Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
St Paul Bulk Fuel Improvements Project - Concept Design Report February 25, 2003
****@ ra.ALASKA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ram)y.4|SENG AND EXPORT AUTHORITY /=>ALASKA-GE )SEENERGY AUTHORITY * 813 WEST NORTHERN LIGHTS BLVD.ANCHORAGE,ALASKA 99503 907 /269-3000 FAX 907 /269-3044 February 25,2003 Mr.John Merculief,City Manager City of St.Paul P.O.Box 901 St.Paul,AK 99660 Re:St.Paul Bulk Fuel improvements Project --Concept Design Report Dear Mr.Merculief: Please find enclosed the Concept Design Report (CDR)for the St.Paul Bulk FuelImprovementsProject.The report presents a plan for upgrades to City and Pribilof School District bulk fuel storage and handling facilities in the community of St.Paul. Please review the CDR and provide written comments no later than March 17,2003. Forward your comments to: David Lockard,P.E. Project Manager Alaska Energy Authority/REG 813 West Northern Lights Blvd. Anchorage,Alaska 99503 (907)269-3044 fax If you have any questions,please call me at 907-269-4541 (or 888-300-8534 toll free).|look forward to working with you on the St.Paul Bulk Fuel Improvements Project. Sincerely, David Lockard,P.E. AEA Project Manager Enclosures:as noted ((TECHSTREET” cc:Malcolm Fleming,Pribilof School District Fechuicerinronwarion surensvoneMikeDahl,PolarConsult File dA wWPES RE AE). (800)699-9277 DRAFT St.Paul Bulk Fuel Improvements Concept Design Report ee Teyhiss44WeNOPAERCATGMEA|ZlfhpoeaNAe February 24,2003 Prepared by: Laurie Hulse,P.E. Civil Engineer Reviewed by: Lorie Dilley,P.E.,C.P.G. Principal Engineer DL HATTENBURG DILLEY &LINNELLNJ,Engineering Consultants 3305 Arctic Blvd.,Ste.204 Anchorage,AK 99503 Phone:907.277.2120 Fax:907.277.2122 E-mail:Ihulse@hdalaska.com St.Paul,Alaska DRAFT Bulk Fuel Upgrade Concept Design Report EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report has been prepared for the State of Alaska,Alaska Energy Authority,Rural Energy Group (AEA).The purpose of this report is to provide information for the development of improvements to the existing bulk fuel systems and to provide an opinion of construction scheduling and costs related to these improvements in the community of St.Paul,Alaska. This report includes a review of the existing bulk fuel systems in the community,a description of the environmental conditions,a discussion of the proposed improvements including possible wind generation,a proposed project schedule and a budget level cost estimate for the improvements. The participants in this project are: e City of St.Paul (City); e Pribilof School District (School). As part of the development of this report,a site investigation was performed on November 19-20,2002.Participants in the site investigation included Lorie Dilley,P.E., of Hattenburg Dilley &Linnell,and David Lockard,P.E.,of AEA.During this investigation,potential participants were identified,the existing fuel systems and tanks were inspected,and interviews were conducted with representatives of the School and the City. The existing City tank farm is a large,actively maintained facility and does not require replacement or expansion.Upgrades to the City and School facilities will be limited to bringing the facilities up to code and providing a retail fuel sales station.The proposed City retail fuel station will include metered sales of both gasoline and diesel.Facility upgrades include sandblasting and repainting the two power plant tanks and the School tank,as well as replacement of ten home heating oil tanks for the School's teacher housing and offices. The estimate for the St.Paul Bulk Fuel Upgrade project is $788,330.This value is for design fees and construction expenses.It includes a 15%contingency,which is for minor variances that might occur during construction. HATTENBURG DILLEY &LINNELLEX-1 DL Engineering Consultants St.Paul,Alaska DRAFT Bulk Fuel Upgrade Concept Design Report TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .........:sscsscssssssecsseceseessnesssescessnecsneccececeeaasosecseeseecsesseasesaceaes EX-1 I.INTRODUCTION ........:csccccssessssscscesssnssssessssesnscesssesesceeseusssersecessusesessssessaessesasseeeesseees 1 A.BULK FUEL TANK FARM UPGRADE PROGRAM OVERVIEW............0..1 B.CONTACTS.0.0...eeeececescsscecseecsseessescessecssesesseccseecsseesseecsececearassescessaseansvtacaas 2C.APPLICABLE REGULATIONS AND CODES .........ccccccescecsssssssessessseenenes 2D.VILLAGE DESCRIPTION ..........:cccsccssscessecsssessseesseeceseesserssseusanscssseceussenesees 3 Il.EXISTING FUEL SYSTEMS.............cssscssssccsssccesssccesssseeessesenssceessccecesesessneeesessnerseneeesens 4 A.GENERAL OVERVIEW..........ccccccsccsssecsssesssecsseecsseceseecsseecsseseseacsueusseeesseaeees 4 B.EXISTING FACILITIES LAYOUT 000...ceccscsessecssssecsseeesssseeseseeeesseeessneeeees 4 1.City of St.Paul's Main Tank Farm ...........ccccccccsssscsecessseceeeseseseeessssans 4 2.Power Plant Tank Farm............ccccccsscssscececeesssssneeececeeesesseeeeeeeeesssseaees 5 3.Pribilof School District Tanks ............ccccccsssscccesssseceesssseeeeesssneeeessseeees 5 4.Existing Wind Generation .............cccssscecesssceccesssnseeeesssceeessssseeeessaees 6 C.DISPOSITION OF EXISTING FACILITIES .............cceccsseceesssseeeessseeeeessenees 7 ITLLENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS .......:cccccssssssssssssrcocssssssccecessesessnssssssccsssnsssenscceessenens 7 A SITE DESCRIPTION|...eecccccccssssnecessesececesssacecescnaaeeseessaueecsssusenessneesessaes 7BSITECONTROL1.0...cecccccccsssecccssssseececsseeeeessssaeecesccaueesssssneeecsssaseeessuesesessees 8CcSOILCONDITIONS...ccccssceeceeeeessssnneeeeeeeeesseeeseeeseesesesnnseseeeessseeneeeeees 8 D COMMUNITY FLOOD DATA...cee cecsscceececeessnnnaceeeeeenssseaaeeeeeeseeessaneeeees 8 E ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING ...000.....cceccccesesssceeeseseeeeeeeseeeeeeeeaaeeeeeeaaeeeeenaaeees 8 F WIND POWER GENERATION POTENTIAL..............::ccccccessssseneeeeeeeressees 10 G.LOCAL FILL MATERIAL ...........ccccceeesssssceeeeeecessenaueneeeessesseeaaeeeeeessenenaeeeees 10 IV.PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS..........:csssssssscsecceessssssceceesesssessccceeeusessseccceusserenses 11 A CITY OF St.PAUL IMPROVEMENTS ............ccccsssceccesessssstreeeeesesseseeneeeees 11 1.Retail DISPENSING................cccsceceseeeeestneeeeeecceeeeeneeeeeeceneeteeeseeeeeeenenes 11 2.Power Plant Tanks .........c::cccccccccesssesnceeeeessessseeceeeeeeeeenaeeeeeeeeeeseaaes 12 B.PRIBILOF ISLAND SCHOOL DISTRICT IMPROVEMENTS ................4 12 1.Tank Painting.........ccccccccccccccccceeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeceeeneeeeeseccsoeaaaaaaeaneceeeeeeeees 12 2.Teacher Housing Heating Oil Tank Replacements...............see 12 3.Regulatory Plans ...........eccececeeessneeeeeeseeeeeeeseneeeeeeaaeeesesseeeseessneeessanes 13 C.WIND GENERATION ...........ccsccccesssceceeeesneeeeseeaeeeeessaeeeeeesaaeeeenpeoeeeeeseeneeeens 13D.PERMITTING.1...ccccceeccccnsseeecesececasereceeeeeeeseessaeeeseneeeeeceeesenseesseeseeesasouses 14 1.Coastal Project Questionnaire «00.0...eeeeeeeeeeeeessescssssseeeeesuseaseeens 14 2 Fire Marshal ReViCW.............:::ccsssssseesseseneeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeseeeesesesenseeeeeees 14 3.US Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Permit .............cessseeeeeees 14 4.SHPO Concullrence..........cccssccccceseeseeenneeeeeeseeeceaeeeeeeeeeseceenseeseeseees 15 5.Endangered Species ...........ccssscseessseeeeesssessecssseessessnssesseseaeessenseeens 15 E.CONSTRUCTION METHOD..............cccssecccceeeseseceeeeeeeseesesenaaeeuseesesenaenenes 15 1.LOCA LADOS.........ccccccccccessssssneeeeeeeeeeeteeeeseeeeeeeeseeeaaeeeseseessesuaeeeesensees 15 2.Local EQuipment...............:::cccceeeeeeeeeenneeeeeseecceccaeeeeseseeessseeeeeeesessenes 16 F.ASS Ot |md ©)O |Wh =e 16 G.BUDGET COST ESTIMATE ...........ccccsssceeeeceeeeeessnneeeeesseneeesoseneasensseeseeses 16 H.SUSTAINABILITY ..........cccccssssssseeceeressssnaeeeeeeeeeesneaaeeeesesenesssseeeaseueeessegees 17 :HATTENBURG DILLEY &LINNELL l DL:Engineering Consultants St.Paul,Alaska DRAFT Bulk Fuel Upgrade Concept Design Report APPENDICES Appendix A:Conceptual Design Drawings Appendix B:Land Status Documentation Appendix C:US Army Corps of Engineers -Flood Plain Managements Services Alaskan Communities Flood Hazard Data 1998 Publication Information Appendix D:Correspondence Records Appendix E:City Equipment List Appendix F:Alaska Energy Authority Training Program Appendix G:Budget Cost Estimate ee HATTENBURG DILLEY &LINNELL Il DL Engineering Consuitants St.Paul,Alaska DRAFT Bulk Fuel Upgrade Concept Design Report I.INTRODUCTION This report has been prepared for the State of Alaska,Alaska Energy Authority,Rural Energy Group (AEA)to provide information for improvements to the City of St.Paul's tank farm and the Pribilof School District tanks at St.Paul,Alaska. This report includes a program overview,a review of the existing bulk fuel systems in the community,a conceptual design for the improvements to these facilities to meet needs,environmental considerations,a discussion of wind generation in the area,a proposed project schedule and a budget level cost estimate for the alternatives. The participants in this project are as follows: e City of St.Paul (City); e Pribilof School District (School). Lorie Dilley of Hattenburg Dilley &Linnell (HDL)and Dave Lockard of AEA conducted a site visit on November 19-20,2002.The investigation included an inspection of the existing fuel systems,and a meeting with representatives of the school district,the tank farm operators,and the Mayor of St.Paul. A.BULK FUEL TANK FARM UPGRADE PROGRAM OVERVIEW The Alaska Energy Authority (AEA),Rural Energy Group is pursuing grant funds to upgrade rural bulk fuel tank farms.Following is a brief outline of the program: e Most of the funds are federal and provided through the Denali Commission.Other federal funding may be available from HUD (ICDBG) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).Additional funds may be available from