The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutREF change funding limitsRow Labels BIOMASS GEOTHERMAL HEAT PUMPS HEAT RECOVERY HYDRO LANDFILL GAS OCEAN/RIVER OTHER TRANSMISSION Wind SOLAR Grand Total Row Labels Aleutians Bering Straits Bristol Bay Copper River/Chugach Kodiak Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim North Slope Northwest Arctic Railbelt Southeast Yukon-Koyukuk/Upper Tanana Grand Total Average of Budget 520181.4327 1249620.7925 778963.5933 572565.7184 1205264.0114 2000000 480152.8825 42123 1240565.1 1246906.1615 104533.75 956035.4864 Average of Budget 890694.1371 1052621.2876 534880.4605 1110162.7329 2355274.0971 985624.0072 194403.0612 1657899.3714 853587.9493 1091847.7331 494662.7596 959317.0688 Count of Budget 48 8 9 38 72 1 4 3 8 74 4 269 Technology Geothermal Wind Transmission Hydro Heat Pumps Heat Recovery Biomass Ocean/River Solar AEA Energy Region Kodiak Northwest Arctic Copper River/Chugach Southeast Bering Straits Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim Aleutians Railbelt Bristol Bay Yukon-Koyukuk/Upper Tanana North Slope Avg. Grant amount 1249620.7925 1246906.1615 1240565.1 1205264.0114 778963.5933 572565.7184 520181.4327 480152.8825 104533.75 Avg. Grant Amount 2355274.0971 1657899.3714 1110162.7329 1091847.7331 1052621.2876 985624.0072 890694.1371 853587.9493 534880.4605 494662.7596 194403.0612 >$1M % >$1M Row Labels Design Construction Feasibility Reconnaissance (blank) Grand Total Row Labels Construction Pre-Construction (blank) Grand Total 164 0.607407407407407 Average of Budget 401272.1024 1535312.0935 271597.5163 578783.065 956035.4864 Average of 1,895,725.00 1532719.1949 327363.1997 952529.1823 Count of Budget 46 140 79 4 269 Count of 1,895,725.00 139 129 268 Row Labels Aleutians Bering Straits Bristol Bay Copper River/Chugach Kodiak Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim North Slope Northwest Arctic Railbelt Southeast Yukon-Koyukuk/Upper Tanana (blank) Grand Total Aleutians Bering Straits Bristol Bay Copper River/Chugach Kodiak Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim North Slope Northwest Arctic Railbelt Southeast Yukon-Koyukuk/Upper Tanana Aleutians Bering Straits Bristol Bay Copper River/Chugach Kodiak Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim North Slope Northwest Arctic Railbelt Southeast Yukon-Koyukuk/Upper Tanana Column Labels Construction Average of Budget 1376472.1682 1604285.2767 975382.8013 1535338.5985 3944064.67 1501025.2308 233201.45 2681139.3687 1296325.1643 1717447.2739 883482.1993 1535312.0935 Construction 11 12 8 13 4 24 4 8 14 28 14 1376472.1682 1604285.2767 975382.8013 1535338.5985 3944064.67 1501025.2308 233201.45 2681139.3687 1296325.1643 1717447.2739 883482.1993 Count of Budget 11 12 8 13 4 24 4 8 14 28 14 140 Pre-construction 13 9 13 8 3 15 4 6 16 26 14 479651.1877 317069.3022 263802.0969 419251.9512 236886.6667 160982.0493 155604.6725 293579.375 466192.8862 418125.1508 105843.32 Pre-Construction Average of Budget 479651.1877 317069.3022 263802.0969 419251.9512 236886.6667 160982.0493 155604.6725 293579.375 466192.8862 418125.1508 105843.32 517944.235 327363.1997 0.541666666666667 0.428571428571429 0.619047619047619 0.380952380952381 0.428571428571429 0.384615384615385 0.5 0.428571428571429 0.533333333333333 0.481481481481481 0.5 0.258415576838868 0.165023835634536 0.212883563471439 0.214496049472803 5.66585562929629E-02 9.68600145465007E-02 0.400211476865311 9.86914731407202E-02 0.26450389322725 0.195790667613812 0.106985332872459 Count of Budget 13 9 13 8 3 15 4 6 16 26 14 2 129 Total Average of Budget 890694.137083333 1052621.28761905 534880.46047619 1110162.73285714 2355274.09714286 985624.007179487 194403.06125 1657899.37142857 853587.949333333 1091847.73314815 494662.759642857 517944.235 956035.486431227 Total Count of Budget 24 21 21 21 7 39 8 14 30 54 28 2 269 Row Labels BIOMASS GEOTHERMAL HEAT PUMPS HEAT RECOVERY HYDRO LANDFILL GAS OCEAN/RIVER OTHER SOLAR TRANSMISSION Wind Grand Total Technology Hydro Wind Transmission Heat Pumps Biomass Heat Recovery Ocean/River Solar Geothermal Technology Wind Heat Recovery Biomass Hydro Heat Pumps Solar Transmission Ocean/River Geothermal Landfill Gas Column Labels Construction Count of Budget 29 1 7 32 23 1 3 4 4 36 140 Avg. Construction 2948852.89 2392079.7778 1799592.335 994853.3143 779667.8631 638405.4059 452503.3533 104533.75 27876 Construction Projects 36 32 29 23 7 4 4 3 1 1 Average of Budget2 779667.8631 27876 994853.3143 638405.4059 2948852.89 2000000 452503.3533 104533.75 1799592.335 2392079.7778 1535312.0935 Avg. Pre-Construction 386844.7418 162004.8408 681537.865 23349.57 124123.1968 221420.7183 563101.47 1424155.7629 Pre-Construction Projects 38 6 19 49 2 4 1 7 Pre-Construction Count of Budget 19 7 2 6 49 1 3 4 38 129 Average of Budget2 124123.1968 1424155.7629 23349.57 221420.7183 386844.7418 563101.47 42123 681537.865 162004.8408 327363.1997 Construction Projects 29 1 7 32 23 3 4 4 36 Total Count of Budget 48 8 9 38 72 1 4 3 4 8 74 269 Pre-Construction Projects 19 7 2 6 49 1 4 38 Total Average of Budget2 520181.432708333 1249620.7925 778963.593333333 572565.718421053 1205264.01138889 2000000 480152.8825 42123 104533.75 1240565.1 1246906.16148649 956035.486431227 0.395833333333333 0.875 0.222222222222222 0.157894736842105 0.680555555555556 0.25 0 0.5 0.513513513513513 Code 402025 402028 402118 402119 402131 402135 402138 403028 403034 403036 403037 403055 403056 403059 403070 403071 403073 407032 407032 407050 407053 407058 407070 407104 407109 407110 408002 409020 409023 409026 409027 409029 410028 410046 410089 402019 402032 402036 407038 407066 410025 410080 410081 410083 411002 402026 402027 402030 402033 402034 402038 402044 402044 402048 402113 402114 402125 402129 403029 403032 403040 403053 403057 403058 403074 406008 406009 406011 406023 407033 407037 407045 407055 407059 407072 407091 407091 409017 409022 409022 409030 410027 410029 410031 410036 410037 410038 410039 410042 410050 410051 410053 410055 410082 410084 410099 411003 411006 402127 403062 403064 403065 403066 403067 403068 407038 407088 407090 407100 411008 402047 410100 402132 402137 403075 406016 402128 403072 402019 402031 402035 403030 403076 406006 407059 407074 407076 407077 407105 409018 410030 410030 410034 410035 410044 410064 403063 407014 403033 402136 402031 402041 402042 402116 402134 403039 406010 406010 407014 407015 407039 407057 407058 407058 407062 407067 407068 407071 407074 407075 407077 407090 407092 407107 409021 410065 407098 407103 402026 402035 402039 402040 402124 407034 407036 407038 407040 407046 407052 409020 410040 410066 410033 409019 410062 410064 406013 406013 406016 406017 406018 407081 407082 407083 407084 407085 407086 409021 409025 402043 402045 402049 402112 402113 402115 402117 402133 403054 406010 406012 407042 407061 407079 407080 407104 410052 410057 410066 410068 410069 410071 410072 410073 410075 410076 410078 410079 410086 410096 410098 402126 403069 410087 410088 402031 402036 407035 407039 407042 407043 407044 407047 407048 407049 407051 407054 410032 407023 407024 407025 407026 407046 407106 407108 409024 409028 410022 410054 410061 410063 410067 410070 410074 410077 410097 403038 407056 407060 410044 PJ Manager DEVANY H. PLENTOVICH DEVANY H. PLENTOVICH DEVANY H. PLENTOVICH DEVANY H. PLENTOVICH DEVANY H. PLENTOVICH DEVANY H. PLENTOVICH DEVANY H. PLENTOVICH DEVANY H. PLENTOVICH DEVANY H. PLENTOVICH JOSHUA A. CRAFT JOSHUA A. CRAFT REBECCA GARRETT REBECCA GARRETT DEVANY H. PLENTOVICH REBECCA GARRETT REBECCA GARRETT REBECCA GARRETT REBECCA GARRETT REBECCA GARRETT ALAN W. FETTERS ALAN P. BALDIVIESO BRYAN CAREY AUDREY ALSTROM BRYAN CAREY DEVANY H. PLENTOVICH JOSHUA A. CRAFT ALAN W. FETTERS BRYAN CAREY DAVID LOCKARD TIMOTHY SANDSTROM JOSHUA A. CRAFT JOSHUA A. CRAFT JOSHUA A. CRAFT RICHARD E. STROMBERG DEVANY H. PLENTOVICH JESSICA STOLP HELEN A. TRAYLOR DEVANY H. PLENTOVICH DANIEL J. HERTRICH AUDREY ALSTROM RICHARD E. STROMBERG DANIEL L. SMITH DANIEL L. SMITH DANIEL L. SMITH DEVANY H. PLENTOVICH DEVANY H. PLENTOVICH BRUCE TIEDEMAN DEVANY H. PLENTOVICH DEVANY H. PLENTOVICH DEVANY H. PLENTOVICH DEVANY H. PLENTOVICH DEVANY H. PLENTOVICH DEVANY H. PLENTOVICH HELEN A. TRAYLOR DEVANY H. PLENTOVICH DEVANY H. PLENTOVICH DEVANY H. PLENTOVICH KARL REICHE DEVANY H. PLENTOVICH DEVANY H. PLENTOVICH DAVID LOCKARD DAVID LOCKARD TIMOTHY SANDSTROM KARL REICHE KARL REICHE PETER CRIMP ALAN P. BALDIVIESO ALAN P. BALDIVIESO DANIEL L. SMITH AUDREY ALSTROM DOUGLAS C. OTT DAVID LOCKARD DEVANY H. PLENTOVICH AUDREY ALSTROM DOUGLAS C. OTT ALAN W. FETTERS ALAN W. FETTERS RICHARD E. STROMBERG DAVID LOCKARD DAVID LOCKARD BRYAN CAREY RICHARD E. STROMBERG TIMOTHY SANDSTROM RICHARD E. STROMBERG ALAN W. FETTERS RICHARD E. STROMBERG JOSHUA A. CRAFT RICHARD E. STROMBERG TIMOTHY SANDSTROM RICHARD E. STROMBERG KARL REICHE RICHARD E. STROMBERG RICHARD E. STROMBERG RICHARD E. STROMBERG DANIEL L. SMITH TIMOTHY SANDSTROM REBECCA GARRETT DAVID LOCKARD DEVANY H. PLENTOVICH REBECCA GARRETT REBECCA GARRETT REBECCA GARRETT REBECCA GARRETT REBECCA GARRETT REBECCA GARRETT DANIEL J. HERTRICH REBECCA GARRETT TIMOTHY SANDSTROM DAVID LOCKARD DAVID LOCKARD DEVANY H. PLENTOVICH TIMOTHY SANDSTROM DEVANY H. PLENTOVICH REBECCA GARRETT REBECCA GARRETT DANIEL L. SMITH DEVANY H. PLENTOVICH REBECCA GARRETT JESSICA STOLP JAMES P. VAIL DEVANY H. PLENTOVICH KRIS NOONAN REBECCA GARRETT PETER CRIMP AUDREY ALSTROM BRYAN CAREY KRIS NOONAN BRYAN CAREY REBECCA GARRETT REBECCA GARRETT DAVID LOCKARD DAVID LOCKARD TIMOTHY SANDSTROM TIMOTHY SANDSTROM RICHARD E. STROMBERG TIMOTHY SANDSTROM KARL REICHE TIMOTHY SANDSTROM REBECCA GARRETT DEVANY H. PLENTOVICH JAMES P. VAIL DEVANY H. PLENTOVICH DEVANY H. PLENTOVICH JAMES P. VAIL REBECCA GARRETT TIMOTHY SANDSTROM NEIL E. MCMAHON NEIL E. MCMAHON TIMOTHY SANDSTROM DAVID LOCKARD AUDREY ALSTROM DOUGLAS C. OTT BRYAN CAREY BRYAN CAREY AUDREY ALSTROM CADY S. LISTER AUDREY ALSTROM KARL REICHE BRYAN CAREY DANIEL J. HERTRICH BRYAN CAREY TIMOTHY SANDSTROM JAMES P. VAIL REBECCA GARRETT KIRK H. WARREN JOSHUA A. CRAFT DAVID LOCKARD DAVID LOCKARD DEVANY H. PLENTOVICH DEVANY H. PLENTOVICH DEVANY H. PLENTOVICH ALAN W. FETTERS DEVANY H. PLENTOVICH TIMOTHY SANDSTROM AUDREY ALSTROM DANIEL J. HERTRICH AUDREY ALSTROM KARL REICHE AUDREY ALSTROM BRYAN CAREY JOSHUA A. CRAFT REBECCA GARRETT JOSHUA A. CRAFT DAVID LOCKARD TIMOTHY SANDSTROM TIMOTHY SANDSTROM ALAN P. BALDIVIESO ALAN P. BALDIVIESO DANIEL L. SMITH ALAN P. BALDIVIESO ALAN P. BALDIVIESO AUDREY ALSTROM AUDREY ALSTROM DANIEL J. HERTRICH AUDREY ALSTROM BRYAN CAREY AUDREY ALSTROM KIRK H. WARREN JOSHUA A. CRAFT DEVANY H. PLENTOVICH DEVANY H. PLENTOVICH JAMES P. VAIL HELEN A. TRAYLOR DEVANY H. PLENTOVICH HELEN A. TRAYLOR HELEN A. TRAYLOR DEVANY H. PLENTOVICH DEVANY H. PLENTOVICH NEIL E. MCMAHON ALAN P. BALDIVIESO AUDREY ALSTROM AUDREY ALSTROM DANIEL J. HERTRICH AUDREY ALSTROM BRYAN CAREY RICHARD E. STROMBERG RICHARD E. STROMBERG REBECCA GARRETT REBECCA GARRETT JOSHUA A. CRAFT JOSHUA A. CRAFT KARL REICHE RICHARD E. STROMBERG RICHARD E. STROMBERG TIMOTHY SANDSTROM REBECCA GARRETT DANIEL L. SMITH TIMOTHY SANDSTROM JOSHUA A. CRAFT JOSHUA A. CRAFT JAMES P. VAIL TIMOTHY SANDSTROM JOSHUA A. CRAFT JOSHUA A. CRAFT JAMES P. VAIL DEVANY H. PLENTOVICH AUDREY ALSTROM AUDREY ALSTROM AUDREY ALSTROM DOUGLAS C. OTT DOUGLAS C. OTT DOUGLAS C. OTT AUDREY ALSTROM BETSY A. MCGREGOR REBECCA GARRETT ALAN P. BALDIVIESO JOSHUA A. CRAFT DOUGLAS C. OTT DOUGLAS C. OTT DOUGLAS C. OTT DOUGLAS C. OTT KARL REICHE JOSHUA A. CRAFT JOSHUA A. CRAFT JOSHUA A. CRAFT RICHARD E. STROMBERG JOSHUA A. CRAFT JOSHUA A. CRAFT REBECCA GARRETT JOSHUA A. CRAFT JOSHUA A. CRAFT JOSHUA A. CRAFT JOSHUA A. CRAFT JOSHUA A. CRAFT AUDREY ALSTROM AUDREY ALSTROM AUDREY ALSTROM RICHARD E. STROMBERG Community Fairbanks Chistochina Tanacross Huslia Angoon Hydaburg Tazlina Cordova Kotzebue Point Lay Wainwright Shishmaref Togiak Russian Mission Brevig Mission Chevak St. Mary's Prince of Wales Island Prince of Wales Island Ruby Nenana Chitina Hoonah Kake Seward Mt. Village/St. Mary's Igiugig Metlakatla St. Paul Pilot Point Point Hope Point Lay Nikolski Nikiski Kokhanok Kenny Lake Railbelt Haines Valdez King Cove Kodiak Gambell Shaktoolik Mekoryuk Ambler Lake & Peninsula Borough Cordova Gulkana Delta Junction Haines Tok Thorne Bay Thorne Bay Tanana Interior region Craig Galena Ketchikan North Pole Unalaska St. Paul Hoonah Tatitlek Sleetmute Nunam Iqua Juneau Juneau Seward Seldovia Atka Cordova Gustavus Wrangell Kodiak Akutan Chignik Lagoon Chignik Lagoon Nome Kotzebue Kotzebue Juneau Railbelt St. George Unalakleet Kwigillingok Quinhagak Mekoryuk Toksook Bay Buckland/Deering?noorvik Sand Point Tuntutuliak Shaktoolik Emmonak Kodiak Chevak Kongiginak McKinley Village Kaltag Mentasta Savoonga Kwinhagak Stebbins Marshall Noorvik New Stuyahok Copper Valley Sitka Waterfall Gartina Eagle Fort Yukon Sand Point Southeast Island School District Scammon Bay Tuntutuliak Sitka Minto Emmonak KennyLake Upper Kobuk Yakutat McGrath Venetie Manley Kodiak Angoon Pelican Railbelt Wales Prince of Wales Island Nome Nome Bethel Kongiganak Railbelt St. Mary's/Pitka's Point Atmautluak Indian Ambler Metlakatla Upper Kobuk Chalkyitsik Venetie Port Graham Bethel Atka Akutan Akutan Tenakee Springs Elfin Old Harbor Whale Pass Chitina Chitina Akutan Tok Kodiak Chenega Bay Angoon Railbelt Railbelt King Cove Scammon Bay Koyuk Atqasuk Atmautluak Tazimina Pedro Bay Lake & Peninsula Borough Yakutat McGrath Fort Yukon Kake Tenakee Springs Chignik Lagoon Valdez Shungnak/Kobuk/Ambler Ketchikan Kaltag Metlakatla Hooper Bay Stebbins Chignik Kake Port Heiden St. Mary's/Pitka's Point Nome Nome Sitka Sitka Tenakee Haines Railbelt Haines Railbelt Sitka Wrangell Atqasuk New Stuyahok McGrath Yukon-Koyukuk School District Upper Tanana Galena Interior region Eyak Kotzebue Hoonah Statewide Akutan Railbelt Railbelt Galena Haines Railbelt Kake Tatitlek Tok Stebbins Kwethluk Marshall Scammon Bay Koliganek Kaktovik Koyuk Chefornak Akiachak False Pass Bethel Chisana Igiugig Interior region Cold Bay Levelock Egegik Upper Kobuk Haines Nushagak Old Harbor Railbelt Whittier Railbelt Prince of Wales Island Skagway Sitka Aleutians East Borough Statewide Lake & Peninsula Borough Railbelt Gustavus Railbelt Railbelt Ketchikan Adak Shishmaref Kivalina Wainwright Delta Junction Teller Cold Bay Napaskiak Eek Nelson Lagoon Selawik Elim Mountain Village Adak Bethel Copper Valley Railbelt Technology BIOMASS BIOMASS BIOMASS BIOMASS BIOMASS BIOMASS BIOMASS HEAT RECOVERY HEAT RECOVERY HEAT RECOVERY HEAT RECOVERY HEAT RECOVERY HEAT RECOVERY HEAT RECOVERY HEAT RECOVERY HEAT RECOVERY HEAT RECOVERY HYDRO HYDRO OCEAN/RIVER OCEAN/RIVER HYDRO HYDRO HYDRO HEAT PUMPS Wind OCEAN/RIVER TRANSMISSION WIND WIND WIND WIND WIND WIND WIND BIOMASS LANDFILL GAS BIOMASS HYDRO HYDRO WIND WIND WIND WIND SOLAR BIOMASS BIOMASS BIOMASS BIOMASS BIOMASS BIOMASS BIOMASS BIOMASS BIOMASS BIOMASS BIOMASS BIOMASS BIOMASS HEAT RECOVERY HEAT RECOVERY HEAT RECOVERY HEAT RECOVERY HEAT RECOVERY HEAT RECOVERY HEAT RECOVERY HEAT PUMPS HEAT PUMPS HEAT PUMPS HEAT PUMPS HYDRO HYDRO HYDRO HEAT RECOVERY HYDRO HYDRO HYDRO HYDRO TRANSMISSION WIND WIND TRANSMISSION WIND WIND WIND WIND WIND WIND WIND WIND WIND WIND WIND WIND WIND WIND WIND SOLAR SOLAR BIOMASS HEAT RECOVERY HEAT RECOVERY HEAT RECOVERY HEAT RECOVERY HEAT RECOVERY HEAT RECOVERY HYDRO HYDRO HYDRO HYDRO SOLAR BIOMASS WIND BIOMASS HEAT RECOVERY HEAT RECOVERY HEAT PUMPS BIOMASS HEAT RECOVERY BIOMASS BIOMASS BIOMASS HEAT RECOVERY HEAT RECOVERY GEOTHERMAL HYDRO HYDRO HYDRO HYDRO HEAT RECOVERY TRANSMISSION WIND WIND WIND WIND WIND WIND HEAT RECOVERY HYDRO HEAT RECOVERY HEAT PUMPS BIOMASS BIOMASS HEAT RECOVERY BIOMASS HEAT RECOVERY HEAT RECOVERY GEOTHERMAL GEOTHERMAL HYDRO HYDRO HYDRO HYDRO HYDRO HYDRO HYDRO HYDRO HYDRO HYDRO HYDRO HYDRO HYDRO HYDRO HYDRO HEAT RECOVERY TRANSMISSION WIND HYDRO HYDRO BIOMASS BIOMASS BIOMASS BIOMASS BIOMASS HYDRO HYDRO HYDRO HYDRO HYDRO HYDRO TRANSMISSION WIND WIND WIND TRANSMISSION WIND WIND GEOTHERMAL GEOTHERMAL HEAT PUMPS HEAT PUMPS GEOTHERMAL HYDRO HYDRO HYDRO HYDRO HYDRO OTHER TRANSMISSION WIND BIOMASS BIOMASS BIOMASS BIOMASS BIOMASS BIOMASS BIOMASS BIOMASS HEAT RECOVERY GEOTHERMAL GEOTHERMAL HYDRO HYDRO HYDRO HYDRO HYDRO WIND WIND WIND WIND WIND WIND WIND WIND WIND WIND WIND WIND WIND WIND WIND BIOMASS HEAT RECOVERY WIND WIND BIOMASS BIOMASS HYDRO HYDRO HYDRO HYDRO HYDRO HYDRO HYDRO HYDRO OTHER OCEAN/RIVER WIND HYDRO HYDRO HYDRO HYDRO HYDRO HYDRO WIND WIND WIND WIND WIND WIND WIND WIND WIND WIND WIND WIND OTHER HYDRO HYDRO WIND Region Railbelt Copper River/Chugach Yukon-Koyukuk/Upper Tanana Yukon-Koyukuk/Upper Tanana Southeast Southeast Copper River/Chugach Copper River/Chugach Northwest Arctic North Slope North Slope Bering Straits Bristol Bay Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim Bering Straits Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim Southeast Southeast Yukon-Koyukuk/Upper Tanana Railbelt Copper River/Chugach Southeast Southeast Railbelt Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim Bristol Bay Southeast Aleutians Bristol Bay North Slope North Slope Aleutians Railbelt Bristol Bay Copper River/Chugach Railbelt Southeast Copper River/Chugach Aleutians Kodiak Bering Straits Bering Straits Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim Northwest Arctic Bristol Bay Copper River/Chugach Copper River/Chugach Railbelt Southeast Yukon-Koyukuk/Upper Tanana Southeast Southeast Yukon-Koyukuk/Upper Tanana Yukon-Koyukuk/Upper Tanana Southeast Yukon-Koyukuk/Upper Tanana Southeast Railbelt Aleutians Aleutians Southeast Copper River/Chugach Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim Southeast Southeast Railbelt Railbelt Aleutians Copper River/Chugach Southeast Southeast Kodiak Aleutians Bristol Bay Bristol Bay Bering Straits Northwest Arctic Northwest Arctic Southeast Railbelt Aleutians Bering Straits Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim Northwest Arctic Aleutians Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim Bering Straits Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim Kodiak Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim Railbelt Yukon-Koyukuk/Upper Tanana Copper River/Chugach Bering Straits Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim Bering Straits Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim Northwest Arctic Bristol Bay Copper River/Chugach Southeast Aleutians Southeast Yukon-Koyukuk/Upper Tanana Yukon-Koyukuk/Upper Tanana Aleutians Southeast Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim Southeast Yukon-Koyukuk/Upper Tanana Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim Copper River/Chugach Northwest Arctic Southeast Yukon-Koyukuk/Upper Tanana Yukon-Koyukuk/Upper Tanana Yukon-Koyukuk/Upper Tanana Kodiak Southeast Southeast Railbelt Bering Straits Southeast Bering Straits Bering Straits Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim Railbelt Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim Railbelt Northwest Arctic Southeast Northwest Arctic Yukon-Koyukuk/Upper Tanana Yukon-Koyukuk/Upper Tanana Railbelt Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim Aleutians Aleutians Aleutians Southeast Southeast Kodiak Southeast Copper River/Chugach Copper River/Chugach Aleutians Yukon-Koyukuk/Upper Tanana Kodiak Copper River/Chugach Southeast Railbelt Railbelt Aleutians Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim Bering Straits North Slope Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim Bristol Bay Bristol Bay Bristol Bay Southeast Yukon-Koyukuk/Upper Tanana Yukon-Koyukuk/Upper Tanana Southeast Southeast Bristol Bay Copper River/Chugach Northwest Arctic Southeast Yukon-Koyukuk/Upper Tanana Southeast Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim Bering Straits Bristol Bay Southeast Bristol Bay Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim Bering Straits Bering Straits Southeast Southeast Southeast Southeast Railbelt Southeast Railbelt Southeast Southeast North Slope Bristol Bay Yukon-Koyukuk/Upper Tanana Yukon-Koyukuk/Upper Tanana Yukon-Koyukuk/Upper Tanana Yukon-Koyukuk/Upper Tanana Yukon-Koyukuk/Upper Tanana Copper River/Chugach Northwest Arctic Southeast Aleutians Railbelt Railbelt Yukon-Koyukuk/Upper Tanana Southeast Railbelt Southeast Copper River/Chugach Yukon-Koyukuk/Upper Tanana Bering Straits Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim Bristol Bay North Slope Bering Straits Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim Aleutians Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim Copper River/Chugach Bristol Bay Yukon-Koyukuk/Upper Tanana Aleutians Bristol Bay Bristol Bay Northwest Arctic Southeast Bristol Bay Kodiak Railbelt Railbelt Railbelt Southeast Southeast Southeast Aleutians Bristol Bay Railbelt Southeast Railbelt Railbelt Southeast Aleutians Bering Straits Northwest Arctic North Slope Railbelt Bering Straits Aleutians Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim Aleutians Northwest Arctic Bering Straits Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim Aleutians Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim Copper River/Chugach Railbelt PJ Title Biomass-fired Organic Rankine Cycle System-CLOSED Chistochina Central Wood Heating Construction Tanacross Woody Biomass Community Space Heating Huslia Water System & Clinic Wood Boiler Project Angoon Low-Income Housing Pellet District Heat Hydaburg Schools Wood Fired Boiler Wood Boiler for the Native Village of Tazlina Cordova Heat Recovery Construction - CLOSED Kotzebue Electric Heat Recovery Construction Point Lay Wind Generation Design R4 Wainwright Wind Turbine Design R4 Shishmaref Heat Recovery Project R5 Togiak Waste Heat Recovery Project Russian Mission Heat Recovery System R5 Brevig Mission Water System Heat Recovery Chevak Water & Vacuum Plant Heat Recovery St. Mary's Heat Recovery System Reynolds Creek Hydroelectric Project Reynolds Creek Hydroelectric Project Ruby Hydrokinetic Construction - Closed Nenana Hydrokinetic Construction-CLOSED Fivemile Creek Hydroelectric Project R2,R4 Hoonah - IPEC Hydro Project R3-Closed Gunnuk Creek Hydroelectric Project Heat Pump System for City of Seward R9 Mountain Village-St. Mary's Wind Intertie R9 Kvichak River - Ocean & River Energy Metlakatla-Ketchikan Intertie R1, R4 St. Paul Wind Diesel Project R3 Pilot Point Wind Power & Heat R3 Point Hope Wind Turbine Design R3, R4 Point Lay Wind Diesel Generation Project R3-Closed Nikolski Wind Integration Construction - Closed Nikiski Wind Farm Construction - Closed Kokhanok - High-penetration Wind Energy R6 KennyLakeSchool Wood Fired BoilerR0,R1,R4-CLOSED Anch. Landfill Gas Elect Const.-Biofuels-CLOSED Haines Borough Municipal Buildings Biomass Pj Allison Lake Hydro Prj Feas. & Construction-CLOSED Humpback Creek Hydro Rehabilitation R3 - Closed Pillar Mtn. Wind PH III Kodiak - Closed Gambell Wind Energy Recovery RD5-CLOSED Shaktoolik Surplus Wind Energy Recovery RD5-CLOSED Mekoryuk Surplus Wind Energy Recovery RD5-CLOSED Ambler Solar PV Construction - Closed Lake & Peninsula Borough Wood Boilers R1,R4-CLOSED Cordova Wood Processing Plant Construction-Closed Gulkana Central Wood Heating Construction Closed Delta Junction Wood Chip Heating Feasibilit-Closed Haines Ctrl Wood Heating Sys Constr(LIHP)-Closed Tok Wood Heating Construction -Biomass- Closed Thorne Bay School Wood Fired Boiler-Biomass-Close Thorne Bay School Wood Fired Boiler-Biomass-Close Tanana Tribe Biomass Energy Conservation R3-Closed Feasibility Assessment Wood Heating Interior AK R4 Craig Biomass Fuel Dryer Project R4 Galena Community Wood Heat Project-CLOSED Ketchikan Gateway Borough Biomass Heating-CLOSED North Pole Heat Recovery Construction - Closed Unalaska Heat Recovery Construction-CLOSED Saint Paul Fuel Economy Upgrade R3-CLOSED Hoonah Heat Recovery Project R4-Closed Tatitlek Heat Recovery Project R5-CLOSED Sleetmute Heat Rec PowerPlant to WaterPlant CLOSED Nunam Iqua Heat Recovery CLOSED Juneau Airport Ground Source Heat Pump - Closed Juneau Ground Source Heat Pump Constr(Aq Ctr)-CLSD AK SeaLifeCenter PH II Seawater Heat PumpR3-CLOSED Seldovia Ground Source Heat Pump-CLOSED Chuniisax Cr Hydroelectric Construction - CLOSED Humpback Creek Hydroelectric Construction-Closed Falls Creek Hydroelectric Construction-Closed Wrangell Hydro Based Electric Boiler Const.-Closed Terror Lake Hydroelectric Project-Closed Akutan Hydroelectric System Repair/Upgrade-Closed Packer's Creek Hydroelectric Project Packer's Creek Hydroelectric Project Nome Banner Peak Wind Farm Trans Const-Closed High Penetration Wind-Battery-Diesel Hybrid R3 High Penetration Wind-Battery-Diesel Hybrid R3 Snettisham Trans Ln Avalanche Mitigation R4-Closed Delta Area Wind Turbines - Closed St. George Wind Farm Construction Unalakleet Wind Farm Construction - Closed Kwigillingok Wind Farm Construction-Closed Quinhagak Wind Farm Construction-Closed Mekoryuk Wind Farm Construction-Closed Toksook Bay Wind Farm Expansion Construction Buckland/Deering/Noorvik Wind Farm Constr Sand Point Wind-Closed Tuntutuliak High Penetration Wind Diesel-CLOSED Shaktoolik Wind-Closed Emmonak/Alakanuk Wind & Transmission - Closed Pillar Mountain High Penetration Wind RD5 - Closed Chevak Wind Energy Recovery RD5-CLOSED Kongiginak Wind Heat Electrical Thermal Storage McKinley Village Solar Thermal Const - Closed Kaltag Solar Construction - CLOSED Mentasta Comm. Fac Woody Biomass Space Heat-CLOSED Savoonga Heat Recovery System R6 CLOSED Kwinhagak Heat Recovery - Water Treatment Plant R6 Stebbins Heat Recovery Project R6 Marshall Heat Recovery - Water Treatment Plant R6 Noorvik Heat Recovery - Water Treatment Plant R6 New Stuyahok Heat Recovery R6 Allison Lake Hydro Prj Feas. & Construction-CLOSED Sitka Blue Lake Hydroelectric Project Waterfall Creek Hydroelectric Project R5, R6 Gartina Falls Hydroelectric Project R6 Eagle Solar Array Project R6-CLOSED District Wood Heating in Fort Yukon R3 Sand Point Excess Wind Utilization Southeast Island School District Wood Boilers Scammon Bay Community Facilities Heat Recovery Tuntutuliak Heat Recovery Sitka Centennial Hall&Library Feas/HeatPump-Closed Minto Community Buildings Biomass Project-Closed Emmonak Heat Recovery System KennyLakeSchool Wood Fired BoilerR0,R1,R4-CLOSED Upper Kobuk River Biomass R4 - Closed Yakutat Biomass Feasibility & District HeatingLoop McGrath Heat Recovery Construction-Closed Venetie Clinic Heat Recovery Manley Hot Springs Geothermal Plant -Closed Terror Lake Hydroelectric Project-Closed Thayer lake Hydroelectric Project R4 Pelican Hydroelectric Upgrade Project R4 - Closed StetsonCrkDiversion/CooperLakeDamFacilities-CLOSED Wales Water System Heat Recovery R9 North Prince of Wales Island Intertie Prj-CLOSED Nome/Newton Peak Wind Farm Construction Nome/Newton Peak Wind Farm Construction Bethel Renewable Energy Project R1 Kongiganak Wind Farm Construction - Closed EVA Creek Wind Turbine Purchase-CLOSED St. Mary's/ Pitka's Point Wind Atmautluak Washeteria Heat Recovery - Closed Indian River Hydroelectric Project R0, R6 Ambler Heat Recovery Construction - CLOSED Lepquinum Center Ground Source Heat Pump Upper Kobuk River Biomass R4 - Closed Chalkyitsik Biomass Central Heating CDR - Closed Venetie District Heat Conceptual Design- Closed Port Graham Biomass Waste Heat Demo PrjR4-CLOSED Bethel Heat Recovery Assessment &Conceptual Design Atka Hydro Dispatched Excess Elect. Power-CLOSED Akutan Geothermal Development Prj R2,R3,R4 Akutan Geothermal Development Prj R2,R3,R4 Indian River Hydroelectric Project R0, R6 Elfin Cove Hydroelectric Project Old Harbor Hydroelectric R1,R4-CLOSED Neck Lake Hydro Feas&Const Design R2&R3-Closed Fivemile Creek Hydroelectric Project R2,R4 Fivemile Creek Hydroelectric Project R2,R4 Town Crk Hydro-Design for Repairs/Upgrades -Closed Yerrick Creek Hydro Project Terror Lake Unit 3 Hydro Project R3 - Closed Chenega Bay Hydro Design and Permitting R3 Thayer lake Hydroelectric Project R4 Battle Creek Diversion R4 -Also SEE PJ 270011 StetsonCrkDiversion/CooperLakeDamFacilities-CLOSED Waterfall Creek Hydroelectric Project R5, R6 Scammon Bay Hydro Design & Engineering R5-Closed Koyuk Water System Heat Recovery R9 Atqasuk Transmission Line-CLOSED Atmautluak Wind Renewable Energy R4-Closed Tazimina Hydroelectric Project Capacity Increase Pedro Bay/Knutson Creek Hydroelectric Project R6 Lake & Peninsula Borough Wood Boilers R1,R4-CLOSED Yakutat Biomass Feasibility & District HeatingLoop McGrath Central Wood Heating Dev Phase III-CLOSED Fort Yukon Central Wood Heating Design-Closed Kake Community Energy Indian Creek Hydro Feasibility Study Chignik Lagoon Hydroelectric Final Design - CLOSED Allison Lake Hydro Prj Feas. & Construction-CLOSED Cosmos Hills Hydroelectric Feasibility-Closed Whitman Lake Hydroelectric Project-Closed California Creek Hydro Feasibility - Closed Metlakatla-Ketchikan Intertie R1, R4 Hooper Bay Wind Farm Construction - Closed Stebbins/St Michael Wind Feas. , FD & Permitting Chignik Lake Area Wind-Hydro Final Design-Closed Kake-Petersburg Intertie-CLOSED Port Heiden Wind Turbine Project R4 St. Mary's/ Pitka's Point Wind Pilgrim Hot Springs Geothermal Assess R3,R4-CLOSED Pilgrim Hot Springs Geothermal Assess R3,R4-CLOSED Sitka Centennial Hall&Library Feas/HeatPump-Closed Sitka Wastewater Treatment Plant Feas R4 Closed Tenakee Inlet Geothermal Resource Study R4-Closed Schubee Lake Hydroelectric Project R4 - Closed Eska Creek Hydroelectric Project R4 - Closed Haines Excursion Inlet Hydro Project R4 - Closed Jack River Hydro Project R4 - Closed Triangle Lake Hydroelectric Project R4 Wrangell Electric Vehicle Feasibility Study-Closed Atqasuk Transmission Line-CLOSED New Stuyahok Wind-Feasibility Analysis R3 McGrath Biomass Feasibility-Biomass-Closed Biomass Hydronic Heating-Yukon Koyukuk Schl Closed Upper Tanana Biomass CHP Project R4, R6-CLOSED Louden Tribal Council RE Feasibility Study -Closed Feasibility Assessment Wood Heating Interior AK R4 Eyak Biomass Feasibility Study R4-Closed Kotzebue Paper & Wood Waste to Energy R4-CLOSED Hoonah Biomass District Heating Loop Organic Rankine Cycle Field Testing R4 Akutan Geothermal Development Prj R2,R3,R4 Mount Spurr Geothermal Project R3, R4-Closed Grant Lake Hydroelectric Facility-Closed Loud Creek Hydro-Closed Connelly Lake Hydroelectric Project R4-Closed Hunter Creek Hydroelectric Project R4 - Closed Gunnuk Creek Hydroelectric Project Tatitlek High Penetration Wind Diesel-Closed Tok Wind Resource Assessment-Closed Stebbins/St Michael Wind Feas. , FD & Permitting Kwethluk Wind Feasibility R4-CLOSED Marshall Wind Feasibility-Closed Scammon Bay Wind Feasibility R4 New Koliganek Wind & Heat Recovery Feasb-CLOSED Kaktovik Wind Diesel R4 - Closed Koyuk Wind Feasibility R4-Closed Chefornak Wind Feasibility R4-CLOSED Akiachak Wind Feasibility&Conceptual Design-Closed False Pass Wind Energy Project R4-CLOSED Bethel Renewable Energy Project R4 TDX Wind Chisana Mountain Wind Feasibility Igiugig Wind Resource Feasibility & CDR Biomass Feas. Studies Public Fac. Interior-Closed Cold Bay Waste Heat Recovery Project R6 Levelock Wind Reconnaissance Study R6 Egegik Wind Feasibility Study R6 Upper Kobuk River Biomass R4 - Closed Haines Borough Municipal Buildings Biomass Pj Nushagak Area Hydropower Project R3-Closed Old Harbor Hydroelectric R1,R4-CLOSED Grant Lake Hydroelectric Facility-Closed Whittier Creek Hydroelectric Reconnaissance-Closed Fourth of July Creek Hydroelectric-Closed Ruth Lake Hydro Reconnaissance - Closed Burro Creek Hydro Feasibility Study - Closed Takatz Lake Hydroelectric Feasibility Aleutians East Borough Feasibility Study - Closed Statewide Hydrokinetic Feasibility Study - Closed Lake Pen Borough Wind Feasibility Study Cresent Lk/Cr Low Impact Hydro Assess - Closed Falls Cr Low Impact Hydro Assessment - Closed Grant Lk/Cr Low Impact Hydro Assessment - Closed Ptarmingan Lk/Ck Low Impact Hydro Assess - Closed Whitman Lake Hydroelectric Project-Closed Adak Hydro Power Generator R9 Shishmaref Wind Feasibility&Conceptual Design R9 Kivalina Wind-Intertie Feas Analys&Concept Des R3 Wainwright Wind Diesel Generation Prj. R3-Closed Delta Junction Wind Assessment& Avian Study-Closed Teller Wind Analysis Cold Bay Electric Utility Wind Energy Project R4 Napaskiak Wind, Power and Heat Recovery R4 Eek Wind Feasibility R4 Nelson Lagoon Wind Energy Project R4 Selawik Hybrid Wind Diesel Syst Turbine Upgrade R4 Elim Wind Feasibility R4 Mountain Village Wind Feasibility & CDR Adak Diesel Hybrid - Closed Kiseralik/Chikuminuk Hydro-Closed Carlson Creek Hydro-Closed EVA Creek Wind Turbine Purchase-CLOSED Budget 1895725 500000 420000 50000 240592 620977 270807 1780000 915627 395912 298000 310841 443030 555000 731400 558800 735200 2000000 2000000 189335.06 450000 3400000 850000 3920000 725000 2042431 718175 1180000 1900000 1421240 124048.42 114845.38 409430 2102.87 185000 548481.89 2000000 1237400 5914500 4000000 4000000 239950 239230 264459 20122 203421.41 136760 500000 2000000 188620 3245349 178179 236507.12 412641.32 1215224 350000 3096900 620000 817291.63 1300000 98149 472963.89 263444.55 126682 450000 513000 1450000 286580 311753.2 996000 4000000 750000 1862387.13 224418.68 1391000 1993496 2352700 801000 4000000 4000000 2000000 2000000 1500000 4000000 1600000 3437322 3155765 1037750 10738438.91 639494.85 1760000 2465633 8000000 7800000 240260 311500 190000 90000 460000 425234.32 668350 1319088 183200 985805 486000 2085509 4000000 2600000 6694000 118013 2318255 307120 832635 756335 455600 232600 274800 689300 99899.34 354193.95 103000 712415 197942.41 27876 3751840 7000000 1893253.19 3018899.6 650047 3217369.34 4000000 4069000 2598320 1699791.57 1463200 4348540 349999.97 2988000 434928.09 3445040 185867 32500 32500 58600 645613 56702.31 173792 2695000 203000 347000 237500 22474.73 277000 303000 162000 75000 248160 242231.05 1060500 500000 576080 200000 79636.86 90922 209875 100000 160000 290000 77000 249600 131719 210000 175000 198513.12 150000 2288000 1025000 1300000 27300 820000 60179.25 342000 74850.6 1538846.79 250000 275554 613167.47 1330243.25 30000 16699.14 568729.62 74191.47 14407.7 78384.4 30000 500000 25000 157429.67 142500 25736.49 12710 362882.62 89628.04 120870.28 63998.83 66578.25 45000 472787 2595000 1993158 1184000 206295.92 468000 84000 80000 51974.47 52232.28 137750 44098.22 111150 142500 77853.48 131859 16142 130522.02 110000 68653.75 213690 119000 80000 102431.85 30000 10000 60000 231606 116612.38 1873223.18 225000 816000 39471 20000 155702.27 48000 2000000 25000 563101.47 184000 23273.04 50000 50000 4684.35 700000 19600 152000 177005 123255.02 65412.09 98165 57591.91 61224.39 114718 75756.47 75420 73234 95893 76369 229952 8811.26 2000000 Actual 1895725 500000 420000 49843.06 240592 264233.86 265858.19 1780000 824064.3 390546.9 0 42418.32 120978.51 552157.06 112310.51 533044.82 507350.92 202502.3 2000000 189335.06 450000 0 850000 244282.31 0 404018 704905.21 487360.72 1760155.06 1249580.38 124048.42 114845.38 409430 2102.87 96139.78 548481.89 2000000 230922.04 5914500 4000000 4000000 239950 239230 264459 20122 203421.41 136760 500000 2000000 188620 3245349 178179 236507.12 412641.32 1192511.92 350000 3096900 620000 817291.63 1300000 98149 472963.89 263444.55 126682 450000 513000 1450000 286580 311753.2 996000 4000000 750000 1862387.13 224418.68 1391000 1993496 2235403.91 801000 4000000 4000000 2000000 2000000 1455167.34 4000000 1600000 3437322 3155765 1037750 10738438.91 639494.85 1760000 2465633 8000000 7800000 240260 274735.01 190000 90000 460000 425234.32 649139.67 1319088 174704.41 985805 431742.39 2085509 4000000 2600000 6694000 118013 2318255 307120 832635 34660.01 71638.58 232600 274800 684311.77 99899.34 354193.95 0 712415 197942.41 27876 3751840 266364.66 1893253.19 3018899.6 0 3217369.34 4000000 4069000 2598320 1699791.57 1463200 3972371 349999.97 2988000 434928.09 3444282.24 185867 32500 32500 58600 559796 56702.31 173792 2695000 203000 315759.31 237500 22474.73 181969.75 302455.47 162000 0 248160 242231.05 1055716.9 500000 576080 200000 79636.86 0 209875 100000 160000 159786.8 77000 249600 131719 210000 26926 198513.12 150000 2288000 1025000 1300000 27300 589729.86 60179.25 308278 74850.6 1538846.79 0 275554 613167.47 1330243.25 30000 16699.14 568729.62 74191.47 14407.7 78384.4 30000 500000 25000 157429.67 142500 25736.49 12710 362882.62 89628.04 120870.28 63998.83 66578.25 40000 472787 2595000 1993158 1184000 206295.92 468000 84000 80000 51974.47 52232.28 137750 44098.22 111150 142500 77853.48 131859 16142 130522.02 110000 68653.75 197170.18 67364.12 0 102431.85 17524.5 10000 60000 231606 116612.38 1873223.18 225000 816000 39471 20000 155702.27 48000 1919069.04 25000 563101.47 184000 23273.04 50000 50000 4684.35 700000 0 0 177005 123255.02 65412.09 98165 57591.91 61224.39 114718 75756.47 75420 73234 95893 76369 229952 8811.26 2000000 Encumbrance 0 0 0 0 0 356743.14 4948.81 0 91562.7 0 0 268422.68 322051.49 2842.94 619089.49 25755.18 227849.08 1047497.7 0 0 0 3400000 0 3675717.69 725000 1638413 0 692639.28 139844.94 171659.62 0 0 0 0 88860.22 0 0 1006477.96 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22712.08 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 117296.09 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36764.99 0 0 0 0 19210.33 0 3711.4 0 54257.61 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 383961.42 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23635.34 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 376169 0 0 0 757.76 0 0 0 0 85817 0 0 0 0 31240.69 0 0 0 0 0 75000 0 0 4783.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 130213.2 0 0 0 0 148074 0 0 0 0 0 0 230270.14 0 33722 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16519.82 51635.88 80000 0 12475.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 80930.96 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commitment 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Remaining 0 0 0 156.94000000001 0 0 0 0 0 5365.10000000003 298000 0 0 0 0 0 0 750000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13269.79 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44832.6599999999 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4784.19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 721674.99 0 0 0 4988.22999999998 0 0 103000 0 0 0 0 6710000 0 0 650047 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 95030.25 544.52999999997 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 90922 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 250000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19600 152000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Phase Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Design Design Design Design Design Design Design Design design design Design Design design design design design design design design design design design design design design Design design design Design Design Design Design Design Design Design Design Design Design Design Design Design Design Design Design Design Design Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Reconnaissance Reconnaissance Reconnaissance reconnaissance Construction/preconstructoin Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Pre-Construction construction id 33 214 200 203 4 3 6 5 205 217 213 219 283 79 199 198 221 282 209 218 212 207 39 7 19 215 206 202 211 64 65 31 25 47 61 41 40 15 9 50 52 51 17 12 30 14 21 67 72 69 73 35 42 62 20 32 37 57 23 24 46 18 13 45 68 71 55 54 22 29 44 36 8 10 59 2 56 11 43 70 234 58 26 16 49 53 210 235 236 220 63 38 27 142 28 60 237 34 216 102 74 84 90 100 93 94 98 80 77 81 91 255 99 76 101 78 97 95 48 89 83 96 75 82 86 87 88 85 92 281 204 124 120 115 110 238 122 119 108 104 112 103 106 107 105 123 121 111 118 113 222 201 117 116 114 223 193 175 177 181 176 180 162 157 186 182 184 183 161 153 224 185 154 208 148 168 152 155 129 133 130 225 132 171 170 156 135 239 134 240 145 187 146 173 174 188 192 126 197 136 169 166 128 147 150 137 179 151 149 138 158 159 172 165 167 190 189 228 178 127 229 141 143 164 140 139 195 194 144 163 241 230 242 243 231 196 232 233 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 279 276 277 278 297 286 287 301 295 302 303 304 284 305 306 298 307 292 294 308 288 309 291 293 300 289 285 296 299 290 310 311 312 313 314 315 318 316 317 award_code 2195302 2195327 2195328 2195330 2195331 2195333 2195334 2195335 2195337 2195339 2195340 2195341 2195342 2195343 2195345 2195346 2195347 2195348 2195350 2195355 2195356 2195357 2195358 2195359 2195360 2195361 2195363 2195366 2195367 2195370 2195371 2195372 2195373 2195374 2195375 2195376 2195377 2195380 2195381 2195383 2195384 2195385 2195386 2195387 2195388 2195389 2195390 2195391 2195393 2195394 2195395 2195396 2195397 2195398 2195399 2195400 2195401 2195402 2195403 2195405 2195406 2195407 2195408 2195409 2195410 2195411 2195412 2195413 2195414 2195415 2195416 2195417 2195418 2195419 2195420 2195421 2195422 2195423 2195424 2195425 2195426 2195427 2195428 2195429 2195430 2195431 2195432 2195433 2195434 2195435 2195437 2195438 2195439 2195440 2195441 2195442 2195443 2195444 2195445 2195446 2195447 2195448 2195449 2195450 2195451 2195452 2195453 2195454 2195455 2195456 2195457 2195458 2195459 2195460 2195461 2195462 2195463 2195464 2195465 2195466 2195467 2195468 2195469 2195471 2195472 2195473 2195474 2195475 2195476 2195480 7 7030001 7030002 7030003 7030004 7030005 7030006 7030007 7030008 7030009 7030010 7030011 7030012 7030013 7030014 7030015 7030016 7030017 7030018 7030019 7030020 7030021 7030022 7030023 7030037 7030038 7040001 7040002 7040003 7040004 7040005 7040006 7040007 7040008 7040009 7040010 7040011 7040012 7040013 7040014 7040015 7040016 7040017 7040018 7040019 7040020 7040021 7040022 7040023 7040024 7040025 7040026 7040027 7040028 7040029 7040030 7040031 7040032 7040033 7040034 7040035 7040036 7040037 7040038 7040039 7040040 7040041 7040042 7040043 7040044 7040045 7040046 7040047 7040048 7040049 7040050 7040051 7040052 7040053 7040054 7040055 7040056 7040057 7040058 7040059 7040060 7040061 7040062 7040063 7040064 7040065 7040066 7040067 7040068 7040069 7040070 7040071 7040072 7040073 7040074 7050803 7050820 7050821 7050823 7050825 7050836 7050839 7050840 7050844 7050847 7050848 7050856 7050858 7050870 7050871 7050875 7050876 7050881 7050887 7060908 7060911 7060912 7060915 7060917 7060922 7060925 7060927 7060929 7060930 7060933 7060934 7060935 7060937 7060939 7060940 7060941 7060944 7060966 7060967 7060976 7060978 7060982 7071011 7071015 7071021 7071025 7071026 7071027 7071031 7071032 7071036 7071037 7071040 7071041 7071043 7071044 7071047 7071052 7071053 7071061 7071067 7071068 7071072 7071073 7071077 7071082 7071085 7071087 7081110 7081113 7081118 7081131 7081135 7081143 7081147 7081161 7081163 budget_federal_grant_funding 0 0 4789.28 73244.13 0 0 0 0 100000 23365.38 99667.8 100000 95218 0 99042.63 0 25362.89 0 0 2402838 74000 24000 399777 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 94001 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 399777 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 808805 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 97637.49 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 budget_other_state_funding 2114.55 20000 0 79700 50000 50000 30000 50000 100000 0 0 99667.8 0 0 0 99042.63 0 25362.89 0 0 2402838 0 15609.44 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 291765.16 0 0 25000 0 94001 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 399777 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 808805 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 62846.9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 97637.49 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3750000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19871.15 0 0 0 8025000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 312000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 budget_renewable_energy_funding 99899.34 0 0 0 50000 50000 23273.04 4684.35 0 31200 0 0 0 0 100000 0 60000 0 1895725 513000 3217369.34 0 0 0 2000000 4000000 116612.38 188620 184000 409430 996000 10738438.91 500000 500000 3437322 3155765 1037750 4000000 750000 198513.12 150000 2288000 817291.63 1450000 190000 2000000 39471 231606 1500000 136760 48000 4000000 189335.06 131719 210000 77000 1780000 25000 74850.6 1600000 1699791.57 20122 1025000 1538846.79 155702.27 712415 3245349 2000000 1873223.18 20000 27876 27300 1862387.13 249600 2000000 0 4000000 816000 820000 2000000 225000 2598320 2102.87 0 0 450000 8069000 60179.25 2000000 1300000 563101.47 0 801000 0 639494.85 229952 157429.67 1300000 76369 32500 32500 434928.09 915627 22474.73 303000 1760000 0 25736.49 224418.68 51974.47 8811.26 2465633 98165 65412.09 718175 395912 8000000 178179 0 206295.92 162000 12710 2595000 52232.28 0 56702.31 1900000 1391000 98149 0 142500 1421240 0 4000000 242231.05 248160 124048.42 123255.02 114845.38 4000000 177005 286580 1993158 850000 0 2318255 412641.32 173792 613167.47 0 0 100000 500000 57591.91 576080 75756.47 1330243.25 137750 250000 203421.41 77853.48 277000 3751840 237500 213690 61224.39 4624094 25000 114718 44098.22 111150 142500 209875 298000 131859 298000 298000 185867 66578.25 75420 1463200 1999972 600000 136500 1184000 472963.89 236507.12 1060500 2000000 1893253.19 203000 350000 347000 700000 362882.62 472787 89628.04 120870.28 90000 2695000 68653.75 16142 73234 63998.83 548481.89 130522.02 110000 67500 2000000 84000 58600 0 14407.7 30000 2000000 468000 74191.47 1180000 78384.4 25000 30000 16699.14 568729.62 500000 7800000 1215224 50000 263444.55 290000 1993496 0 354193.95 555000 79636.86 126682 310841 443030 264459 239230 240260 239950 420000 200000 160000 10000 60000 118013 4000000 6694000 400000 317788 2600000 2085509 102431.85 425234.32 349999.97 668350 1319088 183200 985805 486000 185000 30000 290000 2988000 460000 232600 5914500 1237400 80000 115000 119000 311753.2 274800 2352700 620000 731400 558800 735200 197942.41 3096900 450000 103000 689300 95893 342000 80000 311500 75000 3018899.6 455600 175000 270807 240592 645613 620977 3445040 756335 832635 45000 307120 budget_required_local_match 17472.04 5000 4310.35 15737 25000 25000 13318.27 13671.08 25000 7800 5841.35 25000 25000 25000 25000 23003.91 15000 6685.75 2109009.34 513000 0 18500 6000 0 801500 1000000 20000 36500 40000 41500 1918891 154777.12 12000 0 381924 390493 215306 3400238 0 0 0 573134 204322.9 500000 3600 0 34285 257212 0 0 12000 164340 6600 15000 140656.47 18000 1990000 15000 9854.3 1600000 1475169.97 2012 50625 0 44556.27 167000 15000 231768 0 20000 705000 2700 76357.87 6621.76 300000 0 1404460 204000 160833 1423866 25000 199889 18925.88 0 0 0 884088 0 0 320000 0 0 89000 902933 437900 0 44403.25 619807 5756 9103 8309.09 65000 300000 0 0 1600000 0 6841.35 224418.68 5273.05 2202.82 262263 5167 184567.79 0 39591 888889 42000 0 0 0 2500 0 0 21059.37 15883 200000 135633.35 16685 0 7500 150000 0 5805000 34932.95 200000 13783.16 13694.99 12760.6 1404459 9317 0 2158603 450000 0 1290000 95723 0 313093 0 0 0 0 7987 576080 7260 2000000 7259 0 45000 2575 500000 7590927.82 12500 37710 3688 34444 0 6225 5747.65 6985 7500 0 0 13041 29800 29800 10254 3838.34 7540 23731049.51 0 0 0 296000 0 60000 1142856 500000 0 24795.75 250000 48000 17500000 42619.6 0 0 0 10000 355000 5000 850 3854 3000 0 8205 15000 0 6392900 16000 14119 2045.74 2881.54 1500 400000 117000 18935.06 0 8418.43 428.48 4626.81 2376.48 0 0 7800000 173771 2470 30800 0 523000 0 45449 32000 2792.63 6667 16360 43150 13919 12645 12641 12645 170000 200000 30000 1000 6666 29503 4000000 0 60000 41458 1300000 2085509 0 10452.57 10500 20050 21975 6000 29580 62000 5000 5000 2500 20000 50000 1421270.08 5914500 137448 7000 296.09 29800 48964.43 28800 520000 117929 21941 16765 22057 5954 57267 117000 0 20677 5047 18000 30000 9000 147675 3018899.5 13669 15345 43000 266592 33980 40000 34450 7563 107708 10000 76780 budget_total_project_budget 119485.93 9099.63 88981.13 125000 125000 66591.31 68355.43 125000 39000 29206.73 124667.8 125000 120218 25000 122046.54 15000 32048.64 4004734.34 1026000 5620207.34 92500 45609.44 399777 2801500 5000000 136612.38 225120 224000 450930 2914891 10893216.03 512000 500000 3819246 3546258 1253056 7400238 750000 198513.12 150000 2861134 1021614.53 1950000 193600 2000000 73756 488818 1500000 136760 60000 4164340 195935.06 146719 350656.47 95000 3770000 40000 84704.9 3200000 3174961.54 22134 1075625 1538846.79 200258.54 1171180.16 3260349 2231768 1898223.18 40000 826877 30000 1938745 256221.76 2300000 0 5404460 1020000 980833 3423866 250000 3197986 21028.75 0 0 450000 8953088 60179.25 2000000 1620000 563101.47 0 890000 1711738 1077394.85 229952 201832.92 1919807 82125 41603 40809.09 499928.09 1215627 22474.73 303000 3360000 0 32577.84 448837.36 57247.52 11014.08 2727896 103332 312826.78 718175 435503 8888889 220179 0 206295.92 162000 15210 2595000 52232.28 118696.86 72585.31 2100000 1526633.35 114834 0 150000 1571240 0 9805000 277164 448160 137831.58 136950.01 127605.98 5404459 186322 286580 4151761 1300000 0 3608255 508364.32 173792 926260.47 0 0 100000 500000 65578.91 1152160 83016.47 3330243.25 145009 250000 203421.41 80428.48 777000 15092767.82 250000 251400 64912.39 4658538 25000 120943 49845.87 118135 150000 209875 298000 144900 327800 327800 196121 70416.59 82960 35194249.51 1999972 600000 136500 1480000 472963.89 296507.12 2203356 2500000 1913124.34 227795.75 600000 395000 26225000 405502.22 472787 89628.04 120870.28 100000 3050000 73653.75 16992 77088 66998.83 548481.89 138727.02 125000 67500 8392900 100000 72719 2045.74 17289.24 31500 2400000 585000 93126.53 1180000 86802.83 25428.48 34626.81 19075.62 568729.62 500000 15600000 1388995 52470 263444.55 290000 2516496 0 399642.95 587000 82429.49 133349 327201 486180 278378 251875 252901 252595 590000 400000 190000 11000 66666 147516 8000000 6694000 460000 359246 3900000 4171018 102431.85 435686.89 360499.97 688400 1341063 189200 1015385 548000 190000 35000 292500 3008000 510000 1653870.08 11829000 1374848 87000 296.09 148800 360717.63 303600 2872700 737929 753341 575565 757257 203896.41 3154167 450000 103000 709977 100940 360000 110000 320500 222675 6037799.1 469269 190345 313807 507184 679593 660977 3479490 763898 940343 55000 383900 budget_total_state 102013.89 0 79700 100000 100000 53273.04 54684.35 100000 31200 0 99667.8 0 0 100000 99042.63 60000 25362.89 1895725 513000 3217369.34 0 15609.44 0 2000000 4000000 116612.38 188620 184000 409430 996000 10738438.91 500000 500000 3437322 3155765 1037750 4000000 750000 198513.12 150000 2288000 817291.63 1450000 190000 2000000 39471 231606 1500000 136760 48000 4000000 189335.06 131719 210000 77000 1780000 25000 74850.6 1600000 1699791.57 20122 1025000 1538846.79 155702.27 1004180.16 3245349 2000000 1898223.18 20000 27876 27300 1862387.13 249600 2000000 0 4000000 816000 820000 2000000 225000 2598320 2102.87 0 0 450000 8069000 60179.25 2000000 1300000 563101.47 0 801000 808805 639494.85 229952 157429.67 1300000 76369 32500 32500 434928.09 915627 22474.73 303000 1760000 0 25736.49 224418.68 51974.47 8811.26 2465633 98165 128258.99 718175 395912 8000000 178179 0 206295.92 162000 12710 2595000 52232.28 97637.49 56702.31 1900000 1391000 98149 0 142500 1421240 0 4000000 242231.05 248160 124048.42 123255.02 114845.38 4000000 177005 286580 1993158 850000 0 2318255 412641.32 173792 613167.47 0 0 100000 500000 57591.91 576080 75756.47 1330243.25 137750 250000 203421.41 77853.48 277000 7501840 237500 213690 61224.39 4624094 25000 114718 44098.22 111150 142500 209875 298000 131859 298000 298000 185867 66578.25 75420 11463200 1999972 600000 136500 1184000 472963.89 236507.12 1060500 2000000 1913124.34 203000 350000 347000 8725000 362882.62 472787 89628.04 120870.28 90000 2695000 68653.75 16142 73234 63998.83 548481.89 130522.02 110000 67500 2000000 84000 58600 0 14407.7 30000 2000000 468000 74191.47 1180000 78384.4 25000 30000 16699.14 568729.62 500000 7800000 1215224 50000 263444.55 290000 1993496 0 354193.95 555000 79636.86 126682 310841 443030 264459 239230 240260 239950 420000 200000 160000 10000 60000 118013 4000000 6694000 400000 317788 2600000 2085509 102431.85 425234.32 349999.97 668350 1319088 183200 985805 486000 185000 30000 290000 2988000 460000 232600 5914500 1237400 80000 115000 119000 311753.2 274800 2352700 620000 731400 558800 735200 197942.41 3096900 450000 103000 689300 95893 342000 80000 311500 75000 3018899.6 455600 175000 270807 240592 645613 620977 3445040 756335 832635 45000 307120 closed True True True False True True True True True True True True True True True True False False True True True True True True True True True True False True True True True True True True True False True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True False True True True True True True True True True True False True True False True True True False True True True True True True True True True True True True True True False True False True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True False True True True False True True True True True True True True True True True True False True True True True True True True True True True True False True True False True True False True False True True True True True True False True True True True True True True False True True True True False True True True True True True False True True True True True True True True True True True True True True False True True False True True True True True False True False False True False True True False True True False False True True True True False True True True False True True True True True False True True True True False False False False False False False False False True True True False True True False True False True False False False False True True False False True False False False False end_date 6/30/2015 6/11/2013 3/11/2011 9/30/2014 12/31/2009 12/31/2009 12/31/2009 12/31/2009 11/21/2011 9/30/2014 6/30/2010 6/30/2010 12/31/2011 2/2/2010 7/11/2011 12/31/2013 12/31/2014 12/15/2009 12/31/2009 9/30/2014 6/9/2009 12/31/2013 6/30/2010 12/31/2015 2/25/2011 6/30/2013 12/31/2014 6/30/2010 12/31/2009 12/31/2013 12/31/2012 6/30/2012 12/31/2010 12/31/2013 12/31/2016 12/31/2017 12/31/2010 6/30/2012 6/30/2012 12/31/2011 6/30/2011 8/30/2009 12/31/2014 6/30/2013 12/31/2013 11/30/2010 3/31/2012 9/30/2009 6/30/2012 5/1/2012 12/31/2011 12/31/2015 12/31/2009 12/31/2011 12/31/2011 6/30/2011 6/30/2014 12/31/2014 12/31/2010 6/30/2013 9/30/2010 6/30/2012 6/30/2013 6/30/2013 8/30/2010 6/30/2014 6/30/2016 12/31/2009 12/31/2013 12/31/2011 6/30/2018 6/30/2014 6/20/2010 12/31/2011 12/31/2011 12/31/2011 6/30/2013 6/30/2012 7/31/2009 12/31/2012 12/31/2012 12/31/2018 6/30/2013 12/31/2013 12/31/2018 6/30/2012 7/31/2009 7/31/2009 12/31/2012 6/30/2017 6/30/2012 12/31/2016 12/31/2011 6/30/2014 7/31/2009 3/31/2010 9/30/2014 12/31/2012 6/30/2011 12/31/2011 6/30/2015 6/30/2013 6/30/2012 6/30/2012 6/30/2015 6/30/2018 12/31/2010 6/30/2015 6/30/2013 7/31/2009 6/30/2011 12/31/2012 6/30/2012 12/31/2011 12/31/2012 12/31/2016 12/31/2011 9/30/2015 12/31/2014 12/31/2012 6/30/2013 8/31/2012 12/31/2013 6/30/2012 12/31/2010 12/31/2011 12/31/2010 12/31/2013 2/16/2010 12/31/2013 12/31/2018 6/30/2015 12/31/2015 7/31/2010 6/30/2017 12/31/2018 12/31/2011 6/30/2013 12/31/2015 12/31/2012 6/30/2015 6/30/2015 6/30/2015 12/31/2016 6/30/2015 6/30/2012 6/30/2012 6/30/2014 6/30/2018 6/30/2018 6/30/2013 6/30/2011 6/30/2014 7/31/2010 12/31/2014 12/31/2013 6/30/2016 12/31/2015 12/31/2012 12/31/2015 6/30/2014 6/30/2015 6/30/2018 6/30/2013 12/31/2015 12/31/2016 6/30/2014 12/31/2013 9/30/2017 6/30/2013 12/31/2018 7/25/2014 6/30/2017 12/31/2015 6/30/2014 6/30/2017 12/31/2014 6/30/2013 12/31/2014 6/30/2018 6/30/2018 12/31/2014 12/31/2012 12/31/2016 3/31/2014 6/30/2015 12/31/2012 12/31/2013 6/30/2014 12/31/2013 6/30/2013 12/31/2018 12/31/2012 12/31/2014 3/31/2016 6/30/2017 12/31/2018 12/31/2014 12/31/2012 12/31/2013 12/31/2012 12/31/2012 12/31/2012 1/31/2019 6/30/2016 6/30/2014 12/31/2016 12/31/2013 6/30/2015 6/30/2016 12/31/2016 12/31/2013 12/31/2015 6/30/2013 6/30/2015 12/31/2014 6/30/2013 6/30/2013 12/31/2018 6/30/2014 6/30/2013 12/31/2018 12/31/2014 6/30/2013 6/30/2012 6/30/2012 6/30/2013 6/30/2018 6/30/2013 12/31/2017 12/31/2018 6/30/2016 12/31/2018 12/31/2015 7/1/2012 9/30/2015 6/30/2018 12/31/2014 6/30/2016 12/30/2020 12/31/2019 6/30/2016 6/30/2016 6/30/2016 6/30/2016 6/30/2018 9/30/2015 12/31/2016 12/31/2015 12/31/2017 12/31/2015 6/30/2017 12/31/2015 12/31/2014 12/31/2016 12/31/2017 12/31/2015 6/30/2015 12/31/2015 6/30/2016 6/30/2019 9/30/2018 12/31/2018 12/31/2017 9/30/2018 12/31/2018 12/31/2016 12/31/2018 12/31/2018 6/30/2015 1/31/2017 12/31/2015 12/31/2020 12/31/2016 6/30/2016 6/30/2018 6/30/2015 12/31/2017 6/30/2019 12/31/2016 6/30/2019 12/31/2019 6/30/2019 6/30/2018 12/31/2017 12/31/2015 6/30/2018 9/30/2018 6/30/2017 6/30/2019 9/30/2017 6/30/2018 6/30/2018 6/30/2016 12/31/2018 12/31/2019 12/31/2018 12/31/2019 6/30/2019 6/30/2019 12/31/2018 9/30/2019 3/31/2019 12/31/2017 6/30/2017 expend_federal_grant_funding 0 0 4789.28 73244.13 0 0 0 0 100000 23365.38 99667.8 100000 95218 99042.63 25362.89 0 0 2402838 74000 24000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 94001 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 399777 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 808805 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 97637.49 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 expend_other_state_funding 2114.55 20000 0 37919.63 50000 50000 30000 50000 100000 0 99667.8 0 0 99042.63 25362.89 0 0 2402838 0 15609.44 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 291765.16 0 0 25000 0 94001 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 334137.52 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 62846.9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 97637.49 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3750000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19871.15 0 0 0 8025000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 57406.83 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 expend_renewable_energy_funding 99899.34 0 0 0 50000 50000 23273.04 4684.35 0 11417.78 0 0 0 0 86277.33 0 57462.62 0 1895725 513000 3217369.34 0 0 0 2000000 4000000 116612.38 188620 184000 409430 996000 10738438.91 500000 500000 3437322 3155765 1037750 4000000 750000 198513.12 150000 2288000 817291.63 1450000 190000 2000000 39471 231606 1455167.34 136760 48000 4000000 189335.06 131719 210000 77000 1780000 25000 74850.6 1600000 1699791.57 20122 1025000 1538846.79 155702.27 712415 3245349 1919069.04 1873223.18 20000 27876 27300 1862387.13 249600 2000000 0 4000000 816000 584779.86 2000000 225000 2598320 2102.87 0 0 450000 8069000 60179.25 2000000 1300000 563101.47 0 801000 0 639494.85 229952 157429.67 1300000 76369 32500 32500 434928.09 824064.3 22474.73 302455.47 1760000 0 25736.49 224418.68 51974.47 8811.26 2465633 98165 65412.09 704905.21 390546.9 8000000 178179 0 206295.92 162000 12710 2595000 52232.28 0 56702.31 1760155.06 1391000 98149 0 142500 1249580.38 0 4000000 242231.05 248160 124048.42 123255.02 114845.38 4000000 177005 286580 1993158 850000 0 2318255 412641.32 173792 613167.47 0 0 100000 500000 57591.91 576080 75756.47 1330243.25 137750 0 203421.41 77853.48 181969.75 3751840 237500 197170.18 61224.39 4247925 0 114718 44098.22 111150 142500 209875 0 131859 0 0 185867 66578.25 75420 1463200 0 0 0 1184000 472963.89 236507.12 1055716.9 2000000 1893253.19 203000 350000 315759.31 700000 362882.62 472787 89628.04 120870.28 90000 2695000 68653.75 16142 73234 63998.83 548481.89 130522.02 110000 0 0 84000 58600 0 14407.7 30000 202502.3 468000 74191.47 482410.72 78384.4 25000 30000 16699.14 568729.62 500000 7800000 1192511.92 49843.06 263444.55 266364.66 1993496 0 354193.95 552157.06 79636.86 126682 42418.32 110871.59 264459 239230 240260 239950 420000 200000 160000 10000 60000 118013 4000000 6694000 0 317788 2600000 2085509 102431.85 425234.32 349999.97 643062.41 1319088 174704.41 985805 431742.39 96139.78 17524.5 159786.8 2988000 460000 232600 5914500 230540.12 80000 0 47432.26 311753.2 274800 2199595.81 620000 107687.7 507493.17 125408.19 197942.41 3096900 450000 0 684311.77 95893 282395 0 274735.01 0 3018899.6 70861.91 26926 246116.83 240592 542167 134520.05 3439294.5 34245.86 832635 40000 307120 expend_required_local_match 17472.04 5000 4310.35 15737 25000 25000 13318.27 13671.08 25000 2854.44 5841.35 44000 25000 19896 25000 23003.91 14365.66 6685.75 3195277.82 513000 0 18500 19857.3 0 954534.37 1000000 20000 36500 60562.47 69082.24 1953836.59 154777.12 61107.97 0 381924 390493 153937 3402483 0 0 0 573134 204322.9 500000 20878.92 0 34285 257212 0 0 12658.65 201492 6600 15000 140656.47 18000 2017652 15177.25 9854.3 1600000 1475169.97 2012 50722 0 44246.73 167143.98 15000 231768 0 20016.92 91407 2700 76357.87 6621.76 300000 0 1404460 204000 64561.51 1423866 38454 223299 18925.88 0 0 0 1159641.56 0 0 320000 0 0 122871.43 902933 437900 0 44403.25 619807 5756 9103 8309.09 66659.53 305794.14 0 0 1600000 0 6841.35 224418.68 5273.05 2202.82 374280 5167 184567.79 0 39591 891627 42000 0 0 0 4457 440069.32 0 21059.37 15883 188256.05 135633.35 19238.52 0 8885 86706.19 0 6186291 34932.95 200000 13783.16 13694.99 12760.6 1479710 9317 426720 2549052 450000 0 1291135.72 95723 0 313093 0 0 0 0 7987 576080 7260 2000000 7259 0 386.64 2575 0 7590927.82 12500 34794.74 3688 34444 0 6225 5747.65 6985 16441 0 0 13041 0 0 10254 3838.34 7540 23731049.51 0 0 0 296000 0 60000 1327593.31 500000 0 24795.75 262989.06 50882.95 17933205.24 42619.6 0 0 0 10000 441689.85 5000 850 3854 9235.5 0 8205 18373.44 0 0 16000 14119 2045.74 2881.54 1500 40597.7 118844.37 18935.06 0 8418.43 428.48 4626.81 2376.48 0 0 7800000 174937.86 22470 0 0 523000 0 45449 31692.75 2792.63 6667 13741.72 0 13919 12645 12641 12645 171348.43 200000 34923.45 1636 16377.52 60799.11 4000000 0 0 50295.24 2546513.24 2085509 0 10452.57 10744 21435.39 13202 6000 29580 47447 0 1188.75 2577.98 6317.6 50000 1421270.08 5914500 90683.47 7449 296.09 27672.33 48964.43 35823.44 523938.04 117929 20574.69 10893.91 19900.85 5954 57267 0 0 20677 5047 14863 0 9000 0 3018899.5 10988.47 0 0 60013.31 28535 7750 34450 1740.36 103195.21 10365 79550.51 expend_total_project_cost 119485.93 9099.63 88981.13 125000 125000 66591.31 68355.43 125000 14272.22 29206.73 124667.8 125000 115114 111277.33 122046.54 71828.28 32048.64 4004734.34 1026000 5620207.34 92500 59466.74 0 2954534.37 5000000 136612.38 225120 244562.47 450930 2949836.59 10893216.03 561107.97 500000 3819246 3546258 1191687 7402483 750000 198513.12 150000 2861134 1021614.53 1950000 210878.92 2000000 73756 488818 1455167.34 136760 60658.65 4201492 195935.06 146719 350656.47 95000 3797652 40177.25 84704.9 3200000 3174961.54 22134 1075625 1538846.79 199949 1171180.16 3260349 2150837.04 1898223.18 40000 213284 30000 1938745 256221.76 2300000 0 5404460 1020000 649341.37 3423866 263454 3197986 21028.75 0 0 450000 8953088 60179.25 2000000 1620000 563101.47 0 923871.43 1711738 1077394.85 229952 201832.92 1919807 82125 41603 40809.09 499928.09 1129858.44 22474.73 302455.47 3360000 0 32577.84 448837.36 57247.52 11014.08 2727896 103332 312826.78 704905.21 430137.9 8891627 220179 0 206295.92 162000 15210 2595000 52232.28 118696.86 72585.31 1948411.11 1526633.35 114834 0 150000 1336286.57 0 9805000 277164 448160 137831.58 136950.01 127605.98 5404459 186322 286580 4542210 1300000 0 3609390.72 508364.32 173792 926260.47 0 0 100000 500000 65578.91 1152160 83016.47 3330243.25 145009 0 203421.41 80428.48 181969.75 15092767.82 250000 231964.92 64912.39 4282369 0 120943 49845.87 118135 150610 209875 0 144900 0 0 196121 70416.59 82960 35194249.51 0 0 0 1480000 472963.89 296507.12 2198572.9 2500000 1913124.34 227795.75 600000 365684.46 26658205.24 405502.22 472787 89628.04 120870.28 100000 3050000 73653.75 16992 77088 73234.33 548481.89 138727.02 125000 0 0 100000 72719 2045.74 17289.24 31500 243100 585000 93126.53 482410.72 86802.83 25428.48 34626.81 19075.62 568729.62 500000 15600000 1367449.78 52313.06 263444.55 266364.66 2516496 0 399642.95 583849.81 82429.49 133349 56160.04 110871.59 278378 251875 252901 252595 591348.43 400000 190000 11000 66666 147516 8000000 6694000 0 359246 3905448 4171018 102431.85 435686.89 360499.97 663112.41 1332290 180704.41 1015385 479189.39 96139.78 18713.25 162286.8 2994317.6 510000 1653870.08 11829000 321223.59 87000 296.09 75104.59 360717.63 303600 2723533.85 737929 128262.39 518387.08 145309.04 203896.41 3154167 450000 0 704988.77 100940 297258 0 283735.01 0 6037799.1 81850.38 26926 246116.83 292184 570702 142270.05 3473744.5 35986.22 935830.21 50000 383900 expend_total_state 102013.89 0 37919.63 100000 100000 53273.04 54684.35 100000 11417.78 0 99667.8 0 0 86277.33 99042.63 57462.62 25362.89 1895725 513000 3217369.34 0 15609.44 0 2000000 4000000 116612.38 188620 184000 409430 996000 10738438.91 500000 500000 3437322 3155765 1037750 4000000 750000 198513.12 150000 2288000 817291.63 1450000 190000 2000000 39471 231606 1455167.34 136760 48000 4000000 189335.06 131719 210000 77000 1780000 25000 74850.6 1600000 1699791.57 20122 1025000 1538846.79 155702.27 1004180.16 3245349 1919069.04 1898223.18 20000 27876 27300 1862387.13 249600 2000000 0 4000000 816000 584779.86 2000000 225000 2598320 2102.87 0 0 450000 8069000 60179.25 2000000 1300000 563101.47 0 801000 334137.52 639494.85 229952 157429.67 1300000 76369 32500 32500 434928.09 824064.3 22474.73 302455.47 1760000 0 25736.49 224418.68 51974.47 8811.26 2465633 98165 128258.99 704905.21 390546.9 8000000 178179 0 206295.92 162000 12710 2595000 52232.28 97637.49 56702.31 1760155.06 1391000 98149 0 142500 1249580.38 0 4000000 242231.05 248160 124048.42 123255.02 114845.38 4000000 177005 286580 1993158 850000 0 2318255 412641.32 173792 613167.47 0 0 100000 500000 57591.91 576080 75756.47 1330243.25 137750 0 203421.41 77853.48 181969.75 7501840 237500 197170.18 61224.39 4247925 0 114718 44098.22 111150 142500 209875 0 131859 0 0 185867 66578.25 75420 11463200 0 0 0 1184000 472963.89 236507.12 1055716.9 2000000 1913124.34 203000 350000 315759.31 8725000 362882.62 472787 89628.04 120870.28 90000 2695000 68653.75 16142 73234 63998.83 548481.89 130522.02 110000 0 0 84000 58600 0 14407.7 30000 202502.3 468000 74191.47 482410.72 78384.4 25000 30000 16699.14 568729.62 500000 7800000 1192511.92 49843.06 263444.55 266364.66 1993496 0 354193.95 552157.06 79636.86 126682 42418.32 110871.59 264459 239230 240260 239950 420000 200000 160000 10000 60000 118013 4000000 6694000 0 317788 2600000 2085509 102431.85 425234.32 349999.97 643062.41 1319088 174704.41 985805 431742.39 96139.78 17524.5 159786.8 2988000 460000 232600 5914500 230540.12 80000 0 47432.26 311753.2 274800 2199595.81 620000 107687.7 507493.17 125408.19 197942.41 3096900 450000 0 684311.77 95893 282395 0 274735.01 0 3018899.6 70861.91 26926 246116.83 240592 542167 134520.05 3439294.5 34245.86 832635 40000 307120 navision_project_code 402019 402021 410015 410017 407024 407025 407023 407026 410014 407019 402020 407028 407016 407015 407017 407018 407020 407014 407022 411001 410018 410021 402025 406008 409018 402023 410023 410016 410024 410027 410025 402036 402034 410032 410028 407033 410042 402028 402030 410037 410038 410039 407037 407045 407034 407036 407038 403029 406009 411003 402033 407043 402031 410029 402027 407048 410031 407050 402039 402040 402026 403028 407051 410033 410036 410035 411002 407040 409019 407047 403030 402038 407049 407035 407044 406006 407052 407055 402035 410044 410043 409022 407042 409020 402032 407039 410034 410046 407041 407031 407053 410030 410040 407032 407046 407054 402037 409017 402024 410050 407056 409021 403032 403038 402041 402042 403033 403034 407057 407058 410051 403035 402043 407059 410052 407060 410053 410054 410022 408002 403036 410055 402044 403037 407061 407062 402045 406010 410057 410019 407021 403039 409023 407072 403040 407069 409025 409026 407073 407066 407071 407068 409027 409028 409029 409022 409024 406011 406012 407070 407017 402047 402048 406010 406013 407057 406015 410065 407075 410061 407077 410070 406013 410066 410062 402026 410072 407058 407059 407039 410086 410063 410064 411005 410067 410068 410069 410071 409021 403037 410073 409027 403036 402031 402117 410074 410044 406012 409031 407044 407042 403053 402044 407074 409030 407076 407014 402114 407015 407046 402049 403054 402112 402113 411006 406010 410079 410075 410077 402115 402019 410076 410078 407078 408005 407080 402116 402021 407082 407084 407032 407079 407081 409020 407083 407086 406016 406017 406018 407085 410082 402113 402119 403057 407074 407091 410030 402031 403059 407092 403058 403055 403056 410083 410081 410084 410080 402118 407090 407098 410087 410088 411008 407088 407100 402049 402125 407090 407038 402126 403062 403063 403064 403065 403066 403067 403068 410089 403069 407103 407014 402127 406016 407038 402036 407104 403039 410096 406023 402128 407091 402129 403070 403071 403073 403076 402125 403074 402035 403072 410097 410066 410098 410099 407067 407077 403075 402124 402138 402131 402134 402135 402136 402137 402132 402133 410100 project_scope AEA will contract for the planning and feasibility services related to the installation of biomass fired boilers for heating the Kenny Lake School, including a building to house the boilers and heat exchangers. Tasks to also be accomplished are the preliminary design and final design of the facility, identification of license and permit needs, surveying for the project, geo-investigation, determining site control issues, conducting public meetings related to the project and any necessary research efforts. The Copper River School District (CRSD) will provide a project coordinator that will interface with AEA, the CRSD Board and Superintendent for all input, comments, concerns, approvals, and co-ordination with school operations and maintenance staff. The project coordinator will also provide public awareness and education about the proposed project and address all issues and concerns as the project is developed. This position will also conduct periodic design reviews with CRSD staff and School Board and send formal comments to AEA and the design team. Note: Additional grant funds of $120,000 were made available from the Renewable Energy Fund to complete the feasibility assessment and final design for this project. The objective of this project is to complete an economic analysis and feasibility study to determine the actual benefits of offsetting the costs of diesel with a wood fired heating plant for the Su-Valley High School. The project will perform geotech studies at potential wind sites in the Bethel area, design turbine foundations, provide detailed wind farm design and identify necessary permits. This project was originally scoped as a wind feasibility study using Round 0 funds. After Round I grant 2195377 was awarded providing feasibility, design, permitting and construction funds for the Northwest Arctic Borough communities of Buckland, Deering and Noorvik, this grant was re-scoped to be used for an independent third-party review of a 95% design in Deering prior to any construction. The project will evaluate the potential for a small, low-impact hydro facility utilizing the water resources provided by Falls Creek. The work was completed per the information submitted by the Homer Electric Association dated February 11, 2008 (seven total pages) and incorporated into the grant agreement. Grant funds will be used to evaluate the potential for a small low-impact hydro facility utilizing the water resources provided by Grant Lake and Creek. Work will be completed per the information submitted by the Homer Electric Association dated February 11, 2008 (seven total pages) and incorporated into the grant agreement. The grant funds will be used to evaluate the potential for a small low-impact hydro facility utilizing the water resources provided by Crescent Lake and Creek. Work will be completed per the information submitted by Homer Electric Association dated February 11, 2008 (seven total pages) and incorporated into the grant agreement. The grant funds will be used to evaluate the potential for a small low-impact hydro facility utilizing the water resources provided by Ptarmigan Lake and Creek. Work will be completed per the information submitted by Homer Electric Association, dated February 11, 2008 (seven total pages) and incorporated into the grant agreement. This grant was for Denali Commission funding of a wind project in St. George This preconstruction grant will accomplish three activities: (1) Negotiation of Power Sales Agreement; (2) Preparation of documents for FERC License (including various Monitoring and Environmental Plans and Plan of Finance; and (3) Legal Services for Preconstruction regulatory approvals. The objective of the project is to identify all the potential producers of waste vegetable oil (WVO) in the greater Fairbanks area and determine how much of the total quantity of WVO produced could be converted to bio-fuels. After the above phases, a collection, transportation and processing strategy plan will be developed, identifying appropriate users and bio-fuel type. This plan will be developed through collaboration with the Fairbanks North Star Borough, University of Alaska –Fairbanks, and the Golden Valley Electric Association. Grant is to prepare feasibility report, prepare and submit necessary permit applications, and complete preliminary design documents for the proposed project. This project will assess the possibility of generating electric power through the installation of low impact hydroelectric turbines on the City of Homer's water transmission mains at three locations with a load management system and utility grid interface controls providing electricity to the Homer Electric Association's power grid. The project is to prepare a feasibility study of the Crooked Creek diversion to Jim's Lake for a run-of-river hydroelectric project. A site visit, evaluation of various sites for hydroelectric potential, power generation cost, detailed plant and site services design, access, transmission infrastructure, costs, critical issues, and conclusions as to the technical and economic feasibility of the project and recommendations for further studies will be completed, as well as stakeholder meetings, pre-application filings, and stream gauging. The grant is to prepare a reconnaissance study of a run-of-river hydroelectric project on Yerrick Creek. A report will be prepared to document the findings and shall address: power generation cost and amount and capacity factor, narrative to describe plant, site services, access, transmission infrastructure, costs, critical issues, and conclusions to the technical and economic feasibility of the project and recommendations for further studies. Stakeholder meetings, fish and wildlife surveys, stream gauging, seismic refraction survey, topographic mapping and wetlands survey will be included as budget allows. The project is to prepare a reconnaissance study of a run-of-river hydroelectric project on the existing water supply source in Chenega (Crab Bay Dam #4). The project will complete the following to advance project development: 1. Project management grant administration, project coordination, grant reporting, bookkeeping, and accounting. 