Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
St Paul Bulk Fuel Improvements Preliminary Draft Concept Design Report January 17, 2002
PRELIMINARY DRAFT St.Paul Bulk Fuel Improvements Concept Design Report aad "4.Mer . a .Too ee DT wo :...aces oomTey.o a "tea oR MarstaPNER:a Pies aS ME aS CbtibincenMieBregtoeee SabaSagfgl8lia--:.. January 17,2002 Prepared by: Lorie Dilley,P.E.,C.P.G. Principal Engineer "J HATTENBURG DILLEY &LINNELL-+DL Engineering Consultants 3305 Arctic Blvd.,Ste.204 Anchorage,AK 99503 Phone:907.277.2120 Fax:907.277.2122 E-mail:\dilley@hdalaska.com St.Paul,Alaska PRELIMINARY DRAFT Bulk Fuel Upgrade Concept Design Report EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report has been prepared for the State of Alaska,Alaska Energy Authority,Rural Energy Group (AEA).The purpose of this report is to provide information for the development of a new bulk fuel system design and to provide an opinion of construction scheduling and costs related to upgrading the fuel systems in the community of St. Paul,Alaska. This report includes a review of the existing bulk fuel systems in the community,an analysis of existing and future fuel needs,a conceptual design for the replacement/upgrading of these facilities to meet these needs,a site selection study,a proposed project schedule and a budget level cost estimate for the alternatives. The participants in this project are: e Cityof St.Paul (City); e Pribilof School District (School). As part of the development of this report,a site investigation was performed on November 19-20,2002.Participants in the site investigation included Lorie Dilley,P.E., of Hattenburg Dilley &Linnell,and David Lockard,P.E.,of AEA.During this investigation,potential participants and tank farm sites were identified,the existing fuel systems and tanks were inspected,and interviews were conducted with representatives of the School and the City. The existing City tank farm is a large,actively maintained facility and does not require replacement or expansion.Upgrades to the City and School facilities will be limited to bringing the facilities up to code and providing a retail fuel sales station.The proposed City retail fuel station will include a fenced and lighted area with an attendant kiosk. Facility upgrades include sandblasting and repainting the two power plant tanks and the School tank,as well as replacement of ten home heating oil tanks for the School's teacher housing and offices. The estimate for the St.Paul Bulk Fuel Upgrade project is $602,712.This value is for construction,without design and business plan expenses.It includes a 10% contingency,which is for minor variances that might occur during construction. HATTENBURG DILLEY &LINNELLEX-1 +DL Engineering Consultants St.Paul,Alaska PRELIMINARY DRAFT Bulk Fuel Upgrade Concept Design Report TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .........sssssessccccessessssssossscessssnneeceesessnsesenensessssseseneaaneesssessecsnaes EX-1 I.INTRODUCTION ......cccssccsccsseeccsssceesesssneccessseneesansaneesesssceeseessenesesseenansssssneesessennneess 1 A.CONTACTS.......ecccccccesseccesssneecessnacecccssseeecesssnateesseaueeecesaaeeeessesueeessusaeesessaaes 1 B.APPLICABLE REGULATIONS AND CODES ............cesssscccssseecceesteeeeseeaes 1 C.VILLAGE DESCRIPTION............cc:scccsssssecesssseeeesesseeeeesssseesessneesseseneesensanes 2 Il.EXISTING FUEL SYSTEMG...........ccsssssssssscecesssneccenseneesssssceesesssnesecaeseeessecsnanesseses 3 A.GENERAL OVERVIEW...........cccsccccccsssseecessseeeesssaaeecesseeeecesssuseeessueeeeesseaees 3 B.EXISTING FACILITIES LAYOUT ...........cccscccecsssseeeessseeecesssneeesesseeeneessneeeees 3 1.City of St.Paul's Main Tank Farm ..............cccccccecceeeessssssceeeeesesssseeaes 3 2.Power Plant Tank Farm ...........cccsssseccccceceesesssseeeeceeeeessssusseeeeesesessaaees 4 3.Pribilof School District TankS ............cccccsssssecessssceceessseeeeesseeeessenseees 4 C.DISPOSITION OF EXISTING FACILITIES .............cccscessessseecesseteeeesssneenees 5 Hl,ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS .......cccccsssssssssseesssesscsnsneescsssssssnnensecessasesscseenees 6 A.SITE DESCRIPTION ............ccccccsscceeessseecesssnseeesssneeeseeseeeecsssnseesssnaesevesseaees 6 B.SITE CONTROL...eccccccssscceessssseeeeseseeeesseseneccesesseeesscsseenessseseeesssnesessaaes 6 C.SOIL CONDITIONS.0.0.0....ccccccccesssseecessseseeeessneeessseeseeesecssenesessneecesseueeesseees 6 D.COMMUNITY FLOOD DATA ..........cccccscccceeseneetesseceeeesssaneeceesaeeeeessseeeceesaaes 7 E.ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING.........ccccccccccccsscsssteeeeessssssnseeeecessssseseeeeeeeseeees 7 F.LOCAL FILL MATERIAL ..............ccccesssseeeeeesssssneeeeeeeessseseeeeeeesensesneneeeeetenees 8 IV.PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS1...ssccccsssssssssceesecsssssncceessseessenscnaeesssssssscneaeessenses 8A.CITY OF St.PAUL IMPROVEMENTS ............:csccccceceeesssnceeeeeeeesseseneeeeseesees 8 1.Retail DISDENSING...........ee eeeeeeeeeesenceceeeereeeeeaneeeeeeeeeeeneneaeeeeeeeerensaeeeee®9 2.Power Plant Tanks .............cccccsssscsesecnnneeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeereeesseeeeeeeenne 9 B.PRIBILOF ISLAND SCHOOL DISTRICT IMPROVEMENTS ..............:008 9 1.Tank Painting...........cccccceeeeeeeeeesseceeeeeseeeseaeeeeeeeessseeeeeeesesessnaneesenens 10 2.Teacher Housing Heating Oil Tank Replacements..............eee 10 3.Regulatory PI€ans ...........cccccccccccssssssseceeeeeseeccaeeeeeeerececcuaueeeseeeeeesaneas 10 C.PERMITTING ........ccccscccccssssccccessaceeeeseneeeeeeseneeeeeseaeeeeeesaaeeseceeeeeeseseeeeennnaaes 10 1.Coastal Project QueStionnaire ............ccc eeeseeenencnececeeeeeeeeseeseesererees 11 2.Fire Marshal ReViIQW.........::cccccccssssssseceeeeeeessseeeeeeeeeeeesseeneeateeesenaneas 11 3.US Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Permit ..........cccceeseeseene 11 4.SHPO ConculSrence...........cccsecccenseeeceeeeeeenaeeseeeeeeeeeaeeseeseeeenseeeeeseaens 11 5.Endangered Species ..............eeeeeeeeeeeeeeessseeeeeeeeesessnnueesscesseeesseeeees 12 D.CONSTRUCTION