Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Toksook Bay Bulk Fuel Upgrades Oct 6, 2000
State of Alaska Department of Community and Economic Development Alaska Energy Authority,Rural Energy Group PRELIMINARY DESIGN REPORT TOKSOOK BAY BULK FUEL UPGRADES October 6,2000 Prepared by: Wiley W.Wilhelm,P.E. LCMF Incorporated A subsidiary of Ukpeagvik Inupiat Corporation 139 East 51st Avenue Voice:(907)273-1830 Anchorage,Alaska 99503 Fax (907)273-1831 ©Oct.3l.2000 4:13PM LCNMF 907-273-1831 No.9315 A/S. FAX TRANSMITTAL .LOME Incorporated (i sfZ_.A subsidiary of Ulpamgvit:Inuiptat Corporation } pate oz |00__|pages (5FromWWELHILOMFWO©0-(Gq LCMF Incorporated ;LCMF Fax (907)273-1831139EastSlstAveneLCMFTel(907)273-1830Anchorage,Alaska 99503-7205 : Te "Pom Grew |Fax 504-46 6Sfete::.Tel Re "P71|former TSFreAueCOMMONERS!2S SEF a Se KEE Se EERE Lee ithe aw bhEsoLSOOLAAV1JurtUNAHMME NTS. Architecture Engineering Surveying Project Managemant lonfanch@alasks.net 136 Gast S1et aversAnchorage,AK anosVoie(907)273-1830Fen(M07)273-1831 P.O.Bom 985Serrow,Alaska "This facsimile and the information contained are intended to be privileged and confidential | Vokes (S07)8524212 communication exclusively ta the person or entity to whem itis addressed.If you receive this facsimile Fax (907)e82-8213 in error,please notify us by telephene and desirvy the original 98723 Oct.31.2000 4:13PM LCMF 907-273-1831 No.9315 P.2/8 AVEC October 25,2000 ALASKA VILLAGE ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE,INC.00-M-400E Wiley W.Wilhelm,P.E. Project Manager LCMF,Inc. 139 East 51"Avenue Anchorage,AK 99503 RE:Comments on Preliminary Design Report Toksook Bay Bulk Fuel Upgrades (AVEC W.O.71G38) Dear Mr,Wilhelm: The following comments have resulted from a review of the above referenced report: 1.There appears to be overriding advantages of site C in terms of maintaining a reliable fuel supply to the AVEC power plant. 2.In the event,that a remote site is ultimately selected for consolidation of the bulk fuel storage tanks then a redundant system of intermediate tanks is recommended at the AVEC power plant for maximum reliability. 3.In the event,that a remote sife is selected for consolidation of the bulk fuel storage tanks then larger capacity intermediate tanks should be considered to avoid fuel transfers during the indement winter months. 4.Security lighting should be considered at the bulk fuel storage facility. 5.In the event,that a remote site is selected for consolidation of the bulk fuel storage tanks then it is strongly recommended that a redundant system of safeties be installed to prevent loss of fuel in the event of a failure of the pipeline. 4831 Eagle Street -Anchorage,Alaska 99503-7497 -Phone (907)561-1818 +In State (800)478-1818 -Fax (907)563-9304 Oct.31.2000 4:13PM =LCMF 907-273-1831 No.9315 oP.3/5 6.In the event,that a remote site is selected for consolidation of the bulk fuel storage tanks then it is strongly recommended that a redundant system ofsafetiesbeinstalledtopreventoverfillingoftheintermediatetanks.. -Mark E.Teitzel Vice President and Manager,Engineering MET:jpm cc:Marie Becker,Government Relations Representative Oct.dl.2000 4:14PM LCM October 26,2000 Wiley W.Wilhelm,P.E. Project Manager LCMF,Inc.139 East 51"Avenue Anchorage,AK 99503 F 907-273-1831 No-9318 oP.4/6 =J OCT 39 2000 ,re wl} ALASKA VILLAGE ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE,INC.oo 00-M-401E RE:Comments on Preliminary Design Report of Tununak Bulk Fuel Upgrades (AVEC W.O.15G42) Dear Mr.Wihelm: A review of the above referenced report results in the following comments: 1.AVEC is extremely concerned with the resulting problems associated with locating the bulk fuel storage tanks a considerable distance from the power plant facilites. To reduce problems associated with remote location of the bulk fuel storage facilities from the AVEC power plant,it is recommended that at a minimum two intermediate tanks be installed at the AVEC power plant. If the bulk fuel storage tanks are located a considerable distance away from the AVEC power plant then it is strongly recommended that larger intermediate tanks be considered at the AVEC power plant in order to avoid transfers of fuel during inclement weather conditions. Security lighting should be considered at the bulk fuel storage facility. If the bulk fuel storage tanks are located a considerable distance away from the AVEC power plant then it is strongly recommended that a redundantsystemofsafetiesbeinstalledtapreventlossoffuelintheeventofafailureof. the pipeline. 4831 Eagle Street «Anchorage,Alaska 99503-7497 »Phone (907)561-1818 «In State (800)478-1818 »Fax (907)563-9304 -Oct 3.2000 4:14PM =LCMF 907-273-1831 -No.9315 =P.5/5 6.If the bulk fuel storage tanks are located a considerable distance away from the AVEC power plant then it is strongly recommended that a redundant - system of safeties be installed to prevent over filling of the intermediate tanks. Sincerely yours, Met.#IKK Mark E.Teitzel Vice President and Manager,Engineering MET:jpm cc:Marie Becker,Govemment Relations Representative Architecture Engineering Surveying Project Management Arctic Research 139 East 51st Avenue Anchorage,AK 99503 Voice (907)562-1830 Fax (907)562-1831 P.O.Box 955 Barrow,AK 99723 Voice (907)852-8212 Fax (907)852-8213 LCMEF Incorporated A subsidiary of Ukpeagvik Iriupiat Corporation October 6,2000 Mr.Robert Gerik State of Alaska AIDEA/AEA 333 West Fourth Avenue,Suite 220 Anchorage,AK 99501-2341 Re:Final Report Submittal Toksook Bay Fuel System Upgrade PDR Report Dear Mr.Gerik: Please find enclosed six bound original copies,and one original unbound copy,of the final Preliminary Design Report for the community of Toksook Bay,Alaska. The final report has been modified based on your review comments from the Draft report dated January 4,2000 and a subsequent in-house review. Specific changes in this report include: 1.Identification,discussion and use of local beach material for driving surfaces. 2.Refinement of minimum fill pad layout and depths,which reduced the total wfill volumes. Update of current gasoline/diesel storage capacities. Installation of a new 4,000 gallon intermediate tank at the Elementary School mechanical building in place of upgrading all Elementary School day tanks. .Upsizing of the Power Plant intermediate tank to provide 2-3 weeks of fuel storage (8,000 gallons). Consideration of construction of the new consolidated tank farm near the Armory. Change in schedule for Alternate Site B form one year to two years.Upon review of the amount fill to be placed for the new tank farm,and the potential need for thermal siphons to re-freeze the ground beneath the tank farm,we believe that it would be best to plan on letting the pad set-up over the winter before constructing the containment areas and placing tanks. Changes to Additional Project Costs to reflect standardized AEA non- construction related costs. Alaska Energy Authority October 6,2000 Page 2 Thank you for using LCMF to work on this project.If you have any additional comments or questions,please feel free to call me at 273-1851. Sincerely, Projegt Manager Enclosures:6 bound final Preliminary Design Reports 1 un-bound final Preliminary Design Report Toksook Bay,Alaska Bulk Fuel Upgrades Preliminary Design Report EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report has been prepared for the State of Alaska Department of Community and Economic Development,Alaska Industrial Development &Export Authority,Alaska Energy Authority Rural Energy Group.The purpose of this report is to provide the basis for design,and to identify construction scheduling and costs,for upgrading the fuel systems in the community of Toksook Bay,Alaska. The participants in the proposed fuel system upgrades include: City of Toksook Bay (City) Nunakauiak Yupik Corporation (NYC); Lower Kuskokwim School District (LKSD),and; Alaska Village Electric Cooperative,Inc.(AVEC). As part of the development of this report,a site investigation was performed on October 4,1999. During this investigation potential tank farm sites were inspected,the existing fuel systems and tanks were inspected and a meeting was conducted with the City of Toksook Bay and the Nunakauiak Yupik Corporation. As a result of the findings of the site investigation,two tank farm sites were identified.The first site,proposed by the community (Alternate Site A),is located to the south of the existing AVEC/LKSD combined tank farm,adjacent to the AVEC Power Plant.The second site (Alternate Site B)is also located on the south end of the community,across Cemetery Road from the existing NYC tank farm. The new fuel system upgrades (at either site)are to consolidate fuel storage for NYC,LKSD and AVEC into one tank farm.The City's fuel storage for the Water Plant is to be stored in a new double walled tank at the Water Plant,independent of the new tank farm.The new tank farm will include on-site retail dispensing of gasoline and fuel oil for the NYC,and fuel distribution to the AVEC Power Plant and to the LKSD facilities.Since the community has not traditionally operated a tank truck,nor is one available in the community,the construction of a truck filling station is not included in the Conceptual Design. The Conceptual Design includes the reuse of one horizontal 15,000 gallon bulk tank currently located at the NYC tank farm and one 8,000 gallon tank currently located at the Water Plant.All of the other existing tanks were found to be of questionable condition and not cost effective to reuse.The existing piping is in questionable condition and should be completely replaced. The proposed usable fuel storage capacities for the new fuel system are 10,800 gallons for the Water Plant,88,200 gallons of gasoline storage and 87,000 gallons of fuel oil for the NYC, 50,000 gallons for the LKSD facilities and 136,100 gallons for AVEC Power Plant.These capacities will provide an increase in fuel storage capacity of approximately 35%over the current annual usage.The additional storage capacity will allow for an increase in fuel consumption of roughly 1.5%annually over next 20 years for each entity. LCMF IncorporatedEX-1 A subsidiary ofUkpeagvik Inupiat Corporation Toksook Bay,Alaska Bulk Fuel Upgrades Preliminary Design Report Due to differences in slopes at the two alternate sites,and the resulting different amounts of fill material required for the tank foundations,the anticipated construction schedules differ for earthworks construction,but are similar for the rest of the project.Construction at both Alternate Sites is anticipated to take two summers to complete with only the dirt work finished in the first season. The total Budget Cost Estimate for development at Alternate Site A is approximately $2,907,559.The total Budget Cost Estimate for development at Alternative Site B is approximately $2,732,181.These estimated budget costs includes construction costs with a 20% contingency,project insurance,property and easement determination,design,construction management and a grant audit. EXD LOMF Incorporated aAsubsidiaryofUkpeagvikInupiatCorporationEE, Toksook Bay,Alaska Bulk Fuel Upgrades Preliminary Design Report TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY..........cccscssssesssessees "..EX-1 I.INTRODUCTION 1 A.CONTACTS1...eeeeeccescescceseesscesseesetecevsneeeeessessacssceecsseesesessnesseseceseseeesensstsensesenes 1B.APPLICABLE REGULATIONS AND CODES ........ccccccecsscsssseesseesseeseeeeseeeereeees 1 IL.EXISTING FUEL SYSTEMS..-seseccccsscsesnsesenscsescsossescsssonscsenssenses 2 A.GENERAL OVERVIEW...cecsccssccssecesnecseceenscesescsscessacesaceesessenssesseseseseaceeeacesseas 2 B.EXISTING FACILITIES LAYOUT 0.0...ccsscsscssscesceseceesecseesscesssensensessessneeens 3 1.City Water Plant Tank Farm...eescsscsssessessecsseesseeneessesneeseesensesseeseees 3 2.NYC Tank Farm...eeeeeseseceseceeceseeeececeeesssesesccesseeseseseeceseeeeesennesseeeaes 4 3.LKSD Elementary School Tank Farm ............::ccscccsssesessssnceseceseseesneeenseenes 4 4.LKSD High School Tank Farm ..........cecccsssesesssessccsscsseesessecesaeseceseeesseeeeees 5 5.AVEC Tank Farm .......ccccsscscescsseccsscscecssscesssesesscessceseessceecesscesseenecescenseeeees 5CcEXISTINGTANKSTORAGECAPACITYSUMMARY..........ccccsssscssecssseeseeeees 6 D CURRENT FUEL USE uu...eee ccecesssecsceenssensccsccssecceccesssseseeesesssceeeeseeeesenassnees 8 E PROJECTED FUTURE FUEL USE...ceeccssessscesessscesessesnscesseeseeseeerecneensenes 9 HI.PROPOSED NEW FACILITY sssseceescesecenee 10 A SITE SELECTION1.0.0...cceccsssccsseesseecseceneescscecssesssccescesssesessesaceesseseseeseeeseneeenes 10 B SOIL CONDITIONS 0.0...ce eesscscescesceccsseeseeecsccececeeseessnseesecsatessreseesenseeeneesees il C COMMUNITY FLOOD DATA...cccccccscssssssscssssceescessecsessccseaceessceeesssneseneeeees 11 D LOCAL FILL MATERIAL 0.cccceccsssesscceseeeeeecceeeseecseceeeeeessesseesseeseaseceeeoes 12 E TANK FARM FOUNDATION.....ce cscsecescsscessccencesccsessseesaccneseacensseeesenesscenes 12 F SECONDARY CONTAINMENT ........ccccccceccssccessesccstccscccssessceeceeseeesssaceeeessaeaes 13 G TANKS ooo eeecesecesceeccececseesceescteseesseesacsceneseseeesessessseeescessoseeesceseeseeeseesnsoneeegs 13 H FUEL DISTRIBUTION....0......cceccsssesscesececsececeeesecceseceeseceseeessceseeessecesceeseeeeeeees 15 1.Retail Dispensing .............:cceeccsssseccesseccesccesscccesnsccestseessccsssecesaeeosseeeesees 15 2.LKSD High School and Elementary School ............c.ccsccssssssssecessseeeneees 16 3.AVEC Power Plant .000.....ccecssscsssecssccecsceesesecesnnececceeasseeseeseeseeesessaeeosees 16 4,City Water Plant...eee ccsscscercesseessecesecessccesecessccsecseeessacsesesesseessceenes 17 I.OWNERSHIP AND OPERATION...cessessssscsscceeeesseeeeeeseeseceseesaceseeesseaeeseees 17 J SPILL RESPONSE REGULATORY PLANS .........cccceeesssssseceeesessnseeeecesseseeenes 17 K.PERMITTING..........ccsssesscesssecsscsssesesecesscecsecesecesseessesesscescceseecssceseeesssesaeeeseeess 17 1.Fire Marshal Review ..........:cccccssscccsssssscceseseeecesssscesseseeeceeceneeseesanseeseeneees 18 2.US Army Wetlands Permit 22.0.0...eeesssecceesesneeescncececssnaeesesseeeeeseneees 18 L.CONSTRUCTION ......ceeccsescsscsesececeeseseeeecceseceesncesseecsesessseseecesseeenseesneseneesceeeses 18 1.Local labor ...........cceeeseceescececeesecesscessccenccecseesceesoeesensecsesersesssenssasosesoneees 18 2.Local Equipment ...........csscesessscessseesecesseesscerseessseeesseesseeosssoseessesonsssseees 18 M.SCHEDULE .........scssscssssssccsscessessecscccsccssesseceacessseseesssecsesssasscesesosessssesensessseseeeones 19 N.BUDGET COST ESTIMATE...........ceescseessescceeceseeseesessesecesecssessessssecesseesenseesees 20 1.Alternate Site Au...ccscsscccsscsssesssccsssceccesensesesseesescssesesssssseseeesssesonnsoes 20 2.Alternate Site Bow...ccccecccseeessecescesseseesesesccesseessesessesssessseesesssaseeesens 21 ;LOMF*Incorporated @)Inupiat Corp: Toksook Bay,Alaska Bulk Fuel Upgrades Preliminary Design Report Appendix A:Fuel Record Information Appendix B:Site Selection Summary Letter Appendix C:Certificate to Plat Appendix D:Geotechnical Information Prepared by Duane Miller &Associates Appendix E:US Army Corps of Engineers -Flood Plain Managements Services ALASKAN COMMUNITIES FLOOD HAZARD DATA June 2000 Publication Information Appendix F:Conceptual Design Drawings Appendix G:Budget Cost Estimate LOMF Incorporated verdana Uke k Inupiat Corp jeii Toksook Bay,Alaska Bulk Fuel Upgrades Preliminary Design Report I.INTRODUCTION This report has been prepared for the State of Alaska,Alaska Energy Authority,Rural Energy Group to identify the design basis for the development of a new consolidated bulk fuel storage tank farm and distribution system in the community of Toksook Bay,Alaska. This report includes a review of the existing bulk fuel systems in the community,an analysis of future fuel needs,a conceptual design for the replacement/upgrading of these facilities to meet future needs,a proposed project schedule and a budget cost estimate for the project. The participants in this project are as follows: City of Toksook Bay (City); Nunakauiak Yupik Corporation (NYC); Lower Kuskokwim School District (LKSD);and Alaska Village Electric Cooperative,Inc.