Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Rural Heat Phase 1 1995
Racol Heat MegRadewate+e ae serFRmorthebehind12744geledyHeoeWetre!AH PC.brary.hes database.a a.Vt Ditine raieh potoceen me apele vont.;bullet?Lo ucregcort ionclecton,-veWank ECM liste fom.ne?Cucde)Wet.BatoDey of.ICP.pxflieHide!:"Ve Nes)capy of SP Re Th veg?Mug.&=.Phase |odvet Sephs 6.=thee |LinedofsSeaeft,oe Sao Di.vis TOR COmmends.Ten 70-Phe To fered aSh30PhereL.ea eaeaten7OK.Gal ene..added |Cptty.-seledole Lhllr).a.bmby.Me. '+ x wae i'' -ae we eee - 4 .-eae ow ee ee wee we ee ee 7 87-17-1995 2:16PM Fawn RGR.IPE 'TheotigtR iru n1Ga-2 Hopper,P BeGayub.PE:Law 4 itt" A Prone CHI 27 AS . *..ver ; Fairtberne Adashia aeis07)452.2] sowW aergein de:'Palmer,Biase_UD Prone (07)746-78:3FAXOGDTab-7BI9 "Alaska'piven ofEnergy Anehoraes,AAlntka 99801-2341 aes OO FROM USKH TO ARCHITECTURE..ENGINEERINGa "1 .. ri .5 'lesfvo.Lo : thot ats a vo . .1° a ' t '. ' .owt, * if ia 5 "333.West Fourth Avenue,Suite 220. 24batchofquestionnaires- .Faxtel ining'questionnaires by esisilPhone:5 call to:yemaining'recipients of.questionnairerlFollow-up phone calls''onn weekly basis ©*'Pahrierdiety pee est gece 4 se StasiohAESEf:! .:iwiOres #4730 DN ASO72694645 Cet a 7_BECEIveD. "all to:fecipients:offirst bath ofiestonnaizes : "ako SURVEYING.be.newaAene' ie .jcan.. oa ater rn >4 Sey 1,iFO P.@1 2 Puating -1foes io: 1: {reeres i | af ..ON TTS y FA 7 oP 4 ;,Fe f\1rit.fr |[i\|I,(©47 [A ;|TONY KNOWLES,GOVERNORSATEEequEBEETSFibs8 wen DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND 399 WEST FOURTHAVE,,SUITE 220 REGIONAL AFFAIRS ANCHORAGE,ALASKA 99501-2341PHONE:(907)269-4500 DIRECTOR'S FAX:(907)269-4645DIVISIONOFENERGYENGINEERINGFAX:(307)269-4685 June 26,1995 Scott Bell USKH Architects,Engineers,Surveyors and Planners 2515 A Street Anchorage AK 99503 RE:Rural Heat Contract-Phase I Dear Mr.Bell: I am writing to follow up on our 6/22/95 meeting at which we discussed the schedule changes for Phase I of the Rural Heat Contract.According to my notes,the revised schedule is: 8/8/95 Phase I draft due from USKH 8/22/95 Comments on Phase I draft will be given to USKH by ADOE 9/6/95 Final Phase I report due from USKH 12/5/95 Phase II draft due from contractor 1/9/96 Comments on Phase II draft will be given to contractor by ADOE 1/30/96 Phase II final report due from contractor As described in the 3/2/95 Addendum to the original RFP,the communities of Allakaket and Akiachak have been deleted from the list of contact communities and Galena has been added.The major buildings identified in Galena are the City Schools,City Water Plant,Alascom,and Huhndorf's Store. Please contact me if your notes from the meeting do not agree with these changes or if you have any comments/questions. Sincerely,ES wd fbwd David Lockard,Program Manager Institutional Conservation Program 907 {269-4541 cc:Peter Crimp,Rural Heat Project Manager Steve Stassel,Alaska Energy and Engineering STATE OF ALASKA /imm™ DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNIT ¥Y AND 333 WEST FOURTH AVE.SUITE220REGIONALAFFAIRSPHONEeeNg07)269-4500 DIRECTOR'S FAX:(907)269-4645DIVISIONOFENERGYENGINEERINGFAX:(907)269-4685 July 17,1995 Scott Bell USKH Architects,Engineers,Surveyors and Planners 2515 A Street Anchorage AK 99503 RE:Rural Heat Questionnaire and Schedule Dear Mr.Bell: Thank you for sending me a copy of the final questionnaire for this project.It contains all the additions we discussed and should be a good start towards collecting data for the database. I would appreciate receiving a schedule for the contract work that will occur before you submit the draft report and database on August 8.Specifically,I am interested in the target dates for the following activities: e Distribute questionnaires e Complete literature review e Complete database design The database design is a critical part of the phase I work,and it is important that we discuss it before the data is entered in order to avoid wasting data entry time and expense. Finally,please keep me apprised of any buildings that are added to or deleted from the Table 1 list as described in paragraph 2 on page 2 of the RFP. Sincerely, David Lockard,Program Manager Institutional Conservation Program 907 {269-4541 cc:Peter Crimp,Rural Heat Project Manager Steve Stassel,Alaska Energy and Engineering £2 printed on recycled paper by C.D. UNWIN SCHEBEN KORYNTA HUETTL.INC.ARCHITECTURE +ENGINEERING «LAND SURVEYING +PLANNING PRINCIPALS Leo von Scheben,P.E.,LS. Earl D.Korynta.P.E. James A.Hueftl.AIA Gary H.Pohl,AIA Edwin H.Riggs,P.E. Theodore R.Kruth,P.E. Monte R.Gonitzke,L.S. ASSOCIATES Donna L.Marks Timothy J.Vig.P.E. Daryl D.Sorenson,AIA Steven M.Tjaden James R.Kinney,P.E. Gregory A.Ingham,CPA Scott V.Bell,P.E. Bruce E.Hopper,P.E. Gary R.Kuhn,P.E. John M,Stadum,RIEI OFFICES 2515 A Street Anchorage.Alaska 99503 Phone (907)276-4245 FAX (907)258-4653 1830 Second Avenue Fairbanks,Alaska 99701 Phone (907)452-2128 *FAX (907)452-4225 9097 Glacier Hwy.,Ste.201 Juneau,Alaska 99801 Phone (907)790-2901 FAX (907)790-3901 800 W.Evergreen St.,Ste.218 Paimer,Alaska 99645 Phone (907)746-7815 FAX (907)746-7819 ifnIJuly 18,1995 David Lockard Alaska Division of Energy 333 West Fourth Avenue,Suite 220 Anchorage,Alaska 99501-2341 Subject:Rural Heat Assessment Project -Phase I Dear David: At your request,I have expanded our project schedule to include the literature review and the database design.The schedule is as follows: 1.Questionnaire a.Fax first batch of questionnaires 7/19/95 b.Phone call to recipients of first batch of questionnaires 7/26/95 c.Fax remaining questionnaires by 7/28/95 d.Phone call to remaining recipients of questionnaires 8/4/95 e.Follow-up phone calls on weekly basis f.Draft report due by 8/8/95 Attached is a draft of the spreadsheet we will be using to track the questionnaires.It is an essential tool in managing the project information flow. 2.The literature review will be completed by August 1,1995. 3.The database design will be completed by August 2,1995. USKH proposes using Excell or FoxPro to develop the database housing the questionnaire responses.We need DOE input to ensure that the final design meets your approval. I look forward to meeting with you to discuss this information. Sincerely, cott Bell,P.E.,Chief Mechanical Engineer cc Steve Stassel -AE&E USKH Work Order #4730CT 1:\4730\4730SCH2.LTR M U PES S |U NAL Agreement No.:2155299 S E RV C ES Project No.:N/A AGREEMENT [Project Title.RURAL ALASKA HEAT CONSERVATION &FUEL SUBSTITUTION ASSESSMENT 1 To this Agreement between the State of Alaska,_Department of Community &Regional Affairs, Division_of Ener hereafter the CONTRACTING AGENCY,and USKH._Inc.,hereafter the CONTRACTOR,effective on the last date executed by its parties,in consideration of the terms,conditions and promises of Articles 1 through 8 in this document,the parties hereby agree: CONTRACTOR CORPORATE SEALSignature:a sae tel)”F)Le Name:LF7)at Va pis.Title:A DPT AMVETS,yy WisSignature:_a 7Name:Date:lie oo j <|Title:core Eta a4OSSoCONTRACTINGAGENCY'rn re ;ENS od Project Manager's Signature:.6/)4 /:aS SeName:Peter Cfimp ate:/, Title:Development SpecialistContractingOfficer's Signature:nm Cet,ChafeeName:Percy Frisby /Date:peTitle:Director _ Article 1 --Purpose 1.4 Perform the Rural Alaska Heat Conservation and Fuel Substitution Assessment to identifyopportunitiesforenergyefficiencyandwoodfuelsubstitutioninruralAlaska. Article 2 -Compensation2.1.The maximum amount payable under this Agreement,as set out in Appendix C,shall notexceed:Thirty-three Thousand Two Hundred dollars ($33,200.00)| Article 3 --Period of Performance 3.1.CONTRACTOR shall commence Work under this Agreement as authorized by written Notice(s)to Proceed and shall complete the Work in accordance with any time schedule required byappendices.This Agreement is of no force or effect until executed by the CONTRACTOR andCONTRACTINGAGENCYandnoservicesshallbeundertakenorperformeduntilanoticetoproceedisissue 3.2 The period of performance under this Agreement shall end:September 30,1995 eement Form 2$A261 USKH299.DOC(Page |of 2)DOT&PF 11.1592 Articie 4 --Appendices 4.1 The following Appendices are attached to this document and incorporated herein: Appendix Title Date Prepared No.Pages A General Conditions 5/26/95 7 B Statement of Services 5/26/95 13 Cc Basis of Compensation 5/26/95 9 D Indemnification and Insurance 5/26/95 2 (DOT&PF Form 25A-269),plus Certificates of Insurance Article5 --CONTRACTING AGENCY Project Manager:Peter Crimp Contracting Officer:Percy Frisby Title:Development Specialist Appeals Officer:CONTRACTING AGENCY's Office Federal /State Statute(s):AS 36.30.005Street:333 West 4th Avenue,Suite 220 Funding Collocation Code: P.O.Box:Program Code: City,State,Zip:Anchorage,Alaska 99501-2341 Ledger Code:Telephone:(907)269-4500 Account Code: Article 6 --CONTRACTOR Contractor's Manager:AK Business License No.:179879 Title:Federal Identification.:92-0058687 CONTRACTOR'S Office AKSAS Vendor No.: Street:2515 "A”Street TYPE OF FIRM P.O.Box:C1 Individual CT PartnershipCity,State,Zip:Anchorage,Alaska 99503 -Corporation in state of:Alaska0Other....(specify): Article 7 --Subcontractors 7.1.CONTRACTOR shall perform all professional services required under this Agreement exceptasmaybeperformedbytheSubcontractorslistedbeloworasmaybeallowedunderAppendixA,icle A19. Service or Engineering %Total Svcs ©Subcontractor Ak,Business Lic. Discipline No. Identify Wood Fuel Resources 6%Tanana Chiefs Conference 001215 Inventory &Engineering 30%Alaska Energy &Engineering 180122 Articie 8 Insurance Limits 8.1.See Appendix D,"Indemnification and Insurance,”within this Agreement. Agreement Form 25A261 USKH299.DOC(Page 2 of 2)DOT&PF 11/15/92 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT APPENDIX A Agreement No.:2155299 Project No.:N/A Date Prepared:5/26/95 (INDEX Article Number and Title Al Definition A2 Information and Services from Others A3 Hold Harmless A4 Insurance AS Occupational Safety and HealthA6EqualEmploymentOpportunityATPaymentstotheCONTRACTOR A8 Changes AQ Audits and Records A10 CONTRACTING AGENCY Inspections Aii Termination or SuspensionA12=Officials Not to BenefitA13.-s Independent CONTRACTORA14-ProselytizingA15Covenantagainst Contingent Fees A18 Precedence of Documents Ai7 Endorsement on Documents A18 Ownership of Work ProductA19SubcontractorsSuccessors and Assigns A20 =Claims and DisputesA21_-Extent of AgreementA22=TaxesA23.Goveming LawA24 =-Additional Provisions ARTICLE A1 Definitions Ai.1 Additional or Extra Services -Services,WorkproductsoractionsrequiredoftheCONTRACTORaboveandbeyondprovisionsofthisAgreement. A1.2.Amendment -A written change to this Agreement. A1.3 Appeals Officer -The designated Individual or adulyappointedsuccessorwhosedecisionsconstitutetheexhaustionofcontractualandadministrativealtematives for resolution of claims and disputes. Ai.4.Change -A revision in scope,complexity,character,or duration of the services or provisions of the Agreement. A1.5 Contracting Officer -the individual or a dulyappointedsuccessordesignatedastheofficialrepresentativetoadministercontractsfortheCONTRACTINGAGENCY. A1.6 CONTRACTOR -The finn (person or anybusinesscombination)providing services. A1.7 CONTRACTOR's Manager -The CONTRACTOR's representative in responsible charge oftheproject(s)and directly answerable for the required services. AgreementUSKH299.DOC(Page |of 2) A1.8 Funding Agency -An agency of a Federal,State,Political subdivision,or Local Government which fumishes funds for the CONTRACTOR's compensationunderthisAgreementandwhichmayhaveestablishedregulationsandrequirementsbindingupontheCONTRACTINGAGENCYandtheCONTRACTOR. A1.9 Notice to Proceed (NTP)-Written authorization from CONTRACTING AGENCY to the CONTRACTOR to provide all or specified services in accordance with an existing Agreement. A1.10 Project Manager -CONTRACTING AGENCY''s representative in responsible charge of the project(s)andtheCONTRACTOR's primary point of contact with theCONTRACTINGAGENCY. Ai.11 Scope Of Services -Services and Work productsrequiredoftheCONTRACTORbythisAgreement. A1.12 Subcontractor -CONTRACTOR engaged toprovideaportionoftheservicesbysubcontractwiththefirmwhichisapartytothisAgreement. ARTICLE A2 InformationandServicesfromOthers A2.1.The CONTRACTING AGENCY may,at its election or in response to a request from the CONTRACTOR,furnish information or services from other contractors.If,in the CONTRACTOR's opinion, such information or services is inadequate,the CONTRACTOR must notify the CONTRACTINGAGENCYofthespecificserviceormaterialdeemed inadequate and the extent of the inadequacy prior to use in the performance of this Agreement.The CONTRACTING AGENCY will then evaluate and resolve the matter in writing.Unless so notified by the CONTRACTOR,the CONTRACTING AGENCY may assume the information or services provided are adequate. ARTICLE A3 arm! A3.1 See Appendix 0,"Indemnification and Insurance.” ARTICLEA4 Insurance A4.1 See Appendix 0D,"Indemnification and Insurance.” Fm 284061 DOTA&PF 211892 ARTICLE A5 Occupational Safety and Health A5.1.The CONTRACTOR and its Subcontractors shall observe and comply with the Federal OccupationalSafetyandHealthactof1970andwithailsafetyandhealthstandardspromulgatedbytheSecretaryofLaborunderauthoritythereofandwithallStateofAlaskaOccupationalSafetyandHealthLawsandregulations. ARTICLE A& Equal Employment OpportunityA6.1 The CONTRACTOR shail comply with thefollowingapplicablelawsanddirectivesandregulationsoftheCONTRACTINGAGENCYwhicheffectuatethem; ail of which are incorporated herein by reference: Title IV of Federal Civil Rights Act of 1964; Federal Executive Order 11625 (Equal Employment Opportunity); Title 41,Code of Federal Regulations,Part 60 (Equal Employment Opportunity); Title 49,Code of Federal Regulations,Part 21 (Discrimination); Title 49,Code of Federal Regulations,Part 23 (Minority Business Enterprises); Office of Management and Budget (OMB)circular 102,Attachment O (Procurement Standards); Alaska Statute (AS)18.80.200-300 (Discrimination). A6.2 The CONTRACTOR may not discriminate againstanyemployeeorapplicantforemploymentbecauseofrace,religion,color,national origin,age,physicaldisability,sex,or marital status,change in marital status,pregnancy or parenthood when the reasonable demandsforthepositiondonotrequiredistinctiononsuchbasis.The CONTRACTOR shall take affirmative action to insure that applicants are employed and that employeesaretreatedduringemploymentwithoutregardtotheirrace,religion,color,national origin,age,physicaldisability,sex,or marital status.This action mustinclude,but need not be limited to,the following:employment,upgrading,demotion,transfer,recruitment, or recruitment adve:,tayoff or termination,rates ofpayorotherformsofcompensation,and selection fortrainingincludingappreaficeship.The CONTRACTORshailpostinconspicuousplaces,available to employeesandapplicantsforoenoticessettingouttheprovisionsofthispa A6.3 The CONTRACTOR shall state,in all solicitations or advertisements for employees to work in performanceofthisAgreement,that it is an equal opportunityemployerandthatallqualifiedapplicantswillreceiveconsiderationforemploymentwithoutregardtorace,religion,color,national origin,age physical disability, sex,or marital status. A6.4 The CONTRACTOR shall send to each labor union or representative or workers with which theCONTRACTORhasacollectivebargainingagreementorothercontractorunderstandinganoticeadvisingthe AppendixAUSKH299.DOC(Page|of $) labor union or workers'representative of theCONTRACTOR's commitments under this article andpostcopiesofthenoticeinconspicuousplacesavailabletoallemployeesandapplicantsforemployment. A6.5 In the event the CONTRACTOR subcontracts anypartoftheservicestobeperformedunderthisAgreement,the CONTRACTOR agrees to make goodfaitheffortstoutilizefemaleandminoritybusinessSubcontractors,to affirmatively solicit their interest,capability and prices and to fumish documentation of theresultsofallsuchdirectcontractsonformsprovidedbyoracceptabletotheCONTRACTINGAGENCY. A6.6 The CONTRACTOR shall make,keep andpreservesuchrecordsnecessarytodeterminecompliancewithequalemploymentopportunityobligationsandshallfummishrequiredinformationandreports.All records must be retained and made available in accordance with article A9,Audits and Records. A86.7 The CONTRACTOR shall include the provisions ofthisarticleineverycontract,and shall require theinclusionoftheseprovisionsineverycontractenteredintobyanyofitsSubcontractors,so that these provisionswillbebindinguponeachSubcontractor. ARTICLE A7 PaymentstotheCONTRACTORA7.1 Payments shail be based on approvedCONTRACTOR's invoices submitted In accordance with this article and the provisions of Appendix C.The sumofpaymentsshallnotexceedallowablecompensationStatedinNotice(s)to Proceed and no payments shall bemadeinexcessofthemaximumallowabletotalforthis Agreement. A7.2.The CONTRACTING AGENCY will exert everyefforttoobtainrequiredFundingAgencyapprovalsandtoissueauthorizationsina_timely manner.CONTRACTOR shall not perform any services without aNoticetoProceedtherefore.Accordingly,theCONTRACTINGAGENCYwillnotpaytheCONTRACTORforservicesorassociatedreimbursable costs performed outside those which are authorized by aNoticetoProceed. A7.3 CONTRACTOR's invoices shall be submitted when services are completed or monthly,for months duringwhichservicesareperformed,as applicable,in a formatpwnedbyoracceptabletotheCONTRACTING A7.4 In the event items on an invoice are disputed payment on those items will be held until the dispute isresolved.Undisputed items will not be held with the disputed items. A7.5 The CONTRACTOR shall submit a final invoice and required documentation within 90 days after finalacceptanceofservicesbytheCONTRACTINGAGENCY.The CONTRACTING AGENCY will not be held liable for payment of invoices submitted after thistimeunlesspriorwrittenapprovalhasbeengiven.Satisfactory compliance with article A22,Taxes,is aconditionprecedenttofinalpayment. ARTICLE A8& Form 25A262 DOT&PF 11/15/92 ChangesA8.1 Changes (including "Suppiemental Agreements')intheperiodofperformance,general conditions,scope ofservices,or other provisions established by thisAgreementmaybemadebywrittenAmendmentonly.IfsuchchangescauseanincreaseoradecreaseintheCONTRACTOR's cost,an equitable adjustment shall bemadeandspecifiedintheAmendment.TheCONTRACTORshallnotperformanyadditionalorextraservicespriortoreceivingafullyexecutedcopyofanamendmentandaNoticetoProceed,except as the CONTRACTOR may be directed under the provisions of article A20,Claims and Disputes. A8.2 If at any time the CONTRACTING AGENCYthroughitsauthorizedrepresentatives,whether verballyorinwriting,requests or issues instructions for AdditionalorExtraServicesorotherwisedirectsactionswhich conflict with any provisions of this Agreement,theCONTRACTORshall,within 30 days of receipt and priortopursuingsuch-instructions,so notify theCONTRACTINGAGENCYinwriting,and to the extentpossible,describe the scope and estimated cost of anyAdditionalorExtraServices.The CONTRACTING AGENCY wiil then evaluate and,if appropriate,negotiateanAmendment.Unless so notified by the CONTRACTOR,the CONTRACTING AGENCY mayassumesuchinstructionshavenotchangedanyprovisionsofthisAgreementnorrequireadditionalcompensation.No additional payments shall be made totheCONTRACTORwithoutsuchnotice. ARTICLE A9 AuditsandRecords A9.1.The CONTRACTOR shall maintain records of performances,communications,documents, correspondence and costs pertinent to this AgreementandtheFundingorCONTRACTINGAGENCY'Sauthorizedrepresentativesshallhavetherighttoexaminesuchrecordsandaccountingproceduresand practices. A9.2.The Funding or CONTRACTING AGENCY'sauthorizedrepresentativesshallhavetherighttoexamineallbooks,records,documents and other data of the CONTRACTOR related to the negotiation,pricingandperformanceofthisAgreementandanymodificationorchangeforthepurposeofevaluatingtheaccuracy,completeness and of the data submitted.The right of examination extend to all documents necessary to permit adipquste evaluation of the data,computations and projections used. A9.3 The materials described in this article shall be made available at a business office of the CONTRACTOR at all reasonable times for inspection, audit or reproduction,for a minimum of 3 years from thedateofanyresultingfinalsettlement. A9.3.1 'If this Agreement is completely or partiallyterminated,records relating to the services terminatedshallbemadeavailableforaminimumof3yearsfrom the date of any resulting final settlement. A9.3.2 Records which relate to appeals under article A20.Claims and Disputes,or litigation or the settlement AppendixAUSKH299.DOC(Page2of5) of claims arising out of the performance of thisAgreementshallbemadeavailableuntilsuchappeals,litigation or claims have been concluded. ARTICLE A10 CONTRACTING AGENCY InspectionsA10.1 The CONTRACTING AGENCY has the right toinspect,in the manner and at reasonable times itconsidersappropriateduringtheperiodofthisAgreement,all facilities and activities of theCONTRACTORasmaybeengagedintheperformanceofthisAgreement. ARTICLE A11 fmi uspensi A11.1.This Agreement may be terminated by eitherpartyupon10dayswrittennoticeiftheotherpartyfailssubstantiallytoperforminaccordancewithitstermsthroughnofaultofthepartyinitiatingthetermination(defautt termination).[If the CONTRACTING AGENCY terminates this Agreement,the CONTRACTINGAGENCYwillpaytheCONTRACTORasumequaltothepercentageofworkcompletedthatcanbesubstantiatedinwholeorinparteitherbytheCONTRACTORtothesatisfactionoftheCONTRACTINGAGENCYorthe CONTRACTING AGENCY.If the CONTRACTING AGENCY becomes aware of any nonconformance withthisAgreementbytheCONTRACTOR,theCONTRACTINGAGENCYwillgivepromptwrittennoticethereoftotheCONTRACTOR.Should the CONTRACTOR's services remain in nonconformance,the percentage of total compensation attributable to the nonconforming Work may be withheld. A11.2 The CONTRACTING AGENCY may at any timeterminate(convenience termination)or suspend thisAgreementforitsneedsorconvenience.In the event ofaconveniencetermination,or suspension for more than 3 months,the CONTRACTOR will be compensated forauthorizedservicesandauthorizedexpendituresperformedtothedateofreceiptofwrittennoticeofterminationorsuspensionplusreasonableexpenses.NofeeorothercompensationfortheuncompletedportionoftheserviceswillbepaidexforalreadyincurredindirectcostswhichtheCOCTORcanestablish and which would have been compensated for over the life of this Agreement,but because of the termination orsuspensionwouldhavetobeabsorbedbytheCONTRACTORwithoutfurthercompensation. A11.3 If federal funds support this Agreement,settlement for default or convenience termination must be approved by the Funding Agency and shall be in basicconformancewithTitle41,Code of Federal Regulation,Subparts 1-8.604 or 1-8.203 and 1-8.213. Ai1.4 In the event of termination or suspension,theCONTRACTORshalldeliverallworkproducts,reports,estimates,schedules and other documents and data prepared pursuant to this Agreement to theCONTRACTINGAGENCY. ARTICLE A12 fficial neff A12.1.No member of or delegate to Congress,UnitedStatesCommissionerorotherofficialsoftheFederal, Form 2$A262 DOTAPF 11/15/92 State Political subdivision or Local Government shail beadmittedtoanyshareorpartofthisAgreementoranybenefittoarisetherefrom. ARTICLE A13 independ RACTO A13.1 The CONTRACTOR and its agents and employees shall act in an independent capacity and notasofficersoragentsoftheCONTRACTINGAGENCYintheperformanceofthisAgreementexceptthattheCONTRACTORmayfunctionastheCONTRACTINGAGENCY's agent as may be specifically set forth in this Agreement. A13.2 Any and ail employees of the CONTRACTOR,while engaged in the performance of any Work orservicesrequiredbytheCONTRACTORunderthisAgreement,shall be considered employees of theCONTRACTORonlyandnotoftheCONTRACTINGAGENCYandanyandallclaimsthatmayormightariseundertheWorkersCompensationActonbehalfofsaidemployees,while so engaged and any and all claimsmadebyathirdpartyasaconsequenceofanynegligentactoromissiononthepartoftheCONTRACTOR'semployeeswhilesoengagedonanyoftheservicestoberenderedherein,shall be the sole obligation and responsibility of the CONTRACTOR. A13.3 This Agreement will be declared null and voidshouldtheCONTRACTINGAGENCYdeterminethatbyIntemalRevenueServicedefinitionstheCONTRACTOR is an employee of the CONTRACTING AGENCY. ARTICLE A14 p tytiziA14.1 The CONTRACTOR agrees that it will not engageonafullorparttimebasis,during the period of thisAgreement,any person or persons who are or have beenemployedbytheCONTRACTINGAGENCYduringtheriodofthisAgreementorduringthe90daysimmediatelyprecedingthedateofthisAgreementexceptthosewhohavebeenregulartyretiredorapprovedinwritingbytheCONTRACTINGAGENCY. ARTICLE A15 venant i A15.1.The CONTRACTOR shall comply with theCopeland"Anti-Kickback®Act (18 USC 874)assupplementedinFederalrtmentofLabor regulations (29 CFR past 3),which are incorporated by reference and made a past of this Agreement. A15.2.The CONTRACTOR warrants that it has not employed or retained any organization or person,otherthanabonafideemployee,to solicit or secure thisAgreementandthatithasnotpaidoragreedtopayanyorganizationorperson,other than a bona fide employee,any fee,commission,percentage,brokerage fee,gift orotherconsiderationcontingentuponorresultingfromtheawardormakingofthisAgreement.For breach orviolationofthiswarranty,the CONTRACTING AGENCYhastherighttoannulthisAgreementwithoutliabilityor,in its discretion,to deduct from the allowablecompensationthefullamountofsuchcommission,percentage,brokerage fee,gift or contingent fee. Appendix AUSKH299.DOC(Page 3 of 5) A15.3_The CONTRACTING AGENCY warrants that theCONTRACTORortheCONTRACTOR's representativehasnotbeenrequired,directly or indirectly as an expressorimpliedconditioninobtainingorcarryingoutthisAgreement,to employ or retain,or agree to employ orretain,any organization or person or to make acontribution,donation or consideration of any kind. ARTICLE A16 Precedence of DocumentsA16.1 Components of this Agreement shall stand andprevailinthefollowingorder:Agreement over Generalconditions;General Conditions over Statement ofServices;Statement of Services over Basis ofCompensation;Basis of Compensation over anyappendicesbeyondAppendixC. A16.2 If a "Request for Proposal*(RFP)and/or aproposalareappendedtothisAgreement,thecomponentsdescribedinparagraphA16.1 shall standandPrevalovertheproposalandtheproposaloverthe ARTICLE A17 id m A17.1 Endorsements and professional seals,ifapplicable,must be included on all final drawings,specifications,cost estimates and reports prepared bytheCONTRACTOR.Preliminary copies of suchdocumentssubmittedforreviewmusthavesealsaffixed without endorsement (signature). ARTICLE A18 OwnershipofWorkProductA18.1_Work products produced under this Agreement,except items which have pre-existing copyrights,are thepropertyoftheCONTRACTINGAGENCY.Payments totheCONTRACTORforserviceshereunderincludefull compensation for all Work products produced by theCONTRACTORanditsSubcontractorsandthe CONTRACTING AGENCY shall give royalty-free,non-exclusive and irrevocable right to reproduce,publish,orotherwiseuse,and to authorize others to use,such Work products. A18.2 Should the CONTRACTING AGENCY elect to reuse Work products provided under this Agreement forotherthantheoriginalprojectand/or purpose,theCONTRACTINGAGENCYwill.indemnify theCONTRACTORanditsSubcontractorsagainstanyresponsibilitiesorliabilitiesarisingfromsuchreuse.Additionally,any reuse of design drawings orspecificationsprovidedunderthisAgreementmustbelimitedtoconceptualorpreliminaryuseforadaptationandtheoriginalCONTRACTOR's or Subcontractorssignature,professional seals and dates removed.Suchreuseofdrawingsandspecifications,which requireprofessionalsealsanddatesremoved.Such are use ofdrawingsandspecifications,which require professionalsignatureandseal,will be signed,sealed and dated bytheprofessionalwhoisindirectsupervisorycontrolandresponsiblefortheadaptation. ARTICLE A19 Subcontract u nd Assiqn Form 25A262 DOT&PF 11/15/92 A19.1.The CONTRACTING AGENCY must concur intheselectionofailSubcontractorsforprofessionalservicestobeengagedinperformanceofthis Agreement. A19.2 If this Agreement includes named firms orindividuals,then such firms or individuals shall beemployedforthedesignatedservices,unless theAgreementischangedbyAmendments. A19.3.The CONTRACTOR shall not assign,sublet or transfer any interest in this Agreement without the priorwrittenconsentoftheCONTRACTINGAGENCY. A19.4 The CONTRACTOR binds itself,its partners,its Subcontractors,assignees and legal representatives tothisAgreementandtothesuccessors,assignees andlegalrepresentativesoftheCONTRACTINGAGENCYwithrespecttoallcovenantsofthisAgreement. A19.5 The CONTRACTOR shail include provisionsappropriatetoeffectuatethepurposesofthisAppendixAinallsubcontractsexecutedtoperformservicesunderthisAgreementwhichexceedacostof$10,000. ARTICLE A20 Claims and DisputesA20.1 If the CONTRACTOR becomes aware,of any act or occurrence which may form the basis of a claim by theCONTRACTORforadditionalcompensationoranextensionoftimeforperformance,or if any disputearisesregardingaquestionoffactorinterpretationofthis.Agreement,the CONTRACTOR shail immediately informtheProjectManager.If the matter cannot be resolvedwithin7days,the CONTRACTOR shall,within the next14days,submit an "intent to claim”in writing to the Project Manager. If the CONTRACTOR believes additional compensation is warranted,the CONTRACTOR shall immediately begin to keep and maintain complete,accurate andspecificdailyrecordsconcemingeverydetailofthepotentialclaimincludingactualcostsincurred.TheCONTRACTORshailgivetheCONTRACTINGAGENCYaccesstoanysuchrecordand,when so requested,shallforthwithfumishtheCONTRACTINGAGENCYcopies thereof.Equipment costs shall be based on theCONTRACTOR's intemal rates for ownership, depreciation,and operating expense and not on published rental rates. The claim,if not resotved,shall be presented to theProjectManager,in wtting,within 60 days followingreceiptofthe"Intent to Claim”.Receipt of the claim willbeacknowledgedinwritingbytheProjectManager. The CONTRACTOR agrees that unless these writtennoticesareprovided,the CONTRACTOR will have noentitlementtoadditionaltimeorcompensationforsuchact,event or condition.The CONTRACTOR shall in anycasecontinuediligentperformanceunderthis Agreement. A20.2.The claim shall specifically include the following: A20.2.1 The act,event or condition giving rise to the claim. Appendix A USKH299.DOC(Page 4 of 5) A20.2.2 The provisions of the Agreement which apply totheclaimandunderwhichreliefisprovided. A20.2.2 The item or items of project Work affected andhowtheyareaffected. A20.2.2 The specific relief requested,including ContractTimeifapplicable,and the basis upon which itwasCalculated. A20.3_The claim,in order to be valid,must not onlyshowthattheCONTRACTORsuffereddamagesordelaybutthatthoseconditionswereactuallyaresultoftheacteventorconditioncomplainedofandthattheContractprovidesentitlementtorelieftotheCONTRACTORfor such act,event,or condition. The Project Manager reserves the right to make writtenrequesttotheCONTRACTORatanytimeforadditionalinformationwhichtheCONTRACTORmaypossessrelativetotheclaim.The CONTRACTOR agrees toprovidetheProjectManagersuchadditionalinformationwithin30daysofreceiptofsucharequest.Failure tofumishsuchadditionalinformationmayberegardedasawaiveroftheclaim. If the Claim is not resotved by agreement within 60 daysofitsreceipt,the Project Manager will issue a writtendecisiontotheCONTRACTOR.The CONTRACTOR may appeal to the Project Manager's decision within 30daystotheContractingOfficer.Any appeal must be inwritingandmustlistthespecificexceptionstotheProjectManager's decision including specific provisions of theAgreementwhichtheCONTRACTORintendstorelyuponinhisappeal. The CONTRACTOR shall certify that the claim is madeingoodfaith,that the supporting cost and pricing dataareaccurateandcompletetothebestoftheCONTRACTOR's knowledge and belief,and that theamountrequestedaccuratelyreflectstheadjustmenttotheAgreementforwhichtheCONTRACTORbelieves the OEPARTMENT Is liable. A20.4 The CONTRACTOR will be furnished a written,signed copy of the Contracting Officer's decision within90days,unless additional information is requested bytheContractingOfficer.The Contracting Officer'sdecisionisfinalandconclusiveunlessfraudulentasto the claim or unless,within 14 days of receipt of thedecision,the CONTRACTOR delivers a written Notice of Appeal to the Appeals Officer designated on page 2 ofthisAgreement. A20.5 Procedures for appeals and hearings are coveredunderAS36.30.625 and AS 36.30.630. ARTICLE A21 ExtentofAgreementA21.1 This Agreement including appendices representstheentireandintegratedAgreementbetweenCONTRACTINGAGENCYandtheCONTRACTORand supersedes all prior negotiations,representations orAgreements,written or oral. A21.2 Nothing contained herein may be deemed tocreateanycontractualrelationshipbetween Form 25A262 DOTE&PF 11.15/92 CONTRACTING AGENCY and any Subcontractors or material suppliers;nor may anything contained herein bedeemedtogiveanythirdpartyclaimorrightofactionagainsttheCONTRACTINGAGENCYortheCONTRACTORwhichdoesnototherwiseexistwithout this Agreement. A21.3 This Agreement may be changed only by writtenAmendmentexecutedbyboththeCONTRACTINGAGENCYandtheCONTRACTOR. A21.4.All communications that affect this Agreement must be made or confirmed in writing and must be sent to the addresses designated in this Agreement. A21.5 The CONTRACTOR on receiving final paymentwillexecutearelease,if required,in full of all claimsagainsttheCONTRACTINGAGENCYarisingoutoforbyreasonoftheservicesandWorkproductsfumished and under this Agreement. ARTICLE A22 TaxesA22.1 As a condition of performance of this Agreement,the CONTRACTOR shall pay all Federal,State andLocaltaxesincurredbytheCONTRACTORandshallrequiretheirpaymentbyanySubcontractororanyotherpersonintheperformanceofthisAgreement. ARTICLE A23 Goveming LawsA23.1 This Agreement is govemed by the laws of theStateofAlaskaandFederalandLocalLawsand Ordinances applicable to the Work performed.TheCONTRACTORshailbecognizantandshallatalltimesobserveandcomplywithsuchlawswhichinanymanneraffectthoseengagedoremployedintheperformance,orwhichinanywayaffectsthemanneroftheperformance, of this Agreement. ARTICLE A24 Additional Provisions(Deletion or modification of the articles Al through A23shallbeapproved"as to form"by the CONTRACTINGAGENCY's legal section,acknowledged in writing,andattachedtothisAppendix). A24.1 The foll cattification is applicable to allFederal-aid Highway Roreements exceeding $100,000. The prospective participant certifies,by signing and submitting this bid or ,to the best of his or her knowledge and belief, (1)No federal appropriated funds have been paid orwillbepaid,by or on behalf of the undersigned,toanypersonforinfluencingorattemptingtoinfluenceanofficeroremployeesofanyFederalagency,aMemberofCongress,an officer or employee ofCongress,or an employee of a Member of CongressinconnectionwiththeawardingofanyFederalcontract,the making of any Federal grant,the makingofanyFederalloan,the entering into of anycooperativeagreement,and at the extension,continuation,renewal,amendment,or modification of Appendix A USKH299.DOC(Page 5 of 5) any Federal contract,grant,loan,or cooperativeagreement. (2)If any funds other than Federal appropriatedfundshavebeenpaidorwillbepaidtoanypersonforinfluencingorattemptingtoinfluenceanofficeroremployeeofanyFederalagency,a MemberofCongressinconnectionwiththisFederalcontract, grant,loan,of cooperative agreement,theundersignedshallcompleteandsubmitStandardFormLtt,DisclosureofLobbyingActivities,inaccordancewithitsinstructions.Any person who failstofiletherequireddisclosureshailbesubjecttoacivilpenaltyofnotlessthan$10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure. This certification is a material representation of fact uponwhichreliancewasplacedwhenthistransactionwas made or entered into.Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for mag or entering into this transactionimposedbySection1352,Title 31,U.S.Code. The prospective participant also agrees by submitting hisorherbidorproposalthatheorsheshailrequirethatthelanguageofthiscertificationbeincludedinalllowertiersubcontracts,which exceed $100,000 and that all such subrecipients shall certify and disclose accordingly. Form 25A262 DOTa&PF 11:15492 APPENDIX B SCOPE OF SERVICES USKH299.DOC Contract No.2155299 Appendix B SCOPE OF WORK |.Background and Services Requested: A.Project Goals Rural Alaskan communities use over twice as much energy for space heating as they use for electrical generation.Schools and other public buildings use about half of the space heating energy in a typical community,while private residences consume the rest.Fuel oil is the major source of energy in larger buildings. Waste heat produced by diesel power generation has been used effectively in a number of communities for heating larger buildings;however,in other villages substantial quantities of oil must be imported and stored for space heating. Purchase of fuel oil can present a significant financial drain for cash-poor communities. Waste heat recovery has been the focus of numerous studies sponsored by the Alaska Power Authority during the 1980s.Two other promising alternatives for decreasing oil consumption in non-residential structures,using local fuels and increasing building energy efficiency,have been studied less systematically. Various reconnaissance studies have identified wood as the most readily available local fuel in forested regions. The purpose of this contract is to identify site-specific cost-effective measures that will reduce the amount of oil used for space heating major buildings in select rural Alaskan communities.Specifically,the contract focuses on wood fuel substitution and energy conservation measures as alternatives for offsetting fuel oil usage.Although the primary focus of this contract is on space heating, measures for increasing electrical energy efficiency in major buildings will also be assessed consistent with the broader requirements of the Institutional Conservation Program (ICP).The ICP is a federally-funded program managed in Alaska by the Division of Energy and aimed at increasing energy efficiency of schools and hospitals. Page 1 of 13 B.Work to Be Performed The Scope of Work for this contract is organized into two phases: 1.Phase 1.Compile Existing Information on Energy Consumption and Recommendations a.Description This phase:1)draws together and updates existing information regarding major building energy usage in study area communities,2)summarizes past energy development efforts and recommendations,and 3)recommends priorities for in- depth study.Although this contract focuses on energy efficiency and fuel substitution alternatives,information collected in Phase 1 is also expected to be useful for other energy planning and development activities.Study area communities (Table 1)have populations greater than 150,relatively high energy costs,and significant fuelwood resources."Major buildings"are defined as non- residential buildings and other facilities whose annual heating energy consumption exceeds the equivalent of 4,000 gallons of #2 fuel oil. Table 1 lists potential major buildings in study area communities.The list,which was developed using Power Cost Equalization Program data,is included to serve as a guide for proposers estimating phase 1 costs.It is anticipated that not all of the facilities listed qualify as major buildings,and that there are other facilities which qualify as major buildings that the contractor will identify in the course of the study. It is expected that the contractor will first conduct a complete survey of published information on existing major buildings and energy recommendations by community.At a minimum,the publications and sources listed in Table 2 will be reviewed;however,the contractor will also seek and incorporate other useful sources.This information will then be updated through direct communication with targeted building owners,staff,and other individuals with knowledge of current building energy usage.Based on this research,the contractor will then prepare the draft report and database described below and submit them to the Division of Energy for review.Following review,the contractor will incorporate the additions and modifications requested by the Division and submit a final report and database. b.Deliverables i.A draft database which includes,but is not limited to,information listed in Table 3 for each major building and each community.The database will be in DBase IV,Lotus,or Excel file format for use on an IBM compatible Page 2 of 13 microcomputer and will be delivered as three bound paper copies,as a reproducible paper master,and on 3.5"diskette. ii.A draft report which describes the results of phase 1 work.The report will be in Microsoft Word or WordPerfect file format and delivered as three bound paper copies,as a reproducible paper master,and on 3.5"diskette.The report will include the following: a)Text and tables which describe and summarize information in the above database by building and community. b)Aconcise description of related energy efficiency and energy development recommendations from previous studies.Discussion should be limited to recommendations for larger facilities regarding waste heat from diesel generators,district heat systems,substitution of fuel oil by wood and refuse,and energy conservation retrofits. c)Alist of all sources used in the study and,in the case of published literature,where they may be found.A list of personal contacts made. d)Recommended priorities among communities and major buildings for conducting detailed,on-site feasibility analysis of fuel substitution and energy conservation retrofits in phase 2. iii.A final report and database in the above formats. 2.Phase 2.Detailed Analysis of Fuelwood Substitution and Energy Efficiency Measures a.Description The objective of phase 2 is to identify a set of feasible,site-specific measures which can be applied in target communities to decrease fuel oil consumption for space heating in major buildings.As stated above,the two areas of opportunity on which this contract focuses are fuelwood substitution and energy conservation measures.The contractor will analyze and describe recommended measures in sufficient detail such that design and construction may proceed without further assessment. Based on phase 1 recommendations and discussions with local residents and building managers,the Division of Energy will revise the scope of work for phase 2 activities and negotiate a fixed price with the contractor.The Division may decide not to conduct phase 2 of the project if the Division finds that phase 1 Page 3 of 13 results are not promising,the contractor's performance is not satisfactory,or other circumstances warrant. Analysis of potential energy efficiency and fuelwood substitution retrofits in major buildings will follow the requirements of Technical Assistance (TA)studies under the Alaska State Plan for the Institutional Conservation Program,available from the Division of Energy.The consultant will provide a detailed description of the building envelop;energy use and occupancy;mechanical,HVAC,and electrical systems;and recommended operation and maintenance procedures.Economic feasibility of projects which appear most viable will be determined by comparing project life cycle benefits and costs. In addition to the above,assessments of fuelwood substitution projects will address cost of fuelwood harvest,transportation,and processing,as well as long-term timber supply.Since available timber supply will be closely related to local land use and economic development objectives,it is expected that this portion of the feasibility assessment will require substantial discussion with community leaders and major landowners. For energy efficiency and fuelwood substitution projects judged feasible,the consultant will provide a clear and thorough description of the recommended measure.This will include e Cost estimates and performance criteria suitable for procurement of final design and construction e Recommended equipment e Siting and conceptual design of new construction (e.g.boiler houses,wood storage,piping loops) e Adiscussion of applicable environmental and land use requirements and permits e Options for project financing b.Deliverables i.Draft reports by community presenting the results of analyses of potential fuelwood substitution and energy efficiency measures and describing recommended projects.Reports will be delivered in Microsoft Word or WordPerfect file format and delivered as three bound paper copies,as a reproducible paper master,and on 3.5"diskette. Page4 of 13 ii.Final reports in the above format. ll.Anticipated Schedule: Deliverable Due Date Contract start date June 1,1995 Phase|draft report July 14,1995 Division provides comments on phase|draft July 28,1995 Phase |final report August 11,1995 Phase I!draft reports November 11,1995 Division provides comments on phase I!drafts December 1,1995 Phase II final report due December 21,1995 The Issuing Office estimates that funding available for this project will not exceed $200,000. Page 5 of 13 Table 1.Communities and potential major buildings to be addressed in phase 1. Community Akiachak Allakaket Ambler Aniak Elim Fort Yukon Grayling Gustavus Holy Cross Huslia Potential Major Building Village Safewater Bidg High School Laundromat VSW IRA District heat system Water Plant NW Arctic School District City of Ambler buildings FAA buildings District heating system Alascom Alaska Commercial Co. Kuspuk School District State of Alaska building FAA Water and Sewer Facility Bering Strait School District District heating system YSFD School YSFD-Admin Bldg DOT-State Bldg City Water and Sewer Facility iditarod Area School District Water Plant District heating system Tuboscope Fire Hall and Library Gustavus School IT Corporation Water Facility Iditarod Area School District Yukon Koyukuk School District Page 6 of 13 Kaltag Kiana Kokhanok Koliganek Koyuk Larsen Bay Lower Kalskag McGrath New Stuyahok Nulato Ouzinkie Pelican FAA Yukon Koyukuk School District Kaltag Pumphouse District heating system NW Arctic School District Laundromat Water Plant District heating system Washeteria Kokhanok Village Council Community building Koyuk Washeteria Bering Strait School District KIBSD Main Building PHS Pumphouse Washeteria Alascom Inc. Alaska Commercial Co. McGrath School City of McGrath building USFAA building Iditarod Area School!District MNVC Kiln Project Water pump bldg service Washeteria Bristol Bay Area Health Corp. SW Region School District District heating system Yukon Koyukuk School District Wellhouse KIB Building (school) Tribal freezer Pelican Seafoods Page 7 of 13 Ruby Shungnak Tanana Upper Kalskag Yakutat Community Hall M.A.K.School Washeteria NW Arctic School District Kobuk Valley Electric Co. River Pumphouse District heat system Tanana School District FAA building Tanana Safewater Laundry Alascom District heat system Kuspuk School District Alaska DOT/PF Yakutat City Schools Glacier Bear Lodge Leonard's Landing Lodge Alascom AK Airlines U.S.DOT District heat system Sitka Sound Seafood Page 8 of 13 Table 2.Sources to be included in researching major building energy loads and recommendations. Publication Author Location Reconnaissance Study of Energy Prepared in 1981 by Division of Requirements and Alternatives for Intemational Engineering Co.,|Energy LibraryBuckland,Chuathbaluk,Crooked Creek,1981 for the Alaska Power Hughes,Koyukuk,Nikolai,Red Devil,Authority. Russian Mission,Sheldon Point, Sleetmute,Stony River,Takotna,and Telida Reconnaissance Study of Energy Prepared in 1981 by Holden Division of Requirements and Alternatives for Kaltag,|Associates;Fryer,Pressley,Energy Library Savoonga,White Mountain and Elim Elliott Engineers;Jack West Associates for the Alaska Power Authority. Reconnaissance Study of Energy Prepared in 1982 by ACRES,Division of Requirements and Altematives for Alatna,|for the Alaska Power Authority.|Energy Library Atqasuk,Brevig Mission,Diomede, Galena,Golovin,Gustavus,Kariuk, Koyuk,New Chenega,Ruby,Saint Michael,Shageiuk,Shishmaref,Stebbins, Teller,Unalakleet,and Yakutat. Reconnaissance Study of Energy Prepared in 1981 by Northern Division of Requirements and Altematives for Togiak,|Technical Services and Energy Library Goodnews Bay,Scammon Bay and VanGulik &Associates for the Grayling.Alaska Power Authority. Reconnaissance Study of Energy Prepared in 1982 by Northem Division of Requirements and Altematives for the Technical Services and Energy LibraryvillagesofAniak,Atka,Chefomak,Chignik |VanGulik &Associates for theLake,Cold Bay,False Pass,Hooper Bay,|Alaska Power Authority. Ilvanof Bay,Kotlik,Lower and Upper Kalskag,Mekoryuk,Newtok,Nightmute, Nikolski,St.George,St.Mary's,St Paul, Tooksook Bay and Tununak. Reconnaissance Study of Energy Prepared in 1981 by Holden &|Division ofRequirementsandAltemativesforWhite|Associates;Fryer,Pressley,Energy Library Mountain,Alaska.Elliott;JWA Professional Engineering for the Alaska Power Authority. Reconnaissance Study of Energy Prepared in 1981 by CH2M Hill |Division of Requirements &Alternatives for Akhiok,for the Alaska Power Authority.|Energy Library King Cove,Larsen Bay,Old Harbor, Ouzinkie &Sand Point. Page 9 of 13 Publication Author Location Reconnaissance Study of Energy Prepared in 1980 by CH2M Hill |Division ofRequirementsandEnergyAlternativesfor|for the Alaska Power Authority.|Energy LibraryKodiakIslandVillagesandSandPointand King Cove. A Feasibility Study for Waste-Heat Driven |Prepared in 1990 by Dr.Division of Absorption Refrigeration Plants in Alaska.