2. US Army Corps of Engineers permit application; 3. State of Alaska (ADNR) land lease permitting; 4. Matanuska-Susitna Borough conditional use permit and pipeline/powerline easements; 5. RCA approval and utility certification; 6. AEA Power Project Loan Fund Application; 7. Power Purchase Agreement signed with MEA as approved by RCA; 8. Water rights from ADNR; 9. ADNR Habitat Protection Permit; and 10. Resolution of technical construction issues identified during application review. Project is to prepare a feasibility study of a run-of-river hydroelectric project on Indian River. The study will involve a site visit and evaluation of options for hydroelectric development documented in a report that addresses power generation, project description, site services, access, transmission infrastructure, costs, critical issues, and conclusions as to the technical and economic feasibility of the project and recommendations for further work. A LIDAR survey, conceptual design, permit applications, and a Phase II report that addresses work done to advance project will also be completed. The project is to prepare a reconnaissance study of the Tanana River downstream of the Little Gerstle River confluence for a conventional hydroelectric storage project. A report will be prepared to document the findings of the study and shall address: power generation and capacity factor, narrative to describe the plant, dam, site services, access, transmission infrastructure, costs, reservoir storage, critical issues, and conclusions to the technical and economic feasibility of the project. It will also include, recommendations for further study. Golden Valley Electric Association (GVEA) constructed a solar hot water system for the Denali Education Center consisting of 36 Heliodyne flat panel solar collectors mounted on a 50'X30' array. Heat from the flat-plate collectors flows into an energy and distribution center that contains a large 3,000-gallon insulated heat storage/exchange tank containing a liquid medium. Heat is transferred through two independent separated copper coil loops in the heat exchange tank; one loop for the solar heated liquid and one loop for the domestic water. The heated domestic water is then distributed through a 2,000-foot insulated pipe system circulating in a loop between the laundry building at the south side of the campus, 13 guest cabins, the Riverside complex on the north side, and to the Sheldon Visitors Center to the west by circulating pumps. Nunam Iqua will perform a Wind feasibility study to determine the advisability of installing wind turbines in the community. The objective is to develop interconnect requirements tailored for large scale wind power projects connected to the Golden Valley Electric Association, Inc system. The specification would be used to define and communicate the utility requirements for large scale wind projects to existing and prospective wind electrical power producers. The specification would identify electrical system operating procedures and limits under normal and contingency conditions. The types and scopes of the studies necessary to integrate the project into the electrical system will be defined. This project will demonstrate a biomass-fueled heat and power generation system utilizing an Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) power plant that is potentially suitable for deployment in rural Alaskan communities with available biomass resource. For the purpose of this demonstration unit, the biomass fuel will be waste paper from the Fairbanks Borough waste stream and other suitable woody material. The $2,000,000 in grant funds will be used to purchase fuel processing equipment, a fluidized bed boiler system, two United Technologies Research Center ORC units that will each generate 202 kWh net power, and miscellaneous balance of plant equipment. If changes in timeline are anticipated or occur, the grantee should inform AEA as soon as possible. The grantee is required to petition Regulatory Commission of Alaska for a certificate of public convenience and necessity and economic rate regulation prior to release of construction funds. The use of geothermal energy at the Juneau International Airport Terminal is a part of an overall renovation and expansion project. Based on the feasibility study conducted by the Alaska Energy Engineering LLC, a Ground Source Heat Pump (GSHP) scheme offers the financial incentive to move away from traditional fuel oil-based heating systems to a system that extracts heat from the ground and obtains most of its purchased energy from cleaner hydroelectric sources. The geothermal loop field is located under the pavement of the commuter plane airfield ramp. It consists of 108 vertical borings to a depth of 350 feet each. A mix of 88% water and 12% methanol circulates through a continuous underground loop of more than 16 miles of HDPE piping. The piping enters the building and is distributed to 31 electric heat pumps that provide heating, cooling, and ventilation to interior spaces, as well as heat to the building's front sidewalk that prevents build-up of ice and snow. The heat pumps are digitally controlled to efficiently respond to changing air conditions. Construction of the loop field was completed in the fall of 2009. Installation of the heat pumps inside the building began in early 2010 and continued alongside other renovation work until May, 2011. North Prince of Wales Island Intertie Project is to construct a line extension to the communities of Coffman Cove and Naukati Bay, placing these communities on the Prince of Wales Island (POW) electric grid, which is supplied with renewable energy from two hydroelectric projects. The total line is to be 48 miles (Coffman Cove = 37 miles and Naukati Bay = 11 miles) of overhead 4/0 ACSR three-phase 34.5 kV line with a 1/0 ACSR neutral conductor on single pole wood structures. This line extension will come off the existing 34.5 kV line between Klawock and Thorne Bay, near Control Lake. This grant is funded with $74,000 from Round 0 of the Renewable Energy Fund. Work includes a feasibility study, design work and project management for a wind-diesel system in Kokhanok. These funds supplement a construction project being funded with federal funding and Alaska legislative appropriation. This round 0 funding was for a wind resource assessment south of Tok. $100k Denali Commission CFDA No. 90.100. $25k VWP LLC required match. $67.5k additional VWP LLC match. $92.5k Additional Match RE Round 2 grant. $285k total. New budget is for $24,000 grant and $6,000 match. This grant was fully funded and consists of $399,777 in Denali Commission funds for the desisgn and cosntruction of a wind farm in Bethel. The grantee is providing $199,998 in matching funds. The application called for the construction of a single NW100b turbine. A Round I, Renewable Energy Fund (REF) application called for the installation of three more of these turbines. AEA has asked the City of Bethel to consider installing larger turbines as part of the feasibility work to be performed. All funds in this grant have been re-allocated to Grant #2195432. The is the first project of its kind to integrate wind energy into the Railbelt Grid using an experimental program by Golden Valley Electric Association (GVEA), by using proven cold-weather wind turbine technology. The original scope was for 20 NW100 turbines, but the scoped changed to 1 NW100B turbine and 1 EWT900 turbine. This grant is a combination of Round 0 and Round I awards. The scope of this project is to fund the costs associated with purchasing and transporting turbines for up to $1,000,000. The Pillar Mountain Wind Project, both Phase I and Phase II, proposes to construct and operate a four and a half to nine MW wind farm utilizing up to six wind turbines located on the ridgeline of Pillar Mountain. The project design for Phase I involves the installation of the first three wind turbines at sites T4, T5, T6, and the buried installation of a 25 KV line connecting to High Substation. The power line will follow an existing single-phase line currently providing power to antennas on Pillar Mountain. Tetra Tech EC, Inc. will be responsible for the design and construction of the environmental, civil engineering, and turbine installation portion of the project. EPS, Inc. and Dryden & La Rue, Inc. will be responsible for grid interconnection design. KEA and EPS will be responsible for the installation of the grid interconnection for the project. The majority of permits have been obtained. The necessary permits that have yet to be issued include the State of AK Land Lease from the Department of Natural Resources, City of Kodiak easements, and the Kodiak Island Borough building permit. The Haines Borough process to explore the potential for use of low-emission nontoxic wood biomass as the source for wood-fired boilers to provide heat (through an insulated pipe distribution system) initially to four buildings located within the Borough: the K-12 school, the Voc-Ed Building, the Municipal Administration Building, and the Public Library. The Haines Borough will contract with qualified consultants to perform reconnaissance and feasibility studies, and guide the Borough through the 35% conceptual design. Contracting will be in accordance with the Borough's standard procurement policies. The Chilkoot Indian Association is constructing a four-plex housing facility which will incorporate a cordwood-fired boiler - which is what this grant is funding. (The Chilkoot Indian Association will ultimately build four different four-plex units but currently only plans to build the first one.) A separate boiler/fuel storage building will be built on one lot and recirculate hot water to be used in each of the four-plexes for building heat and domestic hot water. Architectural, civil, mechanical, and electrical design is complete except for an engineering refit to accommodate the wood boiler system. Grant funds will be used to complete the redesign and construction of the cordwood-fired boiler system. This project is a regional Resource Assessment/Feasibility Analysis/Conceptual design of Wind Power opportunities around the Lake and Peninsula Borough in the communities of Pedro Bay, Port Alsworth, Egegik, Port Heiden and Pilot Point. It is designed to build upon existing wind resource assessment efforts, including wind met tower data in some communities, as well as data from existing micro-scale (10kW) wind turbines that are in operation. TDX Power installed a 65 kW V-15 wind turbine on behalf of the utility in 2007, using an U.S. Department of Agriculture - Rural Utilites Service (USDA RUS) grant and Aluetian Pribilof Island Community Development Association (APICDA) funding. Currently the turbine is wired to the power plant but not connected. This proposal would provide funding to integrate the turbine into the power system and develop a heat recovery system in the existing power plant and provide for electric boilers in the lodge and school to use excess wind energy. The project is to complete the final design, permitting and construction of a hydroelectric project, which is 45% complete, on Chuniisax Creek for the City of Atka. The final dam design will be completed first. The remaining elements to be constructed include: dam with intake, penstock, transmission line from existing powerhouse to the City, new controls and interface to diesel plant, and commissioning. The current grant agreement allocates funds to complete feasibility studies, conduct geotechnical studies, collect detailed bids and complete final design and permitting in all three communities. The communities of Buckland and Deering have funds to construct wind projects. The grantee match is from NANA-funded wind studies and in-kind materials. This grant includes project codes 410058, 410059 and 410060. This is a proposed biomass project that will use wood pellets as a fuel. The system will be designed to displace 90% of the oil previously used in the facilities. The application is for Resource Assessment/Feasibility Analysis /Conceptual Design; Final Design and Permitting; and Construction. The following will be accomplished: 1) A wood pellet-fired district hydronic heating system will be integrated with existing heating systems in 5 village buildings including Washeteria, Library, Community Hall. Tribal Office, and Clinic/Multiuse Facility. 2) A wood pellet-fired boiler will be designed and constructed in an insulated 8'x20' ocean container for the four duplex housing units and the water distribution loop nearby. This will contain boiler, hydronic pumps, and related piping. 3) The pellet-fired boiler will be connected to the building hydronic system and located in an 8'x10' enclosure of the new office building. All other buildings will have pellet stoves or furnaces retrofitted into building. Oil-fired appliances will stay as ready backups. A central silo or hopper will serve as storage for bulk pellets for all heating units. This will be filled in by commercially made pellets from the existing Dry Creek pellet mill or the new mill that will be constructed this summer in Fairbanks. The project consists of a Final Design and Construction of wood pellet-fired heating systems to heat nine community buildings and to contribute heat to the village water distribution system. Wood pellets will be produced from the existing pellet mill. A wood pellet-fired boiler will be designed and constructed in an insulated 8'x20' ocean container. This will contain the boiler, hydronic pumps, and related piping. The new office building will have an 8'x10' enclosure with a pellet-fired boiler connected to the building hydronic system. All other buildings will have pellet stoves or furnaces retrofitted into the building. Oil-fired appliances will stay as ready backups. The Alaska Village Electric Cooperative (AVEC) will complete final design, permitting, construction, erection, startup, and commissioning of three Northwind 100 wind turbines in Quinhagak. This project involves the final design, permitting, construction, erection, startup, and commissioning of two Northwind 100a wind turbines to supplement the existing power generation and distribution system for the community of Mekoryuk. The Alaska Village Electric Cooperative (AVEC) will install a 4th NW100 wind turbine in Toksook Bay. The project is to implement construction of a state-of-the-art hydroelectric renewable energy facility on Humpback Creek that would generate up to 4 million kWh per year, meeting 16% of Cordova's annual power demand with a renewable energy resource. This amount is well below the annual amount that must presently be provided from Cordova Electric Cooperative's (CEC) diesel generators, assuring full utilization of the resource. Project partners include Cordova Electric Cooperative, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), the Eyak Corporation, and the City of Cordova. The total cost for the Project is $11,240,238. Out of this amount, $3,840,000 occurred prior to the eligibility date of August 20, 2008, and, therefore, is not reflected in the financial reports. The current estimate for Humpback tasks from August 20, 2008 to completion is $7,400,238. FEMA is estimated to contribute $2,970,000 for activities commencing after August 20, 2008. The Alaska Energy Authority grant totals $4,000,000. Cordova Electric Cooperative is committed to approximately $430,238. Note that contingency was excluded from the estimate for tasks from August 20, 2008 through completion, and Cordova Electric Cooperative will bear the risk of the additional cost of change orders, contingencies in labor and/or materials, etc. The grant funds will be used to construct the access road, tunnel, penstock, power and communications, intake structure, and dam with an estimated cost of $7,400,238 as noted above. This work commences on August 20, 2008 through completion on January 13, 2010. Project is to finish construction of the Falls Creek Hydroelectric Project, which is an 800 kW run-of-river hydroelectric facility, located in Gustavus, Alaska that will provide electric power to the community of Gustavus. The project is being built by Gustavus Electric Company to displace existing diesel generation. Construction of the project is approximately 90% complete and will provide 90% of the community's electric needs. All major equipment and materials are on hand except the power house control system, which will be supplied by Phoenix Power Control, Inc. (PPCI) of Monroe, Washington. All required permits have been obtained and are listed in the final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for this project located at www.ferc.gov, project #P-11659. Remaining tasks at the time of application: -Complete welding of 1200 feet of steel penstock -Prepare bedding and foundation for the penstock pipe -Form and pour 5 concrete thrust blocks for the penstock -Perform ultrasonic testing of pipeline welds -Paint and backfill the pipe -Complete finish work on the powerhouse -Finish turbine/generator installation -Complete purchase of generator control system from PPCI -Install the control system -Complete the substation -Complete installation of the fiberoptic communication cable -Finish miscellaneous items at the intake structure -Install slope protection at the powerhouse -Complete erosion and sediment control work throughout the project per the Environmental Compliance Monitor. -Survey the project boundary per the State of Alaska specifications. -Finish other work as required. Work under this grant is to study engineering, electronics, and economics of restoring the antiquated hydropower system on Indian Creek in Chignik, culminating in a feasibility report. Wetlands, hydrology, economic analysis, conceptual design, and cost estimate will be completed. The feasibility study will determine the actual potential of the resource and include conceptual design and project configuration, both of which will affect the potential energy production. Before expenditure of any grant funds, an agreement that ensures access to the resource has to be signed by City and Trident Seafoods. This project is to complete permitting and final design of a hydroelectric project on Packers Creek. Surveying, stream gauging, geology investigation, construction cost estimate, turbine and generator performance specifications, and controls performance specifications will also be completed. This project is to fund Licensing and Feasibility and Final Design portions of the project. The project is located adjacent to the Prince William Sound, immediately south of Valdez. Allison Lake is estimated to provide approximately 35% of Copper Valley Electric Association's (CVEA) generation needs. When Allison Lake is added to the existing hydropower generated at Solomon Gulch, only 5% of CVEA power will be generated from fossil fuels. This allows CVEA to displace approximately 3,125,000 gallons of fuel per year, which equates to approximately $9,885,000 per year. CVEA entered into a Professional Services Contract with Hatch Acres Corporation to provide consulting services for a pre-feasibility study, which was completed in February of 2008. The preliminary permit to secure and maintain priority to study the power potential of Allison Lake was awarded on September 4, 2008. At the conclusion of the 3-year permit, CVEA expects to file a license application for the project development. The project is to install a waste heat recovery system that would replace 15 existing electric unit heaters totaling 1/2 MW. Golden Valley Electric Association's (GVEA) North Pole Expansion Plant (NPEP) Waste Heat Recovery Project consists of installing 520' of underground supply and return piping, a glycol distribution piping system inside NPEP, installing 12 glycol unit heaters with Variable Frequency Drives (VFDs), and Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC) controls. GVEA will manage and administer the project, perform the electrical / control installation, commissioning, and startup of the system. The mechanical portion of the work will be performed by a mechanical contractor. Electric power conservation/fuel savings will benefit all of GVEA's 33,000 members from Cantwell to Delta Junction. The City & Borough of Juneau designed (Phase III) and constructed (Phase IV) a hybrid ground source heat pump system to serve the heating needs at the Dimond Park Aquatic Center. The Center is a new competition, recreation, and education swimming facility in Juneau. Construction began on the facility in the spring of 2009 and completed in the fall of 2010. The system consists of a ground source heat pump that will meet 81% of the facility's heating needs and supplemental electric heat system to make up the difference during periods when the facility's heat loads exceed the capacity of the ground source heat pump system. The facility primarily serves Juneau residents and visitors from nearby southeast Alaska communities. The City & Borough of Juneau Engineering and Parks and Recreation Departments were directly involved with the design and construction of the facility, as was the Juneau School District. The SWHS consists of 36 Heliodyne flat panel solar thermal collectors mounted on a 50' X 30' array. Heat from the flat-plate collectors flow into an energy and distribution center that contains a large 3,000-gallon insulated heat storage/exchange tank containing a liquid medium. Heat is transferred through two independent separated copper coil loops in the heat exchange tank; one loop for the solar heated liquid and one loop for the domestic water. The heated domestic water is then distributed through a 2,000-foot insulated pipe system circulating in a loop between the laundry building at the south side of the campus, 13 guest cabins, the Riverside complex on the north side, and to the Sheldon Visitors Center to the west by circulating pumps. The Delta/Greely School District proposes a Wood Chip Boiler Heating System to heat 44,000 sq. ft. of educational space in the sub-arctic. The building would be located 50 ft. away from the Delta High School new mechanical room. This grant will fund the cement building to house wood chip boiler, the chip storage room, four chip storage trailers, and the chip feeding and chip drying process The following entities are involved in this project: DGSD and its committee, Alaska Department of Natural Resources Forestry, CTA, CE2 Engineers, T.R. Miles Technical Consultants, Delta Logging and Milling Associates, and USKH (architectural company). The proposed work includes three technical tasks: 1) Research, review and evaluate past hydroelectric studies done in Alaska, especially the report that was generated for Whittier Creek at Whittier, Alaska during the late 1970's; 2) Install stream gauge and measure stream flow for two years; and 3) Analyze the data recorded by the United States Geological Survey (USGS) stream gauge for Whittier Creek. The results of this work will determine if the City of Whittier could benefit from generating their own electric power. Task 1 will provide an interim report on Whittier Creek with July 2010 costs. Research, review and evaluate the existing data, including the listed past publications, topo maps, and make a site visit to collect additional data on possible locations, including the USGS stream gauging data on Twenty-Mile River, a glacial feed river within 10 miles of Whittier. Results of this task will estimate the power available (kW) and the average annual energy (kWh) from Whittier Creek in addition to the capital cost and then estimate the cost of energy generated (in cents/kWh) to determine if the project is economical. Provide an interim report with costs. If the Interim Report results show the project is not economic in its cost of power compared to that provided by Chugach Electric, the grant funding for Whittier Creek will end. Re-programming of remaining grant funds to study other hydro sites will be subject to approval by the Alaska Legislature. Following is a list of previous studies. USACE, Alaska District 1982. "Regional Inventory and Reconnaissance Study for Small Hydropower Projects - Southcentral, Alaska." USACE, Alaska District, 1979. "Regional Inventory and Reconnaissance Study for Small Hydropower Projects in Southeast Alaska." USACE, Alaska District, 1981. "Small-Scale Hydropower Reconnaissance Study Southwest Alaska." CH2M Hill Engineering of Alaska, 1979. "Reconnaissance Study of Hydropower Sites Near Cordova, Alaska." Task 2 will include stream gauging Whittier Creek or possible other location and data collection. Design of a hydroelectric facility on Whittier Creek or other location (Shakespear or Learnard Creek) would require detailed information on the flow regime at Whittier Creek. Therefore, work is proposed to develop this information through gauging the stream for a period of no less than one calendar year. The USGS will work with the Corps of Engineers to gauge the creek. The USGS will install a stream flow monitoring station including satellite telemetry or other means of automated data transmission (the new gauge shall be installed on Whittier Creek), run levels as needed to maintain gauge datum, collect continuous (15 minute) stream stage data, make six to eight discharge measurements annually to define and ensure the accuracy of the stage discharge rating and to help define winter stream flow under ice conditions, calculate daily mean discharge and additional statistical information, archive the stage and discharge data in the USGS data base. Recorded data and preliminary daily discharge will be provided to the Corps of Engineers upon request. Data will be finalized and published in the annual report, "Water Data Report-United States." The cost for two years is approximately $60,000. If the stream gauge is installed on Whittier Creek before task one is successfully completed, then part of the first year cost may be shared with another project on Whittier Creek, depending upon the timing of the installation of the gauge. The Corps of Engineers would coordinate with the USGS and perform stream transport, erosion potential, and icing data during the gauging period. Task 3 is data analysis and preliminary design concept. Once the stream gauge data has been obtained from the USGS and rating curves have been developed, USACE will analyze the data to determine if the production of power is possible at Whittier Creek. Mean annual flow, mean monthly flow, 7-day, 2 year reoccurrence, low flow (both summer and winter), five points on the daily flow duration curve, peak flow, and the 100-year recurring interval will be calculated. These parameters will form the basis for estimating potential capacity and energy at the site. Twenty-Mile River data can be used to help correlate with the Whittier Creek flows to estimate historical Whittier Creek flows. The average annual energy will be calculated based on the net head and flow capacity at the site. From these calculations, a power plant capacity will be selected based on energy capabilities at Whittier Creek. Load characteristics would also need to be analyzed. From there, several different preliminary alternatives will be developed. USACE, Alaska District would coordinate with the Corps center of expertise for hydroelectric generation, (Hydroelectric Design Center) in Portland, OR. This grant will formulate preliminary alternatives, complete preliminary economic analysis by Jan 2012, determine power requirement forecast / load characteristics, develop power benefit stream and cost of energy (CORPS HH/ECON), identify physical works (plant description, site services, access, transmission lines, etc.), determine economic feasibility based upon avoided fuel costs (CORPS HH/ECON), identify critical issues, assess legal / institutional constraints (WIK), and assess licensing and environmental constraints (WIK). A recon report will be provided to the Authority by May 2012 after it is reviewed by CORPS, City of Whittier, and the Authority. Preliminary mechanical and electrical work will be completed by Jan 2012. The feasibility study will include the following milestones. Resource Assessment will determine the sustainable level of biomass harvest in the Upper Kobuk (Ambler, Shungnak, and Kobuk villages) and utilize Geographic Information Systems (GIS) for future harvest planning. Harvest System Assessment will assess a harvest cost delivery model based on two different scales: small individual village scale or a regional harvest scale to service all three villages. Wood Yard Conceptual Design that links production of wood product chips or cord wood with appropriate boiler configuration and a wood processing cost model. Boiler Feasibility and Conceptual Design will determine the most cost effective and best fit for chip or round wood boilers and the amount of annual wood usage, determination with a level one feasibility cost summary, the type of boiler locations and potential for district heating major buildings or houses. Preliminary Business Models will determine the initial appropriate organization and ownership of harvest systems, wood yards, and wood energy utilities and basic costs and cash flows for each village. Many sources will be utilized including the Cold Climate Research Center in Fairbanks. Communication Process will fully involve the communities in supporting, empowering, and making the decisions on the appropriate structure for sustainable wood utilization in the region. Final Presentation will inform project partners and especially villages of the wood energy feasibility, business model, and key pros and cons of moving forward with program construction and implementation. Wind-diesel project for the Community of St. George. The Native Village of Eyak will use the grant funds for the purchase, shipping and set-up of a firewood processor in Cordova. The Native Village of Eyak has identified a specific system that will meet their needs (a Cord King Model 60, with certain upgrades as detailed in the grant application). The project is to explore the potential of upgrading the current hydro system on Burro Creek in order to provide power either to Alaska Power & Telephone or the City of Skagway, culminating in a feasibility study. Conceptual design, stream gauging, investigation of impacts and permitting issues, exploration of power sales options, cost and benefit analysis, and the engineering report will be completed. The project is to install six NW100 wind turbines in Unalakleet. It was designed along with a new powerhouse through the Rural Power System Upgrades (RPSU) program. The project has a fast acting boiler tied into the diesel heat recovery loop. The Yukon River Inter-Tribal Watershed Council (YRITWC) planned to expand on the hydrokinetic project it operated in Ruby in 2008. In 2009 the YRITWC planned to redeploy the 5kW hydrokinetic turbine used in 2008 in an effort to gain additional information for a revised resource assessment. To accomplish this there was a redesign of the turbine deployment (anchoring and debris diversion). The plan was to then to deploy a 25kW version of the hydrokinetic turbine in 2010 for study and analysis. Phase III (Final Design and Permitting) of the project is funded under this agreement. The following tasks will be completed during this stage: Timeline/Milestones: Grant agreement in place (Months 1-2)- submit Project Conceptual Design, submit Updated Project Budget and Schedule, submit Site Control Documentation, and apply for All Necessary Permits. Review Project Design and System Integration (Month 3)- submit 65% Design Documents, submit Conceptual Design and System Integration Plan with the McGrath Heat Recovery Construction Project, perform Geotech Analysis, submit Necessary Power Sales Agreements (PSAs) and Memoranda of Understanding (MOUs), and submit Quarterly Report. Finalize Design and Permitting (Month 4)- submit 95% Design, submit All Site Control and Permitting Documents, submit Final Environmental Analysis, submit Operational Business Plan, and submit Updated Budget and Proposed Construction Schedule. This project has multiple funding sources. The following summarizes the scope of the project development and funding sources: Project Development Tasks to be completed are (based on revised information submitted June 17, 2009): Task One: Project Initiation and Dynamic Planning - $0. Completed Task Two: Schematic Design & Oversight (Completed): $30,000 Renewable Energy Fund $40,000 Council of Athabascan Tribal Governments (CATG) grant from DOE totaling $70,000 An initial level 2 feasibility study was conducted by Efour Engineering to determine a conceptual design and feasibility for district heating and heating of key other commercial buildings. This feasibility determined that chip systems were the best all- around approach. The next step is to develop a specific schematic design by a district heating engineering specialist and develop specific parameters for a final engineered design build construction bid process. Task Three: Final Design: $100,000 Renewable Energy Fund $40,000 CATG grant from DoE Totaling $140,000 Final design will be a design build document that will complete the design phase. This will be the plan that the three planned heating systems will be built from including the CATG Clinic, the downtown district heat system and boilers for the VoTech Campus. An Alaskan based engineering firm with rural Alaska design and build experience will be selected. Task Four: Permitting Process: $20,000 Renewable Energy Fund $0 CATG grant from DoE Totaling $20,000 Boiler permitting at the midscale 2-8 MMBTU/h has essentially not been done in rural interior Alaska. An experienced biomass boiler engineer will complete the process in conjunction with the State of Alaska. Task Five: Land ownership agreements and donations: $5,000 Renewable Energy Fund $0 CATG grant from DoE Totaling $5,000 The project is anticipating the donation of land from GZ Corporation for a wood yard, a building and land from the Fort Yukon School District and an old Quonset hut for a shop and wood chip storage from the federal government. The placing of boilers and piping in various locations will require coordination with owners and may require easements. This task will negotiate, create and finalize all necessary agreements. Task Six: Environmental Analysis: $15,000 Renewable Energy Fund $0 CATG grant from DoE Totaling $15,000 Both AEA and DoE require a complete analysis on the potential positive and negative environmental impacts. An analysis following the NEPA Environmental Analysis process will be prepared on boiler installations and a general analysis on forest management impacts. Task Seven: Power Sales Agreements: $5,000 Renewable Energy Fund $0 CATG grant from DoE Totaling $5,000 Each heating customer in the heating district will be required to complete a BTU purchase agreement from the newly formed heat utility. Under this task, the utility will develop a purchase price for BTU’s that will reflect the cost of production plus operations, maintenance, and profit. Long-term agreements will be developed tied to the cost of fuel oil with escalation and reductions clauses. Task Eight: Project Management, reporting and technical assistance: $35,000 Renewable Energy Fund $35,000 CATG grant from DoE Totaling $70,000 Project manager will coordinate the entire project among the various organizations and contractors. He will be responsible for report writing to AEA and DoE Tribal Energy. Contractor will also give technical support on the development of a forestry program at CATG as well as support the initiation of the Wood Energy Utility under GZ Corporation. The funds are for feasibility studies to install High Efficiency Low Emissions (HELE) wood boilers in 5 communities to provide heat to the local schools and adjacent teacher housings. The communities to be considered are Pedro Bay, Newhalen/Iliamna, Nondalton, Kokhanok, and Port Alsworth. The project is to capture waste heat by installing an Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) heat recovery unit on a new high-efficiency, low-emissions diesel generator, which will increase diesel generator electrical production by an additional 4-6%. The average electric production efficiency of CEC's Orca Power Plant is 13.65 kWh/gallon of diesel. CEC has already placed a deposit on and will purchase and install the new, efficient generator (characteristics: 3.6 MW rated, EMD 710 series, 20-cylinder). The efficiency of the new generator is expected to peak at 15 kWh/gallon. The addition of the ORC will increase the generator's fuel efficiency by nearly 20% over CEC's average fuel efficiency. The new generator will supplement CEC's existing fuel generators and meet emergency redundancy needs. Marsh Creek Energy Systems has been selected to design and manage construction of expansion of the Orca Power Plant to accommodate a new generator and heat recovery unit including installation of both units. The funding is to conduct a Reconnaissance Report assessing possible renewable energy resources - wind, hydro, current, tidal, and waste heat recovery - for the small isolated communities of Cold Bay, False Pass, and Nelson Lagoon. The report will summarize the assessment and findings. The project will be administered and managed by the AEB and will be conducted by a consultant chosen by the AEB. At a minimum, the following will be accomplished: Gather all resource studies that now exist on renewable energy projects within the Borough's boundaries; Research and list other studies that may benefit the smaller communities (with methods and costs); Describe existing power and heating systems in each of the communities, including detailed loan information and other information necessary to continue into feasibility and conceptual design phase; Describe diesel fuel deliveries and, if appropriate, examine other shipping options; Describe renewable energy technologies available specific in each community; Ascertain and document the required operations and maintenance of renewable resource projects; Ascertain and document the community and utility support and interest in specific renewable resource development; Describe each of the proposed systems' costs and benefits; Quantify the potential energy market and sales rates in each community; Identify land (with landowners) needed for each of the proposed systems; Identify anticipated or required permits with timelines and conduct initial environmental screening for each project with potential barriers or problems noted, and; Provide an economic analysis of alternatives for each community and make recommendations for future project development work, in rank order per community. The proposed project is a wind/hydro hybrid intertie feasibility study for Chignik Bay, Chignik Lagoon and Chignik Lake. There is existing wind data confirming class 5 wind in the area, strong enough to be a good energy source. Part of the feasibility study will involve determining the most advantageous site for wind turbines by collecting supplemental met data. The Chignik Alaska Draft Small Hydropower Feasibility Report and EIS, by the Army Corps of Engineers, July 1984, evaluated hydro resources at Packers Creek, Mud Bay Lake and Indian Creek. Study found that Indian Creek had the best potential for economical development. This project consists of the construction of a 450 kW high-penetration wind system in Kwigillingok with multiple secondary thermal loads in residences and the school. The project design is similar to a system being installed in Kongiganak. Half ($1.6 million) of the funding is being provided by a legislative grant. This project consists of the construction of a 450 kW high-penetration wind system in Kongiganak with multiple secondary thermal loads in residences and the school. This project design is similar to systems being installed in Kwigillingok and Tuntutuliak. Half ($1.5 million) of the funding is being provided by a legislative grant. This project is for feasibility, design / permitting, and construction of a photovoltaic solar energy system. A grid-tied batteryless 50.4 kW photovoltaic system will be installed on property adjacent to the Alaska Village Electric Cooperative (AVEC) power plant and tank farm in Ambler. The system will consist of 225 ea 224-watt panels on adjustable 630 sq ft. racking mounted directly on a Triodetic Multipoint foundation system. Each adjustable array utilizes one 7000 watt inverter 277 VAC power. The project is to prepare a feasibility study of potential hydro resources in the Cosmos Hills area to serve Ambler, Shungnak, Kobuk, and Kiana. The first step will be to review prior studies, update cost estimates, and rerun economic analyses to arrive at a list of economic sites for further study, which will be documented in a reconnaissance report. Community outreach, stream gauging and hydrology study, survey and mapping, geotechnical review, field studies, environmental assessment and permitting will also be accomplished. The final outcome will consist of a feasibility level report and a conceptual design report. The Kwaan Electric Transmission Intertie Cooperative, Inc. (KWETICO) will use the Round I grant funds from the Renewable Energy Fund to continue environmental documentation and permitting work for the Kake-Petersburg Transmission Line project. This work was begun with a legislative grant to the Southeast Conference and this grant will continue these efforts in conjunction with work the Authority is also directing to complete the federal NEPA processes, permitting, and final design. Initially, the applicant, along with the State Department of Transportation (AKDOTPF), proposed to build a road and 69-kv transmission line to connect the community of Kake with Petersburg. Funding for the road portion of the project has not been obtained; however, the grantee wants to continue the intertie project. The Kake-Petersburg intertie will provide an interconnection between the Kake electric distribution system and the transmission system owned by Southeast Alaska Power Agency (SEAPA) and allow Kake to be served by SEAPA provided hydroelectric power. The Regulatory Commission of Alaska (RCA) regulated distribution utility Inside Passage Electrical Cooperative (IPEC) will continue to provide retail electricity to Kake ratepayers. IPEC will negotiate wholesale power purchase agreements with SEAPA. Savings from obtaining SEAPA power (presently being sold to SEAPA distribution utility customers at a wholesale rate of $0.068/kWh) will be passed onto Kake ratepayers by IPEC. Grant funds will allow KWETICO to assist IPEC, SEAPA, the Southeast Conference, AEA, and other affected parties to identify the best ownership form for the intertie, and who will be responsible for maintenance and operations of the transmission line and who will be responsible for the design and construction of the intertie. These arrangements will be defined in a participants' agreement between KWETICO, IPEC, SEAPA, and other affected parties, that KWETICO agrees to facilitate in cooperation with AEA. KWETICO agrees to author and sign an appropriate participants' agreement for the project. Completion of the participants' agreement, identifying an owner for the intertie and determining a preferred route acceptable to stakeholders and the Authority will be the first milestone for this grant. Grant funds of up to $500,000 may be used to complete these tasks. Deliverables will include a fully-signed participants' agreement by all impacted parties identifying an owner for the intertie and a preferred route agreed to by all parties impacted. At a minimum the following parties shall be signatory to the agreement: Cities of Kake and Petersburg, SEAPA, IPEC, Southeast Conference and the Organized Village of Kake. KWETICO shall undertake all reasonable efforts to complete these tasks by December 31, 2010. KWETICO will accomplish all necessary tasks to facilitate the federal NEPA process for the project, and accomplishment of design and permitting. It is understood that AEA has additional legislative appropriation funding to assist in bringing the project to completion of environmental analysis, permitting and design, and KWETICO will coordinate with AEA in its expenditure of grant funds for the project. KWETICO will undertake two other specific tasks under this grant that will support the ongoing federal NEPA process for the project, and provide additional, needed input for a second federal register NEPA notice for the project as follows: 1. Work with SEAPA as a potential owner of the transmission line, to evaluate the northern intertie route and the southern routes have been analyzed in recent feasibility studies, to identify a preferred route that can be supported by SEAPA, IPEC, local governments in Kake and Petersburg, and Petersburg Municipal Power and Light, and others. Work with the US Forest Service to include this in the planned second Federal Register notice planned by the US Forest Service. 2. Work with SEAPA and others to develop an approach for ownership of the transmission line, and the means to reasonably recover the costs of ownership, operations and maintenance, that is satisfactory to AEA, local governments of Kake and Petersburg, and the ratepayers of Kake and SEAPA. Facilitate the naming of the project advocate in the planned second Federal Register notice planned by the US Forest Service. Grant/Project management will be provided by the Southeast Conference, which has historically facilitated KWETICO's efforts in Southeast Alaska and has a Memorandum of Understanding with KWETICO for such cooperative efforts. A portion of the grant funds will be allocated to Southeast Conference for management of the work under this grant. Southeast Conference will submit cost reimbursement invoices through KWETICO to the Alaska Energy Authority, for both Southeast Conference in-house expenses and expenditures it has made on behalf of KWETICO in the discharge of its responsibilities under this grant. The project is to complete Phase I of the Ruth Lake Hydroelectric Project, which is a conventional hydropower project located in an unincorporated area northeast of the City of Petersburg. Petersburg Municipal Power & Light (PMPL) prepared and filed an Application for Preliminary Permit with the FERC on February 3, 2009 and an Application for License is anticipated in 2011. Development of hydroelectric power at the site will include construction of a reservoir, lake tap/power conduit, arch dam, unlined tunnel, power penstock, power plant, tailrace, access roads, and transmission line segments. Power generated by the project will provide the interconnected Southern Southeast Alaska regional utilities with increased system reliability; replace current dependency on diesel generation; and enable regional utilities to meet the increasing demand for electricity. The overall project phases include Phase I - Pre-feasibility and Application for Preliminary Permit ($205,000), Phase II - Application for License and FERC Licensing Proceeding ($2,520,000), Phase III - Final Design and Permitting ($5,820,000), and Phase IV - Construction and Project Startup ($101,430,000). The Project is for Final Design, Permitting, and Construction phases of a heat recovery system to provide available heat from the existing McGrath Light & Power Company (ML&P) Power Plant to the Iditarod Area School District, the clinic, and three adjacent commercial buildings. This project will use available jacket water and exhaust head (wasteheat recovery) that is currently being rejected to the atmosphere via radiators. The Tok School Biomass Heating Project is a comprehensive proposal, from project Feasibility to Design and Construction with the final Commissioning of the facility in the fall of 2010. An automated wood chip heating system that will heat a 75,000 sq. ft. school and approximately 5,000 sq. ft. of outbuildings will displace the 64,000 gallons of heating fuel used in 2007-08 and create an annual savings of at least $126,562 per year for this complex. A separate building for the chip-fired boilers will be constructed behind the school, in a central location with easy access to the rest of the outbuildings, for connecting heat piping. The building will have a chip storage bin that will feed into a surge bin inside the boiler room via augers and conveyer system. The surge bin can be loaded from the inside or outside of the building to accommodate for downtime of the chip delivery system. The project was developed in partnership with the Tok Area Forestry, CTA Engineering, and Alaska Gateway School District staff. It is estimated that the forest around Tok can provide 50 tons of chipped fuel per acre. (Initial scientific studies show that the number of tons per acre could be higher than estimated.) High hazard fuel around Tok is estimated at 27,000 acres. Even at 20 tons per acre, the expected yield would provide fuel for about 5 years on the 200 acres. The goal is to determine feasibility of connecting City & Borough of Sitka and other communities in Southeast Alaska through a hydroelectric power plant located on Takatz Lake, Alaska. Application to FERC was submitted in June 2008, and a preliminary permit was issued on September 19, 2008 (FERC Project Number 13324-000). If the project proves feasible, then construction is anticipated to be completed in the 2020 to 2022 timeframe. The project scope is being amended to account for a change in the licensing process and to increase the budgets for several already approved tasks. The project originally was found to be non-jurisdictional by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). However, in the Spring of 2012, the licensing approach was changed to voluntarily fall under FERC’s licensing process to provide for more certainty of process and timely responses from resource agencies. Nushagak Electric and Telephone Cooperative (NETC) has requested to use the Alternative Licensing Process. They received a FERC Preliminary Permit for the project in April 2012. The amendment increases the allocated grant budget by $1,005,000 to a new total of $2,030,000. The balance of the grant funding remains unallocated at $2,001,500. The following task budgets are increased by this amendment: Phase 1 Feasibility Study Lake Elva & Grant Lake ($200,000), site control ($5,000), stream gauging ($100,000), meetings ($25,000), resource study recon ($35,000) and environmental studies ($640,000). The increase in environment study funding will benefit the following resource-specific studies: fisheries, water quality, bathymetry, instream flow, wildlife and cultural resources. The engineering budget increase will support more in depth analysis based upon improved hydrology and environmental data, and be expanded to include operations modeling, LIDAR surveys and a detailed transmission line feasibility study. It is expected all deliverables for the expanded budget tasks will be completed by January 2013, at which time a go-no-go decision point will be made to evaluate the future direction for this project. Project is to complete a reconnaissance level assessment of a hydro resource on the 4th of July Creek. Independence Power, LLC will review existing available information pertinent to technical and permitting aspects of the project. A reconnaissance-level economic analysis of the project will be developed to determine if further work on the project is warranted. The following will be accomplished by this grant: - Reconnaissance Study & Report ($20,000) - Hydrology Study ($6,500) - Initiate Contact with City of Seward & Chugach Electric (Report) ($3,000) - Initiate Permitting Process - Report ($6,500) - Stakeholder/Public Meeting - Minutes ($4,000) TDX Power began the project using their own funds and was awarded grant funds to complete the following. Perform Aeromagnetic Survey to define the subsurface contact between the granitic rock and sedimentary rock of the Manley area. Acquire Local Well Information as there are numerous undocumented wells in the area. This information is an important part of the evaluation of any geothermal resource. RaMPS Survey (Resistivity Monopole Profiling and Sounding) will be completed to better understand the geologic structure (its location, orientation, and extent) and where geothermal water exists. Determine next steps based on surveys; depending on findings, TDX Power in consultation with AEA, UAF and industry experts will determine viability of the proposed project. Based on determinations, project will either proceed or be abandoned. Powerhouse Upgrade and Integration Design to be completed if project is determined to be viable. Construction of pre-packaged geothermal heat conversion and continuous electric generating system for one 200 kW unit. TDX Power, as owner of the new regulated electric utility at Manley, planned to own, operate, and maintain the Manley Geothermal Project over its expected useful lifetime. The project was intended to provide electric energy to residential and commercial electric customers in Manley, from proven geothermal generating equipment utilizing geothermal resources. The project is to prepare a preliminary feasibility study level report addressing the feasibility of a micro-hydro system on California Creek in the Girdwood Valley. The grantee chose to work with the University of Alaska Anchorage School of Engineering for assistance. Surveying and mapping, hydrology, hydraulics, and geotechnical investigations, conceptual design, and preliminary environmental review will be completed, culminating in a final report. This agreement is to fund final design, permitting, and construction of the conversion from diesel-fired boilers to electric-fired boilers in 5 public facilities located in Wrangell, Alaska. The conversion will use the reduced electric rate provided by the City to utilize the spilling of excess water (water not used in power production) provided by the existing Tyee Lake Hydroelectric facility. The project is handled by the City & Borough of Wrangell and Wrangell Municipal Light & Power (WMLP). Electrical Power Systems, Inc. performed 2 feasibility studies for this project and is a preferred choice to perform project management and engineering design. The original application identified the total of 11 buildings for conversion. Due to the reduction of funds awarded, at this point, it is feasible to complete the first 5 facilities. The city's priorities are first the Nolan Center ($148,400), second the Public Safety Building ($139,875), third the High School ($195,000), fourth the Middle School ($133,938), and fifth the Elementary School ($137,375). One facility, the Fire Satellite Station ($7,887) is already completed. As additional funds become available to the community, the remaining 5 building will be completed in the order of sixth the Hospital ($169,490), seventh the Library ($88,600), eight the Power Plant ($144,265), ninth the Public Works Building ($121,607), and tenth the Harbor Office ($10,625). The grant funding under the phase of the project will provide for final design, permitting, equipment evaluation and resource evaluation of the forest project fuel source for its eventual replacement of diesel fuel. The final design will include mechanical and electrical integration of the forest project system into the community of Yakutat’s electric generation infrastructure, as well as design of the fuel storage and handling system. The community of Yakutat has received initial funding from a separate funding source to relocate and upgrade its existing power generation system. The forest product design will be coordinated with the ongoing power plant upgrade design. Permitting will include NEPA project level environment review of the proposed forest product fuel system and harvesting the resource. The City and Borough of Yakutat will work closely with stakeholders and the USFS to identify and mitigate potential impacts to the environment associated with harvesting the biomass resource. In conjunction with the project level environmental review, the City and Borough of Yakutat through Yakutat Power will work with the borough planners, USFS, Yakutat Tlingit Tribe, Yak-Tat Kwaan Inc., and local stakeholders to define and refine the fuel resource available for this project: including identifying realistic costs associated with harvesting, transporting, processing, storing, and handling the biomass product. Golden Valley Electric Association (GVEA) originally proposed feasibility, design, and construction of a 24 MW wind farm in the Healy area and requested $79 million in grant funding. AEA recommended $2.53 million for feasibility assessment, but the project was capped at $2 million. Wind Energy Alaska (WEA), plans to construct a 6 megawatt (MW) wind generation facility on CIRI-owned land near the village of Nikolaevsk, located on the southern Kenai Peninsula. The electricity generated by the project will be interconnected to the Anchor Point Substation, which is owned and operated by the Homer Electric Association (HEA). The project includes the construction of the wind generation plant, with four 1.5 MW GE wind turbines, a new 1.9 mile access road, and a distribution line approximately 10 miles in length from the plant to the Anchor Point Substation in Nikolaevsk. HEA is one of the six prime electric cooperatives, or utilities, that serves the Alaska Railbelt transmission grid. HEA is a member owned electric cooperative that serves most of Alaska’s Kenai Peninsula. HEA serves approximately 20,153 members at 28,547 metered locations, 2,200 miles of energized line, within a service area of 3,166 square miles. WEA, CIRI, and enXco are project proponents. This project expands the installed wind capacity in Kotzebue from 1.14 MW to 2.95 MW with the addition of two 900 kW turbines. Secondary loads will be installed at locations within the community to provide heat during times of excess power. An energy storage device will be installed to provide grid stability and time shift electrical generation. Kenai Hydro, LLC is an entity formed to investigate the feasibility of and develop hydro power projects on the Kenai Peninsula. This project is located near Moose Pass, Alaska and grant funds will be used to complete Phase II of the feasibility study begun with grant funds from the Alternative Energy Solicitation issued by the Alaska Energy Authority in 2007. Kenai Hydro, LLC proposes to divert water flows from Falls Creek into Grant Lake by operating a 4.5 MW hydroelectric facility on Grant Creek. Power from the project will be available to Homer Electric Association and other areas served by the existing Railbelt transmission grid. A Preliminary Permit from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission was secured on October 7, 2008. Phase I studies (stakeholder consultations and preliminary identification of necessary studies and permitting) were partially funded by the grant funds from the Alternative Energy Solicitation noted. This project (Phase II) will build on the work previously completed. The Metlakatla Indian Community (MIC) through their electric utility Metlakatla Power and Light will use the grant funds to complete the design of the 34.5kV transmission line interconnecting the electric systems of Metlakatla Power & Light (MP&L) and Ketchikan Public Utilities (KPU). The proposed transmission line will follow an existing road and require a submarine cable to interconnect the Metlakatla electric system with the Ketchikan electric system. In addition, grant funds will be used to complete design upgrades to the various control systems of the Metlakatla electric system (including the governor and SCADA systems). These upgrades are necessary to accommodate the connection between the Metlakatla and Ketchikan electric systems. Since July, 2009 the Metlakatla Indian Community has moved forward with this project by hiring a contractor to work on the designs needed and to further refine the specifications for the submarine crossing that will be needed to interconnect the two electric utilities. The Municipality of Anchorage (MOA) Solid Waste Services Department (SWS) will develop an electric power generating plant to be located at the Anchorage Regional Landfill (ARL). The plant will use landfill gas (LFG), a byproduct of anaerobic waste decomposition, as its primary fuel. Landfill gas will be collected and sold to Doyon, Limited who will generate electricity for Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson. This project is to conduct FERC licensing and permitting activities for the Old Harbor Hydroelectric project. Tasks that will be completed with this grant include a site visit, feasibility report, Phase I of permitting (FERC PAD), FERC scoping meetings, FERC study plan, and Phase II of permitting (field studies and initial study report). This grant was fully funded and contains $399,777 from a Round 0 Denali Commission grant, $2,598,320 from Round I of the Renewable Energy Fund (REF) and $199,889 from the grantee. The grant includes funding for the conceptual design, final design, and construction of a wind farm in the City of Bethel. The Denali Commission application proposed the installation of one Northern Power NW100b wind turbine and the Round I application proposed an additional three NW100b turbines. The electrical demand in Bethel warrants investigating wind turbines larger than the NW100b and the project will analyze multiple turbine sizes and types as part of the conceptual design. The final design will be based on the conceptual design. It is anticipated that the conceptual and final designs will recommend megawatt scale wind turbines and that additional funding will be sought to complete an expanded project. This project consists of final design and construction project of a 9 MW wind farm at a refinery in Nikiski. The grantee, an independent power producer, decided it was in their business's best interest to not accept the grant award and instead seek alternative financing options; therefore, the grant was cancelled before grant award. The Fishhook Hydroelectric Project received $100,000 in Round 0 grant funding to help complete permitting, utility certification, and a power purchase agreement for the project. At the time the Round 1 grant was made available, the scope for the Round 0 grant was not completed. Therefore, the Round 1 grant was cancelled before grant award. The University of Alaska - Fairbanks, Institute of Northern Engineering will conduct a detailed characterization of the hydrokinetic energy potential of the Tanana River adjacent to the community of Nenana over a 15-month period to include a summer-winter-summer cycle. While the year-round flow is the most important factor that determines the hydrokinetic energy potential of a river, the feasibility of deploying a hydrokinetic turbine system and its efficiency are also affected by the interaction of the hydrokinetic turbine and the river environment. These can involve interactions between turbines, and the anchors and cables holding the turbine in place, with fish populations, floating or submerged debris, ice, and sediment. The river characterization to be undertaken in this project is designed to investigate the interactions between the river environment and hydrokinetic power systems. This process will require the following studies. Mapping the river flow throughout the summer and winter months to determine the seasonal impact of ice. Existing data from a local US Geological Survey gauging station will be used to estimate the historical river flows and its variation. Measurements of flow velocities just prior to river freeze-up (October) and river break-up (April) were completed in 2008 and 2009. Monitoring the sediment carried in the river's main flow and along the bed to determine the baseline conditions and the variability of sediment accumulation and erosion that can affect turbine operations. This includes the influence of anchors and bed-mounted turbines. If a functioning turbine is available to the project, this monitoring will be extended to examine the effect of turbine operations on sediment deposition / erosion and sediment effects on turbine operation. The deployed anchoring system will be monitored to determine changes in sediment deposition and/or erosion that may occur as a result of flow disturbance by anchors. Monitoring fish populations in summer and winter to determine their number, river usage patterns, and species and age composition. Fish populations, and their behavior, differ from summer to winter and understanding those differences may be important to bed-mounted turbines that plan to operate year-round under an ice cover. A study of fish interaction with turbines requires high-resolution sonar equipment that is beyond the budget of this project, but is intended to be incorporated into future studies. Determining fish behavior around turbines will be addressed by these studies. In addition, the impact on larval and juvenile fish drifting downstream will be studied. Monitoring summer debris flow and possible mitigation strategies will also be completed. This will include the design and testing of an instrumented variable angle trash rack that can measure accumulated trash load. River flow measurements above and below the trash rack will be used to determine the influence of debris on the local flow that can affect turbine efficiency. The results of this project will provide critical information to utilities, villages, and commercial hydrokinetic manufacturers who are considering using or commercializing hydrokinetic turbines. Information about what permits are needed and who are critical stakeholders, what are the challenges of deploying and operating hydrokinetic turbines in the river environment and how fish, sediment, ice, and river debris, and their mitigation may affect turbine operations and efficiency. The Nome Joint Utility Sytems (NJUS) originally requested $13.95 million from Round I for feasibility, design and construction of a 3 MW wind farm but project funding was capped at $4 million. An additional $4.069 Million was awarded in Round V of the Renwable Energy Fund (REF). This grant consists of $4,000,000 from Round I of the REF and $4,069,000 from Round V for design and construction of a wind farm in the City of Nome and integration of a secondary load controller and resistive dump boiler into the Nome power system. The grantee will provide $444,444 as match for the Round I appropriation and $439,644 as a match for the Round V appropriation. The total funding for this project is $8,953,088 with $884,088 provided by the grantee. City of Nome/Nome Joint Utility System will complete a conceptual design, final design, permitting, construction and startup of a wind farm along with any necessary controls or equipment needed to integrate the wind farm into the Nome electrical grid. The grant is to evaluate the potential for installing more wind capacity in Hooper Bay. The study is to consider both adding more wind to the existing Alaska Village Electric Cooperative (AVEC) wind farm and also look at installing some wind capacity at the city water treatment facility for heating. The grant funds will be used to assist the construction of the Hiilangaay (formerly Reynolds Creek) Hydroelectric Project near Hydaburg, Alaska. The project will be funded and constructed per the Project Management Agreement negotiated between the various entities involved with the funding and construction of the project. The Ketchikan Public Utilities - Electric Division (KPU-Electric) received a license to construct from the Federal Energy Regulatory Agency (FERC) on March 17, 2009 for the Whitman Lake Hydroelectric project. The KUP-Electric will use the grant funds to prepare final design documents for the Whitman Lake Hydroelectric project. Grant funds will also be used to complete all remaining activities needing to be accomplished before construction bidding. This includes preparation of final drawings and specifications for the project, review and approval of these documents by the FERC Regional Office and preparation of a final construction cost estimate and project construction schedule. The project design work will be divided into three separate contracts; site preparation work, equipment procurement, and general civil engineering work. The project will conduct a resource assessment of hydrokinetic energy potential for 29 sites in rural Alaska by collecting and analyzing velocity and bathymetric data. The University will work with various entities with well-established working