(AVEC). Wiley Wilhelm,P.E.of LCMF Incorporated performed a site investigation on October 4,1999. The investigation included an inspection of the existing fuel systems,inspections of potential new tank farm sites and a meeting with Raymond Therchik,City Administrator,Charles Moses of the City Council,and Simeon John of the NYC.In addition,the City Water Plant fuel system was discussed with Richard Curtis,the Water Plant Operator,and the School fuel system was discussed with Abraham Usugan,of LKSD. A.CONTACTS Additional information for this report was gathered from the following people: Harlan LaGare Corps of Engineers (907)753-2610 Dan Boccia Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium (907)729-3552 Jim Kohl Lower Kuskokwim School District (907)543-4821 Art Isham Department of Military and Veterans Affairs (907)428-7411 B.APPLICABLE REGULATIONS AND CODES The design/operation of fuel systems is controlled by the following State and Federal regulations: State of Alaska Fire and Life Safety Regulations (13 AAC 50); 1997 Uniform Fire Code as adopted by 13 AAC 50; 1997 Uniform Building Code as adopted by 13 AAC 50; State of Alaska Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Control Regulations (18 AAC 75); e EPA Oil Pollution Prevention Regulations (40 CFR Part 112); e US Coast Guard Facilities Transferring Oil or Hazardous Material in Bulk Regulations (33 CFR Part 154). i LOMF Incorporated @)A subsidiary of UkpeagvikInupiat Corporation EE, Toksook Bay,Alaska Bulk Fuel Upgrades Preliminary Design Report II. The current State of Alaska Fire and Life Safety Regulations adopted the 1997 editions of the Uniform Fire Code (UFC)and the Uniform Building Code (UBC).The code requirements of the UFC establish the primary design requirements for new facilities. The State of Alaska Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Control regulations,Oil Discharge Prevention and Contingency Plans (C-Plan),apply to fuel systems which have a storage capacity of more than 420,000 gallons per Owner or Operator. The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)regulations include two regulatory plans for fuel facilities:1)Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasures (SPCC)Plans and 2)Facility Response Plans (FRPs).The SPCC Plan identifies minimum fuel facility requirements for above ground tanks larger than 660 gallons,or which have an aggregate storage capacity of more than 1,320 gallons.The FRP is a spill response plan for facilities which are filled by marine vessel and which have a storage capacity of more than 42,000 gallons. The US Coast Guard Facilities Transferring Oil or Hazardous Material in Bulk regulations apply to fuel facilities that are capable of transferring fuel,in bulk,to or from a vessel with a capacity of 10,500 gallons or more.This regulation includes two separate plans,1)Oil Spill Response Plan and 2)Operations Manual.The Oil Spill Response Plan is a spill response plan similar to the EPA's Facility Response Plan and it outlines spill planning requirements.The Operations Manual is a plan which addresses the procedures and equipment required for transferring fuel to/from vessels at the facility.The Coast Guard requires these two plans,along with a Letter of Intent to Operate,to be submitted and approved prior to the start of fuel transfers. EXISTING FUEL SYSTEMS A.GENERAL OVERVIEW The site investigation included an inspection of the following tank farms and fuel distribution systems: City Water Plant Tank Farm; NYC Tank Farm; LKSD Elementary School Tank Farm; LKSD High School Tank Farm; AVEC Tank Farm.WPwnThe City Washeteria was not included in this inspection since it does not appear to be feasible to connect to a new consolidated tank farm due to it location and the resulting difficulty in installing a stand-alone buried pipeline to the tank.The City agreed to leaving the Washeteria separate from the new fuel system upgrades.Consideration for LOMF Incorporated2AsubsidiaryofUkpeagvikInupiatCorporati upgrading the Washeteria tank should be given during the design phase. a Toksook Bay,Alaska Bulk Fuel Upgrades Preliminary Design Report The Department of Military and Veterans Affairs National Guard Armory was also considered in the development of this report.The Armory's fuel storage capacity is roughly 4,500 gallons and includes one 3,000 gallon double walled tank and one 1,500 gallon double walled tank.Given this relatively small capacity,and the fact that the Armory only receives fuel once a year,this facility was not inspected nor is it included in the new bulk facility design.DMVA has been notified regarding the potential of consolidation of bulk fuel storage in Toksook Bay. B.EXISTING FACILITIES LAYOUT A detailed description of each of these tank farms is as follows: 1.City Water Plant Tank Farm The City provides potable water to the community through the Water Plant.This facility uses fuel oil to heat the building and to maintain the water temperature in the adjacent water tank.Fuel oil is stored adjacent to the building in the Water Plant tank farm (see the Existing Facility Layout Plan). The tank farm consists of two tanks,one vertical cylindrical BIA style tank and one horizontal tank,which are manifolded together.The total shell capacity of the two tanks is approximately 18,500 gallons.The vertical tank is located inside a corrugated steel circular dike area which is lined with an impermeable membrane liner.The 8,000 gallon horizontal tank was installed new,only a few years ago.The horizontal tank is double walled,providing integral secondary containment.Fuel is pumped from the horizontal tank into a day tank located inside the building automatically using high and low level controls installed in the day tank.Fuel in the vertical tank is pumped into the horizontal tank for consumption,using a fixed pump located at the vertical tank. Fuel is received at the common marine header located on the shore of Kangirlvar Bay,roughly 300 feet from the NYC tank farm.The fuel is then pumped through a common barge off-loading pipeline,which is shared by AVEC and the LKSD Elementary School tank farm,to a tee adjacent to the Water Plant.From this junction,the fuel is pumped through a hose into the tanks.Note:The common barge off-loading pipeline bisects the NYC tank farm without connecting to the facility. The vertical tank was found to be in fair condition and the horizontal tank is in good condition. LOMF Incorporated3AsubsidiaryofUkpeagvikInupiatCorporation ; NV'1Id LNOAVI FeSeneystasenSEM, ° ap SEESOo arta ALINOW4 ONILSIXS"sonagin * **/8S xD7 wa id = g : poyeJOdoou =A VNSVTV'AVENOOSNOL quomdoroied Faeoogpue gee3 : A4yyunurur0og jo yueurjreda 6$u- = RdvuDdN Tan4d Wing AVG NOOSNOL erst jo ame tL BERS 3 NNkixgSa 5al=Oagao%@ z<ada.b=>°><=l>== -| O<Li.Olzarw]|"2)heme OM (Zs:¢1) 00/oc/so :alvd ONLLLOTd ASid3-O1F TOWN ONIMVEd OVOOLIY Toksook Bay,Alaska Bulk Fuel Upgrades Preliminary Design Report 2.NYC Tank Farm NYC operates a tank farm and dispensing station at the south end of the community,near the NYC Store,as shown on the Existing Facility Layout Plan. The tank farm consists of twelve BIA style tanks and three horizontal tanks.One vertical BIA style tank has been removed from the tank farm and is not in service due to leaks.The total shell capacity of the gasoline tanks is approximately 60,400 gallons and the total shell capacity of the fuel oil tanks is approximately 82,200 gallons. The gasoline and fuel oil tanks are connected with separate manifolds constructed of pipe and hose.The tanks sit in a secondary containment area constructed with sandbag dikes and lined with an impermeable membrane liner. Fuel is received through separate marine headers located at the tank farm and is pumped through the manifold hoses/piping to the selected receiving tank(s).The City,AVEC and LKSD Elementary School tank farm barge off-loading pipeline bisects the tank farm,however,it is not connected to the NYC tank farm.Fuel is dispensed to vehicles and containers through a fixed transfer pump located in a wooden shed adjacent to the tanks. The tanks were noted to be in poor condition,with scaling steel observed on the underside of the tank bottoms.The remainder of the tank farm equipment and piping is in poor condition. 3.LKSD Elementary School Tank Farm The LKSD provides elementary education at the old BIA school.The Elementary School is located near the AVEC Power Plant at the southern edge of the community (see the Existing Facility Layout Plan).The Elementary School buildings and adjacent teacher housing is supplied fuel oil from the Elementary School tank farm.This tank farm is shared with the AVEC Power Plant tanks. For the purpose of identifying individual entity fuel systems,this report will consider the Elementary School tanks separate from the AVEC tanks. Fuel is drawn from the Elementary School tanks into the back-up generator building by a fixed pump.The fuel is then pumped to six day tanks,which are located outside each buildings heating system. The tank farm consists of eight vertical cylindrical tanks,which are manifolded together.The total shell capacity of the tanks is approximately 53,400 gallons. The tanks are located inside a timber diked secondary containment area,which is lined with a membrane liner. LOMF Incorporated ee itanparth ik inupiat Corp ie Toksook Bay,Alaska Bulk Fuel Upgrades Preliminary Design Report Fuel is received at a marine header located on the shore of Kangirlvar Bay, roughly 300 feet from the NYC tank farm.The fuel is pumped through a common barge off-loading pipeline,which is used jointly with AVEC and the City,to the tank farm.The common barge off-loading pipeline bisects the NYC tank farm without connecting to it. The tanks were noted to be in fair condition.The distribution piping is in fair condition.The intermediate tanks appear to be in fair condition;however,several code deficiencies were noted on each tank. 4,LKSD High School Tank Farm The High School is located on the north side of the community.The High School draws fuel from an intermediate tank which is located on the west side of the building.The intermediate tank is supplied fuel from a bulk tank farm located to the west of the School (see the Existing Facility Layout Plan). The High School tank farm consists of six vertical cylindrical BIA style tanks, which are manifolded together.The total shell capacity of the tanks is approximately 35,900 gallons.The tanks are located inside a timber diked secondary containment area,which is lined with an impermeable membrane liner. Fuel is received at a header located at the edge of the containment area.Fuel is either delivered by hose run through the community,or by fuel truck brought in by the fuel barge.Fuel is distributed to the intermediate tank by gravity. The tanks appear to be in fair condition with some corrosion noted.The intermediate tank appears to be in good condition;however,several code deficiencies were noted. 5.AVEC Tank Farm The AVEC Power Plant provides electricity to the community.The Power Plant is located at the south end of the community,adjacent to the Elementary School and airport runway (see the Existing Facilities Layout Plan).The generators draw fuel from a day tank which is filled from the bulk tanks. The AVEC tank farm consists of eleven BIA style tanks.The total shell capacity of the tanks is approximately 102,300 gallons.The tanks are located in a timber diked secondary containment area shared with the Elementary School tanks, which is lined with an impermeable membrane liner.Fuel is drawn into a day tank inside the Power Plant using a fixed pump. LCMF Incorporated5iaryofUkpikInupiatCorp Toksook Bay,Alaska Bulk Fuel Upgrades Preliminary Design Report Fuel is received at a marine header located on the shore of Kangirlvar Bay, roughly 300 feet from the NYC tank farm.The fuel is pumped through a common barge off-loading pipeline,which is used jointly with Elementary School tank farm and the City,to the tank farm.The common barge off-loading pipeline bisects the NYC tank farm without connecting to it.The tanks appear to be in fair condition with some corrosion noted.The common barge off-loading pipeline is in fair condition. Cc.EXISTING TANK STORAGE CAPACITY SUMMARY The following table lists the existing total tank shell storage capacity for all of the tanks currently in use.The Usable capacity is calculated as 90%of the total shell capacity. Existing Tank Storage Capacity Tank Vert Size Diesel (Gal)Gasoline (Gal) No.Owner __Purpose /Hor LxWxH Total Usable Total Usable City 1 City Int H 8'dia x 23'8,600 7,700 2 City Bulk V 11'dia x 14'9.900 _8,900 City Sub-Total=18,500 16,600 NYC 1 NYC Bulk Vv 10°dia x 14 8,200 7,400 2 NYC Bulk Vv 10.5°diax 14'9,000 =8,100 3 NYC Bulk Vv 9.5'dia x 14'7,400 6,700 4 NYC Bulk Vv 10°dia x 14 8,200 7,400 5 NYC Bulk Vv 9.5'dia x 14'7,400 6,700 6 NYC Bulk Vv 10°dia x 14'8,200 7,400 7 NYC Bulk Vv 10'dia x 14'8,200 7,400 8 NYC Bulk H 8'diax 27.5'10,300 9,300 9 NYC Bulk H 10'dia x 26'15,300 13,700 9 NYC Bulk Vv 10.5'dia x 14'9,000 8,100 10 NYC Bulk Vv"9.5'dia x 14 7,400 6,700 11 NYC Bulk Vv 10°dia x 14'8,200 7,400 12 NYC Bulk Vv 11'dia x 14 9,900 8,900 13 NYC Bulk Vv 9'dia x 14 6,600 5,900 14 NYC Bulk Vv 10.5'dia x 14 9,000 8,100 15 NYC Bulk H 8'dia x 27.5”10,300 __9,300 NYC Sub-Total=82,200 74,100 60,400 54,400 6 bsidiary of Ukpeagvik Inupiat Corporation XLCOMFIncorporated(1)A nay Toksook Bay,Alaska Bulk Fuel Upgrades Preliminary Design Report Existing Tank Storage Capacity (continued) Tank Vert Size Diesel (Gal)Gasoline (Gal) No.Owner _Purpose __/Hor _LxWxH Total Usable Total _Usable LKSD Elementary School 1 LKSD Bulk Vv 9'dia x 14 6,600 5,900 2 LKSD Bulk Vv 8.5°dia x 14'5,900 5,300 3 LKSD Bulk V 7.5°dia x 14 4,600 4,100 4 LKSD Bulk Vv 9.5°dia x 14”7,400 6,700 5 LKSD Bulk Vv 10'dia x 14'8,200 7,400 6 LKSD Bulk Vv 9.5°dia x 14'7,400 6,700 7 LKSD Bulk Vv 9.5'dia x 14'7,400 6,700 8 LKSD Bulk V 8.5'dia x 14”5,900 _5.300 LKSD Elementary School Sub-Total=53,400 48,100 LKSD High School 1 LKSD Bulk Vv 9'dia x 14'6,600 5,900 2 LKSD Bulk Vv 8.5'dia x 14'5,900 5,300 3 LKSD Bulk Vv 8'dia x 14 5,200 4,700 4 LKSD Bulk Vv 8°dia x 14'5,200 4,700 5 LKSD Bulk Vv 8.5'°dia x 14'5,900 5,300 6 LKSD _Bulk Vv 9'dia x 14'6,600 5,900 7 LKSD ____Int H 48”dia x 6”500 500 LKSD High School Sub-Total=35,900 32,300 AVEC 1 AVEC Bulk Vv 11'diax 13.2'9,300 =.8,400 2 AVEC Bulk Vv 11'diax 13.8'9,800 8,800 3 AVEC Bulk Vv 10.5'dia x 13.2'8,500 7,700 4 AVEC Bulk Vv 11'diax 13.8'9,800 8,800 5 AVEC Bulk Vv 11'diax 13.2?9,300 8,400 6 AVEC Bulk Vv 10.5'dia x 13.8'8,900 8,000 7 AVEC Bulk Vv 11'diax 13.2?9,300 =8,400 8 AVEC Bulk Vv 10.5'dia x 13.8'8,900 8,000 9 AVEC _Bulk Vv 11'diax 13.8'9,800 8,800 10 AVEC Bulk Vv 10.5'dia x 13.8'8,900 8,000 1 AVEC _Bulk Vv 11'dia x 13.8'9,800 ___8,800 AVEC Sub-Total=102,300 92,100 GRAND TOTAL==292,300 263,200 60,400 54,400 LCOMF Incorporated "nerdiony oft ik Inupiat Corp ie Toksook Bay,Alaska Bulk Fuel Upgrades Preliminary Design Report