Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutChefornak Fuel System Study November 1989 WH CopyteieaoieaCHEFORNAK FUEL SYSTEM STUDY Prepared for Alaska Energy Authority701EastTudorRoad Anchorage,Alaska 99519 Prepared by Fryer/Pressley Engineering,Inc. 560 East 34th Avenue,Suite 300Anchorage,Alaska 99503 NOVEMBER 1989 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY INTRODUCTION METHODOLOGY ANALYSIS AND EVALUATION 4.)Background 4,2 Tank Farm and Dike Evaluation 4.3 Pipeline Evaluation 44 Pump Evaluation 45 Right-of-Way Analysis CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS APPENDICES A.Cost Estimate B,Survey Notes List of Figures Figure 1:Proposed Tank Foundation Option Figure 2:Proposed City Tank Farm Layout Figure 3:Proposed Corporation Tank Farm Layout Figure 4:Pipeline Route Map 14 1.0 SUMMARY The City of Chefornak,located in southwestern Alaska,has a need for improvements to their bulk fuel storage and delivery system in the village.The city operates 2-125 KW diesel fueled electric generators,with an above ground 500 gallon day tank adjacent to the plant, The city's bulk fuel storage tank farm is located 1,200 feet from the power plant,be- tween the village and the beach.It consists of 4 tanks with a total capacity of 34,050 gallons.The wood timber foundation and dike are in poor condition. Tne Chefarnrmute Corporation,the local village corporation,also owns a bulk fuel storage tank farm directly adjacent to the city tank farm.It consists of 8 tanks that store a combination of fuel oil and gasoline,with a total capacity of 47,360 gallons.It also has a wooden timber foundation that is in poor condition.This tank farm does not have a containment dike. The city currently transfers fuel from the bulk tanks to the power plant day tank through a 1-1/2"rubber hose that lies directly on the tundra.It has been broken and repaired many times.The fuel transfer pump is located halfway between the bulk tanks and the power plant. The Lower Kuskokwim School District also owns a fuel transfer pipeline from the beach to their bulk fuel storage tanks located next to the school.in the vicinity of the city power plant.It runs within 310 feet of the city tank farm and within 25 feet of the power plant. It is used only once per year by the LKSD to fill their bulk tanks from a barge in the springtime. The following Improvements are needed and recommended for this system: e Tie into the LKSD fuel line at the closest point.Branch off from the pipeline at the power plant day tank location. °Replace the tank farm foundations and containment dikes for both the city and the corporation tank farms. e Move the fuel transfer pump to the location of the tank farm. °Replace all the tank farm piping and valves,paint the tanks and the new piping, and replace the tank vents and drains. 2.0 Several additional modifications and improvements are proposed to enhance the overall performance of the fuel oil storage system,they are as follows: °Replace the 500 gallon power plant day tank with a larger day tank so the capacity allows a week's supply or more.Recommend at least a 1,000 gallon tank. °Provide a wooden ramp over the pipeline for 3-wheeler and snow machine traf- fic. e Provide a security fence around the tank farms. °Provide security lighting at the tank farms. The estimated project cost to complete the recommended improvements including only the city tank farm and fuel system is as follows: With the timber foundation option:$340,504 With the gravel pad:$401,394 The estimated project cost to complete the additional modifications is $31,779 without contingencies.See Appendix A for the detailed cost estimate. The planning level project cost to complete the recommended Improvements to the corporation tank farm only |s as follows: With the timber foundation option:$551,183 With the gravel pad:$504,071 INTRODUCTION The City of Chefornak Is located on the Kinia River approximately 90 miles southwest of Bethel.Electricity for the community is provided by 2 city owned 125 KW diesel fueled electric generators.A 500 gallon day tank is located adjacent to the plant. The bulk fuel storage which serves the power plant tank farm Is located approximately 1,200 feet from the generation plant and between the community and the beach.It consists of 3 vertical tanks and 1 horizontal tank.The Chefarnrmute Corporation also owns a tank farm located adjacent to the city's tank farm.It consists of 4 vertical tanks and 4 horizontal tanks.This tank also needs to be upgraded and will be included In the report. 3.0 Fuel is delivered from the tank farm to the generator plant's 500 gallon day tank through a hose with a transfer pump.The fuel oil transfer pump is located in a small pumphouse approximately halfway between the bulk fuel tanks and the generator plant day tank. The bulk fuel tanks are filled once every summer by a fuel barge through a steel pipe that runs down to the beach. The school!district also has a fuel oil pipeline that runs from the beach up to the school facilities'bulk fuel oil storage tanks adjacent the school.This steel pipeline runs parallel to the city's fuel transfer hose line for part of it's length. This study.has been authorized by the Alaska Energy Authority to investigate the problems associated with the existing bulk fuel oil storage system and to investigate the feasibility of constructing a replacement for the approximately 1,200 feet hose transfer line between the bulk tank farm and the powerplant day tanks. The objectives of the study are to: °Conduct a field survey to establish the location and elevations of the new "pipeline,and to determine the condition of tne fuel farm and containment dike. e Develop a report that summarizes available options,and recommends a course of action including construction cost estimates. METHODOLOGY Background information and problem definition were developed through telephone conversations and meetings with the staff of the AEA.A right-of-way investigation was conducted by FPE and the AEA. Applicable data collection included the following: e Air photos of the city. e Plats and maps of the city and surrounding property. e Pictures provided by the AEA. On-site data collection included the following: e A survey to determine the location and elevations of a pipeline from the bulk fuel storage tank farm to the powerhouse day tank. e Conversations with members of the board of the city electric utility,conceming the problems of the existing system,and their recommendations for upgrading it. -3- 4.0 Observation of the bulk fuel storage tanks and containment cike with notes and photo documentation. Analysis and evaluations were made based upon collected data and observed condl- tions.The various options were analyzed and recommendations were then developed and presented in suitable detail to allow for the follow-on development of a bid package.Detailed calculations and design decisions are not a part of the study. ANALYSIS AND EVALUATION 4.) 