Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Preliminary Design Report Kongiganak Bulk Fuel Upgrades January 7, 2000 Draft
DRAFT State of Alaska Department of Community and Economic Development Alaska Energy Authority,Rural Energy Group PRELIMINARY DESIGN REPORT i"3..oSaSd22pateeresae?ee_-ohyrachx='woreaoe'Cryaay>.ae£-.vedRDFESBiggeoh*"ft.*%83+aosaienaeLSKONGIGANAK BULK FUEL UPGRADES January 7,2000 Prepared by: Wiley W.Wilhelm,P.E. LOME Incorporated A subsidiary of Ukpeagvik Inupiat Corporation| 139 East 51st Avenue Voice:(907)273-1830 Anchorage,Alaska 99503 Fax (907)273-1831 Kongiganak,Alaska Bulk Fuel Upgrades Preliminary Design Report EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report has been prepared for the State of Alaska Department of Community and Economic Development,Alaska Industrial Development &Export Authority,Alaska Energy Authority Rural Energy Group.The purpose of this report is to provide the basis for development of a new fuel system design and to identify construction scheduling and costs related upgrading the fuel systems in the community of Kongiganak,Alaska. The participants in the proposed fuel system upgrades includes: e Kongiganak Traditional Council (KTC) e Qemirtalek Coast Corporation (QCC); e Lower Kuskokwim School District (LKSD); e Puvurnaq Power Company (Power Plant). As part of the development of this report,a site investigation was performed on October 6,1999. During this investigation potential tank farm sites were inspected,the existing fuel systems and tanks were inspected and a meeting was conducted with the Kongiganak Traditional Council and the Puvurnag Power Company. As a result of the findings of the site investigation,two tank farm sites were identified.The first site,proposed by the community (Alternate Site A),is located south of the community approximately %of a mile.The community identified this site in order to move marine header down river and removing the need for barges to transit the Kongnignanohk River upstream of the community where erosion is river bank erosion is threatening the community.A second site (Alternate Site B)was identified to the north of the School,on higher ground which borders the airport property.Alternate Site A is located in the river flood plain and the tank farm must be raised to address the 100 year flood levels.An additional alternative marine header location was also identified upstream from Alternate Site A,which would result in a shorter barge off-loading pipeline to a new tank farm constructed at Alternate Site B. Alternate Site A was noted to not have easy river access for fueling of local boats,while the dispensing station for Alternate Site B would be located adjacent to the existing boat landing area on the river,just upstream from the community. The new fuel system upgrades (at either site)are to consolidate fuel storage for KTC,PPC and LKSD into one consolidated tank farm.The new tank farm will include on-site retail dispensing of gasoline and fuel oil for the QCC,and fuel distribution to the Washeteria,Power Plant and School.Since PPC is a subsidiary of KTC,the proposed tank farm combines the Washeteria and Power Plant fuel storage and distribution.The community has not traditionally operated a tank truck,nor is one available in the community,therefore,the construction of a truck filling station is not included in the Conceptual Design. EX-1 Kongiganak,Alaska Bulk Fuel Upgrades Preliminary Design Report The proposed Conceptual Design includes the use of all new bulk storage tanks to replace damaged and corroding existing tanks and to minimize the footprint of the new tank farm.The existing piping is in questionable condition and is intended to be completely replaced. The proposed net fuel storage capacities for the new fuel system are 23,200 gallons for the Washeteria,89,200 gallons for the Power Plant,67,800 gallons for the School and 87,000 gallons of gasoline storage and 87,000 gallons of fuel oil for the QCC.These capacities will provide more than 50%increase in fuel storage capacity over the current annual usage.The additional storage capacity will allow for an increase in fuel consumption of at least 1.5% annually over next 20 years for all facilities. Construction of the tank farm and fuel distribution systems at Alternate Sites A and B,or with the alternate pipe routing shown in Alternate C,are very similar since the only difference is in pipeline lengths,therefore the construction schedules are assumed to be the same.The differences in the amount of work to be completed is reflected in the crew size,with the schedules being the same. The fuel system construction at Alternate Sites A and B,are assumed to be the same,with the only differences being in the piping.Alternative Site A,however,will require the construction of a new boardwalk to access the tank farm.At this time,no outside funding has been secured to construct the boardwalk,therefore,the cost for the new boardwalk is included in the cost for building the new tank farm at Alternate Site A. The total Budget Cost Estimate for development at Alternate Site A is approximately $4,816,000.The total Budget Cost Estimate for development at Alternative Site B is approximately $3,655,000.The total Budget Cost Estimate for development at Alternative Site B with the alternate marine header location identified in the Conceptual Project Layout Plan Alternate C,is $3,461,000.These estimated budget costs includes facility design,construction administration,permitting,development of regulatory plans,construction costs and a 20% construction contingency. EX2 LOMF Incorporated @)A subsidiary of UkpeagvikInupiat Corporation aE, Kongiganak,Alaska Bulk Fuel Upgrades Preliminary Design Report TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY EX-1 I.INTRODUCTION 1 A.CONTACTS .......cccccccccccscccsssssccsssssecccescessseessescceessusessscceeecessseeeessuccecceeneneseeeeeeeesenes 1 B.APPLICABLE REGULATIONS AND CODES .........cccccsccsssssscsesseseesesecceesseeeeees 1 I.EXISTING FUEL SYSTEMS .sevccceesscceseenenseres veeed A.GENERAL OVERVIEW.......ccccccccscesscsscsessssssessceccccsscescenseacesensesecseseeeeeessseeeesenes 2 B.EXISTING FACILITIES LAYOUTuu....cccccccesccscccesssecsvessecccesseecessceeeesesseeeeeees 3 1.KTC Washeteria Tank Farm..............:cccccssssssssssscscsssssncceeecsesssneeeeeeesseesannes 3 2.PPC Power Plant Tank Farm .............ccccccccccssssssssscccecesssssseceseseseenenceceeseees 3 3.LKSD School Tank Farim...........cssssssssccscseessssseeccescesssssessceessessssnssseceeeens 4 4.QCC Tank Farm .........ccccsccccssssscccscsccesesnsccssesaceseesaaeceeseaeeeesesaceeessneesensaaes 4 C EXISTING TANK STORAGE CAPACITY SUMMARY ..........ccssscccssseeceesenteeeee 5 D CURRENT FUEL USE .......ccccsssssccesscssccesscecceenssecccesseseeepenssecesssecessssaseseesenessenes 5 E PROJECTED FUTURE FUEL USE....0........ccccscccsssssccessccscceesscecessecceeessseseesseeeeess 6 III.PROPOSED NEW FACILITY 8 A SITE SELECTION ........ccccecccccssssscesessssecesssececeenseeesecsueecesssneeeceeseeeeseseessesesnneeesenes 8 1.Alternate Site Au......ccccessesssccccsesssscnscsscseessssceeececeseessnsneeeesscssssneeeeensens 8 2.Alternate Site Buu..........ccsssscsscccccsssssnsscececessssnseeceessssssscaeeeceseessneeecesesssnnes 9 B.SITE CONTROL ......ccccccccccscsssccccscscsscscessceccsessescesesseeeseesseesesssseeeceesenseeenesseeesenes 9 C.SOIL CONDITIONS .........ccsssesssssccestccessscessecesseeessseecesnseessseesseeeesneeesseececseeessuss 10 D.COMMUNITY FLOOD DATAA.uu...ceccccsssccccssseccessssceccesstseessssesecesseeeensenaceess 10 E.LOCAL FILL MATERIAL ........ceeeccsssseccessscecessnseecessnsecseesneeeesssaeecesecaneceseeees 10 F,TANK FARM FOUNDATION ........cccecccscsccsssesssscccesscecccessnsceeesseeeseeseeeesssenseaes 11 G.SECONDARY CONTAINMENT .........ccccccccccsssscscescceceessssscesessecesessneeessesnneeeeses 11 H.TANKS .u...eccccccssssscscsssssssssscecccessscceesscesesessneeecesseeeceeeeneeesesaseceececeeesseaeeceserseseess 11 I.FUEL DISTRIBUTION ..............ccccsscssssssscccssssececssesecessnsceesseuecessencecessnseeeseeauecs 12 1,Retail Dispensing .............ccsecessssecssceceseseesecsossesssseasesscssssussessesssneeeeeenese 13 2.Washeteria and Power Plant ...........:::cccccssssssssscccesssssssnsceeesessseaceesessesetnes 13 3.SCHOOL .......cccssssccceceessssscssccceseesssneseeseesessssaeeecesesssseneecessssssssessesessoceseoeess 13 J.OWNERSHIP AND OPERATION ...........cccsscccesssecsecssssesecesesececesseeeesenseeeesseeeees 14 K.SPILL RESPONSE REGULATORY PLANS...........ccsscccsessseceeesseccessnnececssereeeeees 14 L.PERMITTING ............ccccccccscssscenssscescccsccescecesseesceascescsacseeeessesssnessecessnssseessecssoees 14 1.Fire Marshal Review ..........:ccccccccssssssssscceeseesssssaseceeessscssanecceessessneseeeeseeees 15 2.US Army Wetlands Permit ...........ee eescecsscssessecsseesssesssseseeseneeeseessetenes 15 M.CONSTRUCTION METHOD ........cccceesccesssseccssscesecesesseeesesneeeeessceecesseneeesesseaeenss 15 1.Local labor ..........cccccccccssscscceessssccessenecceessececssnsececenstacecesscesasseseeeeessseessans 15 2.Local Equipment ...........cs escescsssescsccsscssesscssesseseessseneesssseseeensenseeeseeenenens 15 N SCHEDULE ...ceccccsccccssssccsscsccsssscscssecsceccessceeesececsstsescsscsscccessecessuseeeseesosssecceeanoees 15 O BUDGET COST ESTIMATE...........:cccssscccesssseceessneceesssneceesssenerseseeeeessseesareseeees 16 1.Alternate A........cccccccccccccesssssssscccsccesssceescesesssesssssseccesseecceesecesesesseneassooonse 16 2.Alternate Buu......cccccccccccsscsssssscecccsessssssecccssscssnnnecessecssessecesesecsssssseesssreees 17 3.Alternate Cui...cccccccccccccccceccssccccseccccssesscsssssssssensessesscesacensosonacuscaseeserens 17 LOMF Incorporated A idiary of Ukp gvik Inupiat Corp ie Kongiganak,Alaska Bulk Fuel Upgrades Preliminary Design Report Appendix A:Fuel Record Information Appendix B:Site Selection Summary Letter Appendix C:Certificate to Plat Appendix D:Geotechnical Information Prepared by Duane Miller &Associates Appendix E:US Army Corps of Engineers -Flood Plain Managements Services ALASKAN COMMUNITIES FLOOD HAZARD DATA 1998 Publication Information Appendix F:Conceptual Design Drawings Appendix G:Budget Cost Estimate LOMF IncorporatediAsubsidiaryofUkpeagvikInupiatCorporation Kongiganak,Alaska Bulk Fuel Upgrades Preliminary Design Report I.INTRODUCTION This report has been prepared for the State of Alaska,Alaska Energy Authority,Rural Energy Group to identify the design basis for the development of a new consolidated bulk fuel storage tank farm and distribution system in the community of Kongiganak,Alaska. This report includes a review of the existing bulk fuel systems in the community,an analysis of future fuel needs,a conceptual design for the replacement/upgrading of these facilities to meet these needs,a proposed project schedule and a budget cost estimate for the project. The participants in this project are as follows: Kongiganak Traditional Council (KTC); Qemirtalek Coast Corporation (QCC); Lower Kuskokwim School District (LKSD);and Puvurnaq Power Company (PPC). A site inspection was conducted on October 6,1999 by Wiley Wilhelm of LCMF and Bruce Tiedeman of AEA.The investigation included an inspection of the existing fuel systems, inspections of potential new tank farm sites and a meeting with Harvey Paul of the Puvurnaq Power Company,Roland Andrew,Joe Mute of the Housing Administration and Kenny Nikoli of the Kongiganak Traditional Council. A.CONTACTS Additional information for this report was gathered from the following people: Harlan LaGare Corps of Engineers Paul Gabbert Village Safe