D.CURRENT FUEL USE Annual fuel consumption data was gathered for each facility,where available.Three or more years of fuel consumption data was requested in order to identify a trend,or average use.Where consumption data was not available,fuel purchase information was requested.At least three years of purchase quantities was requested in order to address both fuel use trends and to address over/under ordering.See Appendix A for fuel record information gathered for these facilities. The fuel consumption and/or purchase data may not completely identify each facility's actual consumption.In some cases,a facility may purchase fuel from another when they run out,therefore,the facility which sells the fuel may show higher use than actually required,while others may not adequately identify the amount of fuel used.Some fuel sharing has occurred in Toksook Bay,however,it is our understanding that these quantities of fuel have only been 1,000 or 2,000 gallons a year,just enough to get by with.Given these smaller quantities,no adjustment should be required to the annual fuel consumption records. Another factor to be considered when determining fuel use is rationing at retail facilities when fuel quantities run low.Obviously,rationing curtails sales and does not accurately reflect the village fuel demands.While difficult to quantify,rationing is estimated to offset 1,000 -2,000 gallons of gasoline sales annually.Heating oil rationing is understood to not have occurred due to inter-facility purchases as noted above. Fuel use information was provided for the City,LKSD facilities and for the AVEC Power Plant.An estimated consumption of 8,000 gallons per year was provided by the Water Plant operator for the Water Plant,which is roughly the average consumption shown in the fuel purchase data.No NYC fuel consumption information has been provided and only an estimate of their fuel consumption has been used. Based on the issues identified above,the estimated current annual fuel consumption for the community is as follows: Estimated Current Annual Fuel Consumption Fuel Oil Use Gasoline Use Facility (gallons)(gallons) City Water Plant Tank Farm 8,000 NYC Tank Farm 64,700*55,200* LKSD Teacher Housing Tank Farm 16,600 LKSD School Tank Farm 17,200 AVEC Tank Farm 98,600 205,100 55,200 *Estimated winter consumption. LOMF Incorporated8AsubsidiaryofUkpeagvikInuplatCorporation Toksook Bay,Alaska Bulk Fuel Upgrades Preliminary Design Report E.PROJECTED FUTURE FUEL USE The community of Toksook Bay appears to be experiencing a slow steady increase in fuel oil and gasoline consumption due to general community growth.In addition,there are several projects in the planning phase which may impact the future fuel consumption. These projects include the potential construction of a new Sub-Regional Clinic and the construction of a Vocational Education facility.Further,continued housing construction is anticipated with seven new houses this coming year and three or four,each following year. The City Water Plant fuel consumption is primarily controlled by the building heating system use.The amount of fuel required to heat the potable water is a variable which fluctuates with demand,however,it is understood to be a small portion of the facility's overall fuel consumption.The past records for fuel purchased for the Water Plant show 10,100 gallons was purchased in 1997,5,000 gallons in 1998 and 6,500 gallons in 1999. It is unknown why the 1997 fuel order was higher,but in talking with Richard Curtis,the Water Plant Operator,he anticipated a drop in fuel consumption due to a recent building insulation upgrade project.Mr.Curtis anticipates that the facility will only require around 8,000 gallons of fuel per year.In order to cover increase water demands with new housing and facilities,a 1.5%annual increase in consumption can be applied over the life span of the facility (20 years for this reports purposes).The resulting increased fuel demand is 10,800 gallons. Records for past fuel purchases,and past consumption,were not available for the NYC retail sales.Given this lack of historical increases in consumption,it is not possible to project future growth without using an assumed growth rate.For the purpose of this report,a projected 1.5%annual growth rate is used for gasoline and fuel oil consumption. The resulting total growth,over a 20 year projected design life for the facility,is roughly 35%over the current use. Future fuel consumption for the LKSD facilities is anticipated to remain constant for the near future,however,given a general growth trend for the community it is anticipated that at some point in the future the school and/or teacher housing will be added onto.For planning purposes,the 35%increase identified above for the NYC facility should be applied to the new facility. The AVEC Power Plant fuel consumption records for the past three years do not provide a clear trend.With consumption in 1999 matching 1997 use while the 1998 consumption was 5,000 gallons higher,it appears that the fluctuation may be weather related,not growth related.Given the increase in housing and possible new facilities,the electrical demand will increase,however the amount of growth is unknown.AVEC has identified a Power Requirement Study,prepared in 1996,which presents a growth rate of approximately 1.5%/year,which results in a 35%increase over current use over 20 years. LCOMF Incorporated9AsubsidiaryofUkpeagvikInupiatCorporation Toksook Bay,Alaska Bulk Fuel Upgrades Preliminary Design Report If the power demand were to increase at a greater rate than anticipated above,other means could be implemented to reduce the fuel demand.The installation of more fuel efficient generators or wind generators are two potential options. Considering the factors outlined above,the resulting projected future fuel storage requirements are identified in the following chart. Projected Future Fuel Storage Requirements Future Annual Future Annual Fuel Oil Demand Gasoline Demand Facility (gallons)(gallons) City Water Plant 10,800 NYC Tank Farm 87,400*74,600* LKSD Facilities 45,600 AVEC Tank Farm 133,100 Total 276,900 74,600 *Based on estimated current consumption with a 35%increase. II.PROPOSED NEW FACILITY The proposed new fuel facility is to be a consolidated bulk tank farm,which will include bulk fuel storage for NYC,LSKD,and AVEC.The City Water Plant is to remain separate from the new tank farm since the facility's fuel can be stored in one code compliant tank at the Water Plant.The new consolidated tank farm will include retail dispensing for NYC fuel and distribution systems to the both LKSD facilities and to the AVEC Power Plant.New intermediate tanks are to be installed at the High School and Elementary School,while the existing 8,000 gallon Water Plant tank is to be used as an intermediate tank at the Power Plant. A.SITE SELECTION The community has identified the south end of the village for the location of the new consolidated tank farm.The area is separated from the residential portions of the village and is close to all of the fuel users,with the exception of the High School.Two potential tank farm sites have been selected in this area.The site initially identified by the community and AVEC,(Alternative A)is located adjacent to the existing AVEC/LKSD tank farm.A second site (Alternative B),located behind the NYC Store was also identified since it is a flatter site and may be less expensive to build upon.See the Site Selection Summary in Appendix B for more information regarding site selection issues and the Conceptual Project Layout Plans in Appendix F for site locations.(Note:An additional site at the Armory was reviewed after the Site Selection Summary letter was completed,however,the site lacked adequate space for construction of both the tank farm and dispensing station,so it was not pursued further.) LCMF Incorporated (K.)Amb:quay10diaryofUkpeagvikInupiatCorporation Toksook Bay,Alaska Bulk Fuel Upgrades Preliminary Design Report Alternative Site A is located on a portion of the Airport Road Right-of-Way and Tract 9 of US Survey No.5024.The Right-of-Way is community property,owned by the City of Toksook Bay and Tract 9 is also owned by the City,as identified in a review of the Bethel Recording District files,summarized in the Certificate to Plat contained in Appendix C. Alternative Site B is located entirely on Tract 9 of US Survey No.5024.As stated above, Tract 9 is owned by the City of Toksook Bay. Both proposed sites are at least partially located on Tract 9 of US Survey No.5024, which is a relatively large tract of land.In order to obtain site control for the project,the tank farm sites should be subdivided from this tract.In addition,the portions of the Right-of-Way to be used for the new tank farm site at Alternate Site A should be vacated and platted together with the subdivided portion of Tract 9.The resulting tank farm property would have to be sized to allow for the UFC setbacks and separations between the tanks and adjacent property.The barge off-loading and distribution pipelines are routed in the existing road Right-of-Ways,with the exception of some piping for Alternate A which lies on the Elementary School property.Easements may be required for these pipelines. B.SOIL CONDITIONS A review of the existing geotechnical information around the community,prepared by Duane Miller &Associates for this report (see Appendix D),indicates that the soil conditions in the community vary from bedrock outcroppings to ice rich clay overburden. The proposed tank farm sites are not located on rock outcroppings,instead both sites are covered with tundra and grasses.It is assumed that the soil conditions in the vicinity of both tank farm sites consist of bedrock overlain with varying depths of marginally frozen, ice rich clay and organics. A complete geotechnical investigation should be performed prior to the completion of the tank farm design to verify the actual site conditions and design assumptions. C.COMMUNITY FLOOD DATA The US Army Corps of Engineers -Flood Plain Management Services ALASKAN COMMUNITIES FLOOD HAZARD DATA June 2000 publication indicates the sites are not subject to flooding (see Appendix E). The 1997 USDA/RD Survey indicates that some of the roads and boardwalks in the community conflict with drainage paths and result in damage during break-up.The design of the new facilities shall consider drainage issues. LCMF Incorporated (LL)A subsidiary of Ukp wane11igvikinupiatCorp Toksook Bay,Alaska Bulk Fuel Upgrades Preliminary Design Report D.LOCAL FILL MATERIAL A material source is located to the south of the community,near the old cemetery.The material is comprised of degraded sandstone and silty overburden,which would be suitable for construction of the core of the new tank farm pads,but not driving surfaces. Surfacing material has been extracted from the beach in front of the community in the past.A 1974 evaluation by the Sate of Alaska Department of Transportation found the beach gravel suitable for a limited life runway surfacing material.This material was believed to have a useful life of 5 -10 years on a runway before replacement would be required.This material should be suitable for use in driving areas,with possible replacement/supplementing required in 10 years. The availability of the beach material is questionable.In 1974 it was estimated that roughly 6,400 cy's was available,spread along the beach in 1-2 foot depths.Since then the material has been used on the runway and other projects.The volume of remaining material will have to be quantified prior to construction. Another potential surfacing material source has been identified to the northeast of the community.The source was identified for the future airport replacement project.The availability of material from the alternate source is dependent upon the construction schedule of the new airport.It does not appear feasible to open the borrow area for this project unless the airport project participates. The local material sources listed above are located on either NYC lands or State of Alaska property (beach material below Mean High Water).A royalty may be required for use of these materials.For planning purposes,a $2/cy royalty is assumed. E.TANK FARM FOUNDATION As stated above,both tank farm sites appears to be located on marginal,or degraded,ice rich permafrost.Until more geotechnical data can be gathered,it is assumed that both sites are frozen and must remain frozen to prevent thaw settlement. In order to maintain frozen soil conditions,the tank farm foundations for both sites will require the installation of rigid insulation and thermal siphons.The minimum fill pad depth should be 2'-8”beneath 4”of rigid insulation.The thermal siphons will be installed at 15'spacing.See the Conceptual Design Drawings contained in Appendix F. Both sites slope to the south,with grades at Alternative Site A around 10%and at Alternate B around 4%.As a result,the tank farm pads will have deep fills on the downhill sides.The maximum depth of the fill at Alternate Site A will be roughly 16 feet deep,while Alternate Site B will have a maximum fill depth of roughly 12 feet. LOMF Incorporated12AsubsidiaryofUkpeagvikInupiatCorporation Toksook Bay,Alaska Bulk Fuel Upgrades Preliminary Design Report F.SECONDARY CONTAINMENT Due to the slopes at both sites,the amount of fill material required for the tank farm foundation pads are significantly affected by the surface area of the tank farm.Therefore, in order to decrease the tank farm surface area,timber dikes lined with an impermeable membrane liner should be used.See the Conceptual Design Drawings in Appendix F for additional details. The secondary containment area must be designed to contain the volume of the largest tank in the containment area,with additional capacity to address the displaced volume from other tanks in the containment area and to provide sufficient freeboard (6” minimum)to allow for snow and precipitation accumulation. In consideration of the different fuel user's responsibilities and liabilities,each fuel user's tank will be located in separate secondary containment cells.This will limit the impact of a spill in the tank farm to the responsible party's separate containment area,and not affect the other fuel systems. G.TANKS The existing NYC tanks were found to have significant corrosion and it is anticipated that the other tanks may have similar corrosion.While the extent of the corrosion has not been quantified,past experience indicates that the presence of scaling steel on a tank requires major repairs or replacement.In addition to the poor condition of the tanks,the refurbishing of many smaller BIA style tanks to bring them into code compliance is not cost effective when compared to installing fewer,larger new tanks.The use of new, larger tanks also decreases the tank farm pad size,which results in a savings in material and hauling/placing costs. The proposed tank farm has been designed around reusing the nearly new NYC 15,000- gallon horizontal tank and installing new 23,000-gallon vertical tanks for bulk storage. The 23,000-gallon tanks have a net storage capacity of roughly 21,400 gallons.