ADEC),Occupational Safety and Health ; Administration (OSHA),Environmental Protection Agency (EPA),Department of © Transportation (DOT),and United States Coast Guard (USCG). Distribution Costs -29% Transportation and distribution costs increase the farther the community is from the refinery,which is one reason delivered prices vary so much in Western Alaska.The shallow water locations of Western Alaska require transportation with specially designed shallow-draft vessels.Insufficient or non-existent docking and off-loading facilities increase time,safety and environmental risks,which increase costs as well.And,inventory carrying costs are incurred by holding the inventory in storage tanks over the winter season or until sold. Product Costs -62% Crude oil prices are determined by worldwide supply and demand.Changes in the price of crude oil affect the price of heating oil.Refineries separate the crude oil into useful substances (gasoline,gas oil,kerosene,jet fuel,etc.).Costs { incurred at refineries include equipment,maintenance,labor,fees,etc.These costs are passed along to companies (like Crowley)who purchase the products. | __ Up to the Challenge. For more than 50 years,Crowley has been responsible for delivering millions of gallons of fuel to Western Alaska communities on an annual basis. Each year Crowley is challenged with orchestrating one of the most complicated fuel delivery systems in the nation.These locations are a long way off the Alaska road system,situated on the coast or on inland rivers and lakes.The challenges vary from =¢)site.It is a capital-intensive business with a r:i=ta¢a CROWLEV 4)Why Heating Oil Prices Fluctuate*Wholesale market price changes daily determined by worldwide supply lave Re\-vaat-1are . ¢Crowley's cost of the fuel is based on the wholesale market price on the[date the barge loads at the refinery.*Transportation costs vary by region.It usually costs more the farther adeliverylocationisfromCookInlet,where most barges load.Deliveriestoinlandriverpointsrequiretransferoffueltoasmallerbargeforthefinaldelivery,adding more cost.Some locations have difficult bargelandingsaffectedbytidethatsimplytakelonger,affecting cost. *Taxes and fees vary by community.a |ee||}e Weather affects accessibility.When low river water levels prevent barge deliveries,fuel may have to be flown into a community,usually at a much higher cost than barge delivery.4h. s elivery season dictated by the constraints of beSVveather and a harsh operating environment. In the best of times,there is a four-month delivery season for Western Alaska starting in Bristol Bay and working north.The Arctic season is even shorter.Typically Crowley is able to transfer about 45 million gallons of fuel to its own terminals and its customers'tanks before ice shuts the barging operations down.The goal is to put enough fuel into inventory to last until the next spring or summer. This is a sizable investment with a carrying cost to Crowley as the fuel product is sold throughout the winter months. ca bs vn 1eieRe1.6 7stomersandwetrytoassist inkg}expedite the application précesseo4saath g to.eeee{Some of the thing bers sna SS:Whee gas While the initial fuel cost is based on the wholesale market price on the date the fuel is purchased from the refinery,there are additional factors that impact the cost of getting the fuel to rural Alaska markets. Ultimately,it is the sum total of raw product and refining costs;local fees,taxes and regulatory costs;storage costs;overhead and marketing costs;and transportation and distribution costs that impact the final price of fuel to our customer. . :a a 2 pes -. Facilitating bulk fuel loans and educating customers about the chal loan process Pita oeHeatingOilPricesFollowCrudeOilPrices,1994-2009 600 Administering the Energy Assistance program and CITCO Energy Assistance program 500-4 400-- lea hi Ai i RR TERveWeeee ee oe ae :cgey mc nSteileeeOeatesbatsoeSineAecasaeResidentialHeatingOilPrice5sip This brochure addresses the challenges and costs of delivering fuel in Western Alaska.It explains the many variables that go into distribution,fuel cost and the structure of the market.At Crowley, we Se it is important that our customers are 300 Replacing the Western Alaska fleet with double-hull barges. This is above and beyond current regulations as it's the right thing to do for the safety of the environment and to protect the | f life in the communities we serve 200-5 - c2 o a oQa n2i od o)Crude Oil Price 100-4edgeableaboutthefueldistributionprocess arenope that this overview is helpful. NR 2 i iss] Ss ::-reET aad,a >we "ie 74 ve he eee Nushagak Area Hydropower Project Grant Agreement #2195419 Amendment 1 Appendix A #14,replace with the following: 14.Disputes Any dispute arising under this Grant Agreement which is not disposed of by mutual agreement must be dealt with in accordance with 3 AAC 108.915. Appendix A #30 Audits,add the following paragraph: Commercial (for-profit)entities shall obtain an audit by an independent auditing firm similar to a program audit prepared under OMB A-133.The auditee and auditor shall have basically the same responsibilities for the federal or state program as they would have for an audit of a major program in a single audit.The expenditure threshold is $500,000 in the commercial entity's fiscal year. Appendix A #32,replace with the following: 32.Grant Close out Upon completion of all work and expenditure of all grant funds related to the Project the Authority will provide written notice fo the Grantee that the Grant will be closed.The Grantee shall sign the Notice of Project Closeout within 30 days after it is delivered by the Authority.The Grant will be considered closed upon receipt of the signed Notice of Project Closeout. The Grant will be administratively closed if the Grantee fails to return the Notice of Project Closeout within 30 days after it is delivered by the Authority.If the Grantee has a valid reason for the Grant to remain open,they must contact the Authority in writing within 30 days. No additional reimbursements will be made to the Grantee after the grant is closed out. Appendix B #2,replace with the following: 2.Governing Laws The Grantee shall perform ail aspects of this Project in compliance with all applicable state,federal and local laws and the Request for Applications dated September 3,2008 and October 7,2009. Appendix B #3,replace with the following: 3.Eligible Costs . The Authority,as Grantor,shall have sole discretion to determine which project costs are eligible to be paid from Grant monies under this agreement.Only direct costs of the Project are eligible for payment or reimbursement from grant funds.Indirect costs are not allowed under this grant unless approved by the Authority in Appendix E. The eligible costs will be determined in accordance with Request for Applications dated September 3, 2008 and October 7,2009 that are incorporated by reference in this grant agreement: Appendix C Grantee Proposal/Scope of Work,add the following to the existing Scope: The Nushagak Electric &Telephone Cooperative (NETC)will use $700,000 of Renewable Energy Funds to complete feasibility activities of Nushagak Area Hydropower Project (NAHP).NAHP consists of hydropower projects at Lake Elva and Grant Lake and the associated transmission lines needed to connect to the existing NETC power grid.However,no construction funds will be released until the Alaska Energy Auth Grant Agreement Amendment Grant Agreement Number Amount of Funds 2195419 $4,031,500 ($4,006,500 RE Fund &$25,000 AEEE fund) Project Code(s)Encumbrance Number/AR_|Period of Performance: 407035 PBOO00378 From:August 20,2008 To:December 31,2012 Project Title , Nushagak Area Hydropower Project Grantee Grantor Name . Nushagak Electric and Telephone Cooperative,Inc.Alaska Energy Authority Street/PO Box Street/PO Box P.O.Box 350 813 W.Northern Lights Blvd City/State/Zip City/State/Zip Dillingham,Alaska 99576 Anchorage,AK 99503 Contact Person Contact PersonMichaelFavors,Project Manac er Doug Oit,Project Manager Phone Fax E-mail:Phone Fax E-mail: 907-842-5251 |907-842-2780 |mfavors@nushagak.coop {|907-771-3067 |907-771-3044 |dott@aidea.org AMENDMENT1 Change Project Title to: Nushagak Area Hydropower Project Appendix A #1e,replace with the following: e)"Project”means Nushagak Area Hydropower Project as defined in Appendix C (Scope of Grant)for which funds have been made available. Appendix A #12,replace with the following: 12.Integration This instrument and all appendices,amendments,attachments,Request for Applications dated September 3, 2008 and October 7,2009,Applications dated October 8,2008 and November 10,2009 hereto embody the entire Agreement of the parties concerning the grant funds granted hereunder.There are no promises,terms, conditions,or obligations regarding said funds other than those contained in the documents described above; and such documents shall supersede all previous communications,representations or agreements,either oral or written,between the parties hereto,To the extent there is any conflict between the provisions of Appendix A and B the Grantee's application or proposal,the provisions of Appendix A and B prevail. CONTINUED NEXT PAGE Authority Executive DirectorGranteeProjectManagerorDesignee Signature Date Signatur Date |Signature DateAaOmreesdGUMY=|4-9 /rfran'Printed Nam rifted Name and Title Printed Name And Title 'Frank Corbin;Sie neral Mtanager |Doug Ott,Project Managed _|Steve Haagenson,AEA Executive Direcw Scope of Work /for Regional Planning : AEA is working with several regional organizations for the purpose of developing Energy Plans for regions aligning with the earlier planning regions subscribed to in AEA's Energy Pathway of 2010.A common scope of work is necessary to guide the regional organization tasked with the duty to draft a plan .Some elements of that scope are as follows: j.enlist the support of all major stakeholders such as: *major utilities within the region(Alaska Village Electric Coop -AVEC)is in 52 villages and Alaska Power and Telephone (APT)is in approximately 22 villages *major regional Non-Profit Corporation *major ANCSA corporation *Regional Housing Authority *Regional Health