4.2 Background The City of Chefornak operates a diesel fuel powered electric generation plant for the communities'power needs.It has two 125 KW generators,with one being used for standby purposes.A 500 gallon day tank Is located next to the power plant.Fuel is supplied to the community once a year by barge and is stored in bulk fuel storage tanks located approximately 1,200 feet from the plant and about 500 feet from the beach.Fuel is transferred to the electric plant day tank through an 1-1/2"rubber hose with a 1 HP transfer pump.The transfer pump Is located in a small pumphouse approximately halfway between the tank farm and the plant. The city utility has asked for assistanceto upgrade the bulk fuel storage system including the tank farm and the pipeline to the power plant. The school district also has a bulk fuel storage system in the village.Tne schoo! district's tank farm Is located adjacent to the school and consists of.3 vertical tanks.The containment dike around these tanks appears in good condition.The school district fills their tanks once per year from a barge.They own a 3-1/2” pipeline that runs from the beach to their bulk storage tanks.It parallels the route of the cities'fuel transfer hose for approximately half the distance,and runs within 25 feet of the city power plant.This pipeline Is used only once per year during the filling operation. Tank Farm and Dike Evaluation The city tank farm consists of 3 vertical tanks and 1 horizontal tank.The specifications of these tanks are: 2 vertical tanks: Diameter -12 feet Height-12 feet Capacity -10,150 gallons CORPORATION TANK FARM FUEL TRANSFER HOSE TO POWERPLANT CITY OF CHEFORNAK TANK FARM DIKE CONNECTION PIPING LINER ----_Pe CITY OF CHEFORNAK TANK FARM 1 vertical tank: Diameter -12 feet Height-16 feet Capacity -13,500 gallons 1 horizontal tank: Diameter -8 feet Length -27-8" Capacity -10,400 gallons TOTAL TANK FARM CAPACITY =34,050 Gallons Tnese tanks are in fair fo poor condition.The horizontal tank is fairly new,but has not been painted,and does net hove a dike of any kind.The 3 vertical tanks are older and were painted at one time,but are now rusting and in poor condition. The tank farm piping consists of a combination of rubber hose and steel pipe and is in poor condition.This piping and all valves should be replaced.Steel vaives are required.Tank vents and emergency relief vents could not be verified.A UL listing for the tanks could not be verified.The tank accessories such as level gages,vents,and drain valves should be checked and replaced if necessary. All of the tanks should be refinished with a silver paint,to minimize the heat gain -of the tank and contents,and protect against the thermal degradation of the permafrost.' Adjacent to the city tank farm is another tank farm owned by the village cor- poration.This tank farm consists of 4 vertical and 4 horizontal storage tanks. Some of these tanks contain gasoline and some contain fuel oil.These tanks are In fair to good condition.The tank vents and emergency relief vents could not be verified.A UL listing for the tanks could not be verified.These tank acces- sories should be checked and replaced if necessary.The cost estimate will as- sume the cost of replacing these specialities.This tank farm does not have a containment dike.This tank farm has a separate fill line from the beach.The cost estimate is based on upgrading this tank farm at the same time as the city owned tank farm.The specifications of the village corporation tanks are: 3 vertical tanks: Diameter -8 feet Height -14 feet Capacity -5.265 gallons 1 vertical tank: Diameter -10 feet Height-14 feet Capacity -8,225 gallons 2 horizontal tanks: Diameter -8 feet Length -27'-4° Capacity -10,265 gallons 1 horizontal tank: Diameter -8 feet Length-22 feet Capacity -8,270 gallons 1 horizontal tank: Diameter -10 feet Length-26 feet Capacity -15,335 gallons TOTAL TANK FARM CAPACITY =47,360 Gallons The existing platform support system for both of these tank farms Is inadequate. Each tank farm has a wooden timber support platform set on the tundra,with minimal wooden timber foundations.The wooden platforms have partially sunk In places allowing tanks to lean.Most of the hojizontal tanks were being held in place by various methods of cribbing,using 55 gallon drums or chunks of wood. Tnere was no gravel pads apparent nor any insulation in either tank farm. A steel platform should be constructed for each set of tanks,consisting of steel beams covered with sheet steel and painted.This steel platform,should be placed on a wooden timber support foundation consisting of 2 layers of 12"x 12° pressure treated timbers,constructed to spread the load out to as large an area as possible.A layer of polyurethane foam,or Dow Styrofoam,should be placed In the spaces between the first layer of timbers,to protect the permafrost beneath the tanks from thermal degradation.Polyurethane foam Is oil resistant, but does absorb moisture,aging with time.The rigid Insulation Is impervious to water,but is degraded by contact with petroleum products.Each should be carefully considered.{f polyurethane foam Is field applied over the tundra,a layer of filter fabric should be placed on the tundra below the first layer of tim- bers.The filter fabric will act to minimize the amount of foam that would fill voids In the tundra surface and for all practical purposes be lost as effective insulation. CONNECTION PIPING AND VALVES CHEFARNRMUTE CORPORATION TANK FARM 55 GALLON DRUMS MoE Dpto ne ee'vas ?kee a x va an SES Yrs §.'.aesaaDiyeeaekteeteetayok CHEFARNRMUTE CORPORATION TANK FARM Heat pipes should be installed around the tank farm foundation to ensure that the permafrost does not thaw. The perimeter of the tank foundation should be protected from thermal degradation,because of the permafrost condition of the soils.To accomplish this protection,a strip of insulation should be applied around the perimeter of the structure. To protect the perimeter insulation from wind,UV degradation and abrasion from work activities that will happen around the tank foundation,the insulation should be covered with sand bags.The sand bags may be filled with any thawed, drained,inorganic soil material locally available. The unprotected steel platform structure,and the use of the heavy timber level- ing courses may conflict with state enforced codes.Without an economically available source of gravel,few alternatives exist.It may be necessary to secure variances during the design process. The conizinment dike around the city tank farm is a combination of 2°x 6°wood frame and sand bags with a polyethylene liner.Tne dike and liner are in poor condition and it is unlikely that they would contain an oil spill. There is no dike of any kind around the village corporation tank farm.This is a violation of codes and regulations governing fuel storage tanks. A new separate dike needs to be constructed around each tank