(Note: The net storage capacity is determined as 90%of the tank's shell capacity.Use of net capacity accounts for the unusable portion of the tank,including ullage left at the top of the tank for thermal expansion and the amount of fuel below the issue nozzle,which cannot be withdrawn through the fixed pumping system.)The tank size was determined based on shipping restrictions (15-foot diameter being at the upper limit of the allowable sized tank possible to be shipped without special handling costs)and the tank anchorage requirements due to wind/seismic loading. As shown on the Conceptual Design Drawings,the proposed facility will incorporate seven new 23,00-gallon tanks for NYC's fuel storage (4 for fuel oil and 3 for gasoline), two new 23,000-gallon tanks for the LKSD facilities,and six new 23,000-gallon tanks for AVEC's fuel storage. LCOMF Incorporated13AsubsidiaryofUkpeagvikInupiatCorporation Toksook Bay,Alaska Bulk Fuel Upgrades Preliminary Design Report In addition to the bulk storage tanks,the proposed design includes a new 3,000-gallon fuel oil/gasoline dispensing tank for dispensing fuel to motor vehicles,one new 12,000- gallon double walled tank for the Water Plant,one new 4,000-gallon double walled tank for the High School,and one new 4,000-gallon double walled tank for the Elementary School.The Power Plant will use the existing 8,000 gallon double walled tank from the Water Plant for an intermediate tank. A summary of the proposed fuel storage capacities (including the bulk storage tanks, dispensing tank and new intermediate tanks,as shown in the Conceptual Design Drawings),is as follows: Proposed Fuel Storage Capacities Tank Vert Size Diesel (Gal)Gasoline (Gal) No.Owner Purpose /Hor LxWxH Total Usable Total Usable City |City Bulk H 10'diax20.5'__12,000__10.800 City Sub-Total=12,000 10,800 NYC 1 NYC Bulk Vv 15'diax 18'=23,800 =21,4002NYCBulkVv15'diax 18'=.23,800 +=21,4003NYCBulkVv15'diax 18'=.23,800 21,4004NYCBulkVv15'diax 18'=.23,800 =21,4005NYCBulkVv15°dia x 18°23,800 21,400 6 NYC Bulk Vv 15'dia x 18°23,800 21,400 7 NYC Bulk Vv 15'dia x 18°23,800 21,400 8 NYC Bulk H 10'dia x 26'15,300 13,800 9 NYC Disp H 67°dia x 17'1500 1.400 1,500 1.400 NYC Sub-Total=96,700 87,000 88,200 79,400 LKSD 1 LKSD Bulk Vv 1S'diax 18'=23,800 =21,400 2 LKSD Bulk Vv 15'diax 18'=23,800 §=21,400 3 LKSD Int H 76”dia x 17°4,000 3,600 4 LKSD___Int H 76”"dia x 17°4,000 __3.600 LKSD Sub-Total=55,600 50,000 LOMF Incorporated14AsubsidiaryofUkpeagvikInupiatCorporation aN Toksook Bay,Alaska Bulk Fuel Upgrades Preliminary Design Report Proposed Fuel Storage Capacities (continued) Tank Vert Size Diesel (Gal)Gasoline (Gal) No.Owner _Purpose /Hor _LxWxH Total Usable Total _Usable AVEC 1 AVEC Bulk Vv 15'dia x 18'23,800 21,400 2 AVEC Bulk Vv 15'dia x 18'23,800 21,400 3 AVEC Bulk Vv 15'dia x 18'23,800 21,400 4 AVEC Bulk Vv 15'dia x 18'23,800 21,400 5 AVEC Bulk Vv 15'dia x 18'23,800 21,400 6 AVEC Bulk Vv 15'dia x 18'23,800 21,400 7 AVEC _Int H 8'dia x 23'8.600 _7,700 AVEC SUB-TOTAL =151,400 136,100 GRAND TOTAL =315,700 283,900 88,200 79,400 Note:Usable capacity equals 90%of total tank shell capacity. The total gross capacity for the entire project is approximately 403,900 gallons.The total amount of fuel which will be stored in the consolidated tank farm will be approximately 375,300 gallons,with 16,600 gallons additional capacity in the AVEC and LKSD intermediate tanks and 12,000 gallons in the City Water Plant tank. The existing tanks,which are not to be reused,shall either be demolished and disposed of,or salvaged and removed from the community. H.FUEL DISTRIBUTION The new bulk tank farm will include fuel storage for retail dispensing,power generation and facility heating.The proposed design includes providing retail dispensing at the tank farm,while fuel for the High School,Elementary School and Power Plant will be distributed to the respective user facilities through permanent pipelines.Fuel for the Water Plant will be delivered directly to the Water Plant tank from the barge. 1.Retail Dispensing The NYC fuel is intended to be distributed for retail sale.Retail sales include both container filling and motor vehicle filling.In order to meet the State regulations for dispensing fuel from above ground tanks to motor vehicles,an approved dispensing tank and dispensing station must be installed.The dispensing station must include the use of a protected tank (2-hour fire rating)and a gas station style dispenser.Dispensing to containers can be performed at a motor vehicle dispenser,if approved containers are used. &))LCOMF Incorporated15AsubsidiaryofUkpeagvikInupiatCorporation Toksook Bay,Alaska Bulk Fuel Upgrades Preliminary Design Report 2.LKSD High School and Elementary School The LKSD fuel distribution system will feed two intermediate tanks (one near the High School and one near the Elementary School).The existing Elementary School and out-building fuel tanks are to be filled from the new intermediate tank through the existing distribution system.The intermediate tanks will be filled using a new transfer pump,located at the tank farm,and new pipelines.Fuel transfers will be manually controlled with a timer,however,the pump control panel will incorporate interlocking controls to direct fuel to the appropriate intermediate tank.The intermediate tanks will be equipped with the following appurtenances: float actuated fill limiting valve; high level pump shut-off switch; critical high level alarm; liquid level gauge;and whistle vent. All new distribution piping shall be constructed using Schedule 80,welded steel pipe with suitable low temperature properties.Some sections of the High School distribution pipeline will have to be buried to avoid potential vehicle damage. The buried sections will be coated and cathodically protected.See the Conceptual Design Drawings in Appendix F for pipeline routing. 3.AVEC Power Plant The Power Plant fuel distribution system will include a new transfer pump and pipeline to transfer fuel from the bulk tank farm to the relocated 8,000 gallon double walled intermediate tank located adjacent to the Power Plant.Fuel transfers will be manually controlled with a timer;however,the transfer system will incorporate redundant overfilling prevention measures.These measures include the installation of the following equipment on the intermediate tank: float actuated fill limiting valve; high level pump shut-off switch; critical high level alarm; liquid level gauge;and whistle vent. The Power Plant fuel distribution pipeline will be constructed using new Schedule 80 welded steel pipe with suitable low temperature properties.See the Conceptual Design Drawings in Appendix F for pipeline routing. 16 LOMF Incorporated (ayAsubsidiaryofUkpeagvikInupiatCorporation\eS, Toksook Bay,Alaska Bulk Fuel Upgrades Preliminary Design Report 4,City Water Plant An automatic day tank inside the water plant will automatically draw fuel from the new 12,000 gallon tank.No other fuel transfers will be required. I.OWNERSHIP AND OPERATION The proposed consolidated tank farm is designed to maintain both physical and legal separation between the three different entities (NYC,LKSD and AVEC).Each entity's fuel tanks are isolated in their own secondary containment cell and the fuel systems are isolated from one another.It is assumed that each owner will maintain their separate operation and maintenance. J.SPILL RESPONSE REGULATORY PLANS The new consolidated tank farm will require an EPA Facility Response Plan (required for all tank farms with more than 42,000 gallon capacity filled from a vessel),an EPA Spill Prevention Control and Contingency (SPCC)Plan,a US Coast Guard Oil Spill Response Plan,and a US Coast Guard Operations Manual.The consolidated tank farm does not require a State of Alaska Oil Discharge Prevention and Contingency Plan since none of the individual operators,or the entire tank farm,has more than 420,000 gallons of storage capacity. The Water Plant tank will have to have an SPCC Plan and the US Coast Guard Operations Manual and Oil Spill Response Plan,however,the EPA Facility Response Plan is not required since the facility has a storage capacity of less than 42,000 gallons. The facility also does not require a C-Plan since it has less than 420,000 gallons of storage capacity. Regulatory Plan Implementation Schedule: e The EPA Facility Response Plan must be submitted prior to receiving fuel; The EPA SPCC Plan must be in place within 6 months of facility start-up;e e The US Coast Guard Operations Manual and Oil Spill Response Plan must be submitted,and approved,with a Letter of Intent to Operate,prior to receiving fuel. The regulatory plans identified above can be consolidated into one of each f for the entire facility,or separately for each operator. K.PERMITTING Typical permitting requirements for a new tank farm and fuel distribution systems, include submittal of the construction documents to the State Fire Marshal for review and approval and obtaining a US Army permit to place fill on wetlands. 7 LOMF Incorporated @)A subsidiaryofUkpeagvik Inupiat Corporation ESS, Toksook Bay,Alaska Bulk Fuel Upgrades Preliminary Design Report L. 1.Fire Marshal Review The construction of the new tank farm and fuel distribution systems will require submittal of a complete set of construction documents to the State of Alaska, Department of Public Safety,Division of Fire Prevention (Fire Marshal)for plan review and approval.Typical review periods range from 2 -3 weeks. 2.US Army Wetlands Permit The vegetation at the two tank farm sites appear to meet the criteria to be considered wetlands by the US Army Corps of Engineers.The US Army Corps of Engineers is in charge of reviewing applications and issuing permits for the placement of fill in wetlands.Specific provisions have been established as a General Permit to address the construction of tank farms in rural Alaska.As a result,facilities,which meet the requirements of the General Permit,can take advantage of an expedited review process,which reduces the review period from approximately 90-120 days down to 15-30 days.The new consolidated tank farm will meet the criteria for consideration under the General Permit guidelines. CONSTRUCTION Construction of the new fuel facility is to be conducted using Force Account methods. Under qualified management,this construction method has traditionally produced cost effective results,fast construction schedules and increased local hire. When working on a Force Account basis,the project typically hires a qualified superintendent and local labor where available.Additional personnel may need to be brought in to supplement the local labor force for specialty trades,such as electricians. Traditionally,Force Account projects have enlisted the use of local equipment where available.Where the local equipment use cannot be donated to the project,equipment rental rates are negotiated or traded off for equipment repair. 1.Local labor NYC was questioned about the local available labor force.They indicated that no formal list was available which identified personnel and skills. 2.Local Equipment There is limited amount of running construction equipment in the community. The City owns two bulldozers,one John Deere 450 with a backhoe attachment and one John Deere 450 with a bucket.The City also owns a Ford 5 cy dump truck.This equipment is in good condition.Rental rates were not available for LOMF Incorporated A idiary of Uk,ik Inupiat Corp i18 this report and will have to be negotiated with the City. ey Toksook Bay,Alaska Bulk Fuel Upgrades Preliminary Design Report M.SCHEDULE Construction of the consolidated tank farm at either Alternate Site A or B will require two construction seasons to complete.The first season will include the construction of the fill pads and installation of the thermal siphons.The pads will then sit through the fall/winter to allow for settlement and consolidation of the fill and to allow for freeze- back of the tundra prior to construction of the tank farm. Since construction at either site will follow a similar timeline,the following schedule has been developed for construction at site A.The only difference for Alternate Site B is that it is estimated to require one month less for earthwork construction in 2001. The following schedule details the estimated construction schedule for development of Alternate Site A.Subtract one month from the 2001 construction period for Alternative Site B.The schedule is based on a calendar days. Construction Schedule -2001 Schedule 2000 Task Name Days Start Finish June July August September October Year t 92d =61/00 8/31/00 Mobilization 1d 6/1/00 6/1/00 Construct Tank Farm Pad,93d 6/15/00 9/15/00 SeyDispensingAreaandAccess Equipment 144d 6/1100 10/31/00 Loader 422d 6/1/00 9/30/00 Dump Truck 122d 6/1/00 9/30/00 10 CY Dump Truck 144d 6/1/00 - --10/31/00 Skid Steer 122d 6800 --9/30/00 Dozer 122d 6/1/00 9/30/00 i9 LCMF Incorporated aAsubsidiaryofUkpeagvikInupiatCorporationSE, Toksook Bay,Alaska Bulk Fuel Upgrades Preliminary Design Report Construction Schedule -2002 Schedule Task Name Days Start Finish June ae July August September Year2 50d 6/8/01 8/15/01 Build Tank Farm Containment System 17d 6/7101 6/30/01 =a|Install New Tanks/Refurbish Existing '233d THA ©7131101 |ann | Buiid Fuel Distribution Systems 35d 7A 6/01 8/31/01 | Demolish Old Tank Farms 12d 881/01 9/5/01 = Receive Fuel in New Tank Farm 1d 9/15/01 9/15/01 + Demob 1d 9/15/01 9/15/01 rs Equipment 83d 6/8/01 --9/30/01 Loader _83d 6/8/01 3001 | Skid Steer B3d -6/8/01.--«9/30/0t a ee Dozer 83d 6/8/01 9/30/01 || if i Note:The proposed schedule is very dependent upon many inter-related factors,such as project start time,material availability and weather.If any of these items creates a delay, the project may run into the following season,which will increase the construction costs. In order to address this potential delay,and increased cost,and a 20%construction contingency should be used in cost estimating for the project. N.BUDGET COST ESTIMATE Budget Cost Estimates have been prepared for construction at both alternative sites (see Appendix G for the complete detailed estimates).The estimates were developed based on historical Force Account construction costs for recent tank farm projects in southwest Alaska.Local fill material royalty costs are estimated at $2/cy.Equipment rental rates are based on historical rental rates for similar equipment.This cost estimate includes construction costs with a 20%contingency,project insurance,property and easement designation,design,construction management and a grant audit. 1.Alternate Site A The Budget Cost Estimate for Alternate A is approximately $2,907,559.The construction budget sub-total is roughly $2,658,559. The resulting total project cost per gallon is $7.20/gallon based on 403,900 gallons of total shell capacity (tank farm plus the new and _refurbished intermediate tanks). 0 LOMF Incorporated A idiary of Ukp ik Inupiat Corp: Toksook Bay,Alaska Bulk Fuel Upgrades Preliminary Design Report A breakdown of each entity's portion of the construction cost,based on gallons of storage capacity,is as follows: City Water Plant $79,770 NYC $1,337,862 LKSD $420,107 AVEC $1,069,821 2.Alternate Site B The Budget Cost Estimate for Alternative B is approximately $2,732,181.The construction budget sub-total is roughly $2,483,181. The resulting total project cost per gallon is $6.76/gallon based on 403,900 gallons of total shell capacity (tank farm plus the new and refurbished intermediate tanks). A breakdown of each entity's portion of the construction cost,based on gallons of storage capacity,is as follows: Water Plant $79,257 NYC $1,247,807 LKSD $399,141 AVEC $1,005,975 a1 LOMF Incorporated (L.\A subsidiary of Ukpeagvik Inupiat Corporation %&yRenee” APPENDIX A FUEL RECORD INFORMATION ne neg Oe TRV al Ra cele ak RS Dn ih On All I Ee okareerreteIFanal:. .'mf ig MRvmeneifeete e's Ia 6-11-99 512:45PM%s 4f -CALISTA CORP.