Water Jim Kohl Lower Kuskokwim School District Art Isham Department of Military and Veterans Affairs Lou Bassler Arctic Slope Consulting Group (BIA Road Design) B.APPLICABLE REGULATIONS AND CODES The design/operation of fuel systems is controlled by the following State and Federal regulations: State of Alaska Fire and Life Safety Regulations (13 AAC 50); 1997 Uniform Fire Code as adopted by 13 AAC 50; 1997 Uniform Building Code as adopted by 13 AAC 50; State of Alaska Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Control Regulations (18 AAC 75); EPA Oil Pollution Prevention Regulations (40 CFR Part 112); US Coast Guard Facilities Transferring Oil or Hazardous Material in Bulk Regulations (33 CFR Part 154). Kongiganak,Alaska Bulk Fuel Upgrades Preliminary Design Report Il. The current State of Alaska Fire and Life Safety Regulations adopted the 1997 editions of the Uniform Fire Code (UFC)and the Uniform Building Code (UBC).The code requirements of the UFC establish the primary design requirements for new facilities. The State of Alaska Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Control regulations (C-Plan) apply to fuel systems which have a storage capacity of more than 420,000 gallons per Owner or Operator. The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)regulations include two regulatory plans for fuel facilities:1)Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasures (SPCC)Plans and 2)Facility Response Plans (FRPs).The SPCC Plan identifies minimum fuel facility requirements for above ground tanks larger than 660 gallons,or which have an aggregate volume of more than 1,320 gallons.The FRP is a spill response plan for facilities which are filled by marine vessel and which have a storage capacity of more than 42,000 gallons. The US Coast Guard Facilities Transferring Oil or Hazardous Material in Bulk regulations apply to fuel facilities that are capable of transferring fuel,in bulk,to or from a vessel with a capacity of 10,500 gallons or more.This regulation includes two separate plans,1)Oil Spill Response Plan and 2)Operations Manual.The Oil Spill Response Plan is a spill response plan similar to the EPA's Facility Response Plan and it outlines spill planning requirements.The Operations Manual is a plan which addresses the procedures and equipment required for receiving fuel at the facility.The Coast Guard requires these two plans,and a Letter of Intent to Operate,are submitted to the Captain of the Port for approval prior to delivery of fuel. EXISTING FUEL SYSTEMS A.GENERAL OVERVIEW The site investigation included an inspection of the following tank farms and fuel distribution systems: 1.Kongiganak Traditional Council Washeteria Tank Farm 2.Puvurnaq Power Company Tank Farm 3.LKSD School Tank Farm 4.QCC Tank Farm The Department of Military and Veterans Affairs National Guard Armory was considered in the development of this report.The Armory's fuel storage capacity is roughly 5,000 gallons.Given this relatively small capacity,and the fact that the Armory only receives fuel once a year,separate fuel storage is not included in the new bulk facility design. Additional fuel storage tanks located on the bluff of the community were not inspected, however,the new facility will incorporate additional fuel storage capacity in the QCC LCOMF Incorporated2AsubsidiaryofUkpeagvikInupiatCorporation tanks to accommodate these fuel users. La Kongiganak,Alaska Bulk Fuel Upgrades Preliminary Design Report B.EXISTING FACILITIES LAYOUT A detailed description of each of these tank farms is as follows: 1.KTC Washeteria Tank Farm The KTC provides potable water and washing facilities for the community at the Washeteria.This facility uses fuel oil to heat the building and to maintain the water temperature in the adjacent water tank.Fuel oil is stored to the north of the School adjacent to the School and Puvurnaq Power Company tank farms (see the Existing Facility Layout Plan). The tank farm consists of two vertical,cylindrical BIA style tanks,which are manifolded together.The total shell capacity of the two tanks is approximately 19,200 gallons.The tanks are located on a pile supported timber platform which sits inside an unlined earthen diked area.Fuel is pumped from the tanks into a day tank located inside the building using a manually controlled transfer pump. The fuel is distributed using a common pipeline with the Washeteria. Fuel is received at the common marine header located approximately 200 feet to the north near the cut bank of the Kongnignanohk River.The fuel is then pumped through a common barge off-loading pipeline,which is shared by the Power Plant tank farm and the School tank farm. The tanks were observed to be in poor to fair condition.The piping is in fair condition. 2.PPC Power Plant Tank Farm The Puvurnaq Power Company provides electricity to the community.The Power Plant is located south of the School,adjacent to the Washeteria (see the Existing Facilities Layout Plan).The generators are supplied with fuel from the Puvurnaq Power Plant tank farm which is located adjacent to the Washeteria tank farm. The tank farm consists of four vertical,cylindrical BIA style tanks,which are manifolded together.The total shell capacity of the four tanks is approximately 58,000 gallons.Two of the tanks are located on a pile supported timber platform which sits inside an unlined earthen diked area.The other two tanks sit on the ground next to the platform inside an lined earthen diked area.Fuel is pumped from the tanks into an intermediate tank located behind the generator modules using a manually controlled transfer pump.The fuel is distributed using a common pipeline with the Washeteria. LCMF Incorporated |KL)3 A subsidiary of Ukpeagvik Inupiat Corporation & 108-EFLP.DWGSe . ::*.Te were oe 7.Er we”-err eepeerDRTee:net 7 Ty 7Fer*,me ='pe SOE .b} re"+AIRPORT ad oe ar.reoo.Ps "ot .:RTH oapeeBOUNDARY|we TD 5 EN NORTEN PY .-toe ;ft t -e See -7 4 _"SCALE IN FEET_,6°" .wolfe PPC DISTRIBUTION POWER PIPING -.\; *1!Scere foe ei :a We. sous PLANT.een Sys acc *.'-Sa a +oe :7 |"«s .; . ">TANK FARM ™0 0 eo pet ae 8-oie =:nares wae.:a .parve iRetAlleellieap ae en Fa ma . Py -wale Be hee ye I a . *y . *. 5 =m "=&ee pt te sf:=ee *KTO «+Je.POWER.a ome .**ce..'@ Se **te.ee A OWASHETERIA-«fs PLANT | t-a! -ee ee 'ee ewe | * ::.--."LKSD"TANK "y ty acc ee Mie10,000 GALLON...Se GASOLINE TANK _._ ol ees %Ay me rd"enya a I oo,|-|oe ;F EXISTING FACILITY LAYOUT PLAN Des geaFESOseOs3sO.§88[e) 3 22bh<3aieGil=<£0 KONGIGANAK,ALASKAKONGIGANAKBULKFUELUPGRADEEXISTINGFACILITYLAYOUTPLANStateofAlaskaDepartmentofCommunityandEconomicDevelopment/.AEARuralEnergyGroup333W.4thAvenue,Suite220*Ba”chorage,Alaska99501-2341AIDEA"iCHECKED BY:WWW DRAWN By:KK DATE:1/7/00 W.0.No:99-108 REVISION 1”=200° DRAWING NO.PLOTTINGDATE:03/02/01(09:07)AUTOCADDRAWINGNAME:ENERGYAUTHORITYIZALASKA«x* Kongiganak,Alaska Bulk Fuel Upgrades Preliminary Design Report Fuel is received at the common marine header located approximately 200 feet to the north near the cut bank of the Kongnignanohk River.The fuel is then pumped through a common barge off-loading pipeline,which is shared by the Washeteria tank farm and the School tank farm. The tanks were observed to be in poor to fair condition.The piping is in fair condition. 3.LKSD School Tank Farm The LKSD School is located on the east edge of the core of the community, adjacent to the airport and Power Plant (see the Existing Facility Layout Plan). The School buildings and adjacent teacher housing is supplied fuel oil from the School tank farm.This tank farm is located to the north of the School building, adjacent to the Washeteria and Power Plant tank farms. Fuel is pumped from the School tanks into intermediate tanks located next to the School,back-up generator and teacher housing. The tank farm consists of ten vertical cylindrical BIA style tanks,which are manifolded together.The total shell capacity of the tanks is approximately 74,100 gallons.The tanks sit on a pile supported timber platform without secondary containment. Fuel is received at the common marine header located approximately 200 feet to the north near the cut bank of the Kongnignanohk River.The fuel is then pumped through a common barge off-loading pipeline,which is shared by the Washeteria tank farm and the School tank farm. The tanks were observed to be in fair condition.The intermediate tanks were found to be in fair condition;however,several code deficiencies were noted.The piping is in fair condition. 4,QCC Tank Farm QCC operates a gasoline and fuel oil tank farm and dispensing station north of the community,near the QCC Store,as shown on the Existing Facility Layout Plan. A 10,000 gallon double walled tank located between the QCC Store and the river is included in with this tank farm as a gasoline retail sales tank. The tank farm consists of sixteen horizontal tanks and two small vertical tanks. The total shell capacity of the tank farm is approximately 96,800 gallons.The total shell capacity of the gasoline tanks is approximately 57,300 gallons and the total shell capacity of the fuel oil tanks is also approximately 39,500 gallons. LOMF Incorporated (Ki)SS4AsubsidiaryofUkpeagvikInupiatCorporation Kongiganak,Alaska Bulk Fuel Upgrades Preliminary Design Report The gasoline and fuel oil tanks are connected with separate piped manifolds.The tanks do not have secondary containment. Fuel is received through separate marine headers located near the river and is pumped through the manifold piping to the selected receiving tank(s).Fuel is dispensed to vehicles and containers through a fixed transfer pump located in a wooden shed adjacent to the tanks.The dispensing system uses the barge off- loading pipeline back to the dispensing shack. The tanks were noted to be in poor condition,with major dents resulting from the tanks floating during flooding.The remainder of the tank farm equipment and piping is in poor condition. C.EXISTING TANK STORAGE CAPACITY SUMMARY The following table lists the existing total tank shell storage capacity for all of the tanks currently in use.The shell capacity (100%of the potential tank volume)is stated since it is common for operators to completely fill the tanks and draw all fuel out of the tanks during normal operation of these facilities. Existing Total Tank Shell Storage Capacity Fuel Oil Capacity |Gasoline CapacityFacility(gallons)(gallons) KTC Washeteria 19,200 PPC Power Plant Tank Farm 58,000 LKSD School Tank Farm 74,100 QCC Tank Farm 39,500 57.300 190,800 57,300 D.CURRENT FUEL USE Annual fuel consumption data was gathered for each facility.Where possible,three or more years of fuel consumption was obtained in order to identify a trend or average use. Where consumption data was not available,fuel purchase information was requested.At least three years of purchase quantities was requested in order to address both fuel use trends and to address over/under ordering.See Appendix A for fuel record information gathered for these facilities. The fuel consumption and/or purchase data may not completely identify each facility's actual consumption.In some cases,a facility may purchase fuel from another when they run out,therefore,the facility which sells the fuel may show higher use than actually required,while others may not adequately identify the amount of fuel used.The Power Plant reported purchased 15,000 gallons of fuel oil from LKSD during the winter of 98/99 due to shortage.It appears that this transfer has been accounted for in the LKSD LOMF Incorporated5AsubsidiaryofUkpeagvikInupiatCorporation Kongiganak,Alaska Bulk Fuel Upgrades Preliminary Design Report fuel consumption information and in the Power Cost