Corporation *Significant Village Ancsa Corporation *Major Fuel Supplier ii.use existing studies and AEA 2010 Pathway as starting points to begin examination of alternative sources of energy for the region iii,Conduct meetings with public and resource agencies iv.Do Resource Study Recon v.Identify and inventory energy alternative vi.Analyze /prioritize alternatives and make recommendations vii.Draft report to AEA and other major stakeholders Nushagak Area Hydropower Project Grant Agreement #2195419 Amendment 1 |Attachment1 Financial Report/Request for Reimbursement Form THIS REQUEST IS FOR FINAL PAYMENT [] Grantee:Nushagak Electric &Telephone Cooperative,Inc. Project:Nushagak Area Hydropower Project Period:to Grant Number:2195419 A B c D=B¢C E#a-D BUDGET SUMMARY TOTAL GRANT PRIOR EXPENDITURES TOTAL GRANT BUDGET EXPENDITURES THIS PERIOD |EXPENDITURES BALANCE BY TASK OR MILESTONE Ph 1 Feasibility Study Lake Elva &Grant Lake $120,000 Ph 1 Obtain site control for field studies $3,000 Ph i Perform stream gauging on Elva Creek (2 years){$75,000Ph1Meetingsw/public &resource agencies)$25,000Ph1Resourcestudyrecone$37,000Ph1PrepareStudyPtanacceptabletoresourceagencies.4 _- $40,000 Ph Zidentify&inventory energy altematives $8,000r2Analyze/Priortize alternatives and makg $12,000 Ph 2 Dreft.ReporttoAEA and other stakeholders $3,000 Ph 2 Final Energy Planto AEA $2,000 Hydrology Data $200,000 Generation and Transmission Report $48 000 Economic Feasibility $15,000 Environmental Studies $197,000 Draft Engineering Feasibility Study $225,000 Final Engineering Feasibility Study $15,000 Unallocated $3,006,500 TOTAL $4,031,500 BY BUDGET CATEGORIES Direct Labor and Benefits $30,000Travel!$10,000 Equipment $0 Materials &Supplies $0 Contractual Services 5 985,000 Construction Services $0 Unallocated $3,006,500 TOTAL $4,031,500 BY FUND SOURCES Grant Funds -Renewable Energy Fund AR4685-13 $4,006,500 Grant Funds AEA AR4684-13 "25,000 TOTAL $4,031,500 CERTIFICATION Form requires two original signatures.The person certifying must be different from the person preparing the report.One signature should be the authorized representative of the Grantee organization or highest ranking officer;the other should be the person who prepared the report. I certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that the information reported on both the Financlal Report above and the attached Progress Report are correct.In addition,funds were spent and work performed in accordance with the grant agreement terms and conditions. Certified By:Prepared By: Printed Name:Printed Name: Title:Date:Title:Date: Nushagak Area Hydropower Project Grant Agreement #2195419 Amendment 1 Feasibility,Economic Feasibility and Environmental Studies.This report shall be submitted to the Authority in draft form for review and acceptance and in final form for Authority review and acceptance. The achievement of milestones defines when tasks are eligible for reimbursement.Once a milestone has been reached,the expenses related to that milestone's reimbursable tasks are eligible for reimbursement.The following table outlines the milestones,reimbursable tasks,budget,schedule,and deliverables for this Amendment. Reimbursable Start EndMilestonesTasksBudgetDateDate Deliverables 1)Renewable Energy Fund Grant is in place Jun 2010 |Aug 2010 Hydrology Data collection and analysis $200,000 |Jul2010 |Aug 2012 |Hydrology Report Generation and $48,000 |Jul2010 |Aug 2012 |G&T ReportTransmissionStudy Economic Feasibility $15,000 |Jul2010 |Aug 2012 |Economic Feasibility Report Environmental Studies $197,000 |Jul2010 |Aug 2012 |Environmental Studies Report Draft Engineering we ate Feasibility Study $225,000 |Jul2010 |Aug 2012 |Draft Feasibility Study Final Engineering Feasibility Study $15,000 |Aug 2012 |Oct2012 |Final Feasibility Study 2)AEA Accepts Feasibility Study Jul 2010 |Dec 2042 Total $700,000 Appendix E #3 Grant Disbursements,add the following sentence: Reimbursements are made for actual costs incurred and must be for approved milestones. Attachment 1 Financial Report/Request for Reimbursement Form,replace with the attached. All other terms and conditions remain unchanged. Nushagak Area Hydropower Project Grant Agreement #2195419 Amendment 1 previously funded Integrated Resource Plan for the Dillingham and Aleknagik grid is completed and approved by the Authority. NETC will conduct studies to determine the overall NAHP feasibility including the feasibility of the hydropower development projects at Grant Lake and Lake Elva. NETC has used $120,000 in grant funds to update the preliminary feasibility studies of Grant Lake and Lake Elva and determined proposed steps toward a more detailed analysis and selection of alternatives.Additional grant funds in the amount of $180,000 were then dedicated for more field information to support licensing of the Lake Elva project,which included site control to conduct field studies,two years of stream gauging on Elva Creek,conduct meetings with the public and resource agencies,resource study research and prepare draft and final study plans acceptable to resource agencies. This Amendment dedicates an additional $700,000 in unallocated grant funding to provide for a single milestone consisting of an updated feasibility study with supporting field studies for Lake Elva and Grant Lake Hydropower Projects.These studies shall be conducted in consultation with state and federal resource agencies to determine and refine design and operations specifications to support a future request for permitting and final design.The studies shall include the following: Economic and Engineering Feasibility Evaluation Hydrology -Hydrology data will be retrieved or generated to obtain applicable data on Elva Creek and Grant River streamflows,and lake levels in Lake Elva and Grant Lake.New stream gauges will be installed where necessary to allow data collection at both sites for at least two years. Generation and Transmission -A detailed generation study will be performed to determine the exact size and type of turbine/generator and switchgear.Once transmission alternatives have been evaluated and initial route selections made,NETC will further evaluate buried/overhead/submarine routings,associated equipment and materials and costs. Economic Feasibility -After preliminary selection of generation alternatives,detailed generation studies will help determine energy generation potential under a range of meteorological conditions.Energy study results will be used in association with power sales,construction,maintenance and operation costs to determine the economic feasibility of the selected alternatives. Environmental Studies --The exact nature and scale of environmental studies will be determined during agency consultation and study planning.Generally,however,environmental field and/or office studies are required to meet information needs in the following areas:Aquatic Resources,Terrestrial Resources,Water Use and Quality,Geology and Soils,Socioeconomics,Cultural Resources,Land Use and Recreation and Aesthetics. Engineering Feasibility -An engineering feasibility study will be performed in association with field surveys and more detailed topographic mapping (to include LIDAR mapping)to determine the constructability of the various project features in relation to subsurface conditions,vegetation and topography.A conceptual design will be prepared which lays out the locations for the site access, intake structures,power conduits,diversions,tunnels and powerhouses.Geotechnical investigations will be conducted for site features. An engineering feasibility report will be prepared which incorporates all studies and field investigation results conducted under this grant including:Hydrology,Generation and Transmission,Engineering Sara Fisher-Goad om:Denali Daniels <DDaniels@denali.gov> Sent:Tuesday,February 22,2011 9:03 AM To:Sara Fisher-Goad Subject:FW:EETF Attachments:FY11 DRAFT Energy Workplan bp.docx Sara, While in concept,the EAC endorsed the attached FY11 Work Plan document and it includes significant federal match to state energy programs.|will be updating this document between now and March 4 which is when we anticipate knowing more about the continuing resolution vs.appropriations bill.{hope to work with your office over the weeks to come on how to update this document to reflect our best guess from the state's side on the emerging tech and other energy match.Let's plan to connect soon so we can update this appropriately between now and March 4. Hope all is well with the new job! Denali 907-271-1189 Denali Commission 510 L Street,Suite 410 Anchorage,AK 99501 907.271.1414 tel 907.271.1415 fax 888.480.4321 toll free www.denali.gov Energy Advisory Committee Meeting February 3,2011 -Anchorage,AK Briefing Paper:FY1I1 Work Plan Prepared by:Denali Daniels,Senior Energy Program Manager **ACTION REQUIRED BY COMMITEE** Issue: Review the DRAFT FY11 Work Plan -Energy Section. Background:The FY11 DRAFT Work Plan document is being prepared in anticipation of federal appropriations.While appropriations are unknown at this time,staff is preparing three funding scenarios using historical and known funding situations as of January 2011. The following table proposes three scenarios for FY11. Funding Source FY11 FY1I1 FY11 Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3 (FY10 actual) Energy and Water Appropriations |$8,665,000 $6,000,000 $6,000,000 (Base)* USDA-RUS -High Cost Energy |$7,680,000 $6,000,000 $0 Grant** Trans Alaska Pipeline Liability |$6,730,376 $6,730,376 $6,730,376 (TAPL)*** Totals $23,075,376 $18,730,376 $12,730,376 *The majority of Base funding has historically been dedicated to the energy program with other program funding sources available (i.e.,health,training).'Base is also the only available discretionary funding,therefore as other programs decline,Base is the obvious next option. Currently the President's budget dedicates $12m to the Commission and scenarios 2 and 3 assume up to $6m would be dedicated to the energy program.Scenario 1 assumes the Department of Labor (DOL)and Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA)funding is received for the Training and Health programs,freeing