farm.The dike could be constructed of sheet steel welded to the steel platform.The top of the dike should be flat to allow for access to the tanks and for operations. With a welded steel containment dike no liner is needed.A drain for the contain- ment should be provided,to be used in a fire fighting situation. Ani illustration of this foundation is shown in Fig.1. An altemate tank farm foundation and containment dike design would be to build a gravel pad foundation on the tundra.For this type of foundation the ac- tive layer should be excavated completely and backfilled with non frost suscep- tible gravel.A source of gravel and a methed of delivering it to the site would have to be carefully considered because of the lack of gravel In the area and the difficulties in hauling material over the tundra.A layer of filter fabric and a layer of insulation would be placed beneath the gravel pad.A separate cost estimate of this alternative is included in the report. WELDED STEEL Thy DIKE.STRUCTURE ™.EXISTING WELDED STEEL DECK EXISTING W 8 X 10 TPROTECTIVEJSTEEL DECK STRUCTURE SAND BAGS ()ra (YY "HEAVY TIMBER LEVELING COURSES 7 (|jt 4 XT] SSASYAKSASVL,7,"Y 4 v7,4 PERIMETER INSULATION HEAVY TIMBER LEVELINGKYQSRKSWipdelnCOURSESWITHINSULATIONNNAN FIGURE 1 CHEFORNAK FUEL STORAGE SYSTEM STUDY FIGURE 1 -TANK FARM FOUNDATION OPTION FRYER/PRESSLEY ENGINEERING560EAST34thAVENUESUITE300 ANCHORAGE,ALASKA 99503 (907)561-16668 43 All of the piping and valves within the tank farm connecting the tanks together should be replaced.Expansion joints should be included on the piping to allow for tank movement.Anti-spill valves should be considered for the tank farms. The tanks should be marked with the name of the product and a flammable warning. The proposed layout of the city farm is shown is Fig.2,and the proposed layout of the corporation tank farm is shown in Fig.3. Pipeline Evaluation The existing method of fuel oil transfer from the bulk tanks to the power plant day tank is through an 1-1/2"rubber hose.It has been broken and repaired many times and is in poor condition.It lies directly on the ground and can become frozen in the ground.It is subject to damage from snowmachine and 3-wheeler traffic across it.The power plant operator indicated the hose Is used once every 3 days to transfer fuel to the 500 gallon day tank for the power plant.This fuel transfer hose Is inadequate and subject to leaks and needs to be replaced. Tne Lower Kuskokwim School District owns a 3-1/2"steel oil fill pipeline that runs from the beach to their bulk fuel tanks adjacent to the school.This pipeline paral- lels the route of the cities'fuel transfer hose,and runs directly adjacent to the city power plant.It currently is used by the school district only once per year to fil their bulk fuel tanks in the spring.The pipeline is supported on a combination of wood supports and wood piles. It is recommended that the city tie Into the school district line at the closest point, at the point where the school district line makes a 90 deg.tum from the beach toward the village.This would require construction of a new length of steel pipeline of 310 feet,with a diameter of 2".The pipeline should be of welded con- struction.It should be constructed above ground,on wooden supports,at a height not to exceed several inches,to allow traffic across it.This pipeline route Is shown in Fig.4.A wooden ramp built across the pipeline should be considered to enable traffic to cross the pipeline without damage. If it ls not possible to tie into the LKSD pipeline,then a separate 2”steel pipeline should be built from the tank farm to the power plant day tank.This pipeline would be approximately 1,200 feet long.It should be supported on a combina- tion of wood supports and wood piles in the low areas. At the connection point,a gate valve should be placed in each of the 3 pipeline sections,to configure the pipeline for the varying operations.Flex connections should be used to allow for pipeline movement. -9- PIPELINE TO POWER PLANT DAYTANK x \\L eesener AND RELIEF VENTS,TYP. CONTAINMENT DIKE FIGURE 2 -PROPOSED CITY TANK FARM LAYOUT FRYER/PRESSLEY ENGINEERING560EAST34thAVENUESUITE300 ANCHORAGE,ALASKA 99503 (907)561 1668 _- LL.me.O f GAZ EH O °Pz O 0 ges GAS L.CITY TANK FARM i 1 CONTANMENT DIKE ORAN _-- FIGURE 3 -PROPOSED CORPORATION TANK FARM LAYOUT FRYER/PRESSLEY ENGINEERING§60 EAST 34th AVENUE SUITE 300 ANCHORAGE,ALASKA 99503 (907)561-1666 POWER PLANT 500 GALLON DAY TANK POWER PLANT NgTTSCHOOL LKSD FUEL PIPELINE CITY POWER PLANT CONNECTION POINT TO LKSD PIPELINE CORPORATION TANK FARM CITY TANK FARM WN . anorng ='i eee pntiretaromoePsmeay5*"ak Pete.gf Qis. % i a Oe me ™° an tg%aie Leas a Th FES mats 'are 's gee.ree we,*,Thee:ctPraceeeRCAROrnsAse TRSenaymalRS,oe RN <:ay Ce ytaee He ADA aPYaseeStrenesak3=,Bet Rece ra a aFe GapeeeTa4Mioettd.%wed ac SS Pith a ete ea |to2bZoeSeseaeCee.ths Loree eS oan ARE| 44 At the power plant location another connection would be made to the school district pipeline for a branch to the power plant day tank.This section of pipeline would be 25 feet long and should also be placed on wooden supports several inches above ground level.It should be constructed with flex connections and swing Joints at the connection to the day tank to allow for movement.A gate valve should be installed in the downstream section of the main pipeline and in the branch to allow configurations for the various operations. Tne existing hose currently used by the city should be removed in its entirety. Tying Into the LKSD pipeline will require an agreement between them and the City of Chefornak to snare the maintenance and liability responsibilities and to define the operating procedure. Since tying into the !KSD pipeline would enable the city to use the LKSD fill line to the beach,the existing city fill line to the beach would no longer be necessary and it could be removed.The line connecting the corporation bulk tanks to the beach should remain,since they are filled separately and some of the tanks con- tain fuels other than diesel. A map and layout of the proposed pipeline Is shown in Fig.4. Pump Evaluation The city currently operates a transfer pump to transfer fuel from the bulk tanks fo the power plant day tank.The 500 gallon capacity of the power plant day tank requires fuel transfer once every 3 days.The pump Isa _1 HP,1 Ph,3450 RPM.itis wired from the power plant with the wires taped to the school district pipeline for the majority of the distance.The wiring is not in conduit and is subject to damage. Tne pump is located in a small pumphouse of wood frame construction,4'x 8'x 7'-4"high on posts,with the floor at 42"above grade,at approximately the mid- point of the pipeline.It appears weathertight.A gasoline powered pump is also stored In the pumphouse for emergency power failures. The pump is working now and appears to be adequate,but the actually pump curve should be checked to insure the performance