Equalization accounting included in Appendix A. Another factor to be considered when determining fuel use is rationing at retail facilities when fuel quantities run low.Obviously,rationing curtails sales and does not accurately reflect the village fuel demands.Fuel rationing was not identified in Kongiganak. Fuel use information was provided for the LKSD facilities and for the PPC Power Plant. The 1998 fuel consumption for the Washeteria was identified as being 11,178 gallons by Alexi Lewis of the Kongiganak Traditional Council.No QCC fuel consumption information has been provided and only an estimate of their fuel consumption has been used. Based on the issues identified above,the estimated current annual fuel consumption for the community is as follows: Estimated Current Annual Fuel Consumption Fuel Oil Use Gasoline Use Facility (gallons)(gallons) KTC Washeteria 11,200 PPC Power Plant Tank Farm 62,200 LKSD School Tank Farm 41,800 QCC Tank Farm 39,500*57,300* 140,700 30,000 *Estimated winter consumption. E.PROJECTED FUTURE FUEL USE The community of Kongiganak appears to be experiencing a slow steady increase in fuel oil and gasoline consumption due to general community growth.In addition,there are several projects on the horizon which may impact the future fuel consumption for the community.These projects include the expansion of the Washeteria and the construction of two new HUD homes in the near future. The expansion of the Washeteria is conservatively anticipated to increase the fuel demand by 50%,Given that the typical current fuel consumption is adequately represented by 1998's fuel consumption figures,the projected fuel demand would be roughly 16,800 gallons.Additional storage should also be provided to allow for discrepancies in the actual current fuel consumption.An additional 25%storage capacity will provide a comfortable buffer. The PPC Power Plant fuel consumption records for the past three years show consistent consumption in 1997 and 1998,however,the 1999 consumption is roughly 10%higher. No clear reason is apparent for this increase in the last year other than environmental conditions.Given the increase in housing and possible new facilities,the electrical 6 LCMF Incorporated @)A subsidiaryof Ukpeagvik Inupiat Corporation EE, Kongiganak,Alaska Bulk Fuel Upgrades Preliminary Design Report demand will increase,however the amount of growth is unknown.Without additional data,a historical growth rate of approximately 1.5%/year should can be applied over the design life of the project (20 years)to generate a design storage capacity.The resulting increase in storage capacity is 35%. By providing a 35%increase,the Power Plant fuel supply would meet the near term demand,however,if growth were to increase,other options may be more feasible than adding fuel storage at this time.Modifications to the Power Plant equipment may provide up to 15%more efficiency and the installation of wind generators are two potential alternatives to constructing fuel tanks which won't be needed for possibly more than a decade. Future fuel consumption for the LKSD facilities is anticipated to remain constant for the near future,however,given a general growth trend for the community it is anticipated that at some point in the future the school and/or teacher housing will be added onto.For planning purposes,the 35%increase identified above for the current consumption should be applied to the new facility. Records for past fuel purchases,and past consumption,were not available for the QCC retail sales.Given this lack of historical increases in consumption,it is not possible to project future growth without using an assumed growth rate.For the purpose of this report,a projected 1.5%annual growth rate is used for gasoline and fuel oil consumption. The resulting total growth,over a 20 year projected design life for the facility,is roughly 35%over the current use.The QCC storage capacity should include adequate storage to absorb the increase in demand for those facilities and individuals which are currently buying bulk fuel directly from the barge which will most likely be shut down by the Coast Guard after the new tank farm is in operation.It is estimated that an additional 27,000 gallons of fuel oil capacity will be required (3,000 gallons at the Church,5,000 gallons at the Armory,9,000 gallons of private retail,and approximately 10,000 gallons of private use). Considering the factors outlined above,the resulting projected future fuel storage requirements are identified in the following chart. Projected Future Fuel Storage Requirements Future Annual Future Annual Fuel Oil Demand Gasoline Demand Facility (gallons)(gallons) KTC Washeteria 21,000 PPC Power Plant Tank Farm 84,000 LKSD School Tank Farm 56,400 QCC Tank Farm 80.400*77,400* Total 241,800 77,400 *Based on estimated current consumption with a 35%increase. 7 LCMF Incorporated (aAsubsidiaryofUkpeagvikInupiatCorporation|we, Kongiganak,Alaska Bulk Fuel Upgrades Preliminary Design Report Ill.PROPOSED NEW FACILITY The proposed new fuel facility is to be a consolidated bulk tank farm,which will include combined bulk fuel storage for the KTC Washeteria and the PPC Power Plant,in addition to bulk storage for the LSKD School,and the QCC retail sales.The new facility will include retail dispensing for QCC fuel and distribution pipelines to the Washeteria &Power Plant and School intermediate tanks.Due to the length of the distribution pipelines and for increased storage capacity,new/upgraded intermediate tanks are to be installed at the Washeteria,Power Plant and School. A.SITE SELECTION During the site inspection meeting,a tank farm site was identified by the community representatives that is approximately *4 mile to the south of the School,on the bank of the Kongnignanohk River (Alternate Site A).An additional tank farm site was noted by LCMF to the north of the School,along the boundary of the Airport property (Alternate Site B).See the Conceptual Project Layout Plans included in Appendix F for more information. Over the past few years,barge access north of the community has been difficult,and at times,impossible.The difficulties are related to an increased river channel width with no increase in flow,resulting in shallower channel.This problem is especially critical at the tight bend on the north side of the community,where erosion has widened the channel by roughly 50 feet. Erosion at the tight bend on the north side of the community is also a key concern for the community.Over the past 5 to 10 years,a significant amount of erosion has cut away at the ridge which the community is built upon.Local residents feel that the barge activity on the north side of the community is a key cause of this erosion,especially due to the high power maneuvering required by the barges to negotiate the shallow water around the bend.As a result,the community would like to move the marine header down stream of the community. 1.Alternate Site A Alternate Site A was selected by the community because of its easy access by the fuel delivery barge and to prevent further erosion of the northern bank of the community due to barge traffic. In addition to constructing the new tank farm at Alternate Site A,the community would like to have a boardwalk constructed to the site for local boat operations. The request for the boardwalk has been identified to BIA for inclusion into an existing roads project currently underway in the community,however,at this time,no funding has been made available.Therefore,if the tank farm is to be located at Alternate Site A,the construction of an access boardwalk will be required as part of the project,unless other funding is made available. &)LOMF Incorporated8AsubsidiaryofUkpeagvikInupiatCorporation Kongiganak,Alaska Bulk Fuel Upgrades Preliminary Design Report The proposed tank farm site along the Kongniganohk River does not offer easy access for local river boat landing.At the time of the site inspection,the river bank was difficult to climb up due to muddy soils and steep angle.The suitability for fuel sales to boats at this site is questionable. 2.Alternate Site B Alternate Site B was identified during the site inspection by LCMF since it is relatively close to the fuel users,it is located above the apparent flood plain and there are no conflicts with other structures. Due to the community's concerns with future barge access on the river above the community,the location of the marine header for a tank farm at Alternate Site B is presented at either Alternate Site A or at a point upstream from Alternate Site A,presented on the Conceptual Project Layout Plan Alternate C.The marine header at Alternate C is located downstream from the first tight bend below the community,which was the furthest upstream a large barge was able to travel the river last summer. Fuel dispensing for Alternate Site B is to be located at the existing boat landing, just upstream from the community.This site has a low river bank which has been supplemented with a gravel beach affords easy boat access. B.SITE CONTROL The lands in and around the village of Kongiganak are held in trust by the Municipal Land Trust Program and have not been subdivided by a US Survey.Only the School and Airport are located on leased or subdivided land.Both Alternate Sites A and B are to be located on properties to which clear ownership has not been determined.Personnel from the Department of Community and Regional Affairs,recommend that the new tank farm and structures be located on property which do not show any signs of historical use,since sites which have been used in the past may have a legal ownership claim which is not identified at this time.Both sites will require working with the Municipal Land Trust Program to obtain site control. Alternative Site A is located roughly %ofa mile south of the community,however,there were indications of past activity at the site which is supported by features observed on aerial photos.The presence of these signs may or may not indicate a that the site has a previous historical use. The ownership of Alternate Site A is unknown.The most likely claim to ownership is the QC Corporation,however,if the site lies outside their claims,the land is most likely claimed by the Calista Regional Corporation. LCMF Incorporated9ofUkpeagvikInupiatCorp Kongiganak,Alaska Bulk Fuel Upgrades Preliminary Design Report Alternative Site B does not appear to be disturbed or have any potential claim for historical use.The site is most likely claimed by the QC Corporation. Cc.SOIL CONDITIONS A review of the existing geotechnical information around the community,prepared by Duane Miller &Associates for this report (see Appendix D),indicates that the soil conditions around the community are marginally frozen,ice rich silty soils.A review of aerial photos for the two sites indicates that the soils at both sites are probably underlain with marginally frozen,ice rich soils which are susceptible to severe settlement if the soils are not maintained in a frozen state. A complete geotechnical investigation should be performed prior to the completion of the tank farm design to verify the actual site conditions and design assumptions. D.COMMUNITY FLOOD DATA The US Army Corps of Engineers -Flood Plain Management Services ALASKAN COMMUNITIES FLOOD HAZARD DATA 1998 publication indicates that while the community of Kongiganak does not flood,low areas along the river are within the 100 year flood plain (see Appendix E). A rough level survey conducted between Alternate Site A and the existing boat landing area on the north side of the community indicates that Alternate Site A is at an approximate elevation of 10 feet (assumed