the State of Alaska,through the Department of Environmental Conservation and the Department of Education. e In order to receive grant funds,each community must demonstrate that the proposed facility will be sustainable by accepting a business plan.The business plan shall describe who will own the facility,and how it will be operated,maintained and replaced. e New tank farms are funded,designed,and constructed in three phases: Phase 1,Conceptual Design;Phase 2,Design Completion;and Phase 3, Construction. e During Phase 1,Conceptual Design,staff from AEA will visit a community, discuss the program,and work with residents and the local government to select a site for the new tank farm. e At the completion of Phase 1 Conceptual Design,the community will be requested to review and approve the location of the collocated tank farm, the number and volume of fuel tanks,and a draft business plan. HATTENBURG DILLEY &LINNELL1EngineeringConsultants St.Paul,Alaska DRAFT Bulk Fuel Upgrade Concept Design Report B. During Phase 2,Design Completion,the design for the new tank farm will be completed.An environmental assessment will be prepared and site control documented.A business plan will be prepared for signing. Each community will be requested to provide "in kind”contributions by providing the land for the new tank farm and free use of local heavy equipment.The grant funds pay for equipment fuel,maintenance,and repairs of equipment during construction. Project may include local hire and construction trade training programs, subject to Denali Commission funding. If construction funding is awarded then the business plan will be sent for signature and construction procurement will start. Ineligible Projects:Funding is not available through AEA for buildings, propane facilities,fuel tank trucks or trailers,fuel to fill the tank farm, operation &maintenance costs,or residential tank upgrades.Loans for fuel tank trucks and trailers may be available through USDA. Training Available:AEA has several training programs available for communities;please see Appendix F. CONTACTS The following individuals contributed valuable information for this report: John Merculief,City Manager 546-3110 Jonas Lestenkof,City Tank Farm Operator 546-3178 Anthony Kochutin,City Tank Farm Operator 546-3178 Malcolm Fleming,Pribilof School District Superintendent 546-3331 Mike Dahl,Polar Consult Alaska (Tank Farm Designer)258-2420 Cc.APPLICABLE REGULATIONS AND CODES The design/operation of fuel systems is controlled by the following State and Federal regulations: State of Alaska Fire and Life Safety Regulations (13 AAC 50); 2000 International Fire Code; 2000 International Building Code; State of Alaska Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Control Regulations (18 AAC 75); EPA Oil Pollution Prevention Regulations (40 CFR Part 112); US Coast Guard Facilities Transferring Oil or Hazardous Material in Bulk Regulations (33 CFR Part 154). The current State of Alaska Fire and Life Safety Regulations adopted the 2000 editions of the International Fire Code (IFC)and the International Building Code (IBC).The provisions of the IFC establish the primary design requirements for new facilities. HATTENBURG DILLEY &LINNELL2EngineeringConsuitants St.Paul,Alaska DRAFT Bulk Fuel Upgrade Concept Design Report The State of Alaska Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Control regulations (C-Plan)apply to fuel systems that have a storage capacity of more than 420,000 gallons per Owner or Operator. The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)regulations include two plans for fuel facilities:1)Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasures (SPCC)Plans and 2)Facility Response Plans (FRPs).The SPCC Plan identifies minimum fuel facility requirements for aboveground tanks larger than 660 gallons,or which have an aggregate volume of more than 1,320 gallons.The FRP is a spill response plan for facilities which are filled by marine vessels and which have a storage capacity of more than 42,000 gallons. The US Coast Guard Facilities Transferring Oil or Hazardous Material in Bulk Regulations apply to fuel facilities that is capable of transferring fuel,in bulk,to or from a vessel with a capacity of 10,500 gallons or more.This regulation includes two separate plans:1)Oil Spill Response Plan and 2)Operations Manual. D.VILLAGE DESCRIPTION St.Paul is located on the southern tip of St.Paul Island,the largest of the PribilofIslands.The island lies in the Bering Sea at approximately 57°07'N latitude and170°16.5'W.Longitude.It is located within the Aleutian Island Recording District.The climate is arctic maritime with cool weather year round and mean temperatures varying from 19 to 51 degrees Fahrenheit.Average precipitation is 25 inches and snowfall of 56 inches.Heavy fog is common in the summer months. St.Paul is predominantly Aleut.In 1788,the Russian American Company enslaved and relocated Aleuts from Siberia,Atka,and Unalaska to the Pribilofs to hunt fur seals;their descendants live on the two islands today.The federally- controlled fur seal industry dominated the economy of the Pribilofs until 1985.St. Paul is an important port for the Central Bering Sea fishing fleet,and recent port and harbor improvements have fueled economic growth.The collapse of the fishing industry in the past years has hurt the Pribilofs with a decrease in population.Eco-tourism is being developed due to the fur seal rookeries and the more than 210 species of nesting sea birds. St.Paul is accessible by sea and air.The State-owned gravel runway is 6,500 feet long and is undergoing improvements.Water wells supply 3 million gallons per day of potable water.All 167 homes and facilities are connected to the piped water and sewer system.A new $3 million power plant has recently been completed. HATTENBURG DILLEY &LINNELL3EngineeringConsultants St.Paul,Alaska DRAFT Bulk Fuel Upgrade Concept Design Report EXISTING FUEL SYSTEMS A.GENERAL OVERVIEW The site investigation included an inspection of the City's main tank farm,the power plant's tank farm,and an inspection of the School's tanks.Delta Western Inc.also maintains a tank farm at St.Paul for the sale of diesel fuel to fishing boats.This tank farm was not included in the proposed improvements due to Denali Commission Private Enterprise policies.The proposed improvements to the City's tank farm were developed so as not to interfere with the competitive nature between the City's tank farm and Delta Western tank farm. B.EXISTING FACILITIES LAYOUT A detailed description of each of the tank farms is as follows (see Appendix A for their location): 1.City of St.Paul's Main Tank Farm The City's main tank farm has a total capacity of 1,847,100 gallons of fuel.Approximately 84,700 gallons is gasoline and the remainder is diesel.There are two vertical tanks each with a capacity of 614,000 gallons,one vertical tank with a capacity of 126,900 gallons,two horizontal tanks each with a capacity of 4,000 gallons,and six vertical tanks each with a capacity of 80,700 gallons.The tank farm stores diesel and gasoline for retail sales. The main customers are the fishing boats,followed by the City residents for heating fuel,and then a small component for the gasoline sales.This tank farm is the only one in town that sells gasoline and diesel to the residents for personal vehicle use. The tank farm has five marine headers that are used to dispense fuel to fishing boats and to fill the tank farm.An 8-inch diameter below grade fill line runs from the marine headers to the pump house.From the pump house to the tanks,are 4-inch and 6-inch pipelines.The tanks are not manifolded together and fuel is transferred between the tanks using hoses.The larger tanks are normally vented through two 8-inch flanged vents,and emergency vented through one 8-inch flanged vent.The larger tanks are equipped with liquid level gauges,24-inch bottom manways,and roof-access stairs.Electronic level sensors are disconnected and tank gauges are inoperative due to corrosion and rust within a few months of installation. There is an impressed current cathodic protection system used on the tanks and the bottoms of the tanks were recently inspected +DL HATTENBURG DILLEY &LINNELL4 4 Engineering Consultants St.Paul,Alaska Bulk Fuel Upgrade DRAFT Concept Design Report during an API 650 tank inspection conducted in 2001.The tanks are in the process of being sandblasted and painted,using Cathacoat paint with a zinc liner.There is a truck loading rack and the City maintains one dual-compartment tanker with a total capacity for 1,000 gallons and one larger,4,000-gallon capacity tanker truck.These trucks are used to deliver fuel to the community. There are two 4,000-gallon tanks,one each for diesel and gasoline. These tanks are connected to the dispensers located outside of the fence for the tank farm.These tanks are horizontal and are top filled by a hose through a 4-inch bung with 2-inch bronze ball valve and quick connect.They are top withdrawn through a 4-inch bung with a submersible pump to 1-%inch threaded steel,above grade pipe to the dispensers.The tanks are not emergency vented.The wiring to the dispensers is exposed and the dispensers are located about 15 feet away from the tanks. Power Plant Tank Farm The City owns and operates the power plant,which is located 200 feet northeast of the main tank farm.The tank farm at the power plant consists of two,horizontal,self-diked,welded steel,skid mounted tanks.One tank is 10,100 gallons in capacity and the other tank is 3,000 gallons in capacity.These tanks were installed approximately 4 to 5 years ago.There is an underground,2-inch diameter pipeline from the main tank farm's truck loading rack to the power plant tanks.Both tanks are manifolded together and fuel is bottom withdrawn from the larger tank by a 2-inch flange with a steel ball valve connected to a 2-inch welded steel distribution pipeline.Fuel is top withdrawn from the smaller tank by 4-inch bung to a 1-inch threaded overhead steel pipe to the plant.The tanks need sandblasting and painting. Pribilof School District Tanks The Pribilof School District tanks consist of one 3,000-gallon self- diked,welded steel,skid mounted tank used to supply heating fuel for the school,and 15 day tanks for teacher housing and offices. The 3,000-gallon tank is top filled by hose from a fuel truck througha3-inch bung with fill cap.Fuel is top withdrawn and returned through one 3-inch threaded bung bushed to two above grade 1” copper tubing lines to the school approximately 6 feet from the tank.The day tanks range in size from 55 gallon drums to about 800 gallons in size.There is an 800-gallon underground tank located at the school office.There are four teacher houses that AD oes:DILLEY &LINNELL5EngineeringConsultants St.Paul,Alaska DRAFT Bulk Fuel Upgrade Concept Design Report only have a 300-gallon underground tank.The remaining five teacher houses each have a 300-gallon underground tank and a 55-gallon aboveground tank.The condition of the underground tanks was unknown.Table 1 presents a summary of the tanks, heating systems and pump controls for the school. TABLE 1:TANK SUMMARY FOR PRIBILOF SCHOOL DISTRICT Exterior |Exterior Heating Day Tank Supply Line FacilityBuildinTankTank:Pump Controls ;9 Size Location System Size P Size &Type Address Combo St Paul School 3,000 gal |Aboveground |Boiler CV2RR Suntec B2GA-8852 |1/2 S&R Comp.