relationships in rural Alaska to assist with local logistics. Following site selection, student research assistants will be trained in hydrographic surveying and velocity measurement prior to conducting survey work on the selected river sites to obtain bathymetric and current distribution data. Data from the United States Geological Survey (USGS) gauging stations will also be used to estimate long-term hydrologic conditions at the selected rural sites. The long-term velocity/depth distribution data obtained will be used to determine the hydrokinetic energy available for power generation. Interior Regional Housing Authority (IRHA) proposed the installation of a biomass heat source and solar electricity source in the Yukon-Koyukuk Assisted Living Center, a NAHSDA, Denali Commission, ICDBG, FHLB, and AHFC funded project that would provide a 9 unit housing complex for the elderly of the Yukon Koyukuk Region. The design included a multi-purpose area, office space, and dormitory-type housing for transient village health care workers. This is a grant to construct a two-mile intertie connecting a 1.17-megawatt wind farm constructed by Banner Wind, LLC with the Nome Joint Utility Systems electrical grid. The project was to install two Vestas V-39 wind turbines with resistive load bank at the powerhouse and dump loads in community buildings. This project is linked with grant 2195264 which is a DOE pass-thru grant. The project is to prepare a preliminary feasibility study of hydroelectric development at the Kisaralik/Lake Chikuminuk area in the Kuskokwim region. A report will be prepared to confirm: project hydrology & output, conceptual design, proposed schedule, land status & transmission routing, costs, environmental impact & permitting, and path forward. A site visit, public meetings, geotechnical analysis, and assessment of regional wholesale utility planning will also be done. The North Slope Borough proposes to study the viability of an overhead transmission intertie between two of their communities. This grant is to fund a portion of the feasibility analysis of an intertie between the regional center, Barrow, and the nearby smaller village of Atqasuk. The intertie would allow Atqasuk to reduce or eliminate the use of diesel fuel for its electrical generators and rely on electricity from Barrow which is produced by natural gas generators. The City of Unalaska will use the grant funds for the purchase and installation of equipment to utilize the excess heat from existing generators at the Dutch Harbor powerhouse. The excess heat will be used by a 200 kW Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) generator designed to convert waste heat to electrical energy. The waste heat recovery system will be designed for expansion to include excess heat from increased power demands when a new powerhouse is constructed. This grant funds only the Resource Reconnaissance, Feasibility Reports and Conceptual Design of the proposed project. The grantee proposes to integrate one or more renewable energy resources with a properly sized efficient diesel plant for the community of Adak. The existing power plant in Adak was designed and constructed in 1964 for a 6000 person military base. The facilities were subsequently turned over to the community of Adak. The diesel plant is grossly oversized for the current population, is in poor condition, is extremely inefficient and does not incorporate any of the abundant renewable energy resources available on the island. The ultimate goal is to integrate a properly sized diesel power plant with one or more of the wind, geothermal, and hydroelectric renewable energy resources. The project as described in the application is a wood energy district heating project located in Chalkyitsik, Alaska for two groups of buildings: District Heat 1: the school, school housing and water system; District Heat 2: the washeteria/water plant and Village/Tribal Office. Although the full project will be a two-year project, the current grant funding is for completion of the feasibility study and conceptual design of the proposed boiler systems only. A level one feasibility and reconnaissance of forest wood resources have been performed in the summer of 2008 under a Department of Energy Tribal energy grant for the Yukon Flats through Council of Athabascan Tribal Governments (CATG). The project as described in the application is a wood energy district heating project located in Venetie, Alaska for three buildings: the school, school housing and washeteria/water system. Although the full project will be a two year project, the current grant funding is for completion of a feasibility study and conceptual design of the proposed boiler systems only. Two important issues that need to be addressed by this project are the supply of wood and reliable operation of the boilers. The feasibility assessment will address these issues before design work is completed. A level one feasibility and a reconnaissance of forest wood resources have been performed in the summer of 2008 under a Department of Energy Tribal energy grant for the Yukon Flats area. The City of Ambler will use grant funds to construct buried piping, pumps, heat exchangers, and other system components required to recover waste heat from the existing Alaska Village Electric Cooperative (AVEC) power plant and confer this energy to the new City water plant and washeteria in Ambler. This project will involve coordination between the City of Ambler, AVEC, the Northwest Arctic Borough, and the Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium (ANTHC). Grant funding of $435,000 comes with the requirement that the City of Ambler and AVEC provide an acceptable heat purchase agreement to AEA before the disbursement of grant funds. This grant is to fund the purchase and installation of equipment that will recover unutilized heat from the diesel generator exhaust stacks for an expanded district heating system and a new absorption chiller to make ice for the fishing fleet in Kotzebue. The project is to prepare a resource assessment, feasibility study and conceptual design of the Neck Lake Hydroelectric Project to serve the village of Whale Pass. Activities to be accomplished with this grant include: surveying and mapping, conceptual design, environmental surveys, geotechnical investigations, estimate of power by month, construction cost and permitting issues, culminating in a feasibility report. The Alaska Energy Authority and Chitina Electric, Inc. will use the grant funds to complete feasibility study, conceptual design and permitting; with the requirement that the feasibility report affirms that a Fivemile Creek hydroelectric project near Chitina, Alaska is practical before subsequent funding is provided for conceptual design and permitting. Work includes environmental assessment, site control, permitting, penstock routing, intake structure location, turbine house, equipment selection and tail race design. On behalf of the Grantee and through a separate grant agreement funded by the Denali Commission, the Authority has previously completed conceptual design, final design, and construction is underway for the diesel powerhouse and associated distribution tie line adjacent to the mouth of Fivemile Creek. The proposed hydroelectric project would provide power to the new powerhouse. Preliminary investigation work along with initial stream gauging at Fivemile Creek mouth was previously completed in May of 2008 under the grant for the powerhouse upgrade project. A Notice to Proceed has been issued for additional stream gauging at the proposed intake location on Fivemile Creek. This project consists of the construction of a 450 kW high-penetration wind system in Tuntutuliak with multiple secondary thermal loads in residences and the school. The project design is similar to a system being installed in Kongiganak. Half ($1.5 million) of the funding is being provided by a legislative grant. The McGrath Traditional Council will use grant funds to complete a feasibility study for community-based biomass resource analysis located in McGrath, Alaska. The study encompasses a 5-mile radius. The scope includes assessing kind, quantity, and delivered cost of biomass. The project will benefit the interior communities of Tanana, Tanacross, and Nenana by showing the proposed method of biomass supply assessment is useful. The project team must coordinate with McGrath Light & Power and other project participants in assessing harvest supply requirements and system requirements, per the review team for the Alaska Energy Authority. This coordination will need to be documented in the report submitted to the Authority. The Terror Lake Unit 3 Hydroelectric Project is to install a third hydro turbine capable of producing an additional 11.25 megawatts (MW) in the existing Terror Lake Plant. The original engineers of the Terror Lake facility had the foresight to design the facility for expansion to three turbines. The original design assumed one day additional capacity would be required. Terror Lake is KEA's primary generation source and is located approximately 25 miles southwest of the City of Kodiak and is within the Kodiak National Wildlife Refuge. The current capacity of Terror Lake has been surpassed by Kodiak's growing load demand. Without the additional hydropower capacity, the synergistic relationship of more renewable variable energy sources and water cannot be fully realized. Expanding the capacity of Terror Lake will significantly enhance the stability of KEA's isolated grid system and reduce KEA's dependence on diesel fuel by providing ample backup capacity to cover peak loads and outage backup for the other two hydro turbine generator units. Feasibility/Conceptual Phase: The project is to complete a feasibility analysis and conceptual design to install a third hydroelectric turbine generator unit in an existing bay of the powerhouse located at Terror Lake. A current analysis will identify the regulatory, engineering, and operational issues involved in expanding the facility's capacity. Upon its successful completion, Kodiak Electric Association will initiate the necessary environmental impact studies in order to develop an appropriate conceptual design for the engineering and operational modifications to the Terror Lake system. This is a grant for feasibility and reconnaissance including: transporting and installing a met tower; studying the wind resource for one year; conducting a geotechnical investigation to determine the soil conditions and needed engineering at the site, and performing a hydroelectric resource assessment. A conceptual design will be created based on the outcome of the met tower recordings, hydroelectric potential and geotechnical investigation. Project is to complete a reconnaissance study of the Carlson Creek Hydroelectric Project near Slana. Work includes stream gauging and preparing the reconnaissance engineering study that will provide information on proposed hydro scheme and layout, energy production by month, stream gauge data for two years, construction cost, cost of power production, and environmental and permitting costs. This is a grant for a construction project to install two Northwind 100-kilowatt turbines, plus secondary heat loads, load controllers and new switchgear. The project used an alternative pre-cast / post tension concrete foundation design to support the wind turbine structures. This is a grant for feasibility and reconnaissance including: permitting, purchasing, transporting and installing a met tower; studying the wind resource for one year; and conducting a geotechnical investigation to determine the soil conditions and needed engineering at the site. A conceptual design will be created based on the outcome of the met tower recordings and geotechnical investigation. This is a proposal to study the wind resource potential along the Richardson Hwy south of Delta Junction. The Village of Igiugig is located at the outlet of Lake Iliamna, 240 air miles southwest of Anchorage, on the southern shore of the Kvichak River. Igiugig has a year-round population of 56 (predominantly Yupik, Aleut, and Athabascan) rising in summer to about 75. Igiugig also provides goods and services to six area tourism lodges and their respective clients and workforce of 90 additional persons per week. This lake outlet location provides an ideal site for the study, testing and implementation of river-in-stream energy conversion that will also benefit other Alaska communities considering this form of renewable energy. A RISEC plant will convert available river kinetic energy into electric power, and feed into the existing Igiugig electric grid to reduce diesel fuel consumption at the Igiugig power plant. Direct beneficiaries include the Lake and Peninsula School District (LPSD) and Igiugig electric service customers. The North Slope Borough will use the grant funds to pay a portion of the cost to construct a waste heat system to deliver recovered heat from the existing diesel powerhouse to several public buildings in the community of Point Lay. Originally proposed as a $10.7 million design/construction project, the scope has changed with the $4 million rural cap applied to each community for a total Renewable Energy Fund (REF) grant of $8 million. The scope reduced to from 6 to 4 turbines in August 2010. The intertie increased to 10-miles due to better ground and barge access. The grant is to fund the final design and construction of a wood fired boiler system that would provide heat to the school in Thorne Bay. The project involves placing Garn wood fired boilers adjacent to the school site and running underground piping from the wood fired boilers to the existing heating system. Wood would be supplied by local sawmills, USFS small sales, wood left behind on the landings from large timber sales, and from small local firewood cutters. The North Slope Borough will use the grant funds to complete the final design of a waste heat system to deliver recovered heat from the existing diesel powerhouse to several public buildings in the community. The North Slope Borough (NSB) recently commissioned an update of the Project Analysis Report (feasibility study) entitled, "Village Heat Recovery" dated February 2006. The prior study assessed the previously constructed waste lines and costs associated with waste heat utilization in Arctic and/or permafrost conditions in six NSB villages. The NSB will be the primary participant and will utilize internal expertise and retain external consultants and contractors that have special expertise in designing waste hast pipelines, connecting building heating plants to the pipe lines, and recommending operations and maintenance schedules. The preconstruction grant is to prepare a feasibility study of the potential hydro resource at Loud Creek near Akutan. Stream gauging, updated assessment of the impound capacity, construction and transmission requirements, economic and energy analysis, construction costs, topographic survey, conceptual designs, and materials lists will be completed during study. The preconstruction project is to conduct field investigation and inspection of the existing hydroelectric system located on Town Creek in Akutan. As-built data will be collected and as-built drawings will be generated. Updated cost estimates, plan and procedure for acquiring required permits and bring the project into compliance with AK Dam Safety Program, final dam designs, LIDAR survey, and a final report will be completed. The Yukon - Koyukuk School District will use the grant funds to develop a wood energy project for the Kaltag school and community. The project will be developed in phases and only the first phase is funded by this grant. The first phase is to identify the energy requirements and to confirm the availability of the resource. A preliminary cost benefit analysis will be conducted to verify that the project and fuel supply has the potential to be sustainable and that the projected cost will justify the development costs. Environmental issues will be identified and community meetings held to confirm support for the project. Potential business partners will be identified. If the first phase of development yields favorable results, additional funding will be required in order for the project to proceed to Phase II and a more detailed business plan and project conceptual design will be developed. The City of Akutan will perform geothermal exploration at the Hot Springs Bay Valley geothermal resource to determine suitable exploratory well locations and drill exploratory wells The information will then be analyzed to determine the economic feasibility of developing the geothermal resource and to create a business plan to ensure the success of the development. Village Wind Power will permit and install a met tower southwest of Tok and complete a wind resource assessment. This grant consists of $100,000 in Denali Commission funding from the 2008 Alternative Energy Request For Proposals. The funding will support feasibility assessment and conceptual design of integrating utility-scale wind generation into Nushagak Cooperative’s electrical system. A $25,000 match is in the form of a hydroelectric and transmission study under Renewable Energy Fund grant 2195419. The project is to prepare a reconnaissance study of the Nenana River for a run-of-river hydroelectric project. A report will be prepared to document findings of the study and shall address: power generation and capacity factor, narrative to describe plant, site services, access, transmission infrastructure, costs, critical issues, and conclusions as to the technical and economic feasibility of the project and recommendations for further study. The project is to complete the permitting and final design for using excess hydropower for electrical heating of the city, school buildings, and potentially the fish processing facility in Atka. In addition, the design of any necessary upgrades to the distribution system to accommodate the proposed project will also be funded. The equipment "captures the waste energy off a utility system" and dispatches that waste energy to heating systems. This project was fully funded. The project consists of $1.9 Million from Round III of the Renewable Energy Fund (REF) with an additional $200,000 in match from the grantee. The grantee has also "matched" $1.5 milllion in turbines purchase (this includes $650,000 of DOE funds). The project will tie one or two of TDX's turbines on St. Paul into the City's grid and make necessary upgrades to the City's facilities and transmission system. The project is to complete permitting, final design, and construction of repairs and upgrades to the 105 kW Town Creek hydroelectric project. Pre-construction activities include completion of: 1) final plans and specifications, 2) cost estimate, 3) construction schedule, 4) economic analysis and 5) AK Dam Safety permitting. Construction activities include: 1) mobilization and demobilization, 2) providing maintenance equipment and building, 3) construction and commissioning including repairs to main intake dam and diversions, existing access road, inspection and maintenance of turbine, upgrading controls and improving integration with diesel plant, and final system commissioning and testing, and 4) providing documentation and training for the upgraded hydro plant. The City of St. Paul wil be designing and upgrading and extending the existing heat recovery loop to work in conjunction with the new wind-diesel system. The scope of work for this grant was added and funded with uncommitted funds remaining in the existing Nushagak Hydropower Project grant, 2195419. This project will complete the feasibility assessment, including "resolution of land and regulatory issues" and "environmental analysis" for a proposed 300kW wind project with associated integration components in New Stuyahok. This grant consists of $1,421,240 from Round III of the Renewable Energy Fund for a wind construction project in Pilot Point. $201,000 in grant funds is allocated for conceptual design, final design and permitting. $1,370,240 is currently unallocated for construction. Allocation of final design funds will be made through an amendment to this grant after the conceptual design report has been accepted by the Authority. Allocation of construction funds will be made through an amendment to this grant after the 65% design report has been accepted by the Authority. The total project cost is $1,571,240 with a match of $150,000 provided by the grantee. City of Pilot Point will complete a meteorological tower study, conceptual design, final design, permitting, construction and startup of a wind farm and heat recovery boiler, along with any necessary controls or equipment needed to integrate the wind farm into the Pilot Point electrical grid. It is expected that the wind farm will be approximately 100 kW in nameplate capacity and a transmission line from the wind farm to the power plant will need to be constructed. Project is to complete a reconnaissance study of a hydroelectric project on the Tanalian River near Port Alsworth. The grant consists of 2 successive phases. If findings of phase 1 indicate the project should move forward, Phase 2 will be authorized by the Authority, culminating in a reconnaissance report. Cordova Electric Cooperative (CEC) is requesting $4 million to implement a construction-ready, state-of-the-art hydroelectric facility on Humpback Creek that would generate up to 4 million kWh per year, meeting 16% of Cordova's annual energy needs with a renewable energy source. CEC operates an isolated electric system and therefore is solely responsible for serving its 1,560 customers. Cordova's high electricity costs have been cited in several formal and informal community planning documents as a primary inhibitor of economic development, and this project would assist in making electricity rates more affordable for residents and businesses as well as displacing diesel fuel, and reducing our particulate emissions. Competitive bids for project construction exceeded expected cost by $5,500,000, so CEC is requesting additional funding to that provided in the Authority's Round 1 Renewable Energy grant. Cordova Electric Cooperative proposes to use the Renewable Energy Fund grant to complete relocation and replacement of the intake structure for the Humpback Creek hydro project, which was destroyed by both a fire in 2005 and flood in 2006. AEA previously awarded the Cordova Electric Cooperative $4 million in Round I for this work; however, the installed cost of the project has increased to $17,621,878 since construction bids came in much higher than expected. Cordova Electric Cooperative has awarded a construction contract and the project is now on schedule for completion by January 2011. There is substantial support from the local Native organization Eyak and fish processers. In addition, the federal agency, FEMA, has provided funding for the project. All permits, including a FERC license to construct are in place for the rebuild. The grant is to complete permitting and final design of a small-scale hydropower project (54 kW run-of-river) on Anderson Creek for Chenega. The Terror Lake Unit 3 Hydroelectric Project is to install a third hydro turbine capable of producing an additional 11.25 megawatts (MW) in the existing Terror Lake Plant. The original engineers of the Terror Lake facility had the foresight to design the facility for expansion to three turbines. The original design assumed one day additional capacity would be required. Terror Lake is KEA's primary generation source and is located approximately 25 miles southwest of the City of Kodiak and is within the Kodiak National Wildlife Refuge. The current capacity of Terror Lake has been surpassed by Kodiak's growing load demand. Without the additional hydropower capacity, the synergistic relationship of more renewable variable energy sources and water cannot be fully realized. Expanding the capacity of Terror Lake will significantly enhance the stability of KEA's isolated grid system and reduce KEA's dependence on diesel fuel by providing ample backup capacity to cover peak loads and outage backup for the other two hydro turbine generator units. Final Design: Project is to assist with the completion of the final design and bid document development. Once complete, KEA intends to initiate the construction phase of the third turbine for the Terror Lake facility. This project will complete the feasibility assessment, including "resolution of land and regulatory issues" and "environmental analysis" for a proposed 900-1000kW wind project with associated integration components in Point Hope. This project will complete the feasibility assessment, including "resolution of land and regulatory issues" and "environmental analysis" for a proposed 750-900kW wind project with associated integration components in Wainwright. This project will complete the feasibility assessment, including "resolution of land and regulatory issues" and "environmental analysis" for a proposed 675-750kW wind project with associated integration components in Point Lay. This project expands the installed wind capacity in Kotzebue from 1.14 MW to 2.95 MW with the addition of two 900 kW turbines. Secondary loads will be installed at locations within the community to provide heat during times of excess power. An energy storage device will be installed to provide grid stability and time shift electrical generation. This project will complete the feasibility assessment, including "resolution of land and regulatory issues" and "environmental analysis" for a proposed 300kW wind project in Kivalina with an associated intertie to the Delong Mtn Transportation System (DMTS) port 17 miles to the southeast. The City of Seward used a Round III grant from the Renewable Energy Fund to complete the installation of a seawater heat pump to supply space heating for the Alaska Sea Life Center in Seward. (The City of Seward is the owner of the Alaska Sea Life Center, which is leased and operated by the Seward Association for the Advancement of Marine Science). This Round III grant was combined with another grant the Alaska Sea Life Center has received from the Denali Commission's Emerging Energy Technology grant fund ($426,720) for the completion of this project. ORNI 46 LLC used a Round III Renewable Energy Fund grant to complete a staged reconnaissance and assessment of the geothermal resources on Mt. Spurr. Work completed included: aeromagnetic gravity survey, electromagnetic geophysical surveys, LiDAR survey, field work, mapping, geochemical sampling, and drilling two temperature gradient and two slim holes. Work began in the summer of 2010 and was completed in the fall of 2011. Ormat Nevada, Inc. has previously completed the initial reconnaissance field work in 2009. The activities completed with the grant funds are follow-up activities to determine whether to proceed to drilling production wells and further commercial development of the Mt. Spurr geothermal project. Preliminary analysis of data from field reconnaissance of the region conducted by Ormat Nevada, Inc. in July and August of 2009, coupled with historical exploration work from the mid-1980's, indicated the potential existence of a commercial size geothermal resource; however, further exploration is required in order to confirm it. The grant had a two-phased program for continued resource studies and assessment surveys. Phase I, included mapping, further geochemical sampling, remote sensing, aerial and ground-based geophysics and temperature gradient drilling. Phase II included slim-hole drilling. The project is to complete FERC licensing, project permitting and design for two potential run-of-river hydropower development projects at Water Supply and Gartina Creeks in Hoonah. Included in this scope will be the 4 mile transmission line interconnection of the projects with Hoonah. After the grant documents are in place, six project development tasks will be accomplished with the funds. This grant is to construct the 2.0 MW Yerrick Creek Hydroelectric Project, which is approximately 20 miles from Tok. This project will complete the construction of the chip-fired biomass heating system in conjunction with the replacement of the GZ diesel power plant The City of Tanana in collaboration with the Tanana Tribal Council applied for the Round III grant from the Renewable Energy Fund to install a biomass heating facility for the Assisted Living Facility for elders in Tanana, the Tanana Tribal Offices and the Internet high tech training center in Tanana. Since the application was submitted in 2009, the City of Tanana has also been awarded $1,540,000 from the US Department of Energy (DOE) to conduct energy efficiency activities in the community and to design and construct biomass heating systems for the school, tribal complex, water/sewer system, fire hall, and city offices. In order to more efficiently complete the design and construction of all of the biomass projects, the City of Tanana requested authority to manage all of the work as one project, utilizing the same design and construction services. DOE funding will provide for the energy efficiency improvements, the design of all of the biomass systems, and the purchase of equipment and construction materials. The Renewable Energy funds will provide for labor and fringe benefits for the construction of the biomass systems. The scope of the original Renewable Energy Fund grant application, the design and construction of a biomass heating system for the Tanana Assisted Living Facility, the Tanana Tribal Offices, and the Internet high tech training center will be completed as part of the larger project, thus satisfying the intent of the Renewable Energy Fund grant. The City of Tanana will oversee the construction and implementation of this project; the Tribal Council will provide in-kind and collaborative oversight of the project. Prerequisites for Renewable Energy grant reimbursement are acceptance of Resource Management Plan, Final Business Plan - including wood supply projections, 95% Engineering Design Drawings, Fire Marshal Approval, and any other required permits. The City of Akutan will continue the geothermal exploration project begun under the Round II Renewable Energy Fund grant. The Round III grant will run concurrently with the Round II grant and supplement the Round II grant for the costs associated with exploratory drilling. The focus of the work accomplished in the summer of 2010 will be the completion of two temperature gradient (TG) wells in Hot Springs Bay Valley. The TG wells will provide data for the project team to be able to better characterize the resource both in temperature and extent. The Pilgrim Hot Springs geothermal resource assessment is being conducted with two Renewable Energy Fund (REF) awards. The full project scope is described under grant #7040007. The grant was cancelled before grant award. The grantee decided to terminate the project due to its small size and increased costs of licensing, permitting, and design requirements associated with falling under FERC jurisdictional licensing. The City and Borough of Sitka will use the Renewable Energy Fund, Round IV, grant to design and construct a hybrid ground source heat pump (GSHP) to serve the heating needs at the City and Borough of Sitka's Japonski Island Boathouse Historical Rehabilitation Project. The Japonski Island Boathouse Heat Pump project hybrid system will consist of a ground source heat pump system that will meet approximately 81% of the facility's heating needs, with a supplemental electric heat system to make up the difference during periods when the facility's heat loads exceed the capacity of the ground source heat pump system. The Renewable Energy Grant is for the additional design and construction costs for the hybrid ground source heat pump system. The grant funding is only for the costs associated with the ground source heat pump system portion of the hybrid system; the costs associated with the supplemental boiler and water heater are excluded from this grant. The large open work bay, which will have only a fabric curtain over the opening, will be heated as needed with a waste oil burner, since the heat pump system would have to be dramatically increased in size, for what would be a very intermittent load. This project will complete a wind conceptual design report and conduct geotechnical analysis in Atmautluak. Significant work has already been done on the CDR. Chugach Electric Association, Inc. (Chugach), on behalf of the Bradley Project Management Committee (BPMC), has been awarded funds to perform feasibility studies and a conceptual design for the Battle Creek Diversion project. Additionally, a non-capacity FERC license amendment and permit applications will be prepared. Battle Creek is located two miles to the west of Bradley Lake hydroelectric project on the Kenai Peninsula. The Bradley Lake project is located at the northeast end of Kachemak Bay, about 27 miles from the city of Homer. The communities that will benefit from the project include all the communities served by the six Railbelt electric utilities that receive a share of the Bradley Lake project. The BPMC is comprised of representatives of these six Railbelt electric utilities which include Chugach, Anchorage Municipal Light and Power, Homer Electric, Matanuska Electric, Golden Valley, and the Seward Electric System. This is a project to divert water from the upper watershed of the middle branch of Battle Creek into Bradley Lake. Based on Battle Creek stream flow measurements from 1991 to 1993, diverting a portion of the stream flow to Bradley Lake has the potential to increase annual energy output by 27,000 to 45,000 MWh, depending on the amount of flow to be diverted. Environmental, geotechnical, preliminary engineering and analytical work is needed to evaluate fish habitat, the potential energy resource, and diversion dam and conveyance (i.e. tunnel, pipe, open channel) alternatives to divert the water. The work that would be funded includes a variety of tasks related to the resource, permitting, environmental and fish studies, preliminary engineering and design and preparing a Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) license amendment. In addition to the $500,000 in grant funds, the BPMC members will provide a matching contribution of $500,000 to fund this work. The Alaska Energy Authority (AEA), under Project Manager Bryan Carey, P.E., will be administrating this project. Major permitting activities and permit requirements for this project include: • Submittal of a non-capacity license amendment to the Bradley Lake Project FERC license (AK-8221). • Application for a Section 404 Permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. • Completion of the Alaska Department of Natural Resources (ADNR) Division of Coastal & Ocean Management Consistency Review. • Completion of the National Marine Fisheries Service’s Essential Fish Habitat Consultation process. • Application for a water rights permit from ADNR. • Application for a material sale contract from ADNR. • Application for a ADNR land use permit and/or lease agreement for access to the project site and use of State lands for the project. • Application for a Title 16 fish habitat permit from Alaska Department of Fish and Game. • A contractor provided Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). This grant consists of $99,075 from Round IV of the Renewable Energy Fund for a wind feasibility assessment in Cold Bay. G&K Electric Utility will install a wind-measuring meteorological (“met”) tower and complete geotechnical reconnaissance to determine the advisability of installing wind turbines in Cold Bay. The project is for feasibility, permitting and final design of a project to divert water from Stetson Creek to Cooper Lake to release environmental flows into Cooper Creek. This change was part of a settlement agreement reached during the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission relicensing of the Cooper Lake Hydroelectric Project in 2007. The main benefit of the proposed project would be the continued operation of the 19.4 MW Cooper Lake Hydroelectric Project. In addition, the diversion adds water to Cooper Lake, resulting in a new increase in hydroelectric generation. A new control structure will be added near the existing Cooper Lake embankment dam to regulate environmental flows in the upper reaches of the Cooper Creek below the dam. These flows will enhance fish habitat in this reach by using natural-warmed lake water to insure optimal water temperatures. Chugach has agreed to match Renewable Energy funding awarded under this grant using cash and in-kind contributions on a dollar-for-dollar basis. The diversion project is located within the Chugach National Forest. Permits expected to be required include U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 404 Permit, Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation 401 Water Quality Certification, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Storm Water Pollution Discharge Elimination System Permit, Alaska Department of Fish and Game Fish Habitat Permit, Alaska Department of Natural Resources Water Rights, and Alaska Department of Natural Resources Coastal Project Questionnaire. Chugach has worked with all of the above agencies and does not anticipate any overwhelming barrier to securing the needed permits. This grant consists of $99,075 from Round IV of the Renewable Energy Fund for a wind feasibility assessment in Nelson Lagoon. Nelson Lagoon Eletric Cooperative will install a wind-measuring meteorological (“met”) tower and complete geotechnical reconnaissance to determine the advisability of installing wind turbines in Cold Bay. The University of Alaska Fairbanks will continue work exploring the geothermal potential of the Pilgrim Hot Springs site begun under a Round III Renewable Energy Fund Grant (REF). In 2010, the University of Alaska Fairbanks began Phase I of an exploration program of the Pilgrim Hot Springs resource. The program is funded mainly through a Department of Energy grant with cost share provided through a $613,174 award under Round III of the REF. This first phase involved the use of geophysical remote sensing techniques (including forward looking infrared radiometry, or FLIR) intended to map the spatial extent and total heat flow to the surface to make a preliminary estimation of the developable extent of the reservoir. These remote sensing techniques are being coupled with ground-based exploration techniques to pinpoint the location of the upflow zone, map the spatial extent and total heat flow to the surface, and estimate the temperature and depth of the reservoir. This grant addresses Phase II and III of this project. Phase II involves drilling and testing two 500 ft. temperature gradient holes and two 2500 ft. confirmation holes into the resource to confirm the results from Phase I. Phase III will involve developing a more complete understanding of the reservoir through flow testing and water sampling of the holes, and development of a numerical reservoir model. The numerical model will be used to predict future performance, including possible megawatts produced, of the reservoir under various production/reinjection scenarios. The end result of this project will be an economic and geothermal resource model of the Pilgrim Hot Springs site and surrounding area to determine if it can be economically developed, and to what extent. The Alaska Village Electric Cooperative (AVEC) will conduct a wind feasibility assessment in Stebbins with an intertie to St. Michael, 10 miles to the east. A detailed conceptual design will be delivered to AEA upon completion of the project. Lake and Pen Borough proposed a design and construction project for a 330kW wind turbine in Port Heiden. AEA has not yet accepted a conceptual design and thus has limited funding to permitting and design work. A very-high penetration wind system was proposed without full consideration of the integration requirements. This project proposes the final design and construction for a wood boiler for the Kokhanok community. A cordwood boiler system will be used to heat two buildings: the Kokhanok Village Council Building and the Community Building. This project will deliver project scoping and contractor solicitation, permit applications and approvals, a resolution of land use and right of way issues, final system design, construction, start-up and commissioning. Prerequisites for AEA grant reimbursement are acceptance of: * Conceptual Design Report * Demonstrated acceptable efficiency and emission levels for selected heating technology (Garn or equal technology) * Business/operational plan including staffing plans and a sustainable long-term fuel supply contract in each burn location. This grant consists of $105,050 from Round IV of the Renewable Energy Fund for a wind and heat recovery feasibility assessment in Koliganek. A wind resourcee analysis was already completed in 2006. The grantee will complete geotechnical reconnaissance to determine the advisability of installing wind turbines. The study will also consider heat recovery from the diesel generators. Chitina Electric Inc. (CEI) has been awarded $277,000 in Round IV Renewable Energy Fund (REF) grant funds to complete permitting and final design of the Fivemile Creek Hydroelectric Project. This 300 kW high head, run-of-river hydroelectric plant has the potential to displace a significant portion of the diesel fuel now used to generate electricity for Chitina. Chitina Electric Inc. (CEI) has been awarded $277,000 in Round IV Renewable Energy Fund (REF) grant funds to complete permitting and final design of the Fivemile Creek Hydroelectric Project. This 300 kW high head, run-of-river hydroelectric plant has the potential to displace a significant portion of the diesel fuel now used to generate electricity for Chitina. CEI received REF Round II funding of $303,000 to complete conceptual design and feasibility assessment of the project (#2194556). In addition to the feasibility assessment, Chitina has begun the permitting and design process using remaining feasi- bility funds. This new grant is a continuation of the work. Project permitting, obtaining site control, completion of final design and a final business plan will be completed. Permitting jurisdiction is outside the authority of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and is through the resource agencies of the State of Alaska.As requested by the grantee the Alaska Energy Authority, is administering this grant for CEI. The Terror Lake Unit 3 Hydroelectric Project is to install a third hydro turbine capable of producing an additional 11.25 megawatts (MW) in the existing Terror Lake Plant. The original engineers of the Terror Lake facility had the foresight to design the facility for expansion to three turbines. The original design assumed one day additional capacity would be required. Terror Lake is KEA's primary generation source and is located approximately 25 miles southwest of the City of Kodiak and is within the Kodiak National Wildlife Refuge. The current capacity of Terror Lake has been surpassed by Kodiak's growing load demand. Without the additional hydropower capacity, the synergistic relationship of more renewable variable energy sources and water cannot be fully realized. Expanding the capacity of Terror Lake will significantly enhance the stability of KEA's isolated grid system and reduce KEA's dependence on diesel fuel by providing ample backup capacity to cover peak loads and outage backup for the other two hydro turbine generator units. Construction: Project is for construction of the third hydropower turbine - generator unit in an empty bay within the existing powerhouse of the Terror Lake Hydroelectric Facility on Kodiak Island. Project is to complete engineering and surveying tasks for Phase II of FERC licensing and preliminary design. FERC License Application Exhibit F, Exhibit G (Survey Control and R-O-W maps), and geotechnical investigation will be completed. Draft drawings (65% design) and specifications, including access road design, project transient analysis and hydraulic calculations, pipeline sizing, alignment and profile, anchorage and thrust block design will be prepared. A construction cost estimate will also be completed with this grant. At the time of the Renewable Energy Fund Round IV application TDX Power was negotiating to purchase Bethel Utility Corporation (BUC) and applied for feasibility and design funding for a wind farm in the City of Bethel. Only the feasibility portion of the application was recommended for funding. The grant was placed in proposal status until such time as TDX Power purchased BUC. TDX Power was unsuccessful in purchasing BUC. Alaska Village Electric Cooperative (AVEC) has since negotiated the purchase of BUC. As the utility in Bethel, AVEC will be pursuing a wind farm using a Denali Commission and Renewable Energy Fund Round I grant transferred to AVEC from the City of Bethel. The scope of work for this grant has been adjusted accordingly. TDX Power, working as a contractor for AVEC, will perform a feasibility study to determine the advisability of installing wind turbines on the Bethel electrical grid. A meteorological study has been performed as part of the Alaska Energy Authority Wind Program's Anemometer Loan Program but further study may prove necessary. The work will entail geotechnical reconaissance, a wind resource assessment, analysis of the current power plant and electrical grid, feasibility study and result in a conceptual design report. This grant consists of $61,225 from Round IV of the Renewable Energy Fund for a wind feasibility assessment in Napaskiak. City of Napaskiak will install the wind-measuring meteorological (“met”) tower currently in Napakiak and complete geotechnical reconnaissance to determine the advisability of installing wind turbines in Napaskiak. The study will also consider heat recovery and tying in to the Bethel grid. This grant consists of $275,554 from Round IV of the Renewable Energy Fund (REF) for completing a wind feasibility assessment and final design in St. Mary’s/Pitka’s Point. The total project cost is $309,998 with a match of $34,444 provided by the grantee. This project will look at the feasibility of retrofitting an existing 12kW solar-battery-diesel system in Lime Village. The system was installed in 1999-2001 with donations by British Petroleum and Siemens for the PV panels. Although the panels are reportedly operable, the charger-inverter and control system does not work. The status of the ~100 kWh lead acid battery system is unknown. The Alaska Village Electric Cooperative (AVEC) will conduct a wind resource and feasibility assessment in Eek. This project consists of $142,500 from Round IV of the Renewable Energy Fund (REF) and $7,500 from the grantee. A detailed conceptual design will be delivered to AEA upon completion of the project. This grant consists of $145,000 from Round IV of the Renewable Energy Fund for a wind feasibility analysis, resource assessment and conceptual design. The total project cost is $161,000 with a match of $16,000 provided by the grantee. Organized Village of Kwethluk will install a meteorological (“met”) tower to determine the advisability of installing wind turbines in Kwethluk. The work will involve obtaining a letter of non-objection for placement of the wind tower, permitting plan, installing the met tower purchased with previous AEA funds and studying the wind resource for a minimum of one year. On completion of the wind study the met tower will be dismantled and returned to AEA. Organized Village of Kwethluk will install instrumentation necessary to monitor the power plant, distribution system, and possible secondary load(s) (e.g. dispatchable electrical loads and heat loads) in order to adequately model the Kwethluk electrical demand, power system, and heat loads for a minimum of one year. Organized Village of Kwethluk will review the current power generation, distribution and control systems to determine necessary upgrades for the integration of wind power. A final report detailing the findings of these tasks along with recommendations for next steps will be submitted to the Authority. The Alaska Village Electric Cooperative (AVEC) will complete a wind resource and feasibility assessment in Marshall. A detailed conceptual design will be delivered to AEA upon completion of the project. The Alaska Village Electric Cooperative (AVEC) will conduct a wind resource and feasibility assessment in Scammon Bay. A detailed conceptual design will be delivered to AEA upon completion of the project. This phase of the Barrow to Atqasuk Power Transmission Project will initiate the engineering of the project concept that was proven to be the most viable in the feasibility study. The intent of the feasibility study was to first determine if there is an economical solution for providing electric power to Atqasuk from a low cost energy source. That source, of course, is the natural gas that is available in the Barrow area. The next goal of the study determines which power transmission concept is the most economical and compatible with the prevailing technical, environmental and social constraints. In short, the most attractive power transmission concept will be the result of the feasibility study. The winning concept then enters the preliminary engineering phase. The purpose of the preliminary design is to adequately define the project so that all stakeholders can understand it. These stakeholders include the owners, end-users, financiers and the concerned regulatory bodies. It is the basis for gaining approval and agreement to go forth with the project. It should be noted that this preliminary phase of engineering constitutes about 30% of the entire engineering effort. The 70% balance is for final design engineering and is required solely for constructing the project. The final design consists of detailed drawings, specifications and other materials relevant to the construction phase. This project will complete the design and permitting for a wind farm in Wainwright. A grant for CDR was received for Wainwright in Renwable Energy Fund, Round III. This project will complete the Kaktovik wind feasibility assessment, including "resolution of land and regulatory issues" and "environmental analysis" for a proposed 300kW wind project with associated integration components. This project will complete the design and permitting for a wind farm in Point Hope. A grant for conceptual design was awarded to Point Hope in Round III of the Renewable Energy Fund (REF). This project will complete the design and permitting for a wind farm in Point Lay A grant for CDR was received for Point Lay in Renewable Energy Fund, Round III. The Northwest Inupiat Housing Authority, in partnership with NANA Regional Corporation, Maniilaq Association, WH Pacific, Inc., and Kobuk, Shungnak, and Ambler Native Villages, will complete the design and permitting for a thermal biomass system. The system will be located in Kobuk, Shungnak, or Ambler based on the recommendation of the feasibility Conceptual Design report funded by Round III of the Renewable Energy Fund. This project will deliver project scoping and contractor solicitation, permit applications, and approvals, environment assessment and mitigation plans, resolution of land use and right of way issues, final system design, engineering cost estimate, economic and financial analyses, power sales agreements with approved rates and the final business/operational plan. Prerequisites for AEA grant reimbursement are acceptance of Resource Management Plan including resource assessment and harvest plan/costs, Preliminary Business/Operational Plan, and Boiler Feasibility and Conceptual Design Report and Drawings. The purpose of this project is to determine the feasibility of converting paper, cardboard, and other wood-based waste into thermal energy for heating the municipal water system of Kotzebue. The City of Kotzebue will complete a feasibility study and conceptual design for a paper/wood waste thermal energy system. To this end, the City will study the paper/wood waste stream in Kotzebue, environmental impacts of the combustion process, and the economics of the process. The Alaska Village Electric Cooperative (AVEC) will conduct a wind resource and feasibility assessment to study the potential of replacing the old AOC turbines with NW100s or other models. A detailed conceptual design will be delivered to AEA upon completion of the project. The Eva Creek project will consist of 12 RePower 2.05 megawatt turbines for a total wind farm capacity of 24.6 megawatts. The grant consists of $1,463,200 in REF funds toward Q4 2011 turbine purchase, plus $10 million in legislative appropriation for construction costs. The construction funds can be spent first with match coming in subsequent quarters. Mount Spurr represents what currently appears to be the best opportunity in Alaska to develop a utility-scale base-load geothermal energy power plant. Located 80 miles west of Anchorage on state lands which were leased by Ormat Nevada Inc. in October of 2008, a successful power project at Mt. Spurr would serve communities along the Railbelt through power purchased by one or more of the Railbelt electric utilities. This grant request is for the start of construction of the geothermal well field and later on (beyond the scope of this grant application), the power plant itself. The first step in construction of a commercial geothermal well-field is to drill a full-size deep geothermal production well, in order to tap into the geothermal reservoir and flow test the geothermal fluid in order to measure its temperature, pressure, chemical composition and other attributes. The location of this well will be based on a synthesis of 2010 and 2011 exploration work mentioned before. Follow-up steps (beyond the scope of this grant application) will include drilling additional production wells; drilling one or more injection wells; performing a long-term multi-well flow test to measure the size of the geothermal reservoir; drilling additional production and injection wells and building a power plant, including a geothermal gathering system, utility interconnection facilities etc. Chugach Electric Association, Inc. (CEA) has applied for a grant through the Alaska Renewable Energy Fund to evaluate the construction of a transmission line between the proposed Mount Spurr geothermal site (to be developed by Ormat Nevada, Inc.) and its existing Beluga generation plant. Phase I of the grant application is funded and will accomplish an initial feasibility study consisting of an analysis of permitting requirements, route selection, and a preliminary design. The narrative below outlines the anticipated time, cost estimates and deliverables for these tasks. CEA will provide in-house management as "other contributions." Consequently, these costs will be tracked and reported to the Alaska Energy Authority. Permitting Requirements - CEA anticipates permitting application and approval to be a major driver in ultimate route selection. A clear and comprehensive study of existing land owners within the project region and their individual requirements for third-party land use will ultimately help clarify routing options. CEA expects some overlap between route selection and permitting since the two are heavily dependent on each other. CEA anticipates bringing a consultant on-board immediately upon approval of the grant with expectation of a completed study within six months (August 2011 through January 2012) at an estimated cost of $200,000. The completed study will include a comprehensive listing of land-owners and detailed analysis of necessary permitting to build/maintain facilities on their respective properties. Preliminary Route Selection - CEA will explore multiple routing options: a) Use of an existing road ROW and the proposed new road extension into the geo-thermal site. "Piggybacking" the transmission line alongside new and existing roads can create lower construction costs and eliminate many of the permitting issues. b) Routing based on "least resistance," i.e. a potentially longer line, but situated where geographical and permitting issues are limited or nonexistent. c) Access to future potential energy sources or loads. The development of Lake Chakachamna, the Chulitina coal fields or future Coal to Liquids projects may require the addition of (future) substations, switchyards and/or tap lines off the main transmission corridor. d) A direct route from Beluga to the geo-thermal site. This option would minimize the line length but may have permitting and access issues. Route selection and construction cost will be dependent on applicable permits, ancillary infrastructure requiring future electrical service and a more "finalized" proposal from Ormat Nevada, Inc. for construction access to the geo-thermal site. CEA would expect a decision on routing within three months (February through April 2012) at an estimated cost of $200,000. Deliverables would include detailed topographic maps identifying the individual candidate routes with accompanying analysis highlighting pros and cons of each route. Evaluation of geographic barriers, permitting issues and access to other planned development in the area would be typical "commentary" for each route option. A final summary identifying the prime candidate would be included. Preliminary Design - The transmission line design template is obviously heavily dependent on final route selection. In addition, CEA must consider potential customers along the chosen route such as the Chuitna Coal project, the proposed Lake Chakachamna Hydroelectric Facility and future Coal - to - Liquid (CTL) plants. Once a preliminary route is selected, a preliminary design is to be available within 3-4 months (April through July 2012) at an estimated cost of $200,000. This time frame and cost estimate assumes minimal field investigation by the consultant and a fairly well-defined accessible route. Deliverables would include a comprehensive project cost estimate, breakdown of major structures (wire sizes, type of tower(s), location of substations/switchyards, etc.) and analysis of the proposed right-of-way with detailed descriptions of individual transmission line segments and infrastructure. The appropriated Renewable Energy Fund budget for this project is $600,000, with a $20,000 anticipated local match. Project is to complete conceptual design and feasibility of a run-of-river hydroelectric project on Fourth of July Creek near Seward. Tasks include hydrology study, geotechnical investigation, topographic survey, land & regulatory issues, permitting & environmental analysis, including fish study if necessary, conceptual design and cost estimate, economic analysis, and conceptual business & operating plans, culminating in a feasibility report. Kenai Hydro LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Homer Electric Association, proposes a continuation of field studies/environmental assessment and preliminary engineering/project scoping for developing a hydroelectric facility at Grant Lake. Under prior grants, Kenai Hydro received $100,000 for reconnaissance assessment from the Alternative Energy Request for Proposals and $816,000 in Renewable Energy Fund Round I (#34). Kenai Hydro will be providing a 25% cash match to the total grant. The Grant Lake Hydroelectric Facility would consist of 4.5 MW of installed capacity with an average annual output of 20,600 MW of energy, installed on the Grant Lake watershed near Moose Pass. The proposed project is comprised of a diversion dam (under consideration) at the outlet to Grant Lake, an intake structure in Grant Lake, a tunnel, a surge tank, a penstock, a powerhouse, a tailrace detention pond, a switchyard with disconnect switch & step-up transformer, and an overhead or underground transmission line. The intake would be in Grant Lake near its outlet. Water would be conveyed from the intake through a 3200' penstock to a powerhouse containing two Francis-type turbines. The powerhouse would be located near the bank of Grant Creek and would discharge through a second penstock into Grant Creek. A transmission line would connect the facility to the Railbelt grid near Moose Pass. Kenai Hydro LLC (KHL), whose sole member is the Homer Electric Association (HEA), was created in 2008 to evaluate and possibly develop this site as a low impact hydroelectric facility. KHL filed a preliminary permit application with FERC on April 28, 2008 and was issued a permit on October 7, 2008. The purpose of the preliminary permit is to determine the feasibility of the proposed project on Grant Lake and Creek in the Kenai Peninsula Borough, Alaska, and would occupy federal lands managed by the Chugach National Forest. A Pre-Application Document (PAD) was filed with FERC on August 6, 2009. FERC has approved the Traditional License Program (TLP) as the appropriate course with which to proceed and secure a FERC license. The original grant application originally requested $2,500,000 in grant funds to complete the Phase II studies that were commenced in 2009. However, the grant award was capped at $1,184,000 due to the previous Round I Renewable Energy Fund grant award for this project phase. KHL has offered a cash match of $296,000. Though not tracked in this grant, KHL is also providing an in-kind match for the cost of management and administrative staffing which they have estimated to be $549,120. Two tasks are anticipated to be accomplished in this grant: 2011 - 2012 field studies and environmental assessment to be completed in March 2013 and 2011 - 2012 preliminary engineering and project scoping to be completed in October 2012. Inside Passage Electric Cooperative(IPEC) will construct a heat recovery project in the community of Hoonah. The Project will recover available jacket water heat from IPEC-Hoonah diesel generation that is currently being rejected to the atmosphere via radiators and reduce annual diesel heating fuel consumption of nearby community buildings by over 55,000-gallons/year. The buildings heated are the Hoonah City Schools' main school building, Hoonah City Schools' pool/gymnasium, Hoonah City police station, and the Hoonah City Fire Hall. IPEC will contract with AE&E for the management of the design, permitting, system integration, and construction of the project. Project matching funds will be provided by IPEC through a Denali Commission grant in the amount of $530,000. Prerequisites for AEA grant reimbursement are acceptance of: *NEPA Permitting *95% Engineering Design Drawings *Heat Sales Agreements *Utility Permits for routing See above The project is to complete pre-construction work to develop the Thayer Lake Hydropower Project (TLHP). The project is a run-of-river hydropower project on Thayer Creek approximately 6 miles north of Angoon. Thayer Creek flows out of the 64 square mile Thayer Lake at a gentle grade through a broad forested valley, then steepens for 6,800 feet through a narrow forested canyon and finally flattens again for 2000 feet before flowing into Chatham Strait. The development will tap the energy potential in the steep section of the creek and will avoid impact on anadromous fish that use the lower portion of the creek. Though the final concept remains to be identified, Kootznoowoo is funded to complete permitting, preliminary and final design for the hydropower project. KI received a grant of $1,110,500 in August 2009 from the U.S. Department of Energy for hydropower development on Thayer Creek. It will be used as match for preconstruction activities to be completed with this AEA grant of $1,060,500. Preliminary design, permitting and final design will be conducted with the available grant funds, with the intent that the project is construction ready at the completion of all grant activities. Additionally, special conditions associated with this grant include the following provisions to be completed prior to releasing any AEA grant funds: KI and IPEC must provide a written joint report acceptable to AEA that documents the integration of project design and operation with the needs of the existing IPEC system, the design specifying the power output capacity and monthly energy production from the new Thayer Lake Hydropower project, and demonstrating expected amounts of diesel consumption from existing diesel fired generation. The project is to provide avalanche protection to six aluminum towers in the Snettisham transmission line. This will greatly improve reliable delivery of a hydroelectric resource and lessen the financial impacts of diesel fuel generation. The Snettisham Transmission Line extends 43.5 miles to the southeast of Juneau, Alaska and provides the only power connection to this community's primary hydroelectric resource. There are multiple areas of avalanche concern along this line; however, the highest priority is a section from 3 to 5 miles from the Snettisham Hydroelectric powerhouse. The Snettisham Hydroelectric Power Plant is a State owned project administered by the Alaska Industrial Development and Export Authority (AIDEA) and operated by AELP. This is a 78 MW power plant serving the primary electrical needs for Juneau. It is connected through a single 43.5 mile 138 KV transmission line in very rugged coastal mountain terrain. The line is located on federally owned US Forest Service (USFS) lands of the Tongass National Forest. In 2008 and 2009, this line was hit by massive avalanches that accounted for 66 days of hydroelectric interruption. The community of Juneau was placed in economic shock when electric service rates rose nearly five hundred percent to $0.52/kWh in 2008 and $0.24/kWh in 2009 due to the cost associated with using 3,800,000 gallons of diesel fuel. The total fuel, repair, and mitigation efforts have exceeded $17.4M since 2008, in addition to $400,000 in annual forecasting and control work. A conceptual design report was completed in 2010 for the six towers of highest avalanche risk. The report was based upon experience and engineering solutions gained during the 2008 and 2009 emergency repairs to other sections of the transmission line from avalanches. It outlines $4,019,600 in construction costs needed to complete the improvements. AELP proposes to complete design and construct the mitigation improvements to the towers in two phases over a two-year period, from 2011-2012. Because grant funds can only reimburse for expenses incurred after July 1, 2011, there will be some expenses incurred which will be ineligible for these funds. Phase 1 work will include the 2011 design and construction of the replacement of tower 3/4 and structural modifications to existing towers 4/1 and 4/2 for an estimated $1,562,000. Phase 2 work will include the 2012 design and construction of a large diversion structure above tower 4/5 similar to the one constructed in 2009 above tower 4/6. There would also be a smaller diversion structure constructed above tower 4/4. The total estimated cost of this phase is $2,457,600. AELP will be responsible for the project costs incurred before the grant eligibility date of July 1, 2011. Their match to this grant will provide the balance of funding needed to complete the two phases of work, estimated at $2,019,600. To date, AELP has conducted the following studies: LIDAR survey, avalanche potential force models, biological assessments, geotechnical considerations and conceptual design. A USFS amended permit was obtained covering the scope of this construction. AELP does not anticipate that additional permitting would be necessary other than agency scoping/advisory meetings. The City of Pelican proposes completing construction of a 650 kW run-of-river hydro project. Its completion will fully implement a six-year energy infrastructure upgrade project within the community of Pelican. Design and construction has been supported by the Denali Commission through an AEA-managed rural power system upgrade project. Other energy-related projects completed recently in Pelican by AEA include a bulk fuel plant and a new diesel powerhouse. The hydro project is a rebuild of the 1940's era hydro project that supplied a fish processing facility and the community. With current activity on the site continuing using federal funds, the project is now approximately 65% complete. It is scheduled for startup in 2012. The first phase of the hydroelectric project consisted of replacement of a new dam wing wall and intake structure, renovation and rebuild of the 2 turbine/generators (a 550 kW Barber turbine/Kato generator and a 100 kW Cornell turbine/generator) and site work for the replacement penstock. Among the items to be completed within this scope include: (1) replacement of a failed wooden flume and penstock with a new HDPE penstock, (2) install a new surge tank, (3) provide instrumentation and controls to upgrade hydro powerhouse for improved efficiency and reliability, (4) provide station power for the intake area, (5) provide communications between diesel plant and hydro powerhouse and (6) provide for excess hydropower to be used for space heating via a dispatchable electric boiler. The construction will continue to use a combination of force account and contracted services under the supervision of a construction manager. AEA has provided management assistance for the recently completed City of Pelican Bulk Fuel project, the RPSU project and the first phase of the hydroelectric upgrade project. The City of Pelican has requested AEA to continue to provide management assistance through completion of the hydroelectric project. Project is to complete permitting and final design of a 120 kW run-of-river hydroelectric project on Indian River to serve the community of Tenakee Springs. The project will purchase and install a biomass fuel dryer with a capacity of approximately 13,000 tons of wood waste per year produced as a byproduct of the sawmilling process. Dried wood would then be burned in publicly owned facilities to provide reduced-cost, district-style heat for these facilities at reduced cost to the public entities that operate these facilities. The project enables recipient facilities to burn renewable fuels to provide heat at lower costs over time than the cost to burn fossil fuels to produce heat. Prerequisite for release of AEA grant funds: - Acceptance of the lease/operation & maintenance/business agreement between Viking Lumber and the City of Craig. This is to assure public benefit of the grant funds. The project is to complete permitting and final design of a run-of-river hydroelectric project at Crooked Creek and a second storage hydroelectric project at Jim's Lake to serve the community. Before funds can be expended towards permitting and final design an independent, third party review of the hydro projects evaluated during the reconnaissance and feasibility studies, in regard to population, demand, and feasible project layout, must be completed. Upon completion of review and verification that project should proceed, then the project will move into the permitting and final design phases. Project is to install 4.6 MW of generating capacity at an existing dam, supporting near term load demand increases in the Ketchikan area and displacing diesel generation as the existing Swan-Tyee resources become fully utilized. Ketchikan Public Utility (KPU) will also replace the aging water supply system of the Southern Southeast Regional Aquaculture Association Whitman Lake Hatchery, providing increased water quality, reliability and redundancy to a facility that is critical to the region's commercial fishing, seafood