METHOD.............:cscccccceeesssseeeceeeererssseneeeeeeneesesnseeneees 12 1.olor=)i Me=|0]0)eee 12 2.Local EQuipMen[..............cccceccceeeeessseseeeeeeeeeeessssnneeeesecseeseaaneeeeeessaes 12 K.SCHEDULE............cccccccccsssscecesssnneseeeeeeeeeseseeeeeesasesesssnsessssseusensaseeeeesenses 12 L.BUDGET COST ESTIMATE .........cccccsscecessseeeeessneneeessecaseeesaeeanenseeeaeensgees 13 M.SUSTAINABILITY ..........cccceesssccccecesssssneeeeeeeessecaceeeeeecesseneeseuseuseesnsseeeeaeeess 13 F HATTENBURG DILLEY &LINNELL I -+DL Engineering Consultants St.Paul,Alaska PRELIMINARY DRAFT Bulk Fuel Upgrade Concept Design Report APPENDICES Appendix A:Conceptual Design Drawings Appendix B:Preliminary Land Status Report Appendix C:US Army Corps of Engineers -Flood Plain Managements Services Alaskan Communities Flood Hazard Data 1998 Publication Information Appendix D:City Equipment List Appendix E:Budget Cost Estimate vs HATTENBURG DILLEY &LINNELL Ul +DL Engineering Consultants St.Paul,Alaska PRELIMINARY DRAFT Bulk Fuel Upgrade Concept Design Report I.INTRODUCTION This report has been prepared for the State of Alaska,Alaska Energy Authority,Rural Energy Group (AEA)to provide information for improvements to the City of St.Paul's tank farm and the Pribilof School District tanks at St.Paul,Alaska. This report includes a review of the existing bulk fuel systems in the community,a conceptual design for the improvements to these facilities to meet needs,environmental considerations,a proposed project schedule and a budget level cost estimate for the alternatives. The participants in this project are as follows: e City of St.Paul!(City); e Pribilof School District (School). Lorie Dilley of Hattenburg Dilley &Linnell (HDL)and Dave Lockard of AEA conducted a site visit on November 19-20,2002.The investigation included an inspection of the existing fuel systems,and a meeting with representatives of the school district,the tank farm operators,and the Mayor of St.Paul. A.CONTACTS The following individuals contributed valuable information for this report: John Merculief,City Manager 546-3110 Jonas Lestenkof,City Tank Farm Operator Anthony Kochutin,City Tank Farm Operator Malcolm Fleming,Pribilof School District Superintendent 546-3331 Mike Dahl,Polar Consult Alaska (Tank Farm Designer)258-2420 B.APPLICABLE REGULATIONS AND CODES The design/operation of fuel systems is controlled by the following State and Federal regulations: State of Alaska Fire and Life Safety Regulations (13 AAC 50); 2000 International Fire Code; 2000 International Building Code; State of Alaska Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Control Regulations (18 AAC 75); e EPA Oil Pollution Prevention Regulations (40 CFR Part 112); e US Coast Guard Facilities Transferring Oil or Hazardous Material in Bulk Regulations (33 CFR Part 154). HATTENBURG DILLEY &LINNELL1-+DL Engineering Consultants St.Paul,Alaska PRELIMINARY DRAFT Bulk Fuel Upgrade Concept Design Report The current State of Alaska Fire and Life Safety Regulations adopted the 2000 editions of the International Fire Code (IFC)and the International Building Code (IBC).The provisions of the IFC establish the primary design requirements for new facilities. The State of Alaska Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Control regulations (C-Plan)apply to fuel systems that have a storage capacity of more than 420,000 gallons per Owner or Operator. The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)regulations include two plans for fuel facilities:1)Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasures (SPCC)Plans and 2)Facility Response Plans (FRPs).The SPCC Plan identifies minimum fuel facility requirements for aboveground tanks larger than 660 gallons,or which have an aggregate volume of more than 1,320 gallons.The FRP is a spill response plan for facilities which are filled by marine vessels and which have a storage capacity of more than 42,000 gallons. The US Coast Guard Facilities Transferring Oil or Hazardous Material in Bulk Regulations apply to fuel facilities that is capable of transferring fuel,in bulk,to or from a vessel with a capacity of 10,500 gallons or more.This regulation includes two separate plans:1)Oil Spill Response Plan and 2)Operations Manual. C.VILLAGE DESCRIPTION St.Paul is located on the southern tip of St.Paul Island,the largest of the PribilofIslands.The island lies in the Bering Sea at approximately 57°07'N latitude and170°16.5'W.Longitude.It is located within the Aleutian Island Recording District.The climate is arctic maritime with cool weather year round and mean temperatures varying from 19 to 51 degrees Fahrenheit.Average precipitation is 25 inches and snowfall of 56 inches.Heavy fog is common in the summer months. St.Paul is predominantly Aleut.In 1788,the Russian American Company enslaved and relocated Aleuts from Siberia,Atka,and Unalaska to the Pribilofs to hunt fur seals;their descendants live on the two islands today.The federally- controlled fur seal industry dominated the economy of the Pribilofs until 1985.St. Paul is an important port for the Central Bering Sea fishing fleet,and recent port and harbor improvements have fueled economic growth.The collapse of the fishing industry in the past years has hurt the Pribilofs with a decrease in population.Eco-tourism is being developed due to the fur seal rookeries and the more than 210 species of nesting sea birds. St.Paul is accessible by sea and air.The State-owned gravel runway is 6,500 feet long and is undergoing improvements.Water wells supply 3 million gallons per day of potable water.All 167 homes and facilities are connected to the piped HATTENBURG DILLEY &LINNELL2EngineeringConsultants St.Paul,Alaska PRELIMINARY DRAFT Bulk Fuel Upgrade Concept Design Report water and sewer system.A new $3 million power plant has recently been completed. EXISTING FUEL SYSTEMS A.GENERAL OVERVIEW The site investigation included an inspection of the City's main tank farm,the power plant's tank farm,and an inspection of the School's tanks.Delta Western Inc.also maintains a tank farm at St.Paul for the sale of diesel fuel to fishing boats.This tank farm was not included in the proposed