up funding to the energy program commensurate to FY10. **USDA-RUS -High Cost Energy Grant program is currently not in the President's budget however historically the program has been replenished through the legislative process.Scenario Energy Advisory Committee 2/3/2011 Briefing Paper FY11 DRAFT Work Plan Page 2 of 5 1 assumes this program is funded level to FY10 figures,scenario 2 estimates $6m and scenario 3 assumes this program is not funded. ***Trans Alaska Pipeline Liability Fund (TAPL)is not subject to legislative approval and is estimated at $6,730,376.TAPL funding is limited to bulk fuel facility upgrades. The timeline for appropriations is unknown,therefore the estimates herein are anticipated to evolve as more information is known. Analysis: DRAFT Budget -Scenario 1 Partner |Project BASE RUS |TAPL |DC Match ProgramTotalUpto50%|Total TBD Bulk Fuel &3.63 7.68 6.73 18.04 18.04 36.08 RPSU Program TBD Conceptual 2.34 0.00 2.34 NA 2.34 Planning/Design BF/RPSU TBD Renewable Energy |0.30 0.00 0.30 NA 0.30 Technical Assistance AEA Emerging Tech 2.40 0.00 2.40 2.40 4.80 Program NA Contingency 0.00 0.00 |0.00 $0 8.67 7.68 |6.73 23.08 20.44 43.52 DRAFT Budget -Scenario 2 Partner |Project BASE RUS |TAPL |DC Match ProgramTotalUpto50%|Total TBD Bulk Fuel &2.30 6.00 6.73 15.03 15.03 30.06 RPSU Program TBD Conceptual 1.00 0.00 1.00 NA 1.00 Planning/Design BF/RPSU TBD Renewable -Energy |0.30 0.00 0.30 NA 0.30 Technical Assistance AEA Emerging Tech 2.40 0.00 2.40 2.40 4.80 Program NA Contingency 0.00 0.00 |0.00 $0 6.00 6.00 6.73 18.73 17.43 36.16 Energy Advisory Committee 2/3/2011 Briefing Paper --FY11 DRAFT Work Plan Page 3 of 5 DRAFT Budget -Scenario 3 Partner |Project BASE RUS |TAPL |DC Match Program Total Up to50%|Total TBD Bulk Fuel &2.30 0.00 6.73 9.03 9.03 18.06 RPSU Program TBD Conceptual 1.00 0.00 1.00 NA 1.00 Planning/Design BF/RPSU TBD Renewable -Energy |0.30 0.00 0.30 NA 0.30 Technical Assistance AEA Emerging Tech 2.40 0.00 2.40 2.40 4.80 Program NA Contingency 0.00 0.00 |0.00 $0 6.00 0.00 6.73 12.73 11.43 24.16 Cost Share Match The FY11 pending Base appropriations language includes the following statement: "Provided,That funds shall be available for construction projects in an amount not to exceed 80 percent of total project cost for distressed communities,as defined by section 307 of the Denali Commission Act of 1998 (Division C,Title II,Public Law 105-277),as amended by section 701 ofAppendix D,Title VI,Public Law 106-113 (113 STAT.1501A-280),and an amount not to exceed 50 percent for non-distressed communities.” Our interpretation of the cost share language is that no match is required for planning and design. Cost share match is not a new policy to Commission programs.See Attachment "C”which includes actual policy language. In FY10 at the recommendation of the EAC,the Commission required 10%match for funded projects.The FY11 Base Funding includes the above match language,and while other funding sources (RUS,TAPL)do not include a match requirement the Commission is anticipated to employ this method across programs.The Governor's budget includes language identifying a request for $9m of state funds for energy infrastructure. It is also unknown how many projects for FY11 are distressed and non-distressed communities. For planning purposes,50%is used in the budget scenarios.EAC input will be considered by the Commission on implementation of the cost share match policy._ Budget Narrative Bulk Fuel &RPSU Program The Alaska Energy Authority (AEA)and the Alaska Village Electric Cooperative (AVEC)have historically managed Bulk Fuel and Rural Power System Upgrades (RPSUV)projects on behalf of the Commission.Each organization maintains a deficiency list and projects are developed *Energy Advisory Committee 2/3/2011 Briefing Paper -FY11 DRAFT Work Plan Page 4 of 5 through a gated process of planning,design and construction.The Commission maintains a comprehensive "universe of need”list using information provided by partners.As projects proceed,or do not proceed,they are updated accordingly in the database.The database is used to track program completion,project balance of program funding need and notate specific project or community information notable for future reference.Commission staff want to bolster this effort. The Bulk Fuel and RPSU programs continue to be a priority for the Commission's energy program and accordingly all scenarios include the majority of funds dedicated for this line item. Project selection in FY11 will be contingent upon the direction taken regarding the cost share match requirement.All projected match figures reflect the maximum match required (50%). Conceptual Planning and Design In FY10,the Commission invested in a planning/design fund which funded several projects for conceptual design/business planning and/or design completion.Two regional energy planning projects were also funded.The projected timelines for construction readiness of all projects in the design phase is currently being assessed.The findings of that exercise will provide cost estimates for future year construction funding,and the impact of investing in new design projects to availability of funds. A limited solicitation was conducted in FY10 for conceptual planning and design projects.A subcommittee to the EAC provided review and recommendations.This process is recommended for FY11.All scenarios include funding for this line item,with the recommendation that if any added funding is received this area be increased first.The reasoning is that no cost share match is required for planning and design activities. Renewable Energy Technical Assistance The State of Alaska Renewable Energy Fund (REF)began as a partnership with the Commission in 2005.As the program reaches its final year under the existing structure,it is anticipated that many projects may not have participated due to capacity or the absence of a regionally supported energy plan.The Commission is coordinating with AEA on gathering feedback from the Interior Regional Energy Plan grant funded by the Commission in FY10 and discussing other regional efforts. All scenarios dedicate $300,000 toward this effort.No match is required for regional planning. Emerging Energy Technology Fund Similar to the beginning of the REF,the Commission funded a new emerging energy technology fund in 2009 using $4m in prior year funds to renewable and alternative energy strategies.In FY10,$2.24m matched $2.4m in state funds which accompanied the passage of legislation establishing the fund.For the first round (the $4m),the Commission managed a grant solicitation process and Alaska Center for Energy and Power (ACEP)provides grant management services and data collection and reporting.The newly passed legislation identifies the AEA as the manager of the fund,establishes an advisory committee to provide input on the project solicitation process.The committee met in December 2010 and a solicitation for $4.8m of State and Commission funds is now open. All scenarios reflect $2.4m in funding contingent upon $2.4m in State match. cy Energy Advisory Committee 2/3/2011 Briefing Paper --FY11 DRAFT Work Plan Page 5 of 5 Contingency No fund is recommended for contingency. Action Required: Provide feedback on funding breakout for scenarios and cost share match implementation.EAC members are asked to come prepared to discuss alternative scenarios to those proposed in this paper. Attachment(s): Attachment C -Cost Share Match and Private Enterprise Policy Language @ Mike Harper From:Douglas Ott Sent:Wednesday,February 16,2011 1:57 PM To:Mike Harper;Peter Crimp Ce:Bruce Tiedeman;Audrey Alstrom Subject:FW:meeting Things are moving forward for the YK region. From:Allen Joseph [mailto:ajoseph@avcphousing.org] Sent:Wednesday,February 16,2011 1:55 PM To:Douglas Ott;Audrey Alstrom Subject:FW:meeting Two emails,below,Christine K.,Calista COO,responding to Wendy C.,Legislative Consultant. From:Christine Klein Sent:Tuesday,February 15,2011 5:51 PM To:'Wendy Chamberlain' Cc:Andrew Guy;Christine Klein;'Ron Hoffman';g.quy kwtinc@yahoo.com Subject:RE:meeting Importance:High Cool.We'll proceed FORWARD then for next week. I'll be preparing as best we can.It'll be a BIG stretch but we can do it.Don't know who/what villages have requested what types of funding.... Here are some facts for you: e Energy generation need and forecast for Bethel and 13 area villages!Akiachak,Akiak,Eek,Kasigluk,Nunapitchuk, Quinhagak,Atmautluak,Oscarville,Napakiak,Kwethluk,Napaskiak,Tuluksak,and Tuntutuliak. This project is intended to cover Bethel and all of the above villages. This project would cover 14 communities out of the 52+in the Calista region (27%) This project covers 45%of all people in the region with 11,163 people /25,083 people for entire region This general area covers 10%of the state of Alaskain square mile area o7,862 mi Calista region compared to state 571,951mi2 *.,e have over 15 planning and engineering reports fron.. 75 forward on energy need,options,and feasibility ass..-.nents. It includes at least 3 previous technical reports on hydropower (the fact that this particular report is still draft should NOT be a concern at this point since all several other engineering reports done over the past 3+decades had similar findings ---let him know. e This latest report took 12 potential/past site options down to remaining feasible 4 sites that are basically only two area -the kisaraluk area and the Chikuminuk area. e Chikuminuk is the now most real feasible option wrt generation capacity to meet area needs,growth potential,year around power,and does not have fish which had concerned area citizens. Christine Christine E.Klein,A.A.E. Executive Vice President Chief Operating Officer Calista Corporation 301 Calista Court,Ste.A Anchorage,Alaska 99518 (907)644-6309 direct (907)351-9585 cell (907)279-5516 From:Wendy Chamberlain [mailto:wendyc@gci.net] Sent:Tuesday,February 15,2011 5:01 PM To:Christine Klein Cc:Andrew Guy Subject:RE:meeting Ok Christine here is where we are at: I talked with Jay Livey a few minutes ago.Senator Hoffman has requested a hearing before Senate Resources on the hydro project next week.We are waiting to hear from Senators Waggoner and Paskavan if there is availability on next week's committee schedule. Jay reo:....