+!42775113#1/3 me get pore ™VE |Fuels &Transportation:re " 'ay 01 Calista Court,SuiteA Be a ,°Nvoice[ae Anbhorage,AK 99518 oy 1,i mo,. "my A Customer No.:6-100180'i °| Invoice No;20 .La : l=sBill To:CITY OF TOOKSOOK BAY .Ship To:CITY OF TOOK800K BAY PO BOX 37008 ,oo,PO BOX 37008 . :TOKSOOK BAY,AK 99837 TOKSOOK BAY,AK 99837 f++"Date -_=Ship Via a F 'iatt.9%Tonng°Bocce.Ll Gace 08/11/898"Quantily +a br pe oe eengcaunedTEshpat+BOF za te et cee tl gl 22 Unit Price =a tS Amount 4999 4999 FUELOOl BULK FUEL HEATING OIL Z " 4,0895 -5446.41 _Invoice subtotal 5448.44 i .Invoice total .5446.41 PAYMENT IS DUE 15 DAYS AFTER INVOICE DATE.___ m _ Ls Postit™Fax Note 7671 [8 G/in/49 [putes -:Te ehes LC fe EetegT 7 Cole Ck)of Toleomh|WAVE ets a Phone #74 44)97-7613 [Pets DIF-S51he x4 39FaX®(107)Y27-791 Pt a2t -S895 WAVE WHOLESALE COMPANY 9401 King Street Anchorage,AK 99515 Phonei (907)349-3101 »Fax (907}349-3104AhbiPholesaleCompat/ _|"7908 City of Toksook bay "SHB VEE RUGCrowleyMarkimeSenices" *INVOICE * Invoice Number: Invoice Date: Due Date: Ship To:7908 City of Toksook bay G30193 10/22/98 .11/5/98 Pe red shipDate:osree/as 'titem Description «::f in:'Gallons awie | bed '3 4 |[Bulk Heating FuelT6587 7,035.66 *eememecepFal i 'nd ol me |Spee ee I.: Pre-Finance Total ; Fiiiance!charges a eee oie "025 per gallon .tefoe..a mo .: FOTAL INVOICE of see 8 os oha io , '('IF INVOICE PAIDBY[ CONTACT WAVE |wit.i:i:: -;PLEASE PAY FUEL INVOICES ON SEPARATE CHECKS.fn 0CLEARLYMARKTHATCHECKisINPAYMENTOFFUELCHARGES.5 Ca het oy "t fs .3 eotee . "0.00; ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE FOR PAYMENT SCHEDULING PRIOR TO DUE DATE.'DUE DATE;PAY:PRE-FINANCE TOTAL:IF FINANCING IS PREFERRED,'PLEASE.:° 0,00 163.93 i. yo 7,199.59° 7,183.59, [,{toom STYSTIOHM FA¥s potestezoB Y¥A FI-cTt ART ORSITILNT -€CROWLEY MARINESERVICES,INC.Invoice Number:|G29265 PLEASE SEND INQUIRIES TO:1 Post Office Box 2287,Seattle,WA 98111 .Booking Number:7919(206)443-8100 1-800-248-8632 Store:SEAPLEASEMAILREMITTANCETO:CVIF:1589539-01PostOfficeBox841371,Dallas,Texas 75284-1371 CREDITDateIssued:10/13/97 .._Sale Type:--"PONo.:7"oe City of Toksook Bay Fed.Registration: -Gen Del ./.+State QD: fh.'Toksook Bay”AK 99637-"TERMS:Net cash on receipt of goods|Deliverto:i oatlesofaeort BY ”"(Cort "tvoresDes Vester”16 ?«Bp S09 n ey2§/97 aX wdMMDackageAS"oie”"Fea Sta L Price Total F S Voy otHF es ie.000°dypod L(er on 212.60 NC;8 ieweYSiesos-es esJeXS48gO”&=JO”<&ssAO”&ryosOm Quantitytotal 10133 Subtotal $16,212.80 Local Tax0 00%|$0.00 TOTAL 16;21serene©ieee BILE\OSangins x|ow.mien aays7Pe sa actinEgoEessaoeene'ouE,5 OVEIEERS 997 MS ;<UfTeLS2)Ging SP ie edoeh «ss oOGSgs"sO S SoeRAULCHI,rag,127 Seta 2S oo S&«Ss RieGeenreJoereFe,Si&:eGJS.se JO"eC.ee Le CIN VOICE|ors in price,extension and Terms and Conditions on reverse side are baton subject to correction.;Incorporated and made part hereof. LU;NUV US°YY Bsob NO.UUZ F.UL gee )|LOWERoNKUSKOKWIM SCHOOL DISTRICT ;BUSINESS OFFICE|P.O.BOX 308,BETHEL,AK.99559-0305 _Ph:907-543-4821;FAX:907-543-4908 S|wiley wil hein |als/e _ Ompany:|e L CW iC Ine rom:J WA Aff= |Telephone: | .Fax:273 -(58 { [Eel Gyan Pr]Swe , U Comments: ay __.i - |-_-aewe POFYTReceived Time Nov.5.8:08AM =8 each ACE Tank Brand BIA style tanks total capacity of 49,926 gallons,Tanks vary in LU: Toksook Bay Elementary Consumption FY 95 13,099 gallons FY 96 12,246 gallonsFY9713,736 gallons FY $8 11,572 gallons FY 99 16,550 gallons .Tankage ) size from 3,624 to 6,480 gallons, 6 each ACE Tank Brand BIA style tanks total capacity of 35,010 gallons.Tanks vary in Toksock Bay High School Consumption. FY 95 46,155 gallons FY 96 14,812 gallons 'FY 97 |15,171 gallons FY 98 17,160 gallons FY 99 15,785 galions Tankage size from 5,130 to 6,600 gallons. Received Time Nov.5.8:08AM NUV US"Ys Seor WO.UUZ F.US PAGE3AVECKEYACCOUNTS42PM..JUL-20-00THU01TITLE:ANNUAL POWER GENERATION REPORT ALASKA VILLAGE ELECTRIC CO-CP RUN DATE:4/20/60 @ 14:38:06 FOR THE YEAR EXDING:12/1999 VIUAGE #GROSS PEAK AG STATION RELOIL CR YR cYKH GAR LINE 1055 UNIT HOURS LVS "Tt oa HID KHED POER Use EFFEC.NET KH SOLD XXH/GAL KH SCT 4 2 3 4 5 6 70 STEBBINS 0171999 «t)«(126077 |293.00 169 29 9923}12.70 [1230283 f 128536]12.93 SHS |4.31%)488 Fas 169 02/1999_}276,00 163 a9 856 |12,63 | IOTIer.992 111,62 7ES-|__7.32-%631 4t 82 O31999 11 436726 6.00 157 Fane)$167]12.75 |1158cb |W497 |12.46 D.3s tF 6S ry")1804/1999 11 404657 |259.00 145 8122 |_12,89 |102375 97816 |12,04 £559-]445-4]428 7 295TBITTBIST26.00 Tao [282 6798 |13.11 86790 S691 |12.34 Oo-] 3,57-%6 730 06/1999 1|71554]_'181.00 9 2565 S685 |_12,59 6898S T2200 _|12.70 3215 $4.66%4 2 7% ---BTS99«TY 1530.00 if P27)$700 |13.31 THAT 75603 |33.50 ro.Te Fa]735, CB/1999_1 233,00 122 2683 7699 |_11,82 88297 B12 |10.55 7O1-|8.08%]432 228 BA AO191105168"el Sits |12.95}102208 RAST 12.15 37S S.0-%1 50 3 ps40/1999 4]118802 J 259.00 $60 3004 9627}42.3%}115708 §10088 1 10.48 1482]12.81-%]56D 135 ZB 1373999 4)325006 |205,00 174 2654 5a55 [12.64 |102392|«TSF FP 12.53 7 |«ae al 3a7 335 F<)A12/4997__1|_§29011 |-253,00 Ws 2504,wi79 |12.67 |1K7 |130863 |12.84 4156]3.29%]657 fe 233 TOVILIAGE TOTALS->]1262656 |295.00]146]31656.|HSS]12.69}1280800]1206510]IAT]2420-]1.97-%]4826 |.HOES |3567 |]}] *©TIEUINE VILLAGES LEGEND FOR LAST COLLM=«EE =VILLAGEKH]ESTIPATE =A =ADUUSTYENTSTOKitSOLD QSOFOFl-1425 GIS OF QOLT-0 10 TOGIAK 02/1999 tt 226753]483.00 302 49%WAT}13.87 |219817 |21883 |13.48 13%]0.61-%Fs]32 71902/1999 1{214774 |485.00 320 517%15573}13.97 |209600 |__:187677_|_12.21 21923-}_10.46-%rid 19 CS A---BYi9991).eB)5.0 310 As 170%|13.01 |eco |217326 |12,28 T439-| 3.3)-%he "74 218 A04/1999 11 207740 |440,00 a 3357 400s |12,8]2s |ws |12.2 BS-|__3.60-%318 323 396weriveeleelelaclterlwalwealwerlwmlfelco|ol mel06/1999 1]157540 9.00 9 .;.4 O79 TT 16332|OO,20 Za 1253 |13.00 |159601 |105605 |14.9 |)Oa |16.24 %we as poss A 03/1999 1]180337 |401.00 242 3152 13613 |13.251 177185 |__133937 |9%4328-|_24,41-%Thy A w/o T) CeeT |(414.00 263 3129 44100 |93.35 |W6502)$8504 F 3.11 238-1 0.23-PA 7001D/1999__1]210523 |427,00 23 161156504 13.45 |207712 |_--213%3 |5.65 6131 |2,95 %7, "T1577 2 OT 318 aris 7 13.40 | ochoso |2lles]|$2.35 Ta306-| 6.76-%7a)12/1999 1 257105 |518.00 6 2769 18702 |13.75 |24336 |]236205 |12.63 13-|_7.13-%Tid,A YNILLAGE FOTALS->]2460151 |518.00 21 |BBS |SIZE |15.43]2616338}2516819 |12.65]=951M]4,12-4][|WO]-248]6275]]I *=TIELINE VILLAGES LEGENDFORLASTCOLUM=«=E =VILLAGEGHESTIMATE «=A =ADJUSTHERNTSTOKHSOLD GISOFOFL-8% GIS6F COOLANT-0 71 TOKSOOK BAY . 01/1999 1]117286]259,00 158 14659 ;11.47 |115627 |113871]11.94 W75é-|1.52%]629 115 02/1999 1|103593.|250.00 154 1879 B79 |12,08 |101714 95510 §11.13 620%-]_6,10-%82 301WLS|233.00 1%749 GAL 1.4 | «10597 SOSS 10,44 TOO}9.735-Z)36 426 2 04/1999 1}58852 |233.00 137 265 8136 |12.15 6387 $3235 |11.46 3152-}3.27-%4 716 A CNiywy 1 91866 4216.00 Ts e268 74 |319 8 BS248 |4178|335-la 4 7o0 A0619999174728fF172.00 10%87 6515 |_33.47 73"6427 |_10.5 534-1 7.27-%4 716 2 OTIS 3|73061 2.00|| cdT C7 |Wa 72352 74768 |43.51 e443 |3.30 %2 735 a 08/1999 9}«87086 |207.00 17 1018 7399 |W77 85058 76797 |10.38 92r1-|_10,77-%6 738--pisiXa T 2%.126 100 TSS 1 11.99 Bees|eS TsO."Si6-|5.36%rs 744 10/3999 1]9883S |216.00 133 850 8197 |12.06 TRS 87853 |10.72 10132-}10,34-%]$21 623 11719991]106216 00 448 870 G75 |11,93 1 100346 |108583 |12.19 3257 |3.07%]317 is A42/1999__1}121276 |259.0 1 06 99400 |12.201 120370 fF 103563 |10.42 1687-1 13.96-%59 fase] TIVILUGE TOTALS->]1172618}259.00 $134]16522 |MZ]WSF 19560%|IDKEIS |11.02]e558t-| 5.67-%|1550}72 |8 ||j | ®=JEELINE VILLAGES LEGENDFORLASTODLUME so E »VILLAGEKAESTIMATE «A =ADUUSTHENTSTOKHSOLD QTSOFOll-1540 OISOF COMAT-=O i "--FO Fo Lb?Bei lL bt Bei i Lk ke 9/22/1999 . State of Alaska11:13 AM Department of Community and Regional Affairs .Power Cost EqualizationFY1999PCEStatisticsReport Fiscal Community Date Pop Number of Customers Fuel Total Total Monthly Monthly Total |Period Population Certified Resid.|[Commer.|[Com.Fac.||Misc Consumed ||Fuel Cost |[Oper.Exp.|{|KWH Gen.KWH Sold ||Elig.F 12 362 12/15/1998 91 14 9 3 5,603 6,549.29 65,815 59,978 2 L--(042)ST.MICHAEL-PR 81366 TOTALS .78,961 80,272.50 ,1,067,776 985,359 33 -----(043)STEBBINS-PR 81367 | 1 513 12/15/1997 117 11 11 3 5,471 5,254.29 .74,531 69,951 2 2 513 12/15/1997 112°1 11 3 6,382 6,129.21 89,228 82,406 3 3 513 12/15/1997 110 1 12 3 7,320 7,030.05 96,153 93,532 3 4 513 12/15/1997 414 1 11 3 7,805 7,495.84 108,131 94,764 3 5 513 1215/1997 114 11 12 3 8,633 8,291.05 114,563 120,218 3 6 548 12/15/1997 116 11 1 3 9,491 9,221.17 122,733 108,745 4 7 548 12/15/1998 114 10 12 3 9,923 9,640.89 126,027 128,336 4 8 548 12/15/1998 118 10 12 3 8,546 8,303.04 109,636 99,342 3 9 548 12/15/1998 119 10 12 2 9,167 8,906.38 116,726:114,197 3 10 548 12/15/1998 124 10 12 3 8,122 7,891.09 104,657 68,233 3 11 548 12/15/1998 _118 11 11 3 6,798 6,604.73 89,152 83,691 2 12 548 12/15/1998 119 11 11 2 5,685 5,523.38 71,554 72,200 3 L--(043)STEBBINS-PR 81367 TOTALS 93,343 90,294.12 1,223,094 4,135,615 4c (---(044)TOGIAK-PR 81368 ; .1 762 12/15/1997 201 13 17 6 10,948 6,813.49 151,086 140,555 6 .2 762 -12/15/1997 206 15 17 6 11,979 7,455.13 167,521 162,425 7376212/15/1997 207 15 17 6 14,377 8,947.53 172,112 166,156 7 4 "762 12/15/1997 205 15 17 6 14,343 14,682.21 196,929 191,787 7 5 762 12/15/1997 203 16 17 6 16,798 17,195.28.-205,416 180,721 7 6 801 12/15/1997 .203 15 17 6 15,851 16,225.88 223,049 216,521 8 7 801 12/15/1998 206 15 18 5 16,207 16,590.30 224,753 218,483 SB880112/15/1998 224 15 18 6 15,373 15,736.57 214,774 187,677 7 9 801 12/15/1998 223 15 18 6 17,704 18,122.70 230,310 217,326 8: 10 801 12/15/1998 221 16 18 6 16,005 16,383.52 207,740 196,550 7 11 801 12/15/1998 221 18 18 6 14,443 15,278.82 195,053 182,260 71 12 801 12/15/1998 227 18 18 6 11,627 12,299.85 _157,540 147,617 7 \--(044)TOGIAK-PR 81368 TOTALS 175,655 165,731.28 2,346,283 2,208,078 93: ---(045)TOKSOOK BAY -PR 81369 .= 1 496 12/15/1997 °.102 1 11 3 6,644 6,471.06 73,553 67,086 32 496 12/15/1997 102 11 11.3 7,486 7,291.14 86,481 .79,290 36 F msi Liewcned-«mwcenes 9/22/1999 i fae i £i State of Alaska11:13 AM Department of Community and Regional Affairs Power Cost EqualizationFY1999PCEStatisticsReport Fiscal Community Date Pop Number of Customers Fuel Total Total Monthly Monthly Total KWHPerlodPopulationCertifiedResid.|[Commer.|[Com.Fac.||Misc Consumed ||Fuel Cost ||Oper.Exp.|{|KWH Gen.||KWH Sold |Elig.Resid. 3 496 12/15/1997 103 10 11 3 7,827 7,623.26 92,324 88,690 37,258 4 496 12/15/1997 104 10 11 "3 8,651 8,425.81 104,581 96,126 38,373549612/15/1997 102 10 11 4 8,828 8,598.21 |106,635 95,843 39,531 6 515 12/15/1997 105 10 11 4 3,754 3,656.28 410,265 99,785 43,626 7 515 12/15/1998 103 10 10 4 10,222 9,955.92 117,286 113,871 45,550851512/15/1998 108 10 1 4 8,579 8,355.69 103,593 95,510 38,060 9 515 12/15/1998 109 10 10 4 9,254 9,013.12 108,748 96,588 38,370 10 515 12/15/1998 108 10 10 4 8,136 7,924.22 98,852 82,435.35,977 11 515 12/15/1998 108 11 10 4 7,714 7,513.20 91,866 86,248 36,986 12 515 12/15/1998 109 12 10 3 6,515 7,409.12 74,728 68,427 33,864 L-.(045)TOKSOOK BAY -PR 81369 TOTALS 93,610 92,237.03 1,168,910 1,069,899 457,257 ----(046)TUNUNAK-PR 81370 1 330 12/15/1997 79 14 8 3 3,442 3,381.90 40,748 36,767 18,928 2 330 12/15/1997 77 14 6 3 4,264 4,189.55 51,726 45,245 18,960 3 330 12/15/1997 77 11 7 3 4,710 4,627.76 58,462 53,316 19,944 . 4 330 12/15/1997 80 12 8 3 5,227 5,135.74 64,849 59,640 21,969 5 330 12/15/1997 80 12 10 3 5,688 5,588.69 71,623 64,940 23,823 6 330 12/15/1997 ,80 12 9 3 6,703 6,585.97 84,531 76,616 25,295 7 330 12/15/1998 78 12 9 3°6,588 6,472.97 ; 83,676 74,857 24,231 8 330 12/15/1998 83 12 10 3 6,128 6,021.01 76,005 72,523 22,003933012/15/1998 85 12°10 3 6,637 6,521.12 81,325 79,919 20,6231033012/15/1998 86 12 10 -3 6,111 6,004.30 76,104 64,253 22,483 11 330 12/15/1998 88 12 9 3 5,169 5,078.75 62,510 ©66,834 19,9001233012/15/1998 87 12 9 3 4,007 4,380.65 47,204 35,317 20,404 L-..(046)TUNUNAK -PR 81370 TOTALS 64,674 63,988.41 798,763 730,227 258,563 ---(047)UPPER KALSAG -PR 81374 1°198 12/15/1997 63 10 8 1 0 0.00 O°31,632 20,593219812/15/1997 63 10 7 1 0 0.00 0 38,147 22,230319812/15/1997 67 9 7 1 0 0.00 0 42,421 21,116419812/15/1997 65 9 8 1 0 0.00 0 43,558 24,203519812/15/1997 65 9 7 1 0 0.00 0 48,755 25,433826812/15/1997 65 9 7 1 0 0.00 0 61,011 30,837726812/15/1998 63 8 7 1 0 .0.00 0 61,597 29,905826812/15/1998 65 9 7 1 0 0.00 0 52,992 26,394 Flee?LJ 5 me Department of Community &Regional AffairsDivisionofEnergyFY98-Power Cost Equalization Program StatisticsbyUtility/\Community {2}fb}{c){d]fe](_{s}fh} Number of Customers aeUtility/Community Popu-Ret |C Residential |C J]Community |Total'lation dential cial nity (kwh)(kwh)Facilities (kwh)Facilities (kwh)Noaiak 401 95 6 Hy 441,155 43959231272]-_-*716,386Nooevik6114413°S|641,082 61,951 251,571 954,604)Nulsto 365|100 10 is}443,533 42,034 219,067 104,634Nunapitehuk489)109 10 8}375,960 36,653 53,522 466,135OldHarbor301101n9}370,757 39,596 124,564 $34,917 Pilot Station $47 109 I 12]455,644 36,730 113,785 606,159 Pitkas Point 154 34 3 4{120,122 199 «45,605 165,926Quinhagek.567 136 15 14}487,090 66922 175,670}«=-729,682RussianMission295n67_241,819 41,589 __40,198 323,606Savoonga6224M71213]482,331 59,695 158,553 700,579 Scammon Bay 459 4 15 8}405,722 $8,594 68,921 533,237Selawik696167171664,160 $3,056 163,475]910,691Shageluk1451a6sf123,984 27,591 54,487 204,062Shaktoolik2633rt]5{282,277 61,665 25,934 429,876Shismaref$42 142 12 13}$01,791 51,820 182,841 36,452Shungnak2523879}295,172 46,265 135,483 476520St.Mary's :504 148 32 1S}642,614 111,189 =46,911}'1,000,714StMichael.ui 85 12 8}307,981 58,554 __'121,871 488,406Stebbins$13 120 il Hi 411,308 59,817 156,456 627,578Togiak7622071517]838,988 86235 375,049)1,300,272 Tooksook Bay 496 103 W 14]452,541 50,688 _147,755 650,984Tununak3303013My261,254 $5,126 98,781 415,161UpperKalskega"i 7]276,316 48,012 39,276]«363,604Wales1625486}__181,554 49,242 81,501 312,297 Total -AVEC Alama -Ses Ailakaket Allakaket Energy Systems 214 n 9 te}187,155 31,653 126,940}.345,748}AlutiiqPowerCompany (Karluk)43 3 2 2](45,654 12,586 9,718 67,958 Andreatiof Electric Corporation (Atka)nl 2 ?2}(95,240 29,851 42,625 167,716AniakLight&Power Company,Inc.$78}173 35 12}800,106 180,334 52,058]1,032,498ArcilcVillageElectricCompany121286}92,007 14,398 51,983 158,388AtmautluakJointUtilities2925663}194,925 31,530 11,413 237,868BeaverJottUtilitics1136313rol81,742 30,561 17,825 130,328BethelUtilitiesCorpInc.son 1,922 320 19}8152156 921,357 1,524,587]40,598,100]Buckland,City of 412 80 9 Ss}326955 37,251 95,031 459,237ChalkyitsikVillageEnergySystemsa)Cheacga Bay _91 24 5 77,908 31,362 29,801 139,571ChignikPlectrie12561212}219,887 50577 94,827 364,591ChignikLagoonPowerUtility;7 5 8 sl__197,539 35,450 __-25,037{258,026ChignikLakeElectricUtility,Inc.a)Calin ler 2 26 29 1 86,682 85,596 13,496 185,774eeLig09Fy13|__102,597 65,950 28,820}197,367 NIA=Data not available,: Conaceunaton unt be cdo:Lack fd or chesnce that have been footnoted,Cinta PCE do 2 a =+aes a hen writearrWw,jue extracted June 1998ColumnxistheactualPCErateasofJune30,sper it 6a WeWiW\EURUULELELLLLEREELELELLALMLLALIMi)Ol fh).