|School School Office 800 gal Underground |Boiler none Suntec B2VA-8216 |3/8 S&R Comp.|950 Tolstoi St Teacher Home 1 {300 gal Underground |Boiler none Suntec A2VA-7116 |3/8 S&R Comp.|House #133 .Sundstrand twoTeacherHome2|300 gal Underground |Boiler none stage H3CA-2184 3/8 S&R Comp.|House #59 Teacher Home 3 |300 gal Underground j Boiler none Suntec B2VA-8216 |3/8S&R Comp.|House #14 Teacher Home 4 |300 gal Underground {Boiler none Suntec B2VA-8216 |3/8 S&R Comp.|Duplex #143 Teacher Home 5 55 gal Aboveground |Monitor none N/A 3/8 S&R Comp.|House #224 300 gal Underground |Forced Air |none Suntec A2VA-7116 |3/8S&R Comp.|House #224 Teacher Home 6 55 gal Aboveground |Monitor none N/A 3/8 S&R Comp.|House #225 300 gal Underground |Forced Air |none Suntec A2VA-7116 |3/8 S&R Comp.|House #225 Teacher Home 7 55 gal Aboveground |Monitor none N/A 3/8 S&R Comp.|House #226 300 gal Underground |Forced Air |none Suntec A2VA-7116 |3/8S&R Comp.|House #226 Teacher Home 8 55 gal Aboveground |Monitor none N/A 3/8 S&R Comp.|House #227 300 gal Underground |Forced Air |none Suntec A2VA-7116_|3/8S&R Comp.|House #227 Teacher Home 9 55 gal Aboveground |Monitor none N/A 3/8 S&R Comp.|House #228 300 gal Underground |Forced Air |none Suntec A2VA-7116 |3/8S&R Comp.|House #228 4.Existing Wind Generation Tanadgusix Corporation (TDX)currently owns and operates a wind generation facility located near the airport.The POSS Camp is now supplied with energy with a hybrid wind-diesel system designed and installed by Northern Power Systems.The system is designed as a_high penetration/no storage wind-diesel configuration.In this configuration,when wind turbine output exceeds facility load requirements,the diesel engines are shut off. Excess wind energy is diverted into a secondary load which consists of multiple three-phase resistive heaters that heat a large insulated water tank that then is used to heat the offices and shop spaces.The wind turbine is a 225 kW turbine connected to two 150 kW diesel gensets.The average load is 51 kW. HATTENBURG DILLEY &LINNELL6EngineeringConsultants St.Paul,Alaska DRAFT Bulk Fuel Upgrade Concept Design Report C.DISPOSITION OF EXISTING FACILITIES The existing City main tank farm is a fully operational C-Plan facility.There are some code violations and maintenance needs,but there is no need to provide a completely new facility.The City has been operating and maintaining the facility since 1988.The tank farm needs the following projects in order to become code compliant and to upgrade the facility: 1)Sandblast and paint tanks -scheduled for 2003; 2)Additional cathodic protection needed for one tank; 3)A sand trap should be put in the line to the oil-water separator - scheduled for 2003; 4)Corrosion-proof high level alarms; 5)Stairs over the berms into the tank farm; 6)Improved tank farm manifold system (upgrade from hoses and pumps); 7)Cages/bollards for the marine headers to avoid damage from equipment; 8)A filling station for both gasoline and diesel for the community. Many of these projects are listed on the City's Capital Improvement program. Except for the filling station,the other improvements were considered by AEA as providing a competitive edge to the City over Delta Western's facility,and would not comply with the Denali Commission private enterprise policy. The power plant tanks are in fair condition and should remain in place.It has been requested that these tanks be sandblasted and painted during the tank farms painting if possible.Additional improvements have not been requested nor anticipated. The condition of the school tank is fair and will need integrity testing, sandblasting and painting.Upgrades to the fill and return lines may need to occur.The day tanks should be upgraded.The disposition of the underground storage tanks is unknown.The Underground Storage Tank Program within the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (ADEC)may be able to help the School with the removal of these tanks. il.ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS A.SITE DESCRIPTION The only site selected for this project is for the retail fuel dispenser at the City's main tank farm.The site is shown on Figure C-2 in Appendix A.The site is located at the intersection of Polovina Turnpike and the entrance into the tank farm and power plant.The site is not level and at the time of the site visit was HATTENBURG DILLEY &LINNELL7EngineeringConsultants St.Paul,Alaska DRAFT Bulk Fuel Upgrade Concept Design Report being regraded with heavy equipment.There are several small hills and a portion of the road is through the site.The Salt Lagoon is approximately 150 feet west of the proposed site. The remaining upgrades and improvements for this project will all occur at their current locations.The day tanks for the teacher housing and school office will be placed in roughly the same location as the current day tanks. B.SITE CONTROL The City's current tank farm and the proposed dispensing facility is on land owned by Tanadgusix Corporation.A "Settlement Agreement”between the City and Tanadgusix provided,among other things,that this property would be conveyed to the City under ANCSA 14(c)(3).These two entities are currently in litigation over this "Settlement Agreement,”possibly preventing the conveyance to the City.Appendix B contains correspondence regarding the land status research.Further research and resolution should be undertaken in the design phase. C.SOIL CONDITIONS The Pribilof Islands consist of a series of basalt flows that have built the islands over time.Overlying the basalt are derived sand,gravel and ash layers. Typically,a thin organic mat overlies very dark,brown sandy and silty ash layers. This material typically occurs on top of a yellow,brown,or black gravelly soils composed of cinders from the basalt flows and weathering of the basalt.The bedrock (basalt)underlies this material.Thicknesses of soil horizons range from a few inches to a few feet thick.Soils are generally highly acidic. D.COMMUNITY FLOOD DATA The US Army Corps of Engineers -Flood Plain Management Services identified the December 1966 flood event as the flood of record.There is no flood gauge in St.Paul,and no elevation associated with the flood of record,although anecdotal evidence states that "floodwaters reached the foundation of Harold Thayer's house,next to the current Assembly of God church.”Another major flood occurred in 1991.The cause of these flood events was coastal surges impacting the land.The Alaskan Communities Flood Hazard Data,2000 Publication by the US Army Corps of Engineers for St.Paul is provided in Appendix C. E.ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING Per the 1988 U.S.Corps of Engineers General Design Memorandum for St.Paul Harbor,St.Paul Island is used by approximately 250,000 sea birds.The most abundant species include thick-billed murre,common murre,red and black- HATTENBURG DILLEY &LINNELL8DLEngineeringConsultants St.Paul,Alaska DRAFT Bulk Fuel Upgrade Concept Design Report legged kittiwake,parakeet auklet and least auklet.Lesser numbers of waterfowl, shore birds and song birds are found on the island as either residents or migrants.The auklets and murre populations have nesting sites in the breakwater area along both the detached breakwater and the breakwater protecting the salt lagoon.Shore birds,gulls and waterfowl nest in the salt lagoon itself. Northern fur seals,Stellar sea lions and Harbor seals are abundant on St.Paul Island during portions of the year.The Northern fur seal is the most abundant species.The total estimated stock of 1.4 million animals in 1974 represented about two-thirds of the world's known fur seal population.Seals come to the Pribilofs to breed and rear pups from early May to October and they feed within a 200 mile radius of the island.Fur seals begin migrating toward southern California and northern Japan during October and remain at sea until returning to the Pribilofs in May.Other marine mammals,principally whales and porpoises, are frequently observed offshore,but rarely enter the harbor area. Two species of birds and seven species of whales listed in the "United States List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants"(Federal Register,January 17,1979)have been reported on or near the Pribilof Islands.The short tailed albatross is reported as accidental on the islands,while a confirmed sighting of the Eskimo curlew has not occurred since the late 1880's.The whales include blue,finback,sei,humpback,right,gray and sperm.Since the construction of the detached breakwater in 1986,no whales have been sighted in Village Cove.All sightings of whales have been outside the cove in English Bay. The water depth of Village Cove varies from 0 ft.to -25 ft.MLLW.Intertidal organisms observed in May 1979 included tide pool sculpin,tide pool snailfish, kelp greenling