-d we print up several books outlining the project without the wo tAFT on the document.He suggested Andrew state onthe publ |:ord that the final approval is pending a public hearing next week.Senator Hoffman is concerned that people we not give proper weight to a draft document. Additionally,can you let me know the 9 villages that will benefit from the project construction?Have any of these villages requested funding through the renewable energy fund? We continue to work on this issue.Look forward to seeing you all next week. Wendy Wendy Chamberlain Owner Legislative Consultants in Alaska (L0QNA} 224 4”street,Juneau AK 99801 907-230-4508 Mike Harper From:Audrey Alstrom Sent:Wednesday,February 16,2011 12:15 PM To:Mike Harper Ce:Marva Weeden Subject:RE:Grants received from AIDEA Attachments:REFundCalistaCorp_11x17.pdf;REFund Status July 2010.xIsx Mike, Here is what |have found regarding energy studies/planning for Calista area (no particular order)from the filing cabinet: 1.Donlin Creek Late Stage Evaluation Study,prepared for Placer Dome Technical Services,LTD by PN&D,March 1999.Do not know who funded this effort. 2.Calista Region Energy Needs Study,Part 1,volumes 1,3,4,prepared for Nuvista by Frank J.Bettine,July 2002.Funded by $250,000 State grant. 3.Bethel Magnetic Survey.Cost $175,000.Recipient was Calista.Completed January 1997.(could not find the study but found it in listing of completed projects) 4.Bethel/NYAC Intertie Design Study.Cost $95,773 and funded by State.Recipient was Calista.Completed March 1996. 5.Bethel/NYAC Independent Cost Estimate.Cost $10,000 and funded by State.Completed April 1997. 6.Donlin Creek Mine Power Supply Feasibility Study,Books 3 of 3.Cost $1.5 million.Recipient was Calista and funded by Denali Commission grant.There were numerous studies done under this effort which culminated with the feasibility study. i also looked in the catalog of our energy library for any studies,but did not find anything that was done recently (1995-present). Also,|have included two attachments that show Renewable Energy Fund (REF)grants received.One attachment contains a map of the Calista region and the REF grants received thus far,which are 10 grants.The other attachment has all the grants from the REF broken out by technology,rounds 0-3,and the amount of the grant ("Total REF Grant”).The grants have either been from Round 0 -3.Round 0 was from 2007 and Round 3 was from 2010. Let me know if this was what you were looking for and if [can help in any way. Audrey From:Mike Harper Sent:Wednesday,February 16,2011 10:29 AM To:Marva Weeden Cc:Audrey Alstrom Subject:FW:Grants received from AIDEA Marva:.u...sorry to report that the best |can do in this short time since you cz..-..to request information about grants for the "Calista/AVCP”regio.2 wot the total answer.However what we have is a listing of grants to the only agency that our system found and that js to Alaska Village Electric Coop.(AVEC).AVEC shows all grants and we do not break it out just for your region.But |believe you and your associates can determine grants for your region. In addition,|have hard copy of 2 reports done by Nuvista ;actually authored by a consultant Frank Bettine dated July 1,2002 titled Calista Region Energy Needs Study Part I-Volumes.Apparently this was funded :"by a $250,000 state grant”.|suspect by the previous legislature. The second report is done by Nuvista,|suspect funded by the legislature ,and dated March 2004. |have asked one of our engineers ,Audrey Alstrom to assist me with this project and she may have further information . From:Linda MacMillan Sent:Tuesday,February 15,2011 9:14 AM To:Mike Harper Cc:Amy Adler Subject:RE:Grants received from AIDEA Mike, That attached excel file has a recap of all the AEA grants to AVEC.|could not find anything in our system regarding Nuvista.Do you remember when the Nuvista loans were changed to grant.|could only find the forgiveness for some Middle Kuskokwim loans in FY2002.Possibly these loan changes during the Division of Energy days.AEA did not give grants to any of the other entities and AIDEA did not give out any grants. Linda From:Mike Harper Sent:Monday,February 14,2011 3:27 PM To:Linda MacMillan Subject:FW:Grants received from AIDEA Linda :Peter,Bruce and |are following up with Calista ,AVCP Inc.and AVCP Housing doing energy region planning .Linda,could you please help us /Calista with this request for energy grants inthis area.MikeH From:Marva Weeden [mailto:mweeden@calistacorp.com] Sent:Monday,February 14,2011 3:21 PM Tor 'mh @aidea.org' Subject:FW:Grants received from AIDEA Here is the additional information: Who (group/agency/company)it was issued to: How much $$$ Name of project/study When (year)sON=aFrom:Marva Weeden Sent:Monday,February 14,2011 3:12 PM To:'mharper@aidea.org' Subject:Grants received from AIDEA Hi Mike, My name is Marva Weeden,I am the executive assistant for Christine Klein.Margaret Nelson suggested |give you a call.|am needing to research some information. Do have information on what grants in the past may have been issued to the following from AEA or AIDEA?For: Calista Corporation Nuvista AVCP AVCP Rural Housing Authority AVEC YKHC My phone number is 907-644-6300,or you may email me at mweeden@calistacorp.com.|am needing this information by late Tuesday afternoon.Any information you can provide will be greatly appreciated. Thanks Marva Weeden Executive Assistant for Christine Klein Mike Harper From:Audrey Alstrom Sent:Wednesday,February 16,2011 4:16 PM To:Mike Harper;Peter Crimp Ce:Bruce Tiedeman Subject:FW:meeting FYI. From:Allen Joseph [mailto:ajoseph@avcphousing.orq] Sent:Wednesday,February 16,2011 1:55 PM To:Douglas Ott;Audrey Alstrom Subject:FW:meeting Two emails,below,Christine K.,Calista COO,responding to Wendy C.,Legislative Consultant. From:Christine Klein Sent:Tuesday,February 15,2011 5:51 PM To:'Wendy Chamberlain' Cc:Andrew Guy;Christine Klein;'Ron Hoffman';g.quy kwtinc@yahoo.com Subject:RE:meeting Importance:High Cool.We'll proceed FORWARD then for next week. I'll be preparing as best we can.It'll be a BIG stretch but we can do it.Don't know who/what villages have requested what types of funding.... Here are some facts for you: e Energy generation need and forecast for Bethel and 13 area villages!Akiachak,Akiak,Eek,Kasigluk,Nunapitchuk, Quinhagak,Atmautluak,Oscarville,Napakiak,Kwethluk,Napaskiak,Tuluksak,and Tuntutuliak. This project is intended to cover Bethel and all of the above villages. This project would cover 14 communities out of the 52+in the Calista region (27%) This project covers 45%of all people in the region with 11,163 people /25,083 people for entire region This general area covers 10%of the state of Alaska in square mile area 57,862 mi Calista region compared to state 571,951 mi2 e ___have over 15 planning and engineering reports from .-.5 forward on energy need,options,and feasibility asse__...ents. "It includes at least 3 previous technical reports on hydropower (the fact that this particular report is still draft should NOT be a concern at this point since all several other engineering reports done over the past 3+decades had similar findings ---let him know. e This latest report took 12 potential/past site options down to remaining feasible 4 sites that are basically only two area -the kisaraluk area and the Chikuminuk area. e Chikuminuk is the now most real feasible option wrt generation capacity to meet area needs,growth potential,year around power,and does not have fish which had concerned area citizens. Christine Christine E.Klein,A.A.E. Executive Vice President Chief Operating Officer Calista Corporation 301 Calista Court,Ste.A Anchorage,Alaska 99518 (907)644-6309 direct (907)351-9585 cell (907)279-5516 From:Wendy Chamberlain [mailto:wendyc@gci.net] Sent:Tuesday,February 15,2011 5:01 PM To:Christine Klein : Cc:Andrew Guy Subject:RE:meeting Ok Christine here is where we are at: I talked with Jay Livey a few minutes ago.Senator Hoffman has requested a hearing before Senate Resources on the hydro project next week.We are waiting to hear from Senators Waggoner and Paskavan if there is availability on next week's committee schedule. Jay requ__._d we print up several books outlining the project without the wo RAFT on the document.He suggested Andrew state on the pub cord that the final approval is pending a public hearing next week.Senator Hoffman is concerned that people we not give proper weight to a draft document. Additionally,can you let me know the 9 villages that will benefit from the project construction?Have any of these villages requested funding through the renewable energy fund? We continue to work on this issue.Look forward to seeing you all next week. Wendy Wendy Chamberlain Owner Legislative Consultants in Alaska (LCIA} 224 4°street,Juneau AK 99804 907-230-4308 Initials |Date Prepared By Approved By 1 2 3 4 6 va Ave,Per Pace.Trenfptet-|Eetneg-iE "nda Eners,[TaniBahchés ;1 _TO aid 3; 4: 5 6 7 8 9 1010 ;11 :12 Y13 :14 :15 :16 :7 Z18CoO|:19 ane | 8:O $O "i 4 212RlringStraifsTHieee||1 FNP)alas | a:O -O :[I;\o;O ;24 :25 s26 :27 ;28 :29 :30 :31 32 :33 :34 \ z35 :36 :37 238 :39 r 414] :42 :43 :44 "45 ; :4747 .: 49; 50 wena inure enuumaA 1 &_SCALAR WRITE!E7ENER PADNEN |WAIANER WYRING!ROLINN . Initiais Prepared By Approved By CULUNMNWRITE®andPENeasimwo;,_ojm|OD|oO]&|Ww]mR|]-royQPUB)rwl\I"SSJ(*m&NNomCO-COmS//MSL +,hr AL 4 /de'qlee recA Lf La\aa->Pre ff aN\asmasa WH CAM IANICe eruroARY 11 A.OPAL WOITE™RIBABR DANNER /WETENER -AWYRING ROUND »wilolm|]mmtao]&1wl]rm[eaeaePetePefefeiefurss[milo]&1]wlrmje[oo-oo-wormfrm---|oOoiednNBRwon]em|om]mmmmmmmmmmeT]Dw|wfWJWwWIW7]w||JWw]BR|A|A|PR[|MRJPKOoO};lwolaolm>|mlrtel_wflrmlH|alaos]aol_asal_ai[_analel]wlrmeplfel_alwalalnrainn]oi]= Initials Date Prepared By Approved By 1 2 3 4 5 6 re Pevulrtrme ||Custmncens ||Emerg,Sabs ||PecLonhdl Harn |Dese7 4SteJ00KWAIelpeg,begria'33 etd Dy $f 1}Anege-|tHe>2 ||Uficy CrperValle,Elecd psog ||”Beet Wn:11.ae 3 a 0 pn tee ISj1 Sar 4 Vee 1h)er 5 clas 45% a Othleutiod Pir /r/ho!