processing and sportfishing industries. The project will be located approximately four miles from the City of Ketchikan. It will generate up to an average of 16,000,000 kWh displacing up to 1,100,000 gallons of diesel fuel annually. Penstocks will lead to a new powerhouse containing two hydro turbine-generators: Unit 1, at 3.9 MW will generate power that would otherwise be spilled; Unit 2, at 0.7 MW will generate power from the water delivered to the fish hatchery located adjacent to the hydroelectric project. Alaska Power & Telephone (AP&T) will conduct an assessment that will be Phase II of the project. This will complete the Feasibility Analysis, Biomass Resource Assessment and Conceptual Design for a 2MWe biomass gasification CHP (combined heat and power) system. AP&T, in partnership with the Upper Tanana communities of Tok, Tetlin, Dot Lake and Tanacross, the State of Alaska Department of Natural Resources (DNR), contracted consultants, foresters and economists, will assess the feasibility of a system utilizing locally sourced woody biomass as fuel. The deliverables of the project will be the sustainable supply and projected costs of the biomass resource, the conceptual design, permitting and environmental analysis of the proposed project site, refined economic/financial analysis, and a conceptual business/operational plan. AP&T must coordinate the feasibility assessment with the Tok School Biomass Project and the Yerrick Creek Hydro Project. The Alaska Center for Energy and Power will conduct the installation and field testing for a 50 kW pre-commercial ORC unit to understand the efficacy of generating power using recovered waste heat from a mid-sized rural power plant. The first phase of this project (funded through the Denali Commission and AEA) performed laboratory testing of the 50 kW unit. The field testing will include: performance data collection and analysis; evaluation of operation and maintenance requirements; economic analysis of potential power generation / cost savings; establish guidelines for future ORC applications throughout rural Alaska; and develop a methodology for selecting appropriate village sites. The analysis of the 50 kW unit will be compared to a 250 kW ORC unit presently being tested in Cordova. The 250 kW ORC unit testing is funded through a separate program. Data will be collected and analyzed in the following areas: Overall efficiency of the system relative to fuel consumption and power output under varying load and environmental conditions, operational/maintenance requirements, number, type, and frequency of unit failures and required repairs, economic feasibility, measured reduction in fuel consumptions, measured effect on emissions and GHG production. Prerequisites for AEA grant reimbursement are acceptance of the final report from the laboratory testing of the 50 kW pre-commercial ORC unit and the operational plan for the 50 kW unit to include the time after the field testing is conducted. This project will deliver a feasibility study and conceptual design for a district heating system for the City of Galena. This study will include a comprehensive forest inventory and forest management plan for the areas surrounding the community of Galena. The original grant application requested funding for feasibility and conceptual design for a biomass combined heat and power system, pending the outcome of a reconnaissance study performed by WH Pacific. The study identified no CHP technology that is ready for commercialization, but identified opportunities for biomass heating systems. Understanding the sustainable harvest levels of biomass is the first step to developing a biomass heating system. The feasibility/conceptual design will include a community heat load audit and potential technology for district heating systems. It will also consider utilizing additional recovered heat from the Galena Power Plant. The forest inventory and management plan will include an assessment of land ownership, species, quantity available for a sustainable harvest, and potential harvest methods of biomass. The study will result in estimated quantities and delivered costs of biomass to a potential system. This project will complete feasibility assessments of wood-fired heating systems (e.g., Garn boilers), in eight communities in Interior Alaska: Hughes, Ruby, Koyukuk, Nulato, Kaltag, Nikolai, Anvik, and Holy Cross. The communities named in this proposal were selected using two criteria: 1) the 2010 Alaska Energy Pathway identifies six of the eight as having significant potential for fuel displacement and cost savings with a wood-fired heating system, and 2) the communities have all held tribal and municipal meetings on this issue, identified wood heat as an energy priority, and reached out to the applicant for assistance with a project of this type. The feasibility studies will include forest resource inventories and wood harvest assessments, potential heating loads, heating technology evaluations, right-of-way evaluation, preliminary environmental/permitting assessments, and preliminary economic analysis. AVEC proposes to install a 10 kW solar array in Kaltag. The array would be installed on the side of the existing power plant facility that is owned and operated by AVEC. Work would involve shipping materials to the community, installing, integrating, testing, and commissioning the array. As a pilot study, installation of this small array in Kaltag would help AVEC evaluate the benefits of solar arrays installed at power generating facilities. The City of Akutan will use this Renewable Energy Fund (REF) grant as a continuation of the Hot Springs Bay Valley Geothermal Reconnaissance Project, previously funded under Alaska Energy Authority (AEA) REF Grant agreements #2195475 and #7030023. The surface exploration and analysis, a preliminary technical feasibility assessment and an economic assessment were completed in 2009 - 2010. Exploratory drilling of two test wells was completed in August 2010. This grant is to complete Phase III, final design and permitting. To accomplish this phase, the grantee will create a final system design and cost estimates for access and support infrastructure, sites for production and reinjection wells, pads, pipelines, power plant and transmission lines. Environmental assessment and permitting will be accomplished for the subsequent construction phase of the project. A Coastal Project Questionnaire (QPT) and Certification Statement will be prepared. The required studies, assessments, and compliance documentation will be processed and provided to the appropriate resource agencies. Development agreements between the City of Akutan and the Akutan Corporation and Aleut Corporation for rights of way, access, site control, land use, project participation, and royalty/leasing agreements will be negotiated and finalized. A Power Sales Agreement and potentially a direct investment partnership with Trident Seafood Corporation will be enacted. The economic and financial analysis will be updated to include the most current information and will be developed into a final business and operational plan. This grant consists of $69,075 from Round IV of the Renewable Energy Fund for a wind feasibility assessment in False Pass. The total project cost is $74,075 with a match of $5,000 provided by the grantee. The City of False Pass Electric Utility is the grantee and the mayor has overall authority for the project. The Aleutians East Borough Community Development Coordinator will be the primary contact representing City of False Pass Electric Utility and has day-to-day responsibility to ensure that the project is on schedule and within budget. The City of False Pass Electric Utility has already installed a meteorological tower and collected two years of wind data. The grantee will complete a wind resource analysis based on this data to develop a permitting and avian study plan. Then a preliminary geotechnical analysis will be conducted to determine the soil conditions and needed engineering at the site. A conceptual design will be created based on the outcome of the wind resource analysis and geotechnical investigation. This design will address the current diesel power and distribution system to identify upgrades that are needed to integrate wind power. A variety of wind turbine models and quantity configurations will be considered. The Alaska Village Electric Cooperative (AVEC) will conduct a wind resource and feasibility assessment in Koyuk. A detailed conceptual design will be delivered to AEA upon completion of the project. Alaska Village Electric Cooperative (AVEC) will conduct a wind resource and feasibility assessment in Elim. A detailed conceptual design will be delivered to AEA upon completion of the project. The Community of Cordova is interested in pursuing a biomass heating system utilizing waste cardboard and the community burn pile as fuel sources. A previously completed pre-feasibility study by Dalson Energy concluded that the waste cardboard and burn pile did not have enough fuel to support a biomass project. "A viable community-scale biomass heating system will require harvesting of local forest feedstock." This project will conduct a biomass feasibility study in the community of Cordova that includes a resource assessment of all available fuel sources - cardboard, wood waste from the burn pile, clearing of road right-of-ways, and other potential local wood harvest options. The resource assessment will investigate sustainable harvest amounts available, land ownership, and estimated delivered cost. The project will also develop a protocol for a community energy audit and conduct a feasibility study that will examine the current heat loads and fuel usage in community buildings. The Copper River School District (CRSD) will construct a 1.8MBTU wood pellet fueled boiler at the Kenny Lake School. The project will tie into the existing heating system for the school complex and will include pellet storage. This grant was partially funded. This grant consists of $136,750 from Round IV of the Renewable Energy Fund for a wind feasibility assessment in Chefornak. A wind resource analysis will be completed after a year of data is collected. The grantee will complete geotechnical reconnaissance to determine the advisability of installing wind turbines. This grant consists of $110,000 from Round IV of the Renewable Energy Fund for a wind feasibility analysis, resource assessment and conceptual design. The total project cost is $125,000 with a match of $15,000 provided by the grantee. Akiachak Native Community/Akiachak Limited will install a wind-measuring meteorological (“met”) tower to determine the advisability of installing wind turbines in Akiachak. The work will involve obtaining a letter of non-objection for placement of the wind tower, permitting plan, installing the met tower purchased with previous AEA funds and studying the wind resource for a minimum of one year. On completion of the wind study the met tower will be dismantled and returned to AEA. Akiachak Native Community/Akiachak Limited will install instrumentation necessary to monitor the power plant, distribution system, and possible secondary load(s) (e.g. dispatchable electrical loads and heat loads) in order to adequately model the Akiachak electrical demand, power system, and heat loads for a minimum of one year. Akiachak Native Community/Akiachak Limited will review the current power generation, distribution and control systems to determine necessary upgrades for the integration of wind power. A final report detailing the findings of these tasks along with recommendations for next steps will be submitted to the Authority. The project is for permitting and design of repairs, refurbishment and upgrade of the City of Seward's Marathon Hydroelectric plant in Seward. The plant will be used by AVTEC as an education and training tool in support of AVTEC's Hydro Power Plant Operator training program. The intent is to return the plant to productive use and maximize the training benefits it can provide. Additionally, the power generated by the Marathon Hydro Plant will be supplied to the Seward Electrical Utility Grid and provide monetary value for the produced power. The project was constructed in the early 1980's. It consists of a small spring-fed diversion, approximately 3,500 ft. of 12-14" steel penstock, a small powerhouse housing a single jet pelton turbine and a 250 kW generator. The project has not been operational since sometime in the 1990's. The plant has been used to support the training in a limited way, but due to the poor condition and outdated equipment, the hydro plant does not meet the standards for training. The land and existing power plant are owned by the City of Seward. The City supports AVTEC's use of this project and is currently developing a Memorandum of Agreement authorizing AVTEC to maintain, operate and utilize the hydro plant for 50 years. AVTEC will be responsible for the design of improvements to the plant and to maintain and operate the Marathon Hydro facility as a training facility and for energy production. AVTEC will use revenue gained from selling the power to the City to offset the operating costs. In summer 2010, AVTEC commissioned a condition assessment of the plant. The assessment reviewed the feasibility of using the plant as a training facility and identified the major components to be replaced in order to bring the plant back online. It found the mechanical equipment to appear to be in generally good condition for having sat unused for such an extended period of time. However, a more detailed analysis is needed to describe the features and costs of the plant upgrades/replacements and to prepare plans and specifications for items needing replacement or refurbishment. A review of existing permits will also be conducted to verify they meet current regulatory requirements for this hydroelectric facility and any new or amended permits will be obtained as needed under this scope of work. Some of the major elements of plant refurbishment include: 1) Repair intake screens and level sensor at the intake structure 2) Inspect penstock 3) Inspect and repair turbine and shutoff valve 4) Test generator and speed increasing gear 5) Replace controls and switchgear 6) Clean powerhouse and paint piping 7) Remove unused water supply equipment and piping. Upgrades planned include: 1) Replace existing electrical turbine control system with hydraulic system 2) Replace existing induction generator with synchronous generator and new voltage controls 3) Connect plant communications to AVTEC 4) Add resistive load bank to plant. ORPC Alaska 2, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Ocean Renewable Power Company, LLC, will install an array of four 150kW TidGen Power Systems with a total rated capacity of 600 kW near (within 3km) of East Foreland, Alaska. The devices are expected to be installed in water depths of 60-190 ft. at MLLW. Models have predicted peak velocities nearing 5 m/s (~9 knots). ORPC has received a FERC Preliminary Permit for the East Foreland Project in March 2011 (P-13821-000). As ORPC is still in the process of developing its tidal technology, all required technology will be developed to a standard by which it will be expected to be operational throughout its economic life. This will be shown by another deployment of the TidGen technology in Maine. In September 2012, ORPC deployed a 150 kW TidGen Power System in Cobscook Bay, Maine, under a Department of Energy award. The deployment of the four devices at the East Foreland project site was originally scheduled to occur in two stages over the summers of 2014 and 2015; however, initial deployment is now expected to be pushed into 2015. Prior to the installation of the first device, ORPC will complete all work needed for the regulatory compliance and technology development. This will include submission of an application for a FERC Pilot License- a special FERC license developed specifically for testing hydrokinetic devices on a relatively small scale (less than 5 MW). Eklutna, Inc., an Alaska Native Corporation and an independent power producer, will perform a reconnaissance study of a potential run-of-river hydroelectric power plant on Hunter Creek near Palmer. With widely varying seasonal flows, Hunter Creek has an estimated installed capacity of up to 6.5 MW. The reconnaissance study will investigate the resource to determine if the project is viable and also to perform preliminary investigations to determine project location, size and resource availability. Funding for this work is from a combination of $84,000 in grant funding and grantee match with $12,000 cash and $4,000 in-kind contributions. Tasks include: investigation of land ownership; permitting and environmental analysis; resource identification and analysis through stream gauging and site inspections; preliminary design; cost estimating and reconnaissance level economic analysis. Eklutna, Inc. will evaluate business structures and concepts during the reconnaissance study. As an Independent Power Producer, Eklutna, Inc. will be subject to the provisions of paragraph 7 of Appendix B1. In preparing their Business plan, various aspects of this section will be explored, including affirmation from prospective utilities that they are interested in this opportunity to purchase power, cost-based rates and need for CPCN. The data collected and analysis performed will be documented with recommendations in a final report. Eklutna, Inc. has contacted Polarconsult, Inc. regarding the project and Polarconsult has agreed to contract for the reconnaissance work. Hunter Creek has an East Basin and a West Basin whose total area is approximately 59 square miles. A preliminary configuration would involve a 2 and a half mile long cross basin pipeline and a larger main pipeline which would carry flow from both basins to a powerhouse. The estimated capacity of this scheme would be 6.5 MW. Eleven miles of transmission line would be needed to interconnect to the MEA electrical grid. The status of the land the project would be located on is to be investigated in the grant scope of work. If it is under federal Bureau of Land Management ownership, jurisdiction for future hydropower project licensing may be with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. Environmental issues are undefined for this project. The Alaska Department of Natural Resources has noted potential conflicts with other users of this land and the proximity of the project to the Castle Mountain Fault. The Village Council of Port Graham will complete the final design and permitting of a 1.45 MMBtu/hr. cordwood-fired district heating system that will supply the New Fire Hall, the Old Fire Hall (and accessory building housing a 4-wheeler foam fire trailer), the Port Graham Clinic, the Port Graham Village Council Office, the Port Graham Museum/Headstart Building and the Port Graham Corporation Office. The proposed site for the biomass facility is the Old Water Plant Building. The Matanuska-Susitna Borough will complete the construction of a wood-fired heating system for the Susitna Valley High School. It includes the Energy Building which houses the boilers, the on-site storage of the wood fuel, the connection piping to the building and the controls required to monitor and control the system. The project also includes finalizing the harvest and business plan. The project will complete a reconnaissance study of a potential run-of-river hydroelectric power plant on Eska Creek near Sutton. Funding for this work is from a combination of $37,000 in grant funding and grantee match with $2,200 cash and $5,200 in-kind contributions. Tasks include investigation of land ownership, mapping and surveying, resource data collection through stream flow monitoring, resource assessment, conceptual design, cost estimating and economic analysis. The data collected and analysis performed will be documented in a final report. Eska Creek has a basin area of approximately 4.9 square miles. One hydropower scheme with over 2 1/2 miles of penstock would have potential capacity up to 1.5 MW. The proposed intake site is also located in (or adjacent to) several existing coal mining leases. The study will investigate potential project schemes and the possibility of acquiring easements for the project. Environmental issues are undefined for this project. The Alaska Department of Natural Resources has noted potential conflicts with other users of this land and the proximity of the project to the Castle Mountain Fault. The Native Village of Cantwell will perform a reconnaissance study of a potential run-of-river hydroelectric power project on Jack River near Cantwell. Tasks include: resource data collection through stream flow monitoring; resource assessment; land use and environmental analysis, including any fish issues and if there are any physical barriers to fish migration; conceptual design and cost estimating; cost of energy and market analysis; and a simple economic analysis. The data collected and analysis performed will be documented in a final reconnaissance report. Preliminary project configuration includes a dam and short tunnel to a powerhouse with an estimated installed capacity in excess of 1 MW. The study will further investigate potential project schemes. The grant funds will be used to assist the construction of the Reynolds Creek Hydroelectric Transmission lines near Hydaburg, Alaska. This transmission will interconnect with the Prince of Wales Island grid which currently serves most of the communities on the Island. The project will be funded and constructed per the Project Management Agreement negotiated between the various entities involved with the funding and construction of the project. The Connelly Lake Hydroelectric Project is a proposed storage hydro located near the community of Haines in the Upper Lynn Canal transmission system of Southeast Alaska. The project would have a capacity of 8 MW and generate 43.2 GWh of energy annually from the project works consisting of a 75' high dam to create a 10,160 acre-feet storage reservoir, a 10,000' long tunnel and penstock arrangement conveying 57 cfs, and pelton turbines operating under 1965' of static head. Total estimated capital cost for the project is 87 million in 2014. The scope of work under this grant is to analyze and document the feasibility of the project. Work included stream gauging, LIDAR topographic surveying, geotechnical investigations, FERC Scoping, fish, wildlife, botanical, wetlands, and heritage surveys, and preparing conceptual designs culminating in a feasibility-level report titled "Feasibility Report Connelly Lake Hydroelectric Project" by Alaska Power and Telephone dated August 2014. The project is to complete a reconnaissance study of a hydroelectric project on Schubee Lake to serve the interconnected communities of the Haines-Skagway area. Tasks include: stream gauge installation and flow monitoring, resource assessment, land use, permitting and environmental analysis, conceptual design, cost estimating, and economic analysis. The Metlakatla Indian Community (MIC) through their electric utility Metlakatla Power and Light will use the grant funds to complete the design of the 34.5kV transmission line interconnecting the electric systems of Metlakatla Power & Light (MP&L) and Ketchikan Public Utilities (KPU). The proposed transmission line will follow an existing road and require a submarine cable to interconnect the Metlakatla electric system with the Ketchikan electric system. In addition, grant funds will be used to complete design upgrades to the various control systems of the Metlakatla electric system (including the governor and SCADA systems). These upgrades are necessary to accommodate the connection between the Metlakatla and Ketchikan electric systems. The grant tasks included in the draft award document include setting up a local project office, completion of all permits and final design, negotiation of applicable power sales agreements, and preparation of an economic feasibility study and a construction cost estimate. The project is to complete reconnaissance study of two potential hydroelectric sites on Excursion Inlet Creek for the community of Excursion Inlet. The study will be conducted in two separate phases. Phase I: project scoping and preliminary fish habitat study. First phase will determine if fish ladders will be necessary. If findings suggest fish ladders are necessary, the project work shall cease. Phase II: AEA must authorize. Includes resource identification & analysis, land status, permitting & environmental analysis, conceptual design, cost estimates, and simple economic analysis, culminating in a recon report. The City & Borough of Wrangell will perform a recon study of potentially using electric and PHEV vehicles to utilize excess hydro from the SEAPA grid. Tasks include assessing the various types of vehicles most appropriate for use in southeast Alaska and their costs; review of codes & standards and any permitting requirements; evaluate impacts on the electric grid; study 'smart grid' and demand-side management applications associated with battery charging; and completing economic analysis of purchasing and operating electric and/or PHEVs. Analyses and findings will be documented in recon report. The City & Borough of Sitka will use a Round 4 RE Fund grant to evaluate the technical and financial feasibility of the integration and optimization of heat pump technologies to offset heating oil and grid electricity at Centennial Hall and the Kettleson Memorial Library on the waterfront of downtown Sitka. The City & Borough of Sitka used a Round IV Renewable Energy Fund (REF) grant to evaluate the technical and financial feasibility for the integration and optimization of heat pump technologies to offset heating oil and grid electricity usage in the Sitka Wastewater Treatment Plant of the waterfront of Japonski Island, Sitka. Inside Passage Electrical Cooperative will use this Renewable Energy Fund (REF) Round IV grant to investigate the potential of using the known geothermal resource at Tenakee Inlet (approximately 57 59' 24" N, 135 56' 20" W) to produce power and evaluate alternative uses of the source. The springs near the head of Tenakee Inlet have the highest recorded surface temperature (176F) of any of the numerous geothermal springs tested on Chichagof Island and listed on the Geothermal Resources of Alaska Map. Geochemistry of the spring waters indicates a maximum subsurface temperature of 243 F. The surface flow rate of the spring has been measured at 90 L/min and the convective heat discharge estimated at 0.5 MW. The project area will be approximately 2 square miles, although the exploration is constrained by the fairly steep ridges to the west, south, and east, and will thus be focused on the valleys and southern portion of the area. The grant funded phase will include mapping, remote sensing, aerial and ground based geophysics, and geochemical sampling of soils, rocks, and surface waters. If this work is successful and promising, future work would include drilling necessary to confirm and develop the resource, necessary permitting, and power plant and infrastructure construction. The funded project tasks include establishment of a local project office, preparation of a feasibility study, completion of applicable permitting, a plan of integration of the proposed hydro plant with other energy generation, utility agreements for power sales, an economic feasibility study, 35% design documents, final design documents and a construction cost estimate. Kodiak Electric Association (KEA) will expand their current wind farm from three to six GE 1.5 MW SLE turbines. The total nameplate capacity of the expanded system will be 9 MW. KEA will also install an Extreme Battery system to act as a bridge between the variable generation of the wind and the response of the Terror Lake Hydro generators. A protective coating will be added to turbine blades for all 6 turbines that will reduce leading-edge erosion. This project will deliver a final design and construction of single woody biomass plant to heat three (3) Interior Alaska communities: Hughes; Anvik; Koyukuk. In order for funding to be released and made available for construction, AEA must accept a fuel supply plan and feasibility study. Also, the system design must include metering and monitoring equipment and instrumentation. However, AEA had some concerns about the wood supply sustainability, the wood supplier, and the lack of feasibility study for each chosen community to evaluate the fuel availability and feasibility of each chosen community. Therefore, AEA recommends full funding of $1,215,224 with requirements that 1) A wood resource plan must be completed and reviewed by AEA and Alaska Division of Forestry to assure the sustainable supply of wood for each chosen community; 2) AEA must accept the recommendations from the feasibility analysis for the three communities that will advance to design and construction; 3) the economic analysis B/C ratios of the chosen communities should average greater than 1.25 (the ratio that was assumed for the purpose of analysis). This project will deliver feasibility study and final design, including system design (must include metering and monitoring equipment and instrumentation), comprehensive fuel wood inventory and supply plan for community of Huslia, Alaska. In order for funding to be released and made available for final design, AEA must accept the feasibility report. Originally, the Huslia Traditional Council in collaboration with ANTHC proposed the design and construction of a biomass heating system for the water treatment facility and the clinic. The project is estimated to replace 21,736 gallons of fuel oil. The water treatment plant operator would be responsible for the operation and maintenance of the wood heating system. The project will use approximately 254 cords per year. However, AEA had some concerns about the wood supply sustainability, the wood supplier, and the lack of comprehensive feasibility study to evaluate the fuel availability and alternatives. Therefore, AEA recommend $50,000 for completion of feasibility and final design, including fuel wood inventory and supply plan with the requirement that AEA accept the feasibility report before funding is made available for final design. This project will update the 2006 mechanical design and construct a heat recovery system that will supply the Tatitlek Community Center, which houses the Village IRA Council administrative offices, from the power plant, 50 feet away. The generating station and administration building were designed to accommodate a heat recovery application when the power plant was refurbished in 2006, and the only phases remaining for this project are design update and construction. The project is estimated to displace 6,000 gallons of fuel oil. At the grantee’s request, this project will be managed by AEA. Tim Sandstrom has been assigned as the project manager. The proposed grant would fund construction of the Thayer Lake hydroelectric project, including the transmission connection to the IPEC managed power system at the City of Angoon. The grant is to fund construction of the 177 kW run-of-river Packers Creek Hydroelectric Project to serve the community of Chignik Lagoon. The project features include a 9-foot tall concrete dam/intake structure, a 3,260 foot long penstock and access trail, a powerhouse, and a 1,750 foot long overhead power line to connect to the existing electrical distribution system. This grant has been combined with RE Fund Round 1 Grant #2195438 and all reporting will be performed under that grant. Please see grant #2195438 "Newton Peak Wind Farm" for all information pertaining to this project. This project will deliver final design and construction for a wood burning boiler system in Kobuk. The intent for this project is to increase the use of locally available, biomass energy for thermal heating. This project includes system design (must include metering and monitoring equipment and instrument), right of way and survey requirement, construction permitting, installation of a wood burning boiler system (Garn unit – proposed), construction of a covered wood splitting and storage shed, gravel pad/foundation, perimeter fencing, hydronic piping and other mechanical components, electrical controls, harvesting and processing equipment (saws, wood splitters, etc.), and freight and travel costs. The city must coordinate with NWIHA and their consultant in developing the project. AEA must accept final design before construction funding is disbursed. Wood supply contract for 5 years must be in place before construction funding is disbursed. This project will provide the final design and construction of a heat recovery that will utilize waste heat from the existing Alaska Village Electric Cooperative (AVEC) power plant for use at the WTP and three LYSD teacher housing units in Russian Mission. The design will be developed based on recommendations from the Russian Mission, Alaska Heat Recovery study that was completed by Alaska Energy and Engineering, Inc. (AE&E). The construction will include retrofitting the AVEC generators and installing a waste heat transmission line, circulation pumps, heat exchangers, and other system appurtenances. The project will involve coordination with the AVEC, the City, LYSD, the Alaska Native Health Consortium (ANTHC), as well as the Alaska Rural Utility Collaborate (ARUC). The City of Scammon Bay will use the $80,793 Round V Renewable Energy Fund grant, and $2,793 of in-kind matching funds, to assess the feasibility of and prepare conceptual design drawings of a 331 kW run-of-river hydroelectric power project on Ekashluak Creek to serve the community. Ekashluak Creek is located in the Askinuk Mountains, eleven miles west of Scammon Bay. The City and hydro site are located in the Yukon Delta National Wildlife Refuge. The power system in Scammon Bay is owned and operated by Alaska Village Electric Cooperative (AVEC). AVEC and several other entities provided letters of support for the grant. Hydroelectric development for Scammon Bay has been studied several times in the past. The most recent study was completed in 2003. That study found that a hydroelectric project at Ekashluak Creek could reduce diesel electrical generation significantly. Stream gage data was collected for 13 months at 2-hour intervals and indicated flow near the mouth of the creek ranged from 11 to 78 cfs. The project was estimated to cost $3.68M (2003 dollars) and annually generate up to 2.5 GWh, of which approximately 1 GWh was useable. It is possible more of this excess energy could be used in Scammon Bay today. The proposed Ekashluak Creek project has risks that need to be understood and some remaining unanswered questions that this study can help to resolve. This feasibility study will address, but it is not limited to, the following: anadromous or resident fish presence in the affected reach of the creek, suitability of geology at the proposed project intake and powerhouse sites, access to the project area for construction and system maintenance, transmission line routing, agency lead if the project moves on to licensing and permitting, the project’s current economics, and estimated cost of power in comparison to diesel generation. The study will also complete conceptual design of the proposed project. If the study of Ekashluak Creek does not appear to be a viable site for hydroelectric development, a second smaller stream, which is located near Scammon Bay and serves as the source of the community water supply, can be reviewed for its hydroelectric potential. This stream has been studied as a potential hydroelectric power site in the past. Additionally, a new road recently constructed east of town may provide access to alternative hydropower sites that can also be investigated in this study. The City of Scammon Bay intends to designate Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium (ANTHC) as its agent for the purposes of accomplishing the tasks funded by this grant. The hydropower engineering for this grant is expected to be conducted by an engineering consultant whose resume was provided in the application. This project will provide the final design and construction of a heat recovery that will utilize the heat from the engines at the Middle Kuskokwim Electric Plant and send it to the water treatment plant to heat the building, the circulated water loops, and the water storage tank. Sleetmute Traditional Council, in collaboration with ANTHC, proposes to construct a waste heat from the Middle Kuskokwim Electric generating station to the water treatment plant. The project will displace approximately 1,779 gallons of diesel per year according to a 2010 Heat Recovery Analysis. The Middle Kuskokwim Electric Power Plant and the Sleetmute water treatment plant are located in Sleetmute. A feasibility study has been done for this project as part of an energy audit of the water treatment plant, and the design will be completed soon with other funds. AEA will work with the grantee to ensure that building energy efficiency is addressed in conjunction with this project. AEA funding is only being provided for construction. The proposed project will design and construct a heat recovery system between the Alaska Village Electric Cooperative (AVEC) power plant and the end-user community buildings: 1) Water Treatment Plant, 2) Clinic, and 3) City Office. The new system will capture jacket water heat generated by the AVEC plant that is currently wasted to the atmosphere by power plant radiators. The new system will tie into the end-users’ heating systems using heat exchangers, control mechanisms and any required upgrades to the existing building hydronic systems. City of Shishmaref, in collaboration with ANTHC, will construct this heat recovery system to connect waste heat from AVEC’s generating station to the water treatment plant, clinic, and City Office. The project will displace approximately 7,900 gallons of diesel per year. A detailed Heat Recovery Analysis was completed for the City of Shishmaref and Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium (ANTHC) by Alaska Energy and Engineering, Inc. The proposed project will design and construct a heat recovery system between the Alaska Village Electric Cooperative (AVEC) power plant and the end-user community buildings: 1) Water Treatment Plant, 2) Clinic, 3) Police Station, 4) City Office, and 5) “Old School” Community Activity Building. These community buildings are within a 500 foot radius of the AVEC power plant, offering an excellent opportunity to capture a maximum amount of waste heat from the plant for hydronic heating. The new system will capture jacket water heat generated by the AVEC plant that is currently wasted to the atmosphere by power plant radiators. The recovered heat will be transferred by insulted glycol piping to the end-users. The new system will tie into the end-users’ heating systems using heat exchangers, control mechanisms, and any required upgrades to the existing building hydronic systems. The City of Togiak, in collaboration with Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium (ANTHC), will construct this heat recovery system to connect waste heat from AVEC’s generating station to the water treatment plant, clinic, police station, City Office, and the “Old School” Community Activity Building. The project will displace approximately 13,700 gallons of diesel per year according to a 2010 Heat Recovery Analysis. A detailed Heat Recovery Analysis was completed for the City of Togiak and ANTHC in June 2010 by Alaska Energy and Engineering, Inc. The Alaska Village Electric Cooperative (AVEC) , in collaboration with Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium (ANTHC), will design and construct a secondary load(s) to capture excess energy from the existing wind farm in Mekoryuk. The secondary loads will be used to provide heat for the washeteria, water treatment plant and drinking water storage tank. ANTHC will provide the match. The Alaska Village Electric Cooperative (AVEC), in collaboration with the Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium (ANTHC), will design and construct a secondary load(s) to capture excess energy from the existing wind farm in Shaktoolik The secondary loads will be used to provide heat for the water treatment plant and drinking water storage tank. ANTHC will provide the match. The Alaska Village Electric Cooperative (AVEC), in collaboration with the Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium (ANTHC), will design and construct a secondary load(s) to capture excess energy from the existing wind farm in Chevak. The secondary loads will be used to provide heat for the water treatment plant and drinking water storage tank. ANTHC will provide the match. The Alaska Village Electric Cooperative (AVEC), in collaboration with Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium (ANTHC), will design and construct a secondary load(s) to capture excess energy from the existing wind farm in Gambell. The secondary loads will be used to provide heat for the water treatment plant and drinking water storage tank. ANTHC will provide the match. This project will deliver a fuel supply plan, final design, and construction of a single centrally located woody biomass plant to heat four (4) community facilities which is estimated to displace 26,500 gallons of imported heating oil and create local wood-harvesting employment/small business opportunities. AEA must accept a fuel supply plan and final design. The system design must include metering and monitoring equipment and instrumentation. AEA recommends full funding of $420,000; however, AEA must accept the fuel supply plan and final design before funding is made available for construction. The project is to complete preconstruction activities, including permitting and final design, for the 375 kW Waterfall Creek Hydroelectric Project. Waterfall Creek is located approximately 5 miles north of the City of King Cove and is within one half mile of the existing Delta Creek Hydroelectric Project. Because of its close proximity to Delta Creek, the new project will share space in an expansion of the existing Delta Creek powerhouse and existing transmission line. Significant new project features include a concrete diversion/intake structure, 4500 feet of HDPE penstock, and 5000 feet of access road. Iliamna Newhalen and Nondalton Electric Cooperative (INNEC) will conduct a feasibility study to determine if the capacity of the existing Tazimina Hydroelectric Project should be increased by replacing either one or both of the existing turbine-generator units with larger generating units. Increased generation capacity will allow INNEC to capture additional energy that is available at the project site. Current annual generation is in excess of 4 million kWhs. Of this amount, hydropower generation currently supplies an average of 82% of the power generated, with diesel gensets providing the balance. The potential increase in available annual energy is conceptually estimated to be between 2 and 2.6 million kWhs. The existing hydropower nameplate capacity is 824 kW and it is anticipated the new total capacity could be increased up to 1,500 kW. This feasibility study will provide a detailed analysis of this estimate. Additionally, the study will analyze the existing and future markets for this new hydro energy and estimate the revenue and impact of an expanded project upon the existing INNEC power sales rate structure. Additionally, a procurement package will be prepared for the new equipment if the project is found to be feasible. The pros of this project are that the hydroelectric project has already been constructed and provisions were included in the original design to allow for a future expansion in capacity. As such, there will be no modifications required for the intake, penstock, powerhouse or tailrace. As such, the $/kW for the additional capacity is expected to be low. The con is that there might not be enough load in the three communities to economically justify the project. There are many potential customers in the service area that would benefit from excess power sales, potentially in the form of dispatchable heating. A few are, Iliamna Air Taxi, Pebble Limited Partnership, State of Alaska, City of Newhalen, City of Nondalton, Iliamna Trading and other local businesses. At this time, INNEC has an interruptible power sales agreement with Lake and Peninsula School District for the Newhalen School and Nondalton School. The Tazimina River provides the water for most of the electrical energy needs of INNEC. The Tazimina Hydroelectric Project is a conventional run-of-river hydroelectric operation that uses the natural flow of the Tazimina River. The project has no impoundment; river flows are diverted into a penstock, through turbine-generators installed in a powerhouse, and returned to the river at the base of the falls. The Tazimina hydro plant currently has two Francis turbines made by Gilkes. Each are connected to 412 kW Kato Generators. These units are 17 years old. The remaining energy resource is diesel which is brought in intermittently by barge in the summer months and mostly flown in. The existing project is subject to regulations of both State and Federal agencies. As there will be no land disturbing activities, a minor permitting effort is expected related to replacement of the existing generating units. Authorization is expected to be required from Alaska Department of Natural Resources (ADNR), Alaska Department of Fish and Game (ADF&G) and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). The total anticipated project cost is currently estimated at $2.6 million. The Lake and Peninsula Borough will complete a reconaissance level wind study in Levelock. The study will determine the advisability of performing a feasibility study to create a Wind-Diesel Conceptual Design Report. Lake and Peninsula Borough will complete a feasibility study investigating the advisability of building a wind farm along with any necessary controls or equipment needed to integrate the wind farm into the Egegik electrical grid. A minimum 12 month long meteorological study will be performed and a wind resource analysis written. Electrical load data will be gathered from the power plant to identify hourly load data and dispatchable electrical loads. Thermal load data will be collected from sites being considered for secondary loads. Geotechnical reconnaissance work will be completed. The feasibility analysis will address the diesel power plant and distribution system to identify upgrades that are needed to integrate wind power. A variety of wind turbine models and quantity configurations will be considered. This grant will fund final design and construction of a 30kW solar photovoltaic array at the Eagle powerhouse by Alaska Power Company (APC). The project will consist of one hundred and sixty three solar photovoltaic panels, six three-phase inverters, a programmable logic controller, a SCADA system, and a diesel power plant interface. Activities will include final design, materials and equipment procurement, shipping, construction, commissioning, and project closeout. The project will be managed by APC. The proposed Blue Lake Hydroelectric Expansion Project, a comprehensive upgrade of an existing hydroelectric project at Blue Lake, began construction in 2013. When completed in 2015, the project will increase the nameplate capacity of the Blue Lake facility from 7.54 to 16.9 MW and increase the annual energy generation by 32,000 MWh. It will result in an increase of the total annual hydroelectric generation of the City and Borough of Sitka (CBS) by 27%, from 120,000 to 152,000 MWh. Some of the major features of this project include the following: • The dam crest would be raised by 83 feet to a spillway crest elevation of 425 feet msl and a parapet elevation of 428 feet msl. • The existing intake structure would be replaced by a new intake structure located at a higher elevation and closer to the dam. The existing power conduit intake would be abandoned in place. • A new underground power conduit would be installed from the new intake structure to an interconnection point with the existing underground power conduit. The portion of the existing power conduit from the existing intake structure to the point of interconnection would be plugged at the point of interconnection. • The steel liners at the portals to the power conduit would be lengthened. • An underground 20-foot-diameter surge chamber would be installed along the power conduit with venting to the surface at elevation 465 feet msl. • The existing 7-foot-diameter penstock would be replaced with a new 9-foot-diameter penstock between the lower portal and the new powerhouse. • The existing powerhouse would be decommissioned and a new powerhouse would be constructed housing three new generating units. • The existing 670-kW fish valve unit would be replaced with a new 1-MW generating unit. • The existing 870-kW pulp mill feeder unit would be decommissioned. • The existing powerhouse transformers would be replaced with new transformers. • Equipment access and dam site staging facilities would be developed. • Timber and other vegetation around the reservoir and in Blue Lake Creek Valley would be left in place and not cleared prior to inundation to the new water surface elevation. • A 1,400-foot-long dam site power distribution line from the fish valve unit would travel along the tunnel alignment to Blue Lake Road and then follow Blue Lake Road to the dam site. • The alignment of Blue Lake Road would be changed to accommodate heavy equipment transport. • The project boundary would be expanded from 1,602 acres to 1,730 acres to accommodate the increased reservoir area. CBS was issued the capacity related amendment to its existing FERC license for the hydroelectric expansion project in May 2012. The CBS advertised the construction contract in May, 2012 and opened bids in July. The bids received were well above the engineer’s estimate. CBS evaluated the bids and opted to select one of the bidders and then negotiate with them. A Notice to Proceed was issued on November 1 and the official ground breaking ceremony took place on December 21, 2012. A two year construction cycle is anticipated. Funding for the $142,305,487 project began in 2009 under Grant 2195311 with a legislative appropriation of $12,500,000 and a CBS cash match. A portion of these funds, were used to complete project development, including licensing, permits and engineering design and initial payments for owner-purchased equipment. In FY 2010, a legislative grant provided $8,000,000 in new funding was added to the existing grant by an amendment. Grant 7910013 provided some funding for this project based on a combination of city funds, an FY 2012 state legislative grant and municipal utility revenue bonds. (AEA reserved $50,000 from the FY 2012 grant to pay for its grant administration costs.) Funding for Grant 7060917 comes from Round VI of the Renewable Energy Fund Grant Program. The scope of work and the total of the overall project cost remain unchanged under this grant and the other two grants already issued. Because the total project cost is unchanged, Amendment 1 to Grant 7910013 will be created to reduce the CBS cash match in that grant by $8,000,000, being offset by this grant’s $4,000,000 increase in the Renewable Energy Fund grant funding and $4,000,000 in CBS cash match. Inside Passage Electric Cooperative (lPEC) will use up to $6,694,000 from a Round VI Renewable Energy Fund grant and $15,000 of in-kind match funds for construction of the 455 kW run-of-river Gartina Falls Hydroelectric Project. The project is located five miles south of the City of Hoonah and will annually generate up to 1,810 MWh and provide for approximately 30% of its annual electricity needs. IPEC received Round III renewable grant funding from the Authority to complete permitting and final design for this hydroelectric project. A Federal Energy Regulatory Commission license was issued for the project in January 2013. Permitting and final design are underway at this time and will need to be submitted to AEA before construction can move forward under this grant. The Gartina Falls Hydroelectric Project will consist of a small diversion dam and intake just above Gartina Falls, a steel penstock, a powerhouse located at the base of Gartina Falls, access road and a 3.8 mile overhead transmission line. The dam will be a rockfill dam with concrete core wall. It will consist of a center section with a moveable radial gate and a fixed crest overflow section. Alaska Power and Telephone will develop the conceptual design for a Biomass Fueled Combined Heat and Power System, building on the feasibility study that was conducted with funding from Round 5 of the Renewable Energy Fund. Even though biomass generation may not be the immediate power solution for Tok, AP&T believes that utilizing this abundant local resource would provide benefits to the Tok community. Harvesting and processing the timber would employ many and would stimulate the economy. Refocusing the use of this resource to primarily provide heat would better utilize the resource available and AP&T believes would provide the greatest benefit to the community. This conceptual design will develop a harvest plan per the standards developed by AEA with AK Division of Forestry and determine the best methods for delivering heat to the greatest number of residents by performing a heat consumption analysis for residential and commercial (Tok, Tanacross, Tetlin), and analyzing potential loads, modeling energy consumption, and determining the best use of energy. AP&T will also perform an analysis for plant locations (CHP, heat, and pellet) and evaluate land ownership and acquisition costs, perform Environmental Impact Studies (air quality, fish & game, land use, traffic, and other required areas), determine the economics of developing a heat utility and develop a business plan, and compete 35% engineering design. Business concepts to be considered and expanded upon through the study include the construction of multiple CHP plants, the development of a pellet manufacturing industry, the application of isolated pellet fueled heat stations, district heating using hot water heat loops and the integration heat supply into such a system from independent heat producers. The Feasibility Study found that the proposed 2MW CHP system would only be feasible if the heat downstream of the steam turbine could be utilized and there were no nearby heat demands. Subsequently, AP&T indicated that the proposed Biomass CHP project was not advisable and that it doesn't want to be a heat sale utility. A request has been made for a local non-profit company to take over the grant. It is being reviewed. The City of Galena will use this grant to fund the design of chip-fired boiler systems to heat its school district and the Galena Interior Learning Academy School (GILA) with local woody resources. The City of Galena will employee contractors to complete the identified tasks. AEA requests deliverables at various points during the design and construction process. This project is estimated to displace a total of 230,000 gallons per year of fuel oil, using an estimated 2,950 green tons of chips per year (40% moisture content). The application includes substantial support for the project from the community, the Louden Tribal Council, Galena City School District, and Gana-A'Yoo Limited. The City of King Cove will use up to $2,600,000 from a Round VI Renewable Energy Fund grant and will provide $1,300,000 of cash match funds for construction of the 375 kW run-of-river Waterfall Creek Hydroelectric Project. The project is located five miles north of the City of King Cove and will annually generate between 1,000 and 1,200 MWh. Sales from this new renewable energy source will help displace diesel generation of electricity by the City and also be sold as dispatchable energy to Peter Pan Seafoods, Inc. to displace some of their diesel generation. Waterfall Creek will be the second hydroelectric project for the City. The first, the 800 kW Delta Creek Hydroelectric Project, was constructed in 1995. Because the two hydro sites are relatively close to one another, the powerhouse for the Waterfall Creek project will co-locate in an expansion to the existing Delta Creek powerhouse and utilize the existing transmission line to King Cove. This will serve to reduce construction costs and facilitate integration of the new hydropower source into the existing power system. The City received $200,000 in Round V renewable grant funding from the Authority to complete permitting and final design for this hydroelectric project, which it matched by a like amount of cash. The project is outside the jurisdiction of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and permits are being sought from state and federal resource agencies under that grant. Permitting and final design are underway at this time. The City is in extended discussions with ADF&G regarding the terms of the Fish Habitat Permit. All tasks listed in the Round V grant will have to be completed and the associated deliverables provided to AEA for review and acceptance before construction can move forward under the new grant. The entire project is located on lands owned by the King Cove Village Corporation. The City expects to purchase 20 acres of land from the corporation for this project. The purchase price is anticipated to be $100,000. The Waterfall Creek Hydroelectric Project will consist of a small diversion dam and intake, a 4,500’ HDPE penstock, a 16’x40’ powerhouse expansion, a Pelton Impulse Turbine and 5,000 feet of access roads. The dam will be a rockfill dam with concrete core wall. It will additionally have a concrete intake section with a forebay and a multi-tiered spillway section. The Allison Creek Hydro project is funded through multiple grants and fund sources and the estimated final price of the project is $49 Million. A cap of 50% State funding has been applied to this project. This grant consists of $2,085,509 from Round VI of the Renewable Energy Fund and $2,085,509 in cash matching funds for construction of the Allison Creek Hydroelectric Project and Copper Valley Electric Association is the grantee. A Round VII Renewable Energy Fund grant contributes $5,914,500 with an addition $5,914,500 in cash matching funds for construction of the Allison Creek Hydroelectric Project. A Legislative appropriation contributed an addition $10,000,000 to the project. Copper Valley Electric Association will finance the balance of the project. The project is run-of-river and will consist of the following primary features: a 130-foot-wide, 16-foot-high diversion structure on Allison Creek; a Coanda screened intake at the spillway conveying flows to the powerhouse; a 42 to 36-inch-diameter, 6,900-foot-long buried steel penstock including a 700-foot-long tunnel section; a powerhouse containing one horizontal Pelton turbine/generator unit with a total installed capacity of 6.5 megawatts; a 70.5-foot-long tailrace extending from the north side of the powerhouse to Allison Creek via a concrete channel and the existing creek bed; a 550-foot-long permanent access road to the powerhouse; and a 3.8-mile-long, 25 kilovolt transmission line connecting to an existing substation. The project is estimated to provide 15,057 MWh during an average year, and up to 23,300 MWh when fully subscribed. Final design drawings have been reviewed by FERC and all construction permits have been obtained. Interior Regional Housing Authority (IRHA) will use the awarded grant funds to perform biomass feasibility assessments and forest inventories in the communities of Alatna, Allakaket, Northway, Grayling, Shageluk, Beaver, and Stevens Village. IRHA will provide the Authority draft copies of the studies for review and approval at the 65% and 95% phases. The Authority has provided IRHA with an outline of the items that need to be included in the biomass feasibility assessments and forest inventories. This grant consists of $425,701 from Round VI of the Renewable Energy Fund for construction of jacket heat recovery project to capture the recovered heat from the diesel engines in the AVEC power plant and excess wind energy from existing wind turbines and send the recovered heat to the water treatment plant for space heating, water storage tank heating, and circulation loop heating and it is expected to reduce the fuel oil usage by 8,800 gallons per year, nearly offsetting the total fuel oil usage. Alaska Village Electric Cooperative (AVEC) has an agreement with the Alaska Rural Utility Collaborative (ARUC), which is under the Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium (ANTHC), to receive the recovered heat for the water treatment plant on behalf of the City of Savoonga. The total project cost is $437,453 with $11,752 of in-kind contribution provided by ANTHC as a match. The City of Savoonga is the grantee. ANTHC will provide project/construction services for this project as an in-kind match, $11,752. ANTHC and the City of Savoonga will execute a Cooperative Project Agreement (CPA) to define each entity's role in the project scope. The CPA must be accepted by AEA prior to the release of construction funds. The final reimbursement of grant funds will not be disbursed without an O&M reporting plan by the AEA Project Manager. AEA may retain up to 10% of the contributed grant funds until the grantee has submitted an acceptable O&M reporting plan. This grant consists of $350,000 from Round VI of the Renewable Energy Fund for construction of heat recovery project to capture the recovered heat from the existing electrical power plant to the Washeteria and is expected to reduce the fuel oil usage by 4,395 gallons per year, nearly offsetting the total fuel oil usage. The recovered heat fluid is pumped through arctic pipe to the end user and is tied into the end-user heating system using a plate heat exchanger. The waste heat infrastructure will include waste heat transmission lines and upgrades necessary in the power house and Washeteria. The total project cost is $360,500 with $10,500 of in-kind contribution provided by Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium (ANTHC) as a match. Atmautluak Traditional Council (ATC) is the grantee. ANTHC will provide project/construction services for this project as an in-kind match, $10,500. ANTHC and the Atmautluak Traditional Council will execute a Cooperative Project Agreement (CPA) to define each entity’s role in the project scope. The CPA must be accepted by AEA prior to the release of construction funds. The final reimbursement of grant funds will not be disbursed without an O&M reporting plan accepted by AEA. AEA may retain up to 10% of the contributed grant funds until the grantee has submitted an acceptable O&M reporting plan. This grant consists of $668,350 from Round VI of the Renewable Energy Fund for design and construction of heat recovery project to capture the recovered heat from the existing Alaska Village Electric Cooperative (AVEC) power plant to the Washeteria and combined utility building. The estimated fuel savings of the combined utility building and Washeteria is projected to be 14,200 gallons of heating oil per year by adding marine jackets to the AVEC generators to increase available recovered heat. If practical an electric boiler will be added to pick up excess wind capacity when available. Air vents, thermometers, pressure gauges, drain valves, and pressure relief valves will also be added, including a BTU meters in each building. The system will also provide freeze protection in the event a user’s boiler system temperature falls below a minimum temperature, typically between 50-100 degrees F. The feasibility study for this project was completed in 2012. The total project cost is $688,400 with $20,050 of in-kind contribution provided by Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium (ANTHC) as a match. ANTHC will be providing project and program management services. ANTHC and the Native Village of Kwinhagak will execute a Cooperative Project Agreement (CPA) to define each entity’s role in the project scope. The CPA must be accepted by AEA prior to the release of construction funds. Native Village of Kwinhagak is the grantee. Native Village of Kwinhagak and the power utility must finalize a heat sales agreement; a copy must be submitted the Authority before construction funds are released to grantee. Similarly a final design must be accepted by the Authority for review before construction funds are released to the grantee. A 65 percent final design, which includes any necessary contracts must be complete and accepted by AEA prior to release of funds for materials requiring long lead time items. A 95% final design must be complete and accepted by AEA prior to release of construction funds. The 95% design must include a narrative, along with attached drawings and specifications as required to establish function of all major components within the biomass system. The 95% design will contain adequate system and component definition to manage construction of the project. The final reimbursement of grant funds will not be disbursed without an O&M reporting plan accepted by the AEA Project Manager. AEA may retain up to 10% of the contributed grant funds until the grantee has submitted an acceptable O&M reporting plan. This grant consists of $1,319,088 from Round VI of the Renewable Energy Fund for design and construction heat recovery system to connect recovered heat from the community power plant to the new water treatment plant, existing water treatment plant, Washeteria, head start building, clinic, and the school. The total project cost is $1,341,000 with $21,975 of in-kind building contribution provided by ANTHC as a match. This project is estimated to displace 57,000 gallons of fuel oil out of an annual usage of 69,000 gallons. The feasibility study for this project was completed in 2012. Construction funding availability is contingent on AEA accepting the final design and the business/operating plan with heat sales agreements. Alaska Village Electric Cooperative, Inc. (AVEC) is the grantee. The community of Stebbins and AVEC must finalize a heat sales agreement; a copy must be submitted to AEA before construction funds are released to grantee. Similarly, a final design must be accepted by AEA for review before construction funds are released to the grantee. A 65% final design, which includes any necessary contracts, must be complete and accepted by AEA prior to the release of funds for materials requiring long lead time items. A 95% final design must be complete and accepted by AEA prior to release of construction funds. The 95% design must include a narrative, along with attached drawings and specifications as required to establish function of all major components within the biomass system. The 95% design will contain adequate system and component definition to manage construction of the project. The final reimbursement of grant funds will not be disbursed without an O&M reporting plan accepted by the AEA Project Manager. AEA may retain up to 10% of the contributed grant funds until the grantee has submitted an acceptable O&M reporting plan. This grant consists of $183,200 from Round VI of the Renewable Energy Fund for design and construction of heat recovery project to capture the recovered heat from the existing electrical power plant to the water treatment plant (WTP) and village store. To provide maximum recovered heat benefit, the piping in the WTP needs to be reconfigured, and the heat recovery controls need to be replaced. New work will include adding a hydronic unit heater and a BTU meter for billing. A bypass line around the heat exchanger in the power plant will be installed with a modulating valve to prevent back pressure against the generator engines. The proposed design will modify piping so that the heat recovery system serves the entire WTP building load, and the three-way valve will be replaced with a heat injection pump. It is expected to reduce the fuel oil usage of the facilities by 7,700 gallons per year, fully offsetting the fuel oil usage. The feasibility study for this project was completed in 2012. The total project cost is $189,200 with $6,000 of in-kind contribution provided by Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium (ANTHC) as a match. ANTHC will be providing project and program management services. The City of Marshall is the grantee. The City of Marshall and the power utility must finalize a heat sales agreement; a copy must be submitted to AEA before construction funds are released to grantee. Similarly, a final design must be accepted by AEA for review before construction funds are released to the grantee. The final reimbursement of grant funds will not be disbursed without an O&M reporting plan accepted by the AEA Project Manager. AEA may retain up to 10% of the contributed grant funds until the grantee has submitted an acceptable O&M reporting plan. This grant consists of $985,805 from Round VI of the Renewable Energy Fund for design and construction of a heat recovery project to capture the recovered heat from the existing electrical power plant to the water treatment plant (WTP). To provide maximum recovered heat benefit, the piping in the WTP needs to be reconfigured, the heat exchangers will be added, etc. It is expected to reduce the fuel oil usage of the facilities by18,600 gallons per year by replacing that consumption with jacket heat from the diesel engines, nearly offsetting the total fuel oil usage. Arctic piping will run from the power plant alongside the road to the end-user building. The end-user facility will also receive a BTU meter to provide recovered heat use totalization and instantaneous use. The feasibility study for this project was completed in 2012. The total project cost is $1,015,580 with $29,580 of in-kind contribution provided by Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium (ANTHC) as a match. ANTHC will be providing project and program management services. City of Noorvik is the grantee. City of Noorvik and the power utility must finalize a heat sales agreement; a copy must be submitted to AEA before construction funds are released to grantee. Similarly, a final design must be accepted by AEA for review before construction funds are released to the grantee. The final reimbursement of grant funds will not be disbursed without an O&M reporting plan accepted by the Authority Project Manager. The Authority may retain up to 10% of the contributed grant funds until the grantee has submitted an acceptable O&M reporting plan. This grant consists of $486,000 from Round VI of the Renewable Energy Fund for design and construction of heat recovery project to capture the recovered heat from the AVEC power plant cooling system, which will involve installing heat exchangers at the plant and school boiler module with appropriate pumps and controls at both sites and ~700 feet of underground piping between the plant and school boiler module. The Preliminary Heat Recovery Assessment for the AVEC Power Plant and New Stuyahok School project was completed on September 19, 2012. The total project cost is $548,000 with $62,000 of in-kind contribution provided by Southwest Region School District as a match. Southwest Region School District (SRSD) is the grantee. SRSD and AVEC must finalize a heat sales agreement; a copy must be submitted to AEA before construction funds are released to grantee. Similarly, a final design must