elevation =0 feet =river surface at time of survey).The same level survey tied to an existing boardwalk near the School at an elevation of approximately 30 feet,which matches the flood data statement regarding the general elevation of the community.Assuming that the survey datum is on the same datum as the Alaskan Communities Flood Hazard Data 1998 report,the anticipated flood level at Alternate Site A is roughly 10 feet deep.A new tank farm constructed at Alternate Site A will have to be raised so that the flood waters will not reach the neutral buoyancy level of the tanks.Also,a detailed survey of the site with ties to flood related elevations will be required prior to the final design to accurately determine the flood depth on the site. A hand level evaluation of Alternate Site B indicates that the site rises above the apparent 100 year flood level.The proposed dispensing station site,however,is located at an elevation of approximately 8 feet and it is in the flood plain.The dispensing system installed at this site will either require to be designed to flood,or be elevated above the flood level. E.LOCAL FILL MATERIAL No suitable local fill materials is available. LOMF Incorporated10AsubsidiaryofUkpeagvikinupiatCorporation Kongiganak,Alaska Bulk Fuel Upgrades Preliminary Design Report F.TANK FARM FOUNDATION Since both tank farm sites are considered to have marginally frozen ice rich soils,the tank farm foundations must maintain thermal stability of the existing ground to prevent thaw settlement.Further,since no local fill material is available,and the cost for constructing a thaw stable,level,imported gravel fill pad above the flood level would be extremely expensive and difficult,a pile supported tank farm platform is recommended.The platform is to be supported on ad-freeze piling installed in the winter during frozen conditions.The piling and platform are to be constructed with steel pile,structural members and plate. G.SECONDARY CONTAINMENT Secondary containment for the tank farm constructed on a raised steel platform is provided by steel dike walls seal welded directly to the platform floor.By seal welding all dikes and platform joints,no additional membrane liner is required.See the Conceptual Design Drawings in Appendix F for additional details. The secondary containment area must be designed to contain the volume of the largest tank in the containment area,with additional capacity to address the displaced volume from other tanks in the containment area and to provide sufficient freeboard to allow for snow and precipitation accumulation.Six inches of freeboard will suffice for this facility. In consideration of the different fuel user's responsibilities and liabilities,each fuel user's tank will be located in separate secondary containment cells.This will limit the impact of a spill in the tank farm to the responsible party's separate containment area,and not affect the other fuel systems. H.TANKS The existing QCC tanks were found to have significant damage and corrosion and it is anticipated that the other tanks may have similar corrosion.Historical experience has shown that refurbishing many smaller BIA style tanks to bring them into code compliance is not cost effective when compared to installing fewer,larger new tanks.In addition,the use of new,larger tanks decreases the tank farm size,which results in a savings in material and platform construction cost. The proposed tank farm has been designed around installing new 23,000-gallon vertical tanks.The 23,000-gallon tanks have a net storage capacity of roughly 21,400 gallons. (Note:The net storage capacity is determined as 90%of the tank's shell capacity.Use of a net capacity allows for the portion of the tank,which are not used during normal operations,including ullage left at the top of the tank for thermal expansion and the amount of fuel below the issue nozzle,which cannot be withdrawn through the fixed pumping system.)The tank size was determined based on shipping restrictions (15-foot LOMF Incorporated (Ki)a ed1diaryofUkpeagvikInupiatCorporationNY Kongiganak,Alaska Bulk Fuel Upgrades Preliminary Design Report diameter being at the upper limit of the allowable sized tank possible to be shipped without special handling costs)and the tank anchorage requirements due to wind/seismic loading. As shown on the Conceptual Design Drawings,the proposed facility will incorporate one new 23,00-gallon tank for the Washeteria's fuel storage,four new 23,000 gallon tanks for the Power Plant's fuel storage,three new 23,000-gallon tanks for the School's fuel storage,and eight new 23,000-gallon tanks for QCC's fuel storage (4 for fuel oil and 4 for gasoline). In addition to the bulk storage tanks,the proposed design includes a new 3,000-gallon fuel oil/gasoline dispensing tank for dispensing fuel to motor vehicles,one new 2,000- gallon double walled tank for the Washeteria,one new 4,000-gallon double walled tank for the Power Plant,and one new 4,000-gallon double walled tank for the School. A summary of the proposed fuel storage capacities (including the bulk storage tanks, dispensing tank and new intermediate tanks,as shown in the Conceptual Design Drawings),is as follows: Proposed Fuel Storage Capacities Net Fuel Oil Net Gasoline Facility Capacity*(gallons)_Capacity*(gallons) KTC Washeteria 23,200 PPC Power Plant Tank Farm 89,200 LKSD School Tank Farm 67,800 QCC Tank Farm 87,000 87,000 Total 267,200 87,000 *Net capacity equals 90%of total tank shell capacity. The existing tanks,which are not to be incorporated into the new consolidated fuel facility,shall either be demolished and disposed of,or salvaged and removed from the community. 1 FUEL DISTRIBUTION The new bulk tank farm will include fuel storage for retail dispensing,power generation and facility heating.The proposed design includes providing retail dispensing at the tank farm,while fuel for the Washeteria,Power Plant and School will be distributed to the respective user facilities.The Washeteria and Power Plant fuel is shown as sharing a common distribution pipeline since they are both operated by the KTC. LCMF Incorporated12AsubsidiaryofUkpeagvikInupiatCorporation Kongiganak,Alaska Bulk Fuel Upgrades Preliminary Design Report 1.Retail Dispensing The QCC fuel is intended to be distributed for retail sale.Retail sales include both container filling and motor vehicle filling.In order to meet the State regulations for dispensing fuel from above ground tanks to motor vehicles,an approved dispensing tank and dispensing station must be installed.The dispensing station must include the use of a protected tank (2-hour fire rating)and a gas station style dispenser.Dispensing to containers can be performed at a motor vehicle dispenser,if approved containers are used. 2.Washeteria and Power Plant The Washeteria and Power Plant fuel distribution system will include a new transfer pump and pipeline to transfer fuel from the bulk tank farm to a new 2,000-gallon intermediate tank located at the Washeteria and to a new 4,000- gallon intermediate tank located adjacent to the Power Plant.Fuel transfers will be manually controlled with a timer;however,the pump control panel will incorporate interlocking controls to direct fuel to the appropriate intermediate tanks.The intermediate tanks will be equipped with the following appurtenances: float actuated fill limiting valve; high level pump shut-off switch; critical high level alarm; liquid level gauge;and whistle vent. The Washeteria and Power Plant fuel distribution pipeline will be constructed using new Schedule 80 welded steel pipe with suitable low temperature properties.See the Conceptual Design Drawings in Appendix F for pipeline routing. 3.School The LKSD fuel distribution system will feed multiple intermediate tanks (the one new 4,000-gallon tank located near the School and -intermediate tanks located at the Elementary School and its outbuildings.The LKSD fuel distribution system will include a fixed transfer pump,located at the tank farm,which will pump fuel through new piping to the intermediate tanks.Fuel transfers will be manually controlled with a timer,however,the pump control panel will incorporate interlocking controls to direct fuel to the appropriate intermediate tanks.The intermediate tanks will be equipped with the following appurtenances: °float actuated fill limiting valve; e high level pump shut-off switch; °critical high level alarm; 3 LOMF Incorporated @)A subsidiaryofUkpeagvik Inupiat Corporation aE, Kongiganak,Alaska Bulk Fuel Upgrades Preliminary Design Report e liquid level gauge;and °whistle vent. All new distribution piping shall be constructed using Schedule 80,welded steel pipe with suitable low temperature properties.See the Conceptual Design Drawings in Appendix F for pipeline routing. J.OWNERSHIP AND OPERATION The proposed consolidated tank farm is designed to maintain both physical and legal separation between the three different entities (QCC,KTC/PPC,and LKSD).Each entity's fuel tanks are isolated in their own secondary containment cell and the fuel systems are isolated from one another. It is assumed that each user will maintain and operate their own fuel systems,however, some portions of the tank farm,such as fencing,would benefit from shared maintenance. For this reason,consideration should be made for one entity being responsible for the overall maintenance and repair of the common portions of the tank farm.Traditionally, the Village Corporation (QCC)would be the entity selected for overall responsibility of the tank farm. K.SPILL RESPONSE REGULATORY PLANS The presence of one entity responsible for the overall condition of the tank farm will allow for the preparation of one set of spill response plans for the entire facility.These plans will include an EPA Facility Response Plan (required for all tank farms with more than 42,000 gallon capacity filled from a vessel),an EPA Spill Prevention Control and Contingency (SPCC)Plan,a US Coast Guard Oil Spill Response Plan,and a US Coast Guard Operations Manual. Since the facility will not have more than 420,000 gallons of storage capacity,a State of Alaska Oil Discharge Prevention and Contingency Plan (C-Plan)will not be required. Regulatory Plan Implementation Schedule: e The EPA Facility Response Plan must be submitted prior to receiving fuel; The EPA SPCC Plan must be in place within 6 months of facility start-up; e The US Coast Guard Operations Manual must be submitted,and approved,with a Letter of Intent to Operate,prior to receiving fuel. L.PERMITTING Typical permitting requirements for a new tank farm and fuel distribution systems, include submittal of the construction documents to the State Fire Marshal for review and approval and obtaining a US Army permit to place fill on wetlands. (eyLOMFIncorporated14AsubsidiaryofUkpeagvikInupiatCorporation Kongiganak,Alaska Bulk Fuel Upgrades Preliminary Design Report 1.Fire Marshal Review The construction of the new tank farm and fuel distribution systems will require submittal of a complete set of construction documents to the State of Alaska, Department of Public Safety,Division of Fire Prevention (Fire Marshal)for plan review and approval.Typical review periods range from 2 3 weeks. 