Is adequate for the revised configuration.It might be necessary to replace the pump.Installing another pump for standby should be considered for a duplex pump configuration. The pump should be moved from its present location at approximately the mid- point of the pipeline,to the beginning of the pipeline at the bulk fuel tanks.The entire pumphouse structure could be moved at one time,which would eliminate -12- POND BARGE FILL =POINTS F S KINIA |2 RIVER ! CORPORATION =1 TANK FARM! Fo te CITY otAVL,TANK FARM |VALVE%G"0!3\\ix TYP, \bNerorns 20ser °°\wanCONNECTIONPOINT TO SCHOOL LINE\' FUEL PUMP SHACK ; POND EX!no--": SFE wnaA CONNECTION LINEFOOTBRIDGETODAYTANK OmL 1SECOND> \ ne =SoHo. O------EXISTING SCHOOL FUEL LINE ---+--PROPOSED TIE-IN TO SCHOOL LINE veces EXISTING FOOT PATH -+--EXISTING FUEL TRANSFER HOSE @ PROPOSED VALVE LOCATION SCHOOL POND ALASKA ENERGY AUTHORITYFIP.witace oF cHerornaK |E].FRYER/PRESSLEY ENGINEERING -[ore : 11/30/89 :560 EAST 34th AVENUE SUITE3 (907)561-1666 N.T.S ANCHORAGE,ALASKA 99503 LKSD FUEL PIPELINE PUMPHOUSE an ey : R 4 +oe - " aeb': oo a. eee ee . - ay PUMPHOUSE FUEL PUMP 5.0 constructing a new pumphouse.The main reason for moving the pump to the beginning of the line is to limit suction lift and priming requirements.The pump should be powered frcm the power plant by running conduit and wire down the length of the pipeline and tied to it.An automatic pump shut off with a float ) switch in the day tank should be Included in the pump controls to prevent overfill- Ing the day tank.A separate high level float switch needs to be Installed with a control valve in the fill line of the day tank to shut off the oil flow to prevent over- filling.A 1-1/2"conduit will be needed for the pump power and control circuits and the possibility of lighting at the tank farms. 4.5 Right-of-Way Analysis A preliminary right-of-way analysis revealed that the tank farms appears to be on the Chefarnrmute Corporation land and part of the pipeline appears to be on the State of Alaska airport property,and part on city and/or private property.An Official survey will have to be done prior to the system design to determine the legal property owners and the necessary right-of-ways obtained. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The existing fuel transfer hose from the bulk fuel tanks to the power plant day tank Is In- adequate and needs to be replaced with a steel pipeline.It can easily be damaged and subsequently develop leaks. The tank farms belonging to the City of Chefornak and the Chefarnrmute Corporation are not adequately diked.Tne Corporation tank farm does not have a dike at all.The city's tank farm has a dike,but it is in poor condition and needs to be replaced.The in- tegrity of the liner is questionable. The foundations beneath the two tank farms are inadequate and need to be replaced. The foundation beneath the city's tanks has deteriorated and some tanks are sinking and leaning.Many of the tanks in the corporation tank farm are braced with 55 gallon drums to hold them in place. The connection piping between the tanks in both tank farms is a combination of rubber hose and steel piping and should be replaced.The city tanks especially need to be cleaned and refinished with a protective coating,and refinishing all of the tanks in both tank farms should be considered.A reflective coating such as silver should be used to reduce the heat gain of the tank and contents,to protect the thermal integrity of the permafrost. -14- The recommendations for the upgrade of the complete bulk fuel oil storage system are as follows: °Connect to the existing 3-1/2"Lower Kuskokwim School District fuel oil pipeline at the closest point.Provide pipe supports.Provide flex connections.Branch off the school district pipeline at the power plant location.Provide all necessary valves at the connection point and at the power plant connection to configure the pipeline for the various operations.Clean and test the complete pipeline. e Move the transfer pump and pumphouse to the location of the tank farm.Con- sider a duplex pump installation.Run conduit and wire along the pipeline to power the pump,with control at the day tank location.Include an automatic pump shutoff with a float switch in the day tank and a separate high limit with a conirol valve in the fill line of the day tank. e Replace the foundation beneath the city and the corporation tank farms with either a wood timber foundation and steel platform or a gravel pad foundation. Include insulation In the foundation.Consider heat pipes for stabilization of the tundra permafrost.Construct new dikes and liners for the tank farms. e Replace all of the piping and valves in the tank farm. °Paint and label the tanks and replace all tank accessories such as vents,emer- gency relief vents,and tank drains as needed. The estimated project cost to complete the recommended improvements including only the city tank farm and fuel system Is as follows: With the timber foundation option:$340,504 With the gravel pad:$401,394 The estimated project cost to complete the additional modifications is $31,779 without contingencies.See Appendix A for the detailed cost estimate. The planning level project cost to complete the recommended Improvements to the corporation tank farm only Is as follows: With the timber foundation option:$551,183 With the gravel pad:$504,071 Several additional Improvements are recommended to enhance the overall perfor- mance of the fuel oil storage system,they are as follows: e Replace the 500 gallon power plant day tank with a larger tank so the day fank capacity allows a week's use or longer.Recommend at least a 1,000 gation tank. -15- °Provide a ramp over the pipeline for 3-wheeler and sncwmachine traffic. °Provide a security fence around the tank farms. e Provide security lighting at the tank farm. The planning level project cost estimate for the additional Improvements Is $31,779, without contingencies.See Appendix A for the detailed cost estimate. -16- APPENDIX A -COST ESTIMATE CHEFORNAK FUEL SYSTEM CITY TANK-FARM AND FUEL SYSTEM PROJECT COST CALCULATION TIMBER FOUNDATION OPTION CONSTRUCTION COST $243,217 DESIGN (18%)$24,322 SIA (29%)$48,643 PROJECT CONTINGENCY (16%)$24,322 PROJECT TOTAL $349,504 W/@ ALTERNATES CORPORATION TANK FARM ONLY TIMBER FOUNDATION OPTION CONSTRUCTION COST 393792 CESIGN (16%)$39,370 SIA (28%)$78,749 PROJECT CONTINGENCY (16%)$39,376 PROJECT TOTAL $551,183 W/O ALTERNATES GRAVEL PAD OPTION $286,718 $28,671 $57,342 $28,671 $491,394 GRAVEL PAD OPTION 362851 $36,285 $72,919 $36,885 $694,871 CHEFORNAK FUEL Conceptual Cost Estimate Prepared for: FRYER/PRESSLEY ENGINEERING 560 East 34th Ave.Suite 300 Anchorage,Alaska 99503 (907)561-1666 CHEFORNAK FUEL Prepared for FPE CONSULTING ENGINEERS by Clark-Graves,Inc. TABLE OF CONTENTS DESCRIPTION PAGE #DESCRIPTION PAGE # Table Of ContentS 2.....cc ccc cece cece reer e nen ennes Page|Estimate -Small Tank Farm .Timber Foundation ......cece cece cece acne cseen Page 1Documents&NoteS .......ccccncccecsccncereccnes Page ii Gravel Pad......00 Page 2 SUMMALY 2...cece eee ce eee rece eee cece nee eeeaee Summary Pipeline to School District Pipeline ..............8.Page 3 F Tee off School District Power Plant ..............5-Page 3Estimate-Large Tank Farm Timber Foundation ......cece ese e eset cence evsecs Page 1 Move Pump &Pumphouse .....