[=i]{m) Average Total Total Total Fuel Used (diesel)Price Non-fuel kwh Soid of Fuel Expenses (kwh)(gallons)-(S/gallon)(Ss) 1,200,894 106,876 236,604 221 sce total 1,496,339 123,114 177,895 1.44 sce total 1,021,486 $2,810 94,762 1.14 see total 2,017,695 (9)190,346 (9)230,427 (9)121 (9)sco total 675,319 $5,763 73,869 1.32 sce total 1,003,758 90,841 109,569 1.21 see total (10)(10)(16)(10)sce total 1,062,487 88,897 100,935 114 sce total 623,096 51,832 59,087 1.14 see total 1,211,957 109,130 124,737 1.14 see total 871,266 73,822 83,399 1.13 see total 1,833,452 159,159 242,363 1.53 sce total 282,194 21,753 35,240 1.27 sce total 709,085 $7,862 65,266 113 sce total 1,345,322 110,619 128,555 1.16 see total 1,191,731 100,158 219,244 2.19 seo total 1,615,163 (11)215,248 (11)253,319 (11)118 (11)see total £38,295 67,671 "79,892 1.18 see total 1,174,066 94,385 103,131 1.09 sce total 2,168,064 178,735 221,353 124 see total 1,090,595 98,633 108,041 1.10 sce total 715,300 62,896 68,888 .L10 sec total a2)(12)2)(12)see total $50,620 47,108 $3,012 1.13 see total 48,614,113 13,350,344 497,852 $4,940 $4,591 1.54 63,014 104,284 13,599 13,390 0.98 26,862 314,694 39,100 47,178 121 43,160 2,322,615 200,096 242,839 1.21 924,404 232,788 34,520 16,614 2.22 16,401 517,139 48,847 51,733 1.18 85,118 262,991 27,978 40,985 1.46 10,896 33,985,512 (13)}2,591,171 3,492,930 135 1,500,000 (14) 908,338 76,511 133,676 1.75 85,897 201,380 22,173 25,231 1.14 51,843 693,165 69,043 $8,977 0.85 91,012 433,601 36,523 $2,789 1.45 46,604 266,131 26,435 26,101 0.99 69,296 285,332 32,305 31,102 0.96 100,131 (1)This utilitybastessthan 12 months of data and Is summarized on page 9a.°)Includes Kasigluk data.(10)See St(11)IncludesPitkasPointdata.(12)See Lower Kalskag.(13)Includes salestoN:(14)Estimated value provided by utility.tal teri,q Power Co. F ll |J i 4d #06 =Calculations cannot be made dus to:Lack of dior esamsans thet av teen otoColumam,Tota!nom-fucl taxes,suppliColumnspisscaleulticdPCEsatebacedon12mantaefdataColumnw,is the value extracted from June 1997 utility reports,Reporte ht the shown ref only the nergy charg perkColumnxistheactualPCErateazofJie301997'This level reflects a reduction af 15%of the full fundine level Interen,and other and verifiable reasonable costs, es State ofAlaska Department of Community &Regional Affairs Division ofEnergy:FY97-Power Cost Equalization Program StatisticsbyUtility/Community {a}{b){c}{dl {fe}()_{g}th}PCE EligibleNumberofCustomerskwh Utility/Community Popu-Resi-Ci C Residential FG on iro pi "Toullation|dential clal nity (kwh)(kwh)|Facilities |(kwh)Facilities (kwh) Noatak 413 3 6 ll 425,084 39,653 197,289,662,026 Noorvik 515 12s 15 4 586,127 58,531 237,663 $82,321Nulato349106n17}438,400 44,029 243,682!726,111 Nunapitchuk 474:107 10 7 376,536 38,596 56,144)471,276 Old Harbor 316 9 10 7 347,205 47,923 122,413 517,541 Pilot Station 536 107 nN nf _435,153 33,005 __-*119,404)$87,562 Pitkas Point 153 35 2 3 117,293 2,602 39,428}159,323 Quinhagek 567,137 17 10}475,330 61,462 140,662!677,954 Russian Mission 284 52 $6 205,596 35,197 23,796 264,589 Szvoonga 615 144 il 12,420,339 51,348 127,520)599,207 Scammon Bay 425 89 13 7 379,586 52,827 *68,683 501,096 Selawik 665 174 17 ig!618,983 37,638 195,773 902,394 Shageluk 139 3 4 6 122,085 26,540 $2,727 201,352; Shaktoolik 231 350 10 s}270,449 $4,628 £8,948!414,025 Shismaref 537:148 "LB 494,011 50,417 174,966 719,394 Shungnak 251 55 8 9 275,997 42,383 122,299 440,679 St Mary's 501 157 29 14 641,287 113,622 264,214 1,019,123 St.Michact 351 83 13 6 290,744 -62,895 111,477 465,116) Stebbins 507 106 ul 10 357,784 60,575 167,090:$85,449+ Togiak 7408 185 15 16 164,590 72,669 246,026 1,083,285 Tooksook Bay ssl 101 if 13 439,537 50,794 132,678}623,009 Tununak 327 16 "4 3 261,307 $3,234 15,813 390,354) Upper Kalskag 197 69 9 s}166256 =48287 22,670),-237,213 Wales 16st 53 7 6 164,715 41,020 99,382)305,117 Total -AVEC Alaina -Sce Allakaket Allakuket Energy Systems 210 68 9 18 187,829 27,651 91,525 307,005 Alutiig Power Company (Kariuk)57 14 3 2 47,532 18,851 8351 14,734) Andreanof Electric Corporation (Atka)100 29 6 2 22201 24,601 36,377 143,179) Aniak Light &Power Company,Inc.595 167 32 12 800,214 182,462 $5,400}1,038,076'Atmautluak Joint Utilities 31!58 6 3]239,399 --=«27,720 11,013;278,132) Beaver'Joint Utilities 104 m*)13 10}=73,021.«30,760 13,750}"117,831BethelUtilitiesCorpIns.5,106 1,812 305 20}7,833,285 903,901 1,416,226!10,353,412Buckland,Cityof 416 81 4 of 330,019 -23,170 0}353,189ChalkyitsikVillageEnergySystemsqa) Chenega Bay :95:29 7 3 111,713 32,639 11,849)156,201 Chignik Electric 128}60 Ml 12 208,916 37,529 99,683 346,128! Chignik Lagoon Power Utility dl):. Chignik Lake Electric Utility,Inc.152)37 4 8;177,800 16,000 33,607:227,407; Chitina Electric Inc.82 34 30 1 95,193 98525 ,16,373 210,091 Circle Utilities 107 Kod 12 5 105,944 62,459 26,101 194,504 (Intentionally Left Blank}NOTES: WA =Data not available. a - - C2 - Bes ese fi]fil ik)=k][mj Average TotalTotalTota!Fuel Used (diese!)°Price Non-fuel kwh Sold of Fuel Expenses (kwh)(gallons)expenses (S/galion)(S's) (S*) 1,143,206 16,594 161,199 2.10 see total1,409,110 116620 4 197,001 1.69 see total1,049,047 $4,440 94,895 1.12 see total 1,927,422 (9)177,109 (9)214,928 (9)121 seo total660,361 93381 1,143 -133 see total988,796 $2,232 58,309 1.20 see total (10)(io)-00)(10)see total 1,017,486 91974 104,093 113 see total$37,004 45,594 $2,027 1.44 see total1,094,092 98,211 116,123 Lis see total'$41,351 70,249 78,826 1.12 sec total1,377,256 131,871 222,014 1.68 sce total252,611 28,750 36,654 127 sce total708,324 60,002 69,131 1s see total1,188,696 107,825 145,676 135 sce total1,089,854 90,618 176,020 1.94 see total 2,512,065 (11)205,584 (11)241,117 (11)117 @)sec total791,335 67,458 73,493 1.09 sce total1,073,662 89,268 97,730 1.09 see total1,909,509 167,569 195,455 Li7 sce total1,023,731 93,506 108,413 1.16 sce total678,326 60,662 67,624 Li see total .qi)qa)(12)see total$48,639 48,482 $9,361 1.22 sce total 12,727,156 (13) +461,705 49,644 87,383 1.76 58,454 343,217 14,536 (14)14,169 (14)0.97 71,060 (15) 276,415 33,177 43,369 131 33,465 ”2,242,530 190,483 237,322 125 859,045 412,652 42,172 48,902 1.16 101,692 253,741 25,926 48,668 1.38 16,722 33,490,716 (16){2,525,419 3,590,129 1.42 1,800,000 (17) 668,992 82,236 218,877 2.66 61,278 281,110 20,702 19,440 0.94 $5,322 (15) 664,421 66,038 _$5,291 0.84 105,374 256,448 (18)8,064 (19)20,323 (19)252 68,708 271,781 28,984 29,881 1.03 88,008 279,909 31,874 30,894 097 NA (i)"This tillity Tras Tess thas 12 months off dats and Is summarized on page Da (15)RepresentsTlofaa(9)Includes Kasigivk data,(10)See St.Mary's,(11)IncludesPitkasPointdate,*(12)See Lower Kalsing,(13)Total not-fuel expenses for al communities served.MUAR Oaen eee (16)Includes salestoNap(17)Estimatedvalueprovi(18)Purchased 217,680 kr(19)Represents 3 of 12 m(09)Value excludes purcd APPENDIX B SITE SELECTION SUMMARY LETTER |- Architecture Engineering Surveying Project Management Arctic Research 139 East 51st Avenue Anchorage,AK 99503 Voice (907)562-1830 Fax (907)562-1831 P.O.Box 955 Barrow,AK 99723 Voice (907)852-8212 Fax (907)852-8213 LCOMIF IncorporatedAsubsidiaryofUkpeagvikIfiupiatCorporation November 24,1999 Mr.Karl Reiche State of Alaska AIDEA/AEA ' 333 West Fourth Avenue,Suite 220 Anchorage,AK 99501-2341 Re:Site Selection Summary Toksook Bay Fuel System Upgrade PDR Report Dear Mr.Reiche: This letter is a summary of the site selection process for a new consolidated bulk tank farm in Toksook Bay.This summary is based on my initial meetings with yourself and my October 4,1999 inspection trip which included a meeting with the City of Toksook Bay and the Nunakauiak Yukpik Corporation. While in the community,I met with the following people: -Raymond Therchik,City Administrator, -Richard Curtis,Water Plant Operator, -Charles Moses,City Council/Corporation, -Simeon John,Corporation, -Abraham Usugan,LKSD Maintenance.; I have also talked with Marie Becker of the Alaska Village Electric Cooperative regarding site issues. Per our August 29,1999 meeting,prior to my trip to Toksook Bay,we had identified two potential tank farm sites which are labeled as Sites A and B on the attached layout plan.These site selections were based on our understanding of the community's recommendations.The two sites appeared to be suitable based on a review of aerial photos. Upon meeting with the City and Corporation during my site inspection,I was informed that the preferred tank farm site was actually located adjacent to the existing AVEC Power Plant,identified as Site C on the layout plan.It is my understanding that Site C was selected because of its close proximity to the existing AVEC Power Plant and the elementary school fuel system. Mr.Karl Reiche November 24,1999 Page 2 While walking the potential tank farm sites,I identified an additional tank farm site between Sites A and C,which I have labeled Site D. Site Conditions While in the village,I walked the ground at each site,noting the general site conditions.I also performed a level survey at Sites A,C and D to get a feel for the slopes at each site.My findings for each site are as follows: Site A.Site A was found to be relatively level and wet.The average slope across the area is approximately 4 -5%to the south.The site bounded by Cemetery Street on the east., The site is covered with tall grass with some standing water.The soil conditions appear to be similar to the existing Corporation tank farm,which is located across Cemetery Street.No significant settlement was observed at the Corporation tank farm,which indicates that the soils have suitable bearing capacities. Cemetery Street appears to be constructed of a thin lift of silty material.The road was noted to be saturated and soft. The site appears to mostly lie within block 9 of the US Survey 5024,based on the property lines overlaid on the attached aerial photo.Depending upon the actual location of the property lines,a portion of the Airport Street Right-of-Way may need to be vacated for the new tank farm. Site B.Site B consists lies between the existing Corporation tank farm and the beach. The site is divided into higher ground adjacent to the existing tank farm and a lower area which is in a fresh water pond which is dammed behind the barrier beach.As a result,there is not adequate space to construct a tank farm in this area withoutbuildingintothepond.Site C.Site C was found to have the steepest slope of all four sites,with a grade of approximately 9 -10%.The area is covered in sparse grasses and tundra.The site has a relatively uniform grade and the soils/vegetation were firm,providing for easy walking. The site is located on the south side of the rock outcropping upon which the Elementary School and Water Plant are built on.The depth of overburden is anticipated to increase the farther south and down grade you go from the ElementaryschoolandWaterPlant. Mr.Karl Reiche November 24,1999 Page 3 Using the property lines which are overlaid on the aerial photo,it appears that the best portion of this site lies in the Airport Street Right-of-Way and on the School District property which is shared by the AVEC Power Plant and the combined LKSD/AVEC tank farm.Development of this site would require re-platting of the Airport StreetRight-of-Way and the School property. Access to the site would either have to be from an extension of Center Street or Sunny Street,both of which stop several hundred feet short of the tank farm site. Site D.Site D is similar to Site C,with the exception that the slope across the site is slightly less (6 -7%grade)...Again,it is assumed that the depth of the silty soil overburden increases as you move down grade to the south. While the tank farm site lies mostly in the Airport Street Right-of-Way,a portion of Lots 1 &2,of Block 8 may need to be subdivided to allow for adequate space for the new tank farm.. Access to Site D would either be from an extension of Center Street,or on a new road in the Airport Road Right-of-Way up from Cemetery Street. Recommendations It is understood that the community has identified Site C as the preferred consolidated tank farm site,however,due to the steep slopes at both Sites C and D,the lack of access to both Sites C and D,and the property issues for both Sites C and D,I recommend that Site A be selected. We understand that Site C was selected since it is adjacent to the AVEC Power Plant and it is desirable to have the Power Plant draw fuel directly from the bulk tanks. Unfortunately,due to the steep slopes,a new tank farm at Site C would wind up lower than the existing combined AVEC/LKSD tank farm,which may require the installation of transfer pumps and an external day tank at the Power Plant,similar to the system required for Site A.Further,the steep slopes at both Sites C and D,may create a potential for slope failure in the existing soils once the new tank farm pad is constructed and the tanks filled.The slope will also require substantial gravel pad depths (up to 10'deep)on the down hill side,which are susceptible to differential settlement in the pad and will substantially increase the project cost. Road access to Sites C and D will require the extension of either Sunny Street or Center Street with adequate turn-around room at the tank farm for dispensing operations.Again,the slope at both of these sites will require a substantial amount ofgravelfilljusttobuildlevelroads.Access at site A is off of an existing road. Mr.Karl Reiche November 24,1999 Page 4 relationships with the project.If necessary,replatting will require time and money to Property conflicts may,or may not,be an issue,depending upon ownership and their coordinate,survey and install monuments.Both Sites C and D will require replatting,I _while Site A may not. If this site selection is acceptable,please let me know so we may proceed with development of the conceptual design layout.Feel free to call me at 273-1851 if you _have any questions or comments. Sincerely, |]Project Manager ) Attachment:Site Layout Plan LL==!:,11/24/99(09:2-jVAIE:iNAME:1TomePLULFINGisNiJAUTObnwdrawSITE LAYOUT PLANLCMFIncorporatedAsubsidiaryofUkpeagvikIftupiatCorporationqTOKSOOKBAY,ALASKA Anch »Alask 907)562-1830Barrow,'Alaska Bor)Beawaet2 DATE:10/15/99 |DRAWN BY:KK SHEET: SCALE:1”=300°|CHECKED BY:WWW W.0.No:99-110 ° APPENDIX C CERTIFICATE TO PLAT FIRST AMERICAN TITLE of Alaska 3035 "C"Street,Anchorage,AK 99503 Phone:(907)561-1844 Fax (907)561-1948 CERTIFICATE TO PLAT ORDER NO:00-00117 PLAT NO:U.S.S.5024 TO: _LCMF Incorporated 139 East 51st Avenue Anchorage,AK 99503-7205 Attn:Tony Hoffman Fee $300.00 This is a Certificate as of January 11,2000,at 8:00AM a.m.fora plat of the following describedproperty: Block 9,according to the official plat thereof,filed under u.S.Survey 5024,Records of the BethelRecordingDistrict,Fourth Judicial District,State of Alaska. The company certifies that record title is vested in: CITY OF TOKSOOK BAY free from all liens,encumbrances and objections EXCEPT AS FOLLOWS: SUBJECT TO: 1.Reservations and exceptions as contained in the U.S.Patent. 2.Said land does not lie within a taxing district. 3.Trustee Permit,from George E.M.Gustafson townsite trustee to State of Alaska,Department of Highways,including the terms and provisions thereof,recorded January 23,1973 Book 19Page110. 4.Easement for utilities and appurtenances thereto granted to United Utilities,Inc.,recorded July 21,1993,Book 61 Page 259.(Blanket Easement) 5.Easement for public utility and appurtenances thereto granted to City of Toksook Bay, recorded July 25,1995,Book 68 Page 745.(Affects a southerly portion) FIRST AMERICAN TITLE of Alaska3035"C”Street,Anchorage,AK 99503 Phone:(907)561-1844 Fax (907)561-1948 _This report is restricted to the use of the addressee,and is not to be used for closing any transaction affecting title to said property.Liability of the Agency is limited to the amount of fee paid herein. FIRST AMERICAN TITLE of ALASKAAortaVargoCherylL.Vargas,Title Officer CV/CV 'Typed:January 13,2000 Page 2 APPENDIX D GEOTECHNICAL INFORMATION PREPARED BY DUANE MILLER &ASSOCIATES 5-24-2022 10:44AM FROM DUANE MILLER ASSOC $07 346 1636 ane Miller soci tie &Geotechni ineer! 