improvements due to Denali Commission Private Enterprise policies.The proposed improvements to the City's tank farm were developed so as not to interfere with the competitive nature between the City's tank farm and Delta Western tank farm. B.EXISTING FACILITIES LAYOUT A detailed description of each of the tank farms is as follows (see Appendix A for their location): 1.City of St.Paul's Main Tank Farm The City's main tank farm has a total capacity of 1,847,500 gallons of fuel.Approximately 84,700 gallons is gasoline and the remainder is diesel.There are two vertical tanks each with a capacity of 614,000 gallons,one vertical tank with a capacity of 126,900 gallons,two horizontal tanks each with a capacity of 4,000 gallons,and six vertical tanks each with a capacity of 80,700 gallons.The tank farm stores diesel and gasoline for retail sales. The main customers are the fishing boats,followed by the City residents for heating fuel,and then a small component for the gasoline sales.This tank farm is the only one in town that sells gasoline and diesel to the residents for personal vehicle use. The tank farm has five marine headers that are used to dispense fuel to fishing boats and to fill the tank farm.An 8-inch diameter below grade fill line runs from the marine headers to the pump house.From the pump house to the tanks,are 4-inch and 6-inch pipelines.The tanks are not manifolded together and fuel is transferred between the tanks using hoses.The larger tanks are normally vented through two 8-inch flanged vents,and emergency vented through one 8-inch flanged vent.The larger tanks are equipped with liquid level gauges,24-inch bottom manways,and roof-access stairs.Electronic level sensors are disconnected and HATTENBURG DILLEY &LINNELL3DLEngineeringConsultants St.Paul,Alaska Bulk Fuel Upgrade PRELIMINARY DRAFT Concept Design Report tank gauges are inoperative due to corrosion and rust within a few months of installation. There is an impressed current cathodic protection system used on the tanks and the bottoms of the tanks were recently inspected during an API 650 tank inspection conducted in 2001.The tanks are in the process of being sandblasted and painted,using Cathacoat paint with a zinc liner.There is a truck loading rack and the City maintains one dual-compartment tanker with a total capacity for 1,000 gallons and one larger,4,000-gallon capacity tanker truck.These trucks are used to deliver fuel to the community. There are two 4,000-gallon tanks,one each for diesel and gasoline. These tanks are connected to the dispensers located outside of the fence for the tank farm.These tanks are horizontal and are top filled by a hose through a 4-inch bung with 2-inch bronze ball valve and quick connect.They are top withdrawn through a 4-inch bung with a submersible pump to 1-%inch threaded steel,above grade pipe to the dispensers.The tanks are not emergency vented.The wiring to the dispensers is exposed and the dispensers are located about 15 feet away from the tanks. Power Plant Tank Farm The City owns and operates the power plant,which is located 200 feet northeast of the main tank farm.The tank farm at the power plant consists of two,horizontal,self-diked,welded steel,skid mounted tanks.One tank is 10,100 gallons in capacity and the other tank is 3,000 gallons in capacity.These tanks were installed approximately 4 to 5 years ago.There is an underground,2-inch diameter pipeline from the main tank farm's truck loading rack to the power plant tanks.Both tanks are manifolded together and fuel is bottom withdrawn from the larger tank by a 2-inch flange with a steel ball valve connected to a 2-inch welded steel distribution pipeline.Fuel is top withdrawn from the smaller tank by 4-inch bung to a 1-inch threaded overhead steel pipe to the plant.The tanks need sandblasting and painting. Pribilof School District Tanks The Pribilof School District tanks consist of one 3,000-gallon self- diked,welded steel,skid mounted tank used to supply heating fuel for the school,and 10 day tanks for teacher housing and offices. The day tanks range in size from 55 gallon drums to about 1,000 gallons in size.There are five underground storage tanks located HATTENBURG DILLEY &LINNELL4-+DL Engineering Consultants St.Paul,Alaska PRELIMINARY DRAFT Bulk Fuel Upgrade Concept Design Report at three of the teacher homes,the superintendent house,and at the Office.The five aboveground tanks are located at five separate teacher homes. The 3,000-gallon tank is top filled by hose from a fuel truck through a 3-inch bung with fill cap.Fuel is top withdrawn and returned through one 3-inch threaded bung bushed to two above grade 1” copper tubing lines to the school approximately 6 feet from the tank. The teacher housing tanks that are aboveground are 55-gallon drums on a wooden crib with a filter and line into the house.These are most likely gravity fed systems to the individual heaters of the houses.The volume inside or condition of the underground tanks was unknown. C.DISPOSITION OF EXISTING FACILITIES The existing City main tank farm is a fully operational C-Plan facility.There are some code violations and maintenance needs,but there is no need to provide a completely new facility.The City has been operating and maintaining the facility since 1988.The tank farm needs the following projects in order to become code compliant and to upgrade the facility: 1)Sandblast and paint tanks -scheduled for 2003; 2)Additional cathodic protection needed for one tank; 3)A sand trap should be put in the line to the oil-water separator - scheduled for 2003; 4)Corrosion-proof high level alarms; 5)Stairs over the berms into the tank farm; 6)Improved tank farm manifold system (upgrade from hoses and pumps); 7)Cages/bollards for the marine headers to avoid damage from equipment; 8)A filling station for both gasoline and diesel for the community. Many of these projects are listed on the City's Capital Improvement program. Except for the filling station,the other improvements were considered by AEA as providing a competitive edge to the City over Delta Western's facility,and would not comply with the Denali Commission private enterprise policy. The power plant tanks are in fair condition and should remain in place.It has been requested that these tanks be sandblasted and painted during the tank farms painting if possible.Additional improvements have not been requested nor anticipated. /™Y HATTENBURG DILLEY &LINNELL5+DL Engineering Consultants St.Paul,Alaska PRELIMINARY DRAFT Bulk Fuel Upgrade Concept Design Report The condition of the school tank is fair and will need integrity testing, sandblasting and painting.Upgrades to the fill and return lines may need to occur.The day tanks should be upgraded.The disposition of the underground storage tanks is unknown.The Underground Storage Tank Program within the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (ADEC)may be able to help the School with the removal of these tanks. lll.ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS A.SITE DESCRIPTION The only site selected for this project is for the retail fuel dispenser at the City's main tank farm.The site is shown on Figure C-2 in Appendix A.The site is located at the intersection of Polovina Turnpike and the entrance into the tank farm and power plant.The site is not level and at the time of the site visit was being regraded with heavy equipment.There are several small hills and a portion of the road is through the site.The Salt Lagoon is approximately 150 feet west of the proposed site. The remaining upgrades and improvements for this project will all occur at their current locations.The day tanks for the teacher housing and school office will be placed in roughly the same location as the current day tanks. B.SITE CONTROL Site control will be needed prior to the final design and construction of the dispensing facility.Since the western side of the site is bordered by Polovina Turnpike,the easement for the roadway needs to be considered.In addition,the turning radius into the tank farm will impact the placement of the dispensing facility.The main fuel line crosses the proposed site and should be considered also in the placement of the station. Appendix B contains a preliminary land status report.Additional research on the title and any easements should be conducted during the design stage. C.SOIL CONDITIONS The Pribilof Islands consist of a series of basalt flows that have built the islands over time.Overlying the basalt are derived sand,gravel and ash layers. Typically,a thin organic mat overlies very dark,brown sandy and silty ash layers. This material typically occurs on top of a yellow,brown,or black gravelly soils composed of cinders from the basalt flows and weathering of the basalt.The bedrock (basalt)underlies this material.Thicknesses of soil horizons range from a few inches to a few feet thick.Soils are generally highly acidic. HATTENBURG DILLEY &LINNELL6+DL Engineering Consultants St.Paul,Alaska PRELIMINARY DRAFT Bulk Fuel Upgrade Concept Design Report D.COMMUNITY FLOOD DATA The US Army Corps of Engineers -Flood Plain Management Services identified the December 1966 flood event as the flood of record.There is no flood gauge in St.Paul,and no elevation associated with the flood of record,although anecdotal evidence states that "floodwaters reached the foundation of Harold Thayer's house,next to the current Assembly of God church.”Another major flood occurred in 1991.The cause of these flood events was coastal surges impacting the land.The Alaskan Communities Flood Hazard Data,2000 Publication by the US Army Corps of Engineers for St.Paul is provided in Appendix C. E.ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING Per the 1988 U.S.Corps of Engineers General Design Memorandum for St.Paul Harbor,St.Paul Island is used by approximately 250,000 sea birds.The most abundant species include thick-billed murre,common murre,red and black- legged kittiwake,parakeet auklet and least auklet.Lesser numbers of waterfowl, shore birds and song birds are found on the island as either residents or migrants.The auklets and murre populations have nesting sites in the breakwater area along both the detached breakwater and the breakwater protecting the salt lagoon.Shore birds,gulls and waterfowl nest in the salt lagoon itself. Northern fur seals,Stellar sea lions and Harbor seals are abundant on St.Paul Island during portions of the year.The Northern fur seal is the most abundant species.The total estimated stock of 1.4 million animals in 1974 represented about two-thirds of the world's known fur seal population.Seals come to the Pribilofs to breed and rear pups from early May to October and they feed within a 200 mile radius of the island.Fur seals begin migrating toward southern California and northern Japan during October and remain at sea until returning to the Pribilofs in May.Other marine mammals,principally whales and porpoises, are frequently observed offshore,but rarely enter the harbor area. Two species of birds and seven species of whales listed in the "United States List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants"(Federal Register,January 17,1979)have been reported on or near the Pribilof Islands.The short tailed albatross is reported as accidental on the islands,while a confirmed sighting of the Eskimo curlew has not occurred since the late 1880's.The whales include blue,finback,sei,humpback,right,gray and sperm.Since the construction of the detached breakwater in 1986,no whales have been sighted in Village Cove.All sightings of whales have been outside the cove in English Bay. The water depth of Village Cove varies from 0 ft.to -25 ft.MLLW.Intertidal organisms observed in May 1979 included tide pool sculpin,tide pool snailfish, HATTENBURG DILLEY &LINNELL7-+DL Engineering Consultants St.Paul,Alaska PRELIMINARY DRAFT Bulk Fuel Upgrade Concept Design Report IV. kelp greenling and unidentified juvenile cods.The strong wave action in Village Cove and tidal currents in the salt lagoon apparently cause a lack of diversity of intertidal organisms.Plant species observed in Village Cove during a 1974 observation and sampling study showed brown algae,including blister wrack, wing kelp and rockweed to be the dominant plant species.The substrate of the cove consists primarily of medium-sized