|32 147)||y|Seyig 7 3/747 aeeeb|%LS |sled assec Akupar||ese Alibre 8 ' ATK:74 3a 367 |3/V4,oe |S38 # 9 Coll Bay 7;3 25[39 |2|2e %Olol717 WZ ovat 4 10 ,Fele Ass|||ys Zi |ylel ul [tP)4-|King Gora ||list 184 790 |%o¢17,74 l2 X *MeligiZad enh bF hl!7 27H >T.19154 AS37957)Ye 3 MN,halla 15 2YUZ aaa Nya Be t,|2,057 4 St,Gters Lg 24 |p 3 15 sh bal Wd»[2b W Sige 677 1/8)408 388 be)|%Pb 16 send |For ||992k Le Yorsigss,"1/757 BED syY|4 a Un clerk 26175 2 bt yf 18pO O 20 a | 'i.y |t21OmStimbsFonS\72L|-/s-r Ley (Boy a)||7 eee 11S.2 al isle leg?Looe Kids |O |Tebergl || 23 $"750,000 Gof, 24 =5,000 _gal_per school25 26 MO Me 5.4451 141129 RoRooo[iemer ch -wr flage -20y )RhwoWwaoat bristol Bay 22 (Is Eten,anWES 33 tke fefesJ-w=wSa)wcon}wwCowwo>Oo=pean=KR>w==>ao=a==ao=woowaoet eines Aim AREA URAC MOE ERE RARER WRERED caOIIAD BALI | Regional Energy Planning for Yukon Kuskolwim Delta Single Source Justification Considerations: What:This is information ,data that intends to provide support for procurement of Grant Administration of Alaska Energy Authority Grant funds for the purpose of writing a Region-wide Energy Plan for the 56 communities with the area bordered by the Lower Yukon and Kuskokwim river Delta. Background:Alaska Energy Authority has published two documents ,one in 2009 and one in 2010 that intended to provide a starting point for Alaskans across the state to begin the process of developing a long term energy strategy for the State. The first document contains information on all critical energy technologies ,as well as a database of community energy resources compiled from a variety of sources.The second report,Alaska Energy Pathway,starts with overall policy direction in energy efficeicny and conservation as well as renewable energy development.It also identifies critical priority areas like economic development, climate change,enery security,and eduation and work force development.Finally it includes much more detailed information on each community and region . Next Step:The 3 stage of energy planning now involves Region-wide energy plans that need to be locally founded and produced.The first region that AEA proposes to work with is the largest rural region in terms of population and number of communities and that is Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta . The reason that AEA chooses to start the strategy to get to all regions within the state is because this area has long had a formal planning process Mike Harper From:Bruce Wright [brucew@apiai.org]Sent:Monday,April 04,2011 11:22 AM To:Mike Harper Subject:energy planning Hi Mike, How are you doing on an energy planning statement of work?It may look something like this: The Alaska Energy Authority (AEA)is proposing to increase the effectiveness of partnerships and resources to promote energy efficiency,energy conservation and renewable energy in the Alaska communities.AEA will accomplish this and promote capacity building and effective planning through the development of a Regional Energy Strategic Implementation Plans.Upon completing the plans AEA proposes to coordinate and finance regional energy projects with participation from Tribal,non-profits,city,borough,state,and federal governments,and individuals from Alaskan communities. AEA expects the coordinated effort and plan outcomes will result in many energy conservation and renewable energy objectives being completed. AEA will fund an organization or organizations to manage and coordinate with all communities and associated entities to produce a strategic plan that comprehensively inventories existing utility infrastructure;evaluates the efficiency of each and study the potential of what renewable energy technology is most proficient in each community to replace or reduce current fossil fuel use.The plans will be reviewed and discussed in depth at a region wide summit.The plan will then be segmented into manageable time table and tasks to implement and ensure the plan becomesa reality of operational renewable resources utilities,energy conservation measures and results in less dependence upon fossil fuels. This planning effort will incorporate a team approach and partnership with the region's governments and organizations culminating in the regional workshop.The partners can include Tribes,boroughs,regional non-profits and for-profits,regional housing authority,community development association and city governments.Buy-in from these organizations will insure economic and staff support for the implementation plans and energy efficiency,energy conservation and renewable energy projects.Additional support and coordination will be sought from the Alaska Housing Finance Corporation,University of Alaska Cold Climate Research Center,Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium,Alaska Energy Authority,Denali Commission,and others.1)ftViLeng BS sf ady blfk Ze2-2 6D .QZ )Bruce Wright gax 279 43ST , Senior Scientist Bruce Wh tp (,ovgAleutianPribilofIslandsAssociation 1131 E.International Airport Rd. Anchorage,AK 99518-1408 Mike Harper From:Christine Klein [cklein@calistacorp.com] Sent:Friday,April 01,2011 5:16 PM To:Mike Harper;Peter Crimp Ce:Andrew Guy;g.guy_kwtinc@yahoo.com;Christine Klein Subject:Nuvista Grant/Contract Importance:High Mike This is to follow up on our conversation today about a contract or grant with Nuvista.The $100,000.in funding requested for the year and subsequent effort (scope provided last week)is to provide a position that would help coordinate and oversee a:1)region-wide alternative energy plan,and a 2)Bethel sub-region alternative energy effort for the Y-K area.The actual plans and any project themselves would have to be funded separately by AEA or the legislature of course.|understand you or AEA may need the following information before AEA can provide any funds,a grant,or contract to Nuvista:a)justification of why or how Nuvista is the best one prepared to do this,and b)two letters of support from other major stakeholders in the region (ie)AVEC and or another Here are some bullets to help provide support for Nuvista receiving a grant: e The sole purpose for Nuvista is as a non-profit utility cooperative set up years ago to address energy issues of the Yukon- Kuskokwim region e Nuvista is an organization focused on energy issues and a non-profit unlike other organizations in the region that may have another mission,focus,profits,and politics e Nuvista members consist of and are represented by a12 member board of directors consisting of the below individuals representing other larger organizations: Alaska Village Council President's -Myron Naneng (3 seats) Yukon Kuskokwim Health Corporation -Gene Peltola (1) Alaska Village Electric Cooperative -Brent Petrie (1) Channinik Wind Group -William Igurak (1) Lower Kuskokwim Electric -Martin Moore (1) Calista Corporation -Art Heckman,Willie Kasayulie (2) Kwethluk Electric --George Guy (1) Middle Kuskokwim Electric-Ernie Baumgartner (1)AVCP Regional Housing Authority-Ron Hoffman (1)e Nuvista does not focus on or address any one member's interests'or area,is an established non-profit,and is the one existing group or entity whichis most representative of the large diverse Y-K regionOWDNAARWNH>1 e .... is the first time all of these many diverse groups have é..-»me together to collaborate,and its very important their cuurts be supported,assisted,and continued while people remain interested and excited The group agreed that we can commit to putting up to $50,000.towards help support and/or match any grant assistance.In addition, Calista has also committed to providing office,logistics,and support space for an individual;as well as,a significant amount of my own time,resource,and direction in leading,overseeing and moving this effort forward (as clearly proven and exhibited over the past 4 months).My knowledge of our region along with background of engineering,master planning,and permitting of many large past projects was specifically requested to ensure this effort proceeded.These have all been major commitments from these organizations and their combined leadership and |respectfully request AEA's funding help to proceed expeditiously. Hope this helps. Christine Christine E.Klein,A.A.E. Executive Vice President Chief Operating Officer Calista Corporation 301 Calista Court,Ste.A Anchorage,Alaska 99518 (907)644-6309 direct (907)351-9585 cell (907)279-5516 Mike Harper From:Christine Klein [cklein@calistacorp.com] Sent:Wednesday,March 23,2011 10:41 AM To:Mike Harper;Peter Crimp;Christine Klein Cc:Bruce Tiedeman;Andrew Guy;g.guy_kwtinc@yahoo.com Subject:Tasks &Job Description Attachments:GMnhuvistatasks&hours.doc;GMnuvistajobdesc.doc Importance:High Gentlemen, My apologies for being a tad late!The legislative session has kept me hopping around the clock lately-but I'm sure you are all in the same boat too.At any rate |have put together the following two items which I'd committed to provide you at our last meeting on the 17th: 1.Job Description flexible for both technical and public planning purposes yet high enough level to do what I think we all envision;and 2.Proposed Scope of Tasks and timeline with the estimated hours so we know what is supposed to get done. I'd like to get some feedback from you so we can finalize a grant with you.At that point we will have the HR department advertise the position,screen applications,and then set up interview panel and interview times for us of the qualified candidates.... Generally |do very structured two and sometimes a three person review/interview panel interviews,if you'd like to suggest someone to join me that would be great.Or if you don't have time perhaps |could ask you to do the preliminary screening. The range of compensation we are thinking is $85,000.to $115,000.We are looking to see if there is a way for us to provide benefits but haven't gotten that all worked out yet.The position will be housed at Calista here in Anchorage to be near me so that I can personally provide direction and guidance as that is what we had committed to you,based on our earlier conversations. !will be in Bethel with the Nuvista Board tomorrow. Thank you Christine Christ...