|Ronald A.Johnson;Energy Library Dr.Debendra K.Das; Ms.Charlotte Hok-Barker, M.S.,Institute of Northern Engineering,UAF for the Alaska Energy Authority. Rural Energy Waste Heat Program:Final |Prepared in 1985 by Division of Report of Waste Heat Recovery System Polarconsult Alaska,Inc.for Energy Library Operations for the City of Tanana.the Alaska Power Authority. Rural Energy Waste Heat Program:Final |Prepared by Polarconsult Division of Report,Volume |,Project Summary for the |Alaska,Inc.for the Alaska Energy Library Villages of Kiana,Ambler,Shungnak,Power Authority,1983. Savoonga,Elim,Kaltag,Grayling, Goodnews Bay and Angoon,St.Mary's and Unalakleet. Rural Energy Waste Heat Program:Prepared in 1983 by Division of Progress Report No.5 for the Villages of {Polarconsult Alaska,Inc.for Energy Library Kiana,Ambler,Shungnak,Savoonga,the Alaska Power Authority. Elim,Kaltag,Grayling,Goodnews Bay and Angoon,St.Mary's and Unalakleet. Rural Waste Heat Capture and District Prepared in 1982 by Raj Division of Heating Project.Bhargava Associates for the Energy Library Alaska Power Authority. Fort Yukon Waste Heat Recovery Report |Prepared in 1990 by Division of and Concept Design Fryer/Pressiey Engineering,Energy Library Inc.for the Alaska Energy Authority. Findings and Recommendations:Division of Feasibility and Design of Waste Heat Energy Library Facilities for 11 Alaskan Villages. Rural Energy Construction Program 1982-|Prepared in 1983 by Crews Division of 1983.Macinnes Hoffman/VITRO Energy Library Consulting Engineers for the Alaska Power Authority. Rural Energy Construction Program 1984-|Prepared in April by Division of 1985.Raj Bhargava Associates for Energy Library the Alaska Power Authority. Page 10 of 13 Publication Author Location Use of Wood Energy in Remote Interior Alaskan Communities Prepared in 1982 by Reid, Collins Alaska,Inc.,for the Alaska Division of Energy and Power Development. Division of Energy Library List of schools,colleges,and training Prepared in 1994 by the Alaska |Alaska schools in Alaska Department of Education.Department of Education Report and Concept Design,White Prepared in 1991 by Division of Mountain Waste Heat Recovery Frank Moolin and Associates,Energy Library Inc.for the Alaska Energy Authority. Report and Concept Design,White Prepared in 1991 by Division of Mountain Waste Heat Recovery Frank Moolin and Associates,Energy Library Inc.for the Alaska Energy Authority. Alaska Housing Finance Corporation AHFC AHFC Library energy library database Page 11 of 13 Table 3:Information to be included for each major building in phase 1 database. Name Address City Zip Phone Contact Name Type of facility (e.g.school,hospital,community building,washeteria, commercial building,district heating system) 8.Owner 9.Contact Name 10.Address 11.City 12.Zip 13.PhoneNOAARWN>14.Year constructed 15.Total gross square footage 16.Renovations and Additions,Year.Description 17.|Planned changes in functional use next 20 years (e.g.demolition, disposal,rehabilitation,conversion), Year.Description 15.Overall condition of building 16.Average hours of occupied use by month and day of week. Mon Tues Wed Thur Fri Sat Sun July August September October November December January February March -Leobkewhweberdite.-_-April May June Page 12 of 13 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. Annual Energy Consumption a)Electricity (kWh and kW,peak) b)Natural gas (cf) c)Diesel Oil#1 (gal) d)Diesel Oil #2 (gal) e)Propane (Ib) f)Healy Coal (ton) g)Wood (cord) h)Purchased steanvhot water (mmBtu) i)Other Annual Retail Cost ($) a)Electricity b)Natural gas c)Diesel #1 d)Diesel #2 e)Propane f)Healy Coal g)Wood h)Purchased steam/hot water i)Other Time period for energy consumption and cost data,from to Types of lighting in use a)Incandescent b)Fluorescent c)Mercury vapor d)High pressure sodium e)Metal halide f)Other Description of special energy using systems (e.g.food service,laundry equipment,swimming pool) Mechanical systems (repeat for each heater) a)Type of heater (e.g.furnace,hot water boiler,steam boiler,hot water heater) b)Type of Fuel (e.g.electricity,natural gas,#1 diesel,#2,diesel,#4 diesel,propane,coal,wood,purchased steam/nhot water) c)Description of heat distribution systems Page 13 of 13 APPENDIX C PSA #:2155299 COMPENSATION PJ #_N/A C1.Payments will be made on approved Invoices.Except for Fixed Price(s)and Fixed Fees,compensation shall be cost-based on actual costs to the Contractor for providing services.Provisions for Audit are contained in Appendix A. C2.Price proposals and Notices-to-Proceed (NTPs)for this Agreement must conform to the LaborRates,Indirect Cost Rate(s),Unit Prices,Fee/Profit Arrangements,Estimated Costs,and Price CapscontainedintheExhibitsattachedtothisAppendixC. C3.Payments are limited to the amount(s)cited in each Notice-to-Proceed (NTP)issued for thisAgreement.The Contractor expressly has no right to any payments in excess of each NTP amount. C4.Final payment to the Contractor may be withheld until a Release from Agreement,on a formprescribedbytheContractingAgency,is executed by the Contractor. C5.Payments for this Agreement and any Amendment,including Costs and Fee,will be adjustedtoexcludeanysignificantsumsbywhichtheContractingAgencyfindsthatpaymentsareincreasedbecausethecostorpricingdatafurnishedbytheContractororprospectiveContractorisinaccurate,AS 30 30-4 Son current on the date of the Agreement or subsequent submittal date of pricing data C.6 The following terminology and explanations are applicable to this Agreement;anyinconsistenciesappearinginthisAgreementmustberesolvedinaccordancewiththeterminologyinthisparagraph. C6.1 Direct Labor Costs -Base salary and/or wages paid to employees charged directly to thisAgreementexclusiveofFringeBenefitsorotherIndirectCostsandFees(including profit). C6.2 Other Direct Costs -Actual costs for subcontracts,equipment (company owned or rented),unit rate items and reimbursable expenses (travel,per diem,reproduction,etc.)exclusive of the Contractor's Direct Labor Costs. C6.3 Indirect Costs -Allowable expenses that,because of their incurrence for common or joint costobjectives,must be allocated to this Agreement using a specified Indirect Cost Rate.A costobjectiveisafunction,organizational subdivision,contract,project or work unit for which cost data isaccumulatedundertheContractor's accounting system.Generally,Indirect Costs are segregatedintothefollowingcategories:Fringe Benefits,Overhead (General &Administrative Expenses -including Indirect Labor),and Allocated Home Office Overhead (if applicable). C6.3.1Fringe Benefits -Costs for items such as: Vacation time and authorized leave; Group and worker's Compensation Insurance;Deferred Compensation/Retirement plans;Social Security and unemployment taxes;andGroupMedicalplanandLifeInsurancePremiums C6.3.2Overhead -Costs for items such as the following,if they are in included in Direct Costs: Indirect Labor (Supervisory,Administrative,etc.)Office supplies; including base salary or wages and related Communications; Fringe Benefits Reproduction costs; Travel,food and lodging;Recruiting expenses;andUpkeepanddepreciationofequipment/computers;Rentals of equipment/computersBusinessInsurancepremiumsnotbilledtoclients;Rent,heat,power,light and janitorial services; USKH299.DO0C (Page 1 of 2) C6.3.3Allocated Home Office Overhead (if applicable)-Costs for management,supervisory,andadministrativefunctionswhichbenefitunitoperations. C6.4 Indirect Cost Rate -A negotiated percentage of incurred expenses for Direct Labor CostswhichisusedasabasisofcompensationforIndirectCosts.Fees or Profit are not included in the Indirect Cost Rate. C6.4.1If this Agreement wholly or partially allocates Indirect Costs on other than a Direct Laborbasis,a description of the Indirect Cost pools or service centers used,and the Indirect Cost Rate(s)and base(s),shall be attached in an Exhibit to this Appendix C;otherwise,such an allocation shallnotbeallowedforthiscontract. C6.4.2Indirect Cost Rates may be fixed or provisional and may be negotiated for the duration of theAgreementoronafiscalyearbasis. C6.4.3Provisional Indirect Cost Rates require a Contracting Agency approved audit of accountingrecordsaftereachoftheContractor's or Subcontractor's fiscal years during which they perform work under the Agreement. C6.4.4Indirect Cost Rates may be changed only by a negotiated Amendment.Payments for IndirectCostsbasedonaprovisionalratemaybeadjustedtoreflectachangedrateifprescribedinanExhibitattachedtothisAppendixC.The amount of any payment adjustments must be cited in theAmendment.Also,the cost estimates for remaining work must be adjusted to reflect the changed Indirect Cost Rate. C6.5 Non-allowable Costs -Payments for the following items and certain other costs defined in 41CFRPart31andrelatedregulationsarenotallowable.Such costs shall not be included as billableDirectorIndirectCostsorinthecalculationoftheIndirectCostRate. Interest and other financial Costs Bad debts Contributions and donations Fines and Penalties Dividends Entertainment,Social Club Membership,etc. Federal income taxes Provisions for Contingencies Deferred state income taxes Losses on other contracts and related legal fees C6.6 Fee -Profit plus any costs not allocable to this contract.The amount of Fee may be fixed orvariable,depending on the method of payment used.Not allocable costs shall not be considered bytheContractingAgencywhennegotiatingFee. C7.Markup of any costs as compensation for administration,management or handling,etc.,isprohibited.Costs of such efforts are included within the elements of Direct Labor and/or IndirectLabor.Compensation for any risk associated with incurring costs is included within Profit. C8.Exhibits:C-1 NTP Form(Sample);C-2 Payments Schedule;and,C-3 Table(s)of Estimated Costs. DOT/PF Form 25A280 $/1/92 Appendix C -Compensation USKH299.DOC (Page 2 of 2) PROJECT AGREEMENT FIXED PRICE(S)Exhibit C-1 Contractor ........:USKH,Inc. Project Title ......:Rural Alaska Heat Cons.&Fuel Sub. NTP No.: Agreement No.:2155299 Project No.:N/A Assessment NOTICE TO PROCEED In accordance with our Agreement,for the above project provide the following services: Compensation for these services shall not exceed the (below). authorized amount(s)specified in the Invoice section issued By (Agency Contract Manager)NTP Accepted (Contractor) Signature Date Signature Date Name:Name: INVOICE Sequential Invoice Number for this NTP Contractor's Invoice Number. Cost Auth.Amount Prior This Totals to %Auth.Balance Element ,Payments Invoice Date Authorized Fixed $$$$%$ Price(s)Expenses $$$$%$ Total $$$$%$ Encumbrance No.:2155299 Payment Request (Contractor): Collocation Code Program Code Ledger Code Account Code Signature Date Name: APPROVALS FOR PAYMENT Payment Recommended (Agency Contract Manager):Payment Approved (Agency Official): Signature Date Signature Date Name:Name: PERFORMANCE EVALUATION (Quantity,Quality,Cost,Schedule,etc.)by Agency Contract Manager. DOT/PF 3/1/92 USKH299.D0C CONTRACTOR'S INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE (Page 1 of 2) PROJECT AGREEMENT CONTRACTOR'S INSTRUCTIONS Keep a copy of this form as issued for Reproduction and billing 2.lf the Notice to Proceed (NTP)is unacceptable,contact the Agency Contract Managerimmediately.If acceptable,acknowledge by signature under "NTP ACCEPTABLE"on a copyofthisformandretumittotheAgencyContractManagerwithintendaysfollowingreceipt. 3.Submit invoices to the Agency Contract Manager when services are completed or monthly asappropriate.You may use your firm's invoice forms;however,you must also provide acompletedcopyofthisformastheFACEPAGEOFEACHINVOICEsubmittedwiththefollowingentriescompleted: -Sequential Invoice Number for this NTP-Contractor's Invoice Number (if appropriate)-Entries for each cost element under:Prior Payments.This Invoice,Totals to Date,Percentage of Authorized Amount that Totals to Date represent,and the Balance Authorized -Signature with printed or typed name and date underPaymentRequest(Contractor) 4.Substantiate all charges other than for Fixed Price(s)or Fixed Fee by attaching:summary ofhoursexpendedandlaborchargesperemployee;summary of units completed,subcontractorbillings;expense receipts,etc.;or other proof of expenditures. 5.Signature under "PAYMENT REQUEST (CONTRACTOR)"acknowledges the followingcertification: "By Signature on this form,the Contractor certifies entries to be true and correct for servicesperformedtodateunderorbyvirtueofsaidAgreementandinaccordancewithAS36.30.400.The Contractor further certifies that all applicable Federal,State and Local taxes incurred bytheContractorintheperformanceofserviceshavebeenpaidandthatallSubcontractorsengagedbytheContractorfortheservicesincludedinanyinvoiceshallbefullycompensatedbytheContractorforsuchservices.” DOT/PF 3/1/92 CONTRACTOR'S INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE (Page 2 of 2) USKH299.DOC EXHIBIT C-2 PAYMENTS SCHEDULE 1,Estimated Contractor and Subcontractor costs of this Agreement are summarized below. CONTRACTOR/SUBCONTRACTOR ESTIMATED PRICE USKH,Inc.$21,725.00 Alaska Energy &Engineering $9,675.00 Tanana Chiefs Conference $1,800.00 Total Agreement Amounts:$33,200.00 Note:Cost,Fee and Price listed for the above partiesdo not include the estimated Price of any other party listed in the table. 2.Progress payments will be based on receipt and approval of monthly NTP/INVOICE forms formonthsduringwhichcostsareincurred.Except for Fixed Prices,Contractor and any SubcontractorsshallestablishandmaintainseparateauditablecostaccountingforeachNTP. 3.The following Method(s)of Payment are used in this Agreement: METHOD OF PAYMENT MAXIMUM AMOUNT(S)PAYABLE FFP -Firm Fixed Price(s)$33,200.00 FPPE -Fixed Price Plus Expenses $ CPFF -Cost Plus Fixed Fee $ T&E -Time and Expenses $ Total Agreement Amount:$33,200.00 4 Fixed Price(s)payments will be a single lump sum payment equal to the Fixed Price orprogresspaymentsnottoexceedtheFixedPricestatedintheNTP. 5.Fixed Price(s)Plus Expenses payments will be a single lump sum payment equal to the FixedPriceorprogresspaymentsnottoexceedtheFixedPrice(s)stated in the NTP plus payments forsubstantiatedReimbursableExpenseswhichdonotexceedtheexpenseallowancestatedinthe 6.Cost Plus Fixed Fee payments will be made according to the following: 6.1 Payments for Direct Labor Costs will be equivalent to the number of hours expended byeachjobclassificationmultipliedbytheapplicableDirectLaborRate. 6.2 Payments for Indirect Costs shall be based on the amount for Direct Labor multiplied bythefollowingapplicableIndirectCostRates: Appendix C DOT.PF Form 254230 USKH299.DOC $1.92 7.0 CONTRACTOR/AUDIT NUMBER END OF CURRENT =|IDCR(%)andSUBCONTRACTOR(IF APPLICABLE)FISCAL YEAR TYPE (F.F/P_OR P)USKH,Inc.94-PA-11 12/31/95 154%F *Notes: 1.IDCR with "E"is fixed for the duration of this Agreement. 2.IOCR with ""F/P"is fixed for the firm's current fiscal year,after which it becomes aprovisionalrateuntilanauditestablishesarevisedfixedrateforeachnewfiscalyear. 3.IDCR with "P"is provisional until completion of post performance audit to establishactualincurredratewhichisusedtonegotiateafinalIDCRfortheperiodcoveredbytheaudit.Post performance audits may be done each fiscal year or once after thecompletionofamulti-year contract.Revised rates can be implemented only by acontractAmendment. 4.Adjustment of any payments made based on provisional IDCR must be supported byacontractAmendmentthatfullyexplainstheamountofalladjustments. 5.All types of IDCRs are capped for the duration of this Agreement.Any subsequentadjustmentsofFixed,Fixed/Provisional_or Provisional rates shall not exceed 125%of those listed above. 6.The parties listed in the above table with either a "F/P"or "P"must segregate costsincurredindifferentfiscalyearsandsubmitseparatebillingsforsuchcosts. 6.3.Payments for allowable Other Direct Costs -if not included in Indirect Costs -shall bemadeforactual,substantiated costs of Subcontractors,Equipment,Unit Rate Items andReimbursableExpenses,that are in conformance with the applicable NTP.ReimbursableExpenses,payments for the following items which are directly chargeable to and necessaryforperformanceoftheservices,are limited reasonable costs which do not exceed that whichwouldbeincurredbyanordinarilyprudentpersonintheconductofcompetentbusiness: Transportation (Economy Rates/Air-Coach);Food and Lodging (Generally,not to exceed Agency Per Diem Rates);Incidential Travel Expenses;Equipment and Computer Use at Approved Rates;Specific Materials and Supplies;andOtherdirectexpenseswhichmaybe identified in a Notice to Proceed. 6.4 If not defined elsewhere in this Appendix C,progress payments for Fees will be basedontheratioofapprovedcoststodate,divided by estimated costs,multiplied by the agreedamountofFee,for the tasks billed. Time and Expenses payments will be monthly,equivalent to the number of hours expended byeachjobclassificationmultipliedbytheapplicablebillingrate.Billing Rates are negotiated rateswhichincludecompensationforallDirectLaborCosts,all Indirect Costs,and Fees.If Billing RatesforeachpersonorjobclassificationarenotstatedinthisAppendixC,then the Billing Rates shall beequaltotheproductoftheDirectLaborRatesmultipliedby2.75 (IDCR =150%,FEE =10%). Appendix C DOT/PF Form 254280 USKH299.DOC S92 EXHIBIT C-3,TABLE OF ESTIMATED COSTS CONTRACTOR/SUBCONTRACTOR:USKH,Inc.METHOD OF PAYMENT:__X_FP,FPPE,CPFF,T&E PROJECT TITLE:RURAL ALASKA HEAT CONSERVATION &FUEL SUBSTITUTION ASSESSMENT FIXED PRICE FOR ALL TASKS RELATED TO PHASE |$33,200.00 ixC Fonm 25A280,DOT&PF 3/1/92 neve Nac INDEMNIFICATION AND INSURANCE APPENDIX D Agreement No.:2155299 Project No.:N/A Date Prepared:5/26/95 ARTICLE01 Hold Harness 01.1 The CONTRACTOR shail indemnify,hold harmiess,and defend the CONTRACTING AGENCY from and against any ciaim of,or liability for negligent error or omission of the CONTRACTOR under thisAgreement.The CONTRACTOR shail not be required to indemnify the CONTRACTING AGENCY for a ctaim of,or iability for,the independent negligence of the CONTRACTING AGENCY.If there is a claim of,or liability for,the joint negligent error or Omission of the CONTRACTOR and the independent negiigence of the CONTRACTING AGENCY the indemnification and hold harmiess obligation shail be apportioned on s comparative fault basis.""CONTRACTOR®and "CONTRACTINGAGENCY,”2s used within this article,include the empicyees,agents andothercontractorswhoaredirectlyresponsible,respectively,to each.The Independent Negligence' CONTRACTING AGENCY'S selection,administration,of the CONTRACTOR and in approving or accepting theCONTRACTOR's Work. 012 The CONTRACTOR shall exercise that degree of sidi,care shall be established by a panel of three qualified,impertial professionalsobjectivelyselectedandappointedbytheappesisofficer. 01.3 The CONTRACTOR shail correct,through reperformance atksexpense,any services which are deficient of defective because of theCONTRACTOR's failure to perform said services in accordance with professional standards,provided the CONTRACTING AGENCY hasnotifiedtheCONTRACTORinwritingwithinareesonabietime,not toexceed60days,of the discovery of any such deficiency during theperformanceoftheservicesandwithin12montheofthedateoffinalpaymertunderthisagreement. CONTRACTOR'sptansandspecificationsduringarelimitedtotheamountofprofessionaliabiityinsurance identified inarticleD2.5 02.1 Without fimiting OR's indemnification,2 isagreedthatCONTRACTORparcheseatIscwexpenseandmaintaininforceatallimesferGalidurationofthisAgreement,plus one imits.If the CONTRACTOR's policy contains higher limits,theCONTRACTING AGENCYshail be entitiedtocoveragetotheextentofsuchhigherlimits.CertificatesofinsurancemustbefumishedtotheCONTRACTINGAGENCYandincorporatedMEOOeaetdgePetstetaeCONTAC:Certificates mustprovidefora30-day poor nace to the CONTRACTING AGENCY ofcancettationorreductioninanylimitsoffabiity.FailuretofurnishcertificatesofinsuranceoreeeetectOnnmeeeadaesgroundsforterminationoftheCONTRACTOR's services and mayprectudeotherAgreementsbetweentheCONTRACTORandthe CONTRACTING AGENCY.uiii3,Appendix D USKH299.DOC 02.1.1 Worker's Compensation Insurance:For salemployeesoftheCONTRACTORengagedinWorkunderthisagreement,"Worker's Compensation insurance”as required byAS23.30.045.The CONTRACTORshailberesponsiblefor febiityprotectionnotlessthan$100,000 per person,$100,000 peroccurrence.Where appiicabie,for all federalacts(Le.,U.S.L.&H.and Jones Acts)must also be included. body Inury end propery damage fabilty Inciing coverageforpremisesandoperations,?|imits offabiltyare$300,000 per occurrence (combined single imi)for limits are per the following schedule: Contract Combined Single Limit,Per Amourt Under $25,000 As Available $25,000 to $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 to $400,900 $250,000 $500,000 to $999,960 $500,000 $1,000,000 and over Negotiable 02.2 Professional Liability insurance coverage and limits required forthisAgreement:$> 023 CONTRACTOR shail include the provisions of trus form in adsubcontractswhichexceed$25,000 and shall ensure Subcortractor'scompliancewithsuchprovisions. Form 254269,DOT&PF 2/10/93 ARTICLE D3 Modification of Insurance Requirements 03.1 if the provisions of article D2 are modified for this Agreement,justification and approval by the Contracting Officer isrequired.Check the appropriate box(es)below and complete the following,as applicable to this Agreement. Note:Project Manager should carefully review Chapter 12 of the PSA handbook prior to modifying this Appendix. Modification Not Applicable:QO Modification Approved | 03.2 Modifications to the insurance provisions pertaining to Workers Comp,General Liability,or Auto Liability coverages arenotedbelow.CONTRACTOR must °°and sign the certification (first)block and any specific text modifying existing coverages. Oo |certify that the CONTRACTOR shall fully indemnify,save harmless and defend the CONTRACTING AGENCY,its officers, agents,and employees from all liability,actions,or claims,including costs and expenses,resulting from injuries or damagessustainedbyanypersonorpropertyarisingdirectlyorindirectlyfromtheCONTRACTOR's performance on this Agreement which would be covered by the insurance policies specified in Article 02,but which are waived in accordance with any of my signed certifications below: CONTRACTOR Signature Date: O Worker's Compensation Insurance is not required because |,the CONTRACTOR,am an Independent Contractor,Sole Proprietor or Self Employed Person having no employees in any sense of AS 23.30.045. CONTRACTOR Signature Date: a Comprehensive or Commercial General Liability Insurance is not required because |do not maintain a piace of business or home office to which the general public or my clients have any business access. CONTRACTOR Signature Date: |Comprehensive Automobile Liability Insurance is not required because only public transportation,or a rented passenger vehicle with business use insurance,will be used to accomplish requirements of this Agreement. CONTRACTOR Signature Date: 03.3 Professional Liability Insurance (E&O).CONTRACTING AGENCY shall indicate the reason(s)for reducing the E&O limits by marking the appropriate box(es).Contracting Officer's signature must appear in 03.4 beiow. 03.3.1 E&O Insurance may be Zero if al!of the following statements apply: s CONTRACTING AGENCY's use of the services or Work products obtained from the CONTRACTOR will not resuit in significant exposure to any third party claims for loss or damage. |CONTRACTOR services will not apply to any construction,alteration,demolition,repair or direct use of any highway,airport,harbor,building or other structure.Note:When services mey apply to fire,iife safetyorstructural aspects and/or wherever the services should safeguard life,limb,health or preperty,Agreements shail inciude requirements fro Professional Liability insurance. OR 03.3.2 E&O Insurance has been reduced to zero as the Agreement is to provide only the following services. eo)e Right-of-Way Fee Appraisals, oO °Photogrammetric Mapping Services,or Oo °Architectural/Engineering review of Construction Bid Documents wherein design responsibility clearly remains with the designer of record. b] 03.4 Approval of Modifications7,/t,,.aContractingOfficer's Signature:thts Ach?4,Gle2f35Name:/c Date ° Title: Appendix D _.Form 25A269,DOT&PF 2/10/93 USKH299.DOC = REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS PART PACKAGE DOE-95-R-005 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS ISSUING OFFICE Contracting AQ@Ncy .......eee :DCRA/Division of Energy Commnrtee ChairpersorvPhone......Peter Crimp 269-4631 PROJECT Project Numbers-State/Federal ...........: Project Site (city,village,etc.)............: Project Title &Contract Description ...... "Rural Alaska Heat Conservation and Fuel Substitution Assessment".This is a fixed price contract to identify opportunities for energy efficiency and woodfuel substitution in rural Alaska. Anticipated penod for pertormance -SeqirvEnd: Estimated amount of proposed contract: (C1 Not exceeding $25,000 (_!$50,000 to $100,000 LJ $250,000 to $500,000 CO $25,000 to $50,000 LX]$100,000 to $250,000 CJ $500,000 to $1,000,000 Proposed method(s)of payment:C]$1,000,000 or Greater kK]Firm Fixed Price (FFP)C]Fixed Price plus Expenses (FPPE) CJ Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF)LJ Other (Describe):Successful proposer will submit FFP for Phase 1.State may negotiate FFP for Phase 2 following completion of Phase 1. INDEX This package consists of the following items assembled as listed: Ferm 25A270,PartA -Request for Proposals (RFP)Form 25A257,Pre-Audit Statement Part 8 -Submittal Checklist Proposed Scope of Work Part C -Evaluation Criteria Other (specify): Part D -Proposai Form Part G -Standard Agreement Forms Part E -Rates &Price Proposal Formats SUBMITTAL DEADLINE Date:March 15,1995 Prevailing Time:4:30 p.m. Mail ta:OR Deliver ta:Division of Energy Division of Energy 333 West 4th Avenue 333 West 4th Avenue Suite 220 Suite 220 Anchorage,Alaska 99501-2341 Anchorage.ae aeonsAttn:Marl ttn:Marlys HaOFFEGRS"RAE RESPONSIBLE TO ASSURE DELIVERY PRIOR TO DEADLONLYPROPOSALSRECEIVEDPRIORTOTHEABOVEDATEANDTIMEWILLBE OPENED. 'T&PF Form 25A270 5/1/92 Part A -RFP (Page 1 of 4) SELECTION PROCEDURE '.Compettive Sealed Proposais (AS 36.30)will be evaluated by a committee.Evaluation of responses to crmeria set forn in Part C results in a numerical score tor eacn srcposa!.Eacn critenon in Part C has an assigned weignt for this RFP whicn demonstrates its relative importance.The total of all weights is 100 (10094). 2.Scoring ot proposals will be accomoishea as follows: 2.1.Each Evaluator will individually read ana rate eacn Offeror's response to each criterion described in Part C-Section |-Technical Proposal.Ratings wiil be basea solely on contents of proposal.Except as may be stated within any criterion description in Part C,a rating of "0"indicates Non-responsive;"1”is the least responsive or among tne least responsive: and "5”is the most responsive or among the most responsive. 2.2 Aftercompletion ot individual ratings.tne Evaluation Committee will meet to discuss proposals.Evaluators may then alter their ratings,however.any cnanges snail be based solely on the criteria set forth in Part C.The cnairperson will sum individual ratings tor eacn criterion and muitiply those sums by the assigned weight for eacn criterion.to obtain scores for Part C-Section i. 2.3.After scoring of Part C-Section |-Technical Proposai.criteria scores for Part C-Section Il -Preferences.and Section ill -Price uf applicable},wili be ceterminea as stated within such criteria descnptions. 2.4 The total score for eacn Offeror will be ontained by summing the scores determined for each critenon in Sections i.tl and ill of Part C.The order of ranking tor negotiations snail be as totlows:highest scored Offeror will be ranked first, next highest scored second.etcetera. 2.5 Themaximum score obtainable tor any proposal is equal to the product of 500 multiplied by the number ot Evaluators. 3.Evaluators may investigate and discuss factual knowledge of Offerors'and proposed Subcontractors'prior work experience and performance,including projects reterenced in proposal,available written evaluations,etcetera,and may contact fisted references or other persons knowledgeable of a Contractor's and/or a Subcontractors past pertormance. Factors such as overall experience relative to the proposed contract.quality of work,control of cost,and ability to meet schedules may be addressed.If any issues of significant concern to the proposed contract are discovered,the Committee may: 3.1 Provide written recommendations for consideration during contract negotiations: 2.2 Recommend suspension ot the Offeror trom consideration for award of the contract if there !s probable cause for debarment (AS 36.30.635):or "3.3.Conduct discussions in accordance with paragraph 4.below. 4.The Committee may decide to conduct discussions (or "interviews”)with responsible Offerors whose proposals are determined to be reasonably susceptible of being selected for award forthe purpose of clarification to assure full understanding of,and responsiveness to,the solicitation requirements (AS 36.30.240 &2 AAC 12.290).Offerors selected by the Committee for discussions may be permitted to submit Best and Final Offers (BAFO)for final Committee Evaluation.Only the criteria set forth in Part C of this RFP may be used for further evaluation (2 AAC 12.260(b)). 5.All Offerors will be advised of the Offeror selected for negotiation and,after completion of negotiations,a Notice of intent to Award will be provided to ail Offerors.If contract negotiations are unsuccessful with Offeror(s)selected for negotiation.the Contracting Agency may e!ther cancel the solicitation or negotiate with other Offerors in the order of ranking. DOT&PF Form 25A270 5/1/92 ParttA-RFP (Page 4) NOTICES 1 The Contracting Agency is an equa!opponunity employer.A 2.Copies of contract documents are avaliable for review at the Contracting Agency's office.Offerors located outside the general vicinny ot the Contracting Agency's office may contac:the Chaimerson for a discussion of such items. 3.Offerors are specitically advised that a contract shall not be in effect until a written agreement is executed by an authonzed agent of the Contracting Agency.The Contracting Agency shail not be liable for any cost incurred by an Offeror in responsetothissolicitation,including any work done.even in good faith,priorto execution of acontract and issue of a notice to proceed. 4.The Contracting Agency expressly reserves the rignt to waive minor informalities,negotiate changes or reject any and all proposais and to not award the proposed contract.if in its bestinterest."Minor informalities”means matters ot form rather than substance which are evident tron the submittal.or are insignificant matters that have a negligible ettect on price.quantity, quality,delivery,or contractual conartions and can be waived or corrected without prejudice to other Offerors (2 AAC 12.990). 5.All proposals shail be open tor public inspection after Notice of Intent to Award a contract is issued (AS 36.30.230). Offerors should not include proprietary intormation in proposals if sucn information should not be disclosed to the public.Any language within a submittal purporting to render ail or portions of a proposal confidential will be disregarded.Proprietary information which may be provided after selection tor contract negotiations will be held to be contidential if expressly agreed to by the Contracting Agency. 6.If it is discovered that a selected Offeror is in arrears on taxes due the State of Alaska,a contract may not be awarded until the Alaska Depanment of Revenue approves the payment provisions for the contract. 7.Offerors and proposed Subcontractors must be in compliance with the following statutory requirements.Copies of required documents may be requested from Offeror(s)selected for negotiation of a contract. 7.1.Alaska Business License (Form 08-070 issued under AS 43.70 )issued prior to submittal of proposals as required by AS 36.30.210 (e)for Offeror;and not later than five days after a Notice of intent to Award as required by AS 36.30.210(a)and AS 36.30.250(a)for all Subcontractors. 7.2 Certificate of Registration for each individual to be "in responsible charge”for Architecture,Engineering or Land Surveying (Form 08-2407 issued under AS 08.48.211)issued prior to submittal of proposal.Engineers or special consultants under the supervision of a registered individual "in responsible charge”are exempt from registra- tion requirements (AS 08.48.331). 7.3 Cartificate of Authorization for Corporate Practice for incorporated Offerors and incorporated Subcontrac- tors tor Architecture,Engineenng or Land Surveying (Form 08-2407 issued under AS.08.48.241).Corporations offering to provide Architectural,Engineering or Land Surveying services do not need to be registered for such disciplines at the time proposal is submitted provided they obtain corporate registration before contract award (AS 08.48.24(a)). 7.4 Board of Director's Resolution as submitted with application for Certiticate of Authorization tor Corporate Practice for incorporated Offerors and incorporated Subcontractors for Architecture.Engineering or Land Surveying (reference AS 08.48.241)which names the person(s)designated "in responsible charge”for each discipline.Such persons shall be licensed in Alaska and shail be listed as project leader(s)or project staff in the proposal. 7.5 All partners in a Partnership to provide Architectural,Engineering,or Land Surveying must be legally regis- tered In Alaska prior to submittal of proposal for at least one of those disciplines (AS 08.48.251)which the Partner- ship offers. 8.Anaudit of the selected Offerors'and proposed Subcontractors'cost accounting systems and business records may be required to ascertain if systems are adequate to establish a maximum allowable indirect Cost Rate forthe Agency's negotiator; and to investigate the accuracy of proposed labor rates and unit pnces.inorder not to unduly delay contract negotiation or award,be prepared to submit Pre-Audit Statement,DOT&PF Form 25A257 immediately for your firm and any subcontract which may exceed $25,000.If selected for negotiation,failure to submit properly completed Pre-Audit Statement(s)ina timely manner may disqualify an Offeror from further consideration. IT&PF Form 25A270 5/1/92 Part A -RFP (Page 3 of 4) 9.Standard insurance provisions tor Worker's Compensation,Generat and Automobile Liability,and Professional Liability are contained in DOT&PF Form 25A269.Incemnification and Insurance.Coverages may be modified under very limmted circumstances.Offeror should not assume any modification of coverages. 10.Professional Liability Insurance for the oroposed contract is: xX Not required '_!Required in the amount of:Minimum Coverage Contract Amount$100,000 0...ee ceeeeeeeeeee Under $100,000$250.000 .......eeeeeteeteeeeee $100.000 to $499,999 $500,000 oe eee eceeeees $500,000 to $999,999 Negotiable «00.00...$1.000.000 ana Over 11.Substitutions by a selected Offeror or a Subcontractor of any personnel named in a proposal may result in termination of negotiations. --_ 12.Federally Assisted Program of the U.S.Department of Transportation (U.S.DOT).Xj No -Yes If yes,Offeror snail insert the fotlowing notification in all subcontract solicitations for bids or proposais pertinent to this RFP. "In accordance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964,78 Stat.252,42 U.S.C.2000d to 2000d-4 and Title 49,CFR,U.S. Department of Transportation (U.S.DOT),Subtitle A,Office of the Secretary,Part 21,Nondiscrimination in Federally- assisted programs of the U.S.DOT issued pursuant to such Act,in any Subcontract entered into pursuant to this RFP, Disadvantaged Business Enterprise firms will be afforded full opportunity to submit bids or proposals and wiil not be discriminated against on the grounds of race,color,sex,or national origin,in consideration for an award.” 13.Preproposa!Conterence:is None CJ As follows: 14.Offerer must be qualified to conduct and certify a Technical Assistance (TA)study under the Institutional Conservation Program.Specifically the offerer must meet the following criteria: a)Be a professional engineer registered in the State of Alaska in accordance with Title 8,Chapter 48 of the Alaska Statuates,or Be an architect-engineer team,the principle members of which are registered in the State of Alaska in accordance with Title 8,Chapter 48 of the Alaska Statuates. b)Have two years of experience in Alaska heating,ventilating and air conditioning (HVAC)engineering.An architect that is a TA analyst may have an engineer (either registered or degreed)with this experience provide the mechanical portions of the analysis to meet this requirement. c)Must be free from financial interests which may conflict with the proper performance of the TA study.This also applies to those working on the TA study under the supervision of the TA analyst. | DOT&PF Form 254270 5/1/92 Part A-RFP (Page-4) SUBMITTAL CHECKLISTContractormayuserightmargintocneckoffapplicableitemswhencompleted. + COfferors must carefully review tnis RFP Package tor defects and questionaole maternal and become 'amitiar with suomettal requirements.Supmn written comments to the Chairperson.Substantive 'ssues wiil C)be acaressed in an agdenaum to all RFP "ecioients on record.Failure to comply with directions will result in 'ower score and may eliminate a suommtal trom consideration.Protests Dbaseq upon any omission.error or coment of this solicitation may be disallowed at the aiscretion of the Contracting Agency ¢the protest is not received In writing at least ten Agency wor gays pnor to the Submmtal Deadline (2 AAC 12.615(a)). 2.Review Part A -RFP and the proposed Scope of Work and any other attached or referenced matenais. If no Scope of Work is attached.contact tne Chairperson. 3.Review Pan C -Evaluation Critena.Read eacn critenon in light ot the proposed Scope of Work.Note _any project specific crtena which may nave been added or any Changes to standard criteria descnptions which may nave been made.Be aware of the assigned weignt for eacn cnterion.if a weight is not entered tor any erterion on Part C.contact the Chairperson.Plan your proposal to address the applicable criteria.Critena Responses shail not exceed the number of pages stated in Item #7 below.OO4.Prepare adistinct Response tor eacncntenon that has a weight more than zero.Failure to respond directly 10 any critena weighted more than zero will result in an evaluation score of zero torthat cntena.Any Responses to crteria weighted zero will be disregarded.Acceptable Responses must be speciic and directly retated to the Contracting Agency's proposed Scope of Work.Marketing brochures and photographs.federal standard forms 254 and 255,marketing resumes.and other non-project specific matenats will be discarded without evaluation and should not be submitted.O5.Each Response must be identiied and keyed to the applicable criterion and assembled in the order in which the cntena are listed in Part C,so the crtenon to which information applies shail be piainty evident. Matenai not so identified or assembled may be discarded without evaluation.Responses shail be presentedon81/2”x 11”paper using not more than 6 lines per vertical inch with reguiar or bold typeface.CAUTION: smail print or typeface that is difficult to read may affect scoring for "Quality of Proposal.” 6.Complete all entries on Part D -Proposal Form.Note requirements for Alaska Business License and be sure to sign and date the Centttication. 7.Attach Criteria Responses to Part 0 -Proposal Form.The maximum number of attached pages (each printed side equals one page)for Criteria Responses shall not exceed:40 Page limit does not inctude the two page Part D-Proposal Form or any Rates and Price Proposals. CAUTION:Criteria Responses which exceed the maximum page limit will result in disqualification.OOOO8.Price 1 is Cx]isnot an Evaluation Criterion tor the proposed contract. if Price is a criterion,prepare RATES and/or PRICE proposals as descnbed in Criteria #14 and/or #15,using the format(s)comtained in PART E of this RFP Package. Checklist continued next page T&PF Form 25A270 5/1/92 Part B -Submnittal Checklist (Page 1 of 2! '|™9.A.Estimated Proposal Cost »QY Approximately $20,000 to $35,000 is available for Phase 1,while $165,000 to $180,000 is available for Phase 2?. B.Contract Award The successful proposer will be required to enter into a contract usingtheAlaskaDepartmentofTransportationandPublicFacilities'standard contract form.This form is used by Division of Energy for this typeofprocurement.A copy of this form is in Part G of this Request forProposals.It is included in the RFP to make proposers aware of contract terms and conditions prior to submitting proposals.Proposers having anysubstantivequestionsabouttheprovisionsofthecontractshouldask them not later than 10 days prior to the proposal due date. Any changes to the standard contract forms must be approved by the Department of Law prior to contract award. 10.Parts A,B and C of Form 25A270 and the proposed Scope of Work shail not be returned to the Contracting Agency.Submittals shail consist of the following appiicabie items assembled as follows and in the order {isted. 10.1 Completed Part O -Proposal Form with original signature and Responses to evaluation cnteria attached.Each copy shall be fastened with one staple in the upper left corner.No other form of binding shall be used and no cover and no transmittal letter will be included.CAUTION:Failure to comply with this instruction will negatively influence evaluation of Submittal.OOOOOO|10.2 Number of copies of Part O and Criteria Responses required |s:5 10.3 if RATES and/or PRICE Proposaks)are required,one copy bound with one stapie in the upperleftcornerseparatelyenciosedInasealedenvelopemarkedontheoutsidetoidentityitasaRATE/ PRICE Proposal and the names of the Project and Offeror. 10.4 Ifltem9,above,is completed for thisRFP Package,any submittal items described therein.Uniess otherwise stated,one copy onty,bound appropriately. 10.5 Note:Pre-Audit Statement,DOT/PF Form 25A257,is not required with Submittal.(See Notice #8 on page 3 of Part A-RFP.) 10.6 CAUTION:If the Contractor duplicates Part D or any form in lieu of using copies provided by the Contracting Agency,eacn completed form must be accompanied by a centificatior signed by theContractortotheeffectthattheduplicatedformtsanexactreplicaofthatissuedby2Contracting Agency. 11.Deliver submittals in one sealed package to the location and before the submittal deadline cited in Part C)A-RFP.Mark the outside of the package to identify the Project andthe Offeror.Proposals must be received pnor to the specried date and time.Late proposais will not be opened. DOT&PF Form 25A270 §/1/92 Part B -Submittal Checklist (Page 2) PART EVALUATION CRITERIA Criteria with a weight of zero are not appticabie to this RFP and should be disregarded.If a weight Is not indicated, contact the Chairperson. SECTION |-TECHNICAL PROPOSAL 1.Objectives and Scope Weight:10 Response must demonstrate comprehension of the objectives and scope of the proposed contract.Do not merely duplicate tne Scope of Work provided witn this RFP.Also.consider if objectives and scope are sufficiently explicit:are expressed or implied schedules attainabieseconomically feasible:etcetera?Explain.Define any assumptions made in formulating Criteria Response.|f scope includes design services tor a Construction project,express any opinions regarding alternative design considerations that could impact construction costs. 2.Methods |Weignt:20 ol Response must outline the methods for accomplishing the proposed contract or.if methodology Is contained in the proposed Scope of Work,aadress its adequacy.Consider wnat.wnen.where.how.and in what sequence the work willbe done.identity ihe amount and type ot work to be performed by any Subcontractors.Consider how each task may be carned out:what Services or interaction required fromywith the Contracting Agency;etcetera.Suggest alternatives.if appropriate.Identify any distinct and substantive qualifications for undertaking the proposed contract such as the availability of specialized equipment or unique approaches or concepts relevant to the required services which the firms may use. 3.Management Weight:5 Response must describe the administrative and operational structures that will be used for pertorming the proposed contract. For example consider:who will have overail responsibility for the contract?Who will have direct responsibility for specific disciplines?What wiil the lines of authority be?For any individual who would be "in-responsible-charge”(reference AS 08.48) as an Architect or Chemical.Civil (including Structurat),Electrical,Mechanical,Mining or Petrofeum Engineer,or Land Surveyor,so state and list his/ner Alaska protessional registration number.A table or chart is preferred in your response to this criterion. 4.Proposed Project Staft Wergnt:45 Response must name proposed leader(s)for the following categories plus any other essential personnel who wiil be directly and routinely engaged -in-pertorming the work:-. 1 -Contract Manager 5-9- 2 -Project Manager 6-10- 3-Engineer 7-W- 4-8-12- Describe the work to be performed by the named Leader(s),and their qualifications in terms of educational and substantive experience directly related to the proposed contract.Identify their:employer (Offeror or Subcontractor),professional discipline or job ctassitication and state of residency.List at least 3 references (contact persons and telephone numbers)for eacn person. A response prepared specifically for this proposal is required.Marketing resumes often include non-relevant information which nay detract from the evaluation of proposal.Lists of projects are not useful.Focus on individual's specific duties and ssponsibilities and how project experience is relevant to the proposed contract. *T&PF Form 25A270 5/1/92 Part C -Evaluation Criteria (Page 1 of 6) The Contracting Agency estimates that the work effort for the proposed contract will be distributed approximately as follows: 55.Workload ana Resources |Weight: Category %Category %Category % No estimate Response must:(1)discuss both current and potential time commitments to ail clients (i.e.,not only the Contracting Agency named in this RFP)for the proposed Project Staff:(2)discuss the projected workload of each firm (Offeror and Proposed Subcontractors)for ail clients:and (3)demonstrate adequate support personnel,facilities and other resources to provide the services required.Provide a table that tists current contracts with the Contracting Agency in which your proposed Project Staff are participating.include all contracts statewide with regions,divisions,etc.of the Contracting Agency. Briefly address capabilities for providing additional services and/or services under an accelerated schedule.Address capacity to reassign personne!,equipment and facilities whenever the proposed contract would not require such capabilities or was delayed.Also address financial ability to bear cost of pertormance until compensated under terms of a contract. 6.Business History Weight:5 Response must identity the period of time firms (Offeror and any Subcontractors)have been in business under current or- ganization and name.Discuss any prior work relationships among the firms.Discuss not more than five priar contractswhichthefirmsaccomplishedtogetherandwhicharesimilartotheworkproposedbythisRFP.Indicate if your proposed ProjectStaffwerealsoinvoivedinsuchcontracts.For each contract,list the Contracting Agency (or Firm)and a reference (contact person and telephone number). 7.Quality of Proposal Weight:5 Offerors do not respond to this criterion.Committee members will rate this criterion based on their perception of the clarity, completeness and presentation of submittal.Note:This criterion is NOT used to evaluate color,graphics or other visual techniques except as they may detract from legibility. DOT/PF Form 25A270 5/1/92 Part C -Evaluation Criteria (Page 6) (8.Weight 9.Weignt: 10.Sos Weight: T&PF Form 25A270 §/1/92 Part C -Evaluation Critena (Page 3 of 6) [SECTION ll-PREFERENCES |C . 11.Disadvantaged Business Enterprises (23 CFR 172.5(e))|Weignt:5 Minimum Weight is "S"for FHWA or FAA tunced contracts.otherwise weight may be "0”. To receive credit,response to this critenon snould identity certitied Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE)which would Participate in the proposed contract.the OOT&PF DBE certification number,and the work to De performed by the OBE.Also demonstrate the extent of such participation (consider effort.compensation,staff,etc.). Centtied OBE are listed in a monthly OBE Directory which is available fromthe Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities at its reqgionat Design and Construction Offices in Juneau,Anchorage and Fairbanks or by mail from the OBE Office, ADOT/PF,Box 196900.Anchorage.AK 99519 (telepnone 907-266-1488).OBE are issued a Certification Number which is listed in the Directory and which must be cited in proposals seeking OBE recognition. Response will be scored as follows:Rating x Number of Evaluators x Weight =Criterion Score A Rating will be assigned as follows: "5”-All services by OBE. "3"-Considerable OBE pantcipation "1"-Minor OBE participation. "0”-No DBE panticipation. 12.Alaska Offeror Preterence 2 AAC 12.260(e)Weight:0 Weight must be "0”if any federal funding:Otherwise weight must be at least "10”. To be granted Offeror preference,Offeror must meet the following requirements of AS 36.30.170(b)and desginate the Alaska Offeror Preference box on page one of Part D: (A)Holds a current Alaska Business License: (B)Submits an offer tor goods.services,or construction under the name as appearing on the person's current Alaska Business License; (C)Has maintained a place of business within the State,staffed by the Offeror or an employee of the Offeror,for a period of six months immediately preceding the date of the offer: (D)1s incorporated or qualified to do business under the laws of the State,is a sole proprietorship,and the proprietor is a resident of the State or is a partnership,and ail partners are residents of the State;and (E)It a joint venture.is composed entirely of entities that quality under (A)-(D). Response will be scored as follows:Rating x Number of Evaluators x Weight =Criterion Score. A Rating will be assigned as follows: "5S”-Qualified for preference "0”-Not qualifed for preference,or preference not designated on page one of Part D. DOT&PF Form 25A270 5/1/92 Part C -Evaluation Criteria (Page 6) SECTION Ill -PRICE (' Price cannot be a SELECTION CRITERION for contracts that will receive funding from the Federal Aviation Administra- tion (FAA)per 49CFR18.36(t). Price can not be a SELECTION CRITERION uncer the Competitive Sealed Proposals process for services which must be pertormed only by licensed Architects,Engineers or Land Surveyors (AVE or LS),unless the provisions of AS 36.30.270(d) apply.If services may be performed by other than AVE or LS,then ail Offerors must provide price proposais in accor- dance with AS 36.30.210(b)and 2 AAC 12.260(c). If both of Criteria #13 and #14 are weighted zero,Price aon Evaluation Criterion for the proposed contract.Otherwise,ail Offerors must submit a RATES Proposal (Criteria #13)and/or a PRICE Proposal (Criterion #14)according to whether esther or both are weighted more than zero.Such proposai(s)must be completed in accordance with the format(s) contained in PART E of this RFP Package.CAUTION:Attachment of Offerors or Subcontractor's "standard”rate sched- ule or other documents which are not in the format of PART E may be determined to be non-responsive if they do not allow for straightforward comparison with other proposals. Sum ot weights for Critena #13 and #14 must be °0”if Price is not an Evatuation Criterion or a minimum of "10°if a }criterion. 