2.US Army Wetlands Permit Since this project will not involve the placement of fill on wetlands,no US Army permit is required. M.CONSTRUCTION METHOD Construction of the new fuel facility is to be conducted using Force Account methods. Under qualified management,this construction method has traditionally produced cost effective results,fast construction schedules and increased local hire. When working on a Force Account basis,the project typically hires a qualified superintendent and local labor where available.Additional personnel may need to be brought in to supplement the local labor force for specialty trades,such as pipe welding and electrical installation. Traditionally,Force Account projects have enlisted the use of local equipment where available.Where the local equipment use cannot be donated to the project,equipment rental rates are negotiated or traded off for equipment repair. 1.Local labor The Kongiganak Traditional Council was questioned about the local available labor force.They indicated that no formal list was available which identified personnel and skills. 2.Local Equipment No equipment,other than for airport maintenance,is available in the community. All equipment for this project will have to be shipped in. N.SCHEDULE A construction schedule for both Alternate Site A and Alternate Site B has been prepared based on historical force account fuel construction methods and crew sizes.One schedule is considered to cover construction at either site since the tank farm design is common,and the amount of piping is similar.Differences in piping construction effort are assumed to be made up with additional labor to maintain the schedule. ee)LOMF Incorporated15AsubsidiaryofUkpeagvtkInupiatCorporation Kongiganak,Alaska Bulk Fuel Upgrades Preliminary Design Report Due to the ground conditions,most of the construction must occur while the ground is frozen.For this reason,the schedule identifies material delivery and equipment delivery to the village in the fall with construction started in the winter.All heavy equipment use must be completed and the equipment must be staged for demobilizing from the village prior to the spring thaw. Note:The proposed schedule is very dependent upon many inter-related factors,such as project start time,material availability and weather.If any of these items creates a delay, the project may run into the following season,which will increase the construction costs. In order to address this potential delay,and increased cost,and a 20%construction contingency should be used in cost estimating for the project. O.BUDGET COST ESTIMATE Budget Cost Estimates have been prepared for construction at both alternative sites and for the alternative marine header location presented on the Conceptual Project Layout Plan Alternate C (see Appendix G for the complete detailed estimates).The estimates were developed based on historical Force Account construction costs for recent tank farm projects in southwest Alaska.Equipment rental rates are based on historical rental rates for similar equipment.This estimate includes design cost,construction costs,regulatory plan development costs,project management costs and a construction contingency of 20%. 1.Alternate A The total Budget Cost Estimate for Alternate A is approximately $4,816,000.The construction budget sub-total for the fuel system installation only is roughly $3,290,000.The total Budget Cost Estimate includes the construction of a boardwalk to the tank farm.The boardwalk construction cost estimate is based on current BIA unit costs for a supported boardwalk used in the Kongiganak BIA Road project study. Using the Total Budget Cost Estimate,the project cost per gallon is $13.60/gallon based on 354,100 gallons of net shell capacity (tank farm plus the new intermediate tanks). A breakdown of each entity's portion of the total project cost,based on gallons of storage capacity,is as follows: KTC/PPC $1,617,000 LKSD $1,294,000 QCC $1,905,000 LOMF Incorporated (J)16 A subsidiaryofUkpeagvik Inupiat Corporation ..y Kongiganak,Alaska Bulk Fuel Upgrades Preliminary Design Report 2.Alternate B The total Budget Cost Estimate for Alternate A is approximately $3,655,000.The construction budget sub-total for the fuel system installation only is roughly $3,406,000.The total Budget Cost Estimate includes the construction of a boardwalk to the tank farm from the dispensing station.The boardwalk construction cost estimate is based on current BIA unit costs for an at grade boardwalk used in the Kongiganak BIA Road project study. Using the Total Budget Cost Estimate,the project cost per gallon is $10.32/gallon based on 354,100 gallons of net shell capacity (tank farm plus the new intermediate tanks). A breakdown of each entity's portion of the total project cost,based on gallons of storage capacity,is as follows: KTC/PPC $1,143,000 LKSD $753 ,000 QCC $1,759,000 3.Alternate C The total Budget Cost Estimate for Alternate C is approximately $3,461,000.The construction budget sub-total for the fuel system installation only is roughly $3,212,000.The total Budget Cost Estimate includes the construction of a boardwalk to the tank farm from the dispensing station.The boardwalk construction cost estimate is based on current BIA unit costs for an at grade boardwalk used in the Kongiganak BIA Road project study. Using the Total Budget Cost Estimate,the project cost per gallon is $9.77/gallon based on 354,100 gallons of net shell capacity (tank farm plus the new intermediate tanks). A breakdown of each entity's portion of the total project cost,based on gallons of storage capacity,is as follows: KTC/PPC $1,089,000 LKSD $716 ,000 QCC $1,656,000 7 LCOMF Incorporated @)A subsidiary of Ukpeagvik InupiatCorporation a, APPENDIX A FUEL RECORD INFORMATION QCC FUEL RECORDS WERE NOT AVAILABLE FOR THIS DRAFT SUBMITTAL.THE INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED AND WILL BE INSERTED IN THE FINAL REPORT,IF AVAILABLE. iu:NUV US°Y9Y LOWER viso NO.UUZ FUL KUSKOKWIM SCHOOL DISTRICT BUSINESS OFFICE - P.O.BOX 305,BETHEL,AK.99559-0305 Ph:907-543-4821;FAX:907-543-4908 To:_::wiley wil bein Pate:|a /s/99C-fe : } ompany L CW c Ine From ;;bs iy, Telephone:Fax:2 7Z -(fe S / Subject:>nA Or fMidian ; Pages:>}With cover Comments: Received Time Nov.5.8:08AM Lv:NUV UD'Y¥Y Bio'NO.UUZ F.UZ Bulk fuel storage consumption and tankage by site: Napaskiak: Consumption FY 95 10,832 galions FY 96 18,047 gallons FY 97 13,445 gallons FY 98 13,734 gallons FY 99 16,504 gallons Tankage 4 each 10,527 gallon horizontal tanks total capacity 42,108 gallons Kongiganak: _Consumption . FY 95 36,094 gallons FY 96 34,970 gallons FY 97 36,315 galions FY 98 37,833 gallons FY 99 41,749 gallons Tankage 10 each vertical tanks with a total capacity of 75,478 gallons,ACE Tank brand BIA style tanks varying in size from 5,950 to 9,180 gallons. Tununak School Consumption FY 95 11,968 gallons FY 96 15,368 gallons FY 97 14,552 gallons FY 98 19,577 gallons FY 99 15,249 gallons pnkage2eachvertical tanks with a total capacity of 40,508 gallons,20,254 gallons each Tununak Housing Consumption FY 95 9,667 galions FY 96 12,898 gallons FY 97 ?gallons FY 98 6,603 gallons FY 99 7,383 gallons Tankage-5 tanks total a mixture of vertical and horizontal,total of 25,087 gallons varying in size from 3,624 to 6,480 gallons. Received Time Nov.5.8:08AM LU:NUV US'3Y Biof NO.UUZ F.US Toksook Bay Elementary Consumption FY 95 13,099 gallons FY 96 12,246 gallonsFY9713,736 gallons FY 98 11,572 gallons FY 99 16,550 gallons Tankage 8 each ACE Tank Brand BIA style tanks total capacity of 49,926 gallons.Tanks vary in size from 3,624 to 6,480 gations. Toksook Bay High School Consumption FY 95 16,155 gallons FY 96 14,812 gallons FY 97 .15,171 gallons FY 98 17,160 gallons FY 99 15,785 gallons Tankage 6 each ACE Tank Brand BIA style tanks total capacity of 35,010 gallons.Tanks vary in size from 5,130 to 6,600 gallons. Received Time Nov.5.8:Q8AM Pe Hs Fiscal Kongiganak Year Fuel Consumed 1995 45354 1996 44777 1997 56753 1998 55315 1999 62164 Tooksook Fiscal Bay Year Fuel Consumed 1995 77908 1996 80116 1997 93506 1998 98633 1999 93610 Fiscal Tununak Year Fuel Consumed 1995 56274 1996 58956 1997 60662 1998 62896 1999 64674 Data ffoulDED Bir DEA. APPENDIX B SITE SELECTION SUMMARY LETTER Architecture Engineering Surveying Project Management Arctic Research 139 East 51st Avenue Anchorage,AK 99503 Voice (907)562-1830 Fax (907)562-1831 P.O.Box 955 Barrow,AK 99723 Voice (907)852-8212 Fax (907)852-8213 LCOMEF IncorporatedAsubsidiaryofUkpeagvikIviupiatCorporation November 23,1999 Mr.Karl Reiche State of Alaska AIJDEA/AEA 333 West Fourth Avenue,Suite 220 Anchorage,AK 99501-2341 Re:Site Selection Summary Kongiginak Fuel System Upgrade PDR Report Dear Mr.Reiche: This letter is a summary of the site selection process for a new consolidated bulk tank farm in Kongiginak.This summary is based on my initial meetings with yourself,my October 6,1999 inspection trip,and my meeting with the Puvurnaq Power Company, members of the Kongiginak Traditional Council and Alaska Energy Authority staff. While in the community,I met with the following people: -Harvey Paul,Puvurnaq Power Company; -Roland Andrew, -Joe Mute,Housing Administration; -Kenny Nikoli,Traditional Council; -Bruce Tiedeman,AEA; Per our August 29,1999 meeting,prior to my trip to Kongiginak,we had identified one potential tank farm site,which is labeled as Site A on the attached Site Layout Plan.The site appeared to be suitable based on a review of aerial photos. Upon meeting with the community representatives,during my site inspection,I was informed that they preferred a tank farm/dispensing station site approximately 1-mile south of the community along the shore of the Kongiganak River.The prime reason for this remote location is due to apparent difficulties in barge access to the existing tank farm site.They indicated that not only is the river narrow and shallow to the north of the community,hindering barge access,but the barges also tend to create significant erosion to the river bank adjacent to the community.The proposed tank farm site is labeled as Site B on the attached Site Layout Plan,however,due to its remote location,it is not visible on the photo. Mr.Karl Reiche November 23,1999 Page 2 During my inspection,I also looked for additional sites not previously identified.Due to the potential for flooding,only one additional site (Site C)was identified as being above the apparent flood plain and suitable for construction of a new consolidated tank farm. Findings Site A:An inspection of the proposed Site A,determined that the site is not suitable for construction of a new tank farm.The site is located on a steep slope where the ground drops from the ridge upon which the community is located down to the low area along the river.The elevation drop over the site is roughly 25'. Site B:The proposed tank farm Site B is located on flat ground,along the shore of the Kongiginak River,approximately 1 mile south of the community.The river bank at the site was roughly 10 feet above the water level at the time of the inspection. Flooding is a critical issue for Site B.The limited flood data available from the Corps of Engineers indicates that the 100 year flood level is at elevation 20.77 MLLW (unknown datum)while "most of the community is located at 30 feet MLLW)”. Since the datum for these flood elevations is unknown,only an approximation as to the flood levels can be made. While in the community,I performed a level survey,which tied the ground level at the School to ground level at Site B.According to this survey,Site B is roughly 16' lower than the ground level at the School.If the flood data is applied to these elevations,the resulting flood level at Site B would be approximately 6 feet above grade.This does not appear reasonable since Site B is located on a broad plain,which is close to the average elevation for the entire region,and the amount of flood water required to achieve 6'of depth would be enormous.Since the School is located on the highest ground in the community (possibly 5 feet higher than the lowest developed portion of the