+..-+++eseeereees Page 4PaintTankS.........ccccccccccccccensccceceres Page 5GravelPad20...cece cee cee cect acne ee ences Page 2 General Reaui t Page 5PipelinetoSchoolDistrictPipeline................Page 3 CQUTEMEMS so serecrrseeececersecceces ag Tee off School District Power Plant ...............-.Page 3 Alternates Move Pump &Pumphouse ..............-25-005-Page 4 Security Fence ......ccc cee ccc cece net eeeeeee Page 6 Paint Tanks 2.0....ccc ccc c cece e cece e eee necees Page 5 ,Security Lighting ........cece cece e eee cece ewes Page 6GeneralRequirements..........cecceecencecence Page 5 Ramp over Pipeline ..........ccecececcceceeeeee Page 7 Alternates Security Fence .........cece cece cee cece ee eeeee Page 6SecurityLighting.........-ccceceeeewereeeeneee Page 6RampoverPipeline...........ccc eee e eee e eee ees Page 7 Page i CHEFORNAK FUEL REFERENCE DOCUMENTS Prepared for FPE CONSULTING ENGINEERS by Clark-Graves,Inc. DRAWINGS:SHEETS:DATE:SPECIFICATIONS:DATE: Mechanical Narrative. Mechanical 8.5x11 detail of fuel tank stand 8.5x11 Air Photo of site NOTES This estimate assumes both tank farms would be modified under the same contract.If this assumption Is not valid there would be a sig- nificant increase to both of the estimates. . Page ii oo Large Tank Farm-= CHEFORNAK FUEL LARGE TANK FARM Prepared for FPE CONSULTING ENGINEERS by Clark-Graves,Inc. CONCEPTUAL COST ESTIMATE:SUMMARY OF COSTS 04-Dec-89 DESCRIPTION TIMBER FOUNDATION OPTION GRAVEL PAD OPTION LINE 1:1.A -TIMBER FOUNDATION $274,694 N/A 1 2:1.B -GRAVEL PAD N/A $245,046 2 3:2 -PIPELINE TO SCHOOL DISTRICT PIPELINE N/A N/A 3 4:3 -TEE OFF SD LINE AT POWER PLANT N/A N/A 4 5:4 -MOVE PUMP &PUMPHOUSE N/A N/A 5 6:5 -PAINT TANKS $20,469 $20,469 6 7:6 -GENERAL REQUIREMENTS $57,111 $57,111 7 SUBTOTAL:. $352,275 $322,626 <<<<< BOND AND ALL RISK INSURANCE COVERAGE:1.6%$5,636 $5,162 UNASSIGNED CONTINGENCY:10.0%$35,791 $32,263 ALLOWANCE FOR INFLATION:N/A N/A N/A TOTAL ESTIMATED COST -BASIC BID:$393,702 $360,051 <<<<<< ALTERNATES W/OUT CONTINGENCIES WITH CONTINGENCIES Al -SECURITY FENCE $9,146 $10,222 A2 -SECURITY LIGHTING $12,090 $13,511 A3 -RAMP OVER PIPELINE N/A N/A $21,236 $44,969 Summary CHEFORNAK FUEL LARGE TANK FARM CONCEP TUAL ESTIMATE Prepared for FPE CONSULTING ENGINEERS by Clark-Graves,Inc.DATE:04-Dec-89 MATERIAL COST LABOR HOURS TOTAL TOTAL COST TOTAL COST LINE .Sr Se +LABOR W/O O'HEAD WITH O'HEAD #WORK DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNITS UNIT TOTAL UNITS TOTALS COST AND PROFIT AND PROFIT 1 2 1.A -TIMBER FOUNDATION 3 4 Treated Timber 12x12 @ 2'oc 53,448 BF $0.75 $40,086 0.011 610.8 $24,433 $64,519 5 Structural Steel Framing 16,512 LBS $0.75 $12,384 0.007.117.9 $4,718 $17,102 6 Structural Deck 4,128 SF $5.10 $21,053 0.041 169.3 $6,773 $27,826 7 Sheet Steel Dike 18"High 417 SF $2.55 $1,063 0.069 28.8 $1,150 $2,214 8 Foundation Insulation 45,624 BF $0.50 $22,812 0.006 260.7 $10,428 $33,240 9 Heat Pipes 3 BA $4,000.00 $12,000 24.000 72.0 $2,880 $14,880 10 Dike Drain 1 EA $100.00 $100 3.000 3.0 $120 $220 11 12 Relocate Tanks on new Foundation 13 Demolition 8 TANKS $20.83 $167 2.000 16.0 $640 $807 14 Oil Transfer 8 TANKS $41.67 $333 8.333 66.7 $2,667 $3,000 15 Lifting 8 TANKS $375.00 $3,000 4.000 32.0 $1,280 $4,280 16 Repiping 8 TANKS $20.83 $167 2.000 16.0 $640 $807 17 18 Freight 200,909 LBS $0.30 $60,273 0.001 172.2 $6,888 $67,161 19 Freight on Insulation 7,756 LBS $0.80 $6,205 0.001 11.1 $443 $6,648 20 21 22 23 24 @eeeeeonveeeoeeeve see ee @eeeeoeneeeseese e@eeneeeeoeeee @eeeeoeeeeoeceevoeeesoseeee eee eeeeeenee eee eoeocoeoeveeceoeeeoeeveecene eevee evoeevene een eeeveees eens eeoevaee eve es ee ee 25 SUBTOTAL:1.A -TIMBER FOUNDATION $179,642 1576.5 $63,061 $242,703 26 Ay NN 28 DIVISION SUB-TOTAL WITH OVERHEAD AND PROFIT:$206,589 $68,106 $274,694 29 LABOR RATE FOR THIS DIVISION:$40.00 PER HOUR CHEFORNAK FUEL CONCEPTUAL ESTIMATE LARGE TANK FARM Prepared for FPE CONSULTING ENGINEERS by Clark-Graves,Inc.DATE:04-Dec-89 MATERIAL COST LABOR HOURS TOTAL TOTAL COST TOTAL COST LINE poreseceeecncnee a ee +LABOR W/O O'HEAD WITH O'HEAD #WORK DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNITS UNIT TOTAL UNITS TOTALS COST AND PROFIT AND PROFIT 31 32 1.B -GRAVEL PAD 33 34 Excavation 1,546 CY $7.41 $11,446 0.160 247.3 $9,892 $21,338 35 Imported Fill 1,546 CY $51.61 $79,770 0.160 247.3 $9,892 $89,662 36 Dike Fill Imported 2°H 6°V 103 CY $51.61 $5,314 0.160 16.5 $659 $5,973 37 Membrane Liner 4,128 SF $1.00 $4,128 0.017 70.8 $2,831 $6,959 38 Dike Drain 1 EA $100.00 $100 3.000 3.0 $120 $220 39 Sand Bedding 50 CY $50.00 $2,523 0.500 25.2 $1,009 $3,532 40 Heat Pipes 8 EA $4,000.00 $32,000 24.000 192.0 $7,680 $39,680 41 Foundation Insulation 6"24,768 BF $0.50 $12,384 0.006 141.5 $5,661 $18,045 42 Relocate Tanks on new Foundation 43 Demolition 8 TANKS $20.83 $167 -2.000 16.0 $640 $807 44 Oil Transfer 8 TANKS $41.67 $333 8.333 66.7 $2,667 $3,000 45 Lifting 8 TANKS $375.00 $3,000 4.000 32.0 $1,280 $4,280 46 Repiping 8 TANKS $20.83 $167 2.000 16.0 $640 $807 47 48 Freight 3,200 LBS $1.20 $3,840 0.001 4.6 $183 $4,023 49 Freight on Insulation 4,211 LBS $3.00 $12,632 0.001 6.0 $241 $12,872 50 51 52 53 54 cece cece cece eee ete eee tena een eseesveeescee eeeeeeeceres ec cecens eer c cece eee n ccc cece eee e eee eee ee ees ceases escecesceeeees 55 SUBTOTAL:1.B -GRAVEL PAD $167,803 1084.8 $43,394 $211,197 56 i ND aaaae 58 DIVISION SUB-TOTAL WITH OVERHEAD AND PROFIT:$192,973 $52,072 $245,046 59 LABOR RATE FOR THIS DIVISION:$40.00 PER HOUR ©RNR DSaee CHEFORNAK FUEL CONCEPTUAL ESTIMATE LARGE TANK FARM Prepared for FPE CONSULTING ENGINEERS by Clark-Graves,Inc.DATE:04-Dec-89 MATERIAL COST LABOR HOURS TOTAL TOTAL COST TOTAL COSTLINEfewereweweececnnei+LABOR W/O O'HEAD WITH O'HEAD #WORK DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNITS UNIT TOTAL UNITS TOTALS COST AND PROFIT AND PROFIT 61 62 2 -PIPELINE TO SCHOOL DISTRICT PIPELINE 63 64 65 See Small Tank Farm 66 67 68 69 70 71 COS HSEREHSHSHSSHSHEHSHSSHSHHSHSHEEHSHSHHHEHSHHEHSHEH HEE HSHESHHEHSHHHEHSHSHEHESEEHHSHSHRHEHEHHEHHHHEHEHHEHEHEHROHHSHHHHEHSHEHEHRHEHSH ORES HS HHESEOHHEHSHHSSHSEHEHSHSHHEESHEHSHHEHO OE 72 SUBTOTAL:2 -PIPELINE TO SCHOOL DISTRICT PIPELINE 75 DIVISION SUB-TOTAL WITH OVERHEAD AND PROFIT: 76 LABOR RATE FOR THIS DIVISION:$40.00 PER HOUR 79 3 -TEE OFF SD LINE AT POWER PLANT 81 See Small Tank Farm 85 SUBTOTAL:3 -TEE OFF SD LINE "AT POWER PLANT 88 DIVISION SUB-TOTAL WITH OVERHEAD AND PROFIT: 89 LABOR RATE FOR THIS DIVISION:$40.00 PER HOUR CHEFORNAK FUEL CONCEPTUAL ESTIMATE LARGE TANK FARM Prepared for FPE CONSULTING ENGINEERS by Clark-Graves,Inc.DATE:04-Dec-89 MATERIAL COST LABOR HOURS TOTAL TOTAL COST TOTAL COST LINE eee ew eee wee e ences os rn +LABOR W/O O*'HEAD WITH O'HEAD #WORK DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNITS UNIT TOTAL UNITS TOTALS COST AND PROFIT AND PROFIT 91 92 4 -MOVE PUMP &PUMPHOUSE 93 94 95 See Small Tank Farm 96 97 . 