and unidentified juvenile cods.The strong wave action in Village Cove and tidal currents in the salt lagoon apparently cause a lack of diversity of intertidal organisms.Plant species observed in Village Cove during a 1974 observation and sampling study showed brown algae,including blister wrack, wing kelp and rockweed to be the dominant plant species.The substrate of the cove consists primarily of medium-sized boulders.However,sand was observed in some locations. The Salt Lagoon has a high degree of environmental sensitivity to both the plant and animal life due to the unique nature of the area.It is the only environment of its type in the central Bering Sea region.The bird nesting areas of the detached breakwater and the breakwater nesting areas to the north of the Salt Lagoon entrance are also of extremely high priority.The invertebrates that occupy the lagoon are a food source for many species of fish and birds.Since the organisms are at the limits of their respective ranges,minor changes such as a petroleum release from the tank farm or dispensing facility may cause significant detrimental effects on this ecosystem.Design of the facility needs to consider the proximity to the Salt Lagoon and its unique habitat. HATTENBURG DILLEY &LINNELL9EngineeringConsultants St.Paul,Alaska DRAFT Bulk Fuel Upgrade Concept Design Report F.WIND POWER GENERATION POTENTIAL As shown in Figure 1,the Pribilof Islands have a Department of Energy Wind Power Class of 7.At 10 meters (33 ft)in height the wind power density isbetween400to1000W/m?with wind speeds of between 15.7 to 21.1 mph.At50meters(164 ft),the wind power density is 800 to 2000 W/m?with wind speed of between 19.7 to 26.6 mph. e"J $90 a<=RipBfFeo,i 570 %Se,,.?22"Nog S90 ES ?\BARREN $)ISLANDS g JS 5 S6e r 58° 59 540 550 "Moller oe ' o Ss . a . l *ALEUTIAN ISLANO Cop Bay Caries KoDIaK 57°ee aye”Os ,RST >«Dutch Harbor 7%oe go gea 8 UNALASKA ° .¢o,°S50 8 S ISLAND g °°$o Sao 3 &Po tv 6Cs&'o i <2 "0 50 100 150 MitesPACIFICOCEAN050100150 Car SCiTF"Kilometors CJ Ridge Crest Estimates 53°Attu 53?CAtka 2°7 "snemyatsiano |78°E 180°aeNEAR172aa.ALEUTIAN ISLANOSoo pask o,474° LANDS ? °Oo52°742 ve oP °.ye 50°PACIFIC AMCHITKA S,°\OCEAN ISLAND °51? Figure 1:Wind Power Class Map for Southwestern Alaska. The proposed location is Telegraph Hill (Appendix A Project Layout Plan).The City has conducted wind studies at the area and support the idea of wind generation.The site is located approximately 4,000 feet from the power plant. G.LOCAL FILL MATERIAL There are quarries located on the island.TDX owns a quarry composed of scoria or basalt.Gravel that meets State of Alaska Department of Transportation D-1 specifications can be produced;however sand production for concrete is questionable.The user of the quarry will need to supply the equipment for production.Currently,if the Corporation produces the material it sells for about (oD Re DILLEY &LINNELL10EngineeringConsultants St.Paul,Alaska DRAFT Bulk Fuel Upgrade Concept Design Report $68/CY.If the material is mined by the user,then the charge is about $16 to $18 ICY.Sand is about $3/CY if produced. The quality of the material is variable depending upon the amount of weathering and the flows that are mined.The Corps of Engineers in the past has had trouble with the material when it was used in the breakwaters due to the freeze/thaw action of the salt water.For the purposes of building a pad for the dispensing facility,the material should be suitable as it is used throughout the island for road and pad construction. iV.PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS The following proposed improvements were discussed with School and City personnel. A history of correspondence with them is included in Appendix D. A.CITY OF ST.PAUL IMPROVEMENTS Proposed improvements to the City's tank farms are based on avoiding conflict with the Private Enterprise policy of the Denali Commission and the improvements needed.The proposed improvements include creating a dispensing facility for use by the community and sandblasting and painting the power plant tanks.Other improvements would benefit the City's tank farm over its competitors and were not considered as part of this project. 1.Retail Dispensing The proposed facility includes two 6,000-gallon dispensing tanks,one each for diesel and gasoline.The tanks will be within a fenced area,with piping to a dual-product dispenser and a single-product dispenser.Based on conversations with the tank farm operators,dispensing tanks of this size will allow approximately one week of operation before they need to be refilled during the busy summer season.The additional dispenser will alleviate long waits at the pump during busy times of the day. In order to meet the State regulations for dispensing fuel from aboveground tanks to vehicles,an approved dispensing station must be installed.If the dispenser is greater than 50 feet from the dispensing tanks,use of a protected dispensing tank (2-hour fire rating)is not required.The dispensers will consist of metered fueling station style dispenser.Dispensing to containers can be performed at a vehicle dispenser,if approved containers are used.The dispensing tanks can be either a separate tank for each product or one dual compartment tank. Two separate tanks were chosen for cost development because,if the single tank were to fail or otherwise become inoperable,both dispensing operations would need to be halted. HATTENBURG DILLEY &LINNELL11-DL Engineering Consultants St.Paul,Alaska DRAFT Bulk Fuel Upgrade Concept Design Report The dispensing area needs to be large enough to accommodate the flow of vehicle traffic,which includes trucks,cars,and 4-wheelers.A concrete pad in front of each dispenser will increase good housekeeping at the facility. 2.Power Plant Tanks The Power Plant tanks should be integrity tested,sandblasted and painted while the main tank farm is being painted in summer 2003.Sandblasting should be a Commercial Blast Cleaning in accordance with The Society for Protective Coatings (SSPC)specifications.The main tank farm has used a zinc primer paint and Cathacoat paint for the large tanks.The paint should assist in protecting the tanks from corrosion.The Pribilof Islands have a high rate of corrosion not only due to the salt water environment but also from the acidic nature of the basaltic bedrock.Other combinations of cathodic-protecting primer,intermediate coating,and urethane top coat can be explored. B.PRIBILOF ISLAND SCHOOL DISTRICT IMPROVEMENTS Improvements for the school include sandblasting and painting the existing school tank and replacing the teacher housing home heating oil tanks.Regulatory documents will also be provided to the school district for their tanks. 1.Tank Painting The tank located adjacent to the school is in fair condition and needs to be sandblasted and painted.Prior to painting,the tank should be integrity and tightness tested.SSPC and/or American Petroleum Institute (API) cleaning specifications should be followed for all tank cleaning and painting.A combination of primer,intermediate coating,and top coat should be used that is similar to that chosen for recoating the power plant tanks. 2.Teacher Housing Heating Oil Tank Replacements There are five aboveground storage tanks and ten underground storage tanks that are used at the Teacher Housing and School offices.The five aboveground tanks supply fuel by gravity to Monitor stoves.The ten underground systems have boilers in the buildings with fuel pumps. These tanks should be replaced with 300-gallon exterior day tanks at each of the nine teacher housing locations and an 800-gallon exterior day tank at the School Office.These standard home heating oil tanks should be supported on skids or tank stands and be situated to feed the existing HATTENBURG DILLEY &LINNELL12+DL.Engineering Consultants St.Paul,Alaska DRAFT Bulk Fuel Upgrade Concept Design Report Cc. systems in each of the houses.An interior inspection of each home that needs a tank should be conducted during the design phase of this project to assess the tank appurtenances needed to safely supply fuel to the homes.Figure C-1 in Appendix A indicates the locations of each of the 9 teacher homes and the School Office where the day tanks proposed for replacement are located. 3.Regulatory Plans City Tank Facility: Spill response regulatory plans will include an EPA Facility Response Plan (required for all tank farms with more than 42,000-gallon capacity,which are filled from a vessel),an EPA Spill Prevention Control and Contingency (SPCC)Plan,a US Coast Guard Oil Spill Response Plan,and a US Coast Guard Operations Manual.A State of Alaska Oil Discharge Prevention and Contingency Plan (C-Plan)will also be required. Regulatory Plan Implementation Schedule: e The EPA Facility Response Plan must be submitted prior to receiving fuel; e The EPA SPCC Plan must be in place within 6 months of facility start-up; e The US Coast Guard Operations Manual must be submitted and approved,with a Letter of Intent to operate,prior to receiving fuel. School Tank Facility: An EPA Spill Prevention Control and Contingency (SPCC)Plan is needed for the School district since the facility will have an aggregate volume of greater than 1,320 gallons and the school tank is greater than 660 gallons. A facility response plan is not needed and an operations manual is not needed since the Schoo!buys its fuel from a licensed operator such as Delta Western or the City.The SPCC Plan should be prepared and implemented within 6 months of facility start-up. WIND GENERATION Wind generated power is a consideration for St.Paul.The village is located in an area with sufficient wind.The proposed site is near the tank farm and power plant and there is sufficient room to locate the towers.There also appears to be trained individuals within the community who could be used to maintain the facility.The existing wind generation system appears to be working and producing power for the POSS Camp.Additional information such as a wind study would need to be conducted as well as design of the exact type of wind generation system. HATTENBURG DILLEY &LINNELL13EngineeringConsultants St.Paul,Alaska DRAFT Bulk Fuel Upgrade Concept Design Report D.PERMITTING Typical permitting requirements for new fuel systems include submittal of the construction documents to the State Fire Marshal for review and approval, obtaining a US Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Permit to place fill on wetlands and obtaining a Costal Zone Permit.Repainting tanks is considered to be maintenance,so there are no permits required for that portion of this project. Installation of home heating oi!tanks of the proposed size also does not require permitting.Tanks not located on the same property as the school's 3,000-gallon tank need not be included in the School's SPCC Plan.Permitting requirements for the construction and operation of the proposed new dispensing facility are described in the following items: 1.Coastal Project Questionnaire Projects located in a coastal region must submit a Coastal Project Questionnaire under the Alaska Coastal Management Program to the State of Alaska,Department of Governmental Coordination (DGC).The DGC reviews the questionnaire and assists in identifying required permits for the project,and upon a favorable review,returns a letter of non- objection.The standard review period of the final design is 45-60 days. As this project is located within a coastal zone,this questionnaire will be required. 