be accepted by AEA for review before construction funds are released to the grantee. The final reimbursement of grant funds will not be disbursed without an O&M reporting plan accepted by the AEA Project Manager. AEA may retain up to 10% of the contributed grant funds until the grantee has submitted an acceptable O&M reporting plan. Kokhanok Electric will complete final design, construction and startup of any necessary controls or equipment needed to integrate the existing wind farm and wind-diesel components into the Kokhanok electrical grid. By the end of 2011, the high development costs of the Kokhanok wind-diesel project, funded by a 2006 Legislative Appropriation, drove the original system designer, Sustainable Automation, out of business. The focus of this funding is to design and implement modifications that will allow a medium-penetration wind system with thewind turbines already installed. This grant will fund a feasibility/conceptual design study for the implementation of diesel heat recovery at their existing power plant by G&K Electric Utility. The Grantee has obtained assistance from the Aleutians East Borough (AEB) in the management of the grant. AEB will facilitate calls for solicitation for a contractor to perform the analysis and organize a community meeting with the contractor for presentation, review and discussion of the results. Permitting and final design of a run-of-river hydro project to power and heat the community. The City of Tenakee Springs, the electric utility provider, will use the $2,988,000 Round VI Renewable Energy Fund grant, $312,000 of cash matching funds from a Legislative grant, and $20,000 of in-kind local matching funds, to construct the 180 kW run-of-river Indian River Hydroelectric Project in Tenakee Springs. Project features include a concrete diversion structure collocated near a U.S. Forest Service fish passage facility at the head of falls #4 on Indian River, a 1,534 foot long penstock, a powerhouse located below falls #2, and a new transmission line approximately 1 mile in length to connect to the existing electrical distribution system. The project will be developed on State and City land. The project is estimated to meet approximately 90% of the electrical demand of Tenakee Springs. The City of Tenakee Springs received funding for feasibility assessment under Round I (2195348), and permitting and final design under Round IV (7040041) for the project. Final design is being completed under the Round IV grant at the time of this grant award. Before funds for construction are released permits and final drawings and specifications must be accepted by the Authority. This grant consists of $460,000 from Round VI of the Renewable Energy Fund for the design and construction of a small biomass district heating system which will supply heat to the school, teen center, council building, post office, and clinic in Mentasta. The total project cost is $510,000 with $50,000 of in-kind building contribution provided by Mentasta Traditional Council (MTC) as a match. MTC is the grantee. MTC will complete the final design, permitting, construction and startup of a small biomass district heating system to supply heat to the school, teen center, council building, post office, and clinic. Rex Goosby has been contracted by MVC to provide construction management services during the project. This grant consists of $232,620 from Round 7 of the Renewable Energy Fund for design, permitting, and construction of an air source heat pump system that will provide space heat to Harrigan Centennial Hall in Sitka. The heat pump system will be installed in conjunction with major renovations to the building. The City and Borough of Sitka (CBS) will complete final design, permitting, construction and startup of the air-to-water heat pump system along with any necessary controls or equipment needed to integrate the heat pumps into building’s heating system. The heat pump units will be housed in a louvered enclosure; a variable refrigerant flow system will pipe refrigerant to indoor fan coils to provide both heating and cooling to the building. A final design package including narrative, construction specifications, drawings, engineer’s cost estimates, updated economic analysis, and operational plan must be complete and accepted by the Authority prior to release of construction funds. The Allison Creek Hydro project is funded through multiple grants and fund sources and the estimated final price of the project is $49 Million. A cap of 50% State funding has been applied to this project. This grant consists of $5,914,500 from Round VII of the Renewable Energy Fund and $5,914,500 in cash matching funds for construction of the Allison Creek Hydroelectric Project and Copper Valley Electric Association is the grantee. A Round VI Renewable Energy Fund grant contributes $2,085,509 with an addition $2,085,509 in cash matching funds for construction of the Allison Creek Hydroelectric Project. A Legislative appropriation contributed an addition $10,000,000 to the project. Copper Valley Electric Association will finance the balance of the project. The project is run-of-river and will consist of the following primary features: a 130-foot-wide, 16-foot-high diversion structure on Allison Creek; a Coanda screened intake at the spillway conveying flows to the powerhouse; a 42 to 36-inch-diameter, 6,900-foot-long buried steel penstock including a 700-foot-long tunnel section; a powerhouse containing one horizontal Pelton turbine/generator unit with a total installed capacity of 6.5 megawatts; a 70.5-foot-long tailrace extending from the north side of the powerhouse to Allison Creek via a concrete channel and the existing creek bed; a 550-foot-long permanent access road to the powerhouse; and a 3.8-mile-long, 25 kilovolt transmission line connecting to an existing substation. The project is estimated to provide 15,057 MWh during an average year, and up to 23,300 MWh when fully subscribed. Final design drawings have been reviewed by FERC and all construction permits have been obtained. Provide final design and installation of low emissions, high efficiency pellet-fired boiler systems to heat the Haines School and Pool, Chilkat Center, Sewer Treatment Plant, Vocational Education Building, Library, old City Shop, new City Shop, Public Safety Building, and the Sheldon Museum. A reconnaissance study dated Sep 2015 was submitted with a round 9 grant application. The utility will conduct a feasibility study for a hydroelectric project on Gunnuck Creek. City of Atka has requested funding to utilize excess hydroelectric energy from the Chuniisax Creek project to heat seven existing community buildings. The buildings include the health clinic, water treatment plant, tribal office, community building, post office, city shop and public safety buildings. Alaska Power Company will complete a wind resource assessment, feasibility study and conceptual design of a wind energy project proposed on Chisana Mountain which sits along a road and transmission line from Tok to Tetlin. The conceptual design report will include any necessary controls or equipment needed to integrate the wind farm into the Tok electrical grid. The proposed system could incorporate one or more megawatt-scale wind turbines. This grant consists of $318,289 from Round 7 of the Renewable Energy Fund for design, permitting, and construction of a ground source heat pump system that will provide supplemental space heat and domestic hot water heating to the Seldovia House Senior Housing Complex in the City of Seldovia. The total project cost is estimated to be $362,805 with $44,516 provided by the grantee as in-kind match. Cook Inlet Housing Authority (CIHA) will complete final design, permitting, construction and startup of the heat pump system and closed-loop vertical loop field along with any necessary controls or equipment needed to integrate the heat pumps into the existing heating system. A final design package including narrative, construction specifications, drawings, engineer’s cost estimates, and sequence of operations must be complete and accepted by the Authority prior to release of construction funds. Project includes design and construction of a cordwood fired central heating system to serve Minto's Multi-Purpose Building/Lodge and the Health Clinic. Supplemental grant funding to complete construction of the Packers Creek Hydroelectric Project. The project will provide a biomass heating system at the airport. The City of Brevig Mission will use the $731,400 Round 7 Renewable Energy Fund grant and $21,941 of in-kind match to design and construct a heat recovery system between the Alaska Village Electric Cooperative (AVEC) electrical power plant and two end-user community buildings: 1) Water Treatment Plant, 2) Washeteria. The new system will capture jacket water heat generated by the AVEC plant that is currently wasted to the atmosphere by power plant radiators. Marine manifolds will be installed on the 2 existing Detroit Diesel generators to increase the amount of heat available for recovery. The recovered heat will be transferred by insulated glycol piping to the end-users and tie into the end-users' heating systems using heat exchangers, control mechanisms, and any required upgrades to the existing building hydronic systems. The City of Chevak will use the $558,800 Round 7 Renewable Energy Fund grant and $16,765 of in-kind match to design and construct a heat recovery system between the Alaska Village Electric Cooperative (AVEC) electrical power plant and the Water Treatment Plant and Vacuum Sewer Plant. The new system will capture jacket water heat generated by the AVEC plant that is currently wasted to the atmosphere by power plant radiators. The recovered heat will be transferred by insulated glycol piping to the loads at the water and sewer plants and tie into the heating systems using heat exchangers, control mechanisms, and any required upgrades. This grant is for design and construction of heat recovery project to capture the recovered heat from the existing AVEC electrical power plant and deliver it to the city shop; water circulation loops; Cold Storage/Hotel; and City Office Building. The project is expected to reduce the fuel oil usage by 15,700 gallons per year, nearly offsetting the total fuel oil usage. The recovered heat fluid is pumped through arctic pipe to the end user and is tied into the end-user heating system using a plate heat exchanger. The waste heat infrastructure will include waste heat transmission lines and upgrades necessary in the power house and each facility served. This grant will provide the design and construction of jacket heat recovery project to capture the recovered heat from the diesel engines in the Venetie Village Electric (WE) power plant and send the recovered heat to the newly constructed clinic in Venetie, Alaska for space heating. It is expected that this project will save the clinic 2,300 gallons of heating oil each year, nearly offsetting the total fuel oil usage. This project will fund the construction of the biomass fueled district heating loop at the Galena Interior Learning Academy. This project is estimated to displace a total of 230,000 gallons per year of fuel oil, using an estimated 2,950 green tons of chips per year (40% moisture content). Use heat from new Power Plant to provide heat to the WTP, Clinic, Motel, Community Hall and Store. Primary heat sources in three municipal publicly accessible buildings will be replaced with two Garn WHS2000 boilers, which will use locally sourced cordwood biomass to provide heat through a supply loop linking all buildings. Existing antiquated hydronic heating systems in each building will be replaced and upgraded to improve efficiency. This grant consists of $689,300 from Round 7 of the Renewable Energy Fund for permitting, design, and construction of a heat recovery system in the community of Emmonak. The total project cost is $709,977 with $20,677 provided by the grantee as a match. This project will provide recovered heat from the existing electrical power plant to the water treatment plant, the City Office, and the Boys and Girls Club. The estimated fuel oil savings to these facilities is projected to be 18,879 gallons of heating oil per year. This grant consists of $123,500 from Round 7 of the Renewable Energy Fund for a wind energy feasibility assessment and conceptual design in the city of Mountain Village. The total project cost is $130,000 with $6,500 provided by the grantee as a match. Alaska Village Electric Cooperative (AVEC) has already completed a wind resource assessment. The grantee will complete a feasibility study and conceptual design of a wind farm along with any necessary controls or equipment needed to integrate the wind farm into the Mountain Village electrical grid. At the grantee’s option, they may combine both documents into a single report. This grant consists of $342,000 from Round 7 of the Renewable Energy Fund for permitting and design of a wind farm in the City of Stebbins, Alaska. The project will serve the intertied communities of Stebbins and St. Michael, Alaska. The total project cost is $360,000 with $18,000 provided by the grantee as a match. AVEC (Alaska Village Electric Cooperative) will complete final design and permitting, of a wind farm along with any necessary controls or equipment needed to integrate the wind farm into the Stebbins-St. Michael electrical grid. Igiugig Village Council will complete a feasibility study and conceptual design of a wind farm along with any necessary controls or equipment needed to integrate the wind farm into the local electrical grid. A minimum 12 month long meteorological study will be performed and a wind resource analysis written. Electrical load data will be gathered from the power plant to identify hourly load data and dispatchable electrical loads. Thermal load data will be collected from sites being considered for secondary loads. Geotechnical reconnaissance work will be completed. The feasibility analysis will address the diesel power plant and distribution system to identify upgrades that are needed to integrate wind power. A variety of wind turbine models and quantity configurations will be considered. This project expands existing Kongiganak Wind Heat Smart Grid System by adding additional electric thermal storage (ETS) devices. An additional 30 residences will be installed with ETS units for a total of 50. This grant is to generate additional construction related documentation required for the Yerrick Creek Hydroelectric project including a business plan, RCA certification, hard copies of design documents and permits, site control easement or deed, and an engineers cost estimate. The grant is for the construction of the Stetson Creek Diversion. Provide a heat recover system connecting the existing power house to community buildings. ANTHC will be managing the project The Organized Village of Kake will complete the final design and permitting for a low emission, high efficiency, and 3rd party tested district wood-fired boiler and heating loop serving the Kake City School District, Tlingit and Haida Senior Center, and the City of Kake’s Bingo Hall, and as funding allows, a tribal government office building and a lodge owned by the Organized Village of Kake (OVK), a federally recognized tribe. This project is estimated to displace approximately 35,000 gallons per year of fuel oil. The final design will include a wood supply analysis, a business/operational plan, and any required heat sales agreements. The Native Village of Tazlina is using a Round 8 Renewable Energy Fund grant to develop and construct a wood boiler system for heating the tribal hall, office, and clinic. This project will relocate the 2 existing cordwood boilers from the Thorne Bay School to the Hollis School and the Coffman Cove School. New, larger cordwood boilers will be installed in the Thorne Bay School to handle the additional load of the greenhouse. Cordwood boilers will also be installed at the Naukati School and the Whale Pass School. The grantee, Sand Point Generating LLC, is using Round 8 REF funding to design and construct electric boilers to utilize non-firm excess wind power for heating. This project will install thermal nodes at 2 community facilities – the Sand Point School and Health Clinic. project_status This project has been completed and the grant is closed. This project has been successfully completed and closed out. This project was canceled before any substantive work could begin. The grantee started negotiating with Bethel Utilities Corporation but made no progress. The extended period of uncertainty in future utility ownership made it very difficult to move forward. Both AEA and the grantee agreed that canceling the project made the most sense. A closeout letter sent to to the grantee. Karl Wood, Senior Accountant Village Wind Power, LLC c/o Alaska Power & Telephone Company PO Box 3222 Port Townsend, WA 98368 The Deering wind conceptual design and final design have been reviewed and accepted by AEA and the project is ready to progress with the construction phase. Contractor, Marsh Creek LLC, has been focusing on power plant issues that must be resolved in order for the wind energy to integrate smoothly with the village power generation and distribution system. Marsh Creek compiled a detailed quote and scope for overhauling the power plant and the proposal was submitted to NANA Corp. for possible funding. NANA Corp. allocated money for the complete system overhaul in fall of 2014. That work will progress over the winter and spring in time for construction on the wind project to begin in late summer of 2015. The funding for this scope expired on Sept. 30, 2014. Any future updates will be reported under the Buckland Deering Noorvik Wind Grant #2195377. This project has been closed out. A reconnaissance report was prepared with the grant. The report concluded the project was not feasible due to environmental concerns. The project is closed. A reconnaissance report was prepared with the grant. The report concluded the project was not feasible due to environmental concerns. The grant is closed. A reconnaissance report was prepared with the grant. The report concluded the project was not feasible due to environmental concerns. The project is closed. A reconnaissance report was prepared with the grant. The report concluded the project was not feasible due to environmental concerns. The project is closed. Denali Commission funding was rescinded as of September 8, 2011. The project has been closed out. The notice of project completion and closeout was initiated on July 22, 2013. The project is has been successfully completed and closed out. The project is closed. The pre-construction design team concluded that the cost/benefit ratio for the project does not indicate that further preparation for construction is feasible at this time. The project completed the report titled City of Homer Water Supply System Micro-Hydro Feasibility Study, prepared by EES Consulting, and dated December 2009. The feasibility grant is complete. Deliverables under this phase include the reports "Hydroelectric Reconnaissance Study Elfin Cove, Alaska", dated June 2010, prepared by Polarconsult Alaska and "Crooked Creek and Jim's Lake Hydroelectric Feasibility Study", dated June 2011 and prepared by Polarconsult Alaska. The grant is complete. The completed report is titled Yerrick Creek Hydro Assessment by Alaska Power & Telephone Company, dated August 2009. Chenega is completing design documents, permits and a business plan. The grantee continued to prepare its response to public comments received for coordination for ADNR leasing and easements and continued its stream gauging program. Additional flow measurements were taken. The grant period expires December 31, 2013 and will need to be extended another year. The design team for this project is Fishhook Renewable Energy, LLC. The project is in pre-construction permitting and a public comment period. This phase is complete. All deliverables associated with the grant phase have been received. Deliverables received under this phase include Indian River Hydroelectric Feasibility Study, dated November 2009, prepared by Polarconsult Alaska, and Indian River Hydroelectric Project Phase II Final Report Conceptual Design and Permitting, dated November 2011, prepared by Polarconsult Alaska, and LIDAR survey data. The project is complete. The project prepared the report titled "Tanana River Hydropower Scheme Tanacross, Alaska Reconnaissance Study", by Knight Piesold and Co., and dated January 2009. The project was constructed in 2009 and first operated in 2010. System problems in 2010/11 were traced to sediment from the water well clogging the hot water distribution loop at the Denali Education Center - not a part of the solar hot water system. Sediment issues were rectified along with a changeout of shower fittings and the system has operated to the satisfaction of DEC since that time. The wind resource analysis is complete and shows a class 3 wind resource. A feasibility study has been completed which shows wind to be viable. A draft Conceptual Design Report was submitted on September 24, 2012. Edits and requests for clarification were made of the grantee. Responses to questions and edits to the draft Conceptual Design Report were received and reviewed and accepted by AEA. This was the final deliverable for the project. The community has decided not to pursue a wind farm at this time. The grant was closed on July 18, 2013. Closed out. The system is shutdown and the grant is closed. The completed geothermal heat pump system has not yet been operating under design conditions long enough to draw substantive conclusions. Nearly half of the 96,000 sq. ft. building area is not using the new geothermal system and will continue to be served by diesel boilers until the Airport replaces these older portions of the terminal. Regardless of these obstacles, data gathered to date show promising evidence of a successful conversion from traditional diesel fired boilers to renewable geothermal heat pumps. Preliminary findings are as follows: The savings in fuel oil between Calendar Year 2008 (pre-construction) and Calendar Year 2011 (post-construction) is 37,082 gallons. The average cost of fuel oil diesel #2 in Juneau during the period of this analysis is $3.52 per gallon. Therefore, the cost of fuel oil saved between Calendar Year 2008 and Calendar Year 2011 is approximately $130,529. The airport terminal project added approximately 12,000 sq. ft. of new area to the building. The difference in electrical usage between Calendar Year 2008 (pre-construction) and Calendar Year 2011 (post-construction that includes 12,000 sq. ft. building expansion) is approximately 168,960 kWh. The electrical local cost, including demand charges, used for purposes of this analysis is $0.092/kWh. Therefore, the additional cost of electricity for the airport terminal is approximately $15,544. Subtracting the additional electrical usage cost from the fuel oil cost savings results in $114,985 in direct annual fuel cost savings for the Juneau International Airport facility with the installation of the ground source heat pump system. Another significant benefit that the airport has seen is the decrease in operations costs due to the snowmelt system. This is a new system, and while it demands significant energy to operate, the safety and passenger comfort issues are very positive. The snow melt system is energized by three water-to-water electric heat pumps that are integrally tied to the geothermal loop field. While not analyzed in detail, it is expected that operating this system by an equivalent diesel energy source would have made the installation cost prohibitive for the airport’s annual operating budget. The geothermal snow melt system savings over traditional snow removal operations is approximately $10,000 per year in staff labor and $1,000 in equipment and supplies. Recognizing the limited scope of analysis to date, the Airport will conduct a full analysis following completion of planned energy efficiency projects and ongoing minor renovation. The grant is closed. The line was energized to Coffman Cove on September 2, 2011. Savings are reflected starting from that date. Construction has slowed this reporting period, permitting is on-going but was delayed for the 12 miles of transmission to Naukati. The line to Naukati was energized on January 27, 2015 at noon. Work continued throughout the calendar year on stringing fiber optic cable, setting transformers, and resetting poles. The grant is closed. The project construction was completed in October 2010. The system commissioning is 70% finished. USDA funds have been fully drawn. A 2006 Legislative Appropriation committed $148,000 to this project. The system still not fully commissioned. There are issues with the grid-forming inverter. The wind turbines are functioning. Additional project funding is provided in a Renewable Energy Fund Round VI grant #7060966 to complete the project. The funds in this grant have been expended. The grant is closed. The wind data collection and a wind resource report were completed. The project is closed out. The scope of work for this grant has been combined with Grant #2195432 and the funds for grant #2195367 have been reallocated toward that grant. All updates and reporting will performed under Grant #2195432. Both wind turbines (1 megawatt total capacity) have been operating since 2010. The project is closed out. The project was completed in August 2009 In May 2012, Alaska Energy Engineering completed the Haines Borough Biomass Feasibility Study. It was concluded that biomass heating was not practical due to the high capital and maintenance costs associated with pellet boilers. However, AEA, Division of Forestry, and the Coast Guard Biomass staff disagree with some of the elements of the study. The project is operational and the grant is closed. The Port Heiden study is complete. The Port Alsworth and Chignik Lagoon towers were installed as of August 2010. Knight Piesold published wind resource reports for each community. The project is closed out. The system is not currently operational. All money has been spent. The energy produced by the wind turbine is more than the power plant can handle along with the existing community load and reaction speed of secondary loads. SCADA is working. The cost to do business in Nikolski was higher than originally estimated. Nikolski has requested an additional $331,000 from Round V of the Renewable Energy Fund to resolve issues, but no funds were awarded. The grant is closed. The hydroelectric project is complete and began providing power to the community as of December 23, 2012. The grant is closed. Buckland, Deering and Noorvik draft conceptual designs have been accepted by AEA. Buckland and Deering 95% designs have been accepted by AEA. The Noorvik project is on hold due to the lack of a strong nearby wind resource and a power plant that is not optimized for the integration of variable wind power. The Deering turbine is delivered and being stored in Kotzebue over the winter. Construction bids were received and a construction contractor has been chosen. Deering now has separate funding from NANA Corp. to overhaul all of their diesel gensets and has met with AEA to share their O&M plans. Buckland construction began in fall 2014 and Deering construction began in August 2015. The project is substantially complete. This project is in the construction phase, but is short of funds to complete the boiler installation. The community is seeking additional funding. This project has been completed and the grant is closed. The wind turbines are up and commissioned effective November 30, 2010. The secondary load controller was damaged in Bethel along with the Mekoryuk secondary load controller. The controllers have been repaired in the communities, but this created a large delay in the project. The switchgear has been installed. Vibration sensors and thermister strings are in. Wireless communication has been installed, as is the satellite internet. Commissioning of the control module and the secondary load controller was completed on January 27, 2012. The grant is closed out. Tasks 4.5 Transmission/Distribution lines and 4.9 Secondary Load Controller are additional costs at grantee's expense. The turbines were installed in the fall 2010. The control Module was repaired and secondary/dump loads were installed in spring 2011. As-built drawing received in mid-2013. This project is closed out. The project is functioning and closed out. This project is complete and the grant is closed. Cordova Electric Cooperative's Humpback Creek Project went into revenue service on July 13, 2011. The project has operated reliably with no downtime since being placed in operation in July 2011. Commissioning was more labor and cost intensive than anticipated in part to the plant being idle for five years. Once the plant was placed in normal operation, the operations and maintenance expenses decreased considerably. The operations costs have been approximately 25% of the fuel savings to date. Annual production is anticipated to exceed 4,000,000 kWh per year. The project is completed and began operation in July 2009. The project is operating as intended. The grant is closed. The final feasibility report has been completed with recommendations to proceed with design and permitting of the proposed project. The grant is closed. This portion of the project is complete and the grant is closed. Permitting and final design are completed. This grant is closed. The grantee's design team has completed 100% design. The license application was filed with FERC in August 2011, and the FERC Original License was issued August 2013. CVEA received a $10M legislative grant in 2012 to add to their construction budget (grant #7910012). This project is complete and the grant is closed. The Ground Source Heat Pump (GSHP) system has been in nearly continuous operation since the spring of 2011 providing heating water to the building, ventilation system, domestic water pre-heating system, and pool water heating systems. The system's capacity is so great that City-Borough has had some issues with insufficient load - in the summer months the system was operating at or just below minimums and needed more load in order to operate efficiently. Despite being in operation since 2011, data was not successfully logged until November of 2012. The data that is available indicates that the system has performed with a Coefficient of Performance above 3.0 when more heavily loaded but the efficiency appears to decrease significantly when more lightly loaded in the summer months. The grant is closed. The system came online in August of 2009. Total solar energy to array was 39,000 kWh (132000 kBTUs). Total energy to loads was 3,750 kWh (12,800 kBTUs). Estimated maximum yield (@ 35% efficiency) is about 13,800 kWh (49,900 kBTUs). System utilization (i.e., yield/available energy) was 27% of available capacity. Monitoring limitations that were seen in 2010 were rectified in 2011 with additional fine tuning for 2012. System distribution problems experienced in 2010 were also rectified in 2011 but additional retrofit efforts were thwarted by a lack of labor resources. Complete retrofitting of end use stations is expected to be completed before the start up in 2012. With retrofits complete, the efficiency yield should also increase. 7/13: during PM site visit solar thermal system was operating well. Operator thrilled with savings and marketing potential of solar energy. 11/14: GVEA reported the system performed well in 2014 with no problems. The grant is closed. The grant is now closed. The project is complete and the grant is closed. USACE completed an interim reconnaissance report of hydropower resources in the vicinity of Whittier in September 2011. The report concluded the available sites could not be developed economically when compared to the cost of railbelt power. The project is closed. The Conceptual Design Report is complete and the grant has been closed out. The grantee is working closely with the AEA Wind and Rural Power Systems Upgrade (RPSU) programs in order to install a wind-diesel system. Construction bids came in higher than the funding available. The City of St. George will be working with the RPSU program to complete construction. Due to expected high winds in St. George starting in September, the erection of the turbine has been scheduled for spring 2014, after the winter winds have fallen off. Construction of the the wind farm is under budget. A hub extender and larger VFD will be tested in Minnesota for possible use at the St. George Wind Farm. This equipment could allow St. George to produce more wind power with the same infrastructure. AEA and possibly ACEP will be involved in establishing the testing parameters and performing data analysis along with the manufacturers. The proposed equipment could help in the deployment of wind turbines at Alaskan communities with lower wind regimes. The 95% design has been accepted by AEA. Wind turbine construction will be complete in November 2014. The wind Turbine was commissioned in November 2014. Three days after commissioning an apparent programming fault misapplied the braking system causing a fire. The turbine was covered by warranty and is being replaced. Completion of the replacement and commissioning is scheduled for sometime in 2015. Tallk Inc. is working to complete repairs to the fire damaged turbine. The anticipated schedule for shipment to St. George with installation and testing is Oct 2015 The project has been completed and the grant is closed. The final feasibility report, Burro Creek Hydroelectric Feasibility Report, dated November 2011 and prepared by Polarconsult Alaska, Inc. was delivered and accepted by AEA December 2011. Final progress and financial reports were received and the project is closed. The project is fully commissioned and operating as designed. Total project costs (including CDQ contribution) were closer to $6 million. The project is closed out. The hydrokinetic project in Ruby was a small one time conceptual test. The turbine was installed, produced a small amount of power and removed within the same season. The project was a first of its kind in Alaska. The project revealed hydrokinetic deployments in Alaska rivers can be challenging. The grant is closed. The Conceptual Design Report and permitting analysis are complete. This project is in close-out. The Environmental Assessment has been completed clearing the way for the development of the final design. Harvest equipment has been purchased, so that initial wood harvesting can take place as soon as the harvest plan is developed. CATG is leading the development of the harvest plan, and staffing changes have delayed the harvest plan completion. The grant is closed. The project is complete. Since start-up, Cordova Electric has been operating almost exclusively on hydroelectric power with just short runs of the diesel system. The Organic Rankine Cycle only functions during extended runs of the diesel system and has not been required. The grant is closed. The grant is closed. The grant is closed. KPC signed an agreement with Calista Corp to sell two wind turbines. AEA is waiting on follow-up information related to the contractor's as-built drawings and operations and maintenance plan that were submitted for review. Notice of project completion was mailed to grantee on June 11, 2013. The grantee has not been providing timely annual reporting as required. All turbines are fully functioning on the new variable speed controller. The electric boiler and thermal stoves are functioning. The supervisory system is being dialed in/optimized. PPC has federal funding for the smart grid system. The smart meters are installed. The fiber optic line is installed between turbines. IES has finished the install of all ETS stoves. The EasyGen controllers are complete. The grantee expects the project to be completed by Q4 2013. AEA has reviewed the final deliverables and the grant is closed. After the initial design work was completed, the grantee and AEA determined that the project as scoped was not economically feasible due to high costs of the Triodetic foundation. The project has been closed out. The Alaska Village Electric Cooperative (AVEC) and consultants WHPacific and Hatch completed the final feasibility report. A proposed 700 kW development on the Kogoluktuk River was recommended for further feasibility analysis, design, and permitting. The grant is closed. Public meetings to comment on the DEIS were held in Kake & Petersburg in January 2015. The final Record of Decision (ROD) was signed in November 2016. SEAPA then anticipates moving into Final Design, for a “shovel ready” project. IPEC would like to divert some of the KPI funding toward a small hydroelectric project on Gunnuck Creek, however, this seems unlikely to occur. There is no construction funding source yet identified for KPI. A grant amendment included a requirement for participant meeting after the ROD has been issued (tentatively scheduled for early 2017). The City conducted a feasibility study of Ruth Lake with this grant. The report is complete and the project is closed. This project is complete and the grant is closed. Project is operational and the grant is closed. The Alaska Energy Authority (AEA) has reviewed the final report prepared by Currents Consulting titled “Takatz Lake Hydroelectric Development Appraisal Study Report”, dated October 2014 and found it satisfied the requirements of the grant. AEA authorized continuation of stream gauging data collection at the site by the USGS through the end of 2015 in support of future development and regional interests. AEA did have concerns that the Takatz Lake study did not include a larger assessment of the current energy generation assets, their potential, and the projections for demand including conversion of heating to electric based. AEA and the City recently modified the grant to include a demand study to address these questions and help the City better plan for future energy needs. The City is expected to begin this work in 2017. The Conceptual Feasibility Study (October 2013) has been completed and results indicated that both of the Grant Lake Project Alternatives analyzed would be economically feasible (Benefit/Cost Ratio greater than 1.0), under the economic conditions analyzed. The Lake Elva Project, however, would not be economically feasible (Benefit/Cost Ratio less than 1.0) under any of the base conditions analyzed. Recommendations for additional work include assessing load growth, integration with wind and other sources of generation, continue with the FERC licensing of the Grant Lake Project, conduct additional geotechnical investigations, and perform additional hydrological analysis particularly for winter flows. The study includes a transmission study that contradicts the finding of feasibility in the main report. Also the economical assumptions are limited to a single case that has an unrealistic growth rate for fuel cost. Overall the feasibility effort appears flawed in the scope of analysis, assumptions, conclusions, and recommendations. Enabling legislation was enacted authorizing these projects in the Wood-Tikchik State Park prior to the completion of this study and the Chikuminuk study which has been shown to be a more economical project. Further action on these projects is not expected at this time. Reconnaissance assessment is complete. Deliverable under this phase is the report titled "Fourth of July Creek Hydroelectric Project Reconnaissance Study and Initial Feasibility Assessment Final Report", dated November 2009, and prepared by Independence Power, LLC. TDX elected in 2010 to not proceed with the project. In 2008 and 2009 TDX Power conducted geological and geophysical explorations around Manley Hot Springs to determine the best potential well site for a geothermal power plant for the community of Manley Hot Springs. After geophysical exploration activities of 2009, TDX Power decided not to commit the necessary matching funds to drill an exploration well. The grant was closed as of December 31, 2010. The project is closed. Deliverable for the grant is the report titled "California Creek Hydroelectric Feasibility Preliminary Engineering Analysis and Environmental Review", dated December 2011, by Alaska Green Energy. The project is complete and the grant is closed. The project is complete and the grant is closed. The grant agreement is in place. Detailed final design plans are being developed to address site access and equipment/material staging. The two minute wind analysis and geotech report was submitted to AEA on July 16, 2010. Geotech drilling was completed for substation foundation. Energy Yield Assessment was done for GE, Clipper, Siemens and REPower wind turbines. Field investigation was completed for wetlands determination. The archeological field studies are completed. Geotech drilling was finished in April 2011. The project was given a green light by board. RePower 2.05MW turbines were chosen. Michel is the EPC contractor. GVEA submitted design for road easements to the state. GVEA submitted exhibits to ACoE for wetland permits and avian/bat plans with the USFWS. The grant was closed out on January 4, 2012. Project cancelled by applicant and AEA. This grant has been closed out and the project is being finished under Grant #7030015. KHL carries out Phase II feasibility level field studies and scoping in support of FERC licensing for this project. The proposed route for the transmission line and road access to the hydro facilities are impacted by the recently discovered Iditarod National Historic Trail which has senior rights to this land. Mitigation of impacts from hydro project are being studied. Project effects on changes in lake levels and river streamflows are also being investigated to minimize impacts to fish habitat. Phase II studies will be supplemented with additional Round IV grant funds. The earliest approval of FERC license is anticipated in March 2014. The grantee expended all grant funds and the grant has been closed. Metlakatla Indian Community (MIC) previously requested assistance from AEA in managing this grant, however, management has remained with MIC. Progress has been stalled pending MIC letter which would address power sales, project management of grant, ownership and O&M responsibilities for the intertie. As of the end of 2014 MIC had contracted with HDR for project management services. As of January 2017, MIC has reported that it is evaluating the potential for additional hydropower from Triangle Lake and the potential impact on the proposed intertie. The Anchorage Landfill Gas Electricity Construction Project has been successfully completed and closed out. The Municipality of Anchorage (MOA) Solid Waste Services Department (SWS) has submitted all final project documents. AEA has reviewed and accepted the final feasibility study and will provide assistance during the mandatory end of project performance reporting. The project phase is complete. All tasks have been completed and all deliverables have been received and accepted. The phase completed the Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Old Harbor Hydroelectric Project Reconnaissance and Feasibility Study by Hatch and dated July 2011, FERC Pre-Application Document, Scoping Meetings, Proposed Study Plan and initial FERC fieldwork. The grant is closed. The City of Bethel was the applicant for the Denali Commission and Round I REF grants. The purchase of Bethel Utilities Corporation (BUC) by Alaska Village Electric Cooperative (AVEC) has been approved by the Regulatory Commission of Alaska (RCA) and completed. The City of Bethel has transferred this grant to AVEC. The City of Bethel (COB) is using Legislative Appropriation Grant #2195257 at the direction of AVEC to perform feasibility analysis of the wind resource in support of the project. TDX Corporation is performing feasibility analysis and conceptual design work funded through Round IV of the Renwable Energy Fund under a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with AVEC. The funds from this grant will be used to complete 65% and 95% designs with the balance going toward construction of a wind turbine and integration controls in the community. It is anticipated that AVEC will be seeking additional funds for construction of an expanded project. Site control discussions for the location of met towers and wind turbines between AVEC and COB have been ongoing. TDX has completed an initial analysis of the Bethel electrical grid and power plant along with a baseline feasibility analysis of low, medium, and high penetration conceptual designs for the Wind-Diesel System. A proposal from AVEC to upgrade the switchgear at the power plant using the Denali Commission funds, prior to completion of the TDX feasibility study, is has been approved. A typical wind-diesel system would use electrically governed generators and automatic switchgear. Due to the age of the generators, and the expense of replacing them, fully modernizing the system is not feasible. While limited by the mechanically governed generators, the switchgear can be upgraded to incorporate greater amounts of wind generated electricity and testing an upgraded system would help identify additional necessary components prior to completion of the final design; this would reduce the amount of uncertainty in the cost and risk associated with construction. Negotiations have begun for the purchase of an EWT 900 wind turbine. The grant agreement is in place. Kenai Wind's power purchase agreement was cancelled by Homer Electric Association in May 2010. A request for grant extension through June 2012 was approved. The project was cancelled due to lack of a power purchase agreement. The grant is closed. The grantee, an independent power producer, decided it was in their business's best interest to not accept the grant award and instead seek alternative financing options; therefore, the grant was cancelled before grant award. The Fishhook Hydroelectric Project received $100,000 in Round 0 grant funding to help complete permitting, utility certification, and a power purchase agreement for the project. At the time the Round 1 grant was made available, the scope for the Round 0 grant was not completed. Therefore, the Round 1 grant was cancelled before grant award. The final report has been published and the grant closed out. The NJUS Round I grant application, called for the construction of five 600 kW wind turbines on Newton Peak at a cost of $13,952,326. Due to caps on funding of Renewable Energy Fund (REF) projects, AEA recommended partial funding of this project for $4 Million. In response, the wind farm was reduced to a single EWT 900 wind turbine. The location was also changed from Newton Peak to Anvil Mountain and then to Banner Peak due to icing concerns. The caps on REF projects have been raised to $8 Million. NJUS submitted two applications in Round V. The first was for $3,703,500 and called for the installation of a second EWT 900 on Banner Peak. The second called for restructuring the layout of the diesel gensets in Nome and for the installation of a secondary load boiler. Restructuring the power plant is an ineligible cost under the RE Fund. AEA recommended partial funding of $4,069,000 for the installation of the second EWT 900 turbine and the installation of the secondary load boiler with the requirement that the Authority accept final design and permitting and NJUS reconfigures the existing diesel generators before construction funds are released. The grants are in place. The Conceptual Design Report (CDR) has been accepted by AEA. The 65% design has been accepted. The grantee has moved forward with construction prior to the 95% design being accepted by AEA and the turbines are installed and commissioned. The grantee is over budget with regards to secondary load installations. AEA has accepted a letter from NJUS detailing proposed locations for secondary loads and possible funding sources. With this letter AEA has accepted the 95% design and will withhold $100,000 until the project is fully completed. In April 2016 NJUS reported significant damage to one of the EWT turbine blades, possibly due to ice impact. The damage was repaired in summer 2016 with NJUS funding. In December 2016 NJUS requested a grant extension to 6/30/17 to complete the secondary load installations and final closeout and commissioning. AEA reviewed preliminary feasibility report and requested that more deatailed data and analysis be completed. As expected, the feasiblity report appears to show that adding wind to the Alaska Village Electric Cooperative (AVEC) facility makes the most sense. AVEC transferred wind turbine data to CE2 Engineers. The budget amendment was approved to complete feasibility study. The grant has been closed out. Construction of Hiilangaay (formerly Reynolds Creek) project began in the fall of 2011 with the clearing of a portion of the transmission route. Subsequently Haida Corporation formed a partnership with Alaska Power & Telephone. Under the new partnership, Haida Energy, the project successfully obtained a loan through the AEA Power Project Fund (PPF) program in the spring of 2016. The $20 million loan was needed to complete the financing package for the project. Haida Energy contracted with AP&T to perform the construction of the project which resumed in the fall of 2016. Final disbursement of the Round 1 REF grant was made at the end of December 2016. Next steps will be to close the grant. The project was completed in December 2014 & closed out. Some warranty work will extend through 2015. In the summers of 2009 and 2010, the project, led by the University of Alaska Anchorage, performed field assessments of approximately 25 remote villages along Alaska’s rivers. In the summer of 2011, field work was conducted at 4 sites on the Yukon River: Rampart, Stevens Village, Beaver, and Tanana. The field work involved collecting data on water velocity, elevation, and bathymetry/topography. The data collected has been processed and analyzed to determine the potential hydrokinetic power at each of villages during the open-water period and the potential sedimentation changes due to the effects of the turbines. A final overall project report has been complete along with individual site reports for each surveyed location. The grant is closed. Funds were not used. This project did not move forward. Construction has been completed and the wind farm is producing power for the utility. Reimbursement was received in May 2010. The grant is closed. The wind turbines are erected and commissioned. A 455kW CAT3456 genset is commissioned. A 395kW air cooled load bank is commissioned. A 126kW electric boiler is commissioned. The cost to complete the remote boiler system exceeds remaining budget. The grant is closed out. The grant is complete. The reconnaissance report titled Kisaralik River and Chikuminuk Lake Reconnaissance and Preliminary Hydropower Feasibility Study, dated May 2011, and prepared by MWH has been accepted. The final report was received and reviewed by AEA. The grant has been closed out. This system is in operation and reporting performance metrics on a monthly basis. The project will be closed pending a final inspection. In November 2011, a reconnaissance report of renewable energy resources was completed for Adak. It concluded the most promising sites were hydroelectric resources, with some promise for wind energy. Because the condition of the existing diesel generation plant is very poor and the electrical transmission and distribution system is vastly oversized for the current population, understanding the existing loads is the first step in analyzing their needs. The remaining grant funds have been committed to gathering load data for Adak and preparing a follow-up report on hydro resources. The grant is closed. The project is complete and the grant is closed. The project is complete and the grant is closed. This project is complete and the grant is closed. This project is in the construction phase and is anticipating completion in 2017. The grant is closed. The grantee decided to terminate the project due to its small size and increased costs of licensing, permitting, and design requirements associated with falling under FERC jurisdictional licensing. Preliminary design drawings and survey data were delivered under this grant. The feasibility report prepared by CRW is titled "Chitina Alaska Conceptual Design Report Fivemile Creek Hydroelectric Project" and is dated January 13, 2012. The related design grant still in progress. All five turbines are operational. The cables are buried. The 3-phase power is extended. The contractor has finished installing all 30 ETS stoves. The fibre optic lines are run from the turbines to the powerhouse. Power poles for upgraded transformers were straightened. TCSA has signed an agreement with Calista Corp to sell one wind turbine. Funds have been zeroed out, but grant agreement is still open until project completed. AEA is waiting on follow-up information related to the contractor's as-built drawings and operations and maintenance plan that were submitted for review. Notice of Project Completion was mailed 7/24/2013 this has not yet been received, on 12/9/2013 a letter was sent to grantee effectively closing the grant. The project is complete and the grant is closed. KEA received the FERC License Amendment. The project phase is closed. The grant agreement is in place. A wind resource assessment began in Summer 2010. TDX did a community visit and site scouting, May 31, 2010 to June 1, 2012. there was a site visit to install anemometers on the ferry dock light tower and on a hill above the water tank on July 21, 2010 and July 23, 2010. The data shows only high class 1 winds even though there are some strong wind eventsfrom time to time. AEA recommends the community move toward biomass energy given the local resources. The project is closed out. The project is closed. The grantee prepared a preliminary feasibility study after conducting a site visit. As a result of the study, the grantee concluded no alternative exhibited sufficient degree of feasibility to warrant further study. Thus, stream gauging was not completed and the grantee requested grant closure before expending all funds. Deliverable under the grant is Carlson Creek Hydroelectric Project Preliminary Feasibility Evaluation, dated December 2011, and prepared by Alaska Power & Telephone Company. The wind turbines are installed and functional. Turbine 1 was installed 230' SE of originally chosen location due to "borrowing" from the gravel at the chosen site. The distribution line is complete. All AVEC Operation’s outstanding punch-list items were completed as of July 6, 2012. The integration of the new control module with the existing AVEC power plant was completed as of July 15, 2012. The two Northwind Wind Turbines were fully commissioned, remotely monitored and controlled as of July 15, 2012. The newly up-graded AVEC power systems are fully functioning and operating according to design as of August 15, 2012. The grant is closed out. The original 40-meter met tower site proved to have a low wind resource so a new site along the road between the dump and the gravel pit south of the airport was established on May 26, 2012 with the installation of a 50-meter met tower. Data collection for this project is complete. Both towers have been decommissioned. A wind feasibility report is in progress. With the loss of the intertie between Teller and Brevig Mission, a wind energy project is not economically feasible at this time due to the small system load with just a single village. The grant is closed out. AEA received the avian study. The NRG raw files are confusing with different site numbers, coordinates and configurations. AEA has one previous study from V3 Energy LLC covering this region. The Igiugig Village Council (IVC) partnered with ORPC and the AEA EETF program to install the RivGen turbine in the Kvichak river. The turbine was deployed successfully and produced power during the summer. The turbine was removed in the fall. In the summer of 2015, IVC again partnered with ORPC and installed the Rivgen for a second time. This deployment went exceptionally well. The turbine was pulled out in the fall. IVC has been working with FERC to move their licensing to the next stage. IVC has is currently seeking funds to deploy version 2 of ORPC’s RivGen on a long term basis. This project is fully operational and the grant is closed. The 95% design has been accepted by AEA. All 4 turbines are erected and interconnected into the distribution system. Wireless communication to the turbines is completed. Intertie construction is complete. Switchgear is installed and operational. The project had been closed out. This cordwood system is fully operational and the project is closed-out. The final design was completed, and the grantee requested a change in scope for the construction phase of the project. The request for change in scope will not move forward because the scope items were for maintenance repairs and are not eligible for reimbursement under the Renewable Energy Fund. This project was closed June 2013 with no expenditure of funds. A feasibility study titled, Loud Creek Hydropower Development Conceptual Design and Feasibility Report, dated July 29, 2011, and prepared by EES Consulting, et al, has been completed and accepted. The City submitted an updated schedule and budget which would allow for the installation of a new stage recorder and continuation of data collection. After review, AEA decided no further grant funding will be available for the project. Subsequently, the City determined it would fund the replace of the stage recorder and collect flow data. A site visit was made on June 18, 2013, where a new stage recorder was installed and flow measurements taken. A technical memorandum by McMillen was completed and the grant is closed. The Condition Assessment Report, including the AK Dam Safety Program Periodic Safety Inspection Report, September 2011 site visit memo, and as-built drawings, survey have been completed. The grantee's engineer coordinated with Dam Safety in support of preparing the City's application to modify and repair the dam, including submission of completed construction drawings. The grant is closed. This project is complete and the grant is closed. The project was completed successfully and the grant has been closed. The wind resource analysis report is complete. The project is closed out. The grant is in place effective October 28, 2010. The grant was transferred from Bristol Bay Area Health Corp to Nushagak Cooperative. Nushagak Electric signed a contract with Marsh Creek to perform the study. A power plant visit completed by Marsh Creek. The final Hydro/Wind Integration Report written by WH Pacific has been received by AEA. The project is closed out. The project is complete. The project completed the study titled "Nenana River Hydropower Scheme Healy, Alaska Reconnaissance Study", by Knight Piesold and Co., and dated January 2009. The design work under this grant was completed and the grant has been closed. The Power Purchase Agreement and 35% design has been accepted by AEA. A phased construction schedule was approved by AEA and the City of St. Paul. This will allow the feeder from the City grid to the TDX POSS camp to be designed and built before the overal design of the system has been completed. This was due to concerns regarding harmonics on the distribution system during wind turbine start up. Testing will be completed once the feeder has been built and the turbines connected to the grid to determine if additional equipment will be necessary to handle any harmonics. Power from the turbines will only be allowed on the grid during this testing phase and the full 65% design will be completed after the testing. The feeder 65% design has been accepted by AEA and St. Paul. The 65% design was accepted by AEA and St. Paul on November 16, 2012. The 95% design was accepted by AEA and the City on May 9, 2013. Construction at the POSS camp has been completed. Work on the City Power Plant switchgear has been haulted due to the delayed installation of Generator 2 by the City. The EETF-funded flywheel, which was partially funded out of this grant, has suffered a bearing failure and is not likely to be repaired. AEA and TDX spent the second half of 2016 discussing options for amending the scope. TDX has committed to providing a scope amendment request by 1/20/17. It will include a revised plan for installing dispatchable thermal loads to use excess wind power and stabilize frequency and voltage. The construction and diesel integration work have been completed and the project began operation in early 2015. The Grant is in place. The 95% design has been accepted by AEA. The project is substantially complete and was operating during an AEA site visit on February 3, 2015. Final deliverables have been received and accepted. The project has been closed out. $700,000 of the uncommitted Round I funds, 2195419, were made available for completion of feasibility activities; therefore, this grant was cancelled before grant award. The grant agreement is in place. The met tower was installed on January 29, 2012 at the north end of the old runway. The Alaska Village Electric Cooperative (AVEC) continues to collect wind resource data. Manpower and a new data card have been dispatched for 4Q2012 to recover wind data. Stuyahok Limited did not agree with the appraisal of the Old Airport land conducted by the Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities (ADOT&PF). There is disagreement about the value of the existing buildings on the land. This land was expected to be a key area for the placement of wind turbines. The issue will need to be resolved if construction at this site is deemed attractive after the feasibility study is completed. A draft conceptual design report (CDR) has been completed. A meteorological study was performed from 2004-2006 with equipment attached to the Bergey wind towers, readings were taken at 10 meters and 30 meters. Over the three year period, about 50% of the data was lost and one month was not collected at all during the three year period. The calculated terrain roughness from the data was not consistent with the roughness of other studies with similar terrain and vegetation. Given the lack of consistent data, the questions regarding the calculated roughness, the placement of the data collection equipment and the off-set on the towers, there is a high probability that all the data could have been compromised. Based on these findings, and at the suggestion of AEA, the City of Pilot Point agreed to perform another meteorological study, this time using ten meter towers at multiple locations. Collecting data from multiple locations for a wind resource assessment provides the best analytical criteria for placement of the wind farm and the type(s) of turbines. The final site selection decision will also be based on site control, site access and development costs, transmission line construction costs and community preferences. An amendment to change the scope of work and budget as well as to extend the grant is in place as of September 6, 2012. The grantee installed 10 meter masts at the old Bergey wind turbine site, Airport Hill and near the Post Office. A draft conceptual design report (CDR) was been submitted that proposed all high penetration systems. A review of the CDR was submitted to the grantee and a revised draft CDR was submitted. Issues with the modeling and proposed systems still remained. The City decided to change contractors and a kick-off meeting was held on February 10, 2015. It was agreed that most information required to finish the CDR has been collected. The contractor will provide a budget and timeline for the CDR and Design work and if necessary the grant will be amended. A budget for construction activities will not be provided until the 65% Design has been accepted by AEA. A draft CDR was submitted to AEA and the recommended project was not economically viable. A review of the CDR was supplied to the grantee and a revised CDR submitted in January 2016. The project is now in design after the CDR was accepted by AEA in 2016. The project is closed. The grant was terminated before any funds were expended due to lack of progress by the grantee. This project is complete and the grant is closed. Cordova Electric Cooperative's Humpback Creek Project went into revenue service on July 13, 2011. The project has operated reliably with no downtime since being placed in operation in July 2011. Commissioning was more labor and cost intensive than anticipated in part to the plant being idle for five years. Once the plant was placed in normal operation, the operations and maintenance expenses decreased considerably. The operations costs have been approximately 25% of the fuel savings to date. Annual production is anticipated to exceed 4,000,000 kWh per year. Chenega was completing design documents, permits and a business plan. AEA received draft design and business reports but the grantee has since determined that the project does not appear to be feasible and that they are returning the grant balance. The grant is closed. KEA received the FERC License Amendment. This phase is complete and the grant is closed. A CDR report has been accepted by AEA. NSB provided additional funding to complete the Conceptual Design Report (CDR). The grant period was extended to allow for changes to the CDR. US Fish & Wildlife consultation meetings were held with the Fairbanks regional office. The CDR with amendments has been accepted. The community has provided a resolution supporting the project. The follow on REF grant 7040026 for wind design has been executed. A CDR report has been accepted by AEA. NSB provided additional funding to complete the Conceptual Design Report (CDR). The grant period was extended to allow for changes to the CDR. US Fish & Wildlife consultation meetings were held with the Fairbanks regional office. Final site, turbine selection and community resolution is necessary before the design funds from related REF grant 7040024 will be reimbursed to the grantee for design effort. A CDR report has been accepted by AEA. NSB provided additional funding to complete the Conceptual Design Report (CDR). The grant period was extended to allow for changes to the CDR. US Fish & Wildlife consultation meetings were held with the Fairbanks regional office. The CDR with amendments has been accepted. The Community has provided a resolution supporting the project. The community needs to confirm agreement on the turbine and site selection. The follow on REF grant 7040027 for wind design has been executed. The turbines have been installed and commissioned and Kotzebue Electric Association (KEA) is working on the final construction punch list for the wind farm and transmission line. Contracts for the thermal secondary loads are being negotiated. Premium Power shipped their flow battery out of Kotzebue after it was determined a major re-design was required. The decision not to continue with the Premium Power battery and Request for Information was sent out in late 2013 to identify an energy storage solution. Responses to a Request for Proposals were received in late 2014. KEA selected the lithium-ion Intensium Max 1000kWh/500kW battery from Saft and the battery was installed in the fall of 2015. The battery and controls were in commissioning through 2016. KEA was delayed in completing the dispatchable loads at the hospital and apartment complex due to other priorities of its partners. In late 2016 both partners installed the required equipment and KEA anticipates closing out the grant 3/17. KEA will request a grant extension in early 2017. The grant agreement is in place. The Alaska Village Electric Cooperative (AVEC) has retained WH Pacific as their engineering contractor. V3 Energy installed a met tower in May 2011. The grantee is also getting wind data from the Red Dog port. The shoreline route from the port to Kivalina passes through Cape Krusenstern NM. The wind data at the port is very bimodal: calm (45%) or strong wind events. Data was collected from the Kivalina site for one year with more stable winds. Wind report final draft was completed July 2012. A preliminary analysis between the two sites has been completed as has a geotech recon report. AVEC has delivered the Final Conceptual Design Report and Options Analysis. AVEC has purchased, shipped and installed a new met tower to Kisimigiuktuk Hill to collect wind data with the remaining funds. AEA will write the wind resource analysis for the K-Hill site after at least a year of data collection has finished. Grant close out procedure has been initiated. During the Quarter ending June 30, 2012, system commissioning was completed, including Tracer operating system training. The sea water supply pump loop has performed well to date, including the submerged turbine pump, in-line strainer, and titanium plate heat exchanger. No evidence of fouling has been detected, and the heat exchanger is delivering approach temperatures that are consistently less than the design specification of 2 degrees F. Issues with the system’s data logger prevented data collection for several months; operational data is now available starting in March of 2013. Since commission, the system has since been expanded and is now able to provide heat to the concrete slabs, sidewalk heating for snow melt, and pre-heating of domestic hot water in addition to providing space heating for the building. The oil fuel boilers are available for backup, but have not been used since the heat pump system came online. The grant is closed. Ormat reported disappointing exploration drilling results in 2011, drilling to a depth of 4,500 feet in the eastern leases on Mt. Spurr. The maximum temperature encountered was 140 degrees F, which is substantially less than the minimum for a commercial system. In the summer of 2012, Ormat conducted a geo-hazard study of the central Mt. Spurr area. This was followed with additional field work in 2013, which was aimed at locating future drill targets in this area. The results of this field work, which was funded by Ormat, are currently under review. The project received FERC License P-14066. A majority of the Terms & Conditions are filed except for the Final Project Design and Specifications, Article 302. Land agreements and ACOE Wetlands Permit received. The grant is closed. The grant was cancelled. The grantee indicated they would like to place the project on hold pending the outcome of another renewable energy study. Additionally, site control remains an issue. For these reasons, the grant was cancelled before grant award and expending any funds. This is a combined heat and power project - diesel power and biomass heat. A significant portion of the district heat will be recovered from the diesel engines cooling systems. Construction funds are from REF, DOE and USDA HECG. Construction of the gravel pad, building shell and district heat system is completed. The construction crew is actively installing the mechanical and electrical systems within the building shell. Two of the four diesel engine generator sets are operable. The 3,000 gallon district heating system has been charged. The boiler installation will begin late summer 2017. The project is complete and the grant is closed. The project was conducted successfully providing information about the temperature gradient. Well TG4 indicated temperatures of approximately 325 degrees (F) at approximately 