13.RATES Proposai Weight:0 Provide proposed RATES for Direct Labor,indirect Costs and Other Direct Costs and Fee in the format contained on PAGE 1 of PART E. Response will be scored as follows: (100 +LIDC%)x (100 +LF%)x (MPP)_Griteri(100 +iIOC%)x (100 +F%)Criterion Score Wherein:LIDC%=Lowest indirect Cost Rate proposed LF%=Lowest Fee percentage proposed 10C%=Indirect Cost Rate proposed by Offeror being evaluated F%=Fee percentage proposed by Offeror being evaluated. MPP --Maximum Possible Points for Criterion calculated as follows: (5)x (#of Evaluators)x (Weight assigned to Criterion) 'OT&PF Form 25A270 5/1/92 Part C -Evaluation Criteria (Page 5 of 6) Provide estimated costs for ail labor.subcontracts.equipment.expenses,etc.and a proposed amount for Fee.in the format contained on Page 2 of Part E. Response wiil be scored as follows (If no tederat funas will be used for the contract and any Out-of-State Offers are received,Price Proposals from Alaska Offerors wiil be reduced by 5%when scoring this Criterion reterence 2 AAC 12.260(d).)}: sti Offerors Price Estimate A}.=Criterion Score Wherein:MPP =Maximum Possible Points for Criterion calculated as follows (5)x (#of Evaluators)x (Weight assigned to Criterion) DOT&PF Form 25A270 5/1/92 Part C -Evaluation Criteria (Page 14 PRICE Provosat Weiont:g |( 6) This form mustdethe first sheet of proposal.PART (No transmmtai letter or cover sneet wiil be used.) Responses to criteria must be attached as airectea in Part 8-Submnta!Checklist. PROPOSAL FORM PROJECT Project NUMOEMS)..........0004 Federat:State:Project Title 0...eccscsssssssccecsseecsseeee! CONTRACTOR OTe)8)Le:(01 (0): Str@Ct eee cecesecccsecscecececceeserscaneeees City,State,Zip...cececeeeeseereeeeees Alaska Business License number *: Federal Tax Identification No........0.....: Individual(s)to sign contract ...............: a)) -_!(check.if applicable)Contractor qualifies for Alaska Offeror Preterence as described in Part C,Criterion 12. Type of business enterprise (check one):_!Corporation in the state of: CO Individual Cc)Partnership Co Other (specity) PROPOSED SUBCONTRACTOR(S) Service.Equi ;Iti ;AK ; *Contractor must have valid Alaska Business License when this proposal is submitted.Copies of Contractor's and Subcomtractor's valid Alaska Business Licenses must be submitted within five days after the date of a Notice of Intent to AWARD (Reference AS 36.30.210(a)and AS 36.30.250 (a)).Failure to provide timely evidence of ail licenses wiil preclude contract award. CERTIFICATION (Note additional Federal-Aid Certification on reverse) |certify that |am a duly authorized representative of the Contractor and that this Submittal accurately represent capabilities of the Contractors'and Subcontractors'identified herein tor providing the services indicated.|further certify, in accordance with AS 36.30.400,that,to the best of my knowledge and belief,any cost and pricing data submitted herewith,or in any future price proposais for this project.will be accurate,complete and current as of the date submitted and will continue to be accurate and complete during the pertormance of the contract.if awarded.The Contracting Agency is hereby authorized to request any entity identified in this proposal to furnish information deemed necessary to verity the reputation and capabilities of the Contractor and Subcontractors.This proposal is valid for at least ninety days. Signature: Name:Date: Title:Telephone (voice/tax): DOT&PF Form 25A270 5/1/92 Part D -Technical Proposal Form (Page 1 ot 2) D CERTIFICATION FOR FEDERAL-AID CONTRACTS EXCEEDING $100,000 The Contractor certifies,by signing and submitting this proposal,to the best of his or her knowledge and belief,that: (1) (2) No federal appropriated funds nave been paid or will be paid.by or on behaff of the undersigned.to any person for influencing or attempting to intiuence an officer or employee of any Federal agency,a Member of Congress,an officer or employee of Congress,or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract,the making of any Federat grant,the making of any Federai loan,the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension,continuation,renewal,amendment,or modification of any Federal comtract,grant,loan,or cooperative agreement. lf any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for intluencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any Federal agency,a Member of Congress,an officer or employee of Congress.oran employee of a Memberof Congress in connection with this Federal contract,grant,loan,or cooperative agreement,the Contractor shail complete and submit Standard Form-LLL,Disclosure of Lobbying Activities,in accordance with its instructions.Any person whe tails to file the required disclosure shall be subject to a civil penaity of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure. This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance will be placed if the proposed contract is awarded. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into the proposed contract imposed by Section 1352, Title 31,U.S.Code. The Contractor also agrees by submitting this proposal that Contractor shail require that the lanquage of this certification be inetuded in all lower tier subcontracts which exceed $100,000 and that ail such Subcontractors shail certity and disclose accordingly. This space reserved only for Contracting Agency use. DOT&PF Form 25A270 5/1/92 Part D -Technical Proposal Form (Page 2 of 2) --_-_-_.PART RATES NOTE:This is not a form-it is the format to use for a RATES Proposal.PROPOSAL FORMAT Submit a RATES Proposat in this format onty #CRITERION #13 in PART C is weighted more than zero.A separate proposalinthisformatmustalsobesubmittedforeacnSubcontractthatmayexceed$25,000. All rates are subject to audit at the Contracting Agency's discretion.Unsupported rates may be disallowed or result in termination ot negotiations.or a comtract if awarded. Cost Terminology is explained on page 2 of the attached Pre-Audit Statement (DOT&PF Form 25A257). 1. 2. Show date of proposal.project title.project number,and Offeror (Contractor)Name. Direct Labor Costs (OLC)Show the Direct Labor Rate tor each job classification of employees proposed for the contract.List under the following headings.Names only required for key staff and/or persons "in responsible charge”(ret:AS 08.48).Rates must be the current amounts actually paid directly to employees and must not include Indirect Costs or Fee. Job Classitication Name Rate ($/hr) Indirect Costs (OC)These costs include what are generally reterred to as Fringe Benefits and Overhead (including Indirect Labor).Show the proposed IDC Rate as a percentage of Direct Labor Costs. iOC Rate:% Other Direct Costs (ODC)List unt rates for computer time,laboratory tests,copies or equipment use,etcetera that may be appticable to this proposal. Rates must be based on actual costs to Contractor,without any profit or other markup (Profit is included in FEE,below). Substantiation for unit equipment rates which separately identities labor cost for crew or operator and costs for acquisition and annual maintenance and repair,etc.will be required druing contract negotiations or during audit. FEE The Contracting Agency will use a structured fee analysis to negotiate a fair and reasonable amount for the Offeror and each Subcontractor (exceeding $25,000).For the purpose of evaluating this Proposal,show your proposed Fee expressed as-a percentage of the sum of Direct Labor Cost plus Indirect Costs (i.e.exclusive ot Other Direct Costs). FEE Rate:% Affix signature of preparer and show name.title and telephone number. DOT&PF Form 25A270 5/1/92 Part E -Price Proposal Format (Page 1 of 2) PART PRICE : NOTE:This Is not a form-it is the format to use for a PRICE Proposal.PROPOSAL FORMAT Submit a PRICE Proposat in this format only if CRITERION #14 in PARTC is weighted more than zero.A separate proposalinthisformatmustalsobesubmittedforeachSubcontractlistedinitem#4 (ODC)that exceeds $25,000. All rates are subject to audit at the Contracting Agency's discretion.Unsupported rates may be disallowed or result in termination of negotiations,or a contract if awarded. Cost Terminology is explained on page 2 of the attached Pre-Audit Statement (DOT&PF Form 25A257). 1.Show date of proposal,project title,project number,and Offeror (Contractor)Name. 2.Direct Labor Costs (OLC)Show the total estimated costs of Direct Labor for each job classification of employees proposed for the contract.Listunderthefollowingheadings.Names only required for key staff and/or persons "in-responsibie-charge”(ref:AS 08.48). .Rates must be the current amounts actually paid directly to employees and must nat include Indirect Costs or Fee.Attach abreakout of hours by job classification per task. Tota!DLC $ 3.Indirect Costs (OC)These costs inciude what are generality referred to as Fringe Benefits and Overhead (inctuding Indirect Labor}.Show the Proposed IOC Rate as a percentage of Direct Labor Costs and the product of that factor multiplied by the total DLC. IDC Rate:%{!0C Amount $ 4.Other Direct Costs (ODC)These costs include:subcontracts,equipment (company owned or rented),unit rate items,and reimbursable expenses (@.g.:transportation,food and lodging,reproduction,etc.)-if not inctuded in Indirect Costs.Show the estimated costs for each item.List under the following headings.!f muitiples of an item required,list the proposed unit rate,quantity, and total cost for each.Costs must be based on actual costs to Contractor,without any profit or other markup for the Contractor.Attachabreakout of items and quantities of each per task. .ae Total ODC $ 5S.Total Estimated Cost- Sumoft OLC +IOC +ODC 'Tota!Cost $ 6.FEE List a proposed amount for profit. Proposed FEE $ 7.Total Proposed PriceSumofTotalCostplus Proposed FEE.Total Price $ 8.Affix signature of preparer and show name,title and telepnone number. DOT&PF Form 25A270 5/1492 Part E -Price Proposal Format (Page 2 of 2) State of Alaska PRE-AUDIT STATEMENT (Confidential when completed) Submit this form.compteted.onty if specifically requested by the Contracting Agency.Evaluation of this statement may preciude the necessity for a comprehensive on-site audit of Contractor's records.Entnes may be handwritten,if legibie. 2a.Direct Labor Costs 2b.Other Direct Costs-sum of following: *Project Specitic Expenses 2c.Indirect Costs-sum of following (ATTACH A LISTING BY COST OBJECTIVE): «Fringe Benefits *Allocated Home Office Overhead (if applicable) +Other (specify): 2d.Indirect Costs Rate (2c /2a)x 100 the audit results. OC Yes CO No DERIVED. +Overhead (Genera!&Administrative Expenses inciuding indirect Labor) 1.Identity your financial year inctuding beginning and ending dates: 2.List your actual costs,by the following categories.for your most recently ended fiscal year.Cost Terminology is detined onthe reverse.If your Terminology differs from that used herein,provide an explanation on an attachment to this form. $ $ *Subcontracts (exclusive of any markup and/or handling charges)$AHA-___Percent (%) 3.If your records have been audited within the last two calendar years by any government agency,attach a copy of the Audit Report and/or identify the agency and the name and phone number of an agency representative to contact about 4.Attach a copy of your most recent Internal and Audited Financial Statement (if pertormed). 5.Are your accounting methods tor recording contract costs based on a work order or project identified cost system? 6.if your response to item §is "No,”explain your accounting system on an attachment to this form. 7.'fyou charge projects based on unit rates (eg:for computer time.laboratory tests.copies or equipment use,etc.)attach a list of such tems and the unit rates.ALSO ATTACH AN EXPLANATION OF HOW SUCH UNIT RATES ARE CERTIFICATION I certify that !ama duly authorized representative of the Contractor listed below and that information and materials enclosed within this statement accuratety represent financial records of the oftice listed below. Office Address for which this Submittal is made: Street: P.O.Box: City,State ,Zip: Signature: Name:Date: Title:Telephone: Contractor:Fax: Address where Accounting Records are maintained,it not at Office Address: DOT&PF Form 25A257 5/1/92 Pre-Audit Statement (Page 1 of 2) COST TERMINOLOGY DIRECT LABOR COSTS-Base salary or wages paid to employees charged directly to contracts or projects exciusive of:Fringe Benefits,other Indirect Costs.Fees or Profit. OTHER DIRECT COSTS -Actual costs of other than Direct Labor for contracts or projects.Some examples of Other Direct Costs are subcontracts,equipment (company owned or rented),unit rate items and reimbursable expenses (travel,computer charges.reproduction,ete.).!f your accounting system separately identifies these costs then they may be directly charged to contracts if the costs are not inciuded in indirect Costs. INDIRECT COSTS RATE -Apercentage of incurred expenses for Direct Labor Costs which is used as a basis of compensation for Indirect Costs.Fee or Protit is not included in the Rate.This percentage shail not exceed the figure derived as follows: The sum of actual!and allowable Indirect Costs incurred by the Contractor during a base period (usually a fiscal year)divided by the sum of Direct Labor Costs during the same period multiplied by 100. INDIRECT COSTS-indirect costs consist of allowable expenses which,because of their incurrence for common or joint cost objectives,must be prorated (allocated)to jobs or contracts using a specified Indirect Costs Rate.Acost objective is a function, organizational subdivision,contract,project or work unit for which cost data is accumulated under the Contractor's accountingsystem.Generally,Indirect Costs are segregated into the following categones:Fringe Benefits,Overhead (General & Administrative Expenses including indirect Labor),and Allocated Home Office Overhead (if applicable). Fringe Benetits -Costs for items such as: Vacation Time and Authorized Leave Social Security and Unemployment Taxes Group and Workers'Compensation Insurance Group Medical Plan and Life Insurance Premiums Deferred CompensatioryRetiremenmt Plans Overhead costs for items such as the following,if they are not included in Direct Costs: Indirect Labor (Supervisory,Administrative,etc.)including Office Suppties base Salary or wages and retated Fringe Benefits Communications Travel,Food and Lodging Reproduction Costs Upkeep and Depreciation of Equipment/Computers Recruiting Expense Business Insurance Premiums Not Billed to Clients Rentals of Equipment/Computers Rent.Heat,Power,Light and Janitorial Services Allocated Home Office Overhead (if applicable)-Costs for management,supervisory and administrative functions which benetit unit operations. NON-ALLOWABLE COSTS-Costs for the following items and certain other costs defined in 48 CFR Part 31 and related reguiations are not allowable.Such costs shail not be included as billable Direct or Indirect Costs or in the calculation of the Indirect Costs Rate. interest and Other Financial Costs Bad Debts Contributions and Donations Fines and Penaties Dividends Entertainment Federal income Taxes Losses on other Contracts and related legal fees Deferred State Income Taxes Provisions for Contingencies NOTE:IF YOUR ACCOUNTING SYSTEM WHOLLY OR PARTIALLY ALLOCATES INDIRECT COSTS ON OTHER THAN A DIRECT LABOR BASIS,ATTACH A DESCRIPTION OF THE INDIRECT COST POOLS OR SERVICE CENTERS YOU USE ANDO IDENTIFY THE INDIRECT COSTS RATE(S)AND BASE(S). DOT&PF Form 25A270 5/1/92 Pre-Audit Statement (Page 2 of 2) PART SCOPE OF WORK l.Background and Services Requested: A.Project Goals Rural Alaskan communities use over twice as much energy for space heating as they use for electrical generation.Schools and other public buildings use about half of the space heating energy in a typical community,while private residences consume the rest.Fuel oil is the major source of energy in larger buildings. Waste heat produced by diesel power generation has been used effectively in a number of communities for heating larger buildings;however,in other villages substantial quantities of oil must be imported and stored for space heating. Purchase of fuel oil can present a significant financial drain for cash-poor communities. Waste heat recovery has been the focus of numerous studies sponsored by the Alaska Power Authority during the 1980s.Two other promising alternatives for decreasing oil consumption in non-residential structures,using local fuels and increasing building energy efficiency,have been studied less systematically. Various reconnaissance studies have identified wood as the most readily available local fuel in forested regions. The purpose of this Request for Proposals (RFP)is to identify site-specific cost- effective measures that will reduce the amount of oil used for space heating major buildings in select rural Alaskan communities.Specifically,the RFP focuses on wood fuel substitution and energy conservation measures as alternatives for offsetting fuel oil usage.Although the primary focus of this RFP is on space heating,measures for increasing electrical energy efficiency in major buildings will also be assessed consistent with the broader requirements of the Institutional Conservation Program (ICP).The ICP is a federally-funded program managed in Alaska by the Division of Energy and aimed at increasing energy efficiency of schools and hospitals. B.Work to Be Performed The Scope of Work for the contract awarded under this RFP is organized into two phases: Page 1 of 13 1.Phase 1.Compile Existing Information on Enerqy Consumption and Recommendations a.Description This phase:1)draws together and updates existing information regarding major building energy usage in study area communities,2)summarizes past energy development efforts and recommendations,and 3)recommends priorities for in- depth study.Although this RFP focuses on energy efficiency and fuel substitution alternatives,information collected in Phase 1 is also expected to be useful for other energy planning and development activities.Study area communities (Table 1)have populations greater than 150,relatively high energy costs,and significant fuelwood resources."Major buildings"are defined as non- residential buildings and other facilities whose annual heating energy consumption exceeds the equivalent of 4,000 gallons of #2 fuel oil. Table 1 lists potential major buildings in study area communities.The list,which was developed using Power Cost Equalization Program data,is included to serve as a guide for proposers estimating phase 1 costs.It is anticipated that not all of the facilities listed qualify as major buildings,and that there are other facilities which qualify as major buildings that the contractor will identify in the course of the study. It is expected that the contractor will first conduct a complete survey of published information on existing major buildings and energy recommendations by community.At a minimum,the publications and sources listed in Table 2 will be reviewed;however,the contractor will also seek and incorporate other useful sources.This information will then be updated through direct communication with targeted building owners,staff,and other individuals with knowledge of current building energy usage.Based on this research,the contractor will then prepare the draft report and database described below and submit them to the Division of Energy for review.Following review,the contractor will incorporate the additions and modifications requested by the Division and submit a final report and database. b.Deliverables i.Adraft database which includes,but is not limited to,information listed in Table 3 for each major building and each community.The database will be in DBase IV,Lotus,or Excel file format for use on an IBM compatible microcomputer and will be delivered as three bound paper copies,as a reproducible paper master,and on 3.5"diskette. Page 2 of 13 ii.A draft report which describes the results of phase 1 work.The report will be in Microsoft Word or WordPerfect file format and delivered as three bound paper copies,as a reproducible paper master,and on 3.5"diskette.The report will include the following: a)Text and tables which describe and summarize information in the above database by building and community. b)Aconcise description of related energy efficiency and energy development recommendations from previous studies.Discussion should be limited to recommendations for larger facilities regarding waste heat from diesel generators,district heat systems,substitution of fuel oil by wood and refuse,and energy conservation retrofits. c)Alist of all sources used in the study and,in the case of published literature,where they may be found.A list of personal contacts made. d)Recommended priorities among communities and major buildings for conducting detailed,on-site feasibility analysis of fuel substitution and energy conservation retrofits in phase 2. iii.A final report and database in the above formats. 2.Phase 2.Detailed Analysis of Fuelwood Substitution and Energy Efficiency Measures a.Description The objective of phase 2 is to identify a set of feasible,site-specific measures which can be applied in target communities to decrease fuel oil consumption for space heating in major buildings.As stated above,the two areas of opportunity on which this RFP focuses are fuelwood substitution and energy conservation measures.The contractor will analyze and describe recommended measures in sufficient detail such that design and construction may proceed without further assessment. Based on phase 1 recommendations and discussions with local residents and building managers,the Division of Energy will revise the scope of work for phase 2 activities and negotiate a fixed price with the contractor.The Division may decide not to conduct phase 2 of the project if the Division finds that phase 1 results are not promising,the contractor's performance is not satisfactory,or other circumstances warrant. Page 3 of 13 Analysis of potential energy efficiency and fuelwood substitution retrofits in major buildings will follow the requirements of Technical Assistance (TA)studies under the Alaska State Plan for the Institutional Conservation Program,available from the Division of Energy.The consultant will provide a detailed description of the building envelop;energy use and occupancy;mechanical,HVAC,and electrical systems;and recommended operation and maintenance procedures.Economic feasibility of projects which appear most viable will be determined by comparing project life cycle benefits and costs. In addition to the above,assessments of fuelwood substitution projects will address cost of fuelwood harvest,transportation,and processing,as well as long-term timber supply.Since available timber supply will be closely related to local land use and economic development objectives,it is expected that this portion of the feasibility assessment will require substantial discussion with community leaders and major landowners. For energy efficiency and fuelwood substitution projects judged feasible,the consultant will provide a clear and thorough description of the recommended measure.This will include e Cost estimates and performance criteria suitable for procurement of final design and construction e Recommended equipment e Siting and conceptual design of new construction (e.g.boiler houses,wood storage,piping loops) e«Adiscussion of applicable environmental and land use requirements and permits e Options for project financing b.Deliverables i.Draft reports by community presenting the results of analyses of potential fuelwood substitution and energy efficiency measures and describing recommended projects.Reports will be delivered in Microsoft Word or WordPerfect file format and delivered as three bound paper copies,as a reproducible paper master,and on 3.5"diskette. ii.Final reports in the above format. Page 4 of 13 ll.Anticipated Schedule: Deliverable Due Date Contract start date April 28,1995 Phase |draft report July 14,1995 Division provides comments on phase|draft July 28,1995 Phase |final report August 11,1995 Phase II draft reports November 11,1995 Division provides comments on phase II drafts December 1,1995 Phase II final report due December 21,1995 The Issuing Office estimates that funding available for this project will not exceed $200,000. Page 5 of 13 Table 1.Communities and potential major buildings to be addressed in phase 1.04 eer¢blag Community Potential Major Building Ss Akiachak Village Safewater Bldg High School Laundromat VSW IRA Allakaket District heat system Ambler Water Plant NW Arctic School District City of Ambler buildings FAA buildings District heating system Aniak Alascom Alaska Commercial Co. Kuspuk School District State of Alaska building FAA Elim Water and Sewer Facility Bering Strait School District District heating system Fort Yukon YSFD School YSFD-Admin Bldg DOT-State Bldg City Water and Sewer FacilityCafens.” Grayling Iditarod Area School District Water Plant District heating system Gustavus Tuboscope Fire Hall and Library Gustavus School IT Corporation Holy Cross Water Facility Iditarod Area School District Ne Huslia Yukon Koyukuk Schoo!District Page 6 of 13 Kaltag Kiana Kokhanok Koliganek Koyuk Larsen Bay Lower Kalskag McGrath New Stuyahok Nulato Ouzinkie Pelican FAA Yukon Koyukuk School District Kaltag Pumphouse District heating system NW Arctic School District Laundromat Water Plant District heating system Washeteria Kokhanok Village Council Community building Koyuk Washeteria Bering Strait School District KIBSD Main Building PHS Pumphouse Washeteria Alascom Inc. Alaska Commercial Co. McGrath School City of McGrath building USFAA building Iditarod Area School District MNVC Kiln Project Water pump bidg service Washeteria Bristol Bay Area Health Corp. SW Region School District District heating system Yukon Koyukuk Schoo!District Wellhouse KIB Building (school) Tribal freezer Pelican Seafoods Page 7 of 13 Ruby Shungnak Tanana Upper Kalskag Yakutat Community Hall M.A.K.School Washeteria NW Arctic Schoo!District Kobuk Valley Electric Co. River Pumphouse District heat system Tanana School District FAA building Tanana Safewater Laundry Alascom District heat system Kuspuk School District Alaska DOT/PF Yakutat City Schools Glacier Bear Lodge Leonard's Landing Lodge Alascom AK Airlines U.S.DOT District heat system Sitka Sound Seafood Page 8 of 13 Table 2.Sources to be included in researching major building energy loads and recommendations. Publication Author Location Reconnaissance Study of Energy Prepared in 1981 by Division of Requirements and Alternatives for International Engineering Co.,|Energy LibraryBuckland,Chuathbaluk,Crooked Creek,1981 for the Alaska Power Hughes,Koyukuk,Nikolai,Red Devil,Authority. Russian Mission,Sheldon Point, Sleetmute,Stony River,Takotna,and Telida Reconnaissance Study of Energy Prepared in 1981 by Holden Division of Requirements and Alternatives for Kaltag,|Associates;Fryer,Pressley,Energy Library Savoonga,White Mountain and Elim Elliott Engineers;Jack West Associates for the Alaska Power Authority. Reconnaissance Study of Energy Prepared in 1982 by ACRES,Division of Requirements and Alternatives for Alatna, Atqasuk,Brevig Mission,Diomede, Galena,Golovin,Gustavus,Karluk, Koyuk,New Chenega,Ruby,Saint Michael,Shageluk,Shishmaref,Stebbins, Teller,Unalakleet,and Yakutat. for the Alaska Power Authority.Energy Library Reconnaissance Study of Energy Requirements and Alternatives for Togiak, Goodnews Bay,Scammon Bay and Grayling. Prepared in 1981 by Northern Technical Services and VanGulik &Associates for the Alaska Power Authority. Division of Energy Library Reconnaissance Study of Energy Prepared in 1982 by Northem Division of Requirements and Altematives for the Technical Services and Energy Library villages of Aniak,Atka,Chefornak,Chignik |VanGulik &Associates for theLake,Cold Bay,False Pass,Hooper Bay,|Alaska Power Authority. lvanof Bay,Kotlik,Lower and Upper Kalskag,Mekoryuk,Newtok,Nightmute, Nikolski,St.George,St.Mary's,St.Paul, Tooksook Bay and Tununak. Reconnaissance Study of Energy Prepared in 1981 by Holden &|Division of Requirements and Alternatives for White |Associates;Fryer,Pressley,Energy Library Mountain,Alaska.Elliott;JWA Professional Engineering for the Alaska Power Authority. Reconnaissance Study of Energy Prepared in 1981 by CH2M Hill |Division of Requirements &Alternatives for Akhiok,for the Alaska Power Authority.|Energy Library King Cove,Larsen Bay,Old Harbor, Ouzinkie &Sand Point. Page 9 of 13 Publication Author Location Reconnaissance Study of Energy Requirements and Energy Alternatives for Kodiak Island Villages and Sand Point and King Cove. Prepared in 1980 by CH2M Hill for the Alaska Power Authority. Division of Energy Library A Feasibility Study for Waste-Heat Driven Absorption Refrigeration Plants in Alaska. Prepared in 1990 by Dr. Ronald A.Johnson; Dr.Debendra K.Das; Ms.Charlotte Hok-Barker, M.S.,Institute of Northern Engineering,UAF for the Alaska Energy Authority. Division of Energy Library Rural Energy Waste Heat Program:Final Report of Waste Heat Recovery System Operations for the City of Tanana. Prepared in 1985 by Polarconsult Alaska,Inc.for the Alaska Power Authority. Division of Energy Library Rural Energy Waste Heat Program:Final Report,Volume J,Project Summary for the Villages of Kiana,Ambler,Shungnak, Savoonga,Elim,Kaltag,Grayling, Goodnews Bay and Angoon,St.Mary's and Unalakleet. Prepared by Polarconsult Alaska,Inc.for the Alaska Power Authority,1983. Division of Energy Library Rural Energy Waste Heat Program: Progress Report No.5 for the Villages of Kiana,Ambler,Shungnak,Savoonga, Elim,Kaltag,Grayling,Goodnews Bay and Angoon,St.Mary's and Unalakleet. Prepared in 1983 by Polarconsult Alaska,Inc.for the Alaska Power Authority. Division of Energy Library Rural Waste Heat Capture and District Heating Project. Prepared in 1982 by Raj Bhargava Associates for the Alaska Power Authority. Division of Energy Library Fort Yukon Waste Heat Recovery Report and Concept Design Prepared in 1990 by Fryer/Pressley Engineering, Inc.for the Alaska Energy Authority. Division of Energy Library Findings and Recommendations: Feasibility and Design of Waste Heat Facilities for 11 Alaskan Villages. Division of Energy Library Rural Energy Construction Program 1982-|Prepared in 1983 by Crews Division of 1983.Maclnnes Hoffman/VITRO Energy Library Consulting Engineers for the Alaska Power Authority. Rural Energy Construction Program 1984-|Prepared in April by Division of 1985.Raj Bhargava Associates for Energy Library the Alaska Power Authority. Page10 of 13 Publication Author Location Use of Wood Energy in Remote Interior Alaskan Communities Prepared in 1982 by Reid, Collins Alaska,Inc.,for the Alaska Division of Energy and Power Development. Division of Energy Library List of schools,colleges,and training Prepared in 1994 by the Alaska |Alaska schools in Alaska Department of Education.Department of Education Report and Concept Design,White Prepared in 1991 by Division of Mountain Waste Heat Recovery Frank Moolin and Associates,|Energy LibraryInc.for the Alaska Energy Authority. Report and Concept Design,White Prepared in 1991 by Division of Mountain Waste Heat Recovery Frank Moolin and Associates, Inc.for the Alaska Energy Authority. Energy Library Alaska Housing Finance Corporation energy library database AHFC AHFC Library Page 11 of 13 Table 3:Information to be included for each major building in phase 1 database. 1 Name 2 Address 3.City 4.Zip 5 Phone 6 Contact Name 7 Type of facility (e.g.school,hospital,community building,washeteria, commercial building,district heating system) 8.Owner 9.Contact Name 10.Address 11.=City 12.Zip 13.Phone 14.Year constructed 15.Total gross square footage 16.Renovations and Additions,Year Description 17.|Planned changes in functional use next 20 years (e.g.demolition, disposal,rehabilitation,conversion), Year__-_-Desccription 15.Overall condition of building 16.|Average hours of occupied use by month and day of week. Mon Tues Wed Thur Fri Sat Sun July August September October November December January February March April May June Page 12 of 13 17. 18. 19, 20. 21. 22. Annual Energy Consumption a)Electricity (kWh and kW,peak) b)Natural gas (cf) c)Diesel Oil #1 (gal) d)Diesel Oil #2 (gal) e)Propane (Ib) f)Healy Coal (ton) g)Wood (cord) h)Purchased steam/hot water (mmBtu) i)Other Annual Cost ($) a)Electricity b)Natural gas c)Diesel d)Diesel e)Diesel f)Propane g)Healy Coal h)Wood i)Purchased steam/hot water j)Other Time period for energy consumption and cost data,from to Types of lighting in use a)Incandescent b)Fluorescent c)Mercury vapor d)High pressure sodium e)Metal halide f)Othe iL.x ey\Ivy ts Description of special energy using systems (e.g.food service,laundry equipment,swimming pool) Mechanical systems (repeat for each heater) a)Type of heater (e.g.furnace,hot water boiler,steam boiler,hot water heater) b)Type of Fuel (e.g.electricity,natural gas,#1 diesel,#2,diesel,#4 diesel,propane,coal,wood,purchased steam/hot water) c)Description of heat distribution systems Page13 of 13 KBR PROFESSIONAL FS =p SERVI CES Agreement No.: \Sik3ry AGREEMENT a Project Title: To this Agreement between the State of Alaska, ,hereafter the CONTRACTING AGENCY, and ,hereafter the CONTRACTOR, effective on the last date executed by its parties,in consideration of the terms,conditions and promises of Articles 1 through 8 in this document,the parties hereby agree: CONTRACTOR CORPORATE SEAL Signature: Name:Date: Title: Signature: Name:Date: Title: CONTRACTING AGENCY Project Manager's Signature: Name:Date: Title: Conrracung Officer's Signature: Name:Date: Title: Article 1 --Purpose 1.1 "Te Article 2 --Compensation 2.1 The maximum amount payable under this Agreement,as set out in Appendix C,shall not exceed: ($) Article 3.--Period of Performance 3.1 CONTRACTOR shall commence Work under this Agreement as authorized by wnitten Notice(s)to Proceed and shall complete the Work in accordance with any time schedule required by appendices.This Agreement is of no force or effect until executed by the CONTRACTOR and CONTRACTING AGENCYandnoservicesshallbeundertakenorperformeduntilanoticetoproceedisissued. 3.2 The period of performance under this Agreement shall end: Agreement Form 25A261 Page |of 2 DOT &PF 11/15/92 Aricie 4 --Appendices 4.i The following Appena:ces are atragnec to tnis document and incorporated nere:n: Appendix Title Date Prepared No_Pages A General Conditions B Statement of Services Cc Basis of Compensation D Indemnificanion and Insurance (DOT&PF Form 25A-269), plus Certificates of Insurance Article 5 --CONTRACTING AGENCY Project Manager:Contracting Officer: Title:Appeals Officer: CONTRACTING AGENCY's Office Federal /State Statute(s):AS 36.30.005 Street:Funding Collocation Code: P.O.Box:Program Code: City,State,Zip:Ledger Code: Telephone:Account Code: Article 6 --CONTRACTOR Contractor's Manager:Ak Business License No.: Title:Federal Identification No.: CONTRACTOR'S Office AKSAS Vendor No.: Street:TYPEOFFIRM P.O.Box:J Individual J Partnership City.State,Zip:3 Corporation in state of: Telephone:J Other...(specify): Article 7 --Subconractors 7.1 CONTRACTOR shall perform all professional services required under this Agreement except as may be performed by the Subcontractors listed below or as may be allowed under Appendix A,Article A19. Servi Engineering Discipli %Total Sv Sut k.Busi Lic.N Article 8 --Insurance Limits 8.1 See Appendix D,"Indemnification and Insurance”,within this Agreement. Form 284-261AgreementDOT&PF 11/1592Page2of2 Cat _FpsSs UY PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT APPENDIX A Agreement No.: Project No.: Date Prepared: *A13 INDEX Al Definitions A2 Informauon and Services from Others A3 Hold Harmiess Ad Insurance A5 Occupational Safety and Health A6 Equal Employment Opportunity Al Payments to the CONTRACTOR A8 Changes A9 Audits and Records Ald CONTRACTING AGENCY Inspecuons All Termination or Suspension Al2 Officials Not to Benefit Al3 Independent CONTRACTOR Al4 Proselyuzing Al5 Covenant against Contingent Fees Al6 Precedence of Documents Al7 Endorsement on Documents Al8g Ownership of Work ProductAl9SubconrractorsSuccessorsand Assigns A20 Claims and Disputes A21 Extent of Agreement A22 Taxes A23 Governing Law A24 Additional Provisions ARTICLE Al Definiti Al.l AdditionalorExtraServices -Services,WorkproductsoractionsrequiredoftheCONTRACTORabove and beyond provisions of this Agreement. Al.2.Amendment -A written change to this Agreement Appeals Officer -The designated individual or adulyappointedsuccessorwhosedecisionsconstitutetheexhaustionofcontractualandadministrativealternativesfor resolution of claims and disputes. Al.4-Change -A revision in scope,complexity,character, or duration of the services or provisions of this Agreement. AlL5 Contracting Officer -The individual or a dulyappointedsuccessordesignatedastheofficialrepresentativetoadministercontractsfortheCONTRACTINGAGENCY. Al.6 CONTRACTOR-The firm (person or any business combination)providing services. Al.7 CONTRACTOR's Manager -The CONTRACTOR'srepresentativeinresponsiblechargeoftheproject(s)and directly answerable for the required services. Appendix A Page |of 6 AlL.8 -An agency of a Federal,State. Political subdivision,or Local Government which furnishes funds for the CONTRACTOR's compensation under this Agreement and which may have established regulations and requirements binding upon the CONTRACTING AGENCY and the CONTRACTOR. ALY N -Written authorization from the CONTRACTING AGENCY (to the CONTRACTOR to provide all or specified services in accordance with an existing Agreement. Al.10 Project Manager -CONTRACTING AGENCY''s representauve in responsible charge of the project(s)and the CONTRACTOR's primary point of contact with the CONTRACTING AGENCY. AL 11 -Services and Work products required of the CONTRACTOR by this Agreement Al.12 Subconmactor -CONTRACTOR engaged to provide a portion of the services by subcontract with the firm which is a party to this Agreement. ARTICLE A2 Inf .t Services f On A2.1 The CONTRACTING AGENCY may,at its election or in response to a request from the CONTRACTOR,furnish information or services from other contractors.If,in the CONTRACTOR's opinion,such information or services is inadequate,the CONTRACTOR must noufy the CONTRACTING AGENCY of the specific service or material deemed inadequate and the extent of the inadequacy prior to use in the performance of this Agreement. The CONTRACTING AGENCY will then evaluate and resolve the matter in writing.Unless so notified by the CONTRACTOR,the CONTRACTING AGENCY may assume the information or services provided are adequate. ARTICLE A3 Hold Harmless See Appendix D,"Indemnification and {nsurance”. ARTICLE A4 Insurance A4.1 See Appendix D,"Indemnification and Insurance”. Form 25A262 DOT&PF 11/15/92 ARTICLE AS sucauona!Safetv and Health AS.1 The CONTRACTOR and it's Subcontractors shall observe and comply with the Federal Occupational Safety and Health act of 1970 and with all safety and health standards promulgated by the Secretary of Labor under authonty thereof and with all state of Alaska Occupauonai Safety and Health Laws and regulations. ARTICLE A6 Equal Employment Opportunity A6.1 The CONTRACTOR shall comply with the following applicable laws and directives and regulauons of the CONTRACTING AGENCY which effectuate them;ail of which are incorporated herein by reference: Title IV of Federal Civil Rights Act of 1964; Federal Executive order 11625 (Equal Employment Opportunity); Tide 41.Code of Federal Regulations,Part 60 (Equal Employment Opportunity): Tide 49,Code of Federal Regulacons,Part 21 (Discrimination): Title 49,Code of Federal Regulations,Part 23 (Minority Business Enterprises); Office of Management and Budget (OMB)circular 102, Attachment O (Procurement Standards); Alaska Statute (AS)18.80.200-300 (Discrimination). A6.2..The CONTRACTOR may not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, religion,color,national origin,age,physical disability,sex, of marital status,change in marital status,pregnancy or parenthood when the reasonable demands of the position donotrequiredistinctiononsuchbasis.the CONTRACTOR shall take affirmative action to insure that applicants are employed and that employees are reated during employment without regard to their race,religion,color,national origin,age,:physical disability,sex,.er marital stats.This actonmustinclude,but need not be limited to,the following: employment,upgrading,demotion,transfer,recruitment or recruitment advertising,layoff or termination,rates of pay or other forms of compensation,and selection for training including apprenticeship.The CONTRACTOR shall post in conspicuous places,available employees and applicants for employment,notices setting out the provisions of this paragraph. A6.3.The CONTRACTOR shall state,in all solicitations or advertisements for employees to work in performance of this agreement,that it is an equal opportunity employer and that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race,religion,color,national origin,age,physical disability,sex,or martial status. A6.4.The CONTRACTOR shall send to each labor union or representative or workers with which the CONTRACTOR has a collective bargaining agreement or Appendix A Page 2 of 6 other contract or understanding a nouce advising the lacor umion or workers representative of the CONTRACTOR 5 commitments under this arucle and post copies of the nouce in conspicuous places available to all employees and applicants tor employment. A6.5 In the event the CONTRACTOR subcontracts any part of the services to be performed under this Agreement. the CONTRACTOR agrees to make good faith efforts to utilize female and minority business Subcontractors,to affirmauvely solicit their interest,capability and prices and to furnish documentation of the results of all such direct contacts on forms provided by or acceptable to the CONTRACTING AGENCY. A6.6 The CONTRACTOR shall make,keep and preserve such records necessary to determine compliance with equal employment opportunity obligations and shall furnish required information and reports.All records must be retained and made available in accordance with article A9, Audits and Records. A6.7.The CONTRACTOR shall include the provisions of this article in every contract,and shall require the inclusion of these provisions in every contract entered into by any of its Subcontractors,so that these provisions will be binding upon each Subcontractor. ARTICLE A7 PaymentstotheCONTRACTOR A7.1 Payments shall be based on approved CONTRACTOR's invoices submitted in accordance with this article and the provisions of Appendix C.The sum of payments shall not exceed allowable compensation stated in Notice(s)to Proceed and no payments shall be made in excess of the maximum allowable total for this Agreement. A7.2..The CONTRACTING AGENCY will exert every effort to obtain required Funding Agency approvals and to issue authorizations in a timely manner.CONTRACTOR shall not perform any services without a Notice to Proceed therefore.Accordingly,the CONTRACTING AGENCY will not pay the CONTRACTOR for services or associated reimbursable costs performed outside those which areauthorizedbyaNoticetoProceed. A7.3.CONTRACTOR's invoices shall be submitted when services are completed or monthly,for months during which services are performed,as applicable,in a format provided by or acceptable to the CONTRACTING AGENCY. A7.4 In the event items on an invoice are disputed payment on those items will be held unul the dispute is resolved.Undisputed items will not be held with the disputed items. A7.5 The CONTRACTOR shall submit a final invoice and required documentation within 90 days after final acceptance of services by the CONTRACTING AGENCY. The CONTRACTING AGENCY will not be held liable for payment of invoices submitted after this time unless prior written approval has been given.Satisfactory compliance with article A22,Taxes,is a condition precedent to final payment. Form 25A262 DOT&PF 11/15/92 ARTICLE A8 Changes A8.1 Changes (including "Supplemental Agreements')intheperiodofperformance,general conditions.scope of services,or other provisions established by this AgreementmaybemadebywrittenAmendmentonly.If such changescauseanincreaseoradecreaseintheCONTRACTOR's cost, an equitable adjustment shall be made and specified in the Amendment.The CONTRACTOR shail not pertorm any additional or extra services prior to receiving a fully executed copy of an amendment and a nouce to proceed, except as the CONTRACTOR may be directed under the provisions of article A20,Claims and Disputes. A8.2.If at any ume the CONTRACTING AGENCY through its authorized representatives,either verbally or in writing,requests or issues instructions for Addiuonal orExtraServicesorotherwisedirectsactionswhichconflict with any provisions of this Agreement,the CONTRACTOR shall,within 30 days of receipt and prior to pursuing such instructions,so notify the CONTRACTING AGENCY in writing,and to the extent possible,describe the scope andestimatedcostofanyAdditionalorExtraServices.The CONTRACTING AGENCY will then evaluate and,if appropriate,negotiate an Amendment.Unless so noufied bytheCONTRACTOR,the CONTRACTING AGENCY may assume such instructions have not changed any provisions of this Agreement nor require additional compensation.NoadditionalpaymentsshallbemadetotheCONTRACTOR without such nouce. ARTICLE A9 AuditsandRecords A9.1 The CONTRACTOR shall maintain records of performances,communications,documents,correspondenceandcostspertinenttothisAgreementandtheFundingorCONTRACTINGAGENCY's authorized representatives shall have the right to examine such records and accounung procedures and practices. A9.2.The Funding or CONTRACTING AGENCY's authorized representatives shall have the right to examine allbooks,records,documents and other data of the CONTRACTOR related to the negotiation,pricing and performance of this Agreement and any modification orchangeforthepurposeofevaluatingtheaccuracy,completeness and currency of the data submitted.The right of examination shall extend to all documents necessary to permit adequate evaluation of the data,computations and projections used. A9.3.The materials described in this article shall be made available at a business office of the CONTRACTOR at all reasonable times for inspection,audit or reproduction,for aminimumof3yearsfromthedateofanyresultingfinal settlement. A9.3.1 If this Agreement is completely or partially terminated,records relating to the services terminated shallbemadeavailableforaminimumof3yearsfromthedateof any resulting final settlement. Appendix A Page 3 of 6 A9 3.2 Records which relate to appeals under arucie ADL. Claims and Disputes.or litigation or the settlement of claims arising out of the pertormance of this Agreemen:shall be made available unul such appeals,liugauon or Claims have been concluded.