2.Fire Marshal Review The construction of the new dispensing facility will require submittal of a complete set of construction documents to the State of Alaska, Department of Public Safety,Division of Fire Prevention (Fire Marshal)for plan review and approval.Upon favorable review,a Plan Review Permit to verify compliance with Building,Fire,and Life Safety codes will be issued.Construction drawings,stamped and signed by a registered engineer or architect,must be submitted,along with the application fee, for permit review.The typical review period is four to six weeks,although reviews have taken as long as six months. 3.US Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Permit Projects that place fill material on existing wetlands require an Application for Department of the Army Permit to be submitted to the United States Army Corps of Engineers,Alaska District (Corps)prior to construction. The Corps will review the project under a general permit (96-07)that allows for village fuel storage facilities to be constructed in wetlands provided the total footprint is not more than 2.0 acres.For fills with a footprint larger than 1.0 acre or within 300 feet of an anadromous fish eDL HATTENBURG DILLEY &LINNELL14EngineeringConsultants St.Paul,Alaska DRAFT Bulk Fuel Upgrade Concept Design Report stream,Pre-Construction Notification must occur.Additional limitations are stated in the permit.The review takes between 30 to 60 days. 4.SHPO Concurrence Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act requires review of any project funded,licensed,permitted,or assisted by the federal government for impact on significant historic properties.Information must be provided about the location of the proposed sites to the Division of Governmental Coordination,State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO). 5.Endangered Species Because of the sensitive ecological nature of the Salt Lagoon and its close proximity to the proposed fuel dispensing facility,additional consultation with the U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service or Alaska Department of Fish and Game may be required.Any design modifications or permits needed from these agencies will be identified during the Coastal Zone Review. The wind generation facility would require permits as well.Of particular concern would be bird kill from the towers especially in such a sensitive and unique environment. E.CONSTRUCTION METHOD Construction of the new facility and the upgrades are to be conducted using Force Account methods.Under qualified management,this construction method has traditionally produced cost effective results,fast construction schedules and increased local hire. When working on a Force Account basis,the project typically hires a qualified superintendent and local labor where available.Additional personnel may need to be brought in to supplement the local labor force for specialty trades,such as pipe welding and electrical installation. Traditionally,Force Account projects have enlisted the use of local equipment where available.Where the local equipment use cannot be donated to the project,equipment rental rates are negotiated or traded off for equipment repair. 1.Local Labor The City was questioned about the local available labor force.They indicated that no formal list was available which identified personnel and skills;however the manager knew of two certified welders,two electricians,and heavy equipment operators. HATTENBURG DILLEY &LINNELL15-DL Engineering Consultants St.Paul,Alaska DRAFT Bulk Fuel Upgrade Concept Design Report 2.Local Equipment The City has a number of pieces of heavy equipment including backhoes, excavators,dozers,cement mixers,and trucks.A list is provided in Appendix E.AEA anticipates that the grantee and any project participants will donate use of their heavy equipment as an in-kind contribution to the project. F.SCHEDULE The construction schedule presented at the end of the report has been prepared for this project based on historical force account fuel system construction methods and crew sizes.The schedule assumes that the materials will be delivered by barge from Seattle to St.Paul.The major lead item is the ordering of the horizontal tanks for the new dispensing facility which requires about 3 to 4 months to be built.The proposed schedule is very dependent upon many inter- related factors,such as project start time,material availability and weather.If any of these items creates a delay,the project may run into the following season, which will increase the construction costs.In order to address this potential delay,and increased cost,a 15%construction contingency should be used in cost estimating for the project. G.BUDGET COST ESTIMATE A Budget Cost Estimate has been prepared for the project as presented on the Conceptual Design Drawings (see Appendix F for the complete estimate).This total value is $788,330,including a 15%contingency,for minor variances that might occur during construction.This estimate includes a base cost ($694,435), and additive alternatives that include an additional dispenser to alleviate congestion ($63,882)and a concrete pad for housekeeping during vehicle dispensing ($30,013).The estimates are based on historical Force Account construction costs for recent tank farm projects in western Alaska and the Aleutians.Equipment rental rates are based on historical rental rates for similar equipment.This estimate includes design fees,construction costs,project management costs,regulatory documents and a construction contingency of 15%.Since the St.Paul tank farm project improvements do not involve providing a bulk fuel facility,the Denali Commission Cost Containment policy is not applicable. The cost estimate in Appendix F includes a breakdown of costs per task as well as a cost breakdown per function.Village labor was anticipated to be about 20 percent of the overall labor.Heavy equipment was assumed to be donated by the participants. HATTENBURG DILLEY &LINNELL16-+DL Engineering Consultants St.Paul,Alaska DRAFT Bulk Fuel Upgrade Concept Design Report H.SUSTAINABILITY Sustainability of the entities that own and operate the tank farms is critical in receiving funding approval for this project.A business plan with financial analysis needs to be developed for each participant that has not already demonstrated sustainability.School districts are exempt from the business plan requirement in this case as they are considered to be sustainable.The improvements proposed in this Concept Design Report for the City of St.Paul may be categorized as maintenance to existing facilities and dispensing system improvements,and may not require a business plan.The business plan includes operating costs,management and training,fuel surcharge,and other factors. HATTENBURG DILLEY &LINNELL17-+DL Engineering Consultants Appendix A:Conceptual Design Drawings ONE NC: _ STATE OF ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY &ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT BULK FUEL STORAGE UPGRADES ST.PAUL,ALASKA aN VICINITY MAP Alaska Industrial Development and Export Authority AIDEAY Arctic Ocean Pacific Ocean LOCATION MAP DRAWING INDEX G-1 G-2 C-1 C-2 C-3 Alaska Energy Authority COVER SHEET AND DRAWING INDEX EXISTING FACILITIES PLAN PROJECT LAYOUT PLAN PROPOSED DISPENSING SITE DISPENSING AREA SITE PLAN 6,000 GALLON SINGLE PRODUCT DISPENSING TANK DISPENSER ENCLOSURE DETAILS DESCRIPTIONDATEREVISIONSa]-N/M}et] ecO8fe=OnzZz s 4 R§=<8wievgZlehxEarNg|e3>|2 atols:a (®)aleels>|oalcFraiteEGus <=ENGINEERINGEARTHSCIENCEPROJECTMANAGEMENTPLANNINGBULKFUELSTORAGEUPGRADESAIDEA/AEARURALENERGYGROUPST.PAUL,ALASKARan a RFH LMDAreEar [=24/05 NONE208NUMBER: 02-033 8 ¢[>E &G H {JZ Nos K 1 1 U q q I T q i LE GEN D E -r --r-EXISTING FUEL UNE : --&-EXISTING FUEL CONTROL LINE -s -*-WATER UNEVILLAGECOVE-s -1 -SEWER UNE -*--t -ELECTICAL PRIMARY LINE SECTIONALIZING CABINET olsaTRANSFORMER3ng1§|-NT)se]© a ro] ea0O-)65OzzS 4 £5in|«aeZIcrZZ\s NgdoSlono3|3 52 (c aeck3=a/0 ole aePapo2in]2 wEuowg=Oz Zzx2<aan]=©w %oO Zzze24Oleis§in]ao @ SALT LAGOON oe atl oO fe) G 25v3?va !»WmoeQSIpdgared\:Powe 77 +o 4 uw/une grow OR ' _--SG -l/a8 7 =g<ING /-EXISTING - EAST LANDING |tat ri =ie WARE-Wy ziiS.Wee HOUSE s S[a ae yi a 5 i y/ou/ya= i /cH 2a \ S/aK =|QO KK EXISTING FACILITIES PLAN -- SCALE:1"=250'ACILITIESPUAN G-2 0 250 500 cane SousBASEMAPDRAWING,PPROVIDED BY Se RFH LMDOLARCONSUL. 