9720 Hillside Drive,Anchorage,Alaska 99516 (907)346-1021,Facsimile 346-1636,E-mail:Duane_Miller@Compuserve.com May 3,2000 -LCMF Inc. 139 E 51st Anchorage,AK 99503 Attention:Wiley Wilhelm Subject:Foundation AlternativesNewFuelTankFarm Toksook Bay,Alaska DM&A Job No,4095.64 The State of Alaska Division of Energy is planning to construct a new fueltankfarmintheCityofToksookBay.This letter presents a summary of thegeotechnicalconditionsinthevillageandtentativeconclusionsregardingthegeotechnicalaspectsofthedesign.Our analysis is based on the evaluation ofexistinggeotechnicaldataforthevillage.No field work has been performed toevaluatesitespecificconditions. The proposed fuel tank farm will be located on the southerly edge of thevillage,between the south end of the existing runway and the beach.The terraininthisareaisslopingandvegetatedwithgrassandbrush. The village area is underlain by Cretaceous siltstone with some intérbeds ofsandstone.The bedrock is exposed in sea cliffs along the coast,along ridges intheupperreachesofNealrukMountain,at intermittent small outcrops alongQemgengCreekanditstributaries,and in portions of the cut along thenorthwestsideoftheCity's runway. Bedrock in the village area is folded with the fold axis orientedapproximatelyN70°W.Rocks on the southwest side of the fold underlie the'community,strike about N70°W with cips to the southwest ranging from 47°to75°.Rocks on the northeast side of the fold have a much wider range oforientations., The City of Toksook Bay is established on a gently sloping low ridge withthestreetsgenerallyorientedalongthestrikeofthebedrock.Several beds ofsandstoneupto50feetthickoutcropalongthebeachbelowthetown.Thesebedscomprisethemostmassiveandnumeroussandstoneunitsobservedin theareaandtheyformsmallheadlands.The fine-grained siltstone forms alcovesbetweenthesandstonelayersduetotheirlowerresistancetoerosion. | 5-04-2808 18:44AM FROM DUANE MILLER ASSOC 987 346 1636 Toksook Bay -Fuel Tank Farm Duane Miller &Associates May 3,2000 Page 2 Soils in the vicinity of Toksook Bay consist of a surface organic layer ofvaryingthicknessoversiltysedimentswithsiltygraveldepositsabovethebedrock.Locally bedrock may be present at the surface almost anywhere in theprojectareabutismorefrequentlyexposedathigherelevations,along the seacliffs,and where streams have cut deep incisions in the ground surface.Sediments overlying bedrock along the lower slopes may range in thickness fromseveralfeettonearly40feet. Permafrost is discontinuous in the area.No permafrost was found in thefivepitsdugin1982todepthsof3to8feetforahousingprojectinthenortherlyhalfofthevillage.In 1995 DM&A drilled four borings to depths of 11 to 30 feetlookingformaterialsourcesandexploringtheroadforthesolidwastefacilitysouthwestofthevillage.All of the materials were frozen and some very ice-richclaywasfoundabovethebedrock. Fill materials have been excavated from the beach and from bedrockoutcrops.The original airstrip was constructed in 1965 from a bedrock borrowateaadjacenttothewestedgeoftherunwayandfrommaterialfromacutsectiononthelandingstrip.In dry weather this runway provided a very hardsurface,however,in wet weather,according to DOT records,the runway wassoftandsticky.The rmmway was subsequently surfaced with more durablematerialthatwasbargedintothevillage. The appropriate foundation support for the new fuel tank farm is verydependentonwhetherthesiteisunderlainbyfrozenorunfrozensoil.If the siteisunderlainbyunfrozensoil,the tank farm can be constructed as anembankmentplacedonthenaturalsoilsafterthesurfaceorganicmaterial isremoved.The local weathered bedrock is deeply weathered,but whencompacted,provides a dense,high strength embankment.The material is notsuitableasasurfacelayerforwheeltrafficduringwetweather., If the site is underlain by permafrost,the frozen condition should bemaintainedunlessbedrockisshallow.If the frozen soil is relatively thick and isicyandthawunstable,the fuel tank farm could be constructed on an insulatedfillpadwiththermalsyphonswhichwouldmaintainthefrozencondition.Ifbedrockisatshallowdepth,the thaw unstable material could be removed andreplacedwithproperlycompactedfillandthesitecouldbetreatedasathawstablesite. The site specific conditions should be explored by either drilling borings orbydiggingtestpitswithabackhoebeforethefueltankfarmisdesigned.Pleasecallmeifyouhavequestions. Very truly youts,eh Wek,Duane L.Miller,P.E. APPENDIX E US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS FLOOD DATA ices munities June 2000 kaD rad@Ocep)oES@2L@))waCcwo=in Alas Flood Pla Flood Hazard Data Alaskan Com US Army Corps of Engineers. y age fetgRet* v3 ITI GGT AGS,eyGEbyrRWyeyiey as,Saieederae ALASKAN COMMUNITIES FLOOD HAZARD DATA 2000 Armny Corps Of EngineersleU.S -Flood Plain Management Services Toksook BayCOMMUNITY LAST FLOOD EVEN Class City.FLOOD CAUSE T:427-76132(g0 2 CITY OFFICE. ELEVATION 513POPULATION BUILDINGS FLOOD OF RECORD FLOOD CAUSE ELEVATION_noneBeringSea RIVER SYSTEM:. COASTAL AREA: NFIP STATUS WORST FLOOD EVENT. FLOOD CAUSENotParticipating e ° NoFLOODPLAINREPORT: NoFLOODGAUGENoFLOODINSURANCESTUDY: COMMENTS. No known flooding. Toksook Bay s 3/17/00Revised: 301 APPENDIX F CONCEPTUAL DESIGN DRAWINGS 110-PLPA.DWG10/06/00(11:38)AUTOCADDRAWINGNAME:PLOTTINGDATE:\ Ss =sain% \Boa &\\US Ta eM.EE '\\On Wiley W.Wilhelm =: \'4%%No.CE-8604 ¥- \\Q g /Wee SF ''E /ey.PROFESSION ge \:NEW 4,000 GALLON DOUBLE Tue,oe? ;\,WALLED INTERMEDIATE:TANK 7!=u” \/NEW BURIED *\ON \;rae (,):(ne / \ aa os \ ts zr WA\/--y \' 4 Os 82 \9 Ors \ 2 ©f 88 3 OiseO#®Ba a ce cee 100 200 8 g a SisSCALEINFEET=Bo --ug|ai '2s p\'So goes)=28 \/wi)/a z \yj <i[+of .Ly \//4 o ; .'Pm po:seh ' %. '5 \NEW BURIED,. ' x ,/ .\/ra 2 > PIPELINE as .= iv / >';//3S <2 '.: '/NN ,/WW qt\;soos JS /ne|axNEW4.000 GALLON DOUBLE 7 /\--7 /as &AIRPORT WALLED INTERMEDIATE TANK fo '7 <i re \\SeHo0L /,/SN ro,{MY . |oO LuDISTRIBUTIONpos/+>= PIPELINE ,SN 'of ;a<«/We UN /™./y j woalozaN' -avec/iKso * _\!/>©\tan FARM /,/'wo}©wiTofeooooOQQ DEMRLISHED /ya | 2/4-4\REFURBISHED ffs.:<x < 8,000 GALLON /}NN |a -< DOUBLE WALLED',5 .OK *.i 2 PAG EMEDIATE ONY fa.fo OF oN 4 sr -12/000 caugn .SOS.7 'Ar & 7 PUA , :LE WALLED TANK ;|oO a oe 9 Jo POWER'PLANT KANGIRLVAR n =zDISTRIBUTIONBAYx(o)PIPELINE fo]oO \:- ,\(1 NEW CONSOLIDATED'Pa i\C=3)TANK FARM ada es -"7 2 g $an %\ee \-&He 2 25 dé--'>aes a \oo wo 58 SSasek a"wo\RETAIL o_-\\co \DISPENSER ae =eS <i eo \:\wenn?ae Souq"55 _-\ge WATER PLANT O -suip ts _aot BARGE OFF-ew fAs =§ \a LOADING:PIPELINE-289 2 ws 'a DY et ae .SE gt ms \\--\7 'rs a * 'v i}* \_-a og i ve\Loe \- '_-Ae pace *« _+\: \'CHECKED BY:WWW\L -\\-DRAWN BY:CR/KK \\DATE:1/04/99 \\W.O.No:98 110 | REVISION '' ie ; 10/6/00_-TANKS \\.NEW GASOLINE"PR ANO PADS \.7 AND--FUEL OILBARGEOFF-LOADING_...\\ff PIPELINES :. '\v MARINE: \WA HEADER (1 \PROJECT LAYOUT PLAN -ALTERNATE ”"”A”ev SCALE:1”=200°"C.1 110-PLPB.OWG10/06/00(11:41)AUTOCADDRAWINGNAME:PLOTTINGDATE:sa"te OF Aa, 1 \/! '\LKSD TANK FARM J\'TO BE DEMOLISHED /\\é \\.f \\me g // \\NEW 4,000 GALLON pouBLe //\,WALLED INTERMEDIATE:TANK 7!F \,NEW BURIED , \\/PIPELINE yi ,.'s. '\2 i / oom y ™,' \\"RY."\/;:z :\-a N ;é ;:e \;/|0 Os ge\\..vA /2 Oz £8\ma, NN \\Sy 'f /|s a 83So:s*--Bi \Nf Sf r Qi 8wee'/'/|0 100 200 Os we 'ee |,e) -"\/A.,:SCALE IN FEET Lbs \NEW ABOVE /' ---LL>22GRADEPIPELINE/\\-re '//\'=ByGEL \rm \/)a =\\ff =|fo /o |% '%'/a -\\/,'eo)5',/ro)'i =<>_/S /Ul 3 qs --'=@ co/;<{Ni .a 5AIRPORTEWBURIED,'of >-2\\PIPELINE D 'le SN a)<=w\\4,000 GALLON DOU!{oo /+s ”.OF\WALLED INTERMEDISTE TANK we sof '5 >wVY/wal ezA>y Ps aREFURBISHED\Lo a.Wi8,000 GALLON ',Pay - \an,<¥/2=TANK \/EB a [=]< we ff.a =WL.§\100 .ue 3 aia.<KANGIRLVAR 9 Oo\'aay ”z= ea 4 (o]AVEC/LKSD 'Oo oO TANK;FARM TO -\BE DEMOLISHED",a 4 " 'vo \>3\a -SCHOOL Ba at">\DISTRIBUTION,<”'a2 os 7 po ON PIPELINE fe 8 s\eo \wo Ne”POWER PLANT ohh 3224 --\oN DISTRIBUTION,Mans 5 as-'\ee fe Oo 8 00<7 \,\ego .PIPELINE ake <>Ww--,oo oe o 2gao\'fo.WATER PLANT 2°Ats oua\:'__BARGE OFF we Ng <2wea\/\ye 7 LOADING PIPELINE gS oct ssa1jaa.ui 678aon _wo fue se\\A DB 2 EQUIPMENT SHED ><;286 O¢me\,aR TO BE RELOCATED 3 g gx Be\a '"°43 Oo *«A \_-Y (TN NEW bal fa)-CD ieee”Soong 'a Le _gone ON @ ” 4\L -' axe CHECKED BY:WWW\\ff DRAWN BY:CR '\Yo fo DATE:12/30/99 S W.0.No:99-110 j .NYC?TAN1'OT Ye 797 BE DEMOLISHED Tore a\oe Td Vi wee casoume 10/6/00 _ TANKS }' \.KH "AND FUEL OI \an \aan _¢BARGE OFF-aN\\ff cerns LOADING PIPELINESA.\/vA MARINE ia HEADER\\Soo, (1 \PROJECT LAYOUT PLAN -ALTERNATE ”B”DRAWING NO, Xe)SCALE:1”=200'C-2 110-SP-A.DWG10/06/00(11:47)AUTOCADDRAWINGNAME:PLOTTINGDATE:eo :-i |NOTES :--i 1.NEW TANKS SHALL BE UL LISTED AND LABELED.ELEMENTARY SCHOOL eet %&C3nnnMees,a TOFESS oeLSarCONNECTTOEXISTINGSanaase' FUEL DISTRIBUTION . NEW '12,000GALLONDOUBLENEW4,000 GALLON oo WALLED TANKDOUBLEWALLED|:.enINTERMEDIATETANK.fo:SSVa;/3 £3BLEstAVECTANKINDEXSiuaeMR4ws83iy''TANK|NOMINAL CAPACITY gee;'\'vo.[FUEL ON]MOGAS DESCRIPTION DIMENSIONS Qo 355,H +4 a NEW cevotPoaAa1|23,800 VERTICAL TANK 15x18"fe)zA4oo,Poi rs NEW te ant OQ cee ee |i |1 2 |23,800 VERTICAL TANK 15'@x18 £i g'i bom NEW ,'3 2g|i :\3 |23,800 verre ane 15'0x18 =rssijoa'E aN ”'NEW 3 ey,h !SS \4 |23,800 15'0x18"395SCALEINFEET|io i L >|VERTICAL TANK 3 gEH\/5 |23,800 NeW 15'0x18"=**H H tye a jt *VERTICAL TANKf's NEW '.|beets ||6 |23.800 een rane 15'6x18 WwWfe+'_{ae!oot 'TOTAL:142,800 <tywore(||cc =<ad 'raed i Oo 2-''a fsa|ae =)TTae'H NYC CORPORATION TANK INDEX LL -REFURBISHED -_L-|TANK{NOMINAL CAPACITY)=pegcapTioN DIMENSIONS =<4 :"vd 1 No.[FUEL O1L|MOGAS b'4 v.POWER 8,000 GALLON DOUBLE --Peat 'aw EoPUNTWALLEDINTERMEDIATETANK ;|7 |23,800 vane 15'ex18°o«z|z ra' VERTICAL al.' ee Un 7 :_8 |23,800 veRneae TANK 15'ox18"2 <<LuLennvvFUELOILBARGE¢le |al _t 0 NEW 'a 9a"aaa OFF--LOADING ,'4 ey "1 9 |23,800 TANK 15'@x18 -J <”o 1 A a VERTICAL pe |ao )PIPELINE a =oa |NEW wy a)od" Z mi F 7 ca "|10 |23,800 VERTICAL TANK 15'0x18"2 x"<q <>For ,'LKSD '===I DRAINAGE /1 :NEW i apt °:a pane :"25,600 |verneau tame |15°0x18 >8 =zpalearenas1kae>NEW «A oa 12 23,800 VERTICAL TANK 15°6x18 <5 a <TO HIGH ee =«GASOLINE BARGE :NEW oat ae]WwSCHOOL-ee =TRANSFER et '\"”OFF LOADING 13 23,800 VERTICAL TANK 15'@xt8 Oo aaeaneae'a PIPELINE REFURBISHED x|ane a NOU 14 15,300 |uninta tov 10'¢x26"ro}Zw#SIPHONS (TYP.-oNc) my oly 15 |1,500 |1,500 |W PROOUCT PROTECTED)"14 5.Oo (o). Cen \DISPENSING TANK ow”oO -=S =,7)6 ip 'TOTAL:96,700 88,200 *es 1 -Pet Py ge ce $ol a 5 DISPENSER -:eae zaeiENCLOSURE.7 : :H - :goes eelMe 4 A q|\i 2 ii :':=0 -rc ae fe o8%j f .,|/LKSD TANK INDEX of a Fy)ai :a °2 £5 SGpstNe,:|mea TANK[NOMINAL CAPACITY o-ete)j "=="e ae \Le No.[FUEL OIL]MOGAS DESCRIPTION DIMENSIONS aE o<°"8 gol!Le :2.5:1 ua.:>t "NEW ',©8 ous 2giole5 >phobucT ied Y -16 |23,800 VERTICAL TANK 15'ex18 a ALS 38iDISPENSER:ae é :NEW a 4a aS <i i oe !/;17 |23,800 VERTICAL TANK 15'0x18 o°2 <=$s{-! F w c.9i:;*{y TOTAL:47,600 og Eas *51.oo :H a ae 'atat me=7 v Te be on SESS Bs|ae mreueoare |oe je aB3 yfBle"f Sass CONTAINMENT.ORES 4 of TOTAL TANK FARM CAPACITY Be fa,a H a . a Q,ca H "| :et a /FUEL OW MOGAS TOTAL o 3 >on H ue eo Se 7 a o *H eh ae /287,100 88,200 375,300 *'el -:xfttwe ;+ape ae?7 : :5 ao lees Y CHECKED BY:WWWinNaaoe' E :/DRAWN BY:CR/KK/Y :pee Sos DATE:12/30/99wiseok::ee : ;mee a Be ye EE :at W.0.No:99-110//en pm cienn 3™os * : .”ee yh my ae nd ae -,a AO Yo aie |a REVISION;//inner eee eee eee md z a te 10/6/00 _-TANKS/ :;a AND PADS i 8 AVEC NYC 3 NYC #:..50.0"50.0"60.0 y So 160.0"i "F ' ”” DRAWING NO.(1\SITE PLAN -ALTERNATE "AKorsJSCALE:1”=40°C-3 110-SP-B.OWG10/09/00(10:36)AUTOCADDRAWINGNAME:PLOTTINGDATE:oe OF Artie,re OL)iy ta",Z,iNOTES2*/som *% 1.NEW TANKS SHALL BE UL LISTED AND LABELED.E :A Wiley W.Wilhelm =fo 7"aio A G7ta,ROFESS\ON *ananse™ a Bi 3AVECTANKINDEXaeTANK[NOMINAL CAPACITY wo FNe.[FUEL OW]MOGAS DESCRIPTION DIMENSIONS o3 882221|23,800 cen sane 15°6x18"63 (6)2 |23,800 veRtioan TasK 15'0x18"figHy g3|23,800 VERTICAL TANK 15'0x18"=;pe38.NEw B .E EL &PIPELINE 5 |23,800 RTCA TANK 15'Ox18"- >6 |23,800 veer sank 15'ox18"wWGASOLINEBARG! -Sit-OFFLOADING ;.-a|[><---1 Creer TOTAL:142,800 =si_"Pit -- oO a- a ""ellIS > ms_-7"ls an Ss <a070T 14a se 5SosesEQUIPMENTSHEDaS418THERMALNYCCORPORATIONTANKINDEX LL ful"is)TO BE RELOCATED<.[SIPHON (TYP.)-NOMINAL CAPACITY =o8 ia =L TRANSFER \ .5 ee Eon wooas DESCRIPTION DIMENSIONS iW rv}vy)<q7---"Soren a a)ue co 7 |23,800 RTCA TANK 15'ox18"as =<"”'"=i}i °He NEW B .<<q/5 CY 1 a -#8 |23,800 ver ann 15'0x18 o te uu1/f i |9 |23,800 ver manne 15'x18"se}/i 0 >-t.,' EW wi @ x/! S i 10 |23,800 ERTICAL TANK 15'0x18 =>v qt|io/DISPENSER NEW ta ap?ban }/DiSrENStR "1 23,800 TANK 15'ex18 >9 ra =,VERTICAL' NEW ,2i|12 23,800 VERTICAL TANK 15'6x16 <5 a.Ia|8 2.5:1 °|13 23,800 veRneae Tak 15'9x18'aor oO a.a ww)'REFURBISHED aoa 4i'14 15,300 HORIZONTAL TANK 10x26 o =LidH7. DUAL OF '7i PRODUC:1 DUAL PRODUCT PROTECTED ..oOHDISPENSERoe&aa 15 |1,500 |1,500 DisewSiNe,Tae 6'0x17 o oO ai4 2 a ae at ee TOTAL:96,700 88,200 x;"' a !Ta _°of="a _-7 -aa i |aealtAVEC'|Lec .--T7 !0"1 awe eeaid$||50.0 ||Lake -Es:¥ ia'4 |our NU 2 §os"\|ew Se 88S4\:,| .LKSD TANK INDEX ait f22z1({'--e825Se|poo Uec7 TANK NOMINAL CAPACITY DESCRIPTION DIMENSIONS "ED <o a8 a0ae'|-FUEL OR]MOGAS BO Pascoe" .2-Tn "=io}"7 16 |23,800 we 15'6x18"ev pa Ses----i 'Ded .VERTICAL TANK ALN:<3HiSonUse!|Uo 17 |23,800 veNTiAL TANK 15 0x18"O°Vt _SsPdoS7'7 wey ug :o/|ra TOTAL:47,600 3a Fos ne/"eeat Re'|°agg «A7 /TOTAL TANK FARM CAPACITY ga/Q,oma|/FUEL OW MOGAS TOTAL ©q \'Ag *|&287,100 88,200 375,300 */i) 1 /|CHECKED BY:WWW 'Ne DRAWN BY:KK')DATE:1/4/00|:W.0O.No:99-110'/REVISIONj .10/6/00 -TANKSa oPea|C J \,AND_PADSy'ee¢|A ”33(o\SITE PLAN -ALTERNATE "BXoo)SCALE:1°=40'SHAWING NO” C-4 110-DET.DWG10/09/00(10:38)AUTOCADDRAWINGNAME:PLOTTINGDATE:= CHAIN LINK HFENCE-_|- SHEET METAL aNCOVER| TANK 7 THERMAL SIPHON oo ANCHOR H 6x6 PT TIMBER a IK6x6PTLtsTeenCyCONTAINMENTDIKE TIMBER RINGWALL 4 '\-SURFACE COURSEx]SX (a 5 4”RIGID INSULATION SURFACE COURSE \ RXXREXXAKXKKKKKKK KK KK KARL](KXKSTSmegc-J .°°° ,.Plxbs 2.5 Ase a 2 be -:*.S °AL°PAN oe "153!z . S :20 oS MEE Pan °-°6 *toca "Fut,$2 >ran) :°°oO °°°°°aooTeeOg22x'br Tver «°°Sean_°endn-woven ceorexti€e®22]PO POSE 8 *te FO te 8Os°0 _ooPRIMARY MEMBRANG LINE 6 "gq b ge %ge RII Y NIN 2 NON-WOVEN GEQTEXTILE ,2 *-FS20..°©0 ee 2 9 Oo S RRR LOro CepoaeIIISOSAKAEXISTINGRROPX/GROUND GEOTEXTILE 7 (1\TIMBER DIKE CONTAINMENT BASIN DETAIL\c-5/SCALE:NTS MATERIALS 1.NON-WOVEN GEOTEXTILE:NON-WOVEN,BLACK,FUEL RESISTANT,GEOTEXTILE FABRIC.INSTALL WITH 3'(MINIMUM)OVERLAP AT ALL JOINTS.AMOCO NO.4557,OR APPROVED EQUAL. 