° ARTICLE Al0 CONTRACTINGAGENCYInspecuons Al0.1 The CONTRACTING AGENCY has the nght toinspect,in the manner and at reasonable umes it considers appropriate during the period of this agreement,all faciliues and acuvities of the CONTRACTOR as may be engaged inthepertormanceofthisAgreement. ARTICLE All TerminationorSuspensi All.1 This Agreement may be terminated by either partyupon10dayswrittennoticeiftheotherpartyfails substantially to perform in accordance with its terms through no fault of the party initiating the termination (default termination).If the CONTRACTING AGENCY terminates this Agreement,the CONTRACTING AGENCY will pay the CONTRACTOR a sum equal wo the percentageofworkcompletedthatcanbesubstanuatedinwholeorin part either by the CONTRACTOR to the satisfaction of the CONTRACTING AGENCY or by the CONTRACTING AGENCY.If the CONTRACTING AGENCY becomes aware of any nonconformance with this Agreement by the CONTRACTOR,the CONTRACTING AGENCY will give prompt written notice thereof to the CONTRACTOR. Should the CONTRACTOR's services remain in nonconformance,the percentage of total compensation attributable to the nonconforming Work may be withheld. All.2)The CONTRACTING AGENCY may at any time terminate (convenience termination)or suspend this Agreement for its needs or convenience.In the event of a convenience termination,or suspension for more than 3 months,the CONTRACTOR will be compensated for authorized services and authorized expenditures performed to the date of receipt of written notice of termination or suspension plus reasonable expenses.No fee or other compensation for the uncompleted portion of 'the services will be paid except for already incurred indirect costs which the CONTRACTOR can establish and which would have been compensated for over the life of this agreement,but because of the termination or suspension would have to be absorbed by the CONTRACTOR without further compensation. All.3 If federal funds support this Agreement,settlement for default or convenience termination must be approved by the Funding Agency and shall be in basic conformance with Title 41,Code of Federal Regulations,Subparts 1-8.604 or |- 8.203 and 1-8.213. All.4 In the event of termination or suspension,the CONTRACTOR shall deliver all work products,reports. estimates,schedules and other documents and data prepared pursuant to this Agreement to the CONTRACTING AGENCY. Form 25A262 DOT&PF 11/15/92 ARTICLE Al2 Offi y ner; Al2.1 No member of or delegate to Congress.United States Commissioner or other officials of the Federal.State. Political subdivision or Local Government shall be admitted tO any share or part of this agreement or any benefit to anise therefrom. ARTICLE Al3 Independent CONTRACTOR Al13.1.The CONTRACTOR and its agents and employees shall act in an independent capacity and not as officers or agents of the CONTRACTING AGENCY in theperformanceofthisAgreementexceptthattheCONTRACTORmayfunctionastheCONTRACTING AGENCY's agent as may be specifically set forth in this Agreement. Al3.2.Any and all employees of the CONTRACTOR, while engaged in the performance of any Work or services required by the CONTRACTOR under this Agreement,shall be considered employees of the CONTRACTOR only and not of the CONTRACTING AGENCY and any and all claims that may or might arise under the Worker's Compensauion Act on behalf of said employees,while so engaged and any an all claims made by a third party as a consequence of any negligent act or omission on the part of theCONTRACTOR's employees,while so engaged on any of the services to be rendered herein,shall be the sole obligation and responsibility of the CONTRACTOR. Al3.3.This Agreement will be declared null and void should the CONTRACTING AGENCY determine that by Internal Revenue Service definitions the CONTRACTOR is an employee of the CONTRACTING AGENCY. ARTICLE Al4 Proselytizing Al4.1 The CONTRACTOR agrees that it will not engage on a full or part time basis,during the period of this Agreement,any person or.persons who are or have beenemployedbytheCONTRACTINGAGENCYduringthe period of this Agreement or during the 90 days immediately preceding the date of this Agreement except those who havebeenregularlyretiredorapprovedinwritingbythe CONTRACTING AGENCY. ARTICLE A15 Cov inst Conti F Al5.1 The CONTRACTOR shall comply with the Copeland "Anti-Kickback”Act (18 USC 874)assupplementedinFederalDepartmentofLaborregulations (29 CFR,part 3),which are incorporated by reference and made a part of this Agreement. AlS.2.The CONTRACTOR warrants that it has not employed or retained any organization or person,other than abonafideemployee,to solicit or secure this Agreement andthatithasnotpaidoragreedtopayanyorganizationor Appendix A Page 4 of 6 person.other than a pona fide emplovee.any fee.commission. percentage,brokerage fee,gift or other consideration conungent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement.For breach or violauon of this warranty.the CONTRACTING AGENCY has the right to annul this Agreement without liability or,in its discretion.to deduct from the allowable compensation the full amount of such commussion,percentage,brokerage or contungent fee. Al5.3 The CONTRACTING AGENCY warrants that the CONTRACTOR or the CONTRACTOR'representative has not been required,directly or indireculy as an express or implied condition in obtaining or carrying out this Agreement,to employ or retain,or agree to employ or retain, any organization or person or to make a contribution, donation or consideration of any kind. ARTICLE Al6 PrecedenceofDocuments Al6.1 Components of this Agreement shall stand and prevail in the following order:Agreement over General Conditions:General Conditions over Statement of Services: Statement of Services over Basis of Compensation:Basis of Compensauon over any appendices beyond Appendix C. Al6.2 Ifa "Request for Proposal"(RFP)and/or a proposal are appended to chis Agreement,the components described in paragraph A16.1 shall stand and prevail over the proposal and the proposal over the RFP. ARTICLE Al? En ment on Docymen Al7.1_Endorsements and professional seals,if applicable, must be included on all final drawings,specifications,cost estimates and reports prepared by the CONTRACTOR. Preliminary copies of such documents submitted for review must have seals affixed without endorsement (signature). ARTICLE Al8 OwnershipofWorkProduct Al8.1 Work products produced under this Agreement,except items which have pre-existing copyrights,are the property of the CONTRACTING AGENCY.Payments to the CONTRACTOR for services hereunder include full compensation for all Work products produced by the CONTRACTOR and its Subcontractors and the CONTRACTING AGENCY shall gave royalty free non- exclusive and irrevocable right to reproduce,publish,or other wise use,and to authorize others to use,such Work products. Al8.2 Should the CONTRACTING AGENCY elect to reuse Work products provided under this agreement for other than the original project and/or purpose,the CONTRACTING AGENCY will indemnify the CONTRACTOR and its Subcontractors against any responsibilities or liabilities arising from such reuse. Additionally,any reuse of design drawings or specifications provided under this agreement must be limited to conceptual or preliminary use for adaptation and the original Form 25A262 DOT&PF 11/15/92 CONTRACTOR's or Subcontractors signature,professional seals and dates removed.Such reuse of drawings and specificauions.which require professional seals and datesremoved.Such are use of drawings and specificauions.whichrequireprofessionalsignatureandseal.will be signed.sealed and dated bv the professional who is tn direct supervisory control and responsible for the adaptauon. ARTICLE Al9 Subcontractors Successors and Assigns Al9.1 The CONTRACTING AGENCY must concur in the selection of all Subcontractors for professional services to be engaged in performance of this Agreement Al9.2 If this Agreement includes named firms orindividuals,then such firms or individuals shail be employed for the designated services,unless the Agreement is changed by Amendments. Al9.3.The CONTRACTOR shall not assign,sublet or transfer any interest in this Agreement without the priorwrittenconsentoftheCONTRACTINGAGENCY. Al9.4 The CONTRACTOR binds itself,its partners,its Subcontractors,assignees and legal representatives to this Agreement and to the successors,assignees and legalrepresentativesoftheCONTRACTINGAGENCYwithrespecttoallcovenantsofthisAgreement. Al9.5 The CONTRACTOR shall include provisions appropriate to effectuate the purposes of this Appendix A inallsubcontractsexecutedtoperformservicesunderthis Agreement which exceed a cost of $10,000. ARTICLE A20 Chi {Di A20.1 If the CONTRACTOR becomes aware,of any act or occurrence which may form the basis of a claim by the CONTRACTOR for additional compensation or an extension of time for performance,or if any disput arises regarding a question of fact or interpretation of this Agreement,the CONTRACTOR shall immediately informtheProjectManager.If the matter cannot be resolved within 7 days,the CONTRACTOR shall,within the next 14 days, submit an "intent to claim"in writing to the Project Manager. If the CONTRACTOR believes additional compensation is warranted,the CONTRACTOR shall immediately begin to keep and maintain complete,accurate and specific daily records concerning every detail of the potential claim including actual costs incurred.The CONTRACTOR shall give the CONTRACTING AGENCY access to any suchrecordand,when so requested,shall forthwith furnish the CONTRACTING AGENCY copies thereof.Equipment costs shall be based on the CONTRACTOR's internal rates for ownership,depreciation,and operaung expense and not on published rental rates. The claim,if not resolved,shall be presented to the Project Manager,in writing,within 60 days following receipt of the Appendix A Page 5 of 6 'Intent to Claim'.Receipt of the ciaim acknowledged in wrung by the Project Manager. wiil pe The CONTRACTOR agrees that unless these written nouces are provided.the CONTRACTOR will have no enutlement to additional time or compensation for such act.event or condition.The CONTRACTOR shall in any case conunue diligent performance under this Agreement. A20.2 The claim shail specifically include the following: A20.2.1 The act,event or condition giving nse to the claim. A20.2.2 The provisions of the Agreement which apply to the claim and under which relief is provided. A20.2.2 The item or items of project Work affected and how they are affected. A20.2.2 The specific relief requested,including Contract Time if applicable,and the basis upon which it was calculated. A20.3 The claim,in order to be valid,must not only show that the CONTRACTOR suffered damages or delay but that those conditions were actually a result of the act.event or condition complained of and that the Conrract provides entitlement to relief to the CONTRACTOR for such act, event,or condition. The Project Manager reserves the right to make written request to the CONTRACTOR at any time for additional information which the CONTRACTOR may possess relative to the claim.The CONTRACTOR agrees to provide the Project Manager such additional information within 30 days of receipt of such a request.Failure to furnish such additional information may be regarded as a waiver of the claim. If the Claim is not resolved by agreement within 60 days of its receipt,the Project Manager will issue a written decision to the CONTRACTOR.The CONTRACTOR may appeal the Project Manager's decision within 30 days to the Contracting Officer.Any appeal must be in writing and must list the specific exceptions to the Project Manager's decision including specific provisions of the Agreement which the CONTRACTOR intends to rely upon in his appeal. The CONTRACTOR shall certify that the claim is made in good faith,that the supporting cost and pricing data are accurate and complete to the best of the CONTRACTOR''s knowledge and belief,and that the amount requested accurately reflects the adjustment to the Agreement for which the CONTRACTOR beleives the DEPARTMENT is liable. A20.4 The CONTRACTOR will be furnished a written signed copy of the Contracting Officer's decision within 90], days,unless additional information is requested by the Contracting Officer.The Contracting Officer's decision is final and conclusive unless fraudulent as to the claim or unless,within 14 days of receipt of the decision.the CONTRACTOR delivers a written Notice of Appeal to the Appeals Officer designated on page 2 of this Agreement A20.5 Procedures for appeals and hearings are covered|, under AS 36.30.625 and AS 36.30.630. Form 25A262 DOT&PF 11/15/92 ARTICLE A21 ExtentofAgreement A21.1 This Agreement including appendices represents the entire and integrated Agreement between the CONTRACTING AGENCY and the CONTRACTOR and supersedes all prior negotiations,representations or Agreements,written or oral. A21.2 Nothing contained herein may be deemed to create any contractual relationship between the CONTRACTING AGENCY and any Subcontractors or material suppliers:nor may anything be contained herein be deemed to give any third party claim or right of action against the CONTRACTING AGENCY or the CONTRACTOR which does not otherwise exist without this agreement. A21.3 This Agreement may be changed only by written Amendment executed by both the CONTRACTING AGENCY and the CONTRACTOR. A21.4 All communications that affect this Agreement must be made or confirmed in wnting and must be se...wo the addresses designated in this Agreement A21.5 The CONTRACTOR on receiving final payment will execute a release,if required,in full of all claims against the CONTRACTING AGENCY arising out of or by reason of the services and Work products furnished and under this Agreement. ARTICLE A22 Taxes A22.1 As acondition of performance of this Agreement, the CONTRACTOR shall pay all Federal,State and Local taxes incurred by the CONTRACTOR and shall require their payment by any Subcontractor or any other persons in the performance of this Agreement. ARTICLE A23 A23.1 This Agreement is governed by the laws of the state of Alaska and Federal and Local Laws and Ordinances applicable to the Work performed.The CONTRACTOR shall be cognizant and shall at all times observe and comply with such laws which in any manner affect those engaged or employed in the performance,or which in any way affects the manner of performance,of this Agreement. ARTICLE A24 Additional Provisi (Deletion or modification of articles Al through A23 shall be approved "as to form"by the CONTRACTING AGENCY's legal section,acknowledged in writing,and attached to this Appendix.) A24.1 The following certification is applicable to all Federal-Aid Highway Agreements exceeding $100,00. Appendix A Page 6 of 6 The prospective parucipant certifies,by signing anc submitting this bid or proposal,to the best of his or her knowledge and belief,that: (1)No federal appropriated funds have been paid or «til be paid,by or on behalf of the undersigned.to any personforinfluencingorattemptingtoinfluenceanofficeror employees of any Federal agency,a Member of Congress.-an otficer or employee of Congress,or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding ofanyFederalconmact,the making of any Federal grant,the making of any Federal loan,the entering into of anycooperativeagreement,and at the extension, continuauon,renewal,amendment,or modification of any Federal contract,grant,loan,or cooperative agreement (2)If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any Federal agency,a Member of Congress in connection with this Federal contract,grant.foan.or cooperative agreement,the undersigned shall completeandsubmitStandardFormLLL,Disclosure of LobbvingActivities,in accordance with its instrucuons.Any person who fails to file the required disclosure shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and nor more than $100,000 for each such failure. This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into.Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this uransaction imposed by Secuon 1352,Title 31,U.S.Code. The prospective participant also agrees by submitung his or her bid or proposal that he or she shall require that the language of this certification be included in ail lower uer subcontracts,which exceed $100,000 and that all such subrecipients shall certify and disclose accordingly. Form 25A262 DOT&PF 11/15/92 APPENDIX C PSA #: COMPENSATION PJ #: C1.Payments will be made on approved Invoices.Except for Fixed Price(s)and Fixed Fees, compensation shall be cost-based on actual costs to the Contractor for providing services.Provisions for Audit are contained in Appendix A. C2.Price proposals and Notices-to-Proceed (NTPs)for this Agreement must conform to the Labor Rates,Indirect Cost Rate(s),Unit Prices,Fee/Profit Arrangements,Estimated Costs,and Price Caps contained in the Exhibits attached to this Appendix C. C3.Payments are limited to the amount(s)cited in each Notice-to-Proceed (NTP)issued for this Agreement.The Contractor expressly has no right to any payments in excess of each NTP amount. C4.Final payment to the Contractor may be withheld until a Release from Agreement,on a form prescribed by the Contracting Agency,is executed by the Contractor. C5.Payments for this Agreement and any Amendment,including Costs and Fee,will be adjusted to exclude any significant sums by which the Contracting Agency finds that payments are increased because the cost or pricing data furnished by the Contractor or prospective Contractor is inaccurate, incomplete,or not current on the date of the Agreement or subsequent submittal date of pricing data (AS 36.30.400). C6._'The following terminology and explanations are applicable to this Agreement;any inconsistencies appearing in this Agreement must be resolved in accordance with the terminology in this paragraph. C6.1 Direct Labor Costs -Base salary and/or wages paid to employees charged directly to this Agreement exclusive of Fringe Benefits or other Indirect Costs and Fees (including profit). C6.2 Other Direct Costs -Actual costs for subcontracts,equipment (company owned or rented),unit rate items and reimbursable expenses (travel,per diem,reproduction ,etc.)exclusive of the Contractor's Direct Labor Costs. C6.3 Indirect Costs-Allowable expenses that,because of their incurrence for common or joint cost objectives,must be allocated to this Agreement using a specified Indirect Cost Rate.A cost objective is a function,organizational subdivision,contract,project or work unit for which cost data is accumulated under the Contractor's accounting system.Generally,indirect Costs are segregated into the following categories:Fringe Benefits,Overhead (General &Administrative Expenses -including Indirect Labor), and Allocated Home Office Overhead (if applicable). C6.3.1 Fringe Benefits -Costs for items such as: Vacation time and authorized leave; Group and worker's Compensation Insurance; Deferred Compensation/Retirement plans; Social Security and unemployment taxes;and Group Medical plan and Life Insurance Premiums. DOT/PF Form 25A280 5/1/92 Appendix C -Compensation (Page 1 of 2) 26.3.2 Overnead -Costs for tems sucn as the following,f they are nat inciuced in Direct Costs: indirect Labor (Supervisory.Administrative.etc.)Office supplies: including base salary or wages and related Communications: Fringe Benefits:Reproduction costs: Travel,food and lodging;Recruiting expenses:and Upkeep and depreciation of equioment'computers:Rentats of equipment'computers. Business Insurance premiums not oilled to clients: Rent,heat.power,light and janitoria!services: C6.3.3 Allocated Home Office Overhead (if applicable)-Costs for management,supervisory,and administrative functions which benefit unit operations. C6.4 Indirect Cost Rate -A negotiated percentage of incurred expenses for Direct Labor Costs which is used as a basis of compensation for tndirect Costs.Fees or Profit are not included in the Indirecr Cost Rate. C6.4.1 If this Agreement wholly or partially allocates Indirect Costs on other than a Direct Labor basis.a description of the indirect Cost pools or service centers used,and the Indirect Cost Rates(s)and base(s),shall be attached in an Exhibit to this Appendix C;otherwise,such an allocation shail not be allowed for this contract. C6.4.2 Indirect Cost Rates may be fixed or provisional and may be negotiated for the duration of the Agreement or on a fiscal year basis. C6.4.3 Provisional Indirect Cost Rates require a Contracting Agency approved audit of accounting records after each of the Contractor's or Subcontractor's fiscal years during which they perform work under the Agreement. C6.4.4 Indirect Cost Rates may be changed only by a negotiated Amendment.Payments for Indirect Costs based on a provisional rate may be adjusted to reflect a changed rate if prescribed in an Exhibit attached to this Appendix C.The amount of any payment adjustments must be cited in the Amendment.Also,the cost estimates for remaining work must be adjusted to reflect the changed Indirect Cost Rate. C6.5 Non-allowable Costs -Payments for the following items and certain other costs defined in 41 CFR Part 31 and related regulations are not allowable.Such costs shail not be included as billable Direct or Indirect Costs or in the calculation of the Indirect Cost Rate. Interest and other financial Costs Bad debts -Contributionsand donations Fines and penalties Dividends Entertainment,Social Club Membership,etc. Federal income taxes Provisions for Contingencies Deferred state income taxes Losses on other contracts and related legal fees C6.6 Fee -Profit plus any costs not allocable to this contract.The amount of Fee may be fixed or variable,depending on the method of payment used.Not allocable costs shail not be considered by the Contracting Agency when negotiating Fee. C7.|Markup of any costs as compensation for administration,management or handling,etc.,is prohibited.Costs of such efforts are included within the elements of Direct Labor and/or Indirect Labor.Compensation for any risk associated with incurring costs is included within Profit. C8.Exhibits:C-1 NTP Form (Sample);C-2 Payments Schedule;and,C-3 Table(s)of Estimated Costs. DOT/PF Form 25A280 5/1/92 Appendix C -Compensation (Page 2 of 2) INSURANCE APPENDIX INDEMNIFICATION AND Agreement No.: Project No.: D Date Prepared: ARTICLE D1 Hold Harmless Dl...The CONTRACTOR shall indemnify,hold harmless,and defend the CONTRACTING AGENCY from and against any claim of,or liability for negligent error or omussion of the CONTRACTOR under this Agreement.The CONTRACTOR shail not be required to indemnify theCONTRACTINGAGENCYforaclaimof,or liability for,the independent negligence of the CONTRACTING AGENCY.If there is a claim otf,or liability for,the joint negligent error or Omission of the CONTRACTOR and theindependentnegligenceoftheCONTRACTINGAGENCY the indemnification and hold harmless obligation shall be apportioned on a comparative lault basis."CONTRACTOR” und "CONTRACTING AGENCY,”as used within this urticte.include the employees.agents and other contractors who arc direcuy responsible,respecuvely,to each.The term "Independent Negligence”is negligence other than in the CONTRACTING AGENCY's selection,administration, monitoring,or conuolling of the CONTRACTOR and in approving or accepting the CONTRACTOR's Work. DI.2 >The CONTRACTOR shall exercise that degree ofskill,cure and judgement commensurate with the professional standards for the services of a similar nature. When such standards are in dispute,they shall be established by u panel of three qualified,impartial professionals objecuvely selected and appointed by the appeals officer. DI3 The CONTRACTOR shall correct,through roperlormance at its expense,any services which are deficient or defective because of the CONTRACTOR's failure to pertorm said services in accordance with professional standards.provided the CONTRACTING AGENCY has noufied the CONTRACTOR in writing within a reasonable time,not to exceed 60 days,of the discovery of any such deficiency during the performance of the services and within 12 months of the date of final payment under this Agreement. (1.4 The provisions of paragraph D1.1 as they pertain to contract claims by construction contractors against the state arising oul of the CONTRACTOR's plans and specificationsduringtheconstruction,are limited to the amount of protessional liability insurance identified in arucle D2. ARTICLE D2 Insurance D2.)Without limiting the CONTRACTOR's indemnification,it is agreed that CONTRACTOR shall Purchase al its own expense and maintain in force at all tumes for the duration of this Agreement,plus one year following the date of final payment,the following policies Appendix D Pave bot? of insurance.Where specific limits are shown,it is understood that they shall be the minimum acceptablelimits.If the CONTRACTOR's policy contains higherlimits,the CONTRACTING AGENCY shall be entitled to coverage to the extent of such higher limits.Certificates of insurance must be furnished to the CONTRACTING AGENCY and incorporated into this Agreement with copies attached to this form.Certificates must provide for a 30-day prior notice to the CONTRACTING AGENCY otf cancellauon or reduction in any limits of liability.Failure to furnish certificates of insurance or lapse of the policy ts a material breach and grounds for terminauon of the CONTRACTOR's services and may preciude other Agreements between the CONTRACTOR and the CONTRACTING AGENCY. D2.1.1 Worker's Compensation Insurance:For allemployeesoftheCONTRACTORengagedinWorkunder this Agreement,"Worker's Compensation Insurance”as required by AS 23.30.045.The CONTRACTOR shall be responsible for "Workers Compensation Insurance”for anySubcontractorwhodirectlyprovidesservicesunderthis Agreement.Coverage must include statutory coverage tor states in which employees are engaging in Work and employer's liability protection not less than $100,000 per person,$100,000 per occurence.Where applicable.coverageforallfederalacts(i...U.S.L.&H.and Jones Acis)must also be included. D2.1.2 iv i al Ligbili Insurance:Such insurance shall cover all operations by,or on behaif of,the CONTRACTOR providing insurance for bodily injury and property damage liability includingcoverageforpremisesandoperations.products and completed operations,contractual liability,broad form damage,and personal liability.For a comprehensive policy, the minimum combined single limit of liabiluy is $300,000 per occurrence,$300,000 aggregate tor bodily injury,property damage and personal injury.For a commercial policy,the minimum limits of liability are $300,000 per occurrence (combined single limit)for bodily injury and property damage,$300,000 per occurrence for personal injury,$300,000 aggregate for products completed operations,and $300,000 general aggregatc. 02.1.3 ComprehensiveAutomobileLiabilityInsurance:Covering all owned,hired and non-owned vehicles withcoveragelimitsnotlessthat$100,000 per person/S300.000 per occurrence bodily injury and $50,000 property damage. D2.1.4 Professional Liability Insurance:Covering allnegligenterrorsoromissionswhichtheCONTRACTOR, Subcontractor or anyone directly or indirectly employed Form 2§A269 DOT &PF 2/10/03 by them,make in the performance of this Agreement which (Schedule of Limits Conunued) result in financial loss to the CONTRACTING $500.000to$999,909.wwe,$500,000 AGENCY.Minimum limits required are per the $1,000,000 andover...0.0...Negouable lolowing schedule: D2.2 Professional Liability Insurance cov i Conwact Combined Single Limit,Per required for this Agreement:$Y coverage and limits Amount Ocurrence &Annual AggregaisSateOe8100000FeeeesASOO D2.3 CONTRACTOR shall include the provisions of this100.000 1 $499.99 Pt es $250,000 form in all subcontracts which exceed $25,000 and shall .ie ,ensure Subcontractor's compliance with such provisions. ARTICLE D3 ModificauonofInsurance Requirements D3.1 If the provisions of article D2 are modified for this Agreement,justification and approval by the Contracting Officer is required.Check the appropriate box(es)below and complete the following,as applicable to this Agreement. Note:Project Manager should carefully review Chapter 12 of the PSA handbook prior to modifying this Appendix.Modification Not Applicable:"4 Modification Approved:cm) D3.2 Modifications to the insurance provisions pertaining to Worker's Comp,General Liability,or Auto Liability coverages arenotcdbelow.CONTRACTOR must "V"and sign the cerufacuon (first)block and any specific text modifying existing coverages. "1 |certify that the CONTRACTOR shall fully indemnify,save harmless and defend the CONTRACTING AGENCY,its ollicers,avents,and employees from all liability,acuons.or claims,including costs and expenses,resulting from injuries ordamagessustainedbyanypersonorpropertyansingdirecuyorindirectlytromtheCONTRACTOR's pertormance of thisAgreementwhichwouldbecoveredbytheinsurancepoliciesspecifiedinArticleD2,but which are waived in accordance with any ol ny signed ceruficauons below: CONTRACTOR Signature Dae T Workers Compensation Insurance is not required because [,the CONTRACTOR,am an Independent Contractor,Sole Proprietor or Self Employed Person having no employees in any sense of AS 23.30.045. CONTRACTOR Signature Date "J Comprehensive or Commercial General Liability Insurance is not required because |do not maintain a place of business or hone alfice to which the general public or my clients have any business access. CONTRACTOR Signature Date "1 Comprehensive Automobile Liability Insurance is not required because only public transportation,or a rentcd passenger vchicle with business use insurance,will be used to accomplish requirements of this Agreement. CONTRACTOR Signanre Dae ae 23.3 Protessional Liability Insurance (E&O).CONTRACTING AGENCY shall indicate the reason(s)for reducingtheLE&O limits by marking the appropriate box(es).Contracting Officer's signature must appear in D3.4_below. (3.3 1 E&O Insurance may be zero if all of the following statements apply: "1 *CONTRACTING AGENCY's use of the services or Work products obtained from the CONTRACTOR will not result in significant exposure to any third party claims for loss or damage. 4)+CONTRACTOR services will not apply to any construction,alteration,demolition,repair or direct use of any highway,airport,harbor,building or other structure. Vote:When services may apply to fire,life safety or structural aspects and/or wherever the services should safeguard life. limh,health or property,Agreements shall include requirements for Professional Liability Insurance. OR D3.3.2 E&O Insurance has been reduced to zero as the Agreement is to provide only the following services. *Right-of-Way Fee Appraisals, *Photogrammetric Mapping Services,or +Architectural/Engineering review of Construction Bid Documents wherein design responsibility clearly remains with the designer of record. D3.4 --Approval of Modifications Contracung Officer's Signature:Name:Date Title: a 4 Appendix D Form 25A269 Pave Zor?DOT&PF 2/10/93 DCRA/Division of Energy Interim Report Rural Alaska Heat Conservation and August 2,1995 Fuel Substitution Assessment USKH,Inc, EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Interim Report presents the report outline and status of data collection for review by the Division of Energy (DOE).The database design will be developed during a meeting between DOE and USKH on August 4,1995. The final report will have expanded information regarding our research into wood fuel technology, energy conservation measures applicable to rural Alaska,completed questionnaires returned from managers of eligible facilities,and recommendations for implantation of wood fuel heating systems.Our findings will be summarized in this Executive Summary. DCRA/Division of Energy Interim Report Rural Alaska Heat Conservation and August 2,1995 Fuel Substitution Assessment USKH,Ine. 1.0 INTRODUCTION The purpose of the Rural Alaska Heat Conservation and Fuel Substitution Assessment is to identify practical,applicable solutions to rural energy requirements that are site specific and cost effective.Specifically,the applicability of wood fuel-fired heating systems and electrical energy conservation measures (ECMs). Many factors must be evaluated and balanced to ensure public and private support for the proposed projects.Users with adequate demand levels and budgets to support the continued operation and maintenance of the proposed facilitates must be identified. Potential impacts to existing electric utilities and rate structures must be considered. Fuel ownership and availability require verification.Existing district heat (waste heat) systems and other critical infrastructure must be inventoried and their capacity and condition established.Ail options must be considered and workable conservation strategies developed.Solutions must be practical,reliable,straight-forward,and easy to maintain with local expertise. Move emplads On Le,,J Lhe.ele re ° DCRA/Division of Energy Interim Report Rural Alaska Heat Conservation and August 2,1995 Fuel Substitution Assessment USKH,Inc. 2.0 RESOURCE MATERIAL REVIEW 2.1 Summary of Existing Reports and Studies This section will state the purpose of reviewing reports and a summary of pertinent information found in the reports. 2.2 Major Buildings Verification This section will include information regarding the verification of previously identified major buildings (i.e.,annual consumption of more than 4,000 gallons ofnumber2fueloil),as well as additional major buildings identified and how we identified them. 10 -new vlleges o4 ell § DCRA/JDivision of Energy Interim Report Rural Alaska Heat Conservation and August 2,1995 Euel Substitution Assessment USKH,Inc. 3.0 FACILITY QUESTIONNAIRE 3.1 Purpose This section will include background on the information requested in the survey ("why”),as well as procedure used to obtain responses to questionnaire ("how'). 3.2 Questionnaire Summary Status Sheet A copy of the questionnaire status summary sheet is included in Appendix E. DCRA/Division of Energy Interim Report Rural Alaska Heat Conservation and August 2,1995 Fuel Substitution Assessment USKH,Inc, 4.0 PAST ENERGY CONSERVATION EFFORTS/RECOMMENDATIONS 4.1 District Heat (Waste Heat)Systems Explanation and description of District heat systems,and their history and reliability in rural Alaska. 4.2 Wood or Refuse Fuel wsod-©Description of wood orfefuse heating systems,and their history and reliability inruralapplicationsinCanadaptAlaska.end | DCRA/Division of Energy Interim Report Rural Alaska Heat Conservation and August 2,1995 Fuel Substitution Assessment USKH,Ine, 5.0 HISTORICAL ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES 5.1 Lighting List and description of lighting ECMs (with typical estimated cost vs.savings). §.2 Energy Efficient Motors List and description of energy efficient motor ECMs (with typical estimated cost vs. savings),and applicability/reliability for rural Alaska.>5 Ds r 2) speed t5.3 Building Envelope Types of building envelope upgrades and relative costs,with estimate of energy savings required to make cost effective. 5.4 Energy Management System/HVAC Controls Applicability of EMS systems in rural Alaska.A comparison of two philosophies: a.The "keep it simple”approach which is usually a low first cost and higher energy cost solution. B.The "spend a little more up front”philosphy for the high technology of ems systems and potentially increased maintenance costs if they fail,but reap the benefits of lower expenditures for energy. 5.5 Heat Plant Simple improvements to boiler mechanical rooms to improve operations of existing heating systems. Neo BLESS f6 Lc reteverce;£ DCRA/Division of Energy Interim Report Rural Alaska Heat Conservation and August 2,1995 Fuel Substitution Assessment USKH,Inc. 6.0 IMPACT OF ENERGY CONSERVATION ON ELECTRIC RATES 6.1 Typical Rural Alaska Electric Rate Structure Example of an APUC approved rate structure in rural Alaska and the relationship of fixed (maintenance,overhead,etc.)to non-fixed (fuel)costs. 6.2 Who Benefits and Who Pays for Energy Conservation Example of how a major reduction in electric consumption in a major community building (i.e.school),may effect the cost of electricity for the community's residential consumers. DCRA/Division of Energy Rural Alaska Heat Conservation and Fuel Substitution Assessment Interim Report August 2,1995 USKH,Inc, 7.0 ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES (ECM)APPLICABLE TO RURAL ALASKA 7.1 Categories of ECMs List and description of ECMs that are applicable for use in rural Alaska. 7.2 Wood Fuel Substitution Potential List of potential major buildings and district heat systems that lend themselves to economies of scale for wood fuel projects. Discucko,.of deriare chon teREELSSExyteZByYfuvegwece?zoft projectsbs 7 DCRA/Division of Energy Interim Report Rural Alaska Heat Conservation and August 2,1995 Fuel Substitution Assessment USKH,Inc, 8.0 WOOD FUEL RESOURCE AVAILABILITY 8.1 Local Wood fuel Resources Information from Tanana Chiefs Conference and other sources regarding sustained yield wood harvests for wood fuel projects. Zp sawrells TA o yen 8.2 Transportation Information from Tanana Chiefs Conference and other sources regarding transportation costs of wood harvests for wood fuel projects. 8.3 Estimated Cost per Cord Estimated costs of wood delivered to communities. DCRA/Division of Energy Rural Alaska Heat Conservation and Fuel Substitution Assessment Interim Report August 2,1995 USKH,Ine. 9.0 RECOMMENDATIONS 9.1 Prioritization List of recommendations for wood fuel projects prioritized by facility. 10 DCRA/Division of Energy Interim Report Rural Alaska Heat Conservation and August 2,1995 Fuel Substitution Assessment USKH,Inc, 10.0 DATABASE 10.1 Database Narrative What it is and what it can be used for,and how to use it. 10.2 Questionnaire Responses Only one completed questionnaire has been received by USKH. il DCRA/Division of Energy Interim Report Rural Alaska Heat Conservation and August 2,1995 Euel Substitution Assessment USKH,Inc. LIST OF FIGURES 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 12 DCRA/Division of Energy interim Report Rural Alaska Heat Conservation and August 2,1995 Fuel Substitution Assessment USKH,Inc, APPENDICES APPENDIX A -RESOURCE REVIEW Bibliography of Existing Reports and Studies .....0....cece eee eee eee A-1 List of Major Buildings by Community .....eee A-2eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeneeeeeeeeeeetenesA-3 ee ee eee eee eee eee eee te eee ene nent nnes A-4 APPENDIX B -WOOD FUEL DATA ee ee eee eee eee eee ee eee ete tee eee B-1 ee een eee eee ee eee ee Eee teen eee nett eee eees B-2 ee ee ene ee eee ee eee een eee eee eee eee eee e eens B-3 ene ene EE eee een eee eee eee eee eee eee ees B-4 APPENDIX C -ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES Sample CalculationS 2...0.0...cece cece eee eee e teen eee eens C-1eeeeeeeeeRRReeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeensC-2 ee eee eRe eee eee eee eee eee eet eee e eens C-3 APPENDIX D -PRIORITY RANKING DATA DOE Estimated Cost Wood Plant ($/MMBtu Installed)..........0...cee eee eee D-1 ee eee eee eee eee eee eee nee eee eee eee eee eee ees D-2 ee ee eee ete eee eee eee eee eee eee eee eee etree eee eee D-3 APPENDIX E -DATABASE Database Data...ccc eee cee nee eee eet ee eee nee e eens E-1 eee ee ee eee en eee RE eRe eee eee eee ee eee teens E-2 APPENDIX F -QUESTIONNAIRES ee eee eee ee nee eee eee eee eee ee ene e eee ens F-1 13 DCRA/Division of Energy Interim Report Rural Alaska Heat Conservation and August 2,1995 Fuel Substitution Assessment USKH,Inc, PHASE I INTERIM REPORT Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .....2.2 ccc cece cece cect sence eee e se ee seen teseeeeraanes i TABLE OF CONTENTS .....ccc cece cece cere ccc rennet terse cere eeseeseeeeeens lii 1.0 INTRODUCTION 2...ccc cece cc ecw ee ere e cere ence eee eee ne eneeeesens 1 2.0 RESOURCE MATERIAL REVIEW .......ccc eee ccc cece ce nancceeeseennneees 3 2.1 Summary of Existing Reports and Studies .........cess wns cce nan ccnee 2.2 Major Buildings Verification ........ccc cece cece eens nan n cnr ceeseees 3.0 FACILITY QUESTIONNAIRE ...2.2...cc cee ccc cere cece rece eee ne eeeesanee 10 3.1 PUFPOSE,2.ccc cere ec ccc cc cece ene e cree ence e eee e eee eeene 3.2 Questionnaire Summary Status Sheet.......0.cc cence ceca nan nceescces 4.0 PAST ENERGY CONSERVATION EFFORTS/RECOMMENDATIONS .........+045 16 4.1 Waste/District Heat.2...ccc ccc ccc cece ee ee ence ease eeeneneces 4.2 Wood/Refuse Fuel.2...ccc cc ccc ccc cece eee ee eee ene eeeeseessesees 4.3 Demand-Side Energy Conservation .......cccceeesencccceccssnencece 5.0 HISTORICAL ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES .........ccceeacccceens 25 5.1 Lighting 0...ccc cece cece er ccc cence renee ete neta e een e testes eeese 5.2 Energy Efficient Motors 22...ccc ccc cece cece etter eee n cena na neenes 5.3 Building Envelope ....2...cc ccc ween scene ener e nc ennceneuneeseeseenn 5.4 Energy Management System/HVAC Controls .......ccc cs scene ecenceees 5.5 Heat Plant 2...crc c ccc cc ccc c ccc cee ee wee seen naa eenaenasence 6.0 IMPACT OF ENERGY CONSERVATION ON ELECTRIC RATES ..........2e000:35 6.1 Typical Rural Alaska Electric Rate Structure ..........ccc eee cce en eenes 7.0 8.0 6.2 Who Benefits/Who Pays for Energy Conservation ........ccceeeseeevess ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES (ECM)APPLICABLE TO RURAL ALASKA.40 7.1 Categories Of ECMS 2...ccc cece cece ccc cet ener e eee eee nenees 7.2 Woodfuel Substitution Potential .......0.cc ccc cece rnc e ence nen nnccnes WOODFUEL RESOURCE AVAILABILITY .........cece cccccccnscscencecnees 44 8.1 Local Woodfuel Resources ......cece ccc c cece ewer cent eeeeceenecees 8.2 Transportation ....ccc ccc ccc ccc ccc ccc cece eee eee eee eee neeeeees 8.3 Estimated Cost per Cord 1...ccc cee cece cree eee e ete e ene e eee ee eeeee DCRA/Division of Energy Interim Report Rural Alaska Heat Conservation and August 2,1995 Fuel Substitution Assessment USKH,Inc. 9.0 RECOMMENDATIONS ......ccc sce cette neta ene ee ween eves ceetseannenes 50 9.1 Prioritization 10.0 DATABASE ......ccc cnn n cance nce rete e near ence c eres aeetaneeeeenunees 65 10.1 Database Narrative 10.2.Questionnaire Response "QPwONnsAPPENDICES APPENDIX A -RESOURCE REVIEW Bibliography of Existing Reports and Studies ........cc.cece c cece ccc cnee A-1 List of Major Buildings by Community ......cc.cere cece cece nce encccees A-2 weet ce ee ee ee eee eee eee eee ee eee ween ecto eee etenees A-3 APPENDIX B -WOODFUEL DATA wee ee eee ee ee eee eee eee eee ee eee eee eee eet eeees B-1 ee eee eee eee eee teen eee eee cette ee eee eee eee aees B-2 ete eaten eee eet eee eee eee eee tee eee eee ee nance nees B-3 APPENDIX C -ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES Sample Calculations .......cc ccc ccc n cree cc rec ect e ene eceseeeseuese C-1 eee ene eee eee eee eee eee eee eee ene cette ee eee ee eeeee C-2 bce ee eee ee eee eee eee eee eee eee eee eee e tee et eee aeenees C-3 APPENDIX D -PRIORITY RANKING DATA DOE Estimated Cost Wood Plant ($/MMBtu Installed).........0cccenceeenee D-1 meee ee eee eee eee eee eee eee ete teeta weet ee eeeee D-2 eee eee eee eee ee eee eee eee e eect eee este ee eeeee D-3 APPENDIX E -DATABASE Database Data .....ccc ccc cence ccc r ence cece renee enews cess enenees E-1 ce ee eee eee eee eee tee ee eee ee eee ett neues eeee E-2 APPENDIX F -QUESTIONNAIRE RESPONSES Appendix E QUESTIONNAIRE STATUS SUMMARY USKH,Inc._w.o.4730 _DCRA Fuel Substitution Survey Date of 1st Date of 2nd Date the |Date Sent 1st Call |Follow-up Person 2nd Call |Follow-up Person Question.|Thank You City Facility Name Remarks Fax No.|Date Faxed Phone No.Call Calied Phone No.Call Cailed Received |Response Ambler Water Plant 445-2174]7/20/95 |445-2122}8/1/95 {Charlie Tickett Ambler NW Arctic School District 'HQ in Kotzebue)442-2392 |7/20/95 |442-3472}8/1/95 |David Ambler City of Ambler Buildings 445-2174]7/20/95 |445-2122}8/1/95 |Charlie Tickett Ambler FAA BuildingsAmblerDistrictHeatSystem 445-2174}7/20/95 |445-2122]8/1/95 {Charlie Tickett Aniak Alascom Admin office =800-478-9000 Aniak Alaska Comercial Company Aniak Kuspuk School District 675-4305 |7/20/95 |675-4250}8/1/95 [Donna Aniak State of Alaska BuildingAniakFAA Elim Water and Sewer Facility 890-3811 |7/20/95 |890-3581;8/1/95 |Kenneth Kotongan Elim Bering Straits School District (HQ in Unalakleet)624-3099 |7/20/95 |624-3611]8/1/95 |Dave Boling Elim District Heat System 890-3811 |7/20/95 |890-3581}8/1/95 {Kenneth Kotongan Fort Yukon |YFSD -School (FY Elem.school ph.no.)662-2519 662-2352|8/1/95 {Samson Peter (FY high school ph.no.)662-2580 Fort Yukon _{|YFSD -Admin Building 662-2519 662-2515|8/1/95 |Samson Peter Fort Yukon {DOT -State Building 656-1368 Fort Yukon {City Water and Sewer Facility 662-2717 |7/20/95 |662-2479 Grafton Bergman Galena City Schools 656-1205 Bill Miller Galena City Water Plant 656-1769}7/20/95 |656-1301 Haroid Cooley Galena Alascom 656-1331 Galena Huhndorf's Store 656-1224 656-1223 Grayling Iditarod Area School District (HQ in McGrath)§24-3217}7/20/95 |524-3033 George Maykowsyj (suGraylingWaterPlant453-5148}7/20/95 |453-5148 David Burkett 8/1/95 Grayling District Heat System 453-5148]7/20/95 |453-5148 Gustavus _[Tuboscope Gustavus __{Fire Hall and Library (fire hall is 697-2222)697-2350 Gustavus _|Gustavus School 697-2248 Gustavus _|IT Corporation Holy Cross _|Water Facility 476-7141]7/20/95 |476-7139 Alvin Demientieff Holy Cross ___|Iditarod Area Schoo!District (HQ in McGrath)474-0657 |7/20/95 |474-9400 George Maykowsyj (su Huslia Yukon/Koyukuk School District |(HQ in Nenana)BAD NO.832-5219}7/26/95 |832-5594 Fred Lau (supt.) Huslia FAA As of:8/2/95 Page 1 4730DATA.XLS Appendix E QUESTIONNAIRE STATUS SUMMARY USKH,Inc._w.o.4730 _DCRA Fuel Substitution Survey Date of ist Date of 2nd Date the |Date Sent tst Call }Follow-up Person 2nd Call |Follow-up Person Question.|Thank You City Facility Name Remarks Fax No.|Date Faxed Phone No.Call Called Phone No.Call Called Received |Response Kaltag Yukon/Koyukuk School District _|(HQ in Nenana)BAD NO.474-0657}7/26/95 |474-9400 Fred Lau (supt.) Kaltag Kaltag Pumphouse §34-2236}7/20/95 |534-2230 Austin Esmailka Jr. Kaltag District Heat System 534-2236}7/20/95 |534-2230 Kiana NW Arctic School District (HQ in Kotzebue)442-2392 |7/20/95 |442-3472 Jerry Covey (supt.} Kiana Laundromat 475-2174]7/20/95 |475-2136 Kiana Water Plant 475-2174 |7/20/95 |475-2136 Emery Johnson Kiana District Heat System 475-2174 |7/20/95 |475-2136 Kokhanok _|Washeteria Kokhanok_|Kokhanok Village Council 282-2202 Koliganek_|Community Building |(Kolig.Natives LTD ph.number)596-3430 Koyuk Koyuk Washeteria 963-3442 |7/20/95 |963-3441KoyukBeringStraitsSchootDistrict(HQ in UnalakKleet)624-3099 |7/20/95 |624-3611 Ed Gonion (supt.) Thomas Briscoe (supt.@ Koyuk) Larsen Bay |KIBSD Main Building (HQ in Kodiak)BAD NO.486-2959 486-3131 John Witteveen (supt.) (Larsen Bay School ph.num.)847-2252 Lower Kalski PHS Pumphouse BAD NO.471-2308 471-2228 McGrath Washeteria 524-3536 |7/20/95 |524-3825McGrathAlascominc.Admin office =800-478-9000 McGrath Alaska Commercial CompanyMcGrathMcGrathSchool 524-3217 |7/20/95 |524-3033 George Maykowsyj (suMcGrathCityofMcGrathBuilding524-3536 |7/20/95 |524-3825McGrath{FAA BuildingMcGrathIditarodAreaSchool District §24-3217|7/20/95 |524-3033 George Maykowsyj (suMcGrathMNVCKilnProject New Stuyahq Water Pump Building BAD NO.693-3176 693-3171 Stephen Blunka New Stuyahq Washeteria BAD NO.693-3176 693-3171 New Stuyah¢Bristol Bay Area Health Corp. New StuyahqSW Region School District (HQ in Dillingham)842-5428 824-5288 Don Ford New Stuyahg¢District Heat System BAD NO.693-3176 693-3171 Nulalo Yukon/Koyukuk School District {(HQ in Nenana)BAD NO.832-5219}7/26/95 |832-5594 Fred Lau (supt.) Nulato Wellhouse (call prior to faxing)898-2207 |7/20/95 |898-2205 Veron Madros Sr. As of:8/2/95 Page 2 4730DATA.XLS Appendix E QUESTIONNAIRE STATUS SUMMARY USKH,Inc._w.o.4730 DCRA Fuel Substitution Survey Date of ist Date of 2nd Date the |Date Sent 1st Call |Follow-up Person 2nd Call |Follow-up Person Question.|Thank You City Facility Name Remarks Fax No.|Date Faxed Phone No.Call Called Phone No.Call Called Received {Response Ouzinkie KiB Building (school)(HQ in Kodiak)474-0657 474-9400 John Witteveen (supt.) (Ouz.school ph.number)680-2204 Ouzinkie _{Tribal Freezer (Ouz.Corp.ph.number)680-2208 Pelican Pelican Seafoods Pelican Community Hall 735-2258 |7/20/95 |735-2202 Ruby M.A.K.School (local Y/KSD ph num.)474-0657 474-9400 Ruby Washeteria (city numbers)BAD NO.468-4443]7/26/95 |468-4401 Shungnak _{NW Arctic School District (HQ in Kotzebue)442-2392 |7/20/95 |442-3472 Jerry Covey (supt.) (Shung.school ph/fax numbers 437-2177 437-2151 Shungnak _|Kobuk Valley Electric Company Item will be deleted Rev.Rudy Harnish Shungnak _{River Pumphouse BAD NO.437-2176 |7/26/95 |437-2161Shungnak__District Heat System BAD NO.437-2176 437-2161 Tanana Tanana School District 366-7169}7/20/95 |366-7159 Ron Delay Tanana FAA Building Tanana Tanana Safewater Laundry 366-7169 366-7159 Tanana Alascom Admin office =800-478-9000 Tanana District Heat System Correct fax no.:366-7169 366-7169]7/20/95 |366-7159 Upper Kaiska Kuspuk School District (HQ in Aniak)675-4305 |7/20/95 |675-4250 Robert McHenry (supt. Yakutat Alaska DOT/PF (maint.station ph.number)784-3293 Yakutat Yakutat City Schools 784-3281 |7/20/95 |784-3323 Larry Eklund Yakutat Glacier Bear Lodge 784-3663 784-3202 Yakutat Leonard's Landing Lodge 784-3245 784-3245 Yakutat Alascom 784-3354 Yakutat Alaska Airlines Yakutat U.S.DOT (FAA-FSS Fac.Chief ph.num.)784-3313 Yakutat District Heat System 784-3281 |7/20/95 |784-3323YakutatSitkaSoundSeafood784-*3392 As of:8/2/95 Page 3 4730DATA.XLS DCRA/Division of Energy Rural Alaska Heat Conservation and interim Report August 2,1995 Fuel Substitution Assessment USKH.,Inc. BIBLIOGRAPHY PUBLICATION AUTHOR LOCATION 1983 Long Term Energy Prepared by HARZA-EBASCO for the Department DOE Library Plan &Appendix of Commerce and Economic Development,Division ENE 009 v.1 of Energy and Power,1983 ENE 009 v.2 Rural Energy Waste Heat Prepared for the Alaska Power Administration by DOE Library Program:Final Report of Polarconsult Alaska,Inc.,March 1986 WAS 029 Waste Heat Recovery System Operations for the City of Tanana Reconnaissance Study of Prepared by Northern Technical Services and DOE Library Energy Requirements VanGulik &Associate's for the Alaska Power VIL-N 004 and Alternatives for Authority,1982 Togiak,Goodnews Bay, Scammon Bay and Grayling Rural Energy Prepared by Crews Macinnes Hoffman/VITRO DOE Library Construction Program Consulting Engineers for the Alaska Power WAS 025 1982-1983 Authority,1983 Energy Planning in Prepared by the House Research Agency,Alaska DOE Library Alaska:Past Efforts and State Legislature,1988 ENE 082 a Future Direction A Feasibility Study for Prepared by Dr.Ronald A.Johnson,Dr.Debendra DOE Library Waste-Heat Driven K.Das,Ms.Charlotte Hok-Barker,M.S.,Institute of Absorption Refrigeration Northern Engineering,UAF for the Alaska Energy Plants in Alaska Authority,1990 Alaska's Public Energy Prepared by Rural Research Agency,Alaska State DOE Library Resources,Distribution of Thermal Energy and Electric Power Energy Resource Consumption Alaska's Energy Plan Senate,1988 Prepared by the Department of Commerce and DOE Library DCRA/Division of Energy Interim Report Rural Alaska Heat Conservation and August 2,1995 Fue!Substitution Assessment USKH.,Inc. 1985,Regional Data Economic Development,Office of Energy,1985 ENE 092 Summary:Section 3 of 3 DOE Library Aniak Waste Heat DOE Library Ft.Yukon Waste Heat DOE Library Koyuk Waste Heat DOE Library Lower Kalskag Waste Heat DOE Library Yakutat Waste Heat A Solid-Fuel-Fired-Co-Prepared by Marks Engineering and Mechanical TCC Library Generation System for Technology Incorporated for Tanana Chiefs the Alaskan Yukon Conference,Inc. Region @8-18-1995 64 1@PM FROM USKH TO 19872694685 P.@1 UNWIN SCHEBEN KORYNTA HUETTL,INC.:Coe ARCHITECTURE «ENGINEERING'+«LAND SURVEYING'«PLANNING Ean 0'Korynta,P.E..: : JomesA.HuetL AA ,August 18,1995.Gary H.Poht,AIA met Edwin MH.Riggs,P.E. 'Theodore R.Kruth,P.E. _Monte R.Gonitzke,LS. «ASSOCIATES "Donna L.Marks,:.Peter Crimp .Timothy vig.he..°Alaska Division of Energy-,DOniD.Sorenson,AIA”Fourth Avenue_:.SteyenM,Tjaden 'James.Kinney.PE,+Anchorage,Alaska.,Gregory A.Ingham,CPA .."|ScottV:Ball,P.E.. "uce'e Hoppe 0°Subject:DOE Rural Heat Substitution Assessment"GaryR.Kuhn,PE,...Database design"John M,Stacum.RIEL .oo = /Dear Peter:) Attached isa memo to me from Jim Henry,our software specialist,in whichhe outlines'the database design as currently envisioned.I recommend that Jim,I,David Lockardandyoumeetagainsoontodiscussthedatabasedesign.With such a complex andcustomsoftwarepackage,frequent meetings near the beginning of the design phase willensurethatUSKHdevelopsthesoftwaretoyourliking.If you concur,please contact metosetvp2atimeforthismeeting.At{this time,Steve has reviewed all but twoo document and the bibliographyis up to date.Itis quite lengthy and USKH plans to include it in the interim report to be submitted nextweek. Sincerely, OmRCES +"Scott Bell,P.EY,CCS "2515A Streat:Chief Mechanical Engineer'Anchorage.Alaska 99503Phone(907)276-4245FAX(907)266-4663.attachmentsio1830SecondAvenue.Fairbanks,Alaska 99701*Phone (907)452-2128En@onaseaas _-*USKH Work Order #4730DN. 9097 Glaciér Hwy.,Ste.203 . Junecu,Alaska.99801 °.[EM4B0\DOCS4730DN2.LTR - Prone (907)790-2901.°ae :FAX (907)790-3901 800 W.Evergreen St.,Ste.218 .'Poimet,Alaska 90645 * 'Phone (907)746-7815FAX(907)746-7819 @8-18-1995 84:11PM FROM USKH TO 19072694685 P.G2 |!