7 |DATE OF DRAWING:aay 20,2001 SCALE IN FEET pa 17=250°02-033 rE ai S aWwweg g2 5 8>xrw ZzStasoe04z4[v4Wwaa 3 «WZpewaaCh thal o. - Ooc ro) >oO c LLBERINGSEA4}=zQWi:73¢ ¥E&S$S ft G&Hn W «<<ly -teat5«W &PROJECT LAYOUT PLAN rjs 2 ,. SCALE:1"=400°a <4 'SHEET ILE LAYOUT PLAN Cc-1400800renaerrRFHLMD PHOTOGRAPHY PROVIDED BY AEROMAP U.S.SCALE IN FEET 02/24/03}1400"DATE OF PHOTOGRAPHY:MAY 27,1997 [=ossDESCRIPTIONDATEHATTENBURGDILLEY&LINNELLEngineeringConsultants:B1a lal[mlele x ©+oa29 8 4 OESCRIPTIONATEREVISIONSMARK]'2345NOTFORCONSTRUCTIO(907)277-2120www.hdalaska.comgt wtmareAN BE PaciinesscE oadofSHEET.C23i SS HATTENBURGDILLEY&LINNELLEngineeringConsultants*ENGINEERING*EARTHSCIENCE¢PROJECTMANAGEMENT«PLANNING: 4 rey **)im €)<.,3 .Aes ¥odReabine aes 3 Lee:. al Pi Zé:AIDEA/AEARURALENERGYGROUPST.PAUL,ALASKA4]BULKFUELSTORAGEUPGRADESie?!..Li 7 fe H Fics id ..PROPOSED DISPENSING SITE - C2 :eeSCALE:1"=50 RFH MD PHOTOGRAPHY PROVIDED BY AEROMAP U.S. DATE OF PHOTOGRAPHY:MAY 27,1997 OATE:SNE: 02/24/03,_1"=50° 08 MAEI 02-033 S inl |Pa Seana EXISTING BURIED FUEL LINE (APPROXIMATE LOCATION) NEW DISPENSING TANKS, SEE SHEET C-4 (TWO TYPICAL) SEE SHEET C-5 NEW 12'x40"CONCRETE PAD.SEE DETAIL ey NEW 26 BURIED ISSUE PIPELINES BOLLARD,TYP. SEE DETAILNEW2"6 BURIED ja )(3 FILL PIPELINES FROM yg |\C-3/CITY TANKS jiii/ff if/Ife'ye/&! EXISTING FENCE «//NOTES /1.EXISTING UTILITIES AND STRUCTURES ARE SHOWN IN li APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS AND ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY. /CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY LOCATIONS. 2.CONSTRUCT NEW FACILITIES SO AS NOT TO DISTURB EXISTING UTILITIES AND STRUCTURES. 3.NEW DISPENSER CLEARANCE REQUIREMENTS: 50'FROM DISPENSING TANKS 50°FROM BUILDINGS BUILDING G)DISPENSING AREA SITE PLAN EARTHWORK AND CONCRETE NOTES 1.EXISTING VEGETATION PROTECTION:THE CONSTRUCTOR SHALL TAKE ALL MEASURES NECESSARY TO PROTECT THE EXISTING VEGETATION AT THE SITE BEYOND THE LIMITS OF EXCAVATION.DAMAGED VEGETATION SHALL BE REPAIRED. 2.GRAVEL SURFACE COURSE:PROVIDE GRAVEL DRIVING SURFACE WITH THE FOLLOWING GRADATION: 3/4"70 -100% 3/8”50 -80% No.4 40 -60% No.40 10 -30% No.200 6 -16% 3.COMPACTION:PLACE ALL FILL IN 6”LIFTS AND COMPACT FILL MATERIAL AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS,MAXIMUM DENSITY DETERMINED BY ASTM D-1557 (MODIFIEDPROCTOR). 4.CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE SHALL HAVE A 28 DAY STRENGTH,FC,OF 3,000 PSI CONCRETE AGGREGATES SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM C-33.AIR ENTRAINMENT OF 3% TO 6%SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM C-231. 5.REINFORCING SHALL BE ASTM A615,GRADE 60 REBAR INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACI 318. 6”CONCRETE PAD 1'-0"2”LEVELING COURSEIMPORTED|a iNFSGRAVEL| (2)DRIVEWAY AND CONCRETE PAD DETAILC-3/SCALE:1 1/2"=1'-0" FILL WITH CONCRETE AND ROUND-OFF TOP WITH GROUT PLUG -guint, 4°SCH 40 STEEL PIPE PAINT CATERPILLAR YELLOWOAFTERINSTALLATION + TOP OF FINISH GRADE ORJSURFACEMATERIALKKPRESAY||RKWYINANAGREYSASS ,YA wy°NS NS + NFS.BACKFILL 95%COMPACTION (3\TYPICAL BOLLARD DETAIL\e-3/>NONE SCALE IN FEET DESCRIPTIONQATE3G8 Jaln]elo PasO9EOw22 8 4 S 8Z\2 ngEAsRa=|3 ssaEar ug : a2Ore ZS,2Us)=oElawigtT]9 2 2Zu$sFO,9uw®Oo Z2rw2Ge¢¢iacg?2 oO > O [om oO >oO iBZQWls2> Ww2° e $S =<&o»W SS41<<ly -a)rg id >"Qa *z <b :3CHECKED ay:EN a RFH =Tar, 02/24/03|_1°=10' J08 NUMBER: 02-033 APPURTENANCE LIST 2”CHECK VALVE 2”FILL PIPING13 -rewy2”FILL LIMITING VALVE WITH DROP TUBE 4°PLUG 8”EMERGENCY VENT 2”NORMAL VENT 2°SCH 40 STEEL PIPE 1°CAM-LOCKING ADAPTOR WITH DUST CAP 1”THREADED LOCKING BALL VALVE 1"@ STEEL PIPE DROP TUBE HIGH LEVEL SHUT-OFF SWITCH LOW LEVEL SHUT-OFF SWITCH SUBMERSIBLE PUMP 2”ANTI-SIPHON VALVE 2”ISSUE PIPING 2”WHISTLE VENT LIQUID LEVEL GAUGE 2°-2000f STREET ELBOW END VIEW END_VIEW (4) (5) (5) ™ (8) (2) (0) Cy) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) @?) (8) 4%QeCOUPLING y ' !iUNISTRUT---1)pareCHANNEL;aaPIPESUPPORT'9 NIPPLE W/INTERSTITIAL(TYPICAL)/FLANGED ||_MONITOR TUBEADAPTORH it ' t(10)ao LY UNISTRUT {CHANNEL a i PIPE SUPPORT :}(TYPICAL) Tt teifTera FLANGEFLANGEiy'o |'capenenaedAS an : ASREQUIREDgEFNZ>REQUIRED SECTION (1\6,000 GALLON SINGLE PRODUCT DISPENSING TANKC-4/SCALE:1”=2' 10. 71. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17, in _t Bd ne NCq GENERAL NOTES THE TANK AND APPURTENANCES SHALL BE DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE STATE OF ALASKA FIRE AND LIFE SAFETY REGULATIONS (13 AAC 50),ASME 831.3 AND ASME 831.4, TANK ANCHORAGE SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 2000 INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE AND UL142. TANK SEPARATION DISTANCES SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH TABLE 2.3.1.1 OF NFPA 30. ALL PIPING AND COMPONENTS SHALL BE SUITABLE FOR USE WITH UNLEADED GASOLINE,ARCTIC GRADE DIESEL AND THE CUMACTIC CONDITIONS AT THE SITE. ELECTRICAL DETAILS ARE NOT SHOWN.PROVIDE ELECTRICAL DESIGN AND INSTALLATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 2000 INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE AND THE NATIONAL ELECTRIC CODE. TANK AND APPURTENANCES PROVIDE COMPLETE DISPENSING TANK SYSTEM AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWING IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING SPECIFICATIONS. TANKS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF ASTM A-36 PLATE AND STRUCTURAL STEEL. TANK COATINGS:THE TANK EXTERIOR,INCLUDING SADDLES,SKIDS,PIPE SUPPORTS AND PIPING SHALL BESANDBLASTEDTOSSPCSP-6 (COMMERCIAL BLAST),PRIMED WITH DEVOE CATHA-COAT 302H (3-4 MILS DFT),INTERMEDIATE COAT WITH DEVOE BAR RUST 233H (6-8 MILS DFT)AND TOP COATED WITH DEVOE DEVTHANE369(2-3 MILS DFT).COATING COLOR SHALL BE WHITE.PROVIDE (1)ONE GALLON OF TOUCHUP PAINTPERTANK.SEAL WELD ALL WELDED JOINTS TO ALLOW CONTINUOUS COATING APPLICATION. LABEL ALL TANKS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 2000 INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE,CHAPTER 34 AND AS TO PRODUCT STORED AND STORAGE CAPACITY.PROVIDE ADDITIONAL SIGNAGE WHICH IDENTIFIES TANK FILLING PROCEDURES,TANK DEPTH-TO-VOLUME CHART AND PROHIBITS SIMULTANEOUS TANK FILLING AND DISPENSING FOR THE DISPENSING TANKS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE. PROVIDE BUSHINGS AS REQUIRED FOR APPURTENANCE INSTALLATION. SUBMERSIBLE PUMP:3/4 HP,208-230 V,SINGLE PHASE,EXPLOSION PROOF SUBMERSIBLE TURBINE PUMPWITHINTAKESCREEN.INSTALL PUMP INTAKE TO LEVEL SHOWN ON DRAWINGS.PROVIDE RED JACKET MO. P75S1 WITH TRAPPER INTAKE SCREEN,OR APPROVED EQUAL. HIGH AND LOW LEVEL SHUT-OFF SWITCHES:FM APPROVED EXPLOSION PROOF,ULTRASONIC LIQUID LEVEL CONTROL WITH STAINLESS STEEL TRANSDUCER AND THREADED TANK CONNECTION.PUMP SHUT-OFF SWITCHES SHALL BE SET AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS.MAGNETROL ECHOTEL ill SERIES 910-A1A0-XXX,OR APPROVED EQUAL. FILL LIMITING VALVE:FLOAT ACTUATED,INTERNAL VALVE WITH DROP TUBE CAPABLE OF BEING INSTALLED THROUGH 4 INCH TANK COUPLING.VALVES SHALL BE SET AS SHOWN ON TANK DRAWINGS.CLAY &BAILEY MODEL NO.F-30 (MODIFIED)WITHOUT WEEP HOLE,OR APPROVED EQUAL. EMERGENCY VENT:CAST IRON BODY,FLANGED CONNECTION EMERGENCY VENT WITH INTERNAL SCREEN,SET TOOPENAT8OZ./SQ._IN.PRESSURE FOR DIESEL AND 16 OZ./SQ.IN.PRESSURE FOR GASOLINE.EMERGENCYVENTSSHALLBESIZEDINACCORDANCEWITHUL142.LOOSE MANHOLES NOT PERMITTED.MORRISON BROS.,CO.MODEL NO.244 Fi W/FLANGED ADAPTOR,OR APPROVED EQUAL. NORMAL VENT:TEE VENT WITH SCREENS AND THREADED CONNECTION.VENT MUST BE 12'MINIMUM ABOVE ADJACENT GROUND LEVEL.CLAY AND BAILEY MFG.CO.MODEL NO.300,OR APPROVED EQUAL. WHISTLE VENT:THREADED,IN-LINE WHISTLE VENT SET TO STOP WHISTLING AT 85%OF TANK CAPACITY.NO REDUCTION ON NORMAL VENTING CAPACITY PERMITTED.Ol.EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURING CORPORATION "KINGFILLALARM",OR APPROVED EQUAL. GASOLINE TANKS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A COMBINATION NORMAL/WHISTLE VENT.ANODIZED ALUMINUMBODYANDRAINGUARD,VITON SEALS,STAINLESS STEEL FLOAT,CABLE,SCREEN AND SCREWS.SET VENTTOOPENAT80Z./SQ.IN.PRESSURE AND 1 0Z./SQ.IN.VACUUM.TWO INCH MORRISON BROS.FIG.922ORAPPROVEDEQUAL.SUPPLY 2°x5"STEEL PIPE NIPPLE TO ATTACH VENT TO TANK IN FIELD. UQUID LEVEL GAUGE:SS FLOAT OPERATED CLOCK GAUGE WITH READOUT IN FEET AND INCHES,UP TO 12FEETIN1/4 INCH INCREMENTS.MARK 85%OF TANK CAPACITY ON DISPENSING TANK GAUGES.MORRISONBROS.,CO.MODEL NO.818,OR APPROVED EQUAL. THREADED BALL VALVES:ANSI CLASS 150 LBS.,CAST CARBON STEEL BODY,CHROME PLATED CARBON STEEL BALL,TEFLON SEAT AND STUFFING BOX SEALS,LOCKABLE LEVER HANDLE.ALL MATERIALS SHALL BE SUITABLE FOR THE SERVICE CONDITIONS.NIBCO MO,T- 560-CS-R-25-FS,OR APPROVED EQUAL. CHECK VALVE:ANSI CLASS 150,CAST CARBON STEEL BODY,RAISED FACE FLANGED,SWING CHECK VALVE. ALL MATERIALS SHALL BE SUITABLE FOR THE SERVICE CONDITIONS.CRANE No.147,OR APPROVED EQUAL ANTI-SIPHON VALVE:BRONZE BODY ANTI SIPHON VALVE PRESET TO OPEN AT 20 FEET HEAD PRESSURE WITH EXPANSION RELIEF BACKWARDS THROUGH VALVE.MORRISON BROS.,CO.MODEL NO.910ER,OR APPROVED EQUAL. FLANGES:PROVIDE ANSI CLASS 150 LBS.,SCHEDULE 40 BORE FLANGES WITH SPIRAL WOUND FUEL RESISTANT GASKETS AND A320,L7,PLATED,CASE HARDENED,CORROSION RESISTANT NUTS AND STUDS. ALL PIPING SHALL BE SEAMLESS SCHEDULE 40 CARBON STEEL WITH WELDED JOINTS UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE. CONTROL LOGIC HIGH LEVEL SHUT-OFF SWITCH -SHUTS OFF TRANSFER PUMP WHEN LIQUID LEVEL REACHES 85%OF TANK CAPACITY. LOW LEVEL SHUT-OFF SWITCH -SHUTS OFF SUBMERSIBLE PUMP WHEN LIQUID LEVEL DROPS TO 18 INCHES ABOVE THE TANK BOTTOM. SUBMERSIBLE PUMP -TURNED ON BY NOZZLE HANG-UP SWITCH AT DISPENSER.-TURNED OFF BY NOZZLE HANG-UP SWITCH AT DISPENSER OR LOW LEVEL SHUT--OFF SWITCH.DESCRIPTIONOATEREMSIONSal-|almlelo PanoOteaaOn76O 4 £3Glaesz/8 SEslSgSa5&:alg i aleOle Pls Ssin|>WgM48srizia¢fo.9uw@oOZz-43Ge9%4a&Ww a a OW > O GS >Ooi82=WwoSalGg<c w DDs©sSft&77)we2a3><«W &3 QO Ka< 6,000 GALLON DISPENSING TANK C-4 aE oe 02/24/03 AS_NOTED308NUMBER:02-033 H:\iobs\92-033St.PoutCOR\cod\drawings\0703300_CO5awaFeb24,20031I:t20m8 i oD a i G bu !S)-ee t T T T T T T T T - 12 'L3x3x1/4 3/16"PLATE ROOF AL55143 1/4 TS4x2x3/16 a Se L3x3x1/41/4 74 . ween ne ne ee ne .L3x3x1/4 ali x 7 DIAGONAL Lp arTENED BREAKAWAY DUAL PRODUCT DISPENSER 3 \Pa BRACING EXPANDED METAL|COUPLING &3 lajn brecopst HOSE SWIVEL a a i TS4x2x3/16 OQ .1 |*Oo DISPENSER HOSE oc 5>took 7 (TYPICAL OF 2)fe)QBeEeealaafeNI H DISPENSER NOZZLE :1/8"PLATE 9 i&POT (TYPICAL OF 2):11/2"COVER ra:: SHEAR VALVE &RG (SEE NOTE 2)att 1/2"5 oO .5 a we REDUCER P|=8 1 8 L2x2x1/4 L2x2x1 /4 B2 ns 1 S|¢Ko€12x10.6 UNISTRUT 2\5 esPIPESUPPORT4°315 cso22------6x6x1/4 PLATE TYP @ 1/8"WITH CLAMP be Fr &* wocorenes V4 COVER als £ LAB ANCHOR BOLT TOP OF SLAB 8”CONCRETE 30 : TOP_OF S Co SLAB XS SH 28 cUy-:eT Of |"-<7 Jo Ar.aN \oe ale i \" ..LO . ° ee ole a'iam L 6'-0"\p 130 ON CENTER *Fi 68scr|.