boulders.However,sand was observed in some locations. The Salt Lagoon has a high degree of environmental sensitivity to both the plant and animal life due to the unique nature of the area.It is the only environment of its type in the central Bering Sea region.The bird nesting areas of the detached breakwater and the breakwater nesting areas to the north of the Salt Lagoon entrance are also of extremely high priority.The invertebrates that occupy the lagoon are a food source for many species of fish and birds.Since the organisms are at the limits of their respective ranges,minor changes such as a petroleum release from the tank farm or dispensing facility may cause significant detrimental effects on this ecosystem.Design of the facility needs to consider the proximity to the Salt Lagoon and its unique habitat. F.LOCAL FILL MATERIAL There are quarries located on the island.The Corporation owns a quarry composed of scoria or basalt.Gravel that meets State of Alaska Department of Transportation D-1 specifications can be produced;however sand production for concrete is questionable.The user of the quarry will need to supply the equipment for production.Currently,if the Corporation produces the material it sells for about $68/CY.If the material is mined by the user,then the charge is about $16 to $18 /CY.Sand is about $3/CY if produced. The quality of the material is variable depending upon the amount of weathering and the flows that are mined.The Corps of Engineers in the past has had trouble with the material when it was used in the breakwaters due to the freeze/thaw action of the salt water.For the purposes of building a pad for the dispensing facility,the material should be suitable as it is used throughout the island for road and pad construction. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS A.CITY OF ST.PAUL IMPROVEMENTS Proposed improvements to the City's tank farms are based on avoiding conflictwiththePrivateEnterprisepolicyoftheDenaliCommissionandthe improvements needed.The proposed improvements include creating adispensingfacilityforusebythecommunityandsandblastingandpaintingthe HATTENBURG DILLEY &LINNELL8-DL Engineering Consultants St.Paul,Alaska PRELIMINARY DRAFT Bulk Fuel Upgrade Concept Design Report power plant tanks.Other improvements would benefit the City's tank farm over its competitors and were not considered as part of this project. 1.Retail Dispensing The proposed facility includes a 12,000-gallon diesel dispensing tank,and 'a 5,000-gallon gasoline dispensing tank.The facility will have a drive- through vehicle area and an attendant kiosk. In order to meet the State regulations for dispensing fuel from aboveground tanks to vehicles,an approved dispensing station must be installed.The dispensing station must include the use of a protected dispensing tank (2-hour fire rating)and a fueling station style dispenser. Dispensing to containers can be performed at a vehicle dispenser,if approved containers are used.The concept dispensing station would have a single-product dispenser,one each for gasoline and for diesel.The protected dispensing tanks can be either a separate tank for each product or one dual compartment tank.Two separate tanks were chosen for cost development because,if the single tank were to fail or otherwise become inoperable,both dispensing operations would need to be halted.The other consideration for separating the dispensing tank is to provide a larger diesel tank than gasoline tank due a higher diesel demand and tank capacity. The dispensing area needs to be large enough to accommodate the flow of vehicle traffic and it was requested to have a kiosk for an on-site operator during the day.Vehicle traffic includes trucks,cars,and 4- wheelers. 2.Power Plant Tanks The Power Plant tanks should be sandblasted and painted while the main tank farm is being painted in summer 2003.Sandblasting should be a Commercial Blast Cleaning in accordance with The Society for Protective Coatings (SSPC)specifications.The main tank farm has used a zinc primer paint and Cathacoat paint for the large tanks.The paint should assist in protecting the tanks from corrosion.The Pribilof Islands have a high rate of corrosion not only due to the salt water environment but also from the acidic nature of the basaltic bedrock. B.PRIBILOF ISLAND SCHOOL DISTRICT IMPROVEMENTS Improvements for the school include sandblasting and painting the existing school tank and replacing the teacher housing home heating oil tanks.Regulatory documents will also be provided to the school district for their tanks. HATTENBURG DILLEY &LINNELL9EngineeringConsultants St.Paul,Alaska PRELIMINARY DRAFT Bulk Fuel Upgrade Concept Design Report Cc. 1.Tank Painting The tank located adjacent to the school is in fair condition and needs to be sandblasted and painted.Prior to painting,the tank should be integrity and tightness tested.The tanks should have a urethane top coat over an epoxy coating with a penetrating sealer primer applied.SSPC and/or American Petroleum Institute (API)cleaning specifications should be followed for all tank cleaning and painting. 2.Teacher Housing Heating Oil Tank Replacements There are five aboveground storage tanks and five underground storage tanks that are used at the Teacher Housing and School offices.These tanks should be replaced with 300-gallon day tanks at each of the 10 locations.These standard home heating oil tanks should be supported on skids or tank stands and be situated to feed the boilers in each of the houses.An interior inspection of each home that needs a tank should be conducted during the design phase of this project to assess the tank appurtenances needed to safely supply fuel to the home.Figure C-1 in Appendix A indicates the locations of each of the 10 day tanks that are to be replaced. 