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 a ee meee cece cece sense eee ecececces occ cece cece cececccccees acc c ccc cece cc ere cece eee access ccesesens 115 SUBTOTAL:4 -MOVE PUMP &PUMPHOUSE 116 sO 118 DIVISION SUB-TOTAL WITH OVERHEAD AND PROFIT: 119 LABOR RATE FOR THIS DIVISION:$40.00 PER HOUR 0 CHEFORNAK FUEL LARGE TANK FARM CONCEPTUAL ESTIMATE Prepared for FPE CONSULTING ENGINEERS by Clark-Graves,Inc.DATE:04-Dec-89 MATERIAL COST LABOR HOURS TOTAL TOTAL COST TOTAL COST LINE 2 Se +LABOR W/O O'HEAD WITH 0'HEAD #WORK DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNITS UNIT TOTAL UNITS TOTALS COST AND PROFIT AND PROFIT 121 122 5 -PAINT TANKS 123 124 SandBlasting 5,156 SF $0.65 $3,352 0.036 184.2 $7,366 $10,718 125 Paint 5,156 SF $0.25 $1,289 0.020 103.1 $4,125 $5,414 126 Protection 1 JOB $500.00 $500 16.000 16.0 $640 $1,140 127 .|2:IS 129 SUBTOTAL:5 -PAINT TANKS $5,141 303.3 $12,131 $17,272 130 UBL ene eee ee ene ee eee ee ee ee ec ee ee ee ee cee tenement eee enn etme e eee e reece ceceees 132 DIVISION SUB-TOTAL WITH OVERHEAD AND PROFIT:$5,912 ;$14,557 $20,469 133 LABOR RATE FOR THIS DIVISION:$40.00 PER HOUR ; Os 135 136 -GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 137.Mob 1 JOB $5,750.00 $5,750 $5,750 138 Supervision 1 MTHS 126.000 126.0 $5,040 $5,040 139 Financing 1 JOB $2,500.00 $2,500 $2,500 140 Freight 3,895 LBS $0.65 $2,532 $2,532 141 Special Freight 1,000 LBS $2.00 $2,000 $2,000 142 Room &Board 223 MDAYS $125.00 $27,920 $27,920 143.Transportation 3 TRIPS $900.00 $2,700 8.000 24.0 $960 $3,660 144d aweccccccccccccccccccce eeec ee cseee eee meee eee w eee cee neeeesseces Cee ecto meee newer ea nec e case e nsec eecceeeeeee 145 SUBTOTAL:6 -GENERAL REQUIREMENTS $43,401 150.0 $6,000 $49,401 146 1A 148 DIVISION SUB-TOTAL WITH OVERHEAD AND PROFIT:$49,911 $7,200 $57,111 149 LABOR RATE FOR THIS DIVISION:$40.00 PER HOUR -49911 -7200 bn0 CHEFORNAK FUEL CONCEPTUAL ESTIMATE LARGE TANK FARM Prepared for FPE CONSULTING ENGINEERS by Clark-Graves,Inc.DATE:04-Dec-89 MATERIAL COST LABOR HOURS TOTAL TOTAL COST TOTAL COST LINE Herc eee e cece en enee Pe oe +LABOR W/O O'HEAD WITH O'HEAD #WORK DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNITS UNIT TOTAL UNITS TOTALS COST AND PROFIT AND PROFIT 151 152 Al -SECURITY FENCE 153 154 Fencing 278 LF $9.40 $2,613 -0.128 35.6 $1,423 $4,037 155 Foundations 28 EA $7.00 $195 1.000 27.8 $1,112 $1,307 156 Mob Fencing Operations 1 JOB $2,500.00 $2,500 $2,500 157 eeeeveevevreeaseeeneeeoeveeeevneseeneeeeenseeeeeevneeeeeeoeeevoeseoeeeeseeeeaneneeveeeeaevneeeeoeevneereseeneaeeenseeeveeoee een eevee eeneeeeneeeveeanseeovneoeveeaeeeveeeneeeeovee 158 SUBTOTAL:Al -SECURITY FENCE *$5,308 63.4 $2,535 $7,843 159 -5308 -63 +2535 -7843 1650 Bee ccc e cee cece eee ew ene e cece erences 161 DIVISION SUB-TOTAL WITH OVERHEAD AND PROFIT:$6,104 ,$3,042 $9,146 162 LABOR RATE FOR THIS DIVISION:$40.00 PER HOUR -6104 +3042 D5 RS 164 165 A2 -SECURITY LIGHTING 166 167.Security Lights on Standards 4 BA $1,500.00 $6,000 16.000 64.0 $2,560 $8,560 168 1"C,3#10XHHW 278 LF $2.45 $681 0.100 27.8 $1,112 $1,793 169 . 170 171 172 173 174 eoteoeeoevecevaeveeveeeeseeeeoae ewe evpeeevesenesenaeeeeeeeve eeseeese0eseveesesvesveeeeveeeesveoeeeenvneoee @eeeseseee¢ee eoeeeeeveneeevns oven eeevneveeeeeveeevneneeeeneeneeeaneea eed175SUBTOTAL:A2 -SECURITY LIGHTING $6,681 91.8 $3,672 $10,353 176 -6681 -92 -3672 -10353L727wnceeeeeeeeeeeeeneeeneeneenceenereeneneeeeneeneneencenenneneeeneaneeeeneteeencascances178DIVISIONSUB-TOTAL WITH OVERHEAD AND PROFIT:$7,683 $4,406 $12,090 179 LABOR RATE FOR THIS DIVISION:$40.00 PER HOUR -7683 -4406 oT CHEFORNAK FUEL CONCEPTUAL ESTIMATE LARGE TANK FARM Prepared for FPE CONSULTING ENGINEERS by Clark-Graves,Inc.DATE:04-Dec-89 MATERIAL COST LABOR HOURS TOTAL TOTAL COST TOTAL COST LINE fee e eee e wee e een eee a +LABOR W/O O'HEAD WITH O'HEAD #WORK DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNITS UNIT TOTAL UNITS TOTALS COST AND PROFIT AND PROFIT 181 182 A3 -RAMP OF PIPELINE 183 184 185 See Small Tank 186 187 ;. 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 sno vccccvcccccccesccsacceces acc ecccccene sec ceceeee wee eee nnces eee ceeccccnee wc ccc cece ccc ccc cece cece r ese asecscescoee 205 SUBTOTAL:A3 -RAMP OF PIPELINE 206 110)eennnneeee.ee rrr rhe.or eee 208 DIVISION SUB-TOTAL WITH OVERHEAD AND PROFIT: 209 LABOR RATE FOR THIS DIVISION:$40.00 PER HOUR 0 Ieee Small Tank Farm CHEFORNAK FUEL SMALL TANK FARM Prepared for FPE CONSULTING ENGINEERS by Clark-Graves,Inc. CONCEPTUAL COST ESTIMATE:SUMMARY OF COSTS 04-Dec-89 DESCRIPTION TIMBER FOUNDATION OPTION GRAVEL PAD OPTION LINE 1:1.A -TIMBER FOUNDATION $125,632 N/A 1 2:1.B -GRAVEL PAD N/A $164,917 2 3:2 -PIPELINE TO SCHOOL DISTRICT PIPELINE $9,091 $9,091 3 4:3 -TEE OFF SD LINE AT POWER PLANT $757 $757 4 5:4 -MOVE PUMP &PUMPHOUSE $22,552 $22,552 5 6:5 -PAINT TANKS $12,118 $12,118 6 7:6 -GENERAL REQUIREMENTS $47,472 $47,472 7 SUBTOTAL:.$217,624 $256,909 <<<<< BOND AND ALL RISK INSURANCE COVERAGE:1.6%$3,482 $4,111 UNASSIGNED CONTINGENCY:10.0%$22,111 $25,691 ALLOWANCE FOR INFLATION:N/A N/A N/A TOTAL ESTIMATED COST -BASIC BID:$243,217 $286,710 <<<<<< ALTERNATES W/OUT CONTINGENCIES WITH CONTINGENCIES Al -SECURITY FENCE $9,946 $11,116 A2 -SECURITY LIGHTING $11,389 $12,728 A3 -RAMP OVER PIPELINE $2,055 $2,297 TOTAL ALTERNATES $23,390 $49,530 Summary CHEFORNAK FUEL SMALL TANK FARM Prepared for FPE CONSULTING ENGINEERS by Clark-Graves,Inc. CONCEPTUAL ESTIMATE DATE:04-Dec-89 TOTAL LABOR MATERIAL COST LABOR HOURS LINE tescccrescccccccs to tess sce ccccscces + TOTAL COST TOTAL COST W/O O'HEAD WITH O'HEAD #WORK DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNITS UNIT TOTAL UNITS TOTALS cost AND PROFIT AND PROFIT 1 2 1.A -TIMBER FOUNDATION 3 4 Treated Timber 12x12 @ 2'oc 20,136 BF $0.75 $15,102 0.011 230.1 $9,205 $24,307 5 Structural Steel Framing 7,088 LBS $0.75 $5,316 0.007 50.6 $2,025 $7,341 6 Structural Deck 1,772 SF $5.10 $9,037 0.041 72.7 $2,907 $11,944 7 Sheet Steel Dike 18"High 279 SF $2.55 $711 0.069 19.2 $770 $1,481 8 Foundation Insulation 22,392 BF $0.50 $11,196 0.006 128.0 $5,118 $16,314 9 Heat Pipes 3 EA $4,000.00 $12,000 24.000 72.0 $2,880 $14,880 10 Dike Drain 1 EA $100.00 $100 3.000 3.0 $120 $220 11 12 Relocate Tanks on new Foundation 13 Demolition 4 TANKS $20.83 $83 2.000 8.0 $320 $403 14 0il Transfer 4 TANKS $41.67 $167 8.333 33.3 $1,333 $1,500 15 Lifting 4 TANKS $375.00 $1,500 4.000 16.0 $640 §2,140 16 Repiping 4 TANKS $20.83 $83 2.000 8.0 $320 $403 17 18 Freight 80,139 LBS $0.30 $24,042 0.001 68.7 $2,748 $26,789 19 Freight on Insulation 3,807 LBS $0.80 $3,045 0.001 5.4 $218 $3,263 20 21 