|3wn||||Memorandum DATE:August 15,1995 To:Scott Bell,PE Project Manager FROM:Jim Henry,CNA Systems Manager SUBJECT:WO 4730 Database Structure Here are the notes and topics we discussed with our client on August 3,1995 pertaining to the alternate fuel study.After more review of the proposed types of data,I have concluded that the use of a spread sheet would not allow for the one to many type of relationships we will desire in the compilation of data.I have designed a relational database using FOXPRO for windows, however,since it is in the XBASE structure,it can be used with most any relational database. J see a clear picture of three distinct databases:the first is easily identifiable as the results of the survey.It contains all of the information in the questionnaire.The structure is identified in examples one and two further in this memo. The second database will consist of the village specific data.I see the fields as follows,with opportunity to expand as our client wants:village name,population,cost of delivered wood, region,electoral district,location code and utility code as defined by our client.It would be related to the main database via the CITY field in both tables. The third database would consist of the ECM data.It would be related to the main database by the FAC_ID (Facility ID)established for each unique facility responding to our questionnaire. The fields might consist of facility ID,comments,feasibility,and percent of energy conserved for each ECM.Again,the beauty of compiling the data with this tool is the ability to expand as our client desires. Also,thinking ahead,if the respondents of the questionnaire are too few,I see the ability of a person using this database directly for the collection of data via phone conversations with managers of the various facilities.The solicitor would call up the respondent,and actually input the data directly into the database,thus eliminating duplicity,and keeping costs down for the client. On the following pages are the actual structure of the facility database.Note:It is actually two databases,but will act as one via the relationship established within.The fields should be clear as to the contents.Whenever possible,I used the wording of the question for the field name,and where not possible,used the questionnaire number,As databases require a alpha character first in @8-18-1995 64:11PM FROM USKH TO 19872694685 P.@3 the field name,if the question was number 22,sub A,I was forced to call it A22.Likewise if the question was three levels,such as question 22,sub A,Sub i,I named the field A221.I feel the structure of this database will provide both an easy to understand framework,and an expandable, flexible opportunity for future growth. I apologize for the slight delay in getting this to you,but as you are aware,the extra time spent on this phase of this project will ensure its success both to USKH and our client. @8-18-1995 @4:11PM Structure for table: FROM USKH Number of data records:1 Date of last update: Code Page: Field Fieid Name 1 FAC_ID 2 FAC_NAME 3 FAC_ADDRES 4 FAC CITY 5 FAC_ZIP 6 QUESDATE 7 FAC_MGR_NM 8 FAC MGR_PH 9 FAC_MGR_FX 10 FAC_TYPE 11 OWNER_NAME 12 OWN_CONTAC 13 OWN_ADDRES 14 OWN_CITY 15 OWN_ST 16 OWN _ZIP 17 OWN_PHONE 18 YEAR BUILT 19 GROSS SOFT 20 OCCUPANTS 21 REN YEAR 22 REN DESCRI 23 ADD_YEAR 24 ADD DESCRI 25 A2z2t 26 Az2II 27 B22i 28 B22II 29 C22I 30 C22Ir 31 D22T 32 D22il 33 WOOD_YN 34 PWP_500 ae Total ** Structure for table: .08/14/95 0 Type Width Character 10 Character 40 Character 40 Character 40 Character 10 Date 8 Character 30 Character 12 Character 12 Character 1 Character 40 Character 40 Character 40 Character 40 Character 2 Character 10 Character 12 Numeric 4 Numeric 10 Numeric 10 Numeric 4 Character 254 Numeric 4 Character 254 Character 10 Character 10 Character 10 Character 10 Character 10 Character 10 Character 10 Character 10 Character 1 Character 1 1010 Number of data records:1 Date of last update: Code Page: Field Field.Name 1 FAC_ID 2 EUIA 08/15/95 fe) Type Width Character 10 Character 1 TO o:\4730\altfuell.dbf Dec c:\4730\altfuel2.dbf Dee Index Index Asc 19072694685 Collate Collate Machine P.04 @8-18-1995 04:12PM FROM USKH TO 19072694685 P.@ 53 O1MON Numeric 2 54 O1TUE Numeric 2 55 O1WED Numeric 2 56 O1THR Numeric 2 57 O1FRI Numeric 2 58 O1SAT Numeric 2 59 O1SUN Numeric 2 60 O2MON Numeric 2 61 O2TUE Numeric 2 62 O2WED Numeric 2 63 O2THR Numeric 2 64 O2FRI Numeric 2 65 O2SAT Numeric 2 66 O2SUN Numeric 2 67 O3MON Numeric 2 68 O3TUE Numeric 2 69 O3WED Numeric 2 70 O3THR Numeric 2 71 O3FRI Numeric 2 72 O3SAT Numeric 2 73 O3SUN Numeric 2 74 O4MON Numeric 2 75 O4TUE Numeric 2 76 OSWED Numeric 2 77 O5STHR Numeric 2 78 OS5FRI Numeric 2 79 O5SAT Numeric 2 80 OSSUN Numeric 2 81 O¢MON Numeric 2 82 O6TUE Numeric 2 83 O6WED Numeric 2 84 B4 Numeric 2 85 B4 Numeric 3 86 C4 Numeric 2 87 D4 Numeric 2 88 H4 Numeric 2 89 F4 Numeric 2 90 AS Numeric 2 91 BS Numeric 2 92 A6 Numeric 2 93 B6 Numeric 2 94 C6 Numeric 2 95 D6 Numeric 2 96 E6 Numeric 2 97 EC_FURN Numeric 2 98 EC_HWB Numeric 2 99°EC_STMB Numeric 2 100 EC_HWH Numeric 2 101 NG FURN Numeric 2 102 NG_HWB Numeric 2 @8-18-1995 @4:12PM >oe 48 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 NG_STMB NG_HWH N1D_FURN N1D_HWB N1D_STMB N1iD_HWH N2D_FURN N2D_HWB N2D_STMB N2D_HWH N4D_FURN N4D_HWB N4D_STMB N4D_HWH PROP_FURN PROP_HWB PROP_STMB COAL_FURN COAL_HWB COAL _STMB COAL_HWH WOOD_FURN WOOD_HWB WOOD_STMB WOOD_HWH PURC_FURN PURC_HWB PURC_STMB PURCH_HWH A8 BS c8 AS Bg A10 A10A B10 B1OA C10 CLOA All ALIA Bll B11A Al2 B12A **Total ** FROM USKH Numeric Numeric Numeric Numeric Numeric Numeric Numeric Numeric Numeric Numeric Numeric Numeric Numeric Numeric Numeric Numeric Numeric Numeric Numeric Numeric Numeric Numeric Numeric Numeric Numeric Numeric Numeric Numeric Numeric Character Character Character Numeric Character Numeric Character Numeric Character Numeric Character Numeric Character Numeric Character Numeric Character myOFPFHPHNNNNNNHNNNNHNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNHNN[NNONONOPeNNOONOONONcop)(>)485 TO 19072694685 P.&6 TOTAL P.@6 PRINCIPALS Leo von Scheben.P.E.,L.S. Earl D.Korynta,P.E. James A.Huefttl,AIA Gary H.Pohl,AIA Edwin H.Riggs,P.E. Theodore R.Kruth,P.E. Monte R.Gonitzke.L.S. ASSOCIATES Donna L.Marks Timothy J.Vig.P.E. Daryl D.Sorenson,AiA Steven M.Tjaden James R.Kinney,P.E. Gregory A.Ingham,CPA Scott V.Bell,P.E. Bruce E.Hopper.P.E. Gary R.Kuhn,P.E. John M.Stadum,RIEI OFFICES 2515 A Street Anchorage.Alaska 99503 Phone (907)276-4245 FAX (907)258-4653 1830 Second Avenue Fairbanks,Alaska 99701 Phone (907)452-2128 FAX (907)452-4225 9097 Glacier Hwy.,Ste.201 Juneau,Alaska 99801 Phone (907)790-2901 FAX (907)790-3901 800 W.Evergreen St.,Ste.218 Palmer,Alaska 99645 Phone (907)746-7815 FAX (907)746-7819 ii|ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING PLANNING LruSeptember 11,1995 Peter Crimp Alaska Division of Energy 333 West Fourth Avenue,Suite 220 Anchorage,Alaska 99501-2341 Subject:Rural Heat Assessment Project -Phase I Dear Peter: 1.0 Introduction This letter summarizes the telephone conference of September 8,1995 and presents our revised Phase I work schedule.Present at the conference were: Peter Crimp -DOE David Lockard -DOE Steven Stassel -Alaska Energy and Engineering Scott Bell -USKH 2.0 Discussion of the Draft Report The draft report and Alaska Energy and Engineering's (AEE)response dated September 7,1995 were discussed.DOE is concerned with the lack of information included in the report and the lack of a ranking methodology and recommendations.USKH and AEE agree that the report is lacking in detail and per the revised schedule will work to improve the report.To accomplish this USKH proposes the following: A.Separate the wood fuel portion of the project from the energy conservation methods (ECMs)portion of the project.We feel the wood fuel portion could proceed at a faster pace independent of the ECMs. USKH and AEE propose investigating up to six rural communities with the potential for wood fuel heating systems based on the following criteria: 1.DOE will provide the cost for different types of wood heating equipment. Costs will be in dollars/energy delivered (cost/MMBtu)format. 2.USKH will estimate the cost of installing the wood heating equipment in each village and modify the cost/MMBtu to reflect this information. UNWIN SCHEBEN KORYNTA HUETIL.INC. Mr.Crimp September 11,1995 Page 2 ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING PLANNING 3.USKH will determine the availability and delivered cost of wood fuel. 4.USKH will estimate the quantity of heating fuel displaced by the use of wood fuel and the simple payback ratio on the wood fuel heating system. 5.As part of the ranking criteria,USKH will contact major entities in each considered village to determine the level of interest in wood fuel heating systems. This information will be used to rank the villages for feasibility of wood fuel heating systems. B.Based on previous engineering experience,USKH will evaluate the ECMs for their feasibility in rural Alaska.USKH will then determine the cost of installing the feasible ECMs and their expected energy savings,calculate the expected simple payback ratio and develop the algorithm used to rank them. 3.0 Revised Project Schedule As a result of the telephone conference the project schedule is revised as follows: Date September 8,1995 September 11,1995 September 11,1995 September 15,1995 September 15,1995 September 13,1995 September 15,1995 September 16,1995 September 18,1995 September 20,1995 September 22,1995 September 29,1995 October 2,1995 October 6,1995 October 6,1995 October 6,1995 October 16,1995 October 19,1995 October 31,1995 November 3,1995 November 14,1995 Submitter USKH USKH DOE DOE USKH USKH USKH USKH USKH DOE USKH USKH DOE/USKH USKH/AEE USKH/AEE USKH USKH/AEE DOE USKH/AEE DOE USKH/AEE Milestone/Submittal Updated Questionnaire Status Summary Sheet This meeting summary letter Form letter to be faxed to non-responding facilities Letter formalizing revised project schedule Updated Questionnaire Status Summary Sheet Find facsimile numbers for non-contacted facilities Complete phone contact of all non-responding facilities Determine which facilities will receive DOE letter Fax DOE letter to facilities Wood heat system equipment costs Updated Questionnaire Status Summary Sheet Updated Questionnaire Status Summary Sheet Determine facilities to be included in database Complete Wood Fuel draft report Complete prioritization of ECMs database Final Questionnaire Status Summary Sheet Submit recommended ranking methodology Submit ranking methodology review comments Submit Draft Report Draft Report review comments Submit Final Report "a UNWIN SCHEBEN KORYNTA HUETTL,INC.ARCHITECTURE +»ENGINEERING +«LAND SURVEYING ».PLANNING Mr.Crimp September 11,1995 Page 3 4.0 Miscellaneous Comments A.The database design is acceptable.USKH will begin populating it with the questionnaire data received to date.USKH will not develop specialized input screens,but will develop simple report formats for DOE approval. B.Energy from refuse is not part of this scope of work. C.Existing data on wood fuel projects is approximately ten years old and much of it is out of date. Need to check data from outside Alaska. D.USKH's review of the past energy conservation efforts and recommendations shows little in the way of practical information or feasible projects. 5.0 Closing This meeting was very beneficial in clarifying the scope of work and schedule on this project.I thank all involved for their hard work and comments as we sorted through the presented information.USKH has begun work on the final fax numbers collection and feel confident we can meet the schedule included herein. Sincerely, C Scott Bell,P.E.,CCS Chief Mechanical Engineer cc:Steven Stassel,P.E.-Alaska Energy and Engineering Chris Maisch -Tanana Chiefs Conference Mark Langberg,P.E.-USKH USKH Work Order #4730CT 1:\4730\DOCS\4730CT2.LTR 7 :\?,aygenye7yerPCEVehEnterim Wood-Fired Boiler Simple Economic Analysis | 1 i Assumptions:a 'Calculations:i com ; ual Fuel Consumption:16,125 gallons \Wood used per year:124 cords assume spruce Wood used per year:127 |(BDT)assume spruce Fuel Energy Content:136,000 |Btu/galion Btu/lb wood @ MC:45.0%4,620 |green assume spruce Cost of Oil $1.35 |$/gallon Cost of wood:$80 |$/cord assume spruce Annual Cost of Oil $21,769 |per year Cost of wood:$9,942 |$/ear assume spruce Annual Fuel Energy Use:2,193 MMBtu/year Annual Wood Energy Use:2,047 |MMBtu/year' Oil Boiler Efficiency 70%Wood Boiler Efficiency 75%Garn Annual Energy Output:1,535 |MMBtu/year Wood Weight at MC:45.0%1.85 |tons/green cord Average MC 45.0%assume spruce Wood Weight at MC:45.0%230 green tons/year Fuel Energy Content:8400|Btu/lb (OD)[assume spruce Real Interest rate 3% Oil system O&M cost /yr $1,500 Boiler Input Boiler Output Wood Equipment Cost $35,000 Fuel Oil |$9.93 |$/MMBtu $14.18 |$/MMBtu Wood System Operation Wood $4.67 '$/MMBtu $6.22 |$/MMBtu Hours/day 2 days/year 180 Cost of labor ($/hr)$13 1.17|OH Rate Present value of costs Cost of labor ($/hr)$15 20-year 10-year 5-year Cost per year sal.worker $5,265 Fuel Oil $346,180 |$198,487 |$106,564 Wood Sys Maintenance Fire brick cost $300 Wood Boiler $264,680 |$166,255 |$104,996 Electric Blower Fan 3/4HP *Hrs Operation Wood Salaried _|Cost of Wood Sys Cost of Oil Equip Worker [Bought Maint Cost of Oil System Wood Sys Year Cost Cost Wood Cost Oil O&M Cost Cost 1995]$35,000 |$5,265}$9,942 |$300 |$21,769/$1,500}$23,269 |$50,5071996$5,265|$9,942)$300 |$21,769|$1,500 |$23,269|$15,507 1997 $5,265 |$9,942 |$300 |$21,769;$1,500/$23,269;$15,507 1998 $5,265 |$9,942 |$300 |$21,769|$1,500 |$23,269;$15,507 1999 $5,265 |$9,942 |$300 |$21,769|$1,500!$23,269|$15,5072000$5,265 |$9,942 |$300 |$21,769!$1,500|$23,269}$15,5072001$5,265 |3$9,942 |$300 |$21,769 |$1,500/$23,269/$15,5072002$5,265|$9,942 1$300 |$21,769}$1,500/$23,269/$15,5072003$5,265 |$9,942 |$300 |$21,769|$1,500}$23,269 |$15,5072004$5,265 |$9,942 |$300 |$21,769;$1,500/$23,269/$15,5072005$5,265 |$9,942 |$300 |$21,769;$1,500/$23,269 |$15,5072006$5,265 |$9,942 |$300 |$21,769 |$1,500 |$23,269!|$15,5072007$5,265/$9,942 |$300 |$21,769|$1,500 |$23,269|$15,5072008$5,265/$9,942 |$300 |$21,769|$1,500 |$23,269|$15,5072009$5,2651$9,942 |$300 |$21,769}$1,500!$23,269|$15,507 2010 $5,265/$9,942 |$300 |$21,769/;$1,500|$23,269|$15,507 2011 $5,265/$9,942 |$300 |$21,769|$1,500 |$23,269|$15,507 2012 $5,265 /$9,942 |$300 |$21,769|$1,500;$23,269|$15,507 2013 $5,265 |$9,942 |$300 |$21,769|$1,500 |$23,269|$15,507 2014 $_5.265 !1$9942!$300 |$21,769|$1500!$23,269/$15507 Page 1 WASTE HEAT,UTILI N SIMULATION WORK SHEET Location:Elim Date:February 25,1992 Annual O&M cost:0 Styear.{ Cost Estimate 0$( Fuel heat value:136000 Btu/gall.{ Fuel cost 1.25 S$/gallon { Fuel cost escal.0.02 /year [ Power increase 0.02 /year [ Discount rate 0.04 fyear [ GENERATOR DATA:-LTA 10,1200 rpm,135 kW Heat rate at kw-load above: Heat rate at kw-load above: Heat rate at kw-load above: Heat rate at kw-load above: Heat rate at kw-load above: Heat rate at kw-load above: Heat rate at kw-load above: Heat rate at kw-load above: Heat rate at kw-load above: Heat rate at kw-load above: Heat rate at kw-load above: GENERATION DATA: -FY91 PCE DATA Kwh/month: January 62080 February §2320 March 54960 April 49040 May 44080 June 30160 July 30240 August 43840 September 46640 October §2000 November 55120 December 60080 §80560 ti: BUILDING DATA: Fuel use,Non- gallons Seasonal Seasonal H School §210 580 Elementary 9300 1035 Bldg 2 0 0 Bldg 3 0 0 Bldg 4 0 0 Bldg 5 0 0 Build.6 Build.7 Build.8 Build.9 HEAT DEMAND VARIATION: Winter Summer Hour: 0.049 0049 1 0.048 0.048 2 0.046 0.046 3 0.044 0.044 4 0.043 0043 5 0.041 0.041 6 0040 0040 7 0039 0.039 8 Boiler Efficiency 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 WEATHER DATA:NOME HDD/Month: WATER TREATMENT PLAT PROGRAM RESULTS: Savings,year 0,gallons:7888 ) ] 10 year B/C ratio:#VALUE!] 20 year B/C ratio:AVALUE!) Pay back time,years #VALUE!} ] SYSTEM LOSS DATA: Btu/kwh Constant losses: Btu/kwh Plant piping: Btu/kwh Subsurface piping: Btu/kwh Engine preheating: Btu/kwh Total constant: Btu/kwh Btu/kwh Variable losses: Btu/kwh Surface piping: Btu/kwh Plant heating: Btu/kwh Radiator losses: Btu/kwh Total variable: 1841 1660 1762 1320 970 576 477 493 .690 Sto 1085 78 (202 eo14086. Building in use,1=yes,O=no January ='February March Aprit 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 POWER PRODUCTION VARIATION: January February March April 0.038 0.038 0.038 0.038 0.036 0.036 0.036 0.036 0.034 0.034 0.034 0.034 0.034 0.034 0.034 0.034 0.033 0.033 0.033 0.033 0.034 0.034 0.034 0.034 0.038 0.038 0.038 0.038 0.042 0.042 0.042 0042 - 2 SCHOOL ak z,a Cv?[''(.=<ad >MeO 0d».me 9 (1)ree NM ->'ATe rr S201 a)|(A7)Se re BV je rXGrom.(Qin 1S ites BsY/ibs -/ 1)0 .Y 2000 Btu/hr.P oo oy!zy ue17000Btu/hr.Arctic Piping {Yo ?uf.2000 Btu/hr.we -s:"21000 Btu/hr.cae . 0 Btwhr.xF plant and secondary 500 Btu/hr.xF Butler Bidg (average) 50 Btushr.xF ; 550 Btu/hr.xF *#2 f- SO ry.go Ce wrt oer 5!SO mB X«S 5,_DO ;Tat faaZyO-1SU Whim =COP MOHH Key OEee 2 44of_,-aw Che WHS zee CSES RAHN? ;fe Shavy &CAP fr (Cee r bow 2 CP (S80 2 A7-co fF (Z fr)-|-\4- |Bnet)386 =6S2CFk &apf : 'IN "5 ;; NS . ; " coo LL aewd.(Coeld une cea Stew 4p ot A May June July August September October November December Oper.HDD 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 9 12541 1 0 0 0 t 1 1 1 9 12541 1 1 4 1 1 1 1 1 12 14087 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 12 14087 4 1 1 1 4 1 1 1 12 14087 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 12 14087 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 12 14087 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 12 14087 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 12 14087 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 12 14087 May June July August September October November December 0.040 0.040 0.040 0.040 0.040 0.040 0.038 0.038 0.037 0.037 0.037 0.037 0.037 0.037 0.036 0.036 0.035 0.035 0.035 0.035 0.035 0.035 0.034 0.034 0.034 0.034 0.034 0.034 0.034 0.034 0.034 0.034 0.034 0.034 0.034 0.034 0034 0.034 0.033 0.033 0.037 0.037 0.037 0.037 0.037 0.037 0.034 0.034 0.037 0.037 0.037 0 037 0037 0.037 0.038 0.038 0039 0.039 0.039 0039 0039 0042 0.0420.039 0.038 0.038 0.037 0.037 0.037 0.037 0.037 0.038 0.039 0.040 0.041 0.043 0.044 0.046 0.048 0.049 Power year factor Year no. Seasonal consumption,gls.: Non-seasonal consump.,gls.: Compound boiler efficiency: oO OL 0.037 0.037 0.037 0.037 0.037 0.038 0.039 0.040 0.041 0.043 0.044 0.046 0.048 0.049 ONOnhwn=AneWh=0.042 0.042 0.047 0.047 0048 0.048 0.047 0.047 0.045 0.045 0.047 0.047 0.048 0.048 0.048 0.048 0.049 0.049 0.046 0.046 0.043 0.043 0.038 0.038 0.038 0.038 0.041 0.041 0.044 0.044 0.040 0.040 31 28 1841 1660 62080 §2320 Building use per month, 82329393 74864116 146956843 133631110 (')0 0 0 0 0 (0)0 0 0 0 (0) 0 0 0 0 0042 0.047 0.048 0.047 0.045 0.047 0.048 0.048 0.049 0.046 0.043 0.038 0.038 0.041 0.044 0.040 31 1752 54960 Btu's 78658622 140404411 ooocooc0ocse229286236 208495226 219063032 Heat available per hour by month 108503 97355 117829 99691 116041 108610 118115 106325 99391 118115 106325 99391 112909 101466 94781 118115 106325 99391 108503 97355 117829 126126 113799 106482126126113799106482 148154 134353 125984 152560 138464 129885 148154 134353 125984 139343 126131 118184 148154 134353 125984 152560 138464 129885 152560 138464 129885 156965 142575 133785 143748 130242 122084 130531 117910 110383 108503 97355 11782910850397355117829 121720 109688 102582 134937 122021 114283 117314 105577 98682 96097120 79130688 85356432 967.9 797.0 859.8 Heat demand by hour by month 365379 367845 349088 353545 355931 337781 340231 342528 325061 327657 329869 313048 316563 318700 302448306208308275292555 60840945 108599345 0 oooo$9$eo0 169440290 111055 102555 94055 94055 89804 94055 111055 128056 128056 118575 122171 118575 111382 118575 122171 122171 125767 114978 104189 111055 111055 123805 107786 119555 81136608 817.3 279012 269975 259808 250207 241735 233828 0.043 0.046 0.039 0.047 0.048 0.049 0.048 0.048 0.044 0.047 0.046 0.042 0.040 0.039 0.040 0.041 31 970 44080 46405327 82831352 eocoo0ooncoo129236679 104422 93331 85936 82239 82239 93331 93331 100725 115513 126604 100725 130301 133998 137695 133998 133998 119210 130301 126604 111816 104422 100725 104422 108119 82274000 828.7 205945 199275 191771 184683 178430 172594 43 J46 0.039 0.047 0.048 0049 0.048 0.048 0.044 0.047 0.046 0.042 0.040 0.039 0.040 0.041 30 576 30160 oooocoococoeooseo67745 59903 54675 65734 65734 59903 59903 65131 75586 83428 65131 86042 88656 91269 88656 88656 78200 86042 83428 72972 67745 65131 67745 70359 52733152 531.2 oooooo0.043 0.046 0.039 0.047 0048 0.049. 0 048 0.048 0.044 0.047 0.046 0.042 0.040 0.039 0.040 0.041 31 477 30240 oooooo0oc0co°co:9n66737 59129 67713 64786 64786 59129 59129 64201 74346 81955 64201 84491 87027 89564 87027 87027 76882 84491 81955 71810 66737 64201 66737 69274 54043488 544.4 oooooo141495 141495 126787 137818 134141 119433 112079 108402 112079 115756 87946400 885.8 oo0000=maoooocoocae9707379 122785 110659 102575 98533 98533 110659 110659 118743 134912 118432 118743 121853 125273 128693 125273 125273 138954 121853 118432 130870 122785 118743 122785 126827 86185376 868.1 159848 154671 148846 143346 138492 133962 0.043 0 046 0 039 0.047 0.048 0.049 0.048 0.048 0.044 0.047 0.046 0.042 0.040 0.039 0.040 0.041 31 1085 52000 51148459 91297978 0 "wOocooceo°ce14244643 128952 115868 107145 102784 102784 115868 115868 124590 113184 124255 124590 127945 131635 135326 131635 131635 116874 127945 124255 109494 128952 124590 128952 133313 90781600 914.4 226995 219643 211372 203561 196668 190235 0.042 0.047 0.048 0.047 0.045 0.047 0.048 0.048 0.049 0.046 0.043 0.038 0.038 0.041 0.044 0.040 30 1446 55120 66037767 117875822 0 ooocooso183913590 128769 137220 141262 141262 145305 133178 421052 128769 128769 112967 125094 108925 90398304 910.5 302844 293036 282001 271579 262383 253801 0.042 0.047 0.048 0.047 0.045 0.047 0.048 0.048 0.049 0.046 0.043 0.038 0.038 0.041 0.044 0.040 31 1776 60080 79648492 142171359 =-oooococondc22181985 104263 123643 113565 113565 108526 113565 104263 121317 121317 142636 146900 142636 134109 142636 146900 146900 151164 138372 125581 104263 104263 117054 129845 112790 93312272 939.9 353481 342032 329152 316988 306255 296237 14086 580560 574789955 1.026E+09 oooococje1.601E+09 979395440 9865.0 gallons Data table,use DATA-2 command with default values as shown: Year 0 fuel saving,gals. 7888.3671 Fuelsave: Fuel- $-saved Disentd.: O&M/year discntd.: Accumitd Balance PB-years. Fuelsave Fuel- 2452 2452 AVALUE! 18 2000 OnNDOhWN-296593 288457 281800 281061 273664 271445 271445 273664 273664 281800 288457 296593 306208 316563 327657 340231 352805 365379 229309165 2309.7 298595 290404 283702 282958 275512 273278 273278 275512 275512 283702 290404 298595 308275 318700 329869 342528 355187 367845 208516075 2100.3 283369 275695 269236 268529 261462 259342 259342 261462 261462 269236 275595 283369 292555 302448 313048 325061 337074 349088 219084938 2206.7 Heat delivered by hour by month 108503 99691 118115 118115 112909 118115 108503 126126 126126 148154 162560 148154 139343 148154 152560 152560 156965 143748 130531 108503 108503 121720 134937 117314 96097120 967.9 97355 116041 106325 106325 101466 106325 97355 113799 113799 134353 138464 134353 126131 134353 138464 138464 142575 122021 105577 79130688 797.0 117829 108610 99391 99391 94781 99391 117829 106482 106482 125984 129885 125984 118184 125984 129885 129885 133785 122084 110383 117829 117829 102582 114283 98682 85356432 859.8 226485 220272 215189 214624 208976 207282 207282 208976 208976 215189 220272 226485 233828 241735 250207 259808 269410 279012 169457234 1706.9 111055 102555 94055 94055 89804 94055 111055 128056 128056 118575 122171 118575 111382 118575 122171 122171 125767 114978 104189 111055 111055 123805 107786 119555 81136608 817.3 167174 162588 158836 158419 154250 153000 153000 154250 154250 158836 162588 167174 172594 178430 184683 191771 198858 205945 129249603 1301.9 104422 93331 85936 82239 82239 93331 93331 100725 115513 126604 100725 130301 133998 137695 133998 133998 119210 130301 126604 111816 104422 100725 104422 108119 82274000 828.7 20444 20444 0.00 eSeooagaooocooaococececaeaeeca0coeoSoneoOeOoOoOeOeooeeOoooooooaoOoseo22503 22503 0.00 C0000cT0DMFCCCeGeAaeGMeeGeoeCoooeooo0cgooOoOCFooooeCeCoOeoOeaeooeeCoNDc=]24522 24522 0.00 2000000ceoeocGeceeGec0eo0odoS7O9TDTKDOCCOCOOoOOeeoOeeaeeaoOoonoooeoO129755 126196 123284 122960 119724 118754 118754 119724 119724 123284 126196 129755 133962 138492 143346 148846 154347 159848 97083498 977.9 122785 110659 102575 98533 98533 110659 110659 118743 123284 118432 118743 118754 118754 119724 119724 123284 126196 121853 118432 130870 122785 118743 122785 126827 84670066 852.8 184261 179207 175071 174612 170017 168638 168638 170017 170017 175071 179207 184261 190235 196668 203561 211372 219184 226995 142460682 1434.9 128952 115868 107145 102784 102784 115868 115868 124590 113184 124255 124590 127945 131635 135326 131635 131635 116874 127945 124255 109494 128952 124590 128952 133313 90781600 914.4 245831 239088 233570 232957 226827 224988 224988 226827 226827 233570 239088 245831 253801 262383 271579 282001 292423 302844 183931981 1852.7 128769 119214 109660 109660 104883 109660 128769 117010 117010 137220 141262 137220 129136 137220 141262 141262 145305 133178 121052 128769 128769 112967 125094 108925 90398304 910.5 286935 279064 272624 271908 264753 262606 262606 264753 264753 272624 279064 286935 296237 306255 316988 329152 341316 353481 221842033 2234.5 104263 123643 113565 113565 108526 113565 104263 121317 121317 142636 146900 142636 134109 142636 146900 146900 151164 138372 125581 104263 104263 117054 129845 112790 93312272 939.9 1.601E+09 161255 783157090 7888.4 gations gallons $-saved: Disentd.: O&Miyear discntd.: Accumitd: Balance : PB-years: CoeriXeS fLper Poe ME Sutton Wood-Fired Boiler Economic Analysis Assumptions:Calculations: Equipment Cost $35,000 check |,a? Interest rate (no inflation)3%Wood used per year (BDT)102 |COW AST™Delivered Wood used per year (cord)100 change Cost/ Average MC 45.0%Btu/lb wood (green)4,620 mmBtu Btu/lb wood (OD)8400 assume spruce mmBtu/year input wood 1,714 Oil $7.97 Wood Boiler Efficiency 84%Garn mmBtu/year output wood 1,439 Wood $5.84 Oil Boiler Efficiency 70%mmBtu/year input oil 2,056 | Cost of Oil $1.10 Oil usage equiv/yr 14,901 Cost of wood ($/cord)$100 Cost of oil/year $16,391 Operation Cost of bought wood/year $10,000 Hours/day 0.5 Sutton 1.5 Cost of non-inmate labor/yr $1,350days/year 180 | Cost per year inmate $730 Present value of costs Cost of labor ($/hr)$15 20-year 10-year 5-yearCostperyearsal.worker {|$1,350 Oil $266,172 |$152,613 |$81,935 Wood Sys Maintenance Sutton Wood $49,304|$42,767 )$38,698 Fire brick cost $300 Other Wood $207,303 |$133,357 |$87,334 Oil system O&M cost /yr $1,500 Wood Salaried |Cost of Wood Sys Cost of Oil Sutton Other Equip Inmate Worker {Bought Maint Cost of Oil System Wood Sys_|Wood Sys| Year Cost Cost -Cost Wood Cost Oil O&M Cost Cost Cost 1991|$35,000 |$ 730|$1,350 |$10,000 |$300 |$16,391 ;$1,500|$17,891 |$36,030 |$46,650 1992 $ 730|$1,350 |$10,000 |$300 |$16,391;$1,500 |$17,891 |$1,030 |$11,650 1993 $ 730|$1,350/$10,000/$300/$16,391/$1,500/$17,891 /$1,030 |$11,650 1994 $ 730|$1,350 |$10,000 |$300 {$16,391|}$1,500|$17,891|$1,030 |$11,650 1995 $730/$1,350 |$10,000 |$300 |$16,391 }$1,500 |$17,891 |$1,030 |$11,650 1996 $730/$1,350}$10,000!$300 |$16,391 |$1,500;$17,891 |$1,030 |$11,650 1997 $730|$1,350 |$10,000 |$300 |$16,391 /$1,500|$17,891 |$1,030 |$11,650 1998 $ 730|$1,350 |$10,000 |$300 |$16,391!1$1,500!$17,891 |$1,030 |$11,650 1999 $730|$1,350 |$10,000 |$300 |$16,391|$1,500|$17,891{|$1,030 |$11,650 2000 $ 730]$1,350 ;$10,000 |$300 |$16,391 |$1,500|%$17,891 }$1,030 |$11,650 2001 $730]$1,350 |$10,000 |$300 |$16,391|$1,500]$17,891|$1,030 |$11,650 2002 $730]$1,350 |$10,000 |$300 |$16,391 |$1,500 |$17,891 |$1,030 |$11,650| 2003 $730|$1,350 |$10,000 |$300 |$16,391 |$1,500 |$17,891 |$1,030 |$11,650 2004 $7301$1,350 |$10,000 |$300 |$16,391|$1,500|$17,891 /|$1,030 |$11,650 2005 $730|$1,350;$10,000 |$300 |$16,391|$1,500/$17,891|$1,030 |$11,650 2006 $730|$1,350 |$10,000 |$300 |$16,391|$1,500|$17,891 |$1,030 |$11,650 2007 $730;$1,350 |$10,000 |$300 |$16,391 |$1,500 |$17,891 |$1,030 |$11,650 2008 $730}$1,350 |$10,000 |$300 |$16,391 |$1,500 |$17,891 |$1,030 |$11,650 2009 $730|$1,350}$10,000 |$300 |$16,391|$1,500|%$17,891|$1,030 |$11,650 2010 $730/$1,350}$10,000 |$300 |$16,391 !$1,500;$17,891 |$1,030 |$11,650 ral i ituti Status October 26,1995 Schedule August 23 USKH Draft phase 1 report/database September 6 DivE Review of draft September 8 DivE,USKH Detailed meeting,revised schedule September 22,1995 USKH Updated questionnaire status 9/22 summary sheet September 29 USKH Updated questionnaire status 9/29 summary sheet October 2 Div E/USKH Determine facilities to be -;\VE -l3- included in database October 6 USKH/AEE Complete wood fuel draft report To be scheduled Complete prioritization of ECMs 10/30 database Final questionnaire status summary sheet Div E Complete questionnaires 112e (77 October 16 USKH/AEE Submit recommended ranking 11/16 (dependin methodology wood report) October 19 Div E Submit recommended ranking 11/19 methodology review comments October 31 USKH/AEE Submit draft report 11/30 November 3 DivE Draft report review comments 12/3 November 14 USKH/AEE Submit final report 12/15 Project cost:$33.2,spent $11.6,invoiced $3.1 Response to questionnaire very slow:Goal is 50 facilities. Completed 21 Say they will complete 19 Planned direct contact 14 of originals Planned new contact USKH not meeting delivery dates,even after comprehensive meeting.Ranking of ECMs due Monday--Thermal is first priority.Stassel delay on wood report. Wood.Garn wood boilers-600 installed and working in northern states.Chips likely unworkable.Stassel/Garn working together. att:|contact status sheet database ral n i |itution Proj Schedule Date Submitter Meeting/Milestone/Submittal Delivery/Revise August 23 USKH Draft phase 1 report/database September 6 DivE Review of draft September 8 DivE,USKH Detailed meeting,revised schedule September 22,1995 USKH Updated questionnaire status 9/22 summary sheet September 29 USKH Updated questionnaire status 9/29 summary sheet October 2 Div E/USKH Determine facilities to be --_-_pt [(/{7includedindatabase October 6 USKH/AEE Complete wood fuel draft report To be scheduled Complete prioritization of ECMs 20 dlowe_ database Final questionnaire status ¢summary sheet Div E Complete questionnaires _=line (7 October 16 USKH/AEE Submit recommended ranking ty)Oo DpH (dependinmethodologywoodreport) October 19 Div E Submit recommended ranking {{/7 peoO) methodology review comments October 31 USKH/AEE Submit draft report 11/30 November 3 Div E Draft report review comments 12/3 November 14 USKH/AEE Submit final report 12/15 Project cost:$33.2,spent $11.6,invoiced $3.1 Response to questionnaire very slow:Goal is 50 facilities. Completed 21 Say they will complete 19 Planned direct contact 14 of originals Planned new contact "CO USKH not meeting delivery dates,even after comprehensive meeting.Ranking of ECMs due Monday--Thermal is first priority.Stassel delay on wood report. Wood.Garn wood boilers-600 installed and working in northern states.Chips likely unworkable.Stassel/Garn working together. att:|contact status sheet database Dayal lex 1/3ShodawesallelecbreLa!"Scot will bok inte botler tuneup cost Te Ask Bll Suse @ boller mtne. Ae a0BU Mb «s5%=2.500 Bl 45%2 OBL /Ib =ASO sd ,:Asov -4g0 =z0K eff _2,900. "oad Vikon |¥5)-22495.-Li igsabAdlle4S)-2203 i,FBX.45)5263 CHa) 3,WFQ sfPdeNong Apres sae (-Naana"Pld.dewvie Aly MeeboLouFadwardSshesIGO r - -_- i a i 4 ani , ' - i aAN : a . ' 7) ' E : : : - \ } : we » wy4 : é . 4tO° a \ . ; . : cae , . wt . : - : -" ; ' , "4 + . a ' ; s . i : . ai/ : ° i. { , 1 : a $ (aT ITT voto risotto toe eter pels - ion conan oe 3.2L A322 DT LD LL Lt L - i . é t i.i t ii yw * ' : E | ; , te 4 . d wee ' ; . 1|: ' ;7iv i :« \ 1'i a - !i' :. F :. ' . j . : DOL LN La OL a Lg ' : ' SN.Ech /;st ever''ek fie reduc aozclIgLeyhs]ovses) -rengors "pho°aca!fal tla,-on ty por"oolaweidhepPlConcaOWserelesfheep7lowe{bw shovevbocds ¢Love K¢Consens V6OW.@ 1.were Lat . 36 hy|to.°4 fhwh|hy pe ote hy | F /y November 29,1995 Scott Bell USKH Architects,Engineers,Surveyors and Planners 2515 A Street Anchorage AK 99503 RE:Rural Heat Questionnaire and Schedule Dear Scott: I have a few suggestions for additions to the "standard ECM calculations”list you have developed: e Eliminate unoccupied ventilation e Night setback thermostats-Some of the buildings do not setback their thermostats at all.It may be worthwhile to combine this measure with elimination of unoccupied ventilation.Some form of override would have to be provided. e Low-flow showerheads and faucets e Occupancy sensors to control lighting e Wood Boilers It is not clear how and if this analysis relates to the work being done by Steve Stassel.Estimated cost should vary geographically as other ECMs.The unit "mbh”is used incorrectly in the concept description. Energy content of wood is attached for your reference--we have provided the same to Steve Stassel. e Conversion to waste heat In reviewing your 11/17 letter and enclosures,I noticed that the boiler tune-up example calculation includes costs that are lower than in the original calculation.Steve Stassel and I both thought the original estimates were low. Does this work include measuring the stack temperature and O2/COz levels and calculating the combustion efficiency and excess air before and after the tune-up,adjusting the burner for optimum efficiency,cleaning the combustion chamber and heat exchanger,verifying that the controls are set and operating properly,and travel for the technician?(Note:I talked to the facilities consultant for the Southeast Regional Resource Center,who consults to the PPPPPP CCCC RRRRRR IIIf PP PP CC CC RR RR II PP PP CC RR RR It PPPPP CC RRRRR II PP ce RR RR II PP CC CC RR RR II PPPP CcccC RRR RR IIII STATE OF ALASKA,DCRA 333 W.4TH AVE.,SUITE 220 ANCHORAGE,AK 99501 PHONE:(907)269-4500 FAX:(907)269-4520 MM MM PPPPPP MMM MMM DATE:11/30/1995TIME:4:04:03 PM PP PP PP PP PPPPP PP PP PPPP school districts.He says most rural boilers do not receive scheduled maintenance or tune-ups.) The high efficiency motor calculation assumes a single-phase motor.According to the gen-set mechanics in our office,almost all the villages they serve have three-phase power and the schools are connected to three-phase.My motors database lists standard 1 hp three-phase motor efficiency as 67 -72%and high efficiency motors as 82 -86%efficient at 3/4 load.These numbers would yield approximately three times the savings shown in the sample calculation.Please let me know if you think these data are incorrect. The electronic ballast lighting retrofit (BALLASTS.XLS)would be more attractive if it assumed existing 4-lamp fixtures that would be retrofitted with T-8's and a single electronic ballast (these 4-lamp electronic ballasts are currently available).My experience with magnetic ballast fluorescent fixtures is that they tend to be 4-tube and the lamps are not individually-switched.Are the 3-lamp fixtures with individually-switched lamps in the sample calculation typical for rural Alaska?The cost estimate on p.2 appears to account for two ballasts but only one T-8 lamp.Shouldn't there be three lamps?What about the number of T-8 sockets? I reviewed the calculations for the first ECM-insulated panels over single-pane glass.I believe there are errors in the savings calculation:the 24 hr/day conversion factor and the estimated heating system efficiency were left out. The cost of installation of $18 per sheet seems low-is this the cost of installing whole panels on exterior walls?A 4'x8'sheet might be cut into three or four pieces.The cost to cut and install a 2'x4'panel would be more than $4.50.In addition,this type of retrofit typically involves removing the glass and framing out the opening before installing an exterior skin.Leaving the glass as the interior surface could cause problems-imagine a janitor leaning a ladder against the exterior surface,thinking it was a solid wall. Sincerely, David Lockard,Program Manager Institutional Conservation Program 907 /269-4541 FERRERO TTA ERED TEER T TATED ITT TRAE EEE E TSP IIL IAT IAT TRANSACTION REPORT NOV-29-95 WED 03:32 PM NOV-29 03:31 PM 912067672421 55”1 SEND OK 1000010010000 0100000010000 O00 OOOO N00 00 N OOOO OOOO COCO OCCT COOK DSDEMEDEDEDEDEDEKDEX k k xk ,DATE START -RECEIVER TX TIME PAGES TYPE NOTE Mt DP xk X xX Energy Content in Alaskan Wood Species Moisture Content (Wet Basis) 0% 15% 45% 0% All All Spruce Birch Higher Heating Value (Btu/b) 8,100 8,300 6,885 7,055 4,455 4,565 Density (lb/cf solid wood) 23.09 34.26 mBtu/cf solid wood 187 284 mBtu/cord 15,897 24,170 Cottonwood 8,800 7,480 4,840 21.18 186 15,843 OOO OOOO OOOO OOOO OOOO OOOO OOOO ROC OOOO OOOO OOOOOOO OOK OO OGIO COGIC CCRC CCC OKO CK OKP,Ol x TRANSACTION REPORT a a NOV-29-95 WED 04:49 PM sk XK X XK X x DATE START RECEIVER TX TIME PAGES TYPE NOTE Mt DP x X X k NOV-29 04:47 PM 92575155 1731"=1 SEND OK 000000000000OOOOCOCOOK DEDEHEDEDEDE ¢DCRA/DOE Rural Heat Study ECM: ECM Description: Energy Conservation Measure Payback Analysis insulating domestic hot water tanks 10/30/95 Insulation of domestic hot water tanks will reduce the heat loss from the tank and directly reduce theenergyconsumedmaintainingdomestichotwateratthesetpointtemperature.| | | Summary of Costs Anchorage Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 and Savings:Cost or |Cost or Cost or |Cost or Costor.|Costor Cost or [Cost or Savings|Savings |Savings|Savings Savings |Savings Savings |Savings Factor Factor Factor Factor Units Estimated Cost . Material $/unit $15.00 Installation $/unit $17.50 Shipping $/unit $2.00 Total Cost $/unit 1.00 $34.50 1.23 $42.44 1.99 $68.66 2.25 $77.63 Estimated Savings Rate Rate Rate Rate Fuel Gallon 0.44 0.93 0.92 1.50 Electricity KwH 0.10 189 0.09 189 0.18 189 0.24 189 Maintenance Hours 35.00 35.00 35.00 35.00 Total Savings $18 $16 $34 $45 Payback Time Years..-.--1.9 2.6 2.0 1.7 Regional Cost Data:|Description Construction |Fuel Cost |Electric Cost |Wages Cost Factor |($/Gal)($/KWH)($/HR) Region Anchorage Anchorage Metropolitan Area 1.00 $0.44 $0.10 |$35.00 Region 1:Southeast Alaska and Kodiak Island 1.23]$0.93 $0.09 |$35.00 Region 2:Southcentral and Southwest Alaska 1.99 $0.92 $0.18 |$35.00 Region 3:Interior Alaska 2.25 $1.50 $0.24 |$35.00 Calculations:See attached concept and example DHW-TANK.XLS Page 1 'DCRA/DOE Rural Heat Study 10/30/95 Concept:The heat loss through a surface is indirectly proportional to the R-value of the material underlying that surface.A hot water tank blanket is often used to provide a greater R-value and thus reduce energy release through the surface.The average factory R-value of a tank is about 5. Assumptions:|The tank is a standard shape and size tank and stock insulation balnkets are available. Cost: 0.5 man hours/100 gallons of water storage +cost of materials &ship. Savings: x/(5+x)%decrease in Btu/hr from the surface (using same insulating material in blanket as in factory installed jacket)at add.R-value of x Example:A 50 gallon water heater is located in a room where the ambient temperature is 75 degrees.The temperature of the heated water is 110 degrees.The R-value of the factory insulation is 5.The surface area of this tank is approximately 21 square feet.The new water heater blanket has an R- value of 5. Cost: 0.5 man hours $15 for tank blanket and tape Source of Estimate:Sampson Hardware,Fairbanks $2.shipping Savings: 147 BtuH heat loss =21 f*2°(110 F-75 F)/(5 hr*t*2*F/Btu) 73.5 BtuH heat loss =21 ft*2*(110 F-75 F)/(Shr*ft*2*F/Btu) 73.5 BtuH heat gained after installation of tank blanket (147-73.5) 0.022 KW =.0002931*73.5 BtuH 189 KWH/Yr =.022 KW°365 day/yr*24 hr/day DHW-TANK.XLS Page 2 *DCRA/DOE Rural Heat Study ECM: ECM Description: Insulate Heating System Pipes Energy Conservation Measure Payback Analysis 10/30/95 'Insulation of heating system piping saves energy by reducing heat loss from the pipes.Insulating'domestic water pipin| t | g systems is recommended but not evaluated. 'The average heating system pipe size is estimated to be 1.25"diameter copper.Insulation thickness 'required by ASHRAE Standard 90.1-1989 is 1.5 inches.The ambient air temperature is assumed to be '68 degrees Fahrenheit and the average heating system water temperature is assumed to be 170 degrees Fahrenheit.| i 1 L Summary of Costs Anchorage Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 and Savings:Cost or {Cost or Cost or |Cost or Costor |Costor Costor |Cost or Savings|Savings jSavings|Savings Savings [Savings Savings |Savings Factor Factor Factor Factor Units Estimated Cost Material $/unit $1.75 Installation $/unit $1.75 Shipping $/unit Total Cost $/unit 1.00 $3.50 1.23 $4.31 1.99 $6.97 2.25 $7.88 Estimated Savings Rate Rate Rate Rate Fuel Gallon 0.44 126.0 0.93 126.0 0.92 126.0 1.50 126.0 Electricity KwH 0.10 0.09 0.18 0.24 Maintenance =Hours 35.00 35.00 35.00 35.00 Total Savings $55 $117 $116 $189 Payback Time Years 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 Regional Cost Data:|Description Construction |Fuel Cost |Electric Cost |Wages Cost Factor |($/Gal)($/KWH)($/HR) Region Anchorage Anchorage Metropolitan Area 1.00 $0.44 $0.10 |$35.00 Region 1:Southeast Alaska and Kodiak Island 1.23 $0.93 $0.09 |$35.00 Region 2:Southcentral and Southwest Alaska 1.99 $0.92 $0.18 |$35.00 Region 3:Interior Alaska 2.25 $1.50 $0.24 {$35.00 Calculations: PIPEINS.XLS See attached concept and example Page 1 *DCRA/DOE Rural Heat Study 10/30/95 Concept:'The heat loss through a surface is indirectly proportional to the R-value of the surface material.'Insulation for hot water piping is recommended to stop excessive heat loss from bare metallic pipe. 'This will save energy and reduce operational costs. | Assumptions:Piping is easily accessible in a basement,crawlspace or above lay-in ceiling tiles. Cost: pipe size and thickness specific +man hours Savings: thickness specific Example:A 1.25"diameter copper pipe is located in a 68 degrees Fahrenheit air space.The fluid passingithroughthepipemaintainsanaveragetemperatureof170degreesFahrenheit.What costs and savings,are associated with adding 1.5"of fiberglass insulation to this pipe?The heating piping is operational|September through May (nine months per year). Costs: $3.50 per If (materials and installation) Source of Estimate:Freel Insulation Inc.,Fairbanks Savings: Heat loss per foot: Q =L*(Th-Tc)/Rp 1Ft=L 102 F =Th-Te Rp =(In(D2/D1))/(6.28*Kp)+(In(D3/D2))/(6.28*Ki)+Raf/(3.14*D3) 1.291 =D1 (in) 1.375.=D2 4.375 =D3 23.083 =Kp Btu/(h*ft*F) 0.021 =Ki 0.7 =Raf 8.90 =Rp2 11 =Q2 (insulated pipe) 0.051 =Rp1 1985 =Q1(un-insulated pipe) Energy savings per foot of insulated pipe: 1973 btu (1985-11) 0.021 gal.of no.1 fuel oil/hr (1973 BtuH/(134,000*.75 Btu/gal)) 126.0 gal.of no.1 fuel oil/year (.021 gal/hr*250 day/hr*24 hr) PIPEINS.XLS -Page 2 DCRA/DOE Rural Heat Study ECM: ECM Description: Energy Conservation Measure Payback Analysis Reducing window area using insulated panels 1 1/3/95 Heat loss through a surface is inversely proportional to the R-value of that surface.By covering the window surface with an insulating panel,this R-value can be greatly increased.The payback of this ECM is very dependent upon the heating degree days value at the building site. Unfortunately,due to the high cost of installation this ECM has a very long payback period. _--{aA ot (-5S©.de a4 "CCY c le/7 Ss -|4 (7 A ae) : .CCovgluraesth *ySaneovyhk. Summary of Costs Anchorage Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 and Savings:Cost or |Cost or Cost or |Cost or Cost or Cost or Cost or |Cost or Savings}Savings |Savings|Savings Savings |Savings Savings |Savings Factor Factor Factor Factor Units Estimated Cost Material $/unit $0.84 Installation $/unit $0.56 Shipping $/unit Total Cost $/unit 1.00 $1.41 1.23 $1.73 1.99 $2.80 2.25 $3.16 Estimated Savings Rate Rate Rate Rate Fuel Gallon 0.44 0.025 0.93 0.014 0.92 0.041 1.50 0.041 Electricity KwH 0.10 0.09 0.18 0.24 Maintenance Hours 35.00 35.00 35.00 35.00 Total Savings $0.011 $0.013 $0.038 $0.062 Payback Time Years 129.9 136.1 74.2 51.4 Regional Cost Data:|Description Construction {Fuel Cost |Electric Cost |Wages Cost Factor |($/Gal)_|($/KWH)(S/HR) Region , . Anchorage Anchorage Metropolitan Area 1.00 $0.44 $0.10 |$35.00 Region 1:Southeast Alaska and Kodiak Island 1.23 $0.93 $0.09 |$35.00 Region 2:Southcentral and Southwest Alaska 1.99 $0.92 $0.18 |$35.00 Region 3:Interior Alaska 2.25 $1.50 $0.24 |$35.00 Calculations:See attached concept and example WIN-AREA.XLS Page 1 DCRA/DOE Rural Heat Study 11/3/95 Concept: Example: Typically,window units will contain double or triple pane glass which has an R-value that is very low when compared to the rest of the structure.This R-value varies depending on the spacing of the glass and the gas which is used in this space.A typical window R-value is close to 3.Extruded polystyrene panels are sometimes applied to the exterior surface of a window in order to increase this R-value. Assumptions:|The windows are easily accesible.Emergency egress windows are not covered. Anyincrease in lighting due to covered windows is not included.Example does not include aesthetic or protective coveringof the insulation board. Cost: material thickness specific Savings: material thickness specific An existing window has an R-value of 3 and is located in an area subject to 9000 heating degree |days per year (i.e.Anchorage).2°thick extruded polystyrene paneling with an R-value of 10 will be, installed on the exterior surface of the window.What will the costs and savings be per square foot of window area? Cost: $27 per 2"4x8 sheet of extruded polystyrene Source of Estimate:Spenard Builders Supply Co.,Fairbanks $18 per sheet installation by contractor $1.41 per square foot +shipping Savings: 692 Btu/yr =1 ft*2*"Btu/(13 hr*ft*2*F)*9000 F*hr/yr =loss w/paneling 3000 Btu/yr =1 ft*2*Btu/(3 hr*ft2"F)"9000 F*hr/yr =loss w/o paneling 2308 Btu/yr =3000 Btu/yr -692 Btu/yr 0.025 gallons of no.1 fuel oil/yr =2308 Btu/yr/(134,000 Btu/gallon *.7) WIN-AREA.XLS Page 2 DCRA/DOE Rural Heat Study ECM: ECM Description: 10/27/95 Energy Conservation Measure Payback Analysis Cleaning filters regularly in gravity and forced air units Gravity and forced air heating systems are very sensitiye to pressure losses.Filters collect particles from the air stream which can build up over time iting high pressure losses.A "dirty”filter can cause a system to operate poorly.Cleaning filtérs should be part of the regular maintenance of any air handling system.It will affect the quality ofthe air and temperature in the space but will not save energy. Summary of Costs rAnchorage Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 and Savings:Cost or Cost or |Cost or Cost or Cost or Cost or {Cost or Savings |Savings|Savings Savings [Savings Savings |Savings Factor Factor Factor nits Estimated Cost Material $/unit Installation $/unit Shipping $/unit Total Cost S/unit 1.00 $0.00 1.23 $0.00 1.99 $0.00 2.25 $0.00 Estimated Savings Rate Rate Rate Rate Fuel Gallon 0.44 0.93 0.92 1.50 Electricity KwH 0.10 0.09 0.18 0.24 Maintenance --Hours 35.00 35.00 35.00;35.00 Total Savings $0 $0 $0 $0 Payback Time Years N/A N/A N/A N/A Regional Cost Data:|Description Construction |Fuel Cost |Electric Cost |Wages Cost Factor {($/Gal)($/KWH)($/HR) [Region Anchorage Anchorage Metropolitan Area 1.00 $0.44 $0.10 |$35.00 Region 1:Southeast Alaska and Kodiak Island 1.23 $0.93 $0.09 [$35.00 Region 2:Southcentral and Southwest Alaska 1.99 $0.92 $0.18 ($35.00 Region 3:Interior Alaska 2.25 $1.50 $0.24 1$35.00 Calculations: FILTERS.XLS None Page 1 DCRA/DOE Rural Heat Study ECM: ECM Description: Energy Conservation Measure Payback Analysis Eliminating all electric heating,including portable heaters 10/30/95 Electric heat is one of the most expensive heating alternatives.In situations where alternative fuels can 'be used,it is often worth comparing costs and savings. Electric heat is often used as an easy and inexpensive method to provide supplemental heat to specificareas.However,it is a much more expensive type of fuel and results in much higher energy costs.'Repairing,extending or improving the oil-fired heating system to replace the electric heater is very site'specific and often very expensive.This makes the payback analysis difficult to extrapolate from one 'example to all situations.For this reason a payback analysis is not included in this ECM discussion, 'but it is highly recommended that the payback for replacement of electric heat with oil-fired heat be janalyzed in all cases.Case ly OF oe Summary of Costs Anchorage Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 and Savings:Cost or |Cost or Cost or }Cost or Costor |Costor Cost or |Cost or SavingsjSavings |Savings|Savings Savings [Savings Savings |Savings Factor Factor Factor Factor Units Estimated Cost Material -$/unit Removal $/unit $0.00 Shipping $/unit Total Cost $/unit 1.00 $0.00 1.23 $0.00 1.99 $0.00 2.25 $0.00 Estimated Savings Rate Rate Rate Rate Fuel Gallon 0.44 0 0.93 0 0.92 0 1.50 0 Electricity KwH 0.10 0 0.09 0 0.18 0 0.24 0 Maintenance Hours 35.00 35.00 35.00 35.00 Total Savings $0 $0 $0 $0 Payback Time Years #DIV/O!#DIV/O!#DIV/O!