1300 feet deep. The grant has been closed and the project will continue under a Round 4 grant for final design and permitting, which will include well site targeting, confirmation well drilling, and flow testing. The project status for the two awards is described under grant #7040007. The grant was cancelled before grant award. The grantee decided to terminate the project due to its small size and increased costs of licensing, permitting, and design requirements associated with falling under FERC jurisdictional licensing. The grantee was unable to provide the committed match and agreed to forfeit the grant. The grant has been closed out. The average wind speed is 6.93 meters per second at 30 meters above ground. Wind power density is 382 watts per square meter - low class 4. Turbulence is low at 0.09. Wind shear is moderate at 0.158. Estimated net capacity factor is 30.2% for a Northern Power 100-kilowatt turbine or which two turbines are recommended along with secondary loads and controls. The conceptual design report was accepted and the project is ready for design work upon further funding. The grant is closed. The design has been revised and the process of amending the FERC license for the project has started. Agency consultations (Alaska Department of Fish & Game, US Fish & Wildlife Service, National Marine Fisheries) and the public have occurred. The license amendment application was submitted in 2015. Construction was completed in 2016 and the grant is now closed. The grant is in place. A meteorological tower was installed on August 9, 2012. On March 26, 2013, AEA was informed by Marsh Creek that data was finally collected from the met tower but was not retrievable from the data card. The data card and logger are being sent to NRG in the event they can retrieve the data. A new logger was lent to Marsh Creek by AEA and has been installed, but the data loss caused a delay in the project. Eighteen months of good data have now been collected. The winds are strong, with turbulence in the IEC level B range - moderate, but still workable. The grantee has provided more in-kind match than was required of the grant. The grantee has been informed that they do not need to continue tracking match for the purpose of this grant. CEA has completed final design documents and has started construction. As of the end of 2014 the Stetson diversion structure is nearly complete. Remaining work on the conveyance and siphon will be completed in 2015. The grant is closed. The grant is in place. The scope and budget have been adjusted to allow for the avian issues in the community. A modified 40' free standing monopole tower was installed on May 23, 2012 and data collection is ongoing. An avian study has been approved and is ongoing. Only a draft Conceptual Design Report (CDR) will be required of the grantee to allow budget for the avian study. The grantee has provided more in-kind match than was required of the grant. The grantee has been informed that they do not need to continue tracking the match for the purpose of this grant. During 2011, the Alaska Center for Energy and Power (ACEP) completed lab and field work related to Tasks 1 and 2, including imaging surveys and analysis, preliminary field work and heat flow modeling, and water sampling. Two 500 ft. temperature gradient holes were also drilled. During the 2012 field season, 29 additional temperature gradient holes were drilled and 3 confirmation holes were drilled to a depth of nearly 2,000 ft. The well holes remained open during the 2013 field season for monitoring as another separately funded production well was drilled. The grant is closed. The grant agreement is in place. A meteorological (met) tower was installed between St. Michael and Stebbins which showed a viable, Class 5 wind regime. Due to land use issues this site cannot be used for wind turbines. Another met tower was installed January 2012 at a location just North of Stebbins. The wind resource at the Stebbins site is class 5 to low class 6. A draft Conceptual Design Report was submitted in on July 13, 2013 and AEA review comments were sent to the grantee on August 19, 2013. The CDR has been accepted and the grant has been closed out. The current diesel power house and electrical distribution system are not capable of supporting a utility-scale wind system. A Rural Power System Upgrade (RPSU) conceptual design report is in progress and will include recommendation for integration of renewable resources. This project is operational and heating the Kokhanok Village Council Building and the Community Building. The project will be closed out pending a final inspection. AEA will fund the final design and construction. The grant in place. A draft Conceptual Design Report (CDR) has been submitted. Marsh Creek, LLC will be working with the Rural Power System Upgrades Program during the new power plant design to finalize the CDR. The grant is closed. This conventional run of the river hydro project has completed the design phase. Chitina Electric Inc. has applied for hydro construction funds from the most recent AEA REF and USDA HECG grant programs. The project construction is ranked number one on the "REF Round 10 Recommended Project List". Once construction funds are secured the project will move into the next phase. Construction activities for Terror Lake Unit 3 addition have been completed and the unit has been commissioned. The grant is closed. Grantee revised the FERC Draft License Application (DLA) to address FERC, USFWS, and ADF&G comments. Anticipate completing revisions to the DLA and submitting the License Application to FERC October 31, 2013. The grant is closed. Final wind modeling, short circuit study, arc flash hazard analysis and interconnection design are underway and scheduled for July 2017 completion. The met tower study indicated a class 2 wind resource which does not provide for an economically feasible project. A final report is being prepared and the grant will be closed. The project is in closeout. The application requested the design and construction of three Northern Power NW100b wind turbines. Only funding for design work was awarded. At AEA's request the grantee is considering the installation of one Emergya Wind Technology EWT 900 in place of the Northern Power turbines; in response to the possible interties between Mountain Village, St. Mary’s, Pilot Station, and St. Mary's. The change in scope exceeds the original budget estimate for task 5. If future Renewable Energy Fund money is awarded, the remainder of task 5 will be included in the scope of the awarded grant. The deliverable from task 5 will be required to be accepted by the Authority before construction funds are released in a later REF proposal. Negotiating purchase of EWT 900. Project was in proposal status pending a rebuild of the diesel power system. The appropriated Renewable Energy Fund budget for this project is $25,000, with no required local match. This project was canceled by AEA on 7/25/14 due to a lack of response from the community. The meteorological tower was installed at the end of the old airport runway on December 20, 2012. The first 6 months of data, indicate a strong class 3 wind resource at the met tower location and that the wind vane has been malfunctioning. Data collection is ongoing, but hampered by an incorrectly formated SD card on the datalogger (manufacturer switched from MMC to SD card on newer dataloggers). V3 Energy traveled to Eek in October 2014 to correct datalogger communications issues. Village electric system is single-phase which may limit wind turbine options. Conceptual design report activity is underway. The grant was executed on October 24, 2011. The grantee is using WH Pacific as their contractor. The meteorological (met) tower was installed June 12, 2012. Data from installation through December 10, 2012 indicates a class 2 wind resource. Data collection is ongoing. After one year of data collection the wind resource does not appear to support a feasible wind project. However, wind varies annually and it is not uncommon to measure the wind resource at a location for more than one year. Also, technology is advancing that allows for the development of lesser wind regimes. Additional wind data, coupled with data from the power plant and possible secondary loads, may indicate a viable wind project or demonstrate that another technology is more appropriate for use in Kwethluk. Project has been closed out. Acknowledging that a viable wind project may not be possible in Kwethluk, a full Conceptual Design Report will not be required of the grantee. Instead these funds will be used to perform a rigorous data collection campaign to support future wind or other energy projects. Ten months of wind data was collected and a wind resource report completed. A draft Conceptual Design Report (CDR) was written based on this initial wind study. The AEA Wind Program requires an industry standard minimum of 12 months of wind data be collected prior to performing a Wind Resource Analysis or Conceptual Design Report. A met tower was installed September 28, 2012 to fill the gaps in the wind data. The final CDR has been accepted. The project is closed out. The grant agreement is in place. A 50 meter meteorological tower was installed in September 22, 2012. The winter met tower data has raised icing concerns. AEA will lend a 10 meter mast to AVEC to install at another potential wind turbine location to collect data and AVEC will install instrumentation at 10 meters on the current met tower. This will allow wind and icing data to be correlated between the two sites in order to determine the best site. Data indicates a question as to the actual orientation of the wind vane. Local personnel will verify the orientation of the vane boom. Draft CDR is complete. A new turbine site will be selected closer to town with less icing potential. The grant agreement was signed on December 4, 2012. The progress report submitted by the grantee on July 24,2013, notes that the contract was awarded to Leland Johnson & Associated for the preliminary engineering phase. The grant has been closed out. This is the follow on design for grant 7030013 CDR. The design grant agreement is in draft and under internal review. Final site, turbine selection and community resolution is necessary before the design funds from related REF grant 7040024 will be reimbursed to the grantee for design effort. MET Tower readings were completed in 2009. HDL was selected to develop the conceptual design. AEA, NSB and HDL conducted a site visit in August. A draft CDR was completed on August 30, 2013 and revised on September 20, 2013 with AEA feedback. The grantee has applied for Renewable Energy Fund, Round VII & VIII funding for the design and permitting phase. The final CDR has been accepted by AEA. The grantee has submitted the final invoice in October 2014. The grant was closed out in the first quarter of 2015. The grant agreement is under internal review. No funds will be allocated until the conceptual design report from Round III grant #7030012 has been accepted by AEA and that grant has been closed out. This grant agreement is under internal review. No funds will be allocated until the CDR from Round III #7030014 has been accepted by AEA and that grant has been closed out. The Conceptual Design Report is complete and this project is closed. The Kotzebue Paper and Wood Waste to Energy Project has been successfully completed and closed out. The City of Kotzebue project has submitted all final project documents. AEA has reviewed and accepted the final feasibility study and will provide future assistance to the City of Kotzebue if they decide to proceed with project. The grant agreement is in place. AVEC is working with a consultant to identify met tower needs and options for new turbines. Information was collected on machines that could be used to repower the site. AVEC had discussions with their term consultant regarding repowering the wind site with different turbines. The consultant developed a proposal to perform the following and provided a fee proposal. AVEC purchased and delivered a 34 meter met tower to Selawik. The FAA permit for installation and operation of the met tower was approved. The tower has been raised and is collecting wind data. All turbines have been erected. Roadwork is finished except for some minor culvert work. The substation equipment is installed. The collector grid is installed. The O&M building is finished. The civil work is finished at the communications site on the Parks Highway. The contractor has installed GSU transformers and secondary cables to the wind towers. The 138kW transmission tap to the Northern Intertie will need a permanent solution whenever the line is energized to 230kV - current workaround is using wooden poles for 138kV operation. An anti-freeze solution will be injected into the conduit from the GSUs into the wind turbine towers to prevent cable damage from freeze-up. All turbines are commissioned. The grant is closed. The Round 4 grant was never issued, as it was contingent upon successful exploration results from the Round 3 grant supporting feasibility work. The applicant requested that the Round 4 funds intended for production well drilling be used to continue earlier phase work of exploration drilling to identify a hot enough resource. AEA negotiated with Ormat but could not come to an agreement on cost share and Ormat cancelled the project. The Renewable Energy Fund budget for this project of $1,999,972 was released within the Fund to re-grant to Round 8 REF projects during the 2015 legislative session. The grant award document has been prepared and signed by CEA. However, the grant award has not been issued. AEA is awaiting the results of ongoing exploration activities by Ormat to discover and define significant geothermal resources on Mt Spurr (Grant #7030018). The grant was not awarded as exploratory drilling under the feasibility grant did not identify a commercially viable heat source. The grant was cancelled before grant award due to lack of progress and unresponsiveness by the grantee. Aquatic and Water Resources field studies were conducted. The grantee expended all grant funds and the grant has been closed. The system is fully operational and the grantee reports that the system is operating as intended. The grant is closed. See above AEA accepted the feasibility study prepared by the grantee's consultant, Orenco, for Kootznoowoo. Kootznoowoo is moving forward with the development of the Barrier Falls hydro project. Recent work includes modifying land use and project permits and undertaking the preliminary design. Most of the funds under this grant have been expended. A new grant was awarded augmenting the scope of work in this grant to allow Kootznoowoo to complete the preliminary project design and drawings. The project is to protect the Snettisham transmission line that carries the majority of Juneau-Douglas area power from failing because of avalanches. Two transmission towers will be protected with avalanche diversion structures. To date the foundations are completed for both diversion structures (4-4 & 4-5) and the heavy equipment required for the foundation preparation have been removed. The steel has been flown to the sites and the steel is being welded together. The project has had approximately four weeks of weather delays. The diversion structure for tower 4-5 should be completed by winter. Because of weather delays and materials costs expenses have been higher than budgeted. The project is closed. Final construction activities are nearing completion for this AEA managed project. It is anticipated the final work will be completed in summer 2014. The Pelican hydro project was started up in March 2013 and has provided virtually all power required by the City. The only exceptions were a few short-term outages and the operation of the diesels required for ensuring reliability. It is currently being optimized. Since the hydro came on-line, AEA has refined the operation of the electric boiler at the school to optimize frequency control and reduce fuel consumption at the City. This process still requires some final programming of the dispatchable boiler controls, which is expected to be completed this winter. Additionally, we are installing pipe clamp sleeves on the penstock. The most significant remaining work is to address erosion at the penstock caused by unanticipated artesian springs in the hillside above the penstock. These became most evident in a recent storm event which dumped 5inches of rain on Pelican in 24 hours. The grant is closed. All state permits necessary for construction have been issued. ADNR issued the City Early Entry Authorization for project easements on state land effective August 1, 2013. State Fish Habitat and Water Use permits have been issued. The City applied for and ADNR issued a final decision to reopen an existing rock quarry at approximately mile 0.8 of Indian River Road for use. USFS issued a road use permit for Indian River Road that is good for 5 years and is renewable indefinitely. The COE issued permits for wetlands fill and work in waters. Phase I (access) design drawings and contracts were finalized and issued for construction, 95% drawings for Phase II is in progress. Engineer's cost estimate for Phase I was completed and Phase II is being updated. Engineer's cost estimate for Phase II, updated financial and economic analysis, and draft business and operating plans are to be done during the next reporting period. The grant is in closeout. As of January 2016 the City is completing final revisions to the Phase II drawings to simplify the project and increase the available head slightly. Construction is expected to resume in 2016. This project is operational and the grant is closed FERC licensing work continues with field studies taking place for the approved study plans along with geotechnical investigations. Preliminary design work is underway as well. At the beginning of 2014, construction was underway. Fabrication of valves, turbines and generators in progress and testing of units had commenced. Switchgear had been delivered to site. Powerhouse, excavation for penstock and access road, concrete foundation for new hatchery head tank, demolition and replacement of valves at dam were completed. KPU had begun installing conduit for transmission and communication, and powerhouse electrical system. KPU had submitted applications for construction of the Achilles Diversion at an alternate site and is awaiting approvals from FERC, USFS, DNR, and ACOE. The project was completed in December 2014 & closed out. Some warranty work will extend through 2015 The project is complete and the grant has been closed out. The University of Alaska Fairbanks - Alaska Center for Energy and Power (ACEP) has submitted the final report for this project, and the grant is closed. The project is complete and grant is closed. IRHA has successfully completed the biomass feasibility studies for eight communities in Interior Alaska: Hughes, Ruby, Koyukuk, Nulato, Kaltag, Nikolai, Anvik, and Holy Cross. In December 2012, IRHA submitted all final documents and AEA has reviewed and accepted the final studies. Three communities will advance to construction in a Round V grant: Hughes; Anvik; Koyukuk. The project is closed out. Project constructed Fall 2012. Minor commissioning required over several months, but generally fully operational throughout 2013. As of 2014, the project is functioning as intended. The grant is now closed. Project Status: In August and September 2016 Akutan drilled a 1,955 foot well in Hot Springs Bay Valley, the third exploratory well drilled in the valley, to test water temperatures and flow to confirm a usable resource to provide electricity and/or heat to the City of Akutan. Three pressure and temperature surveys were conducted, with a maximum measured temperature of 329°F at about 500 feet. Horner calculations based on thermal recovery indicate a maximum formation temperature of 340°F at 400 feet, 334°F at 850 feet, and 310°F at the bottom of the hole. Fracture permeability of the well (AK-3) is critical to success, and is concentrated in the shallowest ~900’ of the well, with the deeper portions of the well exhibiting lower permeability. The casing, cemented to a depth of only 800’, allows access to the fracture networks at 840’-880’. As with well TG-2, permeability is going to be the controlling factor. If sufficient permeability exists below 800’, this well may be productive. The measured temperatures indicate that it is unlikely that the well will flow without assistance, at least initially. Analysis of well data took place October through December 2016, with a decision expected early in 2017. If it is found to be warranted, flow testing is planned for summer 2017. Additional funding from a US Department of Energy award ($931,000) and a grantee match of $355,000 also supports the project costs. Following the drilling phase, an estimated $500,000 of project funds remain for well testing and monitoring, final design, financial analysis, business and operations work. The grant agreement is in place. The grantee has chosen to work with Marsh Creek as their contractor. V3 Energy will be using data collected from 2004 to 2006, as well as November through December of 2011, to complete the Wind Resource Assessment (WRA) as a subcontractor of Marsh Creek. A draft of the Conceptual Design Report (CDR) was submitted. Wind resource deemed Class 3-4; very turbulent, unsuitable for Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine. After the CDR was reviewed by AEA, it was agreed that the False Pass electrical system is not currently capable of using wind power and the project will not proceed to the next phase at this time. The grant agreement is in place. AVEC is coordinating with the City of Koyuk, via letters and telephone conversations regarding the proposed activities and possible land use for setting a MET tower. FAA approved all three proposed met tower sites. The community is concerned about impacts to berry picking if the primary site is developed. AVEC is considering the use of smaller turbines which may not necessitate a full wind study and feasibility assessment. The village corporation has chosen not to provide site control for a met tower site. AVEC sent a letter to the city stating that the project funds will be returned to AEA. The project has been closed out. The grant agreement is in place. AVEC has negotiated a lease with the Elim Native Corporation to place a met tower at the primary site. The FAA permit for the met tower was approved. AVEC ordered and shipped a 34 meter met tower to Elim. V3 Energy installed the tower in Janurary 2014. The modem was non-responsive. The contractor replaced the SIM chip to correct the problem. Current wind data indicates a class 1 wind site. Grantee/contractor is waiting for FAA determination on alternate site. This project is complete and identified sufficient wood supplies to support a small-scale heating system in Cordova. The grant is closed. Construction is complete and the grant is in closeout. The grant is in place. The grantee initially worked with STG as their contractor and is now working with IES. The meteorological (met) tower was installed June 6, 2012. The required, minimum 12 months of data collection has been met and initially the data shows a class 6 wind resource. Data collection is continuing. The CDR was accepted by AEA in 2016 and the project is in close out. The grant is in place. The grantee has chosen to work with WH Pacific as their contractor. The meteorological (met) tower was installed June 6, 2012. AEA is working with the grantee and their contractor to complete work required under this award. AVTEC has cancelled the grant. The grant agreement is in place however the project has stalled while additional funding partners are identified. May 2015 OPRC continues to seek additional funding. As of Sep 2015 no additional action is apparent and the future prospects of additional funding are unknown. The grant has been closed out. The project is complete. The grant completed the report titled "Hunter Creek Hydroelectric Reconnaissance Study", prepared by Polarconsult Alaska, Inc., and dated April 2013. Village has submitted design documents and requested round 8 RE Funds for construction. Project was not recommended for funding. The B/C ratio is 0.36. This grant has been closed out. AEA and MSB determined that there were both technical and operational problems that made continuation of the project unfeasible. The project has been terminated and MSB has returned the grants funds, $750,000. The project was found to not be economically viable. The grant is closed. The grant is complete and closed. Deliverable under this grant, is the report "Jack River Hydroelectric Reconnaissance Study", dated March 2013, prepared by Polarconsult Alaska, Inc. This Round IV grant has not been issued. Discussions are underway to consider changes to the project features to add more reservoir storage, allowing project energy to be dispatched during periods of low precipitation. If found feasible, this change will require re-opening the FERC license for amendment. There remain some impediments to move forward pending resolution/details of power sales agreement and ownership shares. The appropriated Renewable Energy Fund budget for this project is $2,000,000. The study found that the project is not economical due to the limited demand and the high cost of the project. It was found that the Project is likely to be technologically feasible using well-known and reliable construction methods. However, the remote location of the lake and the need to develop storage makes the cost of the Project very expensive. The report recommended the project should not be considered further for development as long as loads in the ULC system trend along the reference load case of the SEIRP. Should loads increase significantly more than the reference load forecast, or if the Palmer mine and/or Yukon Energy interconnection appear imminent, then development of Connelly Lake should be reconsidered. The grant is closed. A feasibility report was completed and the project was found to be uneconomic. The project is closed. SEAPA’s consultant McMillen prepared a report on hydro potential of Annette Island, and an Metlakatla Indian Community (MIC) sponsored review was provided by D Hittle & Associates (along with HDR, EPS, Metlakatla F&W). Regarding the intertie, MIC awarded a PM contract to HDR, however, no additional work has been completed. MIC anticipates that the Annette Island study will serve as the basis for the design of Metlakatla-Ketchikan Intertie MKI. Part of the intertie has been constructed, excluding the submarine portion. As of January 2017, MIC has reported that it is evaluating the potential for additional hydropower from Triangle Lake and the potential impact on the proposed intertie. The Alaska Energy Authority (AEA) has received the final report and Haines Borough (Grantee) has completed the Hydropower Reconnaissance Study for Excursion Inlet as required by the scope of work (Report). AEA’s finds the Grantee’s Report satisfies the requirements of the Grant. A final review of the Grantee’s Report was performed by AEA resulting in the following general comments and recommendations for the Grantee’s consideration for future work. AEA concurs with the final recommendations for stream gaging (particularly for South Creek), LIDAR surveys, geologic, land use, and permitting and aquatic investigations and consultations. The grant is closed. The grantee's consultant completed the feasibility report. AEA reviewed and provided comments. The grant is closed. The feasibility study was completed in July 2012 and the grant is closed. The feasibility study provided information to the City of Sitka, who chose to construction the Kettleson Memorial Library air source heat pump with their own funding as part of a larger renovation and expansion project. The construction project is underway and the heat pump has been installed. The City re-applied for REF funding to construct the Centennial Hall air source heat pump. The feasibility study was completed in July 2012. The grant is closed. In the fall of 2011, the contractor HDL conducted shallow temperature surveys, collected rock, water, and soil samples, and mapped geological strata. In the spring and summer of 2012, the team completed a thermal imaging survey, collected additional shallow temperature data, and conducted a stream cross-section survey to estimate flow rates. Soil gas surveys were performed in the fall of 2012. Results have been compiled into a final report which includes an economic analysis and recommendations for next steps to confirm the resource. The grant is closed. This grant was to pursue, as funding allows, the following: 1) establishing a project management office; 2) preparing a project development plan; 3) preparing a plan of operations, maintenance and ownership; 4) 35% design documents & cost estimates; 5) final design documents & cost estimates; and 6) completed permits. The grant recipient Metlakatla Indian Community (MIC) arranged for SEAPA to prepare an initial study on hydro potential of Annette Island (consultant was McMillen, report 6/2014). MIC then arranged for DHittle & Associates to review the report (11/10/2014). This appeared to be the end of MIC’s efforts as of early 2016. As of January 2017 MIC has reported that it is continuing to study the hydropower potential for Triangle Lake. Activities planned for the next reporting period are: complete ground surveying, develop hydrology needed for sizing project and estimated energy, and develop preliminary design. Feasibility study is scheduled to be completed in January 2017. The wind turbine construction is complete and commissioning finished in mid September 2012. Battery construction and commissioning is complete, setting the two dynamic power units on their pads. The substation upgrade was completed in late September 2012 and went online in early October. A change order was made with Xtreme Power systems for the addition of a Clean Agent FE-25 unit fire suppression systems in light of the Kahuku wind farm battery system fire in early August 2012. Each fire suppression unit costs $55k. Testing of the system successfully supported a 3.4MW trip. The grant was closed on March 1, 2013. The Hughes and Koyukuk systems are operational. Anvik is in the final phase of construction and should be operational in the 2nd quarter of 2017. This project scope will be modified to include the design of the school with the remaining funds. Project completed successfully. Grant has been closed out. The grant was awarded for $290k to augment the scope of work in this, the design grant, which should allow Kootznoowoo to complete the preliminary project design and drawings. The hydro project started providing electricity in Apr 2015 and was commissioned in Aug 2015. This phase 1 grant is pending closeout. The related phase 2 REF grant is still in progress. This grant has been combined with RE Fund Round 1 Grant #2195438 and all reporting will be performed under that grant. Please see grant #2195438 "Newton Peak Wind Farm" for all information pertaining to this project. This project operational and the grant in closeout. The engineering design is in progress through the Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium. ANTHC is anticipating a shortage of funds to complete the construction and is pursuing other funding opportunities. The Grantee completed the work and issued a final feasibility report titled “Hillside Creek Project, Final Draft Report For Hydroelectric Feasibility Study, Scammon Bay, AK, ANTHC 14-C-81313, Rev. 0, September 15, 2014.” The report found that the Hillside Creek hydroelectric project is a viable addition to electric generation in Scammon Bay that should be investigated further through design and permitting efforts. The proposed project resulting from the report has the following configuration: Intake Watershed Area 0.73 sq mi Static Head 480 ft Hydraulic Capacity 6.0 cfs Pipeline Length 4300 ft Pipeline Diameter 16 in Transmission Length 0 mi Min Operational Flow 0.45 cfs Net Efficiency 82% Nominal Capacity 188 kW Annual Energy Potential 755,790 kWh Displaced Diesel Energy 646,537 kWh Future work should include a focus on stream flow data collection, conceptual design improvement, community and other stakeholder consultation, initial permitting actions, land acquisition, potable water system integration, and compatibility and economics with wind generation and diesel heat recovery projects. Project design would follow if it is decided to construct the project. The hydrology data is not adequate to recommend a project size for final design and permitting. Collection of stream flow data on Hillside Creek will be required if the project proceeds to design and permitting. It is recommended to install a stream gauge and collect 2 to 3 years of flow data for project design and permitting. The grant is closed. This project is operational. The project will closeout pending final inspection in first quarter 2016. The project was completed slightly under budget. $3,770.85 will be returned to the Renewable Energy Fund for re-appropriation to new projects. The project is now in closeout process. The engineering design is in progress through the Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium. The City of Togiak is working with Summit Consulting to prepare 35% design drawings for a design-build project. The project was put on hold in September 2015, pending Denali Commission funding for a new AVEC powerhouse. The design will be adapted to the new powerhouse location and layout. As of January 2016, AVEC reported that it has full funding for power house construction. As of August 2016 the city had a cost estimate of $880,000 for final design and construction, but only has a grant budget of $486,180. The city is in the process of determining how to proceed. The grant is in place. The Collaborative Project Agreement between AVEC and ANTHC is also in place. The final design was approved June 6, 2014 by AVEC. AEA accepted the design June 12, 2014 and has released procurement and construction funds. Construction has been completed and an inspection of the project by ANTHC, AVEC, and AEA was completed January 6, 2014. Upon receipt of as-builts and final reimbursement the project will be closed-out. One of the two wind turbines in Mekoryuk suffered a fire inside the base of the tower. The fire was unrelated to this project and will decrease the amount of excess electricity available to the Water Treatment Plant. AVEC is assessing their options and will most likely replace the turbine (which is insured) with a newer model. Performance of this project should return to, or improve upon, initial expectations when the turbine is replaced. The project is in closeout. System now operating; O&M manual delivered to community The grant is in place. The Collaborative Project Agreement between AVEC and ANTHC is also in place. The final design was approved June 6, 2014 by AVEC. AEA accepted the design June 12, 2014 and has released procurement and construction funds. Construction has been completed and commissioning is under way. Interference between the radio communications of the power plant, wind turbines, and secondary loads has caused a delay in the final inspection. A site inspection was performed on April 28, 2015 by AEA. All components were installed and the system was functioning in automatic mode upon departing. O&M manual has been delivered to the community. On receipt of as-built drawings, the project will be closed out. The grant is in place. The Collaborative Project Agreement between AVEC and ANTHC is also in place. The final design was approved June 6, 2014 by AVEC. AEA accepted the design June 12, 2014. The system is operational and upon receipt of final deliverables will be closed out. O&M manual has been delivered to the community. The project is in closeout. The grant is in place. The Collaborative Project Agreement between AVEC and ANTHC is also in place. The final design was approved June 6, 2014 by AVEC. AEA accepted the design June 12, 2014. The system is operational and upon receipt of final deliverables will be closed out. O&M manual has been delivered to the community. Tanacross contracted with Coffman Engineering to conduct an analysis of the most economic biomass space distribution approach and design and engineering of the selected preferred option for the purpose of serving the village's water treatment/washeteria plant and the new 10,000 square foot multi-purpose building. Tanacross has procured two GARN 2000 boilers and constructed a 2,000 s.f. biomass heat station building using village force account labor. This building included a concrete slab/foundation, SIP panel construction (SIP's donated by TVC) and a manufactured roof truss system. The building is fully enclosed including doors installed. Work has now halted on the project. Bids for mechanical work exceed current funding. Tanacross is seeking additional funds to complete the biomass heat system. This project is partially constructed but does not have adequate funds to complete the work. The community is working to identify additional funding and is considering a loan. The grant agreement was signed. Awaiting completion of final design and permitting. Final reimbursement request received Jul 2015 indicated that all grant funds have been expended. Project is ready for construction although AEA provided review comments that questioned some aspects of the proposed plans. The final reimbursement report indicates Canyon is proceeding with turbine construction and the general construction contract with Sunland is awaiting award by the City. The grant is closed. The grant agreement was signed on 7/29/2013. The grant was amended in 9/15 to change the final scope, after the feasibility study, from a turbine generator replacement to increase capacity to improvements to the intake and powerhouse efficiency. INNEC's consultant has made multiple trips to the site and all work is complete as of 12/16. the grantee anticipates closeout in the firt quarter of 2017. The grant agreement was signed on 7/29/2013. The grant was amended in 9/15 to change the final scope, after the feasibility study, from a turbine generator replacement to increase capacity to improvements to the intake and powerhouse efficiency. INNEC's consultant has made multiple trips to the site and all work is complete as of 12/16. the grantee anticipates closeout in the first quarter of 2017. The grant is in place as of May 28, 2014. Lake and Peninsula Borough will work with V3 Energy to complete the scope of work. Lake and Peninsula Borough has added money to this project in order to install a 34 meter meterological tower to collect bankable data. The met tower was installed in July 2014. The met tower is indicating class 2 to 3 winds. A wind resource report will be written after a full year of data is collected. The grant is in place as of May 28, 2014. Lake and Peninsula Borough is working with V3 Energy to complete the scope of work. A meteorlogical tower was purchased and installed in August 2014. After one year of data, the wind resource looks to be a Class 5 (Excellent). HOMER modeling has started. Holding discussions with community with regards to their specific goals for the wind project, especially in light of the school being closed due to low enrollment. This would reduce winter electric loads and remove a significant secondary thermal load from the proposed energy system. The Eagle solar project is operational. The grant is closed. The grant agreement was signed August 2, 2013. Substantial completion is scheduled for January 2015. Grant reporting is current through November 2014. All grant have been expended and the reconstructed and reconfigured Blue Lake project was operational and commissioned at the end of 2014. The grant has been closeout. The grant agreement was signed on August 8, 2013. In 2014, due to permitting and construction delays, the grant was extended until 12/2015. The project construction shut down in December 2014 in order to allow the grantee to obtain additional financing. The Grantee obtained additional financing and completed the construction of the project in June 2015. The project started operation at the end of July 2015. All grant funds have been expended and the grant is closed. The grant agreement was signed September 11, 2013. However before any funds were expended, the grantee and AEA agreed that this project should not be pursued any further. A letter was sent to the applicant on January 5, 2016 to formalize the grant cancellation. The project is complete and the grant has been closed out. The boiler was initially fired in December 2016. The heating system is now operational and commissioning will continue through the 2017 heating season. The project is in winter shut down. The intake structure, access road, and powerhouse are substatially complete. Work is scheduled for completion in 2017. The project has been commissioned and the grant is ready to be closed upon receipt of the final deliverables. 2013: The final reports have been accepted and the grant is closed. This system is operational and the grant has been closed out. This project was constructed by ANTHC. AEA completed connections to new AEA provided power house in 2015. A handover from ANTHC to AEA took place in June 2015 concurrent with the power plant completion by AEA. The grant is being closed out. Construction is complete, system is operational. The grant agreement has been executed. It is currently being amended to reflect project changes. Expected to start operation in early 2017 This heat recovery system is operational and is awaiting final deliverables for close-out. The system started operating in December 2016. System is operational but well under budget. Community will extend the system to the teacher housing over the next year. The wind system in Kokhanok has not been operational since the original commissioning of the system. The Kokhanok project team is investigating technology options for a low to mid penetration system similar to the St. George wind system that can be completed with the remaining grant funds. Power plant switchgear and control upgrades will be required to make this system operational and the project team is evaluating funding opportunities. The grant agreement was signed on July 24, 2013. Kickoff meeting held on April 15, 2015 and draft feasibility/concept study submitted for review on July 15, 2015. Review comments were completed and submitted in August. Final feasibility/conceptual study pending agency acceptance. Anticipate report approval and grant close out March 2017. 9/15: the grantee received FERC's notice of non-jurisdictional status. Design and permitting are ongoing. As of Sep 2015 approximately 250k in grant funds are available for the design and remaining permitting work. The grantee conducted additional fisheries surveys through the summer of 2016. These were coordinated with ADFG per the 5/16 work plan. Grantee is monitoring water flow through winter 2016/17 to determine spawning bed viability. Plans were submitted for AEA review in November 2014. Switchgear and hydro turbine specs were submitted for review in November 2014. The business & operating plan, cost estimate and engineers energy estimate were submitted for review in January 2015. The City issued an invitation to bid May 2015 and then passed a unanimous resolution to award and provided notice of intent to award to Southeast Road Builders, Inc. and executed the contract for the Phase II construction which began in mid June 2015. This system is operational. The project is awaiting final deliverables before closeout. The air source heat pump is part of a larger retrofit for the building which includes major energy efficiency improvements. As of January 2016, the interior walls are partially framed and the installation of the electrical, mechanical, plumbing, and building control infrastructure is in progress. Construction activities pertaining to the heating system were complete in January 2017. AEA is waiting for delivery of final As-Built drawings to complete the grant requirements. The project has been commissioned and the grant is ready to be closed upon receipt of the final deliverables. The RFP for the design of the school and pool heating system will be released in 1st quarter 2017. A pellet stove has been installed to heat the water treatment plant. A steering committee has been formed of biomass technical resources to work with the community on design review and technology selection. The initial feasibility study funded by this grant is complete. IPEC has since indicated that it is proceeding with final design using IPEC funds. A source of construction funding has not been identified (approximate cost $6 million). The grant has been closed out. The major portion of the construction (controls integration) was completed in the spring of 2015. The remaining construction will be resumed after the design is revised to provide excess energy utilization for two new community buildings (water treatment plant and City building) in lieu of the buildings planned previously which are smaller and adequately heated already. The Grantee did not proceed with the revised scope of work to include the two new community buildings. The grant has been closed out. The grant budget and scope has been agreed upon by the grantee and AEA program manager. The grant has been signed by all parties and is in place effective Sept. 9, 2014. US fish & Wildlife Service consultation was completed on Aug. 7. FAA permit for the meteorological tower was received on Aug. 11. Tetlin Village Council authorized use of their lands on Aug. 28. Met tower was installed on Sep. 26. Met tower is collecting data and transmitting through the modem. The grantee will continue to monitor and review data with AEA over the next year. System is operating and displacing an estimated 7,500 gallons of oil per year. The grant has been closed out. Construction is nearly complete. AEA staff is planning a site inspection in March 2017 along with a local Liaison from Tanana Chiefs Conference. The hydro project started providing electricity in Apr 2015 and was commissioned in Aug 2015. The diesel integration portion of the project is still underway. The grantee is soliciting for a design firm specializing in diesel integration. The grant was executed in June 2015 for $620,000 to Ketchikan Gateway Borough. The project has been completed and the grant has been closed out. CRW has been hired by ANTHC and is completing the design. Design Complete. Anticipate construction for summer season 2017. Project completion March 2018. System is operating but not well. Issues at the power plant and washeteria are reducing the delivered heat to the clinic. The final design of this project is in progress through a Round 6 Renewable Energy Fund grant. The construction grant will be issued when the final design is accepted. The community is completing the harvest for the first year of operation. Project was completed and operational in early October, 2015, with exception of installation of BTU Meters that will be installed this summer. Have had a few issues with the system including leaks and temperature controls in a couple of buildings. Final repairs were completed in early January, 2016 and the system is operating. Heat recovered from the Power Plant is adequate to meet the demands of all 5 buildings, except in extreme cold at which case the store system switches to oil fired heat. The grant agreement has not been put in place. The building with the largest heating load has elected to utilize a propane heating system and is no longer interested in participating in this project. CRW has completed 65% of the design. System will start operating in early 2017. Schedule and budget have been negotiated with the grantee. Grant agreement has completed internal review at AEA. The grant agreement was signed by all parties in December 2014. Most work has been completed and the grantee expects to deliver the conceptual design soon. The grant was executed on August 28, 2014. Geotechnical field work was completed in the summer of 2014. This project was put on hold during AVEC's re-evaluation of turbine selection and negotiation with AKDOT to change air traffic patterns in the area of Stebbins. Design activities are underway. Extended grant to work on permitting issues. Lake and Peninsula Borough is working with V3 Energy to complete the scope of work. AEA is revising the earlier wind resource report to comply with current best practices. The grant agreement was executed in November 2015. AEA revision of the wind resource report is nearly complete. The grant is in place. Construction is currently underway and is anticipated to be completed in Fall 2017. The grant is in place and work is underway. The project has been commissioned and final deliverables have been received. The grant has been closed. The grant was executed in December 2014 to ANTHC for a design-build project. ANTHC began the design process. As of November 2016 ANTHC reported that the construction estimate is $1,086,200 and available funds are $390,000. ANTHC also reported that the community is not sure if it wants to proceed. The grant agreement is in place and the Organized Village of Kake is finalizing the RFP for contractor selection. The Tribal Council is applying for a wood innovations grant through the US Forest Service for the design work of the boiler system. The type of boiler system has yet to be determined; AEA staff is working with the community to select the best fit for the community's needs. The new cordwood boilers are operational at the Thorne Bay School and the Naukati School. Design and construction is proceeding for the Hollis School. The grant is in place and site access negotiations are underway. start_date 6/1/2008 9/1/2008 1/29/2009 6/1/2008 6/30/2008 6/1/2008 6/30/2008 6/1/2008 1/29/2009 6/1/2008 6/1/2008 1/28/2009 10/29/2008 1/12/2009 2/9/2009 2/9/2009 6/1/2008 1/28/2009 2/20/2009 6/1/2008 5/11/2009 8/20/2008 10/7/2008 6/1/2008 9/2/2009 6/1/2008 7/12/2012 8/20/2008 8/20/2008 8/20/2008 8/20/2008 8/20/2008 8/20/2008 8/20/2008 8/20/2008 8/20/2008 8/20/2008 8/20/2008 8/20/2008 8/20/2008 8/20/2008 8/20/2008 8/20/2008 8/20/2008 8/20/2008 3/25/2009 8/20/2008 8/20/2008 8/20/2008 8/20/2008 8/20/2008 8/20/2008 8/20/2008 8/20/2008 8/20/2008 8/20/2008 8/20/2008 8/20/2008 8/20/2008 8/20/2008 8/20/2008 8/20/2008 8/20/2008 8/20/2008 8/20/2008 8/20/2008 8/20/2008 8/20/2008 8/20/2008 8/20/2008 8/20/2008 8/20/2008 8/8/2008 8/20/2008 8/20/2008 8/20/2008 8/20/2008 8/20/2008 7/1/2009 8/20/2008 8/20/2008 8/28/2008 8/20/2008 8/20/2008 8/20/2008 8/20/2008 7/1/2009 7/1/2009 8/20/2008 8/20/2008 8/20/2008 8/8/2008 8/20/2008 8/20/2008 7/1/2009 8/20/2008 6/1/2008 7/1/2009 7/1/2009 7/1/2009 7/1/2009 7/1/2009 7/1/2009 7/1/2009 7/1/2009 7/1/2009 7/1/2009 7/24/2009 7/1/2009 7/1/2009 7/1/2009 7/1/2009 7/1/2009 7/1/2009 12/23/2010 7/1/2009 6/1/2008 7/1/2009 7/1/2009 7/1/2009 7/1/2009 7/1/2009 7/1/2009 7/1/2009 7/1/2009 7/1/2009 7/1/2009 6/1/2008 1/28/2009 7/1/2010 7/1/2010 7/1/2010 7/1/2010 7/1/2010 7/1/2010 7/1/2010 7/1/2010 7/1/2010 7/1/2010 7/1/2010 7/1/2010 7/1/2010 7/1/2010 7/1/2010 7/1/2010 7/1/2010 7/1/2010 7/1/2010 7/1/2010 7/1/2010 7/1/2010 7/1/2010 7/1/2010 7/1/2010 7/1/2011 7/1/2011 3/15/2012 7/1/2011 7/1/2011 7/1/2011 7/1/2011 7/1/2011 7/1/2011 7/1/2011 7/1/2011 7/1/2011 7/1/2011 7/1/2011 7/1/2011 7/1/2011 7/1/2011 7/1/2011 7/1/2011 7/1/2011 7/1/2011 7/1/2011 7/1/2011 7/1/2011 7/1/2011 7/1/2011 7/1/2011 7/1/2011 7/1/2011 7/1/2011 7/1/2011 7/1/2011 7/1/2011 7/1/2011 7/1/2011 7/1/2011 7/1/2011 7/1/2011 7/1/2011 7/1/2011 7/1/2011 7/1/2011 7/1/2011 7/1/2011 7/1/2011 7/1/2011 7/1/2011 7/1/2011 7/1/2011 7/1/2011 7/1/2011 7/1/2011 7/1/2011 7/1/2011 7/1/2011 7/1/2011 7/1/2011 7/1/2011 7/1/2011 7/1/2011 7/1/2011 7/1/2011 7/1/2011 7/1/2011 7/1/2011 7/1/2011 7/1/2011 7/1/2011 7/1/2011 7/1/2011 7/1/2011 7/1/2011 7/1/2011 7/1/2011 7/1/2012 7/1/2012 7/1/2012 7/1/2012 7/1/2012 7/1/2012 7/1/2012 7/1/2012 7/1/2012 7/1/2012 7/1/2012 7/1/2012 7/1/2012 7/1/2012 7/1/2012 7/1/2012 7/1/2012 7/1/2012 7/1/2012 7/1/2013 7/1/2013 7/1/2013 7/1/2013 7/1/2013 7/1/2013 7/1/2013 7/1/2013 7/1/2013 7/1/2013 7/1/2013 7/1/2013 7/1/2013 7/1/2013 7/1/2013 7/1/2013 7/1/2013 7/1/2013 7/1/2013 7/1/2013 7/1/2013 7/1/2013 7/1/2013 7/1/2014 7/1/2014 7/1/2014 7/1/2014 7/1/2014 7/1/2014 7/1/2014 7/1/2014 7/1/2014 7/1/2014 7/1/2014 7/1/2014 7/1/2014 7/1/2014 7/1/2014 7/1/2014 7/1/2014 7/1/2014 7/1/2014 7/1/2014 7/1/2014 7/1/2014 7/1/2014 7/1/2014 7/1/2014 7/1/2014 7/1/2015 7/1/2015 7/1/2015 7/1/2015 7/1/2015 7/1/2015 7/1/2015 7/1/2015 7/1/2015 title Kenny Lake School Wood Boiler-Planning & Design Su-Valley School Wood Boiler Assessment Bethel Wind Farm Construction (BNC land) Deering Wind System Assess PreConstruction Falls Creek Low-Impact Hydro Assess Pre-Construction Grant Lk/Crk Low-Impact Hydro Assess Pre-Construction Crescent Lk/Crk Low-Impact Hydro Assess Pre-Construction Ptarmigan Lk/Crk Low-Impact Hydro Assess Pre-Construction Saint George High Penetration Wind Diesel Construction Reynolds Creek Hydro Preconstruction Fairbanks Bio-Diesel - Waste Vegetable Oil Homer Water System Hydro Assessment Coffman Cove Hydro Assessment Elfin Cove Hydro Assessment Yerrick Creek Hydro Assessment Chenega Bay Hydro Assessment Fishhook Creek Hydroelectric Project - PreConstruction Indian River Hydro Assessment Little Gerstle Hydro Assessment GVEA Solar Water Heating System (Feasibility) Wind Power Study Eva Creek Wind Integration Study Biomass-fired Organic Rankine Cycle System Juneau Airport Ground Source Heat Pump North Prince of Wales Island Intertie Project Biodiesel Production from Juneau Area Waste Kokhanok Wind - Diesel Tok Wind Farm Pre-Construction Bethel Wind Energy Project Delta Area Wind Turbines-Construction Pillar Mountain Wind Project - Construction Haines Central Wood Heating Feasibility Study Haines Central Wood Heating Construction Lake Pen Borough Wind Feasibility Study Nikolski Wind Integration Construction Chuniisax Creek Hydroelectric Construction Buckland, Deering, Noorvik Wind Farm Construction Chistochina Central Wood Heating Construction Gulkana Central Wood Heating Construction Quinhagak Wind Farm Construction Mekoryuk Wind Farm Construction Toksook Wind Farm Construction Humpback Creek Hydroelectric Construction Falls Creek Hydroelectric Construction Indian Creek Hydro Feasibility Study Chignik Lagoon Hydroelectric Final Design Allison Lake Hydro Feasibility Study North Pole Heat Recovery Construction Juneau Ground Source Heat Pump Constr McKinley Village Solar Thermal Construction Delta Junction Wood Chip Heating Whittier Creek Hydroelectric Reconnaissance Kobuk River Valley Woody Biomass Feasibility St. George Wind Farm Construction Cordova Wood Processing Plant-Purchase and setup Burro Creek Hydro Feasibility Study Unalakleet Wind Farm Construction Ruby Hydrokinetic McGrath Central Wood Heating Project Development Phase III Fort Yukon Central Wood Heating Design Lake Peninsula Borough Wood Heating Final Design Cordova Heat Recovery Construction Aleutians East Borough Feasibility Study Chignik Lake Area Wind-Hydro Final Design Kwigillingok High Penetration Wind-Diesel Smart Grid Kongiganak High Penetration Wind-Diesel Smart Grid Ambler Solar PV Construction Cosmos Hills Hydroelectric Feasibility Study Kake-Petersburg Intertie Final Design Ruth Lake Hydro Reconnaissance McGrath Heat Recovery Construction Tok Wood Heating Construction Takatz Lake Hydroelectric Feasibility Nushagak Area Hydropower Project Fourth of July Creek Hydroelectric Reconnaissance Manley Hot Springs Geothermal Plant California Creek Hydroelectric Feasibility Wrangell Hydro Based Electric Boilers Construction Yakutat Biomass Feasibility Eva Creek Wind Farm Feasibility Nikolaevsk Wind Farm Design Kotzebue Wind Farm Expansion Construction Grant Lake/Falls Creek Hydro Feasibility Study Metlakatla-Ketchikan Intertie Design and Permitting Anchorage Landfill Gas Electricity Construction Old Harbor Hydroelectric Final Design Bethel Wind Farm Nikiski Wind Farm Construction South Fork Hydroelectric Construction Fishhook Hydroelectric Construction Nenana Hydrokinetic Construction Newton Peak Wind Farm Hooper Bay Wind Farm Feasibility Reynolds Creek Hydroelectric Construction Whitman Lake Hydro Construction (reconnaissance) Statewide Hydrokinetic Feasibility Study Galena Wood Heating Construction Nome Banner Peak Wind Farm Transmission Construction Fort Yukon Central Wood Heat Construction Sand Point Wind Construction Kisaralik/Chikuminuk Hydro Barrow to Atqasuk Transmission Feasibility Study Unalaska Heat Recovery Construction Adak Diesel Hybrid Chalkyitsik Biomass Central Heating Conceptual Design Venetie District Heating Conceptual Design Ambler Heat Recovery Construction Kotzebue Electric Heat Recovery Construction Neck Lake Feasibility Study & Conceptual Design Fivemile Creek Feasibility/Conceptual Design Tuntutuliak High Penetration Wind-Diesel Smart Grid Pilgrim Hot Springs McGrath Biomass Feasibility Terror Lake Capacity - Feasibility/Conceptual Design Tatitlek Wind/Hydro Feasibility Assessment Carlson Creek Hydroelectric Shaktoolik Wind Construction Teller Wind Analysis Delta Junction Wind Assessment & Avian Study Kvichak River RISEC Feasibility and Conceptual Design Point Lay Heat Recovery Construction Emmonak/Alakanuk Wind Design and Construction Thorne Bay Wood Boiler Wainwright Heat Recovery Loud Creek Hydro Feasibility Analysis/Conce Design Town Creek Hydro System - Design for Repairs/Upgrade Biomass Hydronic Heating Hot Springs Bay Valley Geothermal Reconnaissance Tok Wind Resource Assessment Dillingham Area Wind/Hydro Assessment Nenana River ROR Hydro Reconnaissance Study Atka Hydro Dispatched Excess Electrical Power St. Paul Wind Diesel Project Akutan Hydroelectric System Repair and Upgrade Saint Paul Fuel Economy Upgrade Nushagak Area Hydropower Project 2 New Stuyahok Wind Pilot Point Wind Power & Heat Port Alsworth Hydroelectric Construction Humpback Creek Hydroelectric Project Rehabilitation Chenega Bay Hydro Design and Permitting Terror Lake Unit 3 Hydroelectric Project Point Hope Wind Diesel Generation Project Wainwright Wind Diesel Generation Project Point Lay Wind Diesel Generation Project High Penetration Wind-Battery-Diesel Hybrid Kivalina Wind-Intertie Feasibility Analysis & Conceptual Design Alaska Sealife Center Ph II Seawater Heat Pump Project Mount Spurr Geothermal Project Hoonah-IPEC Hydro Project Yerrick Creek Hydroelectric Project District Wood Heating in Fort Yukon City-Tribe Biomass Energy Conservation Akutan Geothermal Development Project Pilgrim Hot Springs Geothermal Resource Assessment Neck Lake Hydroelectric Project Japonski Island Boathouse Heat Pump Atmautluak Wind Renewable Energy Battle Creek Diversion Project Cold Bay Wind Energy Project Stetson Creek Diversion/Cooper Lake Dam Facilities Project Nelson Lagoon Wind Energy Project Pilgrim Hot Springs Geothermal Resource Assessment 2 Stebbins Wind Feasibility Study Port Heiden Wind Turbine Project Lake and Peninsula Wood Boilers New Koliganek Wind Heat Recovery Project Fivemile Creek Hydroelectric Project Terror Lake Unit 3 Hydroelectric Project 2 Old Harbor Hydroelectric Project Bethel Renewable Energy Project Napaskiak Wind, Heat and Heat Recovery Project St. Mary's/ Pitka's Point Wind Construction Lime Village Photovoltaic Retrofit Eek Wind Feasibility Kwethluk Wind Feasibility Study Marshall Wind Feasibility Scammon Bay Wind Feasibility Atqasuk Transmission Line Wainwright Wind Turbine Kaktovik Wind Diesel Feasibility Study Point Hope Wind turbine Design Point Lay Wind Generation Design Upper Kobuk River Biomass Kotzebue Paper and Wood Waste to Energy Project Selawik Hybrid Wind Diesel System Turbine Upgrade GVEA Eva Creek Wind Turbine Purchase Mount Spurr Geothermal Project 2 CEA Transmission Line to Renewable Energy Resources Fourth of July Creek Hydroelectric Project 2 Grant Lake Hydroelectric Facility Hoonah Heat Recovery Project Thorne Bay School Wood Fired Boiler Project Thayer Lake Hydropower Project Snettisham Transmission Line Avalanche Mitigation Pelican Hydroelectric Upgrade Project Indian River Hydroelectric Project Biomass Fuel Dryer Project Elfin Cove Hydroelectric Project Whitman Lake Hydroelectric Project Upper Tanana Biomass CHP Project Organic Rankine Cycle Field Testing Renewable Energy Feasibility Study Feasibility Assessments for Wood Heating in Interior Alaska Communities Kaltag Solar Construction Akutan Geothermal Development Project 2 False Pass Wind Energy Project Koyuk Wind Feasibility Elim Wind Feasibility Study Cordova Community Biomass Feasibility Kenny Lake School Wood Fired Boiler Chefornak Wind Feasibility Study Akiachak Wind Feasibility & Conceptual Design AVTEC Hydro Training Facility Cook Inlet TidGen Project Hunter Creek Hydroelectric Project Port Graham Biomass Waste Heat Demo Project Susitna Valley High School Wood Heat Eska Creek Hydroelectric Project Jack River Hydroelectric Feasibility Study Reynolds Creek Hydro Electric Project Transmission Line Connelly Lake Hydroelectric Project Feasibility Study Schubee Lake Hydroelectric Project Feasibility Study Metlakatla-Ketchikan Intertie Excursion Inlet Hydro Project Phases I & II Wrangell Electric Vehicle Feasibility Study Sitka Renewable Energy Feasibility for Centennial Hall & Library Sitka Renewable Energy Feasibility Study for Wastewater Treatment Plant Reconnaissance Study of Tenakee Inlet Geothermal Resource Triangle Lake Hydroelectric Project Feasibility Pillar Mountain High Penetration Wind Project Design & Construction of Wood Heating Projects in Interior Alaska Communities Huslia Water System & Clinic Wood Boiler Project Tatitlek Heat Recovery Project Thayer Lake Hydropower Development Transmission Project Packer's Creek Hydroelectric Project Nome Renewable Energy Expansion Project Kobuk Biomass Design & Construction Project Russian Mission Heat Recovery System Scammon Bay Hydro Design & Engineering Sleetmute Heat Recovery - Power Plant to Water Plant Shishmaref Heat Recovery Project Togiak Waste Heat Recovery Project Surplus Wind Energy Recovery for Mekoryuk Water System Heat Shaktoolik Surplus Wind Energy Recovery for Water System Heat Surplus Wind Energy Recovery for Chevak Water System Heat Surplus Wind Energy Recovery for Gambell Water System Heat Tanacross Woody Biomass Community Facility Space Heating Project Waterfall Creek Hydroelectric Project Tazimina Hydroelectric Project Capacity Increase Levelock Wind Reconnaissance Study Egegik Wind Feasibility Study Eagle Solar Array Project Blue Lake Hydroelectric Expansion Project Gartina Falls Hydroelectric Project Upper Tanana Biomass CHP Project 2 Galena Community Wood Heat Project Waterfall Creek Hydroelectric Project 2 Allison Creek Project Biomass Feasibility Studies in Public Facilities Savoonga Heat Recovery System - Power Plant to Water Plant Atmautluak Washeteria Heat Recovery Project Kwinhagak Heat Recovery - Water Treatment Plant and Washeteria Stebbins Heat Recovery Project Marshall Heat Recovery - Water Treatment Plant and Community Store Noorvik Heat Recovery - Water Treatment Plant New Stuyahok Heat Recovery Kokhanok High-penetration Wind Energy Cold Bay Waste Heat Recovery Project Knutson Creek Hydroelectric Project-Design and Permitting Indian River Hydroelectric Project Construction Mentasta Community Facilities Woody Biomass Space Heating Project Sitka Centennial Hall Air Source Heat Pump Allison Creek Hydroelectric Project Construction Haines Borough Municipal Buildings Biomass Project Gunnuk Creek Hydroelectric Feasibility Study Atka Dispatchable Heat Chisana Mountain Wind Feasibility Project Seldovia House Ground Source Heat Pump Project Biomass Heat for Minto Community Buildings Packers Creek Hydroelectric Project Phase II Ketchikan Gateway Borough Biomass Heating Project Brevig Mission Water System Heat Recovery Chevak Water and Vacuum Plant Heat Recovery St. Mary's Heat Recovery System Venetie Clinic Heat Recovery Galena Community Wood Heat Project 2 Nunam Iqua Heat Recovery Project Yakutat Biomass District Heating Loop Emmonak Heat Recovery System Mountain Village Wind Feasibility and Conceptual Design Stebbins St Michael Wind Energy Final Design and Permitting Igiugig Wind Resource Feasibility/Conceptual Design Kongiganak Wind Heat Electrical Thermal Storage Yerrick Creek Hydroelectric Project 2 Stetson Creek Diversion Cooper Lake Dam Facilities Project Tuntutuliak Heat Recovery Kake Community Energy Wood Boiler for the Native Village of Tazlina Angoon Low-Income Housing Pellet District Heat Bethel Power Plant Heat Recovery Assessment and Conceptual Design Hydaburg Schools Wood Fired Boiler Project Lepquinum Wellness Center Ground Source Heat Pump Scammon Bay Community Facilities Heat Recovery Southeast Island School District Wood Boilers Hoonah Biomass District Heating Loop Sand Point Excess Wind Utilization grantee__id 1 118 134 133 3 3 3 3 28 132 148 149 147 4 158 85 56 106 24 24 136 24 5 6 7 135 134 53 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 18 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 6 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 12 19 35 12 36 37 18 18 38 39 33 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 24 77 49 50 51 52 18 18 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 58 34 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 49 7 72 73 57 74 9 75 158 18 18 77 78 66 18 79 66 80 80 81 80 7 42 24 14 82 80 83 42 18 84 45 19 85 9 66 66 66 49 18 86 87 88 158 34 89 80 57 7 41 91 92 93 94 95 57 18 12 12 97 72 9 18 44 98 18 99 18 100 18 18 66 66 66 66 66 15 101 18 24 102 94 43 50 88 79 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 7 57 110 63 18 80 111 18 18 29 1 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 158 158 158 51 10 46 41 41 88 51 9 63 121 75 103 122 58 123 124 125 126 127 128 18 18 18 18 150 130 137 12 12 158 41 88 7 138 130 23 63 139 91 140 18 141 142 143 144 93 145 106 146 41 23 10 88 14 158 159 160 122 161 162 156 163 155 138 136 152 164 18 18 78 37 150 94 157 153 166 79 167 grantee__name Copper River School District Matanuska Susitna Borough Village Wind Power LLC Ipnatchiaq Electric Company Homer Electric Association, Inc. Homer Electric Association, Inc. Homer Electric Association, Inc. Homer Electric Association, Inc. City of St. George Haida Corporation Fairbanks Bio-Diesel City of Homer City of Coffman Cove Community of Elfin Cove Non-Profit Alaska Power Company Chenega IRA Council Fishhook Renewable Energy, LLC City of Tenakee Springs Electric Department Golden Valley Electric Association Golden Valley Electric Association City of Nunam Iqua Golden Valley Electric Association Chena Power, LLC City and Borough of Juneau Alaska Power and Telephone Kokhanok Village Council Village Wind Power LLC City of Bethel Alaska Environmental Power Kodiak Electric Association, Inc. Haines Borough Chilkoot Indian Association Lake and Peninsula Borough Nikolski IRA Council City of Atka Northwest Arctic Borough Cheesh'na Tribal Council Gulkana Village Council Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Cordova Electric Cooperative Gustavus Electric Company City of Chignik Chignik Lagoon Power Utility Copper Valley Electric Association Golden Valley Electric Association City and Borough of Juneau Golden Valley Electric Association Delta/Greely School District City of Whittier Northwest Inupiat Housing Authority City of St. George Native Village of Eyak Burro Creek Holdings, LLC Unalakleet Valley Electric Co Yukon River Inter-Tribal McGrath Light & Power Company Gwitchyaa Zhee Utility Company Lake and Peninsula Borough Cordova Electric Cooperative Aleutians East Borough Lake and Peninsula Borough Kwigillingok Power Company Puvurnaq Power Company Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Kwaan Electric Transmission Intertie Cooperative City of Petersburg McGrath Light & Power Company Alaska Gateway School District City and Borough of Sitka Nushagak Electric and Telephone Cooperative Independence Power, LLC TDX Power, Inc. Alaska Green Energy City and Borough of Wrangell Yakutat Power Golden Valley Electric Association Alaska Wind Power, LLC Kotzebue Electric Association Kenai Hydro, LLC Metlakatla Indian Community Municipality of Anchorage Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Kenai Winds, LLC South Fork Hydro, LLC Fishhook Renewable Energy, LLC University of Alaska Fairbanks Nome Joint Utility System City of Hooper Bay Haida Energy, Inc. Ketchikan Public Utility University of Alaska Anchorage Interior Regional Housing Authority Nome Joint Utility System Gwitchyaa Zhee Utility Company Aleutian Wind Energy Association of Village Council Presidents North Slope Borough City of Unalaska TDX Adak Generating, LLC Chalkyitsik Village Council Venetie Village Council City of Ambler Kotzebue Electric Association Alaska Power and Telephone Chitina Electric, Inc. Tuntutuliak Comm Svcs Assoc University of Alaska Fairbanks McGrath Traditional Council Kodiak Electric Association, Inc. Tatitlek Village IRA Council Alaska Power Company Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Alaska Wind Power, LLC Igiugig Village Council North Slope Borough Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Southeast Island School District North Slope Borough City of Akutan City of Akutan Yukon-Koyukuk School District City of Akutan Alaska Power and Telephone Nushagak Electric and Telephone Cooperative Golden Valley Electric Association City of Atka TDX Corporation City of Akutan City of Saint Paul Electric Utility Nushagak Electric and Telephone Cooperative Alaska Village Electric Cooperative City of Pilot Point Alaska Green Energy Cordova Electric Cooperative Chenega IRA Council Kodiak Electric Association, Inc. North Slope Borough North Slope Borough North Slope Borough Kotzebue Electric Association Alaska Village Electric Cooperative City of Seward ORNI 46 LLC Inside Passage Electric Cooperative Alaska Power Company Gwitchyaa Zhee Utility Company City of Tanana City of Akutan University of Alaska Fairbanks Alaska Power and Telephone City and Borough of Sitka Atmautluak Traditional Council Alaska Energy Authority G & K Electric Utility Chugach Electric Association, Inc. Nelson Lagoon Electric Cooperative University of Alaska Fairbanks Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Lake and Peninsula Borough Lake and Peninsula Borough New Koliganek Village Council Chitina Electric, Inc. Kodiak Electric Association, Inc. Alaska Village Electric Cooperative TDX Power, Inc. City of Napaskiak Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Lime Village Traditional Council Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Organized Village of Kwethluk Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Alaska Village Electric Cooperative North Slope Borough North Slope Borough North Slope Borough North Slope Borough North Slope Borough Northwest Arctic Borough City of Kotzebue Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Golden Valley Electric Association Ormat Nevada, Inc. Chugach Electric Association, Inc. Independence Power, LLC Kenai Hydro, LLC Inside Passage Electric Cooperative Southeast Island School District Kootznoowoo, Inc. Alaska Electric Light & Power Company City of Pelican City of Tenakee Springs Electric Department City of Craig Community of Elfin Cove Utility Commission City of Ketchikan Alaska Power and Telephone University of Alaska Fairbanks Louden Tribal Council Interior Regional Housing Authority Alaska Village Electric Cooperative City of Akutan City