22 23 24 e@aeeeesevneeeeveoeeeeaen eee eevee sneeeeeeeoeeeeeneeeeanseeeeeoev ene eeneeeaeneeenaeneeneeeevneeeenseeeesneeeeseeseneneeeeneeeeneaeeeeevneeeneeeeeese @eveveoee 25 SUBTOTAL:1.A -TIMBER FOUNDATION $82,383 715.1 $28,604 $110,987 26 Ay a 28 DIVISION SUB-TOTAL WITH OVERHEAD AND PROFIT:$94,740 $30,892 $125,632 29 LABOR RATE FOR THIS DIVISION:$40.00 PER HOUR wee ee renner een er eae ereerenece CHEFORNAK FUEL SMALL TANK FARM Prepared for FPE CONSULTING ENGINEERS by Clark-Graves,Inc. CONCEPTUAL ESTIMATE DATE:04-Dec-89 MATERIAL COST LABOR HOURS TOTAL TOTAL COST TOTAL COST LINE Hore ees e eee eee a enn +LABOR W/O O'HEAD WITH O'HEAD #WORK DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNITS UNIT TOTAL UNITS TOTALS Cost AND PROFIT AND PROFIT 31 32 1.B -GRAVEL PAD 33 34 Excavation 770 CY $20.08 $15,464 0.160 123.2 $4,929 $20,393 35 Imported Fill 770 CY $60.08 $46,270 0.160 123.2 $4,929 $51,199 36 Dike Fill Imported 2'H 6'W 69 CY $60.08 $4,139 0.160 11.0 $441 $4,580 37 Membrane Liner 1,772 SF $1.00 $1,772 0.017 30.4 $1,215 $2,987 38 Dike Drain 1 EA $100.00 $100 3.000 3.0 $120 $220 39 Sand Bedding 22 CY $50.00 $1,083 0.500 10.8 $433 $1,516 40 Heat Pipes 8 EA $4,000.00 $32,000 24.000 192.0 $7,680 $39,680 41 Foundation Insulation 6"10,632 BF $0.50 $5,316 °0.006 60.8 $2,430 $7,746 42 Relocate Tanks on new Foundation 43 Demolition 4 TANKS $20.83 $83 2.000 8.0 $320 $403 44 Oil Transfer 4 TANKS $41.67 $167 8.333 33.3 $1,333 $1,500 45 Lifting 4 TANKS $375.00 $1,500 4.000 16.0 $640 $2,140 46 Repiping 4 TANKS $20.83 $83 2.000 8.0 $320 $403 47 48 Freight 3,200 LBS $1.20 $3,840 0.001 4.6 $183 $4,023 49 Freight on Insulation 1,807 LBS $3.00 $5,422 "0.001 2.6 $103 $5,526 50 51 52 53 bo)re ee eesceee ce ec cc eee cece ee cesces ee mec we erence ae eee asec ese ee eee ese aes esses ereweseseseceeese 55 SUBTOTAL:1.B -GRAVEL PAD $117,240 626.9 $25,076 $142,316 56 i 9 a RSS ee 58 DIVISION SUB-TOTAL WITH OVERHEAD AND PROFIT:$134,826 $30,092 $164,917 59 LABOR RATE FOR THIS DIVISION:$40.00 PER HOUR CHEFORNAK FUEL SMALL TANK FARM Prepared for FPE CONSULTING ENGINEERS by Clark-Graves,Inc. CONCEPTUAL ESTIMATE DATE:04-Dec-89 MATERIAL COST LABOR HOURS TOTAL TOTAL COST TOTAL COST LINE Se Se +LABOR W/O O*HEAD WITH 0'HEAD #WORK DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNITS UNIT TOTAL UNITS TOTALS COST AND PROFIT AND PROFIT 61 62 2 -PIPELINE TO SCHOOL DISTRICT PIPELINE 63 64 Pipeline 65 Pipe 2"BI 300 LF $3.89 $1,167 0.100 30.0 $1,200 $2,367 66 Trtd Wood Sleepers 4x4x4'0"50 EA $3.99 $200 0.250 12.5 $500 $700 67 Pipe Clamps 50 EA $1.00 .$50 0.063 3.1 $125 $175 68 Tank Farm Headers 69 Pipe 2"BI 290 LF $3.89 $1,128 0.150 43.5 $1,740 $2,868 70 Valves 12 EA $95.00 $1,140 1.000 12.0 $480 $1,620 71 eoeevoonoeeesoeacoaoev ooev eee eevea eee se eeveveneeeeoeeoseeeoseeeoeveeoeeev ees eve eevee eee eveseeveeeeveeevseeeveeveneveeev eevee eveoeoeeveoeseeeaevneveeaeseeeeaeeeevneeeoaeeoe one enoneaeene 72 SUBTOTAL:2 -PIPELINE TO SCHOOL DISTRICT PIPELINE $3,685 101.1 $4,045 $7,730 73 0 Se 75 DIVISION SUB-TOTAL WITH OVERHEAD AND PROFIT:$4,237 $4,854 $9,091 76 LABOR RATE FOR THIS DIVISION:$40.00 PER HOUR 1 78 79 3 -TEE OFF SD LINE AT POWER PLANT 80 81 2"BI Piping 25 LF $3.89 $97 0.100 2.5 $100 $197 82 Gate Valves 2"2 FA $95.00 $190 1.000 2.0 $80 $270 83 Flex Connections 2 EA $50.00 $100 1.000 2.0 $80 $180 84 eoeeeoveeveeeveeeeeeaneeeenvnseeeeoeeveeeeoevoeeeeeeeecevneeseeoeeeeened @eeeenseeneeeeeeeeeee @eetpeoeoeveeeeeoeveeneneneevnenvneeeeoveeevneveeveee eevee eeeveeeeneeeveeee eee85SUBTOTAL:3 -TEE OFF SD LINE AT.POWER PLANT $387 6.5 $260 $647 86 Sy 88 DIVISION SUB-TOTAL WITH OVERHEAD AND PROFIT:$445 $312 $757 89 LABOR RATE FOR THIS DIVISION:$40.00 PER HOURCY6 CHEFORNAK FUEL CONCEPTUAL ESTIMATE SMALL TANK FARM Prepared for FPE CONSULTING ENGINEERS by Clark-Graves,Inc.DATE:04-Dec-89 MATERIAL COST LABOR HOURS TOTAL TOTAL COST TOTAL COST LINE .Hoses cece eee e eens ee eeeeeeeee +LABOR W/O O'HEAD WITH O'HEAD #WORK DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNITS UNIT TOTAL -UNITS TOTALS COST AND PROFIT AND PROFIT 91 92 4 -MOVE PUMP &PUMPHOUSE 93 94 Relocate Pump House 95 Demolition 1 JOB 8.000 8.0 $320 $320 96 Relocate 1 JOB $170.00 $170 4.000 4.0 $160 $330 97 Minor Repairs 1 JOB $100.00 .$100 8.000 8.0 $320 $420 98 Reconnect 1 JOB $100.00 $100 8.000 8.0 $320 $420 99 100 Power Line 101 1-1/2"C,4#10XHHW 1,200 LF $3.10 $3,720 0.100 120.0 $4,800 $8,520 102 Trenching 1,200 LF $4.08 $4,900 0.067 80.0 $3,200 $8,100 103 104 Controls W/Float Switch 1 EA $500.00 $500 8.000 8.0 $320 $820 105 Float Switch 1 EA $145.00 -$145 3.000 3.0 $120 $265 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 e@eoeovoeveeeveoeeveeevneansveeneoeeeoeeeeneeaneanvnese eeeenseeeoeeeeoeeovneeveeeoaeeeaeeeeeaneese eoee#eereeoeseseeeaeevoevoeeooeneeene eee eeovneeevoeeeeeeveevneeaeveevneneeeneeeoeneeeeee 115 SUBTOTAL:4 -MOVE PUMP &PUMPHOUSE '$9,635 239.0 $9,560 $19,195 116 |ly eeteeeeeencecccceceerectene 118 DIVISION SUB-TOTAL WITH OVERHEAD AND PROFIT:$11,080 $11,472 $22,552 119 LABOR RATE FOR THIS DIVISION:$40.00 PER HOUR 520 SSS CHEFORNAK FUEL CONCEPTUAL ESTIMATE SMALL TANK FARM Prepared for FPE CONSULTING ENGINEERS by Clark-Graves,Inc.DATE:04-Dec-89 MATERIAL COST LABOR HOURS TOTAL TOTAL COST TOTAL COST LINE perce ccc cee eee eee ee +LABOR W/O O'HEAD WITH 0'HEAD #WORK DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNITS UNIT TOTAL UNITS TOTALS COST AND PROFIT AND PROFIT 121 122 5 -PAINT TANKS 123 124 SandBlasting 2,983 SF $0.65 $1,939 0.036 106.5 $4,261 $6,199 125 Paint 2,983 SF $0.25 $746 0.020 59.7 $2,386 $3,132 126 =Protection 1 JOB $250.00 $250 16.000 16.0 $640 $890 127 |:aa 129 SUBTOTAL:.5 -PAINT TANKS $2,934 182.2 $7,287 $10,221 130 . ycCN 132 DIVISION SUB-TOTAL WITH OVERHEAD AND PROFIT:$3,374 $8,744 $12,118 133 LABOR RATE FOR THIS DIVISION:$40.00 PER HOUR yO SN 135 136 6 -GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 137 Mob 1 JOB $5,750.00 $5,750 $5,750 138 Supervision 1 MTHS 126.000 126.0 $5,040 $5,040 139 =Financing 1 JOB $1,500.00 $1,500 $1,500 140 Freight 6,621 LBS $0.65 $4,304 $4,304 141 Special Freight 1,000 LBS $2.00 $2,000 $2,000 142 Room &Board 170 MDAYS $125.00 $21,233 $21,233 143.Transportation 1 TRIPS $900.00 $900 8.000 8.0 $320 $1,220 144 nc wcccccccccccccccccvee emcee ccc c cece cece e ween e ween eet ee eee eeeeseeeseees oe eeeeee cece ee ecw ema cence ercscceecceceeneence 145 SUBTOTAL:6 -GENERAL REQUIREMENTS $35,687 134.0 $5,360 $41,047 146 Dy 148 DIVISION SUB-TOTAL WITH OVERHEAD AND PROFIT:$41,040 $6,432 $47,472 149 LABOR RATE FOR THIS DIVISION:$40.00 PER HOUR bl© CHEFORNAK FUEL CONCEPTUAL ESTIMATE SMALL TANK FARM Prepared for FPE CONSULTING ENGINEERS by Clark-Graves,Inc.DATE:04-Dec-89 MATERIAL COST LABOR HOURS TOTAL TOTAL COST TOTAL COST LINE 0 i Pe,+LABOR W/O O*HEAD WITH O'HEAD #WORK DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNITS UNIT TOTAL UNITS TOTALS COST AND PROFIT AND PROFIT 151 152 Al -SECURITY FENCE 153 154 Fencing 186 LF $9.40 $1,748 