=EPOXY ANCHOR 1 1/2"BALL VALVE =Zz 2\-8*concrere "aw BoLT (TYP OF 4)1 1/2"#x24"LONG é 9 -9SIABFLEXFITTING(MPT x ry :9 ZFLANGE)§&3 <mn os 2 x(1.DISPENSER ENCLOSURE SECTION (3.\DISPENSER SECTION i a &a \c-3/SCALE:NONE C-5 }SCALE:NONE cs os fe 1/8"END COVER PIPING FROMFickweibeDYoCHANNEL[q PL DISPENSING TANKS ey 1/4°%1"GALV °==. Seyry APPING i)N_Pr 0.8'-0"oN q ate|I.$--umistrur pre =)TS4x2x3/16 2x1 1/2"REDUCER +1 SUPPORT WITH CLAMP O(TYPICAL)™-:1 1/2 BALL VALVE--LJ q 6}."'va ,"o Ne ;;uy 1 1/2"24°.-cr2xt0.6 Epoxy ANCHOR""*"ass a MPTAFLANGE ]E |25.BOLT (TYP OF 4)°a.reean3/t6 'typ]®1/8"COVER 9eeFsa|DISPENSER n Wy.0"Fe 17 5 :a Lu 4 "as tal,.>vo W ¢¥2oe|mea!eel ee S 1 5/8",10 GA Pho,DISPENSER wo EPOXY ANCHOR fl AY SIZE AND LAYOUT wooFLATTENEDEXPANDED; :4 BOLTS (TYPICAL Fy frMETALSIDINGCae:FIRE 7 OF 4)Pp 1/8 A 2 $©8”CONCRETE EXTINGUISHER EZ L2x2x1/4 S <«_48%TF ag yD ®5 uw & ot a Oe »f3\i <<<< Soa,bl Ae ae j ce at 3°|.7..;:.|e i 2 ; ::2=- wae on x'LW ajor:ane ok 3 Q .HINGE /\Me S.a <5\Zé.or canineJ'-8"WIDE DOOR /'ee .Dems =(2 DISPENSER ENCLOSURE PLAN (+\DISPENSING ENCLOSURE PIPING PLAN C-5 C-5)SCALE:NONE \e-s/SCALE:NONE a a 02/24/03)NONE ce nae[02-033 Appendix B:Land Status Documentation Laurie M.Hulse From:Rick Elliott [rickelliott@gci.net] Sent:Monday,January 27,2003 7:39 PM To:lnulse@hdalaska.com Ce:David Lundin Subject:Re:St.Paul Laurie.There is a "Settlement Agreement"between the City of St.Paul and the Tanadgusix Corporation dated January 11,1988.Among other things,the agreement provided for certain parcels that were to be conveyed to the City under ANCSA 14(c)(3).Included was a 5 acre parcel described as the "Fuel Farm/Power Plant Complex."Also included was a 5 acre parcel described as a "Public Works Complex"described as "being on the opposite side of road from tank farm."BLM official John Sroufe (271-5481)said that the City and Tanadqusix are in litigation over the :"Settlement Agreement"and he speculated that is probably why the site has not been conveyed to the City.Perhaps the City and the Tanadqusix Corporation could set other issues aside and resolve this issue.The site has already been surveyed.However,the northernmost portion of the existing fuel farm site (Tract A,Plat 95-5)is only 210 x 210 feet.The remainder of the parcel is 420'x 420' according to the survey.The proposed dispensing area is in the smallest portion of the Tract.This parcel extends 210'along Polovina Turnpike from the intersection with Diamond Hill Road.A determination needs to be made whether the new dispensing area will fit into this surveyed area.In regard to the land ownership issue,it might be more appropriate (and perhaps more likely to get a response)if AEA contacted both the City and Tanadqusix.However,I am willing to give it a shot if you want me to.Ideally,Tanadqusix would just convey the site to the City under ANCSA 14(c)(3)but this may not be possible with the ongoing litigation.Please let me know how you would like me to proceed.--Rick "Laurie M.Hulse"wrote: >Thanks for your efforts on St Paul and Koyukuk.Full speed ahead on >both.David L.is on vacation until Feb 6.We would like to have the >St Paul site figured out by then,if possible. > >Laurie Hulse,P.E. >Senior Civil Engineer >Hattenburg Dilley &Linnell,LLC >(907)277-2120 > >-----Original Message----- From:Rick Elliott [mailto:rickelliott@gci.net] Sent:Saturday,January 25,2003 2:26 PM To:Laurie M.Hulse Subject:St.Paul Laurie.I have completed some preliminary research on St.Paul.The existing fuel farm was surveyed in 1995.The parcel is identified as Tract A,Fuel Farm Subdivision,Plat No.95-5,recorded in the Aleutian Islands District on March 17,1995.Tanadgusix Native Corporation signed the plat as landowner.My research indicates that Tanadgusix was at that time,and still is the owner,at least according to documents of record.However,I have a meeting with BLM on Monday to see if any additional information is available.Even if the land is owned by Tanadgusix,the City should have a claim to the site under ANCSA 14(c)(3).Since Tanadgusix's office is located here in Anchorage,I may check with their office also.I'll keep you posted.--RickVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVv Appendix C:US Army Corps of Engineers -Flood Plain Managements Services Alaskan Communities Flood Hazard Data 2000 Publication Information ALASKAN COMMUNITIES FLOOD HAZARD DATA 2000 i,Army Corps Of Engineers Flood Plain Management Services COMMUNITY:Saint Michael CE:(907)923-3222 LAST FLOOD EVENT:2"Class City FLOOD CAUSE: ELEVATION: ION:381 Ss:FLOOD OF RECORD: FLOOD CAUSE: STEM:none ELEVATION: AREA:Norton Sound WORST FLOOD EVENT: TUS:Not Participating ©FLOOD CAUSE: -AIN REPORT:Yes ISURANCE STUDY:No FLOOD GAUGE:No TS: ntire community is above the 100-year flood plain.The lowest the Yutana Barge Line building constructed in 1900.This building been flooded,although water has reached its footings.The 100-year flood level would be just below its first floor elevation. mmended building elevation is 2 feet above the first floor of this arge Line building. hael ALASKAN COMMUNITIES FLOOD HAZARD DATA 200. U.S.Army Corps Of Engineers -Flood Plain Management Services COMMUNITY:Saint Paul CITY OFFICE:(907)546-2331 LAST FLOOD EVENT:1991 STATUS:2”Class City |FLOOD CAUSE:Coastal ELEVATION: POPULATION:673 BUILDINGS:FLOOD OF RECORD:1966 FLOOD CAUSE:Coastal RIVER SYSTEM:none ELEVATION: COASTAL AREA:St.Paul Is. WORST FLOOD EVENT: NFIP STATUS:-Not Participating FLOOD CAUSE:FLOOD PLAIN REPORT:No FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY:No FLOOD GAUGE:No COMMENTS: December,1966,was the flood of record.Floodwaters reached the foundation of Harold Thayers'house next to the current Assembly of God Parsonage. Saint Paul Revised:3/30/00 Appendix D:Correspondence Records Correspondence.doc 1/16/03.Telephone conversation with Trena Hallback ,Delta Western Environmental Manager City is selling fuel.Trena does not at this point see a problem with providing a retail dispendsing station,painting power plant tanks and upgrades to school. Will talk with Jim about it some more and will call back if questions.Gave her Dave Lockard's phone number for any questions. 1/22/03 Telephone conversation with Malcolm Fleming,Pribilof Island School District Superintendent malcolm@ak.net Asked Malcolm about the heating systems in each teacher house and school office.The five ASTs have monitor stoves (teacher housing).The five USTshaveboilerswithpumpsindoors(teacher housing and school office).|informedhimthattheschooldistrictwillberesponsiblefordecommissioningandremovaloftheoldtanksafterourprojectisthrough.He will send any shop drawings oftheschool's tank system that they have. 1/24/03 Telephone conversation with John Merculief,St.Paul City Manager Verified that they use a blended diesel for a total of two fuel types:Gasoline andDiesel.He remembers that they fill their 4k dispensing tanks about twice a week in the busy summer season.Vehicles get lined up at certain times of day behindthefuelpump.We discussed where to put the tanks and dispenser in relation to the pump shed and existing fuel line,which is buried.The City plans to build a commercial-style facility there,with a coffee shop and attendant's building.Our plans should accommodate this future expansion. John indicated that they would email the only map that they had of the distribution system.(I received this and it was no improvement over the map that we have.)He also requested that Mike Dahl at PolarConsult receive a copy of the Draft CDR. Laurie M.Hulse From:Lorie M.Dilley [Ildiley@hdalaska.com] Sent:Thursday,January 16,2003 3:26 PM To:David Lockard (David Lockard) Cc:Laurie Hulse (Laurie Hulse) Subject:Delta Western -St.Paul I contacted Trena Hallback at Delta Western today to discuss the St.Paul project.We talked about the private enterprise policy from the Denali Commission and our proposed projects.She did not at this time see a problem with AEA continuing with the three projects of a new dispensing facility,painting the power plant tanks,and upgrading the school tanks.She will talk to Jim Sorrano who is President of Delta Western about the projects and get back to us if there are any questions but she does not think he will have any problems with this either.Dave,I gave her your name and number as well. Lorie Dilley,P.E. Hattenburg Dilley &Linnell Ph:(907)277-2120 Fx:(907)277-2122 Message Page |of2 Laurie M.Hulse From:Laurie M.Hulse [Ihulse@hdalaska.com] Sent:Thursday,January 23,2003 8:56 AM To:'David Lockard';Lorie Dilley Ce:Laurie Hulse Subject:FW:SPCC question FYI---See email below for discussion with Jim Berry about St Paul teacher housing tanks.He called this morning after his meeting with EPA,and confirmed that in this case the teacher housing tanks are not regulated because they are not on the same property as the school tank.This is clear because they are scattered throughout town. If they were on properties ADJACENT to the property with the regulated 3000 gal tank,they would likely beincludedintheSPCC. Laurie Hulse,P.E. Senior Civil Engineer Hattenburg Dilley &Linnell,LLC (907)277-2120 From:Jim Berry [mailto:jberry@gci.net] Sent:Wednesday,January 22,2003 10:11 PM To:lhulse@hdalaska.com Subject:Re:SPCC question Your question is timely! The answer depends on who interprets the definition of "Facility",and the day of the week! 40 CFR 112.2 defines Facility as:"Facility means any mobile or fixed,onshore or offshore building, structure,installation,equipment,pipe,or pipeline (other than a vessel or a public vessel)used in oil well drilling operations,oil production,oil refining,oil storage,oil gathering,oil processing,oil transfer, oil distribution,and waste treatment,or in which oil is used,as described in Appendix A to this part. The boundaries of a facility depend on several