#DIV/O! Regional Cost Data:|Description Construction |Fuel Cost |Electric Cost |Wages Cost Factor {($/Gal)($/KWH)($/HR) Region Anchorage Anchorage Metropolitan Area 1.00 $0.44 $0.10 |$35.00 Region 1:Southeast Alaska and Kodiak Island 1.23 $0.93 $0.09 |$35.00 Region 2:Southcentral and Southwest Alaska 1.99 $0.92 $0.18 [$35.00 Region 3:Interior Alaska 2.25 $1.50 $0.24 |$35.00 Calculations:None ELECHEAT.XLS Page 1 DCRA/DOE Rural Heat Study ECM: ECM Description: Energy Conservation Measure Payback Analysis Replacing pump impeller with one of a smaller diameter 10/30/95 Typically,pumps are supplied with standard impeller sizes.To tailor the impeller to the system,it can be exchanged for one with a smaller diameter.With a smailer impeller the pump will draw less horsepower and reduce the energy consumed. Summary of Costs Anchorage Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 and Savings:Costor |Costor (Cost or /Cost or Costor |Costor Costor |Cost or Savings|Savings |Savings|Savings Savings [Savings Savings |Savings Factor Factor Factor Factor Units Estimated Cost Material $/unit $520.00 Installation $/unit $240.00 Shipping $/unit $50.00 Total Cost $/unit 1.00}$810.00 1.23 $996.30 1.99]$1,611.90 2.25]$1,822.50 Estimated Savings Rate Rate Rate Rate Fuel Gallon 0.44 0.93 0.92 1.50 Electricity KwH 0.10 3978 0.09 3978 0.18 3978 0.24 3978 Maintenance Hours.35.00 35.00 35.00 35.00 Total Savings $386 $338 $724 $943 Payback Time Years 2.1 2.9 2.2 1.9 Regional Cost Data:|Description Construction |Fuel Cost /Electric Cost |Wages Cost Factor |($/Gal)($/KWH)($/HR) Region Anchorage Anchorage Metropolitan Area 1.00 $0.44 $0.10 |$35.00 Region 1:Southeast Alaska and Kodiak !sland 1.23 $0.93 $0.09 |$35.00 Region 2:Southcentral and Southwest Alaska 1.99 $0.92 $0.18 |$35.00 Region 3:Interior Alaska 2.25 $1.50 $0.24 |$35.00 Calculations:See attached concept and example PUMP-IMP.XLS Page 1 DCRA/DOE Rural Heat Study 10/30/95 Concept:The size of the impeller in part determines the basic characteristics of the pumps energy vs.flow 'relationships.Each pump has its own specific "pump curve'illustrating values such as head,gpm,'efficiency,hp,and impeller size vs.one another.An impeller can be taken out and machined to a'smaller diameter quit easily.In a rural application,the cost of doing without the pump during shipment of an existing impeller for machining is probably great enough to justify purchasing a new impeller of theappropriatesizetoeliminatedowntime. Assumptions:Impellers for the specific pump can be trimmed.Trimming is very common in large pumps and less common as pumps reduce in size.Pumps under 1/2 horsepower are rarely available with trimmed impellers. Costs: size &material specific Savings: size reduction and pump curve specific ° Example::A pump was originally installed in a system which was designed to flow 100 gpm at 30 ft of head.The'impeller size is 6"and the power drawn from the motor is 1-1/4 hp.This pump operates continually.'After testing the system pressure,it is determined that the pressure produced by the pump is higherthanrequired.What will the cost and savings be for exchanging the 6"impeller with a 5-1/4"impeller? {The head will drop from 30 ft to 20 ft dropping the hp from 1-1/4 to 9/10.The impeller material isbronze. Costs: $520 =cost of new 7"diameter impeller machined to a 5-1/4"diameter Source of Estimate:Larry Harrington Co.,Portland $240 =6 hours of contractor labor @ $40 per hour Savings: 0.35 hp =1-1/4 hp -9/10 hp 3978 kwh/year =.7457kw/hp *.35 hp *24 hr/day *365 day/year (ee Jee wePatBESfhaemyeeealle PUMP-IMP.XLS Page 2 DCRA/DOE Rural Heat Study ECM: ECM Description: Energy Conservation Measure Payback Analysis Ventilation control using two-speed fan motors 11/2/95 Two-speed motors allow the user to alter a fan's performance.During periods when lower air flow is required,motor rpms can be reduced and energy savings realized in decreased electricity usage.Two: speed motors are available with one and two-windings.Only motors with two-windings are considered due to their flexibility and common usage.Also,two-speed motors can come in two-thirds or one-half rpm reductions.The one-half rpm two-speed motor will provide greater savings and is thus used for calculation. Because the cost of replacing an existing motor is much more than specifying a two-speed motor during new construction,the replacement cost is analyzed here. Summary of Costs Anchorage Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 and Savings:Cost or |Cost or Cost or |Cost or Costor |Costor Cost or |Cost or Savings|Savings |Savings}Savings Savings |Savings Savings |SavingsUnitsFactorFactorFactorFactor Estimated Cost Material $/unit $430.00 Installation $/unit $750.00 Shipping $/unit $50.00 Total Cost $/unit 1.00]$1,230.00 1.23 $1,512.90 1.99]$2,447.70 2.25]$2,767.50 Estimated Savings Rate Rate Rate Rate Fuel Gallon 0.44 0.93 0.92 1.50 Electricity KwH 0.10 5212 0.09 5212 0.18 5212 0.24 §212 Maintenance Hours 35.00 35.00 35.00 35.00 Total Savings $506 $443 $949 $1,235 Payback Time Years 2.4 3.4 2.6 2.2 Regional Cost Data:|Description Construction |Fuel Cost |Electric Cost |Wages Cost Factor 1(§/Gal)($/KWH)($/HR) Region Anchorage Anchorage Metropolitan Area 1.00 $0.44 $0.10 |$35.00 Region 1:Southeast Alaska and Kodiak Island 1.23 $0.93 $0.09 |$35.00 Region 2:Southcentral and Southwest Alask 1.99 $0.92 $0.18 |$35.00 Region 3:Interior Alaska 2.25 $1.50 $0.24 |$35.00 Calculations:See attached concept and example 2-SPEED.XLS PAGE:1 DCRA/DOE Rural Heat Study 11/2/95 Concept:Typically,a two-speed motor with two windings costs twice as much as a one speed motor.The one speed motor runs at 1750 rpms while the two-speed motor with two windings has the capability of running at 1750 or 875 rpms. Costs: 100%higher cost for two-speed motor from a one-speed motor Savings: Fan Law 1 States: BHP2 =BHP1/(RPM1/RPM2)43 BHP2 =power required at RPM2 BHP1 =power required at RPM1 2 =RPM1/RPM2 8 =(RPM1/RPM2)43 BHP2 =BHP1/8 88%=savings in power at one-half rpms Example:A fan is used to ventilate a building which will be occupied 12 hrs per day for 6 days per week and 52 weeks out of the year.A motor which will provide 1.6 BHP is required for this application which translates into a nominal two HP motor.Should a two-speed motor be installed in order to decrease the amount of ventilation air provided during non-occupied periods?The two-speed motor would be installed with a 7-day programable timer. Assumptions:Heat gain from the motors is not considered since fan motors are usually installed outside the air stream and reject their heat to the mechanical room,not the occupied space. Cost: $160 =price for a one-speed,two HP motor $320 =price for a two-speed,two HP motor Source of Estimate:Pace Representative -Johnson-Barrow Inc.,Anchorage $110 =cost of a 7 day programmable timer Source of Estimate:Debenham Electric Supply Co.,Fairbanks $430 =total cost Savings: 1.60 =BHP at full speed 1.40 =BHP saved at half speed 1.04 =KW saved at half speed (.7457*HP=KW) 4992 =hours per year at half speed 5212 =KWH per year savings 2-SPEED.XLS PAGE:2 DCRA/DOE Rural Heat Study ECM: ECM Description: Energy Conservation Measure Payback Analysis 10/31/95 Adjust boiler firing rate to the building demand instead of to a constant hot water supply temperature. Typically,burners fire according to the temperature required by the boilers fixed temperature range.A more efficient means of operation is to reset this temperature range (vary the boiler water heating temperature)according to the outside air temperature so that longer heating cycle periods are { t established. Summary of Costs Anchorage Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 and Savings:Cost or |Cost or Cost or |Cost or Costor {Costor Costor |Cost or Savings|Savings |Savings|Savings Savings {Savings Savings |Savings Factor Factor Factor Factor Units Estimated Cost. Material $/unit $150.00 Installation $/unit $450.00 Shipping $/unit $25.00 Total Cost $/unit 1.00}$625.00 1.23 $768.75 1.99 $1,243.75 2.25!$1,406.25 Estimated Savings Rate Rate Rate Rate Fuel Gallon 0.44 280.00 0.93 280.00 0.92 280.00 1.50 280.00 Electricity KwH 0.10 0.09 0.18 0.24 Maintenance Hours 35.00 35.00 35.00 35.00 Total Savings $123 $260 $258 $420 Payback Time Years 5.1 3.0 4.8 3.3 Regional Cost Data:|Description Construction |Fuel Cost {Electric Cost |Wages Cost Factor |($/Gal)($/KWH)($/HR) Region Anchorage Anchorage Metropolitan Area 1.00 $0.44 $0.10 |$35.00 Region 1:Southeast Alaska and Kodiak Island 1.23 $0.93 $0.09 |$35.00 Region 2:Southcentral and Southwest Alaska 1.99 $0.92 $0.18 |$35.00 Region 3:Interior Alaska 2.25 $1.50 $0.24 |$35.00 Calculations:See attached concept and example FIR-RATE.XLS Page 1 DCRA/DOE Rural Heat Study 10/31/95 Concept:|Typical hot water heating system supply temperature setpoints are 180 to 190 degrees F.This is the temperature required to meet the design heating load in the building.Resetting the setpoint to as low as }100 degrees F when the outside air temperature is 40 degrees F results in an average hot water supplyitemperatureof140to145degreesF. Assumptions:|The simpliest boiler operating temperature reset controllers are available as stock items with fixed reset schedules.Boiler must be near an outside wall so outside air temperature sensor capillary can be installed. Costs:$150.00 per reset controller.Source:Systech Controls,Fairbanks,Alaska Savings:Savings are difficuit to calculate since they are based on the building thermal performance,heating system equipment performance and the severity of the climate. Colder climates have a larger difference between the design heating temperatures and average operating temperatures and generally result in more savings from boiler temperature reset controls.Honeywell,Inc.has experienced an average savings of 12%to 18%from the installation of reset controls. Example:Installing a reset controller on an existing 100 MBH boiler.This requires draining of the existing heating|system fluid for retrofit of the HWS temperature sensor into the piping.It also requires penetratoin of ithe existing exterior wall for installation of the outside air temperature sensor.Assume heating systemluses2,000 gallons of fuel per year and reset controller will save 14%. Cost:$150 Controller cost 12 hours of labor for installation Savings:280 gallons =14%of 2000 gallons U-flee Dads VAs aie* FIR-RATE.XLS Page 2 DCRA/DOE Rural Heat Study ECM: ECM Description: 10/31/95 Energy Conservation Measure Payback Analysis Utilizing waste heat 'Utilizing waste heat can lead to fuel saving but waste heat equipment must be added carefully to avoid boiler operation problems.For example,products such as "stack robbers"lower flue gas temperatures which can cause condensation to form in the stack creating an acid that can corrode chimneys and 'drop onto boiler sections and reduce the effectiveness of cleaning.A stack robber may also create draft problems for neutral draft appliances since the draft is created by warm flue gases rising.4 .(awe te've voeGelieefConan,sey Ii-ae A a.{ro =Ac.f e/ad feonw eeee py WREAK Savy;\ w,Wer (b °fom Vcauk we S Ooi\c oe ?Le,"0°CO Summary of Costs Anchorage Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 and Savings:Cost or Cost or |Cost or Cost or Cost or Costor Cost or Savings |Savings|Savings Savings |Savings Savings |Savings Factor Factor Factor Units Estimated Cost Material $/unit $250.00 Installation $/unit $260.00 Shipping $/unit $15.00 Total Cost $/unit 1.00}$525.00 1.23 $645.75 1.99 $1,044.75 2.25/$1,181.25 Estimated Savings Rate Rate Rate Rate Fuel Gallon 0.44 125.00 0.93 116.25 0.92 115.00 1.50 187.50 Electricity KwH 0.10 0.09 0.18 0.24 Maintenance Hours 35.00 35.00 35.00 35.00 Total Savings $55 $108 $106 $281 Payback Time Years 9.5 6.0 9.9 4.2 Regional Cost Data:|Description Construction |Fuel Cost |Electric Cost |Wages Cost Factor /|($/Gal)($/KWH)($/HR) Region '1Anchorage Anchorage Metropolitan Area 1.00 $0.44 $0.10 |$35.00 Region 1:Southeast Alaska and Kodiak Island 1.23 $0.93 $0.09 |$35.00 Region 2:Southcentral and Southwest Alaska 1.99 $0.92 $0.18 |$35.00 Region 3:Interior Alaska 2.25 $1.50 $0.24 |$35.00 Calculations:See attached concept and example WST-HEAT.XLS Page 1 DCRA/DOE Rural Heat Study 10/31/95 Concept:'Using some of the energy rejected up the boiler stack is a proven method of saving energy.Stackrobbersarerelativelyinexpensivewaystoheattheareaatorneartheboilersuchastheboilerroom or igarage. t Assumptions:_/There is sufficient room to mount the stack robber on the chimney and sufficient clearance to combustible construction.Heat from the stack robber can be utilized to heat at garage or other utility area. Costs:Boiler stack robbers for 6",7"and 8"diameter stack robbers are $200.00 Source:Genesco Supply Co.,Anchorage,Alaska Savings:Stack robbers can result in savings of from 18%to 24%of the heat normally lost up the boiler or furnace stack.For the Torrid Air stack robber this is a savings of approximately 28,000 BtuH to 37,000 BtuH. Example:A200 MBH boiler located in a garage is retrofitted with a stack robber which can deliver up to 20,000 BtuH to the space.Assume the boiler operates from September through May and fires 5%of the time. Cost:Stack robber $200 Chimney fittings $50 Installation 4 hours at $35/hr $140 Electrical connection $120 Total =$510 Savings:9 Months of possible boiler operation 10 %actual boiler operation time 648 Hours of annual operation 1£+07 BtuH saved at 20,000 BtuH 75 %boiler efficiency with No.1 fuel oil 125 Gallons of fuel oil saved annually WST-HEAT.XLS | Page 2 DCRA/DOE Rural Heat Study ECM: ECM Description: Energy Conservation Measure Payback Analysis Boiler Tune-ups 10/30/95 Regular boiler tune-ups are required in order to maintain high efficiency. Although the payback time on boiler (and furnace)tune ups is very long,neglecting boiler maintenance will lead to the early breakdown of the equipment and require the very vest repair or replacement oftheboiler.()ek Sees po|ra FuelCyottpoM4sete Summary of Costs Anchorage |Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 and Savings:Cost or |Cost or Cost or |Cost or Costor |Costor Cost or |Cost or Savings|Savings |Savings/Savings Savings |Savings Savings |Savings Factor Factor Factor Factor Units Estimated Cost $/unit = Installation $/unit $200.0 » Shipping $/unit \-$50-00| Total Cost S/unit 1.00]$250.00 1.23 $307.50 1.99 $497.50 2.25}$562.50 Estimated Savings Rate Rate Rate Rate Fuel Gallon 0.44 40.20 0.93 40.20 0.92 40.20 1.50 40.20 Electricity KwH 0.10 0.09 0.18 0.24 0 Maintenance Hours 35.00 35.00 35.00 35.00 Total Savings $18 $37 $37 $60 Payback Time Years 14.1 8.2 13.5 9.3 Regional Cost Data:|Description Construction |Fuel Cost |Electric Cost |Wages Cost Factor |($/Gai){$/KWH)($/HR) Region Anchorage Anchorage Metropolitan Area 1.00 $0.44 $0.10 |$35.00 Region 1:Southeast Alaska and Kodiak Island 1.23 $0.93 $0.09 |$35.00 Region 2:Southcentral and Southwest Alaska 1.99 $0.92 $0.18 |$35.00 Region 3:Interior Alaska 2.25 $1.50 $0.24 |$35.00 Calculations: B-TUNUP.XLS See attached concept and example PAGE:1 DCRA/DOE Rural Heat Study 10/30/95 Concept:Boiler efficiency is defineds as the net heat produced by the boiler system divided by the energy contentofthefuelbeingburnedintheprocess.An oil-boiler is typically sent from the factory with an operating efficiency of 80%.During usage,a number of factors cause this efficiency to decline with time.An'operating efficiency may drop to an average of 60%at the end of a tune-up/cleaning cycle (this mayvarygreatly). Assumptions:'Boller is tuned up annually and is otherwise in good repair. Costs:(aie 5 man hours +transportation Savings: 20%efficiency gain after tune-up/cleaning (80%-60%) Example:A 100 MBH boiler is used to heat a building.The AFUE (Annual Fuel Utilization Efficiency)water 'rating is 80 when new.The boiler is subjected to normal usage and is adjusted properly at the'beginning of the year.What will be the costs and savings involved in tuning-up and cleaning thisiboilerattheendof2years? Costs: $200 =boiler tune-up Source of Estimate:Altrol Inc.,Fairbanks Savings: 70%=average efficiency between tune-up/cleaning (80%+60%)/2 80%=optimal efficiency 10%=efficiency upgrade from tune-up/cleaning (80%-70%) 0.13 gal/nr fuel savings =(134,000 Btu/ga!)/(100,000 Btu/hr)*10% 300 hr/yr =250 day/yr *24 hr/day *.05 (assumed operating time of 5%) 40 gal/yr =.24 gaV/hr *438 hr/yrvet._le T Crw Vile ew dv 7 ;.\.-Rem she &-s (Pou eoAd25DAen:ZS Vise j -¢OAnpn ect}ae / Cex |at}|2.te wihy Avsise oeelaotUAo)o ona fern p art aT,Aessee” I x medley flow 2 DCRA/DOE Rural Heat Study ECM: Energy Conservation Measure Payback Analysis Providing automatic boiler shutoff 11/3/95 ECM Description:Turning boilers off when the outside air temperatures exceed a specified value (ie 65 F)can save energy by eliminating fuel consumption when heating is werR be not required. Cum Levee w /at ty ror q Ves J Vay on+aly vaspeedAS aos sp eel Summary of Costs Anchorage Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 and Savings:Cost or |Cost or Cost or |Cost or Cost or Cost or Cost or |Cost or Savings}Savings |Savings}Savings Savings {Savings Savings |Savings Factor Factor Factor Factor Units Estimated Cost Material $/unit $150.00 'Installation $/unit $450.00 Shipping $/unit $25.00 Total Cost $/unit 1.00}$625.00 1.23 $768.75 1.99}$1,243.75 2.25]$1,406.25 Estimated Savings Rate Rate Rate Rate Fuel Galion 0.44 57.60 0.93 53.57 0.92 52.99 1.50 86.40 Electricity KwH 0.10 0.09 0.18 0.24 Maintenance Hours 35.00 35.00 35.00 35.00 Total Savings $25 $54 $53 $86 Payback Time Years 24.7 14.4 23.5 16.3 Regional Cost Data:|Description Construction |Fuel Cost {Electric Cost (Wages Cost Factor |($/Gal)_|($/KWH)(S/HR) Region ; Anchorage Anchorage Metropolitan Area 1.00 $0.44 $0.10 |$35.00 Region 1:Southeast Alaska and Kodiak Island 1.23 $0.93 $0.09 |$35.00 Region 2:Southcentral and Southwest Alaska 1.99 $0.92 $0.18 |$35.00 Region 3:Interior Alaska 2.25 $1.50 $0.24 |$35.00 Calculations: SHUTOFF.XLS See attached concept and example _ Page 1 DCRA/DOE Rural Heat Study 11/3/95 Concept:Eliminate fuel consumption during the warm months of the year by turning boilers off when the outside: air temperature is above 65 degrees F.This can be accomplished at no additional cost by installing a | reset controller.See ECM "Adjust Boiler Firing Rate" Assumptions:Savings will vary greatly depending on number of days per year with temperatures above 65 F.This ECM cannot be implemented if the boiler provides domestic hot water during the warm days. Costs:Installing a boiler shut off device is a relatively low-cost controls device Savings:Savings wil!depend on the outside air temperatures and boiler firing rate. A 0° Example:100 MBH boiler provides heat to a small school building.It does not provide domestic hot water.In this-viflage there are 45 days per year with an outside air temperature above 65 F for 8 hours a day. Calculate the savings from a boiler shut-off device. Cost:Cost of boiler shut-off control ,$150 Installation 12 hours Savings:8 Hours per day above 65 F 45 Days per year 360 Hours per year above 65 F 10 %Boiler firing time to maintain set point temperature 36 Hours of firing time 1.2 GPH firing rate 75 %Boiler efficiency 57.6 Gallons saved o&f ThsnusavesCala)p>°nom elec 'Ned aC Cee fr here, SHUTOFF.XLS Page 2 DCRA/DOE Rural Heat Study ECM: ECM Description: Energy Conservation Measure Payback Analysis Using wood-fired boilers 10/30/95 in some situations,utilizing wood as a source of boiler fue!may be a viable alternative.Additional handling and transportation costs can sometimes be outweighed by an abundant and inexpensive source of wood,especially in rural communities.This analysis does not take into account the ability to collect free firewood in many rural areas of Alaska.Utilizing free firewood the payback time will be reduced. Summary of Costs Anchorage Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 and Savings:Cost or |Cost or Cost or |Cost or Cost or Cost or Cost or |Cost or SavingsjSavings |Savings|Savings Savings |Savings Savings |Savings Factor Factor Factor Factor Units Estimated Cost Material $/unit $1,100.00 Installation $/unit Shipping $/unit Total Cost $/unit 1.00]$1,100.00 1.00 $1,100.00 1.00 $1,100.00 -1.00}$1,100.00 Estimated Savings Rate Rate Rate Rate Fuel Gallon 0.44 796 0.93 442 0.92 1327 1.50 1327 Electricity KwH 0.10 0.09 0.18 0.24 Maintenance Hours 35.00 35.00 35.00 35.00 Total Savings ($730)($69)($579)$191 Payback Time Years N/A NIA N/A 5.8 Regional Cost Data:|Description Construction {Fuel Cost |Electric Cost |Wages Cost Factor |($/Gal)($/KWH)($/HR) Region Anchorage Anchorage Metropolitan Area 1.00 $0.44 $0.10 |$35.00 Region 1:Southeast Alaska and Kodiak Island 1.23 $0.93 $0.09 {$35.00 Region 2:Southcentral and Southwest Alaska 1.99 $0.92 $0.18 |$35.00 Region 3:Interior Alaska 2.25 $1.50 $0.24 |$35.00 Calculations:See attached concept and example WOOD-FIR.XLS Page 1 DCRA/DOE Rural Heat Study 10/30/95 Concept: Example: Wood fuel costs can vary considerably from rural to urban settings.Costs per cord can be high in areas where the supply is limited but can also be very low in areas where subsistence type lifestyles predominate.Also,the benefits of using wood fuel as a back-up source of energy varies.Typically wood fuels burn with 50%efficiency while fuel oils burn with 70%efficiency.The energy content of a gallon of no.1 fuel oil is 134 mbh while that of a cord of spruce and birch is 15,000 mbh and 18,200 mbh respectively. Assumptions:{Wood is available for use as a heating fuel.The houses have room for a wood-fired boiler. This example does not take into account the ability to collect free firewood in many rural areas of the state. Costs: manufacturer and model specific Savings: cost specific;ie cost per cord of wood,fuel oil A wood boiler is used to heat House A.A 50/50 mixture of birch and spruce is used in this boiler.The original purchase price of the boiler is $2500.00.An oil-fired boiler is used in an identical House B next door and has a $1400 original purchase price.These houses are subject to 9000 heating degree days (i.e.Anchorage).The price of 1 cord of 50/50 spruce-birch is $120 split and delivered.Which neighbor, Aor B,is getting the most energy output for the dollar?The house is 2000 ft*2. Cost: $1,100 =$2,500 -$1,400 (purchase price difference) Source of Estimate:Burnham Representative -Mechanical Sales Inc.,Anchorage Savings: Fuel equivalents: 1.7E+07 Btu/cord=(18,200,000+15,000,000)/2 8.3E+6 Btu/cord @ 50%efficiency 88 gal/cord =8,300,000 Btu/cord /(134,000 Btu/gal *.7) Fuel requirement per year for typical frame structure in Anchorage: 9 cords/2000 ft*2 $1,080 =cost per year/2000 ft*2 heating with wood 796 gallons of no.1 fuel oil/2000 ft*2 WOOD-FIR.XLS Page 2 DCRA/DOE Rural Heat Study ECM: ECM Description: Energy Conservation Measure Payback Analysis Insulating domestic hot water tanks 10/30/95 Insulation of domestic hot water tanks will reduce the heat loss from the tank and directly reduce the'energy consumed maintaining domestic hot water at the setpoint temperature. Summary of Costs Anchorage Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 and Savings:Cost or {Cost or Cost or jCost or Cost or Cost or Costor |Cost or Savings}Savings |Savings|Savings Savings |Savings Savings |Savings Factor Factor Factor Factor Units Estimated Cost Material $/unit $15.00 Installation $/unit $17.50 Shipping $/unit $2.00 Total Cost $/unit 1.00 $34.50 1.23 $42.44 1.99 $68.66 2.25 $77.63 Estimated Savings Rate Rate Rate Rate Fuel Gallon 0.44 0.93 0.92 1.50 Electricity KwH 0.10 189 0.09 189 0.18 189 0.24 189 Maintenance Hours 35.00 35.00 35.00 35.00 Total Savings $18 $16 $34 $45 Payback Time Years 1.9 2.6 2.0 1.7 Regional Cost Data:|Description Construction |Fuel Cost |Electric Cost |Wages Cost Factor {($/Gal)($/KWH)($/HR) Region Anchorage Anchorage Metropolitan Area 1.00 $0.44 $0.10 |$35.00 Region 1:Southeast Alaska and Kodiak Island 1.23 $0.93 $0.09 |$35.00 Region 2:Southcentral and Southwest Alaska 1.99 $0.92 $0.18 |$35.00 Region 3:Interior Alaska 2.25 $1.50 $0.24 |$35.00 Calculations:See attached concept and example DHW-TANK.XLS Page 1 DCRA/DOE Rural Heat Study 10/30/95 Concept:The heat loss through a surface is indirectly proportional to the R-value of the material underlying that surface.A hot water tank blanket is often used to provide a greater R-value and thus reduce energy release through the surface.The average factory R-value of a tank is about 5. Assumptions:_The tank is a standard shape and size tank and stock insulation balnkets are available., Cost: 0.5 man hours/100 gallons of water storage +cost of materials &ship. Savings: x/(5+x)%decrease in Btu/hr from the surface (using same insulating material in blanket as in factory installed jacket)at add.R-value of x Example:A 50 gallon water heater is located in a room where the ambient temperature is 75 degrees.The temperature of the heated water is 110 degrees.The R-value of the factory insulation is 5.The surface area of this tank is approximately 21 square feet.The new water heater blanket has an R- value of 5. Cost: 0.5 man hours $15 for tank blanket and tape Source of Estimate:Sampson Hardware,Fairbanks $2 shipping Savings: 147 BtuH heat loss =21 ft*2*(110 F-75 F)/(5 hr*ft*2*F/Btu) 73.5 BtuH heat loss =21 ft*2*(110 F-75 F)/(Shr*ft*2*F/Btu) 73.5 BtuH heat gained after installation of tank blanket (147-73.5) 0.022 KW =.0002931*73.5 BtuH 189 KWH/Yr =.022 KW*365 day/yr*24 hr/day DHW-TANK.XLS Page 2 DCRA/DOE Rural Heat Study ECM: ECM Description: Energy Conservation Measure Payback Analysis Insulate Heating System Pipes 10/30/95 {Insulation of heating system piping saves energy by reducing heat loss from the pipes.Insulating degrees Fahrenheit. 'domestic water piping systems is recommended but not evaluated. The average heating system pipe size is estimated to be 1.25"diameter copper.Insulation thickness required by ASHRAE Standard 90.1-1989 is 1.5 inches.The ambient air temperature is assumed to be 68 degrees Fahrenheit and the average heating system water temperature is assumed to be 170 Summary of Costs Anchorage Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 and Savings:Cost or |Cost or Cost or {Cost or Cost or Cost or Cost or |Cost or Savings|Savings |Savings|/Savings Savings |Savings Savings |Savings Factor Factor Factor Factor Units Estimated Cost Material $/unit $1.75 installation $/unit $1.75 Shipping $/unit Total Cost $/unit 1.00 $3.50 1.23 $4.31 1.99 $6.97 2.25 $7.88 Estimated Savings Rate Rate Rate Rate Fuel Gallon 0.44 126.0 0.93 126.0 0.92 126.0 1.50 126.0 Electricity KwH 0.10 0.09 0.18 0.24 Maintenance Hours 35.00 35.00 35.00 35.00 Total Savings $55 $117 $116 $189 Payback Time Years 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 Regional Cost Data:|Description Construction |Fuel Cost jElectric Cost |Wages Cost Factor {|($/Gal)($/KWH)($/HR) Region Anchorage Anchorage Metropolitan Area 1.00 $0.44 $0.10 |$35.00 Region 1:Southeast Alaska and Kodiak Island 1.23 $0.93 $0.09 |$35.00 Region 2:Southcentral and Southwest Alaska 1.99 $0.92 $0.18 |$35.00 Region 3:Interior Alaska 2.25 $1.50 $0.24 |$35.00 Calculations: PIPEINS.XLS See attached concept and example Page 1 DCRA/DOE Rural Heat Study 10/30/95 Concept: Example: PIPEINS.XLS 'The heat loss through a surface is indirectly proportional to the R-value of the surface material. 'Insulation for hot water piping is recommended to stop excessive heat loss from bare metallic pipe.'This will save energy and reduce operational costs. | Assumptions:Piping is easily accessible in a basement,craw!space or above lay-in ceiling tiles. Cost: pipe size and thickness specific +man hours Savings: thickness specific A 1.25"diameter copper pipe is located in a 68 degrees Fahrenheit air space.The fluid passing through the pipe maintains an average temperature of 170 degrees Fahrenheit.What costs and savings are associated with adding 1.5”of fiberglass insulation to this pipe?The heating piping is operational September through May (nine months per year).° Costs: $3.50 per If (materials and installation) Source of Estimate:Freel Insulation Inc.,Fairbanks Savings: Heat loss per foot: Q =L*(Th-Tc/Rp 1 Ft=Lb 102 F =Th-Te Rp =(In(D2/D1))(6.28*Kp)+(In(D3/D2))/(6.28*Ki)+Raf/(3.14*D3) 1.291 =D1 (in) 1.375 =D2 4.375 =D3 23.083 =Kp Btu/(h*ft*F) 0.021 =Ki 0.7 =Raf 8.90 =Rp2 11 =Q2 (insulated pipe) 0.051 =Rp1 1985 =Q1(un-insulated pipe) Energy savings per foot of insulated pipe: 1973 btu (1985-11) 0.021 gal.of no.1 fuel oil/hr (1973 BtuH/(134,000*.75 Btu/gal)) 126.0 gal.of no.1 fuel oil/year (.021 gal/hr*250 day/hr*24 hr) Page 2 11-30-1995 @7:@9AM UNWIN SCHEBEN:KORYNTA HUETTL,INC._ PRINCIPALS Lec von Scheben,PE,Ss"Earl D.Korynte,P.E.. JamesA Huett,AA' Gary H.POM,AIA "Edwin H,%ggs.PE. .Treodore R.Kruth,P.E. - Monte R.Gonitzke,LS. "ASSOCIATES 'Donna L.Marks *Timothy J.Vig.PE.” Daryl D.Sorenson,AIA * Steven M.Tacen Jarnes R.Kinney,P.E. "Gregory A.Ingham.CRA Scott V.Bel,P.E. ”Bruce E.Hopper.PE.. , Gary R.Kuhn,P.E."John M,Stedum,RIEL FROM USKH TO 19072694685 P,OL ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING LAND SUPRVE TING PLANNING -November 30,1995 Peter CrimpStateofAlaska Division of Energy333WestFourthAvenue,Suite 220 _Subject: Anchorage,Alaska 99501-2341 DOE Rural Heat Assessment ProjectResponsetoECMPaybackAnalysis review comments oe Dear Peter: "OFFICES "Q515A Steet-Ancnorage.Aloska 99603 Phone (907)276-4245©FAX (907)258-4653 "1830 Second Avenue | .Fairbanks,Alaska 99701 © ”Phone (907)482-2128 *FAX (907)452.4225 9097 Glacier Hwy.,Ste.201 _Juneau,Alaska 99801 -Phone (907)790-2901 -FAX (907)790-390! ,800W.EvergreenSt.,Ste.218"Paimer,Alaska 99645Phone(907)746-7815 FAX (907)746-7819, I have reviewed your comments regarding the Energy Conservation Measure (ECM)'Payback Calculations and apologize for the ECM calculations containing mathematical - errors.USKH will review each ECM calculation,correct any errors and reissue the corrected ECMs by December 6,1995.In regard to David Lockard's specific comments | 1. 'and our telephone conversation yesterday,I have the following responses: Eliminate unoccupied ventilation.USKH will calculate the payback for this - _ECM using standard night and weekend unoccupied time periods assuming a. 5,000 cfm air flow rate. Night setback thermostats.USKH will calculate the payback for this item as .both a stand-alone ECM andin combination with eliminating the unoccupiedventilationrate. Low-flow showerheads and faucets..USKH will perform separate payback"-ealculations for the shower and the faucet replacements.The calculations will .5.. 6. ECM assuming non-DDC control systems.. assume a flow rate of 5 gpm for standard showers and faucets,and 2.5gpm forlow-flow showers and faucets.Showers are inexpensive to retrofit but faucets usually require a complete replacement and are more expensive. Occupancy sensors to control lighting.-USKH will calculate payback for this .; Wood boilers..Due to the complexity of commercial boiler calculations Steve'smorein-depth analysis will account for that application.This residential ECMisnotapplicabletothisprojectandwillbedeletedfromthestudy. Conversion to waste heat.This ECMis so site specific that a generic ECMis ©not warranted.It was agreed that USKH will not analyze this ECM. 11-30-1995 07:09AM FROM USKH TO 19072694685 P.@2 UNWIN SCHEBEN KORYNTA HUETTL,INC.; ARCHITECTURE «ENGINEERING »«LANO SURVEYING .«PLANNING Mr.Crimp > .November 30,1995.- -Page2 - 7.Boiler tune-up.1 spoke directly with a boiler tuneup company in Anchorage regarding the cost 3 10. _to tuneup,clean and check the controls on an oil-fired boiler.They charge $75.00 per hour and it takes them about 1.25 hours on-site plus travel.I assumed 1.75 hours of travel for a total of .three hours.For rural areas the additional cost of transportation can be spread over all the bumers to be adjusted in the village.Some of this cost is covered by the construction correction factors,but USKH will revise the ECM adding $200 to cover additional travel expenses. High efficiency motors.My village connections informed me that there are very few three-.phase motors outside the powerplantsin villages.However,I will calculate the payback for athree-phasemotor replacement so information for both types of motors are available.My Reliance Electric information on motor efficiency differs from yours (see attached)and lists the 'efficiency of a standard efficiency,1750 rpm,three-phase,one horsepower motor as 78.6% :(standard frame)to 81%(totally enclosed fan cooled).The equivalent high efficiency motor hasaminimumefficiencyof78.5%and a nominal efficiency of 81.5%.Changing from the standardefficiencymotortothehighefficiencymotoryieldsa2.9%efficiencyincrease (81.5%-78.6%). For the single-phase motor ECM the assumed efficiencyincrease was 5%(72%to 77%).. David Lockard will ptovide Motor Master efficiency information and USKH will revise theECMutilizingtheMotorMasterefficiencyinformation.I will discuss electric motor efficiency_more fully with our electrical engineering department.Electronic ballasts.This ECM considered three-lamp fixtures since they are the standard type foundin school classrooms.Four-lamp fixtures are usually replaced instead of retrofitted withnewballastsandT-8 lamps.USKH willl calculate the payback to replace a four-lamp fixturewithafixturewithanelectronicballastandT-8 lamps.;Installing insulated panels in windows.Due to the high cost of this ECM and the limitednumberofwindowwallapplicationstobefoundinruralAlaska,this ECM will be deleted from'the study. In addition,information on the "Heat-Timer”boiler control device has been located and the payback willbecalculatedforthisECM.Again,I apologize for the errors in the submitted ECMs and will correct . '”and resubmit them by December 6,1995.We are still on-track for submission of the Draft Report onDecember8,1995. SSincerely, .Scott Bell,P E.,CCS,Chief Mechanical Engineerattachment ce *Steve Stassel AE&E.'USKH Work Order #473 ODN,I:\4730\DOCS\4730ECM2.LTR B7-8 \11-30-1995 @7:1AM FROM USKH ee a OSES ES a ENGINEERING DATA | STANDARD EFFICIENT SINGLE-PHASE ¢PROTECTED «APS On TORQUE FT4B)FULL LOADFRAMEFULLFULLOCKEDFULLLOCKEDBREAKPOWER WEAve6ZELOAOPwTYPE1apROTORLOADROTOROOMNEFFFACTORCODE18|4886 1149 cs 2.20 920 0.74 270 183 48.0 43.014448/58 1730 cs 2.80 71.00 077 $3.28 192 60.0 $7.0 M561140cs290|13.25 112 3.83 358 $7.0 80.9 N184B3450cs3.80 13.4 0.50 1.03 1.61 56.7 08.0 L§4g/5e 1730 cs a2 |16.65 0.99 3.53 S16 6.0 65.0 M81140cs390|16.15 149 5.48 440 56.0 53.0 uMv248/86 3450 cs 3.18.5 arse 148 1.00 08.6 %2.2 K551730csax|NE 1.0 50 391 65.2 62.4 t561140cs470|2250 227 6.00 524 eto 58.0 L3/4 88 3450 cs 470 26.25 1.43 258 254 70.6 73.8 K&17322 cs 5.80 27.25 236 7.43 832 60.4 81 K861140cs6.70 |2B60 3.41 6.66 7.18 08.0 68.0 J166|3450 cs 60a |seco 1.49 264 304 73.0 76.0 Klo)170 cs 750 42.590 3.00 11.60 730 72.4 68.0 K8&6 1149 cH 5.00 |28.20 457 9.20 210 4.9 17,1 J1356|3460 cs 300 |«100 225 a5 425 72.0 850 H861730cs10.00 |4790 40 11.50 10.60 73.0 70.0 Jzsa|3450 6s 11.00 |63.60 301 550 50 |0.0 as 4B61790CH10.00 €1.0 602 16890 .|16.06 80,0 769 J368|3450 CH 15.00 |86.00 457 a7 10.40 735 664 H O SINGLE-PHASE e TOTALLY ENCLOSED rt APS @250Y TORQUE FT LB)FULL LOADFULLFULLLOCKEDFULLLOCKED|=SfAFAK REMAwPSELOADRPM]ENCL TYPE Loan ROTOR LOKD ROTOR COWwN err FRETOR CODE16|406 tyan_|TENV cs 70 |om O74 270)183 |480 a0 Nan1730|TENV cs 220 |14.295 0.70 275 124 |630 61.0 K5G1140|TENV |cs 200 |ts25 1.12 ges |asa |670 5.0 N1848/86 S450 TENYV cs 2.30 44.10 oso t49 1.68 87.0 70.9 t43761730TENVcs29015.25 1.01 3.68 S16 6.0 50.6 uu51140|TENV cs 350 |90.40 1.63 60s |ana |]ego 50.0 M561160__|TEFC cs g90 |1815 1.48 s4s_|440 |560 63.0 vifr49/56 3450 TENY cs 3.00 22.8 0.78 1.84 23%740 FO NM5B3450TEFCcs34822,10 0.74 1.01 2.24 66.1 72.3 K861790TENYcs32018.50 1a $25 348 730 88.0 t561730TEFCcs45024.50 1.65 6.18 449 63.0 33.0 4661140_|TEFG cs 470 |2259 227 sou |626 |510 58.0 La56uso6}TEFC |cS 470 |2090 1.12 aos |256 |726 769 K56$730 |TEFC cs 650 |20.00 225 700 |8st 704 605 K561140YEFScs60024.50 142 19.20 780 68.7 a5 d1*3450 |TEFG cs 560 |86.20 145 2%|353 |0 789 J56173|TEFC cs 620 |34.00 3.00 aso |706 |710 71.0 kK5a1140(YEFC |cH 590 |28,20 4.57 aso |oas0 |70 771 4155B50TEFCcs$00 56.40 216 45)6.16 739 784 K561730|TEFc |]cH aco |69.00 42 |1420 |1160 |770 70 K263650|TEFC cs |100 |7700 2.00 708 |oes |mmo B10 K6@1790|TEFC |cH 900 |60.50 so |16880 |1420 |m9 649 H NOTES: (1)IAP ato avatiable ita 140T frame,E SNCS I=This performance data is for standard designe ond should be used for extimating purposes only.LECTRI am Actual ratings may vary slighty trom this data, -veer 11-38-1995 87:11AM FROM USKH TO 19972694585 P.O4 aa:wye te sy Jevt IW -VULA F Le |ENGINEERING DATA TYPICAL PERFORMANCE DATA SXE e PREMIUM ENERGY EFFICIENT SINGLE-PHASE e TYPE CH PROTECTED e TOTALLY ENCLOSED Pa AMPS @ 2387 PORQUE (FTLB)FULL LOADFRAMEFULLFULLisexeo|AL |Locxen |BREAK won Po power |wenauPSZE{LOADRPN |LOAD ROTOR LOAD ROTOR DOWN err err FACTOR COLE1/4 56 1940 2.70 12:90 1.13 433 9.67 64.0 64.0 67.8 N13dese17301.85 17.95 1.00 8.81 9.58 72.0 68.9 0.0 N5a114022514.85 1.50 17 4.38 RO 86.0 3 MV248/56 M450 2.89 3.8 0.76 333 3.00 T22 seg a2.3 |86 1790 215 25.00 1.50 617 417 778 749 88.4 N5611403.30 21.20 2.25 9.89 ace 72.0 680 68.1 L a6 58 3450 9.40 29.90 1.41 a7zt 3.00 735 72.0 92.8 t56173025020.50 2.25 650 5.92 710 749 90.3 K6S14404.45 26.00 3.38 10.00 33 74.0 70.9 73.4 J 1 66 9460 460 61.00 1.50 40 45 75.8 72.0 O42 L58173804.60 42.50 2.00 9.19 8.69 779 74.0 90.0 tL'56 4440 5.90 28.20 as7 9.90 9.10 749 70.0 74 J1S58:3450 6.70 PY Y=*)2.26 625 609 78S 720 94.7 J5817307.00 $4.00 450 15.00 12.90 90.0 77.0 86.3 K2§8 3450 ee 6400 2.00 8 7.70 778 T4840 G.I d rYPICAL PERFORMANCE DATA STANDARD EFFICIENT THREE-PHASE PROTECTED im ANPS @ 480¥.TORQUE FTLB)FULL LoanFRANEFULLFULLLOCKEDFULLLOCKED[|BREAK POWER NEMAHP6v-|LOADRPM!LOAD ROTOR LOAD ROTOR DOWN BF FICTOR COpEFe4845634500.868 40 O47 1.25 351 620 ess L48/56 1790 0.89 290 0.76 212 287 €2.0 678 «45/56 1140 084 2.90 1.14 3.72 43 0.6 86.0 Kv334500.25 405 O47 1.28 151 62.0 ee)t485581730ags3.70 1.02 3.098 3.68 71.0 623 L5811400.95 400 50 299 3.99 0.3 68.2 J47218634501,00 &.0S 0.78 2.31 26 72.0 73.0 K5617301.18 5.50 151 433 558 744 666 L611404.30 4.90 2.25 3.79 7.44 70.9 So hdEr)56 3450 1.30 7.23 1.13 2.50 275 7.0 759 J561730140a52268.76 7.88 77.7 732 r)56 1440 1.80 7.15 343 1,3 10.00 74.0 65.0 J15694801.60 10.00 154 00 8.00 78.0 82.0 35681730£79 9.80 208 ast 10.40 00.2 73.0 J5691402.20 995 456 10.80 14.00 740 58.0 31.5 56 3450 220 |.14.90 227 5.63 7.3%79.0 KG K5G37302.80 7.90 a5t__]12.90 16.70 7A 66.7 K2s&3450 2.90 21.00 $15 8.13 10.80 B12 Bs K668173042021.00 8.10 18.60 21.20 B18 746 38$6 3450 4.00 27.10 463 .[11.20 14.43 788 86.8 Jj NOTES: (2)58 fame also avaiiabioina 140T frame, This pera datafsfor starctard designs and for .This portman ce fs for estar dosigns shouldbeused for a kmating purpuses only PEUANCE 7 .11-38-1995 27:11AM FROM USKH TO 19072694685 P.05 aw muy Law vw a nd tte eVWVa teVy *ENGINEERING DATA STANDARD EFFICIENT THREE-PHASE a HIPS 9 4807 TOROUE (PT)PULL LOADFRANEFULFULLLOCKEDRALLACKEDBREAKPOWER WEMAMPSRELOADRPMexc.low ROTOR LOAS ROTOR cow arr FACTOR CODE164858114TENV@.50 1.75 0.77 _2.16 258 86 §8.0 L1%4855 450 TENYV 0.50 328 0.398 44 1.84 CG?749 M463450TEFSC854.05 0.47 1.28 1.51 62.9 6a3 L465584730TENVass345a81.19 368 74.0 61.0sé1730TEFC0.8 3.10 0.78 2B 8.28 61.0 6290 uu40561140TENY6.70 $25 4.16 400 $.08 S70 62.0 Maac48/58 B Ts)TENY 0.86 3.76 Os2 2.00 208 70.6 71.2 L8éMEOTEFC603.76 082 206 2.08 TOE 72 L48461730TENVC+We]455 10 288 439 749 59 L581730TEFC08s9.75 0.97 3.08 244 719 842 M561140TENY0.80 ¥.70 180 4.38 5.38 87.0 61.0 «12 4848 Mx TENV oe 650 6.78 2.38 3.00 738 $0.0 N8653459TEFC1.00 BOS 0.76 231 '346 72.0 73.0 «56 9730 TENV 1.10 6.10 150 3.92 $53 TAS 657 L&1730 TEFC 1.10 6.70 181 4.21 534 8.0 66.9 =&(140 TENY 12 S60 228 686 7.81 74D eao ulsa1149TEFC1.29 6.60 2.26 8%7.81 74.0 8.0 LM4§&4450 TENV 1.20 $40 2.16 S08 6.23 79.9 829 L&3450 TEFC 12 8.28 L.t2 292 asa 740 80.0 t561THTENV12810.00 226 8.06 10.60 782 74.0 uM$6 1730 TEFS 1.20 6.00 152 378 658 89.0 §03 L 4 3sé140TENV188.70 340 10.99 14.20 789 620 L&8 1140 TEFG 1.€745 $43 7.78 10.00 740 660 Fj15834650TENY1810.75 1.50 408 5.49 86.0 87.0 «5 3466 Tero 1.8 10.00 1.80 3.58 4.60 [>Re]84.0 K$6 173 TENV 1.60 12.30 3.04 12.50 19.89 ata 78.0 r61730TEFC17911.90 3,00 225 11.60 727 206 t&440 TEFC 270 9.95 456 10.80 1490 740 68.6 J1868350TEFC204.30 229 4530 6.31 310 e804 #Bs i730 TEFG 2.0 16.20 4.51 12.90 16.70 76.6 7 K2863450TEFS2.00 18.75 ace 6.25 8.33 81.0 92.9 J661796TEFC3.20 21.00 @1D 18.90 41.20 $4.6 746 d3S64mTEFc328628.00 463 12.40 4800 $5.0 g15 K NOTES: (1)S6 kame also avaiablein@ 1407 frame, SESGe y=Tivé performance dais is for standard designs and shauid be ysed for estimating purposesFLECTRICBJActualratingsmayvaryeightytramOvedota" oO sant ee ere tan aue 11-30-1995 87:12AM FROM USKH TO 19072694685 P.a6 uw awry ww iaa heaeSee ee 2 ||"ENGINEERING DATA TYPICAL PERFORMANCE DATA SXE «PREMIUM ENERGY EFFICIENT THREE-PHASE . PROTECTED «TOTALLY ENCLOSED AMPS @ A507 TORQUE (FT4.5)FULL LOAD rose [FULL ruc {weren |mu |tocxen |ene NOU mH POWER |WEMAWPSVEjloanns}LOAD |ROTOR |(oad |goron |Down eF er FcTOR |cOCE10456|1730 0.50 3.60 o78 375 304 758 720 eA ry)56}1140 0.60 290 114 205 425 '78 8a L17386|seta 055 a1 0.40 2.08 202 70 70 750 R66173055$95 aon ass a74 ms 788 747 4s¢|tteo 070 3.46 147 3.69 458 75.5 720 60.4 K2oe|S450 0.00 610 O78 10.35 292 770 74.0 827 LbéT73900.75 $.05 1.48 asx 488 80.0 770 79 3&|We 1.00 4.50 228 483 Ts 90.0 77.9 66.2 Jce|oe Kee)1.10 9.25 Tis 1235 417 2.5 as 88.4 aSs|1730 1.10 768 225 6.08 7.80 825 90D 08 r)55 1940 130 690 345 9.39 10.90 785 78.8 68.0 H136|3450 135 10.85 1.50 439 5.92 ror 815 $31 Kse|1730 1.50 10.80 200 792 |1000 ais 785 77.0 K86441401.70 8.60 480 }1090 13.10 815 735 720 858].ss 3450 2.08 13.4 228 €06 @sB1 ais 785 03.0 J5a|1730 210 16.70 452 11.70 12.80 815 785 178 J256ws2.70 58.40 306 620 10.40 a5 eS $2.0 a5s|1790 270 19.00 600 «6|«16390 «|ano 840 815 83.8 H NOTES:'(1)56 frame aise evetablein2 1407 rama. This porformance cata is for standard desi and should be used for pupocess ,Actual ratige ney wey ne need fo estknaing purpores eniy PELIANGE 7@ TOTAL P.G6 on --_i?ir -LAG 1 '7 -iWARISGeAAShyHH|fn ener Pye Fah N\A igh /TONY KNOWLES,GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND /333 WEST FOURTH AVE.,SUITE 220 REGIONAL AFFAIRS /ANCHORAGE,ALASKA 99501-2941 /PHONE:(907)269-4500 DIRECTOR'S FAX:(907)269-4645DIVISIONOFENERGYENGINEERINGFAX:(907)269-4685 December 4,1995 Mr.Scott Bell USKH,Inc. 1830 Second Avenue Fairbanks,AK 99701 re:Draft Wood Fuel Report comments Dear Scott: We have reviewed the draft wood fuel report delivered by Steve Stassel;this letter gives our comments.Generally the report is useful and well prepared.We appreciate the clear way in which the assumptions are described and tied together in the analysis.Specific comments are as follows: Equivalent Annual Wood Requirement.Birch is readily available in all the villages you include except for Elim,is better fuelwood (around 24 mmBtu/cord), and can be grown on a relatively short rotation.For this analysis assume 2/3rd birch use by volume.I had difficulty reproducing your spruce energy contents. Please call to clear this up. Wood Cost per Cord.We understand that wood costs are difficult to estimate at present in some cases,especially since there may not be a significant market in the studied villages now.The need to handle (buck and split)the wood will be less compared to a woodstove because of the long log lengths and diameters of input fuel;this may bring the cost down somewhat. Dm painted onrecyted caer UDa In appendix B-6 Tanana Chiefs gives felling,yarding,loading,hauling,and overhead costs in per mbf (thousand board feet)basis,a measure not usually used for fuelwood or related to the rest of the analysis.Please give figures in per ccf or cord basis (.85 ccf =1 cord)assuming average 8 inch diameter logs.This is important since these costs are a major portion of the wood system costs,and will give an indication to village corporations or other wood suppliers of their potential production expenses. Labor Cost for Wood System.The Garn boiler manufacturer assumes 0.18 hours either per firing or per hour of operation (I'm not sure which).Please determine which is correct and include this in the analysis. Wood availability.Our copy is missing pages of the Elim timber inventory. Installed Costs.Clearly there will be considerable variability in installed costs. Please make your best estimate of the approximate range in installed cost for each of the installations focusing on the major unknowns. We look forward to receiving the draft report on December 8.With it please provide an electronic copy of spreadsheets,so that we might better understand your analysis methods. Peter Crimp Development Specialist cc:Steve Stassel,Alaska Energy and Engineering TONY KNOWLES,GOVERNOR .ml C re -1 oo a =o>;I iA\mt (AC ja ai (7 i DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ji 333 WEST FOURTHAVE.,SUITE 220 REGIONAL AFFAIRS /ANCHORAGE,ALASKA 99501-2341 PHONE:(907)269-4500 DIRECTOR'S FAX:(907)269-4645DIVISIONOFENERGY!ENGINEERING FAX:(907)269-4685 November 22,1995 Mr.Scott Bell USKH,Inc. 1830 Second Avenue Fairbanks,AK 99701 Dear Scott: Our brief review of the calculations for the potential Energy Conservation Measures that you sent on November 16 has identified significant errors (see the accompanying letter's discussion of wood boiler and insulated panel ECMs).I am disappointed to find errors in the work and concerned that there are other mistakes . which we have not noticed.on Please correct these errors,check the other work,and ensure that the state is not billed for the time USKH spends making the corrections.Also please call me at your edrliest convenience to discuss this situation. Peter Crimp Development Specialist Sinceyely, &painted on recycled paper by ©.0. TONY KNOWLES,GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND /333 WEST FOURTHAVE.,SUITE 220REGIONALAFFAIRS/ANCHORAGE,ALASKA 99501-2341 'i PHONE:(907)269-4500 ;DIRECTOR'S FAX:(907)269-4645DIVISIONOFENERGYENGINEERINGFAX:(907)269-4685 November 22,1995 . Scott Bell USKH Architects,Engineers,Surveyors and Planners 2515 A Street Anchorage AK 99503 RE:FEEDBACK ON ECM CALCULATIONS AND WOOD BOILER INFO Dear Scott: I have a few suggestions for additions to the "standard ECM calculations”list you have developed: e Eliminate unoccupied ventilation e Night setback thermostats-Some of the buildings do not setback their thermostats at all.It may be worthwhile to combine this measure with elimination of unoccupied ventilation.Some form of override would have to be provided. e Low-flow showerheads and faucets e Occupancy sensors to control lighting e Wood Boilers There is an error in the spreadsheet.Total savings does not reflect the difference between oil and wood cost--only the cost of oil.It is not clear how and if this analysis relates to the work being done by Steve Stassel.Estimated cost should vary geographically as other ECMs.The unit "mbh”is used incorrectly in the concept description.Energy content of wood is attached for your reference--we have provided the same to Steve Stassel. e Conversion to waste heat In reviewing your 11/17 letter and enclosures,I noticed that the boiler tune-up example calculation includes costs that are lower than in the original calculation.Steve Stassel and I both thought the original estimates were low. Does this work include measuring the stack temperature and O2/COz2 levels and calculating the combustion efficiency and excess air before and after the tune-up,adjusting the burner for optimum efficiency,cleaning the combustion chamber and heat exchanger,verifying that the controls are set and operating properly,and travel for the technician?(Note:I talked to the facilities consultant for the Southeast Regional Resource Center,who consults to the pie printed on recycied caner 7 y Q)i] school districts.He says most rural boilers do not receive scheduled maintenance or tune-ups.) The high efficiency motor calculation assumes a single-phase motor.According to the gen-set mechanics in our office,almost all the villages they serve have three-phase power and the schools are connected to three-phase.My motors database lists standard 1 hp three-phase motor efficiency as 67 -72%and high efficiency motors as 82 -86%efficient at 3/4 load.These numbers would yield approximately three times the savings shown in the sample calculation.Please let me know if you think these data are incorrect. The electronic ballast lighting retrofit (BALLASTS.XLS)would be more attractive if it assumed existing 4-lamp fixtures that would be retrofitted with T-8's and a single electronic ballast (these 4-lamp electronic ballasts are currently available).My experience with magnetic ballast fluorescent fixtures is that they tend to be 4-tube and the lamps are not individually-switched.Are the 3-lamp fixtures with individually-switched lamps in the sample calculation typical for rural Alaska?The cost estimate on p.2 appears to account for two ballasts but only one T-8 lamp.Shouldn't there be three lamps?What about the number of T-8 sockets? I reviewed the calculations for the first ECM-insulated panels over single-pane glass.I believe there are errors in the savings calculation:the 24 hr/day conversion factor and the estimated heating system efficiency were left out. The cost of installation of $18 per sheet seems low-is this the cost of installing whole panels on exterior walls?A 4'x8'sheet might be cut into three or four pieces.The cost to cut and install a 2'x4'panel would be more than $4.50.In addition,this type of retrofit typically involves removing the glass and framing out the opening before installing an exterior skin.Leaving the glass as the interior surface could cause problems-imagine a janitor leaning a ladder against the exterior surface,thinking it was a solid wall. Sincerely,E>.)Zh) David Lockard,Program Manager Institutional Conservation Program 907 /269-4541 Moisture Content (Wet Basis) 0% 15% 45% 0% All All in Al Spruce Birch Cottonwood Higher Heating Value (Btu/b) 8,100 8,300 8,800 6,885 7,055 7,480 4,455 4,565 4,840 Density (Ib/cf solid wood) 23.09 34.26 21.18 mBtu/cf solid wood 187 284 186 mBtu/cord 15,897 24,170 15,843 WOODBTU.XLS,11/22/95 11:13 AM,Page 1 of 1 "™ SCHEBEN KCRYNTA HUETTL.INC.ARCHITECTURE +ENGINEERING «LAND SURVEYING »«PLANNING PRINCIPALS Leo von Scheben,P.E.,L.S. Earl D.Korynta,P.E. James A.Huett,AIA November 16,1995 Gary H.Pohi,AIA Edwin H.Riggs.P.E. Theodore R.Kruth,P.E.. Monte R.Gonitzke,LS. ASSOCIATES Peter CrimpDonnaL.Marks se Timothy J.Vig.P-E.State of Alaska Division of Energy Daryl D.Sorenson,AIA 333 West Fourth Avenue,Suite 220 Steven M.Tjaden James R.Kinney.P.E.Anchorage,Alaska 99501-2341 Gregory A.Ingham.CPA Scott V.Bell,P.E. Bruce E.Hopper,P.E. Gary R.Kuhn,P.E. John M.Stadum,RIEI Subject:_DCRA/DOE Rural Heat Substitution Assessment Project Energy Conservation Measure (ECM)Ranking Methodology Dear Peter: As part of this project,USKH has identified and evaluated energy conservation measures (ECMs)which look promising for use in rural Alaska.USKH has also developed a methodology for ranking the ECMs for their applicability to each facility.The ranking methodology is as follows: 1. OFFICES 2515 A Street Anchorage,Alaska 99503 Phone (907)276-4245 FAX (907)258-4653 1830 Second Avenue Fairbanks,Alaska 99701 Phone (907)452-2128 FAX (907)452-4225 9097 Glacier Hwy.,Ste.201 Juneau,Alaska 99801 Phone (907)790-2901 FAX (907)790-3901 800 W.Evergreen St.,Ste.218 Palmer,Alaska 99645 4, Phone (907)746-7815 FAX (907)746-7819 Identify potential Energy Conservation Measures (ECMs)applicable to rural Alaska. Rank the ECMs as to high,medium or low feasibility. Calculate the simple payback time for each ECM based on the evaluation of a typical condition.The following assumptions are made in the payback calculation: A.Fuel costs are based on delivered bulk fuel costs to typical villages in each region. B.Electrical costs are based on average non-Power Cost Equalization (PCE) rates for each region. C.Construction costs are based on an April 1995 Alaska Department of Labor report of construction costs in rural hub towns plus an "outlying factor”to account for increased construction costs in outlying villages.For Region 1 (southeast Alaska and Kodiak Island)an outlying factor of 30%is used.For Regions 2 and 3 (southwest Alaska and interior Alaska)the outlying factor is 50%. Enter questionnaire data into the database. ry UNWIN SCHEBEN KORYNTA HUETTL,INC.ARCHITECTURE »«ENGINEERING +»LAND SURVEYING «©PLANNING Mr.Crimp November 16,1995 Page 2 5.Database information will be used to calculate the following for each facility: a.Total annual energy costs per square foot of floor area ($/sf). b.Total annual energy consumed per square foot of floor area (Btw/sf). c.Annual thermal energy costs per square foot of floor area (Oil $/sf). d.Annual electrical energy costs per square foot of floor area (Electrical $/sf). e.Annual thermal energy consumed per square foot of floor area (Oil Btw/sf). f.Annual electrical energy consumed per square foot of floor area (Electrical Btu/sf). 