0.128 23.8 $952 $2,701 155 Foundations 19 EA $7.00 $130 1.000 18.6 $744 $874 156 Mob Fencing Operations 1 JOB $5,000.00 $5,000 $5,000 157 eee eoeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeSeSeSH SHH SSHH SSS HSH EHEC HHSHSEHRE SHH HRS HH EHHEHE HF SEH SSE HOS HHS HHH OHSHHEHOHHOEHEHHHHEHOHHHSCHSEHSHEHHOHE HO BEE HHH OSH EHO HH HEEHHE HEHE 158 SUBTOTAL:Al -SECURITY FENCE $6,879 42.4 $1,696 $8,575 159 1A,0 SS 161 DIVISION SUB-TOTAL WITH OVERHEAD AND PROFIT:$7,910 $2,036 $9,946 162 LABOR RATE FOR THIS DIVISION:$40.00 PER HOUR bc 164 165 A2 -SECURITY LIGHTING 166 167 Security Lights on Standards 4 EA $1,500.00 $6,000 16.000 64.0 $2,560 $8,560 168 1"C,3#10XHHW 186 LF $2.45 $456 0.100 18.6 $744 $1,200 169 170 171 172 173 174 eeseeweovoseveeeaevpeeesesceeveevp coeveeveeeeevseeoeaeepeeveeeeveeaeseeevesveseveeveoeseeeve eevee eeseeveeees eeoeveveeveveveeveeos eee eovoeveeeseenvnenvnevnveveeevpeeeeeevoevevp eeeseeaevneevee 175 SUBTOTAL:A2 -SECURITY LIGHTING $6,456 82.6 $3,304 $9,760 176 5 Se 178 DIVISION SUB-TOTAL WITH OVERHEAD AND PROFIT:$7,424 $3,965 $11,389 179 LABOR RATE FOR THIS DIVISION:$40.00 PER HOUR BS10 a CHEFORNAK FUEL SMALL TANK FARM Prepared for FPE CONSULTING ENGINEERS by Clark-Graves,Inc. CONCEPTUAL ESTIMATE DATE:04-Dec-89 MATERIAL COST LABOR HOURS LINE toccc cere cre scces to tec ccc cc csr cccee + #WORK DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNITS UNIT TOTAL UNITS TOTALS TOTAL COST TOTAL COST LABOR W/O O0'HEAD WITH 0'HEAD COST AND PROFIT AND PROFIT 181 182 A3 183 184 Wood Framing &Decking Trtd 576 BF $0.85 $490 0.016 9. 185 Handrails 24 LF $24.00 $576 0.343 8 186 ” 187 . 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 -RAMP OF PIPELINE $362 $852 $329 $905 204 Coon eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeereeereeeeoeeoeoeos @eeereeceeereecceoesneeeoeos eeereceeesnececce oC HCOOH ERO OHH MSH HOSE HEC HOS HOH HEHHES OHH OBE BEHO HEHE BH HOH HSEH HOES205SUBTOTAL:A3 -RAMP OF PIPELINE 206 $1,066 17.3 1 eee ee eee eee eee eee eer ee ee eee ee eee reer se 208 DIVISION SUB-TOTAL WITH OVERHEAD AND PROFIT:$1,225 209 LABOR RATE FOR THIS DIVISION:$40.00 PER HOUR 7 0 ee ee eee eee eee eensae eee eee ee eee ween nee $691 $1,757 APPENDIX B -SURVEY NOTES on Doug Keon leJomfeds ourtast i | [: HU-F-3879| Cloud TOPCO 5°f v Peeeen Say oy ore een Fy De lioo |Vine(fe () Bel Stra hese.(fuel) wee,aaaSFrSFaeda! \e >cS wh v = oe q 33 . : ys : % ) s >, >» \- . \ _¥ gv eat ry SS Fy sdaN es ySsBYsa XY sh we gt és ?> x «wh aww> -_ »33 = S; SE wo SSSESS : e"N .y €x £c . s rm42us 28 gS} 22 nee =a* v>3SJe ES ¢ 2 2 zy ye w "Ss @ rg ot ae S SS Tr os "< _ woe . . s . . SY . Ss +\rsd os) xySN+ . > ray oy " e "*>NA8&co - . . . . - x . Ww . \ ' eX iS =322 g eg&8 ve LL ¥ z < s 3 > : m& SF oRShoeYfsFF'y s 8 oR eR ce CS cw Oc OF . . " . » " Pad z > S o o eS o/s w. a in)I RK Re Seo ® > as "a xLd™a Sy *s 3 * * * : : > 5 - = mk ROS TR TEtg FgTS -"s * "5 a=== "* Sqs< +ta) p Ke " >ee_>me of-* _* % SS - swwea . =yayINA< = s te< < z=\ns s = = ° oat = CC< xx <= x <x<x <x Bererhy,tadste=onea0 B2 3 Bu H+ U13600 301°33,'60" Zo0(33 v0 279°2235 €' leeO24 5° ”¢e 2%$3 So 100 3 i 'ne 184 Zope ev4- qt 52 yo 21t sou8 3 708 ys" 8616 Yo &00 00 2 q1 igo. Go4s3e e '4 4/22 Zo Disk Desev| | J |393,2y oto 7 393.24 |$74 A Pal 89324|5THA iBY.5h G6SP 150 ,60°CB5P 403 dyn ay! 136.90 |GE oP (B70 .”'Ypor th,bide ofyor. i ' ! ' i { | t \ au ,SouthMel.2B aetee Fmd aAbBS6P GBOP=Grond bebw Scheel pipe #3 Deity Kenlecna!Cesta tl (l-F-BD TOPCEN CLOUDY CWELAST SF B2 rovucl elew,belowB¢cleeo (fuel (Vee, BS bsysodaeSeat$3a oeaePSRaAe4Bigpavst2eyiteeretex:aFyOERCatt.eeRONFangenFeSetiteae ITA LP 38 H] é e 156 1°70 4 vd Go 78 1 aGoro"5 Dot Yi,7@ Dee GI36P Pipe V's GLlLe "G68 sfe abe Gp revmel (3gNe) ken [ee ;es Teint Ped.mend uM-FBYD TOP COW nN Llu B°F-40STEJeEAAedecb@eaiataieeeeReortPEGEURPALATERETEeeeARNOTTBAARHSUUey Bepe Receipes Seasen eeANSecthetSM ELSEWEIMS pray Red at eke Midi tySponrif FASEANTRabe ey Se WR, SN CSRS %(3Aid. t ' t t Ly 4 todtyee , pew | ' ' t ' a Ve Wya1 tha of Schoo!Pie | "Ve:{&h ftnd4 'Sheol the 'QGBSPUb20i i !| «'i'*ISV1LOS |go e7 2F wu 3 waits aoe.ee < Rt -_ la' s SsNay \E ' TA Hl HF bow 3 Sl jo '” 1/4 0/e0 »' meg of &to. Mo ZI. a 1065270" »¢« U4 5435 NYS6pe t 4125039S e ' «f 4 NZI2 ty "cys se "37 523Y 906 7 v4 89'43z0° 89 3230 99 avvN .our 4 OF ¥400 87'473? qo1y25" 90.1735" 'os' a1 yByS Go.Iss | 29°33 Yo. List” Y 70.4" Yo 3.xy YB,/2- 4%,7 443,70. Yeo 7B ote YZ .40 244,28 342.02 311.94" Dest ven tre, encl ot tra & one CaAVIIOOkfonk ee a ait Skeklr Deny Kew ler, Taw bedltaend HU-7-87 | Cev Clevd | ae t -Bir p23 B2y 325 Bey HFi ve»pist Pee piezo 8730 x0, | !i!| .'«|1 An7aero|Fo a 271,32 Hose(7°,30!SWE $0"Sage |"om ied ed os Fe"og a Je,Bo'a co.al o 'Me eq ell oe F,Tha 0G of B89.zy ©a pod coef25!te 'ys BT F070 115.8@ "st8s 33,6B'alge,ve)and Teasers ; a fevers"ondf!Pir :!hevse ;, 1 !|t 1 |i t | i i ;|j : !i !i I ! | | H i !{ !t | i /] ne oe o prmeeceme meee -wr ”2)SOP RET OE Dy ate aRectan:eee Fee ; at f ros Seabed : ey °<S aby y ; 4 ea yot s 7 *pine Re tareeeas ou;ER AE eats et Sh eerie pee is ea a SGat4 BU kenleTimoedH?olM-JF-8B9|FOP LO su ECOUDS©SpeeTRENOaaeeSPEERERTSeyBittecia.KyevabaaASISeeeex,ruLoerg ! ! { ! i ' | ! i | | 4TR,h4A [v4 [Disk |Pesew, ,#8 >é uy t ra 4"é,p Bud BIDYOY"|B1IFY0 LUIVAo |EyB282ueses|B87 IE sy fryer|jw Covneyshack,Bee 824 'ise"|s2iy'se°|e cremePPUtt%1 B7IYST]27.70 ts f °tq 'a 7 v U uy ' :avn .BS ZOOSZ TS)BL ogo |a1y.18 Choose ' .a4 °oo"Bl 208 0%o0|BLI¥26 |ga4iy wee f bonBot270USS,2 1197.%0'5 hose 4 84 of A t oon ' Y321/0730 |$6 2520 |1%,Zo "old y B 4 247 F405]BG20Ye 9 |$ey1t15|B6 20 |(35,70 'pias2992/20 cor Ffh28DY|ouv1do [D9Y.Se EYlds { Necherkeda 5 Tm P Same 26 jhifiol reading,| B %c '>>&'be ;@ Blu Uss f47 3705 [484,70 |mI | 1o- canal ral -s ae ee TEE'daotey:COR.js Pieeh atasaneSad5pe'ee He x Sapte ey ee 5Ewere?i wt! J ofp ™ Dring keu le'Tom Reelnoontl U-G-B897 Teptisn Clevdey Gr riseSayVeaeitraryWhaaBATES H¢;VE Drs |Bese.| ; ee wt ireread94938|Fey,Ge'aadat; |.-?A i C 'e ts(/91738 399%00 F594 Tore Mesos,893470,5H,279"Fauk "(gui117.2830:BI v7 "¥¥Ze.en Wer?fe"sbi!'$82,ay!bat|i!ereoo|e9's¢re Jt3.Ba teh|N9Az4o a Pnbow,30°NEleove fark 64N441¢0"stves7 WW er 1 '' ':'; i '! 7 we cere oe oe nes ome iy OSCR Ae ASRS eal oe ta a P ate Lid ' 3 te ee ria Boe HCO EAE eo S29 es ™;e x3 a 4 ie pets fy va 4 Po acegl awvENNrary2wwpesheTaeeaeSaSdat!ae'a ANTS :z a5 Re sve a SES : 1.:i ' \: '4 :i 1 ie ; Das fowler,fog ;cS "?tur Peden an :S eee y E Be pee tetWH-4-89 gd ee aaa oats aoaWereRett!Set AAR Ok "oy os .Touten |Sk PEE SE neta rattasy CeClovelBeeBEaaeteWASPaByDLRCecednanee.x eae tere S,.SiN ce eae itS°E .ko Gh:zee Ser Ae Pen of '13 ee BS os hg a5 re ?E ae Se eaie es a "a :<Rites é eae os see ne 3$3 3 bs a of : a 4 hie .:rae Se %eae ot zs le x?a2 8 ef Be i ap "yy i iz %»A, obeaes -.f pane Be pees Pee igtie _eee ate eS eae cgay aioe eat SiepersMiphy he Aaah x siaxyia , 4 ASERI Ne ,He 7 UE nes FU ;Spare arate See see é3sigea"i :she res oe :