3.Regulatory Plans An EPA Spill Prevention Control and Contingency (SPCC)Plan is needed for the School district since the facility will have an aggregate volume of greater than 1,320 gallons and the school tank is greater than 660 gallons. A facility response plan is not needed and an operations manual is not needed since the School buys its fuel from a licensed operator such as Delta Western or the City.The SPCC Plan must be prepared and implemented before the new tanks are operational. PERMITTING Typical permitting requirements for new fuel systems include submittal of the construction documents to the State Fire Marshal for review and approval, obtaining a US Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Permit to place fill on wetlands and obtaining a Costal Zone Permit.Repainting tanks is considered to be maintenance,so there are no permits required for that portion of this project. Installation of home heating oil tanks of the proposed size also does not require permitting,although these tanks should be included in the School's SPCC Plan. Permitting requirements for the construction and operation of the proposed new dispensing facility are described in the following items: HATTENBURG DILLEY &LINNELL10-DL Engineering Consultants St.Paul,Alaska PRELIMINARY DRAFT Bulk Fuel Upgrade Concept Design Report 1.Coastal Project Questionnaire Projects located in a coastal region must submit a Coastal Project Questionnaire under the Alaska Coastal Management Program to the State of Alaska,Department of Governmental Coordination (DGC).The DGC reviews the questionnaire and assists in identifying required permits for the project,and upon a favorable review,returns a letter of non- objection.The standard review period of the final design is 45-60 days. As this project is located within a coastal zone,this questionnaire will be required. 2.Fire Marshal Review The construction of the new dispensing facility will require submittal of a complete set of construction documents to the State of Alaska, Department of Public Safety,Division of Fire Prevention (Fire Marshal)for plan review and approval.Upon favorable review,a Plan Review Permit to verify compliance with Building,Fire,and Life Safety codes will be issued.Construction drawings,stamped and signed by a registered engineer or architect,must be submitted,along with the application fee, for permit review.The typical review period is four to six weeks,although reviews have taken as long as six months. 3.US Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Permit Projects that place fill material on existing wetlands require an Application for Department of the Army Permit to be submitted to the United States Army Corps of Engineers,Alaska District (Corps)prior to construction. The Corps will review the project under a general permit (96-07)that allows for village fuel storage facilities to be constructed in wetlands provided the total footprint is not more than 2.0 acres.For fills with a footprint larger than 1.0 acre or within 300 feet of an anadromous fish stream,Pre-Construction Notification must occur.Additional limitations are stated in the permit.The review takes between 30 to 60 days. 4,SHPO Concurrence Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act requires review of any project funded,licensed,permitted,or assisted by the federal government for impact on significant historic properties.Information must be provided about the location of the proposed sites to the Division of Governmental Coordination,State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO). HATTENBURG DILLEY &LINNELL11EngineeringConsultants St.Paul,Alaska PRELIMINARY DRAFT Bulk Fuel Upgrade Concept Design Report 5.Endangered Species Because of the sensitive ecological nature of the Salt Lagoon and its close proximity to the proposed fuel dispensing facility,additional consultation with the U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service or Alaska Department of Fish and Game may be required.Any design modifications or permits needed from these agencies will be identified during the Coastal Zone Review. D.CONSTRUCTION METHOD Construction of the new facility and the upgrades are to be conducted using Force Account methods.Under qualified management,this construction method has traditionally produced cost effective results,fast construction schedules and increased local hire. When working on a Force Account basis,the project typically hires a qualified superintendent and local labor where available.Additional personnel may need to be brought in to supplement the local labor force for specialty trades,such as pipe welding and electrical installation. Traditionally,Force Account projects have enlisted the use of local equipment where available.Where the local equipment use cannot be donated to the project,equipment rental rates are negotiated or traded off for equipment repair. 1.Local Labor The City was questioned about the local available labor force.They indicated that no formal list was available which identified personnel and skills;however the mayor knew of two certified welders,two electricians, and heavy equipment operators. 2.Local Equipment The City has a number of pieces of heavy equipment including backhoes,excavators,dozers,cement mixers,and trucks.A list is provided in Appendix D. E.SCHEDULE The construction schedule presented at the end of the report has been prepared for this project based on historical force account fuel system construction methods and crew sizes.The schedule assumes that the materials will be delivered by barge from Seattle to St.Paul.The major lead item is the ordering of the horizontal tanks for the new dispensing facility which requires about 3 to 4 HATTENBURG DILLEY &LINNELL12EngineeringConsultants St.Paul,Alaska PRELIMINARY DRAFT Bulk Fuel Upgrade Concept Design Report months to be built.The proposed schedule is very dependent upon many inter- related factors,such as project start time,material availability and weather.If any of these items creates a delay,the project may run into the following season, which will increase the construction costs.In order to address this potential delay,and increased cost,and a 10%construction contingency should be used in cost estimating for the project. F.BUDGET COST ESTIMATE A Budget Cost Estimate has been prepared for the project as presented on the Conceptual Design Drawings (see Appendix E for the complete estimate).This value is $602,712,including a 10%contingency,for minor variances that might occur during construction.The