of False Pass Electric Utility Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Native Village of Eyak Copper River School District City of Chefornak Akiachak Native Community/Akiachak Ltd. Alaska Vocational Technical Center Ocean Renewable Power Company Eklutna, Inc. Port Graham Village Council Matanuska Susitna Borough Bering Pacific Engineering Native Village of Cantwell Alaska Power Company Alaska Power Company Alaska Power Company Metlakatla Indian Community Haines Borough City and Borough of Wrangell City and Borough of Sitka City and Borough of Sitka Inside Passage Electric Cooperative Metlakatla Indian Community Kodiak Electric Association, Inc. Interior Regional Housing Authority Huslia Traditional Council Tatitlek Village IRA Council Kootznoowoo, Inc. Chignik Lagoon Village Council Nome Joint Utility System City of Kobuk City of Russian Mission City of Scammon Bay Sleetmute Traditional Council City of Shishmaref City of Togiak Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Native Village of Tanacross City of King Cove Iliamna, Newhalen, Nondalton Electrical Coop. Lake and Peninsula Borough Lake and Peninsula Borough Alaska Power Company City and Borough of Sitka Inside Passage Electric Cooperative Alaska Power and Telephone City of Galena City of King Cove Copper Valley Electric Association Interior Regional Housing Authority City of Savoonga Atmautluak Traditional Council Native Village of Kwinhagak Alaska Village Electric Cooperative City of Marshall City of Noorvik Southwest Regional School District Kokhanok Electric Utilities G & K Electric Utility Pedro Bay Village Council City of Tenakee Springs Electric Department Mentasta Traditional Council City and Borough of Sitka Copper Valley Electric Association Haines Borough Inside Passage Electric Cooperative City of Atka Alaska Power Company Cook Inlet Housing Authority Village of Minto Chignik Lagoon Village Council Ketchikan Gateway Borough City of Brevig Mission City of Chevak City of St. Mary's Village of Venetie City of Galena City of Nunam Iqua City and Borough of Yakutat City of Emmonak Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Igiugig Village Council Puvurnaq Power Company Native Village of Tanacross Chugach Electric Association, Inc. Native Village of Tuntutuliak Organized Village of Kake Native Village of Tazlina Southeast Island School District TDX Power, Sand Point Generating grantee__grantee_class__id 6 6 8 5 3 3 3 3 6 11 11 6 6 4 7 2 8 6 3 3 6 3 5 6 11 2 8 6 8 7 6 4 6 6 6 9 2 2 3 3 3 3 8 6 5 3 3 6 3 1 6 9 6 6 8 3 6 5 7 6 3 6 6 5 5 3 3 3 6 5 1 6 3 8 8 8 6 5 3 8 7 8 6 6 3 3 8 8 8 4 5 6 8 5 6 9 5 7 8 6 5 6 8 6 6 6 7 11 7 3 4 2 7 5 7 3 3 8 6 5 3 6 5 5 5 6 5 11 3 3 6 8 5 5 3 3 6 8 3 2 7 5 5 5 7 3 6 8 3 7 7 6 5 4 11 6 2 3 8 3 3 4 3 6 6 6 7 7 3 8 5 3 2 3 2 3 3 5 5 5 5 5 9 6 3 3 8 3 8 8 3 6 8 3 6 6 6 5 5 11 4 6 9 3 5 6 3 3 6 6 6 5 6 8 8 6 6 8 6 7 7 7 6 6 6 6 6 3 6 7 9 2 5 8 2 5 6 6 6 6 6 6 3 3 3 3 6 6 3 6 6 7 6 3 11 6 6 3 9 6 2 2 3 6 6 1 5 8 2 6 2 6 3 6 3 6 7 6 6 2 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 3 3 6 5 6 3 6 6 2 6 7 grantee__grantee_class__code LOCAL LOCAL IPP UTIL-GOV UTIL-COOP UTIL-COOP UTIL-COOP UTIL-COOP LOCAL FOR-PROFIT FOR-PROFIT LOCAL LOCAL NON-PROFIT UTIL-PRIV GE-TC IPP LOCAL UTIL-COOP UTIL-COOP LOCAL UTIL-COOP UTIL-GOV LOCAL FOR-PROFIT GE-TC IPP LOCAL IPP UTIL-PRIV LOCAL NON-PROFIT LOCAL LOCAL LOCAL GE-HA GE-TC GE-TC UTIL-COOP UTIL-COOP UTIL-COOP UTIL-COOP IPP LOCAL UTIL-GOV UTIL-COOP UTIL-COOP LOCAL UTIL-COOP GE-SD LOCAL GE-HA LOCAL LOCAL IPP UTIL-COOP LOCAL UTIL-GOV UTIL-PRIV LOCAL UTIL-COOP LOCAL LOCAL UTIL-GOV UTIL-GOV UTIL-COOP UTIL-COOP UTIL-COOP LOCAL UTIL-GOV GE-SD LOCAL UTIL-COOP IPP IPP IPP LOCAL UTIL-GOV UTIL-COOP IPP UTIL-PRIV IPP LOCAL LOCAL UTIL-COOP UTIL-COOP IPP IPP IPP NON-PROFIT UTIL-GOV LOCAL IPP UTIL-GOV LOCAL GE-HA UTIL-GOV UTIL-PRIV IPP LOCAL UTIL-GOV LOCAL IPP LOCAL LOCAL LOCAL UTIL-PRIV FOR-PROFIT UTIL-PRIV UTIL-COOP NON-PROFIT GE-TC UTIL-PRIV UTIL-GOV UTIL-PRIV UTIL-COOP UTIL-COOP IPP LOCAL UTIL-GOV UTIL-COOP LOCAL UTIL-GOV UTIL-GOV UTIL-GOV LOCAL UTIL-GOV FOR-PROFIT UTIL-COOP UTIL-COOP LOCAL IPP UTIL-GOV UTIL-GOV UTIL-COOP UTIL-COOP LOCAL IPP UTIL-COOP GE-TC UTIL-PRIV UTIL-GOV UTIL-GOV UTIL-GOV UTIL-PRIV UTIL-COOP LOCAL IPP UTIL-COOP UTIL-PRIV UTIL-PRIV LOCAL UTIL-GOV NON-PROFIT FOR-PROFIT LOCAL GE-TC UTIL-COOP IPP UTIL-COOP UTIL-COOP NON-PROFIT UTIL-COOP LOCAL LOCAL LOCAL UTIL-PRIV UTIL-PRIV UTIL-COOP IPP UTIL-GOV UTIL-COOP GE-TC UTIL-COOP GE-TC UTIL-COOP UTIL-COOP UTIL-GOV UTIL-GOV UTIL-GOV UTIL-GOV UTIL-GOV GE-HA LOCAL UTIL-COOP UTIL-COOP IPP UTIL-COOP IPP IPP UTIL-COOP LOCAL IPP UTIL-COOP LOCAL LOCAL LOCAL UTIL-GOV UTIL-GOV FOR-PROFIT NON-PROFIT LOCAL GE-HA UTIL-COOP UTIL-GOV LOCAL UTIL-COOP UTIL-COOP LOCAL LOCAL LOCAL UTIL-GOV LOCAL IPP IPP LOCAL LOCAL IPP LOCAL UTIL-PRIV UTIL-PRIV UTIL-PRIV LOCAL LOCAL LOCAL LOCAL LOCAL UTIL-COOP LOCAL UTIL-PRIV GE-HA GE-TC UTIL-GOV IPP GE-TC UTIL-GOV LOCAL LOCAL LOCAL LOCAL LOCAL LOCAL UTIL-COOP UTIL-COOP UTIL-COOP UTIL-COOP LOCAL LOCAL UTIL-COOP LOCAL LOCAL UTIL-PRIV LOCAL UTIL-COOP FOR-PROFIT LOCAL LOCAL UTIL-COOP GE-HA LOCAL GE-TC GE-TC UTIL-COOP LOCAL LOCAL GE-SD UTIL-GOV IPP GE-TC LOCAL GE-TC LOCAL UTIL-COOP LOCAL UTIL-COOP LOCAL UTIL-PRIV LOCAL LOCAL GE-TC LOCAL LOCAL LOCAL LOCAL LOCAL LOCAL LOCAL LOCAL LOCAL UTIL-COOP UTIL-COOP LOCAL UTIL-GOV LOCAL UTIL-COOP LOCAL LOCAL GE-TC LOCAL UTIL-PRIV grantee__grantee_class__description Local Government Local Government Independent Power Producer Utility-Government Utility-Cooperative Utility-Cooperative Utility-Cooperative Utility-Cooperative Local Government For Profit Entity For Profit Entity Local Government Local Government Non Profit Entity Utility-Private Government Entity - Tribal Council Independent Power Producer Local Government Utility-Cooperative Utility-Cooperative Local Government Utility-Cooperative Utility-Government Local Government For Profit Entity Government Entity - Tribal Council Independent Power Producer Local Government Independent Power Producer Utility-Private Local Government Non Profit Entity Local Government Local Government Local Government Government Entity - Housing Authority Government Entity - Tribal Council Government Entity - Tribal Council Utility-Cooperative Utility-Cooperative Utility-Cooperative Utility-Cooperative Independent Power Producer Local Government Utility-Government Utility-Cooperative Utility-Cooperative Local Government Utility-Cooperative Government Entity - School District Local Government Government Entity - Housing Authority Local Government Local Government Independent Power Producer Utility-Cooperative Local Government Utility-Government Utility-Private Local Government Utility-Cooperative Local Government Local Government Utility-Government Utility-Government Utility-Cooperative Utility-Cooperative Utility-Cooperative Local Government Utility-Government Government Entity - School District Local Government Utility-Cooperative Independent Power Producer Independent Power Producer Independent Power Producer Local Government Utility-Government Utility-Cooperative Independent Power Producer Utility-Private Independent Power Producer Local Government Local Government Utility-Cooperative Utility-Cooperative Independent Power Producer Independent Power Producer Independent Power Producer Non Profit Entity Utility-Government Local Government Independent Power Producer Utility-Government Local Government Government Entity - Housing Authority Utility-Government Utility-Private Independent Power Producer Local Government Utility-Government Local Government Independent Power Producer Local Government Local Government Local Government Utility-Private For Profit Entity Utility-Private Utility-Cooperative Non Profit Entity Government Entity - Tribal Council Utility-Private Utility-Government Utility-Private Utility-Cooperative Utility-Cooperative Independent Power Producer Local Government Utility-Government Utility-Cooperative Local Government Utility-Government Utility-Government Utility-Government Local Government Utility-Government For Profit Entity Utility-Cooperative Utility-Cooperative Local Government Independent Power Producer Utility-Government Utility-Government Utility-Cooperative Utility-Cooperative Local Government Independent Power Producer Utility-Cooperative Government Entity - Tribal Council Utility-Private Utility-Government Utility-Government Utility-Government Utility-Private Utility-Cooperative Local Government Independent Power Producer Utility-Cooperative Utility-Private Utility-Private Local Government Utility-Government Non Profit Entity For Profit Entity Local Government Government Entity - Tribal Council Utility-Cooperative Independent Power Producer Utility-Cooperative Utility-Cooperative Non Profit Entity Utility-Cooperative Local Government Local Government Local Government Utility-Private Utility-Private Utility-Cooperative Independent Power Producer Utility-Government Utility-Cooperative Government Entity - Tribal Council Utility-Cooperative Government Entity - Tribal Council Utility-Cooperative Utility-Cooperative Utility-Government Utility-Government Utility-Government Utility-Government Utility-Government Government Entity - Housing Authority Local Government Utility-Cooperative Utility-Cooperative Independent Power Producer Utility-Cooperative Independent Power Producer Independent Power Producer Utility-Cooperative Local Government Independent Power Producer Utility-Cooperative Local Government Local Government Local Government Utility-Government Utility-Government For Profit Entity Non Profit Entity Local Government Government Entity - Housing Authority Utility-Cooperative Utility-Government Local Government Utility-Cooperative Utility-Cooperative Local Government Local Government Local Government Utility-Government Local Government Independent Power Producer Independent Power Producer Local Government Local Government Independent Power Producer Local Government Utility-Private Utility-Private Utility-Private Local Government Local Government Local Government Local Government Local Government Utility-Cooperative Local Government Utility-Private Government Entity - Housing Authority Government Entity - Tribal Council Utility-Government Independent Power Producer Government Entity - Tribal Council Utility-Government Local Government Local Government Local Government Local Government Local Government Local Government Utility-Cooperative Utility-Cooperative Utility-Cooperative Utility-Cooperative Local Government Local Government Utility-Cooperative Local Government Local Government Utility-Private Local Government Utility-Cooperative For Profit Entity Local Government Local Government Utility-Cooperative Government Entity - Housing Authority Local Government Government Entity - Tribal Council Government Entity - Tribal Council Utility-Cooperative Local Government Local Government Government Entity - School District Utility-Government Independent Power Producer Government Entity - Tribal Council Local Government Government Entity - Tribal Council Local Government Utility-Cooperative Local Government Utility-Cooperative Local Government Utility-Private Local Government Local Government Government Entity - Tribal Council Local Government Local Government Local Government Local Government Local Government Local Government Local Government Local Government Local Government Utility-Cooperative Utility-Cooperative Local Government Utility-Government Local Government Utility-Cooperative Local Government Local Government Government Entity - Tribal Council Local Government Utility-Private phase__id 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 4 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 4 2 2 4 4 4 4 2 4 4 4 2 4 2 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 2 3 2 4 4 4 4 2 2 4 4 2 4 2 2 3 3 4 2 2 4 4 2 2 2 2 4 4 2 2 2 2 2 4 2 2 3 4 2 3 4 2 3 4 4 4 2 4 2 4 3 2 4 4 4 4 2 2 4 2 2 2 4 4 2 2 4 2 3 2 2 4 2 2 2 4 4 4 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 1 3 4 4 4 2 2 4 2 4 3 3 2 2 2 4 2 4 2 2 4 4 4 2 2 3 4 2 3 2 3 2 2 2 3 4 2 3 4 3 2 2 4 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 2 3 3 2 2 2 4 4 2 2 2 4 4 3 4 4 3 4 3 4 2 2 2 2 4 3 2 2 2 2 4 2 2 3 4 2 2 4 2 2 4 2 2 4 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 2 2 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 2 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 2 3 4 4 4 4 4 2 4 2 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 2 3 2 4 3 4 4 3 4 4 phase__description Project configuration and specifications that guide construction. Land use and resource permits and leases required for construction. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. A preliminary general study designed to ascertain whether a feasibility study is warranted. A preliminary general study designed to ascertain whether a feasibility study is warranted. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. A preliminary general study designed to ascertain whether a feasibility study is warranted. A preliminary general study designed to ascertain whether a feasibility study is warranted. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. A preliminary general study designed to ascertain whether a feasibility study is warranted. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Project configuration and specifications that guide construction. Land use and resource permits and leases required for construction. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Project configuration and specifications that guide construction. Land use and resource permits and leases required for construction. Project configuration and specifications that guide construction. Land use and resource permits and leases required for construction. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Project configuration and specifications that guide construction. Land use and resource permits and leases required for construction. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Project configuration and specifications that guide construction. Land use and resource permits and leases required for construction. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Project configuration and specifications that guide construction. Land use and resource permits and leases required for construction. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Project configuration and specifications that guide construction. Land use and resource permits and leases required for construction. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Project configuration and specifications that guide construction. Land use and resource permits and leases required for construction. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Project configuration and specifications that guide construction. Land use and resource permits and leases required for construction. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. A preliminary general study designed to ascertain whether a feasibility study is warranted. Project configuration and specifications that guide construction. Land use and resource permits and leases required for construction. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Project configuration and specifications that guide construction. Land use and resource permits and leases required for construction. Project configuration and specifications that guide construction. Land use and resource permits and leases required for construction. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Project configuration and specifications that guide construction. Land use and resource permits and leases required for construction. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Project configuration and specifications that guide construction. Land use and resource permits and leases required for construction. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Project configuration and specifications that guide construction. Land use and resource permits and leases required for construction. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Project configuration and specifications that guide construction. Land use and resource permits and leases required for construction. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Project configuration and specifications that guide construction. Land use and resource permits and leases required for construction. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Project configuration and specifications that guide construction. Land use and resource permits and leases required for construction. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Project configuration and specifications that guide construction. Land use and resource permits and leases required for construction. Project configuration and specifications that guide construction. Land use and resource permits and leases required for construction. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Project configuration and specifications that guide construction. Land use and resource permits and leases required for construction. Project configuration and specifications that guide construction. Land use and resource permits and leases required for construction. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Project configuration and specifications that guide construction. Land use and resource permits and leases required for construction. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Project configuration and specifications that guide construction. Land use and resource permits and leases required for construction. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Project configuration and specifications that guide construction. Land use and resource permits and leases required for construction. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Project configuration and specifications that guide construction. Land use and resource permits and leases required for construction. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Project configuration and specifications that guide construction. Land use and resource permits and leases required for construction. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Project configuration and specifications that guide construction. Land use and resource permits and leases required for construction. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Project configuration and specifications that guide construction. Land use and resource permits and leases required for construction. Project configuration and specifications that guide construction. Land use and resource permits and leases required for construction. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Project configuration and specifications that guide construction. Land use and resource permits and leases required for construction. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Project configuration and specifications that guide construction. Land use and resource permits and leases required for construction. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Project configuration and specifications that guide construction. Land use and resource permits and leases required for construction. Detailed evaluation intended to assess technical, economic, financial, and operational viability and to narrow focus of final design and construction. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Project configuration and specifications that guide construction. Land use and resource permits and leases required for construction. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Project configuration and specifications that guide construction. Land use and resource permits and leases required for construction. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. Completion of project construction, start of operation, and final commissioning. It also includes follow-up O&M reporting requirements. phase__long_name Phase III - Final Design and Permitting Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase I - Reconnaissance Phase I - Reconnaissance Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase I - Reconnaissance Phase I - Reconnaissance Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase I - Reconnaissance Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase III - Final Design and Permitting Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase III - Final Design and Permitting Phase III - Final Design and Permitting Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase III - Final Design and Permitting Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase III - Final Design and Permitting Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase III - Final Design and Permitting Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase III - Final Design and Permitting Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase III - Final Design and Permitting Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase III - Final Design and Permitting Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase I - Reconnaissance Phase III - Final Design and Permitting Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase III - Final Design and Permitting Phase III - Final Design and Permitting Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase III - Final Design and Permitting Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase III - Final Design and Permitting Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase III - Final Design and Permitting Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase III - Final Design and Permitting Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase III - Final Design and Permitting Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase III - Final Design and Permitting Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase III - Final Design and Permitting Phase III - Final Design and Permitting Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase III - Final Design and Permitting Phase III - Final Design and Permitting Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase III - Final Design and Permitting Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase III - Final Design and Permitting Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase III - Final Design and Permitting Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase III - Final Design and Permitting Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase III - Final Design and Permitting Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase III - Final Design and Permitting Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase III - Final Design and Permitting Phase III - Final Design and Permitting Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase III - Final Design and Permitting Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase III - Final Design and Permitting Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase III - Final Design and Permitting Phase II - Feasibility Analysis, Resource Assessment, Conceptual Design Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase III - Final Design and Permitting Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase III - Final Design and Permitting Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting Phase IV - Construction, Commissioning, Operation, and Reporting phase__short_name Final Design Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Construction Construction Reconnaissance Reconnaissance Feasibility Reconnaissance Reconnaissance Feasibility Feasibility Reconnaissance Construction Feasibility Feasibility Construction Construction Construction Construction Feasibility Construction Construction Construction Feasibility Construction Feasibility Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Feasibility Final Design Feasibility Construction Construction Construction Construction Feasibility Feasibility Construction Construction Feasibility Construction Feasibility Feasibility Final Design Final Design Construction Feasibility Feasibility Construction Construction Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Construction Construction Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Construction Feasibility Feasibility Final Design Construction Feasibility Final Design Construction Feasibility Final Design Construction Construction Construction Feasibility Construction Feasibility Construction Final Design Feasibility Construction Construction Construction Construction Feasibility Feasibility Construction Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Construction Construction Feasibility Feasibility Construction Feasibility Final Design Feasibility Feasibility Construction Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Construction Construction Construction Feasibility Feasibility Final Design Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Reconnaissance Final Design Construction Construction Construction Feasibility Feasibility Construction Feasibility Construction Final Design Final Design Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Construction Feasibility Construction Feasibility Feasibility Construction Construction Construction Feasibility Feasibility Final Design Construction Feasibility Final Design Feasibility Final Design Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Final Design Construction Feasibility Final Design Construction Final Design Feasibility Feasibility Construction Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Final Design Final Design Feasibility Final Design Final Design Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Construction Construction Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Construction Construction Final Design Construction Construction Final Design Construction Final Design Construction Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Construction Final Design Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Construction Feasibility Feasibility Final Design Construction Feasibility Feasibility Construction Feasibility Feasibility Construction Feasibility Feasibility Construction Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Final Design Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Final Design Final Design Feasibility Feasibility Construction Construction Construction Final Design Construction Construction Construction Feasibility Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Feasibility Final Design Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Feasibility Construction Feasibility Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Feasibility Final Design Feasibility Construction Final Design Construction Construction Final Design Construction Construction project__id 435 685 776 772 784 423 388 389 476 486 779 782 412 633 413 639 473 453 775 489 778 490 441 387 412 780 773 572 455 484 485 430 422 452 475 446 444 404 391 457 459 458 410 399 429 403 416 487 492 489 493 437 447 476 415 431 439 470 419 420 451 411 400 450 488 491 462 461 418 427 449 438 390 395 472 538 465 398 448 490 479 471 423 409 456 460 455 483 445 473 482 770 424 486 426 474 442 436 420 599 501 532 557 597 576 577 590 522 511 523 559 544 419 504 598 513 586 580 454 551 786 585 502 785 534 535 546 533 572 688 482 680 673 535 634 395 583 525 628 410 639 504 610 530 531 471 678 637 543 645 413 420 654 533 544 511 717 700 702 706 701 705 544 584 709 451 707 523 504 460 777 708 581 774 692 698 696 582 532 530 683 610 531 447 570 697 490 543 665 472 423 710 502 679 699 711 453 609 633 426 656 620 606 690 694 533 704 695 693 507 435 619 497 643 672 653 662 685 651 406 486 588 629 409 687 686 719 718 671 512 485 690 726 787 679 403 770 447 736 739 740 746 748 459 586 757 758 595 764 846 861 862 854 848 645 656 606 764 416 690 747 837 839 840 841 842 845 773 870 850 453 761 719 416 430 876 680 874 878 880 403 875 877 893 879 577 606 872 448 873 545 584 860 491 413 701 843 510 730 915 916 831 918 919 502 666 599 project__electric_efficiency_prior_to_re_integration 12.39 13.005 13 14.4 14.2 13.005 10.92 13.78 15.48 14.2 13 13 80 13.1 14.09 13.62 13 13 10.8 12.5 14.4 13.84 13.65 13 13.19 13 13 14.2 14.7 77 13 13.78 16.37 13 16.25 13.62 13 13 13 14 13 14.11 8.66 8.66 13 14 14.7 14.8 55 13 14 13 13.78 14.2 13 14 13 13 13 13.9 14.2 10.8 16.37 14.09 13 14.83 13.4 13 13 14.8 13 14.83 12.5 10.92 10.7 13 12.5 10.8 13 13 13.19 55 13.62 project__electric_generation_fuel_displaced False True True True True True True True True True True True True True True False True True True False True True True True True True False False False True True True True True True True True True True True False False True False True True True False False False True True True True True True False True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True False True True True False False False True True True True False True True True True True True True False True True False True False True True False True True True True True True True True False False True True True True False True True True True True True True True False True True True True True True True True True True True True False True True False False True True True True False True True True True False True True True False True True True True False True True True True True True True True True True False False True False True True True False True True True False False True True True True True True True True True False True False True True True False False True False False True False True True True True True False True project__goal_net_heat_delivered 0 1500 1353 2181 8281 6740 6864 8196 472 1117 8451 91184 7700 111200 139000 1214 2273784 1594 15430 6787 1600 1117 12232 1594 24170 1000 24170 1978 11350 24170 67960 1000 1594 project__goal_net_re_electric_generation 1458642 19128960 1458642 2031234 13008600 16000000 691164 502824 234768 4000000 1700000 1170217 1035432 878641 1019455 1019445 19128960 2049840 24503168 4822416 16000000 2350483 1408608 1662400 865488 130000000 263676 697296 420000 420000 4000000 130000000 2049840 1810000 48500000 130000000 19128960 1000000 16000000 8191 13008600 1170217 4822416 502824 263676 32000000 1810000 1170217 1019445 48500000 1408608 project__heat_efficiency_after_re_integration 90 90 80 80 80 80 project__heat_efficiency_prior_to_re_integration 90 70 70 80 75 75 70 85 90 75 70 100 75 70 70 80 75 75 75 75 70 70 75 75 70 70 70 70 70 70 77 80 70 80 70 75 75 70 80 80 70 70 75 80 75 70 70 80 80 75 70 80 80 80 80 75 80 70 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 70 70 80 75 80 project__heat_fuel_displaced True True False True False False True False True False True False False False True True True True True True False False False False True True True True True False True True True True True True True True True True True False False True True False True False False False True False True True False True True True True True True False False True False True True True False True True True True True True False True True False False True True True False True True True True False False False True True False True True True True True False True False False False False True False True True True True True True False False True True False True True True False True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True False True True project__latitude 61.68361 62.131318 60.79222 66.9 60.48 60.48 60.5024521 60.4110021 56.6 55.2150771 64.833333 59.633333 56.02 58.1775888 63.3781049 60.0667821 61.757925 57.7918569 63.770887 63.85 62.533333 64.05306 64.75 58.30194 56.02 58.30194 59.433333 63.33667 60.79222 64.83333 57.78333 59.23333 59.23333 59.71667 52.93806 52.1904308 66.9 62.565 62.27139 59.74889 60.38806 60.53028 60.6129114 58.25 56.2932788 56.3056961 61.0560011 64.75111 58.30194 63.85 64.83333 60.769433 56.6 60.525059 59.435708 63.87306 64.73944 62.95639 66.56472 59.71667 60.54278 55.33972 56.25537 59.86393 59.96331 67.08611 66.9846319 56.97583 56.9741466 62.95639 63.33667 57.1374264 59.7857703 60.098797 65.00111 60.973514 56.47083 59.54694 64.05306 59.833333 66.89828 60.48 55.12959 61.21806 57.2330066 60.79222 60.733333 61.316667 61.757925 64.56389 64.50111 61.53111 55.2150771 55.333195 61.22 64.73333 64.50111 66.56472 55.33972 60.153012 71.29056 53.87361 51.8725 66.65444 67.01389 67.08 66.89828 56.0981271 61.5860781 60.34306 65.09361 62.95639 57.6523703 60.86472 62.7662177 64.33389 59.97185 64.83333 59.32778 69.72774 62.77778 55.68778 70.633333 54.1220063 54.1390343 64.3265405 54.13556 63.33667 59.033333 64.56389 52.210038 57.12222 54.1390343 57.12222 59.7857703 59.45278 57.56417 60.2025 60.6129114 60.0667821 57.6523703 68.34778 70.63694 69.73586 66.89828 67.72694 60.10417 61.29972 58.0732016 63.3781049 66.56472 65.1808 54.13556 65.09361 56.0981271 57.05306 60.86694 59.7558107 55.18583 60.44611 56.00194 65.09361 63.52222 56.94839 59.71667 59.72861 61.5860781 57.6523703 57.2330066 60.79222 60.70806 62.05306 61.35 60.21889 60.81222 61.87778 61.84278 71.29056 70.63694 70.13194 68.34778 69.73586 66.87145 66.60389 64.05306 61.29972 61.17917 60.098797 60.48 58.11 55.68778 57.5802614 58.16667 57.96083 57.7918569 55.47639 58.1775888 55.333195 63.3367 64.8353 64.73333 64.84722 64.32722 54.13556 54.85394 64.93194 64.6175 60.525059 61.68361 60.216667 60.90944 60.10417 60.72028 61.4381638 59.35139 62.131318 61.7399738 63.3441449 55.2150771 59.4235727 59.3557818 55.12959 58.5149824 56.47083 57.05306 57.05306 57.988889 55.14056 57.78333 64.84722 65.683333 60.866667 57.5802614 56.3056961 64.50111 61.783333 61.821511 61.7 66.25 59.066667 60.38806 64.33389 61.52904 63.7612 63.383333 55.12837 59.75 59.116667 58.216667 64.783333 57.05306 58.0732016 63.3367 64.73333 55.12837 61.0560011 64.84722 63.6942 60.8669 59.85 63.52222 61.883333 66.833333 59.45278 59.433333 55.18583 59.783333 57.7918569 62.9 57.05306 61.0560011 59.23333 52.210038 56.3056961 62.334722 62.053 67.01389 64.73333 62.533 59.54694 62.778 62.083333 63.52222 59.333333 59.96331 63.3781049 60.44611 60.366667 56.966667 62.0508 55.2 55.68778 58.11 55.33972 project__longitude -144.85234 -150.043631 -161.75583 -162.58333 -149.32 -149.32 -149.4358776 -149.3479091 -169.54167 -132.603436 -147.716667 -151.55 -136.3334874 -143.60666 -148.0165564 -149.229359 -135.194198 -144.835234 -148.966667 -164.866667 -148.74583 -147.35 -134.41972 -134.41972 -154.75 -142.98556 -161.75583 -147.71667 -152.4 -135.43333 -135.43333 -154.9 -168.86778 -174.1955945 -162.58333 -144.66472 -145.38222 -161.91583 -166.185 -165.1025 -145.6795177 -158.4058278 -158.5239737 -146.3489387 -147.34944 -134.41972 -148.966667 -147.71667 -148.688286 -169.54167 -145.628293 -135.374941 -160.78806 -155.48694 -155.59583 -145.27389 -154.77 -145.7575 -160.49722 -158.76175 -163.13322 -162.87981 -157.85139 -156.6912247 -133.94722 -132.7840911 -155.59583 -142.98556 -134.8699374 -158.598673 -149.298284 -150.63389 -149.14071 -132.37667 -139.72722 -148.74583 -151.583333 -162.59585 -149.32 -131.57496 -149.90028 -153.3079938 -161.75583 -151.316667 -149.566667 -149.229359 -149.09306 -165.40639 -166.09667 -132.603436 -131.5327107 -149.88 -156.9275 -165.40639 -145.27389 -160.49722 -158.7345439 -156.78861 -166.53667 -176.62861 -143.72222 -146.41861 -157.85 -162.59585 -133.1398627 -144.4361506 -162.66306 -164.92389 -155.59583 -153.0250189 -146.67861 -143.8460983 -161.15389 -154.84779 -147.71667 -155.89472 -162.74357 -164.52306 -132.52222 -160.016667 -165.78791 -165.7792096 -158.7244045 -165.77306 -142.98556 -158.45 -149.09306 -174.207114 -170.275 -165.7792096 -170.275 -158.598673 -157.31194 -157.57917 -154.31278 -145.6795177 -148.0165564 -153.0250189 -166.80806 -160.03833 -163.01178 -162.59585 -164.53333 -149.44222 -152.25139 -135.3916122 -143.60666 -145.27389 -152.07889 -165.77306 -164.92389 -133.1398627 -135.33 -162.27306 -162.72111 -149.84944 -161.20278 -164.92389 -162.28806 -158.62902 -154.77 -157.28444 -144.4361506 -153.0250189 -153.3079938 -161.75583 -161.76611 -163.16583 -155.466667 -162.02444 -161.43583 -162.08111 -165.58167 -156.78861 -160.03833 -143.62389 -166.80806 -163.01178 -162.52371 -160.00694 -148.74583 -152.25139 -151.02361 -149.298284 -149.32 -135.44 -132.52222 -134.6233273 -133.73333 -136.2275 -135.194198 -133.14833 -136.3334874 -131.5327107 -142.9856 -147.65325 -148.01444 -158.72194 -165.77306 -163.40883 -161.15694 -162.26056 -145.628293 -144.85234 -164.2 -161.43139 -149.44222 -151.40611 -148.814798 -151.82972 -150.043631 -148.9083606 -148.7814559 -132.603436 -135.6640537 -135.3269566 -131.57496 -132.37667 -135.33 -135.33 -135.94 -131.46722 -152.4 -148.01444 -156.4 -146.683333 -134.6233273 -158.5239737 -165.40639 -161.316667 -165.908743 -157.166667 -166.066667 -160.4 -166.185 -161.15389 -165.59046 -154.75583 -143.35 -162.329925 -154.916667 -156.85 -157.366667 -141.2 -135.17 -135.3916122 -142.9856 -162.329925 -146.3489387 -148.01444 -170.4789 -162.2731 -163.133333 -162.28806 -162.083333 -161.05 -157.31194 -154.75 -162.72111 -154.1 -135.194198 -143.75 -135.33 -146.3489387 -135.43333 -174.207114 -158.5239737 -166.334722 -163.166 -146.41861 -164.867 -139.72722 -164.523 -163.716667 -162.28806 -155.916667 -162.87981 -143.60666 -149.84944 -162.633333 -133.933333 -145.4359 -132.816667 -132.52222 -135.44361 -160.49722 project__master_project_code 10049 10299 10387 10341 10132 10037 10002 10003 10090 10100 10391 10394 10026 10247 10027 10253 10087 10067 10189 10103 10390 10104 10055 10001 10026 10392 10389 10186 10069 10098 10099 10044 10036 10066 10089 10060 10058 10018 10005 10071 10073 10072 10024 10013 10043 10017 10030 10101 10106 10103 10107 10051 10061 10090 10029 10045 10053 10084 10033 10034 10065 10025 10014 10064 10102 10105 10076 10075 10032 10041 10063 10052 10004 10009 10086 10152 10079 10012 10062 10104 10093 10085 10037 10023 10070 10074 10069 10097 10059 10087 10096 10384 10038 10100 10040 10088 10056 10050 10034 10213 10115 10146 10171 10211 10190 10191 10204 10136 10125 10137 10173 10158 10033 10118 10212 10127 10200 10194 10068 10165 10396 10199 10116 10395 10148 10149 10160 10147 10186 10302 10096 10294 10287 10149 10248 10009 10197 10139 10242 10024 10253 10118 10224 10144 10145 10085 10292 10251 10157 10259 10027 10034 10268 10147 10158 10125 10331 10314 10316 10320 10315 10319 10158 10198 10323 10065 10321 10137 10118 10074 10388 10322 10195 10297 10306 10312 10310 10196 10146 10144 10385 10224 10145 10061 10184 10311 10104 10157 10279 10086 10037 10324 10116 10293 10313 10325 10067 10223 10247 10040 10270 10234 10220 10304 10308 10147 10318 10309 10307 10121 10049 10233 10111 10257 10286 10267 10276 10299 10265 10020 10100 10202 10243 10023 10301 10300 10333 10332 10285 10126 10099 10304 10340 10282 10293 10017 10384 10061 10351 10354 10355 10361 10363 10073 10200 10372 10373 10209 10379 10414 10429 10430 10422 10416 10259 10270 10220 10379 10030 10304 10362 10405 10407 10408 10409 10410 10413 10389 10083 10418 10067 10376 10333 10030 10044 10442 10294 10440 10444 10446 10017 10441 10443 10459 10445 10191 10220 10438 10062 10439 10159 10198 10428 10105 10027 10315 10411 10124 10345 10460 10461 10399 10463 10464 10116 10280 10213 project__name Kenny Lake School Wood Fired Boiler Susitna Valley High School Wood Heat Bethel Wind Farm Construction (BNC land) Deering Wind System Assess PreConstruction Falls Creek Low-Impact Hydro Grant Lake Hydroelectric Facility Crescent Lk/Crk Low-Impact Hydro Ptarmigan Lk/Crk Low-Impact Hydro Saint George Wind Farm Hiilangaay (Reynolds Creek) Hydroelectric Project Fairbanks Bio-Diesel - Waste Vegetable Oil Homer Water System Hydro Assessment North Prince of Wales Island Intertie Project Elfin Cove Hydro Yerrick Creek Hydroelectric Construction Chenega Bay Hydro Fishhook Hydroelectric Project Indian River Hydroelectric Project Little Gerstle Hydro Assessment McKinley Village Solar Thermal Nunam Iqua Wind Power Study GVEA Eva Creek Wind Turbine Purchase Biomass-fired Organic Rankine Cycle System Juneau Airport Ground Source Heat Pump North Prince of Wales Island Intertie Project Biodiesel Production from Juneau Area Waste Kokhanok Wind - Diesel Tok Wind Resource Bethel Wind Farm Construction Delta Area Wind Turbines Pillar Mountain Wind Project Haines Central Wood Heating Feasibility Study (Community Buildings) Haines (Chilkoot) Central Wood Heating System Construction Lake Pen Borough Wind Feasibility Study Nikolski Wind Integration Chuniixsax Creek Hydroelectric Buckland, Deering, Noorvik Wind Farm Chistochina Central Wood Heating Gulkana Central Wood Heating Quinhagak Wind Farm Mekoryuk Wind Farm Toksook Wind Farm Humpback Creek Hydroelectric Project Rehabilitation Falls Creek Hydroelectric Construction Indian Creek Hydro Chignik Lagoon Hydroelectric Allison Lake Hydro North Pole Heat Recovery Juneau Aquatic Ctr. Ground Source Heat Pump McKinley Village Solar Thermal Delta Junction Wood Chip Heating Whittier Creek Hydroelectric Upper Kobuk River Biomass Saint George Wind Farm Cordova Wood Processing Plant Burro Creek Hydro Unalakleet Wind Farm Ruby Hydrokinetic McGrath Biomass Fort Yukon Central Wood Heating Lake and Peninsula Borough Wood Boilers Cordova Heat Recovery Aleutians East Borough Chignik Lake Area Wind-Hydro Kwigillingok High Penetration Wind-Diesel Smart Grid Kongiganak High Penetration Wind-Diesel Smart Grid Ambler Solar PV Cosmos Hills Hydroelectric Kake-Petersburg Intertie Ruth Lake Hydro McGrath Heat Recovery Tok Wood Heating Takatz Lake Hydroelectric Nushagak Area Hydropower Project Fourth of July Creek Hydroelectric Project Manley Hot Springs Geothermal Plant California Creek Hydroelectric Wrangell Hydro Based Electric Boilers Yakutat Biomass GVEA Eva Creek Wind Turbine Purchase Nikolaevsk Wind Farm Kotzebue High Penetration Wind-Battery-Diesel Hybrid Grant Lake Hydroelectric Facility Metlakatla-Ketchikan Intertie Anchorage Landfill Gas Electricity Old Harbor Hydroelectric Bethel Wind Farm Construction Nikiski Wind Farm South Fork Hydroelectric Construction Fishhook Hydroelectric Project Nenana Hydrokinetic Banner Peak Wind Farm Expansion Hooper Bay Wind Farm Hiilangaay (Reynolds Creek) Hydroelectric Project Whitman Lake Hydro Statewide Hydrokinetic Interior Regional Housing Wood Energy Nome Banner Peak Wind Farm Transmission Fort Yukon Central Wood Heating Sand Point Wind Kisaralik/Chikuminuk Hydro Atqasuk Transmission Line Unalaska Heat Recovery Adak Diesel Hybrid Chalkyitsik Biomass Central Heating Venetie District Heating Ambler Heat Recovery Kotzebue Electric Heat Recovery Neck Lake Hydro Fivemile Creek Hydroelectric Project Tuntutuliak High Penetration Wind-Diesel Smart Grid Pilgrim Hot Springs McGrath Biomass Terror Lake Unit 3 Hydroelectric Project Tatitlek Wind/Hydro Carlson Creek Hydroelectric Shaktoolik Wind Construction Teller Wind Analysis Delta Junction Wind Kvichak River RISEC Point Lay Heat Recovery Emmonak/Alakanuk Wind Thorne Bay School Wood Fired Boiler Project Wainwright Heat Recovery Loud Creek Hydro Akutan Hydroelectric System Repair and Upgrade Kaltag Biomass Hydronic Heating Akutan Geothermal Development Project Tok Wind Resource Nushagak Community Wind Power Project Nenana Hydrokinetic Atka Hydro Dispatched Excess Electrical Power St. Paul Wind Diesel Project Akutan Hydroelectric System Repair and Upgrade Saint Paul Fuel Economy Upgrade Nushagak Area Hydropower Project New Stuyahok Wind Pilot Point Wind Power & Heat Port Alsworth Hydroelectric Humpback Creek Hydroelectric Project Rehabilitation Chenega Bay Hydro Terror Lake Unit 3 Hydroelectric Project Point Hope Wind Diesel Generation Project Wainwright Wind Turbine Point Lay Wind Generation Kotzebue High Penetration Wind-Battery-Diesel Hybrid Kivalina Wind-Intertie Alaska Sealife Center Ph II Seawater Heat Pump Project Mount Spurr Geothermal Project Gartina Falls Hydroelectric Project Yerrick Creek Hydroelectric Construction Fort Yukon Central Wood Heating City-Tribe Biomass Energy Conservation Akutan Geothermal Development Project Pilgrim Hot Springs Neck Lake Hydro Japonski Island Boathouse Heat Pump Atmautluak Wind Renewable Energy Battle Creek Diversion Project Cold Bay Wind Energy Project Stetson Creek Diversion/Cooper Lake Dam Facilities Project Nelson Lagoon Wind Energy Project Pilgrim Hot Springs Stebbins Wind Port Heiden Wind Turbine Project Lake and Peninsula Borough Wood Boilers New Koliganek Wind Heat Recovery Project Fivemile Creek Hydroelectric Project Terror Lake Unit 3 Hydroelectric Project Old Harbor Hydroelectric Bethel Renewable Energy Project Napaskiak Wind Power and Heat Recovery Project St. Mary's/ Pitka's Point Wind Lime Village Photovoltaic System Retrofit Eek Wind Feasibility Kwethluk Wind Marshall Wind Scammon Bay Wind Atqasuk Transmission Line Wainwright Wind Turbine Kaktovik Wind Diesel Point Hope Wind Diesel Generation Project Point Lay Wind Generation Upper Kobuk River Biomass Kotzebue Paper and Wood Waste to Energy Project Selawik Hybrid Wind Diesel System Turbine Upgrade GVEA Eva Creek Wind Turbine Purchase Mount Spurr Geothermal Project CEA Transmission Line to Renewable Energy Resources Fourth of July Creek Hydroelectric Project Grant Lake Hydroelectric Facility Hoonah Heat Recovery Project Thorne Bay School Wood Fired Boiler Project Thayer Lake Hydropower Project Snettisham Transmission Line Avalanche Mitigation Pelican Hydroelectric Upgrade Project Indian River Hydroelectric Project Craig Biomass Fuel Dryer Project Elfin Cove Hydro Whitman Lake Hydro Upper Tanana Biomass CHP Project Organic Rankine Cycle Field Testing Louden Tribal Council Renewable Energy Wood Heating in Interior Alaska Communities Kaltag Solar Construction Akutan Geothermal Development Project False Pass Wind Energy Project Koyuk Wind Elim Wind Cordova Community Biomass Kenny Lake School Wood Fired Boiler Chefornak Wind Akiachak Wind AVTEC Hydro Training Facility Cook Inlet TidGen Project Hunter Creek Hydroelectric Project Port Graham Biomass Waste Heat Demo Project Susitna Valley High School Wood Heat Eska Creek Hydroelectric Project Jack River Hydroelectric Hiilangaay (Reynolds Creek) Hydroelectric Project Connelly Lake Hydroelectric Project Schubee Lake Hydroelectric Project Metlakatla-Ketchikan Intertie Excursion Inlet Hydro Project Wrangell Electric Vehicle Feasibility Study Sitka Renewable Energy Feasibility for Centennial Hall & Library Sitka Renewable Energy Feasibility Study for Wastewater Treatment Plant Tenakee Inlet Geothermal Resource Triangle Lake Hydroelectric Project Pillar Mountain Wind Project Wood Heating in Interior Alaska Communities Huslia Water System & Clinic Wood Boiler Project Tatitlek Heat Recovery Project Thayer Lake Hydropower Project Chignik Lagoon Hydroelectric Banner Peak Wind Farm Expansion Upper Kobuk River Biomass Russian Mission Heat Recovery System Scammon Bay Hydro Design & Engineering Sleetmute Heat Recovery - Power Plant to Water Plant Shishmaref Heat Recovery Project Togiak Waste Heat Recovery Project Mekoryuk Wind Farm Shaktoolik Wind Construction Surplus Wind Energy Recovery for Chevak Water System Heat Surplus Wind Energy Recovery for Gambell Water System Heat Tanacross Woody Biomass Community Facility Space Heating Project Waterfall Creek Hydroelectric Project Tazimina Hydroelectric Project Capacity Increase Levelock Wind Reconnaissance Study Egegik Wind Feasibility Study Eagle Solar Array Project Blue Lake Hydroelectric Expansion Project Gartina Falls Hydroelectric Project Upper Tanana Biomass CHP Project Louden Tribal Council Renewable Energy Waterfall Creek Hydroelectric Project Allison Lake Hydro Wood Heating in Interior Alaska Communities Savoonga Heat Recovery - Power Plant to Water Plant Atmautluak Washeteria Heat Recovery Project Heat Recovery for the Water Treatment Plant and Washeteria of Quinhagak Stebbins Heat Recovery Project Heat Recovery for the Water Treatment Plant & Community Store for Marshall Heat Recovery for the Water Treatment Plant for Noorvik New Stuyahok Heat Recovery Kokhanok Wind - Diesel Cold Bay Heat Recovery Knutson Creek Hydroelectric Project Design and Permitting Indian River Hydroelectric Project Mentasta Woody Biomass Community Facility Space Heating Project Sitka Renewable Energy Feasibility for Centennial Hall & Library Allison Lake Hydro Haines Central Wood Heating Feasibility Study (Community Buildings) Gunnuk Creek Hydroelectric Feasibility Study Atka Hydro Dispatched Excess Electrical Power Chisana Mountain Wind Feasibility Project Seldovia House Ground Source Heat Pump Project Biomass Heat for Minto Community Buildings Chignik Lagoon Hydroelectric Ketchikan Gateway Borough Biomass Heating Project Brevig Mission Water System Heat Recovery Chevak Water and Vacuum Plant Heat Recovery St. Mary's Heat Recovery System Venetie District Heating Louden Tribal Council Renewable Energy Nunam Iqua Heat Recovery Project Yakutat Biomass Emmonak Heat Recovery System Mountain Village Wind_City and Tribe Stebbins Wind Igiugig Wind Turbine Design Kongiganak High Penetration Wind-Diesel Smart Grid Yerrick Creek Hydroelectric Construction Stetson Creek Diversion/Cooper Lake Dam Facilities Project Heat Recovery for the Water Treatment Plant/Washeteria Building for Tuntutuliak Kake Biomass Multi Disciplinary Combined Facility (MDCF) Primary Care Center Biomass Feasibility Project Angoon Low-Income Housing Pellet District Heat Bethel Power Plant Heat Recovery Assessment and Conceptual Design Hydaburg Schools Wood Fired Boiler Project Lepquinum Wellness Center Ground Source Heat Pump Scammon Bay Community Facilities Heat Recovery Thorne Bay School Wood Fired Boiler Project Hoonah City Schools Biomass Heating System (FROM APPLICATION #495 TITLE) Sand Point Wind project__project_expected_completion_date 1/1/2016 12/31/2013 6/30/2009 9/30/2014 6/30/2009 12/31/2013 12/31/2009 12/31/2009 6/30/2015 12/31/2018 12/30/2011 6/30/2014 6/30/2011 12/31/2013 12/31/2013 12/31/2018 6/30/2009 3/31/2009 9/30/2009 6/30/2013 12/31/2012 7/1/2010 12/30/2011 12/31/2010 12/31/2010 12/31/2018 10/30/2009 9/30/2010 12/31/2013 12/31/2011 12/31/2010 6/30/2010 12/31/2010 12/31/2011 10/1/2017 10/16/2009 12/31/2010 12/31/2010 12/31/2009 12/31/2011 8/30/2009 5/30/2010 12/31/2015 8/30/2012 11/15/2009 6/30/2011 3/31/2009 12/31/2011 5/1/2012 10/1/2015 6/30/2015 12/1/2009 12/31/2011 3/31/2010 12/31/2012 8/1/2017 1/1/2015 6/30/2013 3/31/2011 4/30/2012 6/30/2011 12/31/2011 10/31/2009 5/1/2010 10/1/2010 12/31/2013 12/31/2012 12/31/2013 12/31/2010 2/9/2011 6/30/2013 12/31/2012 12/31/2013 6/30/2013 12/31/2018 12/31/2010 12/31/2013 12/31/2012 12/31/2013 4/30/2010 12/31/2018 12/1/2013 6/30/2013 11/1/2011 8/1/2017 12/31/2011 6/30/2011 12/31/2014 6/30/2012 6/30/2012 6/30/2014 12/31/2017 12/31/2010 12/31/2011 6/30/2013 12/31/2012 12/31/2013 7/30/2011 12/31/2011 12/31/2011 7/30/2011 12/31/2011 3/31/2013 12/31/2012 12/31/2012 6/30/2010 6/30/2015 12/1/2010 3/31/2014 12/31/2010 12/31/2012 6/30/2015 6/30/2015 12/31/2014 12/31/2012 12/31/2011 1/1/2016 12/31/2011 12/31/2011 12/31/2013 12/31/2013 6/30/2011 2/29/2012 12/31/2012 12/31/2012 6/30/2012 11/30/2011 7/29/2015 6/30/2011 8/1/2017 3/31/2014 6/30/2013 12/31/2010 12/31/2014 6/30/2012 6/30/2016 6/30/2013 8/1/2015 6/30/2013 6/30/2013 6/30/2016 1/1/2015 6/30/2014 12/31/2013 12/31/2015 6/30/2013 12/31/2012 12/31/2013 12/31/2012 12/31/2012 2/29/2012 12/31/2012 6/30/2011 12/31/2012 10/1/2015 12/31/2012 6/30/2013 12/31/2013 12/31/2013 6/1/2012 12/31/2012 12/31/2012 12/31/2012 12/31/2018 6/30/2015 6/30/2014 12/1/2013 6/30/2015 12/31/2013 1/1/2017 12/31/2012 9/30/2012 3/31/2014 6/30/2013 12/31/2012 12/31/2012 12/31/2012 1/1/2016 12/31/2013 12/31/2013 12/31/2011 12/31/2012 12/31/2013 12/31/2012 6/30/2013 12/31/2018 12/31/2012 6/30/2012 6/30/2013 6/30/2013 10/1/2012 6/30/2012 12/31/2012 9/30/2010 12/31/2012 12/31/2015 9/30/2014 12/31/2015 12/31/2013 10/1/2015 12/31/2015 12/31/2013 12/31/2013 9/30/2015 6/30/2016 12/31/2010 12/31/2011 6/30/2015 6/30/2015 10/1/2016 1/1/2016 12/21/2014 7/29/2015 6/30/2015 1/1/2017 8/30/2012 12/31/2012 8/31/2015 12/31/2015 2/1/2017 12/1/2016 9/30/2015 12/31/2010 12/31/2018 9/30/2015 10/1/2012 8/30/2012 12/31/2013 12/31/2015 8/1/2016 3/31/2018 6/30/2012 1/1/2017 3/1/2017 6/30/2016 6/30/2011 6/30/2011 8/1/2015 9/1/2019 12/31/2012 12/31/2011 project__project_full_commission_date 1/27/2015 6/30/2010 12/31/2012 1/27/2015 10/1/2010 10/1/2012 1/1/2012 1/1/2016 12/1/2017 10/31/2010 1/27/2012 3/1/2011 9/1/2009 7/13/2011 7/24/2009 8/27/2015 9/1/2016 11/15/2009 10/12/2011 6/30/2010 10/1/2011 1/1/2016 1/31/2010 12/1/2018 1/1/2015 9/2/2013 8/1/2013 12/1/2012 5/1/2010 11/1/2010 2/28/2011 12/31/2012 12/31/2012 11/1/2013 1/1/2015 10/31/2010 12/1/2018 2/1/2016 11/1/2013 8/1/2013 10/1/2013 1/1/2013 3/1/2015 3/1/2015 2/3/2015 7/13/2011 6/30/2012 7/30/2015 12/1/2018 1/1/2015 1/1/2016 12/31/2012 1/1/2013 1/1/2013 1/1/2014 3/31/2013 1/1/2015 1/1/2016 10/1/2012 2/1/2017 10/1/2012 1/1/2016 8/27/2015 11/1/2013 1/1/2016 10/1/2017 1/1/2015 3/1/2011 7/1/2015 7/1/2015 9/1/2018 1/1/2016 1/1/2016 12/20/2014 7/30/2015 9/1/2016 1/1/2016 8/31/2015 12/31/2015 9/1/2015 12/1/2016 9/1/2016 10/7/2014 2/1/2017 9/1/2016 1/1/2016 8/27/2015 8/1/2016 2/1/2016 12/1/2012 9/1/2018 5/1/2018 1/1/2013 project__project_notes Project Manager - Jim Vail Project Manager - Jim Vail Turbine malfunction during commissioning. New turbine will be shipped/installed in spring/summer. The line to Naukati was energized on January 27th at noon. Work continues of pole placement. Prior to the solar system, an electric water heater was in use. Original analysis was done assuming displacement of electricity (from GVEA). Assuming displace DFO for GVEA. Electric generation efficiency prior to RE integration reflects GVEA's average efficiency from DFO in 2011. Electric generation efficiency prior to RE integration is the assumption used in the REF Model VII. Project Manager: Devany Plentovich The line to Naukati was energized on January 27th at noon. Work continues of pole placement. Generator efficiency is taken from the first reported performance data and is not prior to the installation of the wind farm. Applicatior 803 was partially funded and will add three GE 1.5 MW turbines and a battery in 2012. Expected completion date for the expansion is 12/31/12. Haines is deciding it's next steps. AEA received a progress report on August 14, 2012. Efficiency generation efficiency prior to RE integration not reported. Used REF Model Round VII assumption of 13 kWh per gallon. (AVM, 01/13/2013) Project Manager - Jim Vail Quinhagak secondary load is not value added. Heating system efficiency is unknown. Application 870 was funded to install an electric boiler at the ANTHC facilities as a secondary load. This project added a fourth turbine to the three already installed. Electric generation efficiency prior to RE integration not reported. Used the REF Model VII assumption of 13 kWh per gal. (AVM, 01/13/2013) Electric generation efficiency prior to RE integration not reported. Used REF Model Round VII assumption of 13 kWh per gallon. (AVM, 01/13/2013) Prior to the solar system, an electric water heater was in use. Original analysis was done assuming displacement of electricity (from GVEA). Assuming displace DFO for GVEA. Electric generation efficiency prior to RE integration reflects GVEA's average efficiency from DFO in 2011. Turbine malfunction during commissioning. New turbine will be shipped/installed in spring/summer. The project is for a plant that processes wood, not a burning system. A 100% efficiency is used for prior and after RE integration, in effect negating efficiency to factor into the displacement and savings estimates. Electric generation efficiency prior to RE integration is the assumption used in the REF Model VII Diesel heating system efficiency prior to RE integration is an assumption. Takatz Lake represents one of the best hydroelectric development sites on Baranof Island, with a lake perched at El. 905 ft about a mile from tidewater. The Project was studied extensively by the Alaska Power Administration (APA) in the 1960’s. The site has not been developed mainly due to its remote location, about 18 miles from Sitka on the eastern shore of Baranof Island. Approximate project configuration has about 25 MW capacity, 18 mile transmission line from the Project to the City of Sitka and average annual energy of 87,500 to about 105,000 MWH of annual energy generation potential. Studies were performed in 1968, 1983, and 2014. The project would utilize a dam, lake storage, a 3 mile pipeline, and approximately 50 miles of transmission line. Proposed project has 1.9 MW capacity and would generate approximately 14.3 GWh of energy annually. Electric generation efficiency prior to RE integration is the assumption used in the REF Model VII Electric generation efficiency prior to RE integration is the assumption used in the REF Model VII. Electric generation efficiency prior to RE integration is the assumption used in the REF Model VII Project Manager: Helen Traylor Installed Capacity: 7 MW (Five Jenbacher J420 1.4 MW units) Electric generation efficiency prior to RE integration is an assumption: weighted average of 2011 NG efficiency by AML&P from Alaska Energy Statistics Report Electric generation efficiency prior to RE integration is the assumption used in the REF Model VII. Project closed out in feasibility phase. Insufficient wind resource to advance to next phase. Electric generation efficiency prior to RE integration is the assumption used in the REF Model VII. Project will be fully commissioned after secondary loads are installed Q3 2012. Its unknown at this time if the secondary loads will be value added. Application 878 to install two more turbines was not recommended for funding because the wind resource in Emmonak is Class 2. The original project was recommended for funding based on the wind class in Nunam Iqua. The wind resource report came out after the four turbines in Emonnak were constructed. The grantee has informed the Authority that the seafood plant in Atka has plans to expand and thus would require additional electricity, which may make the dispatched hydropower unfeasible. Once the plant's plans are more definite, the project will be reevaluated. The project would utilize a dam, lake storage, a 3 mile pipeline, and approximately 50 miles of transmission line. Proposed project has 1.9 MW capacity and would generate approximately 14.3 GWh of energy annually. Electric generation efficiency prior to RE integration not reported. Used the REF Model VII assumption of 13 kWh per gal. (AVM, 01/13/2013) Electric generation efficiency prior to RE integration is the assumption used in the REF Model VII This project will reduce heat recovery from the diesel powerhouse by an unknown amount. The Stetson Creek Diversion Project comprises the construction of facilities and structures to divert water from Stetson Creek, convey it approximately 2 miles to Cooper Lake, and allow controlled releases of water from Cooper Lake into Cooper Creek as an expansion of existing hydropower facilities owned and operated by Chugach Electric Association. The diversion is the result of a licensing mitigation strategy that involves removing cold water from Cooper Creek (the Stetson Creek diversion) and discharge a designated amount of warmer water from the Cooper Lake reservoir to Cooper Creek (the siphon construction) in an effort to restore anadromous salmon presence in Cooper Creek. Prior to the construction of the Stetson diversion, Cooper Lake operations diverted all flow from Cooper Lake through the tunnel/penstock to the powerhouse, where it is discharged into Kenai Lake. The 4.8-mile-long Cooper Creek bypassed reach below the Cooper Lake dam received no flow from Cooper Lake; there was no existing minimum flow requirement for Cooper Creek and no outlet structure to provide such flows. The original project had an average annual generation of about 48,500 megawatt-hours (MWh) and an average outflow through the powerhouse of about 100 cubic feet per second (cfs), which is equivalent to 73,000 acre-feet/year. Powerhouse discharge ranged from 0 to 380 cfs into Kenai Lake. The Stetson diversion project consisted of the following main elements: • Construction of a new Diversion Dam on Stetson Creek, • Construction of a 2.2-mile-long diversion pipeline from the new Diversion Dam on Stetson Creek to Cooper Lake, and • Construction of Siphon Outlet Facilities in the existing Cooper Lake Dam spillway alignment to allow controlled releases of water from Cooper Lake into Cooper Creek. The Stetson diversion’s impact on operations is summarized below: • Maximum Diversion from Stetson Creek – 110 cubic feet per second (cfs) • Minimum Instream Flow (MIF) Remaining in Stetson Creek during Diversion – None specified • Minimum Annual Volume Diverted from Stetson Creek to Cooper Lake – 18,285 ac-ft+/- • Total Volume Released from Cooper Lake into Cooper Creek per year – 10,256 ac-ft • Expected net Generation Increase from Stetson Creek Diversion Flow – 8,029 ac-ft Electric generation efficiency prior to RE integration is the assumption used in the REF Model VII. Electric generation efficiency prior to RE integration is an assumption. Project Manager: Devany Plentovich Project Manager - Helen Traylor Project Manager - Helen Traylor. Project Manager - Jim Vail Project Manager - Helen Traylor. Project Manager - Jim Vail Offset 12,200 gallons of heating oil, commitments to efficiency updates first, Process report on 4-11-2016 says "The heat pump equipment is onsite with most of it installed. Units are in each of the rooms with condensate and refrigeration piping are installed and tested." Generator efficiency is taken from the first reported performance data and is not prior to the installation of the wind farm. Applicatior 803 was partially funded and will add three GE 1.5 MW turbines and a battery in 2012. Expected completion date for the expansion is 12/31/12. Project Manager - Devany Plentovich Project Manager - Devany Plentovich Project Manager - Devany Plentovich Project Manager - Devany Plentovich Application 870 was funded to install an electric boiler at the ANTHC facilities as a secondary load. Electric generation efficiency prior to RE integration is the assumption used in the REF Model VII. Project Manager - Helen Traylor This project will reduce heat recovery from the diesel powerhouse by an unknown amount. Project Manager: Devany Plentovich Project Manager - Helen Traylor Offset 12,200 gallons of heating oil, commitments to efficiency updates first, Process report on 4-11-2016 says "The heat pump equipment is onsite with most of it installed. Units are in each of the rooms with condensate and refrigeration piping are installed and tested." Haines is deciding it's next steps. AEA received a progress report on August 14, 2012. The grantee has informed the Authority that the seafood plant in Atka has plans to expand and thus would require additional electricity, which may make the dispatched hydropower unfeasible. Once the plant's plans are more definite, the project will be reevaluated. Project Manager - Helen Traylor The Stetson Creek Diversion Project comprises the construction of facilities and structures to divert water from Stetson Creek, convey it approximately 2 miles to Cooper Lake, and allow controlled releases of water from Cooper Lake into Cooper Creek as an expansion of existing hydropower facilities owned and operated by Chugach Electric Association. The diversion is the result of a licensing mitigation strategy that involves removing cold water from Cooper Creek (the Stetson Creek diversion) and discharge a designated amount of warmer water from the Cooper Lake reservoir to Cooper Creek (the siphon construction) in an effort to restore anadromous salmon presence in Cooper Creek. Prior to the construction of the Stetson diversion, Cooper Lake operations diverted all flow from Cooper Lake through the tunnel/penstock to the powerhouse, where it is discharged into Kenai Lake. The 4.8-mile-long Cooper Creek bypassed reach below the Cooper Lake dam received no flow from Cooper Lake; there was no existing minimum flow requirement for Cooper Creek and no outlet structure to provide such flows. The original project had an average annual generation of about 48,500 megawatt-hours (MWh) and an average outflow through the powerhouse of about 100 cubic feet per second (cfs), which is equivalent to 73,000 acre-feet/year. Powerhouse discharge ranged from 0 to 380 cfs into Kenai Lake. The Stetson diversion project consisted of the following main elements: • Construction of a new Diversion Dam on Stetson Creek, • Construction of a 2.2-mile-long diversion pipeline from the new Diversion Dam on Stetson Creek to Cooper Lake, and • Construction of Siphon Outlet Facilities in the existing Cooper Lake Dam spillway alignment to allow controlled releases of water from Cooper Lake into Cooper Creek. The Stetson diversion’s impact on operations is summarized below: • Maximum Diversion from Stetson Creek – 110 cubic feet per second (cfs) • Minimum Instream Flow (MIF) Remaining in Stetson Creek during Diversion – None specified • Minimum Annual Volume Diverted from Stetson Creek to Cooper Lake – 18,285 ac-ft+/- • Total Volume Released from Cooper Lake into Cooper Creek per year – 10,256 ac-ft • Expected net Generation Increase from Stetson Creek Diversion Flow – 8,029 ac-ft project__project_operation_start_date 4/1/2017 4/1/2016 9/2/2011 6/30/2010 10/1/2012 4/1/2012 5/1/2011 9/2/2011 10/31/2010 9/1/2010 9/30/2010 10/1/2011 12/23/2012 1/1/2016 12/1/2017 10/11/2010 11/30/2010 11/1/2010 8/1/2009 7/13/2011 7/14/2009 3/1/2015 9/1/2016 11/15/2009 4/20/2011 6/30/2010 9/1/2011 1/1/2016 4/1/2016 12/1/2011 12/1/2009 5/1/2018 1/1/2015 6/1/2012 2/3/2012 12/1/2010 5/1/2010 10/1/2010 2/9/2011 10/1/2012 5/1/2012 8/27/2012 7/15/2013 10/20/2014 10/31/2010 5/1/2018 8/1/2011 9/30/2014 2/1/2016 10/1/2013 1/1/2013 1/1/2014 4/30/2012 8/1/2013 9/6/2011 1/1/2013 12/1/2014 12/1/2014 2/3/2015 7/13/2011 1/1/2014 5/1/2012 11/15/2011 7/30/2015 5/1/2018 1/1/2014 8/17/2015 1/1/2015 1/1/2014 1/1/2016 10/1/2012 8/20/2012 1/1/2013 1/1/2014 3/1/2013 2/1/2015 10/20/2014 2/1/2017 1/1/2016 10/1/2012 4/1/2017 4/11/2016 9/30/2010 1/1/2016 2/1/2017 3/1/2015 7/15/2013 1/1/2016 10/1/2017 11/30/2014 11/1/2010 4/30/2012 7/1/2015 7/1/2015 9/1/2018 5/1/2017 1/1/2016 1/1/2016 11/14/2014 7/30/2015 2/1/2017 5/1/2017 9/1/2016 1/1/2016 10/31/2014 8/31/2015 12/31/2015 12/1/2016 9/1/2015 12/1/2016 9/1/2016 10/31/2010 10/7/2014 4/11/2016 9/1/2016 1/1/2016 2/1/2018 3/1/2015 8/1/2016 1/31/2019 2/1/2016 2/1/2017 4/1/2018 12/1/2016 12/1/2010 8/17/2015 9/1/2018 5/1/2018 1/1/2013 8/1/2011 project__electric_generation_fuel_displaced_type__id 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 4 1 1 1 1 1 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 4 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 project__electric_generation_fuel_displaced_type__abbreviation DFO DFO NG NG NG DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO NG DFO DFO DFO DFO NA DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO NA DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO NG DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO NG NG DFO NA DFO NG DFO NG DFO DFO NG NG NG DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO NA DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO NG NG DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO NA NG NG DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO NG NG NG NG DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO NG DFO project__electric_generation_fuel_displaced_type__conversion_factor_mmbtu 0.13869 0.13869 1.021 1.021 1.021 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 1.021 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.1275 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.1275 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 1.021 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 1.021 1.021 0.13869 0.1275 0.13869 1.021 0.13869 1.021 0.13869 0.13869 1.021 1.021 1.021 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.1275 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 1.021 1.021 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.1275 1.021 1.021 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 1.021 1.021 1.021 1.021 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 1.021 0.13869 project__electric_generation_fuel_displaced_type__emission_factor 73.15 73.15 53.06 53.06 53.06 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 53.06 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 70.88 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 70.88 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 53.06 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 53.06 53.06 73.15 70.88 73.15 53.06 73.15 53.06 73.15 73.15 53.06 53.06 53.06 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 70.88 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 53.06 53.06 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 70.88 53.06 53.06 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 53.06 53.06 53.06 53.06 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 53.06 73.15 project__electric_generation_fuel_displaced_type__name Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Natural Gas Natural Gas Natural Gas Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Natural Gas Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Naphtha Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Naphtha Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Natural Gas Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Natural Gas Natural Gas Distillate Fuel Oil Naphtha Distillate Fuel Oil Natural Gas Distillate Fuel Oil Natural Gas Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Natural Gas Natural Gas Natural Gas Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Naphtha Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Natural Gas Natural Gas Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Naphtha Natural Gas Natural Gas Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Natural Gas Natural Gas Natural Gas Natural Gas Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Natural Gas Distillate Fuel Oil project__electric_generation_fuel_displaced_type__physical_units Gallons Gallons MCF MCF MCF Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons MCF Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons MCF Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons MCF MCF Gallons Gallons Gallons MCF Gallons MCF Gallons Gallons MCF MCF MCF Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons MCF MCF Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons MCF MCF Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons MCF MCF MCF MCF Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons MCF Gallons project__heat_fuel_displaced_type__id 1 1 1 3 1 6 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 project__heat_fuel_displaced_type__abbreviation DFO DFO DFO PR DFO RFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO NA DFO PR DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO RFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO DFO project__heat_fuel_displaced_type__conversion_factor_mmbtu 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.091 0.13869 0.14969 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.1275 0.13869 0.091 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.14969 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 0.13869 project__heat_fuel_displaced_type__emission_factor 73.15 73.15 73.15 63.07 73.15 78.8 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 70.88 73.15 63.07 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 78.8 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 73.15 project__heat_fuel_displaced_type__name Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Propane Distillate Fuel Oil Residual Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Naphtha Distillate Fuel Oil Propane Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Residual Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil Distillate Fuel Oil project__heat_fuel_displaced_type__physical_units Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons project__re_utility__id 18 49 44 44 44 44 90 7 44 7 35 7 22 120 104 40 40 78 40 40 7 55 7 18 40 54 13 8 1 8 31 42 25 23 30 40 40 27 90 7 109 64 43 31 59 87 8 83 64 92 79 91 27 114 115 40 44 56 44 65 8 18 44 27 120 76 8 7 50 76 43 102 18 110 8 56 7 26 106 64 54 100 7 8 8 40 8 5 5 7 13 95 5 95 79 8 84 98 31 22 54 77 16 16 56 8 48 7 43 7 14 27 37 27 73 8 86 74 26 54 8 18 70 8 62 8 58 8 8 16 77 77 16 8 40 27 91 44 48 6 82 104 35 50 7 8 36 8 8 71 3 91 120 120 40 7 7 7 65 114 65 54 100 48 23 76 8 1 8 121 121 51 47 7 48 7 51 30 55 81 104 30 13 23 115 8 87 7 27 102 project__re_utility__certificate True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True project__re_utility__eia_operator_id 1651 9416 19558 19558 19558 19558 219 19558 219 5721 219 11824 18541 7353 7353 7353 7353 219 10455 219 1651 7353 10433 56256 221 221 40215 7822 3421 4329 7353 7353 3522 219 40548 12119 7833 40215 10491 221 14856 12119 17271 13870 16955 3522 21015 30150 7353 19558 10451 19558 12385 221 1651 19558 3522 11824 13642 221 219 10210 13642 7833 1651 19454 221 10451 219 3465 19267 12119 10433 18480 219 221 221 7353 221 24486 24486 219 56256 17898 24486 17898 13870 221 40215 10433 26616 1276 1276 10451 221 18963 219 7833 219 878 3522 6866 3522 13477 221 3465 10433 221 1651 221 221 9832 221 221 1276 26616 26616 1276 221 7353 3522 16955 19558 18963 213 29297 18541 5721 10210 219 221 221 221 3422 192 16955 11824 11824 7353 219 219 219 12385 21015 12385 10433 18480 18963 13642 221 221 9897 9188 219 18963 219 9897 4329 10455 14633 18541 4329 56256 30150 221 219 3522 project__re_utility__name Bethel Utilities Corporation Ipnatchiaq Electric Company Homer Electric Assn Inc Homer Electric Assn Inc Homer Electric Assn Inc Homer Electric Assn Inc Saint George, City of Alaska Power & Telephone Company Homer Electric Assn Inc Alaska Power & Telephone Company Elfin Cove Utility Commission Alaska Power & Telephone Company Chenega Ira Council Matanuska Electric Association Tenakee Springs, City of Golden Valley Elec Assn Inc Golden Valley Elec Assn Inc Nunam Iqua Electric Company Golden Valley Elec Assn Inc Golden Valley Elec Assn Inc Alaska Power & Telephone Company Kokhanok Village Council Alaska Power & Telephone Company Bethel Utilities Corporation Golden Valley Elec Assn Inc Kodiak Electric Assn Inc Atka, City of Alaska Village Electric Cooperative AVEC Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Cordova Electric Cooperative Gustavus Electric Co Chignik, City of Chignik Lagoon Power Utility Copper Valley Elec Assn Inc Golden Valley Elec Assn Inc Golden Valley Elec Assn Inc Chugach Electric Assn Inc Saint George, City of Alaska Power & Telephone Company Unalakleet Valley Electric Cooperative Mcgrath Light & Power Gwitchyaa Zhee Utilities Company Cordova Electric Cooperative Kwigillingok Power Company Puvurnaq Power Company Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Petersburg, City of Mcgrath Light & Power Sitka, City & Borough of Nushagak Electric Cooperative Seward, City of Chugach Electric Assn Inc Wrangell, City of Yakutat Power Inc Golden Valley Elec Assn Inc Homer Electric Assn Inc Kotzebue Electric Association Homer Electric Assn Inc Metlakatla Power & Light Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Bethel Utilities Corporation Homer Electric Assn Inc Chugach Electric Assn Inc Matanuska Electric Association Nome Joint Utility Systems Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Alaska Power & Telephone Company Ketchikan Public Utilities Nome Joint Utility Systems Gwitchyaa Zhee Utilities Company TDX Corporation Bethel Utilities Corporation Unalaska, City of Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Kotzebue Electric Association Alaska Power & Telephone Company Chitina Electric Inc Tuntutuliak Community Mcgrath Light & Power Kodiak Electric Assn Inc Tatitlek Village Ira Council Alaska Power & Telephone Company Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Golden Valley Elec Assn Inc Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Akutan, City of Akutan, City of Alaska Power & Telephone Company Atka, City of Saint Paul Municipal Electric Akutan, City of Saint Paul Municipal Electric Nushagak Electric Cooperative Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Pilot Point Electric Utility Tanalian Electric Cooperative Cordova Electric Cooperative Chenega Ira Council Kodiak Electric Assn Inc North Slope Borough Power & Light Barrow Utilities & Electric Cooperative Inc. Barrow Utilities & Electric Cooperative Inc. Kotzebue Electric Association Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Inside Passage Electric Alaska Power & Telephone Company Gwitchyaa Zhee Utilities Company Alaska Power & Telephone Company Atmautluak Tribal Utilities Chugach Electric Assn Inc G & K Inc Chugach Electric Assn Inc Nelson Lagoon Electrical Coop Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Port Heiden Utilities New Koliganek Village Council Chitina Electric Inc Kodiak Electric Assn Inc Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Bethel Utilities Corporation Napaskiak Electric Utility Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Lime Village Electric Utility Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Kwethluk Incorporated d/b/a Kuiggluum Kallugvia Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Barrow Utilities & Electric Cooperative Inc. North Slope Borough Power & Light North Slope Borough Power & Light Barrow Utilities & Electric Cooperative Inc. Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Golden Valley Elec Assn Inc Chugach Electric Assn Inc Seward, City of Homer Electric Assn Inc Inside Passage Electric Alaska Electric Light & Power Company Pelican Utility Tenakee Springs, City of Elfin Cove Utility Commission Ketchikan Public Utilities Alaska Power & Telephone Company Alaska Village Electric Cooperative False Pass, City of Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Naterkaq Light Plant (City of Chefornak) Akiachak Native Community Seward, City of Matanuska Electric Association Matanuska Electric Association Golden Valley Elec Assn Inc Alaska Power & Telephone Company Alaska Power & Telephone Company Alaska Power & Telephone Company Metlakatla Power & Light Wrangell, City of Metlakatla Power & Light Kodiak Electric Assn Inc Tatitlek Village Ira Council Inside Passage Electric Chignik Lagoon Power Utility Nome Joint Utility Systems Alaska Village Electric Cooperative AVEC Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium King Cove, City of I-N-N Electric Coop, Inc Alaska Power & Telephone Company Inside Passage Electric Alaska Power & Telephone Company King Cove, City of Copper Valley Elec Assn Inc Kokhanok Village Council Pedro Bay Village Council Tenakee Springs, City of Copper Valley Elec Assn Inc Atka, City of Chignik Lagoon Power Utility Yakutat Power Inc Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Puvurnaq Power Company Alaska Power & Telephone Company Chugach Electric Assn Inc TDX Corporation project__re_utility__pce_id project__re_utility__regulatory_status__id 5 4 5 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 4 5 6 5 4 5 5 4 5 5 5 6 5 5 5 5 4 4 4 4 5 4 6 4 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 5 4 4 6 4 4 5 4 4 4 5 4 4 5 5 4 5 5 4 5 5 5 5 4 4 5 4 4 5 5 5 4 4 4 5 4 6 5 5 5 5 4 4 5 4 4 4 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 6 5 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 4 4 4 6 4 5 4 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 4 5 5 5 4 4 4 4 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 5 6 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 4 4 6 6 4 4 4 6 4 4 6 5 5 5 project__re_utility__regulatory_status__name Regulated Not regulated Regulated Regulated Regulated Regulated Not regulated Regulated Regulated Regulated Not regulated Regulated Regulated, rate exemption Regulated Not regulated Regulated Regulated Not regulated Regulated Regulated Regulated Regulated, rate exemption Regulated Regulated Regulated Regulated Not regulated Not regulated Not regulated Not regulated Regulated Not regulated Regulated, rate exemption Not regulated Regulated Regulated Regulated Not regulated Regulated Regulated Regulated Regulated Not regulated Not regulated Regulated, rate exemption Not regulated Not regulated Regulated Not regulated Not regulated Not regulated Regulated Not regulated Not regulated Regulated Regulated Not regulated Regulated Regulated Not regulated Regulated Regulated Regulated Regulated Not regulated Not regulated Regulated Not regulated Not regulated Regulated Regulated Regulated Not regulated Not regulated Not regulated Regulated Not regulated Regulated, rate exemption Regulated Regulated Regulated Regulated Not regulated Not regulated Regulated Not regulated Not regulated Not regulated Regulated Not regulated Not regulated Not regulated Not regulated Not regulated Not regulated Not regulated Not regulated Not regulated Regulated, rate exemption Regulated Not regulated Not regulated Not regulated Not regulated Not regulated Regulated Regulated Regulated Regulated Not regulated Regulated Regulated Regulated Not regulated Not regulated Not regulated Regulated, rate exemption Not regulated Regulated Not regulated Regulated Not regulated Not regulated Not regulated Not regulated Not regulated Not regulated Not regulated Not regulated Not regulated Not regulated Not regulated Not regulated Regulated Regulated Not regulated Regulated Regulated Regulated Not regulated Not regulated Not regulated Not regulated Regulated Not regulated Not regulated Not regulated Not regulated Not regulated Not regulated Not regulated Regulated Regulated Regulated Regulated Regulated Regulated Regulated Not regulated Regulated Regulated Regulated Regulated Regulated, rate exemption Not regulated Not regulated Not regulated Not regulated Not regulated Regulated Regulated Regulated Not regulated Not regulated Regulated, rate exemption Regulated, rate exemption Not regulated Not regulated Not regulated Regulated, rate exemption Not regulated Not regulated Regulated, rate exemption Regulated Regulated Regulated project__re_utility__utility_type__id 6 6 6 6 6 6 5 6 6 6 8 6 6 8 5 6 6 5 6 6 6 5 6 6 6 8 5 8 8 8 6 6 6 6 6 6 8 5 6 8 6 6 8 6 6 8 5 6 5 8 5 8 5 5 6 6 8 6 6 8 6 6 8 8 6 8 6 5 6 6 6 6 5 8 8 6 6 8 6 8 6 6 8 8 6 8 5 5 6 5 5 5 5 8 8 5 5 8 6 8 5 8 8 8 8 8 6 6 6 6 8 6 8 8 8 5 6 6 8 8 6 6 8 5 8 6 8 8 8 5 5 8 8 6 8 5 6 8 6 5 5 8 5 6 8 5 8 8 6 6 5 8 8 6 6 6 6 6 5 6 8 6 8 6 6 8 8 5 8 6 8 6 5 6 5 6 5 6 5 6 5 8 6 6 8 6 project__re_utility__utility_type__name Private Electric Utility Private Electric Utility Private Electric Utility Private Electric Utility Private Electric Utility Private Electric Utility Public Electric Utility Private Electric Utility Private Electric Utility Private Electric Utility Electric Co-op Private Electric Utility Private Electric Utility Electric Co-op Public Electric Utility Private Electric Utility Private Electric Utility Public Electric Utility Private Electric Utility Private Electric Utility Private Electric Utility Public Electric Utility Private Electric Utility Private Electric Utility Private Electric Utility Electric Co-op Public Electric Utility Electric Co-op Electric Co-op Electric Co-op Private Electric Utility Private Electric Utility Private Electric Utility Private Electric Utility Private Electric Utility Private Electric Utility Electric Co-op Public Electric Utility Private Electric Utility Electric Co-op Private Electric Utility Private Electric Utility Electric Co-op Private Electric Utility Private Electric Utility Electric Co-op Public Electric Utility Private Electric Utility Public Electric Utility Electric Co-op Public Electric Utility Electric Co-op Public Electric Utility Public Electric Utility Private Electric Utility Private Electric Utility Electric Co-op Private Electric Utility Private Electric Utility Electric Co-op Private Electric Utility Private Electric Utility Electric Co-op Electric Co-op Private Electric Utility Electric Co-op Private Electric Utility Public Electric Utility Private Electric Utility Private Electric Utility Private Electric Utility Private Electric Utility Public Electric Utility Electric Co-op Electric Co-op Private Electric Utility Private Electric Utility Electric Co-op Private Electric Utility Electric Co-op Private Electric Utility Private Electric Utility Electric Co-op Electric Co-op Private Electric Utility Electric Co-op Public Electric Utility Public Electric Utility Private Electric Utility Public Electric Utility Public Electric Utility Public Electric Utility Public Electric Utility Electric Co-op Electric Co-op Public Electric Utility Public Electric Utility Electric Co-op Private Electric Utility Electric Co-op Public Electric Utility Electric Co-op Electric Co-op Electric Co-op Electric Co-op Electric Co-op Private Electric Utility Private Electric Utility Private Electric Utility Private Electric Utility Electric Co-op Private Electric Utility Electric Co-op Electric Co-op Electric Co-op Public Electric Utility Private Electric Utility Private Electric Utility Electric Co-op Electric Co-op Private Electric Utility Private Electric Utility Electric Co-op Public Electric Utility Electric Co-op Private Electric Utility Electric Co-op Electric Co-op Electric Co-op Public Electric Utility Public Electric Utility Electric Co-op Electric Co-op Private Electric Utility Electric Co-op Public Electric Utility Private Electric Utility Electric Co-op Private Electric Utility Public Electric Utility Public Electric Utility Electric Co-op Public Electric Utility Private Electric Utility Electric Co-op Public Electric Utility Electric Co-op Electric Co-op Private Electric Utility Private Electric Utility Public Electric Utility Electric Co-op Electric Co-op Private Electric Utility Private Electric Utility Private Electric Utility Private Electric Utility Private Electric Utility Public Electric Utility Private Electric Utility Electric Co-op Private Electric Utility Electric Co-op Private Electric Utility Private Electric Utility Electric Co-op Electric Co-op Public Electric Utility Electric Co-op Private Electric Utility Electric Co-op Private Electric Utility Public Electric Utility Private Electric Utility Public Electric Utility Private Electric Utility Public Electric Utility Private Electric Utility Public Electric Utility Private Electric Utility Public Electric Utility Electric Co-op Private Electric Utility Private Electric Utility Electric Co-op Private Electric Utility project__technology_type__id 2 2 11 11 6 6 6 6 11 6 1 7 10 6 6 6 6 6 6 19 11 11 2 12 10 1 11 11 11 11 11 2 2 11 11 6 11 2 2 11 11 11 6 6 6 6 6 5 12 19 2 6 2 11 2 6 15 7 2 2 2 5 8 11 15 15 18 6 10 6 5 2 6 6 6 4 6 5 2 11 11 11 6 10 13 6 11 11 6 6 7 11 11 6 6 7 2 10 2 15 6 10 5 8 2 5 5 5 6 6 15 4 2 6 11 6 11 11 11 7 5 11 2 5 6 6 2 4 11 11 7 5 11 6 5 6 11 11 6 6 6 6 11 11 11 11 11 12 4 6 6 2 2 4 4 6 12 11 6 11 6 11 4 11 11 2 11 6 6 6 11 11 11 18 11 11 11 11 10 11 11 11 11 2 1 11 11 4 10 6 6 5 2 6 10 6 6 2 6 6 2 5 2 2 18 4 11 11 11 2 2 11 11 6 7 6 2 2 6 6 6 6 6 10 6 8 12 12 4 6 11 2 2 5 6 6 11 2 5 6 5 5 5 11 11 11 11 2 6 6 11 11 18 6 6 2 2 6 6 2 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 11 5 6 6 2 12 6 2 6 5 11 12 2 6 2 5 5 5 5 2 5 2 5 11 11 11 15 6 6 5 2 2 2 5 2 12 5 2 2 15 project__technology_type__name BIOMASS BIOMASS WIND WIND HYDRO HYDRO HYDRO HYDRO WIND HYDRO BIOFUELS OCEAN/RIVER TRANSMISSION HYDRO HYDRO HYDRO HYDRO HYDRO HYDRO SOLAR THERMAL WIND WIND BIOMASS HEAT PUMPS TRANSMISSION BIOFUELS WIND WIND WIND WIND WIND BIOMASS BIOMASS WIND WIND HYDRO WIND BIOMASS BIOMASS WIND WIND WIND HYDRO HYDRO HYDRO HYDRO HYDRO HEAT RECOVERY HEAT PUMPS SOLAR THERMAL BIOMASS HYDRO BIOMASS WIND BIOMASS HYDRO WIND TO HEAT OCEAN/RIVER BIOMASS BIOMASS BIOMASS HEAT RECOVERY OTHER WIND WIND TO HEAT WIND TO HEAT SOLAR PV HYDRO TRANSMISSION HYDRO HEAT RECOVERY BIOMASS HYDRO HYDRO HYDRO GEOTHERMAL HYDRO HEAT RECOVERY BIOMASS WIND WIND WIND HYDRO TRANSMISSION LANDFILL GAS HYDRO WIND WIND HYDRO HYDRO OCEAN/RIVER WIND WIND HYDRO HYDRO OCEAN/RIVER BIOMASS TRANSMISSION BIOMASS WIND TO HEAT HYDRO TRANSMISSION HEAT RECOVERY OTHER BIOMASS HEAT RECOVERY HEAT RECOVERY HEAT RECOVERY HYDRO HYDRO WIND TO HEAT GEOTHERMAL BIOMASS HYDRO WIND HYDRO WIND WIND WIND OCEAN/RIVER HEAT RECOVERY WIND BIOMASS HEAT RECOVERY HYDRO HYDRO BIOMASS GEOTHERMAL WIND WIND OCEAN/RIVER HEAT RECOVERY WIND HYDRO HEAT RECOVERY HYDRO WIND WIND HYDRO HYDRO HYDRO HYDRO WIND WIND WIND WIND WIND HEAT PUMPS GEOTHERMAL HYDRO HYDRO BIOMASS BIOMASS GEOTHERMAL GEOTHERMAL HYDRO HEAT PUMPS WIND HYDRO WIND HYDRO WIND GEOTHERMAL WIND WIND BIOMASS WIND HYDRO HYDRO HYDRO WIND WIND WIND SOLAR PV WIND WIND WIND WIND TRANSMISSION WIND WIND WIND WIND BIOMASS BIOFUELS WIND WIND GEOTHERMAL TRANSMISSION HYDRO HYDRO HEAT RECOVERY BIOMASS HYDRO TRANSMISSION HYDRO HYDRO BIOMASS HYDRO HYDRO BIOMASS HEAT RECOVERY BIOMASS BIOMASS SOLAR PV GEOTHERMAL WIND WIND WIND BIOMASS BIOMASS WIND WIND HYDRO OCEAN/RIVER HYDRO BIOMASS BIOMASS HYDRO HYDRO HYDRO HYDRO HYDRO TRANSMISSION HYDRO OTHER HEAT PUMPS HEAT PUMPS GEOTHERMAL HYDRO WIND BIOMASS BIOMASS HEAT RECOVERY HYDRO HYDRO WIND BIOMASS HEAT RECOVERY HYDRO HEAT RECOVERY HEAT RECOVERY HEAT RECOVERY WIND WIND WIND WIND BIOMASS HYDRO HYDRO WIND WIND SOLAR PV HYDRO HYDRO BIOMASS BIOMASS HYDRO HYDRO BIOMASS HEAT RECOVERY HEAT RECOVERY HEAT RECOVERY HEAT RECOVERY HEAT RECOVERY HEAT RECOVERY HEAT RECOVERY WIND HEAT RECOVERY HYDRO HYDRO BIOMASS HEAT PUMPS HYDRO BIOMASS HYDRO HEAT RECOVERY WIND HEAT PUMPS BIOMASS HYDRO BIOMASS HEAT RECOVERY HEAT RECOVERY HEAT RECOVERY HEAT RECOVERY BIOMASS HEAT RECOVERY BIOMASS HEAT RECOVERY WIND WIND WIND WIND TO HEAT HYDRO HYDRO HEAT RECOVERY BIOMASS BIOMASS BIOMASS HEAT RECOVERY BIOMASS HEAT PUMPS HEAT RECOVERY BIOMASS BIOMASS WIND TO HEAT navision_project_code 402019 402021 410015 410017 407024 407025 407023 407026 410014 407019 402020 407028 407016 407015 407017 407018 407020 407014 407022 411001 410018 410021 402025 406008 409018 402023 410023 410016 410024 410027 410025 402036 402034 410032 410028 407033 410042 402028 402030 410037 410038 410039 407037 407045 407034 407036 407038 403029 406009 411003 402033 407043 402031 410029 402027 407048 410031 407050 402039 402040 402026 403028 407051 410033 410036 410035 411002 407040 409019 407047 403030 402038 407049 407035 407044 406006 407052 407055 402035 410044 410043 409022 407042 409020 402032 407039 410034 410046 407041 407031 407053 410030 410040 407032 407046 407054 402037 409017 402024 410050 407056 409021 403032 403038 402041 402042 403033 403034 407057 407058 410051 403035 402043 407059 410052 407060 410053 410054 410022 408002 403036 410055 402044 403037 407061 407062 402045 406010 410057 410019 407021 403039 409023 407072 403040 407069 409025 409026 407073 407066 407071 407068 409027 409028 409029 409022 409024 406011 406012 407070 407017 402047 402048 406010 406013 407057 406015 410065 407075 410061 407077 410070 406013 410066 410062 402026 410072 407058 407059 407039 410086 410063 410064 411005 410067 410068 410069 410071 409021 403037 410073 409027 403036 402031 402117 410074 410044 406012 409031 407044 407042 403053 402044 407074 409030 407076 407014 402114 407015 407046 402049 403054 402112 402113 411006 406010 410079 410075 410077 402115 402019 410076 410078 407078 408005 407080 402116 402021 407082 407084 407032 407079 407081 409020 407083 407086 406016 406017 406018 407085 410082 402113 402119 403057 407074 407091 410030 402031 403059 407092 403058 403055 403056 410083 410081 410084 410080 402118 407090 407098 410087 410088 411008 407088 407100 402049 402125 407090 407038 402126 403062 403063 403064 403065 403066 403067 403068 410089 403069 407103 407014 402127 406016 407038 402036 407104 403039 410096 406023 402128 407091 402129 403070 403071 403073 403076 402125 403074 402035 403072 410097 410066 410098 410099 407067 407077 403075 402124 402138 402131 402134 402135 402136 402137 402132 402133 410100 project__technology_type__name BIOMASS BIOMASS WIND WIND HYDRO HYDRO HYDRO HYDRO WIND HYDRO BIOFUELS OCEAN/RIVER TRANSMISSION HYDRO HYDRO HYDRO HYDRO HYDRO HYDRO SOLAR THERMAL WIND WIND BIOMASS HEAT PUMPS TRANSMISSION BIOFUELS WIND WIND WIND WIND WIND BIOMASS BIOMASS WIND WIND HYDRO WIND BIOMASS BIOMASS WIND WIND WIND HYDRO HYDRO HYDRO HYDRO HYDRO HEAT RECOVERY HEAT PUMPS SOLAR THERMAL BIOMASS HYDRO BIOMASS WIND BIOMASS HYDRO WIND TO HEAT OCEAN/RIVER BIOMASS BIOMASS BIOMASS HEAT RECOVERY OTHER WIND WIND TO HEAT WIND TO HEAT SOLAR PV HYDRO TRANSMISSION HYDRO HEAT RECOVERY BIOMASS HYDRO HYDRO HYDRO GEOTHERMAL HYDRO HEAT RECOVERY BIOMASS WIND WIND WIND HYDRO TRANSMISSION LANDFILL GAS HYDRO WIND WIND HYDRO HYDRO OCEAN/RIVER WIND WIND HYDRO HYDRO OCEAN/RIVER BIOMASS TRANSMISSION BIOMASS WIND TO HEAT HYDRO TRANSMISSION HEAT RECOVERY OTHER BIOMASS HEAT RECOVERY HEAT RECOVERY HEAT RECOVERY HYDRO HYDRO WIND TO HEAT GEOTHERMAL BIOMASS HYDRO WIND HYDRO WIND WIND WIND OCEAN/RIVER HEAT RECOVERY WIND BIOMASS HEAT RECOVERY HYDRO HYDRO BIOMASS GEOTHERMAL WIND WIND OCEAN/RIVER HEAT RECOVERY WIND HYDRO HEAT RECOVERY HYDRO WIND WIND HYDRO HYDRO HYDRO HYDRO WIND WIND WIND WIND WIND HEAT PUMPS GEOTHERMAL HYDRO HYDRO BIOMASS BIOMASS GEOTHERMAL GEOTHERMAL HYDRO HEAT PUMPS WIND HYDRO WIND HYDRO WIND GEOTHERMAL WIND WIND BIOMASS WIND HYDRO HYDRO HYDRO WIND WIND WIND SOLAR PV WIND WIND WIND WIND TRANSMISSION WIND WIND WIND WIND BIOMASS BIOFUELS WIND WIND GEOTHERMAL TRANSMISSION HYDRO HYDRO HEAT RECOVERY BIOMASS HYDRO TRANSMISSION HYDRO HYDRO BIOMASS HYDRO HYDRO BIOMASS HEAT RECOVERY BIOMASS BIOMASS SOLAR PV GEOTHERMAL WIND WIND WIND BIOMASS BIOMASS WIND WIND HYDRO OCEAN/RIVER HYDRO BIOMASS BIOMASS HYDRO HYDRO HYDRO HYDRO HYDRO TRANSMISSION HYDRO OTHER HEAT PUMPS HEAT PUMPS GEOTHERMAL HYDRO WIND BIOMASS BIOMASS HEAT RECOVERY HYDRO HYDRO WIND BIOMASS HEAT RECOVERY HYDRO HEAT RECOVERY HEAT RECOVERY HEAT RECOVERY WIND WIND WIND WIND BIOMASS HYDRO HYDRO WIND WIND SOLAR PV HYDRO HYDRO BIOMASS BIOMASS HYDRO HYDRO BIOMASS HEAT RECOVERY HEAT RECOVERY HEAT RECOVERY HEAT RECOVERY HEAT RECOVERY HEAT RECOVERY HEAT RECOVERY WIND HEAT RECOVERY HYDRO HYDRO BIOMASS HEAT PUMPS HYDRO BIOMASS HYDRO HEAT RECOVERY WIND HEAT PUMPS BIOMASS HYDRO BIOMASS HEAT RECOVERY HEAT RECOVERY HEAT RECOVERY HEAT RECOVERY BIOMASS HEAT RECOVERY BIOMASS HEAT RECOVERY WIND WIND WIND WIND TO HEAT HYDRO HYDRO HEAT RECOVERY BIOMASS BIOMASS BIOMASS HEAT RECOVERY BIOMASS HEAT PUMPS HEAT RECOVERY BIOMASS BIOMASS WIND TO HEAT Community Adak Afognak Akhiok Akiachak Akiak Akutan Alakanuk Alatna Alcan Border Aleknagik Aleneva Allakaket Alpine Ambler Anaktuvuk Pass Anchorage Anchor Point Anderson Andreafsky Angoon Aniak Anvik Arctic Village Atka Atmautluak Atqasuk Attu Station Auke Bay Ayakulik Badger Barrow Bear Creek Beaver Belkofski Beluga Bethel Bettles Big Delta Big Lake Bill Moore's Slough Birch Creek Brevig Mission Buckland Buffalo Soapstone Butte Candle Cantwell Central Chalkyitsik Chandalar Chase Chefornak Chena Hot Springs Chena Ridge Chenega Bay Chevak Chickaloon Chicken Chignik Chignik Lagoon Chignik Lake Chilkat Valley Chiniak Chisana Chistochina Chitina Chuathbaluk Chugiak Chuloonawick Circle Clam Gulch Clark's Point Clear Coffman Cove Cohoe Cold Bay Coldfoot College Cooper Landing Copper Center Copperville Cordova Council Covenant Life Craig Crooked Creek Crown Point Cube Cove Deadhorse Deering Delta Junction Deltana Diamond Ridge Dillingham Diomede Dot Lake Dot Lake Village Douglas Dry Creek Dutch Harbor Eagle Eagle River Eagle Village Edna Bay Eek Egegik Eielson AFB Eklutna Ekuk Ekwok Elfin Cove Elim Emmonak Ester Eureka Eureka Roadhouse Evansville Excursion Inlet Eyak Fairbanks False Pass Farmers Loop Farm Loop Ferry Fishhook Flat Fort Greely Fort Yukon Four Mile Road Fox Fox River Fritz Creek Funny River Gakona Galena Gambell Game Creek Gateway Georgetown Girdwood Glacier View Glennallen Goldstream Golovin Goodnews Bay Grayling Gulkana Gustavus Haines Halibut Cove Hamilton Happy Valley Harding-Birch Lakes Healy Healy Lake Hobart Bay Hollis Holy Cross Homer Hoonah Hooper Bay Hope Houston Hughes Huslia Hydaburg Hyder Igiugig Iliamna Indian Ivanof Bay Jakolof Bay Juneau Kachemak Kachemak Selo Kaguyak Kake Kaktovik Kalifornsky Kalskag Kaltag Kanatak Karluk Kasaan Kasigluk Kasilof Kenai Kenny Lake Ketchikan Kiana King Cove King Island King Salmon Kipnuk Kivalina Klawock Klukwan Knik-Fairview Knik River Kobuk Kodiak Kodiak Station Kokhanok Koliganek Kongiganak Kotlik Kotzebue Koyuk Koyukuk Kupreanof Kwethluk Kwigillingok Lake Louise Lake Minchumina Lakes Larsen Bay Lazy Mountain Levelock Lime Village Livengood Loring Lowell Point Lower Kalskag Lutak Manley Hot Springs Manokotak Marshall Mary's Igloo McCarthy McGrath McKinley Park Meadow Lakes Mekoryuk Mendeltna Mentasta Lake Mertarvik Metlakatla Meyers Chuck Miller Landing Minto Moose Creek Moose Pass Mosquito Lake Mountain Village Mud Bay Nabesna Naknek Nanwalek Napaimute Napakiak Napaskiak Naukati Bay Nelchina Nelson Lagoon Nenana New Allakaket Newhalen New Stuyahok Newtok Nightmute Nikiski Nikolaevsk Nikolai Nikolski Ninilchik Noatak Nome Nondalton Noorvik North Pole Northway Northway Junction Northway Village Nuiqsut Nulato Nunam Iqua Nunapitchuk Ohogamiut Old Harbor Oscarville Ouzinkie Paimiut Palmer Pauloff Harbor Paxson Pedro Bay Pelican Perryville Petersburg Petersville Pilot Point Pilot Station Pitkas Point Platinum Pleasant Valley Point Baker Point Hope Point Lay Point MacKenzie Point Possession Pope-Vannoy Landing Portage Creek Port Alexander Port Alsworth Port Clarence Port Graham Port Heiden Port Lions Port Protection Port William Primrose Prudhoe Bay Quinhagak Rampart Red Devil Red Dog Mine Ridgeway Ruby Russian Mission Saint George Saint Mary's Saint Michael Saint Paul Salamatof Salcha Sand Point Savoonga Saxman Scammon Bay Selawik Seldovia Seldovia Village Seward Shageluk Shaktoolik Shemya Station Shishmaref Shungnak Silver Springs Sitka Skagway Skwentna Slana Sleetmute Soldotna Solomon South Naknek South Van Horn Stebbins Steele Creek Sterling Stevens Village Stony River Sunrise Susitna Susitna North Sutton-Alpine Takotna Talkeetna Tanacross Tanaina Tanana Tatitlek Tazlina Telida Teller Tenakee Springs Tetlin Thom's Place Thorne Bay Togiak Tok Toksook Bay Tolsona Tonsina Trapper Creek Tuluksak Tuntutuliak Tununak Twin Hills Two Rivers Tyonek Uganik Ugashik Umkumiute Unalakleet Unalaska Unga Uyak Valdez Venetie Wainwright Wales Ward Cove Wasilla Whale Pass White Mountain Whitestone Whitestone Logging Camp Whittier Willow Willow Creek Wiseman Womens Bay Woody Island Wrangell Yakutat gnis_feature_id 1418109 1397926 1398007 1398011 1398012 1418123 1398042 1865542 2418762 1398091 1865543 1398129 1865544 1412509 1398235 1398242 1412516 1398245 2418771 1420113 1398286 1398335 1398382 1418170 1699811 1406178 2418783 1398469 1398512 1893447 1398635 1865547 1398776 1418210 1865548 1398908 1926949 1398949 1866933 1399024 1399049 1420670 1412684 2418798 1416898 1412708 1399788 1400106 1400128 1400137 1866934 1400188 1400199 2582710 1421254 1400219 1400239 1400245 1400269 1400274 1893911 1421022 1866935 1400321 1400333 1400337 1400376 1400378 1893942 1400404 1412797 1400426 1400433 1669437 1412828 1418448 1412829 1400578 1421192 1400669 1866937 1421215 1400735 1866938 1421260 1400824 1417059 1866940 1866941 1412894 1401104 2418552 1865549 1401203 1401213 1401364 1865550 1401374 1866943 1419726 1401499 1401545 1401553 1421658 1401666 1401686 2418568 1401727 1401735 1401738 1401787 1401788 1401837 1397658 1401908 1401927 1401936 1401951 1805281 1401958 1418574 2582712 2418580 1866944 2418582 1402165 2418584 1402276 2418586 1402342 1866945 1866947 1865552 1402448 1402457 1402463 1866948 1865553 1402539 1422161 2418599 1402643 2582713 1402760 1415910 1402921 1403046 1403078 1422400 1781963 1403136 1866949 2418611 1403275 2419534 1866951 1866952 1403447 1413141 1403488 1403493 1422645 1416613 1403596 1403644 1422709 1422711 1403706 1403763 1422736 1894909 1866953 1404263 1413247 1415989 1404309 1422926 1404349 1413260 1404378 1404379 1404401 1404456 1404468 1404483 1413283 1413299 1866955 1423039 1413311 1418792 1411501 1404738 1404781 1413348 1423100 1866956 2418663 2418662 1413362 1404875 2418665 1404333 1404914 1404934 1404964 1413378 1404981 1404984 1424959 1405119 1405122 1865556 1405185 2418681 1405216 1866958 1405300 1405351 1405579 1423422 1865557 1405763 1866960 1405922 1405927 1405984 1895603 1406098 1406131 1423625 1866961 1406211 1866962 1406241 2582714 1423661 1423664 1413533 1406419 1406548 1417076 1866963 1406655 1865558 1406770 1406798 1412986 1406828 1406829 1406834 1866964 1865559 1418948 1406940 2419536 1406978 1406972 1406985 1407008 1416651 1417063 1407022 1418954 1413634 1413638 1407125 1407129 1413646 1407230 1407253 1866965 1407254 1416680 1407321 1409405 1407339 1407436 1407483 1407624 1407684 1407723 1407737 2419532 1866966 1407862 1424201 1407902 1424228 1407927 1407992 1407993 1408054 1408072 1866967 1424323 1408110 1408115 1865561 2582716 2419181 1865562 1424551 1408208 1408213 1413800 1419072 1408218 1866970 1408228 1424646 1408327 1408462 1408519 1408580 1865564 1866972 1408878 1408925 1419161 1398261 1408977 1419163 1413901 2419205 1419182 1409106 1414511 1409133 1413930 1413937 1865565 1414598 1409306 1669434 2369534 1409434 1413983 2419219 1414736 1414754 1866975 1409698 1409747 1414025 1409869 1409961 2582717 1410158 2582718 1414063 1410198 1410241 1415091 1410439 2419291 2419240 1410562 1410591 1410618 1865567 1410629 1415193 1410694 1410727 1410730 1415210 1410765 1865568 1669435 1411039 1411046 1411060 1865569 1411105 1417100 1411295 1411324 1410644 1416737 1397685 1414206 1897130 1411486 1411511 1411517 1419424 1419430 1411608 1412465 1411644 1411728 1404755 1415612 1411788 1744590 1411989 2582719 1866976 1415757 1417146 1412074 1414284 1866977 2575186 1415843 1415858 census_code 200065 200425 200650 200760 200870 201090 201200 201305 201390 201420 201560 201860 201882 201970 202080 203000 203110 203220 199984 203440 203550 203880 203990 204210 204430 204500 204670 204760 204990 205000 205200 205585 205750 205970 206245 206520 206630 206850 207070 207390 207620 208740 209600 209657 209710 210040 210150 211690 211800 211910 212350 212680 212900 212920 212970 213230 213340 213450 213550 213670 213780 213825 213860 213890 214000 214110 214330 214440 214790 214880 215320 215430 200000 216360 216420 216530 216630 216750 217190 217300 217380 217410 217630 217670 217740 217850 217960 218030 218290 218510 218620 218675 218925 218950 219060 219720 219750 219830 220020 220270 220380 220490 220600 220970 221040 221150 221370 221475 221700 221810 222140 222250 222910 223460 223680 223720 223790 223900 224010 224230 224660 224980 225000 225220 225550 225880 226100 226760 226835 226870 226910 227090 227145 227420 227530 227640 227700 228200 228350 228410 228590 228740 229130 229180 229290 230060 230500 230940 231050 231270 231375 231710 231765 232150 232310 232550 232810 233030 233140 233360 233470 233580 233800 233910 234350 234460 234570 234790 235120 200000 235890 235950 236400 236540 200000 236655 236770 236990 237250 281320 237430 237480 237540 237650 237975 238090 238420 238910 238970 239300 239410 280175 239630 239740 239960 240400 240510 240645 240670 240840 240950 241210 241280 241500 241610 241720 241830 241940 242050 242160 242380 242490 242805 242820 242832 243040 243260 243810 244030 244580 245020 245295 245460 245700 246780 246890 247000 247220 245790 246010 246560 247735 247990 248200 248540 248590 248870 248980 249450 249530 250080 250190 250800 251180 251455 251960 252060 252210 252250 252390 252720 252845 252915 252940 253050 253162 253270 253710 253820 253930 254050 254085 254150 254260 254480 254700 254920 255030 255140 255910 256220 256250 256260 256320 256350 256600 256680 257060 257340 258330 258550 258600 258660 258985 259320 259540 259650 260200 260310 260460 260640 260750 260860 261080 261120 261190 261630 261700 261788 261825 262125 262285 262510 262620 263170 263280 263390 263610 263870 263940 264240 264380 264600 264820 264930 264980 265345 265590 265700 265800 266140 266360 266470 266510 266550 267020 267460 267570 267680 268230 268340 268370 268560 268670 268890 200000 269770 270100 270320 270540 270760 270870 270930 271090 271640 271750 272190 272230 272960 272985 273070 273290 273400 273950 274340 274350 274525 274610 274830 275050 275077 275160 275380 275480 275800 275930 276260 276590 276970 277140 277690 277800 278240 278297 278350 278680 278790 279120 279230 279780 279830 279890 200000 280100 280330 280660 280770 280880 281980 282200 282420 282750 282860 282970 283080 284000 284070 284120 284200 284510 285280 285290 285610 285680 199812 286380 286490 census_area__name Aleutians West Census Area Kodiak Island Borough Kodiak Island Borough Bethel Census Area Bethel Census Area Aleutians East Borough Kusilvak Census Area Yukon-Koyukuk Census Area Southeast Fairbanks Census Area Dillingham Census Area Kodiak Island Borough Yukon-Koyukuk Census Area North Slope Borough Northwest Arctic Borough North Slope Borough Anchorage Municipality Kenai Peninsula Borough Denali Borough Kusilvak Census Area Hoonah-Angoon Census Area Bethel Census Area Yukon-Koyukuk Census Area Yukon-Koyukuk Census Area Aleutians West Census Area Bethel Census Area North Slope Borough Aleutians West Census Area Juneau City and Borough Kodiak Island Borough Fairbanks North Star Borough North Slope Borough Kenai Peninsula Borough Yukon-Koyukuk Census Area Aleutians East Borough Kenai Peninsula Borough Bethel Census Area Yukon-Koyukuk Census Area Southeast Fairbanks Census Area Matanuska-Susitna Borough Kusilvak Census Area Yukon-Koyukuk Census Area Nome Census Area Northwest Arctic Borough Matanuska-Susitna Borough Matanuska-Susitna Borough Northwest Arctic Borough Denali Borough Yukon-Koyukuk Census Area Yukon-Koyukuk Census Area Yukon-Koyukuk Census Area Matanuska-Susitna Borough Bethel Census Area Fairbanks North Star Borough Fairbanks North Star Borough Valdez-Cordova Census Area Kusilvak Census Area Matanuska-Susitna Borough Southeast Fairbanks Census Area Lake and Peninsula Borough Lake and Peninsula Borough Lake and Peninsula Borough Haines Borough Kodiak Island Borough Valdez-Cordova Census Area Valdez-Cordova Census Area Valdez-Cordova Census Area Bethel Census Area Anchorage Municipality Kusilvak Census Area Yukon-Koyukuk Census Area Kenai Peninsula Borough Dillingham Census Area Denali Borough Prince of Wales-Hyder Census Area Kenai Peninsula Borough Aleutians East Borough Yukon-Koyukuk Census Area Fairbanks North Star Borough Kenai Peninsula Borough Valdez-Cordova Census Area Valdez-Cordova Census Area Valdez-Cordova Census Area Nome Census Area Haines Borough Prince of Wales-Hyder Census Area Bethel Census Area Kenai Peninsula Borough Hoonah-Angoon Census Area North Slope Borough Northwest Arctic Borough Southeast Fairbanks Census Area Southeast Fairbanks Census Area Kenai Peninsula Borough Dillingham Census Area Nome Census Area Southeast Fairbanks Census Area Southeast Fairbanks Census Area Juneau City and Borough Southeast Fairbanks Census Area Aleutians West Census Area Southeast Fairbanks Census Area Anchorage Municipality Southeast Fairbanks Census Area Prince of Wales-Hyder Census Area Bethel Census Area Lake and Peninsula Borough Fairbanks North Star Borough Anchorage Municipality Dillingham Census Area Dillingham Census Area Hoonah-Angoon Census Area Nome Census Area Kusilvak Census Area Fairbanks North Star Borough Yukon-Koyukuk Census Area Matanuska-Susitna Borough Yukon-Koyukuk Census Area Haines Borough Valdez-Cordova Census Area Fairbanks North Star Borough Aleutians East Borough Fairbanks North Star Borough Matanuska-Susitna Borough Denali Borough Matanuska-Susitna Borough Yukon-Koyukuk Census Area Southeast Fairbanks Census Area Yukon-Koyukuk Census Area Yukon-Koyukuk Census Area Fairbanks North Star Borough Kenai Peninsula Borough Kenai Peninsula Borough Kenai Peninsula Borough Valdez-Cordova Census Area Yukon-Koyukuk Census Area Nome Census Area Hoonah-Angoon Census Area Matanuska-Susitna Borough Bethel Census Area Anchorage Municipality Matanuska-Susitna Borough Valdez-Cordova Census Area Fairbanks North Star Borough Nome Census Area Bethel Census Area Yukon-Koyukuk Census Area Valdez-Cordova Census Area Hoonah-Angoon Census Area Haines Borough Kenai Peninsula Borough Kusilvak Census Area Kenai Peninsula Borough Fairbanks North Star Borough Denali Borough Southeast Fairbanks Census Area Hoonah-Angoon Census Area Prince of Wales-Hyder Census Area Yukon-Koyukuk Census Area Kenai Peninsula Borough Hoonah-Angoon Census Area Kusilvak Census Area Kenai Peninsula Borough Matanuska-Susitna Borough Yukon-Koyukuk Census Area Yukon-Koyukuk Census Area Prince of Wales-Hyder Census Area Prince of Wales-Hyder Census Area Lake and Peninsula Borough Lake and Peninsula Borough Anchorage Municipality Lake and Peninsula Borough Kenai Peninsula Borough Juneau City and Borough Kenai Peninsula Borough Kenai Peninsula Borough Kodiak Island Borough Petersburg Census Area North Slope Borough Kenai Peninsula Borough Bethel Census Area Yukon-Koyukuk Census Area Kodiak Island Borough Kodiak Island Borough Prince of Wales-Hyder Census Area Bethel Census Area Kenai Peninsula Borough Kenai Peninsula Borough Valdez-Cordova Census Area Ketchikan Gateway Borough Northwest Arctic Borough Aleutians East Borough Nome Census Area Bristol Bay Borough Bethel Census Area Northwest Arctic Borough Prince of Wales-Hyder Census Area Hoonah-Angoon Census Area Matanuska-Susitna Borough Matanuska-Susitna Borough Northwest Arctic Borough Kodiak Island Borough Kodiak Island Borough Lake and Peninsula Borough Dillingham Census Area Bethel Census Area Kusilvak Census Area Northwest Arctic Borough Nome Census Area Yukon-Koyukuk Census Area Petersburg Census Area Bethel Census Area Bethel Census Area Matanuska-Susitna Borough Yukon-Koyukuk Census Area Matanuska-Susitna Borough Kodiak Island Borough Matanuska-Susitna Borough Lake and Peninsula Borough Bethel Census Area Yukon-Koyukuk Census Area Ketchikan Gateway Borough Kenai Peninsula Borough Bethel Census Area Haines Borough Yukon-Koyukuk Census Area Dillingham Census Area Kusilvak Census Area Nome Census Area Valdez-Cordova Census Area Yukon-Koyukuk Census Area Denali Borough Matanuska-Susitna Borough Bethel Census Area Valdez-Cordova Census Area Valdez-Cordova Census Area Bethel Census Area Prince of Wales-Hyder Census Area Wrangell City and Borough Kenai Peninsula Borough Yukon-Koyukuk Census Area Fairbanks North Star Borough Kenai Peninsula Borough Haines Borough Kusilvak Census Area Haines Borough Valdez-Cordova Census Area Bristol Bay Borough Kenai Peninsula Borough Bethel Census Area Bethel Census Area Bethel Census Area Prince of Wales-Hyder Census Area Valdez-Cordova Census Area Aleutians East Borough Yukon-Koyukuk Census Area Yukon-Koyukuk Census Area Lake and Peninsula Borough Dillingham Census Area Bethel Census Area Bethel Census Area Kenai Peninsula Borough Kenai Peninsula Borough Yukon-Koyukuk Census Area Aleutians West Census Area Kenai Peninsula Borough Northwest Arctic Borough Nome Census Area Lake and Peninsula Borough Northwest Arctic Borough Fairbanks North Star Borough Southeast Fairbanks Census Area Southeast Fairbanks Census Area Southeast Fairbanks Census Area North Slope Borough Yukon-Koyukuk Census Area Kusilvak Census Area Bethel Census Area Kusilvak Census Area Kodiak Island Borough Bethel Census Area Kodiak Island Borough Kusilvak Census Area Matanuska-Susitna Borough Aleutians East Borough Valdez-Cordova Census Area Lake and Peninsula Borough Hoonah-Angoon Census Area Lake and Peninsula Borough Petersburg Census Area Matanuska-Susitna Borough Lake and Peninsula Borough Kusilvak Census Area Kusilvak Census Area Bethel Census Area Fairbanks North Star Borough Prince of Wales-Hyder Census Area North Slope Borough North Slope Borough Matanuska-Susitna Borough Kenai Peninsula Borough Lake and Peninsula Borough Dillingham Census Area Petersburg Census Area Lake and Peninsula Borough Nome Census Area Kenai Peninsula Borough Lake and Peninsula Borough Kodiak Island Borough Prince of Wales-Hyder Census Area Kodiak Island Borough Kenai Peninsula Borough North Slope Borough Bethel Census Area Yukon-Koyukuk Census Area Bethel Census Area Northwest Arctic Borough Kenai Peninsula Borough Yukon-Koyukuk Census Area Kusilvak Census Area Aleutians West Census Area Kusilvak Census Area Nome Census Area Aleutians West Census Area Kenai Peninsula Borough Fairbanks North Star Borough Aleutians East Borough Nome Census Area Ketchikan Gateway Borough Kusilvak Census Area Northwest Arctic Borough Kenai Peninsula Borough Kenai Peninsula Borough Kenai Peninsula Borough Yukon-Koyukuk Census Area Nome Census Area Aleutians West Census Area Nome Census Area Northwest Arctic Borough Valdez-Cordova Census Area Sitka City and Borough Skagway Municipality Matanuska-Susitna Borough Valdez-Cordova Census Area Bethel Census Area Kenai Peninsula Borough Nome Census Area Bristol Bay Borough Fairbanks North Star Borough Nome Census Area Fairbanks North Star Borough Kenai Peninsula Borough Yukon-Koyukuk Census Area Bethel Census Area Kenai Peninsula Borough Matanuska-Susitna Borough Matanuska-Susitna Borough Matanuska-Susitna Borough Yukon-Koyukuk Census Area Matanuska-Susitna Borough Southeast Fairbanks Census Area Matanuska-Susitna Borough Yukon-Koyukuk Census Area Valdez-Cordova Census Area Valdez-Cordova Census Area Yukon-Koyukuk Census Area Nome Census Area Hoonah-Angoon Census Area Southeast Fairbanks Census Area Wrangell City and Borough Prince of Wales-Hyder Census Area Dillingham Census Area Southeast Fairbanks Census Area Bethel Census Area Valdez-Cordova Census Area Valdez-Cordova Census Area Matanuska-Susitna Borough Bethel Census Area Bethel Census Area Bethel Census Area Dillingham Census Area Fairbanks North Star Borough Kenai Peninsula Borough Kodiak Island Borough Lake and Peninsula Borough Bethel Census Area Nome Census Area Aleutians West Census Area Aleutians East Borough Kodiak Island Borough Valdez-Cordova Census Area Yukon-Koyukuk Census Area North Slope Borough Nome Census Area Ketchikan Gateway Borough Matanuska-Susitna Borough Prince of Wales-Hyder Census Area Nome Census Area Southeast Fairbanks Census Area Hoonah-Angoon Census Area Valdez-Cordova Census Area Matanuska-Susitna Borough Valdez-Cordova Census Area Yukon-Koyukuk Census Area Kodiak Island Borough Kodiak Island Borough Wrangell City and Borough Yakutat City and Borough census_area__gnis_feature_id 1419965 1419974 1419974 1419966 1419966 1419964 1419985 1419987 1419983 1419968 1419974 1419987 1419978 1419979 1419978 1416061 1419972 1419988 1419985 2371430 1419966 1419987 1419987 1419965 1419966 1419978 1419965 1419971 1419974 1419969 1419978 1419972 1419987 1419964 1419972 1419966 1419987 1419983 1419976 1419985 1419987 1419977 1419979 1419976 1419976 1419979 1419988 1419987 1419987 1419987 1419976 1419966 1419969 1419969 1419984 1419985 1419976 1419983 1419975 1419975 1419975 1419970 1419974 1419984 1419984 1419984 1419966 1416061 1419985 1419987 1419972 1419968 1419988 1419980 1419972 1419964 1419987 1419969 1419972 1419984 1419984 1419984 1419977 1419970 1419980 1419966 1419972 2371430 1419978 1419979 1419983 1419983 1419972 1419968 1419977 1419983 1419983 1419971 1419983 1419965 1419983 1416061 1419983 1419980 1419966 1419975 1419969 1416061 1419968 1419968 2371430 1419977 1419985 1419969 1419987 1419976 1419987 1419970 1419984 1419969 1419964 1419969 1419976 1419988 1419976 1419987 1419983 1419987 1419987 1419969 1419972 1419972 1419972 1419984 1419987 1419977 2371430 1419976 1419966 1416061 1419976 1419984 1419969 1419977 1419966 1419987 1419984 2371430 1419970 1419972 1419985 1419972 1419969 1419988 1419983 2371430 1419980 1419987 1419972 2371430 1419985 1419972 1419976 1419987 1419987 1419980 1419980 1419975 1419975 1416061 1419975 1419972 1419971 1419972 1419972 1419974 2516404 1419978 1419972 1419966 1419987 1419974 1419974 1419980 1419966 1419972 1419972 1419984 1419973 1419979 1419964 1419977 1419967 1419966 1419979 1419980 2371430 1419976 1419976 1419979 1419974 1419974 1419975 1419968 1419966 1419985 1419979 1419977 1419987 2516404 1419966 1419966 1419976 1419987 1419976 1419974 1419976 1419975 1419966 1419987 1419973 1419972 1419966 1419970 1419987 1419968 1419985 1419977 1419984 1419987 1419988 1419976 1419966 1419984 1419984 1419966 1419980 2516402 1419972 1419987 1419969 1419972 1419970 1419985 1419970 1419984 1419967 1419972 1419966 1419966 1419966 1419980 1419984 1419964 1419987 1419987 1419975 1419968 1419966 1419966 1419972 1419972 1419987 1419965 1419972 1419979 1419977 1419975 1419979 1419969 1419983 1419983 1419983 1419978 1419987 1419985 1419966 1419985 1419974 1419966 1419974 1419985 1419976 1419964 1419984 1419975 2371430 1419975 2516404 1419976 1419975 1419985 1419985 1419966 1419969 1419980 1419978 1419978 1419976 1419972 1419975 1419968 2516404 1419975 1419977 1419972 1419975 1419974 1419980 1419974 1419972 1419978 1419966 1419987 1419966 1419979 1419972 1419987 1419985 1419965 1419985 1419977 1419965 1419972 1419969 1419964 1419977 1419973 1419985 1419979 1419972 1419972 1419972 1419987 1419977 1419965 1419977 1419979 1419984 1419981 2339479 1419976 1419984 1419966 1419972 1419977 1419967 1419969 1419977 1419969 1419972 1419987 1419966 1419972 1419976 1419976 1419976 1419987 1419976 1419983 1419976 1419987 1419984 1419984 1419987 1419977 2371430 1419983 2516402 1419980 1419968 1419983 1419966 1419984 1419984 1419976 1419966 1419966 1419966 1419968 1419969 1419972 1419974 1419975 1419966 1419977 1419965 1419964 1419974 1419984 1419987 1419978 1419977 1419973 1419976 1419980 1419977 1419983 2371430 1419984 1419976 1419984 1419987 1419974 1419974 2516402 1419986 census_area__census_code 99016 99150 99150 99050 99050 99013 99270 99290 99240 99070 99150 99290 99185 99188 99185 99020 99122 99068 99270 33390 99050 99290 99290 99016 99050 99185 99016 99110 99150 99090 99185 99122 99290 99013 99122 99050 99290 99240 99170 99270 99290 99180 99188 99170 99170 99188 99068 99290 99290 99290 99170 99050 99090 99090 99261 99270 99170 99240 99164 99164 99164 99100 99150 99261 99261 99261 99050 99020 99270 99290 99122 99070 99068 99198 99122 99013 99290 99090 99122 99261 99261 99261 99180 99100 99198 99050 99122 33390 99185 99188 99240 99240 99122 99070 99180 99240 99240 99110 99240 99016 99240 99020 99240 99198 99050 99164 99090 99020 99070 99070 33390 99180 99270 99090 99290 99170 99290 99100 99261 99090 99013 99090 99170 99068 99170 99290 99240 99290 99290 99090 99122 99122 99122 99261 99290 99180 33390 99170 99050 99020 99170 99261 99090 99180 99050 99290 99261 33390 99100 99122 99270 99122 99090 99068 99240 33390 99198 99290 99122 33390 99270 99122 99170 99290 99290 99198 99198 99164 99164 99020 99164 99122 99110 99122 99122 99150 99195 99185 99122 99050 99290 99150 99150 99198 99050 99122 99122 99261 99130 99188 99013 99180 99060 99050 99188 99198 33390 99170 99170 99188 99150 99150 99164 99070 99050 99270 99188 99180 99290 99195 99050 99050 99170 99290 99170 99150 99170 99164 99050 99290 99130 99122 99050 99100 99290 99070 99270 99180 99261 99290 99068 99170 99050 99261 99261 99050 99198 99275 99122 99290 99090 99122 99100 99270 99100 99261 99060 99122 99050 99050 99050 99198 99261 99013 99290 99290 99164 99070 99050 99050 99122 99122 99290 99016 99122 99188 99180 99164 99188 99090 99240 99240 99240 99185 99290 99270 99050 99270 99150 99050 99150 99270 99170 99013 99261 99164 33390 99164 99195 99170 99164 99270 99270 99050 99090 99198 99185 99185 99170 99122 99164 99070 99195 99164 99180 99122 99164 99150 99198 99150 99122 99185 99050 99290 99050 99188 99122 99290 99270 99016 99270 99180 99016 99122 99090 99013 99180 99130 99270 99188 99122 99122 99122 99290 99180 99016 99180 99188 99261 99220 99230 99170 99261 99050 99122 99180 99060 99090 99180 99090 99122 99290 99050 99122 99170 99170 99170 99290 99170 99240 99170 99290 99261 99261 99290 99180 33390 99240 99275 99198 99070 99240 99050 99261 99261 99170 99050 99050 99050 99070 99090 99122 99150 99164 99050 99180 99016 99013 99150 99261 99290 99185 99180 99130 99170 99198 99180 99240 33390 99261 99170 99261 99290 99150 99150 99275 99282 census_area__county_code 16 150 150 50 50 13 158 290 240 70 150 290 185 188 185 20 122 68 158 105 50 290 290 16 50 185 16 110 150 90 185 122 290 13 122 50 290 240 170 158 290 180 188 170 170 188 68 290 290 290 170 50 90 90 261 158 170 240 164 164 164 100 150 261 261 261 50 20 158 290 122 70 68 198 122 13 290 90 122 261 261 261 180 100 198 50 122 105 185 188 240 240 122 70 180 240 240 110 240 16 240 20 240 198 50 164 90 20 70 70 105 180 158 90 290 170 290 100 261 90 13 90 170 68 170 290 240 290 290 90 122 122 122 261 290 180 105 170 50 20 170 261 90 180 50 290 261 105 100 122 158 122 90 68 240 105 198 290 122 105 158 122 170 290 290 198 198 164 164 20 164 122 110 122 122 150 195 185 122 50 290 150 150 198 50 122 122 261 130 188 13 180 60 50 188 198 105 170 170 188 150 150 164 70 50 158 188 180 290 195 50 50 170 290 170 150 170 164 50 290 130 122 50 100 290 70 158 180 261 290 68 170 50 261 261 50 198 275 122 290 90 122 100 158 100 261 60 122 50 50 50 198 261 13 290 290 164 70 50 50 122 122 290 16 122 188 180 164 188 90 240 240 240 185 290 158 50 158 150 50 150 158 170 13 261 164 105 164 195 170 164 158 158 50 90 198 185 185 170 122 164 70 195 164 180 122 164 150 198 150 122 185 50 290 50 188 122 290 158 16 158 180 16 122 90 13 180 130 158 188 122 122 122 290 180 16 180 188 261 220 230 170 261 50 122 180 60 90 180 90 122 290 50 122 170 170 170 290 170 240 170 290 261 261 290 180 105 240 275 198 70 240 50 261 261 170 50 50 50 70 90 122 150 164 50 180 16 13 150 261 290 185 180 130 170 198 180 240 105 261 170 261 290 150 150 275 282 alaska_native_regional_corporation__name Aleut Corporation Koniag, Incorporated Koniag, Incorporated Calista Corporation Calista Corporation Aleut Corporation Calista Corporation Doyon, Limited Bristol Bay Native Corporation Doyon, Limited NANA Regional Corporation, Incorporated Arctic Slope Regional Corporation Calista Corporation Sealaska Corporation Calista Corporation Doyon, Limited Aleut Corporation Calista Corporation Koniag, Incorporated Arctic Slope Regional Corporation Doyon, Limited Aleut Corporation Calista Corporation Calista Corporation Doyon, Limited Bering Straits Native Corporation NANA Regional Corporation, Incorporated Ahtna, Incorporated Doyon, Limited Calista Corporation Chugach Alaska Corporation Calista Corporation Cook Inlet Region, Incorporated Bristol Bay Native Corporation Bristol Bay Native Corporation Bristol Bay Native Corporation Ahtna, Incorporated Ahtna, Incorporated Calista Corporation Calista Corporation Doyon, Limited Bristol Bay Native Corporation Aleut Corporation Ahtna, Incorporated Chugach Alaska Corporation Bering Straits Native Corporation Sealaska Corporation Calista Corporation NANA Regional Corporation, Incorporated Bristol Bay Native Corporation Bering Straits Native Corporation Doyon, Limited Doyon, Limited Calista Corporation Bristol Bay Native Corporation Cook Inlet Region, Incorporated Bristol Bay Native Corporation Bristol Bay Native Corporation Calista Corporation Doyon, Limited Chugach Alaska Corporation Doyon, Limited Aleut Corporation Doyon, Limited Ahtna, Incorporated Doyon, Limited Calista Corporation Bering Straits Native Corporation Calista Corporation Doyon, Limited Ahtna, Incorporated Calista Corporation Doyon, Limited Doyon, Limited Sealaska Corporation Calista Corporation Doyon, Limited Doyon, Limited Sealaska Corporation Bristol Bay Native Corporation Bristol Bay Native Corporation Bristol Bay Native Corporation Sealaska Corporation Koniag, Incorporated Sealaska Corporation Arctic Slope Regional Corporation Koniag, Incorporated Doyon, Limited Koniag, Incorporated Sealaska Corporation Calista Corporation Cook Inlet Region, Incorporated NANA Regional Corporation, Incorporated Aleut Corporation Bering Straits Native Corporation Bristol Bay Native Corporation Calista Corporation NANA Regional Corporation, Incorporated Sealaska Corporation Sealaska Corporation Cook Inlet Region, Incorporated NANA Regional Corporation, Incorporated Koniag, Incorporated Bristol Bay Native Corporation Bristol Bay Native Corporation Calista Corporation Calista Corporation NANA Regional Corporation, Incorporated Bering Straits Native Corporation Doyon, Limited Calista Corporation Calista Corporation Koniag, Incorporated Bristol Bay Native Corporation Calista Corporation Calista Corporation Doyon, Limited Bristol Bay Native Corporation Calista Corporation Bering Straits Native Corporation Doyon, Limited Calista Corporation Ahtna, Incorporated Doyon, Limited Calista Corporation Bristol Bay Native Corporation Chugach Alaska Corporation Calista Corporation Calista Corporation Calista Corporation Aleut Corporation Doyon, Limited Bristol Bay Native Corporation Bristol Bay Native Corporation Calista Corporation Calista Corporation Doyon, Limited Aleut Corporation Cook Inlet Region, Incorporated NANA Regional Corporation, Incorporated Bering Straits Native Corporation Bristol Bay Native Corporation NANA Regional Corporation, Incorporated Doyon, Limited Arctic Slope Regional Corporation Doyon, Limited Calista Corporation Calista Corporation Calista Corporation Koniag, Incorporated Calista Corporation Koniag, Incorporated Calista Corporation Aleut Corporation Bristol Bay Native Corporation Bristol Bay Native Corporation Bristol Bay Native Corporation Calista Corporation Calista Corporation Calista Corporation Arctic Slope Regional Corporation Arctic Slope Regional Corporation Cook Inlet Region, Incorporated Bristol Bay Native Corporation Chugach Alaska Corporation Bristol Bay Native Corporation Koniag, Incorporated Koniag, Incorporated Calista Corporation Doyon, Limited Calista Corporation Doyon, Limited Calista Corporation Aleut Corporation Calista Corporation Bering Straits Native Corporation Aleut Corporation Cook Inlet Region, Incorporated Aleut Corporation Sealaska Corporation The Thirteenth Regional Corp NANA Regional Corporation, Incorporated Cook Inlet Region, Incorporated Chugach Alaska Corporation Doyon, Limited Bering Straits Native Corporation Bering Straits Native Corporation NANA Regional Corporation, Incorporated Sealaska Corporation Calista Corporation Bering Straits Native Corporation Bristol Bay Native Corporation Bering Straits Native Corporation Doyon, Limited Calista Corporation Doyon, Limited Doyon, Limited Doyon, Limited Chugach Alaska Corporation Ahtna, Incorporated Doyon, Limited Bering Straits Native Corporation Bristol Bay Native Corporation Calista Corporation Calista Corporation Calista Corporation Calista Corporation Bristol Bay Native Corporation Koniag, Incorporated Bristol Bay Native Corporation Calista Corporation Bering Straits Native Corporation Aleut Corporation Aleut Corporation Chugach Alaska Corporation Arctic Slope Regional Corporation Bering Straits Native Corporation Bering Straits Native Corporation Chugach Alaska Corporation Koniag, Incorporated Sealaska Corporation latitude 51.88 58.0221236 56.9455556 60.9094444 60.9122222 54.1355556 62.6888889 66.5572222 62.6747868 59.2730556 58.06 66.5655556 70.3280556 67.0861111 68.1433333 61.2180556 59.7766667 64.3441667 62.071503 57.5033333 61.5783333 62.6561111 68.1269444 52.1961111 60.8669444 70.4691667 52.8947998 58.3833333 57.1949295 64.8 71.2905556 60.1641667 66.3594444 55.0888889 61.1411111 60.7922222 66.9188889 64.1525 61.5213889 62.9497222 66.2590355 65.3347222 65.9797222 61.7162325 61.5422222 65.9133333 63.3916667 65.5725 66.6544444 67.5052778 62.4491667 60.16 65.0530556 64.7940907 60.0633333 61.5277778 61.7966667 64.0733333 56.2952778 56.3084393 56.2555556 59.399702 57.6319444 62.0661111 62.5717828 61.5158333 61.5719444 61.3888889 62.9461111 65.8255556 60.2311111 58.8441667 64.3361111 56.0138889 60.3686111 55.1858333 67.2563889 64.8569444 60.49 61.9769598 62.0438889 60.5427778 64.895 59.4172222 55.4763889 61.87 60.4222222 57.935 70.2055556 66.0755556 64.0377778 63.8721715 59.6761111 59.0397222 65.7537652 63.6613889 63.6508333 58.2755556 63.6533333 53.8898 64.7880556 61.3213889 64.7805556 55.9488889 60.2188889 58.2155556 64.6632652 61.4580556 58.8035099 59.3497222 58.1944444 64.6175 62.7777778 64.8472222 65.1794444 61.9386111 66.9227778 58.4213889 60.526294 64.8377778 54.8508333 64.9061824 61.6389068 63.9277778 61.7440172 62.4536111 63.941202 66.5647222 64.6028341 64.9580556 59.8583333 59.7361111 60.5019444 62.3019444 64.7333333 63.7797222 58.0566667 61.5727778 61.8938889 60.9425 61.9074835 62.1091667 64.9339114 64.5433333 59.1188889 62.9036111 62.2713889 58.4133333 59.228589 59.595 62.8961111 59.9472222 64.3714024 63.8569444 63.9872308 57.4658333 55.5566667 62.1994444 59.6425 58.11 61.5311111 60.9202778 61.6302778 66.0488889 65.6986111 55.2080556 55.9169444 59.3277778 59.7567965 60.9872222 55.9 59.4469444 58.3019444 59.67 59.7915 56.868931 56.9758333 70.1319444 60.4183333 61.5372222 64.3272222 57.5727792 57.5719444 55.5388889 60.8955556 60.3375 60.5544444 61.7191667 55.3422222 66.975 55.0616667 64.9775 58.6883333 59.9388889 67.7269444 55.5522222 59.4038889 61.5126174 61.4600112 66.9072222 57.79 57.7658667 59.4394444 59.7286111 59.9532731 63.0341667 66.8983333 64.9319444 64.8802778 56.8144444 60.8122222 59.8644444 62.2813889 63.8827778 61.6052854 57.54 61.6261111 59.1141667 61.3563889 65.5244444 55.6025 60.0725 61.5122222 59.3411111 65.0011111 58.9813889 61.8777778 65.1488994 61.4333333 62.9563889 63.7327778 61.6247222 60.3880556 62.0661111 62.9211111 60.8109892 55.1291667 55.7408333 59.6675 65.150411 64.71 60.4875 59.5291667 62.0855556 59.1597222 62.3719444 58.7283333 59.3563889 61.54 60.6966667 60.7080556 55.8736111 61.9919444 56.0006152 64.5638889 66.54268 59.72 59.4527778 60.9427778 60.4794444 60.6902778 59.8119444 63.0133333 52.9380556 60.0513889 67.5711111 64.5011111 59.9736111 66.8383333 64.7511111 62.9616667 63.0022222 62.9822222 70.2175 64.7194444 62.5336111 60.8969444 61.5677778 57.2027778 60.7227778 57.9236111 61.7013889 61.5997222 54.4576992 63.0897222 59.7872222 57.9608333 55.9139846 56.8112667 62.4963889 57.5641667 61.9388889 62.0327778 59.0130556 64.8813889 56.3527778 68.3486111 69.743857 61.3597222 60.923099 59.5584786 58.9061111 56.2497222 60.2025 65.2622222 59.3513889 56.9325614 57.8675 56.3172222 58.4922222 60.3436111 70.2552778 59.7488889 65.505 61.7611111 68.0755556 60.5319444 64.7394444 61.785 56.6 62.0530556 63.4780556 57.1222222 60.615375 64.5239904 55.3397222 63.6941667 55.3183333 61.8427778 66.6038889 59.4380556 59.4780556 60.1041667 62.6822222 64.3338889 52.7246 66.2566667 66.8880556 62.0191984 57.0530556 59.4583333 61.9902778 62.7069444 61.7025 60.4877778 64.5608333 58.7155556 64.8090848 63.5222222 64.9295332 60.5372222 66.0063889 61.7830556 60.8897222 61.5436111 62.1522556 61.7962564 62.9886111 62.3238889 63.3852778 61.6269444 65.1719444 60.8647222 62.0588695 63.3838889 65.2636111 57.7808333 63.1350512 56.2019444 55.6877778 59.0619444 63.3366667 60.5337752 62.0838889 61.6558333 62.3166667 61.1025 60.3430556 60.5855556 59.0791667 64.8722222 61.0680556 57.7667 57.5130556 60.4996523 63.8730556 53.8736111 55.1840915 57.6377778 61.1308333 67.0138889 70.6369444 65.6091667 55.4119444 61.5813889 56.1152778 64.6813889 64.1528375 58.0711111 60.7730556 61.7472222 61.8197222 67.41 57.6822222 57.781737 56.4708333 59.5469444 longitude -176.6580556 -152.7652264 -154.1702778 -161.4313889 -161.2138889 -165.7730556 -164.6152778 -152.7072222 -141.1314 -158.6177778 -152.9097222 -152.6455556 -150.9775 -157.8513889 -151.7358333 -149.9002778 -151.8313889 -149.1869444 -163.279515 -134.5838889 -159.5222222 -160.2066667 -145.5377778 -174.2005556 -162.2730556 -157.3994444 -173.124245 -134.6597222 -154.5072442 -147.5333333 -156.7886111 -149.395 -147.3963889 -162.0305556 -151.0827778 -161.7558333 -151.5161111 -145.8422222 -149.9544444 -163.7788889 -145.8190168 -166.4891667 -161.1230556 -149.09999 -149.0333333 -161.9244444 -148.9508333 -144.8030556 -143.7222222 -148.4936111 -150.1016667 -164.2658333 -146.0555556 -148.0357455 -148.0113889 -165.5863889 -148.4627778 -141.9361111 -158.4022222 -158.5302391 -158.7625 -135.8964089 -152.1825 -142.0408333 -144.6541704 -144.4369444 -159.245 -149.4819444 -164.1722222 -144.0605556 -151.3936111 -158.5508333 -149.1630556 -132.8277778 -151.3063889 -162.7211111 -150.1841667 -147.8027778 -149.8341667 -145.3297294 -145.4205556 -145.7575 -163.6763889 -136.025 -133.1483333 -158.1108333 -149.3666667 -134.7111111 -148.5116667 -162.7172222 -145.7322222 -145.21773 -151.5575 -158.4575 -168.92315 -144.0644444 -144.0438889 -134.3925 -144.6652778 -166.5422 -141.2 -149.5677778 -141.1136111 -133.6622222 -162.0244444 -157.3758333 -147.05442 -149.3622222 -158.5533853 -157.4752778 -136.3433333 -162.2605556 -164.5230556 -148.0144444 -150.2144444 -147.1680556 -151.5080556 -135.4366667 -145.6351157 -147.7163889 -163.415 -147.695391 -149.14215 -149.1302778 -149.23613 -158.0075 -145.57398 -145.2738889 -149.12006 -147.6183333 -150.9583333 -151.2952778 -150.7622222 -145.3019444 -156.9275 -171.7411111 -135.5077778 -149.2408333 -157.7177778 -149.1663889 -147.50484 -145.5463889 -148.0083822 -163.0291667 -161.5875 -160.0647222 -145.3822222 -135.7369444 -135.444114 -151.225 -163.8941667 -151.7322222 -146.5991 -148.9661111 -144.6998325 -133.3533333 -132.6363889 -159.7713889 -151.5483333 -135.4436111 -166.0966667 -149.6402778 -149.8180556 -154.2555556 -156.3997222 -132.8266667 -130.0247222 -155.8947222 -154.9110837 -149.5136111 -159.4833333 -151.5102778 -134.4197222 -151.4341667 -151.0747 -153.7955164 -133.9472222 -143.6238889 -151.29 -160.3052778 -158.7219444 -156.0431783 -154.4555556 -132.4008333 -162.5180556 -151.2744444 -151.2583333 -144.9483333 -131.6461111 -160.4227778 -162.3102778 -168.0572222 -156.6613889 -164.0413889 -164.5333333 -133.0958333 -135.8844444 -149.60012 -148.91237 -156.8811111 -152.4072222 -152.60004 -154.7761111 -157.2844444 -162.8951327 -163.5533333 -162.5966667 -161.1569444 -157.7008333 -132.9805556 -161.4358333 -163.1341667 -146.5511111 -152.3122222 -149.3066138 -153.9786111 -148.9455556 -156.8588889 -155.4355556 -148.5447222 -131.6361111 -149.4411111 -160.3580556 -135.5655556 -150.6338889 -159.0583333 -162.0811111 -165.0677585 -142.9216667 -155.5958333 -148.9141667 -149.6011111 -166.185 -146.45 -143.7691667 -164.4991078 -131.5722222 -132.2563889 -151.4347222 -149.349708 -147.1436111 -149.3688889 -136.0911111 -163.7294444 -135.3758333 -143.0086111 -157.0138889 -151.9208333 -158.6741667 -161.9519444 -161.7661111 -133.1847222 -146.7686111 -161.206974 -149.0930556 -152.64769 -154.8972222 -157.3119444 -164.6294444 -164.7238889 -151.2888889 -151.6105556 -154.375 -168.8677778 -151.6688889 -162.9652778 -165.4063889 -154.8458333 -161.0327778 -147.3494444 -141.9372222 -141.7772222 -141.9516667 -150.9763889 -158.1030556 -164.8411111 -162.4594444 -161.8636111 -153.3038889 -161.77 -152.5022222 -165.8394444 -149.1127778 -162.7071458 -145.6130556 -154.1061111 -136.2275 -159.1632767 -132.9512425 -150.7655556 -157.5791667 -162.875 -163.2877778 -161.8163889 -146.8686111 -133.6211111 -166.7347222 -163.008442 -149.9783333 -150.6882074 -154.49109 -157.7175 -134.6444444 -154.3127778 -166.8458333 -151.8297222 -158.6249699 -152.8822222 -133.5980556 -152.5827778 -149.3441667 -148.3372222 -161.9158333 -150.17 -157.3125 -162.8561111 -151.0852778 -155.4869444 -161.3202778 -169.5416667 -163.1658333 -162.0391667 -170.275 -151.3194369 -146.9021 -160.4972222 -170.4788889 -131.5958333 -165.5816667 -160.0069444 -151.7113889 -151.6519444 -149.4422222 -159.5619444 -161.1538889 174.1121 -166.0719444 -157.1363889 -145.35541 -135.33 -135.3138889 -151.3977778 -143.9611111 -157.1697222 -151.0583333 -164.4391667 -156.9980556 -147.7854312 -162.2880556 -147.3953282 -150.7647222 -149.0908333 -156.5880556 -149.4211111 -150.5125 -149.734371 -148.85051 -156.0641667 -150.1094444 -143.3463889 -149.4280556 -152.0788889 -146.6786111 -145.4284212 -153.2822222 -166.3608333 -135.2188889 -142.5238796 -132.185 -132.5222222 -160.3763889 -142.9855556 -165.1036627 -146.0702778 -145.1752778 -150.2313889 -160.9616667 -162.6630556 -165.2558333 -160.275 -147.0383333 -151.1369444 -153.4 -157.3975 -165.1988597 -160.7880556 -166.5366667 -160.5050438 -153.9994444 -146.3483333 -146.4186111 -160.0383333 -168.0875 -131.7227778 -149.4394444 -133.1208333 -163.4055556 -145.9064053 -135.4297222 -148.6838889 -150.0375 -145.2122222 -150.1075 -152.6686111 -152.349075 -132.3766667 -139.7272222 aea_energy_region__name Aleutians Kodiak Kodiak Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim Aleutians Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim Yukon-Koyukuk/Upper Tanana Yukon-Koyukuk/Upper Tanana Bristol Bay Kodiak Yukon-Koyukuk/Upper Tanana North Slope Northwest Arctic North Slope Railbelt Railbelt Railbelt Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim Southeast Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim Yukon-Koyukuk/Upper Tanana Yukon-Koyukuk/Upper Tanana Aleutians Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim North Slope Aleutians Southeast Kodiak Railbelt North Slope Railbelt Yukon-Koyukuk/Upper Tanana Aleutians Railbelt Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim Yukon-Koyukuk/Upper Tanana Railbelt Railbelt Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim Yukon-Koyukuk/Upper Tanana Bering Straits Northwest Arctic Railbelt Railbelt Northwest Arctic Railbelt Yukon-Koyukuk/Upper Tanana Yukon-Koyukuk/Upper Tanana Yukon-Koyukuk/Upper Tanana Railbelt Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim Yukon-Koyukuk/Upper Tanana Railbelt Copper River/Chugach Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim Railbelt Yukon-Koyukuk/Upper Tanana Bristol Bay Bristol Bay Bristol Bay Southeast Kodiak Copper River/Chugach Copper River/Chugach Copper River/Chugach Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim Railbelt Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim Yukon-Koyukuk/Upper Tanana Railbelt Bristol Bay Railbelt Southeast Railbelt Aleutians Yukon-Koyukuk/Upper Tanana Railbelt Railbelt Copper River/Chugach Copper River/Chugach Copper River/Chugach Bering Straits Southeast Southeast Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim Railbelt Southeast North Slope Northwest Arctic Railbelt Railbelt Railbelt Bristol Bay Bering Straits Yukon-Koyukuk/Upper Tanana Yukon-Koyukuk/Upper Tanana Southeast Yukon-Koyukuk/Upper Tanana Aleutians Yukon-Koyukuk/Upper Tanana Railbelt Yukon-Koyukuk/Upper Tanana Southeast Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim Bristol Bay Railbelt Railbelt Bristol Bay Bristol Bay Southeast Bering Straits Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim Railbelt Yukon-Koyukuk/Upper Tanana Railbelt Yukon-Koyukuk/Upper Tanana Southeast Copper River/Chugach Railbelt Aleutians Railbelt Railbelt Railbelt Railbelt Yukon-Koyukuk/Upper Tanana Railbelt Yukon-Koyukuk/Upper Tanana Railbelt Railbelt Railbelt Railbelt Railbelt Copper River/Chugach Yukon-Koyukuk/Upper Tanana Bering Straits Southeast Railbelt Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim Railbelt Railbelt Copper River/Chugach Railbelt Bering Straits Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim Yukon-Koyukuk/Upper Tanana Copper River/Chugach Southeast Southeast Railbelt Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim Railbelt Railbelt Railbelt Yukon-Koyukuk/Upper Tanana Southeast Southeast Yukon-Koyukuk/Upper Tanana Railbelt Southeast Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim Railbelt Railbelt Yukon-Koyukuk/Upper Tanana Yukon-Koyukuk/Upper Tanana Southeast Southeast Bristol Bay Bristol Bay Railbelt Bristol Bay Railbelt Southeast Railbelt Railbelt Kodiak Southeast North Slope Railbelt Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim Yukon-Koyukuk/Upper Tanana Kodiak Kodiak Southeast Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim Railbelt Railbelt Copper River/Chugach Southeast Northwest Arctic Aleutians Bering Straits Bristol Bay Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim Northwest Arctic Southeast Southeast Railbelt Railbelt Northwest Arctic Kodiak Kodiak Bristol Bay Bristol Bay Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim Northwest Arctic Bering Straits Yukon-Koyukuk/Upper Tanana Southeast Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim Railbelt Yukon-Koyukuk/Upper Tanana Railbelt Kodiak Railbelt Bristol Bay Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim Yukon-Koyukuk/Upper Tanana Southeast Railbelt Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim Southeast Yukon-Koyukuk/Upper Tanana Bristol Bay Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim Bering Straits Copper River/Chugach Yukon-Koyukuk/Upper Tanana Railbelt Railbelt Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim Copper River/Chugach Copper River/Chugach Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim Southeast Southeast Railbelt Yukon-Koyukuk/Upper Tanana Railbelt Railbelt Southeast Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim Southeast Copper River/Chugach Bristol Bay Railbelt Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim Southeast Copper River/Chugach Aleutians Railbelt Yukon-Koyukuk/Upper Tanana Bristol Bay Bristol Bay Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim Railbelt Railbelt Yukon-Koyukuk/Upper Tanana Aleutians Railbelt Northwest Arctic Bering Straits Bristol Bay Northwest Arctic Railbelt Yukon-Koyukuk/Upper Tanana Yukon-Koyukuk/Upper Tanana Yukon-Koyukuk/Upper Tanana North Slope Yukon-Koyukuk/Upper Tanana Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim Kodiak Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim Kodiak Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim Railbelt Aleutians Copper River/Chugach Bristol Bay Southeast Bristol Bay Southeast Railbelt Bristol Bay Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim Railbelt Southeast North Slope North Slope Railbelt Railbelt Bristol Bay Bristol Bay Southeast Bristol Bay Bering Straits Railbelt Bristol Bay Kodiak Southeast Kodiak Railbelt North Slope Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim Yukon-Koyukuk/Upper Tanana Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim Northwest Arctic Railbelt Yukon-Koyukuk/Upper Tanana Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim Aleutians Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim Bering Straits Aleutians Railbelt Railbelt Aleutians Bering Straits Southeast Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim Northwest Arctic Railbelt Railbelt Railbelt Yukon-Koyukuk/Upper Tanana Bering Straits Aleutians Bering Straits Northwest Arctic Copper River/Chugach Southeast Southeast Railbelt Copper River/Chugach Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim Railbelt Bering Straits Bristol Bay Railbelt Bering Straits Railbelt Railbelt Yukon-Koyukuk/Upper Tanana Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim Railbelt Railbelt Railbelt Railbelt Yukon-Koyukuk/Upper Tanana Railbelt Yukon-Koyukuk/Upper Tanana Railbelt Yukon-Koyukuk/Upper Tanana Copper River/Chugach Copper River/Chugach Yukon-Koyukuk/Upper Tanana Bering Straits Southeast Yukon-Koyukuk/Upper Tanana Southeast Southeast Bristol Bay Yukon-Koyukuk/Upper Tanana Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim Copper River/Chugach Copper River/Chugach Railbelt Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim Bristol Bay Railbelt Railbelt Kodiak Bristol Bay Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim Bering Straits Aleutians Aleutians Kodiak Copper River/Chugach Yukon-Koyukuk/Upper Tanana North Slope Bering Straits Southeast Railbelt Southeast Bering Straits Railbelt Southeast Railbelt Railbelt Copper River/Chugach Yukon-Koyukuk/Upper Tanana Kodiak Kodiak Southeast Southeast AEA ID