2.PRIMARY MEMBRANE LINER:23 OZ/SY.BLACK,HIGH STRENGTH POLYESTER SCRIM COATED WITH URETHANEWHICHMEETSOREXCEEDSTHEPHYSICALANDLOWTEMPERATUREPROPERTIESIFCOOLEYL1023SDEP,OR APPROVED EQUAL.LINER SHALL BE RESISTANT TO LONG TERM EXPOSURE TO GASOLINE AND DIESEL.PROVIDE FACTORY SEAMING OF ALL JOINTS WITH CERTIFICATION.FIELD VERIFY SIZE REQUIRED AND INCLUDE EXCESS TO PREVENT BINDING AND EXCESSIVE STRESS.LINER SHALL BE PROTECTED AND CRATED TO PREVENT ANY DAMAGE DURING SHIPPING.PROVIDE AN UNFLODEING MAP WHICH INDICATES WHERE LINER BUNDLE NEEDS TO BE POSITIONED TO ALLOW FOR EASE IN UNFOLDING AT THE SITE.INTALL LINER IN ACCRODANCE WITH THE MANUFACTRUER'S INSTRUCTION.INSTALL BETWEEN NON-WOVEN GEOTEXTILE LAYERS FOR PROTECTIONS. NO LINER PENETRATIONS PERMITTED. J WARNING TAPE == ®NFS GRAVEL FILL SAND BEDDNG ELECTRICAL CONDUIT 174 ANODEAT500.0°0.C. (2\SECTION -BURIED PIPEC-5S/SCALE:NTS W))(- Osa LEWESSOstQi$3os ro) SisUL=22aifGis WW ”<wu =!6 <<a.an)>lee«|&ax |we2<as2|304z/Fa5s;,9 a7]x|/¢e2=>=9 aT<Zik-ao a=zr |wzo6|OeOo|Ze7)OzS$|°9 E Oo Be :[=|ox2Bsia$8920 8 0GSGuR30aTALS§$3 gatesotBAS=229OSFnsGaaRefo<aso *o fa.oy \Ags *+* * CHECKED BY:WWW DRAWN BY:CR/KK DATE:12/27/99 W.0.No:99-110 REVISION ORAWING NO. C-5 APPENDIX G BUDGET COST ESTIMATE BUDGET COST ESTIMATE Toksook Bay Fuel Upgrade Alternate A PROJECT:Conceptual Design Construction Budget BY:WWW PROJECT No.:99-110 FILE NAME:Toksook Alt A Cost Est.xls LEVEL:Budget DATE:10/6/00 REFERENCE DRAWING(S):10/6/00 BASIS:Force Account Construction FREIGHT RATE:$0.50/lb COST SUMMARY Construction Cost ........ssccecsescess coceecccccvecs bacec cece cccccccccescnsccennescscccsceasosecases snacevcevccsccnsescsccecces 2,658,559 ||Additional Project Costs .....ssssssssosssosssssscsusccsessscsenssensecsuss sesonecesseeeees sessseecnvecuscnsensecuscnsensssnecnsesnscenecsses 249,000 "Project Total:2,907,559 my |PROJECT COST BREAKDOWN BY USER* ii City of Toksook Bay ........ccccsssccssscesescecccccstssccccceccssccesene dace eeececeneseececsscscscsnscscsceccscncecsssssscessessseeees 79,770 |Nunakauiak Yupik Corporation .........scccosscscccnccssetececcecscnscenccccscesconccsnesessecesescscesscccncscecceseseseseasecenseusees 1,337,862 Lower Kuskokwim School District ........scsscccccscccsrscsccccscssccccncccssccccscsssccncecccosccecsccucessseesessonsesccsesccsncsscsses:420,107 Alaska Village Electric Cooperative ........ccccccsssceccsscccsenscccencccesecsvcnccescescccnncesscconecesenccecasconseanoessesesnsseces 1,069,821 Total:2,907,559 -*Breakdown includes all items specifically for User's system plus percentage of common tank farm costs based on 4 Users'fuel storage vs.total storage in the tank farm. TOTAL PROJECT COST PER GALLON =$7.20/gal (Total Project Cost/Net Storage Volume of Tank Farm and Intermediate Tanks (403,900 gal)) Page 1 of 4 4 BUDGET COST ESTIMATE Page 2 of 4 Toksook Bay Fuel Upgrade Alternate A MATERIAL LABOR OTHER ;OR ;UNIT MATL MAN UNIT LABOR]EQUIP INo ITEM QTY |UNITS}COST TOTAL |HOURS COST TOTAL}RENT j|FREIGHT TOTAL **(See Note Below) Labor .......cecscvecssecsccscevscuccceesevererecsesceeseaseseseeeseshecssseesseeaeeeeteeseaeeeeeteeeeeenscesesesnesessaasecensneseesececeseaessasaeens 1 Crew Labor MD's 1050 500 525,000 525,000 Miscellaneous .........ccccccovscecsscccccrerscscecsccesessensnceesencneneereesesenessessesececnensesensecneeseseseensseseneecnonceeeseeeeneeseess 2 Mob/DeMob 1 SUM_10,000 10,000 10,000 3 Crew Per Diem 1071 MD's 42 44,982 44,982 4 Crew Housing 1071 MD's 50 53,550 53,550 5 Loader Rental 8 MO _8,500 68,000 22,200 90,200 6 Loader Standby 8 MO 4,250 34,000 34,000 7 Local Dump Truck Rental 3 MO -5,000 15,000 15,000 8 10cy Dump Truck Rental 4 MO _5,000 20,000 10,000 30,000 9 Local Dozer Rental 4 MO _5,000 20,000 20,000 10 Skid Steer Rental 8 MO -3,500 28,000 3,600 31,600 11 Skid Steer Standby 8 MO 1,750 14,000 14,000 12 Welder Rental 4 MO 4,000 16,000 600 16,600 13 Four Wheeler Rental 8 MO __1,500 12,000 12,000 14 Fuel 1 SUM 30,000 30,000 15 Tool Rental 4 MO _15,000 60,000 5,000 65,000 16 Consumables 1 SUM 10,000 10,000 5,000 15,000 Tank Farm Embankment ...........ccccscsscccnenenseecerctsseeeseseeeeeeeeeensseeeeeeseceseseseeesensessenseneseenneeeeeneeeseeeeesetemeneneees 76,770 17 Gravel Royalty 17,000 CY 2 34,000 34,000 18 Surface Course 1,132 CY 2 2,264 2,264 19 Thermal Siphons 13 EA 1,500 19,500 2,600 22,100 20 Rigid Insulation 30,570 SF 0.27 8,216 10,190 18,406 .-+Timber Dike Secondary Containment ..............csessseessccsetcnesccesstnseeneeseneseeeaneeeeesseaeeceseeeeaeeseenessaeeseeseeeeeeneseeeeane :21 Dike Posts 88 EA 70 6,160 6,710 12,870 22 6x6 Wall Timbers 3'dike 680 LF 2.00 1,360 2,273 3,633 23 Membrane Liner 20,144 SF 1.20 24,173 2,518 26,691 24 Non-Woven Geotextile 48,346 SF 0.08 3,868 10,491 14,359 25 Sheet Metal Covers 890 #£&3.LF 22 19,580 11,125 30,705 26 Chain Link Fence 635 LF 10 6,350 4,763 11,113 BUDGET COST ESTIMATE Toksook Bay Fuel Upgrade Alternate A MATERIAL LABOR OTHER OR UNIT MATL |MAN UNIT LABOR]EQUIP INo ITEM QTY {UNITS}COST TOTAL |HOURS COST TOTAL |RENT |{FREIGHT|TOTAL **(See Note Below) Tanks cesssscccsssssscscssssusssessssscesssscesssscesssecessneccessnsesssnvsscesssusssesssussesssnmsssssuecessasecsaeetsaseessnvesessnnesessnneesesse 27 Tank Foundations 15 EA 1,500 22,500 33,674 56,174 28 Foundation Gravel Backfill 270 CY 100 27,000 27,000 29 New 23k Tanks 15 EA 23,800 357,000 357,000 .714,000 30 Refurbish 15k Tank 1 EA 10,000 10,000 1,500 11,500 31 3k Dual Prod Disp Tank 1 SF 25,000 25,000 5,000 30,000 Barge Off-Loading Pipeline ..............cescsccecsscecensceceenesceseusceeceseceessscensescenceesesusceeteseaeeseneseeesseesesesessesseceaseoess 32 3"Piping 2000 LF 6.00 12,000 10,250 22,250 33 3"Ball Valve 2 EA 350 700 25 725 34 3"Check Valve 2 EA 450 900 50 950 35 Timber Pipe Supports 100 EA 15 1,500 750 2,250 36 Road Crossing Culvert 1 EA 500 500 250 750 'Tank Farm Manifold Piping ......ccceececerececeenceerseceenreenecesesseeeersesnneeeereeseeneesseeenseseeseeeneesencaseeeesnieseeeeeassesenenenes -,,37 3"Manifold Piping 585 LF 6.00 3,510 2,998 6,508 -38 3"Ball Valve 23 EA 350 8,050 288 8,338 39 3”Flex Fittings 19 EA 100 1,900 475 2,375 *.40 2"Strainer 2 EA 400 800 25 825 41 2"Solenoid Valve 2 EA 600 1,200 25 1,225 42 Timber Pipe Supports 60 EA 15 900 450 1,350 "Retail Dispensing Station .............ccecssscecesceseeeeceanscesceeenneeeececcesacaseseessceeuaeseceseueeeeseeeneesesseuseeeseeeeeeaseneeeseeenees 43 Dispenser Enclosure 1 SUM -2,000 2,000 500 2,500 44 Dual Product Dispenser 1 EA 8,500 8,500 500 9,000 Water Plant Fuel System ............ccescssscscssseeeceeeeseeeeesneeeeneeesensceeeeseeeeesaeseeeeeneseesseeeeeeneeeseeeeeeeeeeennessaeesenees 45 Distribution Pipeline 150 LF 5.50 825 769 1,594 46 12k Intermediate Tank 1 EA 16,000 16,000 12,000 28,000 School Fuel Distribution System ...........csccesesssecsccsecnscneccesccssseneeeessenseeeeeeeeesseeeeeesseeneneseneeeeesenceeeneneeeneeeeeneetes "47 Distribution Pipeline 1800 LF 5.50 9,900 4,500 14,400 48 Timber Pipe Supports 180 EA 15 2,700 1,350 4,050 _49 Transfer Pump System 1 EA 2,500 2,500 500 3,000 ° $0 4k Intermediate Tank 2 EA 8,000 16,000 4,000 20,000 Page 3 of 4 BUDGET COST ESTIMATE Toksook Bay Fuel Upgrade Alternate A MATERIAL LABOR OTHER OR .UNIT MATL |MAN UNIT LABOR]EQUIP No.ITEM QTY [UNITS]COST TOTAL |HOURS COST TOTAL |RENT |FREIGHT|TOTAL :**(See Note Below) "Power Plant Fuel Distribution System ........s.s.sssssssssesessssesesesesscsescssssssesssssarsnseseenensseveuesececssavessesssssessssususcaceees 12,931 cu Sl Distribution Pipeline 150 LF 5.50 825 769 1,594 "1 52.Timber Pipe Supports 15 EA 15 225 113 338 53 Transfer Pump System 1 EA 2,500 2,500 500 3,000 "534 Refurb 8k Int Tank 1 EA =4,000 4,000 4,000 8,000 Tank Farm Electrical ............cscccceccccceccccscccescccestsaccnssssnctentecsestestseteseesnessteveaseesuscscsesacecnasseutesscensesecsesseuasees 50,700 ,}55 Power Extension 1 SUM _5,000 5,000 14 500 7,000 1,200 13,200 '}56 Lighting 1 SUM_10,000 10,000 7 500 3,500 1,000 14,500 57 Control Pannel 1 SUM 15,000 15,000 14 500 7,000 1,000 23,000 ny Sub-Totals:813,438 542,500 317,000 542,529 2,215,466 Contingency @ 20%443,093 Construction Total:2,658,559 _MISCELLANEOUS COSTS 58 Project Insurance ..........cccccscsscscecncnteeeeeneceseceneeeseeeeeeeeeeeeeseeeeneesaeeesasneeeneeensaneeeeeneneresetereeeeenensenteneenneens 20,000 ,59 ROW Legal Work .0..........ccecssssseceserccceeeserscesensescseuseeeseesons Leen eecececeeeecesecscesececesecececesseseesseseeeseseseneessces 15,000 -:60 Engineering Allowance ........ssscsccscssssessssseesesecssessesensessensceuenssseeesseeseseceesessesseseeeseneeeeeseeseeseseseseceeccesoesoes:110,000 *61 Construction Management Allowance ..........ssesessesssssererssonneeeeececeseeeseeeesesetsaaaaaaonsnsececseseeeeeeees seeseeottereneaeee 100,000 62 Grant Audit ..........ccccccccccceccceccccccesecscccsscccsscenceeccessnsesteccecscescectecccuccensecseseeenscsursccetesseesssnesseestenesseeeesas 4,000 *BASIS FOR BUDGET COST ESTIMATE 1 **EQUIPMENT FREIGHT COST CALCULATED AT $0.30/LB EACH WAY. MISCELLANEOUS COST TOTAL==249,000 Page 4 of 4 BUDGET COST ESTIMATE Toksook Bay Fuel Upgrade Alternate B PROJECT:Conceptual Design Construction Budget BY:WWW PROJECT No.:99-110 FILE NAME:Toksook Alt B Cost Est.xls LEVEL:Budget DATE:10/6/00 REFERENCE DRAWING(S):10/6/00 BASIS:Force Account Construction FREIGHT RATE:$0.50/Ib COST SUMMARY Construction Cost .......sscsssecssoerescescccsccesrensccensenvseneaneascseceesccesennntescecesesssescsscececesossseesenscoensee 2,483,181 Additional Project Costs ........cceccsccsoveees ce evecevecccecesecavececcecoseneseseccseccesececesesecesecesecese oevccecccereececccccesesess 249,000 Project Total:2,732,181 PROJECT COST BREAKDOWN BY USER* City of Toksook Bay .......ssssesssoscsccescccccvcccecsnsccsrcersccesecccescesccsscesssecessesseccescncesccesessccessscussessecesossense 79,257 Nunakauiak Yupik Corporation .........ssccssssscssssessecsconesscconsssconsencsccacensseonssecanessecessceesssosensssossscsessoseneens 1,247,807 Lower Kuskokwim School District ....sccsscssssssscsessccosssssessecsscacencsascassesscussesaceassucsucnecusasenecuesesseasscuseseeesonee:399,141 Alaska Village Electric Cooperative .......ccsscesececnsseceserssererersnsscnsscsessncnsncccecsocensaasssnsascsaccosanscecessssooeseoeee 1,005,975 Total:2,732,181 *Breakdown includes all items specifically for User's system plus percentage of common tank farm costs based on Users'fuel storage vs.total storage in the tank farm. TOTAL PROJECT COST PER GALLON =$6.76/gal (Total Project Cost/Net Storage Volume of Tank Farm and Intermediate Tanks (403,900 gal)) Page 1 of 4 BUDGET COST ESTIMATE :26 Chain Link Fence Page 2 of 4 Toksook Bay Fuel Upgrade Alternate B MATERIAL LABOR OTHER OR :UNIT MATL MAN UNIT LABOR]EQUIP . No.ITEM QTY {UNITS}COST TOTAL |HOURS COST TOTAL]RENT |FREIGHT TOTAL 4 **(See Note Below) Labor .........csecsesenecnscsconccscenccecsecssssseseenestessaeeeeseeeeeseeeaeeeeeeecbareneeeeneeenenaeeeeeseeensensesaesnensenesesseeeseteesoerees '1 Crew Labor MD's 900 500 450,000 450,000 |Miscellaneous .......sssscescocceseseescescsscescesscescesenccsccecessesscascsssccsceaccassceececeecsesacaceasesccsaeceseeceaceasaseassaecsuces ""2.Mob/DeMob 1 SUM_10,000 10,000 10,000 3 Crew Per Diem 921 MD's 42 38,682 38,682 4 Crew Housing 921.MD's 50 46,050 46,050 5 Loader Rental 7 MO -8,500 $9,500 22,200 81,700 6 Loader Standby 8 MO 4,250 34,000 34,000 _7 Local Dump Truck Rental 2 MO _-5,000 10,000 10,000 ;8 10cy Dump Truck Rental 3 MO -5,000 15,000 10,000 25,000 9 Local Dozer Rental 3 MO _5,000 15,000 15,000 .-;10 Skid Steer Rental 7 MO -3,500 24,500 3,600 28,100 -11 Skid Steer Standby 8 MO __1,750 14,000 14,000 12 Welder Rental 4 MO 4,000 16,000 600 16,600 13 Four Wheeler Rental 7 MO __1,500 10,500 10,500 14 Fuel 1 SUM 20,000 20,000 15 Tool Rental 4 MO _15,000 60,000 5,000 65,000 "+16 Consumables 1 SUM__10,000 10,000 5,000 15,000 Tank Farm Embankment ............scsseseecceseecenssccanetecenssccnessensaseeeeeesesesanssereeeeeseseneseaneneeeeenseesaeeeseeseesseseaeeseeees -17 Gravel Royalty 7,400 CY 2 14,800 14,800 -18 Surface Course 943 CY 2 1,886 1,886 _19 Thermal Siphons 13 EA 1,500 19,500 2,600 22,100 ©20 Rigid Insulation 25,460 SF 0.27 6,842 8,487 15,329 ..Timber Dike Secondary Containment ............-.ccscosccsscserssstescrencencecseeesennecesesteeeeenteseneeeseaesaesserseeeneauesereneeeeeeees'21 Dike Posts 88 EA 70 6,160 6,710 12,870 22 6x6 Wall Timbers 3'dike 680 LF 2.00 1,360 2,273 3,633 '23 Membrane Liner 20,144 SF 1.20 24,173 2,518 26,691 *24 Non-Woven Geotextile 48,346 SF 0.08 3,868 10,491 14,359 25 Sheet Metal Covers 890 LF 22 19,580 11,125 30,705 635 LF 10 6,350 4,763 11,113 BUDGET COST ESTIMATE Toksook Bay Fuel Upgrade Alternate B MATERIAL LABOR OTHER OR UNIT MATL |MAN'UNIT LABOR|EQUIP | No.ITEM QTY {UNITS}COST TOTAL |HOURS COST TOTAL]RENT |FREIGHT TOTAL |**(See Note Below) Tanks ....cccccececesscecececcccacsceccscececeecececcacsevscssscsvscsessescsssssssscsscassesscacsssesevsescsevasscsecacsecacsesavsseessecsusacaeneeaes 27 Tank Foundations 15 EA 1,500 22,500 '33,674 56,174 28 Foundation Gravel Backfill 270 CY 100 27,000 '27,000 29 New 23k Tanks 15 EA 23,800 357,000 357,000 714,000 30 Refurbish 15k Tank 1 EA 10,000 10,000 1,500 11,500 31 3k Dual Prod Disp Tank 1 SF 25,000 25,000 5,000 30,000 :Barge Off-Loading Pipeline .............cescsscecsssrsccecsersesesecsesceccesceccsenssenerssececcensesaeseeceecerecseseeesenseeseesesenveneneees 14,675 32 3"Piping 1000 LF 6.00 6,000 5,125 11,125 33 3"Ball Valve 2 EA 350 700 . 25 ”725 34 3"Check Valve 2 EA 450 900 50 950 35 Timber Pipe Supports 50 EA 15 750 375 1,125 .36 Road Crossing Culvert 1 EA 500 500 250 .750 Tank Farm Manifold Piping ...........csccsececeseescescestescenseseeceeeeecascenseeseseeeneeeeeeeeenseneesesersassseneeeseeseneeeeeeeseeseeensed 37 3"Manifold Piping 585 LF 6.00 3,510 2,998 6,508 '38 3"Ball Valve 23 EA 350 8,050 .288 8,338 39 3”Flex Fittings 19 EA 100 1,900 475 2,375 "fs 40 2”Strainer 2 EA 400 800 25 825 .41 2"Solenoid Valve 2 EA 600 1,200 25 1,225 42 Timber Pipe Supports 60 EA 15 900 450 1,350 Retail Dispensing Station ..........sssssesesececcccscccecesseeeeeeeeeeeseeseeeeassseseeeeeeeeeeeeeseeeeeeeaeaeeeeeeseeeeeeeeeeseaneneeeeeseeteeanes 43 Dispenser Enclosure 1 SUM _-2,000 2,000 500 2,500 44 Dual Product Dispenser 1 EA 8,500 8,500 500 9,000 Water Plant Fuel System ............cssscsssecosscececcesscessscueseensccenccesssseussenseseuscsanecceenssenecsnsseesseeeeeeesssouseossuessenes o 45 Distribution Pipeline 500 LF 5.50 2,750 2,563 5,313 46 12k Intermediate Tank 1 EA 16,000 16,000 12,000 28,000 School Fuel Distribution System ......sssscccssssesssescscsescseseesesesesescscsescescsesescceseeesesesseseseececscsssesnsssseeeseacaaseseessese 46,063 '47 Distribution Pipeline 2250 LF 5.50 12,375 5,625 18,000 _48 Timber Pipe Supports 225 EA 15 3,375 |1,688 5,063 _49 Transfer Pump System 1 EA -2,500 2,500 500 3,000 *50 4k Intermediate Tank 2 EA 8,000 16,000 ,4,000 20,000 Page 3 of 4 BUDGET COST ESTIMATE BASIS FOR BUDGET COST ESTIMATE Toksook Bay Fuel Upgrade Alternate B MATERIAL LABOR OTHER OR ;UNIT MATL |MAN UNIT LABOR]EQUIP __ |No.ITEM QTY |UNITS|COST TOTAL |HOURS COST TOTAL!RENT |FREIGHT|TOTAL -**(See Note Below) Power Plant Fuel Distribution System .......s.scssssssssessssessssscsscsssscsesssacsvesssecscsesecacareucussesesececsnssesarsesueatsesteaeeees -§1 Distribution Pipeline 750 LF 5.50 4,125 3,844 7,969 52 Timber Pipe Supports 75 EA 15 1,125 563 1,688 53 Transfer Pump System 1 EA 2,500 2,500 500 3,000 :54 Refurb 8k Int Tank 1 EA 4,000 4,000 4,000 8,000 Tank Farm Electrical ...........cccccecececerscecenccecneceesteeseeeeseeeseenseeeeaeeeneeeeneaeaeenaasecnsaseaeaesesneneeceatesensceseaeansnees 50,700 :55 Power Extension 1 SUM _5,000 5,000 14 =500 7,000 1,200 13,200 56 Lighting 1 SUM__10,000 10,000 7 500 3,500 1,000 14,500 57 Control Pannel 1 SUM 15,000 15,000 14 500 7,000 1,000 23,000 = . :Sub-Totals:781,211 467,500 278,500 542,107 2,069,317 :Contingency @ 20%413,863 Construction Total:2,483,181 _MISCELLANEOUS COSTS 58 Project Insurance ...........ccssccsecescceecneceecteseeensaeseneeeeseeecneneeeeeeeseeseesenseeeeeeseeeeenseneeeeeneeneeenasteeseneseensnnteneeee 20,000 ©,59 ROW Legal Work .........cccccsssssseessececeensenceecnseneressansaceencesaesseaeescesecerseeseecseseoueeessaceessssesecansnseneseeanessens 15,000 *60 Engineering Allowance ..........sssssssssssssseesesesesescessnecsesessenescsesssacaeassessesesensessesseeeeseesensasssssaeeeesseenneneneseee 110,000 61 Construction Management Allowance ..........cccsscceccseescscsecesssneeanscseenceeeseseseseeneeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeseneeeeeenneemengeeeetees 100,000 62 Grant Audit ..........ccesecccsscessceesseesseeesseessneecenecsaceceaneosaecsasesseesenensnessseceaesessaesossesesusenssecsseenseeeseeeeseesnes ___4,000 249,000MISCELLANEOUSCOSTTOTAL= 1 **EQUIPMENT FREIGHT COST CALCULATED AT $0.30/LB EACH WAY. ¢ Page 4 of 4