estimates are based on historical Force Account construction costs for recent tank farm projects in western Alaska and the Aleutians.Equipment rental rates are based on historical rental rates for similar equipment.This estimate includes construction costs,project management costs and a construction contingency of 10%.It does not include business plan expenses or design fees.The Denali Commission Cost Containment policy is not applicable in this case. The cost estimate in Appendix G includes a breakdown of costs per task as well as a cost breakdown per function.Village labor was anticipated to be about 20 percent of the overall labor and village equipment was assumed to be the smaller equipment and gear. G.SUSTAINABILITY Sustainability of the entities that own and operate the tank farms is critical in receiving funding approval for this project.A business plan with financial analysis needs to be developed for each participant that has not already demonstrated sustainability.School districts are exempt from the business plan requirement in this case as they are considered to be sustainable.The improvements proposed in this Concept Design Report for the City of St.Paul may be categorized as maintenance to existing facilities and may not require a business plan.The business plan includes operating costs,management and training,fuel surcharge,and other factors. HATTENBURG DILLEY &LINNELL13+DL Engineering Consultants Appendix A:Conceptual Design Drawings STATE OF ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY &ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT BULK FUEL STORAGE UPGRADES ST.PAUL,ALASKA re St.Paul, Alaska VICINITY MAP Alaska Industrial Development and Export Authority AIDEAL: Alaska En:ergy Authority Arctic Ocean Pacific Ocean LOCATION MAP DRAWING INDEX G-1 G-2 C-1 C-2 C-3 C-4 COVER SHEET AND DRAWING INDEX EXISTING FACILITIES PLAN PROJECT LAYOUT PLAN PROPOSED DISPENSING SITE DISPENSING AREA SITE PLAN DISPENSER ENCLOSURE DETAILS DESCRIPTIONOATEREMSIONSMARK|'2a¢§HATTENBURGDILLEY&LINNELLEngineeringConsultantsNOTFORCONSTRUCTIO!(907)277-2120www.hdalaska.comENGINEERINGEARTHSCIENCEPROJECTMANAGEMENTPLANNINGST.PAUL,ALASKAE}BULKFUELSTORAGEUPGRADESz;:55AIDEA/AEARURALENERGYGROUPgora Tear 01/15/03__NONE OB NUMBER 02-033 Wooexse]BpU MAA SONINNVTd * s 0212-222 (408) VHSVIY'INWdUS g'LNSWSASVNVYAW LOSFOud « 3345 £ : NPE 8 7 OLLONELSNOO Bonalos Hina dNOYD ADYANS WuNY VaVv/Vadlv yee yorLON ONIMSANIONS © Qs NOUSIOSIO 31v0a sjueynsuoD Buyesuibug S70vY9dN FOvHOLS WN WINE z5ifRE SROSVSE TIANNTT? AaTHG SuneNaiva WD uit: ibss z e t g 9 £ i l q if ] qT 8 iriraghz3 EA ° [m)3E4G iv) zZv8g8 S) wu) 385,828 s Terre q QC) 22227656BEEEbeZ wu) sasadke k i}|ee. yp nwe me] a [s| {lea x iliia m COVEVILLAGE 0REGIN FUELLINETOmA \ ae STA_0+00 \ al \ PORT OF ST.PAUL VO/ EAST LANDING EXISTING FACILITIES PLAN SCALE:1°=250' BASEMAP DRAWING PROVIDED BY DATE OF DRAWING:MAY 20,2001 POLARCONSULT ALASKA,INC. age Bal cw[PET STAN"Ga ee BERING SEA PHOTOGRAPHY PROVIDED BY AEROMAP U.S. DATE OF PHOTOGRAPHY:MAY 27,1997 FFEST ETE:7 a Roe Ag AtLARGER / PROPOSED DISPENSING PROJECT LAYOUT PLAN SCALE:1°=400°:REVISIONSMARI|ATEfDESCRIPTIONN 3HATTENBURGDILLEY&LINNELLEngineeringConsultantsNOTFORCONSTRUCTIO«ENGINEERING¢EARTHSCIENCE-7-,aes.etEE.joofyAeewe'.snail":tiedeeeG.aba-.Paq:pictBiaaaaeFAL-=AIDEA/AEARURALENERGYGROUP§]BULKFUELSTORAGEUPGRADESST.PAUL,ALASKAiingDRAM BY:@eCxEDay:RFH LMO DATE: O1/16/03).E (907)277-2120www.hdalaska.com*PROJECTMANAGEMENT¢PLANNINGSCALE: 17=400" ER 02-033 E F a H \=*=-+T }I !: See 8 tos ow § als Faa)§|NTH Ll o a haaysogget OArstied}see oFTetaaHobeoa)=>0 Q <ae 5 fe*:*,aoa+ome Zz 5O or4=8ulees2\5 R3T?3 &3ye=jO aigOleeg OEap=ui]2 uEM8s bo 5 22633Oo"£O 4-4v Zq¢tewwaa fa oO. =) O lam Oo >,o) iQo2QoW oS ala<<> $xSs<¢§H WW 2a-ftzt3 +PP 12 eee€oy Kt cee mk Peer,£;TITS Sok =LIDS Oy 5 ef Pd io ot a <4+a?Fé SHEET TUE aire SHE ..'i y+ei rag an SMe c-2PROPOSEDDISPENSINGS'100 ----SCALE:1°=50'Bioeee01/15/0531 1"=50"PHOTOGRAPHY PROVIDED BY AEROMAP U.S.I meerDATEOFPHOTOGRAPHY:MAY 27,1997 . 02-033 ¢ oziz-122 208) ONINNVTA* VISVIV"INvd'1Sa , ANSW3OWNYW LOaroud + goo- £ . i]8 TPOLLONELSNOS BoNaI08 Hunva dNOYSD AOYSN]"WunVav/Vvadlv Eta& ioyo LON ONINAANIONA °¢ ,5oO=3° NOUdHdS30 31¥0 Daw sjue)|Nsuog BuveeulbugQ i=NZ ROSIE TENN ari SunaNaLivaL ROE SIOVUOSN FOVUOIS THs NS Ye Ye z € g $ 9 é f T T T T T T FA g |Al: < a ive)° < id1 3 a)" ze ty age elk zee < wes *ydi65 w - of a2 A z7 A e Bf € § 6 \ CFL ee 0045 10:34amvon15,2003-:\obs02-033St.PnulCOP\cad-O2033\drawings\0203300_C04dwg\L3x3x 1/4 174V TS4x2x5/16 L3x3x1/4 3/16"PLATE ROOF NP > L3x3x 1/4 /DIAGONAL t BRACING TS4x2x3/16mereaea Ro aa 1/4 74V [FLATTENED EXPANDED METAL a _denne LIr » N Jl NS !TYP!&1/4 H Ww'Pa'ry 1 '(a) I Q ' i) Prococnacc 6x6x1/4 PLATE:Pay<P EPOXY TOP_OF SLAB i ANCHOR BOLT TOP _OF SLAB 6 uy .t "Ay |»- (.\DISPENSER ENCLOSURE SECTION \Cc-4 }SCALE:NONE a'-o" TS4x2x3/16(TYPICAL)we .A °a B 6x6x1/4"-*:<¢Le] 7 " ee .é + 2 =EPOXY,ANCHOR Loa, .+(BOLT (TYP OF 4);1S4x2x3/16 4-0":"oy . =e °° a 4 © 1 5/8",10 GA ci DISPENSER a ._FLATTENED EXPANDED .;. METAL SIDING :es FIRE."e Cg CONCRETE EXTINGUISHER - |SLAB )tO ;° aod *2 '2 ° ©: o |4 ;i .* . 4 . .°o (2.DISPENSER ENCLOSURE PLAN \c-4 }SCALE:NONE DUAL PRODUCT DISPENSERBREAKAWAYCOUPLING|__| HOSE SWIVEL Q DISPENSER HOSE "(TYPICAL OF 2) DISPENSER NOZZLETYP 1/8”PLATEWCALOF2)1 1/2"COVER :SHEAR VALVE :SEE NOTE 28VA¢)2"1 1/2"REDUCERL2x2x1/4 L2xaxt/4 C12x10.6 UNISTRUT PIPE SUPPORT Rp 1/8"WITH CLAMPCOVERSN>8”CONCRETE SLAB EPOXY ANCHOR 1 1/2"BALL VALVEBOLT(TYP OF 4)1 1/2"#x24"LONGFLEXFITTING(MPT xFLANGE) (3.\DISPENSER SECTION\e-4)SCALE:NONE end Cover,TACKne [|q PL DISPENSING TANKS 1/4°x1"GALV .= | =° , SELF TAPPING N "SCREW PNso I]unistRuT PIPEbe 2°x1 1/2”REDUCER -T SUPPORT WITH CLAMP 1 1/2 BALL VALVE --L]4 ne1ay2%o4".. C12x10.6 SS FLEX FITTING =ryMPTXPLANGEwep4 S$®@ 1/8"COVER |DISPENSER7. TT C12x10.6 ca)Yt L2x2x1/4 r cH CONSTRUCT BASETOMATCHDISPIEPOXYANCHOR BOLTS (TYPICAL /....