=.Klein,A.A.E. Executive Vice President Chief Operating Officer Calista Corporation 301 Calista Court,Ste.A Anchorage,Alaska 99518 (907)644-6309 direct (907)351-9585 cell (907)279-5516 Energy Director/General Manager Proposed Scope &Tasks 2011-2013 Timeframe Task Deliverable:Region Wide Alternative Energy Plan Estimated Hours =1,256 Initiate and carry out efforts of a Calista/AVCP region wide comprehensive alternative energy plan.This will be done in close coordination with AEA to result in a formal region-wide planning document which can lead to future actions and or projects.The plan will integrate stakeholders'and smaller sub-regions'or areas'desires,plans, efforts,and projects which may have been undertaken in the Calista region.Multiple energy technology will be assessed,alternatives documented,and reasons documented when alternative(s)are eliminated and removed from further consideration,feasibility of options,and 'best options'analyses completed for the 'preferred alternative(s)'.All region areas will be incorporated into the report.Tasks and estimated hours below.Obtain funding Grant(s)to undertake and implement above action 2011 3°quarter (160 hours)Obtain and negotiate contractor/consultant scope to carry out the efforts-2011 4"quarter (128 hours)Compile all past reports,studies,and summaries of efforts underway-2011 (40 hours) Gather new information on village/area desires,energy technology options,feasibility (760 hours) Hold Public Meetings and Coordinate with Hub Villages (minimum)on above item -2012 (288 hours) Draft Report and compile comments-2012 (240 hours)Finalize report,findings,alternatives,preferred option(s),next steps,and costs-4%quarter 2013 (240 hrs)Present findingsin public meetings to villages and stakeholders-2"3 4 quarter 2013 (in."Other”below) Task Deliverable:Sub-Region Alternative Energy Plan Preferred Alternative Estimated ours =1,920 Initiate next steps to complete a Comprehensive Detailed Feasibility Report for the Bethel Area Sub-Region (Bethel and 13 area villages)energy alternative actions.This includes development of the Preferred Alternative for the Sub-region of the Chikuminuk Lake Hydropower project option determined as most feasible based on latest report and meetings from January 2011.Tasks and estimated hours below. e Obtain contractor/consultant to carry out final detailed feasibility report-3 quarter 2011 (160 hours)e Oversee consultant(s)on Detailed Feasibility Assessment,Engineering Plans,and the Federal EnergyRegulatoryCommission(FERC)site preliminary application document PAD-3 quarter 2011 (1040 hours)Undertake site field investigations,surveys,data gathering,and preliminary engineering-2012 (above hrs) Research,initiate specifications and submit required FERC initial documents for the site -2012 (80 hours) e Assess steps for Rights-Of-Ways,Land Easements,Acquisitions for route(s)Electrical Utility TransmissionSystemforenergygenerationsite,and,Interconnecting Village Grid system-2012 (160 hours)Develop economic analysis,financing alternatives,and go/no-go decision timeline-4"qrtr 2012 (120 hrs)Present preferred alternative findings,initial environmental process public meetings-2011-2013 (360 hrs) Provide project updates and information gathering in all villages affected at minimum (in "Other”below) Other Ongoing Task/Duties:Estimated Hours =2,078 °Coordinate with Stakeholders to Provide Updates on Activities Regularly"Monthly checkin updates for Agencies and Nuvista (20 hours) o Written Quarterly Update for:Agencies (AEA)and Nuvista Board (40 hours) o Semi-Annual (2x)project funding update to funding agencies/groups (20 hours) o Provide Annual Conference Meeting for Stakeholders and Interested Parties (40 hours) e Public,Board,&Other Meetings for Alternative Energy Preferred Alternatives &Options o Nuvista Cooperative Board Meetings (80 hours) o Public and Stakeholders in Region (448 hours) o Appropriate State and Federal Agencies,Legislators,delegation,others'(140 hours) e Provide Project Management o Write Scopes and Request for Proposal(s)to undertake studies,reports,projects o Oversee Grant and Proposal(s),Submissions,Requirements,Cost Tracking,and invoicing o Supervise and Oversee Contractor(s)on a weekly basis ensuring scope,schedule,budget are met and invoices approved according to contract(s),bids,and professional agreements. Total Tasks |-Ill Estimated Hours =5,254 Mike Harper From:Christine Klein [cklein@calistacorp.com] Sent:Wednesday,March 23,2011 10:41 AM To:Mike Harper;Peter Crimp;Christine Klein Ce:Bruce Tiedeman;Andrew Guy;g.guy_kwtinc@yahoo.com Subject:Tasks &Job Description Attachments:GMnhuvistatasks&hours.doc;GMnuvistajobdesc.doc Importance:High Gentlemen, My apologies for being a tad late!The legislative session has kept me hopping around the clock lately-but I'm sure you are all in the same boat too.At any rate |have put together the following two items which I'd committed to provide you at our last meeting on the 17th: 1.Job Description flexible for both technical and public planning purposes yet high enough level to do what |think we all envision;and 2.Proposed Scope of Tasks and timeline with the estimated hours so we know what is supposed to get done. I'd like to get some feedback from you so we can finalize a grant with you.At that point we will have the HR department advertise the position,screen applications,and then set up interview panel and interview times for us of the qualified candidates.... Generally |do very structured two and sometimes a three person review/interview panel interviews,if you'd like to suggest someone to join me that would be great.Or if you don't have time perhaps |could ask you to do the preliminary screening. The range of compensation we are thinking is $85,000.to $115,000.We are looking to see if there is a way for us to provide benefits but haven't gotten that all worked out yet.The position will be housed at Calista here in Anchorage to be near me so that !can personally provide direction and guidance as that is what we had committed to you,based on our earlier conversations. |will be in Bethel with the Nuvista Board tomorrow. Thank you Christine Christ =.Klein,A.A.E. Executive Vice President Chief Operating Officer Calista Corporation 301 Calista Court,Ste.A Anchorage,Alaska 99518 (907)644-6309 direct (907)351-9585 cell (907)279-5516 Mike Harper From:Christine Klein [cklein@calistacorp.com] Sent:Tuesday,March 29,2011 6:06 PM To:Mike Harper;Peter Crimp Ce:Bruce Tiedeman;g.guy_kwtinc@yahoo.com;Andrew Guy Subject:RE:checking in Mike Thanks for getting back to me. Nuvista is a non-profit utility membership organization -basically anyone can join who wants to and intends to purchase power. My understanding is that the planning effort that all of us (AEA,Calista,YKHC,AVCP everyone)want just need someone to be focused on and lead the efforts for the region as |understand it---so we proposed Nuvista since it has so many groups as members that it's pretty well rounded (excuse my pun),exists already,and is a non-profit.A grant for the planning efforts could probably be to anyone - it just seems to make the most sense at Nuvista since energy is the focus and mission of that organization.The rest of the groups all have other focus,missions',objectives,etc.not necessarily energy planning as their day to day work. As for the planning and or future project(s)effort(s)that would be undertaken in coordination with AEA -those will certainly involve anyone and everyone who is interested and show's up to public meetings and such -of course |can't Force people to participate though.Its certainly not simply members of Nuvista.Perhaps folks are getting the organization (which can hold a grant)vs the actual planning efforts confused? A working group/committee can certainly be set up that's including everyone and anyone for the 1)region wide alternative energy plan, and 2)the chikuminuk lake feasibility effort.|envision the new person (NOT ME!!!)will do these type things,set up lots of working committees,and public meetings and so forth to keep everyone in tune. I'm probably getting way down in the weeds now. Lets meet up,as |suspect we are really all on the same sheet of music Christine Christ -:.Klein,A.A.E. Executive Vice President Chief Operating Officer Calista Corporation 301 Calista Court,Ste.A Anchorage,Alaska 99518 (907)644-6309 direct (907)351-9585 cell (907)279-5516 From:Mike Harper [mailto:mharper@aidea.orq] Sent:Tuesday,March 29,2011 5:49 PM To:Christine Klein;Peter Crimp Cc:Bruce Tiedeman Subject:RE:checking in Mrs.Klein:yes,indeed we received your job description and Scope and as a matter of fact are talking about how best to put that into a grant package .Let us review it more closely and get back to you this week.Sorry for our delay ,but as you say,it is getting crunch time in Juneau and so you know where a lot of our focus is right now. ido have one question.That is ,will the region -wide group have any problems with involving the City of Bethel as a player in same fashion your other partners are?Perhaps they already are to some degree. We understand this subject came up at one of their recent meetings. in light of involving others ,we were wondering if a more appropriate title for the group might be the Lower Yukon &Kuskokwim Region.Something to study on. Also,how are members like AVEC and MKEC treated:are they part of Navista as well.Peter and Or |will give you a call tomorrow to see where we stand. Thanks Mike harper From:Christine Klein [mailto:cklein@calistacorp.com] Sent:Tuesday,March 29,2011 5:22 PM To:Peter Crimp;Mike Harper Ce:Bruce Tiedeman Subject:checking in Fellows, Did you receive my email last week on the:1.Energy person job description,and 2.General scope of work,tasks,hours,timeline?It covered coordination for both the:a)region wide energy planning efforts,and the b)Sub-region Chikuminuk lake feasibility efforts. Our board approved moving forward last week out in Bethel so are anxiously pressing me for actions. 2 Can |<..