6.As a Starting point,graph the above calculated information with the consumption data in the y- axis and the villages in the x-axis. 7.To relate the ECMs to the facilities develop a chart with the ECMs listed in the left-hand column in order of increasing payback time and facilities listed across the top of the chart from left to right with decreasing consumption per square foot values.If an ECM is applicable to the facility a mark will be placed in the facility column.This chart will be repeated for the six types of consumption values listed in 5.,above.This will help determine the facilities with the best potential for savings from ECMs.These facilities can then be researched in more detail. This methodology is dependent upon the receipt of good data from the questionnaires.As we discussed today,typically the questionnaire data we have received for each facility is not complete.-Additional contact may need to be made with the questionnaire respondents or assumptions made from review of the questionnaire data. I look forward to your comments and suggestions regarding this methodology. Sincerely , lac Scott Bell,P.E.,CCS Chief Mechanical Engineer cc:Steve Stassel,P.E.-Alaska Energy and Engineering USKH Work Order #4730DN 1:\4730\DOCS\4730METH.LTR UNWIN SCHEBEN KORYNTA HUETTL,INC.ARCHITECTURE +ENGINEERING +LAND SURVEYING PLANNING !dJPRINCIPALS Leo von Scheben,P.E.,LS.December 5 1995EarlD.Korynta,PE.> James A.Hueftl,AIA Gary H.Pohl,AIA Peter CrimpEdwinH.Riggs,P.E.see Theodore R.Kruth,PE.State of Alaska Division of Energy Monte R.Gonitzke.LS.333 West Fourth Avenue,Suite 220 ASSOCIATES Anchorage,Alaska 99501-2341DonnaL.Marks Timothy J.Vig.P.E. ae Oren AIA Subject:_DCRA/DOE Rural Heat Substitution Assessment projectevenM.Tj :. James R.Kinney,P.E.Energy Conservation Measure Resubmittal Gregory A.Ingham,CPA Scott V.Bell,P.E. Bruce £.Hopper,P.E.Dear Peter: Gary R.Kuhn,P.E. Yohn M.Stacum,RIE Attached are Energy Conservation Measures (ECMs)for your review.This batch contains corrected ECMs previously submitted on November 17,1995 and additional ECMs requested by you on November 27,1995.The revised ECMs are listed in bold.The new ECMs in normal print. ECM Description )File Name Reduce single-pane window area using insul.panels (HDD=8,000)1pan-se.xls Reduce single-pane window area using insul.panels (HDD=14,000)=1pan-int.xls Replace single-pane window with triple-pane window (HDD=8,000)1pan-re2.xIs Replace single-pane window with triple-pane window (HDD=14,000)1pan-rep.xls Boiler and furnace tune-ups b-tunup.xls Replace standard efficiency pump motor with high efficiency motor pump-eff.xls Reset boiler firing rate based on outside air temperature fir-rate.xls Remove lamps and ballasts in overlit areas over-lit.xls Retrofit exit lights with LEDs exit-led.xls Retrofit high pressure sodium lights with low pressure sodium lights ex-light.xls Retrofit fluorescent lights with electronic ballasts ballasts.xls "Heat-Timer”to boiler reset,boiler and pump shutoff on outside temp._heattime.xls OFFICES Low-flow shower head lowflowsh.xls 2515 A Sheet Low-flow lavatory faucet lowfauce.xls nlpaerayal Shut-off ventilation when building is not occupied (HDD=14,000)ventoffl.xls _ FAX (907)258-4653 Shut-off ventilation when building is not occupied (HDD=8,000)ventoff2.xls 1830 Second Avenue Install temperature setback controls (HDD=14,000)setback.xls dienearis Install temperature setback controls (HDD=8,000)setback2.xls FAX (907)452-4225 Shut-off ventilation and setback temperature (HDD =14,000)ventset1.xls 9097 Glacier Hwy.,Ste.201 Shut-off ventilation and setback temperature (HDD=8,000)ventset2.xls suneau,Alaska 9980)Add motion sensors to control lighting motion.xls FAX (907)790-3901 Replace old inefficient lighting fixtures with new replace.xls 800 W.Evergreen St.,Ste.218 Palmer,Alaska 99645 Phone (907)746-7815 FAX (907)746-7819 UNWIN SCHEBEN KORYNTA HUETTL,INC.ARCHITECTURE +«ENGINEERING +LAND SURVEYING «PLANNING Mr.Crimp December 5,1995 Page 2 I look forward to your review of the ECMs.All will be included in the Draft Report to be submitted December 8,1995. 'Sincerely, Scott Bell,P.E.,CCS Chief Mechanical Engineer attachments ce:Steve Stassel,P.E.-Alaska Energy and Engineering USKH Work Order #4730DN 1:\4730\D0CS\4730ECM3.LTR RA/DOE Rural Heat Study ECN: ECM Description: Energy Conservation Measure Payback Analysis Reducing single-pane window area using insulated panels Heating Degree Days =8,000 12/5/95 Heat loss through a surface is inversely proportional to the R-value of that surface.By covering the window surface with an insulating panel,this R-value can be greatly increased.The payback of this ECM is very dependent upon the heating degree days value at the building site. Summary of Costs Anchorage Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 and Savings:Cost or |Cost or Cost or |Cost or Costor |Costor Costor |Cost or Savings|Savings |Savings|/Savings Savings |Savings Savings |Savings Factor Factor Factor Factor Units Estimated Cost Material $/unit Installation $/unit Shipping S/unit Total Cost $/unit 1.00 $9.75 1.23 311.99 1.99 $19.40 2.25 $21.94 Estimated Savings Rate Rate Rate Rate Fuel Gallon 0.44 1.939 0.93 0.92 1.50 Electricity KwH 0.10 0.24 0.33 0.44 Maintenance Hours 35.00 35.00 35.00 35.00 Total Savings $0.853 $1.803 $1.784 $2.909 Payback Time Years 11.4 6.6 10.9 7.6 Regional Cost Data:|Description Construction |Fuel Cost |/Electric Cost |Wages Cost Factor |($/Gal)($/KWH)($/HR) Region Anchorage Anchorage Metropolitan Area 1.00 $0.44 $0.10 |$35.00 Region 1:Southeast Alaska and Kodiak Island 1.23 $0.93 $0.24 |$35.00 Region 2:Southcentral and Southwest Alaska 1.99 $0.92 $0.33 |$35.00 Region 3:Interior Alaska 2.25 $1.50 $0.44 |$35.00 Calculations: 1PAN-SE.XLS See attached concept and example Page 1 OCRA/DOE Rural Heat Study 12/5/95 Concept: Example: 1PAN-SE.XLS Typically,single-pane window units have an R-value of approximately 1.The window can be replaced with framed construction consisting of siding,wood or metal framing,insulation,sheetrock and paint Assumptions:-§The windows are easily accessible.Emergency egress windows are not covered. 'Any increase in lighting due to covered windows is not included. Cost: material thickness specific Savings: material thickness specific 'An existing window has an R-value of 1 and is located in an area subject to 8,000 heating degree days per year (i.e.Southeast Alaska).The framed wail will consist of r-19 insulation and will completely replace the window.What will the costs and savings be per square foot of window area? Cost: $9.75 per square foot of wall Source of Estimate:USKH architectural department Savings: 10105 Btu/yr =1 ft*2*Btu/(19 hr*ft*2*F)*(8000 F*day/yr)*(24hr/day)=loss through wall 192000 Btu/yr =1 ft*2*Btu/(1 hr*ft*2*F)*(8000 F*day/yr)*(24hr/day)=loss through window 181895 Btu/yr saved 1.939 gallons of no.1 fuel oil saved per year Page 2 DCRA/DOE Rural Heat Study ECM: ECM Description: Energy Conservation Measure Payback Analysis Reducing single-pane window area using insulated panels Heating Degree Days=14,000 12/5/95 Heat loss through a surfaceis inversely proportionai to the R-value of that surface.By covering the window surface with an insulating panel,this R-value can be greatly increased.The payback of this ECM is very dependent upon the heating degree days value at the building site. Summary of Costs Anchorage Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 and Savings:Cost or |Cost or Cost or |Cost or Costor {|Costor Cost or |Cost or Savings|Savings |Savings|Savings Savings |Savings Savings |Savings Factor Factor Factor Factor Units Estimated Cost Material $/unit Installation $/unit Shipping $/unit Total Cost $/unit 1.00 $9.75 1.23 $11.99 1.99 $19.40 2.25 $21.94 Estimated Savings Rate Rate Rate Rate Fuel Gallon 0.44 3.394 0.93 0.92 1.50 Electricity KwH 0.10 0.24 0.33 0.44 Maintenance Hours 35.00 35.00 35.00 35.00 Total Savings $1.493 $3.156 $3.122 $5.090 Payback Time Years 6.5 3.8 6.2 43 Regional Cost Data:|Description Construction |Fuel Cost |Electric Cost |Wages Cost Factor |($/Gal)($/KWH)($/HR) Region Anchorage Anchorage Metropolitan Area 1.00 $0.44 $0.10 |$35.00 Region 1:Southeast Alaska and Kodiak Island 1.23 $0.93 $0.24 1$35.00 Region 2:Southcentral and Southwest Alaska 1.99 $0.92 $0.33 |$35.00 Region 3:Interior Alaska 2.25 $1.50 $0.44 |$35.00 Calculations:See attached concept and example 1PAN-INT.XLS Page 1 DCRA/DOE Rurat Heat Study 12/5/95 Concept:Typically,single-pane window units have an R-value of approximately 1.The window can be replaced with framed construction consisting of siding,wood or metal framing,insulation,sheetrock and paint Assumptions:The windows are easily accessible.Emergency egress windows are not covered. Any increase in lighting due to covered windows is not included. Cost: material thickness specific Savings: material thickness specific Example:An existing window has an R-value of 1 and is located in an area subject to 14,000 heating degree days per year (i.e.Interior Alaska).The framed wall will consist of R-19 insulation and will completely replace the window.What will the costs and savings be per square foot of window area? Cost: $9.75 per square foot of wall Source of Estimate:USKH architectural department Savings: 17684 Btu/yr =1 ft*2*Btu/(19 hr*ft*2*F)*(14,000 F*day/yr)*(24hr/day)=loss through wall 336000 Btu/yr =1 ft*2*Btu/(1 hr*ft*2*F)*(14,000 F*day/yr)*(24hr/day)=loss through window 318316 Btu/yr saved 3.394 gallons of no.1 fuel oil saved per year 1PAN-INT.XLS Page 2 DCRA/DOE Rural Heat Study ECM: ECM Description: Replacing single-pane windows with triple-pane windows Heating Degree Days =8,000 Energy Conservation Measure Payback Analysis 12/5/95 Heat loss through a surface is inversely proportional to the R-value of that surface.By replacing single pane windows with tripie-pane windows,this R-value can be greatly increased.The payback of this ECM is very dependent upon the heating degree days value at the building site. Summary of Costs Anchorage Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 and Savings:Cost or |Cost or Cost or |Cost or Costor |Cost or Cost or |Cost or Savings|Savings |Savings|Savings Savings [Savings Savings |Savings Factor Factor Factor Factor Units Estimated Cost Material $/unit $19.00 Installation $/unit $16.00 Shipping $/unit Total Cost $/unit 1.00]$35.00 1.23 $43.05 1.99 $69.65 2.25 $78.75 Estimated Savings Rate Rate Rate Rate Fuel Gallon 0.44 1.365 0.93 0.92 1.50 Electricity KwH 0.10 0.24 0.33 0.44 Maintenance Hours 35.00 35.00 35.00 35.00 Total Savings $0.600 $1.269 $1.255 $2.047 Payback Time Years 58.3 33.9 55.5 38.5 Regional Cost Data:|Description Construction |Fuel Cost |Electric Cost |Wages Cost Factor |($/Gal)($/KWH)($/HR) Region Anchorage Anchorage Metropolitan Area 1.00 $0.44 $0.10 |$35.00 Region 1:Southeast Alaska and Kodiak Island 1.23 $0.93 $0.24 |$35.00 Region 2:Southcentral and Southwest Alaska 1.99 $0.92 $0.33 |$35.00 Region 3:Interior Alaska 2.25 $1.50 $0.44 |$35.00 Calculations:See attached concept and example 1PAN-RE2.XLS Page 1 DCRA/DOE Rural Heat Study 12/5/95 Concept:Single pane windows have R-values close to 1.Replacing single pane window units with triple-pane glass would increase the window R-value to approximately 3. Assumptions:The windows are easily accessible. Cost: material thickness specific Savings: material thickness specific Example:An existing window has an R-value of 1 and is located in an area subject to 8,000 heating degree days per year (i.e.Southeast Alaska).It is replaced with a triple-pane window with a wood or vinyl frame.What will the costs and savings be per square foot of window area? Cost: $19 per square foot of window area Source of Estimate:Spenard Builders Supply Co.,Fairbanks $16 installation per square foot of window area $35.00 per square foot +shipping Savings: 64000 Btu/yr =1 ft*2*Btu/(3 hr*ft*2*F)*(8000 F*day/yr)*(24hr/day)=loss from triple-pane window 192000 Btu/yr =1 ft*2*Btu/(1 hr*ft*2*F)*(8000 F*day/yr)*(24hr/day)=loss from single pane window 128000 Btu/yr =energy saved per year 1.365 gallons of no.1 fuel oil saved per year 41PAN-RE2.XLS Page 2 DCRA/DOE Rural Heat Study ECM: ECM Description: Energy Conservation Measure Payback Analysis Replacing single-pane windows with triple-pane windows Heating Degree Days =14,000 12/5/95 Heat loss through a surface is inversely proportional to the R-value of that surface.By replacing single pane windows with triple-pane windows,this R-value can be greatly increased.The payback of this ECM is very dependent upon the heating degree days value at the building site. Summary of Costs Anchorage Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 and Savings:Cost or |Cost or Cost or ;Cost or Cost or Cost or Costor |Cost or Savings|Savings |Savings|Savings Savings |Savings Savings |Savings Factor Factor Factor Factor Units Estimated Cost Material $/unit $19.00 Installation S/unit $16.00 Shipping $/unit Total Cost S/unit 1.00]$35.00 1.23 $43.05 1.99 $69.65 2.25 $78.75 Estimated Savings Rate Rate Rate Rate Fuel Gallon 0.44 2.388 0.93 -0.92 1.50 Electricity KwH 0.10 0.24 0.33 0.44 Maintenance =Hours 35.00 35.00 35.00 35.00 Total Savings $1.051 $2.221 $2.197 $3.582 Payback Time Years 33.3 19.4 31.7 22.0 Regional Cost Data:|Description Construction |Fuel Cost jElectric Cost |Wages Cost Factor |($/Gal)($/KWH)($/HR) Region Anchorage Anchorage Metropolitan Area 1.00 $0.44 $0.10 |$35.00 Region 1:Southeast Alaska and Kodiak Island 1.23 $0.93 $0.24 |$35.00 Region 2:Southcentral and Southwest Alaska 1.99 $0.92 $0.33 |$35.00 Region 3:Interior Alaska 2.25 $1.50 $0.44 |$35.00 Calculations:See attached concept and example 1PAN-REP.XLS Page 1 DCRA/DOE Rural Heat Study 12/5/95 Concept: Example: 1PAN-REP.XLS ° Single pane windows have R-values close to 1.Replacing single pane window units with triple-pane glass would increase the window R-value to approximately 3. Assumptions:The windows are easily accessible. | Cost: material thickness specific Savings: material thickness specific An existing window has an R-value of 1 and is located in an area subject to 14,000 heating degree days per year (i.e.Interior Alaska).It is replaced with a triple-pane window with a wood or vinyl frame.What will the costs and savings be per square foot of window area? Cost: $19 per square foot of window area Source of Estimate:Spenard Builders Supply Co.,Fairbanks $16 installation per square foot of window area $35.00 per square foot +shipping Savings: 112000 Btu/yr =1 ft*2*Btu/(3 hr*ft*2°F)*(14000 F*day/yr)*(24hr/day)=loss from triple-pane window 336000 Btu/yr =1 ft*2*Btu/(1 hr*ft*2*F)*(14000 F*day/yr)*(24hr/day)=loss from single pane window 224000 Btu/yr =energy saved per year 2.388 gallons of no.1 fuel oil saved per year Page 2 DCRA/DOE Rural Heat Study ECM: ECM Description: Boiler and Furnace Tune-ups Energy Conservation Measure Payback Analysis 12/5/95 Regular boiler and furnace tune-ups are required in order to maintain high efficiency.Tune-ups should be done at least every two years. Although the payback time on boiler and furnace tune-ups is very long,neglecting boiler maintenance -will lead to the early breakdown of the equipment and require the very costly repair or replacement oftheboiler. 'Tune-ups can range from the simple replacement of the burner nozzie to complete cleaning of the boilers and testing of all relief valves and controls.Cleaning of the chimney system is not included in a jtune-up. Summary of Costs Anchorage Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 and Savings:Cost or {Cost or Cost or |Cost or Cost or Cost or Cost or |Cost or Savings|Savings |Savings|Savings Savings |Savings Savings {Savings Factor Factor Factor Factor Units Estimated Cost $/unit Installation $/unit $640.00 Shipping $/unit Total Cost S/unit 1.00}$640.00 1.23 $787.20 1.99 $1,273.60 2.25!$1,440.00 Estimated Savings Rate Rate Rate Rate Fuel Gallon 0.44 223.88 0.93 223.88 0.92 223.88 1.50 223.88 Electricity KwH 0.10 0.24 0.33 0.44 0 Maintenance Hours 35.00 35.00 35.00 35.00 ot Total Savings $99 $208 $206 $336 Payback Time Years 6.5 3.8 6.2 4.3 Regional Cost Data:|Description Construction |Fuel Cost |Electric Cost |Wages Cost Factor {($/Gal)($/KWH)($/HR) Region Anchorage Anchorage Metropolitan Area 1.00 $0.44 $0.10 [$35.00 Region 1:Southeast Alaska and Kodiak Island 1.23 $0.93 $0.24 |$35.00 Region 2:Southcentral and Southwest Alaska 1.99 $0.92 $0.33 |$35.00 Region 3:Interior Alaska 2.25 $1.50 $0.44 |$35.00 Calculations: B-TUNUP.XLS See attached concept and example PAGE:1 DCRA/DOE Rural Heat Study 12/5/95 Concept:Boiler efficiency is defineds as the net heat produced by the boiler system divided by the energy content of the fuel being burned in the process.An oil-boiler is typically sent from the factory with an operating efficiency of 80%.During usage,a number of factors cause this efficiency to decline with time.An operating efficiency may drop to an average of 60%at the end of a tune-up/cleaning cycle (this may vary greatly). Assumptions:Boiler is tuned up every two years and is otherwise in good repair.t i | i i Costs: 5 hours total including transportation $200.00 travel $75.00 per hour $65.00 parts $640.00 total cost Savings: 10%efficiency gain after tune-up/cleaning (80%-70%) Example:'A500 MBH boiler is used to heat a building.The AFUE (Annual Fuel Utilization Efficiency)waterratingis80whennew.The boiler is subjected to normal usage and is adjusted properly at the 'beginning of the year.What will be the costs and savings involved in tuning-up and cleaning this 'boiler at the end of 2 years? Costs: $640 =boiler tune-up Source of Estimate:Altrol Inc.,Fairbanks Savings: 70%=average efficiency between tune-up/cleaning (80%+60%)/2 80%=optimal efficiency 10%=efficiency upgrade from tune-up/cleaning 500,000 BtuH design firing rate 0.37 gal/hr fuel savings 250 days per year operation 24 hours per day 5 %operating time 112 gallons of savings per year 224 gallons of savings per two years B-TUNUP.XLS PAGE:2 DCRA/DOE Rural Heat Study ECM: ECM Description: Energy Conservation Measure Payback Analysis Replacing standard-efficiency pump motor with high-efficiency pump motor. 12/3/95 'Typically,pumps are supplied with standard-efficiency motors.Energy savings can be realized byreplacingstandard-efficiency motors with high-efficiency motors.This is usually done for motors 1/4 'horsepower and greater in size. This ECM is equally valid for single-phase or three-phase motors. Summary of Costs Anchorage Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 and Savings:Cost or |Cost or Cost or |Cost or Cost or Cost or Cost or |Cost or Savings|Savings |Savings/Savings Savings Savings Savings |Savings Factor Factor Factor Factor Units Estimated Cost _ Material $/unit $330.00 Installation $/unit $160.00 Shipping $/unit $15.00 Total Cost $/unit 1.00}$505.00 1.23 $621.15 1.99]$1,004.95 2.25|$1,136.25 Estimated Savings Rate Rate Rate Rate Fuel Gallon 0.44 0.93 0.92 1.50 Electricity KwH 0.10 628 0.24 628 0.33 628 0.44 628 Maintenance Hours 35.00 35.00 35.00 35.00 Total Savings $61 $151 $207 $276 Payback Time Years 8.3 4.1 4.8 4.1 Regional Cost Data:|Description Construction |Fuel Cost jElectric Cost |Wages Cost Factor |($/Gal)($/KWH)($/HR) Region Anchorage Anchorage Metropolitan Area 1.00 $0.44 $0.10 |$35.00 Region 1:Southeast Alaska and Kodiak Island 1.23 $0.93 $0.24 |$35.00 Region 2:Southcentral and Southwest Alaska 1.99 $0.92 $0.33 |$35.00 Region 3:Interior Alaska 2.25 $1.50 $0.44 |$35.00 Calculations:See attached concept and example PUMP-EFF.XLS Page 1 DCRA/DOE Rural Heat Study 12/3/95 Concept:Standard efficiency single-phase electric motors have operating efficiencies ranging from 60%for 1/4 horsepower motors to 80%for 2 horsepower motors.High efficiency single-phase electric motors have operating efficiencies ranging from 68%for 1/4 horsepower motors to 85%for 2 horsepower motors. Standard efficiency three-phase electric motors have operating efficiencies of 62%for 1/4 horsepower ;'and 81.8%for 2 horsepower.High efficiency three-phase electric motors have operating efficiencies of 75.5%for 1/4 horsepower and 86%for 2 horsepower.| Savings are directly linked to motor size and duration of operation. Assumptions:|The motor is accessible and of standard design.1750 rpm motors are evaluated here. Costs: size &material specific Savings: dependent upon motor size and increased efficiency Example:A pump was originally installed in a system which was designed to flow 100 gpm at 20 ft of head.The motor is 1 hp and the pump operates continually during the heating season.Determine the cost and savings associated with the replacement of the standard-efficiency motor (72%efficient)with a high- 'efficiency motor (85%efficient)of the same horsepower. Costs: $330 =cost of new 1 horsepower high-efficiency electric motor diameter Source of Estimate:Hayden Electric ,Anchorage,Alaska $160 =4 hours of contractor labor @ $40 per hour Savings: 1 hp motor 72 %standard-efficiency motor 85 %high-efficiency motor 24 hours per day 270 days per year 628 kwh/year PUMP-EFF.XLS Page 2 DCRA/DOE Rural Heat Study 12/5/95 Energy Conservation Measure Payback Analysis ECM:Reset boiler firing rate to the building demand instead of to a constant hot water supply temperature. ECM Description:'Typically,burners fire according to the temperature required by the boilers fixed temperature range.A more efficient means of operation is to reset this temperature range (vary the boiler water heating temperature)according to the outside air temperature so that longer heating cycle periods are established. Summary of Costs Anchorage Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 and Savings:Cost or |Cost or Cost or (Cost or Cost or Cost or Cost or |Cost or Savings|Savings |Savings|Savings Savings |Savings Savings |Savings Factor Factor Factor Factor Units Estimated Cost Material $/unit $150.00 installation $/unit $420.00 Shipping $/unit $25.00 Total Cost $/unit 1.00]$595.00 1.23 $731.85 1.99 $1,184.05 2.25|$1,338.75 Estimated Savings Rate Rate Rate Rate Fuel Gailon 0.44 200.00 0.93 200.00 0.92 200.00 1.50 200.00 Electricity KwH 0.10 0.24 0.33 0.44 Maintenance Hours 35.00 35.00 35.00 35.00 Total Savings $88 $186 $184 $300 Payback Time Years 6.8 3.9 6.4 4.5 Regional Cost Data:|Description Construction {Fuel Cost {Electric Cost |Wages Cost Factor {|($/Gal)($/KWH)($/HR) Region Anchorage Anchorage Metropolitan Area 1.00 $0.44 $0.10 |$35.00 Region 1:Southeast Alaska and Kodiak Island 1,23 $0.93 $0.24 |$35.00 Region 2:Southcentral and Southwest Alaska 1.99 $0.92 $0.33 |$35.00 Region 3:Interior Alaska 2.25 $1.50 $0.44 |$35.00 Calculations:See attached concept and example FIR-RATE.XLS Page 1 DCRA/DOE Rural Heat Study 12/5/95 Concept:Typical hot water heating system supply temperature setpoints are 180 to 190 degrees F.This is the temperature required to meet the design heating load in the building.Resetting the setpoint to as low as :100 degrees F when the outside air temperature is 40 degrees F results in an average hot water supply temperature of 140 to 145 degrees F. Assumptions:|The simpliest boiler operating temperature reset controllers are available as stock items with fixed reset schedules.Boiler must be near an outside wail so outside air | temperature sensor capillary can be installed. Costs:$150.00 per reset controller.Source:Systech Controls,Fairbanks,Alaska Savings:Savings are difficult to calculate since they are based on the building thermal |performance,heating system equipment performance and the severity of the climate.; Colder climates have a larger difference between the design heating temperatures |and average operating temperatures and generally result in more savings from boiler: temperature reset controls.The industry experience is that an average of 2%to 8%| can be saved from the installation of reset controls. Example:Install a reset controller on an existing 500 MBH boiler.This requires draining of the existing heatingsystemfluidforretrofitoftheHWStemperaturesensorintothepiping.It also requires penetratoin of the:existing exterior wall for installation of the outside air temperature sensor.Assume heating system uses .{5,000 gallons of fuel per year and reset controller will save 4%. || Cost:$150 Controller cost 12 hours of labor for installation Savings:4 %savings 5000 gallons per year current fuel oil consumption 200 gallons of fuel oil saved per year FIR-RATE.XLS Page 2 DCRA/DOE Rural Heat Study ECM: ECM Description: Energy Conservation Measure Payback Analysis Retrofitting to electronic ballasts and T-8 lamps 1 2/5/95 Electronic ballasts and T-8 lamps are more efficient than standard magnetic ballasts and T-12 lamps. Rated life for the different ballasts and lamps is comparable.Savings can be realized by the decreased energy usage. Summary of Costs Anchorage Region 1 Region2 Region 3 and Savings:Cost or |Cost or Cost or |Cost or Cost or Cost or Cost or |Cost or Savings|Savings |Savings|Savings Savings |Savings Savings |Savings Factor Factor Factor Factor Units Estimated Cost Material $/unit $72.50 Installation $/unit $35.00 Shipping $/unit $10.00 Total Cost $/unit 1.00}$117.50 1.23 $144.53 1.99 $233.83 2.25}$264.38 Estimated Savings Rate Rate Rate Rate Fuel Gallon 0.44 0.93 0.92 1.50 Electricity KwH 0.10 138.5 0.24 138.5 0.33 138.5 0.44 138.5 Maintenance Hours 35.00 35.00 35.00 35.00 Total Savings $13 $33 $46 $61 Payback Time Years 8.7 4.3 5.1 4.3 Regional Cost Data:|Description Construction |Fuel Cost |Electric Cost |Wages ,Cost Factor |($/Gal)($/KWH)($/HR) Region Anchorage Anchorage Metropolitan Area 1.00 $0.44 $0.10 [$35.00 Region 1:Southeast Alaska and Kodiak Island 1.23 $0.93 $0.24 |$35.00 Region 2:Southcentral and Southwest Alaska 1.99 $0.92 $0.33 |$35.00 Region 3:Interior Alaska 2.25 $1.50 $0.44 |$35.00 Calculations:See attached concept and example BALLASTS.XLS Page 1 DCRA/DOE Rural Heat Study 12/5/95 Concept:Three lamp recessed fluorescent lighting fixtures with two 2 lamp ballast (tandem wired fixtures)to operate lamps inboard-outboard (ability to have one,lamp,two lamps or three lamps on). Costs: Approximately 50%higher costs for lamps and ballasts. Savings: Energy savings from lower operating costs for electronic ballasts. Example:'Three lamp recessed fluorescent lighting fixtures provide lighting in an office space which will be occupied 12 hrs.per day for 6 days per week and 52 weeks per year.Replace existing magnetic 'ballasts and T-12 lamps with new electronic ballasts and T-8 lamps. Assumptions:__Fixtures are standard type,easily accessible and no higher than 12 feet above the'finished floor. { Cost: $67.50 =price for electronic ballasts $3.00 =price for T-8 lamp $2.00 =price for T-8 sockets $35.00 =1 hr.labor to convert lighting fixtures $107.50 =Total cost Savings: 129 =Average operating watts per lighting fixture for magnetic ballasts and T-12 lamps. 92 =Average operating watts per lighting fixture for electronic ballasts and T-8 lamps. 37 =Average watts saved per lighting fixture. 138.5 =KWH savings per year per lighting fixture. BALLASTS.XLS Page 2 DCRA/DOE Rural!Heat Study ECM: ECM Description: Removing lamps and ballasts in overlit areas and adding reflectors. Energy Conservation Measure Payback Analysis 4 2/5/95 Converting four-lamp recessed fluorescent lighting fixtures to two-lamp lighting fixtures with efficient silver reflectors results in comparable lumen output and reduced energy consumption. Summary of Costs Anchorage Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 and Savings:Cost or |Cost or Cost or |Cost or Cost or Cost or Cost or jCost or SavingsiSavings |Savings|Savings Savings |Savings Savings |Savings Factor Factor Factor Factor Units Estimated Cost Material $/unit $50.00 Installation $/unit $35.00 Shipping $/unit $10.00 Total Cost $/unit 1.00 $95.00 1.23 $116.85 1.99 $189.05 2.25}$213.75 Estimated Savings Rate Rate Rate Rate Fuel Gallon 0.44 0.93 0.92 1.50 Electricity KwH 0.10 395.4 0.24 395.4 0.33 395.4 0.44 395.4 Maintenance Hours 35.00 35.00 35.00 35.00 Total Savings $38 $95 $130 $174 Payback Time Years 2.5 1.2 1.4 1.2 Regional Cost Data:|Description Construction |Fuel Cost |Electric Cost |Wages Cost Factor |($/Gal)($/KWH)($/HR) Region . Anchorage Anchorage Metropolitan Area 1.00 $0.44 $0.10 |$35.00 Region 1:Southeast Alaska and Kodiak Island 1.23 $0.93 $0.24 |$35.00 Region 2:Southcentral and Southwest Alaska 1.99 $0.92 $0.33 |$35.00 Region 3:Interior Alaska 2.25 $1.50 $0.44 |$35.00 Calculations:See attached concept and example OVER-LIT.XLS Page 1 DCRA/DOE Rural Heat Study 12/5/95 Concept: Example: OVER-LIT.XLS Convert existing four-lamp recessed fluorescent lighting fixtures to two-lamp lighting fixtures with silver reflectors.Operating hours provide lighting in a school space will be occupied 12 hrs.per day for 6 days per week and 52 weeks per year. Costs: First costs only for conversion kits.Lamp and ballast repfacement costs cut in half. Savings: Energy savings realized from reduced operating costs of lamps. Convert existing four-lamp recessed fluorescent lighting fixtures to two-lamp lighting fixtures with silver teflectors.Operating hours provide lighting in a school space will be occupied 12 hrs.per day for 6 days per week and 52 weeks per year. Assumptions:'Lamps are standard type,easily accessible and no higher than 12 feet above finished floor. i Cost: $50.00 =price for conversion kit. $35.00 =1 hr.labor to convert lighting fixtures $85.00 =Total cost Savings: 192 =Average operating watts per lighting fixture for four-lamp fixture. 96 =Average operating watts per lighting fixture for two-lamp fixture. 96 =Average watts saved per lighting fixture. 395.42 =KWH savings per year per lighting fixture. Page 2 OCRA/DOE Rural Heat Study ECM: ECM Description: Energy Conservation Measure Payback Analysis 1 2/5/95 Retrofit high-pressure sodium exterior light fixtures to low-pressure sodium exterior light fixtures. Low pressure sodium lighting fixtures are more energy efficient than comparable high pressure sodium lighting fixtures. Summary of Costs Anchorage Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 and Savings:Cost or {Cost or Cost or |Cost or Cost or Cost or Cost or |Cost or Savings|Savings |Savings|Savings Savings |Savings Savings |Savings Factor Factor Factor Factor Units Estimated Cost Material $/unit $520.00 Installation $/unit $70.00 Shipping $/unit $10.00 Total Cost $/unit 1.00]$600.00 1.23 $738.00 1.99 $1,194.00 2.25]$1,350.00 Estimated Savings Rate Rate Rate Rate Fuel Gallon 0.44 0.93 0.92 1.50 Electricity KwH 0.10 280.8 0.24 280.8 0.33 280.8 0.44 280.8 Maintenance Hours 35.00 35.00 35.00 35.00 Total Savings $27 $67 $93 $124 Payback Time Years 22.0 11.0 12.9 10.9 Regional Cost Data:|Description Construction |Fuel Cost |Electric Cost |Wages Cost Factor {($/Gal)($/KWH)($/HR) Region Anchorage Anchorage Metropolitan Area 1.00 $0.44 $0.10 |$35.00 Region 1:Southeast Alaska and Kodiak Island 1.23 $0.93 $0.24 |$35.00 Region 2:Southcentral and Southwest Alaska 1.99 $0.92 $0.33 |$35.00 Region 3:Interior Alaska 2.25 $1.50 $0.44 |$35.00 Calculations:See attached concept and example EX-LIGHT.XLS Page 1 DCRA/DOE Rural Heat Study 12/5/95 Concept: Example: Replace existing pole-mounted250W high pressure sodium site lighting fixtures with new 135W low pressure sodium site lighting fixtures.Mount on same pole.Operating hours average 16 hours per day for 5 months out of the year. Costs: 100%higher costs for lamps. Savings: Energy savings from lower operating costs for low pressure sodium lamps. Replace existing pole-mounted 250W high pressure sodium site lighting fixtures with new 135W low pressure sodium site lighting fixtures.Mount on same pole.Operating hours average 16 hours per day for §months out of the year. Assumptions:Light is easily accessible and operation time is controlled by timer or photoelectric switch. Cost: $520.00 =price for 135W low pressure sodium lighting fixture with lamp $70.00 =2hr.labor to convert lighting fixtures $590.00 =Total cost _Savings: 295 =Average operating watts per lighting fixture for low pressure sodium. 178 =Average operating watts per lighting fixture for high pressure sodium. 117 =Average watts saved per lighting fixture. 280.8 =KWH savings per year per lighting fixture. EX-LIGHT.XLS Page 2 DCRA/DOE Rural Heat Study ECM: ECM Description: Energy Conservation Measure Payback Analysis Retrofitting incandescent exit lighting to LED exit lighting 12/5/95 'LED lighting operates more efficiently than incandescent.LED lamps also have a far longer life than 'incandescent lamps. Summary of Costs Anchorage Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 and Savings:Cost or j|Cost or Cost or |Cost or Cost or Cost or Cost or jCost or Savings|Savings |Savings|Savings Savings {Savings Savings |Savings Factor Factor Factor Factor Units Estimated Cost Material $/unit $30.00 Installation $/unit $17.50 Shipping S/unit $7.00 Total Cost $/unit 1.00 $54.50 1.23 $67.04 1.99 $108.46 2.25|$122.63 Estimated Savings Rate Rate Rate Rate Fuel Gallon 0.44 0.93 0.92 1.50 Electricity KwH 0.10 235.9 0.24 235.9 0.33 235.9 0.44 235.9 Maintenance Hours 35.00 35.00 35.00 35.00 Total Savings $23 $57 $78 $104 Payback Time Years 2.4 1.2 1.4 1.2 Regional Cost Data:|Description Construction |Fuel Cost {Electric Cost |Wages Cost Factor |($/Gal)($/KWH)($/HR) Region Anchorage Anchorage Metropolitan Area 1.00 $0.44 $0.10 |$35.00 Region 1:Southeast Alaska and Kodiak Island 1.23 $0.93 $0.24 }$35.00 [Region 2:Southcentral and Southwest Alaska 1.99 $0.92 $0.33 |$35.00 Region 3:Interior Alaska 2.25 $1.50 $0.44 |$35.00 Calculations:See attached concept and example EXIT-LED.XLS Page 1 DCRA/DOE Rural Heat Study 12/5/95 Concept:Standard exit signs operate continuously and offer a good chance for energy savings. Costs: 200%higher costs for lamps Savings: Energy savings from lower operating costs for LED lamps. Maintenance savings realized due to less frequent lamp replacements. 19,000 hr =average life for incandescent lamps. 25 yrs.=average life for LEDs. Example:Standard two-lamp incandescent exit sign replaced with two-lamp LED. Cost: $30.00 =price for LED conversion kit $17.50 =1/2 hr.labor to convert exit signs. $47.50 =Total cost Savings: 29 =Average operating watts per incandescent exit sign 2 =Average operating watts per LED exit sign. 27 =Average watts saved per exit sign. 235.87 =KWH savings per year per lighting fixture. EXIT-LED.XLS Page 2 DCRA/DOE Rural Heat Study ECM: ECM Description: Energy Conservation Measure Payback Analysis Combine boiler temperature reset,automatic shutoff,circulating pump shutoff Utilize "Heat-Timer"to accomplish this sequence. 1 2/3/95 Typically,burners fire according to the temperature required by the boilers fixed temperature range.A more efficient means of operation is to reset this temperature range (vary the boiler water heating temperature)according to the outside air temperature so that longer heating cycle periods are established.Automatic boiler and heating system circulating pump shut-off at temperatures above 65 F can be accomplished by the same device and will save additional energy.Heat-Timer is a specific brand of controller to accomplish temperature reset,boiler shutoff and pump shutoff. Summary of Costs Anchorage Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 and Savings:Cost or |Cost or Cost or |Cost or Cost or Cost or Cost or |Costor Savings|Savings |Savings|Savings Savings |Savings Savings {Savings Factor Factor Factor Factor Units Estimated Cost Material $/unit $600.00 Installation $/unit $280.00 Shipping $/unit $25.00 Total Cost S/unit 1.00}$905.00 1.23 $1,113.15 1.99 $1,800.95 2.25]$2,036.25 Estimated Savings Rate Rate Rate Rate Fuel Gallon 0.44 250.00 0.93 250.00 0.92 250.00 1.50 250.00 Electricity KwH 0.10 1830 0.24 1830 0.33 1830 0.44 1830 Maintenance --Hours 35.00 35.00 35.00 35.00 Total Savings $288 $672 $834 $1,180 Payback Time Years 3.1 1.7 2.2 1.7 Regional Cost Data:|Description Construction |Fuel Cost [Electric Cost |Wages Cost Factor |($/Gal)($/KWH)($/HR) Region Anchorage Anchorage Metropolitan Area 1.00 $0.44 $0.10 |$35.00 Region 1:Southeast Alaska and Kodiak Island 1.23 $0.93 $0.24 |$35.00 Region 2:Southcentral and Southwest Alaska 1.99 $0.92 $0.33 ]$35.00 Region 3:Interior Alaska 2.25 $1.50 $0.44 }$35.00 Calculations:See attached concept and example HEATTIME.XLS Page 1 DCRA/DOE Rural Heat Study 12/3/95 Concept:Typical hot water heating system supply temperature setpoints are 180 to 190 degrees F.Thisisthe _ temperature required to meet the design heating load in the building.Resetting the setpoint to as low as 100 degrees F when the outside air temperature is 40 degrees F results in an average hot water supply temperature of 140 to 145 degrees F.Additional savings can be obtained by automatically shutting-off the boilers and heating system circulation pumps when the outside air temperatures exceed 65 F. Assumptions:The simptiest boiler operating temperature reset controllers are available as stock items with fixed reset schedules.Boiler must be near an outside wall so outside air temperature sensor capillary can be installed. Costs:$440.00 Heat-Timer $160.00 Timeclock for night setback operation Source:Alaska Pipe and Supply,Fairbanks,Alaska Savings:'Savings are difficult to calculate since they are based on the building thermal performance,heating system equipment performance and the severity of the climate. Colder climates have a larger difference between the design heating temperatures_and average operating temperatures and generally result in more savings from boiler .temperature reset controls.Our experience is that an average of 2%to 8%can be saved from the installation of reset controls. Example:Install a reset controller on an existing 500 MBH boiler.This requires draining of the existing heating 'system fluid for retrofit of the HWS temperature sensor into the piping.It also requires penetratoin of the existing exterior wall for installation of the outside air temperature sensor.Assume heating system 'uses 5,000 gallons of fue!per year and reset controller will save 4%. 'Automatic shut-off of boilers and pumps will save energy by shutting equipment off when not needed. Boiler shut off can save an additional 1%per year.Assume 1 horsepower pump off for 3 months of the year. Cost:$600 Controller and relay costs 8 hours of labor for installation Savings:4 %savings from temperature reset 5000 gallons per year current fuel oil consumption 200 gallons of fuel oil saved per year :1 %savings from boiler shut-off 5000 gallons per year current fuel oil consumption 50 gallons of fuel oil saved per year 1 horsepower pump 88 %efficiency 2160 hours shut-off 1830 KwH Savings HEATTIME.XLS Page 2 DCRA/DOE Rural Heat Study ECM: ECM Description: Install low-flow shower head Energy Conservation Measure Payback Analysis 12/5/95 Standard-flow shower heads deliver5 gallons per minute (gpm)of hot water and low-flow shower heads deliver 2.5 gpm of hot water.Changing to low-flow heads results in lower hot water consumption and lower fuel bills to heat the water. Summary of Costs Anchorage Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 and Savings:Cost or {Cost or Cost or |Cost or Cost or Cost or Costor |Cost or Savings|Savings |Savings|Savings Savings {Savings Savings |Savings Factor Factor Factor Factor Units Estimated Cost Material $/unit $12.98 Installation $/unit $35.00 Shipping $/unit $15.00 Tota!Cost S/unit 1.00 $62.98 1.23 $77.47 1.99 $125.33 2.25|$141.71 Estimated Savings Rate Rate Rate Rate Fuel Gallon 0.44 98.5 0.93 0.92 1.50 Electricity KwH 0.10 0.24 0.33 0.44 Water Gallon 0.06 325 0.10 0.10 0.10 Total Savings $63 $124 $123 $180 Payback Time Years 1.0 0.6 1.0 0.8 Regional Cost Data:|Description Construction |Fuel Cost |Electric Cost |Wages Cost Factor {($/Gal)($/KWH)($/HR) Region Anchorage Anchorage Metropolitan Area 1.00 $0.44 $0.10 |$35.00 Region 1:Southeast Alaska and Kodiak {sland 1.23 $0.93 $0.24 |$35.00 Region 2:Southcentral and Southwest Alaska 1.99 $0.92 $0.33 |$35.00 Region 3:Interior Alaska 2.25 $1.50 $0.44 |$35.00 Calculations:See attached concept and example LOWFLOSH.XLS Page 1 DCRA/DOE Rural Heat Study 12/5/95 Concept: Example: Shower heads can be easily changed and can reduce the consumption of domestic hot water _ Assumptions:Shower head is easily changed,water heater is oil-fired and delivered temperature is ,at maximum hot water setpoint. Cost:specific to the shower head Savings: specific to amount of water saved Assume one shower head is changed from standard-flow to low-flow model.Savings are dependent upon amount of use. Costs: $12.98 for low-flow shower head Source of Estimate:Arctic Technical Services,Fairbanks $35 per hour to install 1 hour installation time $35.00 installation cost Savings: 5 Standard flow rate of hot water (gpm) 2.5 Low flow rate of hot water (gpm) 2.5 Reduction in flow rate (gpm) 0.5 Hours per day of use 5 Days per week of use 52 Weeks per year of use 80 %water heater efficiency 45 incoming water temperature (F) 110 Hot water temperature (F) 99 Fuel saved per year (gallons) 325 Gallons of water saved LOWFLOSH.XLS Page 2 DCRA/DOE Rural Heat Study ECM: ECM Description: *Energy Conservation Measure Payback Analysis Install low-flow lavatory faucet 12/5/95 Standard-flow faucets deliver 5 gallonsperminute (gpm)of hot water and low-flow faucets deliver 2.5 gpm of hot water.Changing to low-flow faucets results in lower hot water consumption and lower fuel bills to heat the water. Summary of Costs Anchorage Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 and Savings:Cost or |Cost or Cost or |Cost or Cost or Cost or Costor |Costor Savings|Savings |Savings|Savings Savings |Savings Savings |Savings Factor Factor Factor Factor Units Estimated Cost Material $/unit $118.00 Installation S/unit $140.00 Shipping $/unit $15.00 Total Cost $/unit 1.00}$273.00 1.23 $335.79 1.99 $543.27 2.25)$614.25 Estimated Savings Rate Rate Rate Rate Fuel Gallon 0.44 60.6 0.93 0.92 1.50 Electricity KwH 0.10 0.24 0.33 0.44 Water Gallons 0.06 325 0.10 0.10 0.10 Total Savings $46 $89 $88 $123 Payback Time Years 5.9 3.8 6.2 5.0 Regional Cost Data:|Description Construction |Fuel Cost |Electric Cost |Wages Cost Factor {($/Gal)($/KWH)($/HR) Region Anchorage Anchorage Metropolitan Area 1.00 $0.44 $0.10 |$35.00 Region 1:Southeast Alaska and Kodiak Island 1.23 $0.93 $0.24 |$35.00 Region 2:Southcentral and Southwest Alaska 1.99 $0.92 $0.33 |$35.00 Region 3:Interior Alaska 2.25 $1.50 $0.44 |$35.00 Calculations:See attached concept and example LOWFAUCE.XLS Page 1 DCRA/DOE Rural Heat Study 12/5/95 Concept: Example: Faucets are not easily changed and are more likely to use less than 100%hot water,but can reduce the consumption of domestic hot water. Assumptions:Faucet is moderately easy to replace,water heater is oil-fired,and average water discharge temperature is less than maximum since faucets are not used for long duration. Cost:specific to the faucet Savings: specific to the amount of water used Assume one faucet is changed from standard-flow to low-flow model.Savings are dependent upon amount of use. Costs: $118.00 for low-flow shower head Source of Estimate:Arctic Technical Services,Fairbanks $35 per hour to install 4 hour installation time $140.00 installation cost Savings: 5 Standard flow rate of hot water (gpm) 2.5 Low flow rate of hot water (gpm) 2.5 Reduction in flow rate (gpm) 0.5 Hours per day of use 5 Days per week of use 52 Weeks per year of use 80 %water heater efficiency 45 Incoming water temperature (F) 85 Hot water temperature (F) 61 Fuel saved per year (gallons) 325 Gallons of water saved LOWFAUCE.XLS Page 2 DCRA/DOE Rural Heat Study ECM: ECM Description: Energy Conservation Measure Payback Analysis Shutoff ventilation when the building is interior Alaska location. not occupied. 12/5/95 Shutting off the ventilation system when the building is unoccupied at night and on weekends.Energy savings are based on reduction in the outside air flow rate and reduction in electrical motor power consumption.This evaluation assumes an average ambient winter temperature of 15 degrees F; equivalent to the average heating season ambient temperature in Alaska's Interior. Summary of Costs Anchorage Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 and Savings:Cost or |Cost or Cost or |Cost or Cost or Cost or Cost or |Cost or Savings|Savings jSavings|Savings Savings jSavings Savings |Savings Units Factor Factor Factor Factor Estimated Cost Material $/unit $733.00 Installation $/unit $980.00 Shipping $/unit Total Cost $/unit 1.00]$1,713.00 1.23 $2,106.99 1.99 $3,408.87 2.25|$3,854.25 Estimated Savings Rate Rate Rate Rate Fuel Gallon 0.44 1854 0.93 0.92 1.50 Electricity KwH 0.10 15704 0.24 0.33 0.44 Maintenance Hours 35.00 35.00 35.00 35.00 Total Savings $2,339 $5,493 $6,888 $9,691 Payback Time Years 0.7 0.4 0.5 0.4 Regional Cost Data:|Description Construction |Fuel Cost {Electric Cost |Wages Cost Factor j|($/Gal)($/KWH)($/HR) Region Anchorage Anchorage Metropolitan Area 1.00 $0.44 $0.10 |$35.00 Region 1:Southeast Alaska and Kodiak fsland 1.23 $0.93 $0.24 |$35.00 Region 2:Southcentral and Southwest Alaska 1.99 $0.92 $0.33 |$35.00 Region 3:Interior Alaska 2.25 $1.50 $0.44 |$35.00 Calculations: VENTOFF1.XLS See attached concept and example PAGE:1 OCRA/DOE Rural Heat Study 12/5/95 Concept: Example: VENTOFF1.XLS Reduce heat loss from the facilityby shutting off the building ventilation system when the building is unoccupied.The reduction in ventilation system energy consumption is based on an assumed ventilation rate. Costs:Dependent on cost of installing the setback controller Savings:Dependent on the climate in which it is installed. For building in Interior Alaska the average heating season ambient air temperature is 15 degrees F and the supply air setpoint temperature is 60 degrees F.Calculate savings when ventilation system is off during unoccupied periods.Assume total ventilation rate is 5,000 cfm with 20%outside air and Shp motor.Assume building is occupied 12 hours per day,five days per week.Calculate savings assuming a 5,000 gallon annual fuel consumption before ECM is implemented. Assumptions:_A timeclock plus additional relays are required to control the air handler unit on/off. Cost: $165 =cost of a 7 day programmable timer or thermostat Source of Estimate:Debenham Electric Supply Co.,Fairbanks $568 =cost of additional control relays for air handler system 28 =hours to install $980 =installation cost at $35/hour Savings: 15 Average winter ambient temperature (F) 70 Interior occupied temperature (F) _60 Interior unoccupied temperature (F) 39 Number of weeks of boiler operation time 60 Weekly occupied time (hours) 5000 Total air flow rate (cfm) 20 %outside air 0 80 %heating system efficiency 2884 Average fuel consumed by constant ventilation system (gal/yr) 1030 Average fuel consumed with ventilation off during unoccupied times (gal/yr) 1854 Average fuel savings with ventilation off during unoccupied times (gal/yr) 5 Fan motor horsepower 15704 Electrical energy saved when fan is off (KwH/yr) PAGE:2 OCRA/DOE Rural Heat Study ECM: ECM Description: Shutoff ventilation when the building is not occupied. Coastal Alaska location. Energy Conservation Measure Payback Analysis 12/5/95 Shutting off the ventilation system when the building is unoccupied at night and on weekends.Energy savings are based on reduction in the outside air flow rate and reduction in electrical motor power consumption.This evaluation assumes an average ambient winter temperature of 36 degrees F: equivalent to the average heating season ambient temperature on Alaska's coast. Summary of Costs Anchorage Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 and Savings:Cost or |Cost or Cost or |Cost or Cost or Cost or Cost or |Cost or Savings|Savings |Savings|Savings Savings |Savings Savings |Savings Units Factor Factor Factor Factor Estimated Cost Material S/unit $733.00 Installation $/unit $980.00 Shipping $/unit Total Cost $/unit 1.00}$1,713.00 1.23 $2,106.99 1.99 $3,408.87 2.25|$3,854.25 Estimated Savings Rate Rate Rate Rate Fuel Gallon 0.44 989 0.93 0.92 1.50 Electricity KwH 0.10 15704 0.24 0.33 0.44 Maintenance Hours 35.00 35.00 35.00 35.00 Total Savings $1,958 $4,689 $6,092 $8,393 Payback Time Years 0.9 0.4 0.6 0.5 Regional Cost Data:|Description Construction |Fuel Cost |Electric Cost |Wages Cost Factor |{($/Gal)($/KWH)($/HR) Region Anchorage Anchorage Metropolitan Area 1.00 $0.44 $0.10 |$35.00 Region 1:Southeast Alaska and Kodiak Island 1.23};$0.93 $0.24 |$35.00 Region 2:Southcentral and Southwest Alaska 1.99 $0.92 $0.33 |$35.00 Region 3:Interior Alaska 2.25 $1.50 $0.44 |$35.00 Calculations: VENTOFF2.XLS See attached concept and example PAGE:1 DCRA/DOE Rural Heat Study 12/5/95 Concept: Example: VENTOFF2.XLS Reduce heat loss from the facility by shutting off the building ventilation system when the buildingis unoccupied.The reduction in ventilation system energy consumption is based on an assumed ventilation rate. Costs:Dependent on cost of installing the setback controller Savings:Dependent on the climate in which it is installed. For building in coastal Alaska the average heating season ambient air temperature is 36 degrees F and the supply air setpoint temperature is 60 degrees F.Caiculate savings when ventilation system is off during unoccupied periods.Assume total ventilation rate is 5,000 cfm with 20%outside air and 5hp motor.Assume building is occupied 12 hours per day,five days per week.Calculate savings assuming 'a 5,000 gallon annual fuel consumption before ECM is implemented. Assumptions:A timeclock plus additional relays are required to control the air handier unit on/off. Cost: $165 =cost ofa 7 day programmable timer or thermostat Source of Estimate:Debenham Electric Supply Co.,Fairbanks $568 =cost of additional control relays for air handler system 28 =hours to install $980 =installation cost at $35/hour Savings: 36 Average winter ambient temperature (F) 70 Interior occupied temperature (F) 60 Interior unoccupied temperature (F) 39 Number of weeks of boiler operation time 60 Weekly occupied time (hours) 5000 Total air flow rate (cfm) 20 %outside air 80 %heating system efficiency 1538 Average fuel consumed by constant ventilation system (gal/yr) 549 Average fuel consumed with ventilation off during unoccupied times (gal/yr) 989 Average fuel savings with ventilation off during unoccupied times (gal/yr) 5 Fan motor horsepower 15704 Electrical energy saved when fan is off (KwH/yr) PAGE:2 DCRA/DOE Rural Heat Study ECM: ECM Description: Energy Conservation Measure Payback Analysis Install temperature setback controls Interior Alaska location. 