site-specific factors,including,but not limited to,the ownership or operation of buildings,structures,and equipment on the same site and the types of activity at the site.” Ifa day tank is piped /plumbed to a regulated intermediate tank,or if it on contiguous property ("same site")it is part of the "facility".Please don't ask for a definition of contiguous! If a day tank is on non contiguous property (rented housing -off-site?),I believe it would be a separate and non regulated facility.But -if it is filled by a mobile tank owned /operated by the school,is it considered part of the school operation (facility)!?I will be discussing this exact issue with the EPA tomorrow and will inform you of tomorrow's interpretation. "Laurie M.Hulse”wrote: Hi Jim We are working with AEA on a tank farm upgrade project in St.Paul,and 1/27/2003 Message Page 2 of2 I have an SPCC question that I thought I would bring to the expert:The school district there has a 3,000 gallon tank that they fill with fuel purchased from a private retailer.This tank will need an SPCC plan. The school district also has a school office a block away,and ten teacher homes scattered throughout town.These each have 200-500 gallon home heating oil tanks.My question:Do each of these home heating oil tanks need to be part of the school's SPCC?Ifso,do they then need to be double walled?We would like to avoid providing them a heating oil system beyond what would be required if they were a private home. Laurie Hulse,P.E. Senior Civil Engineer Hattenburg Dilley &Linnell,LLC (907)277-2120 1/27/2003 Appendix E:City Equipment List St.Paul City-Owned Equipment List Description |.D# Thiokol Snow Cat 557 Lincoln Welder 462 Case 480F 4x4 Backhoe 486 Case Uni-Loader 487 International 4600 Stellar Truck 493 International Flatbed 519 Freightliner 12yd /Sander 525 CAT R80 Forklift 530 REO Cement Mixer 537 John Deere 450 Dozer 539 Case 580-C Backhoe 544 CAT 225 Excavator 545 CAT 966D Loader 547 Ingersol Compressor 552 Ingersol Light Tower 553 Bobcat /Accessories 555 CAT 980C Whee!Loader 556 Ford Lube Truck 577 Waste Oil Pump n/a 586 E Forklift 585 Steam Cleaner 563 V300B Forklift 534 1102 Case Compactor 587 Hyster Forklift 460 Hyster Forklift 461 CAT 12G Grader 531 Gallon Grader 536 CAT 14G Grader 590 Isuzu Q-16 P/U 523 International 4,000-gal Tanker 551 Air Compressor 552 Welder/Pipe Fuser 497 D-6 Dozer 478 DES M-2-M20 Bottom Dump 479 Dynawald Fixed Lowboy 480 Kenworth Tractor 481 14CY Dump Truck 484 International 2OCY Dump Truck 574 Appendix F:Alaska Energy Authority Training Program Alaska Energy Authority Training Program Advanced Power Plant Operator Training This advanced course prepares the student with the necessary knowledge and skills to diagnose and repair failures in power plants.Program content includes: review of electrical fundamentals;testing equipment;basics of computerized engine control systems;sensors and actuators;electronic signatures and waveforms;and diagnostics and testing. Bulk Fuel Operator Training This course provides students with the knowledge and skills necessary to safely operate and maintain a bulk fuel storage facility while complying with state and federal laws.Program content includes:bulk fuel storage facility construction; facility operations;tank farm inspection criteria;facility maintenance;inventory control;tank farm safety;detection of spills;and spill response planning. Hydro Training This course will train local operators to ensure that hydro facilities can be sustained over the long-term.Program content includes:overview of the hydro plant,including the hydrology and fuel systems;operation of all systems involved (i.e.hydro,diesel,system voltage control,and safe clearance procedures); maintenance of all systems involved (i.e.hydro,diesel,reservoir and electrical distribution system);and record keeping. Itinerant Bulk Fuel Training This course is a follow up to the bulk fuel operator training.An instructor will travel to the communities of students previously trained in the Bulk Fuel Operator Training program to provide on-site training.Training activities will include an initial physical inspection through the tank farm;identification of operation and maintenance needs;hands-on repairs and replacement of minor maintenance needs;and additional on-site training of specific facility concerns and considerations.Training on reporting requirements,if needed,will also be provided. Power plant Operator Training This is the entry level course for power plant operators and provides them with the necessary skills to operate and maintain a power plant.Program content includes:theory,maintenance and troubleshooting of engines,electrical systems, and generators;introduction to electrical distribution systems;operation of diesel electric sets;contro!panels;paralleling generator sets;load management,fuel management;waste heat recovery;plant management;and power plant safety and industrial CPR. Spill Response Training This course is on-site in communities that have fully completed,operation-ready bulk fuel tank farms.Training will address all the DEC,US Coast Guard and EPA measures of compliance.This training assures the tank farms will be in compliance with all governing agencies.Training includes a spill response drill. Utility Clerk Training This course focuses on Power Cost Equalization (PCE)reporting;Regulatory Commission of Alaska (RCA)reporting;how to apply for bulk fuel loans and general accounting practices utilities can use to keep their records and reports current.Courses are planned for Anchorage as well as select hub communities. For further information,please contact Monica Moore,Training Program Manager at (907)269-3026. Appendix G:Budget Cost Estimate COST ESTIMATE February 2003 SAINT PAUL FUEL IMPROVEMENTS NO ITEM QTY UNIT UNITCOST SUBTOTAL TOTAL 1.0 GENERAL CONDITIONS $53,690.00 1.1 Non -Productive Supervision 80 hrs $89.00 $7,120.00 1.2 Testing Services 2 LS $450.00 $900.00 1.3 Survey and Layout 1 LS $8,000.00 $8,000.00 1.4 Utilities 2 Mth $500.00 $1,000.00 1.5 Job Office and Supplies 1 LS $1,000.00 $4,000.00 1.6 Communications 2 Mth $500.00 $1,000.00 1.7 Small Tools 1 LS $6,000.00 $6,000.00 1.8 Personnel Transportation 8 ea $1,100.00 $8,800.00 1.9 Personnel Freight 7000 Ibs $0.85 §$5,950.00 1.10 Board and Room 96 Mday $£145.00 $13,920.00 2.0 TANKS $99,450.00 2.1 6,000 gallon dbl wall tank 2 ea $30,000.00 $60,000.00 2.2 300 gallon tanks/stands 10 ea $650.00 $6,500.00 2.3 Freight Factory to Seattle 6,000 gal tank 2 LS $1,000.00 $2,000.00 2.4 Freight Seattle to St.Paul 2 ea $9,640.00 $19,280.00 2.5 Freight Seattle to St.Paul 10 ea $375.00 $3,750.00 2.6 Equipment 30 =hrs $-§- 2.7 Core Labor 60 hrs $84.00 §$5,040.00 2.8 Local Labor 60 hrs $48.00 $2,880.00 3.0 TANK PIPING &ACCESSORIES $58,480.00 3.1 Pumps 1 LS $10,000.00 $10,000.00 3.2 Piping 320 Lft $12.00 $3,840.00 3.3 Piping accessories 1 LS $6,000.00 $6,000.00 3.4 Tank accessories 1 LS $12,000.00 $12,000.00 3.5 Freight 10000 Ibs $0.48 §$4,800.00 3.6 Equipment 40 hrs $-§- 3.7 Core Labor 120 hrs $86.00 $10,320.00 3.8 Local Labor 240 -s hrs $48.00 $11,520.00 3.9 Consumables 1 LS $600.00 $600.00 4.0 RECONDITION EXISTING TANKS $47,140.00 4.1 Sand Blast 3000 Sqft $2.50 §$7,500.00 4.2 Painting 4000 Sqft $3.00 $12,000.00 4.3 Freight 8000 Ibs $0.85 $6,800.00 4.4 Equipment 60 -sihrs $-§- 4.5 Core Labor 80 =-s hrs $89.00 $7,120.00 4.6 Local Labor 140 =hrs $48.00 $6,720.00 4.7 Consumables 1 LS $4,000.00 $4,000.00 4.8 Cleaning &Disposal 10 ea $300.00 $3,000.00 5.0 DISTRIBUTION &DISPENSING $70,500.00 5.1 Distribution piping 450 Lft $12.00 $5,400.00 5.2 Pipe supports 20 «ea $65.00 $1,300.00 5.3 Product Dispenser 1 LS $6,500.00 $6,500.00 5.4 Dispenser Enclosure 1 LS $8,000.00 $8,000.00 5.5 Pumps 1 LS $4,500.00 $4,500.00 COST ESTIMATE February 2003 SAINT PAUL FUEL IMPROVEMENTS NO ITEM QTY UNIT UNIT COST SUBTOTAL TOTAL 5.6 Painting 1 LS $3,000.00 $3,000.00 5.8 Freight 20000 Ibs $0.48 §$9,600.00 5.9 Equipment 60 =hrs $-$- 5.10 Core Labor 200 hrs $89.00 $17,800.00 5.11 Local Labor 300 -s hrs $48.00 $14,400.00 6.0 SITE DEVELOPMENT $51,220.00 6.1 Site work -Gravel Pad 100 Cy $35.00 §$3,500.00 6.2 Found Pads 300 Lft $23.00 $6,900.00 6.3 Bollards 120 IFT $35.00 $4,200.00 6.3 Hardware and attachments 2 LS $2,000.00 $4,000.00 6.4 Freight 24000 Ibs $048 $11,520.00 6.5 Equipment 60 =hrs $-$- 6.6 Core Labor 140 hrs $89.00 $12,460.00 6.7 Local Labor 180 hrs $48.00 $8,640.00 7.0 ELECTRICAL $84,800.00 7.1 Materials 1 LS $35,000.00 $35,000.00 7.2 Freight 10000 Ibs $0.48 $4,800.00 7.3.Sub-Contract Labor 1 LS $45,000.00 $45,000.00 8.0 FENCE $12,811.00 8.1 Materials 120 Lft $24.00 $2,880.00 8.2 Freight 4200 Ibs $0.48 $2,016.00 8.3 Backfill material 8 CY $150.00 $1,200.00 8.4 Equipment 40 =ihrs $-$- 8.5 Core Labor 35 hrs $89.00 §$3,115.00 8.6 Local Labor 75 hrs $48.00 $3,600.00 Direct Costs $478,091.00 Engineering &Site Control $75,000.00 Contingency (15%)$71,713.65 Regulatory documents $6,500.00 Total Direct Costs $631,304.65 Project Management (10%)$63,130.47 Project Subtotal $694,435.12 COST ESTIMATE February 2003 SAINT PAUL FUEL IMPROVEMENTS NO ITEM QTY UNIT UNITCOST SUBTOTAL TOTAL A1 ALTERNATE A-Additional Dispensing Unit $50,700.00 A1.1 Distribution piping 120 Lft $12.00 $1,440.00 A1.2 Pipe supports 4 ea $65.00 $260.00 A1.3 Product Dispenser 1 LS $6,500.00 $6,500.00 A1.4 Dispenser Enclosure 1 LS $8,000.00 $8,000.00 A1.5 Pumps 1 LS $4,500.00 $4,500.00 A1.6 Painting 1 LS $3,000.00 §$3,000.00 A1.7 Freight 12000 Ibs $048 §$5,760.00 A1.8 Equipment 60 =-hrs $-$- A1.9 Core Labor 120 =hrs $89.00 $10,680.00 A1.10 Local Labor 220 hrs $48.00 $10,560.00 Contingency (15%)$7,605.00 General Conditions (11%)$5,577.00 Alternate A Total $63,882.00 Bi ALTERNATEB -Concrete Pad $23,820.00 B1.1 Leveling course 20 CY $25.00 $500.00 B1.2 Forming 1LS $1,200.00 $1,200.00 B1.3 Concrete (with reinforcement)12 CY $120.00 $1,440.00 B1.4 Freight 46000 Lbs $0.25 $11,500.00 B1.5 Equipment 20 hrs B1.6 Core Crew 60 hrs $89.00 $5,340.00 B1.7 Local Labor 80 hrs $48.00 $3,840.00 Contingency (15%)$3,573.00 General Conditions (11%)$2,620.20 Alternate B Total $30,013.20 Project Total with Alternatives $788,330.32