-./er any questions or should we connect up on it? Christine Christine E.Klein,A.A.E. Executive Vice President Chief Operating Officer Calista Corporation 301 Calista Court,Ste.A Anchorage,Alaska 99518 (907)644-6309 direct (907)351-9585 cell (907)279-5516 CHP THeL *Sec.4.The following appropriations are for deferred maintenance capital projects and grants from the general fund or other funds as set out in section 5 of this Act by funding source to the agencies named for the purposes expressed.They lapse under AS 37.25.020, unless otherwise noted. kKekKAK Appropriation General Other Allocations Items Funds Funds kw ke ke *****Department of Administration ***** kkk KK Governor's House Deferred Maintenance (HD 3-4) Statewide Deferred Maintenance Projects Non-Public Building Fund Facilities Deferred Maintenance (HD 1-40) Public Building Fund Facilities Deferred Maintenance (HD 1-40) State of Alaska Telecommunication System Deferred Maintenance (HD 1-40) kkAKK *****Department of Commerce,Community and Economic Developmen kk eK * Alaska Industrial Development &Export Authority -Ketchikan Shipyard Deferred Maintenance (HD 1-40) SB0230d kkk KK 1,000,000 1,000,000 9,250,000 6,250,000 3,000,000 450,000 5,800,000 3,000,000 kekK KS t ****%* kek 2,000,000 2,000,000 HCS CSSB 230(FIN)am H,Sec.4 thd KO Lireope _Be Sule rh 1 Appropriation General Other 2 Allocations Items Funds Funds 3 &Herring Demonstration 4 Project (HD 36-38) 5 Alaska Climate Change 500,000 500,000 6 Impact Mitigation Program 7 Community Planning Grant -150,000 8 Atmautluak (HD 38) 9 Community Planning Grant -150,000 10 Kipnuk (HD 38) 1]Hazard Impact Assessment 50,000 12 Mini-Grant -Elim (HD 39) 13 Hazard Impact Assessment 50,000 14 Mini-Grant -Nelson Lagoon 15 (HD 37) 16 Hazard Impact Assessment 50,000 17 Mini-Grant -Nightmute 18 (HD 38) 19 Hazard Impact Assessment 50,000 20 Mini-Grant -Quinhagak (HD 21 38) -22 Alaska Energy Authority 24,500,000 8,500,000 16,000,000 23 Energy Projects 24 Alternative Energy and 8,000,000 25 Energy Efficiency (HD 26 1-40) 27 Bulk Fuel Upgrades (HD 5,000,000 28 1-40) 29 Rural Power System 9,000,000 30 Upgrades (HD 1-40) 31 Southeast Integrated 500,000 32 Resources Plan (HD 1-5) LL 33 Statewide Energy Plan 2,000,000 HCS CSSB 230(FIN)am H,Sec.7 SB0230d -20- oCONAMNB&BWNWwWwWHWwWPbPPONONOWNNHNHWNNDNO|||HHKFHFOSOoSlSlwoNnF|&F&FOoeHIHDAFFWYNY-|&§CODOOFHAHDAFBWNY|CORetirement and Benefits Document Management System (HD 1-40) kk kk * Appropriation General Other Allocations Items Funds Funds 475,000 475,000 kekke* *****Department of Commerce,Community and Economic Development ***** kkk KK Alaska Aerospace Corporation -Kodiak Launch Complex Sustainability (HD 36) Alaska Energy Authority - Electrical Emergencies Program (HD 1-40) Alaska Energy Authority - Railbelt Large Scale Hydro Planning,Design and Permitting (HD 12-35) Alaska Energy Authority - Renewable Energy Round Three Grants (HD 1-40) Alaska Visitors Statistics Program (HD 1-40) Banking and Securities Imaging (HD 1-40) Community and Regional Affairs System Replacement and Consolidation (HD 1-40) Denali Commission Federal-State Partnership Grant (HD 1-40) Western Alaska Canned Chum SB0230d kk KA K 4,000,000 4,000,000 330,400 330,400 10,000,000 10,000,000 50,250,000 50,250,000 500,000 500,000 609,000 609,000 326,000 326,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 300,000 300,000 HCS CSSB 230(FIN)am H,Sec.7 -19- BILLS PARTIALLY VETOED BY GOVERNOR PARNELL 2010 Chapter 41 Chapter 43 OPERATING AND LOAN PROGRAM APPROPRIATIONS Makes appropriations for state fiscal year 2011 for the operating and loan program expenses of state government,for certain programs,and to capitalize funds. (CCS HB 300) Effective Date:Sections 35 and 37 take effect June 30,2010;remainder of Act takes effect July 1,2010;those portions of the appropriations made in section 1 of this Act that appropriate either the unexpended and unobligated balance of specific fiscal year 2010 program receipts or the unexpended and unobligated balance on June 30,2010,of a specified account are retroactive to June 30,2010,solely for the purpose of carrying forward a prior fiscal year balance CAPITAL APPROPRIATIONS Makes and amends appropriations,including capital appropriations,supplemental appropriations,fund capitalizations,and other appropriations. (HCS CSSB 230(FIN)am H) Effective Date:Sections 16 and 57,and the appropriations made in sections 23(c),23(d),24(d),29(c),30(a),36,and 38 are conditional; sections 1,4,10,29(c),31,32(b),34,37,38(a),58,and 60 take effect June 4,2010;sections 29(a),29(b),33,and 39 -56 take effect June 30,2010;remainder of Act takes effect July 1,2010;sections 29(c)and 38(a)are retroactive to March 1,2010 -35- OoSeINHDNHFFWNO=WwWwWWwWWYNONONYONYNYNYNYNYWNNO||S|=SSS|ReSewoNY--&COCOOOnNHWnFFWYNOKHCDCOWONDBDNHFPWNYOKKCOAppropriation General Other Allocations Items Funds Funds Alaska Energy Authority 5,587,300 Rural Energy Operations Alaska Energy Authority 100,700 Technical Assistance Statewide Project 1,307,700 Development,Alternative Energy and Efficiency Alaska Seafood Marketing 18,680,300 13,680,300 5,000,000 Institute Alaska Seafood Marketing 18,680,300 Institute The amount appropriated by this appropriation includes the unexpended and unobligated balance on June 30,2010,of the receipts from the salmon marketing tax (AS 43.76.110),from the seafood marketing assessment (AS 16.51.120),and from program receipts of the Alaska Seafood Marketing Institute. Banking and Securities 3,324,600 3,324,600 Banking and Securities 3,324,600 Insurance Operations 6,957,300 6,825,700 131,600 Insurance Operations 6,957,300 The amount appropriated by this appropriation includes up to $1,000,000 of the unexpended and unobligated balance on June 30,2010,of the Department of Commerce,Community,and Economic Development,division of insurance,program receipts from license fees and service fees. Corporations,Business and 11,151,900 10,038,700 1,113,200 Professional Licensing The amount appropriated by this appropriation includes the unexpended and unobligated balance on June 30,2010,of receipts collected under AS 08.01.065(a),(c)and (f)-(i). Corporations,Business and 11,151,900 Professional Licensing 8,699,400 8,361,700RegulatoryCommissionof 337,700 Alaska CCS HB 300,Sec.1 _Energy Citations Database (ECD)--Document #950715 NM,7 72TH MVCvo /Page |of 2eneryyLon(fap) &syHare €it Energy Citations Database ADOPT-A-DOC? Bibliographic Citation Document iaja @ Mb or -search,view and/or download individual pages Dol 10.2172/950715 Title NANA Strategic Energy Plan &Energy Options Analysis Creator/Author Jay Hermanson ;Brian Yanity Publication Date 2008 Dec 31 OSTI Identifier OSTI ID:950715 DOE Contract Number FG36-07G017091 Other Number(s)Other:N/A;TRN:US200911%%436 Resource Type Technical Report Coverage Final Research Org NANA Regional Corporation,Inc.WHPacific Sponsoring Org Department of Energy -Tribal Energy Program Subject 17 WIND ENERGY,13 HYDRO ENERGY;15 GEOTHERMAL ENERGY;AGRICULTURE; BIOMASS;COMMUNITIES;COOPERATIVES;ELECTRIC UTILITIES;FINANCING;HEAT RECOVERY;PLANNING;RIVERS Related Subject NANA Strategic Energy Plan &Energy Options Analysis inti NANA Strategic Energy Plan summary NRC,as an Alaska Native Corporation,has committed toDescription/Abstract addressing the energy needs for its shareholders.The project framework calls for implicitinvolvementoftheIRACouncilsintheSteeringCommittee.Tribal Members,from the NRC to individual communities,will be involved in development of the NANA Energy Plan.NRC,as the lead tribal entity,will serve as the project director of the proposed effort.The NRC team has communicated with various governmental and policy stakeholders via meetings and discussions, including Denali Commission,Alaska Energy Authority,and other governmental stakeholders. Work sessions have been initiated with the Alaska Village Electric Cooperative,the NW Arctic Borough,and Kotzebue Electric Association.The NRC Strategic Energy Pian (SEP)Steering committee met monthly through April and May and weekly starting in June 2008 in preparation of the energy summit that was held from July 29-31,2008.During preparations for the energy summit and afterwards,there was follow through and development of project concepts for consideration.The NANA regional energy summit was held from July 29-31,2008,and brought together people from all communities of the Northwest Arctic Borough.The effort was planned in conjunction with the Alaska Energy Authority's state-wide energy planning efforts.Over $80,000V3wa.2 in cash contributions was collected from various donors to assist with travel from communities ?/Ney and to develop the summit project.Available funding resources have been identified andZedrequirementsreviewed,including the Denali Commission,U.S.Dept.of Agriculture,and the Alaska Energy Authority.A component of the overall plan will be a discussion of energy funding and financing.There are current project concepts submitted,or are ready for submittal,in the-#”region for the following areas:*Wind-diesel in Deering,Buckland,Noorik,and Kiana areas;/ 2.potential development around Red Dog mine.«Biomass Feasibility analysis in the upper Kobuk;*+Run of the river hydroelectric development for the Upper Kobuk;«Solar photovoltaic (PV)power 5demonstrationprojectsforNoatak,Ambler,Selawik,Kiana,and Noorvik;»Heat Recovery for¢,several communities;In September 2008,the NRC team participated at the Alaska Rural Energy Conference in Girdwood,Alaska In November 2008,the NRC team gave a presentation on the NANA regional energy plans at a DOE Tribal Energy Program conference in Denver,Colorado. In January 2009,the final SEP report was submitted to NRC. Country of Publication United States Language English http://www.osti.gov/energycitations/product.biblio.jsp?query_id=3&page=0&osti_id=950715 4/6/2011 Tribal Renewable Energy -Closeout Summary Report Project Title: Date of Report: Recipient Organization: Award Number: Partners: Technical Contact: Business Contact: DOE Project Officer: NANA Strategic Energy Plan &Energy Options Analysis March 19,2009 NANA Regional Corporation (NRC) DE-FG36-07G0O17091 Northwest Arctic Borough (NWAB),Northwest Inupiat Housing Authority (NIHA),Alaska Village Electric Cooperative,(AVEC),Manilaaq Association,Kotzebue Electric Association (KEA),NWAB School District,and IRA/Traditional Councils. Jay Hermanson NANA Pacific 300 W.31°Ave.,Anchorage,AK 99503 jhermanson @ whpacific.com 907-339-6500 Jeff Nelson NANA Regional Corporation 1001 East Benson Blvd Anchorage,AK 99508 Lizana K.Pierce,lizana.pierce@go.doe.gov 1.Project Objective:Improved NANA Region energy security through strategic energy planning and improved understanding of available energy options. SO 1:Increased collaboration between NANA Region stakeholders on energy policy,program, infrastructure,and increased capacity of tribal entities for the region. SO2:Increased understanding of energy options available to NANA Region energy stakeholders for improved energy decision making. SO3:Increased awareness and understanding of NANA Region energy needs on the part of external stakeholders. The objective of the energy options analysis is to undertake a pre-feasibility analysis of identified renewable resources,non-renewable renewable resources,energy efficiency measures,and analyze energy consumption needs and patterns.The purpose of the NANA SEP is to provide stakeholders with a conceptual framework and energy vision for the enhancement of energy security. 