village),it is more likely that the flood waters reach the top of the bank of the river and overflow to a depth of 1 -2 feet. Access to Site B is another issue.At this time,the site is not connected to the community by road or boardwalk.Boats,four-wheelers and snow machines offer the only practical means of access at this time.A BIA project is working on a boardwalk project which includes an extension to Site B.It is not known if,or when,the boardwalk is to be constructed. Site C:This proposed site is located on a small ridge which runs down from the airport.The site slopes at roughly 8 -10%towards the River.The site is set back from the river across a low wet area and is not currently accessed by road or boardwalk.The site backs against the airport boundary. Mr.Karl Reiche November 23,1999 Page 3 Recommendations The location of a new tank farm in this community has raised some unexpected issues and two drastically different alternatives. Given the complexity of the consequences of picking one of these two sites,I recommend that both alternatives should be presented in the Preliminary Design Report.This will allow for a more in-depth comparison,which can be used for the final site selection. If this is acceptable,please let me know so we may proceed with development of the conceptual design layouts.Feel free to call me at 273-1851 if you have any questions or comments. Sincerely, LCMF INCORPORATED .Wilhelm,P.E. Project Manager Attachment:Site Layout Plan PLOTTINGDATE:03/02/01(10:50)AUTOCADDRAWINGNAME:108-SP.DWG1 4 ' "oo ' .a L ia . . ' Lb 1 ?ot i a i 4 i 1 ., 4 .”Uy :tw Bc ensae)ens"aD oe _pes 4 *aden a a Fr a . :, .P eeapeae”=:*"deellaneitieastl=.Dili Adil iinet "Tey46aoeog ol ded &peedCGEU(rogNe ih é Me 7}I fi wv dbemcngPtADdailTreweresTEST ar ¥weoioerar: "4 NGIAWare]xy]*-*saath*aaOeaarePaTOESareAeSpma.¥5"2ahecy'inaneI, ,-ghadre >;>te gsve* ane74aadbnany am porches enduro.EealteMeLCMF IncorporatedAsubsidiaryofUkpeagvikIMupiatCorporation Anchorage,Alaska 907)562-1830 Barrow,Alaska 907)852-8212 SITE LAYOUT PLAN KONGIGANAK,ALASKA DATE:10/15/99 DRAWN BY:KK SHEET: SCALE:1”=300'|CHECKED BY:Www W.O.No:99-108 APPENDIX C CERTIFICATE TO PLAT THE CERTIFICATE TO PLAT HAS BEEN ORDERED BUT WAS NOT AVAILABLE FOR INCORPORATION INTO THIS DRAFT REPORT.THE CERTIFICATE WILL BE INCLUDED IN THE FINAL REPORT. APPENDIX D GEOTECHNICAL INFORMATION PREPARED BY DUANE MILLER &ASSOCIATES THE LETTER FROM DUANE MILLER &ASSOCIATES SUMMARIZING THE SOIL CONDITIONS IN THE COMMUNITY WAS NOT AVAILABLE FOR INCLUSION IN THIS REPORT.THE LETTER WILL BE PROVIDED IN THE FINAL REPORT. APPENDIX E US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS FLOOD DATA Page 146 ALASKAN COMMUNITIES FLOOD HAZARD DATA 1998 U.S.Anny Corps Of Engineers =Flood Plain Management Services COMMUNITY:Kongiganak COUNCIL OFFICE:(907)557-5225 LAST FLOOD EVENT:STATUS:*Unincorporated FLOOD CAUSE: ELEVATION: POPULATION:349 BUILDINGS:FLOOD OF RECORD: FLOOD CAUSE: RIVER SYSTEM:Kongnignanohk R.ELEVATION:- COASTAL AREA:Kuskokwim Bay WORST FLOOD EVENT: NFIP STATUS:Not Participating FLOOD CAUSE: FLOOD PLAIN REPORT:No FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY:No FLOOD GAUGE:No COMMENTS: The 100-year or Base Flood Elevation (BFE)has been calculated to be.20.7 feet MLLW.Most of the community is located at 30 feet MLLW. The community is located 5.5 miles upstream of the mouth of the Kongnignanohk River but is susceptible to coastal storms. cen Kongiganak Revised:6/2/99 Received Time Sep-10.9:19AM APPENDIX F CONCEPTUAL DESIGN DRAWINGS 108-SPA3.DWGPLOTTINGDATE:01/07/00(09:55)AUTOCADDRAWINGNAME:NORTH ie)500 + SCALE IN FEET $62-1830907)907)852-8212Anchorage,AlaskaBarrow,AlaskasokLQ::SeOoO§&i 3ai33 LAYOUTPLANALTERNATECwsftP*:a oa yd -mybepeTOONAIRPORT an we Ef.°|BOUNDARY:S O yl ,po a Lu ¥-a ?4...he is =<oes 4 {"Ve.<5 7 WELDED.QTEEL *=.Sst.ax |OwTEYNEWbt,-4 /DISTRIBUTION”?we}o at ae ,mee'me,I34\/araAC=4/CONSOLIDATED'©PIPELINE aga Fy i< po TANK ARM ”eo fe OU vvi- a ..ma?as < 'so Ps 0%,OS 3 «=>|Po Ss OS Go| ,aoe GlafNEW:Naty : " z Dye aan ;_qo |wwryDISPENSING,eater Oe Zz2/6 'STATION,a o*eos '<> ah ee po PR aHEADER 7 6 |S ara ei NEW 4000 °-"oS See Z o Sa 7 '¥afte af _GALLON .(ae eee ro) foo.NS Roar ¢INTERMEDIATE eo at fe,4 ST Pa ae TANK:©™.OLD'SEWAGE :|BTS”«|-KONGNIGNANOHK RIVER feoer >>-SS)LAGOONS-<-POWER PLANT .-..ot egy . . : P ;°NEW 4,000 GALLON eT ual Meare >S bios INTERMEDIATE';54.7._WATER PLANT.Ba OF ro TANK”*>1 Namen ge 88% eo.%»+!-3 ann ae Lat ,::ofS 32242 bm.NEW 2,000 GALLON:-See Saatr_ INTERMEDIATE TANK gh ea seul .cle Siri a°At 5 38 ,Le wS ogee | as Tee SRT QL 7 7 GROUND WELDED on ews s . ™.7 .+STEEL BARGER.7,7T?,28 cQe2r2 .et ma,"ws.OFF-LOADING NS x sags iy,Toe tk >PIPELINE Tos AS ar .' -_,oo -we A,**oy \Lob a 'eet |es bof :a!* j . or SEWAGE epee!ws CHECKED BY:WWW j "f,*LAGOON _a.DRAWN BY:KK +i +|7 beg 7 va DATE:1/7/00 ;-¢tte h *W.O.No:99-108 \\eee Rs Lo 2 noo 4 REVISION PO q NY on . wa Paa a.tee sn cl -wee 'a :he the Aes.vate at wine wa Ma ee «thee eh a enscee em Ain,/7\PROJECT LAYOUT PLAN -ALTERNATE C *_ SANG WO (esJ SCALE 1 =500"C-3 ALIHOHLNW ADY3aNa C2 * SS/ @ JLVNUSLIV NVId LNOAVT["SVIVE/NEI, eo LOArOUd TWNLdAONOD anoupABi0ugjong aye10d00u) INT vav/vadlv pe} UlSIND WASVIV SIVNVDIONOD qyueurdojeasq oTUIOUODW pue 3avuddN TaN4 AINA AVNVDIONON Aa yseryyoee CHECKED BY:WWW DRAWN BY:KK 1/7/00 W.O.No:99-108 REVISION DATE: C-2 DRAWING NO. oy a, 6. 2.9>;-.s5!0.9cs -ogS.. we>Hi , ; 20°;ow . Woo: Ee aq ww. en eeae <uwez . 9 <7act < aga oa)CF eS Sow Ovum aay r wie ' . 2300- fox.eo& bs Bawz 24 ve} swt O,S! ratios ae zoe AF port es, : hoe Lyf bal og ' 2 ar i.Ta a) _ ; ' v roaaary: ta ThE, ' Pe ea get te Lars Peay em af a Sa e -_ SCALE IN FEET eeze - -_ eSOF. .Benteim7: * . i '3 °9” ° a: "Zi a ee Eee ab eh=OF.oF ' onyeot 4 os on LOT. =A Of98 'Zz eexo6 Oo we nb fe OLFeu HE) No' owl, ow Eee EONS Selone atk: "eae 55zu sus. Set. 4o4 - - z au '"wSevliZ wot wee , fe) Cet "ZOO WN2 2Er zZr a 6 Be ys BOaBOTT an .322 R foe!rpa ,:% awd : WOR t- eesa. . ' ot ZOP gM ' a . mL Sy a ek Nesx6) Meme, ayyeufeee f pn oO eelada "4 ..( . [2lo)|3Ml Lad ' ,44 : a ea = . "4 fF ' N_ . -|" ' CE 'aa Matttetadl' PROJECT LAYOUT PLAN -ALTERNATE B (0€:01) 00/20/10 <31v0 ONILLOIdOMQ'l¥dS--801 TBAWN ONIMWHO OVOOLNVY W.ABOVE'*_GROUND WELDED .STEEL DISTRIBU IPELINES ...©Teammemag'CONSOLIDAJETANKFARM - DISPENSIN ABOVE GRO WELDED STEEL.DISTRIBUTION;"yp IDS PIPELINES NEW MARINE:=, -|AIRPORT KONGNIGNANOHK R {307}562-1830mew:@:OsgiOf£i Tay=;Q:Anchorage,AlaskaBarrow,Alaska852-8212CONCEPTUALPROJECTKONGIGANAKBULKFUELUPGRADEKONGIGANAK,ALASKALAYOUTPLANALTERNATEAPOWER PLANT . WATER PLANT Yo -.°°}, ._.Shatay :Y os:000-GALLO "s+INTERMEDIATE.oa¥.teoe,%Eraoeoe,yRypment\/AEARuralEnergyGroupasW.4thAvenue,Suite220By*StateofAlaskaAIDEADepartmentofCommunityandEconomicDeveloDRAWN BY:KK DATE:1/7/00 REVISION 108-SPA2.DWG\"ys ..vsiaden, /7\PROJECT LAYOUT PLAN -ALTERNATE AXevSCALE:1”=500 PLOTTINGDATE:01/07/00(09:48)AUTOCADDRAWINGNAME:DRAWING NO, C-1 IBALDSKAchorage,Alaska99501-2341**"iCHECKED BY:WWW W.O.No:99-108 108-TFSP.OWGPLOTTINGDATE:01/07/00(10:34)AUTOCADDRAWINGNAME:210.0° FUEL Oil BARGE OFF-LOADING PIPELINE OFF-LOADING PIPELINE[GASOLINE BARGE \50.0°ac Qe PPC LKSD 60.0°50.0"75.0°25.0° 7 nl "|j TRANSFER PUMP TANK $6TANK#1 TANK:#16GASOLINEFUELOil 1500 GAL FUEL O17 eo:le e e e fe a {@)e]e}i)je}C3b>a Sd TANK #8 .GASOLINE ind «1500 GAL xi P -INTERMEDIATE STEEL DIKE INTERMEDIATE STEEL DIKE f | r eo M4 NXFUELOILTOGASOLINETO PILE SUPPORTED STEEL NEW DISPENSING NEW DISPENSING PLATFORM CONTAINMENT DIKE STATIONSTATION™_ DISPENSER DUAL PRODUCTDISPENSER +] ENCLOSUREWN 4Ll \Gwa Ol PIPELINE TO NEWPOWERPLANTINTERMEDIATE TANK AND WATER PLANT INTERMEDIATE TANK FUEL OlL PIPELINE TO NEW SCHOOL INTERMEDIATE TANK TRANSFER PUMP (_2\ NY, (1\TANK FARM SITE PLAN\e-4J SCALE:1"=20' Qcc TANK INDEX PPC TANK INDEX LKSD TANK INDEX en EE AEA)DESCRIETION DIMENSIONS Rn)DescRPTION DIMENSIONS TA SN AAS)DESCRIPTION DIMENSIONS 1 |1,500 |1,500 [OM PRO eee RO]6'ext7"10 |23,000 venta tase 15'9x18 15 |23,000 vere ane 15'ex18"NOTES 2 |23,000 verneae TAN 15'ex18°11 |23,000 vernon Tac 15'ex18"16 |23,000 VERTME Tank 15'ox18"1.NEW TANKS SHALL BE UL LISTED AND LABELED. 3 |23,000 veRTCAL TANK 15'9x18°12 |23,000 venneae TANK 15'0x18"17 |23,000 veRTea Tank 15'ax18" 4 |23,000 VERT.Tan 15'ex18"13 |23,000 veRneae Taw 15'ex18"TOTAL:69,000 s |23,000 VERT Tank 15'ox18"14 |23,000 VERTICAL Tan 15'9x18" 6 23,000 VERTICAL TANK 15'9x18"TOTAL:115,000 7 23,000 venTeae TANK 15'9x18" 8 23,000 ventas TANK 15'#x18" 9 23,000 veRTOn,TANK 15'0x18" TOTAL:93,500 93,500 BIE-tt5$3 wihsxSjE<238 Ww 2==rT}ce a.<2 ui. =sive?\|z2Ou)fc <)eoOya d3]2u<=)ig ="és oa”eTz<©ak:Gz OoO 4 $a:aBossshesiggeisarkaActs-SN *<OO Reso2ofBOSesgoasaeBESta+fPury[))*a3 * * CHECKEDSY:WWW DRAWN BY:KKDATE:1/7/00 W.O.No:99-108 REVISION DRAWING NO. C-4 108 -DET.OWGPLOTTINGDATE:01/07/00(10:37)AUTOCADDRAWINGNAME:CHAIN LINK FENCE WITH BARBED WIRE °FABuaI6-01|1TANK LiL STEEL BEAM o TANK SUPPORT (TYPICAL)| PL 1/47 A STEEL PURUNM0 n"STEEL BEAMPILECAP FACEOFTUBE_STEEL(0)PILESUPPORTED STEEL CONTAINMENT BASIN DETAILC-5/SCALE:1°=4 12 @ 1/4"ROOF . 9 a.!5 +Cs)fy N§ CHAIN LINK 2FENCEGFABRICGa [*--STEEL PILE EXISTING GRADE NEW BOARDWALK &PILE SUPPORTED DUAL PRODUCT DISPENSER\c-5/)SCALE:1°=4 GRIP-STRUT LANDING NEW BOARDWALK.( 11/2" HANDRAIL STEEL PILEa 5-3", J '©GRIP-STRUT y A LANDING : N ate AN ii GRIP-STRUT TREADS EXISTING GRADE ORIRDRUR IORI OCOROUR ORIORION OOOO ERROR 852-8212{3073$62-1830\.LCMFincorporated(4.AsubsidiaryofUkpeagvikMHupiatCorporationAnchorage,AlaskaBarrow,AlaskaKONGIGANAKBULKFUELUPGRADEKONGIGANAK,ALASKACONCEPTUALPILESUPPORTEDCONTAINMENTBASINDETAILSNY>a :FI 4 ox oe3=|a GaQua£2 2saeeeTile)$8 Bi)a feAS223=6 owt séfo]25%o¢Ha Sess+o Lé25afs]as»&oO"Ee +agm xoyxagx” * CHECKED BY:WWW DRAWN BY:CR/KK DATE:1/7/00 W.O.No:99-108 REVISION @)PILE SUPPORTED STEEL STAIR\c-5/SCALE:1°=4 ORAWING NO. C-5 APPENDIX G BUDGET COST ESTIMATE BUDGET COST ESTIMATE Kongiganak Bulk Fuel Upgrade Alternate Site C MATERIAL LABOR OTHER OR UNIT MATL MAN UNIT LABOR]EQUIP No.ITEM QTY |UNITS|COST TOTAL |HOURS COST TOTAL]RENT |FREIGHT TOTAL **(See Note Below) Retail Dispensing Station ...........c..sccscessecsceeteececeeeeeesenseeeeesenceessapeepseeePeeeeeeeeeateeseenenesaseenseeesesaetaeseeebenenaees 46 3k Dual Prod Disp Tank 1 SF 25,000 25,000 2,000 27,000 47 Piles 4 EA 600 2,400 4,000 6,400 48 Pile Slurry Sand -13 CY 100 1,320 1,320 49 Distribution Pipeline 1000 LF 6.00 6,000 5,125 11,125 50 Timber Pipe Supports 100 EA 15 1,500 750 2,250 51 Dispenser Enclosure 1 SUM _1,500 1,500 500 2,000 52 Dual Product Dispenser 1 EA 8,500 8,500 S00 9,000 Tank Farm Electrical ..............ccceccreccsccccntescescceessscoseeceesescssetevssecescsseveceecetstesseucseess ge eveeeeeedeenacactesescescesesses 50,700 53 Power Extension 1000 LF 10 10,000 140 50 7,000 1,200 18,200 54 Lighting 1 SUM _5,000 5,000 70 50 3,500 1,000 9,500 55 Control Pannel 1 SUM__15,000 15,000 140 50 7,000 1,000 23,000 Sub-Totals:1,000,886 467,500 435,750 772,514 2,676,649 Contingency @ 20%535,330 Construction Total:3,211,979 MISCELLANEOUS COSTS $6 Project Insurance .........cccccccccccrccccscccsccccenssseeeeesaserssersesscecssecececsseserenseceasseeeeeeseseseeeeeeseeneenseseenenseneeneees 20,000 57 ROW Legal Work ........cssseseccccesccenccrcccccccsscccveascccencrescecceeccssescnccnscocenceseemecessscncenecenenscenesesceseeeneses 15,000 58 Engineering Allowance ...........ccccscecescecacecscesececsscccececensscsencnsereseasscceseeseeccsesceeeseesesssesenaseonss eeeevccscsevccces 110,000 59 Construction Management Allowance .......cccscscssssevccccvercssccsvcecvesscecsseceseessnseeneasserenesasaseseneasevesassensaeneeones 100,000 GO Grant Audit .........cccccccccccccncccsccncccnccccvcesecceccscevcccsccvencescsccscncescsencescacecceseceseessseecsccsscenssesscesnaseneseseoces 4,000 TOTAL CONSOLIDATED TANK FARM BUDGET COST =__3,460,979 BASIS FOR BUDGET COST ESTIMATE 1 **EQUIPMENT FREIGHT COST CALCULATED AT $0.30/LB EACH WAY. Page 4 of 4 BUDGET COST ESTIMATE Kongiganak Bulk Fuel Upgrade Alternate Site A PROJECT:Conceptual Design Construction Budget BY:WWW PROJECT No.:99-108 FILE NAME:Kong ConceptA Cost Est.xls LEVEL:Budget DATE:1/7/00 REFERENCE DRAWING(S):1/7/00 Preliminary Design Report BASIS:Force Account Construction FREIGHT RATE:$0.50/Ib COST SUMMARY Marine Header/Barge Off-Loading Pipelines ............s.sccccscsscssscessvcsscscrecesssccccccesnccccesccccccccenseccesescoesoccoeece 18,895 Tank Farm Foundation and Secondary Containment System ............cccscsscssssscscvccscscscscscscccsccssccsocssccccssscsoees 1,062,635 Bulk Tanks &Manifold Piping ..........ccsccssscssccsvsvsssccncscccccscecenscecencensceesesecncccescccnscccccncescecccsesescosensescence 1,360,948 Tank Farm Electrical Systems ........ccccccccccsescvceccccvcccccccnsesececcceesscccssssecesesesescecececesevescccsceserececsccceecesscoses 90,840 Dispensing Station .........cccccccscsccssscesescnscscascncssenscncccccccccecssceceseneeecseserecnensccecessececeseeseeseseseneescesenseeesones 129,463 Washeteria/Power Plant Fuel Distribution System ...........ccccccscscscsscccscscccscscsccscsccsccnccvcccscvcscesccccecccessecsscocss 316,909 School Fuel Distribution System .............ccosccccccccecsccccscscesescccevscvsssesessswseesensneusccssscceneceencsecesnosceseensnccocase 309,709 Construction Sub-Total:3,289,400 Miscellaneous Project Costs ..........sccccccccrccccsesecesconccccscenerscccesssescscecesececescscessceresececserenecsrecesecconeresecnsoens 249,000 Tank Farm Access Boardwalk ...csccccosscesevonssvccesesccsccsccsssevesccccesceneneoseseenecesseessssnccesncescecescessescscsscsosecscons 1,277,500 Project Total:4,815,900 PROJECT COST BREAKDOWN BY USER* Kongiganak Traditional Council/Puvurnag Power Company .......ssccccssscssoscsccscessscessscesnenseserccacecccssuncacensseces 1,617,405 Lower Kuskokwim School District ......ccssccsccssccscecccccccsccccsccccscscccssscceseccscscscsccscesccseeseecseseesaseseesseonecoesees 1,293,540 Qemirtalek Coast Corporation ..........ccccocccccsccseccsccerscccesceccnccsncencescnscesensensesuneecnseaccsecsesscescoeecasooeeens 1,904,956 Total:4,815,900 *Breakdown is based on a portion of tank farm cost which relates to the users %fuel storage vs.total storage in tank farm,plus the costs for fuel distribution for each users facility.The Miscellaneous &Boardwalk costs are equally divided. COST PER GALLON =$13.60/gal (Total Project Cost/Net Storage Volume of Tank Farm and Intermediate Tanks (354,100 gal)) Page 1 of4 BUDGET COST ESTIMATE Kongiganak Bulk Fuel Upgrade Alternate Site A MATERIAL LABOR OTHER OR UNIT MATL MAN UNIT LABOR]EQUIP INo ITEM QTY |UNITS}COST TOTAL |HOURS COST TOTAL]RENT |FREIGHT|TOTAL **(See Note Below) Lar 000...ccc cece cee eee cence eee ece eee ee cence reese nesses eee e ese eee ence eae eee eee ee EG ESHESR ESE SE ECE ES OEE ES EOE ED EEE Se EE EOE EFS ERE DSEGeRO REE EES EE 1 Foreman MHr's 1800 50 =:90,000 90,000 2 Carpenters/Welders MHr's 5400 40 216,000 216,000 3 Local Labor MHr's 7500 30 225,000 225,000 Miscellaneous ............sceccesscscscececeuscevsnevecscsceaeserseneeecenenseensteessneeseagaccanaseneuseutateestetecersevestscsesteseuacenensencs 712,322 4 Mob/DeMob 1 SUM 10,000 10,000 10,000 5 Crew Per Diem 1491 MD's 42 62,622 62,622 6 Crew Housing 1491 MD's 50 74,550 74,550 7 Loader Rental 4 MO 8,500 34,000 22,200 56,200 8 Loader Standby 5 MO -5,000 25,000 22,200 47,200 9 Crane Rental 4 MO _15,000 60,000 10,000 70,000 10 Crane Standby 5 MO 11,000 55,000 55,000 11 Skid Steer Rental 4 MO _-3,500 14,000 3,600 17,600 12 Skid Steer Standby 5 MO __1,750 8,750 3,600 12,350 13 Drill Rig Rental 1 MO -25,000 25,000 3,600 28,600 14 Drill Rig Standby 8 MO 10,000 80,000 3,600 83,600 13 Welder Rental 5 MO 4,000 20,000 600 20,600 14 Four Wheeler Rental 6 MO 1,500 9,000 9,000 15 Fuel 1 SUM 30,000 30,000 16 Tool Rental 5 MO _15,000 75,000 5,000 80,000 17 Consumables 1 SUM 50,000 50,000 5,000 55,000 Marine Header and Barge Off-Loading Pipelines ...............csccesssccsceecsececeseneeceeeeeceeesenssecnsteseceseeeseeuteesereesneteeteenas 18 3"Piping 100 LF 6.00 600 513 1,113 19 3"Ball Valve 2 EA 350 700 25 725 20 3"Check Valve 2 EA 350 700 50 750 21 Drip Box 1 EA 400 400 100 S00 21 Timber Pipe Supports 10 EA 15 150 75 225 Tank Farm Piling and Secondary Containment Structure ...........:.ccsceecessscseteceeceeeecensenseseeeeeneseeeeseeeeeeeensneeneeneaeeeees 22 Piles 68 EA 600 40,800 .68,000 108,800 23 Pile Slurry Sand 224 CY 100 22,440 22,440 24 Structural Steel 105,000 LBS 0.35 36,750 52,500 89,250 25 Deck Plate 107,188 LBS 0.50 53,594 53,594 107,188 26 Dike Wall 690 LF 35 24,150 12,351 36,501 27 Chain Link Fence 640 LF 10 6,400 4,800 11,200 Page 2 of 4 BUDGET COST ESTIMATE Kongiganak Bulk Fuel Upgrade Alternate Site A MATERIAL LABOR OTHER OR UNIT MATL MAN UNIT LABOR]EQUIP No.ITEM QTY |UNITS{]COST TOTAL |HOURS COST TOTAL}RENT |FREIGHT}TOTAL **(See Note Below) Bulk Tanks .....c.cccsceccccececeececsecececsssescsscscsecsesscsessessssvscecscssssesssssusacsesscsscecsssacssssesssessusecsasseesesssasssasssseeass 28 New Tank Foundations 38400 LBS 0.35 13,440 19,200 32,640 29 New 23k Tanks 16 EA 23,800 =380,800 380,800 761,600 Tank Farm Manifold Piping ...............:ccscssscseseseseceesesssesneeeeeeneeeeeneeeeeeeeneseeeeeeeenessenanneeeeeeeeseDeeeeeneteneueseneeasees 18,044 30 3"Manifold Piping 450 LF 6.00 2,700 2,306 5,006 31 3"Ball Valve 22 EA 350 7,700 275 7,975 32 3"Flex Fittings 16 EA 100 1,600 400 2,000 33 2"Strainer 2 EA 400 800 25 825 34 2"Solenoid Valve 2 EA 600 1,200 25 1,225 35 Pipe Supports 45.EA 15 675 338 1,013 Washeteria/Power Plant Fuel Distribution System .............ccccececescstecscerecneneceseeseeseasnensecesececoeseeceesseeseuseenenseneseeeen 95,725 36 Distribution Pipeline 37 Timber Pipe Supports 38 Transfer Pump System 39 2k Intermediate Tank 40 4k Intermediate Tank School Fuel Distribution System 41 Distribution Pipeline 42 Timber Pipe Supports 43 Transfer Pump System 44 4k Intermediate Tank Retail Dispensing Station 45 3k Dual Prod Disp Tank 46 Piles 47 Pile Slurry Sand 48 Dispenser Enclosure 49 Dual Product Dispenser 6100 305 LF 6.00 36,600 EA 15 4,575 EA 2,500 2,500 EA =4,000 4,000 EA 8,000 8,000 EA 600 2,400 CY 100 1,320 SUM -1,500 1,500 EA 8,500 8,500 Page 3 of 4 31,263 67,863 2,288 6,863 500 3,000 31,263 67,863 2,288 6,863 500 3,000 4,000 12,000 2,000 27,000 4,000 6,400 1,320 500 2,000 500 9,000 Kongiganak Bulk Fuel Upgrade BUDGET COST ESTIMATE Alternate Site A MATERIAL LABOR OTHER OR UNIT MATL MAN UNIT LABOR]EQUIP No.ITEM QTY |UNITS|COST TOTAL |HOURS COST TOTAL |RENT |FREIGHT|TOTAL **(See Note Below) Tank Farm Electrical ..............ccccsccenceccececeneeeseeeneeseeseetenesceseessnsactasscesenseneeesasesenerestensteetaseseesepensesesceseseseeees 75,700 50 Power Extension 3500 LF 10 35,000 140 50 7,000 1,200 43,200 51 Lighting 1 SUM _5,000 5,000 70 50 3,500 1,000 9,500 $2 Control Pannel 1 SUM_-15,000 15,000 140 50 7,000 1,000 23,000 Sub-Totals:993,841 548,500 435,750 763,076 2,741,167 2,741,167 Contingency @ 20%548,233 Construction Total:3,289,400 MISCELLANEOUS COSTS 53 Project Insurance ......cccccccccccccvcvccccccccsccsccscssceccesccceccesscaeceesenseressesecsesnesseseeeesceesensececesceecesecenenesseneces 20,000 54 ROW Legal Work .........ccccssscensecccccececescccscsceccncecerecesseesreeeseseseseeececeseeneceneeeeeeeenseseneseeneensneernenseceees 15,000 55 Engineering Allowance ..........cccccccccesscccvccscecsesecscestrecsecececesesecneesereeeseeseseeneeeseneneeseeeneeeeneseneeseensseesseceens 110,000 56 Construction Management Allowance ........ccsccccrsecerscccccesvacerececereccceseseesesseeneeeeeneneneseseareeseeaseseneesseeseoeense.100,000 57 Grant Audit ........cscssssccsccccccsccescccccecescesesescecsecbenscenseceenscseseseneenseneeresceeeseneeeesennecnseeeeeeeceeeeeeeeeesenseneeees 4,000 TOTAL CONSOLIDATED TANK FARM BUDGET COST =_3,538,400 ADDITIONAL PROJECT COST $8 Tank Farm Boardwalk 3500 LF 365 1,277,500 1,277,500 |TOTAL BUDGET COST =4,815,900 BASIS FOR BUDGET COST ESTIMATE 1 **EQUIPMENT FREIGHT COST CALCULATED AT $0.30/LB EACH WAY. Page 4 of 4 BUDGET COST ESTIMATE Kongiganak Bulk Fuel Upgrade Alternate Site B PROJECT:Conceptual Design Construction Budget BY:WWW PROJECT No.:99-108 FILE NAME:Kong ConceptB Cost Est.xls LEVEL:Budget DATE:1/7/00 REFERENCE DRAWING(S):1/7/00 Preliminary Design Report BASIS:Force Account Construction FREIGHT RATE:$0.50/Ib COST SUMMARY Marine Header/Barge Off-Loading Pipelines .............scsecosveserercccccccsccscscccsuscscecescscssevssenscesecsceseneneseesecececs 416,269 Tank Farm Foundation and Secondary Containment System .........sccsccrsevese eacecccccesecesaccevercecesecocccsscsccescesoees 1,062,635 Bulk Tanks &Manifold Piping ............eccccccscssvssvesecesccsccvccesecsscenscsescoeneensseeeanesecensecsseesecesceneeneenecescscees 1,360,948 Tank Farm Electrical Systems ........cccccccssscscscccccscssecesccesesrerecscnsnseerereseseneeenarenesneeeeeneneeensasenessasseensesesens 72,840 Tank Farm Access Boardwalk ........cccccccccccccssccccvccccsccscssccsevevccsccecencensenccsenscsecseceeceesescssseseeeresescsescensenees 54,075 Dispensing Station ..........cccccsccccecccccercvccscenscecsesescesececesenseseceveseesecessseseenseerasnsesneseseseresereseesereceseseeseens 192,293 Washeteria/Power Plant Fuel Distribution System ...........scccccsssceserercsvecsvccnensescenscsceseterecnsesressesssessssosorseses 133,015 School Fuel Distribution System ..........ccccccccccccccsccscccccnrercccccccccecncccecsseceaneeneeseeseesneneeeseesseasseneseeaseseeesaees 113,380 Construction Sub-Total:3,405,455 Additional]Project Costs ...........scscccsovcsccccececccssverscesreresccsesseereeeneeeneesseneeneeseeeeenseeeseeeeeeeneeesnensneesesenerene 249,000 Project Total:3,654,455 PROJECT COST BREAKDOWN BY USER* Kongiganak Traditional Council/Puvurnag Power Company .........ccccrossssevscessssscaccnscnesescsosccacorecoveresencenecsecs 1,143,130 Lower Kuskokwim School District ........sccsccscccssccccvccscccvecsescesscsenreseeessenseccscneesceseeneeeseeeeseenesennaseessensesees 752,649 Qemirtalek Coast Corporation ........cccccosssernconscsscescsscsscecensssscnssseccnscassncccsccnsanccesuececonccesesesessensneeaens 1,758,677 Total:3,654,455 *Breakdown is based on a portion of tank farm cost which relates to the users %fuel storage vs.total storage in tank farm,plus the costs for fuel distribution for each users facility.The Miscellaneous &Boardwalk costs are equally divided. COST PER GALLON =$10.32/gal (Total Project Cost/Net Storage Volume of Tank Farm and Intermediate Tanks (354,100 gal)) Page 1 of 4 BUDGET COST ESTIMATE Kongiganak Bulk Fuel Upgrade Alternate Site B MATERIAL LABOR OTHER OR UNIT MATL MAN UNIT LABOR]EQUIP (No ITEM QTY |UNITS|COST TOTAL |HOURS COST TOTAL]RENT {FREIGHT TOTAL **(See Note Below) |.)50)eer desecuseseseeseesceseveseeere 1 Foreman MHr's 1800 50 90,000 90,000 2 Carpenters/Welders MHr's 5400 40 216,000 216,000 3 Local Labor MHr's 7500 30 225,000 225,000 Miscellaneous ..........ccccccccesccucceccesecteeeeceenseeseeseeeeeaeeeeseenaseneeeteeeesseeeeeeesseeeSOEeESOHEDEeesObaeeeeESSEEneRaOEROEEEEEOES 712,322 4 Mob/DeMob 1 SUM_10,000 10,000 10,000 5 Crew Per Diem 1491 MD's 42 62,622 62,622 6 Crew Housing 1491 MD's 50 74,550 _74,550 7 Loader Rental 4 MO _8,500 34,000 22,200 56,200 8 Loader Standby 5 MO _5,000 25,000 22,200 47,200 9 Crane Rental 4 MO _15,000 60,000 10,000 70,000 10 Crane Standby 5 MO __11,000 55,000 55,000 11 Skid