1 2/5/95 Installing night setback thermostats or a weekly timeclock will allow reduction of the interior setpoint temperature when the building is unoccupied at night and on weekends.Savings are usually expressed as a percentage of total energy consumption.This evaluation assumes an average ambient winter temperature of 15 degrees F;equivalent to the average heating season ambient temperature in Alaska's Interior. Summary of Costs Anchorage Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 and Savings:Cost or |Cost or Cost or }Cost or Cost or Cost or Costor {Cost or Savings|Savings |Savings|Savings Savings |Savings Savings |Savings Units Factor Factor Factor Factor Estimated Cost Material $/unit $165.00 Installation $/unit $280.00 Shipping $/unit Total Cost S/unit 1.00}$445.00 1.23 $547.35 1.99 $885.55 2.251 $1,001.25 Estimated Savings Rate Rate Rate Rate Fuel Gallon 0.44 584.42 0.93 0.92 1.50 Electricity KwH 0.10 0.24 0.33 0.44 Maintenance Hours 35.00 35.00 35.00 35.00 Total Savings $257 $544 $538 $877 Payback Time Years 1.7 1.0 1.6 1.1 Regional Cost Data:|Description Construction |Fuel Cost |Electric Cost |Wages Cost Factor |($/Gal)($/KWH)($/HR) Region Anchorage Anchorage Metropolitan Area 1.00 $0.44 $0.10 |$35.00 Region 1:Southeast Alaska and Kodiak Island 1.23 $0.93 $0.24 |$35.00 Region 2:Southcentral and Southwest Alaska 1.99 $0.92 $0.33 |$35.00 Region 3:Interior Alaska 2.25 $1.50 $0.44 |$35.00 Calculations: SETBACK.XLS See attached concept and example PAGE:1 DCRA/DOE Rural Heat Study 12/5/95 Concept:Reduce heat loss from the facility by reducing the interior setpoint temperature from 70degreesFto 60 degrees F.The reduction in heat loss is listed as a percentage of the total heat loss.The average winter (September through May)ambient air temperature in Interior Alaska is 15 degrees F. Costs:Dependent on cost of installing the setback controller Savings:Dependent on the climate in which it is installed. Example:For building in Interior Alaska the average winter ambient air temperature is 15 degrees F and the interior setpoint temperature is 70 degrees F.Calculate savings when setback temperature of 60 degrees F is installed.Assume building is occupied 12 hours per day,five days per week.Assume 5,000 gallon annual fuel consumption before setback is implemented. Assumptions:_A single timeclock or thermostat can control the setback temperature of the entire building. Cost: $165 =cost of a 7 day programmable timer or thermostat Source of Estimate:Debenham Electric Supply Co.,Fairbanks 8 =hours to install $280 =installation cost at $35/nour Savings: 15 Average winter ambient temperature (F) 70 Interior occupied temperature (F) 60 Interior unoccupied temperature (F) 39 Number of weeks of boiler operation time 60 Weekly occupied time (hours) 5000 Average fuel consumption with no setback (gallons) 4091 Average fuel consumption during setback period (gallons) 4416 Average fuel consumption (gallons) 584 Average fuel savings (gallons) SETBACK.XLS PAGE:2 DCRA/DOE Rural Heat Study ECM: ECM Description: Energy Conservation Measure Payback Analysis Install temperature setback controls Coastal Alaska location. 12/5/95 Installing night setback thermostats or a weekly timeclock will allow reduction of the interior setpoint temperature when the building is unoccupied at night and on weekends.Savings are usually expressed as a percentage of total energy consumption.This evaluation assumes an average ambient winter temperature of 36 degrees F;equivalent to the average heating season ambient temperature on Alaska's coast. Summary of Costs Anchorage Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 and Savings:Cost or |Cost or Cost or |Cost or Cost or Cost or Cost or |Cost or Savings|Savings |Savings|Savings Savings {Savings Savings |Savings Units Factor -|Factor Factor Factor Estimated Cost Material S/unit $165.00 Installation S/unit $280.00 Shipping S/unit Total Cost $/unit 1.00]$445.00 1.23 $547.35 1.99 $885.55 2.25!$1,001.25 Estimated Savings Rate Rate Rate Rate Fuel Gallon 0.44 945.38 0.93 0.92 1.50 Electricity KwH 0.10 0.24 0.33 0.44 Maintenance Hours 35.00 35.00 35.00 35.00 Total Savings $416 $879 $870 $1,418 Payback Time Years 1.1 0.6 1.0 0.7 Regional Cost Data:|Description Construction |Fuel Cost |Electric Cost |Wages Cost Factor |($/Gal)($/KWH)($/HR) Region Anchorage Anchorage Metropolitan Area 1.00 $0.44 $0.10 |$35.00 Region 1:Southeast Alaska and Kodiak Island 1.23 $0.93 $0.24 |$35.00 Region 2:Southcentral and Southwest Alaska 1.99 $0.92 $0.33 |$35.00 Region 3:Interior Alaska 2.25 $1.50 $0.44 |$35.00 Calculations: SETBACK2.XLS See attached concept and example PAGE:1 DCRA/DOE Rural Heat Study 12/5/95 Concept:Reduce heat loss from the facility by reducing the interior setpoint temperaturefrom70 degreesF to 60 degrees F.The reduction in heat loss is listed as a percentage of the total heat loss.The average winter (September through June)ambient air temperature in coastal Alaska is 36 degrees F. Costs:Dependent on cost of installing the setback controller Savings:Dependent on the climate in which it is installed. Example:Fora building in coastal Alaska the average winter ambient air temperature is 36 degrees F and the interior setpoint temperature is 70 degrees F.Calculate savings when setback temperature of 60 degreesF is installed.Assume building is occupied 12 hours per day,five days per week.Assume 5,000 gallon annua!fuel consumption before setback is implemented. Assumptions:'Asingle timeclock or thermostat can control the setback temperature of the entire 'building. Cost: $165 =cost of a7 day programmable timer or thermostat Source of Estimate:Debenham Electric Supply Co.,Fairbanks 8 =hours to install $280 =installation cost at $35/hour Savings: 36 Average winter ambient temperature (F) 70 Interior occupied temperature (F) 60 Interior unoccupied temperature (F) 39 Number of weeks of boiler operation time 60 Weekly occupied time (hours) 5000 Average fuel consumption with no setback (gallons) 3529 Average fuel consumption during setback period (gallons) 4055 Average fuel consumption (gallons) 945 Average fuel savings (gallons) SETBACK2.XLS PAGE:2 DCRA/DOE Rural Heat Study ECM: ECM Description: Energy Conservation Measure Payback Analysis 12/5/95 Shutoff ventilation and reduce setpoint temperaure when the building is not occupied. Interior Alaska location. Shutting off the ventilation system and setting back the interior temperature when the building is unoccupied at night and on weekends.Temperature savings are usually expressed as a percentage of total energy consumption.Fan savings are based on reduction in the outside air flow rate and reduction in electrical motor power consumption.This evaluation assumes an average ambient winter temperature of 15 degrees F;equivalent to the average heating season ambient temperature in Alaska's Interior. Summary of Costs Anchorage Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 and Savings:Cost or |Cost or Cost or |Cost or Costor |Costor Cost or |Costor Savings|Savings |Savings|Savings Savings {Savings Savings |Savings Units Factor Factor Factor Factor Estimated Cost Material $/unit $733.00 Installation $/unit $1,120.00 Shipping $/unit Total Cost S/unit 1.00}$1,853.00 1.23 $2,279.19 1.99 $3,687.47 2.25]$4,169.25 Estimated Savings Rate Rate Rate Rate Fuel Gallon 0.44)2493.96 0.93 0.92 1.50 Electricity KwH 0.10 15704 0.24 0.33 0.44 Maintenance Hours 35.00 35.00 35.00 35.00 Total Savings $2,621 $6,088 $7,477 $10,651 Payback Time Years 0.7 0.4 0.5 0.4 Regional Cost Data:|Description Construction |Fuel Cost |Electric Cost |Wages Cost Factor {($/Gal)($/KWH)($/HR) Region Anchorage Anchorage Metropolitan Area 1.00 $0.44 $0.10 1 $35.00 Region 1:Southeast Alaska and Kodiak Island 1.23 $0.93 $0.24 |$35.00 Region 2:Southcentral and Southwest Alaska 1.99 $0.92 $0.33 |$35.00 Region 3:Interior Alaska 2.25 $1.50 $0.44 |$35.00 Calculations: VENTSET1.XLS See attached concept and example PAGE:1 DCRA/DOE Rural Heat Study 12/5/95 Concept: Example: VENTSET1.XLS Reduce heat loss from the facility by shutting off the building ventilation system and reducing the setpoint temperature when the building is unoccupied.The reduction in ventilation system energy consumption is based on an assumed ventilation rate.The reduction in heat loss is listed as a percentage of the total heat loss. Costs:Dependent on cost of installing the setback controller Savings:Dependent on the climate in which it is installed. For building in Interior Alaska the average heating season ambient air temperature is 15 degrees F and the supply air setpoint temperature is 60 degrees F.Calculate savings when ventilation system is off during unoccupied periods.Assume total ventilation rate is 5,000 cfm with 20%outside air and 5hp motor.Assume building is occupied 12 hours per day,five days per week.Calculate savings from temperature setback assuming a 5,000 gallon annual fuel consumption before setback is implemented. Assumptions:'A single timeciock can setback the building temperature.The same timeclock plusadditionalrelaysarerequiredtocontroltheairhandleruniton/off. Cost: $165 =cost ofa 7 day programmable timer or thermostat Source of Estimate:Debenham Electric Supply Co.,Fairbanks $568 =cost of additional contro!relays for air handler system 32 =hours to install $1,120 =installation cost at $35/hour Savings: 15 Average winter ambient temperature (F) 70 Interior occupied temperature (F) 60 Interior unoccupied temperature (F) 39 Number of weeks of boiler operation time 60 Weekly occupied time (hours) 5000 Average fuel consumption with no setback (gallons) 4091 Average fuel consumption during setback period (gallons) 4416 Average fuel consumption with setback control (gallons) 584 Average fuel savings (gallons) 5000 Total air flow rate (cfm) 20 %outside air 80 %heating system efficiency 2970 Average fuel consumed by constant ventilation system (gal/yr) 1061 Average fuel consumed with ventilation off during unoccupied times (gal/yr) 1910 Average fuel savings with ventilation off during unoccupied times (gail/yr) 5 Fan motor horsepower 15704 Electrical energy saved when fan is off (KwH/yr) PAGE:2 DCRA/DOE Rural Heat Study ECM: ECM Description: Energy Conservation Measure Payback Analysis 1 Shutoff ventilation and reduce setpoint temperaure when the building is not occupied. Coastal Alaska location. 2/5/95 Shutting off the ventilation system and setting back the interior temperature when the building is unoccupied at night and on weekends.Temperature savings are usually expressed as a percentage of total energy consumption.Fan savings are based on reduction in the outside air flow rate and reduction in electrical motor power consumption.This evaluation assumes an average ambient winter temperature of 36 degrees F;equivalent to the average heating season ambient temperature on Alaska's coast Summary of Costs Anchorage Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 and Savings:Cost or |Cost or Cost or |Cost or Cost or Cost or Cost or |Cost or Savings|Savings |Savings|Savings Savings |Savings Savings |Savings Units Factor Factor Factor Factor Estimated Cost Material $/unit $733.00 Installation $/unit $1,120.00 Shipping $/unit Total Cost S/unit 1.00]$1,853.00 1.23 $2,279.19 1.99 $3,687.47 2.25|$4,169.25 Estimated Savings Rate Rate Rate Rate Fuel Gallon 0.44 1964 0.93 0.92 1.50 Electricity KwH 0.10 15704 0.24 0.33 0.44 Maintenance Hours 35.00 35.00 35.00 35.00 Total Savings $2,387 $5,595 $6,989 $9,856 Payback Time Years 0.8 0.4 0.5 0.4 Regional Cost Data:|Description Construction {Fuel Cost |Electric Cost |Wages Cost Factor |($/Gal)($/KWH)($/HR) Region Anchorage Anchorage Metropolitan Area 1.00 $0.44 $0.10 |$35.00 Region 1:Southeast Alaska and Kodiak Island 1.23 $0.93 $0.24 $35.00 Region 2:Southcentral and Southwest Alaska 1.99 $0.92 $0.33 |$35.00 Region 3:Interior Alaska 2.25 $1.50 $0.44 |$35.00 Calculations: VENTSET2.XLS See attached concept and example PAGE:1 DCRA/DOE Rural Heat Study 12/5/95 Concept:Reduce heat loss from the facility by shutting off the building ventilation system and reducing the setpoint temperature when the building is unoccupied.The reduction in ventilation system energy consumption is based on an assumed ventilation rate.The reduction in heat loss is listed as a percentage of the total heat loss. Costs:Dependent on cost of installing the setback controller Savings:Dependent on the climate in which it is installed. Example:For building in coastal Alaska the average heating season ambient air temperature is 36 degrees F and the supply air setpoint temperature is 60 degrees F.Calculate savings when ventilation system is off during unoccupied periods.Assume total ventilation rate is 5,000 cfm with 20%outside air and Shp motor.Assume building is occupied 12 hours per day,five days per week.Calculate savings fromtemperaturesetbackassuminga5,000 gallon annual fuel consumption before setback is implemented. Assumptions:A single timeclock can setback the building temperature.The same timectock plus ladditional relays are required to control the air handler unit on/off. Cost: $165 =cost of a7 day programmable timer or thermostat Source of Estimate:Debenham Electric Supply Co.,Fairbanks $568 =cost of additional control relays for air handler system 32 =hours to install $1,120 =installation cost at $35/hour Savings: 36 Average winter ambient temperature (F) 70 Interior occupied temperature (F) 60 Interior unoccupied temperature (F) 39 Number of weeks of boiler operation time 60 Weekly occupied time (hours) 5000 Average fuel consumption with no setback (gallons) 3529 Average fuel consumption during setback period (gallons) 4055 Average fuel consumption with setback control (gallons) 945 Average fuel savings (gallons) 5000 Total air flow rate (cfm) 20 %outside air 80 %heating system efficiency 1584 Average fuel consumed by constant ventilation system (gal/yr); 566 Average fuel consumed with ventilation off during unoccupied times (gal/yr) 1018 Average fuel savings with ventilation off during unoccupied times (gal/yr) 5 Fan motor horsepower 15704 Electrical energy saved when fan is off (KWH/yr) VENTSET2.XLS PAGE:2 DCRA/DOE Rurai Heat Study ECM: ECM Description: Energy Conservation Measure Payback Analysis Add motion sensors to control lighting. 12/5/95 Add motion sensors in a school classroom to turn off lights during periods when the classroom is unoccupied. | 1 Summary of Costs Anchorage Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 and Savings:Cost or |Cost or Cost or jCost or Cost or Cost or Cost or |Cost or Savings|Savings |Savings|Savings Savings |Savings Savings |Savings Factor Factor Factor Factor Units Estimated Cost Material $/unit $280.00 installation $/unit $105.00 Shipping $/unit $15.00 Total Cost $/unit 1.00}$400.00 1.23 $492.00 1.99 $796.00 2.25}$900.00 Estimated Savings Rate Rate Rate Rate Fuel Gallon 0.44 0.93 0.92 1.50 Electricity KwH 0.10 1,094.4 0.24 1,094.4 0.33 1,094.4 0.44 1,094.4 Maintenance Hours 35.00 35.00 35.00 35.00 Total Savings $106 $263 $361 $482 Payback Time Years 3.8 1.9 2.2 1.9 Regional Cost Data:|Description Construction |Fuel Cost |Electric Cost |Wages Cost Factor |($/Gal)($/KWH)($/HR)} Region Anchorage Anchorage Metropolitan Area 1.00 $0.44 $0.10 |$35.00 Region 1:Southeast Alaska and Kodiak Island 1.23 $0.93 $0.24 |$35.00 Region 2:Southcentral and Southwest Alaska 1.99 $0.92 $0.33 |$35.00 Region 3:Interior Alaska 2.25 $1.50 $0.44 |$35.00 Calculations: MOTION.XLS See attached concept and example Page 1 DCRA/DOE Rurai Heat Study 12/5/95 Concept: Example: MOTION.XLS Add motion sensors in a school classroom to turn off lignts during periods when the classroom is unoccupied.Savings realized vary depending on teacher's and maintenance personnel schedule of turning off lights. .Costs: Added costs for motion sensor and switch pack. Savings: Energy savings realized from reduced operating costs of lamps. -Assume standard operating hours of lighting in a standard classroom to be 12 hrs.per day for 5 days per week and 40 weeks per year.Assume savings potential to range from 10 to 50 percent.Based on _previous studies,figure 25 percent for this calculation. Cost:| $170.00 =price for motion sensor. $110.00 =price for switch pack. $105.00 =3 hrs.labor to install and connect motion sensor. $385.00 =Total cost Savings: 114 =Average operating watts per lighting fixture (3 lamp parabolic lighting fixtures). (Assume energy savings magnetic ballasts and T-12 lamps.) 16 =Number of fixtures per classroom. 1824 =Average watts installed per classroom. 1094.4 =KWAH saved per year per classroom. Page 2 DCRA/DOE Rural Heat Study ECM: ECM Description: Replacing old inefficient lighting fixtures with new. Energy Conservation Measure Payback Analysis 12/5/95 Replacing four lamp recessed lensed fluorescent lighting fixtures with new three lamp recessed parabolic fluorescent lighting fixtures with electronic ballasts and T8 lamps to reduce lighting levels in overlit areas and increase energy efficiency. Summary of Costs Anchorage Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 and Savings:Cost or |Cost or Cost or |Cost or Costor |Cost or Cost or |Cost or Savings|Savings |Savings|Savings Savings /|Savings Savings |Savings Factor Factor Factor Factor Units Estimated Cost Material $/unit $106.00 Installation $/unit $17.50 Shipping $/unit $15.00 Total Cost $/unit 1.00}$138.50 1.23 $170.36 1.99 $275.62 2.25)$311.63 Estimated Savings Rate Rate Rate Rate Fuel Gallon 0.44 0.93 0.92 1.50 Electricity KwH 0.10 374.4 0.24 374.4 0.33 374.4 0.44 374.4 Maintenance Hours 35.00 35.00 35.00 35.00 Total Savings $36 $90 $124 $165 | Payback Time Years 3.8 1.9 2.2 1.9 Regional Cost Data:|Description Construction |Fuel Cost jElectric Cost |Wages Cost Factor [($/Gal)($/KWH)($/HR) Region Anchorage Anchorage Metropolitan Area 1.00 $0.44 $0.10 |$35.00 Region 1:Southeast Alaska and Kodiak !sland 1.23 $0.93 $0.24 |$35.00 Region 2:Southcentral and Southwest Alaska 1.99 $0.92 $0.33 |$35.00 Region 3:Interior Alaska 2.25 $1.50 $0.44 |$35.00 Calculations: REPLACE.XLS See attached concept and example Page 1 DCRA/DOE Rural Heat Study . 12/5/95 Concept: Example: Replace four lamp recessed lensed fluorescent lighting fixtures with new three lamp recessed parabolic fluorescent lighting fixtures with electronic ballasts and T8 lamps. Costs: First costs involve fixture replacement costs.Maintenance costs reduced by eliminating one ballast and lamp per lighting fixture. Savings: Energy savings realized from reduced operating costs of lamps. 'Replace four lamp recessed lensed fluorescent lighting fixtures with new three lamp recessed parabolic'fluorescent lighting fixtures with electronic ballasts and T8 lamps.Operating hours provide lighting in an'office space will be occupied 12 hrs.per day for 6 days per week and 52 weeks per year.| Assumptions:Lights are easily accessible. Cost: $106.00 =price for new lighting fixture. $17.50 =1/2 hr.labor to replace lighting fixture $123.50 =Total cost Savings: 192 =Average operating watts per lighting fixture for four lamp fixture. 92 =Average operating watts per lighting fixture for three lamp fixture. 100 =Average watts saved per lighting fixture. 374.4 =KWH savings per year per lighting fixture. REPLACE.XLS Page 2 CommentsonDraft 1.Most important aspect is recommended prioritization,which is absent. Building data still missing.We must complete this.Strategy at meeting. Minor text comments out in letter today. Standardize 11,600 Btu/kWh. No draft database Wood analysis/report requires changes Schedule modification YNQQaFWYONPerformance of waste heat systems (issue-not action item) |teGFcow?20 miner work te co mel ete2b-major worlk st.01 [elec Mates o,USKE (2/4 Kops wt 1a/|,neg leat te conifer --OF A -maa ae,where Jt ee.be >xgtalledspscheatly .Ges Lnergy delivered by tin,heady systemsPorcbenyofantSPDoee OR WOM ex )ty ef aveafover)ty wn Paik entsHelagoHc?Fass pew woste hast [aTheta?alayde|ivered Af 33 Bea =#0.Oats Zell)340090 kehwaBla--- rel ele =£0.LOBAL Wh OO op or a eonly bs72.wa G0: "c,d i-ien ¢Linent ory Sennvey=Dek LevinerWsbn.oe AVEC=4¢dflet El o<jo kW C2>jo kh Poi a-esty-for rods "<0 tz,btn } total!cost tots)B+thee»hotest BticlecBhudLo£pvt.LsJs New.sehodyle§Ten.3! need Rural Heat Conservation and Fuel Substitution Project Background The Division of Energy is looking for opportunities to reduce rural energy costs in ways that benefit local communities.Two promising ways to do this are by 1)conserving energy and 2)using local fuels such as wood for heating instead of oil.We are focusing on reducing energy costs in larger buildings because they usually have the most potential for successful, cost-effective projects.Other state energy programs are available to deal with other rural energy concerns such as bulk fuel storage,utility improvements,and residential energy conservation. Enclosed is a questionnaire which asks about your facility's energy systems.We encourage you to fill out and return it to us.The Division of Energy and our contractors will use the survey information to determine if energy improvements are feasible.Depending on the outcome of the survey and our available resources,we will visit your facility and provide at no cost a detailed engineering analysis of energy alternatives.Our goal is to identify cost-effective rural projects to be considered in Division of Energy loan and grant priorities.i? If you are interested in reducing the energy costs in your acity,askthatyoucompleteandreturnthequestionnairebyNovember.1@ If you have questions or concerns about the project,please contact Peter Crimp in Anchorage at 907/269-4631 or David Lockard at 269-4541. DDDDD LLLL O00 CcCC KKK KK AA RRRRRR DDDDD DD DD LL 00 OO CC CC KK KK AAAA RR RR DD DD DD DD LL 00 00 CC KK KK AA AA RR RR DD ODD DD DD LL 00 0o CC KKKK AA AA RRRRR DD DD DD DD LL L OO 00 CC KK KK AAAAAA RR RR DD DD DD DD LL LL OO 00 CC CC KK KK AA AA RR RR DD DD DDDDD LLLLLLL O00 cccC KKK KK AA AA RRR RR DDDDD STATE OF ALASKA,DCRA 333 W.4TH AVE.,SUITE 220 ANCHORAGE,AK 99501 PHONE:(907)269-4500 FAX:(907)269-4520 DATE:11/13/1995TIME:1:52:23 PM 3. 4. 5. uestions/Guidelinesfor Rural Heat Phone Calls .Introduce self and give short background on project (also see cover letter). Project goal is to decrease cost of energy in rural areas,thus making more funds available for other uses (e.g.schools for education),while benefiting community (not sacrificing comfort and safety,not driving up costs for other users). Collecting info in order to identify good bets for energy conservation and possible wood fuel substitution using state-of-the-art technology. We have set aside funds for detailed on-site visit and engineering analysis. Would emphasize working closely with maintenance staff,since it has been our experience that they have the best grasp on problems and solutions. If analysis shows cost-effective measures and there is interest,we would prioritize for Division/federal grants and loans,and provide other support for project development. We are focusing on buildings using over 4000 gal/yr.because more likely feasible projects. Does facility use more than 4,000 gallons? Is there potential interest? Contact name,fax,address. We would like information by November 10.Project must proceed.If you cannot make timeline,can we help in some manner?(compile energy records, walk-through energy audit) DDDDD LLLL 000 CCCC KKK KK AA RRRRRR DDDDD DD DD LL 00 OO CC CC KK KK AAAA RR RR DD DD DD DD LL 00 oo cc KK KK AA AA RR RR DD ODD DD DD LL 00 0Oo CC KKKK AA AA RRRRR DD DD DD DD LL L OO OO CC KK KK AAAAAA RR RR DD DD DD DD LL LL OO OO CC CC KK KK AA AA RR RR DD DD DDDDD LLLLLLL 000 cccc KKK KK AA AA RRR_RR DDDDD STATE OF ALASKA,DCRA 333 W.4TH AVE.,SUITE 220 ANCHORAGE,AK 99501 PHONE:(907)269-4500 FAX:(907)269-4520 DATE:11/06/1995TIME:11:01:13 AM Appendix E Questionnaire Status Key [A =Retumed 'al C =May or May Not Retum 3s N =Not Contacted Yet QUESTIONNAIRE STATUS SUMMARY B=Will Retum 16 D =Will Not Retum 33 USKH,Inc.w.o.4730 DCRA Fuel Substitution Survey Date of 151 Date of 2nd)Contacted |Contacied|Date the Question.|Date Sent)When Ques.Re-contact by Di Status Remarks .1st Call |Fotlow-up Person 2nd Cali |Followup]9/14/95 9/19/95 |Question.|Question.|Copies [Thank Yo |Should Be |Div Energy |Div Energy Person Oate QuestionCityFacilityNameSEOr|€1 ec Remarks Fax No.|Date Faxed!Phone No Call Cailed Phone No.Call of 9/15/95?)Received|Copied?[Distribute |Letter Finished |To Contact}Contactor Contacted Phone No |Fax No Faxed Status Ambler City of Ambler Buildings 445-2174]7/20/95 |445-2122]8/1/95 [Chartie Tickett Will Look Fo]8/25/95 |Refaxed Q.Unknown cAmbierDistrictHeatSystemNoneedtocontact445-2174]7/20/95 [445-2122]8/1/95 [Charlie Tickett Will Look Fo]8/25/95 Never 2 Ne cous to ee=-axe again'Ambler FAA Buildings Harry Gilmore,FAA Anch|271-4470]9/19/95 [271-5280|9/19/95 No Yes axed e aga soe Dave Bell,Mntnc.Still interested.11/30-Left Ambier NW Arctic School District HQ”in Kotzebue 442-2392]7/20/95 |442-3472{8/1/95 |Dave Bell,mntnc dir.Yes 11/10/95 Y Oavid Director 442-3472 |442-2392 |11/13/95 8 msgbierWaterPlant445-2174]7/20/95 |445-2122]6/1/95 [Charlie Tickett Will Look Fo]8/25/95 |RefaxedQ Unknown c Aniak Alascom Not Large Enough N/A N/A NIA Aniak Alaska Commercial Company_675-4224]9/14/95 |675-4327[9/14/95 [Ben Payne Same 9/19/95 [No Answer]Yes C__|Refaxed 9/20/95 Aniak FAA No.listed is a recording.675-4336 No Yes D [Faxed Q again 10/2/95 Why doesn't DOE pay thePAniakKuspukSchoolDistrict(HS)x d a p 675-4305|7/2005 |675-4250]8/1/95 _|Steve Hill 9/14/95 Yes Never!Y Peter Stev Hill (maint)|675-4250 |675-4336 |10/31/95 A__|SD's to compile this info?Aniak Kuspuk School District (Eiem)K {Zf)Peter Stev Hill (maint)|675-4250 |675-4336 |10/31/95 A Okay if Div EnergyAniakStateofAlaskaBig¥__|Fleet Equipment Bldg 675-4338]9/14/95 |675-4277 L.Frisbe/Tim Nadrea [|269-5979 |9/29/95 No No Y Peter B Faxed 10/2/95 to 269-5989 Anvik Y Peter Bud Duke (maint)[474-9400 x]474-0662 |11/3/95 [2]No school in Anvik listed Arctic Village Yukon Flats SD Y Oavid Oorothy Jordan |662-2515 |662-2707 11/7195 oO Samson doesn't want toBeaverYukonFlatsSDYDavidDorothyJordan|662-2515 |662-2707 11/7/95 D Samson doesn't want to Chatkyitsik Yukon Flats SD Y David Dorothy Jordan”|662-2515 |662-2707 |11/7/95 D__|[Samson doesn't want to Chenega Chugach Schoois oO oO «3 _J)[sont fax 573-5137 §73-5123 11/3/95 |DON KINSEY Y David Don Kinsey 573-5123 |573-5137 11/6/95 A 1/1 3 will fax on 11/15!F Chuathbaluk Kuspuk Schoo!District xX X 20 Y¥Peter Stev Hill (maint)|675-4250 |675-4336 |10/31/95 A Okay if Div EnergyCrookedCreek{No Schools w Crown Point No Schools : Cube Cove Chatham School District Logging camp owns bidg 788-3302 [BILL BOROFKA Y¥David Bil!Borofka 788-3302 |788-3252 11/6/95 BD logging camp owns bldg School energy usage does Dot Lake Alaska G.ry 883-5154 |11/1/95 [883-5151 Oarroil hargraves (Supt),then Jon Landrache (maint)Y Peter John Landroche |883-5151 |883-5267 11/1/95 D fot concem him :Stassel contacted him Dot Lake District heat system Oil Boiler-fired Y Stassel Bill Miller 883-5137 6 regarding wood usage 11/15 Edna Bay Southeast Island Schools 225-2836 11/6/95}225-9658 dave dossett,super.11/10/95 Y David David Dossett_|225-9658 |225-2836 [11/6/95 D__[Oossett:"not interested” Ekwok SW Region Schoo!District Y¥Peter Oon Ford (supt)|842-5288 |842-5180 1/7195 B Re-re-faxed starred vers Elim Benng Straits Schoo!District D4 UT RHO in Unalakleet)624-3099]7/20/95 |624-3611}8/1/95 [Dave Boling No 8/895 A Elim District Heat System 7 890-3811 {7/20/95 [890-3581]8/1/95 [Kenneth Kotongan Busy 8/25/95 Out of Town Never D__|No ECMs to consider. Elim FAA (7)(USKH no label)Harty Gilmore,FAA Anch}271-4470]9/19/95 [271-5280]9/19/95 No |Yes C__[Faxed Q.again 10/2/95 Elim Water and Sewer Facility 890-3811 |7/2095 [890-3581]8/1/95 [Kenneth Kotongan Busy 8/25/95 Out of Town Never D___|No ECMs to consider. Fort Yukon DOT-State Building x K DAW 656-1368]7/26/95 |451-2203 Lynne Francis Y David Jim Little 451-2203 |451-5263 11/6/95 A 11/13-will return by 11/15 Fort Yukon Public Water yas MX ys 662-2717|7/20/95 |662-2952]8/2/95 {Grafton Bergman 8/25/95 No 9/7/95 8/26/95 A Fort Yukon YFSD -School (Bumed in 1994)(FY Elem.school ph.no.)|662-2519 662-2352]8/1/95 Peter 8/25/95 M g Never D Fort Yukon Yukon Flats SD -Admin Buildin 662-2519]7/26/95 |662-2515]8/1/95 Peter 8/25/95 D 9 8/26/95 Y David Dorothy Jordan |662-2515 |662-2707 11/7/95 [»)Samson doesn't want toFortYukonYukonFlatsSD-School (Bumed in 1994)(FY high school ph.no.)662-2580 Y David Dorothy Jordan 662-2515 |662-2707 11/7/95 D doesn't want to Galena Alascom Not Large Enough 656-1331 N/A NIA NIAGalenaCitySchoolsxx656-1368|8/15/95 [656-1205 Bill Miller 8/18/95 8/28/95 9/8/95 A ;_Galena City Water Plant New waste heat bidg 656-1769]7/20/95 [656-1301]8/2/95 [Chow Taylor 8/2595 |Message Never O___[Building being replaced Gatena Huhndor's Store 656-1224|Mailed 8/14]656-1223]8/14/95 No Ans./Bus'CcGraylingDistrictHeatSystemNotinoperationanymore]453-5148]7/20/95 [453-5148]8/2/95 [Brian Leal Yes Never O___|No ECMs to consider. Send reminder fax letter to Grayling Iditarod Area School District x ><%(HQ in McGrath)524-3217,7/20/95 |524-3033]8/2/95 |John Monahan (Supt.}}9/14/95 |Refaxed Q.10/10/95 9/22/95 10/5/95 Y Peter _|John Monahan (Su/524-3033 |524-3933 11/2/95 8 cover alt Idit SD villagesGraylingWaterPlantS453-5148]7/20/05 _[453-5148 David Burkett 8/1/95 8/28/95 A Gustavus Fire Halt &Library fax 697-2451 Fireyall phe 2222 (fire hall is 697-2222)694-2369]Mailed 8/15]697-2350]9/14/95 9/5195 A Gustavus Gustavus School Will look for it 697-2378]Mailed 8/15]697-2248 Opp 9/29/95 Yes Doubtful c Gustavus IT Corporation 'Contractor -Not There No Never [2] Gustavus Tuboscope Contractor -Not Thera No Never D Hobart Bay Chatham School District Schools are trailers 768-3302 BILL BOROFKA Y David Bill Borofka 788-3302 |788-3252 |11/6/95 O __[trailers onlySandreminder fax letter to Holy Cross Iditarod Area School District «K *HQ in McGrath)474-0657|7/20/95 |474-9400 John Monahan (Supt.Yes 10/10/95 9/22/95 Y Peter [John Monahan (Su]524-3033 |524-3933 |11/2/95 B__|cover all Idit SO villages Holy Cross Water Facility Klay C7 CJ U 476-7141]7/20/95]476-7139[No answer |Alvin Demientieff 8/25/95 8/30/95 :A Huslia FAA No.is a recording CcHusliaFAAHarryGilmore,FAA Anca]273-4470|9/19/95}271-5280}9/19/95 No Yes Cj Faxed Q.again 10/2/95HusliaYukon/Koyukuk School District ba <<S JH in Fairbanks)832-5219]7/26/95 |474-9400|No answer |Perey-Frisbee 9/14/95 Yes 10/5/95 Y¥Peter Bud Duke (maint)[474-9400 x |474-0659 11/3/95 A Hyder Southeast Island Schools 7”|Bussed to B.C.225-2836 11/6/95]225-9658 dave dossett,super.Y David David Dossett 225-9658 |225-2836 11/6/95 D students bussed to BC -Rater Stev-Hill{mainh-|675.4250 |675-4336 be nell Kaltag District Heat System 534-2236]7/20/05 |534-9222|No answer [Austin Esmailka J.8/25/95 Yes C__{Gone fishing for the weekKaitagKaltagPumphouse534-2236]7/20/95 _|534-9222 [No answer|Austin E Je.8/25/95 Yes C___|Gone fishing for the weekKalta:Yukon/Koyukuk School District xX <_<J lthoin Fairbanks)474-0657}7/26/95 |474-9400 Percy Frisbee 9/14/95 Yes 40/5/95 Y Peter Bud Duke (maint)[474-9400 x |474-0660 11/3/95 A Kiana District Heat System [475-2174]7/20/05 _[475-2136|8/2/95 _[Bertha Shirk Refaxed |8/25/95 Yes Naver D__|No ECMs to consider Kiana Kiana Laundromat 11/6 Bertha dealing w/it_[475-2174]7/20/95 |475-2136]8/2/95 [Bertha Shirk Refaxed 8/25/95 Yes 9/20/95 Y David Bertha Shirk 475-2136 |475-2174 |11/7/95 [°)Laundromat does not exist11/30-Bertha says gave to Kiana Kiana Water Plant 11/6 Bertha dealing w/it |475-2174]7/20/95 |475-2136]8/2/95 _|Bertha Shirk Refaxed 8/25/95 Yes 9/20/95 Y David Bertha Shirk 475-2136 |475-2174 41/7/95 c Warren Found”fax on desk.T1722/,D S 'el \Dave Bell,Mninc.A Still interested 11/30-LeftCesNWArcticSchoolDistrictXoOOHQ"in Kotzebue 442-2392]7/20/95 |442-3472{8/1/95 {Dave Bell,mninc dir.Yes 10/6/95 11/10/95 ¥David Director 442-3472 |442-2392 |11/13/95.msg(JaQ-/ett As of 12/18/95 m59 Page 1 QUESTAT1I XLS left FP to Cbahg fs call Ke hewan Flectiwe 2 EZ-SEOSY5552Ut|Boy 2!Lares Chalke Ot litestedAppendixEQuestionnaireStatusKeA=Retumed 38 C =May or May Not Retum N =Not Contacted Yet pYrype .]QUESTIONNAIRE STATUS SUMMARY ¥lps Will Retum |B=WilNot Retum 3 Kho k wre Line P v4 LaLO 2 a lUSKH,Inc.wo.4730 DCRA Fuet Substitution Survey /? Date of 1st Date of 2nd)Contacted |Contacted]Date the Question.|Date Sent]When Ques.Re-contact by Division of Energy Status RemarksPa.-1st Call |Follow-up Person 2nd Call |Fotlow-up|9/14/95 9/19/95 |Question.|Question.|Copies [Thank Yo |Should Be |Div Energy |Oiv Energy Person Date QuestionCityFacilityNameSitoOt\.Remarks Fax No.|Date Faxed|Phone No Call Calted Phone No.Call or 9/15/95?)Received|Copied?[Distribute |Letter Finished {To Contact]Contactor Contacted Phone No Fax No pa sos Z 5 aTBii -}8-3252 Au 'en said yes-Klukwan Chatham School District x {S L]Yeainay by 11/9 788-3302 BILL BOROFKA Y David Ken Tyler 788-3302 |788-32 rete aoa Te °Dave Bell,Matnc.Still interested.11/30-LentKobukNWArcticSchoolDistrict"HQ"in Kotzebue 442-2392 7/20/95 _|442-3472]8/1/95 [Dave Bell,mntne dir.11/10/95,Y Oavid Director 442-3472 |442-2392 |11/13/95 6 msgKokhanokKokhanokVillageCouncit262-2240]8/15/95 |282-2202 John Nelson 8/25/95 [No Ans.(2)!cKokhanokSchooladded9/19/95 246-4473]9/19/05 |246-4280 Dennis Niedemeyer No Fax Q.Kokhanok Washeteria phone #changed 9/19/95 |282-2240]8/15/95 _|282-2203 Shirlay Nielson No Ans.(2)}Fax Q.cKoliganekCommunityBuilding(Kolig.Natives LTD ph.n |596-3484]8/5/95 |596-3441 8/25/95 _|Message cKoyukBeringStraitsSchoolDistrict"a i]t (HQ in Unalakieet)624-3099 7/20/05 [624-3611]8/2/95 [Dave Boling,Thomas Briscoe (supt.@ Koyuk)8/8/95 8/28/95 AKoyuk.Koyuk Washetena "963-3442 7/20/95 [963-3441[8/2/05 _|Call Becky 9/25/05 |063-9921 |8/25/05 |Message(2)C __|Anthony K.to call meKoyukukYukon/Koyukuk School District |'ce <-FP Y Peter |Bud Duke (maint)[474-9400 x |474-0658 |11/3/05 ALabouchereBay{No Schools i NLarsenBayKIBSDMainBuildingfilo<4 'SX _UT THA in Kodiak (486-9220)|486-9279]8/15/95 [847-2252]9/15/95 [Bruce Johnson (Supt.Yes 9/22/95 A -Lower Kalskag _[Kuspuk School District "Zow'Xx I 2p Peter Stev Hill (maint)|675-4250 |675-4336 |10/31/95 A__|Okay if Div Ener,Lower Kaiskag [PHS Pi *Only uses 2000 GPY 471-2363]8/15/95 _[471-2228 Mike Savage (Mayor)|No Answer]8/25/95 |[RefaxedQ|Yes D___jOnty uses 2000 gallons/yrMcGrathAlascomIncNotLargeEnoughN/A NAMcGrathAlaskaCommercialCompany524-3235]9/14/95 |524-3688 Mark Melton Yes 10/1/95 BMcGrathCityofMcGrathBuildingandWashetetig?St aes)$24-3536]7/2095 |524-3825]8/2/05 |G Hanley 8/25/95 8/25/95 8728/95 |__9/1/95 AMcGrathFAABuilding524-3197]9/14/95 |524-3611|9/15/95 [Pete Yos BMcGrathFAABuildingHarryGilmore,FAA Anch|271-4470]9/19/95 |271-5280|9/19/95 No Yes €___|Faxed Q.again 10/2/95 Send reminder fax letter toMcGrath\ditarod Area School District xX >4 K J §24-3217|7/20/95 |524-3033]8/2/05 [John Mi Yes 9/22/1095 Y Peter [John Monahan (Su{524-3033 |524-3933 11/2/95 8 cover ahi SOees = 1994 and only used once.NoMcGrathMNVCKilnProjectKiinonlyusedonce.524-3899]9/14/95 |524-3024]9/15/95 [Melody Yes O ___jenergy data availableNewStuyahok[Bristol Bay Area Health Corp.842-9354]9/14/95 |842-5201}9/15/95 [Jack Wassillie Yes 8NewStuyahok[District Heat System City of New Stuyahok [693-3290]8/14/95_[693-3171]9/14/95 _|William Gumilickpuk 8/25/95 |Refaxed Q|Never D___|No ECMs to consider.New Stuyahok _|SW Region School District (HQ in Dillingham'842-5428]8/15/95 |842-5287}9/14/95 [Don Ford Yes 9/25/95 Y Peter Don Ford (supt)|842-5288 |842-5180 |11/7/95 8 Re-re-faxed starred versNewStuyahok_(Wi bd [o}CD Ul City of New Stuyahok [693-3290]8/14/95 [693-3171]9/14/95 [William Gumlickpuk 8/25/95 |Refaxed Q|10/10/95 cNewStuyahok[Water Pump Building My)OU CD Yj [City of New Stuyahok 693-3290]8/14/95 [693-3171]9/14/95 {William Gi 8/25/95 _|Refaxed Q|10/2/95 ANikolaiIditarodAreaSchoolDistrictYPeter_|John Monahan (Sul 524-3033 |524-3933 11/2/95 BNulatoWellhouse(call prior to faxing)898-2207]7/2095 |898-2254]8/2/95 [Veron Madros Sr.No Answer}8/25/95 |No Ans.(2) : cNulatoYukon/Koyukuk School Distict |SC WZ '&Pf [HQ in Fairbanks 474-0857|9/14/95 |474-9400 Percy Frisbee Yas 10/5/95 Y Peter |Bud Duke (maint)[474-9400 x |474-0661 |11/3/95 A Wajoraaatonn 185° Jinvalidates energy consum.Ouzinkie KI8 Building (school HQ in Kodiak (486-9220)|486-9279]9/14/95 |486-9220]9/15/95 |Bruce Johnson (Supt)9/20/95 Yes D__fhistoryOuzinkieBuilding(school)(Ouz.school ph.no.){Ouzinke>_(ftabal Freozer >nr ="2...U |(Ouz.Corp.ph.no)680-2214{8/15/95 |680-2259 Elena Refaxed [|8/25/95 83195 APelicanityHallx735-2258]7/20/05 [735-2202|8/2/95 8/14/95 8/28/95 APelicanPelicanSeafoods735-2281|8/15/05 _[735-2204 No Never D {Received short letter[Port Alexander [Southeast island Schools Pi 225-2836 1176/95 [225-9658 dave dossett,super.11/10/95 ¥David David Dossett |225-9658 |225-2836 |11/6/95 [)Dossett:"not interested”Ruby Washeteria xO)©O&A [(city numbers)468-4443}7/26/95 [468-4401]6/2/95 {Kathy 8/8/95 8/30/95 : ARubyYukon/Koyukuk School District |><"2.Z_£|(local YKSD ph num)[474-0657]9/14/05 |474-9400 Percy Frisbee Yes 10/5/95 Y Peter |Bud Duke (maint)[474-9400 x |474-0657 |11/3/95 A Shungnak District Heat System [Tl iw]=437-2176]8/14/95 [437-2161 8/25/95 8/25/95 8/30/95 AShungnakKobukValleyElectricComp.Item wilt be deleted Rev.Rudy Hamish NIA N/A A Why doesnt DOE pay theShungnakNWArcticSchoolDistrictxcf2?)©U [iain kotcebue)442-2392]7/2095 |442-3472{8/2/05 _|Steve Hill Yes 10/6/96 SD's to compile this info?Shungnak River Pumphouse 437-2176]8/14/95 |437-2161 'City clerk will look for it 8/25/95 Yes 8SkwentnaMat-Su Borough Schools Ke x 3 Pp 745-2157 |11/2995 [745-0231 Peter Powell 11/6/95 Y Peter Peter Powell 745-2157 |745-0231 |11/2/95 A ___Sleetmute Kuspuk School District 2:5 2.f°Y Peter |Stev Hill (maint)|675-4250 |675-4536 |10/31/95 A [Okay if Biv EnergyStevensVillage[Yukon Flats SD Y David Borothy Jordan |662-2515 |662-2707 VATS (2)Samson doesn't want toTananaAlascomNotLargeEnoughNIAN/ATananaDistrictHeatSystem4wd-_X |Correct fax no.:366-7169]366-7169]7/20/05 [366-7159]8/2/95 8/25/95 9/5/95 aTananaFAABuilding571-1301}9/14/95 |366-7288 No -Tanana FAA Building Harty Gilmore,FAA Anch|271-4470]9/19/95 |271-5280]9/19/95 :No Yos C__[Faxed Q again 10/2/95TananaJailHouseUU)[e)Og 366-7169]9/14/95 |366-7158 978/95 ATananaTananaSafewaterLaundry[o}6 [oe]366-7169 386-7159]8/2/95 8/25/95 9/8/95 "Tanana Tanana Schoot District xX >C9)366-7201]7/20/95 |366-7203}8/2/95 |Ron Delay Refaxed Q 9/22/95 10/2/95 TSO WnTocomplete] today.Fiat fee of $12,000/yr for electricity.5200 gal/ys @TatitlekChugachSchoolPOSSIBLY325-2299 11/3/951325-2252 | 11/3/95|DENNIS MOORE Y David Dennis Moore |325-2252 |325-2299 |11/6/95 B _{$1.21/gatTenakeeSprings[Chatham School Distnct Done in ICP-no ECMs 786-3302 BILL BOROFKA Y David Bill Borofka 788-3302 |788-3252 |11/6/95 O __|done in ICPTetlinAlaskaGatewaySchoolsxSSxX883-5154 |11/1/95 [883-5151 Oarrolt hargraves (Supt),then Jon Landrache (maint)Y Peter John Landroche |883-5151 {883-5265 |11/1/95 A Tok x x be 4 Y Peter |John tandroche |883-5151 |683-5265 |11/1/95 A__[Non-study facility but SD isWhydoesn't DOE pay theUpperKatskag|Kuspuk School District qreg Pas t =P (HQ in Aniak)675-4305|7/20/95 [675-4250]8/2/95 |Steve Hill Yes Never!O ___[SD's to compile this info?SPUR Sthoot-Breiret (Scion prtaxno-sy nciie SEAS ¥37-2TSt =Yakutat Alascom t .Not Large Enough 784-3354 Thomas Briscoe (supt.@ Koyuk)N/A N/ACcWodave5.VEun ft b Ni.. .re=Ak ae,.1$Se eae '(,oO;Ve lec oe tat wove "Hho CLAN of Shoal 153 o £by Ss $sy r?+t Qum reputs /am GS.QUESTATIXLSAsof:12/18/95 2:Cest nly Che k POE aoc col al Com 'een Page 2 7 wi Sys teen |Maney gt \@o veo- . :Z.Flat tee afoot le @.sef genet)Pavers sd .Lo wa 4Ww.u Wetter pleF st 2 X=Aart a aexVaent Appendix E Questionnaire Status Key A =Retumed 'el C =May or May Not Retum 33 N =Not Contacted YetQUESTIONNAIRESTATUSSUMMARYB=Wit Retum 16 D =Will Not Return 33,USKH,inc.7.ion Su:--ewrveoewrewers = Date of 1st]Date of 2nd)Contacted |Contacted|Date the Question.[Date Sent]When Ques.Re-contact by Division of Energy Status Remarks .((|1st Cali |Followup Person 2nd Call |Follow-up |9/14/95 |9/19/95 |Queston.|Question.|Copies [Thank Yo |Should Be |Div Energy [Div Energy Person N pate esrCityFacilityNameOrnEeecRemarksFaxNo.|Date Faxed|Phone No Call Caited Phone No Can or 915/957]Raceived|Copied?[Distribute |Letter Finished |To Contact]Contactor Contacted Phone No.|Fax No axe =Yakutat Alaska Airlines 784-3528]9/14495_|784-3366]9/19/95 [Skip Ryman No Yes eYakutatAlaskaDOT/PF On Vacation til 10/1/95 |764-3536]6/15/95 |784-3293|9/19/95 [Sill Russ 82595 [Busy (2)|RefaxQ.Maybe eTry Gan Bagge al TEC 348YakutatDistrictHeatSystem784-3281]7/2095 _|784-3323]8/2/95 [Tom Armour No Answer |8/25/95 Yes 5 ty Gary ©0199)Yakutat Glacier Bear Lodge Too busy to fill in Quest.|784-3663[8/2/95 [784-3202]-8/2/95 Yes Never AYakutatLeonard's Landing Lodge Dal O O°784-3245]8/14/95 |784-3245 8/21/95 8/28/95 AYakutatSitkaSoundSpan©SK 784-3302]9/14/95 {784-3392 9/15/95YakutatU.S DOTIFAA __|FAA-FSS Fac Chief 784-3305]9/14/95 |784-3314]9/19/95 No rol Faxed @ again 10/2/05YakutatU.S.DOTIFAA Harry Gilmore,FAA Anch]271-4470]9/19/95 [271-5280]9/19/95 No Yes %Yakutat Yakutat City Schools x x x 784-3446]7/2095 [784-3318 Larry Eklund's sec.9/19/95 |Message |RefaxQ.[9/25/95 (omglete *O ZO Mea\or wee K*("| As of 12/18/95 Page 3 QUESTAT1 XLS Chenega Way indalting new per plet -/uote hed.No dhs.avn lable,-pn ypeferod for : Kian - Khai kwer -Survey SAYS tila rete Le elec. :.MOR RAP BV?A G i iG A po FAL «ai / :KUpie fRl ee fey yi al 8 /TONY KNOWLES,GOVERNORhyNy|mic [a\SP LA ER REGIONAL AFFAIRS ANCHORAGE,ALASKA 99501-2341 PHONE:(907)269-4500CTOR':PB DIVISION OF ENERGY ENGINEERINGPAX:(907)269-4608 November 21,1996 Ron DeLay,Superintendent Tanana City Schools Box 89 Tanana,AK 99777 Dear Mr.DeLay: The Division of Energy is pleased to provide you with recommendations for low cost/no cost energy saving measures that your school can undertake to reduce heating and electrical bills.At a time of tightening budgets,the Division is seeking ways to help Alaska's schools decrease costs so that more funds are available for education.Energy conservation is one way that the Division can help schools. The attached energy audit recommendations are the result of the recent walk through audit undertaken by Division staff David Lockard and Cristina Klein.The audit showed many areas of potential savings at minimal or no cost to your school. The recommendations also include an analysis of savings that would result from a lighting retrofit.This analysis shows that a switch to more efficient lighting would save the school a significant amount,about $23,000 a year in electrical costs.The actual cost of a lighting retrofit would be about $32,000.The simple payback,or the amount of time needed to pay for the retrofit out of savings,would be 1.5 years. Savings in heating fuel are more difficult to estimate,and will depend on the number of recommendations which you choose to follow. Please call Cristina Klein if you would like to know more about this information or if you would like recommendations on high efficiency lighting products. Thank you for participating in the Division of Energy's energy audit. Sincerely, Percy Frisby,Direotor ce:Cristina Klein David Lockard py J ae printed on recycled pacer)y 0.D 7 10.Before turning oon air-conditioners iin summer:-te loess ote _ : ALASKA DIVISION OF ENERGY Percy Frisby,Director Results of Tanana School Energy Audit -September 4,1996 LOW COST/NO COST OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE RECOMMENDATIONS: .Replace all incandescents that are on more than a few hours a day with compact fluorescents.The payback for a light that is on 40 hours a week is less than 5 months,which means that this retrofit can be paid for out of the school's annual operating budget. Consider valving off one of the two boilers for the spring,summer and fall to reduce standby losses and improve the system efficiency.Even though the burner may be turned off,there can be significant thermal losses through the heat exchanger of the boiler that is not in use. If there is a two month period during the summer when no space heating is needed,consider turning off all the hydronic circulating pumps.The _- Grundfos,Model B,735 Watt pump |noted uses $2,400 per year.Turning it off for two months would save $400.If there are two of these pumps,it would save $800.: Repair/replace photo sensor on the exterior 250 Watt high pressure sodium lightfixture that has malfunctioned (Bill Sam said it stays lit during the day).|estimate the potential savings at over $300 per year. Turn off all lightsin the building during unoccupied hours.This may prove a -greater deterrent to vandalism than leaving security lighting on,since any .-- lights in the building after hours will indicate an unwarranted entry.This © measure works particularly well when occupancy sensors are present,since'- an intruder would cause different areas of the building to light UP as hemovedthroughthem...wo or Repair/replace the broken thermostatin the kindergarten.oe ee feat SDisconnectanyunneededcopiersandrefrigerators(for 'example,during the.summer while schoolis notin session).The annual energy cost fora dorm- "size refrigeratoris approximately $200.A full-size refrigerator may cost $400-__a-$800 per year,depending on its efficiency and condition.:ne, Install low-flow showerheads and faucetsin locker rooms."Thiswill ed [water and fuel consumption. e Ensure that the heating system is not cera..-; "e Close all windows,doors and window blinds TUE"e Tumoff unnecessary lights and office equipment (sources of heat Bs aagigg se ve ALASKA DIVISION OF ENERGY Percy Frisby,Director -.11.Encourage a "culture of conservation',in which staff and students routinely turn off any lights and equipment they are not using.One way to do this is toorganizea"conservation”team made up of a teacher,student,the maintenance staff. ENERGY CONSERVATION EQUIPMENT RECOMMENDATIONS: 4.Retrofit the lighting system as described on the accompanying spreadsheet. This should provide an annual savings of approximately $21,000 at a cost of approximately $32,000,which would result in a simple payback of 1.5 years. 2.During the above-mentioned lighting retrofit,consider reducing the number of fixtures in overlit rooms (Room #3,Kindergarten,etc.).The DEC lighting level requirement for classrooms is 50 foot-candles measured at the desk surface. 3.If there are any commercial refrigerators or freezers that have condensing coils in heated spaces,consider re-configuring them to cool them with outside air. 4.Insulate hydronic pipes leading from the boiler to the VOTEC room. OTHER RECOMMENDATIONS 1.Whether or not outside air dampers are open during occupied hours,it isimportanttoensurethattheyareclosedduringunoccupiedhours.During the audit,Bill Sam was unsure whether the dampers were open or not.2.Consider repairing the time clock to control ventilation and temperature setback..Doing this properly may require installing a new electronic timeclock that includes battery backup to ensure that the system remains on schedule.If this measure resultsin an increase in the ventilation rates,it couldincreaseenergyuse.If all classroom areas have operable windows,this may satisfythe.Uniform Building Code ventilation requirement for schools. Set outside air intake dampers for minimum required ventilation rates.Tune up boilers and clean heat exchanger surfaces at regular intervals. Re-configure gym heating system ducts to supply air at floor level.OnhwCheck to make sure that school boilers are not heating waste heat loop. 11/19/96 © TANANA SCHOOL LIGHTS Hat CLASSRM,HALLWY,ETC LOCKERSETC GYM VOTEC BLDG EXITS TOTALS "1 EXISTING FIXTURES'>°°-”.:T-12,4',FLL2LAMPS/FIXT .INCANDESCENTS MERCURY VAPORS MERCURY VAPORS __INC.EXIT LIGHTS#OF LAMPS 7 634 117 22 10 16 WATTAGE/LAMP INCLBALLAST."4 48 :130 400 400 6 TOTAL WATTAGE ry :30432 15210 8800 4000 96 58538 COST PER YEAR ;$25,857 $12,924 $10,433 -$1,584 $319 $51,114 |RETROFITFIXTURES T-8,4,2LAMPSIFIX COMPACTFLUOR.-METAL HALIDE METAL HALIDE LED FIXTURES WATTAGE/LAMP W/BALLAST 33 27 250 250 4 TOTAL WATTAGE ms 20922 3159 5500 2500 16 32097 AVG HRSMWK (ANNUAL BASIS)43 43 60 20 168 COST PER KWH . .$0.38 $0.38 $0.38 $0.38 $0.38 GROSS SAVINGS PER YEAR $8,080 $10,239 $3,912 $593 $266 $23,091 KWH SAVINGS PER YEAR 21,264 26,946 10,296 1,560 699 60765 EXTRA FUEL REQUIRED (GALLONS)399 505 193 29 13 1,140 COST OF EXTRAFUEL $510 $647 $247 $37 $17 $1,459 NET COST SAVINGS PER YEAR "$7,570 »$9,593 $3,665 $555 $249 $21,632 MATLCOSTPERLAMP $25 .+$20 $50 $50 $50 TOTAL MATERIAL COST:$15,850 $2,340 $1,100 $500 $800 $20,590 MINUTES TO INSTALL PER LAMP .45 10 30 30 15 TOTAL HOURS TO RETROFIT _159 :20 "W 5 4 198 __LABOR AT $60/HR,NET,PER LAMP .$15 $10 $30.$30 $15 . "TOTALLABORCOST $9,510 :"$4,470 $660.'$300 $240 "$11,880 TOTALCOSTPER LAMP."la "$40 ee $30 $80 $80 $65 PROJECT COST 'a $1,760.©:$800 -$1,040 $32,470° SIMPLE PAYBACK pe 04 |05 a 1.4 4.2 15 -:.voto oO ..'oN Tr pe --!4 ne rar)nn :_e David Lockard mo bo bp Paget ro 11/19/96