2.NANA Strategic Energy Plan executive summary NRC,as an Alaska Native Corporation,has committed to addressing the energy needs for its shareholders.The project framework calls for implicit involvement of the IRA Councils in the Steering Committee.Tribal Members,from the NRC to individual communities,will be involved in development of the NANA Energy Plan.NRC,as the lead tribal entity,will serve as the project director of the proposed effort.The NRC team has communicated with various governmental and policy stakeholders via meetings and discussions,including Denali Commission,Alaska Energy Authority,and other governmental stakeholders.Work sessions have been initiated with the Alaska Village Electric Cooperative,the NW Arctic Borough,and Kotzebue Electric Association. The NRC Strategic Energy Plan (SEP)Steering committee met monthly through April and May and weekly starting in June 2008 in preparation of the energy summit that was held from July 29-31,2008. During preparations for the energy summit and afterwards,there was follow through and development of project concepts for consideration. The NRC team has developed a community survey instrument in order to involve community members in energy decision making.Energy coordinator Gia Hanna also travelled to a majority of the villages to involve community members in the energy planning and further understand how energy is adversely affecting these communities.Many community members from across the Northwest Arctic Borough attended the regional energy summit in July.NRC community-based technicians also worked with community leadership on energy issues. The NANA region "energy statement”was discussed with stakeholders,and has been developed for the draft SEP report.The regional energy goals and desired outcomes include reduced overall energy costs, more efficient use of energy,the adoption of renewable energy sources,and increased community participation in energy decision-making.The SEP process aims to develop a synergy between different energy sources and end-users,with composition of the optimal 'energy mix'custom-tailored for each community.The energy plan is being used for development of proposals for the region. The NANA regional energy summit was held from July 29-31,2008,and brought together people from all communities of the Northwest Arctic Borough.The effort was planned in conjunction with the Alaska Energy Authority's state-wide energy planning efforts.Over $80,000 in cash contributions was collected from various donors to assist with travel from communities and to develop the summit project. A clear and distinct listing of metrics and project objectives has been developed for the region and are being reviewed for applicability.The project objectives include a 25%decrease in fossil fuels imported to the region by 2015,and 50%by 2020;energy standards for new buildings and retrofits;and new technologies adopted.Metrics include the number of gallons of diesel and other fuels displaced,as well as the number of new projects.Data was being collected to determine present energy use patterns in the NANA Region,which will also be used to predict future demand trends.. Possible coal and natural gas deposits have been identified for the region,and included as energy options in the energy options analysis.Exploration for hydrocarbon resources,including coal and natural gas,are beyond the scope of this report yet should be monitored for regional energy planning implications.Coal deposits have been identified at Chicago Creek near Deering,and at Point Lay,which lies north of the NANA region in the North Slope Borough.Exploration efforts for natural gas have been proposed for the 2 Red Dog Mine and Selawik areas.Maniilaq Association and other team members are developing a concept entitled the "Dark Fiber”project that involves development of stranded natural gas deposits in the Selawik area.Components of concept will be included in the regional energy plan as it includes intertie development.There is current analysis and activity associated with natural gas development. Cogeneration options have been identified for Shungnak,Deering,and Noatak.There are likely other co- generation (combined heat and power)other options possible in the NANA Region,which further feasibility studies will help identify. A review of the diesel system efficiencies for the region has been undertaken,resulting in new gen-sets in Selawik only.All other communities,aside from Selawik,would benefit with improved efficiencies. Proactive and community-wide end-use energy efficiency measures have been reviewed for the region, including building energy audits,weatherization and insulation,lighting and heating upgrades,and diesel generator efficiency.At the energy summit,leaders in energy efficiency were available to provide information on energy efficiency and conservation to community members. Wind diesel project concepts have been developed for Buckland,Deering,and Noorvik.Met towers have been installed as of July 2008 for a year long data collection.C/b at this time can only be considered preliminary;until data has been fully collected for the desired time-frame.Wind development concepts are being considered for both Ambler and Kiana.Met towers are being sought for both Ambler and Kiana.A grant application submitted to the Alaska Energy Authority in October 2008 for wind-diesel project construction funding for Buckland,Deering,and Noorvik was recommended to the state legislature for funding. A pre-feasibility review of biomass has been conducted,resulting in identified biomass potential for the Amber/Kobuk/Shungnak area and possibly Noorvik,Kiana,and Selawik.Biomass energy expert Dr.Bill Wall is prepared a biomass prefeasibility study for the NANA region,after community visits to the Upper Kobuk region during summer 2008.A grant application submitted to the Alaska Energy Authority in October 2008 for wood biomass energy resource development for the Upper Kobuk region was recommended to the state legislature for funding. A pre-feasibility evaluation has identified geothermal energy potential for the Deering/Buckland area- Granite Mountain area,as well as Division hot springs south of the Shungnak-Kobuk area.Geothermal development around Kotzebue has been deemed unfeasible.Additional feasibility analysis is currently underway,and a "phase 1”report of geothermal energy potential for the NANA region has been completed.Site visits to Deering,Buckland,and Kotzebue have been undertaken to discuss geothermal potential in these targeted communities.Aside from the Granite Mountain and Division hot springs areas, there are no other reasonable and feasible options for geothermal development in the area without substantial investment in transmission infrastructure.At present,planning is underway for geophysical exploration activities near Buckland and Kotzebue.These activities may include analysis of remote sensing data,soil geochemical surveys,and ground-based geophysical surveys. Red Dog Mine,an existing mining operation in the region,NovaGold,and Mantra Mining are the primary commercial interests that could benefit and are potentially be interested in co-development of energy & power in the region.Preliminary discussions with both Teck Cominco (operator of the Red Dog Mine) and NovaGold/Mantra Mining (which is exploring for poly-metallic deposits in the upper Kobuk River Valley)have been initiated.In both cases,NRC is interested in collaborating on both new energy sources and new electric transmission lines that could serve both mining operations and existing NANA communities.Of particular interest is the co-development of wind power generation at remote Arctic locations near the Red Dog Mine and Port facilities,as well as on mountaintops north of Shungnak and Kobuk where NovaGold/Mantra Mining is exploring.Red Dog Mine is presently installing wind met towers for a wind energy resource assessment.With support from NRC and NovaGold/Mantra Mining, the Alaska Village Electric Cooperative a grant application was submitted to the Alaska Energy Authority in October 2008 for hydroelectric feasibility studies for the Upper Kobuk region.The grant application has been recommended to the state legislature for funding. Available funding resources have been identified and requirements reviewed,including the Denali Commission,U.S.Dept.of Agriculture,and the Alaska Energy Authority.A component of the overall plan will be a discussion of energy funding and financing.There are current project concepts submitted, or are ready for submittal,in the region for the following areas: e Wind-diesel in Deering,Buckland,Noorik,and Kiana areas;potential development around Red Dog mine. e¢Biomass Feasibility analysis in the upper Kobuk; ¢Run of the river hydroelectric development for the Upper Kobuk; ¢Solar photovoltaic (PV)power demonstration projects for Noatak,Ambler,Selawik,Kiana,and Noorvik; ¢Heat Recovery for several communities; In September 2008,the NRC team participated at the Alaska Rural Energy Conference in Girdwood, Alaska In November 2008,the NRC team gave a presentation on the NANA regional energy plans at a DOE Tribal Energy Program conference in Denver,Colorado. In January 2009,the final SEP report was submitted to NRC.