Steer Rental 4 MO -3,500 14,000 3,600 17,600 12 Skid Steer Standby 5 MO __1,750 8,750 3,600 12,350 13 Drill Rig Rental 1 MO _25,000 25,000 3,600 28,600 14 Drill Rig Standby 8 MO 10,000 80,000 3,600 83,600 13 Welder Rental 5 MO 4,000 20,000 600 20,600 14 Four Wheeler Rental 6 MO _1,500 9,000 9,000 15 Fuel 1 SUM 30,000 30,000 16 Tool Rental 5 MO _15,000 75,000 5,000 80,000 17 Consumables 1 SUM 50,000 50,000 5,000 55,000 Marine Header and Barge Off-Loading Pipelines ...............cccscsecsecssceeseereseeseeceeeeeeseeneeeeeeeaeeeeeeeeeeereesseseseeneeeseen 18 3"Piping 13200 LF 6.00 79,200 67,650 146,850 19 3”Ball Valve 2 EA 350 700 25 725 20 3"Check Valve 2 EA 350 700 50 750 21 Drip Box 1 EA 400 400 100 $00 21 Timber Pipe Supports 1320 EA 15 19,800 9,900 29,700 Tank Farm Access Boardwalk .........ccccscsecscescesesesceseeeeesenseeseseeeneeeeeensenenesseseeeeeneeeeeseeseeeeneeteeeenceeeneenegeseaeeten 22 Boardwalk $00 LF =85.00 42,500 2,563 45,063 Page 2 of 4 BUDGET COST ESTIMATE Kongiganak Bulk Fuel Upgrade Alternate Site B MATERIAL LABOR OTHER OR UNIT MATL MAN UNIT LABOR}EQUIP No.ITEM QTY |UNITS}|COST TOTAL |HOURS COST TOTAL |RENT |FREIGHT|TOTAL **(See Note Below) Tank Farm Piling and Secondary Containment Structure ..............cccceecsececnscnceeeeececsesonsenceeustescesesnseusessesesenseeeatenses 23 Piles 68 EA 600 40,800 68,000 108,800 24 Pile Slurry Sand 224 CY 100 22,440 22,440 25 Structural Steel 105,000 LBS 0.35 36,750 52,500 89,250 26 Deck Plate 107,188 LBS 0.50 53,594 53,594 107,188 27 Dike Wall 690 LF 35 24,150 12,351 36,501 28 Chain Link Fence 640 LF 10 6,400 4,800 11,200 Bulk Tanks .....cccssssessssessssessssesssesssecesecsseccanscsssccssscsssesanscesssessnscsssecasscessecsscssvecsuccssnesnsscaneesueeeaneessneeeneess 29 New Tank Foundations 38400 LBS 0.35 13,440 19,200 32,640 30 New 23k Tanks 16 EA 23,800 380,800 380,800 761,600 Tank Farm Manifold Piping .............cccecerscscsceescnceeseuseeeeeneneeeesensesesseeseeeseeeeneeesaueeesenesetereseeneeenesesatateeneneneeney 18,044 31 3"Manifold Piping 450 LF 6.00 2,700 2,306 5,006 32 3”Ball Valve 22 EA 350 7,700 275 7,975 33 3"Flex Fittings 16 EA 100 1,600 400 2,000 34 2"Strainer 2 EA 400 800 25 825 35 2"Solenoid Valve 2 EA 600 1,200 25 1,225 36 Pipe Supports 45 EA 15 675 338 1,013 Washeteria/Power Plant Fuel Distribution System .................cceceeeeeeseeeeceeeeetececeneeeeensnenteseteeeenneeeensseeneneeenenenes 39,938 37 Distribution Pipeline 1500 LF 6.00 9,000 7,688 16,688 38 Timber Pipe Supports 100 EA 15 1,500 750 2,250 39 Transfer Pump System 1 EA 2,500 2,500 500 3,000 40 2k Intermediate Tank 1 EA =4,000 4,000 _2,000 6,000 41 4k Intermediate Tank 1 EA 8,000 8,000 4,000 12,000 School Fuel Distribution System .............-:cccceeeeesececeenceeeeeeeneeeeeeeeeeeeeseneneeeeteeeeeeeesaeneneseentenees ctteaeeesseeeseneanens 23,575 42 Distribution Pipeline 700 LF 6.00 4,200 3,588 7,788 43 Timber Pipe Supports 35 EA 15 525 263 788 44 Transfer Pump System 1 EA 2,500 2,500 500 3,000 45 4k Intermediate Tank 1 EA 8,000 8,000 4,000 12,000 Page 3 of 4 BUDGET COST ESTIMATE Kongiganak Bulk Fuel Upgrade Alternate Site B MATERIAL LABOR OTHER OR UNIT MATL MAN UNIT LABOR]EQUIP No!ITEM QTY |UNITS!COST TOTAL |HOURS COST TOTAL]RENT |FREIGHT TOTAL **(See Note Below) Retail Dispensing Station ..........ccsccscsscscecceeseeceesecneeseenseeeeneeeeenseeeeeeeeeeeeeseeeeeeseeseensGeeenEeeseeOSGbeaOnneaEOEEGERDEEEESS 46 3k Dual Prod Disp Tank 1 SF 25,000 25,000 2,000 27,000 47 Piles 4 EA 600 2,400.4,000 6,400 48 Pile Slurry Sand 13 CY 100 1,320 1,320 49 Distribution Pipeline 1000 LF 6.00 6,000 $,125 11,125 50 Timber Pipe Supports 100 EA 15 1,500 750 2,250 51 Dispenser Enclosure 1 SUM __1,500 1,500 500 2,000 52 Dual Product Dispenser 1 EA -8,500 8,500 500 9,000 Tank Farm Electrical ...........cccceccsececerssosceeseeeseeeeenesseeeeeseeeneeeeeeesseseeneeaeeeeeeesnesencaseteeeeesesebeeetaeaeeeeeeenecneeees 60,700 53 Power Extension i SUM_20,000 20,000 140 50 7,000 1,200 28,200 54 Lighting 1 SUM _5,000 5,000 70 50 3,500 1,000 9,500 55 Control Pannel 1 SUM _15,000 15,000 140 50 7,000 1,000 23,000 Sub-Totals:1,059,966 548,500 435,750 793,664 2,837,879 2,837,879 Contingency @ 20%567,576 Construction Total:3,405,455 MISCELLANEOUS COSTS 56 Project IMSUrance ..........cccccccssvcccccccsenscenenseeeseeserenereserescesereereeseeereseneneeeneeseeeeeeeeeeseesneneneesennnsseeneaseseees 20,000 57 ROW Legal Work ......s.scsccccsececcceccceccssccecccesesesececocesencccecccscessseecececeneceseneeeneneneenennvenesereneceeaeaseseees 15,000 58 Engineering Allowance ...........cccccccccscccsssecccccsecssceresenecsncnsnceesesececeneeenseaecesessesencessaceseaseenssevennseeneerones 110,000 59 Construction Management AllOWaNnce ......ccccccccccccccrcsccececccccccacesavecccenecseonscesseneeeeeeeesceeeeeneneseeenanseeneessenes 100,000 60 Grant Audit ........ccccccccccsccccccenscccseecessseceseeeeseeeeeeeeeeeeneeeeeeeseeneeeeeeseeeeeeeeeeeeaeseeeeeeeeneeeeesoeecssconeecesecceees 4,000 TOTAL CONSOLIDATED TANK FARM BUDGET COST =_3,654,455 BASIS FOR BUDGET COST ESTIMATE 1 **EQUIPMENT FREIGHT COST CALCULATED AT $0.30/LB EACH WAY. Page 4 of 4 BUDGET COST ESTIMATE Kongiganak Bulk Fuel Upgrade Alternate Site C PROJECT:Conceptual Design Construction Budget BY:WWW PROJECT No.:99-108 FILE NAME:Kong ConceptC Cost Est.xls LEVEL:Budget DATE:1/7/00 REFERENCE DRAWING(S):1/7/00 Preliminary Design Report BASIS:Force Account Construction FREIGHT RATE:$0.50/Ib COST SUMMARY Marine Header/Barge Off-Loading Pipelines ..........csccscsccccsesescvascscccesevesccavccccevevscccvonereasseeserenscesscssasseses 289,665 Tank Farm Foundation and Secondary Containment System ..........ccscccscccsscscrccccnscccscccscccccccscnssesessccesccnsevece 1,062,635 Bulk Tanks &Manifold Piping ........ccccccosccocscsscscsccceseseccevevesevscnsvececereseeessesesseeeseseereeessoeseescerenseasseceeeeens 1,360,949 Tank Farm Electrical Systems ........ccccccsvccreccssvccscecscecccencnsseceecccnceresseccceceseneseeseeeeenesseenensecnessensesesneessens 60,840 Tank Farm Access Boardwalk .......sscccscssvscsccccsvccscscscnscseecnsneseessscesneseenseeneneeesereseeseeeneneseeenseeeeenseseseenees 54,075 Dispensing Station ..........ccscccccssserccccsccevererecccvcnceresseveessseceeneceseeeeeeeeseeneenassensneesesseeeseeeeseneeseneneessonesenees 158,411 Washeteria/Power Plant Fuel Distribution System .........ssccccccsossccsecercscccvcsnsceneaccesnscesescsccccssassecsnsesessessesees 122,632 School Fuel Distribution System ........cccccccosrsesssscrecscecscccsscccecccssecsecccsceseesecesenseeeneenseeseneseseessessonseseneneens:102,772 Construction Sub-Total:"3,211,979 Miscellaneous Project Costs .......sssccccssccssssnccecccnsresscccescerecnccccscavesesececccnenseseceenenensasseneanansnsaesesnonesesesenacs 249,000 Project Total:3,460,979 PROJECT COST BREAKDOWN BY USER* Kongiganak Traditional Council/Puvurnag Power Company ......sssscsssssscsevsssescvvsrevessccccscoscescenccesscsconscsessvere 1,089,433 Lower Kuskokwim School District ........cccccssescsscvesccsvccssccccescccesensscceessceeeeneseneensccencccceaceneseseseescennesseseeess 716,053 Qemirtalek Coast Corporation ........ccccocccscecascsececsecsscaccscnscnccncecascassesscessessessonerecessensecesesaenaneneaneneens 1,655,493 Total:3,460,979 *Breakdown is based on a portion of tank farm cost which relates to the users %fuel storage vs.total storage in tank farm,plus the costs for fuel distribution for each users facility.The Miscellaneous &Boardwalk costs are equally divided. COST PER GALLON =$9.77/gal (Total Project Cost/Net Storage Volume of Tank Farm and Intermediate Tanks (354,100 gal)) Page 1 of 4 BUDGET COST ESTIMATE Kongiganak Bulk Fuel Upgrade Alternate Site C MATERIAL LABOR OTHER OR UNIT MATL MAN UNIT LABOR]EQUIP No.ITEM QTY {UNITS}COST TOTAL |HOURS COST TOTAL]RENT [FREIGHT TOTAL **(See Note Below) LabOr ......cesecseseesseceeeneescees ees eeseenenenee sees eens eens eee eee ee ene eAe Ab ESE OEP EROEEGESEE EASED DEAE DEE OE EES EE EEO EE EOE EO EE DEO SS DOE EOR EGE EEE 1 Foreman MHr's 1800 50 90,000 90,000 2 Carpenters/Welders MHr's 4500 40 180,000 180,000 3 Local Labor MHr's .6000 30 180,000 180,000 Miscellaneous ...........c.ccccececscsesenecececeeseerseeseeeeuebeceeecneeeeeneeeeeeneceneeneseeeseceeneeeneeeseeneeeneesreeeneeessesseeeeneeeseesens 690,242 4 Mob/DeMob 1 SUM 10,000 10,000 10,000 5 Crew Per Diem 1251 MD's 42 52,542 52,542 6 Crew Housing 1251 MD's 50 62,550 62,550 7 Loader Rental 4 MO -8,500 34,000 22,200 56,200 8 Loader Standby 5 MO _5,000 25,000 22,200 47,200 9 Crane Rental 4 MO _15,000 60,000 10,000 70,000 10 Crane Standby 5 MO _11,000 55,000 55,000 11 Skid Steer Rental 4 MO _-3,500 14,000 3,600 17,600 12 Skid Steer Standby 5 MO __1,750 8,750 3,600 12,350 13 Drill Rig Rental 1 MO 25,000 25,000 3,600 28,600 14 Drill Rig Standby 8 MO _10,000 80,000 3,600 83,600 13 Welder Rental 5 MO 4,000 20,000 600 20,600 14 Four Wheeler Rental 6 MO 1,500 9,000 9,000 15 Fuel 1 SUM 30,000 30,000 16 Tool Rental 5 MO _15,000 75,000 5,000 80,000 17 Consumables 1 SUM_-50,000 50,000 5,000 55,000 Marine Header and Barge Off-Loading Pipelines .............:sccecssssscveeeerccenenensceseeneseeeeeeseneeeseeneenseeeeeaAeEeeeeneneeaEEEEOES 18 3"Piping 9600 LF 6.00 57,600 49,200 106,800 19 3"Ball Valve 2 EA 350 700 25 725 20 3"Check Valve 2 EA 350 700 50 750 21 Drip Box 1 EA 400 400 100 500 21 Timber Pipe Supports 960 EA 15 14,400 7,200 21,600 Tank Farm Access Boardwalk ........ccccsccscsceescescectonteeeeneeeeseceseeeseceeeeeeeeeesesesseeasesEseeessesetaeesaseeeeeenseeeaeeneeeeee 22 Boardwalk 500 LF 85.00 42,500 ,2,563 45,063 Page 2 of4 BUDGET COST ESTIMATE Kongiganak Bulk Fuel Upgrade Alternate Site C MATERIAL LABOR OTHER OR UNIT MATL |MAN'UNIT LABOR]EQUIP No,ITEM QTY {UNITS}COST TOTAL |HOURS COST TOTAL|RENT |FREIGHT|TOTAL **(See Note Below) Tank Farm Piling and Secondary Containment Structure .............ccscescsececceesscnececnsenceeesenenseneesceescceeaeenseseenseesasueeegs 23 Piles 68 EA 600 40,800 68,000 108,800 24 Pile Slurry Sand 224 CY 100 22,440 22,440 25 Structural Steel 105,000 LBS 0.35 36,750 52,500 89,250 26 Deck Plate 107,188 LBS 0.50 53,594 53,594 107,188 27 Dike Wall 690 LF 35 24,150 12,351 36,501 28 Chain Link Fence 640 LF 10 6,400 4,800 11,200 Bulk Tanks ...c.cccscscscscsssssesescscscsesssscscscscscscscsesecevssessvsuscscavsvscscscssscacavscsesesassvsssvacscecsesssesscssevsseeesssseseneeees 29 New Tank Foundations 38400 LBS 0.35 13,440 19,200 32,640 30 New 23k Tanks 16 EA 23,800 380,800 380,800 761,600 Tank Farm Manifold Piping ................cecscseseeeeeesceeeescecnseeeecsedeceseceeneseeeseeeeeeeneneseeesneeseeesnseneuseseeesseeeeeserseeeees 18,044 31 3"Manifold Piping 450 LF 6.00 2,700 2,306 5,006 32 3"Ball Valve 22 EA 350 7,700 275 7,975 33 3"Flex Fittings 16 EA 100 1,600 400 2,000 34 2"Strainer 2 EA 400 800 25 825 35 2"Solenoid Valve 2 EA 600 1,200 25 1,225 36 Pipe Supports 45 EA 15 675 338 1,013 Washeteria/Power Plant Fuel Distribution System ..............cescsesscosceseseeeeoseeseesseseenseeeneeaenseeeeeseeneeeeessaeeesenneneatanta 39,938 37 Distribution Pipeline 1500 LF 6.00 9,000 7,688 16,688 38 Timber Pipe Supports 100 EA 15 1,500 750 2,250 39 Transfer Pump System 1 EA 2,500 2,500 500 3,000 40 2k Intermediate Tank 1 EA =4,000 4,000 2,000 6,000 41 4k Intermediate Tank 1 EA 8,000 8,000 4,000 12,000 School Fuel Distribution System ..............ccceeceneereceeteccnecnceneneeeeneeeeeneeeneneneneerecessenoneeeeneenseeeeeeereeenteteesetaneseeees 23,575 42 Distribution Pipeline 700 LF 6.00 --4,200 3,588 7,788 43 Timber Pipe Supports 35 EA 15 525 263 788 44 Transfer Pump System 1 EA 2,500 2,500 500 3,000 45 4k Intermediate Tank 1 EA 8,000 8,000 4,000 12,000 Page 3 of 4