|\\SIZE AND LAYOUT OF 4)en SfCOVER L2x2x1/4 (3 5 (+DISPENSING ENCLOSURE PIPING PLAN\e-4)SCALE:NONE DRAFT DESCRIPTIONDATEBl8l [a[olelo «feO98EOwzz 5) ziz 2S15RslSg3a583 48 : a?Olt 3/5 =in|2 WCluwo=<}o §2 Bbozeuég9&9 &2 <awWwaa ou > Oc O >O ti829Weyg<<fam Sze S3S<G&7)ud aad-trgmi=)x QO a5Sika< ENCLOSURE DET C-4 a Ce are SEALE 01/15/03)NONE 708 NUMER: 02-033 Appendix B:Preliminary Land Status Report Appendix C:US Army Corps of Engineers -Flood Plain Managements Services Alaskan Communities Flood Hazard Data 2000 Publication Information ALASKAN COMMUNITIES FLOOD HAZARD DATA 2000i,Army Corps Of Engineers -Flood Plain Management Services COMMUNITY:Saint Michael CE:(907)923-3222 2”°Class City ION:381 S: STEM:none AREA:Norton Sound TUS:Not Participating -AIN REPORT:Yes ISURANCE STUDY:No TS: ntire community is above the 100-year flood plain.The lowest LAST FLOOD EVENT: FLOOD CAUSE: ELEVATION: FLOOD OF RECORD: FLOOD CAUSE: ELEVATION: WORST FLOOD EVENT: FLOOD CAUSE: FLOOD GAUGE:No the Yutana Barge.Line building constructed in 1900.This buildingbeenflooded,although water has reached Its footings.The100-year flood level would be just below its first floor elevation. mmended building elevation is 2 feet above the first floor of this arge Line building. hael ALASKAN COMMUNITIES FLOOD HAZARD DATA 200. U.S.Army Corps Of Engineers -Flood Plain Management Services COMMUNITY:Saint Paul CITY OFFICE:(907)546-2331STATUS:2°Class City POPULATION:673 BUILDINGS: RIVER SYSTEM:none COASTAL AREA:St.Paul Is. NFIP STATUS:Not Participating FLOOD PLAIN REPORT:No FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY:No COMMENTS: LAST FLOOD EVENT:.1991 FLOOD CAUSE:Coastal ELEVATION: FLOOD OF RECORD:1966 FLOOD CAUSE:Coastal ELEVATION: WORST FLOOD EVENT: FLOOD CAUSE: FLOOD GAUGE:No December,1966,was the flood of record.Floodwaters reached thefoundationofHaroldThayers'house next to the current Assembly of God Parsonage. Salnt Paul Revised:3/30/00 Appendix D:City Equipment List St.Paul City-Owned Equipment List Description |.D.# Thiokol Snow Cat 557 Lincoln Welder 462 Case 480F 4x4 Backhoe 486 Case Uni-Loader 487 International 4600 Stellar Truck 493 International Flatbed 519 Freightliner 12yd /Sander 525 CAT R80 Forklift 530 REO Cement Mixer 537 John Deere 450 Dozer 539 Case 580-C Backhoe 544 CAT 225 Excavator 545 CAT 966D Loader 547 Ingersol Compressor 552 Ingersol Light Tower 553 Bobcat /Accessories 555 CAT 980C Wheel Loader 556 Ford Lube Truck 577 Waste Oil Pump n/a 586 E Forklift 585 Steam Cleaner 563 V300B Forklift 534 1102 Case Compactor 587 Hyster Forklift 460 Hyster Forklift 461 CAT 12G Grader 531 Gallon Grader 536 CAT 14G Grader 590 Isuzu Q-16 P/U 523 International 4,000-gal Tanker 551 Air Compressor 552 Welder/Pipe Fuser 497 D-6 Dozer 478 DES M-2-M20 Bottom Dump 479 Dynawald Fixed Lowboy 480 Kenworth Tractor 481 14CY Dump Truck 484 International 2OCY Dump Truck 574 Appendix E:Budget Cost Estimate COST ESTIMATE January 2003 SAINT PAUL FUEL IMPROVEMENTS NO ITEM QTY UNIT UNITCOST SUBTOTAL TOTAL 1.0 GENERAL CONDITIONS $53,690.00 1.1 Non -Productive Supervision 80 =hrs $89.00 $7,120.00 1.2 Testing Services 2 LS $450.00 $900.00 1.3.Survey and Layout 1 LS $8,000.00 $8,000.00 1.4 Utilities 2 Mth $500.00 $1,000.00 1.5 Job Office and Supplies 1 LS $1,000.00 $1,000.00 1.6 Communications 2 Mth $500.00 $1,000.00 1.7 Small Tools 1 LS $6,000.00 $6,000.00 1.8 Personnel Transportation 8 ea $1,100.00 $8,800.00 1.9 Personnel Freight 7000 Ibs $0.85 $5,950.00 1.10 Board and Room 96 Mday $£145.00 $13,920.00 2.0 TANKS $99,900.00 2.1 12,000 gallon dbl wall tank 1 ea $36,000.00 $36,000.00 2.2 5,000 gallon dbl wall tank 1 ea $22,000.00 $22,000.00 2.3 300 gallon tanks/stands 10 ea $650.00 $6,500.00 2.4 Freight Factory to Seattle 12,000 gal tank 1 LS $1,000.00 $1,000.00 5,000 gal tank 1 LS $600.00 $600.00 2.5 Freight Seattle to St.Paul 2 ea $9,640.00 $19,280.00 2.6 Freight Seattle to St.Paul 10 ea $375.00 $3,750.00 2.5 Equipment 30 -s hrs $95.00 $2,850.00 2.6 Core Labor 60 -s hrs $84.00 $5,040.00 2.7 Local Labor 60 hrs $48.00 §$2,880.00 3.0 TANK PIPING &ACCESSORIES $62,280.00 3.1 Pumps 1 LS $10,000.00 $10,000.00 3.2 Piping 320 Lft $12.00 $3,840.00 3.3 Piping accessories 1 LS $6,000.00 $6,000.00 3.4 Tank accessories 1 LS $12,000.00 $12,000.00 3.5 Freight 10000 Ibs $0.48 §$4,800.00 3.6 Equipment 40 -s hrs $95.00 $3,800.00 3.7 Core Labor 120 =hrs $86.00 $10,320.00 3.8 Local Labor 240 =-s hrs $48.00 $11,520.00 3.9 Consumables 1 LS $600.00 $600.00 4.0 RECONDITION EXISTING TANKS $43,900.00 4.1 Sand Blast 2000 _ =s Sofft $2.50 $5,000.00 4.2 Painting 4000 Saft $1.50 $6,000.00 4.3 Freight 8000 Ibs $0.85 $6,800.00 4.4 Equipment 60 -s hrs $150.00 $9,000.00 4.5 Core Labor 60 -shrs $89.00 $5,340.00 4.6 Local Labor 120 =hrs $48.00 $5,760.00 4.7 Consumables 1 LS $3,000.00 $3,000.00 4.8 Cleaning &Disposal 10 ea $300.00 $3,000.00 5.0 DISTRIBUTION &DISPENSING $99,400.00 COST ESTIMATE January 2003 SAINT PAUL FUEL IMPROVEMENTS NO ITEM QTY UNIT UNIT COST SUBTOTAL TOTAL 5.1 Distribution piping 450 Lft $12.00 §$5,400.00 5.2 Pipe supports 20 ea $65.00 $1,300.00 5.3 Product Dispenser 1 LS $6,500.00 $6,500.00 5.4 Dispenser Enclosure 1 LS $8,000.00 $8,000.00 5.5 Pumps 1 LS $4,500.00 $4,500.00 5.6 Painting 1 LS $3,000.00 $3,000.00 5.7 Attendant Kiosk 1 LS $16,000.00 $16,000.00 5.8 Freight 35000 Ibs $0.48 $16,800.00 5.9 Equipment 60 hrs $95.00 $5,700.00 5.10 Core Labor 200 hrs $89.00 $17,800.00 5.11 Local Labor 300 hrs $48.00 $14,400.00 6.0 SITE DEVELOPMENT $47,200.00 6.1.Site work -Gravel Pad 100 Cy $35.00 $3,500.00 6.2 Found Pads 300 Lft $23.00 $6,900.00 6.3 Bollards 60 IFT $35.00 $2,100.00 6.3 Hardware and attachments 1 LS $2,000.00 $2,000.00 6.4 Freight 18000 Ibs $0.48 §$8,640.00 6.5 Equipment 60 srs $95.00 $5,700.00 6.6 Core Labor 120 hrs $89.00 $10,680.00 6.7 Local Labor 160 hrs $48.00 $7,680.00 7.0 ELECTRICAL $58,840.00 7.1 Materials 1 LS $25,000.00 $25,000.00 7.2 Freight 8000 Ibs $0.48 §$3,840.00 7.3 Sub-Contract Labor 1 LS $30,000.00 $30,000.00 8.0 FENCE $26,990.00 8.1 Materials 240 Lft $24.00 $5,760.00 8.2 Freight 8500 Ibs $0.48 §$4,080.00 8.3 Backfill material 15 CY $150.00 $2,250.00 8.4 Equipment 40 -hrs $95.00 $3,800.00 8.5 Core Labor 60 hrs $89.00 $5,340.00 8.6 Local Labor 120 hrs $48.00 $5,760.00 Direct Costs $492,200.00 Contingency (10%)$49,220.00 Regulatory documents $6,500.00 Total Direct Costs $547,920.00 Project Management _(10%)$54,792.00 Project Total $602,712.00